The Digital Twin Paradigm Applied to Soil Quality Assessment: A Systematic Literature Review
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Applied Methodology
2.1. Review Planning
2.1.1. Definition of Search Questions
2.1.2. Preparation of the PICOC Method
- Population (P): Who?
- Intervention (I): What and how?
- Comparison (C): What to compare?
- Result (O): What are the final goals you seek to achieve?
- Context (C): What are the contexts?
2.1.3. Selection of Keywords and Synonyms
2.1.4. Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria
2.1.5. Quality Criteria
2.1.6. Data Extraction Form
2.2. Conduction
Creation of the String and Selection of Search Sources
- Springer Link (SL): From the Springer Link library (https://link.springer.com/, accessed on 30 May 2022).In the first search, the query string was used in the simple search bar of the site, and many results were found. It is necessary to select the option “include content for viewing only”, and also the filters “content type: article” and “discipline: engineering”.
- Biblioteca Digital—Association for Computing Machinery (ACM): From the Digital ACM library (https://dl.acm.org/, accessed on 30 May 2022).The advanced search feature was used and the search string used was highlighted. Furthermore, the “Research Article” filter was applied.
- ISI Web of Science (WoS): From the ISI Web of Science library (https://access.clarivate.com/, accessed on 30 May 2022).The query was performed in the search tab and a search string was added.
- Digital Library—Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE): From the IEEE Digital Library (https://ieeexplore.ieee.org, accessed on 30 May 2022).The search was performed in the simple search bar tab on the site, and the option “ALL” was selected. Furthermore, we added the search strings in the tab.
- Scopus: From the Scopus library (https://www.scopus.com/, accessed on 30 May 2022).An advanced search was performed. The following filters were applied: “article”, “engineering”, “keyword: digital twin”.
3. Results and Discussion
3.1. Results
3.2. Results Analysis
3.3. Discussion
4. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
Abbreviations
ACM | Association for Computing Machinery |
DT | Digital Twin |
DQ | Data extraction Question |
EC | Exclusion Criteria |
IC | Inclusion Criteria |
IEEE | Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Internet of Things |
IoT | Internet of Things |
PICOC | Population, Intervention, Comparison, Outcomes, Context |
PRISMA | Preferred Report Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-analyses |
Quality Question | |
SLR | Systematic Literature of Review |
RQ | Research Question |
SL | Springer Link |
WoF | Web of Science |
References
- Grieves, M. Origins of the Digital Twin Concept. Fla. Inst. Technol. 2016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Grieves, M.; Vickers, J. Digital twin: Mitigating unpredictable, undesirable emergent behavior in complex systems. In Transdisciplinary Perspectives on Complex Systems; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2017; pp. 85–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Reyes Yanes, A.; Abbasi, R.; Martinez, P.; Ahmad, R. Digital Twinning of Hydroponic Grow Beds in Intelligent Aquaponic Systems. Sensors 2022, 22, 7393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Grieves, M. Virtually Perfect: Driving Innovative and Lean Products through Product Lifecycle Management; Space Coast Press: Merritt Island, FL, USA, 2011. [Google Scholar]
- Piascik, B.; Vickers, J.; Lowry, D.; Scotti, S.; Stewart, J.; Calomino, A. DRAFT Materials, Structures, Mechanical Systems, and Manufacturing Roadmap; Technical Report; National Aeronautics and Space Administration: Washington, DC, USA, 2010.
- Verdouw, C.; Tekinerdogan, B.; Beulens, A.; Wolfert, S. Digital twins in smart farming. Agric. Syst. 2021, 189, 103046. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nasirahmadi, A.; Hensel, O. Toward the Next Generation of Digitalization in Agriculture Based on Digital Twin Paradigm. Sensors 2022, 22, 498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Neethirajan, S.; Kemp, B. Digital twins in livestock farming. Animals 2021, 11, 1008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chergui, N.; Kechadi, M.T.; McDonnell, M. The Impact of Data Analytics in Digital Agriculture: A Review. In Proceedings of the 2020 International Multi-Conference on: “Organization of Knowledge and Advanced Technologies” (OCTA), Tunis, Tunisia, 6–8 February 2020; pp. 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Horváthová, M.; Lacko, R.; Hajduova, Z. Using Industry 4.0 Concept—Digital Twin—to Improve the Efficiency of Leather Cutting in Automotive Industry. Qual. Innov. Prosper. 2019, 23, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Agavanakis, K.; Cassia, J.; Drombry, M.; Elkaim, E. Telemetry transformation towards Industry 4.0 convergence. A fuel management solution for the transportation sector based on digital twins. AIP Conf. Proc. 2021, 2437, 020083. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Abdelmajied, F.Y. Industry 4.0 and Its Implications: Concept, Opportunities, and Future Directions. In Supply Chain; Bányai, T., Ágota, B., Kaczmar, I., Eds.; IntechOpen: Rijeka, Croatia, 2022; Chapter 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tekinerdogan, B.; Verdouw, C. Systems architecture design pattern catalog for developing digital twins. Sensors 2020, 20, 5103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kritzinger, W.; Karner, M.; Traar, G.; Henjes, J.; Sihn, W. Digital Twin in manufacturing: A categorical literature review and classification. IFAC-PapersOnLine 2018, 51, 1016–1022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sivalingam, K.; Sepulveda, M.; Spring, M.J.J.; Davies, P. A Review and Methodology Development for Remaining Useful Life Forecast of Offshore Fixed and Floating Wind turbine Power Converter with Digital Twin Technology Perspective. In Proceedings of the 2018 2nd International Conference on Green Energy and Applications (ICGEA), Singapore, 24–26 March 2018; pp. 197–204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ray, P.P. Internet of things for smart agriculture: Technologies, practices and future direction. J. Ambient. Intell. Smart Environ. 2017, 9, 395–420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tao, F.; Cheng, J.; Qi, Q.; Zhang, M.; Zhang, H.; Sui, F. Digital twin-driven product design, manufacturing and service with big data. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 2018, 94, 3563–3576. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alves, R.G.; Souza, G.; Maia, R.F.; Tran, A.L.H.; Kamienski, C.; Soininen, J.P.; Aquino, P.T.; Lima, F. A digital twin for smart farming. In Proceedings of the 2019 IEEE Global Humanitarian Technology Conference (GHTC), Seattle, WA, USA, 17–20 October 2019; pp. 1–4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Grieves, M. Digital twin: Manufacturing excellence through virtual factory replication. White Pap. 2014, 1, 1–7. [Google Scholar]
- Boschert, S.; Rosen, R. Digital twin—The simulation aspect. In Mechatronic Futures; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2016; pp. 59–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Clark, A.; Schultz, E.; Harris, M. What Are Digital Twins; Technical Report; IBM: Armonk, NY, USA, 2019; Available online: https://developer.ibm.com/articles/what-are-digital-twins/ (accessed on 10 June 2022).
- Schwab, K. The Fourth Industrial Revolution; Currency: New York, NY, USA, 2017. [Google Scholar]
- Trivelli, L.; Apicella, A.; Chiarello, F.; Rana, R.; Fantoni, G.; Tarabella, A. From precision agriculture to Industry 4.0: Unveiling technological connections in the agrifood sector. Br. Food J. 2019, 121, 1730–1743. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Benyam, A.A.; Soma, T.; Fraser, E. Digital agricultural technologies for food loss and waste prevention and reduction: Global trends, adoption opportunities and barriers. J. Clean. Prod. 2021, 323, 129099. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Basterrechea, D.A.; Rocher, J.; Parra, M.; Parra, L.; Marin, J.F.; Mauri, P.V.; Lloret, J. Design and Calibration of Moisture Sensor Based on Electromagnetic Field Measurement for Irrigation Monitoring. Chemosensors 2021, 9, 251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Soderstrom, M.; Sohlenius, G.; Rodhe, L.; Piikki, K. Adaptation of regional digital soil mapping for precision agriculture. Precis. Agric. 2016, 17, 588–607. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Kitchenham, B.; Charters, S. Guidelines for Performing Systematic Literature Reviews in Software Engineering; Technical Report, Version 2.3; EBSE: Keele, UK, 2007. [Google Scholar]
- Cárceles Rodríguez, B.; Durán-Zuazo, V.H.; Soriano Rodríguez, M.; García-Tejero, I.F.; Gálvez Ruiz, B.; Cuadros Tavira, S. Conservation Agriculture as a Sustainable System for Soil Health: A Review. Soil Syst. 2022, 6, 87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Maikhuri, R.K.; Rao, K.S. Soil quality and soil health: A review. Int. J. Ecol. Environ. Sci. 2012, 38, 19–37. [Google Scholar]
- Rojas, R.V.; Achouri, M.; Maroulis, J.; Caon, L. Healthy soils: A prerequisite for sustainable food security. Environ. Earth Sci. 2016, 75, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kitchenham, B.A.; Budgen, D.; Brereton, P. Evidence-Based Software Engineering and Systematic Reviews; CRC Press: New York, NY, USA, 2015; Volume 4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dyba, T.; Dingsoyr, T.; Hanssen, G.K. Applying systematic reviews to diverse study types: An experience report. In Proceedings of the First International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement (ESEM 2007), Madrid, Spain, 20–21 September 2007; pp. 225–234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cooper, H.M. Synthesizing Research: A Guide for Literature Reviews, 3rd ed.; Applied Social Research Methods Series, v. 2; Sage Publications: Thousand Oaks, CA, USA, 1998. [Google Scholar]
- Cooper, H.; Hedges, L. The Handbook of Research Synthesis; Russell Sage Foundation: New York, NY, USA, 1994. [Google Scholar]
- Dybå, T.; Kampenes, V.B.; Sjøberg, D.I. A systematic review of statistical power in software engineering experiments. Inf. Softw. Technol. 2006, 48, 745–755. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Higgins, J.P.; Green, S. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions 4.2.6 [Updated September 2006]; The Cochrane Library: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2006; Volume 4. [Google Scholar]
- Mulrow, C.D.; Cook, D. Systematic Reviews: Synthesis of Best Evidence for Health Care Decisions; ACP Press: Minneapolis, MN, USA, 1998. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Petticrew, M.; Roberts, H. Systematic Reviews in the Social Sciences: A Practical Guide; John Wiley & Sons: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2008. [Google Scholar]
- Popay, J.; Roberts, H.; Sowden, A.; Petticrew, M.; Arai, L.; Rodgers, M.; Britten, N.; Roen, K.; Duffy, S. Guidance on the conduct of narrative synthesis in systematic reviews. Prod. Esrc Methods Programme Version 2006, 1, b92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Higgins, J. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. Version 5.1.0 [Updated March 2011]; The Cochrane Collaboration: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2011; Available online: http://www.cochrane-handbook.org (accessed on 10 June 2022).
- Skobelev, P.; Tabachinskiy, A.; Simonova, E.; Lee, T.R.; Zhilyaev, A.; Laryukhin, V. Digital twin of rice as a decision-making service for precise farming, based on environmental datasets from the fields. In Proceedings of the 2021 International Conference on Information Technology and Nanotechnology (ITNT), Samara, Russia, 20–24 September 2021; pp. 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dörr, J. Digital Farming in the Context of Digital Ecosystems. Atzheavy Duty Worldw. 2021, 14, 68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chukkapalli, S.S.L.; Aziz, S.B.; Alotaibi, N.; Mittal, S.; Gupta, M.; Abdelsalam, M. Ontology driven ai and access control systems for smart fisheries. In Proceedings of the 2021 ACM workshop on Secure and Trustworthy Cyber-Physical Systems, Virtual Even, 28 April 2021; pp. 59–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, Y.; Ma, X.; Shu, L.; Hancke, G.P.; Abu-Mahfouz, A.M. From Industry 4.0 to Agriculture 4.0: Current status, enabling technologies, and research challenges. IEEE Trans. Ind. Inform. 2020, 17, 4322–4334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Raj Kumar, R.; Sriram, K.; Surya Narayanan, I. Self Optimizing Drip Irrigation System Using Data Acquisition and Virtual Instrumentation to Enhance the Usage of Irrigation Water. In Cyber-Physical Systems and Digital Twins, Proceedings of the International Conference on Remote Engineering and Virtual Instrumentation, Banglore, India, 3–6 February 2019; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2019; pp. 489–495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sung, Y.M.; Kim, T. Smart Farm Realization Based on Digital Twin. ICIC Express Lett. 2022, 13, 421–427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Akroyd, J.; Harper, Z.; Soutar, D.; Farazi, F.; Bhave, A.; Mosbach, S.; Kraft, M. Universal digital twin: Land use. Data-Centric Eng. 2022, 3, e3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tabunshchyk, G.; Arras, P.; Henke, K.; Wuttke, H.D. Smart Innovative Engineering for Smart Agriculture Modernization. In Online Engineering and Society 4.0, Proceedings of the International Conference on Remote Engineering and Virtual Instrumentation, Hongkong, China, 24–26 February2021; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2021; pp. 155–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hurst, W.; Mendoza, F.R.; Tekinerdogan, B. Augmented Reality in Precision Farming: Concepts and Applications. Smart Cities 2021, 4, 1454–1468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ng, A.K.; Mahkeswaran, R. Emerging and disruptive technologies for urban farming: A review and assessment. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 2021, 2003, 012008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lowe, T.; Moghadam, P.; Edwards, E.; Williams, J. Canopy density estimation in perennial horticulture crops using 3D spinning lidar SLAM. J. Field Robot. 2021, 38, 598–618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tsolakis, N.; Bechtsis, D.; Vasileiadis, G.; Menexes, I.; Bochtis, D.D. Sustainability in the Digital Farming Era: A Cyber-Physical Analysis Approach for Drone Applications in Agriculture 4.0. In Information and Communication Technologies for Agriculture—Theme IV: Actions; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2021; pp. 29–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ghandar, A.; Ahmed, A.; Zulfiqar, S.; Hua, Z.; Hanai, M.; Theodoropoulos, G. A decision support system for urban agriculture using digital twin: A case study with aquaponics. IEEE Access 2021, 9, 35691–35708. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jans-Singh, M.; Leeming, K.; Choudhary, R.; Girolami, M. Digital twin of an urban-integrated hydroponic farm. Data-Centric Eng. 2020, 1, e20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Skobelev, P.; Mayorov, I.; Simonova, E.; Goryanin, O.; Zhilyaev, A.; Tabachinskiy, A.; Yalovenko, V. Development of models and methods for creating a digital twin of plant within the cyber-physical system for precision farming management. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 2020, 1703, 012022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sreedevi, T.; Kumar, M.S. Digital Twin in Smart Farming: A categorical literature review and exploring possibilities in hydroponics. In Proceedings of the 2020 Advanced Computing and Communication Technologies for High Performance Applications (ACCTHPA), Cochin, India, 2–4 July 2020; pp. 120–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Delgado, J.A.; Short, N.M., Jr.; Roberts, D.P.; Vandenberg, B. Big data analysis for sustainable agriculture on a geospatial cloud framework. Front. Sustain. Food Syst. 2019, 3, 54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Machl, T.; Donaubauer, A.; Kolbe, T.H. Planning agricultural core road networks based on a digital twin of the cultivated landscape. J. Digit. Landsc. Archit. 2019, 4, 316–327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Laryukhin, V.; Skobelev, P.; Lakhin, O.; Grachev, S.; Yalovenko, V.; Yalovenko, O. Towards developing a cyber-physical multi-agent system for managing precise farms with digital twins of plants. Cybern. Phys. 2019, 8, 257–261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Angin, P.; Anisi, M.H.; Göksel, F.; Gürsoy, C.; Büyükgülcü, A. AgriLoRa: A digital twin framework for smart agriculture. J. Wirel. Mob. Netw. Ubiquitous Comput. Dependable Appl. 2020, 11, 77–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jones, D.; Snider, C.; Nassehi, A.; Yon, J.; Hicks, B. Characterising the Digital Twin: A systematic literature review. CIRP J. Manuf. Sci. Technol. 2020, 29, 36–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Search Questions | ||
---|---|---|
RQ1 | RQ2 | RQ3 |
In the context of agriculture, what were the applications of digital twins? | In these digital twins, what were the control techniques or actions employed? | Was there a concern or action to minimise the impact caused on the soil based on reducing the application of chemical and mechanical actions? |
PICOC Method | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Population | Intervention | Comparison | Result | Context |
Digital twins | Soil digital twins and predictive controller; machine learning | Compare with existing digital twins | Optimisation of soil quality and reduction in the number of pesticides and fertilisers applied to the soil | Precision agriculture |
Definition of Keywords | ||
---|---|---|
Keywords | Synonym | Related to |
Digital twin | - | Population |
Soil | land, field | Context |
Agriculture | crop, farm | Context |
Field management | - | Intervention |
Soil quality | - | Result |
Inclusion Criteria | |
---|---|
IC1 | Paper is accessible |
IC2 | The work was published after 2016 |
IC3 | The article belongs to the thematic area, namely precision agriculture |
IC4 | The article includes one or more keywords, has an adequate structure, and proposes some kind of implementation initiative |
IC5 | The paper is written in English |
Exclusion Criteria | |
---|---|
EC1 | Paper is not accessible |
EC2 | The work was published before 2016 |
EC3 | The article does not belong to the thematic area, namely precision agriculture |
EC4 | The article belongs to the thematic area, but only to redefine general concepts |
EC5 | The article does not include the keywords: “digital twins” |
EC6 | The article includes some of the keywords, but only to redefine general concepts |
EC7 | The paper is not written in English |
Quality Questions | |
---|---|
QQ1 | Was the article based on research and not on expert opinion? |
QQ2 | Does the article have a clear research objective? |
QQ3 | Does the article discuss the results of the work? |
QQ4 | Was the development context of the article an agricultural environment? |
QQ5 | Was the application of one or more digital twins discussed in the article? |
QQ6 | Were the applications of digital twins sufficiently characterized? |
QQ7 | Were the challenges and activities of applying digital twins discussed in the article? |
QQ8 | Were the contributions and benefits of soil digital twin applications discussed in the article? |
QQ9 | Does the article answer at least one of the research questions? |
Data Extraction Questions | |
---|---|
DQ1 | What were the main applications of digital twins? |
DQ2 | What were the main objectives? |
DQ3 | What were the main challenges/obstacles faced? |
DQ4 | What were the main technologies used? |
DQ5 | What were the main contributions found? |
DQ6 | Did the article discuss the applications of soil digital twins? |
Digital Library | Specific Search String |
---|---|
Springer Link | (“digital twin* ”) AND (agri* OR crop* OR farm*) AND (soil OR land OR field OR “field* management*“ OR “soil quality*”) |
ACM | [All: “digital twin”] AND [[All: agri*] OR [All: crop*] OR [All: farm*]] AND [All: “soil”] OR [All: “land”] OR [All: “field ”] OR [All: “field management*”] OR [All: “soil quality *”]] |
WoS | (“digital twin*”) AND (agri* OR crop* OR farm*) AND (soil OR land OR field OR “field* management*” OR “soil quality*”). |
IEEE | (“digital twin*”) AND (agri* OR crop* OR farm*) AND (soil OR land OR field OR “field* management*” OR “soil quality*”) |
Scopus | ALL ( (“digital twin*” ) AND (agri* OR crop* OR farm* ) AND ( soil OR land OR field OR “field management*” OR “soil quality*” ) ) AND (LIMIT-TO ( DOCTYPE, “ar” ) AND (LIMIT-TO ( SUBJAREA, “ENGI” ) AND ( LIMIT-TO ( EXACTKEYWORD, “digital twin” ) ) |
Percentage of Articles by Libraries | ||
---|---|---|
Libraries | Number of Articles Extracted | Percentage of Selected Articles |
SL | 56 | 35 |
ACM | 09 | 6 |
WoS | 31 | 20 |
IEEE | 11 | 7 |
Scopus | 51 | 32 |
Total | 158 | 100 |
Quality Assessment Result | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Reference | Number | QQ1 | QQ2 | QQ3 | QQ4 | QQ5 | QQ6 | QQ7 | QQ8 | QQ9 | Final Score |
[41] | 1 | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | 9.0 |
[18] | 2 | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | P | P | Y | Y | 8.0 |
[42] | 3 | Y | Y | N | Y | Y | N | N | N | P | 4.5 |
[43] | 4 | Y | Y | Y | N | Y | N | N | N | N | 4.0 |
[44] | 5 | Y | Y | Y | Y | N | N | N | N | N | 4.0 |
[45] | 6 | Y | Y | Y | Y | N | N | N | N | P | 4.5 |
[46] | 7 | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | P | Y | Y | 8.5 |
[47] | 8 | Y | Y | Y | Y | N | N | N | N | P | 4.5 |
[7] | 9 | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | 9.0 |
[48] | 10 | Y | Y | Y | Y | N | N | P | P | P | 5.5 |
[49] | 11 | Y | Y | Y | Y | N | N | N | N | Y | 5.0 |
[50] | 12 | Y | Y | Y | Y | N | N | P | P | Y | 6.0 |
[51] | 13 | Y | Y | Y | Y | N | N | N | N | N | 4.0 |
[52] | 14 | Y | Y | P | Y | Y | P | N | N | P | 5.0 |
[53] | 15 | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | 9.0 |
[54] | 16 | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | 9.0 |
[55] | 17 | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | 9.0 |
[56] | 18 | Y | Y | P | Y | Y | P | P | Y | Y | 7.5 |
[57] | 19 | Y | Y | Y | Y | P | P | P | P | Y | 7.0 |
[58] | 20 | Y | Y | P | Y | Y | P | N | N | P | 5.0 |
[59] | 21 | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | P | Y | Y | Y | 8.5 |
Articles Selected and Accepted by Year | ||
---|---|---|
Year | Selected | Accepted |
2017 | 2 | - |
2018 | 1 | - |
2019 | 22 | 4 |
2020 | 29 | 4 |
2021 | 67 | 10 |
2022 | 33 | 3 |
Total | 158 | 21 |
Statistical Calculations | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Median | Average | Maximum | Minimum | Limit Value |
6.0 | 6.5 | 9.0 | 4.0 | 6.0 |
Selected Articles | |||
---|---|---|---|
Identification | Reference | Authors | Final Score |
Case study 01 | [41] | P. Skobelev | 9.0 |
Case study 02 | [18] | R. G. Alves | 8.0 |
Case study 03 | [46] | Y. Sung | 8.5 |
Case study 04 | [7] | Nasirahmadi | 9.0 |
Case study 05 | [50] | A. K. Ng and Mahkeswaran | 6.0 |
Case study 06 | [53] | Ghandar | 9.0 |
Case study 07 | [54] | Jans-Singh | 9.0 |
Case study 08 | [55] | P. Skobelev | 9.0 |
Case study 09 | [56] | T. Sreedevi | 7.5 |
Case study 10 | [57] | J.A. Delgado | 7.0 |
Case study 11 | [59] | V. Laryukhin | 8.5 |
Data Extractions Results | |
---|---|
Case 01 | [41] |
DQ1 | Rice Cultivation |
DQ2 | Determining plant growth patterns and improving crop yields |
DQ3 | Global climate change puts agricultural production at risk |
DQ4 | Digital platform for intelligent services, an intelligent system based on ontology and multi-agent technology |
DQ5 | Increase in business efficiency, increase in income, decrease in the complexity of business management, high transparency and traceability of operations, reduction in errors due to the negative human factor, and business growth with reduction in administrative costs |
DQ6 | Y |
Case 02 | [18] |
DQ1 | Water management platform and soil probe |
DQ2 | Improvement in crop water management and understanding of the best state of farms in terms of use of resources and equipment |
DQ3 | Factors such as climate change and the expansion of the world population have become a global challenge for the availability of fresh water and insufficient irrigation, causing a reduction in crop productivity |
DQ4 | IoT, big data, artificial intelligence (AI), process management, IoT Fiware agent, MYSQL, Grafana |
DQ5 | With the final system in place, it will be possible to understand the consumption of resources on the farms and the impact on crop yields. This will enable sustainable development and increase food security for the global population |
DQ6 | Y |
Case 03 | [46] |
DQ1 | Cultivation of ginseng berry |
DQ2 | Allowed to decouple the physical flow from cyber control system and implement a digital twin conceptual model for smart farms |
DQ3 | In the IoT vision, a high level of interoperability needs to be achieved in terms of communication, as well as in service and even in the levels of knowledge on different established platforms |
DQ4 | Monitoring, sensing, smart farm technology, and smart big data analytics equipment |
DQ5 | The digital twin smart farm model was suggested, and the implementation was presented at the laboratory level and at the field level. The ginseng plant was adopted and tested in the proposed system |
DQ6 | Y |
Case 04 | [7] |
DQ1 | Review of digital twin concepts |
DQ2 | Provided an overview of digital twins in the ground. Data recording and modelling, including artificial intelligence, big data, simulation, analysis, forecasting, and communication aspects are discussed |
DQ3 | One of the main global challenges has been how to guarantee food security for the world’s growing population, ensuring long-term sustainable development |
DQ4 | Information and communication (ICT), Internet of Things (IoT), big data analysis and interpretation techniques, machine learning, and artificial intelligence |
DQ5 | Through real-time continuous monitoring of the physical world (the farm), it was possible to update the state of the virtual world. Data-driven approaches increased decision-making capabilities on the farm, improving crop performance, reducing losses, and therefore benefiting the crop |
DQ6 | Y |
Case 05 | [50] |
DQ1 | Review of urban agriculture techniques |
DQ2 | A comparison between different technologies (including digital twins) was presented. A list of their applications, advantages, and disadvantages was discussed |
DQ3 | In agriculture, environmentally unsustainable practices were adopted, which can lead to deforestation |
DQ4 | Fusion of IoT and AI, known as Artificial Intelligence of Things (AIoT), was used, along with the latest eco-friendly fifth-generation wireless technology (5G), green 5G-AIoT |
DQ5 | Provided a reliable and energy-efficient network of interconnected smart devices capable of self-monitoring and self-healing |
DQ6 | Y |
Case 06 | [53] |
DQ1 | Urban agriculture: aquaponics |
DQ2 | Scalable aquaponics installation |
DQ3 | Research on aquaponics in low- and middle-income countries often focused on food security, as in the Gaza Strip, an arid and dense urban area in prolonged crisis |
DQ4 | Digital twin system and machine learning gateway |
DQ5 | Several potential benefits have been demonstrated, for example in the reduction in waste and logistical costs. The growing acceptance of urban agriculture can reduce the production load and generate benefits of greater food security and sustainability |
DQ6 | Y |
Case 07 | [54] |
DQ1 | Controlled-environment agriculture |
DQ2 | The digital twin presented here proposed a framework for integrated urban farms to collect data and use it in a meaningful way |
DQ3 | In implementing digital twins, some challenges need to be overcome (in data creation, data analysis, and data modelling). If the farms were to test different lighting regimes at different times of day and different ventilation rates for prolonged periods in different weather conditions, more could be learned about the response of the farm environment to the controls |
DQ4 | Used a wireless sensor network (WSN) that sends real-time data to a server. The WSN is composed of 25 sensors, monitoring a total of 89 variables, which transmit data to 8 Raspberry Pi registers. These registrars, in turn, transferred the data to servers in the Engineering Department at the University of Cambridge (server) over WiFi. Loggers also stored data on SD cards when wireless service dropped. Microsoft Azure database |
DQ5 | Farm grew 12 × more per unit area than traditional greenhouse farming in the UK. The farm also consumed 4 × more energy per unit area |
DQ6 | Y |
Case 08 | [55] |
DQ1 | Wheat cultivation |
DQ2 | The article proposed a method to estimate the duration of plant development stages and yield based on expert knowledge. A method was presented to calculate the yield forecast, as well as the start and end dates of each stage of plant development within the tube during its normal development and in case of critical situations. Described the structure and functions of a DT smart plant, which was built on a module for the multi-agent planning of plant development stages and integrated with the external weather forecast and fact services. A brief description of the smart plant DT system prototype in Java was provided |
DQ3 | In agricultural production, it has generally been very difficult to plan the work, even with precision in the composition and order of operations, which is due to the great lack of knowledge about plant life, characterised by high complexity, uncertainty, and dynamics, mainly caused by climate change. When using machine learning models, a test selection is required, which must be achieved under certain conditions unchanged |
DQ4 | Digital twin |
DQ5 | New principles for construction and implementation of the digital twin plant; a knowledge base for the development of wheat stages; the structure and functions of the DT intelligent system (using wheat as an example), open to supply with other crops; a prototype smart plant DT system in Java; and a protocol tested on model data to prove its practical applicability for greater compliance, building the knowledge base, making calculations and decisions |
DQ6 | Y |
Case 09 | [56] |
DQ1 | Review on the application of digital twin (DT) |
DQ2 | The application of the Hydroponic method, in which different ways were described in which DTs can contribute |
DQ3 | Digital twins (DT) have a huge margin of success in the field of sustainable agriculture. However, the number of works carried out in this field was relatively less compared with other domains. There is a great need to adopt more efficient and sustainable production methods. To support this, a detailed review of next-gen DT apps in smart agriculture was performed in this article. It found that challenges, such as natural disasters, soil erosion, climate change, urbanisation, and epidemics, are making soil-less farming methods increasingly popular compared with soil cultivation |
DQ4 | Technologies, such as big data analysis, robotics, Internet of Things, and artificial intelligence |
DQ5 | Smart farming methods have been invented to meet the growing demand for global food production. The digital twin has been identified as an excellent candidate for making these farming methods more efficient. DT can involve different phases of the hydroponic agriculture lifecycle |
DQ6 | Y |
Case 10 | [57] |
DQ1 | Sustainable precision agriculture and environment (SPAE) |
DQ2 | Developed a digital twin that can allow the simulation of new ideas that can be tested virtually to determine environmental impacts before real-world implementation |
DQ3 | The greatest challenge of the century is achieving food security. Agricultural systems face challenges, such as climate change, depletion of water resources, potential erosion and loss of productivity due to the occurrence of extreme weather events, low adherence to decision support tools, poor communication infrastructure, siloed data management, and immature AI analytics applications |
DQ4 | Big data, digital agriculture, WebGIS framework, automation, IS, IoT, DRONES, roos, digital twins |
DQ5 | Precision agriculture emerged as a way to improve margins by managing input costs and at the same time improving yields. Contributed to increased income and profits, greater adaptation to climate change, and greater sustainability (off-field and across the watershed) |
DQ6 | Y |
Case 11 | [59] |
DQ1 | Wheat cultivation |
DQ2 | A conceptual model of the digital twin of the plant-based on ontology was proposed, which corresponds to the macro stages of plant development with the possibility of recalculating its parameters |
DQ3 | In an agricultural context, it becomes difficult to plan operations, with high adaptability required. The problem becomes more complex, with the increase in climatic variations, little knowledge about plant development factors, and the high uncertainty of the cultivation |
DQ4 | Multi-agents and ontologies |
DQ5 | Under conditions of global climate change, it is possible to create a system that will help to accumulate invaluable agronomic experience and take into account the new realities of agricultural production. Continuous monitoring and control of plant development phases will allow for the timely detection of deviations from the norm and the development of immediate recommendations for measures to reduce risks and damage to crops |
DQ6 | Y |
Digital Twins | ||
---|---|---|
Reference | Applications | Financing |
[41] | Rice Cultivation | It has no information |
[18] | Water management platform and soil probe | It has no information |
[46] | Cultivation of “ginseng berry” | Support from the Basic Scientific Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Education |
[7] | Review of state-of-the-art digital twins concepts | Did not receive external funding |
[50] | Review of urban agriculture techniques | It has no information |
[53] | Urban farming: aquaponics (growing plants and fish together) | It has no information |
[54] | Controlled-environment agriculture | Support from the Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council at the University of Warwick. Furthermore, funding also by AI for Science and Government (ASG), the UKRI Strategic Priorities Fund awarded to the Alan Turing Institute, and the Lloyd’s Register Foundation program in Data-Centred Engineering. |
[55] | Wheat cultivation | Supported by the Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation |
[56] | Review on digital twin applications in smart agriculture | It has no information |
[57] | Sustainable precision agriculture and environment (SPAE) | It has no information |
[59] | Wheat cultivation | Support from the Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation at the State Technical University of Samara. |
Research Questions Results | |
---|---|
Case study 01 | [41] |
RQ1 | It is developed as a stand-alone service and can be integrated with any existing digital agriculture platform. A pilot integration with the cyber–physical system for agriculture needs |
RQ2 | Fast, flexible, and efficient planning of agro-technological operations, as well as the subsequent control of the implementation of selected cultivation technologies. Monitoring and control of plant growth and development in fields using the digital twin |
RQ3 | The system performs adaptive scheduling of resources, such as fertilisers, protection agents, vehicles, personnel, and finances. Implementing DT in proper service decision making compared with pilot farming experiments makes businesses smarter, more flexible, and cost-effective, providing better plant cultivation productivity and agriculture sustainability to combat global climate change. The idea of accurate agricultural mail is that field processing is performed based on the actual state of crops at a given time and place. These needs can be determined by several modern information applications, namely remote sensing. At the same time, the treatment means are differentiated in several areas of the field, providing the best efficiency with the minimum environmental impact and reducing the amount of waste used |
Case study 02 | [18] |
RQ1 | The Sensing Change project developed a soil probe, while the SWAMP project is currently developing an Internet of Things platform for water management on farms. This article leverages the technologies developed by these projects by building an initial digital environment to create a cyber–physical system (CPS) so that farmers can better understand the state of their farms in terms of resource and equipment usage. The system can collect data from the land probe and display its information on a dashboard that allows for the deployment of more land probes and other monitoring and control devices to create a fully operational digital twin. Presents the primary development of a digital twin for smart agriculture using IoT to control an irrigation system based on farmer decisions and/or AI |
RQ2 | Project consists of a monitoring station, a smartphone app, and a cloud system. A monitoring system was developed for a farm that could collect and analyse information. Proposed system: On the farm, there are several devices and systems deployed, such as soil probes, weather stations, irrigation systems, seeders, harvesters, etc. These devices and equipment are connected to the cloud through a gateway that sends information to an IoT Agent (a service that translates various communication protocols into the one used in the cloud). However, to fully develop a smart digital farm, all environments must be developed using an integrative approach. Data collected and analysed in the cloud as viewed in the digital environment must be entered into the physical system via the cloud or by connecting programmable logic controllers (PLCs) in the irrigation system, equipment, and machines |
RQ3 | By using the digital twin model and IoT technology, farmers can connect different assets and systems to gain greater insight into the different aspects and parameters that affect farm behaviour and final production and resource consumption. This is a key feature that allows farmers to make better decisions and reduce environmental impacts to water, land, and soil resources. This research indicates that the system design and cloud implementation are working and can be used in the implementation of the next steps, which are the development of AI algorithms and other digital contexts. |
Case study 03 | [46] |
RQ1 | The main contributions and meanings of this study are to suggest the digital twin smart farm architecture and to implement the concept in the laboratory environment for a practical point of view. This shows how smart farm architecture can be realised based on digital twin technology. The concept is also applied in the smart farm environment itself, which shows the possibility of a commercial success story. Prescriptive DT: An intelligent digital object that aggregates intelligence to recommend corrective and preventive actions on real-life objects, usually based on optimisation algorithms and specialised heuristics, using predictive analytics. This article sets out to explore the recent trend of digital twin modelling prevalent in the smart farm context. After a literature review, the conceptual framework of the DT is proposed |
RQ2 | Digital twins have been adopted in smart agriculture across wide areas in the last decade. Digital twins can play a central role in farm management, which allows for decoupling the physical flow from the cyber control system. In a smart farm environment, farmers can be free from soil or farmland. Instead, they can control and monitor the status of farming in the build room while using the monitor. This transforms agricultural activities into different dimensions compared with those used in the past. Several sensors are connected to the plant’s control module, which monitors the nutrient status and growth of the plant. External weather conditions are also monitored by sensors installed on the laboratory ceiling. According to weather conditions, electrical power is automatically supported or interrupted. The self-monitoring and control system plays the role of the digital twin in the DT system. We designed the LED and LD (laser diode) wavelength-controlled vegetable growing system that optimises the elements of plant growth. It is fully controlled and monitored based on digital twins and IoT. The actual growing system is designed using a laboratory-grade container |
RQ3 | All field crops need soil, light (sun), temperature, air, water, and nutrition to grow. Soil gives plants stability; it also stores water and nutrients that plants can absorb through their roots. Light (sunlight) provides the energy needed for plant growth. Air allows plants to “breathe”. Water provides moisture and nutrition. The practical architecture of DT is explained. The smart farm is free of agriculture essentials, such as soil, sunlight, air, water, and fertilisers. It is designed and operated inside the building where the plant is growing in the water with nourishment and without any fertiliser, soil, and sunlight |
Case study 04 | [7] |
RQ1 | This review describes the state-of-the-art digital twin concepts, along with different digital technologies and techniques in agricultural contexts. It presents an overview of digital twins in soil, irrigation, robotics, agricultural machinery, and post-harvest food processing in the agricultural field. Data recording and modelling, including artificial intelligence, big data, simulation, analysis, and prediction, as well as the communication aspects of digital twins in agriculture are discussed. Digital twin systems can support farmers as a next-generation digitalisation paradigm, continuously monitoring the physical world (farm) in real time and updating the state of the virtual world |
RQ2 | Data from the physical world (agricultural area), such as climate, fertiliser, and soil type, as well as information from developed models that simulate soil and crop behaviour, were considered as input data for the digital twin. The digital twin concept also consisted of a soil agent (including hydrological models and soil data), a crop agent (including crop models and evaporation data), and a field avatar, which is a digital representation of the field, such as geological models and climate data. Exchanging information from soil as a physical system to a virtual system using IoT, cloud, fog, and edge computing technologies in digital twins can allow us to assess the state of soil and irrigation systems. In particular, an edge computing technique that saves and executes data processing next to soil and irrigation monitoring devices can improve performance and overcome the problems of cloud-based systems in digital twin concepts. In addition, it could offer different irrigation recommendations based on crop needs that have not yet been resolved by researchers |
RQ3 | Monitoring and evaluating soil quality to sustain plant productivity is the basis of land-use strategies on agricultural farms. The health and productivity of crops depend on the quality and property of the soil. More detailed information about soil cultivation can reduce the potential use of chemical fertiliser and pesticide dosages, improve groundwater, and protect the environment and human health. This also allows you to define the plant density more efficiently. Digital technologies are helping scientists better understand and study the soil. Soil monitoring sensors, such as sensors for humidity, temperature, organic matter, and soil pollutants, are playing a critical role in digital agriculture |
Case study 05 | [50] |
RQ1 | In this article, several emerging and disruptive technologies for urban agriculture are reviewed and evaluated. Based on the literature from 2015 to 2021, IoT, automation, and AI are the top three technology innovations that are widely implemented and documented. In contrast, genetic modification, AM, and nanotechnology are relatively new and are in the early stages of adoption |
RQ2 | A digital twin is a virtual representation of a physical system. It uses simulation and AI to mirror system properties and behaviours in real time, incorporating all physical system statuses and information. Any changes to the physical system may be reflected by its digital counterpart. As such, a digital twin can illustrate how a physical system will react in different design alternatives and situations, supporting decision making without the need to create prototypes. With digital twins, farm operators do not need to be physically on the farm site to monitor, control, coordinate, and run farm operations. Simulating layers of vertical beds in different configurations optimises building resources. Virtual models of farm operating parameters (e.g., energy and water consumption) can guide agricultural operators in making decisions, thus maximising yields and minimising energy and water use. In addition to current data, historical data can be used to predict system behaviours. Thus, digital twins can act as early warning systems when the predicted environment goes outside safe operational limits. However, implementing digital twins for agriculture is complicated and demanding. Most agricultural variables are associated with living organisms and are difficult to accurately model and simulate because of their intricate behaviours. In addition, modelling and simulating the fertility of seeds, fertilisers, pesticides, and pollution is a challenge |
RQ3 | Virtual farm operation models can guide agricultural operators in making decisions, thus maximising yields and minimising energy and water usage. In addition, data is used to predict system histories. Thus, digital twins can act as early warning systems when the predicted environment exceeds safe operational limits. However, implementing digital twins for agriculture is complicated and demanding. Most agricultural variables are associated with living organisms and are defined from the model |
Case study 06 | [53] |
RQ1 | The article aims to describe the background and related works, namely to describe a planning and decision support system for coordinating multiple farms and planning agricultural initiatives at the city level, to describe the cyber–physical aquaponics system that was developed, and present the results and empirical analysis. In the results section, we evaluated the effectiveness of a model-based digital twin approach and a machine learning approach to perform predictive decision analysis to predict urban agriculture production (a scalable "aquaponics" facility). Were also evaluated the ability of a modelling framework to generate meaningful insights into urban agriculture system design as a step towards a decision support system that uses an online simulation. |
RQ2 | The system architecture required to implement the system from the level of individual farms, data acquisition, and through a pre-processing step to enable greater coordination at the cloud layer, where global optimisation and advanced analysis and modelling capabilities predictors can be implemented. A use-case study is operational management. This case is supported by using real-time data from sensors to perform adaptive control and tactical management. The decision support system would connect different stakeholders and allow them to coordinate activities through a gateway. These users include agricultural facilities, retailers, distributors, and consumers |
RQ3 | The benefits of urban agriculture have been identified in food security, resilience to climate disturbances, environmental sustainability, and positive economic and social outcomes. As an example, there is the possibility of reducing food waste by recycling food waste as fertiliser |
Case study 07 | [54] |
RQ1 | In this article, the digital twin of the underground farm faithfully represents the reality of the environment through real-time data streams, making it a useful representation for a farm operator. This includes three crucial elements: (a) Data Creation: An extensive and robust monitoring system that tracks observable environmental conditions at the underground farm. This is supported by data curation that ensures data quality and tractability; (b) Data analysis: Using observable data in conjunction with information reported by agricultural operators to identify key variables that influence the farm environment and therefore crop yields; (c) Data modelling: Investigating the most appropriate techniques to identify trends and critical changes, predict possible future operational scenarios, and provide feedback on the influence of recent events on the farm environment |
RQ2 | The structure of the article follows the representation of the digital twin. We first introduce the monitoring process and key data challenges of monitoring in a continuously operating environment. We present data analysis that includes: (a) the influence of the farm environment on crop growth, (b) the influence of operable controls on the environment, and (c) the influence of manual changes to operational controls. Within the limitations of the data, this exercise identifies the variables that are crucial to tracking and predicting. Next, we introduce the data model, which is essentially a predictive model that predicts extreme temperatures and provides feedback on operational changes that can reduce energy usage and control the farm environment more effectively. We conclude with a discussion of the development of this digital twin. The five environmental variables that are continuously monitored are temperature, relative humidity (RH), CO2 concentration, air velocity, and light levels. Some of them, such as temperature, are monitored by several sensors, linked to different data loggers. This differs from typical CEA predictive control models, where changes in control processes (heating, ventilation) are automatically regulated in response to short-term temperature predictions |
RQ3 | The process of developing a digital twin of a unique hydroponic underground farm in London, Growing Underground (GU). The key to the continued operational success of this farm and similar ventures is finding ways to minimise energy use while maximising crop growth and maintaining optimal growing conditions. As such, it belongs to the environmentally controlled agriculture class, where indoor environments are carefully controlled to maximise crop growth using artificial lighting and smart heating, ventilation, and air-conditioning systems |
Case study 08 | [55] |
RQ1 | Digital twin from the project to an intelligent cyber–physical system for precision agriculture management. The article discusses the constructive principles of the DT plant, as well as models, methods, and specific characteristics of its implementation, which is the basis of an intelligent cyber–physical system (ICPS) for precision agriculture management. It shows the main directions of digitalisation in agriculture associated with the beginning of the development of cyber–physical systems for precision agriculture. It presents the problem statement for creating a DT in the form of an intelligent decision support system using a detailed formalised representation of knowledge about each stage of plant development. Provides an overview of existing developments in the use of CPS and DTs. It describes the structure and functions of the IDT plant based on multi-agent technology and the ontological representation of knowledge. It proposes a new model to assess the yield and duration of plant development stages based on the range of change for the most important parameters of plant development at each stage. It examines the method for calculating the duration of the plant’s developmental stage depending on changes in temperature and crop yield. It describes a prototype system for a DT smart plant. It discusses the main results and perspectives for the development of the system with the IDT plant |
RQ2 | If the DT is synchronised with a real plant, i.e., it can properly reflect its state, e.g., through regular inspections of real plants by agronomists, it can be used by agronomists to develop and make decisions, such as whether to implement agro-technical measures based on planning, in addition to modelling possible problem situations and finding ways to solve them |
RQ3 | Knowledge about the microstates of plant development should help less qualified agronomists to more accurately model and predict plant growth and change plans for agro-technical measures on time, developing management actions in case of deviations from the actual development of the plant by the application of fertilisers. Regarding fertiliser application volumes, it is known that this is usually quite expensive, requiring loans that can only be returned after the harvest is sold |
Case study 09 | [56] |
RQ1 | A review of research works carried out on the application of DT in smart agriculture was presented. Performing predictive analysis in hydroponics using DT can solve many problems |
RQ2 | To improve the temperature prediction of the nutrient solution, the DT concept can be applied with the aid of meteorological data. By using DT, the relationship between nutrient solution temperature and meteorological factors can be found leading to the development of a predictive model for nutrient solution temperature. The various methods suggested by hydroponics producers to control the temperature of the nutrient solution are the use of centrifugal or squirrel-cage fans or even air conditioners. Using DTs, farmers can estimate the performance of such cooling devices when installed on a hydroponics farm without actually installing actual devices. It allows farmers to create an efficient initial design of their farm and evaluate the performance caused by adding new features such as fans and heaters |
RQ3 | Hydroponics are one of the popular ways of growing soil-less plants indoors, reducing fertiliser usage and providing more protection from pests and adverse weather conditions. Hydroponics challenges also include the need for capital investment and experience in operational control systems. Reducing the use of fertilisers used in hydroponics and the environmental performance of various nutrient-recovery methods are discussed |
Case study 10 | [57] |
RQ1 | The growing impact of climate change, the next revolution in precision agriculture and agriculture in general, will be driven by Sustainable Precision Agriculture and Environment (SPAE, similar to the 7 Rs ). This transitions from a site-specific management focus to a global sustainability notion. In this transition, it presents WebGIS as a principle that connects local data systems and as site-specific smart grid generators to an agricultural industry view. The increasing use of artificial intelligence (AI), the Internet of Necessary Things, drones, and big data, which will serve as the global basis for the “digital twin”, will contribute to the development of conservation practices, site-specific management that ensure the conservation, and general sustainability |
RQ2 | Innovative advances in modern farm management can resemble the notion of “digital twins”, which is the confluence of IoT, AI, and big data. A digital twin is “a digital replica of a living or non-physical entity” that is used “to create living digital simulation models that update and change as their physical counterparts change". In terms of farm management, digital twins mean that “farm operations no longer need physical proximity, for the remote monitoring, control, and coordination of farming operations" |
RQ3 | Among other positive impacts, SPACE collaborates to increase yields and the sustainability of agricultural systems |
Case study 11 | [59] |
RQ1 | An approach was proposed for creating a digital wheat twin based on multi-agent knowledge bases and technologies to model wheat cultivation. The need to develop physical cybernetic systems for the management of agricultural enterprises was discussed, providing the problem statement for creating a control object model, i.e., digital twin plant that will do the research and determine the entire plant growth and development cycle, as well as the production plan for the enterprise. It provides an overview of existing approaches to the development of digital twins and proposes a new approach with ontological models and multi-agent systems. It describes a multi-agent system for planning and modelling plant development, which is the core part of the plant’s digital twin. I discusses the ontology development and knowledge base of plant developmental stages, which are the basis for the digital twin and the interaction protocol between the agronomist and the digital twin plant |
RQ2 | Cyberphysical systems are a new type of system that integrate computing, communication, and control components, including sensors, actuators, and network connectors. Modern precision agriculture technologies with daily controlled plant cultivation can significantly improve product quality and agricultural production efficiency. This approach hypothesises that the reasoning of agronomists and other experts in farm management can be modelled as a self-organising process from the above entities, which can be implemented using multi-agent, plant-growing technology to simulate prospective scenarios for new crops, predicting returns and risks for the business. Furthermore, they can improve the quality and efficiency of agricultural management decisions |
RQ3 | The plant’s digital twin will be created for each field to mirror the plant’s current growth and development. It would mirror the daily development of the plant, representing the most anticipated version of the plant development plan, updated daily with data from the weather server, sensors in the fields, and observations from agronomists. Thus, before the agronomist makes suggestions about the actions that need to be taken in each field in a given situation, they can “simulate” the impact on the crop and analyse the possible “response”. This process needs to be supported in the proposed system so that the agronomist can use it, and compare it with the real plant response. In this way, knowledge about plant cultivation can be adjusted year after year, modifying the plant’s decision-making model and creating a more accurate digital twin, expanding a possible state graph of the agent under various conditions. The main idea of the proposed approach is to consider crop cultivation as a complex adaptive system with collective decisions distributed among crop varieties, soil, fertilisers, precise machines, etc. |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Silva, L.; Rodríguez-Sedano, F.; Baptista, P.; Coelho, J.P. The Digital Twin Paradigm Applied to Soil Quality Assessment: A Systematic Literature Review. Sensors 2023, 23, 1007. https://doi.org/10.3390/s23021007
Silva L, Rodríguez-Sedano F, Baptista P, Coelho JP. The Digital Twin Paradigm Applied to Soil Quality Assessment: A Systematic Literature Review. Sensors. 2023; 23(2):1007. https://doi.org/10.3390/s23021007
Chicago/Turabian StyleSilva, Letícia, Francisco Rodríguez-Sedano, Paula Baptista, and João Paulo Coelho. 2023. "The Digital Twin Paradigm Applied to Soil Quality Assessment: A Systematic Literature Review" Sensors 23, no. 2: 1007. https://doi.org/10.3390/s23021007
APA StyleSilva, L., Rodríguez-Sedano, F., Baptista, P., & Coelho, J. P. (2023). The Digital Twin Paradigm Applied to Soil Quality Assessment: A Systematic Literature Review. Sensors, 23(2), 1007. https://doi.org/10.3390/s23021007