Analysis of the Accuracy Potential of a Stereo High-Speed Camera System in 3D Measurements in Highly Dynamic Experiments

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

The paper is well structured and organized with clearly defined objectives, results and analysis. Methodological aspects are well covered. The results represent a contribution to the academic community

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

Overall, the paper discusses an interesting topic regarding the potential use of a stereo camera system in order to investigate rigid-body transformation. However, I have found several issues that may request further clarity from the authors, as follows:

-          Abstract: who will benefit from this study?

-          Introduction: The authors need to differentiate a section of general background and existing studies for the sake of clarity.

-          Page 4: Table 1 needs references

-          In general, the authors use a lot of figures and tables but do not find significant analysis, and only contain very little description. For example, Page 4: the authors need to explain/elaborate further on Figure 2 and Table 2

-          Methodology: given the complexity of methods proposed by authors, I highly suggest generating a workflow that describes a procedural step of the study.

-          The authors need to elaborate further conclusion part. Limitations and further recommendations are also required.

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 3 Report

1. For me, the title should not include the initial part, i.e. "Methods for", because the article describes specific studies, not "methods"

2. Reference 8 does not contain a complete description

3. Line 229 is not correct 

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Round 2

Reviewer 2 Report

Dear Authors

Thank you for responding to my feedback.

One small comment: I guess the general background should be put first before related works in the introduction. 

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf