1. Introduction
Accompanied by the fast urbanization progress in China, the construction of urban rail transit, especially the metro, has developed rapidly as well in a lot of large cities. The gradually perfected metro network brings great convenience to the public travelling in the downtown area, while in the meantime leading to increasingly more vibration and noise problems. The excessive metro-train-induced vibration and noise not only affects the work and living conditions of nearby residents [
1,
2] but also results in a negative impact on historical buildings [
3,
4], sensitive equipment [
5], etc. Therefore, prior to the construction of environmentally sensitive structures close to metro lines, the impact of train-induced vibration and radiated noise on the structure has to be effectively assessed in the preliminary design phase. In case the vibration or noise exceeds the allowable level, certain mitigation measures have to be implemented to guarantee the functionality of the structure.
Train-induced vibration and noise is a complex systematic problem, which can be affected by many factors including vibration sources, propagation paths and receivers. The vibration sources of the metro concern the whole vehicle–track–foundation system. It has been found that vehicle and track damping measures, such as dampers on the wheels [
6] and rails [
7], elastic clips [
8], ladder slabs [
9] and embedded [
10] and floating slab tracks with damping pads [
11,
12,
13,
14] and steel springs [
15], etc., can have a significant impact on the vibration levels and frequency characteristics. Besides the variation of track structures, the track condition is also an important influencing factor that cannot be ignored. The impact factors include but are not limited to the change of wheel and rail profiles due to wear and maintenance [
16], the temperature force in the rail [
17], different types of track irregularities [
18] and installation quality of fastening clips [
19], etc. Regarding the propagation path of the vibration, which is mainly the surrounding rock and soil of the railway foundation, the physical properties [
20,
21] as well as distribution of soil and rock layers [
20,
22] are considered as influential factors that may contribute to the attenuation of vibration. In the aspect of vibration and noise receivers, the foundation type [
23], the height and weight of the structure [
24], the position of measurement points [
24,
25,
26] and the vibration isolation design [
27,
28], etc., can all influence the vibration and noise level.
To assess the impact of train-induced vibration and radiated noise on adjacent buildings, both experimental [
29,
30,
31,
32,
33] and numerical [
34,
35,
36,
37,
38] methods are commonly applied. Connolly et al. [
29] analyzed many vibration records at several high-speed rail sites across Europe to obtain more insights into ground vibration prediction. Kouroussis et al. [
30] measured and analyzed the ground vibration generated by different trains to obtain relevant parameters to model the train/track structure. Mouzakis et al. [
31] proposed a method to determine the transfer function of vibration diffusion inside the given geological media based on field measurement and applied the transfer function to assess the train-induced vibration on nearby buildings. Sanayei et al. [
32] analyzed the surface train- and subway-induced 3D vibrations in both inside buildings and open fields, respectively. Zou et al. [
33] proposed predicted models for train-induced vibration and noise based on the existing model and validated it through field measurements in a metro depot. Ibrahim et al. [
34] developed a track–soil–structure finite element model and analyzed the vibration mitigation effect of different trench techniques. López-Mendoza et al. [
35] proposed a scoping model to predict train-induced vibration in buildings with the soil–structure interaction taken into consideration. Lopes et al. [
36] proposed a 2.5D FEM-PML numerical approach for the prediction of vibrations induced in buildings due to railway traffic in a tunnel. Guo et al. [
37] investigated the influence of some key parameters, e.g., train speed and fastener configurations, on the train-induced vibration acceleration level of a metro depot through numerical simulation. It can be seen that for numerical modelling and analysis, in situ measurements to some extent remain necessary for model validation [
38]. In some cases, the numerical method is applied in combination with field measurement [
39]. The entire process from vibration generation and propagation to noise radiation signifies that in situ measurement is still the most effective and intuitive method to assess train-induced vibration and noise.
It has to be noted that the impact of train-induced vibration and noise on proposed structures cannot be directly assessed through on-site measurement due to the lack of foundation and structure, while accurate numerical modelling and simulation is quite time-consuming and not efficient for engineering application. Considering that the assessed vibration and noise level will be used to guide the design of vibration mitigation measures, a slight deviation can be acceptable. Therefore, to assess the vibration and noise level of proposed structures, analogical measurement and analysis based on an existing building with comparable structural type and relative location to the metro is a practical option.
Recently in Shenzhen, a top-level theater close to several metro lines was proposed. To guarantee the stage effect of the theater, the train-induced vibration and noise in the theater have to be kept within the stipulated limits. Therefore, the goal of this study is to assess the expected levels of the train-induced vibration and radiated noise in the theater. To achieve this goal, measurements and analysis based on an analogical building with similar relative location to the metro and structural type as the theater are implemented. To ensure the applicability of the analogical assessment, the analogical building is validated using the metro train-induced ground vibration responses. The train-induced vibration and radiated noise in both the public areas and the cinema in the analogical building are measured, and the results are analyzed using the indicators with the consideration of frequency weighting. The outcomes of the analogical assessment will be further applied as key references to provide necessary guidance for the anti-vibration design of the theater.
2. Overview of the Theater
The theater is proposed to be constructed in one of the urban core districts in Shenzhen, China. Containing a dream theater with more than 1000 seats and a multi-functional performing space with more than 500 seats, it is positioned as a milestone project to enhance the image of Shenzhen as an international metropolis.
The urban core region of Shenzhen has the highest metro density in China with over 1 km/km
2 in double lines, and the train-induced vibration and noise problems due to the operation of metro lines are particularly prominent. In the construction site of the theater, there are currently two metro lines (Line A and Line B) passing on the south. In the near future, there will be another two metro lines (Line C and Line D) also passing on the south. The plane and section positional relationships of the theater and the metro lines are shown in
Figure 1.
The shortest horizontal distance between the theater (designed outline) and Metro Line A (middle line of the closed tunnel) is 30 m. To the south of Line A, Line B passes over with the shortest horizontal distance from the theater of around 80 m. The proposed Metro Line C and Line D will pass to the south of the theater with the shortest distance of 28 m, and these two lines are currently in the stage of preliminary design. Based on the principle of preconception, priorities are given to Line A and Line B in the assessment of train-induced vibration and radiated noise. In return, the assessment results can also help provide a reference for the anti-vibration design of Metro Line C and Line D.
3. Assessment Methods
The assessment of the train-induced vibration and radiated noise is aimed to be applied to determine the vibration mitigation requirement for the theater. Therefore, the assessment work is performed based on the Chinese standards for building construction. Specifically, the impact of train-induced vibration and radiated noise in the public area of the theater are assessed according to standard JGJ/T 170-2009 [
40], and the noise level in the theater and the performing space of the theater are assessed according to standard GB/T 50356-2005 [
41].
According to the above standards, the indicator for the vibration assessment is the maximum vibration level in 1/3 octave band frequency divisions (in the range of 4–200 Hz, expressed by VLmax). The indicator for the radiated noise assessment is the equivalent continuous A-weighted sound pressure (in the frequency range of 16–200 Hz, expressed by LAeq). In addition, the noise level in the dream theater and the performing space is the noise rating (NR) value in the frequency range of 31.5–8000 Hz. All the indicators are briefly explained in this section.
3.1. Experimental Tools
The key components for the assessment of the train-induced vibration and radiated noise are the accelerometer for the tunnel wall and ground vibration measurements and the sound level meter for the radiated noise measurements. The main configurations of these sensors are listed in
Table 1.
3.2. Vibration Assessment Method
The vibration acceleration level can be calculated through Formula (1).
where
a is the root mean square acceleration value, and
a0 is the reference acceleration value. For train-induced vibration,
a0 = 10
−6 m/s
2. For discrete data, the root mean square acceleration value can be calculated through Formula (2):
where
n is the data length of the measured discrete acceleration signal. The
VLmax can be calculated through Formula (3):
where
VLk is the vibration acceleration level in each 1/3 octave frequency band, and
wk is the corresponding weighting factor. The recommended values of
wk in 4–200 Hz are provided in the international standard ISO 2631-1: 1997 [
42]. The
VLmax corrects to an integer by rounding.
3.3. Radiated Noise Assessment Methods
The impact of train-induced radiated noise in the theater is assessed in two dimensions. One dimension is for the public area of the theater except the dream theater and the multi-functional performing space, the assessment method is the LAeq; the other dimension is for the dream theater and the multi-functional performance space. The assessment method is the noise rating (NR) value. The details of radiated noise assessment methods are presented below.
3.3.1. Equivalent Continuous A-Weighted Sound Pressure
The A-weighted Sound pressure (
LA) can be calculated through Formula (4):
where
p is the root mean square sound pressure, and
p0 is the reference sound pressure. For air-born sound,
p0 = 2 × 10
5 Pa. The sound pressure A-weighting factors in 1/3 octave frequency bands are provided in the international standard IEC 61672-1:2013 [
43].
The mean energy value of A-weighted sound pressure in the specified measurement time is
LAeq, which can be calculated through Formula (5).
where
n is the number of train passages, and
LAE,
i is the A-weighted sound pressure of train
i. It has to be noted that the measured radiated noise is effective only when it is more than 3 dB (A) higher than the background noise. In case the difference between measured radiated noise and background noise is 3–9 dB (A), the measurement results have to be amended by 1–3 dB (A) [
40].
3.3.2. Noise Rating Number
The noise rating (
NR) curve for the assessment of noise levels inside various types of buildings was proposed in the international standard ISO/R 1996:1971 [
44]. In GB/T 50356-2005, the
NR curve is applied to the acoustic control for theater, cinema and multi-use auditorium. In this method, the sound pressure levels in octave-band frequencies of 31.5–8000 Hz are measured, and the sound pressure limit in each frequency band can be calculated through Formula (6).
where
is the allowable sound pressure level in each frequency band, A and B are constant values that correspond to each frequency band [
41], and
NR is the sound pressure level in the frequency range of 1000 Hz.
Using this method, the NR number is determined by the tangent point of the sound pressure curve. Specifically, we plot the fitted sound pressure curve on the NR curve map, and the NR curve with the highest tangent point is defined as the NR number of the measured sound pressure.
3.4. Allowable Vibration and Noise Levels
Combining the requirements of the theater with the stipulations of the standards, the allowable VLmax value is 62 dB, and the allowable LAeq value is 42 dB (A).
The noise control values in the dream theater and the multi-functional performing space are both
NR-20. The sound pressure levels in the corresponding octave frequencies are listed in
Table 2.