Next Article in Journal
Rapid Texture Optimization of Three-Dimensional Urban Model Based on Oblique Images
Next Article in Special Issue
Preliminary Study of UAS Equipped with Thermal Camera for Volcanic Geothermal Monitoring in Taiwan
Previous Article in Journal
Homomorphic Filtering for Improving Time Synchronization in Wireless Networks
Previous Article in Special Issue
Prioritizing Seafloor Mapping for Washington’s Pacific Coast
Article Menu
Issue 4 (April) cover image

Export Article

Open AccessArticle
Sensors 2017, 17(4), 910;

Investigating Surface and Near-Surface Bushfire Fuel Attributes: A Comparison between Visual Assessments and Image-Based Point Clouds

School of Science, RMIT University, Melbourne 3001, Australia
Bushfire and Natural Hazards Cooperative Research Centre, East Melbourne 3002, Australia
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Received: 30 January 2017 / Revised: 17 April 2017 / Accepted: 17 April 2017 / Published: 20 April 2017
Full-Text   |   PDF [4835 KB, uploaded 21 April 2017]   |  


Visual assessment, following guides such as the Overall Fuel Hazard Assessment Guide (OFHAG), is a common approach for assessing the structure and hazard of varying bushfire fuel layers. Visual assessments can be vulnerable to imprecision due to subjectivity between assessors, while emerging techniques such as image-based point clouds can offer land managers potentially more repeatable descriptions of fuel structure. This study compared the variability of estimates of surface and near-surface fuel attributes generated by eight assessment teams using the OFHAG and Fuels3D, a smartphone method utilising image-based point clouds, within three assessment plots in an Australian lowland forest. Surface fuel hazard scores derived from underpinning attributes were also assessed. Overall, this study found considerable variability between teams on most visually assessed variables, resulting in inconsistent hazard scores. Variability was observed within point cloud estimates but was, however, on average two to eight times less than that seen in visual estimates, indicating greater consistency and repeatability of this method. It is proposed that while variability within the Fuels3D method may be overcome through improved methods and equipment, inconsistencies in the OFHAG are likely due to the inherent subjectivity between assessors, which may be more difficult to overcome. This study demonstrates the capability of the Fuels3D method to efficiently and consistently collect data on fuel hazard and structure, and, as such, this method shows potential for use in fire management practices where accurate and reliable data is essential. View Full-Text
Keywords: image-based point clouds; fuel structure; visual assessment image-based point clouds; fuel structure; visual assessment

Figure 1

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. (CC BY 4.0).

Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Spits, C.; Wallace, L.; Reinke, K. Investigating Surface and Near-Surface Bushfire Fuel Attributes: A Comparison between Visual Assessments and Image-Based Point Clouds. Sensors 2017, 17, 910.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics



[Return to top]
Sensors EISSN 1424-8220 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top