Next Article in Journal
A Novel Method for Classification of Running Fatigue Using Change-Point Segmentation
Previous Article in Journal
Analysis of BDS Fractional Cycle Biases and PPP Ambiguity Resolution
Previous Article in Special Issue
Integrations between Autonomous Systems and Modern Computing Techniques: A Mini Review
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

Special Issue “Advanced Signal Processing in Intelligent Systems for Health Monitoring”

1
Department of Electronic and Computer Engineering, Brunel University London, Uxbridge UB8 3PH, UK
2
Department of Mechanical engineering, Yuan Ze University, Taoyuan 32003, Taiwan
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sensors 2019, 19(21), 4727; https://doi.org/10.3390/s19214727
Submission received: 25 October 2019 / Accepted: 29 October 2019 / Published: 31 October 2019

Abstract

:
Recently, significant developments have been achieved in the field of artificial intelligence, in particular the introduction of deep learning technology that has improved the learning and prediction accuracy to unpresented levels, especially when dealing with big data and high-resolution images. Significant developments have occurred in the area of medical signal processing, measurement techniques, and health monitoring, such as vital biological signs for biomedical systems and noise and vibration of mechanical systems, which are carried out by instruments that generate large data sets. These big data sets, ultimately driven by high population growth, would require Artificial Intelligence techniques to analyse and model. In this Special Issue, papers are presented on the latest signal processing and deep learning techniques used for health monitoring of biomedical and mechanical systems.

1. Introduction

Health monitoring is a diverse subject since it covers biological systems as well as physical systems. Biological systems are usually associated with the monitoring of human health, whether it is related to diagnosis of diseases, monitoring of daily activities, or vital signs. On the other hand, physical systems health monitoring is associated with checking physical systems, such as structures and rotary or linear displacement machines. Structural health is related to checking vibration, cracks, or fatigues of materials in buildings, aircrafts, or pipes.
Due to the development of handheld-device technologies, processing power, and sensory accuracy, the penetration into the biomedical field has received intense interest, which has led to the development of new sensors and signal processing algorithms in the field. However, there is still a need to integrate different systems and technologies such that real-time detection and diagnosis can be made available to all people to meet the demand and requisites of the world health monitoring systems [1].
On the other hand, advances in technology, such as high-resolution cameras, optical sensors, drones, and robotics, have evolved the generation of intelligent monitoring systems for physical system health monitoring. Infrastructure health monitoring systems can monitor vibration in buildings, displacement, rotation, stress/strain, cracks/spalling, and defects either directly or remotely. Structural health traditionally is monitored using conventional sensors with data acquisition, transmission, and information processing to assess the structure’s health check. Recently, smart sensors with embedded microprocessors and wireless communication are being used, in addition to fibre optic sensor technology and automated low-cost photogrammetry for flexible structure monitoring [2,3]. Furthermore, non-destructive testing equipment, such as eddy current equipment in pipes and aircraft bodies, have also evolved to become more accurate and reliable due to the developments of intelligent signal processing systems.
On-line monitoring systems have also been used to monitor rotary and displacement machines. The utilisation of vibration-based sensors in addition to image and wireless communication of smart devices, and the use of programmable and web connected applications are the base for the next-generation measurement technology of structural health monitoring. The abundance of handheld smartphones with an easily programmable framework has helped in modifying the relevant software to acquire data using embedded sensors. And in addition, noncontact sensors, such as unmanned aerial vehicles (drones) and mobile sensors, to acquire structural data. The state-of-the-art methods have been presented in a detailed literature review of the recent applications of smartphones, unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs), cameras, and robotic sensors used for structural condition monitoring and maintenance [4].
The acquired data needs to be filtered, processed, and classified using the latest developments in Artificial Intelligence (AI), such as deep learning and signal processing algorithms like Wavelets transforms (WL) and Empirical Mode Decomposition (EMD). Such algorithms are computationally intensive and require high speed computing. This has caused no major hurdle as the developments and advances in computing has fulfilled this requirement, such as the use of GPUs, computer clusters, edge computing, and cloud applications. Many systems now reside on the cloud, which only requires access via the internet, providing sophisticated algorithm and high-speed processing power.

2. Review of the Contributions in This Special Issue

Papers published in this Special Issue can be classified into two groups, human health monitoring (biological systems) and structural health monitoring (physical systems).
For the field of health monitoring applications to biological systems (human health), this issue included five papers in the field. The use of signal processing and deep learning algorithms is common among the recent applications. A typical example is heart failure detection using R-R interval to monitor the heart rate variability using the long short-term memory deep learning network, which can achieve up to 99% accuracy [5]. This example is extended to utilise wearable sensors that can be used for real-time monitoring of people, athletes, and high-risk patients. This application is of particular interest due to the type of recorded data using sensors on moving parts of the body [6]. Wearable devices, also being used to estimate the blood pressure using a photoplethysmogram (PPG) sensor without the need for cuff and pressure extortion [7]. The advances in deep learning allows extracting features from signals that was not possible using conventional algorithms due to artefacts and noise. This also has been experienced with the use of AI for extracting meaningful signals from electromyography (EMG) measurements [8].
The use of deep learning has also improved the accuracy of pneumonia detection and classification using electronic nose. An accuracy of up to 94% can be achieved with the aid of deep learning networks. This application has improved the detection accuracy, in addition to cutting the detection time and avoiding the use of bacterial growth which usually takes days before the treatment can start [9].
The second group consists of six papers reporting research work on structural health monitoring, many of which address fault detection on rotational machines. Vibration noisy signals are usually used to diagnose faults on machines; however, due to vibration and electrical noise, the signal recorded from sensory equipment is normally contaminated with noise that is sometimes higher in amplitude to the vibration sensor output. As a result, conventional algorithm classification under experimental conditions may severely degrade the accuracy under noisy environmental conditions, which are ubiquitous in practical industrial applications. A one-dimensional (1-D) denoising convolutional autoencoder (DCAE) [10] and a 1-D convolutional neural network (CNN) proved to be excellent solutions to address this problem [11], whereby the former is used for noise reduction of raw vibration signals and the latter for fault diagnosis using the de-noised signals. The DCAE model can be trained using noisy data for learning. Such configuration is used for fault diagnosis of ball-bearing failure in rotational machines [12], railways, and diesel engine operations [13].
In addition to the use of deep learning algorithms, other feature extraction algorithms can be used for pre-processing the signals before classification, such as EMD and WL [14]. This is in addition to other different techniques, such as the use of video images in analysing the movements of large structures [15].
The last paper is a mini review that addresses autonomous health monitoring systems. Autonomous systems are defined within the context of intelligent systems that can learn, adapt, and have a certain degree of self-control when integrated with advanced resources, such as smart sensors and internet access, and can handle big data using AI and deep learning. Such systems should be able to deal with dynamic environments where changes to internal parameters, and disturbances, can be accommodated during operation by self-reconfiguration to adapt to the new environment. A classic example of such system is adaptive control where the control law is adapted according to changes in the environment. However, for autonomous systems, it should be able to reconfigure itself when sensors or actuators fail or become out of their operational range [16].

Author Contributions

M.A. and J.-S.S. wrote the paper.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Gahlot, S.; Reddy, S.R.N.; Kumar, D. Review of Smart Health Monitoring Approaches with Survey Analysis and Proposed Framework. IEEE Internet Things J. 2019, 6, 2116–2127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Rose, T.; Jasper, J.K.; Iyappan, L. Developments of Structural Health Monitoring System, State-of-the-Art Review. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Emerging and Sustainable Trends in Civil Engineering (ESCE-2018), Shivamogga, India, 27–28 September 2018. [Google Scholar]
  3. Alokita, S.; Rahul, V.; Jayakrishna, K.; Kar, V.R.; M Rajesh, S.T.; Manikandan, M. Recent Advances and Trends in Structural Health Monitoring. In Structural Health Monitoring of Biocomposites, Fibre-Reinforced Composites and Hybrid Composites; Woodhead Publishing: Cambridge, UK, 2019; pp. 53–73. [Google Scholar]
  4. Shea, S.S.L.; Ayan, S. A Literature Review of Next-Generation Smart Sensing Technology in Structural Health Monitoring. J. Struct. Control Health Monit. 2019, 26, e2321. [Google Scholar]
  5. Wang, L.; Zhou, X. Detection of Congestive Heart Failure Based on LSTM-Based Deep Network via Short-Term RR Intervals. Sensors 2019, 19, 1502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Chowdhury, M.E.H.; Alzoubi, K.; Khandakar, A.; Khallifa, R.; Abouhasera, R.; Koubaa, S.; Ahmed, R.; Hasan, A. Wearable Real-Time Heart Attack Detection and Warning System to Reduce Road Accidents. Sensors 2019, 19, 2780. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Lazazzera, R.; Belhaj, Y.; Carrault, G. A New Wearable Device for Blood Pressure Estimation Using Photoplethysmogram. Sensors 2019, 19, 2557. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Manoni, L.; Turchetti, C.; Falaschetti, L.; Crippa, P. A Comparative Study of Computational Methods for Compressed Sensing Reconstruction of EMG Signal. Sensors 2019, 19, 3531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Liao, Y.H.; Wang, Z.C.; Zhang, F.G.; Abbod, M.F.; Shih, C.H.; Shieh, J.S. Machine Learning Methods Applied to Predict Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia with Pseudomonas Aeruginosa Infection via Sensor Array of Electronic Nose in Intensive Care Unit. Sensors 2019, 19, 1866. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Liu, X.; Zhou, Q.; Zhao, J.; Shen, H.; Xiong, X. Fault Diagnosis of Rotating Machinery under Noisy Environment Conditions Based on a 1-D Convolutional Autoencoder and 1-D Convolutional Neural Network. Sensors 2019, 19, 972. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Zhao, D.; Liu, F.; Meng, H. Bearing Fault Diagnosis Based on the Switchable Normalization SSGAN with 1-D Representation of Vibration Signals as Input. Sensors 2019, 19, 2000. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Li, H.; Li, Y.; Yu, H. A Novel Health Indicator Based on Cointegration for Rolling Bearings’ Run-To-Failure Process. Sensors 2019, 19, 2151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Tao, J.; Qin, C.; Li, W.; Liu, C. Intelligent Fault Diagnosis of Diesel Engines via Extreme Gradient Boosting and High-Accuracy Time-Frequency Information of Vibration Signals. Sensors 2019, 19, 3280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Liu, H.; Qin, C.; Liu, M. A Rail Fault Diagnosis Method Based on Quartic C2 Hermite Improved Empirical Mode Decomposition Algorithm. Sensors 2019, 19, 3300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Yang, Y.S. Measurement of Dynamic Responses from Large Structural Tests by Analyzing Non-Synchronized Videos. Sensors 2019, 19, 3520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Chen, J.; Abbod, M.F.; Shieh, J.S. Integrations between Autonomous Systems and Modern Computing Techniques: A Mini Review. Sensors 2019, 19, 3897. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Abbod, M.; Shieh, J.-S. Special Issue “Advanced Signal Processing in Intelligent Systems for Health Monitoring”. Sensors 2019, 19, 4727. https://doi.org/10.3390/s19214727

AMA Style

Abbod M, Shieh J-S. Special Issue “Advanced Signal Processing in Intelligent Systems for Health Monitoring”. Sensors. 2019; 19(21):4727. https://doi.org/10.3390/s19214727

Chicago/Turabian Style

Abbod, Maysam, and Jiann-Shing Shieh. 2019. "Special Issue “Advanced Signal Processing in Intelligent Systems for Health Monitoring”" Sensors 19, no. 21: 4727. https://doi.org/10.3390/s19214727

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop