Next Article in Journal
Real-Time Drink Trigger Detection in Free-living Conditions Using Inertial Sensors
Next Article in Special Issue
Deep CNN for Indoor Localization in IoT-Sensor Systems
Previous Article in Journal
A Robust Noise Mitigation Method for the Mobile RFID Location in Built Environment
Previous Article in Special Issue
RGB-D-Based Pose Estimation of Workpieces with Semantic Segmentation and Point Cloud Registration
Open AccessFeature PaperReview

Routing Protocols for Low Power and Lossy Networks in Internet of Things Applications

1
Instituto de Telecomunicações, Universidade da Beira Interior, 6201-001 Covilhã, Portugal
2
Federal Institute of Maranhão (IFMA), São Luís-MA 65010-030, Brazil
3
National Institute of Telecommunications (Inatel), Santa Rita do Sapucaí-MG 37540-000, Brazil
4
Federal University of Piauí, Teresina-PI 64049-550, Brazil
5
College of Computer and Information Sciences (CCIS), King Saud University, Riyadh 12372, Saudi Arabia
6
ITMO University, St. Petersburg 197101, Russia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Current address: Av. João de Camargo, 510-Centro, Santa Rita do Sapucaí-MG 37540-000, Brazil.
Sensors 2019, 19(9), 2144; https://doi.org/10.3390/s19092144
Received: 23 March 2019 / Revised: 2 May 2019 / Accepted: 5 May 2019 / Published: 9 May 2019
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Sensors, Robots, Internet of Things, and Smart Factories)
The emergence of the Internet of Things (IoT) and its applications has taken the attention of several researchers. In an effort to provide interoperability and IPv6 support for the IoT devices, the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) proposed the 6LoWPAN stack. However, the particularities and hardware limitations of networks associated with IoT devices lead to several challenges, mainly for routing protocols. On its stack proposal, IETF standardizes the RPL (IPv6 Routing Protocol for Low-Power and Lossy Networks) as the routing protocol for Low-power and Lossy Networks (LLNs). RPL is a tree-based proactive routing protocol that creates acyclic graphs among the nodes to allow data exchange. Although widely considered and used by current applications, different recent studies have shown its limitations and drawbacks. Among these, it is possible to highlight the weak support of mobility and P2P traffic, restrictions for multicast transmissions, and lousy adaption for dynamic throughput. Motivated by the presented issues, several new solutions have emerged during recent years. The approaches range from the consideration of different routing metrics to an entirely new solution inspired by other routing protocols. In this context, this work aims to present an extensive survey study about routing solutions for IoT/LLN, not limited to RPL enhancements. In the course of the paper, the routing requirements of LLNs, the initial protocols, and the most recent approaches are presented. The IoT routing enhancements are divided according to its main objectives and then studied individually to point out its most important strengths and weaknesses. Furthermore, as the main contribution, this study presents a comprehensive discussion about the considered approaches, identifying the still remaining open issues and suggesting future directions to be recognized by new proposals. View Full-Text
Keywords: Internet of Things; low-power and lossy network; LOADng; routing protocol; RPL Internet of Things; low-power and lossy network; LOADng; routing protocol; RPL
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Sobral, J.V.V.; Rodrigues, J.J.P.C.; Rabêlo, R.A.L.; Al-Muhtadi, J.; Korotaev, V. Routing Protocols for Low Power and Lossy Networks in Internet of Things Applications. Sensors 2019, 19, 2144.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map

1
Back to TopTop