Next Article in Journal
2-D Joint Sparse Reconstruction and Micro-Motion Parameter Estimation for Ballistic Target Based on Compressive Sensing
Next Article in Special Issue
Dynamic Displacement Estimation for Long-Span Bridges Using Acceleration and Heuristically Enhanced Displacement Measurements of Real-Time Kinematic Global Navigation System
Previous Article in Journal
Closed-Loop Elastic Demand Control under Dynamic Pricing Program in Smart Microgrid Using Super Twisting Sliding Mode Controller
Previous Article in Special Issue
Space State Representation Product Evaluation in Satellite Position and Receiver Position Domain
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Testing Multi-Frequency Low-Cost GNSS Receivers for Geodetic Monitoring Purposes

Faculty of Civil and Geodetic Engineering, University of Ljubljana, Jamova Cesta 2, 1000 Ljubljana, Ljubljana
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sensors 2020, 20(16), 4375; https://doi.org/10.3390/s20164375
Submission received: 7 July 2020 / Revised: 27 July 2020 / Accepted: 3 August 2020 / Published: 5 August 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue GNSS Signals and Sensors)

Abstract

Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) technology is widely used for geodetic monitoring purposes. However, in cases where a higher risk of receiver damage is expected, geodetic GNSS receivers may be considered too expensive to be used. As an alternative, low-cost GNSS receivers that are cheap, light, and prove to be of adequate quality over short baselines, are considered. The main goal of this research is to evaluate the positional precision of a multi-frequency low-cost instrument, namely, ZED-F9P with u-blox ANN-MB-00 antenna, and to investigate its potential for displacement detection. We determined the positional precision within static survey, and the displacement detection within dynamic survey. In both cases, two baselines were set, with the same rover point equipped with a low-cost GNSS instrument. The base point of the first baseline was observed with a geodetic GNSS instrument, whereas the second baseline was observed with a low-cost GNSS instrument. The results from static survey for both baselines showed comparable results for horizontal components; the precision was on a level of 2 mm or better. For the height component, the results show a better performance of low-cost instruments. This may be a consequence of unknown antenna calibration parameters for low-cost GNSS antenna, while statistically significant coordinates of rover points were obtained from both baselines. The difference was again more significant in the height component. For the displacement detection, a device was used that imposes controlled movements with sub-millimeter accuracy. Results, obtained on a basis of 30-min sessions, show that low-cost GNSS instruments can detect displacements from 10 mm upwards with a high level of reliability. On the other hand, low-cost instruments performed slightly worse as far as accuracy is concerned.
Keywords: monitoring; low-cost instrumentation; displacements; GNSS monitoring; low-cost instrumentation; displacements; GNSS

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Hamza, V.; Stopar, B.; Ambrožič, T.; Turk, G.; Sterle, O. Testing Multi-Frequency Low-Cost GNSS Receivers for Geodetic Monitoring Purposes. Sensors 2020, 20, 4375. https://doi.org/10.3390/s20164375

AMA Style

Hamza V, Stopar B, Ambrožič T, Turk G, Sterle O. Testing Multi-Frequency Low-Cost GNSS Receivers for Geodetic Monitoring Purposes. Sensors. 2020; 20(16):4375. https://doi.org/10.3390/s20164375

Chicago/Turabian Style

Hamza, Veton, Bojan Stopar, Tomaž Ambrožič, Goran Turk, and Oskar Sterle. 2020. "Testing Multi-Frequency Low-Cost GNSS Receivers for Geodetic Monitoring Purposes" Sensors 20, no. 16: 4375. https://doi.org/10.3390/s20164375

APA Style

Hamza, V., Stopar, B., Ambrožič, T., Turk, G., & Sterle, O. (2020). Testing Multi-Frequency Low-Cost GNSS Receivers for Geodetic Monitoring Purposes. Sensors, 20(16), 4375. https://doi.org/10.3390/s20164375

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop