Next Article in Journal
Case Study: Impacts of Air-Conditioner Air Supply Strategy on Thermal Environment and Energy Consumption in Offices Using BES–CFD Co-Simulation
Previous Article in Journal
New Synthetic Partial Discharge Calibrator for Qualification of Partial Discharge Analyzers for Insulation Diagnosis of HVDC and HVAC Grids
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Sensors
Volume 23
Issue 13
10.3390/s23135956
Review Report
sensors-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
Article
Peer-Review Record

A 3D Composited Flexible Sensor Based on Percolative Nanoparticle Arrays to Discriminate Coupled Pressure and Strain

Sensors 2023, 23(13), 5956; https://doi.org/10.3390/s23135956
by Linqi Ye, Xinlei Li, Xinle Yi, Pan Tang and Minrui Chen *
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Reviewer 3: Anonymous
Sensors 2023, 23(13), 5956; https://doi.org/10.3390/s23135956
Submission received: 20 May 2023 / Revised: 16 June 2023 / Accepted: 21 June 2023 / Published: 27 June 2023
(This article belongs to the Section Sensor Materials)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Authors did a great job preparing this paper. The topic and the approach to the problem is interesting.

Please consider below comments:

·         Line 66: Add a reference for statement” because of the mechanical sensing cantilever with only one end fixed”.

 

·          Add more quantitative information about the sensitivity of other structures in your Introduction.

·         Line 102: Explain briefly what techniques has been used and how the purity has been measured.

 

·         Add how many datapoints you have in Figure 2. Do you have sufficient measurements?

·         Add an SEM image of your fabricated device.

 

·         Add an image of the measurement/experimental setup

 

English language can be improved.

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

The authors have developed flexible sensors based on nanoparticle networks that can discriminate between the type of mechanical stimuli. It is an original work and the sensors, according to the tests, show very good sensitivities. The article is well written with enough details related to the experiments. Maybe it would be good to give some details related to the reproducibility of the method and how reliable it is. I believe that it would arouse the interest of readers in the field, perhaps due to its ability to discriminate the type of mechanical stimuli. The literature in the field abounds, but its efficiency, sensitivity and not very difficult way of preparation can bring many readers.

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 3 Report

Overall, this is a good paper. The following revisions are requested.

-Abstract does not talk about the nature of the specific research in detail.

-Former research studies accomplished in line with the performed research are not presented in detail. 

-Figure 2: Enlarge the circled areas.

-Figure 3: Label the images.

-Figure 5: Why do you use two linear curve fitting? Unjustified.

-Table 1: All compared publications are with MEMBRANE. Nothing is with 3D STRUCTURE. Why?



Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Round 2

Reviewer 1 Report

Thank you for revising the paper. The paper can be accepted in the current form.

Back to TopTop