Next Article in Journal
A New Automatic Foot Arch Index Measurement Method Based on a Flexible Membrane Pressure Sensor
Previous Article in Journal
Energy Efficient Determinism in WSN through Reverse Packet Elimination
Open AccessArticle

Fecal Malodor Detection Using Low-Cost Electrochemical Sensors

1
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Box 90287, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708, USA
2
Duke University Center for WaSH-AID and Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Durham, NC 27701, USA
3
Duke Global Health Institute, Box 90287, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sensors 2020, 20(10), 2888; https://doi.org/10.3390/s20102888
Received: 24 April 2020 / Revised: 14 May 2020 / Accepted: 17 May 2020 / Published: 20 May 2020
(This article belongs to the Section Chemical Sensors)
Technology innovation in sanitation is needed for the 4.2 billion people worldwide, lacking safely managed sanitation services. A major requirement for the adoption of these technologies is the management of malodor around toilet and treatment systems. There is an unmet need for a low-cost instrumented technology for detecting the onset of sanitation malodor and triggering corrective actions. This study combines sensory data with low-cost gas sensor data on malodor emanating from feces. The response of 10 commercial electrochemical gas sensors was collected alongside olfactometric measurements. Odor from fecal specimens at different relevant dilution as well as specimens with pleasant odors as a control were evaluated for a total of 64 responses. Several of the sensors responded positively to the fecal odor, with the formaldehyde, hydrogen sulfide, and ammonia sensors featuring the highest signal to noise ratio. A positive trend was observed between the sensors’ responses and the concentration of the odorant and with odor intensity, but no clear correspondence with dilution to threshold (D/T) values was found. Selected sensors were responsive both above and below the intensity values used as the cutoff for offensive odor, suggesting the possibility of using those sensors to differentiate odor offensiveness based just on the magnitude of their response. The specificity of the sensors suggested that discrimination between the selected non-fecal and fecal odors was possible. This study demonstrates that some of the evaluated sensors could be used to assemble a low-cost malodor warning system. View Full-Text
Keywords: odor; malodor; electronic nose; low-cost sensors odor; malodor; electronic nose; low-cost sensors
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

MDPI and ACS Style

Kawadiya, S.; Welling, C.; Grego, S.; Deshusses, M.A. Fecal Malodor Detection Using Low-Cost Electrochemical Sensors. Sensors 2020, 20, 2888.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Search more from Scilit
 
Search
Back to TopTop