# Control Systems with Tomographic Sensors—A Review

^{*}

## Abstract

**:**

## 1. Introduction

## 2. General Characteristics of Tomography-Based Control

#### 2.1. Implications for Selection of Control Method

**x**(t) is an n-dimensional state vector

**u**(t) is a vector of input variables,

**y**(t) is a vector of output variables,

**A**,

**B**,

**C**and

**D**are matrices of appropriate dimensions. The number of first-order equations n is finite, and it is called the order of this model.

**A**,

**B**,

**C**,

**D**would be infinite-dimensional operators on Hilbert spaces and not matrices [22]. Such models are popular in textbooks on the mathematical theory of infinite-dimensional systems. However, their relationship to physics is indirect and their practical applicability is more than limited. Nevertheless, they are closely related to partial differential equations (PDEs) and can be derived from them [22]. For this reason, it is better to work with models in the form of PDEs that can be derived from the underlying physics of the process.

_{j}(t) is the steam jacket temperature, u is the heated fluid velocity through the tube, and τ is a positive constant. The steam temperature is considered to be spatially uniform for simplicity.

**x**is composed of temperatures T(1,t) to T(N,t), input vector

**u**includes T(0,t) and T

_{j}(t), and output from the system is T(N,t), the set of Equation (5) can be written in matrix form (1).

#### 2.2. Tomography Data Processing

**x**stands for a vector of internal state variables (e.g., concentration distributions), and

**y**is the vector of the measured outputs. Vectors

**ξ**and

**η**are noises: process noise and measurement noise, respectively. These vectors are not included in the continuous version of the state space Equation (1). They are added to the discretized version because these noises are the standard way the model uncertainties and measurement errors are considered in Kalman filtering and LQ control [45]. System input (manipulated variables, disturbances) is denoted with

**u**and k stands for the discrete time.

## 3. Control Techniques, Methods, and Applications

#### 3.1. Control Based on Distributed Models

#### 3.1.1. Concentration Distribution Control

**ξ**is the vector of space coordinates within the domain of interest Ω (finite segment of a pipe). This domain is generally three-dimensional, but it can be two-dimensional if it is a straight pipe with circular symmetry. The concentration distribution is denoted as c(

**ξ**, t) where

**ξ**∈ Ω and t ≥ 0,

**v**(

**ξ**) is the velocity field and κ(

**ξ**) is the diffusion coefficient. The source term

**q**(

**x**, t) describes the injection of substance B into the flow of substance A. If there are multiple injectors, this term can be expressed as

**u**(t) is the vector of manipulated variables and

**Λ**is a linear map that depends on the geometry of the injection and the number of injectors K.

_{in}(t) is the time-varying concentration at the input boundary, i.e., it is generally assumed that even the fluid entering the pipe can contain a fraction of the substance injected by the injectors. This variable is a disturbance from the viewpoint of feedback control.

**c**(k) is the space and time-discretized concentration, which plays the role of a state vector,

**u**(k) is the vector of manipulated variables defined in Equation (9), disturbance

**d**(k) is input concentration defined in Equation (10), and

**w**(k) is a stochastic process representing modeling uncertainties, random components of input signals and other stochastic influences. Assuming that the velocity field and the diffusion coefficient in Equation (8) are not time-varying, the matrices in Equation (13) are constant, i.e., they describe a linear time-invariant finite-dimensional system. It can be used instead of the PDE model (8) in control design. That means that this approach is a sort of early lumping design.

_{I}) applied to the electrodes. These voltages depend on the conductivity distribution σ within the pipe, and this conductivity distribution depends on the concentration of injected substance c. Voltage measurements for one current injection pattern can be expressed by a compound formula

**V**

_{j}are the voltage measurements, and

**U**

_{j}maps the conductivity to the measured voltages. Vector

**v**

_{j}represents additive measurement noise. If the controlled process is slow enough, the conductivities can be considered constant during the whole frame, where the full set of all current injection patterns is used. In this case, all measurements and conductivity mappings can be combined into one vector and one mapping [52]. Equation (9) can then be written as

**J**is the Jacobian of the function

**U***(

**c**(k)) evaluated at the operating point c

_{0}.

**C**can be zeros and ones matrix that selects just the concentrations in the region of interest as controlled outputs. This form of output equation can also cover other cases of control objectives, e.g., an average concentration in a chosen region of interest can be the output variable.

**x**(k) is a state vector, i.e., it is the vector of concentrations

**c**(k) if model (8) is the controlled plant.

**K**(k) is an optimal feedback gain matrix calculated using a discrete-time matrix Riccati equation [55]. Equations (13), (16), and (17) provide a standard setting for the design and straightforward application of LQ controller. It was only necessary to take into account that the LQ controller in its basic form is a regulator, i.e., its objective is to drive states and system output to zero. In this case, it is not an appropriate objective because the control objective is to obtain a specified nonzero reference concentration

**y**

_{ref}at the output boundary. For this reason, the structure of the controller had to be changed to

**y**

_{ref}is achieved. This modification introduces feedforward action into the controller. Set-point enters the controller indirectly as a variable on the basis of which the steady-state values are computed. The controller described by Equation (19) is used by all of the papers [46,47,48,51]. The state vector (concentrations), which is input to the controller (19), is estimated either using a Kalman filter based on a linearized observation equation [46] or using an extended Kalman filter based on a nonlinear observation equation [51].

#### 3.1.2. Microwave Drying Process

#### 3.1.3. Inline Fluid Separation Process

#### 3.1.4. Issues with Control Based on Early-Lumped PDE Models

_{i}(x)

**C**is zeros and ones matrix. On the contrary, the construction of the output equation becomes more complicated if any method with global spatial basis functions is used. Despite this problem, methods with global spatial basis functions are worthy of research attention because control designs based on models with thousands of state variables are unlikely to find industrial implementation.

#### 3.2. Control Based on Lumped Parameters Dynamical Models with a Static Model of Distributed Variables

_{0}) and velocity (U

_{0}), while output variables are particle moisture (x

_{p}) and temperature (T

_{p}). Although there are two input variables, it was shown by a sensitivity analysis published in [46] that the inlet air velocity has a much more significant influence on the performance of a fluidized bed dryer than the inlet air temperature. For this reason, it is enough to use this velocity as the only manipulated variable while the inlet air temperature can be kept constant.

_{R}and c

_{i}are real functions and J

_{0}is the Bessel function of the order zero, and λ

_{i}the i-th positive zero of this function. The structure of the mathematical model combining lumped dynamical model and (22) is shown in Figure 5b.

_{R}and c

_{i}.

_{0}corresponding to a set of particle moisture x

_{p}values for a specified desired permittivity shape and identified coefficients in model (22). The relationship between x

_{p}and optimal U

_{0 opt}resulting from this optimization was then approximated by a third-order polynomial

#### 3.3. Experimental Approaches: Identified Models, Empirical Controller Tuning

#### 3.3.1. Control of a Wurster Fluidized Bed

#### 3.3.2. Control of Microwave Drying

_{1}is the power applied to magnetrons, u

_{2}is the average input moisture, and y is the average permittivity change measured by the ECT sensor corresponding to the change of average output moisture. The input moisture was calculated on the basis of weighting the sheets of wet foams on a digital scale and the known weight of dry foam sheets.

#### 3.3.3. Control of Continuous Casting of Metals

#### 3.3.4. Control of Hydrocyclone Separators

#### 3.4. Knowledge-Based Control, Fuzzy Logic and Artificial Intelligence Approaches

_{A}is the output membership function defined in the range from a to b. An example of this defuzzification method for one specific output membership function is shown in Figure 10.

## 4. Discussion and Future Research Directions

## Author Contributions

## Funding

## Institutional Review Board Statement

## Data Availability Statement

## Conflicts of Interest

## Abbreviations

ECT | Electrical Capacitance Tomography |

EIT | Electrical Impedance Tomography |

FEM | Finite Element Method |

LQ | Linear Quadratic |

ODE | Ordinary Differential Equation |

PDE | Partial Differential Equation |

PID | Proportional Integral Derivative |

MIMO | Multi Input Multi Output |

MPC | Model Predictive Control |

SISO | Single Input Single Output |

TRL | Technology Readiness Level |

## References

- Beck, M.S.; Williams, R.A. Process Tomography: A European Innovation and Its Applications. Meas. Sci. Technol.
**1996**, 7, 215–224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Reimers, P.; Gilboy, W.B.; Goebbels, J. Recent Developments in the Industrial Application of Computerized Tomography with Ionizing Radiation. NDT Int.
**1984**, 17, 197–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Beck, M.S.; Dyakowski, T.; Williams, R.A. Process Tomography-The State of the Art. Trans. Inst. Meas. Control
**1998**, 20, 163–177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Hampel, U.; Babout, L.; Banasiak, R.; Schleicher, E.; Soleimani, M.; Wondrak, T.; Vauhkonen, M.; Lähivaara, T.; Tan, C.; Hoyle, B.; et al. A review on fast tomographic imaging techniques and their potential application in industrial process Control. Sensors
**2022**, 22, 2309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Wei, K.; Hsin, Y.; Qiu, C.-H.; Primrose, K. Super-Sensing Technology: Industrial Applications and Future Challenges of Electrical Tomography. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. A Math. Phys. Eng. Sci.
**2016**, 374, 0328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version] - Soleimani, M. Super-sensing through industrial process tomography. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. A
**2016**, 374, 0445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version] - Abdul, W.Y.; Abdul, R.R.; Fazalul, R.M.H.; Ridzuan, A.S.; Mohd, Y.F.R.; Goh, C.L.; Abdul, R.H.; Ling, L.P. Non-Invasive Process Tomography in Chemical Mixtures–A Review. Sens. Actuators B Chem.
**2015**, 210, 602–617. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Sattar, M.A.; Garcia, M.M.; Portela, L.M.; Babout, L. A Fast Electrical Resistivity-Based Algorithm to Measure and Visualize Two-Phase Swirling Flows. Sensors
**2022**, 22, 1834. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Beck, M.S.; Williams, R.A. Process Tomography-Principles, Techniques and Applications; Butterworth-Heinemann: Oxford, UK, 1995; ISBN 9780080938011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Scott, D.M.; McCann, H. Process Imaging for Automatic Control; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2005; ISBN 978-1-315-22089-5. [Google Scholar]
- Wang, M. Industrial Tomography-Systems and Applications; Publishing Series in Electronic and Optical Materials, Number 71; Woodhead: Cambridge, UK, 2015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- World Congress on Industrial Process Tomography. Available online: https://www.isipt.org/publications.html (accessed on 23 December 2021).
- Cruz, F.A.J.; Dantas, C.C.; de Lima, H.J.B.F.; Lima, A.O.E.; Melo, S.B.; Barbosa, E.S. Digital Control Design for a Circulating Fluidized Bed Unit Using Gamma Transmission Measurements. In Proceedings of the 8th World Congress on Industrial Process Tomography, Iguassu Falls, Brazil, 26–29 September 2016; ISBN 978-0-853-16349-7. [Google Scholar]
- Cruz, F.A.J.; Barbosa, E.S.; Dantas, C.C.; de Lima, H.J.B.F.; Lima, A.O.E.; Melo, S.B. Identification and Digital Control Design for a Pilot FCC Type Unit using Gamma Transmission Measurements. In Proceedings of the 9th World Congress on Industrial Process Tomography, Bath, UK, 2–6 September 2018; ISBN 978-0-853-16356-5. [Google Scholar]
- Zhang, Z.; Jia, J. Control Strategies of EIT-Guided Mechanical Ventilation. In Proceedings of the 10th World Congress on Industrial Process Tomography, Global, Online Event, 13–16 September 2021; ISBN 978-0-85316-364-0. [Google Scholar]
- Sattar, M.A.; Garcia, M.M.; Banasiak, R.; Portela, L.M.; Babout, L. Electrical Resistance Tomography for Control Applications: Quantitative Study of the Gas-Liquid Distribution inside A Cyclone. Sensors
**2020**, 20, 6069. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Wang, H.; Yang, W. Application of Electrical Capacitance Tomography in Circulating Fluidised Beds–A Review. Appl. Therm. Eng.
**2020**, 176, 115311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Wang, H.; Yang, W. Application of Electrical Capacitance Tomography in Pharmaceutical Fluidised Beds–A Review. Chem. Eng. Sci.
**2021**, 231, 116236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Yao, J.; Takei, M. Application of Process Tomography to Multiphase Flow Measurement in Industrial and Biomedical Fields: A Review. IEEE Sens. J.
**2017**, 17, 8196–8205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Ma, L.; Soleimani, M. Magnetic induction tomography methods and applications: A review. Meas. Sci. Technol.
**2017**, 28, 072001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version] - Williams, I.I.R.L.; Lawrence, D.A. Linear State-Space Control Systems; John Wiley & Sons: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2007; ISBN 978-0-471-73555-7. [Google Scholar]
- Curtain, R.; Zwart, H. Introduction to Infinite-Dimensional Systems Theory a State-Space Approach; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2020; ISBN 978-1-0716-0590-5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lasiecka, I. Control of Systems Governed by Partial Differential Equations: A Historical Perspective. In Proceedings of the 34th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, New Orleans, LA, USA, 13–15 December 1995; Volume 3, pp. 2792–2796. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Christofides, P.D. Nonlinear and Robust Control of PDE Systems-Methods and Applications to Transport-Reaction Processes; Birkhäuser: Basel, Switzerland, 2001; ISBN 978-1-4612-0185-4. [Google Scholar]
- Krstic, M.; Smyshlyaev, A. Boundary Control of PDEs: A Course on Backstepping Designs; Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics: Philadelphia, PA, USA, 2008; ISBN 978-0-89871-650-4. [Google Scholar]
- Morris, K.A. Controller Design for Distributed Parameter Systems; Springer Nature: Cham, Switzerland, 2020; ISBN 978-3-030-34949-3. [Google Scholar]
- Yupanqui Tello, I.F.; Vande Wouwer, A.; Coutinho, D. A Concise Review of State Estimation Techniques for Partial Differential Equation Systems. Mathematics
**2021**, 9, 3180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Mbihi, J. Analog Automation and Digital Feedback Control Techniques; John Wiley & Sons, Inc.: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2018; ISBN 978-1-78630-248-9. [Google Scholar]
- Mazumder, S. Numerical Methods for Partial Differential Equations Finite Difference and Finite Volume Methods; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2016; ISBN 978-0-12-849894-1. [Google Scholar]
- Shang, H.; Forbes, J.F.; Guay, M. Feedback Control of Hyperbolic PDE Systems. IFAC Proc. Vol.
**2000**, 33, 533–538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Kouvaritakis, B.; Cannon, M. Model Predictive Control-Classical, Robust and Stochastic; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2016; ISBN 978-3-319-24851-6. [Google Scholar]
- Cinquemani, S.; Ferrari, D.; Bayati, I. Reduction of spillover effects on independent modal space control through optimal placement of sensors and actuators. Smart Mater. Struct.
**2015**, 24, 085006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Hoyle, B.S.; McCann, H.; Scott, D.M. Process Tomography. In Process Imaging for Automatic Control; Scott, D.M., McCann, H., Eds.; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2005; pp. 85–126. ISBN 978-1-315-22089-5. [Google Scholar]
- West, R.M.; Jia, X.; Williams, R.A. Parametric Modelling in Industrial Process Tomography. Chem. Eng. J.
**2000**, 77, 31–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Romanowski, A.; Grudzien, K.; Williams, R.A. A Review of Data Analysis Methods for Electrical Industrial Process Tomography Applications. In Proceedings of the 4th World Congress on Industrial Process Tomography, Aizu, Japan, 5 September 2005; pp. 916–921. [Google Scholar]
- Zhou, L.; Zhang, Y.C.; Yao, D.Y.; Peng, L.H.; Zhang, B.F. Using Principal Component Analysis to Measure Two-Phase Flow Concentration. In Proceedings of the 2nd World Congress on Industrial Process Tomography, Hannover, Germany, 29–31 August 2001; pp. 35–40. [Google Scholar]
- Seleghim, P.; Hervieu, E. Direct imaging of two-phase flows by electrical impedance measurements. Meas. Sci. Technol.
**1998**, 9, 1492–1500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Yang, W.Q.; Liu, S. Role of tomography in gas/solids flow measurement. Flow Meas. Instrum.
**2000**, 11, 237–244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Jeanmeure, L.F.C.; Dyakowski, T.; Zimmerman, W.B.J.; Clark, W. Direct flow-pattern identification using electrical capacitance tomography. Exp. Therm. Fluid Sci.
**2002**, 26, 763–773. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Yan, R.; Viumdal, H.; Mylvaganam, S. Process Tomography for Model Free Adaptive Control (MFAC) via Flow Regime Identification in Multiphase Flows. IFAC-PapersOnLine
**2020**, 53, 11753–11760. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Abouelazayem, S.; Glavinić, I.; Wondrak, T.; Hlava, J. Control of Jet Flow Angle in Continuous Casting Process Using an Electromagnetic Brake. IFAC-PapersOnLine
**2019**, 52, 88–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Choi, Y.J.; Mccarthy, K.L.; Mccarthy, M.J. Tomographic Techniques for Measuring Fluid Flow Properties. J. Food Sci.
**2002**, 67, 2718–2724. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Tan, C.; Murai, Y.; Liu, W.; Tasaka, Y.; Dong, F.; Takeda, Y. Ultrasonic Doppler Technique for Application to Multiphase Flows: A Review. Int. J. Multiph. Flow
**2021**, 144, 103811. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Abouelazayem, S.; Glavinić, I.; Wondrak, T.; Hlava, J. Flow Control Based on Feature Extraction in Continuous Casting Process. Sensors
**2020**, 20, 6880. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Simon, D. Optimal State Estimation Kalman, H
_{∞}and Nonlinear Approaches; John Wiley & Sons, Inc.: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2006; ISBN 978-0-471-70858-2. [Google Scholar] - Ruuskanen, A.R.; Seppänen, A.; Duncan, S.; Somersalo, E.; Kaipio, J.P. Using process tomography as a sensor for optimal Control. Appl. Numer. Math.
**2006**, 56, 37–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Ruuskanen, A.R.; Seppänen, A.; Duncan, S.; Somersalo, E.; Kaipio, J.P. Using tomographic measurements in process control. In Proceedings of the 43 IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, Nassau, Bahamas, 14–17 December 2004; pp. 4696–4701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ruuskanen, A.R.; Seppänen, A.; Duncan, S.; Somersalo, E.; Kaipio, J.P. Optimal control in process tomography. In Proceedings of the 3rd World Congress on Industrial Process Tomography, Banff, AB, Canada, 2–5 September 2003; pp. 245–251. [Google Scholar]
- Duncan, S. Regulating concentration profile in fluid flow using process tomography. IFAC Proc. Vol. IFAC-PapersOnline
**2002**, 151, 449–454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version] - Duncan, S. Using process tomography as a sensor in a system for controlling concentration in fluid flow. In Proceedings of the 2nd World Congress on Industrial Process Tomography, Hannover, Germany, 29–31 August 2001; pp. 378–386. [Google Scholar]
- Kaasinen, A. Optimal Control in Process Tomography. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland, 2013. Available online: https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/32423406.pdf (accessed on 3 April 2022).
- Seppänen, A.; Heikkinen, L.; Savolainen, T.; Voutilainen, A.; Somersalo, E.; Kaipio, J.P. An Experimental Evaluation of State Estimation with Fluid Dynamical Models in Process Tomography. Chem. Eng. J.
**2007**, 127, 23–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Kaipio, J.P.; Seppänen, A.; Voutilainen, A.; Haario, H. Optimal Current Patterns in Dynamical Electrical Impedance Tomography Imaging. Inverse Probl.
**2007**, 23, 1201–1214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Normey-Rico, J.E.; Camacho, E.F. Control of Dead-Time Processes; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2007; ISBN 978-1-84628-829-6. [Google Scholar]
- Stengel, R.F. Optimal Control and Estimation; Dover Publications: New York, NY, USA, 1994; ISBN 978-0-48668-200-6. [Google Scholar]
- Hosseini, M.; Kaasinen, A.; Link, G.; Lähivaara, T.; Vauhkonen, M. LQR Control of Moisture Distribution in Microwave Drying Process Based on a Finite Element Model of Parabolic PDEs. IFAC-PapersOnLine
**2020**, 53, 11470–11476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Roussy, G.; Bennani, A.; Thiebaut, J. Temperature Runaway of Microwave Irradiated Materials. J. Appl. Phys.
**1987**, 62, 1167–1170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Yadav, R.; Omrani, A.; Link, G.; Vauhkonen, M.; Lähivaara, T. Microwave Tomography Using Neural Networks for Its Application in an Industrial Microwave Drying System. Sensors
**2021**, 21, 6919. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] - Garcia, M.M.; Sahovic, B.; Sattar, M.A.; Atmani, H.; Schleicher, E.; Hampel, U.; Babout, L.; Legendre, D.; Portela, L.M. Control of a gas-liquid inline swirl separator based on tomographic measurements. IFAC-PapersOnLine
**2020**, 53, 11483–11490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Sahovic, B.; Atmani, H.; Sattar, M.A.; Garcia, M.M.; Schleicher, E.; Legendre, D.; Climent, E.; Zamansky, R.; Pedrono, A.; Babout, L.; et al. Controlled Inline Fluid Separation Based on Smart Process Tomography Sensors. Chem. Ing. Tech.
**2020**, 92, 554–563. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version] - Vallabhan, M.K.G.; Matias, J.; Holden, C. Feedforward, Cascade and Model Predictive Control Algorithms for De-Oiling Hydrocyclones: Simulation Study. Model. Identif. Control
**2021**, 42, 185–195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Skogestad, S.; Poslethwaite, I. Multivariable Feedback Control Analysis and Design, 2nd ed.; Wiley: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2007; ISBN 13-978-0-470-01168-3. [Google Scholar]
- Rakovic, S.V.; Levine, W.S. Handbook of Model Predictive Control; Birkhäuser: Basel, Switzerland, 2019; ISBN 978-3-319-77488-6. [Google Scholar]
- Sbarbaro, D.; Vergara, S. Design of a Control System Based on EIT Sensors: An Optimization Based Approach. IFAC-PapersOnLine
**2015**, 48, 218–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Li, H.-X.; Qi, C. Modeling of Distributed Parameter Systems for Applications—A Synthesized Review from Time–Space Separation. J. Process Control
**2010**, 20, 891–901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Hoo, K.A.; Zheng, D. Low-Order Control-Relevant Models for a Class of Distributed Parameter Systems. Chem. Eng. Sci.
**2001**, 56, 6683–6710. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Villegas, J.A.; Li, M.; Duncan, S.R.; Wang, H.G.; Yang, W.Q. Feedback Control of Moisture in a Batch Fluidised Bed Dryer Using Tomographic Sensor. In Proceedings of the 5th World Congress on Industrial Process Tomography, Bergen, Norway, 3–6 September 2007; pp. 405–413. [Google Scholar]
- Villegas, J.A.; Li, M.; Duncan, S.R.; Wang, H.G.; Yang, W.Q. Modeling and Control of Moisture Content in a Batch Fluidized Bed Dryer Using Tomographic Sensor. In Proceedings of the American Control Conference, Seattle, WA, USA, 11–13 June 2008; pp. 3350–3355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Villegas, J.A.; Duncan, S.R.; Wang, H.G.; Yang, W.Q.; Raghavan, R.S. Distributed Parameter Control of a Batch Fluidised Bed Dryer. Control Eng. Pract.
**2009**, 17, 1096–1106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Wang, H.G.; Senior, P.R.; Mann, R.; Yang, W.Q. Online Measurement and Control of Solids Moisture in Fluidised Bed Dryers. Chem. Eng. Sci.
**2009**, 64, 2893–2902. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Sherwood Scientific, Model 501 Fluid Bed Dryer-Lab-Scale, Programmable & Analytical, Information Brochure. Available online: https://www.sherwood-scientific.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/01/Fluid-bed-dryer-brochure.pdf (accessed on 5 February 2022).
- Li, M.; Duncan, S. Dynamic Model Analysis of Batch Fluidized Bed Dryers. Part. Part. Syst. Charact.
**2008**, 25, 328–344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Che, H.; Wang, H.; Ye, J.; Yang, W. Control of Pellets Coating in a Wurster Fluidised Bed by Means of Electrical Capacitance Tomography. Trans. Inst. Meas. Control
**2020**, 42, 729–742. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Ziegler, J.G.; Nichols, N.B. Optimum Settings for Automatic Controllers. Trans. ASME
**1942**, 64, 759–768. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Hosseini, M.; Kaasinen, A.; Aliyari Shoorehdeli, M.; Link, G.; Lähivaara, T.; Vauhkonen, M. System Identification of Conveyor Belt Microwave Drying Process of Polymer Foams Using Electrical Capacitance Tomography. Sensors
**2021**, 21, 7170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Hosseini, M.; Kaasinen, A.; Shoorehdeli, M.A.; Link, G.; Lähivaara, T.; Vauhkonen, M. Tomography-assisted control for the microwave drying process of polymer foams. J. Process Control, 2022; submitted. [Google Scholar]
- Thomas, B.G. Review on Modeling and Simulation of Continuous Casting. Steel Res. Int.
**2018**, 89, 1700312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Zhang, T.; Yang, J.; Jiang, P. Measurement of Molten Steel Velocity near the Surface and Modeling for Transient Fluid Flow in the Continuous Casting Mold. Metals
**2019**, 9, 36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version] - Kim, M.; Moon, S.; Na, C.; Lee, D.; Kueon, Y.; Lee, J.S. Control of Mold Level in Continuous Casting Based on a Disturbance Observer. J. Process Control
**2011**, 21, 1022–1029. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Furtmueller, C.; del Re, L. Control Issues in Continuous Casting of Steel. IFAC Proc. Vol.
**2008**, 41, 700–705. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version] - Sedén, M.; Jacobson, N. Online Flow Control with Mold Flow Measurements and Simultaneous Braking and Stirring. IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng.
**2018**, 424, 012015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version] - Abouelazayem, S.; Glavinić, I.; Wondrak, T.; Hlava, J. Switched MPC Based on Clogging Detection in Continuous Casting Process. IFAC-PapersOnLine
**2020**, 53, 11491–11496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Abouelazayem, S.; Glavinić, I.; Wondrak, T.; Hlava, J. Adaptive Control of Meniscus Velocity in Continuous Caster Based on NARX Neural Network Model. IFAC-PapersOnLine
**2019**, 52, 222–227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Glavinic, I.; Muttakin, I.; Abouelazayem, S.; Blishchik, A.; Stefani, F.; Eckert, S.; Soleimani, M.; Saidani, I.; Hlava, J.; Kenjereš, S.; et al. Laboratory Investigation of Tomography-Controlled Continuous Steel Casting. Sensors
**2022**, 22, 2195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] - Gutierrez-Gnecchi, J.A.; Marroquín-Pineda, E. Control of a pilot-scale, solid-liquid separation plant using electrical impedance tomography measurements. Part. Part. Syst. Charact.
**2008**, 25, 306–313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Gutiérrez, J.A.; Dyakowski, T.; Beck, M.S.; Williams, R.A. Using Electrical Impedance Tomography for Controlling Hydrocyclone Underflow Discharge. Powder Technol.
**2000**, 108, 180–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Williams, R.A.; Dickin, F.J.; Gutiérrez, J.A.; Dyakowski, T.; Beck, M.S. Using Electrical Impedance Tomography for Controlling Hydrocyclone Underflow Discharge. Control Eng. Pract.
**1997**, 5, 253–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Hooda, D.S.; Raich, V. Fuzzy Logic Models and Fuzzy Control an Introduction; Alpha Science International Ltd.: Oxford, UK, 2017; ISBN 978-1-78332-281-7. [Google Scholar]
- Mahmoud, M.S. Fuzzy Control, Estimation and Diagnosis Single and Interconnected Systems; Springer International Publishing: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2018; ISBN 978-3-319-54954-5. [Google Scholar]
- Siddique, N. Neuro-Fuzzy Control. In Intelligent Control, Studies in Computational Intelligence; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2014; Volume 517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Neuffer, D.; Alvarez, A.; Owens, D.H.; Ostrowski, K.L.; Luke, S.P.; Williams, R.A. Control of pneumatic conveying using ECT. In Proceedings of the 1st World Congress on Industrial Process Tomography, Buxton, UK, 14–17 April 1999; pp. 71–76. [Google Scholar]
- Deloughry, R.; Pickup, E.; Ponnapalli, P. Closed loop control of a pneumatic conveying system using tomographic imaging. J. Electron. Imaging
**2001**, 10, 653–660. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Ponnapalli, P.V.S.; Benchebra, D.; Deloughry, R.; Ibrahim, I. Application of an ANN-based controller for the control of pneumatic conveyed polypropylene pellet flow. In Proceedings of the 5th World Congress in Industrial Process Tomography, Bergen, Norway, 3–6 September 2007; pp. 677–682. [Google Scholar]
- Cirstea, M.N.; Dinu, A.; Khor, J.G.; McCormick, M. Neural and Fuzzy Logic Control of Drives and Power Systems; Elsevier Ltd.: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2002; ISBN 0 7506 55585. [Google Scholar]
- Bukhari, S.F.A.; Yang, W.; McCann, H. A hybrid control strategy for oil separators based on electrical capacitance tomography images. Meas. Control
**2007**, 40, 211–221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Hou, Z.; Jin, S. Model Free Adaptive Control-Theory and Applications; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2016; ISBN 9781138033962. [Google Scholar]
- Yang, Y.; Yang, W.; Zhong, H. Temperature distribution measurement and control of extrusion process by tomography. In Proceedings of the IST IEEE Workshop on Imaging Systems and Techniques, Chania, Greece, 10–12 September 2008; pp. 170–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Abouelazayem, S. Control of Continuous Casting Process Based on Distributed Sensing. Ph.D. Thesis, Technical University of Liberec, Liberec, Czech Republic, 2022. [Google Scholar]
- Rymarczyk, T.; Sikora, J. Applying industrial tomography to control and optimization flow systems. Open Phys.
**2018**, 16, 332–345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Candy, J.V. Model-Based Processing: An Applied Subspace Identification Approach; John Wiley & Sons: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2019; ISBN 978-1-119-45776-3. [Google Scholar]
- Esfandiari, K.; Abdollahi, F.; Talebi, H.A. Neural Network-Based Adaptive Control of Uncertain Nonlinear Systems; Springer Nature: Cham, Switzerland, 2022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Su, X.; Wen, Y.; Yang, Y.; Shi, P. Intelligent Control, Filtering and Model Reduction Analysis for Fuzzy-Model-Based Systems; Springer Nature: Cham, Switzerland, 2022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

**Figure 1.**(

**a**) Flow patterns in the mold; (

**b**) parametrization of the jet flow using a line with a variable angle.

**Figure 5.**(

**a**) Schematic sketch of the fluidized bed dryer and its instrumentation (

**b**) structure of its control-oriented mathematical model.

**Figure 10.**Defuzzification example resulting in a single numerical value of manipulated variable (heater power).

Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |

© 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

## Share and Cite

**MDPI and ACS Style**

Hlava, J.; Abouelazayem, S.
Control Systems with Tomographic Sensors—A Review. *Sensors* **2022**, *22*, 2847.
https://doi.org/10.3390/s22082847

**AMA Style**

Hlava J, Abouelazayem S.
Control Systems with Tomographic Sensors—A Review. *Sensors*. 2022; 22(8):2847.
https://doi.org/10.3390/s22082847

**Chicago/Turabian Style**

Hlava, Jaroslav, and Shereen Abouelazayem.
2022. "Control Systems with Tomographic Sensors—A Review" *Sensors* 22, no. 8: 2847.
https://doi.org/10.3390/s22082847