Next Article in Journal
Measuring Labor Input: Construction Activity Counting Using IMU on Hand Tools
Previous Article in Journal
Whispering-Gallery Mode Micro-Ring Resonator Integrated with a Single-Core Fiber Tip for Refractive Index Sensing
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Biodegradable Carrageenan-Based Force Sensor: An Experimental Approach

by
Uldis Žaimis
1,*,
Jūratė Jolanta Petronienė
2,
Andrius Dzedzickis
2,* and
Vytautas Bučinskas
2
1
Institute of Science and Innovative Technology, Liepaja University, 3401 Liepaja, Latvia
2
Department of Mechatronics, Robotics, and Digital Manufacturing, Vilnius Gediminas Technical University, 10105 Vilnius, Lithuania
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sensors 2023, 23(23), 9423; https://doi.org/10.3390/s23239423
Submission received: 26 October 2023 / Revised: 23 November 2023 / Accepted: 24 November 2023 / Published: 26 November 2023
(This article belongs to the Section Sensor Materials)

Abstract

:
The development of low-cost biodegradable pressure or force sensors based on a carrageenan and iron (III) oxide mix is a promising way to foster the spread of green technologies in sensing applications. The proposed materials are inexpensive and abundant and are available in large quantities in nature. This paper presents the development and experimental study of carrageenan and iron (III)-oxide-based piezoresistive sensor prototypes and provides their main characteristics. The results show that glycerol is required to ensure the elasticity of the material and preserve the material from environmental impact. The composition of the carrageenan-based material containing 1.8% Fe2O3 and 18% glycerol is suitable for measuring the load in the range from 0 N to 500 N with a sensitivity of 0.355 kΩ/N when the active surface area of the sensor is 100 mm2. Developed sensors in the form of flexible film have square resistance dependence to the force/pressure, and due to the soft original material, they face the hysteresis effect and some plastic deformation effect in the initial use stages. This paper contains extensive reference analysis and found a firm background for a new sensor request. The research covers the electric and mechanical properties of the developed sensor and possible future applications.

1. Introduction

Flexible force or pressure sensors, known from 1900 [1], have currently become among the most demanded electronic components. The wide variety in their typical application fields set specific requirements for such sensors: they must be functional, inexpensive, meet environmental protection requirements, and be harmless to humans. Flexible force sensors are required to quantify the applied force or pressure, efficiently converting the mechanical deformation into an electrical signal [2]. The flexibility of the force sensor allows them to conform to irregular surfaces, allowing more accurate and precise force measurements [3]. Flexible force sensors typically consist of a flexible substrate material, such as polyimide, silicone, etc., that serves as the base for the sensing elements and conductive materials, such as carbon or silver particles [4]. The specific sensing mechanism may vary depending on the design, but common approaches include piezoresistive, capacitive, or optical sensing principles [5,6,7].
The operating range of force sensors generally depends on the properties of the material used and the mechanical design of the sensor [8]. A well-known example of such a sensor is a force-sensitive resistor (FSR) [9]. With the emergence of flexible force sensors, some of the FSR problems were solved, but new challenges were raised, and the best combination of substrate and conductive materials can still be improved. However, gel-based sensors typically suffer from significant hysteresis and sensor sensitivity variation with respect to time or changes in the environmental conditions. Therefore, the main challenge parameter for the piezoresistive flexible force sensors is repeatability and linearity, which could be ensured by improving the characteristics of the sensitive material or implementing smart signal acquisition [10] and processing techniques. Multi-criteria research on flexible force sensors leads to various unexpected solutions, such as the construction of flexible force sensors on a piece of paper [11].
The aim of this paper is to present the experimental research on piezoresistive flexible force sensors produced from the original combination of a carrageenan-based substrate and iron oxide conductive fillers. The paper presents the most promising combinations of material compositions and provides detailed characteristics of the sensor prototypes.

2. State-of-the-Art: Natural-Materials-Based Force Sensors

Biodegradable force sensors are a specific type of technology designed to be environmentally friendly and capable of naturally degrading over time. These sensors are typically made from biocompatible and biodegradable materials, allowing them to break down and dissolve into nontoxic components when exposed to specific environmental conditions. Flexible biodegradable force sensors find applications in various fields where temporary force monitoring or sensing is needed, for example, in biomedicine, environmental monitoring, or agricultural applications. Like most flexible sensors, they can also be used in medical implants or wearable devices to monitor the forces applied during rehabilitation or assistive activities [12,13]. The construction of biodegradable force sensors often involves the use of organic or biobased materials, such as natural polymers or composites. The materials for constructing biodegradable force sensors are usually selected by their ability to degrade through natural processes such as enzymatic or microbial degradation [14,15]. Crucial in the context of this work are studies of the aerobic composting of biodegradable plastics; therefore, a recent report by Kalita et al. [16] presents a mathematical model for the biodegradability of several polymers with good empirical coincidence.

2.1. Biodegradability of Biosensor Materials

It is worth noting that the research and development of biodegradable force sensors is ongoing, and advancements in materials science and sensor technology continue to improve their performance, sensitivity, and degradation properties. Reviewing the most exciting solutions for biodegradable polymer-based force sensors, the work of Yu et al. [17] is worth mentioning. Researchers have developed biodegradable force sensors using polymer-based materials, such as polylactic acid (PLA) or polyhydroxyalkanoates (PHA). These sensors can be integrated into medical implants or wearable devices to monitor the forces exerted during rehabilitation exercises or assistive activities. Ma et al. [18] presented another eco-friendly force sensor solution for temporary force monitoring based on the use of starch—a renewable and biodegradable material developed by incorporating conductive materials within a starch matrix.
The sustainable use of cellulose or cellulose-nanofiber-based materials for sensors is also an essential issue; for example, Su et al. [19] proposed that cellulose nanofibers derived from sustainable sources such as wood or plants could be used to produce biodegradable force sensors. These sensors exhibit good mechanical properties and can measure forces in various applications, including environmental monitoring or agricultural settings.
Silk-based force sensors are also considered a sustainable solution [20,21]. This natural protein fiber is suitable for the development of biodegradable force sensors, which can be implanted or integrated into medical devices to measure forces in biomedical applications. These sensors are biocompatible and gradually degrade with time.
Biodegradable gelatin, derived from collagen, has been investigated for creating a biodegradable force sensor by Wang et al. [22]. The authors defined that the incorporation of conductive materials or microstructures within gelatin matrices makes it possible to develop sensors to monitor forces in applications such as tissue engineering or drug delivery systems.
Generally, the use of biodegradable force sensors offers several advantages. First, they minimize environmental impact by reducing the accumulation of non-biodegradable waste. Second, they eliminate the need for sensor retrieval or removal after use, as they naturally degrade over time. This feature is particularly beneficial in applications where the sensors are implanted or deployed in hard-to-reach or sensitive environments. Finally, biodegradable sensors can provide real-time force data during their functional lifespan, enabling the monitoring and analysis of force-related parameters.

2.2. Application of Seaweed-Derived Carrageenan in the Development of Biodegradable Force Sensors and Combination with Metal Salts and Metal Oxides

Red algae are photosynthetic eukaryotes with an extracellular matrix consisting of a complex of supramolecular networks connecting cells. The structure of the extracellular complex depends on the algae species and the life-cycle stage. The main components of the extracellular complex are sulfated galactans such as agars, porphyrins, and carrageenans [23]. Thus, polysaccharides retain water and sometimes work as phycocolloids with gelling and viscosity properties depending on the biopolymer’s structural modifications. Gel formation and thermo-versability are the most critical features of carrageenan. Like all biopolymers, carrageenan undergoes aging and syneresis. Isopropyl alcohol or 2-propyl alcohol is used to precipitate carrageenan from the extraction liquid. Therefore, 2-propanol can be observed in the final samples produced, where this material acts as a surfactant [24].
Carrageenan [25] is a unit of naturally derived polysaccharides extracted from algae. Using established procedures for the acquisition of the carrageenan biopolymer, after algae extraction, polysaccharides are precipitated using ethanol or isopropanol [26,27]. In this way, the seaweed Furcellaria lumbricalis can be successfully used as a source for the development of a biodegradable force sensor matrix, in which electrically conductive elements (particles) are encapsulated at evenly distributed distances and approach each other corresponding to the applied force, thus, changing the electrical resistance [28,29].
Therefore, carrageenan, which has a history of use for human purposes, was rediscovered in sensing technologies when the application of rubber-like materials and gels in sensor production became available. In general, conductive hydrogels, as a separate class that changes their electrical properties in response to the applied force, are attractive due to their self-healing, good conductivity, and flexibility [30].
The chemical structure of carrageenan located in the outer cell wall and the intracellular matrix of algae tissue [31] depends on the species of red algae and extraction methods. Carrageenans are linear anionic sulfated polysaccharides or sulfate galactose biopolymers composed of galactose and anhydrous-galactose and are divided into types according to repeating disaccharide units [32]. The major subtypes of carrageenan are kappa, iota, and lambda. Kappa or K-carrageenan forms strong gels, iota or i-carrageenan forms soft gels, and lambda carrageenan does not make a gel. Carrageenan subtypes differ in the number of sulfate groups in the hexose scaffold skeleton of plant molecules and contain some negatively charged sulfate ester groups per disaccharide unit [33].
In some cases, the extraction result may be kappa–iota hybrids of carrageenan. As a hydrophilic colloid, K-carrageenan is popular as a gelling agent in many manufacturing fields and has thermal response behavior as a sol-gel transition and gelation ability [34].
As a biopolymer, carrageenan carries out such properties as an antioxidant, antibacterial agent, anti-coagulant, and immune modulator [33]. The gelling properties of carrageenans depend on the structure of its molecule. One way to gelatinize is to apply polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) to provide the elasticity of the carrageenan biopolymer [35]. As an anionic polysaccharide, carrageenan can absorb the surface lipid droplets at pH3 to pH6 better than other marine polysaccharides. Emulsions of carrageenan with NaCl are stable, have high viscosity, and are applicable for different purposes [36].
The structural properties of carrageenan gels can be tuned by changing the salt concentration by adding KCl and CaCl2 to kappa and iota carrageenans, and their mixtures [37]. Different concentrations of salts are necessary for the gelation of ι-carrageenan, κ-carrageenan, and Ca2+ ions, causing the stiffer k-carrageenan network induced by K+ ion [37]. Morris E.R. [38] investigated the influence on carrageenan and reported that the presence of K+, Rg+, Cs+, and high concentrations of Na+ influences gel formation. Smidsrod also investigated the gelling mechanism [39]. The elastic modulus of κ-carrageenan gels with Ca2+ was investigated by P. MacArtain [40].
As is known, all polysaccharides as anionic biopolymers interact with water via hydrogen bonding. This means that in a biopolymer, the solvent works only on a hydrogen-bonded network, and this network retains unpolymerized molecules in its structure. The Flory–Huggins (FH) [41] theory describes the behavior of polysaccharides, two-phase systems, solvent separation, etc. Many models in the literature are dedicated to defining the elastic pressure of biopolymers, which, together with osmotic pressure and swelling ratios [42] defining the strength and stability, are named as the main characteristics of such materials. The uniaxial compression can be described by the theory of non-linear elasticity [43,44].
Due to many variations in the structure of carrageenan and its combination with other materials, many reports have been dedicated to carrageenan application in sensors. Tao [45] reported on the tactile biopolymer-based sensor made of carrageenan cross-linked with polyacrylic acid (PAM) as a pyramidal biopolymer with good mechanical properties. Adding metals to biopolymers containing PAM chains enhances the mechanical properties of the biopolymer. Qiang Zheng [46,47] reported about a κ-carrageenan/polyacrylamide biopolymer with remarkable mechanical performance as a strain sensor and good stability by using Zr4+ ions, cross-linked with PAM. The k-carrageenan with the nano-TiO2–anthocyanin layer is an indicator. On the contrary, the TiO2–agar layer works due to the strong adhesion between these two hydrophilic colloid layers [48].
Zhifeng Pan proposed stretchable sensors based on carrageenan for self-healing carrageenan-based sensors [49]. C.M. Costa [50] announced a 3D-printed carrageenan-based sensing device with multi-wall carbon nanotubes. M.M. Khodaei [51] presented a compound based on carrageenan–metformin nanoparticles produced using Fe3O4 magnetic particles. They mentioned carrageenan as an excellent material for sensors. Youshiyuki Nishio investigated the nano incorporation of iron oxides as magnetic compounds [52]. Chang [53] presented the successful application of carrageenan as a resistive switching layer for resistive memory devices. It is necessary to note that the composition of carrageenan with Fe2O3 nanoparticles was only mentioned as a gas sensor for medical purposes and investigated by analyzing carrageenan as a biological study object [54].
Marine polysaccharides have wide applications in industry, and there are reports of various development routes for this biopolymer. The transformation of the enchanted copolymerization of the K-carrageenan structure by microwave irradiation in aqueous medium results in polymers with enchanted characteristics [38,55]. Carrageenan is commonly applied as an emulsifier, stabilizer, thickener, and gelation agent in cosmetics and foods around the world. However, in the European Union (EU), its use in the food industry is restricted by legal regulations. However, carrageenan was treated as an antiviral material that could be used for medical purposes [33]. The antivirus feature of carrageenans is useful in designing products for natural environments.

2.3. The Role of Iron (III) Oxide in the Force Sensor Structure

Iron (III) oxide, with good semiconductor properties, is gaining broader applications and is attractive because of the properties of this material: mechanical, magnetic, catalytic, sorption, semiconductor, thermal, electrical, and capillary [56]. Currently, iron (III) oxide synthesis using microbial and plant extracts has already been achieved. It is an efficient and inexpensive process. Therefore, iron (III) oxide is favored as a green chemistry method. Therefore, using iron (III) oxide in combination with seaweed-derived carrageenan should be relevant for green course solutions [57]. Carrageenan, composed with Fe2O3 as super-porous matrices with spherical morphology, is applicable for high-flux magnetic field extended bed adsorption [58].
The manufacturing of flexible compression sensors usually has the challenge of connecting working-sensitive material to the electronic parts of a sensor. One of the important procedures in force sensor manufacturing is connecting wires or contacts to the working part of the sensor. Copper foil is usually offered for the electrical connection to assemble the sensor [59]. The alumina wire as a connector is well-studied also. The adsorption of carrageenan on alumina increased in the presence of surfactants [60], and this characteristic must influence the quality of the contact in the sensor. The adsorption on the surface is a complex process and is not fully understood yet [61].
It is important to note that the field of biodegradable force sensors is an active area of research, and advancements are being made to explore new materials, fabrication techniques, and applications. The reports mentioned above highlight the potential of utilizing biodegradable materials for force sensing while minimizing the environmental impact.

3. Materials and Methods

3.1. Materials and Devices

All the solutions were prepared using deionized water. All the chemicals (isopropanol, Fe2O3, other metal oxides, and glycerol) were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (Taufkirchen, Germany). All the main materials, such as aluminum foil, transparent plastic plates, etc., were obtained according to the description of the internal procedures of the laboratories. The carrageenan was prepared from seaweed Furcellaria lumbricalis in the scientific lab of Liepaja University, Latvia [24,62,63].
The micrographs were made by the custom-made robotic micro-positioning system operated by open-source Linux CNC 2.8.4 and equipped with a digital microscope consisting of a camera with a SONY IMX334 1/1.8-inch sensor (Sony, Tokyo, Japan) and monocular objective with zoom capabilities up to 400 times.
The determination of the mechanical properties of the prepared material samples was performed experimentally by using the computer-controlled tension–compression machine Mecmesim MultiTest 2.5-i (Mecmesim Limited, Slinfold, West Sussex, UK, maximum load: 2500 N; maximum sample diameter: 134 mm; load sensor measurement error: ± 0.1%; speed range: 1–1000 mm/min). The testing machine was controlled by the software “Emperor v1.18” (Mecmesin Limited, Slinfold, West Sussex, UK). In our case, 25 N and 1000 N load cells were mounted on the testing machine gripper and used for the experimental research. The resistance measurement was performed using a UNI-T UT55 Multimeter; the measurement accuracy fits within ±2%.
Micrographs of the sample cross-sections were obtained by using a scanning electron microscope (SEM) at Liepaja University, Latvia, using a Hitachi TM3000 tabletop microscope (Hitachi, Tokyo, Japan).

3.2. Sample Preparation

The carrageenan gel extracted from seaweeds and prepared for the next steps was stored at 9 °C. The preparation of the biopolymer was performed in the following order.
The carrageenan gel was heated in a 70 °C temperature water bath. Before the experimental procedures, isopropanol was stored at a temperature of −18 °C. Cold isopropanol was suddenly poured into the same amount of hot carrageenan gel solution in a ratio of one part of solvent to one part of the gel and stirred vigorously until a stiff biopolymer had formed. The polymerization process begins immediately after the first drops of isopropanol contact the carrageenan gel. The end of the polymerization process is evaluated visually. The detailed procedure of the biopolymer preparation is given by Zaimis [62]. The prepared biopolymer with the water–isopropanol mixture was tightly closed and stored at 9 °C. After, the prepared mass from the carrageenan gel was filtered through a sieve to separate the liquid phase from the biopolymer. The produced mass of biopolymer shows thread-like disordered segments with chaotic connections. The biopolymer mass separated from the liquid was mixed with selected additives (metal oxides) and placed in a container to form a film approximately 2 mm thick.
After the initial investigation with different metal oxides, the Fe2O3 was selected. Based on the newly obtained experimental data from our research group, the literature review, and our co-authors’ [64] previous publications, we selected iron oxide as a well-examined environmentally friendly material, not included in active industrial applications. The biopolymer mixed with Fe2O3 was heated again to melt and gently mixed, enriched with the different amounts of glycerol to avoid complete drying. Thus, the product’s elasticity was preserved most ecologically, without the additional hazardous materials, such as PVA glue or similar. The carrageenan biopolymer was mixed with Fe2O3 (from 1% to 5%), as the stable biopolymer structure was not forming at higher oxide concentrations. It was experimentally determined that samples containing approximately 1.8% Fe2O3 in the carrageenan biopolymer showed better mechanical properties (resistance to tearing, scratching, stretching) in the initial assessment and were selected as a composition suitable for the force sensor. The prepared product was transferred into a plastic Petri dish for drying at room temperature. The samples prepared in this way are elastic and flexible. The samples without the glycerol dried out and lost their flexibility within a week if placed in an open area.
Similar samples were prepared in two laboratories in Latvia and Lithuania to compare results and to check the correctness of the preparation protocol. For further experiments, samples with 10%, 15%, and 18% of the glycerol were selected. The prepared samples were stored at ambient temperature in a container protected from moisture loss. The size of the samples selected for the force experiments was approximately 700 mm2.
The prepared samples were investigated by optical microscope and SEM to understand the distribution of Fe2O3 in the biopolymer. An optical microscope was used to research the sample surface, and SEM was used to analyze the cross-section of the prepared samples.
The aging processes of the prepared samples were assessed by storing some of them at room temperature for more than two months and, after that, investigating their properties in a controlled compression bench as the other samples.

3.3. Experimental Section

The prepared material samples were placed into a special holder from a transparent 0.3 mm thick plastic film (Figure 1) to test the mechanical and electrical properties. The plastic holder is a base for fixing 10 mm width, 100 mm length, and 0.2 mm thickness electrodes made from aluminum foil. The electrodes were placed across the sensitive material and rotated by a 90-degree angle relative to each other. Therefore, after placing the produced biopolymer between them, a prototype of a force sensor with a sensitive area of 100 mm2 at the electrode’s intersection point was formed. The mentioned plastic holder also acted as a protective coating, sealing the biopolymer and protecting it from environmental impact. The used plastic film is relatively thin and much stiffer than the sample material; therefore, its effects on the material’s mechanical properties could be neglected.
The electrodes are made from aluminum since the aluminum and carrageenan interaction is well-studied, and it is known that any phenomenon in the pair of these materials could affect the results of the electrical characteristic measurements.
The measurements of the samples’ mechanical characteristics were complemented with parallel resistance measurements (Figure 1). The samples located in the holder were placed into the tension–compression machine, and, at the same time, electrodes were connected to a resistance measuring device.
At least three samples of each concentration of glycerol (10%, 15%, 18%) were tested by compressing them at a 1 mm/min speed while the load reached 500 N. After removing the compressing force, the relaxation time was registered by observing material resistance variation with a multimeter. The experiment and equipment were filmed using a smartphone to synchronize the data obtained from the multimeter and tension–compression machine.

4. Results

This section provides a set of experimental results obtained by researching the characteristics of pure carrageenan and later combining it with iron (III) oxide and glycerol.
Initially, the characteristics of the pure carrageenan liquid were defined. The ionic conductivity of the prepared pure carrageenan liquid gel is 0.27–0.28 mScm−1. The resistance of this liquid is from 0.038 MΩ to 1.6 MΩ when dried. The resistance of carrageenan biopolymer liquid with Fe2O3 is about 0.08 MΩ. The resistance of the dried sample ranges from 1.2 MΩ to 0.5 MΩ according to the amount of Fe2O3 in the sample.
Before evaluating the mechanical and electrical properties, the structure of the prepared samples was investigated under optical and scanning electron microscopes to evaluate the distribution of Fe2O3 particles in the biopolymer. As is seen from the sample cross-section micrographs (Figure 2), the Fe2O3 distribution in the film is even enough after evaluating the data. However, it should be noted that the density of Fe2O3 is higher than the density of the biopolymer. Therefore, Fe2O3 has the opportunity to settle on the bottom during sample drying.
In addition, it is seen that the particles of the chosen iron oxide differ in their size. The larger iron oxide particles are badly embedded into the biopolymer in the micrographs above. There are places in the micrographs with large iron oxide particles surrounded by dark places—air gaps. Such large particles can damage the biopolymer during compression and negatively influence the actual resistance due to air gaps. The sifted particles would improve the quality, but on the other hand, they would also increase the product cost. The micrographs of pure biopolymer and the prepared sample surfaces are presented in Figure 3. It is seen that the iron (III) oxide particles modify the surface of the biopolymer, making it smoother.
Figure 4 shows the influence of Fe2O3 concentration on resistance concerning time. It represents material stability and its sensitivity to environmental impact. These characteristics were obtained from new samples before starting the experiments with the load. The freshly prepared carrageenan biopolymer samples with iron (III) oxide show a dependence of the resistance values on metal oxide concentration when the sample is not loaded. From visual evaluation and resistance measurements, it was noticed that environmental humidity could negatively affect the samples. The samples without glycerol, which guarantees the elasticity of this product, are losing relevant properties. As the most stable composition, the samples with 1.6% to 2% Fe2O3 in the carrageenan biopolymer could be noted.
Detailed studies were carried out with a tension–compression machine after validating the suitability of the carrageenan iron oxide and glycerol composition as a sensitive material for force/pressure sensors. The obtained testing results are represented in the figures below. Figure 5 shows the hysteresis and relaxation time of a sample of carrageen-biopolymer composition with Fe2O3 and 10% glycerol. From Figure 5a,b, significant hysteresis and cycle-dependent characteristic drift, which is typical behavior for such materials, is noticeable. Moreover, non-linear sensitivity is noticeable; the angle of curve inclination drastically changes when the 20 N load value is reached. Therefore, sensor sensitivity characteristics can be divided into two parts: when the biopolymer structure withstands the load without significant deformation (approximately 20 N) and when the carrageenan product starts to deform plastically. Hysteresis as a mechanical behavior in the sensor material occurs due to the high internal friction of the material. This material has very low stiffness and, under high loads, can relax stresses by plastic deformation. Therefore, hysteresis here is unavoidable.
Comparing the relaxation results (Figure 5c,d), obtained by registering the resistance values 20 s after unloading the sample, it is possible to notice similar tendencies. In both cases, the average relaxation time is approximately 17 s, but in the case of relaxation after five cycles, the resistance variation concerning time seems more linear. The rearrangement of the conductive particles and destruction/damage in the biopolymer structure could explain the variation in sensor characteristics regarding the loading cycles.
The dependencies between sensor deformation and load are represented in Figure 6. It is seen that the variation in mechanical characteristics is less noticeable compared to electric ones. In the first and fifth loading cycles, the overall deformation almost equals 0.75 mm under a 500 N load. However, the data obtained from the fifth cycle show some minor fluctuations referring to internal changes in the material’s structure, for example, the rearrangement or break-up of the Fe2O3 particles.
Figure 7 provides the results of the sample prepared with 0.5 mL of glycerol added to 100 g of carrageenan liquid, resulting in a glycerol concentration of 15%.
Figure 7a provides a hysteresis of the sample with 15% glycerol, defined after five loading cycles. The shape of the obtained curve allows us to assume that sensor stiffness is relatively low and internal friction in the material causes significant energy losses when deformed. In addition, one can see that the hysteresis loop is shifted to the side of the higher loads and unevenly distributed in the range of the tested loads. A sudden change in sensor characteristics occurs when the load exceeds 30 N. Therefore, sensitivity in the load range from 0 to 30 N was observed in more detail (Figure 7b), defining that it is significantly better than in the remaining load range.
The dependency between displacement and load (Figure 7c) showed a non-linear relation, while displacement vs. resistance (Figure 7d) was almost linear. Such behavior confirms the hypothesis that material resistance changes mainly due to the variation in contact surface area between conductive particles due to the increasing or decreasing distances between them. Furthermore, the determined characteristics show that samples with 15% glycerol are better for measuring forces up to 3 N, and in case of higher loads, using this sensor only as a binary switch is more reliable.
The results obtained from testing samples with 0.6 mL of glycerol corresponding to the concentration of 18% are provided in Figure 7.
The hysteresis of the sample containing 18% glycerol (Figure 8a) is smaller compared to the sample with 15% glycerol. Still, in this case, a higher difference between the sensor response to the decreasing and increasing load is noticeable in the range from 20 to 150 N. After five loading cycles (Figure 8b), hysteresis becomes negligible for loads higher than 250 N but increases for the smaller loads. Such behaviors point to the properties typical for all flexible piezoresistive materials—their characteristics vary concerning the amount and types of the loading cycles. When using contact materials, ensuring electrical transmission depends on the microstructure of the materials [65,66,67], especially in our case, where iron (III) oxide and carrageenan are working in contact with alumina wires.
It is assumed that the absolute value of characteristic shifts could also be affected by the contact interaction features between the aluminum contact and sensor film. The same reason could also explain the slightly unstable behavior observed under loads below 20 N.
The dependency between displacement and load (Figure 8c) shows that the mechanical characteristics of the sample are similar to the sample containing 15% of glycerol. Still, this sample is stiffer, and the dependency between displacement and resistance (Figure 8d) is even more linear. Similarly, the linear part of the sensor sensitivity curve is more significant (Figure 8e). The linear relation between load and resistance exists in the load range from 20 N to 110 N. The relaxation time during which resistance increases to 90% of the initial value for this material composition is approximately 12 s.
In a comparison of all three compositions researched, the best results are shown for the sample containing 18% glycerol. Such results highlight that the glycerol in this biopolymer plays an essential role in retaining moisture, which helps self-heal the biopolymer and protects it from the damage and abrasion caused by iron oxide (III) oxide particles.

5. Discussion

The sensitivity and hysteresis characteristics of the tested samples show their different responses to the mechanical load values. The initial resistance of all the tested samples was approximately equal to 200 kΩ. However, when samples were tested with a 500 N load, the resistance of the samples containing 10% and 18% glycerol decreased to 2.3 kΩ and 7.1 kΩ, respectively. In comparison, the resistance of samples containing 15% glycerol remains in the range of 120 kΩ. Furthermore, the sensitivity characteristics of all the tested compositions are partly linear, and two intervals with different sensitivities are noticeable. For the material compositions containing 10% and 15% glycerol, a sudden sensitivity change was observed under the 20 N and 30 N loads. The composition containing 18% glycerol showed a smooth response, and a sensitivity change appeared approximately at a 160 N load in the case of the first load cycle. In contrast, it offered an almost linear response after the five loading cycles. Such results show that the glycerol concentration could have an impact on the material and the resistance between aluminum contacts and the biopolymer.
The evaluation of the deformation of the materials under the loads also revealed some unambiguous impact of the glycerol concentration on the stiffness of the material. The most exceptional results were provided in samples containing 15% glycerol; deformation under the 500 N load reached 1.75 mm, while samples containing 10% and 18% deformed 0.75 mm and 0.66 mm, respectively. The curves representing the resistance dependence on displacement were fitted using the polynomial fourth-order function. The fitting results (R-squared more than 0.998) proved that the mechanical behavior of all the compositions tested corresponded to the polynomial model, applicable when the energy of the deformation was continuously differentiable several times with respect to three strain invariants for compressible materials and two invariants for incompressible ones [43]. The polynomial model fits well to describe the material characteristics in the finite element method (FEM) and corresponds to the recommendation provided in [68], where various functional forms and math expressions were proposed to describe invariants for deformation tensors and principal stretches, and the polynomial model was presented as the most suitable for hyper-elastic materials.
The analysis of the dependencies between material deformation and resistance showed that resistance is linearly proportional to deformation, and the glycerol concentration does not have a significant impact on these characteristics. However, it affects the resistance between the biopolymer surface and the electrodes and could introduce some non-linearities, as was observed in the testing samples containing 15% glycerol.
The measurements of the material relaxation parameters showed typical behavior for piezoresistive elastic material. The average relaxation time for all the compositions tested was approximately 17 s. That is how long it took for the resistance to stop increasing after five loading cycles. However, the speed of the resistance change varied during the relaxation process. The highest values were observed during the first four seconds. The sample containing 18% of the glycerol achieved a resistance increase speed equal to 10 kΩ/s, and the sample with 15% of the glycerol, correspondingly, 7.5 kΩ/s. In the remaining part of the relaxation cycle, all samples showed a similar resistance increase speed, approximately equal to 6 kΩ/s. The relatively long relaxation process can be explained by the excessive impact of the load on the biopolymer structure; the variation in measurement values between cycles shows that the structure requires some time to recover. Furthermore, it should be noted that all compositions were tested under loads of up to 500 N to achieve plastic deformation of the sensor material. However, it should be noted that it is a significant load for such a type of material, and for real applications, the ratio between the maximum load and sensor size must be optimal to avoid the irreversible deformation of the material.
A systematic comparison of the characteristics of all tested material compositions shows that all of them could be used for force or pressure measurements (Figure 9).
The composition containing 18% glycerol demonstrates the best characteristics of the flexible force or pressure sensor with a sensitive area of 100 mm2 capable of operating in the load range from 0 to 500 N. This composition has the highest sensitivity—0.355 kΩ/N, the smallest hysteresis of 17.9 kΩ, and the lowest deformation of 0.52 mm. Consequently, the resistance variation during the relaxation process is also lower.
The analysis of all the experimentally obtained data shows the complicated impact of the glycerol concentration on the materials’ characteristics essential for use in sensing applications. A tricky glycerol impact was noticed in the observance of material deformation. The highest deformation was observed in the composition containing 15% glycerol, while other characteristics showed average values between 10% and 18% concentrations. From Figure 9, it appears that a higher concentration of glycerol ensures better characteristics. However, it is necessary to note that attempts to produce samples with concentrations higher than 18% were unsuccessful, as no stable film was formed.

6. Conclusions

Carrageenan, as a biopolymer with a wide application range and a long history of use for various human needs, including in the food industry, pharmaceutical production, etc., is a safe material in the human environment and could be used in contact with the human body. The abundance of carrageenan in the environment and its resistance to viruses have already found applications in medicine. However, the possibilities of applying carrageenan more efficiently and sustainably for everyday needs are economically beneficial and correspond to sustainability issues, forcing the replacement of polluting materials by materials that are safer and easier to recycle or reuse. Due to the ecological requirements for electronic products and the reduction of environmental pollution, by many authors, carrageenan is considered to be an excellent material for creating environmentally friendly biodegradable substrates for wearable electronics. Therefore, the capability of using carrageenan as a base material for force sensors was researched.
The results of this research point to these conclusions and future research:
  • The iron (III) oxide powder added into the carrageenan ensures the electric conductivity of the solution. However, it affects the cross-linking of biopolymer molecules and causes corresponding changes in its structure. The most promising results are provided by a composition containing 1.8% Fe2O3.
  • The pure composition of carrageenan and Fe2O3 powder demonstrates the piezoresistive properties, but the material characteristics are extremely sensitive to the humidity level of the material and the environmental impact.
  • Glycerol is a suitable material to stabilize the characteristics of carrageenan and Fe2O3 compositions. However, the glycerol concentration in the solution significantly impacts material electric conductivity elasticity and hysteresis. The most promising is a combination containing 18% glycerol.
  • The material composition containing 1.8% Fe2O3 and 18% glycerol is suitable for producing tactile force or pressure sensors, ensuring a sensitivity of 0.355 kΩ/N in the load range from 0 N to 500 N.
  • Varying the concentration of Fe2O3 and glycerol in the carrageenan makes it possible to optimize sensor characteristics regarding its specific use case while maintaining relatively low manufacturing costs and exploiting its environmentally friendly features.
  • The results of the performed research prove the suitability of the tested materials for implementation in sensing applications; however, the main direction for the future is more detailed research on long-term characteristics under various loads and the implementation of data processing algorithms capable of compensating for characteristic drift in a short period.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, V.B. and A.D.; methodology, U.Ž.; software, U.Ž.; validation, V.B. and A.D.; formal analysis, U.Ž. and J.J.P.; investigation, U.Ž. and J.J.P.; resources, U.Ž.; data curation, J.J.P.; writing—original draft preparation, J.J.P. and U.Ž.; writing—review and editing, V.B., A.D., and U.Ž., visualization, J.J.P.; supervision, V.B.; project administration, V.B.; funding acquisition, U.Ž. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was supported by Lithuanian Research Council Project No T22T091692 “Development and improvement of a structural parameter sensor using a scanning electrochemical microscope”.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Takei, K. History of Flexible and Stretchable Devices. In Flexible and Stretchable Medical Devices; Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA: Weinheim, Germany, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  2. Carvalho, H.; Yao, Y.; Gonçalves, L.M. Flexible force sensors for e-textiles. IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2017, 254, 072007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Chen, Y.W.; Pancham, P.P.; Mukherjee, A.; Martincic, E.; Lo, C.Y. Recent advances in flexible force sensors and their applications: A review. Flex. Print. Electron. 2022, 7, 033002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Chen, W.; Yan, X. Progress in achieving high-performance piezoresistive and capacitive flexible pressure sensors: A review. J. Mater. Sci. Technol. 2020, 43, 175–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Wang, C.; Liu, C.; Shang, F.; Niu, S.; Ke, L.; Zhang, N.; Ma, B.; Li, R.; Sun, X.; Zhang, S. Tactile sensing technology in bionic skin: A review. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2023, 220, 114882. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Du, J.; Ma, Q.; Wang, B.; Sun, L.; Liu, L. Hydrogel fibers for wearable sensors and soft actuators. iScience 2023, 26, 106796. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Pinelli, F.; Magagnin, L.; Rossi, F. Progress in hydrogels for sensing applications: A review. Mater. Today Chem. 2020, 17, 100317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Sadun, A.S.; Jalani, J.; Sukor, J.A. Force Sensing Resistor (FSR): A brief overview and the low-cost sensor for active compliance control. SPIE 2016, 10011, 222–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Liu, E.; Cai, Z.; Ye, Y.; Zhou, M.; Liao, H.; Yi, Y. An Overview of Flexible Sensors: Development, Application, and Challenges. Sensors 2023, 23, 817. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Hoffmann, K. Applying the Wheatstone Bridge Circuit; HBM: Darmstadt, Germany, 1974. [Google Scholar]
  11. Liu, X.Y.; O’Brien, M.; Mwangi, M.; Li, X.J.; Whitesides, G.M. Paper-based piezoresistive MEMS force sensors. In Proceedings of the 2011 IEEE 24th International Conference on Micro Electro Mechanical Systems, Cancun, Mexico, 23–27 January 2011; pp. 133–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Ali, G.A.M.; Thalji, M.R.; Salam, A.; Makhlouf, H. Biodegradable Materials: Fundamentals, Importance, and Impacts. In Handbook of Biodegradable Materials; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Ma, X.; Hu, Q.; Dai, Y.; He, P.; Zhang, X. Disposable sensors based on biodegradable polylactic acid piezoelectret films and their application in wearable electronics. Sens. Actuators A Phys. 2022, 346, 113834. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Mohanan, N.; Montazer, Z.; Sharma, P.K.; Levin, D.B. Microbial and Enzymatic Degradation of Synthetic Plastics. Front. Microbiol. 2020, 11, 580709. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Roohi; Bano, K.; Kuddus, M.; Zaheer, M.R.; Zia, Q.; Khan, M.F.; Ashraf, G.M.; Gupta, A.; Aliev, G. Microbial Enzymatic Degradation of Biodegradable Plastics. Curr. Pharm. Biotechnol. 2017, 18, 429–440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Kalita, N.K.; Sarmah, A.; Bhasney, S.M.; Kalamdhad, A.; Katiyar, V. Demonstrating an ideal compostable plastic using biodegradability kinetics of poly(lactic acid) (PLA) based green biocomposite films under aerobic composting conditions. Environ. Chall. 2021, 3, 100030. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Yu, Z.; Liu, K.-K. Soft Polymer-Based Technique for Cellular Force Sensing. Polymers 2021, 13, 2672. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Ma, C.; Xie, F.; Wei, L.; Zheng, C.; Liu, X.; Wang, L.; Liu, P. All-Starch-Based Hydrogel for Flexible Electronics: Strain-Sensitive Batteries and Self-Powered Sensors. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2022, 10, 6724–6735. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Su, T.; Liu, N.; Gao, Y.; Lei, D.; Wang, L.; Ren, Z.; Zhang, Q.; Su, J.; Zhang, Z. MXene/cellulose nanofiber-foam based high performance degradable piezoresistive sensor with greatly expanded interlayer distances. Nano Energy 2021, 87, 106151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Liu, J.H.; Li, W.D.; Jia, J.; Tang, C.Y.; Wang, S.; Yu, P.; Zhang, Z.M.; Ke, K.; Bao, R.Y.; Liu, Z.Y.; et al. Structure-regenerated silk fibroin with boosted piezoelectricity for disposable and biodegradable oral healthcare device. Nano Energy 2022, 103, 107787. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Chen, Q.; Tang, H.; Liu, J.; Wang, R.; Sun, J.; Yao, J.; Shao, Z.; Chen, X. Silk-based pressure/temperature sensing bimodal ionotronic skin with stimulus discriminability and low temperature workability. Chem. Eng. J. 2021, 422, 130091. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Wang, X.; Bai, Z.; Zheng, M.; Yue, O.; Hou, M.; Cui, B.; Su, R.; Wei, C.; Liu, X. Engineered gelatin-based conductive hydrogels for flexible wearable electronic devices: Fundamentals and recent advances. J. Sci. Adv. Mater. Devices 2022, 7, 100451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Chevenier, A.; Jouanneau, D.; Ficko-Blean, E. Carrageenan biosynthesis in red algae: A review. Cell Surf. 2023, 9, 100097. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Zaimis, U.; Ozolina, S.; Kukuskins, A. Recycled Algae Paper Density Control System for Quality Screening with Adjustable Light Source Wavelength. In Proceedings of the 21st International Scientific Conference on Engineering for Rural Development, Jelgava, Latvia, 25–27 May 2022; pp. 818–823. [Google Scholar]
  25. Tuvikene, R. Carrageenans. In Handbook of Hydrocolloids; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2021; pp. 767–804. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Júnior, L.M.; Vieira, R.P.; Jamróz, E.; Anjos, C.A.R. Furcellaran: An innovative biopolymer in the production of films and coatings. Carbohydr. Polym. 2021, 252, 117221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Yu, G.; Yang, B.; Ren, W.; Zhao, X.; Zhang, J.; Barrow, C. A comparative analysis of four kinds of polysaccharides purified from Furcellaria lumbricalis. J. Ocean Univ. China 2007, 6, 16–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Jayakody, M.M.; Vanniarachchy, M.P.G.; Wijesekara, I. Seaweed derived alginate, agar, and carrageenan based edible coatings and films for the food industry: A review. J. Food Meas. Charact. 2022, 16, 1195–1227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Riyaz, S.M.; Inbakandan, D.; Manikandan, D.; Bhavadharani, P.; Elson, J.; Prabhu, N.S.; Dhas, T.S.; Nalini, S.; Latha, M.B.; Simal-Gandara, J. Microbiome in the ice-ice disease of the farmed red algae Kappaphycus alvarezii and degradation of extracted food carrageenan. Food Biosci. 2021, 42, 101138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Nie, Z.; Peng, K.; Lin, L.; Yang, J.; Cheng, Z.; Gan, Q.; Chen, Y.; Feng, C. A conductive hydrogel based on nature polymer agar with self-healing ability and stretchability for flexible sensors. Chem. Eng. J. 2023, 454, 139843. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Therkelsen, G.H. CARRAGEENAN. In Industrial Gums Polysaccharides and Their Derivatives, 3rd ed.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1993; pp. 145–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Kiran-Yildirim, B.; Hale, J.; Wefers, D.; Gaukel, V. Ice recrystallization inhibition of commercial κ-, ι-, and λ-carrageenans. J. Food Eng. 2021, 290, 110269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Frediansyah, A. The antiviral activity of iota-, kappa-, and lambda-carrageenan against COVID-19: A critical review. Clin. Epidemiol. Glob. Heal. 2021, 12, 100826. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Muscolino, E.; Di Stefano, A.B.; Trapani, M.; Sabatino, M.A.; Giacomazza, D.; Alessi, S.; Cammarata, E.; Moschella, F.; Cordova, A.; Toia, F.; et al. κ-Carrageenan and PVA blends as bioinks to 3D print scaffolds for cartilage reconstruction. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2022, 222, 1861–1875. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Pahnavar, Z.; Ghaemy, M.; Naji, L.; Hasantabar, V. Self-extinguished and flexible cation exchange membranes based on modified K-Carrageenan/PVA double network hydrogels for electrochemical applications. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2023, 231, 123253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Shi, F.; Chang, Y.; Shen, J.; Chen, G.; Xue, C. A comparative investigation of anionic polysaccharides (sulfated fucan, ι-carrageenan, κ-carrageenan, and alginate) on the fabrication, stability, rheology, and digestion of multilayer emulsion. Food Hydrocoll. 2023, 134, 108081. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Bui, V.T.N.T.; Nguyen, B.T.; Nicolai, T.; Renou, F. Mixed iota and kappa carrageenan gels in the presence of both calcium and potassium ions. Carbohydr. Polym. 2019, 223, 115107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Morris, E.R.; Rees, D.A.; Robinson, G. Cation-specific aggregation of carrageenan helices: Domain model of polymer gel structure. J. Mol. Biol. 1980, 138, 349–362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Smidsrød, O.; Grasdalen, H. Some physical properties of carrageenan in solution and gel state. Carbohydr. Polym. 1982, 2, 270–272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. MacArtain, P.; Jacquier, J.C.; Dawson, K.A. Physical characteristics of calcium induced κ- carrageenan networks. Carbohydr. Polym. 2003, 53, 395–400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Bussamra, B.C.; Sietaram, D.; Verheijen, P.; Mussatto, S.I.; da Costa, A.C.; van der Wielen, L.; Ottens, M. A critical assessment of the Flory-Huggins (FH) theory to predict aqueous two-phase behaviour. SePurif. Technol. 2021, 255, 117636. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Bai, Z.; Wang, T.; Zheng, X.; Huang, Y.; Chen, Y.; Dan, W. High strength and bioactivity polyvinyl alcohol/collagen composite hydrogel with tannic acid as cross-linker. Polym. Eng. Sci. 2021, 61, 278–287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Treloar, L. The Physics of Rubber Elasticity. 1975. Available online: https://books.google.com/books?hl=lt&lr=&id=EfCZXXKQ50wC&oi=fnd&pg=PR9&ots=qDNlWHuWpS&sig=6WAu8rCk_83D78d6r6sd8k-jJ7s (accessed on 25 August 2023).
  44. Dastjerdi, S.; Alibakhshi, A.; Akgöz, B.; Civalek, Ö. A Novel Nonlinear Elasticity Approach for Analysis of Nonlinear and Hyperelastic Structures. Eng. Anal. Bound. Elem. 2022, 143, 219–236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Tao, K.; Chen, Z.; Yu, J.; Zeng, H.; Wu, J.; Wu, Z.; Jia, Q.; Li, P.; Fu, Y.; Chang, H.; et al. Ultra-Sensitive, Deformable, and Transparent Triboelectric Tactile Sensor Based on Micro-Pyramid Patterned Ionic Hydrogel for Interactive Human–Machine Interfaces. Adv. Sci. 2022, 9, 2104168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Yu, H.C.; Li, C.Y.; Du, M.; Song, Y.; Wu, Z.L.; Zheng, Q. Improved Toughness and Stability of κ-Carrageenan/Polyacrylamide Double-Network Hydrogels by Dual Cross-Linking of the First Network. Macromolecules 2019, 52, 629–638. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Zheng, G.; Gao, W.; Li, X.; Wu, Z.; Cao, L.A.; Feng, E.; Yang, Z. A κ-Carrageenan-Containing Organohydrogel with Adjustable Transmittance for an Antifreezing, Nondrying, and Solvent-Resistant Strain Sensor. Biomacromolecules 2022, 23, 4872–4882. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Zhang, J.; Zhang, J.; Huang, X.; Shi, J.; Liu, L.; Song, W.; Zhai, X.; Xiao, J.; Hashim, S.B.; Li, Z.; et al. A visual bi-layer sensor based on Agar/TiO2/butterfly bean flower anthocyanin/κ-carrageenan with photostability for monitoring Penaeus chinensis freshness. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2023, 235, 123706. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Li, X.; Xiang, S.; Ling, D.; Zhang, S.; Li, C.; Dai, R.; Zhu, P.; Liu, X.; Pan, Z. Stretchable, self-healing, transparent macromolecular elastomeric gel and PAM/carrageenan hydrogel for self-powered touch sensors. Mater. Sci. Eng. B 2022, 283, 115832. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Macedo, V.M.; Pereira, N.; Tubio, C.R.; Martins, P.; Lanceros-Mendez, S.; Costa, C.M. 3D-printed carrageenan-based nanocomposites for sustainable resistive sensing devices. Polymer 2022, 262, 125456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Heydari, F.; Bakhtiarian, M.; Khodaei, M.M. Preparation of Fe3O4@Carrageenan-Metformin nanoparticles as a new bio-inspired magnetic nanocatalyst for the synthesis of dihydropyrano[2,3-c]pyrazoles. Mater. Sci. Eng. B 2023, 296, 116686. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Oya, K.; Tsuru, T.; Teramoto, Y.; Nishio, Y. Nanoincorporation of iron oxides into carrageenan gels and magnetometric and morphological characterizations of the composite products. Polym. J. 2013, 45, 824–833. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Chang, Y.C.; Lin, C.H.; Liu, H.J.; Jian, J.C. Biodegradable resistive switching devices made from carrageenan insulator and carrageenan substrate. Org. Electron. 2023, 120, 106818. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Hosny, N.M.; Sherif, Y.E. Synthesis, optical band gap and anti-rheumatic activity of Fe2O3 nanocrystals via solid state decomposition of 4-aminophenol precursor. Chem. Data Collect. 2022, 37, 100813. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Prasad, K.; Meena, R.; Siddhanta, A.K. Microwave-induced rapid one-pot synthesis of κ-carrageenan-g-PMMA copolymer by potassium persulphate initiating system. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2006, 101, 161–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Machala, L.; Zboril, R.; Gedanken, A. Amorphous iron(III) oxide—A review. J. Phys. Chem. B 2007, 111, 4003–4018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Taneja, L.; Kochar, C.; Yadav, P.K.; Yadav, M.; Tripathy, S.S. Enhancement of surface area of iron oxide modified by natural moieties towards defluoridation from water and antibacterial properties. Groundw. Sustain. Dev. 2023, 22, 100954. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Pishnamazi, M.; Selakjani, P.P.; Abarati, M.N.; Pishnamazi, M.; Nouri, A.; Kharazi, H.H.; Marjani, A. κ-Carrageenan-Fe2O3 superporous composite adsorbent beads for application in magnetic field expanded bed chromatography adsorption. J. Mol. Liq. 2020, 319, 114194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Feng, S.; Guo, J.; Guan, F.; Sun, J.; Song, X.; He, J.; Yang, Q. Preparation of 3D printable polyvinyl alcohol based conductive hydrogels via incorporating k-carrageenan for flexible strain sensors. Colloids Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 2023, 676, 132141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Matusiak, J.; Grządka, E.; Kowalczuk, A.; Pietruszka, R.; Godlewski, M. The influence of hydrocarbon, fluorinated and silicone surfactants on the adsorption, stability and electrokinetic properties of the κ-carrageenan/alumina system. J. Mol. Liq. 2020, 314, 113669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Nylander, T.; Samoshina, Y.; Lindman, B. Formation of polyelectrolyte–surfactant complexes on surfaces. Adv. Colloid Interface Sci. 2006, 123–126, 105–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Ozolina, S.; Zaimis, U. Some Aspects of Extraction and Application of Seaweed Furcellaria Lumbricalis Carrageenan in Production of Recycled Paper. In Proceedings of the 21st International Scientific Conference on Engineering for Rural Development, Jelgava, Latvia, 25–27 May 2022; pp. 618–622. [Google Scholar]
  63. Bučas, M.; Daunys, D.; Olenin, S. Overgrowth patterns of the red algae Furcellaria lumbricalis at an exposed Baltic Sea coast: The results of a remote underwater video data analysis. Estuar. Coast. Shelf Sci. 2007, 75, 308–316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Šutinys, E.; Dzedzickis, A.; Samukaitė-Bubnienė, U.; Bučinskas, V. Novel synthetic iron (III) oxide-based force sensor. Sens. Actuators A Phys. 2021, 331, 113043. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Klinski-Wetzel, K.V.; Kowanda, C.; Heilmaier, M.; Mueller, F.E.H. The influence of microstructural features on the electrical conductivity of solid phase sintered CuCr composites. J. Alloys Compd. 2015, 631, 237–247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Warnes, B.M.; Aplan, F.F.; Simkovich, G. Electrical conductivity and seebeck voltage of Fe2O3, pure and doped, as a function of temperature and oxygen pressure. Solid State Ion. 1984, 12, 271–276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Gardner, R.F.G.; Sweett, F.; Tanner, D.W. The electrical properties of alpha ferric oxide—I.: The impure oxide. J. Phys. Chem. Solids 1963, 24, 1175–1181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Dal, H.; Denli, F.A.; Açan, A.K.; Kaliske, M.; Ka, A. Data-Driven Hyperelasticity-Part I: A Canonical Isotropic Formulation for Rubberlike Materials. J. Mech. Phys. Solids 2023, 179, 105381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Schematic representation of the experimental setup. 1—mechanical force load system; 2—electrodes; 3—wires; 4—sample; 5—multimeter.
Figure 1. Schematic representation of the experimental setup. 1—mechanical force load system; 2—electrodes; 3—wires; 4—sample; 5—multimeter.
Sensors 23 09423 g001
Figure 2. Investigation of the k-carrageenan biopolymer with Fe2O3 structure by SEM: (a) Micrograph of carrageenan biopolymer with Fe2O3, cross-section. Size 1280 × 1100; DPI = 182.63; Conditions: Vacc = 15.0 kV; Mag = ×100; WD = 10.60 mm, (b) Micrograph of carrageenan biopolymer with Fe2O3 particles, cross-section, Size 1280 × 1100; DPI = 182.65; Conditions: Vacc = 15.0 kV; Mag-1.0k; WD = 10.30 mm.
Figure 2. Investigation of the k-carrageenan biopolymer with Fe2O3 structure by SEM: (a) Micrograph of carrageenan biopolymer with Fe2O3, cross-section. Size 1280 × 1100; DPI = 182.63; Conditions: Vacc = 15.0 kV; Mag = ×100; WD = 10.60 mm, (b) Micrograph of carrageenan biopolymer with Fe2O3 particles, cross-section, Size 1280 × 1100; DPI = 182.65; Conditions: Vacc = 15.0 kV; Mag-1.0k; WD = 10.30 mm.
Sensors 23 09423 g002
Figure 3. Micrographs of the sample surfaces: (a)—pure carrageenan film; (b)—carrageenan with iron (III) oxide.
Figure 3. Micrographs of the sample surfaces: (a)—pure carrageenan film; (b)—carrageenan with iron (III) oxide.
Sensors 23 09423 g003
Figure 4. Sensitivity of carrageenan biopolymer samples without glycerol to the environmental impact: (a) dependence of the resistance on the concentration of Fe2O3 in time; (b) dependence of resistance vs. concentration of Fe2O3 after 120 h from sample preparation.
Figure 4. Sensitivity of carrageenan biopolymer samples without glycerol to the environmental impact: (a) dependence of the resistance on the concentration of Fe2O3 in time; (b) dependence of resistance vs. concentration of Fe2O3 after 120 h from sample preparation.
Sensors 23 09423 g004
Figure 5. Electrical characteristics of the carrageen–biopolymer composition with Fe2O3 and 10% glycerol: (a) hysteresis of the first loading cycle from 0 to 500 N; (b) hysteresis of the fifth loading cycle from 0 to 500 N; (c) relaxation of the sample after removing the load, at first experiment and fit curve of polynomial order 4; (d) relaxation of the sample after removing the load, at fifth experiment and fit curve of polynomial order 4.
Figure 5. Electrical characteristics of the carrageen–biopolymer composition with Fe2O3 and 10% glycerol: (a) hysteresis of the first loading cycle from 0 to 500 N; (b) hysteresis of the fifth loading cycle from 0 to 500 N; (c) relaxation of the sample after removing the load, at first experiment and fit curve of polynomial order 4; (d) relaxation of the sample after removing the load, at fifth experiment and fit curve of polynomial order 4.
Sensors 23 09423 g005
Figure 6. Mechanical characteristics of the carrageen–biopolymer composition with Fe2O3 and 10% glycerol: (a) dependency between load and sensor deformation during the first loading; (b) dependency between load and sensor deformation during the fifth loading cycle.
Figure 6. Mechanical characteristics of the carrageen–biopolymer composition with Fe2O3 and 10% glycerol: (a) dependency between load and sensor deformation during the first loading; (b) dependency between load and sensor deformation during the fifth loading cycle.
Sensors 23 09423 g006
Figure 7. Characteristics of the sample containing 15% of the glycerol: (a) hysteresis defined at the fifth loading cycle from 0 to 500 N; (b) sensor sensitivity in the range from 0 to 30 N; (c) dependency between load and sensor deformation during the fifth loading cycle; (d) dependency between resistance and displacement during the fifth loading cycle.
Figure 7. Characteristics of the sample containing 15% of the glycerol: (a) hysteresis defined at the fifth loading cycle from 0 to 500 N; (b) sensor sensitivity in the range from 0 to 30 N; (c) dependency between load and sensor deformation during the fifth loading cycle; (d) dependency between resistance and displacement during the fifth loading cycle.
Sensors 23 09423 g007
Figure 8. Characteristics of the sample containing 15% of the glycerol: (a) hysteresis defined after the first loading cycle; (b) hysteresis defined after the fifth loading cycle; (c) dependency between load and resistance; (d) dependency between displacement and resistance; (e) sensor sensitivity in the range from 20 to 100 N; (f) relaxation of the sample after removing the load.
Figure 8. Characteristics of the sample containing 15% of the glycerol: (a) hysteresis defined after the first loading cycle; (b) hysteresis defined after the fifth loading cycle; (c) dependency between load and resistance; (d) dependency between displacement and resistance; (e) sensor sensitivity in the range from 20 to 100 N; (f) relaxation of the sample after removing the load.
Sensors 23 09423 g008aSensors 23 09423 g008b
Figure 9. The summarized comparison of the characteristics of the researched carrageenan–iron (III) oxide compositions with different glycerol concentrations.
Figure 9. The summarized comparison of the characteristics of the researched carrageenan–iron (III) oxide compositions with different glycerol concentrations.
Sensors 23 09423 g009
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Žaimis, U.; Petronienė, J.J.; Dzedzickis, A.; Bučinskas, V. Biodegradable Carrageenan-Based Force Sensor: An Experimental Approach. Sensors 2023, 23, 9423. https://doi.org/10.3390/s23239423

AMA Style

Žaimis U, Petronienė JJ, Dzedzickis A, Bučinskas V. Biodegradable Carrageenan-Based Force Sensor: An Experimental Approach. Sensors. 2023; 23(23):9423. https://doi.org/10.3390/s23239423

Chicago/Turabian Style

Žaimis, Uldis, Jūratė Jolanta Petronienė, Andrius Dzedzickis, and Vytautas Bučinskas. 2023. "Biodegradable Carrageenan-Based Force Sensor: An Experimental Approach" Sensors 23, no. 23: 9423. https://doi.org/10.3390/s23239423

APA Style

Žaimis, U., Petronienė, J. J., Dzedzickis, A., & Bučinskas, V. (2023). Biodegradable Carrageenan-Based Force Sensor: An Experimental Approach. Sensors, 23(23), 9423. https://doi.org/10.3390/s23239423

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop