Next Article in Journal
SMIFormer: Learning Spatial Feature Representation for 3D Object Detection from 4D Imaging Radar via Multi-View Interactive Transformers
Previous Article in Journal
Autonomous Internet of Things (IoT) Data Reduction Based on Adaptive Threshold
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Correction of Spacecraft Magnetic Field Noise: Initial Korean Pathfinder Lunar Orbiter MAGnetometer Observation in Solar Wind

Sensors 2023, 23(23), 9428; https://doi.org/10.3390/s23239428
by Junhyun Lee 1, Ho Jin 1,*, Khan-Hyuk Kim 1, Hyeonhu Park 1, Wooin Jo 1, Yunho Jang 1, Hyeonji Kang 1, Eunhyeuk Kim 2 and Young-Jun Choi 3
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2:
Sensors 2023, 23(23), 9428; https://doi.org/10.3390/s23239428
Submission received: 23 October 2023 / Revised: 16 November 2023 / Accepted: 24 November 2023 / Published: 26 November 2023
(This article belongs to the Section Physical Sensors)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

Please see attached file.

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Please see the attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

Dear Authors,

your work is interesting, well structured and the procedure seems giving good results. The cleanliness procedure is not so easy and some improvements on the description might be helpful for the reader to follow the text. In this respect, I suggest the use of some schematic images.

Attached is a commented version of your paper, where I indicated what is not clear and should be corrected/improved.

A point that is not clear is about the high frequency noise: it is described theoretically that amplification of High-Frequency noise can happen when similar data are used for the correction procedure and how to mitigate it, but then it not shown in the experimental case, or at least it is not clear. Please, describe it in detail in paragraph 4.

Last point is about the application of the technique: I understand that it cannot be done once and for all, but instead it has to be applied each time some disturbances from the vessel happens. Please clearly specify it in the introduction and conclusions.

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Comments on the Quality of English Language

The quality of the English Language is fine in my opinion, I just indicated some terms here and there that might be better clarified.

Author Response

Please see the attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Round 2

Reviewer 2 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

Dear Authors,

I appreciate that you have taken on board all my comments and suggestions. In my opinion your paper is now clear and straightforward.

I have just one last suggestion about Figure 2. Make it in higher quality or with bigger letters, so as to be able to read also subscrips by zooming it in the pdf version.

Best regards

Back to TopTop