Next Article in Journal
Extrinsic Calibration of Camera Networks Based on Pedestrians
Previous Article in Journal
Improved Reconstruction of Radio Holographic Signal for Forward Scatter Radar Imaging
Previous Article in Special Issue
Human Collaborative Localization and Mapping in Indoor Environments with Non-Continuous Stereo
Article Menu

Export Article

Sensors 2016, 16(5), 655; doi:10.3390/s16050655

Editorial
Sensors for Indoor Mapping and Navigation
1
Department of Infrastructure Engineering, University of Melbourne, Parkville 3010 VIC, Australia
2
3D Geoinformation, Faculty of Architecture and the Built Environment, Delft University of Technology, Delft, P.O.Box 5043, 2600 GA, The Netherlands
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Academic Editor: Vittorio M. N. Passaro
Received: 4 May 2016 / Accepted: 4 May 2016 / Published: 9 May 2016
With the growth of cities and increased urban population there is a growing demand for spatial information of large indoor environments. This includes location information of pedestrians, goods and robots in indoor spaces as well as detailed indoor maps and models, which can be used for route planning, navigation guidance and several other applications.
Obtaining spatial information in indoor environments is a challenge. In the absence of GNSS signals, a range of technologies have been used for positioning and mapping indoors. However, limitations in accuracy and coverage, dependence on infrastructure and calibration issues limit the existing solutions to only a few application scenarios.
Articles in this special issue provide an overview of the most recent developments in sensor technology and methodology for indoor positioning, mapping and new applications enabled by indoor location information. The majority of these works focus on the positioning problem. Inertial sensors, accelerometers and gyroscopes, which are available on most smartphones, are used for positioning in [1,2,3,4,5,6]. The position estimation in these works is mainly based on the Pedestrian Dead Reckoning (PDR) approach, which involves step length estimation using accelerometer data. In [7,8,9,10,11,12] inertial sensors are combined with map information or landmarks to strengthen the positioning solution. In [13] inertial sensors are integrated with a 2D laser scanner to obtain the position of a mobile robot. The simultaneous map generation and positioning methods in [14,15] combine inertial sensors with camera images. In [16] accelerometer data and ambient radio sensed by a smartphone are used to detect place visits of the user. The pressure sensor built in smartphones (usually referred to as barometer) is used to estimate the vertical position or to recognize vertical movements in [7,10,13,17,18].
The magnetic sensor built in smartphones (usually referred to as magnetometer or digital compass) is used for attitude estimation as part of a positioning system in [1,4,7,8,9,10,12,19,20]. In [21] a complete magnetic positioning system is described, in which the positioning is based on a magnetic sensor measuring the strength of the magnetic field generated by a number of coils installed in the environment.
Indoor positioning using WiFi signals is investigated in [22,23,24,25,26,27]. The common approach to position estimation in these works is based on the received signal strength (RSS) and the fingerprinting method. In [1,7,12] the authors integrate the WiFi positioning with the PDR approach using smartphone sensors. In [20] the received signal strength is combined with orientation information obtained by smartphone magnetometer. A positioning method using wireless motes with varying transmission power is described in [28]. In [29] the authors investigate the use of directional antennas for positioning based on RSS and the fingerprinting method. Efficient methods for the generation and updating of fingerprint databases are presented in [30,31,32].
Other sensors used for positioning in indoor environments include Ultrasonic [33], Pseudolites [34,35,36], RFID (including near field communication—NFC) [37,38,39], Ultra Wide Band (UWB) [40,41,42], microphone and light sensor [19]. In [43] an afocal optical flow sensor is introduced for reducing the odometry error in a mobile robot. Camera images [14,15,44] and range data captured by a 2D laser scanner [13] are also used for positioning indoors. In [45] infrared images are used to localize and track moving targets in large indoor environments.
3D mapping and modeling of indoor environments is the focus of several articles in the special issue. In [46] a simultaneous localization and mapping (SLAM) approach based on data captured by a 2D laser scanner and a monocular camera is introduced. In [14,15] visual SLAM using camera images is used for positioning and mapping in indoor environments. The SLAM approach in [47] relies on data acquired by an RGB-D sensor. RGB-D data of indoor scenes are used for detecting small tabletop objects in [48]. In [49,50,51] 3D laser scanning is used for mapping indoor environments. In [50,51] the authors also propose methods for the generation of a building information model (BIM) from the point cloud data.
Applications of indoor location information are discussed in [37,40,52]. In [37] indoor location information is used for tracking health processes and analyzing medical protocols in a hospital. In [40] the authors describe an indoor navigation system for the visually impaired people. In [52] the authors introduce a fading memory model for decision making in indoor emergency situations such as evacuations.
In summary, the special issue presented substantial efforts in the research and development of indoor positioning, tracking and mapping. Many papers address positioning, e.g., by WiFi fingerprinting, but the progress in autonomous approaches for indoor mapping and positioning is also significant. In the presented papers the use of 3D indoor models is relatively limited, but 2D maps are largely applied to support positioning and improve the accuracy. 3D approaches are, however, largely envisaged for simultaneous localization and mapping.
This special issue is the result of the collective efforts of many individuals. We wish to thank the authors for contributing high quality research articles to the special issue. We are also grateful to the anonymous reviewers who thoroughly reviewed the submissions and provided constructive feedback to the authors. We hope the special issue will provide new insights and stimulate further research in indoor mapping, positioning and navigation.

References

  1. Chen, G.; Meng, X.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Tian, P.; Yang, H. Integrated WiFi/PDR/Smartphone using an unscented kalman filter algorithm for 3D indoor localization. Sensors 2015, 15, 24595–24614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Deng, Z.-A.; Wang, G.; Hu, Y.; Wu, D. Heading estimation for indoor pedestrian navigation using a smartphone in the pocket. Sensors 2015, 15, 21518–21536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Diaz, E. Inertial pocket navigation system: Unaided 3D positioning. Sensors 2015, 15, 9156–9178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Renaudin, V.; Combettes, C. Magnetic, acceleration fields and gyroscope quaternion (MAGYQ)-based attitude estimation with smartphone sensors for indoor pedestrian navigation. Sensors 2014, 14, 22864–22890. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Xu, Z.; Wei, J.; Zhang, B.; Yang, W. A robust method to detect zero velocity for improved 3D personal navigation using inertial sensors. Sensors 2015, 15, 7708–7727. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Yuan, X.; Yu, S.; Zhang, S.; Wang, G.; Liu, S. Quaternion-based unscented kalman filter for accurate indoor heading estimation using wearable multi-sensor system. Sensors 2015, 15, 10872–10890. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Chen, Z.; Zou, H.; Jiang, H.; Zhu, Q.; Soh, Y.; Xie, L. Fusion of WiFi, smartphone sensors and landmarks using the kalman filter for indoor localization. Sensors 2015, 15, 715–732. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Chiang, K.-W.; Liao, J.-K.; Tsai, G.-J.; Chang, H.-W. The performance analysis of the map-aided fuzzy decision tree based on the pedestrian dead reckoning algorithm in an indoor environment. Sensors 2016, 16, 34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Qian, J.; Pei, L.; Ma, J.; Ying, R.; Liu, P. Vector graph assisted pedestrian dead reckoning using an unconstrained smartphone. Sensors 2015, 15, 5032–5057. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Shang, J.; Gu, F.; Hu, X.; Kealy, A. Apfiloc: An infrastructure-free indoor localization method fusing smartphone inertial sensors, landmarks and map information. Sensors 2015, 15, 27251–27272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Tian, Q.; Salcic, Z.; Wang, K.I.-K.; Pan, Y. A hybrid indoor localization and navigation system with map matching for pedestrians using smartphones. Sensors 2015, 15, 30759–30783. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Wang, J.; Hu, A.; Liu, C.; Li, X. A floor-map-aided WiFi/pseudo-odometry integration algorithm for an indoor positioning system. Sensors 2015, 15, 7096–7124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Gao, Y.; Liu, S.; Atia, M.; Noureldin, A. INS/GPS/LiDAR integrated navigation system for urban and indoor environments using hybrid scan matching algorithm. Sensors 2015, 15, 23286–23302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Guerra, E.; Munguia, R.; Bolea, Y.; Grau, A. Human collaborative localization and mapping in indoor environments with non-continuous stereo. Sensors 2016, 16, 275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Gerstweiler, G.; Vonach, E.; Kaufmann, H. Hymotrack: A mobile AR navigation system for complex indoor environments. Sensors 2016, 16, 17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Kim, B.; Kang, S.; Ha, J.-Y.; Song, J. Visitsense: Sensing place visit patterns from ambient radio on smartphones for targeted mobile ads in shopping malls. Sensors 2015, 15, 17274–17299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Gu, F.; Kealy, A.; Khoshelham, K.; Shang, J. User-independent motion state recognition using smartphone sensors. Sensors 2015, 15, 30636–30652. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Xia, H.; Wang, X.; Qiao, Y.; Jian, J.; Chang, Y. Using multiple barometers to detect the floor location of smart phones with built-in barometric sensors for indoor positioning. Sensors 2015, 15, 7857–7877. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Galván-Tejada, C.; García-Vázquez, J.; Galván-Tejada, J.; Delgado-Contreras, J.; Brena, R. Infrastructure-less indoor localization using the microphone, magnetometer and light sensor of a smartphone. Sensors 2015, 15, 20355–20372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Sánchez-Rodríguez, D.; Hernández-Morera, P.; Quinteiro, J.; Alonso-González, I. A low complexity system based on multiple weighted decision trees for indoor localization. Sensors 2015, 15, 14809–14829. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Kasmi, Z.; Norrdine, A.; Blankenbach, J. Towards a decentralized magnetic indoor positioning system. Sensors 2015, 15, 30319–30339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Caso, G.; de Nardis, L.; di Benedetto, M.-G. A mixed approach to similarity metric selection in affinity propagation-based WiFi fingerprinting indoor positioning. Sensors 2015, 15, 27692–27720. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Castañón–Puga, M.; Salazar, A.; Aguilar, L.; Gaxiola-Pacheco, C.; Licea, G. A novel hybrid intelligent indoor location method for mobile devices by zones using Wi-Fi signals. Sensors 2015, 15, 30142–30164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Ma, L.; Xu, Y. Received signal strength recovery in green WLAN indoor positioning system using singular value thresholding. Sensors 2015, 15, 1292–1311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Ma, R.; Guo, Q.; Hu, C.; Xue, J. An improved WiFi indoor positioning algorithm by weighted fusion. Sensors 2015, 15, 21824–21843. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Zhou, M.; Zhang, Q.; Xu, K.; Tian, Z.; Wang, Y.; He, W. Primal: Page rank-based indoor mapping and localization using gene-sequenced unlabeled WLAN received signal strength. Sensors 2015, 15, 24791–24817. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Zou, H.; Lu, X.; Jiang, H.; Xie, L. A fast and precise indoor localization algorithm based on an online sequential extreme learning machine. Sensors 2015, 15, 1804–1824. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Canedo-Rodriguez, A.; Rodriguez, J.; Alvarez-Santos, V.; Iglesias, R.; Regueiro, C. Mobile robot positioning with 433-MHz wireless motes with varying transmission powers and a particle filter. Sensors 2015, 15, 10194–10220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Guzmán-Quirós, R.; Martínez-Sala, A.; Gómez-Tornero, J.; García-Haro, J. Integration of directional antennas in an RSS fingerprinting-based indoor localization system. Sensors 2016, 16, 4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Du, Y.; Yang, D.; Xiu, C. A novel method for constructing a WiFi positioning system with efficient manpower. Sensors 2015, 15, 8358–8381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Jan, S.-S.; Yeh, S.-J.; Liu, Y.-W. Received signal strength database interpolation by kriging for a Wi-Fi indoor positioning system. Sensors 2015, 15, 21377–21393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Tang, J.; Chen, Y.; Chen, L.; Liu, J.; Hyyppä, J.; Kukko, A.; Kaartinen, H.; Hyyppä, H.; Chen, R. Fast fingerprint database maintenance for indoor positioning based on UGV SLAM. Sensors 2015, 15, 5311–5330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Gualda, D.; Ureña, J.; García, J.; Lindo, A. Locally-referenced ultrasonic – LPS for localization and navigation. Sensors 2014, 14, 21750–21769. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Fujii, K.; Sakamoto, Y.; Wang, W.; Arie, H.; Schmitz, A.; Sugano, S. Hyperbolic positioning with antenna arrays and multi-channel pseudolite for indoor localization. Sensors 2015, 15, 25157–25175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Gioia, C.; Borio, D. Stand-alone and hybrid positioning using asynchronous pseudolites. Sensors 2015, 15, 166–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Xu, R.; Chen, W.; Xu, Y.; Ji, S. A new indoor positioning system architecture using GPS signals. Sensors 2015, 15, 10074–10087. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Fernandez-Llatas, C.; Lizondo, A.; Monton, E.; Benedi, J.-M.; Traver, V. Process mining methodology for health process tracking using real-time indoor location systems. Sensors 2015, 15, 29821–29840. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Ozdenizci, B.; Coskun, V.; Ok, K. NFC internal: An indoor navigation system. Sensors 2015, 15, 7571–7595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Shen, B.; Zheng, Q.; Li, X.; Xu, L. A framework for mining actionable navigation patterns from in-store RFID datasets via indoor mapping. Sensors 2015, 15, 5344–5375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Martinez-Sala, A.; Losilla, F.; Sánchez-Aarnoutse, J.; García-Haro, J. Design, implementation and evaluation of an indoor navigation system for visually impaired people. Sensors 2015, 15, 32168–32187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Nguyen, V.-H.; Pyun, J.-Y. Location detection and tracking of moving targets by a 2D IR-UWB radar system. Sensors 2015, 15, 6740–6762. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Yin, Z.; Cui, K.; Wu, Z.; Yin, L. Entropy-based TOA estimation and SVM-based ranging error mitigation in UWB ranging systems. Sensors 2015, 15, 11701–11724. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Yi, D.-H.; Lee, T.-J.; Cho, D.-I. Afocal optical flow sensor for reducing vertical height sensitivity in indoor robot localization and navigation. Sensors 2015, 15, 11208–11221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Kim, H.; Lee, D.; Oh, T.; Choi, H.-T.; Myung, H. A probabilistic feature map-based localization system using a monocular camera. Sensors 2015, 15, 21636–21659. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Mossel, A. Robust 3D position estimation in wide and unconstrained indoor environments. Sensors 2015, 15, 31482–31524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Oh, T.; Lee, D.; Kim, H.; Myung, H. Graph structure-based simultaneous localization and mapping using a hybrid method of 2D laser scan and monocular camera image in environments with laser scan ambiguity. Sensors 2015, 15, 15830–15852. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Zhang, H.; Liu, Y.; Tan, J. Loop closing detection in RGB-D SLAM combining appearance and geometric constraints. Sensors 2015, 15, 14639–14660. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Bao, J.; Jia, Y.; Cheng, Y.; Xi, N. Saliency-guided detection of unknown objects in RGB-D indoor scenes. Sensors 2015, 15, 21054–21074. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Adán, A.; Quintana, B.; Vázquez, A.; Olivares, A.; Parra, E.; Prieto, S. Towards the automatic scanning of indoors with robots. Sensors 2015, 15, 11551–11574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Díaz-Vilariño, L.; Khoshelham, K.; Martínez-Sánchez, J.; Arias, P. 3D modeling of building indoor spaces and closed doors from imagery and point clouds. Sensors 2015, 15, 3491–3512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Kim, S.; Kim, J.; Jung, J.; Heo, J. Development of a 3D underground cadastral system with indoor mapping for as-built BIM: The case study of gangnam subway station in korea. Sensors 2015, 15, 30870–30893. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Zhao, H.; Winter, S. A time-aware routing map for indoor evacuation. Sensors 2016, 16, 112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Sensors EISSN 1424-8220 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top