Next Article in Journal
Autonomous Road Roundabout Detection and Navigation System for Smart Vehicles and Cities Using Laser Simulator–Fuzzy Logic Algorithms and Sensor Fusion
Next Article in Special Issue
A Combined Method for MEMS Gyroscope Error Compensation Using a Long Short-Term Memory Network and Kalman Filter in Random Vibration Environments
Previous Article in Journal
Electrochemical Biosensors Employing Natural and Artificial Heme Peroxidases on Semiconductors
Previous Article in Special Issue
Fabrication of Thermal Conductivity Detector Based on MEMS for Monitoring Dissolved Gases in Power Transformer
Letter

Criterion Validity of Catapult ClearSky T6 Local Positioning System for Measuring Inter-Unit Distance

Institute for Health and Sport (IHES), Victoria University, Footscray VIC 3011, Australia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sensors 2020, 20(13), 3693; https://doi.org/10.3390/s20133693
Received: 26 May 2020 / Revised: 25 June 2020 / Accepted: 28 June 2020 / Published: 1 July 2020
(This article belongs to the Collection Modeling, Testing and Reliability Issues in MEMS Engineering)
The validity of a local positioning system (LPS) to measure inter-unit distance was investigated during a team sport movement circuit. Eight recreationally active, female indoor team-sport players completed a circuit, comprising seven types of movements (walk, jog, jump, sprint, 45° change of direction and shuffle), on an indoor court. Participants wore a receiver tag (ClearSky T6, Catapult Sports) and seven reflective markers, to allow for a comparison with the reference system (©Vicon Motion Systems, Oxford Metrics, UK). Inter-unit distance was collected for each combination of participants. Validity was assessed via root mean square error, mean bias and percentage of variance accounted for, both as an overall dataset and split into distance bands. The results presented a mean root mean square error of 0.20 ± 0.05 m, and mean bias detected an overestimation for all distance bands. The LPS shows acceptable accuracy for measuring inter-unit distance, opening up opportunities to utilise player tracking for tactical variables indoors. View Full-Text
Keywords: player tracking; team sports; tactical; validity; positioning; performance analysis; local positioning system player tracking; team sports; tactical; validity; positioning; performance analysis; local positioning system
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Hodder, R.W.; Ball, K.A.; Serpiello, F.R. Criterion Validity of Catapult ClearSky T6 Local Positioning System for Measuring Inter-Unit Distance. Sensors 2020, 20, 3693. https://doi.org/10.3390/s20133693

AMA Style

Hodder RW, Ball KA, Serpiello FR. Criterion Validity of Catapult ClearSky T6 Local Positioning System for Measuring Inter-Unit Distance. Sensors. 2020; 20(13):3693. https://doi.org/10.3390/s20133693

Chicago/Turabian Style

Hodder, Ryan W., Kevin A. Ball, and Fabio R. Serpiello 2020. "Criterion Validity of Catapult ClearSky T6 Local Positioning System for Measuring Inter-Unit Distance" Sensors 20, no. 13: 3693. https://doi.org/10.3390/s20133693

Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Back to TopTop