Next Article in Journal
Two-Level Optical Coherence Tomography Scheme for Suppressing Spectral Saturation Artifacts
Previous Article in Journal
Disseminating Ambient Assisted Living in Rural Areas
Open AccessArticle

Near Infrared Spectroscopy Calibration for Wood Chemistry: Which Chemometric Technique Is Best for Prediction and Interpretation?

1
Forest Products Development Center, School of Forestry and Wildlife Sciences, Auburn University, 520 Devall Dr., Auburn, AL 36849, USA
2
Center for Bioenergy and Bioproducts, Biosystems Engineering, Auburn University, 520 Devall Dr., Auburn, AL 36849, USA
3
College of Textiles, Qingdao University, 308 Ningxia Road, Qingdao 266071, China
4
Forest Health Dynamics Laboratory, School of Forestry and Wildlife Sciences, Auburn University, 602 Duncan Drive, Suite 3301. Auburn, AL 36849, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sensors 2014, 14(8), 13532-13547; https://doi.org/10.3390/s140813532
Received: 29 May 2014 / Revised: 12 July 2014 / Accepted: 21 July 2014 / Published: 25 July 2014
(This article belongs to the Section Chemical Sensors)
This paper addresses the precision in factor loadings during partial least squares (PLS) and principal components regression (PCR) of wood chemistry content from near infrared reflectance (NIR) spectra. The precision of the loadings is considered important because these estimates are often utilized to interpret chemometric models or selection of meaningful wavenumbers. Standard laboratory chemistry methods were employed on a mixed genus/species hardwood sample set. PLS and PCR, before and after 1st derivative pretreatment, was utilized for model building and loadings investigation. As demonstrated by others, PLS was found to provide better predictive diagnostics. However, PCR exhibited a more precise estimate of loading peaks which makes PCR better for interpretation. Application of the 1st derivative appeared to assist in improving both PCR and PLS loading precision, but due to the small sample size, the two chemometric methods could not be compared statistically. This work is important because to date most research works have committed to PLS because it yields better predictive performance. But this research suggests there is a tradeoff between better prediction and model interpretation. Future work is needed to compare PLS and PCR for a suite of spectral pretreatment techniques. View Full-Text
Keywords: NIR; chemometric; PLS; PCR; regression; loading; coefficient; error; wood chemistry NIR; chemometric; PLS; PCR; regression; loading; coefficient; error; wood chemistry
Show Figures

MDPI and ACS Style

Via, B.K.; Zhou, C.; Acquah, G.; Jiang, W.; Eckhardt, L. Near Infrared Spectroscopy Calibration for Wood Chemistry: Which Chemometric Technique Is Best for Prediction and Interpretation? Sensors 2014, 14, 13532-13547. https://doi.org/10.3390/s140813532

AMA Style

Via BK, Zhou C, Acquah G, Jiang W, Eckhardt L. Near Infrared Spectroscopy Calibration for Wood Chemistry: Which Chemometric Technique Is Best for Prediction and Interpretation? Sensors. 2014; 14(8):13532-13547. https://doi.org/10.3390/s140813532

Chicago/Turabian Style

Via, Brian K.; Zhou, Chengfeng; Acquah, Gifty; Jiang, Wei; Eckhardt, Lori. 2014. "Near Infrared Spectroscopy Calibration for Wood Chemistry: Which Chemometric Technique Is Best for Prediction and Interpretation?" Sensors 14, no. 8: 13532-13547. https://doi.org/10.3390/s140813532

Find Other Styles

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Only visits after 24 November 2015 are recorded.
Search more from Scilit
 
Search
Back to TopTop