Next Article in Journal
Wearable Emotion Recognition Using Heart Rate Data from a Smart Bracelet
Previous Article in Journal
Recent Surge Behavior of Walsh Glacier Revealed by Remote Sensing Data
Article

Automatic Tunnel Crack Detection Based on U-Net and a Convolutional Neural Network with Alternately Updated Clique

by 1,2,*, 1,*, 3, 1 and 1
1
School of Electronic and Control Engineering, Chang’an University, Xi’an 710064, Shaanxi, China
2
Key Laboratory of Road Construction Technology and Equipment of MOE, Chang’an University, Xi’an 710064, Shaanxi, China
3
Key Laboratory for Old Bridge Detection and Reinforcement Technology of Ministry of Transportation, Chang’an University, Xi’an 710064, Shaanxi, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sensors 2020, 20(3), 717; https://doi.org/10.3390/s20030717
Received: 15 December 2019 / Revised: 25 January 2020 / Accepted: 27 January 2020 / Published: 28 January 2020
(This article belongs to the Section Physical Sensors)
Regular crack inspection of tunnels is essential to guarantee their safe operation. At present, the manual detection method is time-consuming, subjective and even dangerous, while the automatic detection method is relatively inaccurate. Detecting tunnel cracks is a challenging task since cracks are tiny, and there are many noise patterns in the tunnel images. This study proposes a deep learning algorithm based on U-Net and a convolutional neural network with alternately updated clique (CliqueNet), called U-CliqueNet, to separate cracks from background in the tunnel images. A consumer-grade DSC-WX700 camera (SONY, Wuxi, China) was used to collect 200 original images, then cracks are manually marked and divided into sub-images with a resolution of 496   ×   496 pixels. A total of 60,000 sub-images were obtained in the dataset of tunnel cracks, among which 50,000 were used for training and 10,000 were used for testing. The proposed framework conducted training and testing on this dataset, the mean pixel accuracy (MPA), mean intersection over union (MIoU), precision and F1-score are 92.25%, 86.96%, 86.32% and 83.40%, respectively. We compared the U-CliqueNet with fully convolutional networks (FCN), U-net, Encoder–decoder network (SegNet) and the multi-scale fusion crack detection (MFCD) algorithm using hypothesis testing, and it’s proved that the MIoU predicted by U-CliqueNet was significantly higher than that of the other four algorithms. The area, length and mean width of cracks can be calculated, and the relative error between the detected mean crack width and the actual mean crack width ranges from −11.20% to 18.57%. The results show that this framework can be used for fast and accurate crack semantic segmentation of tunnel images. View Full-Text
Keywords: tunnel crack; U-net; CliqueNet; crack measurement tunnel crack; U-net; CliqueNet; crack measurement
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Li, G.; Ma, B.; He, S.; Ren, X.; Liu, Q. Automatic Tunnel Crack Detection Based on U-Net and a Convolutional Neural Network with Alternately Updated Clique. Sensors 2020, 20, 717. https://doi.org/10.3390/s20030717

AMA Style

Li G, Ma B, He S, Ren X, Liu Q. Automatic Tunnel Crack Detection Based on U-Net and a Convolutional Neural Network with Alternately Updated Clique. Sensors. 2020; 20(3):717. https://doi.org/10.3390/s20030717

Chicago/Turabian Style

Li, Gang, Biao Ma, Shuanhai He, Xueli Ren, and Qiangwei Liu. 2020. "Automatic Tunnel Crack Detection Based on U-Net and a Convolutional Neural Network with Alternately Updated Clique" Sensors 20, no. 3: 717. https://doi.org/10.3390/s20030717

Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Back to TopTop