Respiratory Activity during Exercise: A Feasibility Study on Transition Point Estimation Using Impedance Pneumography
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Participants and Protocol
2.2. Devices and Measurements
2.3. Ventilatory Response during Graded Exercise
- Workload and workload indexed to body mass;
- Heart rate (HR, recorded during last minute of a segment);
- Respiratory rate: determined as averages at 30 s intervals with 50% overlap, each value is calculated from the distance between two detected respiratory onsets;
- Tidal volume (TV): the initial one denoted as 1, then determined as averages at 30 s intervals with 50% overlap;
- Complex respiratory parameter constructed as multiplication of corresponding respiratory rate and relative tidal volume (here and after VENT); a surrogate of such an approach was presented in Reference [26].
2.4. Transition Point
- VENT and workload indexed to body mass,
- Respiratory rate and workload indexed to body mass,
- Relative tidal volume differences and workload indexed to body mass,
- VENT and HR,
- Respiratory rate and HR,
- Relative tidal volume differences and HR.
- sex,
- physical capacity (arbitrary two groups: those who completed more than five stages and those who completed five full stages or less), and
- initial heart rate (measured just before the start of the test; divided into two groups: below or above 90 BPM—probably anticipatory HR rise was already present at the beginning, and there would be a smaller space for further growth),
3. Results
- 3 steps (120 Watts): 6 females,
- 4 steps (160 Watts): 10 females,
- 5 steps (200 Watts): 7 females,
- 6 steps (240 Watts): 1 female and 2 males,
- 7 steps (280 Watts): 1 female and 4 males,
- 8 steps (320 Watts): 3 males.
3.1. Ventilatory Response during Graded Exercise
3.2. Transition Point
- IP1: the relation of VENT and workload indexed to body mass,
- IP2: the relation of Respiratory rate and workload indexed to body mass,
- IP3: the relation of Relative tidal volume differences and workload indexed to body mass,
- IP4: the average of the previous three approaches (workload-indexed-to-body-mass-related),
- IP5: the relation of VENT and HR,
- IP6: the relation of Respiratory rate and HR,
- IP7: the relation of Relative tidal volume differences and HR,
- IP8: the average of the previous three approaches (HR-related).
4. Discussion
4.1. Study Limitations
4.2. Novelty
- the use of VENT parameter, which combines both tidal volume and respiratory rate, in the specific application of the dynamic respiratory mechanics analysis, and
- various analytical approaches based on impedance pneumography signals to find an estimation of a transition point (that might be further studied to be similar to gas exchange threshold).
4.3. Further Research Perspective
- researching a larger group, with the participation of elite athletes, with the assessment of blood lactate concentration and/or the ergospirometric examination as a reference to comparison with impedance-pneumography-based estimations,
- further assessment of respiratory response during the graded exercise test in terms of possible long-term steady state occurrence, but with modified protocol comprising longer stages of constant workloads,
- evaluation of age-, sex-related, and health-state-related differences in cardiorespiratory characteristics, similar those to presented in Reference [43],
- performance of long-lasting study considering training period and/or the course of a season and associations between cardiorespiratory fitness and actual workload (not only forced by the exercise stress test), the inspiration for which comes from Reference [44],
- supplementing the analysis to assess the flow-volume curve “movement” during the test, depending on fatigue levels (also going towards recovery state after exercise test).
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Poole, D.C.; Rossiter, H.B.; Brooks, G.A.; Gladden, L.B. The anaerobic threshold: 50+ years of controversy. J. Physiol. 2021, 599, 737–767. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Beaver, W.L.; Wasserman, K.; Whipp, B.J. Improved detection of lactate threshold during exercise using a log-log transformation. J. Appl. Physiol. 1985, 59, 1936–1940. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wasserman, K.; Beaver, W.L.; Davis, J.A.; Pu, J.; Heber, D.; Whipp, B.J. Lactate, pyruvate, and lactate-to-pyruvate ratio during exercise and recovery. J. Appl. Physiol. 1985, 59, 935–940. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Goodwin, M.L.; Harris, J.E.; Hernández, A.; Gladden, L.B. Blood lactate measurements and analysis during exercise: A guide for clinicians. J. Diabetes Sci. Technol. 2007, 1, 558–569. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Beneke, R.; Leithäuser, R.M.; Ochentel, O. Blood lactate diagnostics in exercise testing and training. Int. J. Sport. Physiol. Perform. 2011, 6, 8–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Older, P.; Hall, A.; Hader, R. Cardiopulmonary exercise testing as a screening test for perioperative management of major surgery in the elderly. Chest 1999, 116, 355–362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Wasserman, K.; Whipp, B.J.; Koyl, S.; Beaver, W. Anaerobic threshold and respiratory gas exchange during exercise. J. Appl. Physiol. 1973, 35, 236–243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mao, Y.; Yue, W.; Zhao, T.; Shen, M.; Liu, B.; Chen, S. A Self-Powered Biosensor for Monitoring Maximal Lactate Steady State in Sport Training. Biosensors 2020, 10, 75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Heuberger, J.A.; Gal, P.; Stuurman, F.E.; de Muinck Keizer, W.A.; Mejia Miranda, Y.; Cohen, A.F. Repeatability and predictive value of lactate threshold concepts in endurance sports. PLoS ONE 2018, 13, e0206846. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Beaver, W.L.; Wasserman, K.; Whipp, B.J. A new method for detecting anaerobic threshold by gas exchange. J. Appl. Physiol. 1986, 60, 2020–2027. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Whipp, B.J.; Davis, J.A.; Wasserman, K. Ventilatory control of the ‘isocapnic buffering’region in rapidly-incremental exercise. Respir. Physiol. 1989, 76, 357–367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mezzani, A. Cardiopulmonary exercise testing: Basics of methodology and measurements. Ann. Am. Thorac. Soc. 2017, 14, S3–S11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pallarés, J.G.; Morán-Navarro, R.; Ortega, J.F.; Fernández-Elías, V.E.; Mora-Rodriguez, R. Validity and reliability of ventilatory and blood lactate thresholds in well-trained cyclists. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0163389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nitkiewicz, S.; Barański, R.; Kukwa, A.; Zając, A. Respiratory disorders-measuring method and equipment. Metrol. Meas. Syst. 2018, 25, 187–202. [Google Scholar]
- Lucía, A.; Sánchez, O.; Carvajal, A.; Chicharro, J.L. Analysis of the aerobic-anaerobic transition in elite cyclists during incremental exercise with the use of electromyography. Br. J. Sport. Med. 1999, 33, 178–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jürimäe, J.; von Duvillard, S.P.; Mäestu, J.; Cicchella, A.; Purge, P.; Ruosi, S.; Jürimäe, T.; Hamra, J. Aerobic–anaerobic transition intensity measured via EMG signals in athletes with different physical activity patterns. Eur. J. Appl. Physiol. 2007, 101, 341–346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Saunoriene, L.; Siauciunaite, V.; Vainoras, A.; Bertasiute, V.; Navickas, Z.; Ragulskis, M. The characterization of the transit through the anaerobic threshold based on relationships between RR and QRS cardiac intervals. PLoS ONE 2019, 14, e0216938. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Rogers, B.; Giles, D.; Draper, N.; Mourot, L.; Gronwald, T. Detection of the Anaerobic Threshold in Endurance Sports: Validation of a New Method Using Correlation Properties of Heart Rate Variability. J. Funct. Morphol. Kinesiol. 2021, 6, 38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rogers, B.; Giles, D.; Draper, N.; Hoos, O.; Gronwald, T. A new detection method defining the aerobic threshold for endurance exercise and training prescription based on fractal correlation properties of heart rate variability. Front. Physiol. 2021, 11, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Seppa, V.P.; Hyttinen, J.; Uitto, M.; Chrapek, W.; Viik, J. Novel electrode configuration for highly linear impedance pneumography. Biomed. Tech. Eng. 2013, 58, 35–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Młyńczak, M.; Cybulski, G. Decomposition of the Cardiac and Respiratory Components from Impedance Pneumography Signals. In Proceedings of the 10th International Joint Conference on Biomedical Engineering Systems and Technologies (BIOSTEC 2017), Porto, Portugal, 21–23 February 2017; pp. 26–33. [Google Scholar]
- Młyńczak, M.; Krysztofiak, H. Discovery of causal paths in cardiorespiratory parameters: A time-independent approach in elite athletes. Front. Physiol. 2018, 9, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Młyńczak, M.; Krysztofiak, H. Cardiorespiratory temporal causal links and the differences by sport or lack thereof. Front. Physiol. 2019, 10, 45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Młyńczak, M.; Niewiadomski, W.; Zylinski, M.; Cybulski, G. Ambulatory devices measuring cardiorespiratory activity with motion. In Proceedings of the 10th International Joint Conference on Biomedical Engineering Systems and Technologies (BIOSTEC 2017), Porto, Portugal, 21–23 February 2017; pp. 91–97. [Google Scholar]
- Młyńczak, M.; Niewiadomski, W.; Żyliński, M.; Cybulski, G. Assessment of calibration methods on impedance pneumography accuracy. Biomed. Eng. Tech. 2016, 61, 587–593. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- e Bueno, L.d.A.; Kwong, M.T.; Milnthorpe, W.R.; Cheng, R.; Bergmann, J.H. Applying ubiquitous sensing to estimate perceived exertion based on cardiorespiratory features. Sport. Eng. 2021, 24, 1–9. [Google Scholar]
- Mourot, L.; Bouhaddi, M.; Perrey, S.; Rouillon, J.D.; Regnard, J. Quantitative Poincare plot analysis of heart rate variability: Effect of endurance training. Eur. J. Appl. Physiol. 2004, 91, 79–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Welch, R.; Kolbe, J.; Lardenoye, M.; Ellyett, K. Novel application of Poincaré analysis to detect and quantify exercise oscillatory ventilation. Physiol. Meas. 2021, 42, 04NT01. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gronwald, T.; Hoos, O.; Ludyga, S.; Hottenrott, K. Non-linear dynamics of heart rate variability during incremental cycling exercise. Res. Sport. Med. 2019, 27, 88–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nabetani, T.; Ueda, T.; Teramoto, K. Measurement of ventilatory threshold by respiratory frequency. Percept. Mot. Ski. 2002, 94, 851–859. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Neder, J.A.; Stein, R. A simplified strategy for the estimation of the exercise ventilatory thresholds. Med. Sci. Sport. Exerc. 2006, 38, 1007–1013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Cannon, D.T.; Kolkhorst, F.W.; Buono, M.J. On the determination of ventilatory threshold and respiratory compensation point via respiratory frequency. Int. J. Sport. Med. 2009, 30, 157–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Onorati, P.; Martolini, D.; Valli, G.; Laveneziana, P.; Marinelli, P.; Angelici, E.; Palange, P. A simplified approach for the estimation of the ventilatory compensation point. Med. Sci. Sport. Exerc. 2012, 44, 716–724. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nicolò, A.; Massaroni, C.; Schena, E.; Sacchetti, M. The importance of respiratory rate monitoring: From healthcare to sport and exercise. Sensors 2020, 20, 6396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Nicolò, A.; Marcora, S.M.; Sacchetti, M. Time to reconsider how ventilation is regulated above the respiratory compensation point during incremental exercise. J. Appl. Physiol. 2020, 128, 1447–1449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Folke, M.; Cernerud, L.; Ekstrom, M.; Hok, B. Critical review of non-invasive respiratory monitoring in medical care. Med Biol. Eng. Comput. 2003, 41, 377–383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Varon, C.; Lázaro, J.; Bolea, J.; Hernando, A.; Aguiló, J.; Gil, E.; Van Huffel, S.; Bailón, R. Unconstrained estimation of HRV indices after removing respiratory influences from heart rate. IEEE J. Biomed. Health Informatics 2018, 23, 2386–2397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Scherr, J.; Wolfarth, B.; Christle, J.W.; Pressler, A.; Wagenpfeil, S.; Halle, M. Associations between Borg’s rating of perceived exertion and physiological measures of exercise intensity. Eur. J. Appl. Physiol. 2013, 113, 147–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tokmakidis, S.P.; Léger, L.A.; Pilianidis, T.C. Failure to obtain a unique threshold on the blood lactate concentration curve during exercise. Eur. J. Appl. Physiol. Occup. Physiol. 1998, 77, 333–342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Neder, J.A.; Phillips, D.B.; Marillier, M.; Bernard, A.C.; Berton, D.C.; O’Donnell, D.E. Clinical Interpretation of Cardiopulmonary Exercise Testing: Current Pitfalls and Limitations. Front. Physiol. 2021, 12, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Facioli, T.P.; Philbois, S.V.; Gastaldi, A.C.; Almeida, D.S.; Maida, K.D.; Rodrigues, J.A.; Sánchez-Delgado, J.C.; Souza, H.C. Study of heart rate recovery and cardiovascular autonomic modulation in healthy participants after submaximal exercise. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 1–9. [Google Scholar]
- Lahtinen, O.; Seppa, V.P.; Vaisanen, J.; Hyttinen, J. Optimal electrode configurations for impedance pneumography during sports activities. In Proceedings of the 4th European Conference of the International Federation for Medical and Biological Engineering, Antwerp, Belgium, 23–27 November 2008; pp. 1750–1753. [Google Scholar]
- Wooten, S.V.; Moestl, S.; Chilibeck, P.; Alvero Cruz, J.R.; Mittag, U.; Tank, J.; Tanaka, H.; Rittweger, J.; Hoffmann, F. Age-and Sex-Differences in Cardiac Characteristics Determined by Echocardiography in Masters Athletes. Front. Physiol. 2021, 11, 1863. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nobari, H.; Alves, A.R.; Clemente, F.M.; Pérez-Gómez, J.; Clark, C.C.; Granacher, U.; Zouhal, H. Associations Between Variations in Accumulated Workload and Physiological Variables in Young Male Soccer Players Over the Course of a Season. Front. Physiol. 2021, 12, 233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Female | Male | |
---|---|---|
N | 25 | 9 |
Age [y] | 24 ± 1 | 25 ± 1 |
Height [cm] | 167.8 ± 4.5 | 182.9 ± 4.0 |
Weight [kg] | 60.0 ± 7.8 | 77.9 ± 5.6 |
Case | SD1 | SD2 | Avg. SD1/SD2 |
---|---|---|---|
Respiratory rate case [BPM] | 1.47 ± 0.06 | 8.17 ± 1.04 | 0.182 |
VENT parameter case [a.u.] | 4.51 ± 0.65 | 34.42 ± 3.67 | 0.134 |
Approach to Estimate the Transition Point | ANOVA p-Value for Sex Factor | ANOVA p-Value for Physical Capacity Factor | ANOVA p-Value for Initial HR Factor | Mean ± SD Sum of Adjusted for the Optimum Case (Max. 2) | Mean ± SD Time from IP to the End of Stress Test [minutes] |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
IP1 | Ns. | 0.001 ** | Ns. | 1.56 ± 0.21 | 5.82 ± 3.43 |
IP2 | Ns. | Ns. | Ns. | 1.07 ± 0.38 | 6.17 ± 3.96 |
IP3 | 0.002 ** | Ns. | Ns. | 1.33 ± 0.32 | 4.92 ± 3.63 |
IP4 | 0.006 ** | 0.005 ** | Ns. | — | 5.63 ± 2.22 |
IP5 | 0.07 | 0.026 * | Ns. | As for IP1 | |
IP6 | Ns. | Ns. | Ns. | As for IP2 | |
IP7 | 0.07 | Ns. | Ns. | As for IP3 | |
IP8 | Ns. | Ns. | Ns. | — | As for IP4 |
ID | Sex | BMI | Completed Steps | Final HR | Workload at the Transition [Watts] (1) | Interval to the Test End [min] (2) | SD1 [BPM] (3) | SD2 [BPM] (4) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | F | 23.5 | 6 | 189 | 170.5 | 5.1 | 1.57 | 8.12 |
2 | F | 22.2 | 4 | 189 | 125.6 | 4.7 | 1.43 | 6.26 |
3 | F | 21.8 | 4 | 173 | 109.6 | 4.7 | 1.36 | 6.62 |
4 | F | 18.9 | 4 | 166 | 79.0 | 4.7 | 1.28 | 6.70 |
5 | F | 18.6 | 4 | 176 | 102.2 | 3.8 | 1.35 | 6.30 |
6 | F | 20.5 | 5 | 189 | 160.3 | 4.3 | 1.31 | 7.48 |
7 | M | 23.6 | 6 | 177 | 117.1 | 9.3 | 1.43 | 7.30 |
8 | M | 24.2 | 6 | 175 | 172.0 | 7.4 | 1.44 | 7.16 |
9 | M | 21.2 | 7 | 180 | 159.2 | 6.1 | 1.50 | 7.18 |
10 | F | 18.3 | 3 | 174 | 93.5 | 4.4 | 1.49 | 7.05 |
11 | F | 20.8 | 5 | 181 | 111.3 | 5.3 | 1.49 | 7.75 |
12 | F | 20.4 | 5 | 178 | 79.3 | 8.2 | 1.45 | 7.81 |
13 | F | 20.7 | 4 | 179 | 88.4 | 5.3 | 1.44 | 7.80 |
14 | F | 23.3 | 5 | 184 | 74.3 | 7.8 | 1.45 | 7.64 |
15 | F | 20.9 | 3 | 170 | 90.6 | 5.5 | 1.46 | 7.50 |
16 | F | 19.4 | 7 | 190 | 204.7 | 5.3 | 1.43 | 7.32 |
17 | F | 22.9 | 4 | 195 | 63.0 | 6.5 | 1.43 | 7.22 |
18 | M | 25.9 | 8 | 193 | 142.5 | 9.3 | 1.47 | 8.32 |
19 | M | 22.6 | 7 | 182 | 152.6 | 7.3 | 1.48 | 8.91 |
20 | F | 20.4 | 5 | 183 | 126.0 | 6.7 | 1.49 | 8.91 |
21 | F | 21.7 | 5 | 198 | 112.2 | 6.1 | 1.48 | 8.81 |
22 | M | 20.3 | 7 | 191 | 148.2 | 8.8 | 1.53 | 8.99 |
23 | F | 22.9 | 4 | 200 | 154.9 | 2.2 | 1.52 | 8.92 |
24 | M | 22.2 | 8 | 190 | 177.1 | 8.9 | 1.52 | 9.35 |
25 | F | 23.7 | 4 | 160 | 124.9 | 3.5 | 1.51 | 9.36 |
26 | F | 25.6 | 4 | 164 | 116.4 | 2.8 | 1.51 | 9.30 |
27 | F | 22.1 | 4 | 180 | 93.3 | 3.8 | 1.51 | 9.21 |
28 | F | 16.7 | 3 | 140 | 90.5 | 3.0 | 1.52 | 9.13 |
29 | F | 18.1 | 3 | 184 | 76.9 | 4.4 | 1.51 | 9.04 |
30 | F | 21.0 | 3 | 145 | 103.6 | 2.4 | 1.51 | 8.97 |
31 | M | 24.8 | 8 | 195 | 139.2 | 11.0 | 1.51 | 9.11 |
32 | F | 30.5 | 5 | 195 | 120.6 | 3.8 | 1.50 | 9.02 |
33 | F | 18.4 | 3 | 156 | 89.8 | 3.1 | 1.50 | 8.96 |
34 | M | 25.1 | 7 | 205 | 192.8 | 6.3 | 1.56 | 10.23 |
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Młyńczak, M.; Krysztofiak, H. Respiratory Activity during Exercise: A Feasibility Study on Transition Point Estimation Using Impedance Pneumography. Sensors 2021, 21, 6233. https://doi.org/10.3390/s21186233
Młyńczak M, Krysztofiak H. Respiratory Activity during Exercise: A Feasibility Study on Transition Point Estimation Using Impedance Pneumography. Sensors. 2021; 21(18):6233. https://doi.org/10.3390/s21186233
Chicago/Turabian StyleMłyńczak, Marcel, and Hubert Krysztofiak. 2021. "Respiratory Activity during Exercise: A Feasibility Study on Transition Point Estimation Using Impedance Pneumography" Sensors 21, no. 18: 6233. https://doi.org/10.3390/s21186233