Review Reports
- Xiwen Lu1,2,
- Lijun Yang1,2,* and
- Zhan Yang3,*
Reviewer 1: Elena Sheka Reviewer 2: Wei-Yen Woon Reviewer 3: Anonymous
Round 1
Reviewer 1 Report
PLease see attached file
Comments for author File: 
Comments.pdf
Author Response
Please see the attachment.
Author Response File: Author Response.pdf
Reviewer 2 Report
This paper report fabrication and performance of a graphene based photothermal sensor. The authors have shown that the sensor is able to detect infra-red signal with fast response, and may be useful for applications like night-sight or fast temperature sensing application (such as the use for fever detection to screen virus infected personnel). I think the paper can be published in Sensors.
1. Grammatic
2. It would be more convincing if the authors provide a control set of data to compare with their device
Author Response
Please see the attachment.
Author Response File: Author Response.pdf
Reviewer 3 Report
In this article, the authors report about a photothermal nano-device that was made using graphene, which was transferred to the electrode using all- dry viscoelastic stamping method.
Even though the article may be interesting, some issues must be fixed.
- In Fig. 1 (b) the scale bar is not visible.
- Please use either brackets or a line (/) to indicate the units of measurements in the graphs throughout the text.
- Figures 2, 3 and 7 are not readable.
- The authors should highlight more clearly in the introduction the novelty of their work in comparison with previous research.
- In the introduction, the authors should refer to different method of preparation of graphene:
( for example, CVD, exfoliation , etc. ). See for example:
[1] Variable Angle Spectroscopic Ellipsometry investigation of CVD-grown monolayer graphene, Appl. Surf. Sci. 467–468 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2018.10.161.
[2] Liquid-Phase Exfoliation of Graphene: An Overview on Exfoliation Media, Techniques, and Challenges, Nanomater. (Basel, Switzerland). 8 (2018) 942. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano8110942.
Author Response
Please see the attachment.
Author Response File: Author Response.pdf
Round 2
Reviewer 1 Report
The revised text of the article is significantly improved
Reviewer 3 Report
I recommend the publication of this article.