Next Article in Journal
Synthesis, Characterization, and Sensor Applications of Spinel ZnCo2O4 Nanoparticles
Next Article in Special Issue
Network Allocation Vector (NAV) Optimization for Underwater Handshaking-Based Protocols
Previous Article in Journal
Autonomous Aeromagnetic Surveys Using a Fluxgate Magnetometer
Previous Article in Special Issue
Looking inside the Ocean: Toward an Autonomous Imaging System for Monitoring Gelatinous Zooplankton
Article

Underwater Electromagnetic Sensor Networks, Part II: Localization and Network Simulations

1
Escuela Técnica Superior de Ingenieros de Telecomunicación (ETSIT), Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (UPM), Av. Complutense 30, 28040 Madrid, Spain
2
Instituto para el Desarrollo Tecnológico y la Innovación en Comunicaciones (IDeTIC), Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria (ULPGC), 35017 Las Palmas, Spain
3
Plataforma Oceánica de Canarias (PLOCAN), Telde, 35200 Las Palmas, Spain
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sensors 2016, 16(12), 2176; https://doi.org/10.3390/s16122176
Received: 7 November 2016 / Accepted: 14 December 2016 / Published: 17 December 2016
In the first part of the paper, we modeled and characterized the underwater radio channel in shallowwaters. In the second part,we analyze the application requirements for an underwaterwireless sensor network (U-WSN) operating in the same environment and perform detailed simulations. We consider two localization applications, namely self-localization and navigation aid, and propose algorithms that work well under the specific constraints associated with U-WSN, namely low connectivity, low data rates and high packet loss probability. We propose an algorithm where the sensor nodes collaboratively estimate their unknown positions in the network using a low number of anchor nodes and distance measurements from the underwater channel. Once the network has been self-located, we consider a node estimating its position for underwater navigation communicating with neighboring nodes. We also propose a communication system and simulate the whole electromagnetic U-WSN in the Castalia simulator to evaluate the network performance, including propagation impairments (e.g., noise, interference), radio parameters (e.g., modulation scheme, bandwidth, transmit power), hardware limitations (e.g., clock drift, transmission buffer) and complete MAC and routing protocols. We also explain the changes that have to be done to Castalia in order to perform the simulations. In addition, we propose a parametric model of the communication channel that matches well with the results from the first part of this paper. Finally, we provide simulation results for some illustrative scenarios. View Full-Text
Keywords: underwater communications; ad hoc networks; radio-frequency; localization; Castalia underwater communications; ad hoc networks; radio-frequency; localization; Castalia
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Zazo, J.; Macua, S.V.; Zazo, S.; Pérez, M.; Pérez-Álvarez, I.; Jiménez, E.; Cardona, L.; Brito, J.H.; Quevedo, E. Underwater Electromagnetic Sensor Networks, Part II: Localization and Network Simulations. Sensors 2016, 16, 2176. https://doi.org/10.3390/s16122176

AMA Style

Zazo J, Macua SV, Zazo S, Pérez M, Pérez-Álvarez I, Jiménez E, Cardona L, Brito JH, Quevedo E. Underwater Electromagnetic Sensor Networks, Part II: Localization and Network Simulations. Sensors. 2016; 16(12):2176. https://doi.org/10.3390/s16122176

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zazo, Javier, Sergio V. Macua, Santiago Zazo, Marina Pérez, Iván Pérez-Álvarez, Eugenio Jiménez, Laura Cardona, Joaquín H. Brito, and Eduardo Quevedo. 2016. "Underwater Electromagnetic Sensor Networks, Part II: Localization and Network Simulations" Sensors 16, no. 12: 2176. https://doi.org/10.3390/s16122176

Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Back to TopTop