Next Article in Journal
Robust Adaptive Beamforming with Sensor Position Errors Using Weighted Subspace Fitting-Based Covariance Matrix Reconstruction
Previous Article in Journal
PS-CARA: Context-Aware Resource Allocation Scheme for Mobile Public Safety Networks
Article

Poaching Detection Technologies—A Survey

Pervasive Systems Group, University of Twente, Enschede 7522 NB, The Netherlands
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sensors 2018, 18(5), 1474; https://doi.org/10.3390/s18051474
Received: 6 March 2018 / Revised: 23 April 2018 / Accepted: 27 April 2018 / Published: 8 May 2018
(This article belongs to the Section Sensor Networks)
Between 1960 and 1990, 95% of the black rhino population in the world was killed. In South Africa, a rhino was killed every 8 h for its horn throughout 2016. Wild animals, rhinos and elephants, in particular, are facing an ever increasing poaching crisis. In this paper, we review poaching detection technologies that aim to save endangered species from extinction. We present requirements for effective poacher detection and identify research challenges through the survey. We describe poaching detection technologies in four domains: perimeter based, ground based, aerial based, and animal tagging based technologies. Moreover, we discuss the different types of sensor technologies that are used in intruder detection systems such as: radar, magnetic, acoustic, optic, infrared and thermal, radio frequency, motion, seismic, chemical, and animal sentinels. The ultimate long-term solution for the poaching crisis is to remove the drivers of demand by educating people in demanding countries and raising awareness of the poaching crisis. Until prevention of poaching takes effect, there will be a continuous urgent need for new (combined) approaches that take up the research challenges and provide better protection against poaching in wildlife areas. View Full-Text
Keywords: anti-poaching; conservation; surveillance; intruder detetection anti-poaching; conservation; surveillance; intruder detetection
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Kamminga, J.; Ayele, E.; Meratnia, N.; Havinga, P. Poaching Detection Technologies—A Survey. Sensors 2018, 18, 1474. https://doi.org/10.3390/s18051474

AMA Style

Kamminga J, Ayele E, Meratnia N, Havinga P. Poaching Detection Technologies—A Survey. Sensors. 2018; 18(5):1474. https://doi.org/10.3390/s18051474

Chicago/Turabian Style

Kamminga, Jacob, Eyuel Ayele, Nirvana Meratnia, and Paul Havinga. 2018. "Poaching Detection Technologies—A Survey" Sensors 18, no. 5: 1474. https://doi.org/10.3390/s18051474

Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Back to TopTop