Next Article in Journal
Determining Large Trees and Population Structures of Typical Tree Species in Northeast China
Previous Article in Journal
Unravelling Metazoan and Fish Community Patterns in Yujiang River, China: Insights from Beta Diversity Partitioning and Co-Occurrence Network
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Data Descriptor

The Biological Diversity of Fruit Flies (Diptera: Drosophilidae) in Russia: A Description of a Set of Own and Published Data and a Complete List of Species

by
Nikolai G. Gornostaev
1,
Alexander B. Ruchin
2,*,
Mikhail N. Esin
2,
Evgeniy A. Lobachev
2 and
Irina G. Esina
2
1
N.K. Koltzov Institute of Developmental Biology, Russian Academy of Sciences (RAS), 119334 Moscow, Russia
2
Joint Directorate of the Mordovia State Nature Reserve and National Park «Smolny», 430005 Saransk, Russia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Diversity 2025, 17(7), 490; https://doi.org/10.3390/d17070490
Submission received: 17 June 2025 / Revised: 14 July 2025 / Accepted: 15 July 2025 / Published: 17 July 2025
(This article belongs to the Section Animal Diversity)

Abstract

Drosophilidae is a relatively small family within Diptera. However, species of this family occupy a wide range of ecological niches and are frequently found in synanthropic habitats. Additionally, some species are known agricultural pests. The dataset is based on collections of Drosophilidae from eleven regions of Russia. The dataset was uploaded to the GBIF platform in 2024. Published sources specifying exact localities and collection dates were also used. The database includes records dating back to 1867, with the majority of specimens collected by the authors between 2001 and 2024. Collection methods included net sweeping and bait trapping. The dataset contains 2830 occurrence records, with a total of 51,006 specimens of Drosophilidae studied. It includes data on 108 species from two subfamilies, covering 49 regions of Russia. Considering additional published sources, 188 species of Drosophilidae are currently known from Russia, with a complete species list provided. Among the most abundant species in the dataset, 10 species are represented by more than 1000 specimens: Drosophila obscura, Scaptodrosophila rufifrons, Drosophila melanogaster, Drosophila phalerata, Drosophila transversa, Drosophila kuntzei, Drosophila histrio, Drosophila testacea, Phortica semivirgo, and Drosophila immigrans. Conversely, 39 species are represented by fewer than 10 specimens in the dataset. Regarding ecological groupings, the most dominant groups are xylosaprobionts (39 species, 40.6%) and mycophages (30 species, 31.3%). Notably, in 2017, the quarantine pest Drosophila suzukii was detected in the European part of Russia. The current knowledge of the Drosophilidae fauna in Russia remains insufficient. Of the 15 regions, only one or two localities are represented in the dataset. The distribution limits and range boundaries of many species remain unknown. Moreover, the local faunas of more than half of Russia’s regions remain unexplored.

1. Summary

The study of species diversity in animals and plants has long attracted the attention of taxonomists, ecologists, and other specialists [1,2]. In recent years, this issue has received increased attention due to the observed decline in population numbers and biodiversity worldwide [3,4]. A key question concerns the biodiversity of taxonomic groups. To facilitate information exchange, specialized databases have been developed, among which the Global Biodiversity Information Facility (GBIF) is one of the largest. The GBIF contains over 2 billion occurrence records of various organisms, and this number continues to grow [5,6].
Diptera is one of the most challenging insect orders to study. These insects are highly active, sometimes abundant, sometimes rare, and morphologically diverse, with a global distribution across all continents. Their vast range of forms and sizes has enabled them to occupy a wide variety of ecological niches, both in natural habitats and in anthropogenically altered landscapes [7,8,9,10].
Drosophilidae are small Diptera, typically yellow to dark brown in coloration, often with reddish eyes. This family is widely distributed across the globe, with more than 4600 known species worldwide and over 300 species recorded in the Palearctic region [11]. The biodiversity of fruit flies is particularly high in tropical regions and the southern Palearctic. In Brazil, 304 species have been recorded [12], while a single Afrotropical island, São Tomé in the Indian Ocean, harbors 80 species [13]. In the southern Palearctic, Bulgaria hosts 120 species [14].
In the northern Palearctic, the species diversity of Drosophilidae decreases significantly. For instance, Canada has 79 known species, with an estimated additional 20–25 species potentially present [15]. Finland has recorded 67 species [16], and Norway 47 species [17]. Previous estimates suggested that Russia hosts between 200 and 230 species [18]. However, more recent assessments based on targeted studies of this family estimate the Russian fauna at approximately 160 species [19].
Drosophilidae inhabit various natural biotopes, often found on tree bark near exuding sap, on flowers, and on ripe fungi [20,21]. Many species are synanthropic and have spread into human dwellings. In synanthropic habitats, they are commonly found near fruits, vegetables, garbage heaps, and other organic substrates [22,23,24]. Drosophilidae are particularly attracted to fermenting substrates [25,26].
Larvae develop in various decaying substrates, feeding on microorganisms that thrive in these environments. They inhabit rotting berries, fungi, fruits, wood, and tree bark with exuding sap. Some species mine the stems and leaves of various agricultural plants, causing economic damage [27,28,29].
The objective of our study was to compile a database based on research conducted from 2019 to 2024, supplemented by reliable published data with precise locality names and/or geographic coordinates of Drosophilidae species occurrences. The study aimed to achieve the following: (1) Determine the number of Drosophilidae species in the fauna of Russia; (2) Identify abundant and rare species; (3) Classify species into ecological groups; (4) Detect invasive and potentially harmful pest species.

2. Data Description

2.1. Dataset Description

In the described dataset, each recorded observation includes key information such as location (latitude/longitude), date of observation, observer’s name, and identifier’s name. If the observation has been previously published, a reference is provided. Coordinates were determined on-site using a GPS device or post-study through Google Maps (Table 1).

2.2. Biodiversity of Fruit Flies

The dataset includes records of 108 Drosophilidae species from two subfamilies (Steganinae and Drosophilinae) across 49 regions of Russia (Table 2). The total number of occurrences recorded is 2830, with 51,006 specimens documented in the dataset.
In the identification guide for the European part of Russia, Drosophilidae are estimated to include 44–54 species [31]. A more recent publication on the Russian Far East reports that over 160 species inhabit Russia [19]. We have attempted to expand the list of Drosophilidae species by including those not recorded in our dataset. Appendix A provides a list of these species, compiled based on published sources [19,32].
Considering all available data, the current fauna of Russia comprises 188 Drosophilidae species. The Russian Far East remains the most thoroughly studied region, exhibiting significant species diversity. However, the European part of Russia has also been increasingly studied in recent years. It is possible that, with continued intensive research, the number of documented species may exceed 200.
Comparing the Drosophilidae fauna of Russia with other countries presents a challenge due to Russia’s vast territory, unparalleled by other nations. However, for reference, some well-studied countries report the following numbers of species: 79 in the Czech Republic, 71 in Slovakia, and 120 in Bulgaria [14,33].
Among the Drosophilidae recorded in the dataset, 10 species stand out, each with more than 1000 registered specimens. At the same time, these species also have a significant number of documented localities. However, for three species (Gitona distigma, Leucophenga quinquemaculata, and Scaptomyza pallida), despite having lower overall specimen counts, the number of recorded localities is notably high (Figure 1).
Drosophila obscura is a typical xylosaprobiont species, with larvae primarily living in decaying tissues under the bark and in fermenting tree sap of various deciduous trees. The larvae of Phortica semivirgo and Scaptodrosophila rufifrons are also xylosaprobionts, sharing the same habitats as Drosophila obscura. In contrast, the larvae of Drosophila histrio, Drosophila kuntzei, Drosophila phalerata, Drosophila testacea, and Drosophila transversa are mycetobionts, living in various fungi, predominantly in live fungi, but sometimes in decaying ones.
Among the most abundant Drosophilidae species found in Russia, Drosophila immigrans and Drosophila melanogaster are synanthropic species, closely associated with human activity. These species inhabit and breed in areas with fermenting and decaying fruits, vegetables, wine, beer, and juices. Although they are primarily found in human-influenced environments, these species may occasionally occur in small numbers in wild biotopes, likely due to migration or wind dispersal.
Drosophilidae are unevenly distributed in forest biotopes, with most species preferring the lower tiers of the forest. In boreal and cool temperate forests in Russia, canopy-dwelling Drosophilidae species are mostly sap and decayed bark feeders. The largest group of Drosophilidae inhabiting the lower forest tiers consists primarily of mycetobiont species and some xylosaprobiont species, including the most abundant Drosophila obscura, Phortica semivirgo, and Scaptodrosophila rufifrons [34]. Drosophilidae are also distributed unevenly across different types of forests in European Russia, being most numerous in birch forests [35].
A total of 39 species were recorded in the database, with each species having 10 or fewer specimens. Thirteen species were represented by only one specimen (Cacoxenus vlasovi, Drosophila altukhovi, Drosophila ambigua, Drosophila lummei, Hirtodrosophila lundstroemi, Lordiphosa andalusiaca, Microdrosophila cristata, Mycodrosophila takachihonis, Nesiodrosophila magnidentata, Stegana masanoritodai, Stegana baechlii, Zaprionus flavofasciatus, Hirtodrosophila shaitanensis). These species were found in regions such as Krasnoyarsk Krai, Khabarovsk Krai, Primorsky Krai, the Republic of Dagestan, Saint Petersburg, Sakhalin Oblast, and the Republic of Altai.
Five species were found in two specimens each (Leucophenga quadripunctata, Microdrosophila congesta, Drosophila parakuntzei, Drosophila picta, Stegana similis), and these species are distributed across only seven regions. Four species (Leucophenga sorii, Lordiphosa acuminata, Stegana mehadiae, Lordiphosa miki) were represented by three specimens each, found in five regions.
In total, for the 39 species in the dataset, only 10 or fewer specimens are known from six or fewer localities. This means that 36.1% of the species are recorded from one, two, or three regions within Russia. This highlights the limited study of much of Russia’s territory, with the exception of the Far East and, to some extent, parts of the Caucasus. Of the 15 regions, only one or two localities are represented in the dataset. In fact, the fauna of half of Russia’s regions, including the central, western, Volga, and Siberian areas, is poorly documented.
Based on the dataset, we have prepared an analysis of the ecological groups of Drosophilidae according to their larval breeding sites (Figure 2).
Information was obtained for 96 species, with the main groups being xylosaprobionts (39 species, 40.6%) and mycophages (30 species, 31.3%). It has been previously noted [34,36] that in the temperate zone, most species of this family belong to the aforementioned groups. Specifically, eight out of the ten most numerous species are classified as xylosaprobionts (Drosophila obscura, Scaptodrosophila rufifrons, Drosophila testacea, Phortica semivirgo) and mycophages (Drosophila phalerata, Drosophila transversa, Drosophila kuntzei, Drosophila histrio). Eight species are listed as saprophages and phytosaprophages. One species, Cacoxenus vlasovi, is classified as a kleptoparasite, inhabiting the nests of Osmia and Chalicodoma (Hymenoptera) [37].
One of the most well-known invasive Drosophilidae species is Drosophila suzukii. This fruit pest is a polyphage that can pierce the skins of soft fruits while laying its eggs. In Europe, Drosophila suzukii was first discovered in Spain and Italy in 2008, and soon after, it spread to many other countries (France, Austria, Germany, Belgium, Croatia, Slovenia, Ireland, UK, and Switzerland) [38,39]. In Russia, the first findings of the species were recorded in the Far East and the Caucasus. In the Krasnodar region, the species has already spread actively, causing damage to grapes, figs, and other fruit crops [40,41,42].
Two other species also cause certain damage to agricultural crops. Scaptomyza flava is a polyphage and has been found on Brassicaceae, Asteraceae, Capparidaceae, Resedaceae, Tropaeolaceae, and Viciaceae in European and other countries. It frequently damages plants such as Brassica rapa, Brassica campestris, Brassica juncea, Eruca vesicaria, Cardamine debile, Cardamine flexuosa, Cardamine hirsuta, Rorippa nasturtium-aquaticum, Coronopus didymus, Raphanus raphanistrum, Raphanus maritimus, and other crops [43]. Scaptomyza graminum mines the leaves of Caryophyllales, Amaranthaceae, Portulaceae, Fabaceae, causing damage to crops such as Beta vulgaris, Brassica campestris, Brassica oleracea, Brassica rapa, and others [44,45].
Also included in the group of pests are synanthropic Drosophilidae species (Drosophila melanogaster, Drosophila simulans, Drosophila hydei, Drosophila repleta, Drosophila immigrans, Drosophila busckii, Drosophila virilis, Drosophila funebris), which reproduce in large numbers on fruits, vegetables, juices, beer, and wine, contaminating the products with their adults and larvae [46,47].

3. Methods

3.1. Study Area

Descriptions of the nature and territory of Russia can be found in many publications. The authors’ own research was conducted within the boundaries of the Volga Upland and the Oka–Don Lowland. The majority of this large macroregion is located in the mixed forest zone, with broadleaf forests and forest steppe in the south and taiga forests in the northeast. The largest rivers are the Don (and its numerous tributaries), which flows from the west and southwest, and the Oka, which flows from the northern side of the macroregion. To the east, the region is bounded by the Volga River (Figure 3).
Figure 3 shows the locations from which data were obtained for the dataset. Due to the lack of data from many other regions of Russia, significant gaps are visible on the map (as noted above).

3.2. Study Material

The material for the dataset was collected from Drosophilidae specimens across 49 regions of Russia. In addition, reliable publications were used, which provide trust in the original data sources. The earliest Drosophilidae specimen dates back to 1867. However, the majority of the material (2303 occurrences, 81.4%) was collected between 2001 and 2024. The dataset did not include materials from the publications of vs. Sidorenko, as virtually all of his results were used in two well-known papers [19,32].
In our own research, traditional and various methods were employed. Primarily, these were collections using nets, as well as trapping with various baits [48]. After capture, Drosophilidae were preserved in a 70% ethanol solution for subsequent identification. Identification was performed at the Laboratory of Evolutionary Developmental Genetics of the N.K. Koltsov Institute of Developmental Biology, RAS, Moscow, Russia. A Micromed MS-2-Zoom microscope (Moscow, Russia) was used to determine the drosophilids. The identification was carried out by N.G. Gornostaev using drosophilid identification keys [19,49]. The systematics of the Drosophilidae was interpreted according to Grimaldi [50].

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, N.G.G.; methodology, N.G.G. and A.B.R.; software, M.N.E.; validation, N.G.G. and A.B.R.; formal analysis, A.B.R.; investigation, A.B.R. and M.N.E.; resources, E.A.L., M.N.E. and I.G.E.; data curation, A.B.R. and I.G.E.; writing—original draft preparation, N.G.G. and A.B.R.; writing—review and editing, N.G.G. and A.B.R.; visualization, A.B.R.; supervision, N.G.G.; project administration, A.B.R.; funding acquisition, N.G.G. and A.B.R. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by Russian Science Foundation, grant number 22-14-00026-П. The work of N.G. Gornostaev was conducted under the IDB RAS Government basic research program in 2024, No. 0088-2024-0011.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data are contained within the article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Appendix A

Table A1. List of Drosophilidae species from the fauna of Russia not represented in the dataset.
Table A1. List of Drosophilidae species from the fauna of Russia not represented in the dataset.
Steganinae
Acletoxenus formosus (Loew, 1864)
Amiota aquilotaurusata Takada, Beppu & Toda, 1979
Amiota clavata Okada, 1960
Amiota delta Takada, Beppu & Toda, 1979
Amiota dentata Okada, 1971
Amiota eos Sidorenko, 1989
Amiota elongata Okada, 1960
Amiota falcilis Takada, Beppu & Toda, 1979
Amiota palpifera Okada, 1971
Amiota promissa Okada, 1960
Amiota subfurcata Okada, 1971
Amiota stylopyga Wakahama & Okada, 1958
Amiota taurusata Takada, Beppu & Toda, 1979
Amiota todai Sidorenko, 1989
Amiota trifurcata Okada, 1968
Cacoxenus indagator Loew, 1858
Cacoxenus kaszabi (Okada, 1973)
Cacoxenus romankovae (Sidorenko, 1991)
Leucophenga maculata (Dufour, 1839)
Leucophenga todai Sidorenko, 1991
Phortica okadai (Máca, 1977)
Stegana ctenaria Nishiharu, 1979
Stegana nigrithorax Strobl, 1898
Stegana sidorenkoi Hu & Toda, 1994
Stegana singularis Sidorenko, 1990
Stegana taba Okada, 1971
Stegana xuei Hu & Toda, 1994
Drosophilinae
Drosophila auraria Peng, 1937
Drosophila biauraria Bock & Wheeler, 1972
Drosophila bondarenkoi Sidorenko, 1993
Drosophila brachynephros Okada, 1956
Drosophila calidata Takada, Beppu & Toda, 1979
Drosophila curvispina Watabe & Toda, 1984
Drosophila imaii Moriwaki & Okada, 1967
Drosophila kanekoi Watabe & Higuchi, 1979
Drosophila lacertosa Okada, 1956
Drosophila limbata Roser, 1840
Drosophila moriwakii Okada & Kurokawa, 1957
Drosophila multispina Okada, 1956
Drosophila neokadai Kaneko & Takada, 1966
Drosophila okadai Takada, 1959
Drosophila orientacea Grimaldi, James & Jaenike, 1992
Drosophila parakuntzei Okada, 1973
Drosophila rellima Wheeler, 1960
Drosophila sordidula Kikkawa & Peng, 1938
Drosophila subauraria Kimura, 1983
Drosophila tsigana Burla & Gloor, 1952
Drosophila unispina Okada, 1956
Hirtodrosophila alboralis (Momma & Takada, 1954)
Hirtodrosophila kangi (Okada & Lee, 1961)
Hirtodrosophila macromaculata (Kang & Lee, 1961)
Hirtodrosophila makinoi (Okada, 1956)
Hirtodrosophila nokogiri (Okada, 1956)
Hirtodrosophila pseudonokogiri (Kang, Lee & Bahng, 1965)
Hirtodrosophila shaitanensis (Sidorenko, 1995)
Hirtodrosophila quadrivittata (Okada, 1956)
Hirtodrosophila trilineata (Chung, 1960)
Hirtodrosophila ussurica (Duda, 1935)
Lordiphosa clarofinis (Lee, 1959)
Lordiphosa collinella (Okada, 1968)
Lordiphosa hexasticha (Papp, 1971)
Lordiphosa magnipectinata Okada, 1956
Lordiphosa pseudotenuicauda (Toda, 1983)
Lordiphosa stackelbergi (Duda, 1935)
Lordiphosa pseudotenuicauda (Okada, 1956)
Microdrosophila cristata Okada, 1960
Mycodrosophila celesta Sidorenko, 1992
Mycodrosophila japonica Okada, 1956
Mycodrosophila nigropteropleura Kang, Lee & Bahng, 1965
Mycodrosophila planipalpis Kang, Lee & Bahng, 1966
Mycodrosophila shikokuana Okada, 1956
Mycodrosophila takachihonis Okada, 1956
Nesiodrosophila okadai Nishiharu, 1981
Scaptodrosophila puncticeps (Okada, 1956)
Scaptodrosophila throckmortoni (Okada, 1973)
Scaptomyza baechlii Sidorenko, 1993
Scaptomyza montana Wheeler, 1949
Scaptomyza polygonia Okada, 1956
Scaptomyza subsplendens (Duda, 1935)
Scaptomyza trochanterata Collin, 1953

References

  1. Trujillo-Arias, N.; Serrano-Cardozo, V.H.; Ramírez-Pinilla, M.P. Role of a Campesine Reserve Zone in the Magdalena Valley (Colombia) in the conservation of endangered tropical rainforests. Nat. Conserv. Res. 2023, 8, 49–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Duco, R.A.J.; Bejar, S.G.F.; Bañez, J.G.; Fidelino, J.S.; Duya, M.V.; Ong, P.S.; Duya, M.R.M. Forest fragments matter: A look into the species richness and diversity patterns of birds in a small, isolated, Protected Landscape in Mindanao Island, Philippines. Nat. Conserv. Res. 2024, 9, 47–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Jain, A.; Cunha, F.; Bunsen, M.J.; Cañas, J.S.; Pasi, L.; Pinoy, N.; Helsing, F.; Russo, J.; Botham, M.; Sabourin, M.; et al. Insect Identification in the Wild: The AMI Dataset. In Computer Vision—ECCV 2024. ECCV 2024. Lecture Notes in Computer Science; Leonardis, A., Ricci, E., Roth, S., Russakovsky, O., Sattler, T., Varol, G., Eds.; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2025; Volume 15095. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Drago, M.C.; Vrcibradic, D. Will future extinctions occur at the same places where the past ones did? A review involving mammals and the IUCN Red List. Nat. Conserv. Res. 2023, 8, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Alfeus, M.; Irish, J.; Birkhofer, K. Recognition and completeness metrics from iNaturalist and GBIF can inform future citizen science and research projects: A case study on arthropods in Namibia. Biodivers. Conserv. 2025, 34, 467–480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Štípková, Z.; Tsiftsis, S.; Kindlmann, P. Is the GBIF appropriate for use as input in models of predicting species distributions? Study from the Czech Republic. Nat. Conserv. Res. 2024, 9, 84–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Ostrauskas, H.; Pakalniškis, S.; Taluntytė, L. The species composition of plant mining dipterous (Insecta: Diptera) of greenhouse surroundings in Lithuania. Ekologija 2003, 3, 3–11. [Google Scholar]
  8. Krivosheina, N.P. Macromycete fruit bodies as a habitat for dipterans (Insecta, Diptera). Entomol. Rev. 2008, 88, 778–792. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Oliveira-Christe, R.; Marrelli, M.T. Taxonomic history, biology and ecology of Culex (Microculex) (Diptera: Culicidae). Acta Trop. 2024, 259, 107387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Izwan-Anas, N.; Halim, M.R.A.; Low, V.L.; Adler, P.H.; Ya’cob, Z. Wild-caught adult black flies (Diptera: Simuliidae) from various ecological landscapes in Malaysia. Acta Trop. 2024, 259, 107374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Bächli, G. TaxoDros: The Database on Taxonomy of Drosophilidae. 2024. Available online: https://www.taxodros.uzh.ch/ (accessed on 10 November 2024).
  12. Gottschalk, M.; Hofmann, P.; Valente, V. Diptera, Drosophilidae: Historical occurrence in Brazil. Check List 2008, 4, 485–518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Prigent, S.R.; Lang, M.; Nagy, O.; Acurio, A.; Matamoro-Vidal, A.; Courtier-Orgogozo, V.; David, J.R. Field collections reveal that São Tomé is the Afrotropical island with the highest diversity of drosophilid flies (Diptera: Drosophilidae). Ann. Société Entomol. Fr. (N.S.) 2020, 56, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Hubenov, Z. Species Composition and Distribution of the Dipterans (Insecta: Diptera) in Bulgaria; Pensoft & National Museum of Natural History: Sofia, Bulgaria, 2021; 276p. [Google Scholar]
  15. Savage, J.; Borkent, A.; Brodo, F.; Cumming, J.M.; Curler, G.; Currie, D.C.; deWaard, J.R.; Gibson, J.F.; Hauser, M.; Laplante, L.; et al. Diptera of Canada. In The Biota of Canada—A Biodiversity Assessment; Langor, D.W., Sheffield, C.S., Eds.; Part 1: The Terrestrial Arthropods; ZooKeys: Sofia, Bulgaria, 2019; Volume 819, pp. 397–450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Kahanpää, J. Checklist of the Diptera (Insecta) of Finland: An introduction and a summary of results. Zookeys 2014, 19, 1–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Gammelmo, Ø.; Søli, G. Notes on new and interesting Diptera from Norway. Nor. J. Entomol. 2011, 58, 189–195. [Google Scholar]
  18. Nartshuk, E.P. Key to families of Diptera (Insecta) of the fauna of Russian and adjacent countries. In Proceedings of the Zoological Institute; Zoological Institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences: Saint Petersburg, Russia, 2003; Volume 294, pp. 1–252. [Google Scholar]
  19. Sidorenko, V.S. Drosophilidae/Key to the Insects of Russian Far East. Vol. VI. Diptera and Siphonaptera. Pt. 2; Dalnauka: Vladivostok, Russia, 2001; pp. 211–242. [Google Scholar]
  20. Mitsui, H.; Van Achterberg, K.; Nordlander, G.; Kimura, M.T. Geographical distributions and host associations of larval parasitoids of frugivorous Drosophilidae in Japan. J. Nat. Hist. 2007, 41, 1731–1738. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Batista, M.R.; Uno, F.; Chaves, R.D.; Tidon, R.; Rosa, C.A.; Klaczko, L.B. Differential attraction of drosophilids to banana baits inoculated with Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Hanseniaspora uvarum within a Neotropical forest remnant. PeerJ 2017, 5, e3063. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Hochmüller, C.J.C.; Lopes-da-Silva, M.; Valente, V.L.S.; Schmitz, H.J. The drosophilid fauna (Diptera, Drosophilidae) of the transition between the Pampa and Atlantic Forest Biomes in the state of Rio Grande do Sul, southern Brazil: First records. Papéis Avulsos Zool. 2010, 50, 285–295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Gottschalk, M.S.; De Toni, D.C.; Valente, V.L.S.; Hofmann, P.R.P. Changes in Brazilian Drosophilidae (Diptera) assemblages across an urbanisation gradient. Neotrop. Entomol. 2007, 36, 848–862. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Duarte, L.B.; Valer, F.B.; Vizentin-Bugoni, J.; Bernardi, E.; Valente, V.L.D.S.; Gottschalk, M.S. From visit to emergence: Interactions between mycophagous Drosophilidae (Insecta, Diptera) and macroscopic fungi (Basidiomycota) and their patterns in ecological networks. Rev. Bras. Entomol. 2024, 68, e20230097. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Gornostaev, N.G.; Ruchin, A.B.; Esin, M.N.; Lazebny, O.E.; Kulikov, A.M. Vertical distribution of fruit flies (Diptera: Drosophilidae) in deciduous forests in the center of European Russia. Insects 2023, 14, 822. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Ruchin, A.B.; Egorov, L.V.; MacGowan, I.; Makarkin, V.N.; Antropov, A.V.; Gornostaev, N.G.; Khapugin, A.A.; Dvorak, L.; Esin, M.N. Post-fire insect fauna explored by crown fermental traps in forests of the European Russia. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 21334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Vrdoljak, J.; Padró, J.; De Panis, D.; Soto, I.M.; Carreira, V.P. Protein–alkaloid interaction in larval diet affects fitness in cactophilic Drosophila (Diptera: Drosophilidae). Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 2019, 127, 44–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Yoshimoto, J.; Nishida, T. Plant-mediated indirect effects of carpenterworms on the insect communities attracted to fermented tree sap. Popul. Ecol. 2008, 50, 25–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Schmitz, H.J.; da Silva Valente, V.L. The flower flies and the unknown diversity of Drosophilidae (Diptera): A biodiversity inventory in the Brazilian fauna. Papéis Avulsos Zool. 2019, 59, e20195945. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Gornostaev, N.; Esin, M.; Ruchin, A.; Esina, I. Biodiversity of Fruit Flies (Diptera: Drosophilidae) of Russia. Joint Directorate of the Mordovia State Nature Reserve and National Park “Smolny”. 2024. GBIF Occurrence Download. Available online: https://doi.org/10.15468/dyqr7q (accessed on 28 October 2024).
  31. Shtakelberg, A.A. Drosophilidae. In Key of Insects of the European Part of the USSR; Israel Program for Scientific Translations: Jerusalem, Israel, 1970; Volume 5, Part 2; pp. 390–399. [Google Scholar]
  32. Sidorenko, V.S. Drosophilid Flies of the Subfamily Steganinae (Diptera: Drosophilidae) of the Fauna of Russia and Neighbouring Counties; Dalnauka: Vladivostok, Russia, 2008; 231p. [Google Scholar]
  33. Máca, J.; Roháček, J.; Vilela, C.R.; Březíková, M. New and interesting records of Drosophilidae (Diptera) from the Czech Republic and Slovakia. Acta Mus. Siles. Sci. Natur. 2015, 64, 101–106. [Google Scholar]
  34. Gornostaevl, N.G.; Ruchinl, A.B.; Esin, M.N. An annotated list of fruit flies (Diptera: Drosophilidae) of the Republic of Mordovia. Far East. Entomol. 2024, 503, 7–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Gornostaev, N.G.; Ruchin, A.B.; Esin, M.N.; Kulikov, A.M. Seasonal dynamics of fruit flies (Diptera: Drosophilidae) in forests of the European Russia. Insects 2022, 13, 751. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Sidorenko, V.S.; Storozhenko, S.Y. Complexes of the Drosophilid flies (Diptera, Drosophilidae)—Inhabitants of xylotrophic fungi from the south of Primorye Region. Izv. St. Peterbg. Lesoteh. Akad. 2009, 187, 310–317. [Google Scholar]
  37. Tsacas, L.; de Chenon, R.D. Taxinomie et Biogéographie des «Genres» Cacoxenus—Paracacoxenus—Gitonides—Gitona [Dipt., Drosophilidae] et Biologie d’Une Nouvelle Espèce Africaine Commensale d’Apoidea [Hymenoptera] . Ann. Société Entomol. Fr. (N.S.) 1976, 12, 491–507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Cini, A.; Loriatti, C.; Anfora, G. A review of the invasion of Drosophila suzukii in Europe and a draft research agenda for integrated pest management. Bull Insectology 2012, 65, 149–160. [Google Scholar]
  39. dos Santos, L.A.; Mendes, M.F.; Krüger, A.P.; Blauth, M.L.; Gottschalk, M.S.; Garcia, F.R.M. Global potential distribution of Drosophila suzukii (Diptera, Drosophilidae). PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0174318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Bieńkowski, A.O.; Orlova-Bienkowskaja, M.J. Invasive agricultural pest Drosophila suzukii (Diptera, Drosophilidae) appeared in the Russian Caucasus. Insects 2020, 11, 826. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Sidorenko, V.S. New and unrecorded species of Drosophilidae from Soviet Far East (Diptera, Brachycera). Spixiana 1992, 15, 93–95. [Google Scholar]
  42. Rastegaeva, V.M.; Kuzina, N.P.; Shirokova, O.A. Field testing of different doses of synthetic attractant in combination with colored “Plastina” sticky traps for early detection and monitoring of Drosophila suzukii. Plant Health Quar. 2024, 12, 26–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Martin, N.A. History of an invader, Scaptomyza flava (Fallen, 1823) (Diptera: Drosophilidae). N. Zealand J. Zool. 2004, 31, 27–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Stalker, H.D. On the biology and genetics of Scaptomyza graminum Fallen (Diptera, Drosophilidae). Genetics 1945, 30, 266–279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Szwejda, J.H. Diptera pests occurring on vegetable crops in Poland. J. Hortic. Res. 2023, 31, 169–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Gross, H.; Christian, E. Drosophilid communities along an urban gradient across Vienna. Z. Für Okol. Naturschutz 1994, 3, 81–86. [Google Scholar]
  47. Poppe, J.L.; Valente, V.L.D.S.; Schmitz, H.J. Structure of Drosophilidae assemblage (Insecta, Diptera) in Pampa Biome (São Luiz Gonzaga, RS). Papéis Avulsos Zool. 2012, 52, 185–195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Ruchin, A.B.; Egorov, L.V.; Khapugin, A.A.; Vikhrev, N.E.; Esin, M.N. The use of simple crown traps for the insects collection. Nat. Conserv. Res. 2020, 5, 87–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Gornostaev, N.G. A key to the Drosophilid flies (Diptera, Drosophilidae) from European Russia and neighbouring countries. Entomol. Obozr. 2001, 80, 908–915. [Google Scholar]
  50. Grimaldi, D.A. A phylogenetic revised classificationof genera in the Drosophilidae (Diptera). Bull. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist. 1990, 197, 139p. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. The number of specimens and the number of localities for the most abundant Drosophilidae species based on dataset records.
Figure 1. The number of specimens and the number of localities for the most abundant Drosophilidae species based on dataset records.
Diversity 17 00490 g001
Figure 2. Ecological groups of Drosophilidae (based on dataset data).
Figure 2. Ecological groups of Drosophilidae (based on dataset data).
Diversity 17 00490 g002
Figure 3. Map of the studied regions. The red dots indicate the localities from which information for the dataset was obtained. The asterisk for the landmark is Moscow.
Figure 3. Map of the studied regions. The red dots indicate the localities from which information for the dataset was obtained. The asterisk for the landmark is Moscow.
Diversity 17 00490 g003
Table 1. Description of the data in the dataset [30].
Table 1. Description of the data in the dataset [30].
Column LabelColumn Description
occurrenceIDAn identifier for the occurrence (as opposed to a particular digital record of the occurrence)
basisOfRecordThe specific nature of the data record: HumanObservation
scientificNamThe full scientific name including the genus name and the lowest level of taxonomic rank with the authority
KingdomThe full scientific name of the kingdom in which the taxon is classified
decimalLatitudeThe geographic latitude of the location in decimal degrees
geodeticDatumThe ellipsoid, geodetic datum, or spatial reference system (SRS) upon which the geographic coordinates given in decimalLatitude and decimalLongitude is based
CountryThe name of the country in which the location occurs
countryCodeThe standard code for the country in which the location occurs
individualCountThe number of individuals present at the time of the occurrence
eventDateThe date when material from the trap was collected or the range of dates during which the trap collected material
YearThe integer year in which the event occurred
MonthThe ordinal month in which the event occurred
DayThe integer day of the month on which the event occurred
recordedByA person, group, or organization responsible for recording the original occurrence
identifiedByA list of names of people who assigned the taxon to the subject
bibliographicCitationA bibliographic reference for the resource
Table 2. Species diversity of Drosophilidae in Russia (dataset).
Table 2. Species diversity of Drosophilidae in Russia (dataset).
SpeciesSpecimensLocality
Steganinae
Amiota albilabris (Roth, 1860)8826
Amiota alboguttata (Wahlberg, 1839)8923
Amiota flagellata Okada, 197141
Amiota rufescens (Oldenberg, 1914)4116
Amiota subtusradiata (Duda, 1934)5420
Cacoxenus vlasovi (Duda, 1934)11
Gitona distigma Meigen, 183014436
Leucophenga maculata (Dufour, 1839)5314
Leucophenga quadripunctata (Meijere, 1908)21
Leucophenga quinquemaculata Strobl, 189371740
Leucophenga quinquemaculipennis Okada, 195692
Leucophenga sorii Kang, Lee & Bhang 196533
Leucophenga stackelbergi Duda, 1934104
Phortica chi (Toda & Sidorenko, 1996)176
Phortica conifera (Okada, 1977)605
Phortica iota (Toda & Sidorenko, 1996)14110
Phortica semivirgo (Máca, 1977)132733
Phortica variegata (Fallén, 1823)96
Stegana baechlii Laštovka & Máca, 198211
Stegana coleoptrata (Scopoli, 1763)1110
Stegana furta (Linnaeus, 1767)167
Stegana hypoleuca Meigen, 1830105
Stegana longifibula Takada, 196874
Stegana masanoritodai Okada & Sidorenko, 199211
Stegana mehadiae Duda, 192432
Stegana sibirica (Duda, 1934)141
Stegana similis Laštovka & Máca, 198222
Drosophilinae
Chymomyza amoena (Loew, 1862)51921
Chymomyza caudatula Oldenberg, 19144019
Chymomyza costata (Zetterstedt, 1838)16723
Chymomyza distincta (Egger, 1862)336
Chymomyza fuscimana (Zetterstedt, 1838)8921
Drosophila alpina Burla, 194818812
Drosophila altukhovi Imasheva, Lazebny, Cariou, David & Tsacas, 199411
Drosophila ambigua Pomini, 194011
Drosophila angularis Okada, 1956174
Drosophila bifasciata Pomini, 194035526
Drosophila busckii Coquillett, 190121117
Drosophila ezoana Takada & Okada, 19571337
Drosophila funebris (Fabricius, 1787)95629
Drosophila helvetica Burla, 1948387
Drosophila histrio Meigen, 1830242643
Drosophila hydei Sturtevant, 192114718
Drosophila imaii Moriwaki & Okada, 1967101
Drosophila immigrans Sturtevant, 1921122629
Drosophila ingrica Hackman, 195743
Drosophila kuntzei Duda, 1924297848
Drosophila limbata Roser, 18402410
Drosophila littoralis Meigen, 183066
Drosophila lummei Hackman, 197211
Drosophila melanogaster Meigen, 1830444546
Drosophila mercatorum Patterson & Wheeler, 1942352
Drosophila montana Stone, Griffen & Patterson, 1941425
Drosophila nigromaculata Kikkawa et Peng, 1938227
Drosophila nigrosparsa Strobl, 1898111
Drosophila obscura Fallén, 182313,48049
Drosophila parakuntzei Okada, 197322
Drosophila phalerata Meigen, 1830413250
Drosophila picta Zetterstedt, 184722
Drosophila rellima Wheeler, 1960182
Drosophila repleta Wollaston, 1858417
Drosophila simulans Sturtevant, 191961
Drosophila subobscura Collin, 193631123
Drosophila subsilvestris Hardy & Kaneshiro, 196836221
Drosophila suzukii (Matsumura, 1931)125
Drosophila testacea Roser, 1840283956
Drosophila transversa Fallén, 1823389179
Drosophila tristis Fallén, 1823166
Drosophila unispina Okada, 1956203
Drosophila virilis Sturtevant, 191663
Hirtodrosophila baikalensis Watabe, Toda & Sidorenko, 199673
Hirtodrosophila cameraria (Haliday, 1833)136
Hirtodrosophila confusa (Staeger, 1844)16530
Hirtodrosophila histrioides (Okada & Kurokawa, 1957)313
Hirtodrosophila lundstroemi (Duda, 1935)11
Hirtodrosophila oldenbergi (Duda, 1924)42
Hirtodrosophila sexvittata (Okada, 1956)562
Hirtodrosophila shaitanensis Sidorenko, 199611
Hirtodrosophila subarctica (Hackman, 1969)31722
Hirtodrosophila toyohiokadai (Sidorenko, 1990)5410
Hirtodrosophila trivittata (Strobl, 1893)5920
Lordiphosa acuminata (Collin, 1952)32
Lordiphosa andalusiaca (Strobl, 1906)11
Lordiphosa fenestrarum (Fallén, 1823)1711
Lordiphosa miki (Duda, 1924)31
Lordiphosa mommai (Takada & Okada, 1960)5601
Lordiphosa nigricolor (Strobl, 1898)116
Microdrosophila congesta (Zetterstedt, 1847)22
Microdrosophila cristata Okada, 196011
Mycodrosophila celesta Sidorenko, 199272
Mycodrosophila poecilogastra (Loew, 1874)597
Mycodrosophila shikokuana Okada, 195681
Mycodrosophila takachihonis Okada, 195611
Nesiodrosophila magnidentata (Lee, 1964)11
Scaptodrosophila coracina (Kikkawa & Peng, 1938)542
Scaptodrosophila deflexa (Duda, 1924)922
Scaptodrosophila rufifrons (Loew, 1873)637439
Scaptomyza carinata Okada, 19732166
Scaptomyza consimilis Hackman, 19552711
Scaptomyza flava (Fallén, 1823)5020
Scaptomyza graminum (Fallén, 1823)5922
Scaptomyza okadai Hackman, 1959137
Scaptomyza pallida (Zetterstedt, 1847)53843
Scaptomyza taigensis Sidorenko & Toda, 199682
Scaptomyza teinoptera Hackman, 195521
Scaptomyza unipunctum (Zetterstedt, 1847)139
Scaptomyza yakutica Sidorenko & Toda, 1996802
Zaprionus flavofasciatus (Takada, Beppu & Toda, 1979)11
Total51,006
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Gornostaev, N.G.; Ruchin, A.B.; Esin, M.N.; Lobachev, E.A.; Esina, I.G. The Biological Diversity of Fruit Flies (Diptera: Drosophilidae) in Russia: A Description of a Set of Own and Published Data and a Complete List of Species. Diversity 2025, 17, 490. https://doi.org/10.3390/d17070490

AMA Style

Gornostaev NG, Ruchin AB, Esin MN, Lobachev EA, Esina IG. The Biological Diversity of Fruit Flies (Diptera: Drosophilidae) in Russia: A Description of a Set of Own and Published Data and a Complete List of Species. Diversity. 2025; 17(7):490. https://doi.org/10.3390/d17070490

Chicago/Turabian Style

Gornostaev, Nikolai G., Alexander B. Ruchin, Mikhail N. Esin, Evgeniy A. Lobachev, and Irina G. Esina. 2025. "The Biological Diversity of Fruit Flies (Diptera: Drosophilidae) in Russia: A Description of a Set of Own and Published Data and a Complete List of Species" Diversity 17, no. 7: 490. https://doi.org/10.3390/d17070490

APA Style

Gornostaev, N. G., Ruchin, A. B., Esin, M. N., Lobachev, E. A., & Esina, I. G. (2025). The Biological Diversity of Fruit Flies (Diptera: Drosophilidae) in Russia: A Description of a Set of Own and Published Data and a Complete List of Species. Diversity, 17(7), 490. https://doi.org/10.3390/d17070490

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop