Next Article in Journal
Evaluation of Concurrent Validity between a Smartphone Self-Test Prototype and Clinical Instruments for Balance and Leg Strength
Next Article in Special Issue
The Design and Manufacturing Process of an Electrolyte-Free Liquid Metal Frequency-Reconfigurable Antenna
Previous Article in Journal
Utilising Flow Aggregation to Classify Benign Imitating Attacks
Previous Article in Special Issue
Three-Dimensional Chipless RFID Tags: Fabrication through Additive Manufacturing
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Multi-Layer and Conformally Integrated Structurally Embedded Vascular Antenna (SEVA) Arrays

1
Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843, USA
2
Materials and Manufacturing Directorate, U.S. Air Force Research Laboratory, WBAFB, Dayton, OH 45433, USA
3
Department of Aerospace Engineering, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843, USA
4
Department of Material Science and Engineering, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77840, USA
5
University of Dayton Research Institute, 300 College Park, Dayton, OH 45469, USA
6
Department of Electrical Engineering, Pennsylvania State University, State College, PA 16801, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sensors 2021, 21(5), 1764; https://doi.org/10.3390/s21051764
Submission received: 27 January 2021 / Revised: 19 February 2021 / Accepted: 25 February 2021 / Published: 4 March 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Applications of Antenna Technology in Sensors)

Abstract

:
This work presents the design and fabrication of two multi-element structurally embedded vascular antennas (SEVAs). These are achieved through advances in additively manufactured sacrificial materials and demonstrate the ability to embed vascular microchannels in both planar and complex-curved epoxy-filled quartz fiber structural composite panels. Frequency-reconfigurable antennas are formed by these structures through the pressure-driven transport of liquid metal through the embedded microchannels. The planar multi-layer topology examines the ability to fabricate two co-located radiating structures separated by a single ply of quartz fabric within the composite layup. The multi-element linear array topology composed of microchannels embedded on to a single-layer are used to demonstrate the ability to conformally-integrate these channels into a complex curved surface that mimics an array of antennas on the leading edge of an Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV). A parallel-strip antipodal dipole feed structure provides excitation and serves as the interface for fluid displacement within the microchannels to facilitate reconfiguration. The nominal design of the SEVAs achieve over a decade of frequency reconfiguration with respect to the fundamental dipole mode of the antenna. Experimental and predicted results demonstrate the operation for canonical states of the antennas. Additional results for the array topology demonstrate beam steering and contiguous operation of interconnected elements in the multi-element structure.

1. Introduction

Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAV) are deployed to serve a wide variety of commercial, municipal, and defense applications including health care, public safety, mobile network coverage diagnostics, etc. [1,2,3]. The growing utilization of UAV-based application spaces and the growing complexity of their missions have increased the need for more robust communication and sensing systems that support these wireless links. This has facilitated a need for robust, shape-conformal, and frequency reconfigurable antennas and phased arrays that can adapt to dynamic operational scenarios; these vehicles (controlled remotely or autonomously) are also required in many scenarios to maintain reliable and long-range communication with a ground station. Reconfigurable, multi-band, and/or broadband omnidirectional antennas used in UAV applications have been proposed in response to this (e.g., [4,5,6,7,8,9]). Antenna arrays have also been used in-place of single antennas in these applications to provide enhanced gain and scanning capabilities (e.g., [10,11,12]).
Antennas considered for use in UAVs are often derived from canonical planar topologies. The integration of these antennas on/in to the UAV presented challenges and numerous efforts have been carried out to embed these antennas into load bearing structures (even conformal to their surfaces). These efforts mainly focused on improving structural efficiency and antenna performance. Various efforts in this direction resulted in development of vertically grown carbon nanotubes and carbon composite fibers used for fabrication of load bearing antennas having desirable RF and mechanical performance [13,14]. Similar load bearing antennas, like Conformal Load bearing Antenna Structures (CLAS) and Composite Smart Structures (CSS), have been proposed to overcome geometrical limitations and eases integration with a non-planar surface [15,16,17,18,19]. Examples of CLAS include MEMS reconfigurable pixelated patch antennas and bi-layer log periodic antenna arrays [20,21]. Antennas and antenna arrays designed using high strength metal coated fibers suited for stress, weight and shape critical applications provide synergistic advances [22,23,24].
The development of load bearing antenna technologies has been critical in the deployment of radiating systems that can withstand the extreme environments and physical conditions encountered by both traditional aircraft and UAVs [25,26,27,28]. Advances in additive manufacturing using liquid metal as a reconfiguration mechanism [29,30] have been demonstrated recently to impart a greater degree of electromagnetic agility into the design space of conformal load bearing antenna systems. Previous work on the load-bearing, structurally embedded vascular antenna (SEVA) [30] demonstrated the frequency reconfigurability of a dipole antenna meandered in exponentially increasing sinusoidal pattern. The effective (resonant) length of the embedded dipole was varied using pressure driven transport of liquid metal (eGaIn) [31] to operate the antenna over a wide frequency range. The prior work [32,33,34,35] on embedded structures emphasize on the mechanics, materials, and fundamental concepts used to emphasize the functionalization of antennas in structurally embedded environments. The repeatability and stability of antenna characteristics make this structure an extensible demonstration vehicle to use in future and ongoing efforts. In this work the design is used to demonstrate the ability to engineer multi-layer and conformally curved reconfigurable antennas enabled by transport of liquid metal through the embedded microvascular channels. This is illustrated through two unique designs. First, it is used to demonstrate an antenna with vascular networks fabricated on two closely spaced and consecutive layer of fabric in the composite lay-up. In the second design it is shown that vascular networks with distinct pattern can fabricated in a complexly curved substrate mimicking the shape of a UAV wing. These structurally embedded vascular antennas operate over a decade of frequency in a single footprint. The organization of this work on multi-element frequency reconfigurable SEVAs follows. Full-wave electromagnetic solver [36] is used for simulation of these structures. First the design and fabrication of a multi-layer SEVA (ML-SEVA) is presented. The multi-element SEVA conformal linear array (SEVA-CLA) integrated onto a complex-curved surface is discussed next. The last section includes measured and simulated results from these structures. A brief discussion concludes the work.

2. Design and Fabrication

2.1. Multi-Layer SEVA (ML-SEVA)

Figure 1 shows the CAD model and notional composite lay-up of the multi-layer SEVA (ML-SEVA) presented in this work. The design and operation of this two-layer ML-SEVA leverages advances in additive manufacturing techniques to synthesize complex co-located vascular networks that provide additional operational degrees of freedom with respect to the antenna performance metrics demonstrated by the original SEVA in [30]. The fabric lay-up for the ML-SEVA in this work features two unique vascular networks separated by a single ply low-dielectric epoxy/quartz prepreg fabric RM-2014/4581 Astroquartz® III with a 0.25 mm layer thickness. Each pair of the meandered lines that form the microchannels through which liquid metal is flowed are first extrusion-printed using the sacrificial PLA formulation in a single layer thickness of 0.6 mm onto Polyimide sheets. These two pairs of meandered lines create two distinct dipole-like configurations that are then thermally transferred to a fabric layer below the previous one and arranged according to the lay-up shown in Figure 1.
The feed structure consists of parallel strips connected to the meandering microvascular elements of the antenna through antipodal dipoles; this also forms a balun-like transition [30]. Equations (1) and (2) provide the parameterization of the sacrificial PLA used to create microvascular channels for the ML-SEVA in Figure 1. These meander outward in the y-dir. starting from the feed location y = ±s0 = ±10.0 mm and to y = ±d0 = ±72.2 mm and are modulated sinusoidally in the x-dir. with a period p0 = 2 within a power series envelope with a growth parameter α. In this work, the first vascular network in the lay-up uses α = 2 to provide a sinusoidally-meandering dipole antenna topology referred to as the SEVA-RLα2. The vascular network on the layer below uses α = 30 to form a quasi-linear dipole-like antenna referred to as the SEVA-RLα30. The parameter t in these expressions denotes the location of liquid metal, or length of meandering along y-axis in SEVA, and the terms t1 and t2 (used later) denote the channel filling parameter in SEVA-RLα2 and SEVA-RLα30, respectively.
x t = t α d 0 α 1 sin π p 0 t
y t = t + s 0
The processing steps for this structure follow [30] by first curing the composite with embedded microchannels in an autoclave. Vertical cylindrical channels are then machined down from the top of the composite to the lowest of the two sacrificial layers (SEVA-RLα30) to provide release holes for the ablation of sacrificial materials. This is followed by a post-cure in a vacuum oven to vaporize the sacrificial material and create microvascular voids in the composite. These are inspected visually and then tested with compressed air to ensure all channels cleared of any blockage. After this the vertical channel at each feed location (x, y) = (0, ±s0), with s0 = 3.94 in. (10 mm), connects the two arms of the SEVA-RLα2 and SEVA-RLα30; the remaining four only contact a single arm where they intersect y = ±d0 = 2.6 in.
The resulting composite with embedded microvasculature is electromagnetically functionalized by first adhering hollow copper cylindrical vias 2 mm in diameter at the two feed locations. These are extended just below the surface for mechanical stability and provide access for the pressure-driven displacement of fluids into each of the four channels. These metallic vias extend upwards through drilled holes in a 31 mil (0.7874 mm) FR4 substrate (εr = 4.4 and tan δ = 0.02) where they are electrically connected (soldered) to the arms of an antipodal dipole having a length l = 2y0. This antipodal dipole is fed by a parallel strip feed line with a 50 Ω characteristic impedance that is terminated in a Sub-Miniature Version A (SMA) connector for measurements. In this configuration, the transition from parallel strip line to antipodal dipole operates as a Dyson-style balun for the SEVA over the frequency ranges considered in this work. The ML-SEVA operates as a combination of two thin wire dipoles growing outward from the antipodal dipole; the selective filling of channels is achieved by leaving the vertical channel at its opposing end unobstructed or sealing the individual vertical channels with a thermal adhesive where it intersects y = ±d0.

2.2. Multi-Element SEVA Conformal Linear Array (SEVA-CLA)

Figure 2 shows the notional composite lay-up and CAD model of the mandrel used to form the composite into a complex-curved surface for the SEVA conformal linear array (SEVA-CLA). The complex-curved shape of the mandrel is not necessarily representative of a leading-edge design for a specific UAV and/or other aircraft, but it demonstrates the extensibility of the SEVA processing steps. This advancement in the additive manufacturing is leveraged in this work to fabricate a large contiguous channel embedded within a complex-curved composite with multiple access points. The structurally-embedded microvascular structure can operate in a number of different radiating manifold configurations; the focus here is on its operation as a three-element linear array as well as a single contiguous antenna that extends the bandwidth of the manifold. The SEVA-CLA generally follows the processing steps for the original SEVA [30] but expands on them in terms of the dimension and geometry of the complexity of the vascular network. As with other SEVA designs, debulking of the prepreg to remove volatiles from the resin and avoid the formation of porosity is an important step before curing in an autoclave. Once cured and released from the mandrel it is drilled at the prescribed locations (at the ends of the curvilinear channels) to access the sacrificial layer. The structure is then placed in a vacuum oven to post-cure and vaporize the sacrificial material and create the embedded microvascular network.
The meandering vasculature of the three-element SEVA-CLA uses the parameterization of the SEVA-RLα2 for each of the three driven antenna elements. The curvature of the mandrel used to shape the composite is approximated for the high frequency modeling of antennas by sweeping the polynomial approximations of the “leading edge” curvature f z x 12.0 × 10 3 x 2 in the xz-plane along the contour “saddle path” f z y 275.5 × 10 6 y 2 in the yz-plane. Three of the feed structures are first positioned then the array elements are first mapped conformally onto the complex-curved surface of the mandrel using [37]. The central element has symmetric arm lengths d0 = d2 = 3.59 in. (91.44 mm) while the arm lengths for the edge elements are asymmetric with the length of one arm fixed to d0 = d1 = 2.92 in. (74.12 mm) and the other one fixed to d0 = d2 = 3.59 in. (91.44 mm). The zero crossing points (denoted by variable t) on y-axis extend from 0 to 2.4 in. for sinusoidal arms of length d1 and it extends from 0 to 3.2 in. for sinusoidal arms of length d2 repeated at regular intervals of 0.4 in. along the y-axis.
The topology and operation/role of the feed network for this structure is similar to the structure presented in Figure 1. Its 50 Ω impedance parallel strip feed lines have a length l0 = 5.78 in. (147 mm) and is fabricated on 31 mil (0.7874 mm) thick RT/Duroid 5880 (εr = 2.2 and tan δ = 0.0004); this is used in place of the FR4 substrate to provide a feed network that can conform to the curvature of the composite. Figure 3 (top view) shows three feed elements connected to the sinusoidally meandered dipoles. Figure 3 (side view) shows the detailed connection between feed and embedded microvascular channels.

3. Measurement and Analysis

Discussion on the transport of liquid metal in the embedded vascular channels of ML-SEVA and SEVA_CLA is presented in this section. Comparison between simulated and measured results of these structures draw attention to the frequency reconfigurability of ML-SEVA and beam scanning ability of SEVA-CLA. Operation of SEVA-CLA as a contiguous antenna element operating in VHF is also presented in this section. Demonstration of fundamental array principles are presented by studying contour plots of isotropic antenna array and SEVA-CLA.

3.1. Multi-Layer SEVA (ML-SEVA)

Figure 4 shows the final fabricated model of ML-SEVA. The embedded microvascular channels are visible in the semi-translucent ML-SEVA. This offers a means to visibility track and measure the position of liquid metal being transported through the microchannels as well as its proximity to the zero-crossing points of the exponentially increasing sinusoidal structure (SEVA-RLα2) at t1 = 0, 0.4, 0.8, 1.2, 1.6, 2, and 2.4 in. Corresponding values are chosen for t2 (SEVA-RLα30) in this experiment. Selected combinations of t1 and t2 are presented in this article to demonstrate the principle of frequency reconfiguration in ML-SEVA. Radiation patterns observed have remain consistent with simulation across different configurations and the selected combinations are shown for illustration.
Cylindrical metallic tubes with a diameter of 2 mm are soldered to the feed and visually aligned with the opening on the embedded channels in the substrate to ensure continuous and leakage-proof flow of liquid metal from inlets towards the outlets. This also establishes electrical connection between liquid metal in the embedded channels and the feed. Additionally, for mechanical stability, the feed is affixed to the substrate by nylon screws ensuring a tight fitted connection between the feed and the substrate. Filling the embedded channels with non-conductive, low-loss, low dielectric, and heat transfer fluid Fluorinert FC-70 [38] electronic liquid before flowing liquid metal ensures smooth flow of liquid metal in the channels. When liquid metal is transported from the inlet of SEVA-RLα2 towards its outlet the outlet of SEVA-RLα30 is sealed with hot melt adhesive (HMA) to avoid leakage of liquid metal into the undesired channel. Similarly, the outlet of SEVA-RLα2 is sealed with HMA when liquid metal is transported through SEVA-RLα30.
Figure 5 shows the measured and simulated input reflection coefficient (in dB) for the chosen combinations of t1 and t2. The plots clearly demonstrate down shift of fundamental mode resonant frequency with increasing liquid metal flow in the embedded channels. These plots illustrate that the radiation pattern of the antenna remains quasi-omnidirectional for the different configurations. The close agreement observed between the measured and simulated results indicates that the operation of frequency reconfigurable ML-SEVA is also stable across the range of frequencies considered in this work. Figure 6 shows the measured and simulated Eθ and Eφ in xy- and xz- planes at the lowest value of magnitude (in dB) for the fundamental mode. When the antenna resonates at a frequency closer to the antipodal dipole (around 4 GHz) used to feed the microvascular component the antenna, the radiated pattern deviates from expectations due to increase interactions with the parallel strip feed network and other artifacts of experimental set-up. Thus, higher volume of metal in the embedded channels offers stable radiation pattern compared to lower metal volumes in the channels as with higher metal volumes in channel the antenna resonates at frequencies much lower than 4 GHz. Simulated maximum gains for configurations in Figure 6a–d is 2.3, −0.01, −3, 1.7, and −5 dBi, respectively.

3.2. Multi-Element SEVA Conformal Linear Array (SEVA-CLA)

Figure 7 shows the fabricated model of multi-element Conformal Linear Array (SEVA-CLA). Oxidation during the fabrication of the composite resulted in an opaquer panel compared to the ML-SEVA. This limits the visibility of the embedded channels in the composite thus, the embedded channels of multi-element SEVA-CLA are filled using a different approach than ML-SEVA. Additional modifications included the use of a torus-shaped gasket formed from an HMA that was used to affix the feed structure on the curved composite. This prevents leakage of liquid metal and ensures smooth flow of liquid metal in the embedded channels.
During the measurement campaign for this antenna the embedded microchannels were first filled with FC-70 in preparation for the transport of liquid metal (to regulate back-pressure, etc.). For each of the three antennas, the antipodal dipole feed structure was first measured while the other two feeds are terminated in matched loads. Pre-measured liquid metal was then injected into the channels through the hollow via in the feed section using an appropriately tipped syringe. The amount of FC-70 flowing out from the outlets along with input reflection coefficient reading from the network analyzer was used to provide a rough estimate of the position of liquid metal in the microchannel. This was necessary as the darker color of the panel prevented visual inspection of the exact position of the fluid. This process was repeated for each element, for each of the measured configurations.
Figure 8 shows the simulated and measured input reflection coefficient of the multi-element SEVA-CLA with a filling of t = 1.55 in. in each arm of sinusoidal meandering, operating at 824 MHz as shown in Figure 3b. A subset of the mutual impedance measurements of multi-element SEVA-CLA are compared. This configuration is chosen such that the center of the matched impedance bandwidth of the antennas (when filled with liquid metal) would provide a half-wavelength element spacing in the array. Operationally, at frequencies higher than this (when the dipole arms contain less liquid metal) the spacing become much greater than a half-wavelength and the pattern behaves as expected with the generation of grading lobes and other features. The radiation pattern of SEVA-CLA with zero-degree relative phasing between the elements is shown in Figure 9. Beam scanning by the array in the yz-plane is shown in Figure 10. Maximum beam scanning range of the array is within ±45 degrees. The principal beam of the array can be scanned by varying the progressive phase shift between the elements of the array. The phase difference between the antenna elements is varied by connecting microstrip transmission lines with pre-determined phases at 824 MHz.
The contour plot in Figure 11 shows the array pattern for three isotropic elements spaced 183 mm apart and the three element SEVA-CLA with uniform excitation over a nominal operational bandwidth from 0.45 GHz to 4.05 GHz. The overall array pattern for multi-element SEVA-CLA is obtained by multiplying the single elemental pattern of multi-element SEVA-CLA with the array pattern of similarly spaced isotropic source. Careful examination of the two normalized gain plots testifies that the gain pattern of SEVA-CLA is obtained by multiplying the gain pattern for three-element isotropic array with the unit element pattern shown in Figure 11. Additional nulls at ±90 degrees in the SEVA-CLA contour plot are introduced by the individual elemental pattern of multi-element SEVA-CLA. The position and distribution of maxima at 0 degrees and grating lobes are similar between the two plots. Increase in the number of grating lobes in the visible region at higher frequencies is due to the widening gap between individual elements in terms of wavelength. Figure 12 shows the gain distribution of SEVA-CLA over similar frequency range (0.45–4.05 GHz). The variation in the gain pattern is attributed to the coupling between the elements with different filling factor, t, over the frequency range. The gain of SEVA_CLA observes a dip around 2 GHz as the grating lobes start to emerge in the visible range. The efficiency of the SEVA-CLA could not be measured experimentally in the facility due to lack of available tools or in simulation but a decrease in efficiency is expected to be seen with increasing grating lobes [39].
Figure 13 shows the measured input reflection coefficient for another unique configuration of the SEVA-CLA. This corresponds to the complete filling of embedded microchannels with liquid metal. The central element is driven in the configuration shown with the other two ports terminated in open circuits—this is one of many unique configurations that can potentially be achieved using different reactive loads and feed locations. In the form shown, the contiguous antenna structure operates as single antenna element with a matched impedance bandwidth centered at 95 MHz. The shift between measured and simulated input reflection coefficient is attributed to differences arising from fabrication and processing as well as other variations between modeled and fabricated designs.

4. Discussion

Current advances in the design and implementation of antennas engineered to reconfigure using the controlled transport of liquid metal through microchannel has been used to enable frequency reconfiguration, polarization reconfiguration, and beam-steering [40,41,42]. These designs show the wide range of applications of antenna sensors using transport of liquid metal through microchannels suitable for varied applications over wide frequency range. These and other structures are typically single-layer design with microfluidic channels traversing a planar geometry. They open up questions on the integration of these techniques for most complex host. This study demonstrates the ability to engineer multilayer and conformally curved reconfigurable antennas enabled by the transport of liquid metal in structurally embedded vascular networks. This study provides insights into the fabrication of vascular networks in two consecutive layers of fabric in the composite lay-up. It also demonstrates the ability to embed distinct patterns in a complexly curved composite. The design, fabrication and electromagnetic functionalization of these structures leads to better understanding of the scope they provide and challenges they present. These fabrication techniques have been leveraged to create multilayer SEVA in which two co-located reconfigurable antennas have been utilized synergistically for impedance and radiation tuning. In SEVA-CLA this technique has been utilized to demonstrate beam scanning of three element array on a complex curved composite which can be reconfigured for a decade of frequency. The agreement between measured and simulated data testifies the concept and ideas presented in this paper. These design techniques can be successfully utilized in designing and fabricating embedded antennas to operate as sensors in UAVs or airplanes. This research also opens avenues in designing shape-conformal electromagnetic sensors using the concepts of microfluidics and structurally embedded vascular electromagnetic devices.

5. Conclusions

ML-SEVA and multi-element SEVA-CLA portrays advances in design and fabrication of SEVA. Pressure driven transport of liquid metal through these structures establishes frequency-reconfiguration over a wide frequency range. Multi-element SEVA-CLA conformal to the shape of UAV wing operates as phased array establishing its beam scanning ability. These structures open avenues towards design of load bearing frequency reconfigurable antennas and antenna arrays integrable on UAVs and/or aircrafts.

Author Contributions

Antenna design and simulation, A.B., H.P., and G.H.H.; composite and additive manufacturing, J.W.B., G.J.F., and T.G.; experimental campaign, A.B. and H.P.; project management and supervision, G.H.H., J.W.B., G.J.F., and D.J.H.; writing—original draft preparation, A.B.; writing—review and editing, A.B., J.W.B., and G.H.H.; All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the AFRL Commander’s Research and Development Fund.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

All the results and references are included here.

Acknowledgments

Pennsylvania State University and Texas A&M University gratefully acknowledge the support of the Air Force Research Laboratory (AFRL).

Conflicts of Interest

Any opinions, findings, and conclusion or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the view of the AFRL or the US government. Approved for public release (88ABW-2017-5151).

References

  1. Inata, H.; Say, S.; Ando, T.; Liu, J.; Shimamoto, S. Unmanned aerial vehicle based missing people detection system employing phased array antenna. In Proceedings of the 2016 IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference, Doha, Qatar, 3–6 April 2016. [Google Scholar]
  2. Fernandez, M.G.; Lopez, Y.A.; Andres, F.L.-H. On the Use of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles for Antenna and Coverage Diagnostics in Mobile Networks. IEEE Commun. Mag. 2018, 56, 72–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Kim, S.J.; Lim, G.J.; Cho, J.; Côté, M.J. Drone-Aided Healthcare Services for Patients with Chronic Diseases in Rural Areas. J. Intell. Robot. Syst. 2017, 88, 163–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Tran, H.H.; Nguyen-Trong, N.; Le, T.T.; Park, H.C. Wideband and Multipolarization Reconfigurable Crossed Bowtie Dipole Antenna. IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. 2017, 65, 6968–6975. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Yoon, S.; Tak, J.; Choi, J.; Park, Y.-M. Conformal monopolar antenna for UAV applications. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Symposium on Antennas and Propagation & USNC/URSI National Radio Science Meeting, San Diego, CA, USA, 9–14 July 2017. [Google Scholar]
  6. Nosrati, M.; Jafargholi, A.; Pazoki, R.; Tavassolian, N. Broadband Slotted Blade Dipole Antenna for Airborne UAV Applications. IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. 2018, 66, 3857–3864. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Wu, D.; Chen, X.; Yang, L.; Fu, G.; Shi, X. Compact and Low-Profile Omnidirectional Circularly Polarized Antenna with Four Coupling Arcs for UAV Applications. IEEE Antennas Wirel. Propag. Lett. 2017, 16, 2919–2922. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Hu, J.; Luo, G.Q.; Hao, Z.-C. A Wideband Quad-Polarization Reconfigurable Metasurface Antenna. IEEE Access 2018, 6, 6130–6137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Balderas, L.I.; Reyna, A.; Panduro, M.A.; Del Rio, C.; Gutierrez, A.R. Low-Profile Conformal UWB Antenna for UAV Applications. IEEE Access 2019, 7, 127486–127494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Seo, D.-G.; Jeong, C.-H.; Choi, Y.-S.; Park, J.-S.; Jeong, Y.-Y.; Lee, W.-S. Wide Beam Coverage Dipole Antenna Array with Parasitic Elements for UAV Communication. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Symposium on Antennas and Propagation and USNC-URSI Radio Science Meeting, Atlanta, GA, USA, 7–12 July 2019. [Google Scholar]
  11. Costa, A.; Goncalves, R.; Pinho, P.; Carvalho, N.B. Design of UAV and ground station antennas for communications link budget improvement. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Symposium on Antennas and Propagation & USNC/URSI National Radio Science Meeting, San Diego, CA, USA, 9–14 July 2017. [Google Scholar]
  12. Lee, C.U.; Noh, G.; Ahn, B.; Yu, J.-W.; Lee, H.L. Tilted-Beam Switched Array Antenna for UAV Mounted Radar Applications with 360° Coverage. Electronics 2019, 8, 1240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Zhou, Y.; Bayram, Y.; Du, F.; Dai, L.; Volakis, J.L. Polymer-Carbon Nanotube Sheets for Conformal Load Bearing Antennas. IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. 2010, 58, 2169–2175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Mehdipour, A.; Sebak, A.-R.; Trueman, C.W.; Rosca, I.D.; Hoa, S.V. Reinforced Continuous Carbon-Fiber Composites Using Multi-Wall Carbon Nanotubes for Wideband Antenna Applications. IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. 2010, 58, 2451–2456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Biswas, S. Fabrication of Conformal Load Bearing Antenna using 3D Printing. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Symposium on Antennas and Propagation & USNC/URSI National Radio Science Meeting, Boston, MA, USA, 8–13 July 2018. [Google Scholar]
  16. Chen, C.; Zheng, H. Design of a dual-band conformai antenna on a cone surface for missle-borne. In Proceedings of the Sixth Asia-Pacific Conference on Antennas and Propagation (APCAP), Xi’an, China, 16–19 October 2017. [Google Scholar]
  17. Kim, J.; Jang, J.-Y.; Ryu, G.-H.; Choi, J.-H.; Kim, M.-S. Structural design and development of multiband aero-vehicle smart skin antenna. J. Intell. Mater. Syst. Struct. 2014, 25, 631–639. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Xu, F.; Wei, B.; Li, W.; Liu, J.; Qiu, Y.; Liu, W. Cylindrical conformal single-patch microstrip antennas based on three dimensional woven glass fiber/epoxy resin composites. Compos. Part B Eng. 2015, 78, 331–337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Liu, Y.; Du, H.; Liu, L.; Leng, J. Shape memory polymers and their composites in aerospace applications: A review. Smart Mater. Struct. 2014, 23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Bishop, N.A.; Miller, J.; Zeppettella, D.; Baron, W.; Tuss, J.; Ali, M. A Broadband High-Gain Bi-Layer LPDA for UHF Conformal Load-Bearing Antenna Structures (CLASs) Applications. IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. 2015, 63, 2359–2364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Bishop, N.; Ali, M.; Baron, W.; Miller, J.; Tuss, J.; Zeppettella, D.; Ali, M. Aperture coupled MEMS reconfigurable pixel patch antenna for conformal load bearing antenna structures (CLAS). In Proceedings of the 2014 IEEE Antennas and Propagation Society International Symposium (APSURSI), Memphis, TN, USA, 6–11 July 2014; pp. 1091–1092. [Google Scholar]
  22. Kiourti, A.; Volakis, J.L. Stretchable and Flexible E-Fiber Wire Antennas Embedded in Polymer. IEEE Antennas Wirel. Propag. Lett. 2014, 13, 1381–1384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Yao, L.; Jiang, M.; Zhou, D.; Xu, F.; Zhao, D.; Zhang, W.; Zhou, N.; Jiang, Q.; Qiu, Y. Fabrication and characterization of microstrip array antennas integrated in the three dimensional orthogonal woven composite. Compos. Part B Eng. 2011, 42, 885–890. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Zhong, J.; Kiourti, A.; Sebastian, T.; Bayram, Y.; Volakis, J.L. Conformal Load-Bearing Spiral Antenna on Conductive Textile Threads. IEEE Antennas Wirel. Propag. Lett. 2016, 16, 230–233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Wang, Z.; Zhang, L.; Bayram, Y.; Volakis, J.L. Embroidered Conductive Fibers on Polymer Composite for Conformal Antennas. IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. 2012, 60, 4141–4147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Du, C.-Z.; Zhong, S.-S.; Yao, L.; Qiu, Y.-P. Textile microstrip two-element array antenna on 3D orthogonal woven composite. In Proceedings of the 2010 International Symposium on Signals, Systems and Electronics, Nanjing, China, 17–20 September 2010; Volume 2, pp. 1–2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Ghorbani, K. Conformal load bearing antenna structure using Carbon Fibre Reinforced Polymer (CFRP). In Proceedings of the International Workshop on Antenna Technology: Small Antennas, Novel EM Structures and Materials, and Applications (iWAT), Sydney, Australia, 4–6 March 2014. [Google Scholar]
  28. Kim, M.-S.; Park, C.-Y.; Cho, C.-M.; Jun, S.-M. A multi-band smart skin antenna design for flight demonstration. In Proceedings of the 8th European Conference on Antennas and Propagation (EuCAP 2014), The Hague, The Netherlands, 6–11 April 2014. [Google Scholar]
  29. Morishita, A.; Kitamura, C.; Ohta, A.; Shiroma, W. Two-octave tunable liquid-metal monopole antenna. Electron. Lett. 2014, 50, 19–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Huff, G.H.; Pan, H.; Hartl, D.J.; Frank, G.J.; Bradford, R.L.; Baur, J.W. A Physically Reconfigurable Structurally Embedded Vascular Antenna. IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. 2017, 65, 2282–2288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Morales, D.; Stoute, N.A.; Yu, Z.; Aspnes, D.E.; Dickey, M.D. Liquid gallium and the eutectic gallium indium (EGaIn) alloy: Dielectric functions from 1.24 to 3.1 eV by electrochemical reduction of surface oxides. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2016, 109, 091905. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Hartl, D.J.; Frank, G.J.; Baur, J.W. Effects of microchannels on the mechanical performance of multifunctional composite laminates with unidirectional laminae. Compos. Struct. 2016, 143, 242–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Hartl, D.J.; Frank, G.J.; Malak, R.J.; Baur, J.W. A liquid metal-based structurally embedded vascular antenna: II. Multiobjective and parameterized design exploration. Smart Mater. Struct. 2016, 26, 025002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Hartl, D.J.; Huff, G.H.; Pan, H.; Smith, L.; Bradford, R.L.; Frank, G.J.; Baur, J.W. Analysis and characterization of structurally embedded vascular antennas using liquid metals. In Proceedings of the Sensors and Smart Structures Technologies for Civil, Mechanical, and Aerospace Systems, Las Vegas, NV, USA, 20 April 2016. [Google Scholar]
  35. Hartl, D.J.; Frank, G.J.; Huff, G.H.; Baur, J.W. A liquid metal-based structurally embedded vascular antenna: I. Concept and Multiphysics Modelling. Smart Mater. Struct. 2017, 26, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Ansys HFSS: High Frequency Structural Simulator. Available online: https://www.ansys.com/products/electronics/ansys-hfss (accessed on 27 January 2021).
  37. Stein, F.M. The Curve Parallel to a Parabola Is Not a Parabola: Parallel Curves; Taylor & Francis, Ltd.: Abingdon, UK, 1980; Volume 11, pp. 239–246. [Google Scholar]
  38. 3MTM FluorinertTM Electronic Liquid FC-70–3M Science Applied to Life. September 2019. Available online: https://multimedia.3m.com/mws/media/64891O/fluorinert-electronic-liquid-fc-70.pdf (accessed on 27 January 2021).
  39. Vosoogh, A.; Kildal, P.-S. Simple Formula for Aperture Efficiency Reduction Due to Grating Lobes in Planar Phased Arrays. IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. 2016, 64, 2263–2269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Bharambe, V.T.; Adams, J.J. Planar 2-D Beam Steering Antenna Using Liquid Metal Parasitics. IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. 2020, 68, 7320–7327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Liu, Y.; Wang, Q.; Jia, Y.; Zhu, P. A Frequency- and Polarization-Reconfigurable Slot Antenna Using Liquid Metal. IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. 2020, 68, 7630–7635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Singh, A.; Goode, I.; Saavedra, C.E. A Multistate Frequency Reconfigurable Monopole Antenna Using Fluidic Channels. IEEE Antennas Wirel. Propag. Lett. 2019, 18, 856–860. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Detailed representation of multi-layer structurally embedded vascular antennas (ML-SEVA) (a) CAD model used for simulating the structure (b) Fabrication lay-up.
Figure 1. Detailed representation of multi-layer structurally embedded vascular antennas (ML-SEVA) (a) CAD model used for simulating the structure (b) Fabrication lay-up.
Sensors 21 01764 g001aSensors 21 01764 g001b
Figure 2. Detailed representation of multi-element SEVA conformal linear array (SEVA-CLA) (a) Fabrication lay-up (b) CAD model of complex curved mandrel used for shaping the composite.
Figure 2. Detailed representation of multi-element SEVA conformal linear array (SEVA-CLA) (a) Fabrication lay-up (b) CAD model of complex curved mandrel used for shaping the composite.
Sensors 21 01764 g002
Figure 3. CAD Model of multi-element SEVA-CLA (a) Top view: Connection of feed elements with sinusoidally meandered dipoles (b) Side view: Connection of feed elements with sinusoidally meandered dipoles.
Figure 3. CAD Model of multi-element SEVA-CLA (a) Top view: Connection of feed elements with sinusoidally meandered dipoles (b) Side view: Connection of feed elements with sinusoidally meandered dipoles.
Sensors 21 01764 g003
Figure 4. Fabricated ML-SEVA and feed network aligned and attached with nylon threads.
Figure 4. Fabricated ML-SEVA and feed network aligned and attached with nylon threads.
Sensors 21 01764 g004
Figure 5. Measured and simulated S-parameter values (|S11| (dB)) for different scenarios. (a) t1 = 0.8 in. and t2 = 0.8 in. (b) t1 = 1.6 in. and t2 = 0.8 in. (c) t1 = 1.6 in. and t2 = 1.6 in. (d) t1 = 2.4 in. and t2 = 1.6 in. (e) t1 = 1.6 in. and t2 = 2.4 in. (f) t1 = 2.4 in. and t2 = 0.8 in. (g) t1 = 1.6 in. and t2 = 2.4 in. (h) t1 = 2.4 in. and t2 = 2.4 in.
Figure 5. Measured and simulated S-parameter values (|S11| (dB)) for different scenarios. (a) t1 = 0.8 in. and t2 = 0.8 in. (b) t1 = 1.6 in. and t2 = 0.8 in. (c) t1 = 1.6 in. and t2 = 1.6 in. (d) t1 = 2.4 in. and t2 = 1.6 in. (e) t1 = 1.6 in. and t2 = 2.4 in. (f) t1 = 2.4 in. and t2 = 0.8 in. (g) t1 = 1.6 in. and t2 = 2.4 in. (h) t1 = 2.4 in. and t2 = 2.4 in.
Sensors 21 01764 g005aSensors 21 01764 g005b
Figure 6. Measured and Simulated radiation pattern in yz- (left) and xz-planes (right) for different scenarios (a) t1 = 0.8 in. and t2 = 0.8 in. at f =1.681 GHz; (b) t1 = 1.6 in. and t2 = 1.6 in. at f = 0.74 GHz; (c) t1 = 2.4 in. and t2 = 0.8 in. at f = 0.372 GHz; and (d) t1 = 0.8 in. and t2 = 2.4 in. at f = 0.8 GHz.
Figure 6. Measured and Simulated radiation pattern in yz- (left) and xz-planes (right) for different scenarios (a) t1 = 0.8 in. and t2 = 0.8 in. at f =1.681 GHz; (b) t1 = 1.6 in. and t2 = 1.6 in. at f = 0.74 GHz; (c) t1 = 2.4 in. and t2 = 0.8 in. at f = 0.372 GHz; and (d) t1 = 0.8 in. and t2 = 2.4 in. at f = 0.8 GHz.
Sensors 21 01764 g006aSensors 21 01764 g006b
Figure 7. Fabricated model of SEVA-CLA (a) Top view showing the complete array with the three elements (b) Single element of the array with outlets and inlets indicated.
Figure 7. Fabricated model of SEVA-CLA (a) Top view showing the complete array with the three elements (b) Single element of the array with outlets and inlets indicated.
Sensors 21 01764 g007
Figure 8. Measured and simulated impedance results of multi-element SEVACLA at 824 MHz for channel filling variable, t = 1.55 in (a) Self-impedance of the array elements (b) Mutual-impedance of array elements.
Figure 8. Measured and simulated impedance results of multi-element SEVACLA at 824 MHz for channel filling variable, t = 1.55 in (a) Self-impedance of the array elements (b) Mutual-impedance of array elements.
Sensors 21 01764 g008
Figure 9. Radiation pattern of multi-element SEVA-CLA for an antenna array with 0° relative phasing at 824 MHz.
Figure 9. Radiation pattern of multi-element SEVA-CLA for an antenna array with 0° relative phasing at 824 MHz.
Sensors 21 01764 g009
Figure 10. Beam scanning of multi-element SEVA-CLA for different scan angles at with channel filling factor t = 1.55 in. operating at 824 MHz (a) Radiated beam at ± 15° (b) Radiated beam at ± 30° (c) Radiated beam at ± 45°.
Figure 10. Beam scanning of multi-element SEVA-CLA for different scan angles at with channel filling factor t = 1.55 in. operating at 824 MHz (a) Radiated beam at ± 15° (b) Radiated beam at ± 30° (c) Radiated beam at ± 45°.
Sensors 21 01764 g010
Figure 11. Simulated variation of radiation pattern with frequency (a) 3-element isotropic elements spaced 183 mm apart and (b) multi-element SEVA-CLA spaced 183 mm apart.
Figure 11. Simulated variation of radiation pattern with frequency (a) 3-element isotropic elements spaced 183 mm apart and (b) multi-element SEVA-CLA spaced 183 mm apart.
Sensors 21 01764 g011
Figure 12. Simulated variation of gain with frequency multi-element SEVA-CLA.
Figure 12. Simulated variation of gain with frequency multi-element SEVA-CLA.
Sensors 21 01764 g012
Figure 13. Measured and simulated results of multi-element SEVA-CLA operated as a single antenna element.
Figure 13. Measured and simulated results of multi-element SEVA-CLA operated as a single antenna element.
Sensors 21 01764 g013
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Bal, A.; Baur, J.W.; Hartl, D.J.; Frank, G.J.; Gibson, T.; Pan, H.; Huff, G.H. Multi-Layer and Conformally Integrated Structurally Embedded Vascular Antenna (SEVA) Arrays. Sensors 2021, 21, 1764. https://doi.org/10.3390/s21051764

AMA Style

Bal A, Baur JW, Hartl DJ, Frank GJ, Gibson T, Pan H, Huff GH. Multi-Layer and Conformally Integrated Structurally Embedded Vascular Antenna (SEVA) Arrays. Sensors. 2021; 21(5):1764. https://doi.org/10.3390/s21051764

Chicago/Turabian Style

Bal, Amrita, Jeffery W. Baur, Darren J. Hartl, Geoffrey J. Frank, Thao Gibson, Hong Pan, and Gregory H. Huff. 2021. "Multi-Layer and Conformally Integrated Structurally Embedded Vascular Antenna (SEVA) Arrays" Sensors 21, no. 5: 1764. https://doi.org/10.3390/s21051764

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop