Next Article in Journal
Q3: A Compact Device for Quick, High Precision qPCR
Next Article in Special Issue
Application of Electronic-Nose Technologies and VOC-Biomarkers for the Noninvasive Early Diagnosis of Gastrointestinal Diseases
Previous Article in Journal
The Shared Bicycle and Its Network—Internet of Shared Bicycle (IoSB): A Review and Survey
Previous Article in Special Issue
Real-Time Distributed Architecture for Remote Acoustic Elderly Monitoring in Residential-Scale Ambient Assisted Living Scenarios
Article Menu
Issue 8 (August) cover image

Export Article

Open AccessArticle
Sensors 2018, 18(8), 2580;

Evaluation of Water Indices for Surface Water Extraction in a Landsat 8 Scene of Nepal

Department of Civil Engineering, Kangwon National University, Chuncheon 24341, Korea
Institute of Forestry, Pokhara Campus, Tribhuvan University, Pokhara 33700, Nepal
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Received: 27 June 2018 / Revised: 31 July 2018 / Accepted: 4 August 2018 / Published: 7 August 2018
Full-Text   |   PDF [54085 KB, uploaded 8 August 2018]   |  


Accurate and frequent updates of surface water have been made possible by remote sensing technology. Index methods are mostly used for surface water estimation which separates the water from the background based on a threshold value. Generally, the threshold is a fixed value, but can be challenging in the case of environmental noise, such as shadow, forest, built-up areas, snow, and clouds. One such challenging scene can be found in Nepal where no such evaluation has been done. Taking that in consideration, this study evaluates the performance of the most widely used water indices: Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI), Normalized Difference Water Index (NDWI), Modified NDWI (MNDWI), and Automated Water Extraction Index (AWEI) in a Landsat 8 scene of Nepal. The scene, ranging from 60 m to 8848 m, contains various types of water bodies found in Nepal with different forms of environmental noise. The evaluation was conducted based on measures from a confusion matrix derived using validation points. Comparing visually and quantitatively, not a single method was able to extract surface water in the entire scene with better accuracy. Upon selecting optimum thresholds, the overall accuracy (OA) and kappa coefficient (kappa) was improved, but not satisfactory. NDVI and NDWI showed better results for only pure water pixels, whereas MNDWI and AWEI were unable to reject snow cover and shadows. Combining NDVI with NDWI and AWEI with shadow improved the accuracy but inherited the NDWI and AWEI characteristics. Segmenting the test scene with elevations above and below 665 m, and using NDVI and NDWI for detecting water, resulted in an OA of 0.9638 and kappa of 0.8979. The accuracy can be further improved with a smaller interval of categorical characteristics in one or multiple scenes. View Full-Text
Keywords: water; index method; NDVI; NDWI; MNDWI; AWEI; elevation; Landsat; Nepal water; index method; NDVI; NDWI; MNDWI; AWEI; elevation; Landsat; Nepal

Figure 1

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited (CC BY 4.0).

Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Acharya, T.D.; Subedi, A.; Lee, D.H. Evaluation of Water Indices for Surface Water Extraction in a Landsat 8 Scene of Nepal. Sensors 2018, 18, 2580.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics



[Return to top]
Sensors EISSN 1424-8220 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top