Next Article in Journal
Incorporating a Novel Dual Transfer Learning Approach for Medical Images
Next Article in Special Issue
Microphones as Airspeed Sensors for Unmanned Aerial Vehicles
Previous Article in Journal
VKECE-3D: Energy-Efficient Coverage Enhancement in Three-Dimensional Heterogeneous Wireless Sensor Networks Based on 3D-Voronoi and K-Means Algorithm
Previous Article in Special Issue
Estimation of Airflow Parameters for Tail-Sitter UAV through a 5-Hole Probe Based on an ANN
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Thrust Vectoring Control of a Novel Tilt-Rotor UAV Based on Backstepping Sliding Model Method

Sensors 2023, 23(2), 574; https://doi.org/10.3390/s23020574
by Zelong Yu 1, Jingjuan Zhang 2 and Xueyun Wang 2,*
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Sensors 2023, 23(2), 574; https://doi.org/10.3390/s23020574
Submission received: 5 November 2022 / Revised: 29 December 2022 / Accepted: 29 December 2022 / Published: 4 January 2023

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

This paper presents a thrust vectoring control scheme for a tilt-rotor UAV based on backstepping sliding mode control method. Many grammatical mistakes are found which makes the paper difficult to read. The detailed comments are listed as follows:

1. The modeling of the propeller and ducted fan is missing. 

2. It looks like this paper only investigates the control performance of the UAV under VTOL mode. Therefore, the title of the paper may be changed. 

3. The control allocation equation as described in Eqs. (7), (9), (10) are kind of complicated. However, it is not clear that how the actual control inputs are calculated based on these equations. This part is the core of the paper, however, the present expression on this problem makes the paper hard to understand. The contributions can not be justified. 

4. Definitions of some variables are missing. 

5. From the simulation results, it looks like at the initial stage, the pitch moment of the UAV is not balanced.

6. The quality of the demonstrated figures is very low and hard to understand. 

7. At balanced position, each of the front twol rotors provides more than 300N, and the rear rotor only provides 4N. Is this reasonable? Based on the demonstrated schematic of the UAV, this is not correct. 

8. The performance of the compared control scheme is questionable. 

Author Response

Dear Editors and Reviewers,

Thank you very much for your careful review and constructive suggestions with regard to our manuscript " Thrust Vectoring Control of a Novel Tilt-rotor UAV Based on Backstepping Sliding Model Method " (Manuscript ID: sensors-2046792). These comments are helpful for us to revise and improve our manuscript. We have studied comments carefully and tried our best to revise and improve the manuscript. Please see responses to the review comments in the accompanying file.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

1. The contributions of this paper is not clear. It seems just a change of control structure. The authors should summarize the contributions in Introduction.

2. Equation (23) is the virtual control law. Although the control allocation result is shown in Table 1, the description of control allocation is not enough. That is how to decouple multiple real control inputs.

3. In the control curves of simulations, the subtitles of each subfigures (a) and (b) should be given to tell their difference, e.g. Figure 10.

4. Please interpret crosswind disturbance by combining the UAV model.

Author Response

Dear Editors and Reviewers,

Thank you very much for your careful review and constructive suggestions with regard to our manuscript " Thrust Vectoring Control of a Novel Tilt-rotor UAV Based on Backstepping Sliding Model Method " (Manuscript ID: sensors-2046792). These comments are helpful for us to revise and improve our manuscript. We have studied comments carefully and tried our best to revise and improve the manuscript. Please see responses to the review comments in the accompanying file.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 3 Report

Valuable contribution in the field of UAV's control, but in the future, for similar approaches it should be insisted on the construction and implementation of the control strategy.

Author Response

Dear Editors and Reviewers,

Thank you very much for your careful review and constructive suggestions with regard to our manuscript " Thrust Vectoring Control of a Novel Tilt-rotor UAV Based on Backstepping Sliding Model Method " (Manuscript ID: sensors-2046792). These comments are helpful for us to revise and improve our manuscript. We have studied comments carefully and tried our best to revise and improve the manuscript. Please see responses to the review comments in the accompanying file.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Round 2

Reviewer 1 Report

The authors have answered all my questions. I have no further comments. 

Author Response

Dear Editors and Reviewers,

Thank you very much for your careful review and constructive suggestions with regard to our manuscript " Thrust Vectoring Control of a Novel Tilt-rotor UAV Based on Backstepping Sliding Model Method " (Manuscript ID: sensors-2046792). These comments are helpful for us to revise and improve our manuscript. 

Reviewer 2 Report

The paper is revised according to the comments. It seems better than the previous. However, there some unclear descriptions, such as which are the real control variables: Tr, Tl, Tb and Trm, Tlm, Tbm? 

Author Response

Dear Editors and Reviewers,

Thank you very much for your careful review and constructive suggestions with regard to our manuscript " Thrust Vectoring Control of a Novel Tilt-rotor UAV Based on Backstepping Sliding Model Method " (Manuscript ID: sensors-2046792). These comments are helpful for us to revise and improve our manuscript. We have studied comments carefully and tried our best to revise and improve the manuscript. Please see responses to the review comments in the accompanying file.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Back to TopTop