Next Article in Journal
Threshold Uniformity Improvement in 1b Quanta Image Sensor Readout Circuit
Next Article in Special Issue
An Oversampling Method of Unbalanced Data for Mechanical Fault Diagnosis Based on MeanRadius-SMOTE
Previous Article in Journal
An Experimental Feasibility Study Evaluating the Adequacy of a Sportswear-Type Wearable for Recording Exercise Intensity
Previous Article in Special Issue
Self-Powered Self-Contained Wireless Vibration Synchronous Sensor for Fault Detection
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Partial Transfer Ensemble Learning Framework: A Method for Intelligent Diagnosis of Rotating Machinery Based on an Incomplete Source Domain

Sensors 2022, 22(7), 2579; https://doi.org/10.3390/s22072579
by Gang Mao, Zhongzheng Zhang, Sixiang Jia, Khandaker Noman and Yongbo Li *
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Sensors 2022, 22(7), 2579; https://doi.org/10.3390/s22072579
Submission received: 8 March 2022 / Revised: 23 March 2022 / Accepted: 25 March 2022 / Published: 28 March 2022

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

The paper presents a framework of transfer learning to diagnose faults from two incomplete datasets. The paper is structured well, and the sufficient explanations are provided where required. Few corrections/ suggestions to improve the paper are below.

  1. Partial transfer learning applied in other types of incomplete data sources in fault diagnosis (e.g. sensor data with different frequency) are not highlighted in the paper.
  2. Real-world examples of the problem statement need to be added.
  3. In pg 4, equation 8, λ is introduced without any description.
  4. In section 3.1 (pg 5), if i is always 1, x is sufficient rather than xi. If there is a case of i>1, it is not obvious in the explanation.
  5. Term ‘chapter’ is used in place of ‘section’ in some places. Consistency is required in the paper.
  6. In Eq (14) in pg 7, the third part has max(pa, pw, pw) instead of max(pa, pb, pw).
  7. Fig 7(b) in Pg 9 has numbers in the layout which is explained only in table 2 Pg 10. Putting them side by side will be easier to understand.
  8. In fig 8 (pg 9), six different faults are explained. But in print it looks like fig 8 6. Same concern with Table 3 7 on pg 10.
  9. In fig 9 and 12, mention the load at which the signals and distributions are recorded.
  10. In section 4.1.2, it is stated as ‘5 kinds of states’. It is better to mention as ‘5 kind of health states). This clarification is needed in many places in the paper.
  11. Test scenarios are denoted as A-E for both case studies. They could be differentiated as A1-E1 and A2-E2 (or similar methods to differentiate the two cases).
  12. Reference 32 is not of a proper format.
  13. List of abbreviations is required.
  14. Grammatical errors need to be checked.

 

Author Response

Please see the attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

This paper proposed a partial transfer ensemble learning framework for the intelligent diagnosis of rotating machinery based on an incomplete source domain. This scenario is easy to occur in actual industrial engineering and this is challenging. However, there are some problems as follows:

  1. In case 2, the author should provide relevant fault pictures.
  2. For the dataset in Case, please insert a citation to it. (Version, etc.)
  3. In table 6, why the accuracy of the proposed method is lower than some of the other methods.
  4. Please check all equations, symbols, for example, formula 9 is not centred.
  5. The accuracy is about 91%, it looks not very high.
  6. Classifier Cw provides pseudo labels, the necessity should be further explained.

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Back to TopTop