Next Article in Journal
SEFPN: Scale-Equalizing Feature Pyramid Network for Object Detection
Previous Article in Journal
Unfairness of Random Access with Collision Avoidance in Industrial Internet of Things Networks
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Sensors
Volume 21
Issue 21
10.3390/s21217132
sensors-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Communication

Effects of Tungsten Disulphide Coating on Tapered Microfiber for Relative Humidity Sensing Applications

by
Norazida Ali
1,
Saaidal Razalli Azzuhri
2,
Md Ashadi Md Johari
3,
Haroon Rashid
1,
Muhammad Imran Mustafa Abdul Khudus
4,
Mohd. Zulhakimi Ab. Razak
5,
Zhe Chen
6,
Norbahiah Misran
1 and
Norhana Arsad
1,*
1
Department of Electrical, Electronic and System Engineering, Faculty of Engineering and Built Environment, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia (UKM), Bangi 43600, Malaysia
2
Department of Computer System and Technology, Faculty of Computer Science and IT, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur 50603, Malaysia
3
Faculty of Engineering Technology, Universiti Teknikal Malaysia Melaka, Melaka 76100, Malaysia
4
Department of Physics, Faculty of Science, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur 50603, Malaysia
5
Institute of Microengineering and Nanoelectronics, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia (UKM), Bangi 43600, Malaysia
6
Department of Optoelectronic Engineering, Jinan University, Road Huangpu, District Tianhe, Guangzhou 510632, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sensors 2021, 21(21), 7132; https://doi.org/10.3390/s21217132
Submission received: 30 August 2021 / Revised: 11 October 2021 / Accepted: 23 October 2021 / Published: 27 October 2021
(This article belongs to the Section Physical Sensors)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Tungsten disulphide (WS2) is a two-dimensional transition-metal dichalcogenide material that can be used to improve the sensitivity of a variety of sensing applications. This study investigated the effect of WS2 coating on tapered region microfiber (MF) for relative humidity (RH) sensing applications. The flame brushing technique was used to taper the standard single-mode fiber (SMF) into three different waist diameter sizes of MF 2, 5, and 10 µm, respectively. The MFs were then coated with WS2 via a facile deposition method called the drop-casting technique. Since the MF had a strong evanescent field that allowed fast near-field interaction between the guided light and the environment, depositing WS2 onto the tapered region produced high humidity sensor sensitivity. The experiments were repeated three times to measure the average transmitted power, presenting repeatability and sensing stability. Each MF sample size was tested with varying humidity levels. Furthermore, the coated and non-coated MF performances were compared in the RH range of 45–90% RH at room temperature. It was found that the WS2 coating on 2 µm MF had a high sensitivity of 0.0861 dB/% RH with linearity over 99%. Thus, MF coated with WS2 encourages enhancement in the evanescent field effect in optical fiber humidity sensor applications.

1. Introduction

Silica fiber has received significant attention due to various applications in laser technology [1,2,3], sensor technology [4,5], plasmonic devices [6,7], telecommunications devices [8], and other applications. Moreover, due to recent technological development, silica fiber has experienced changes in structure, size, and composition, increasing its performance [9,10,11]. Hence, silica fiber has been used in critical areas for sensing purposes, such as the biomedical and chemical industries [12,13,14]. The size of silica fiber is the center of the discussion, as it can be manipulated and reduced to the micro-scale. This new development may increase the potential of silica fiber to be used widely and for numerous applications [15]. One techniques known as flame brushing can taper and reduce the silica fiber size down to the micro-region by heating and pulling using sufficient temperature flame [16,17]. The micro-silica fiber, better known as MF or tapered fiber, has a unique character due to its diameter and high index contrast between the core of the fiber and the air [18]. MF is the best choice in optical sensing applications based on the principle of the evanescent field, where strong interactions occur between the MF medium and its surroundings. This principle has been a significant advantage of MF, potentially being used in a limited area with high performances.
The MF structures used for relative humidity sensors can be classified into resonator and non-resonator types. A resonator is an advanced structure based on a closed-loop configuration that uses a large evanescent field created from self-coupling light and overlapping condition. This configuration enables the evanescent field to interact with the surrounding environment of the sensing region. As a result, the collected transmitted light is interpreted as the changed output power for sensing purposes. There are a few resonator-based structures, including the MF loop resonator (MLR) [19], the MF coil resonator (MCR) [20], the MF knot resonator (MKR) [21], and the whispering gallery mode resonator (WGMR) [22]. The working principle of the resonator-based humidity sensor is that the resonance wavelength is changed with the variation of humidity concentration. Besides sensitivity and linearity parameters, other sensing characteristics of resonators have been studied for the humidity sensors: intensity variation, wavelength shift, and Q-factor.
Unlike the resonator, the configuration of a non-resonator MF’s structure is straightforward and has been extensively used [23,24]. Besides, it has various forms, such as functional material coated sensors, Mach–Zehnder interferometer (MZI)-based sensors, micro-probes/nano-probes, grating-based sensors, and coupling-based sensors. For functional material coated sensors, the tapered region surface is coated with high refractive index material to create the functionality in humidity sensing to sustain the ability of waveguiding [25].
Two-dimensional (2D) transition metal dichalcogenides (TMDs) have recently piqued the interest of researchers due to their unique electrical, optical, chemical, and thermal properties [26,27,28]. Among TMDs, tungsten disulphide (WS2) has shown good potential for humidity sensing [29]. Numerous studies on humidity sensors that use 2D nanostructure-based materials coating as sensitivity catalysts have been reported recently [30,31,32,33].
In this work, the effects of WS2 coating on various waist diameters of MF using a facile and cost-effective method known as the drop-casting technique were explored for relative humidity sensing applications. Before that, using the flame brushing technique, we managed to form three sizes of tapered fiber region, i.e., 2, 5, and 10 µm. These MFs were then coated with WS2 and tested in humidity ranging from 45% to 90% for sensing purposes. The characterization of coated MFs was done by using a tunable laser source and optical power meter. The performances of coated MFs for the different tapered region in humidity sensing were evaluated and compared.

2. Fabrication and Preparation of Tapered Microfiber Sensor

Figure 1 shows the schematic of the fabrication technique of the MF by means of a flame brushing method. The MF was fabricated from standard 125 μm SMF-28 using Programmable Logic Controller (PLC) stepper motor stages to pull the fiber while the flame from the torch moved to heat the stripped fiber. First, the outer plastic of the fiber was removed and the buffer was stripped, as shown in Figure 2. The fiber was then finely placed on the holder for the tapering process. The stripped area was heated gradually by manipulating the flame temperature, and the fiber was pulled from both sides to complete the process.
The MFs were then placed on glass slides and measured under a microscope to ensure the desired tapered region diameter depicted in Figure 3. After that, each MF sample was placed on a stage for the deposition process. The coating material, WS2 prepared in solution, was purchased from the Graphene Supermarket, which is practical for the SMF coating process. The MFs were coated at the tapered region with 10 μL of WS2 using the drop-casting technique and left in ambient environment for two hours to obtain a uniform layer formation on the tapered MF surface. The coated MFs were tested on a few humidity levels for sensing purposes.
The size of the MF was determined by the time consumed by the heating process during the tapering procedure. The duration of tapering time is proportional to the size of the MF. Figure 4 demonstrates the characterization of MF in two parameters: waist diameter Dw and neck-to-neck length Lw. The Dw is determined as the size of produced MF, which were 2, 5, and 10 µm with the waist-length range of about 30 to 40 mm.

3. Experimental Setup

The performances of MF before and after WS2 coatings were compared. Figure 5 shows the experimental setup to investigate the performance of coated MF towards a different level of relative humidity percentage. Three differently coated MFs, i.e., 2, 5, and 10 µm, were placed inside the sealed chamber, whose ends were connected to the tunable laser source (TLS) and to the optical power meter (OPM). The chamber was also connected to a commercial hygrometer sensor (RS 1365) to monitor relative humidity levels. The experiment was performed at ambient temperature (25 °C) under an atmospheric pressure of 1.0 atm. The relative humidity was varied from 45% to 90% RH by using sodium hydroxide (NaOH) mixed with a drop of water inside the chamber.
The TLS (ANDO AQ4321D) at 1550 nm was used as an input, and the OPM (THORLABS S145C) was used to observe the output power simultaneously. Each coated MF of different sizes was repeatedly tested for three cycles to reduce the random errors during the experiment.

4. Sensing Mechanism

Despite tapered MF-based sensors having a simple form and being low cost, the detecting mechanism renders the RH sensor highly subject to light transmitted changes and fiber loss. The tapered MF sensing mechanism has relied on the variation of light intensity and transmission scheme, which can be used to evaluate the performance of the RH sensor. This sensor operates strongly dependently on MF that guides light through the tapered region (sensing area) and the interaction of evanescent field outside the fiber. It can be found that due to the strong evanescent field, the MF is extremely sensitive to the change in the surrounding environment, including temperature and RH.
For comparison, the actual RH level reading surrounding the tapered fiber inside the chamber was also measured using a hygrometer sensor as a reference. The changes in the surrounding environment caused by the presence of water vapor will result in the variation of the output transmitted power of the tapered MF, making it suitable to be used as a moisture sensor. The output transmitted power is identified by the modulation of light intensity according to the interaction between evanescent field absorption and the propagated light signal.
However, the tapered MF RH sensor found some difficulties in measuring the accurate value of sensing parameters since it is influenced by the fluctuations from the surrounding environment. Therefore, integrating the tapered MF with a coating material will improve the sensitivity of the RH sensor.
WS2 is among the TMDs that offers thermodynamic stability at room temperature, and that is capable of both absorption and desorption of water vapor. WS2 was deposited on the tapered MF as sensing material allowing for enhanced sensitivity of the RH sensor. When the sensor was exposed to water vapor, the tapered MF significantly interacted with the WS2, causing a change in fiber optical transmission at 1550 nm wavelength. As a result, even a tapered MF with a small waist diameter will achieve a high sensitivity RH sensor by enhancing evanescent field interaction between guided light and WS2 coating.

5. Results and Discussion

5.1. Characterization of Tapered Microfiber

The TLS was used to characterize the WS2-coated MF with a wavelength ranging from 1520 to 1620 nm. This experiment used the range of wavelengths from 1550 to 1550.1 nm with an interval of 0.001 nm. The OPM was used to collect the output power from the other end of the fiber. Figure 6 shows the transmission spectra produced by tapered MF with three different waist diameters (Dw) and coated with WS2. The insertion loss from the 2 µm coated MF was −29.20 dBm, for the 5 µm MF it was −18.1 dBm, and for the 10 µm MF it was −18.9 dBm. From the results, 5 and 10 µm coating MFs had similar insertion loss values, whereas the insertion loss of the 2 µm MF was slightly lower. The size of non-coated MF affected the value of insertion loss. The coating diameter remained the same for all MFs: <10 µm.
The transmission spectra for the non-coated MF of three different sizes are depicted in Figure 6a. The insertion loss from the 2 µm non-coated MF was −17.00 dBm; it was −18.1 dBm for the 5 µm MF; and it was −1.985 dBm for the 10 µm MF. For 2 µm and 5 µm non-coated MFs, the insertion loss values were lower than 10 µm. The MF guides light as a single-mode waveguide, with the evanescent field guided outside the MF. This evanescent field is affected not only by the operating wavelength and the surrounding medium, but also by the diameter of the fiber [34]. Therefore, the size of the MF is still the main contributing factor for the insertion loss value, even for a non-coated MF. The waist diameter size of the MF sensor corresponds to the output transmitted power value. A small diameter of MF decreases the refractive index of the fiber and allows the light travelling through it to be refracted outside. Consequently, the insertion loss of output power will increase as the MF diameter decreases. For sensing applications, the smallest diameter is crucial to allow more light to be refracted over microfiber boundaries and become a sensing mechanism. The more light refracts, the more sensitive it becomes.

5.2. Structural, Morphological, and Compositional Analysis of WS2

The morphological characteristics of the MF were analyzed using field emission scanning electron microscopy (FESEM). Figure 7a represents the surface morphology of WS2 coated (thin layer) on top of the MF waist region. The enlarged image of the WS2 can be seen in Figure 7b, which adhered to the MF surface with a diameter range of 400 to 600 nm. The elemental compositional analysis and elemental distribution mapping were performed using energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDX). Figure 7c represents EDX analysis of the 10 µm WS2-coated MF. The inset of Figure 7c tabulates the percentual weights and atomic percentages of the elemental compositions of materials. The presence of tungsten (W) and sulfur (S) confirms the successful deposition of sensitive sensing material (WS2). Silicon (Si), carbon (C) and oxygen (O) peaks arose from MF. The normalized S/W ratio was calculated to be 1.667, which is evidence of non-stoichiometric WS2 presence. The deficiency of S atoms is attributed to the presence of O atoms from the environmental during the deposition process performed at room temperature. Figure 7f–i represents the elemental distribution mapping of Si, W, O and S, respectively.
The structural properties of coated MF were obtained using Raman scattering analysis within the spectrum range from 330 to 450 cm−1. Figure 7d divulges the bonding structure of the thin WS2 layer. Two dominant peaks are shown within the spectrum range. Both originated from an in-plane optical mode known as phonon mode (E12g) and from an out-plane vibration mode caused by S atoms, confirming the successful growth of WS2 on the MF surface. The lattice vibration is caused by the weak van der Waals interlayer forces. Both E12g and A1g modes are apparent at 349 and 418.42 cm−1, respectively. The separation (Δ) between two peaks (E12g and A1g) was calculated as 69.42 cm−1, which validates the presence of WS2 [35].

5.3. The Performance of the RH Sensor

Sensitivity and linearity values for three different sizes of coated and uncoated MFs are shown in Figure 8. Sensitivity is defined as the change in output power for each RH level [36]. Linearity is the interaction of output powers concerning each percentage of RH [37]. Figure 8a shows the sensitivity and linearity results, among which 2 µm coated MF recorded the highest values: 0.0861 dB/% RH for sensitivity and 99.8% for linearity. Figure 8b represents the sensitivity and linearity values for non-coated MF. The 2 µm non-coated MF had the highest performance parameters with a sensitivity of 0.0615 dB/% RH and linearity of 99.6%. The tapered regions of 5 µm and 10 µm show lower sensitivity and linearity than the 2 µm tapered MF. The results for all parameters are tabulated in Table 1. In both graphs, the 2 µm coated MF shows the best performance for sensitivity and linearity. It is also shown to have more sensitivity towards a different level of humidity. Moreover, by coating the MF with WS2, the humidity sensor recorded higher sensitivity and linearity than the non-coated MF. These experiments show that WS2 has the potential to improve humidity sensing capabilities.
Figure 9 represents the repeatability results for coated and non-coated MF on all three diameter sizes. This process is vital to reduce random error in measurement, which affects the sensing process. For every MF condition, it was repeated three times with the same setup. The sensitivity and linearity were calculated to ensure that all data collection was always on track. The results show that the 2 µm MF exhibited the best sensitivity toward RH changes for both coated and non-coated MFs, and among all the MF, the 2 µm coated MF had the optimum RH sensing performance.

6. Conclusions

In this paper, we demonstrated the performance of tungsten disulphide (WS2) as a coating material on tapered MF for RH sensing applications. We used it to enhance sensitivity with changing RH. The MF was formed with three different waist diameter sizes, i.e., 2, 5, and 10 µm, using a flame brushing technique developed in-house. The fabricated MFs were then prepared in two sets, non-coated and MFs coated with WS2; each set had a similar size of tapered region. Both sets were experimentally characterized using TLS with wavelength ranging from 1550 to 1550.1 nm with a step interval of 0.001 nm. For these experiments with 45–90% RH, the results were compared and evaluated. The sensitivity and linearity parameters were analyzed to identify the sensing performance. The optimum performance was recorded for the WS2-coated 2 µm MF with sensitivity and linearity values of 0.0861 dB/% RH and 99.8%, respectively. These results show the potential of WS2 to become the potential sensing material for optical sensing applications.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, N.A. (Norazida Ali); methodology, N.A. (Norazida Ali) and S.R.A.; validation, S.R.A. and N.A. (Norhana Arsad); formal analysis, N.A. (Norazida Ali), N.A. (Norhana Arsad), M.A.M.J., H.R., M.I.M.A.K. and M.Z.A.R.; investigation, N.A. (Norazida Ali) and S.R.A.; writing—original draft preparation, N.A. (Norazida Ali); writing—review and editing, M.A.M.J., H.R., M.I.M.A.K., M.Z.A.R., Z.C. and N.M.; visualization, M.A.M.J.; supervision, N.A. (Norhana Arsad). All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia under Modal Insan funding with grant code MI-2020-002, GUP-2019-010; the Royal Society of the UK under the Newton Fund with grant code IF026-2018; the University of Malaya with grant code IIRG028C-2019; and Kementerian Sains, Teknologi dan Inovasi (MOSTI), with grant code IF0419IF1082.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to sincerely acknowledge Sulaiman Wadi Harun’s infrastructure and support from the Department of Electrical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, University of Malaya.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Matsumoto, A.; Ohba, H.; Toshimitsu, M.; Akaoka, K.; Ruas, A.; Sakka, T.; Wakaida, I. Fiber-optic laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy of zirconium metal in air: Special features of the plasma produced by a long-pulse laser. Spectrochim. Acta—Part B At. Spectrosc. 2018, 142, 37–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Zhao, J.; Li, L.; Zhao, L.; Tang, D.; Shen, D. Cavity-birefringence-dependent h-shaped pulse generation in a thulium-holmium-doped fiber laser. Opt. Lett. 2018, 43, 247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Salim, M.A.M.; Ali, N.; Azzuhri, S.R.; Khudus, M.I.M.A.; Jamaludin, J.; Faruki, M.J.; Amiri, I.S. Switchable erbium-doped fiber laser (EDFL) using non-adiabatic microfiber. Opt. Fiber Technol. 2019, 52, 101967. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. He, C.; Fang, J.; Zhang, Y.; Yang, Y.; Yu, J.; Zhang, J.; Guan, H.; Qiu, W.; Wu, P.; Dong, J.; et al. High performance all-fiber temperature sensor based on coreless side-polished fiber wrapped with polydimethylsiloxane. Opt. Express 2018, 26, 9686–9699. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. He, Y.; Li, Y.; Li, N. Temperature-independent evanescent wave sensor made of a stress-released silica optical fiber taper. Opt. Fiber Technol. 2017, 36, 237–244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Yang, M.; Xiong, X.; He, R.; Luo, Y.; Tang, J.; Dong, J.; Lu, H.; Yu, J.; Guan, H.; Zhang, J.; et al. Halloysite Nanotube-Modified Plasmonic Interface for Highly Sensitive Refractive Index Sensing. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2018, 10, 5933–5940. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Polley, N.; Basak, S.; Hass, R.; Pacholski, C. Fiber optic plasmonic sensors: Providing sensitive biosensor platforms with minimal lab equipment. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2019, 132, 368–374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Ng, W.P.; Lalam, N.; Dai, X.; Wu, Q.; Fu, Y.Q.; Harrington, P.; Gomes, N.J.; Lu, C. Integrating Radio-Over-Fiber Communication System and BOTDR Sensor System. Sensors 2020, 20, 2232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  9. Fu, H.; Jiang, Y.; Ding, J.; Zhang, J.; Zhang, M.; Zhu, Y.; Li, H. Zinc oxide nanoparticle incorporated graphene oxide as sensing coating for interferometric optical microfiber for ammonia gas detection. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2018, 254, 239–247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Zhou, N.; Wang, P.; Shi, Z.X.; Gao, Y.X.; Yang, Y.X.; Wang, Y.P.; Xie, Y.; Cai, D.W.; Guo, X.; Zhang, L.; et al. Au nanorod–coupled microfiber optical humidity sensors. Opt. Express 2019, 27, 8180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Johari, M.A.M.; Khudus, M.I.M.A.; Jali, M.H.; Maslinda, M.S.; Ali, U.U.M.; Harun, S.W.; Zaidan, A.H.; Apsari, R.; Yasin, M. Effect of tapering diameters with microbottle resonator for formaldehyde (CH2O) liquid sensing. Sens. Bio-Sens. Res. 2019, 25, 100292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Roriz, P.; Silva, S.; Frazão, O.; Novais, S. Optical fiber temperature sensors and their biomedical applications. Sensors 2020, 20, 2113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Jivraj, J.; Chen, C.; Huang, Y.; Ramjist, J.; Lu, Y.; Vuong, B.; Gu, X.; Yang, V.X.D. Smart laser osteotomy: Integrating a pulsed 1064nm fiber laser into the sample arm of a fiber optic 1310nm OCT system for ablation monitoring. Biomed. Opt. Express 2018, 9, 6374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Idris, S.; Azeman, N.H.; Noor Azmy, N.A.; Ratnam, C.T.; Mahdi, M.A.; Ahmad, A.A. Gamma irradiated Py/PVA for GOx immobilization on tapered optical fiber for glucose biosensing. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2018, 273, 1404–1412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Spillman, W.B.; McMahon, D.H. Frustrated-total-internal-reflection multimode fiber-optic hydrophone. Appl. Opt. 1980, 19, 113–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Brambilla, G.; Jung, Y.; Renna, F. Optical fiber microwires and nanowires manufactured by modified flame brushing technique: Properties and applications. Front. Optoelectron. China 2010, 3, 61–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Jasim, A.A.; Harun, S.W.; Arof, H.; Ahmad, H. Inline Microfiber Mach–Zehnder Interferometer for High Temperature Sensing. IEEE Sens. J. 2013, 13, 626–628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Wu, X.; Tong, L. Optical microfibers and nanofibers. Nanophotonics 2013, 2, 407–428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Jali, M.H.; Rahim, H.R.A.; Johari, M.A.M.; Hamid, S.S.; Yusof, H.H.M.; Thokchom, S.; Wang, P.; Harun, S.W. Optical characterization of different waist diameter on microfiber loop resonator humidity sensor. Sens. Actuators A Phys. 2019, 285, 200–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Kowsari, A.; Ahmadi, V.; Darvish, G.; Moravvej-Farshi, M.K. Dynamic analysis of optical microfiber coil resonators. Appl. Opt. 2016, 55, 6680. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Han, Y.-G. Relative humidity sensors based on microfiber knot resonators—A review. Sensors 2019, 19, 5196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  22. Pongruengkiat, W.; Pechprasarn, S. Whispering-gallery mode resonators for detecting cancer. Sensors 2017, 17, 2095. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  23. Zhang, D.; Guan, H.; Zhu, W.; Yu, J.; Lu, H.; Qiu, W.; Dong, J.; Zhang, J.; Luo, Y.; Chen, Z. All light-control-light properties of molybdenum diselenide (MoSe2)-coated-microfiber. Opt. Express 2017, 25, 28536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Guan, H.; Xia, K.; Chen, C.; Luo, Y.; Tang, J.; Lu, H.; Yu, J.; Zhang, J.; Zhong, Y.; Chen, Z. Tungsten disulfide wrapped on micro fiber for enhanced humidity sensing. Opt. Mater. Express 2017, 7, 1686. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Talataisong, W.; Ismaeel, R.; Brambilla, G. A review of microfiber-based temperature sensors. Sensors 2018, 18, 461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Rosol, A.H.A.; Mahyuddin, M.B.H.; Jusoh, Z.; Harun, A.S.W. Tungsten disulfide saturable absorber for nanosecond pulses generation. Nonlinear Opt. Quantum Opt. 2019, 51, 161–169. [Google Scholar]
  27. Xiong, Y.; Chen, H.W.; Zhang, D.W.; Zhou, P. Electronic and Optoelectronic Applications Based on ReS2. Phys. Status Solidi—Rapid Res. Lett. 2019, 13, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Rashid, H.; Ramli, R.; Ahmad, H. Optoelectronic characteristics of tungsten disulphide based visible range photodetector. In Proceedings of the 2019 IEEE 9th International Nanoelectronics Conferences (INEC), Kuching, Malaysia, 3–5 July 2019; pp. 3–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Luo, Y.; Chen, C.; Xia, K.; Peng, S.; Guan, H.; Tang, J.; Lu, H.; Yu, J.; Zhang, J.; Xiao, Y.; et al. Tungsten disulfide (WS2) based all-fiber-optic humidity sensor. Opt. Express 2016, 24, 8956. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Faruki, M.J.; Ab Razak, M.Z.; Azzuhri, S.R.; Rahman, M.T.; Soltanian, M.R.K.; Brambilla, G.; Rahman, B.M.A.; Grattan, K.T.V.; De La Rue, R.; Ahmad, H. Effect of titanium dioxide (TiO2) nanoparticle coating on the detection performance of microfiber knot resonator sensors for relative humidity measurement. Mater. Express 2016, 6, 501–508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Adnan Zain, H.; Hafiz Jali, M.; Rafis Abdul Rahim, H.; Ashadi Md Johari, M.; Helmi Mohd Yusof, H.; Thokchom, S.; Yasin, M.; Wadi Harun, S. ZnO nanorods coated microfiber loop resonator for relative humidity sensing. Opt. Fiber Technol. 2020, 54, 102080. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Hazarika, S.J.; Mohanta, D. Inorganic fullerene-type WS2 nanoparticles: Processing, characterization and its photocatalytic performance on malachite green. Appl. Phys. A Mater. Sci. Process. 2017, 123, 381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Azzuhri, S.R.; Amiri, I.S.; Zulkhairi, A.S.; Salim, M.A.M.; Razak, M.Z.A.; Khyasudeen, M.F.; Ahmad, H.; Zakaria, R.; Yupapin, P. Application of graphene oxide based Microfiber-Knot resonator for relative humidity sensing. Results Phys. 2018, 9, 1572–1577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Sun, L.; Semenova, Y.; Wu, Q.; Liu, D.; Yuan, J.; Sang, X.; Yan, B.; Wang, K.; Yu, C.; Farrell, G. Investigation of humidity and temperature response of a silica gel coated microfiber coupler. IEEE Photonics J. 2016, 8, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Berkdemir, A.; Gutiérrez, H.R.; Botello-Méndez, A.R.; Perea-López, N.; Elías, A.L.; Chia, C.I.; Wang, B.; Crespi, V.H.; López-Urías, F.; Charlier, J.C.; et al. Identification of individual and few layers of WS2 using Raman Spectroscopy. Sci. Rep. 2013, 3, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Lee, C.Y.; Lee, G. Bin Humidity sensors: A review. Sens. Lett. 2005, 3, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Yusoff, S.F.A.Z.; Lim, C.S.; Azzuhri, S.R.; Ahmad, H.; Zakaria, R. Studies of Ag/TiO2 plasmonics structures integrated in side polished optical fiber used as humidity sensor. Results Phys. 2018, 10, 308–316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Sensors 21 07132 g001 550
Figure 1. Schematic of the MF taper fabrication setup.
Figure 1. Schematic of the MF taper fabrication setup.
Sensors 21 07132 g001
Sensors 21 07132 g002 550
Figure 2. SMF before and after tapering process.
Figure 2. SMF before and after tapering process.
Sensors 21 07132 g002
Sensors 21 07132 g003 550
Figure 3. Microscopic image for tapered region MF with 2 µm (a), 5 µm (b), and 10 µm (c) diameter.
Figure 3. Microscopic image for tapered region MF with 2 µm (a), 5 µm (b), and 10 µm (c) diameter.
Sensors 21 07132 g003
Sensors 21 07132 g004 550
Figure 4. Microscopic images of MF structure (a) before coated and (b) after coated with WS2.
Figure 4. Microscopic images of MF structure (a) before coated and (b) after coated with WS2.
Sensors 21 07132 g004
Sensors 21 07132 g005 550
Figure 5. Experimental setup for MF RH sensing.
Figure 5. Experimental setup for MF RH sensing.
Sensors 21 07132 g005
Sensors 21 07132 g006 550
Figure 6. Non-coated MF transmission modes (a–c) and coated MF transmission modes (d–f) of 2, 5, and 10 µm.
Figure 6. Non-coated MF transmission modes (a–c) and coated MF transmission modes (d–f) of 2, 5, and 10 µm.
Sensors 21 07132 g006
Sensors 21 07132 g007 550
Figure 7. FESEM image of the MF coated with WS2 (a). An enlarged view of the region marked by a blue rectangle is MF coated with WS2 at 10,000× magnification (b). EDX elemental spectrum and quantification results for tapered MF coated with WS2 (c). Raman spectra of WS2 coated on MF by drop-casting (d). EDX-elemental mapping on the tapered region of MF coated with WS2 (e). Silicon, (f) tungsten (W) (g); oxygen (O) (h), and sulfur (i) distribution mapping.
Figure 7. FESEM image of the MF coated with WS2 (a). An enlarged view of the region marked by a blue rectangle is MF coated with WS2 at 10,000× magnification (b). EDX elemental spectrum and quantification results for tapered MF coated with WS2 (c). Raman spectra of WS2 coated on MF by drop-casting (d). EDX-elemental mapping on the tapered region of MF coated with WS2 (e). Silicon, (f) tungsten (W) (g); oxygen (O) (h), and sulfur (i) distribution mapping.
Sensors 21 07132 g007
Sensors 21 07132 g008 550
Figure 8. Transmitted power value for three different diameters of WS2: (a) coated MFs and (b) non-coated MFs. Power varies with the percentage of humidity.
Figure 8. Transmitted power value for three different diameters of WS2: (a) coated MFs and (b) non-coated MFs. Power varies with the percentage of humidity.
Sensors 21 07132 g008
Sensors 21 07132 g009 550
Figure 9. Non-coated MF (a–c) and coated MF (d–f) of 2, 5, and 10 µm repeatability results with different levels of humidity.
Figure 9. Non-coated MF (a–c) and coated MF (d–f) of 2, 5, and 10 µm repeatability results with different levels of humidity.
Sensors 21 07132 g009
Table
Table 1. Analysis of different diameters of MF with WS2 performance in humidity sensing activity.
Table 1. Analysis of different diameters of MF with WS2 performance in humidity sensing activity.
Parameters2 µm5 µm10 µm
Non-Coated MFCoated MFNon-Coated MFCoated MFNon-Coated MFCoated MF
Linearity (%)99.699.899.399.391.098.3
Sensitivity (dB/% RH)0.06150.08610.04840.04840.01080.0089
Linear Range (% RH)45–9045–9045–9045–9045–9045–90
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ali, N.; Azzuhri, S.R.; Johari, M.A.M.; Rashid, H.; Khudus, M.I.M.A.; Razak, M.Z.A.; Chen, Z.; Misran, N.; Arsad, N. Effects of Tungsten Disulphide Coating on Tapered Microfiber for Relative Humidity Sensing Applications. Sensors 2021, 21, 7132. https://doi.org/10.3390/s21217132

AMA Style

Ali N, Azzuhri SR, Johari MAM, Rashid H, Khudus MIMA, Razak MZA, Chen Z, Misran N, Arsad N. Effects of Tungsten Disulphide Coating on Tapered Microfiber for Relative Humidity Sensing Applications. Sensors. 2021; 21(21):7132. https://doi.org/10.3390/s21217132

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ali, Norazida, Saaidal Razalli Azzuhri, Md Ashadi Md Johari, Haroon Rashid, Muhammad Imran Mustafa Abdul Khudus, Mohd. Zulhakimi Ab. Razak, Zhe Chen, Norbahiah Misran, and Norhana Arsad. 2021. "Effects of Tungsten Disulphide Coating on Tapered Microfiber for Relative Humidity Sensing Applications" Sensors 21, no. 21: 7132. https://doi.org/10.3390/s21217132

APA Style

Ali, N., Azzuhri, S. R., Johari, M. A. M., Rashid, H., Khudus, M. I. M. A., Razak, M. Z. A., Chen, Z., Misran, N., & Arsad, N. (2021). Effects of Tungsten Disulphide Coating on Tapered Microfiber for Relative Humidity Sensing Applications. Sensors, 21(21), 7132. https://doi.org/10.3390/s21217132

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop