Next Article in Journal
Deformation Prediction of Unstable Slopes Based on Real-Time Monitoring and DeepAR Model
Previous Article in Journal
Unconventionally Designed Tracking Loop Adaptable to Plasma Sheath Channel for Hypersonic Vehicles
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Hybrid LPG-FBG Based High-Resolution Micro Bending Strain Sensor

1
Department of Cognitive Science, Yonsei University, 50 Yonsei-ro, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul 03722, Korea
2
Advanced Photonics Research Institute (APRI), Gwangju Institute of Science and Technology (GIST), 1 Oryong-dong, Buk-gu, Gwangju 500-712, Korea
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sensors 2021, 21(1), 22; https://doi.org/10.3390/s21010022
Submission received: 8 November 2020 / Revised: 16 December 2020 / Accepted: 18 December 2020 / Published: 22 December 2020
(This article belongs to the Section Optical Sensors)

Abstract

:

Simple Summary

The solved problem, the helical core sensor for spatial coordinate direction within the fiber was applied to monitor the microscopic repetitive pattern caused by the body structure on the body surface. The body motion state was measured using the strain change of the helical core in three-dimensional space For real-time monitoring, sophisticated sensing and stability against noise are required. The femtosecond laser processing allows us to check the measurement reliability of the sensor through the design of the long and short period gratings. This shows the possibility of monitoring spatial coordinates from one core to one core. It can be used as a wearable sensor.

Abstract

Sensitivity and reliability are essential factors for the practical implementation of a wearable sensor. This study explores the possibility of using a hybrid high-resolution Bragg grating sensor for achieving a fast response to dynamic, continuous motion and Bragg signal pattern monitoring measurement. The wavelength shift pattern for real-time monitoring in picometer units was derived by using femtosecond laser Bragg grating processing on an optical wave path with long-period grating. The possibility of measuring the demodulation system’s Bragg signal pattern on the reflection spectrum of the femtosecond laser precision Bragg process and the long-period grating was confirmed. By demonstrating a practical method of wearing the sensor, the application of wearables was also explored. It is possible to present the applicability of sophisticated micro transformation measurement applications in picometer units.

1. Introduction

Recently, the ability to monitor an individual’s activity, health, and lifestyle using sensor technology has arisen. Using wearable “on-body” sensors, various physiological Bragg signals such as heart rate, blood pressure, and respiration rate can be monitored as a person goes about their daily life [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10].
Among sensor technologies, the grating Bragg wavelength of fiber optic sensors is very sensitive to environmental variables, such as temperature, stress, bending, and pressure, and thus, it has been widely applied as a high-precision sensor [8]. Fiber optic sensors are used in chemical, bio, and precision measurements for various specific environments. They are being used as hybrid sensors [11,12,13,14]. Fiber Bragg gratings can be applied through grating structures instead of electrical strain gages to obtain useful strain measurements for shape detection algorithms [15,16]. The intensive process using femtosecond lasers can process gratings at strategic locations without removing the fiber’s coating [17].
This study was conducted to investigate the ability of a small, high-precision directional sensitivity sensor with high accuracy to act as a single point sensor through the optical fiber. It is a wearable device that aims to measure body motion.

1.1. Wearable Motion Sensing

1.1.1. Body Motion

The body is a complex structure with a high number of degrees of freedom. In a kinematic, multi-joint system, the reference system is established through the chain arrangement system, and the chain must achieve system regulations. The movement trajectory of the point to be measured is patterned to allow the analysis of the spatial and temporal regularity relationship regarding the movement and characteristics of the movement [18,19].
For the segment analysis of a joint in the body system, the position of the sensor in the body segment unit and the number of degrees of freedom in the sensor design must be strategically determined. The vector properties of the joint segment unit and the fundamental 3D surface deformation environment of the body surface require the use of high-precision sensors for dynamic vector motion [20,21].
Human physiological aspects and a dynamic detection monitoring system can be applied when a real-time target feedback system is available. Sensitivity and resolution requirements are required depending on the environment of exceptional contact with the body and sensor. Bragg signal stability and reliability against noise in dynamic environments caused by continuous motion are required. This type of sensor could be used for flexible applications to measure a variety of body vectors. This study involved pattern measurement strain wavelength shift, which could be derived by the femtosecond laser grating process between long-period grating. We detail the possibility of measuring the patterning of a stable Bragg signal on the pico nanoscale using the filtering effect of the grating. Real-time patterned strain measurements, instantaneous moment vector measurements, Bragg signal stability against noise, and ultra-compact practical applications could be used for wearable applications.

1.1.2. Optical Fiber Sensor Sensitivity Improvement for Wearable Motion Sensing

These sensors can be implemented with a double fiber structure, tapered structure, and cladding removal method, which can improve the sensitivity and precision of their external stress and strain response. However, the sensors must be durable and efficient to allow repetitive dynamic movements, and sensors for measuring body applied vectors must be applied to strategic locations in the body’s structural system. Additionally, when using the sensor, it should provide a stable Bragg signal.

External Stress and Internal Reaction Applied to Optical Fibers

The wavelength-to-strain response of the Bragg grating is linear. The maximum strain is set to 1% for practical use, and the stress imparted to the fiber by pulling or twisting reacts with only half of the fiber surface of the glass volume. Bending stress has the maximum rate of change in stress for a change in diameter of 10–20 mm due to bending at a constant radius [22,23]. The position of the core within the optical fiber can improve the sensor’s sensitivity.

Long-Period Grating (LPG)

Typical LPGs are manufactured to operate at telecommunication wavelengths (1300 nm and 1550 nm). The refractive index of an optical fiber pre-treated with dye immersion in response to a specific wavelength change occurs due to the change in the Si–O–Ge chain structure caused by light irradiation. Coupling of light from core to cladding is induced by periodic modulation of the refractive index along the fiber axis. The loss of guided light in the core at the Bragg wavelength manifests itself as a spectral dip in transmission according to the phase sum of the core mode and the cladding mode, as shown in Equation (1) [22].
λ l p g = Λ ( n e f f , c r n e f f , c l )
where Λ is the grating period, and n e f f , c r and n e f f , c l are the useful refractive indices of the core and cladding modes.
The axial strain sensitivity of the LPG may be assessed by differentiating Equation (2) [24].
d λ d ε = d λ d ( δ n e f f ) ( d n e f f d ε d n c l d ε ) + Λ d λ d Λ
The sensitivity is determined by the material and the waveguide effect. The material effect is the change in fiber dimension, and the waveguide effect is the dispersion term. It occurs in dλ/d𝛬. For an LPG with a periodicity of 100 μm, the material contribution is negative and the waveguide contribution is positive. Choosing to identify the lattice period and fiber composition can create bands with positive, negative, or zero sensitivity to deformation [25].
Depending on the specific measurand or component, there can be different levels of sensitivity and attenuation bands. The waveguide can be designed by changing the configuration of the optical fiber or the LPG spacing [26,27].
Long-period gratings are very sensitive to bending, and strain and refractive index sensors can undergo temperature cross-sensitivity. Moreover, it has been reported that for demodulation systems that detect wavelength shift, a fixed portion of the grating bandwidth is involved. The use of SMF during irradiation of the CO2 laser can provide higher sensitivity [28,29,30,31]. Previous studies manufactured sensors with sensitivity to twisting, bending, and deformation [29]. Due to their advantages, the standard LPFG (SLPFG) interferometer can be used in various applications where information about the bending amplitude and direction are required simultaneously [32]. The SLPFG interferometer of component can have different sensitivity attenuation bands. The waveguide can be designed by changing the configuration of the optical fiber or the LPG spacing.

High Precision Integrated Optical Process Using a Femtosecond Laser

Compared to sensors built using conventional UV lasers, femtosecond laser writing gratings can be used for specific applications. The ability to use the grating directly increases the flexibility of the sensor design. It can enable the fabrication of advanced waveguide structures such as multimode enhanced waveguides [33,34,35]. It presents a fast and flexible way to produce superstructure fiber gratings (SFG) using femtosecond laser point-by-point technology. The flexibility to change the grating parameters makes it easy to change the grating length, pitch, and spectral response [36,37].
Point-by-point processing for the optical fiber core is possible, and 3D processing without removing the outer coating is also possible. Femtosecond laser processing allows sensors to be designed for a variety of applications. The overall approach of 3D laser structuring in fiber optics extends to many more applications, including through and blind holes, microfluidic networks, reservoirs, micro-optics and inline Bragg grating waveguides (BGW) filters, birefringence tuning, and interferometers. A fiber Bragg grating (FBG)-based tapered temperature fiber sensor made with a femtosecond laser has been proposed and has shown excellent reproducibility [38,39,40].

1.2. Fiber Bragg Grating Sensing

1.2.1. FBG Sensor Principle

The grating Bragg wavelength is widely applied as a high-precision sensor because it is very sensitive to environmental variables such as temperature, stress, bending, and pressure [41,42]. The light reflected from the end of the fiber and the light incident from the standing wave give a periodic energy change inside the fiber core. The grid is created by inducing a regular shift in the refractive index. This phenomenon is called photosensitivity [43,44]. The optical fiber grating device is a photonic device that uses photosensitive properties in which the refractive index changes when a part of the optical fiber core to which germanium or boron is added is exposed to a laser.

Fiber Bragg Grating Waveguide Devices

Bragg gratings are widely applied to detect various physical variables, such as temperature, strain, pressure, and acceleration, due to their moderate manufacturing cost and high sensitivity to environmental parameters [45,46,47,48].
Bragg gratings are made by doping the core and irradiating light to adjust the refractive index. They have a sub-micron period and combine the light from the fiber’s forward propagation mode with the reverse propagation mode. They act as a narrowband reflection filter. Interrogators are measured and monitored to identify Bragg center wavelength shift due to changes in the refractive index along the fiber axis of an external tensile load. Strain can be calculated as the moving speed and direction of the external strain [49]. The strain response is expressed as a function of Equation (3) [50].
Various previous studies have aimed to improve the maximum functionality of Bragg grating sensors and approach detection for multiple characteristics of the measurement range [51,52,53,54]. Examples of methods used by previous papers to increase the sensitivity of FBGs are the Bragg grating technique, which uses a fine structure through a taper technique [19,29], and the Bragg grating based on a grating configuration [55,56].
(1 − Ρe) ε = Δλ/λ
Δ λ B λ B = Δ ( n e f   Λ ) n e f   Λ   =   ( 1 + 1 n e f   n e f ε ) Δ ε =   ( 1 + Ρ e )   Δ ε   = ( 1 + Ρ e )   Δ ε   = β e   Δ ε
where Λ is the grating period, n e f is the effective refractive index, λr is the center wavelength of reflection, and Δ ε is the strain change and Δ λ B   is the strain-induced wavelength shift.
ε = λ B λ B 0 ( 1 Ρ e ) λ B 0 = α λ B + β
where Ρ e   is the photo elastic constant, λ B λ B 0 is the shift of the Bragg wavelength, λ B is the FBG Bragg wavelength without strain, λ B 0 is the FBG Bragg wavelength with strain, and ε is a linear relationship with strain, as shown in Equations (3)–(5) [57].
Previous papers have increased the sensitivity of FBG Bragg gratings using microstructures through tapering technology [58], and Bragg gratings based on grating configurations [59] have been introduced by previous studies. In addition, various previous studies have improved the maximal function of the Bragg grating sensor and investigated the sensing of various characterizations of the measurement range [60,61,62,63].

1.2.2. Interrogator Measurement

The interrogator is measured by the amplitude and phase values of the Bragg wavelength of scattered light along the waveguide. The light emission reaction by deformation is applied to the core by external physical deformation. The change in wavelength as the spacing change function of a fiber Bragg grating is measured as a composite factor of the displacement, the curvature along the axis, the law of physics, and the elastic point, which can be explained by the applied load.
The performance of the interrogator is based on how it measures the center wavelength of the grating. The distribution of all reflected light between the start and end points of the sensor peak is calculated to determine the critical amount of light. The center of the distribution is identified. This includes the specifications of a calculation method suitable for changes in the amount of reflected light distributed.
There are several ways to find the central wavelength of a peak. This method calculates the median by finding the peak’s starting point and the end point of the peak falling below the threshold.

2. Materials and Methods

The sensor analyses Bragg signals by measuring the wavelength shift using the significant refractive constant value for the Bragg grating, which relates to strain of the optical fiber axis. In this experiment, to improve the sensor’s strain variation, a single-mode core was used. The fiber core located at the outer 70% of the volume from the center of the fiber. A 1.54 cm pitch helical core was geometrically applied to the external strain as a basis for highly efficient dynamic modeling of the spiral spring element [64,65]. The Bragg grating formed an optical wave path designed as an extended period chirp grating, and the sub-short-period Bragg grating between the long-period grating and the grating was processed with a femtosecond laser. The strain wavelength variation of the sensor Bragg grating was compared between conditions with the presence or absence of the long-period grating.

2.1. Optical Fiber

The femtosecond laser process was possible due to the use of germanium-doped to ensure light guiding. Seven helical core structures, one center, and six external positions were used. The specifications were a core spacing of 35 micrometers, a core diameter of 6.3 micrometers, a numerical aperture of 0.21, and a useful core index of within 0.05%.
The preform rotated at high speed to apply twist during the process and had a pitch of 2 cm at a rate of 50 circuits per meter. An optical fiber coated with an acrylate-based UV transparent fiber was used. Figure 1 shows the locations of the seven cores in (a1) and the diameter of the core cross-section in (b). The core sensor used in the Bragg grating is shown in (a1), and in (c), the side of the femtosecond Bragg grating processed core is shown. It is shown as an electron micrograph.

2.2. Femtosecond Laser Processing

The pulse repetition rate used was 1 kHz, the output was at least 2 W, the time width was 30 fs(femtosecond)–2 picosecond, and variable conditions were used for the Femtosecond laser—a 785 nm center wavelength, a 185 fs (femtosecond) pulse width, and a maximum output of 1 W (Figure 1a).
The X and Y axes operated at a maximum speed of 20 mm/s with a precision of 20 nm in the linear motor stage—the 300 mm by 300 mm machining range. The Z-axis operated at a maximum speed of 20 mm/s with a precision level of 0.5 m in the ball screw stage and a movement range of 200 mm. The actual operating stage is shown in Figure 2c.
Processing was done by fixing the optical fiber at a delicate precision processing stage and moving the laser beam. The scan speed was adjusted to 2 mm/s, the line spacing was set to 2 μ, and the depth (Z) was fixed at −60 μ. The laser power was changed from 0.3 to 3 mW, and the Bragg grating was processed inside the optical fiber. Figure 2b shows a schematic diagram of the phase mask processing. During processing, the Bragg signal’s detection of the interrogator at 10 kHz occurred in real-time, and the peak generation and shift of the wavelength were observed.

2.3. Bragg Grating Specifications of the Sensor

Figure 3 shows the long- and short-period Bragg grid structure diagram of the sensor. The long-period grating (498 μm) (h) and femtosecond laser short-period grating (0.85 μm) (h2) used in UV laser processing were demodulated. The Bragg wavelength passing through the fiber core is measured as the reflected light (e) from the light incident on the fiber (d). The light incident on the long-period grating is divided into light scattered in the cladding mode (f) and light passing through it (g). The summation of the core and cladding modes by the long-period grating can be measured with a spectroscopic spectrometer as opposed to the reflected Bragg grating measurement.

2.4. Protocol 1(Spectral Bragg Signal Observation Experiment of Short-Period Gratings Engraved Between Long-Period Gratings)

After connecting the optical fiber of the sensor part and the optical fiber part of the fan-out with a ferrule, a relative rotation position was created to induce light intensity and long-period grating period position modulation. Figure 4 shows the experimental method used.
The relative position of the short-period Bragg grating according to the long-period grating period was measured as the changes in the waveguide angle and length. The fixed point of the passive stage used a rubber stopper fixing frame to prevent the axis of the optical fiber from moving.
The angle unit of the manual stage used was 1 degree, and the length unit was 1 mm. The interrogator used was able to undergo real-time motion monitoring at 10 hz. The device fan-out that connects the 7 cores of the optical fiber to the interrogator individually, one by one, allows the observation of each of the 7 channels. In this experiment, the moving points in Figure 4A(g),B(g) at regular intervals (10 degrees) and length (1 cm) at regular intervals are moved 10 times in Figure 4B, and the wavelength of the interrogator over time observed mutation morphology.

2.5. Protocol 2 (Wearable Application Experiment and Sensor Resolution Measurement)

The sensor was placed between the silicone band and the body surface to explore the practical applicability of the wearables. When used directly by humans, the indexing environmental conditions caused by body tremor or temperature were adapted under the manual measuring device. Proceed to the metronome 80′s.
Motion Bragg signal monitoring was performed through mobile phone repetitive numbering. A cellular numbering protocol was performed using the degrees of freedom of the metacarpophalangeal joint centered on the carpometacarpal (CMC) joint [48], as shown in Figure 5c. Rotation at the CMC joint in Figure 5d was generally coupled and posture of the trapezium relative to the third metacarpal changed significantly with thumb position [66,67]. Figure 5e shows the constrictor muscles of thumb movement.
The measuring device and sensor used were the same for both protocols 1 and 2.

3. Results

3.1. Result 1 (Spectral Bragg Signal Observation Experiment of Short-Period Gratings Engraved Between Long-Period Gratings)

Figure 6A shows a spectrum of the process in which a short-period grating was engraved between the long-period gratings. Figure 6B shows that the sensor part and fan-out part were connected with a ferrule and the seven core positions of the seven core fan-out of the sensor rotated in opposite directions to adjust the intensity of the light power. As the amount of light power increased, the spectra of the long-period grating, and the short-period grating changed in the order shown in B(a–d) of Figure 6.
Figure 6B(e,f) show the three-point wavelength spectrum change according to the long-period spectral period position (Figure 6A(b)) in the state of the highest light power intensity. The case where the short-period grating spectrum was placed in a flat and curved position is shown.
The real-time time-wavelength shift graph in Figure 6B(e) shows a stable level accuracy. The response Bragg signal pattern accuracy of the strain direction wavelength shift to the detected peak point shift improved. The reflection detected threshold was adjustable, and the strain linearity response resulted in a state where the peak loss did not decrease.
The LPG grating plays the role of an ideal bandpass filter. Since the Bragg grating’s Bragg signal measured the peak wavelength shift at the center frequency, it did not cause the Bragg grating’s wavelength shift Bragg signal to attenuate. The reduction in the Bragg grating amplitude did not affect the peak point Bragg signal’s measurement in the mid-band by reducing the bandwidth through a reduction in the lower cutoff frequency.
After connecting the fan-out and the sensor through the ferrule, the outer core was rotated in the direction of a particular angle around the central core, and the optical power through the interrogator and the Bragg’s peak point grating were observed. It was possible to adjust the detected threshold of the reflection without changing the detected peak point. It was possible to confirm the possibility of adjusting the position of the flattening band or the rising or falling band of the peak point through adjusting the optical wave’s position generated by the long-period grating by controlling the intensity of the optical power. Figure 7 shows the spectra of samples with and without long-period gratings.
The amplitude of the FBG reflection spectrum is a function of the LPG spectrum position, and a shift in the wavelength of the LPG spectrum is converted into a change in the amplitude of the FBG reflection spectrum. The external physical strain response can be measured as a shift in wavelength over time. The LPG response of the wavelength shift was observed through experiments in a nonlinear manner. The Bragg grid can be located on a flat or inclined portion of the spectrum. According to the Bragg grating reflection spectrum location, the shift in wavelength response improved with time.
Figure 8 shows the shape of the wavelength shift over time by comparing the cases with long-period gratings. The change in the spatial resolution of the wavelength shift was confirmed.

3.2. Result 2 (Wearable Applicational Experiment and Sensor Resolution Measurement)

The search for the possibility of grafting wearable device applications explored the motion repeatability and Bragg signal monitoring patterning in mobile phone numbering. Our primary purpose was to understand the measurement resolution and Bragg signal stability of the Bragg signal, and the characteristics of the hybrid grating structure sensor were applied to the application of wearable devices. While testing the sensor, the body’s body temperature does not affect the sensor’s action.
Figure 9 shows the improvement of Bragg signal precision along with the improvement in spatial resolution shown in Figure 8. Figure 9 shows the detailed morphology comparison of wavelength shift change over time in a 1-s interval. The wavelength shift for B(c) shown in Figure 8 is presented in detail in Figure 9.
The strain direction of the helical core used in this paper with respect to the X, Y, and Z axes of the optical axis and the responsiveness to each axis influenced the sensitivity of the acceleration change. The difference function, the cubic function shown in Figure 9A(b), and the quaternary function shown in Figure 9A(c) were determined. The helical core is parallel to the direction of the waveguide and rotated to the right by 45 degrees. The change of the morphology curve according to the velocity change of the stress strain was observed rather than the general linear waveguide and the longitudinal stress strain response.
The spatial division of the pattern and the pattern Bragg signal’s significance were confirmed within the 1-nanometer range. The linearity of the strain measurement in Pico nano units was verified. Figure 10A shows the morphology of static maintenance at each wavelength shift in the holding state according to a constant stress increase and decrease. Figure 10B shows the morphology of the dynamic wavelength shift in stages with increasing and decreasing angular directions. The dynamic variation was measured according to a continuous 10-degree rise and decrease. C shows the shifts in the long and short wavelength directions repeatedly according to the crossover method in the clockwise and counterclockwise directions.
Figure 11 shows the wavelength shift measured through cell phone numbering. Figure 11a shows the wavelength shift’s mean value according to the mobile phone number. Figure 11b shows the amount of variation in wavelength according to the direction and location of each section. It shows the unit wavelength shift resulting from numbering from left to right or right to left and the change in the diagonal position of the diagonal line from top to bottom or bottom to top. Figure 11c shows the morphology of the wavelength shift over time, according to the numbering used. The flow chart of morphology changed based on the order of the numbering position and direction, and it shows that the position function value was dependent on the relative position before and after numbering. The full set of data is shown in Appendix A and Appendix B.
Figure 12 shows the unit wavelength shift value for each cell phone numbering section, where the accuracy of the delicate repetition pattern is shown to be within 1 nanometer. The accuracy and reliability of the pattern monitoring sensor can be checked in the Pico nano range. The wavelength shift can be expressed as an integer part (N) and an excess fraction part (𝜀).
Figure 13 shows a comparison of the maximum and minimum mean values of short-period Bragg wavelength shifts with and without the use of a long-period grating. A 15 cm flexible loading frame was used to test the Bragg grating sensor epoxy attachment in the middle of the loading frame. Experiment numbers one, two, three, four, five, and six show the comparative values of the maximum, middle, and minimum wavelength shifts in the cell phone numbering experiment. Table 1 shows the sensor reliability results for the phone numbering given in ⒶⒷⒸⒹⒻⒼ in Figure 11. The reliability of the sensor’s effectiveness and the practical application of the sensor’s measurement resolution in pico nano units are shown. From the results in Table 1, the closer to the center point of the short-period FBG wavelength spectrum curve, the maximum sensitivity on the FBG sensing appears to occur.
Figure 10, Figure 12 and Figure 13 show the magnitude of the strain of the external force acting on the axis of the light wave of the sensor when moving the repetitive dynamic trajectory at the speed set to the metronome 80, which is transformed into the Bragg grid by the stress magnitude and direction of the internal stress of the optical fiber is expressed as the shift in wavelength with speed. The degree of correspondence of the periodicity of the waveform generated by the repeated operation means the linearity of the strain, and this was calculated and presented as a reliability.

4. Discussion

Compared with conventional sensors, the LPG-based Bragg grating improves the resolution of fiber optic sensors when detecting small parameter changes. Amplitude modulation without reducing the Bragg grating’s power was shown to be possible due to the period of LPG and the coupling factor in the cladding mode, which enabled high resolution to be obtained in the micro bending region.
When the Bragg grating was located in the valley of the long-period grating spectrum, the shape of the wavelength shift was unstable. The reliability and stability of the response morphology iterations were confirmed when on a flat surface than when the response was located in a valley.
The Bragg grating position relative to the long-period grating makes it possible to accurately measure the responsiveness of the distribution response in the fields of chemical, temperature, and biosensors. It can be applied to a sensor that measures the sensitivity distribution of the bias according to the spectrum’s distribution. It is possible to provide a potential factor for improving the measurement sensor’s sensitivity according to the concentration of the bio or chemical sensor.
Development of low-cost sensor devices has been secured by the development of polymer materials for integrated optical devices. The development of polymer materials makes it possible to have excellent thermal stability and chemical resistance of various physical properties. Further studies can be presented with the optical fiber internal stress conditions used in this sensor [68,69,70].

5. Conclusions

A high-sensitivity sensor element requires high measurement accuracy in terms of the amount of change in the minority part, and, therefore, it is necessary to control the amount of noise present. The long-period grating can induce a filtering effect with light waves by summing the core and cladding modes, and thus the amount of change in the Bragg signal can be adjusted according to the amount of light. The accuracy of Bragg signal measurement is improved with one accurate frequency measurement without the requirement for continuous monitoring and sensing operations and the Bragg signal is stable in response to noise.
The bending’s sensitivity showed a wavelength shift due to an increase in the moving speed or curvature of the central Bragg wavelength. This curvature can be interpreted as an increase in the segmentation component of the Bragg grating spectrum. The Bragg wavelength’s phase shift can be interpreted as improving the sensitivity to time in the reflection spectrum. It was possible to have detail in measuring the speed change due to the influence of the directional twist strain according to the characteristics of the helical core.
The transmission amplitude modulation of the long-period grating was linked to the reflection of the Bragg grating and the amplitude modulation of the Bragg grating. However, this did not affect the response of the Bragg grid. It was confirmed that the amplitude of the FBG reflection spectrum is a function of the LPG spectrum’s position and it provides a resolution factor for the sensor measurement resolution.

Author Contributions

S.-B.L.; Conceptualization, methodology, software, validation, formal analysis, investigation, resources, data curation, writing—draft preparation, project administration, funding acquisition, Y.-J.J., H.-K.C., I.-B.S.; Femto seconds laser processing advice and sample processing laboratory equipment technical assistance. J.-H.L.; review and editing, supervision. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

Data Availability Statement

Data sharing not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Appendix A

Table A1. Wavelength of Subject Phone Number (nm).
Table A1. Wavelength of Subject Phone Number (nm).
N1234567890*#
Quantile
0.11547.00001547.00701547.06001546.86531546.93871546.98301546.79301546.79301546.84001546.76871546.62171546.8903
0.21547.00231547.01201547.06301546.87401546.94501546.98501546.79401546.79401546.84001546.77201546.62501546.8980
0.31547.00431547.02001547.07571546.87401546.94901546.99731546.79771546.79771546.84131546.77301546.62771546.9003
0.41547.00601547.02301547.07901546.87401546.94971546.99801546.79971546.79971546.84271546.78271546.66731546.9023
0.51547.00801547.02401547.08101546.88901546.95501546.99901546.80101546.80101546.84301546.78801546.67101546.9070
0.61547.00801547.02401547.08131546.89031546.95671547.00071546.80201546.80201546.84471546.78971546.67331546.9080
0.71547.01201547.02501547.08201546.89301546.96001547.00201546.80401546.80401546.84671546.79171546.67401546.9100
0.81547.34631547.02701547.08701547.86601546.96101547.00401546.80501546.80501546.84901546.79301546.67501546.9130
0.91547.00001547.04671547.08731547.89001546.96871547.00831546.80601546.80601546.89301546.79601546.67771546.9270
*,# Mobile phone numbering dial code

Appendix B

Table A2. Wavelength of Subject Phone Number (nm).
Table A2. Wavelength of Subject Phone Number (nm).
N1234567890*#
λ (nm)1547.011547.0521546.8421546.8421546.9581547.0381546.6341546.8091546.9331546.8391546.6261546.873
1547.0031547.0621546.8561546.8561546.9681547.0021546.6871546.8021546.9111546.7961546.621546.885
1547.0131547.0231546.8741546.8741546.96115471546.6831546.8061546.8841546.7951546.6211546.893
15471547.0441546.871546.871546.971546.9981546.6821546.8011546.861546.7921546.6241546.894
1547.0061547.0071546.8761546.8761546.951546.9831546.6971546.8041546.8471546.7931546.8391546.898
1547.9971547.021546.8741546.8741546.9561547.0021546.6791546.8061546.8441546.7871546.6221546.9
1547.0081547.0121546.8661546.8661546.9491546.9851546.6841546.8051546.8431546.7891546.6251546.901
1546.9991547.0081546.891546.891546.9611546.9991546.6911546.81546.8391546.7911546.6311546.903
1547.00215471546.8741546.8741546.961547.0081546.6931546.8021546.841546.7881546.671546.907
1547.0071547.021546.8891546.8891546.9561547.0091546.681546.8041546.8471546.7911546.6691546.908
1547.0051547.0191546.8911546.8911546.9551547.0081546.6861546.7991546.841546.7831546.6751546.91
1547.0081547.0241546.8931546.8931546.9531547.0031546.6781546.7931546.841546.7821546.6731546.913
1546.9951547.0251546.891546.891546.9471547.0041546.6871546.7941546.8461546.7961546.6741546.921
1547.0081547.0241546.8931546.8931546.93815471546.6831546.7971546.8411546.7731546.6641546.925
1546.9951547.0271546.8741546.8741546.9411546.9971546.6821546.7931546.8421546.7721546.6731546.931
1547.0031547.0241546.8741546.8741546.9451546.9961546.6971546.7871546.8411546.7661546.6751546.939
N232323232323232323232323
Mean1547.09141547.02461547.07641547.13801551.29931546.99891546.09261546.80001546.85231546.78551546.66341546.9062
Mean(se)0.059600.003030.002240.093764.346620.002520.006550.001150.005040.003230.009390.00298
Sd0.28580.01450.01080.449720.84570.012510.03140.00550.02420.01550.04500.0143
Minimum1546.9951547.0001547.0541546.8421546.9321546.9781546.6781546.7871546.8391546.7661546.6201546.873
1st quartile1547.00121547.01921547.06481546.87401546.94731546.99621546.68201546.79451546.84101546.77221546.62601546.9000
Median1547.0061547.02401547.08101546.88901546.95501546.99901546.68401546.80101546.84301546.78801546.67101546.9070
3st quartile1547.00971547.02671547.08201547.70381546.96081547.00281546.69271546.80401546.84701546.79281546.67481546.9125
Maximum1547.9971547.0621547.0881547.8901646.9251547.0381546.8341546.8091546.9331546.8391546.8391546.939
Mode1547.0081547.0241547.0821546.8741546.9611547.0021546.6971546.8061546.8431546.7961546.6741546.913
*,# Mobile phone numbering dial code.

References

  1. Winslow, B.D.; Chadderdon, G.L.; Dechmerowski, S.J.; Jones, D.L.; Kalkstein, S.; Greene, J.L.; Gehrman, P. Development and clinical evaluation of an mhealth application for stress management. Front. Psychiatry 2016, 7, 130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. Rodrigues, M.J.; Postolache, O.; Cercas, F. Physiological and behavior monitoring systems for smart healthcare environments: A review. Sensors 2020, 20, 2186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. Yong, Y.-T.; Lee, S.-C.; Rahman, F.A. Sensitization of hybrid LPFG–FBG refractometer using double-pass configuration. Opt. Commun. 2015, 338, 590–595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Suarez, F.; Nozariasbmarz, A.; Vashaee, D.; Öztürk, M.C. Designing thermoelectric generators for self-powered wearable electronics. Energy Environ. Sci. 2016, 9, 2099–2113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Yeo, J.C.; Lim, C.T. Emergence of microfluidic wearable technologies. Lab. Chip. 2016, 16, 4082–4090. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Heikenfeld, J.; Jajack, A.; Rogers, J.; Gutruf, P.; Tian, L.; Pan, T.; Li, R.; Khine, M.; Kim, J.; Wang, J.; et al. Wearable sensors: Modalities, challenges, and prospects. Lab. Chip. 2018, 18, 217–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  7. Wang, C.; Xia, K.; Wang, H.; Liang, X.; Yin, Z.; Zhang, Y. Advanced carbon for flexible and wearable electronics. Adv. Mater. 2019, 31, e1801072. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Campanella, C.E.; Cuccovillo, A.; Campanella, C.; Yurt, A.; Passaro, V.M.N. Fibre bragg grating based strain sensors: Review of technology and applications. Sensors 2018, 18, 3115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Ascorbe, J.; Corres, J.M.; Arregui, F.J.; Matias, I.R. Recent developments in fiber optics humidity sensors. Sensors 2017, 17, 893. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Titon, S.C.M.; Titon, B.; Barsotti, A.M.G.; Gomes, F.R.; Assis, V.R. Time-related immunomodulation by stressors and corticosterone transdermal application in toads. PLoS ONE 2019, 14, e0222856. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Di Sante, R. Fibre optic sensors for structural health monitoring of aircraft composite structures: Recent advances and applications. Sensors 2015, 15, 18666–18713. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Yong Zhao, Q.; He, H. Characteristics and applications of tilted fiber Bragg gratings. J. Optoelectr. Adv. Mater. 2010, 12, 2343–2354. [Google Scholar]
  13. Yanjiang Yu, J.; Feng, H.; Sun, W.; Feng, X. High-precision fiber Bragg gratings inscription by infrared femtosecond laser direct-writing method assisted with image recognition. Opt. Expr. 2020, 28, 8937. [Google Scholar]
  14. Léonie, P.; Chatellier, C.; Vauzelle, R.; Fradet, L. Sensor-to-segment calibration methodologies for lower-body kinematic analysis with inertial sensors: A systematic review. Sensors 2020, 20, 3322. [Google Scholar]
  15. Vazirian, M.; Shojaei, I.; Tromp, R.L.; Bazrgari, B. Age-related differences in trunk intrinsic stiffness. J. Biomech. 2016, 49, 926–932. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Lebel, K.; Boissy, P.; Nguyen, H.; Duval, C. Inertial measurement systems for segments and joints kinematics assessment: Towards an understanding of the variations in sensors accuracy. BioMed. Eng. Online 2017, 16, 56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Kalli, K.; Davies, C.K.E.; Komodromos, M.; Webb, D.J.; Zhang, L. Femtosecond laser inscribed superstructure fibre gratings. Opt. Fiber Sens. 2011, 77, 537–539. [Google Scholar]
  18. Faber, G.S.; Chang, C.C.; Kingma, I.; Dennerlein, J.T.; van Dieën, J.H. Estimating 3D L5/S1 moments and ground reaction forces during trunk bending using a full-body ambulatory inertial motion capture system. J. Biomech. 2016, 49, 904–912. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Leigang Donga, T.G.; Biana, C.; Tonga, R.; Wanga, J.; Hua, M. A high sensitivity optical fiber strain sensor based on hollow core tapering. Opt. Fiber Technol. 2020, 56, 102179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Gulati GSGST. Design methodology for the mechanical reliability of optical fiber. optical engineering. Opt. Eng. 1991, 30, 709–715. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Gougeon, N.; Poulain, M. Mechanical reliability of silica optical fibers. Non Cryst. Solids 2003, 316, 125–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Lambin, I.V.; Boisvert, J.S.; Loranger, S.; Kashyap, R. 3D printed long period gratings for optical fibers. Opt. Lett. 2016, 41, 1865–1868. [Google Scholar]
  23. Hojoong Jung, W.S.; Jun Ki, K.; Park, S.-H.; Do-Kyeong, K.; Lee, J.; Oh, K. Bending and strain sensitivities in a helicoidal long-period fiber gratings. IEEE Photonics Technol. Lett. 2009, 21, 1232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Dong, P.H.L.; Birks, T.A.; Reekie, L.; St, P.; Russell, J. Novel add/drop filters for wavelength-division-multiplexing optical fiber systems using a Bragg grating assisted mismatched coupler. IEEE Photonics Technol. Lett. 1996, 8, 1656–1658. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Kersey, A. Invited paper A review of recent developments in fiber optic sensor technology. Opt. Fiber Technol. 1996, 2, 291–317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Zhou, Q.; Zhang, W.; Chen, L.; Bai, Z.; Zhang, L.; Wang, L.; Wang, B.; Yan, T. Bending vector sensor based on a sector-shaped long-period grating. IEEE Photonics Technol. Lett. 2015, 27, 713–716. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Tosi, D. Review of chirped fiber bragg Grating (CFBG) fiber-optic sensors and their applications. Sensors 2018, 18, 2147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  28. Kueha, S.R.M.; Suresh, R.S.P.; Advania, G. A methodology for using long-period gratings and mold-filling simulations to minimize the intrusiveness of flow sensors in liquid composite molding. Compos. Sci. Technol. 2001, 62, 311–327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Chen, Y.; Semenova, Y.; Farrell, G.; Xu, F.; Lu, Y.-Q. A Compact Sagnac Loop Based on a Microfiber Coupler for Twist Sensing. IEEE Photonics Technol. Lett. 2015, 27, 2579–2582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Sugioka, K.; Xu, J.; Wu, D.; Hanada, Y.; Wang, Z.; Cheng, Y.; Midorikawa, K. Femtosecond laser 3D micromachining: A powerful tool for the fabrication of microfluidic, optofluidic, and electrofluidic devices based on glass. Lab. Chip. 2014, 14, 3447–3458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Fokine, M.; Theodosiou, A.; Song, S.; Hawkins, T.; Ballato, J.; Kalli, K.; Gibson, U.J. Laser structuring, stress modification and Bragg grating inscription in silicon-core glass fibers. Opt. Mater. Express 2017, 7, 1589–1597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Haque, M.; Lee, K.K.C.; Ho, S.; Fernandes, L.A.; Herman, P.R. Chemical-assisted femtosecond laser writing of lab-in-fibers. Lab Chip 2014, 14, 3817–3829. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Zhang, W.; Zhu, L.; Dong, M.; Lou, X.; Liu, F. A Temperature Fiber Sensor Based on Tapered Fiber Bragg Grating Fabricated by Femtosecond Laser. Appl. Sci. 2018, 8, 2616. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Mihailov, S.J.; Grobnic, D.; Hnatovsky, C.; Walker, R.B.; Lu, P.; Coulas, D.; Ding, H. Extreme Environment Sensing Using Femtosecond Laser- Inscribed Fiber Bragg Gratings. Sensors 2017, 17, 2909. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Balg, X.L.; Liu, Y.; Zhang, L.; Bennion, I. Sampled fiber Bragg grating for simultaneous refractive-index and temperature measurement. Opt. Lett. 2001, 26, 774–776. [Google Scholar]
  36. Cotillard, R.; Laffont, G.; Rougeault, S.; Ayrault, D.; Asserin, O.; Robidet, R. Strain monitoring at high temperature by femtosecond point-by-point fiber Bragg Grating across a TIG weld bead. Opt. Fiber Sens. 2018, 26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Capilla-Gonzalez, G.; May-Arrioja, D.A.; Lopez-Cortes, D.; Guzman-Sepulveda, J.R. Stress homogenization effect in multicore fiber optic bending sensors. Appl. Opt. 2017, 56, 2273–2279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Honglei, G.; Gaozhi, X.; Mrad, N.; Jianping, Y. Simultaneous Interrogation of a Hybrid FBG/LPG Sensor Pair Using a Monolithically Integrated Echelle Diffractive Grating. J. Lightwave Technol. 2009, 27, 2100–2104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Arena, M.; Viscardi, M. Strain State Detection in Composite Structures: Review and New Challenges. J. Compos. Sci. 2020, 4, 60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Frieden, J.; Cugnoni, J.; Botsis, J.; Gmür, T. Low energy impact damage monitoring of composites using dynamic strain Bragg signals from FBG sensors—Part I: Impact detection and localization. Compos. Struct. 2012, 94, 438–445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Berrettoni, C.; Trono, C.; Vignoli, V.; Baldini, F. Fibre Tip Sensor with Embedded FBG-LPG for Temperature and Refractive Index Determination by means of the Simple Measurement of the FBG Characteristics. J. Sens. 2015, 2015, 491391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Coelho, L.; Viegas, D.; Santos, J.L.; de Almeida, J.M.M.M. Optical sensor based on hybrid FBG/titanium dioxide coated LPFG for monitoring organic solvents in edible oils. Talanta 2016, 148, 170–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  43. Min, R.; Ortega, B.; Broadway, C.; Hu, X.; Caucheteur, C.; Bang, O.; Antunes, P.; Marques, C. Microstructured PMMA POF chirped Bragg gratings for strain sensing. Opt. Fiber Technol. 2018, 45, 330–335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Bremer, K.; Lewis, E.; Leen, G.; Moss, B.; Lochmann, S.; Mueller, I.A.R. Feedback Stabilized Interrogation Technique for EFPI/FBG Hybrid Fiber-Optic Pressure and Temperature Sensors. IEEE Sens. J. 2012, 12, 133–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Li, T.; Ren, H. A hybrid FBG displacement and force sensor with a suspended and bent optical fiber configuration. Sens. Actuators A Phys. 2017, 268, 117–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. James, S.W.; Tatam, R.P. Optical fibre long-period grating sensors: Characteristics and application. Meas. Sci. Technol. 2003, 14, R49–R61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Sun, A.; Wu, Z. A hybrid LPG/CFBG for highly sensitive refractive index measurements. Sensors 2012, 12, 7318–7325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Buczek, F.L.; Sinsel, E.W.; Gloekler, D.S.; Wimer, B.M.; Warren, C.M.; Wu, J.Z. Kinematic performance of a six degree-of-freedom hand model (6DHand) for use in occupational biomechanics. J. Biomech. 2011, 44, 1805–1809. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Presti, D.L.; Massaroni, C.; Leitão, C.S.J.; Domingues, M.D.F.; Sypabekova, M.; Barrera, D.; Floris, I.; Massari, L.; Oddo, C.M.; Sales, S.; et al. Fiber Bragg Gratings for Medical Applications and Future Challenges: A Review. Digit. Object Identifier 2020, 10, 1109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Leal-Junior, A.G.; Díaz, C.R.; Leitão, C.; Pontes, M.J.; Marques, C.; Frizera, A. Polymer optical fiber-based sensor for simultaneous measurement of breath T and heart rate under dynamic movements. Opt. Laser Technol. 2019, 109, 429–436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Leal-Junior, A.; Avellar, L.; Frizera, A.; Marques, C. Smart textiles for multimodal wearable sensing using highly stretchable multiplexed optical fiber system. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 13867. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Leitão, C.; Pereira, S.O.; Alberto, N.; Lobry, M.; Loyez, M.; Costa, F.M.; Pinto, J.L.; Caucheteur, C.; Marques, C. Cortisol in-fiber ultrasensitive plasmonic immunosensing. IEEE Sens. J. 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Lobry, M.; Loyez, M.; Chah, K.; Hassan, E.M.; Goormaghtigh, E.; DeRosa, M.C.; Wattiez, R.; Caucheteur, C. HER2 biosensing through SPR-envelope tracking in plasmonic optical fiber gratings. Biomed. Opt. Express 2020, 11, 4862–4871. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Melville, D.M.; Taljanovic, M.S.; Scalcione, L.R.; Eble, J.M.; Gimber, L.H.; DeSilva, G.L.; Sheppard, J.E. Imaging and management of thumb carpometacarpal joint osteoarthritis. Skelet. Radiol. 2015, 44, 165–177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Halilaj, E.; Rainbow, M.J.; Got, C.; Schwartz, J.B.; Moore, D.C.; Weiss, A.P.; Ladd, A.L.; Crisco, J.J. In vivo kinematics of the thumb carpometacarpal joint during three isometric functional tasks. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 2014, 472, 1114–1122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  56. Goto, A.; Leng, S.; Sugamoto, K.; Cooney, W.P.; Kakar, S.; Zhao, K. In vivo pilot study evaluating the thumb carpometacarpal joint during circumduction. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 2014, 472, 1106–1113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  57. Wolf, J.M.; Scher, D.L.; Etchill, E.W.; Scott, F.; Williams, A.E.; Delaronde, S.; King, K.B. Relationship of relaxin hormone and thumb carpometacarpal joint arthritis. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 2014, 472, 1130–1137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  58. Ding, L.; Li, Y.; Zhou, C.; Hu, M.; Xiong, Y.; Zeng, Z. In-Fiber Mach-Zehnder Interferometer Based on Three-Core Fiber for Measurement of Directional Bending. Sensors 2019, 19, 205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  59. Hu, X.; Peng, J.; Yang, L.; Li, J.; Li, H.; Dai, N. Design and fabrication of a heterostructured cladding solid-core photonic bandgap fiber for construction of Mach-Zehnder interferometer and high sensitive curvature sensor. Opt. Express 2018, 26, 7005–7012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Dong, X.; Du, H.; Luo, Z.; Duan, J. Highly Sensitive Strain Sensor Based on a Novel Mach-Zehnder Interferometer with TCF-PCF Structure. Sensors 2018, 18, 278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  61. Lamberti, A.; Vanlanduit, S. Development of an Optical Fiber Sensor Interrogation System for Vibration Analysis. J. Sens. 2016, 2016, 5204581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  62. Lamberti, A.; Vanlanduit, S.; De Pauw, B.; Berghmans, F. Influence of fiber Bragg grating spectrum degradation on the performance of sensor interrogation algorithms. Sensors 2014, 14, 24258–24277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  63. Sharath, U.; Sukreet, R.; Apoorva, G.; Asokana, S. Blood pressure evaluation using sphygmomanometry assisted by arterial pulse waveform detection by fiber Bragg grating pulse device. J. Biomed. Opt. 2013, 18, 067010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Schulze, S.; Wehrhold, M.; Hille, C. Femtosecond-Pulsed Laser Written and Etched Fiber Bragg Gratings for Fiber-Optical Biosensing. Sensors 2018, 18, 2844. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  65. Soto, M.A.; Ramirez, J.A.; Thevenaz, L. Intensifying the response of distributed optical fibre sensors using 2D and 3D image restoration. Nat. Commun. 2016, 7, 10870. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  66. Corcione, C.; Troia, B.; De Leonardis, F.; Passaro, V.M.N. Investigation of a Fiberoptic Device Based on a Long Period Grating in a Ring Resonator. Sensors 2016, 16, 1357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Esposito1, F.; Ranjan, R.; Stăncălie, A.; Sporea, D.; Neguţ, D.; Becherescu, N.; Campopiano1, S.; Iadicicco, A. Real-time analysis of arc-induced Long Period Gratings under gamma irradiation. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 43389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  68. Jäckle, S.; Eixmann, T.; Schulz-Hildebrandt, H.; Hüttmann, G.; Pätz, T. Fiber optical shape sensing of flexible instruments for endovascular navigation. Int. J. Comput. Assisted Radiol. Surg. 2019, 14, 2137–2145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  69. Zhang, J.; Zhaohui, Q.; Wang, G.; Guo, S. High-Efficiency Dynamic Modeling of a Helical Spring Element Based on the Geometrically Exact Beam Theory. Shock Vib. 2020, 2020, 8254606. [Google Scholar]
  70. Yan, T.; Zhou, H.; Niu, H.; Shao, H.; Wang, H.; Pan, Z.; Lin, T. Highly Sensitive Detection of Subtle Movement Using a Flexible Strain Sensor From Helically Wrapped Carbon Yarns. J. Mater. Chem. C 2019, 32, 10049–10058. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. (a) cross-section photograph of the optical fiber used. (b) a cross-sectional picture of the diameter of the core. (c) electron microscope observation photo of the side of the core processed by femtosecond laser grating.
Figure 1. (a) cross-section photograph of the optical fiber used. (b) a cross-sectional picture of the diameter of the core. (c) electron microscope observation photo of the side of the core processed by femtosecond laser grating.
Sensors 21 00022 g001
Figure 2. (a) schematic diagram of a femtosecond laser micro machining system; (b) femtosecond laser phase mask grating process structure diagram; and (c) real femtosecond laser precision machining stage.
Figure 2. (a) schematic diagram of a femtosecond laser micro machining system; (b) femtosecond laser phase mask grating process structure diagram; and (c) real femtosecond laser precision machining stage.
Sensors 21 00022 g002
Figure 3. Bragg grating sensor structure and principle. (a) fiber optic core; (b) fiber optic cladding; (c) core reflected light of the long- and short-period Bragg gratings; (d) incident light; (e) reflected light; (f) cladding mode scattering of long-period grating; (g) transmitted light; (h) long- and short-period grid structure diagram; (h1) long-period grating space; and (h2) short-period grating space.
Figure 3. Bragg grating sensor structure and principle. (a) fiber optic core; (b) fiber optic cladding; (c) core reflected light of the long- and short-period Bragg gratings; (d) incident light; (e) reflected light; (f) cladding mode scattering of long-period grating; (g) transmitted light; (h) long- and short-period grid structure diagram; (h1) long-period grating space; and (h2) short-period grating space.
Sensors 21 00022 g003
Figure 4. A(a–h) Configuration diagram of experimental measurement device; B(b–d,f–h) Appearance of the experimental measurement device, diagram of the experimental protocol; A(a) manufactured sensor; A(b) sensor with the 7-core measurement fanout; A(c) short-period Bragg grating position; A(d) flexible loading body frame; A(e) interrogator and notebook; A(f) and B(f) center fixed point manual stage of the sensor movement; A(g) and B(g) strain deformation measurement the moving point and manual measuring stage; A(h) schematic of the ferrule connection between the sensor part and fan-out measurement part; B. Configuration diagram and experiment method sequence diagram of the actual test equipment.
Figure 4. A(a–h) Configuration diagram of experimental measurement device; B(b–d,f–h) Appearance of the experimental measurement device, diagram of the experimental protocol; A(a) manufactured sensor; A(b) sensor with the 7-core measurement fanout; A(c) short-period Bragg grating position; A(d) flexible loading body frame; A(e) interrogator and notebook; A(f) and B(f) center fixed point manual stage of the sensor movement; A(g) and B(g) strain deformation measurement the moving point and manual measuring stage; A(h) schematic of the ferrule connection between the sensor part and fan-out measurement part; B. Configuration diagram and experiment method sequence diagram of the actual test equipment.
Sensors 21 00022 g004
Figure 5. (a) mobile phone numbering coordinate standard; (b) real photo of the cell phone numbering experiment; and (c) sensor-wearing method and experiment method photo. (d) carpometacarpal (CMC) joint (e) constrictor muscle combined with rotation of the CMC joint.
Figure 5. (a) mobile phone numbering coordinate standard; (b) real photo of the cell phone numbering experiment; and (c) sensor-wearing method and experiment method photo. (d) carpometacarpal (CMC) joint (e) constrictor muscle combined with rotation of the CMC joint.
Sensors 21 00022 g005
Figure 6. (A). (a) interrogator measurement spectrum before the grating process; (b) interrogator measurement spectrum after the long-period grating process on the entire optical fiber; and (c) grating spectrum of one point of the short-period grating between long-period gratings with a femtosecond laser. (B). (a) sensor Bragg wavelength spectrum with minimal light power intensity; (b) sensor Bragg wavelength spectrum with 30% light power intensity; (c) sensor Bragg wavelength spectrum with 70% light power intensity; (d) sensor Bragg wavelength spectrum at the maximum light power intensity; (e) three short-period Bragg wavelength spectra placed flat period part of the long-period grating; and (f) three short-period Bragg wavelength spectra placed on curved part of the long-period grating.
Figure 6. (A). (a) interrogator measurement spectrum before the grating process; (b) interrogator measurement spectrum after the long-period grating process on the entire optical fiber; and (c) grating spectrum of one point of the short-period grating between long-period gratings with a femtosecond laser. (B). (a) sensor Bragg wavelength spectrum with minimal light power intensity; (b) sensor Bragg wavelength spectrum with 30% light power intensity; (c) sensor Bragg wavelength spectrum with 70% light power intensity; (d) sensor Bragg wavelength spectrum at the maximum light power intensity; (e) three short-period Bragg wavelength spectra placed flat period part of the long-period grating; and (f) three short-period Bragg wavelength spectra placed on curved part of the long-period grating.
Sensors 21 00022 g006
Figure 7. (A) One short-period Bragg grating spectrum between long-period gratings; (a) A’s morphology picture measured on an actual interrogator monitor; (B). Bragg grating spectrum with only short-period gratings; (b) B’s morphology picture measured on an actual interrogator monitor.
Figure 7. (A) One short-period Bragg grating spectrum between long-period gratings; (a) A’s morphology picture measured on an actual interrogator monitor; (B). Bragg grating spectrum with only short-period gratings; (b) B’s morphology picture measured on an actual interrogator monitor.
Sensors 21 00022 g007
Figure 8. (A) (a), (b) time-dependent strain wavelength displacement morphology and spectrum of short-period grating process sensors; (B) (a), (b) time-dependent strain wavelength displacement morphology and spectrum of short-period Bragg grating process sensors between long-period gratings.
Figure 8. (A) (a), (b) time-dependent strain wavelength displacement morphology and spectrum of short-period grating process sensors; (B) (a), (b) time-dependent strain wavelength displacement morphology and spectrum of short-period Bragg grating process sensors between long-period gratings.
Sensors 21 00022 g008
Figure 9. (A) (a–k) wavelength variation according to strain deformation, (B) (a–c) wavelength variation according to strain velocity variation (;A) (a) example of curve deformation according to continuous the speed increase and decrease in the strain application; (A) (b) example of stepped deformation according to the continuous presence or absence of strain application; (A) (c,e) morphology when increasing the strain application rate; (A) (d,f) morphology when reducing the strain application speed; and (A) (h–k) morphology according to changes in the acceleration of the strain application. The three-step morphology based on the change in the magnitude of the stress applied by acceleration is shown as ((B) (a) < (B) (b) < (B) (c)).
Figure 9. (A) (a–k) wavelength variation according to strain deformation, (B) (a–c) wavelength variation according to strain velocity variation (;A) (a) example of curve deformation according to continuous the speed increase and decrease in the strain application; (A) (b) example of stepped deformation according to the continuous presence or absence of strain application; (A) (c,e) morphology when increasing the strain application rate; (A) (d,f) morphology when reducing the strain application speed; and (A) (h–k) morphology according to changes in the acceleration of the strain application. The three-step morphology based on the change in the magnitude of the stress applied by acceleration is shown as ((B) (a) < (B) (b) < (B) (c)).
Sensors 21 00022 g009
Figure 10. (A). The morphology of the wavelength shift when strain decreases and increases in static steps (picosecond); (B). Continuous stepwise strain reduction and increase in the wavelength shift morphology; and (C). Wavelength shift pattern morphology of clockwise and counterclockwise directional stress–strain.
Figure 10. (A). The morphology of the wavelength shift when strain decreases and increases in static steps (picosecond); (B). Continuous stepwise strain reduction and increase in the wavelength shift morphology; and (C). Wavelength shift pattern morphology of clockwise and counterclockwise directional stress–strain.
Sensors 21 00022 g010
Figure 11. (a) numbering definition Ⓐ123 Ⓑ456 Ⓒ789 Ⓓ*0# Ⓔ147* Ⓕ2580 Ⓖ369# and experiment result value (b) direction of thumb movement and experiment result value (c) real-time numbering wavelength shift morphology.
Figure 11. (a) numbering definition Ⓐ123 Ⓑ456 Ⓒ789 Ⓓ*0# Ⓔ147* Ⓕ2580 Ⓖ369# and experiment result value (b) direction of thumb movement and experiment result value (c) real-time numbering wavelength shift morphology.
Sensors 21 00022 g011
Figure 12. (a) unit value of the wavelength shift in horizontal section a and (b) unit value of the wavelength shift in vertical section b.
Figure 12. (a) unit value of the wavelength shift in horizontal section a and (b) unit value of the wavelength shift in vertical section b.
Sensors 21 00022 g012
Figure 13. Comparison of the Bragg wavelength shift with and without the use of a long-period grating.
Figure 13. Comparison of the Bragg wavelength shift with and without the use of a long-period grating.
Sensors 21 00022 g013
Table 1. Sensor reliability results for repetitive motion.
Table 1. Sensor reliability results for repetitive motion.
Experiment NumberStandardized
Cronbach’s Alpha(α)
Difference
10.894−0.046
20.852−0.035
30.8610.018
40.92−0.026
50.887−0.028
60.885−0.037
70.880.042
Standardized
Cronbach’s alpha
0.894
α ≥ 0.9(excellent),
0.8 ≤ α ≤ 0.9(good),
0.7 ≤ α ≤ 0.8(acceptable)
0.6 ≤ α ≤ 0.7(questionable),
0.5 ≤ α ≤ 0.6(poor),
α ≤ 0.5(unacceptable)
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Lee, S.-B.; Jung, Y.-J.; Choi, H.-K.; Sohn, I.-B.; Lee, J.-H. Hybrid LPG-FBG Based High-Resolution Micro Bending Strain Sensor. Sensors 2021, 21, 22. https://doi.org/10.3390/s21010022

AMA Style

Lee S-B, Jung Y-J, Choi H-K, Sohn I-B, Lee J-H. Hybrid LPG-FBG Based High-Resolution Micro Bending Strain Sensor. Sensors. 2021; 21(1):22. https://doi.org/10.3390/s21010022

Chicago/Turabian Style

Lee, Song-Bi, Young-Jun Jung, Hun-Kook Choi, Ik-Bu Sohn, and Joo-Hyeon Lee. 2021. "Hybrid LPG-FBG Based High-Resolution Micro Bending Strain Sensor" Sensors 21, no. 1: 22. https://doi.org/10.3390/s21010022

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop