Next Article in Journal
Railway and Road Infrastructure in Saiga Antelope Range in Kazakhstan
Previous Article in Journal
Preliminary Insights into Summer Archaeal Communities in Eutrophic Jinhae Bay, Korea
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Mt. Fuji in the Ocean–Description of a Strange New Species of Sea Anemone, Discoactis tritentaculata fam., gen., and sp. nov. (Cnidaria; Anthozoa; Actiniaria; Actinostoloidea) from Japan, with the Foundation of a New Family and Genus †

1
Department of Marine Bio-Science, Faculty of Life Science and Biotechnology, Fukuyama University, 985 Sanzo, Higashi-Mura Cho, Fukuyama City 729-0292, Hiroshima, Japan
2
Coastal Branch of Natural History Museum and Institute, Chiba, Katsuura 299-5242, Chiba, Japan
3
Misaki Marine Biological Station, School of Science, University of Tokyo, 1024 Misaki, Miura 238-0225, Kanagawa, Japan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act:EA2105B4-D768-40DF-991C-DBC12356B0C2; urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act:B0E8B56E-B622-4AC7-AF85-D8F82FF15E04; urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act:9B346F9E-E38E-4645-BE45-4D8425ECA907.
Diversity 2025, 17(6), 430; https://doi.org/10.3390/d17060430
Submission received: 24 March 2025 / Revised: 3 May 2025 / Accepted: 5 May 2025 / Published: 18 June 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Taxonomy, Phylogeny and Biogeography of Cnidaria)

Abstract

:
A new species in a new family and genus of sea anemone, Discoactis tritentaculata fam. gen. and sp. nov., was discovered at several localities around Japan. These anemones were indicated to belong to the superfamily Actinostoloidea by phylogenetic analyses. However, the specimens have flat, disc-like bodies; triplet tentacles on the oral disc; endocoels without tentacles; 10 macrocnemes in the column; and numerous microcnemes only in the aboral end. These features are unique among not only Actinostoloidea but also sea anemones in general, and thus they could not be accommodated into any existing families and genera in Actinostoloidea. Therefore, we establish the new family Discoactinidae and the new genus Discoactis for this species of anemone. Our phylogenetic analyses also suggested that the family Capneidae, of which the phylogenetic position has not been certainly convinced yet, also should be a member of Actinostoloidea, and thus we revised its placement and discussed the diagnosis of the superfamily. With these results, the superfamily Actinostoloidea now accommodates eight families.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Sea anemones, a well-known marine animal group distributed broadly in the world’s oceans, belong to the order Actiniaria Hertwig, 1882 [1] of the class Anthozoa of the phylum Cnidaria. Actiniaria currently contains approximately 1100 valid species from 264 genera of 50 families [2]. All sea anemones are free-living individual polyps and are composed of only soft tissues in three layers—ectoderm, endoderm, and mesoglea; thus, their bodies are flexible and deformable by habitat effects [3]. Sea anemones have relatively few reliable taxonomic diagnostic characters, and therefore researchers have been puzzled by their taxonomy, often struggling to correctly classify them by morphology [4].
Mesenterial arrangements and sphincter muscles are two of the few effective characters for the classification of sea anemones. Mesenteries are some of the most prominent structures in the body plan of sea anemones. They develop in the direction of the distal–proximal axis and separate the actiniarian coelenteron into partitions. Mesenteries are some of the most important tissues of sea anemones and play multiple roles: supporting the actinopharynx and in the elongation and contraction of the body, digestion, and reproduction. The mesenteries of Actiniaria are distinguished into two types in their bodies: macrocnemes, which are usually distinct and develop several structures such as retractor muscles, gonads, and filaments; and microcnemes, which are small and without these structures [5,6]. The mesenteries usually form pairs with one another and develop in particular cyclic patterns, and the arrangement may differ depending on the species and genera and are thus considered as the important taxonomic characters of sea anemones [4].
Sphincter muscles form the endodermal circular musculature at the upper end of the column to tighten the oral disk. The endodermal musculature is embedded in the mesoglea (“mesogleal sphincter”) or accumulated at the branched mesoglea separate from the main mesogleal body (“endodermal sphincter”) [5]. The type of sphincter, mesogleal or endodermal, is one of most important morphological characters for higher taxon classification within Actiniaria. Although this structure is one of the most characteristic features of Actiniaria, some species have no sphincter, even sometimes at the superfamily level (e.g., Actinernoidea [7])
In 2014, Rodríguez et al. conducted the most comprehensive molecular analyses of Actiniaria to date [8]. The study concluded that the classification system of Carlgren [5] did not accurately reflect the phylogeny, and hence thoroughly revised the classification system of the order Actiniaria. Rodríguez et al. (2014) [8] rearranged the higher taxa of Actiniaria into several superfamilies and suborders (see Table 1 in [9]). In this paper, the superfamily Actinostoloidea Carlgren, 1932 [10], was revived.
Actinostoloidea is one of the three superfamilies of the suborder Enthemonae Rodríguez and Daly, 2014. This suborder was established by Carlgren in 1932 [10] to include Actinostolidae Carlgren, 1932 [10] and Exocoelactinidae Carlgren, 1925 [11]. After that, these families of anemones were accommodated in tribe Mesomyaria [5] but re-established as one of the members of Enthemonae [4,8]. According to the definition of this superfamily, the marginal sphincter muscles of the species of Actinostoloidea are all mesogleal (a key character of Mesomyaria) and the mesenterial pairs of this taxon generally unequally develop in this suborder (“Actinostola rule”; [5] p. 77). These characters have thought to be unique to Actinostoloidea, and anemones of this superfamily have been distinguished from other anemones by the combination of unequally sized mesenterial arrangements and mesogleal sphincter muscles.
Recently, however, peculiar groups have been added into this superfamily. For example, Halcampulactidae Gusmão, Berniler, Deusen, Harris, and Rodríguez, 2019 [12], which have macrocneme–microcneme pairs in the first mesenterial cycle like Edwardsiidae Andres, 1882 [13], do not obey the Actinostola rule. Moreover, Actonostolidae, which accommodates over 20 genera, was divided into several families in 2021 [14] (see the Discussion), and thus the common features of this superfamily have become ambiguous.
In the present study, we report on unique anemone specimens collected from Japanese waters. These anemones have unique features: flat, disc-like bodies; triplet tentacles on the oral disc; endocoels without tentacles; 10 macrocnemes in the column; and numerous microcnemes only in the aboral end. These features do not correspond to any existing anemones, and we report and formally describe this species in this study via morphological and molecular analyses as a member of a new genus and family within Actinostoloidea.
Among the known anemones, based on molecular analyses, the family Capneidae Forbes, 1841 [15] was suggested to be the most related family to our undescribed species by high support rates. Among Capneidae, Capnea geogiana (Carlgren, 1927) was already included in the robust analysis of Rodríguez et al. [8], who placed it within Actinostoloidea. Subsequently, Capneidae was redescribed as a family of Actinostoloidea in 2021 [16]. However, these studies did not revise the definition of Actinostoloidea, and thus the diagnosis of this superfamily still does not support the inclusion of Capneidae concerning the sphincter muscles and mesenterial arrangement. Therefore, here, along with the formal species description of our specimens, we also comprehensively revised the diagnosis of Actinostoloidea to accommodate Capneidae and another new family based on our phylogenetic analyses.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Sample Collection and Preservation

Nine specimens of the unique anemone were collected in this study from several localities of Japan (Figure 1A–D). Two specimens, including the holotype, were collected on 17 May 2003 at Senoumi Bank off Shizuoka Prefecture by the deep tow dredge (a box dredge, 50 cm in length, 35 cm in width, and 15 cm in height [17]) during a research cruise of R/V Natsushima (JAMSTEC, Cruise No. NT 03-05, DT-6C); three paratypes were collected from the west off Misaki, Kanagawa Prefecture with a 50 cm biological dredge on R/V Rinkai-Maru (Misaki Marine Biological Station, University of Tokyo); three more specimens were collected from the southwest off Iki Island, Nagasaki Prefecture or the west off Sukumo, Kochi Prefecture with a 50 cm biological dredge or a beam trawl during a research cruise of R/V Toyoshio-Maru (Hiroshima University); and the final one was collected from the southwest off Otsuchi, Iwate Prefecture by a 50 cm biological dredge on R/V Yayoi (AORI).
Additionally, a specimen of a Capneidae species, identified as Capnea japonica (Carlgren, 1940) [18], was provided from Aquamarine Fukushima aquarium. The specimen was collected off Fukushima Prefecture.
For some specimens, in vitro images of living polyps were taken prior to fixation to record the external form, color, and size of the individuals. Individuals were then anesthetized using a magnesium chloride solution while they elongated their tentacles, and we dissected their tentacle tissues (preserved in 99% ethanol for DNA extraction), which were fixed in a 10–20% (v/v) formalin in sea water solution. The other specimens were preserved directly in a formalin–sea water solution.
The specimens examined have been deposited at either the National Museum of Nature and Science, Tokyo (NSMT), or the Coastal Branch of Natural History Museum and Institute, Chiba (CMNH).

2.2. Preparation of Histological Sections

Histological sections were prepared following standard protocols [19]. Specimens were dissected to obtain tissues. Dissected tissues were dehydrated with ethanol, cleared in xylene, embedded in paraffin, sliced into serial sections (7–10 µm thick) using a microtome, mounted on glass slides, and stained with hematoxylin and eosin. The pictures of these sections were taken by an optical microscope at NSMT.

2.3. Observation with SEM

For Capnea japonica, a specimen was embedded in paraffin with three horizontally dissected parts. Then, the middle parts were dissected by a microtome to sharpen the horizontal surface, deparaffinized with xylol, substituted with butyl alcohol, dried in a t-BuOH freeze dryer, and coated with gold using an ion sputter machine. This tissue was observed using a scanning electron microscope (SEM) for the observation of the three-dimensional mesenterial arrangement.

2.4. Cnidae Observation

Cnidae were observed in the tentacles, actinopharynx, column, and filaments of four specimens (NSMT-Co 1908, 1909, CMNH-ZG 10795, and 10797), although some tissues of some specimens were not examined as they were too damaged (See the description part for the damaged tissues). We also observed the tissues of the basal disc, but no cnidae were observed. Tissues from each part were placed on slide glasses and mounted using a 50% (v/v) glycerin in sea water solution. Images of the cnidae were taken by differential interference contrast microscopy at NSMT. The length and width were measured using the software ImageJ ver. 1.49 [20]. The cnidae nomenclature followed Mariscal (1974) [21].

2.5. Phylogenetic Analyses

DNA was extracted from the tissues preserved in 99% EtOH from two specimens (NSMT-Co 1908 from Misaki and NSMT-Co 1909 from Sea of Japan) by a ChargeSwitch gDNA Micro Tissue Kit (Invitrogen: Minato-Ku, Tokyo, Japan). PCR amplifications were performed in 10 µL reaction volumes, consisting of 0.4 µL of 25 µM forward and reverse primers, 2.0 µL of EmeraldAmp PCR Master Mix (TaKaRa: Kusatsu, Japan), and 3.4 µL of distilled water. For PCR amplifications, three mitochondrial markers—12S, 16S rDNA, and cytochrome oxidase III (COXIII)—and two nuclear markers—18S and 28S rDNA—were used. The primers and amplification conditions are shown in Table 1; all markers were adopted from Rodriguez et al. (2014) [8], though the primer sets of 12S and 28S were different. The PCR products were processed using exonuclease I and shrimp alkaline phosphate (ExoSAP-IT; Thermo Fisher: Waltham, MA, USA) before sequencing. Sequencing reactions were performed using BigDye Terminator Cycle Sequencing Ready Reaction Kit v3.1 (Applied Biosystems: Waltham, MA, USA) and PCR primers (12S, 16S, and COXIII) or PCR primers and internal primers (four internal primers for 18S and three for 28S; Table 1). Sequencing was performed by an ABI 3500xL Genetic Analyzer (Applied Biosystems) at NSMT. Fragments were individually assembled by GeneStudio ver. 2.2.0.0 (https://sourceforge.net/projects/genestudio/; accessed on 15 April 2020). New sequences obtained in this study have been deposited in GenBank (Table 2).
Table 1. Primers and protocols of polymerase chain reactions of every molecular marker.
Table 1. Primers and protocols of polymerase chain reactions of every molecular marker.
MarkerPrimersSequences (5′-3′)PCR ProtocolReferences
12S12S1a TAAGTGCCAGCAGACGCGGT(95 °C for 4 min) + 4 × [(94 °C for 30 s) → (50 °C for 1 min) → (72 °C for 2 min)]
+30 × [(94 °C for 30 s) → (55 °C for 1 min) → (72 °C for 2 min)] + (72 °C for 4 min)
[22]
12S3r ACGGGCAATTTGTACTAACA
16SANEM16SA CACTGACCGTGATAATGTAGCGT(95 °C for 4 min) + 30 × [(95 °C for 30 s) → (46 °C for 45 s) → (72 °C for 1 min)] + (72 °C for 5 min)[23]
ANEM16SB CCCCATGGTAGCTTTTATTCG
COXIIICOIIIFCATTTAGTTGATCCTAGGCCTTGACC(95 °C for 2 min) + 30 × [(95 °C for 30 s) → (46 °C for 45 s) → (72 °C for 1 min)] + (72 °C for 5 min)[23]
COIIIRCAAACCACATCTACAAAATGCCAATATC
18SPCR18SAAACCTGGTTGATCCTGCCAGT(94 °C for 4 min) + 35 × [(94 °C for 20 s) → (57 °C for 20 s) → (72 °C for 1 min 45 s)] + (72 °C for 7 min)[24,25]
18SBTGATCCTTCCGCAGGTTCACCT
Only
Sequence
18SLCCAACTACGAGCTTTTTAACTG
18SCCGGTAATTCCAGCTCCAATAG
18SYCAGACAAATCGCTCCACCAAC
18SOAAGGGCACCACCAGGAGTGGAG
28SPCR1F63sqAATAAGCGGAGGAAAAGAAAC(94 °C for 5 min) + 30 × [(94 °C for 30 s) → (45 °C for 1 min) → (72 °C for 3 min)] + (72 °C for 10 min)[26]
R2077sqGAGCCAATCCTTWTCCCGARGTT
PCR2LSU5TAGGTCGACCCGCTGAAYTTAAGCA(94 °C for 5 min) + 30 × [(94 °C for 30 s) → (45 °C for 1 min) → (72 °C for 3 min)] + (72 °C for 10 min)[27,28,29]
LSU1600RAGCGCCATCCATTTTCAGG
Only
Sequence
LSU330FCAAGTACCGTGAGGGAAAGTTG
LSU900FCCGTCTTGAAACACGGACCAAG
ECD2SCTTGGTCCGTGTTTCAAGACGG
For the phylogenetic analyses of Actiniaria, sequence data of Capnea japonica, a species of Capneidae, Actinostoloidea, were obtained by us [16] using the same methods as mentioned above. In addition, the sequences of sea anemones used by Rodriguez et al. (2014) [8] were also obtained from GenBank (Table 2). The dataset was aligned by MAFFT ver. 7.402 [30] under the default settings. Ambiguously aligned regions were eliminated by Gblocks ver. 0.91b [31]: the type of sequences was DNA and the parameters were the default, except for allowing small final blocks and gap positions within the final blocks. Next, the file was processed by Kakusan 4 [32] to test substitution models for analyses of both RAxML and MrBayes (alignment available from the corresponding author upon request). Maximum-likelihood (ML) analyses were performed by RAxML-VI-HPC [33], with the GTR+Γ evolutionary model recommended by Kakusan 4 and evaluated by 100 bootstrap replicates. Bayesian inference (BI) was conducted using MrBayes ver. 3.2.6 [34] with HKY85_Gamma as the substitution parameter. Two independent runs of the Markov Chain Monte Carlo were carried out simultaneously for 5,000,000 generations, sampling trees every 100 generations and calculating the average standard deviation of split frequencies (ASDSFs) every 100,000 generations. As the ASDSF was calculated based on the last 75% of the samples, the initial 25% of the sampled trees were discarded as the burn-in.
Finally, the two resultant trees were combined by FigTree ver. 1.4.3 (http://tree.bio.ed.ac.uk/software/figtree/; accessed on 15 April 2020) and low bootstrap (<50) and posterior probability values (<0.50) were manually deleted on each node.
The phylogenetic analysis was at first conducted on the level of the order Actiniaria, and then, after the approximate taxonomic position of our undescribed species was confirmed, held on the superfamily level (Table 2).
Table 2. Base sequences in the phylogenetic analyses. Taxa indicated with a gray background were analyzed in this study. Sequences indicated in bold were obtained in this study and deposited in GenBank. Species of Zoanthidea and Relicanthidae were the outgroups for the phylogenetic analysis of the order Actiniaria.
Table 2. Base sequences in the phylogenetic analyses. Taxa indicated with a gray background were analyzed in this study. Sequences indicated in bold were obtained in this study and deposited in GenBank. Species of Zoanthidea and Relicanthidae were the outgroups for the phylogenetic analysis of the order Actiniaria.
Higher TaxaFamiliesGenusSpecies(Remarks)12S16S18S28SCOXIII
Actiniaria
Anenthemonae
ActinernoideaActinernidaeActinernusantarcticus KJ482930KJ482966KJ483023KJ483126-
Isactinernusquadrolobatus KJ482932KJ482968KJ483024KJ483105KJ482998
Synhalcuriaslaevis KJ482942-KJ483021KJ483120-
HalcuriidaeHalcuriaspilatus KJ482931KJ482967KJ483020KJ483109KJ482997
EdwardsioideaEdwardsiidaeEdwardsiajaponica GU473274GU473288GU473304KJ483048GU473359
Edwardsiatimida GU473281-GU473315KJ483088KJ482996
Edwardsianthusgilbertensis EU190728EU190772EU190859EU190817-
Nematostellavectensis EU190750AY169370AF254382KJ483089FJ489501
Enthemonae
ActinostoloideaCapneidaeCapneajaponica(CMNH-ZG 06547; off Misaki)LC602145LC602146LC602147LC602148LC602149
Capneageorgiana -KJ482951KJ483022KJ483050KJ482990
DiscoactinidaeDiscoactistritentaculata(NSMT-Co 1908; off Misaki)LC874807LC875472LC875474LC875477LC876766
Discoactistritentaculata(NSMT-Co 1909; off Iki Island)LC874806LC875473LC875475-LC876767
HalcampulactinidaeHalcampulactissolamar MK279362MK279363MK279364MK279365MK279366
ExocoelactinidaeExocoelactisactinostoloides(CMNH-ZG 05926; off Misaki)KP793003KP793004LC875476LC875478LC876768
ActinostolidaeActinostolacrassicornis -EU190753EU190843KJ483098GU473332
Actinostolachilensis -GU473285GU473302KJ483110GU473357
Actinostolageorgiana KJ482928KJ482952KJ483032KJ483099KJ482991
Antholobaachates GU473269GU473284GU473301KJ483128GU473356
Stomphiadidemon KJ482929EU190795EU190875KJ483127GU473348
Stomphiaselaginella GU473280GU473298GU473314GU473331GU473349
AnthosactinidaeAnthosactisjanmayeni KJ482938GU473292GU473308KJ483091GU473363
Anthosactispearseae EU190751EU190798EU190878EU190841GU473365
Hormosomascotti EU190733EU190778EU190863KJ483090GU473366
Tealidiumkonoplinorum MZ569954MZ567264MZ569926MZ569979MZ576886
SicyonidaeSicyonisdenisovi MZ569948MZ567258MZ569920MZ569973MZ576880
Ophiodiscusbukini MZ569953MZ567263MZ569925MZ569978MZ576885
ActinoideaActiniidaeActiniafragacea EU190714EU190756EU190845EU190845GU473334
Anemoniaviridis EU190718EU190760EU190849EU190849GU473335
Anthopleuraelegantissima EU190713EU190755EU190844EU190844GU473333
Anthostellastephensoni JQ810719JQ810721JQ810723JQ810723JQ810726
Bolocerakerguelensis KJ482925KJ482965KJ483029KJ483029KJ482985
Bunodactisverrucosa EU190723EU190766EU190854EU190854-
Bunodosomagrandis EU190722EU190765EU190853EU190853GU473336
Epiactislisbethae EU190727EU190771EU190858EU190858GU473360
Glyphoperidiumbursa KJ482923KJ482961KJ483033KJ483033KJ482982
Isotealiaantarctica JQ810720JQ810722--JQ810727
Isosicyonisalba -KJ482959KJ483030KJ483030KJ482981
Isosicyonisstriata EU190736EU190781EU190864EU190864FJ489493
Korsaranthusnatalinesis KJ482920KJ482958KJ483017KJ483017KJ482987
Macrodactyladoreenensis EU190739EU190785EU190867EU190867GU473342
Urticinacoriacea GU473282EU190797EU190877EU190877GU473351
ActinodendridaeActinostephanushaeckeli KJ482936EU190762KJ483034KJ483034GU473353
HaloclavidaeHaloclavaproducta EU190734EU190779AF254370AF254370JF833008
Haloclavasp. KJ482924KJ482963KJ483031KJ483031KJ482989
Harenactisargentina KJ482926KJ482964KJ483026KJ483026KJ482984
Peachiacylindrica EU190743EU190789KJ483015KJ483015-
Stephanthusantarcticus KJ482927KJ482960KJ483019KJ483019KJ482983
LiponematidaeLiponemabrevicornis EU190738EU190784EU190866EU190866KJ483001
Liponemamultiporum KJ482922KJ482962---
PhymanthidaePhymanthusloligo EU190745EU190791EU190871EU190871GU473345
PreactiidaeDactylanthusantarcticus GU473272AY345877AF052896AF052896GU473358
Preactismilliardae KJ482921KJ482957KJ483018KJ483018KJ482986
StichodactidaeHeteractismagnifica EU190732EU190777EU190862EU190862KJ482988
MetridioideaActinoscyphiidaeActinoscyphiaplebeia EU190712EU190754FJ489437 KJ483067FJ489476
AiptasiidaeAiptasiamutabilis JF832963FJ489418FJ489438KJ483115FJ489505
Aiptasiapallida EU190715EU190757EU190846EU190803KJ482979
Bartholomeaannulata EU190721EU190763EU190851KJ483068FJ489483
Neoaiptasiamorbilla EU190742EU190788EU190869KJ483075JF833010
AliciidaeAliciasansibarensis KJ482933KJ482953KJ483016KJ483116KJ483000
Triactisproducta EU490525-EU190876KJ483125GU473350
AmphianthidaeAmphianthussp. FJ489413FJ489432FJ489450FJ489467FJ489502
Peronanthussp. KJ482917KJ482956KJ483014KJ483066KJ482976
AndvakiidaeAndvakiaboninensis EU190717EU190759EU190848KJ483053FJ489479
Andvakiadiscipulorum GU473273GU473287GU473316KJ483051-
Telmatactissp. JF832968JF832979KJ483013KJ483135-
AntipodactinidaeAntipodactisawii GU473271GU473286GU473303KJ483074GU473337
BathyphelliidaeBathyphelliaaustralis FJ489402FJ489422EF589063EF589086FJ489482
BoloceroididaeBoloceroidesmcmurrichi GU473270-EU190852KJ483103KJ483002
Bunodeopsisglobulifera KJ482940KJ482949KJ483025KJ483122KJ482992
DiadumenidaeDiadumenecincta EU190725EU190769EU190856KJ483106FJ489490
Diadumeneleucolena JF832957JF832977JF832986KJ483123JF833006
Diadumenesp. JF832960JF832976JF832980KJ483130JF833005
GalantheanthemidaeGalatheanthemumsp. KJ482918KJ482955KJ483012KJ483065KJ482977
Galatheanthemumprofundus KJ482919KJ482954KJ483011KJ483119KJ482978
GonatiniidaeGonactiniaprolifera KJ482935-KJ483008KJ483112KJ482994
Protanteasimplex KJ482939KJ482970KJ483010KJ483078KJ482993
HalcampidaeCactosomasp. nov. GU473279GU473297GU473313GU473329 GU473346
Halcampaduodecimcirrata JF832966EU190776AF254375EU190820-
Halcampoidespurpurea EU190735EU190780AF254380KJ483100-
HaliplanellidaeHaliplanellalineata EU190730EU190774EU190860KJ483108FJ489506
HormathiidaeActinaugerichardi EU190719EU190761EU190850KJ483055FJ489480
Adamsiapalliata FJ489398FJ489419FJ489436KJ483101FJ489474
Allantactisparasitica FJ489399FJ489420FJ489439KJ483056FJ489478
Calliactisjaponica FJ489403FJ489423FJ489441KJ483057FJ489486
Calliactisparasitica EU190711EU190752EU190842KJ483102FJ489475
Calliactispolypus FJ489407FJ489427FJ489445KJ483058FJ489485
Calliactistricolor FJ489405FJ489425FJ489443KJ483059FJ489488
Chondrophelliaorangina FJ489406FJ489426FJ489444KJ483060FJ489489
Hormathiaarmata EU190731EU190775EU190861KJ483062FJ489491
Hormathialacunifera FJ489409FJ489428FJ489446KJ483063FJ489492
Hormathiapectinata FJ489415FJ489430FJ489448FJ489465FJ489497
Paracalliactisjaponica FJ489411FJ489429FJ489447KJ483061FJ489496
Paraphelliactissp. FJ489412FJ489431FJ489449FJ489466FJ489498
IsanthidaeIsanthuscapensis JF832967GU473291GU473307KJ483096GU473362
KadosactinidaeAlvinactischessi GU473278GU473296GU473312KJ483052 GU473352
Cyanantheahourdezi GU473275GU473293GU473309KJ483081GU473364
Kadosactisantarctica FJ489410EU190782EU190865KJ483080FJ489504
Metridiumsenile EU190740EU190786AF052889KJ483076FJ489494
NemathidaeNemanthusnitidus EU190741EU190787EU190868KJ483064FJ489495
PhelliidaePhelliagausapata EU190744EU190790EU190870KJ483054FJ489473
Phelliaexlex JF832958JF832978JF832984KJ483121JF833004
SagartiidaeActinothoesphyrodeta FJ489401FJ489421FJ489440KJ483111FJ489481
Anthothoechilensis FJ489397FJ489416FJ489434FJ489453FJ489470
Cereuspedunculatus EU190724EU190767EU190855EU190813FJ489471
Cereusherpetodes JF832956JF832969 JF832983JF832992-
Sagartiatroglodytes EU190746EU190792EU190872KJ483073FJ489499
Sagartiaornata JF832959JF832975JF832985KJ483069JF833011
Sagartiogetonlaceratus EU190748EU190794EU190874KJ483071FJ489500
Sagartiogetonundatus FJ489400FJ489417FJ489435KJ483070FJ489472
Verrillactispaguri FJ489414FJ489433FJ489440KJ483046FJ489503
ZoanthideaEpizoanthidaeEpizoanthusilloricatus AY995901EU591597KC218424KJ483036-
ParazoanthidaeParazoanthusaxinellae GQ464940EU828754KC218416KJ483044-
Savaliasavaglia AY995905DQ825686HM044299HM044298-
UndknownRelicanthidaeRelicanthusdaphneae KJ482934KJ482971KJ483028KJ483131KJ482999

3. Results and Discussions

3.1. Taxonomic Section

Order ACTINIARIA Hertwig, 1882
Suborder ENTHEMONAE Rodríguez and Daly, 2014
Superfamily ACTINOSTOLOIDEA Carlgren, 1932
(Japanese name: setomono-isoginchaku-jouka: Izumi et al., 2019a)
Family DISCOACTINIIDAE fam. nov.
(New Japanese name: enban-isoginchaku-ka)
urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act:EA2105B4-D768-40DF-991C-DBC12356B0C2
Diagnosis. See the diagnosis of the genus Discoactis.
Type genus. Discoactis gen. nov. (monotypic).
Remarks. Discoactis tritentaculata fam., gen., and sp. nov., collected from several localities in Japan, was the sister group of Capnea of family Capneidae Forbes, 1841 [15] in the present phylogenetic tree (Figure 7). However, there are several differences between Discoactis and Capnea as shown below. Capnea has numerous vesicle-like tentacles [5,16], in contrast to the few slender tentacles of Discoactis (Figure 2). Only Discoactis has endocoels without tentacles (Figure 2), in contrast to Capnea, which develops two or more tentacles in every exocoel/endocoel [5,16,18]. Capnea has conspicuous pinnate endodermal sphincter muscles ([16,18]), one of the characteristic features of this genus, while there is only a weak mesogleal muscle in Discoactis (Figure 3B). Discoactis has only 10 macrocnemes (two dorso-lateral macrocnemes of the first cycle mesenteries are absent; Figure 3C), while Capnea has at least 12 macrocnemes in first cycle. Thus, we judged that it was inappropriate to unify Discoactis into Capneidae even though they were sister groups in the phylogenetic tree (Figure 7). Thus, we established a new family, Discoactinidae fam. nov., for the genus Discoactis.
The most characteristic feature of Discoactinidae is the unequal mesenterial pair in the first cycle, and this mesenterial arrangement is particular in Actinostoloidea. In this superfamily, almost all of the existing families are developing their mesenteries in the first cycle completely [4,5,14]. The only exceptional families are Halcampulactidae Gusmão, Berniker, Deusen, Harris, and Rodriguez, 2019: Halcamplactis solimar has only eight macrocnemes [12]. Therefore, only Halcampulactidae and Discoactinidae have unequally developed mesenterial pairs in the first cycle. However, there is an apparent difference in dorso-lateral mesenteries: in contrast to Halcampulactidae, of which the dorso-lateral mesenterial pair develops unequally [12], Discoactinidae anemones develop the pair equally (also see Discussion). Moreover, they can be distinguished from each other by the distribution of mesenteries in distal–proximal axis. As mentioned below, the mesenteries of D. tritentaculata sp. nov. increase in the proximal part, in contrast to Halcampulactis solimar, which has more microcnemes in the distal end [12]. Additionally, concerning the marginal sphincter muscle, only Discoactinis tritentaculata develops a mesogleal one. D. tritentaculata, therefore, has too unique features to accommodate Halcampulactinidae.
In addition to morphology, we can advocate this based on phylogeny (Figure 7): though the topology around Halcampulactidae is not fixed (it might be ascribed from the long branch attraction of Halcampulactis solimar [12]), at least it is shown that D. tritentaculata is most related to Capneidae (BV/PP = 88/0.99). In conclusion, we can indicate that D. tritentaculata should be accommodated into a new family based on the morphological differences from Capneidae species.
Genus Discoactis gen. nov.
(New Japanese name: enban-isoginchaku-zoku)
urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act:B0E8B56E-B622-4AC7-AF85-D8F82FF15E04
Diagnosis. Actinostoloidea anemone with a very wide pedal disc. Column comparatively smooth, divisible into scapus and capitulum, the former provided with a more or less distinct periderm. Sphincter weak, mesogleal. Tentacles 14–18, long and slender, simple, few in number, arranged in a peculiar pattern: 6 tentacles with each exocoel in first cycle. Eight–twelve tentacles in each exocoel: tentacles absent in the endocoels of the second cycle. Longitudinal muscles of tentacles and radial muscles of oral disc chiefly mesogleal. One siphonoglyph. Mesenteries far more numerous proximally than distally. Three types of mesenteries: 10 perfect macrocnemes; 10–14 imperfect macrocnemes with strong parietals in first and second cycles; and numerous tiny, weaker imperfect microcnemes younger than the third cycle, without filaments, only on the proximal side. Retractor distinct, circumscribed. Parietal muscles well developed in first/second cycles. Cnidom: spirocysts, basitrichs, and microbasic p-mastigophores.
Etymology. The type species of this genus, Discoactis tritentaculata sp. nov., has a very conspicuous basal disc that becomes disc-like in shape after preservation. “Disco-” is derived from this shape; “-actis” means radiated sunshine, and this term has been often used in the names of actiniarian genera.
Type species. Discoactis tritentaculata sp. nov. (monotypic).
Remarks. The most distinguishable character of this genus is existence of endocoels without tentacles on the distal end. While almost all anemones have at least one tentacle in each exocoel/endocoel in the distal end [5], this group has endocoels that bear no tentacles in the second cycle. In addition to the tentacular arrangement, it is also peculiar that two dorso-lateral mesenteries in first mesenterial cycle do not develop into perfect mesenteries. There are only a few known anemones with 10 macrocnemes (Limnactinia Carlgren, 1921 [35] or Decaphellia Bourne, 1918 [36]), and thus this character is also diagnostic of this genus.
Discoactis tritentaculata sp. nov.
(Japanese name: umi-no-fujisan)
urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act:9B346F9E-E38E-4645-BE45-4D8425ECA907
Material examined. Holotype. CMNH-ZG10795: embedded tissues in paraffin, histological sections, prepared nematocysts; collected on 17 May 2003, at Senoumi Bank off Shizuoka Prefecture, 34.587° N, 138.472° E, at 311 m in depth collected during the research cruise of R/V Natsushima (Cruise No. NT03-5, DT-6C) by Kensuke Yanagi. Paratypes: CMNH-ZG10796: dissected specimen and histological sections, same locality, date, and collector as CMNH-ZG. NSMT-Co 1908: dissected specimen, embedded tissues in paraffin, histological sections, prepared nematocysts, 17 April 2018, collected from the west off Misaki, Kanagawa Prefecture, 35°08.328′ N, 139°32.568′ E, at 108–198 m in depth, collected by Hisanori Kohtsuka boarding R/V Rinkai-Maru. NSMT-Co 1910: whole specimen, same locality, date, and collector as NSMT-Co 1908. NSMT-Co 1911: dissected specimen, embedded tissues in paraffin, histological sections, prepared nematocysts, 15 February 2017, collected from the west off Misaki, Kanagawa Prefecture, 35°08.388′ N, 139°33.731′ E, at 95–98 m in depth by Takato Izumi boarding R/V Rinkai-Maru. Other specimens: CMNH-ZG10797: dissected specimen, embedded tissues in paraffin, histological sections, prepared nematocysts, 24 July 2017, collected from the southwest off Otsuchi, Iwate Prefecture, 39°20.929′ N, 142°02.408′ E, at 117–124 m in depth by R/V Yayoi (St-1-4) and Kensuke Yanagi. NSMT-Co 1909: whole specimen, 25 May 2014, collected from the southwest off Iki Island, Nagasaki Prefecture, 33°03.582ʹ N, 129°31.175′ E, at 79–83 m in depth during the research cruise of R/V Toyoshio-Maru (St-9), collected by Takato Izumi. NSMT-Co 1912: whole specimen, same locality, date, and collector as NSMT-Co 1909. NSMT-Co 1913: whole two specimens, 24 October, 2023, collected from the west off Sukumo, Kochi Prefecture, 32°40.257′ N, 132°10.056′ E, at 377–401 m in depth during the research cruise of R/V Toyoshio-Maru (St-2), collected by Takato Izumi
Description. External anatomy. On living specimens (NSMT-Co 1910, 1911), column white or pale yellow, semitransparent in proximal side, and distal end dark red in color. Wholly white on preserved ones. Tentacles striped with pale red and dark red (Figure 2C). Column divisible scapus and scapulus, and drastically broaden towards the proximal end (Figure 2A–D): the width of scapus is ca. 2–4 mm at the distal end but reaches to ca. 15–25 mm at the proximal end (= basal disc) of preserved specimens. The height of preserved specimen is ca. 10–15 mm. Scapus and scapulus smooth, sometimes with transversal wrinkle in preserved specimens (Figure 2A). Pedal disc adherent, semitransparent, almost circular but flexible in outline (Figure 2C). Mouth with indistinct lip. Tentacles 1.5–2.0 mm in length, long and slender, almost the same length from the center to margin (Figure 2A,C). Tentacles 14–18 in number, in a peculiar rule of arrangement: 6 tentacles in each exocoel in first cycle; 8–12 tentacles in each exocoel, with tentacles absent in endocoels of second-cycle mesenteries.
Internal anatomy. Three types of mesenteries: 10 perfect macrocnemes, fertile and with strong retractors and parietals in the first cycle; 10–14 imperfect macrocnemes (Figure 3C) with strong parietals in the first and second cycles; numerous, around 100 in number, imperfect microcnemes, weaker and tiny, between the third to fifth cycles, without filaments (Figure 3G).
Microcnemes sometimes are not equally developed within the same pair of perfect mesenteries (Figure 3G). Mesenteries at the base more numerous than at the margin: microcnemes only on proximal side (Figure 2E and Figure 3G). Only 10 perfect macrocnemes fertile on the proximal side (Figure 3G). Retractors distinct, strong, pinnate, and consist of a main lamella with 10–16 simple branches (Figure 3C,G). Parietal muscles distinct in macrocnemes on the distal side, with 5–15 muscular processes on each side (Figure 3C), but indistinct on the proximal side. Tentacular longitudinal muscle mesogleal, distinct (Figure 3E), and circular muscle endodermal but indistinct (Figure 3D). Columnar circular muscle well-developed (Figure 3B). Sphincter muscle mesogleal and comparatively weak (Figure 3A). Basilar and parietobasilar muscle absent (Figure 3A,B,F). Mesoglea the thickest in the column, ca. 500 µm in thickness, and thick in the actinopharynx, but very thin in the mesenteries and tentacles. Only 10 perfect mesenteries fertile with gonads, but mature gonads absent in all specimens (Figure 3F).
Cnidom. Spirocysts, basitrichs, microbasic p-mastigophores. See Figure 4 and Table 3 for the size and distribution.
Etymology: The species name “tritentaculata” is derived from the tentacular arrangement; that of Discoactis tritentaculata sp. nov. is composed six sets of three tentacles. Japanese name: “Umi-no-Fujisan” means Mt. Fuji (Fujisan) of (no) the ocean (Umi), too. The shape of this sea anemone in living and well-fixed specimens very closely resembles the shape of Mt. Fuji. In addition, from Sagami Bay and Suruga Bay, the habitats of this sea anemone, everyone can see Mt. Fuji over the sea; actually, the authors sometimes conducted sample collection of this species while being able to see the scenery of Mt. Fuji.
Remarks. As we already mentioned in the remarks for the genus, Discoactis tritentaculata sp. nov. is a unique anemone that does not fit with any previously described families and genera in Actinostoloidea. However, in contrast to the singularity of its morphology, D. tritentaculata sp. nov. is a relatively common species and has been widely collected in Japan. Over 10 individuals of this species were collected from the Pacific Ocean, Sagami-Bay (Misaki), Suruga Bay (Senoumi-Bank), Otsuchi-Bay, Bungo Strait (off Sukumo), and Sea of Japan.
Family CAPNEIDAE Gosse, 1860
(Common name: yosai-isoginchaku-ka)
Diagnosis (the arranged point from Carlgren [1949], the diagnosis of Aurelianidae, was shown in bold): Actinostoloidea anemones with a distinct, often wide pedal disc. Column smooth, or with vesicles in its upper part. Sphincter strong, circumscribed. Tentacles very short, vesicle-like, often slightly lobed, few or many communicating with each of the main exo- and endocoels. Longitudinal muscles of tentacles and radial muscles of oral disc endodermal or mesogloeal. A single siphonoglyph, but two pairs of directives. All or most of the mesenteries perfect and fertile. Retractors very strong, strongly restricted, or usually circumscribed.
Remarks: Capneidae, established in Gosse 1860 [37], were previously classified as members of Endomyaria [5] because of their distinct endodermal sphincter muscle. Though the placement of this family became Actinioidea Rafinesque, 1815, as with almost all endomyarians in the thorough rearrangement of the classification of sea anemones [8], Capnea anemones were shown as belonging to superfamily Actinostoloidea Carlgren, 1932 recently by a phylogenetic analysis [38]. The diagnosis of this family had not changed from Carlgren (1949) [5], and thus we only have updated the classification in the diagnosis in this study.
Genus Capnea Gosse, 1860
Capnea japonica (Carlgren, 1940)
Material examined. CMNH-ZG 10798: Dissected specimens and histological sections; collected on 9 December 2020, off Iwaki, Fukushima Prefecture, at 150 m in depth during the research cruise of R/V Iwaki-Maru by Takashi Iwasaki, Masato Ikegawa, and the captain and crews; kept in the tank of Aquamarine Fukushima by Mai Hibino; then, preserved by Takato Izumi. CMNH-ZG 06547: see Yanagi and Izumi (2021).
Description. See Yanagi and Izumi (2021) [16].
Remarks. Based on an additional specimen examined in this study, we found that the pair of mesenteries was not unequally developed. Yanagi and Izumi [16] suggested that the mesenteries were unequally developed within the pair. We find that was a mistake and was caused by the poor sample condition. The retractors develop on each mesentery and are almost the same size within each pair. The retractors are pinnate and circumscribed; so, the main lamellae are completely separated from the mesentery (Figure 5).

3.2. Molecular Phylogeny

The taxonomic position in the order. In the phylogenetic tree of order Actiniaria, species were separated into two clades (Figure 6). One consisted of a clade of species of the suborder Enthemonae Rodríguez and Daly, 2014 (clade indicated by node B in Figure 6) and the other was Anenthemonae Rodríguez and Daly, 2014 (node A in Figure 6). The monophyly of each suborder clade was supported with a bootstrap value of 100% and a posterior probability of 1.00 (the nodes indicated at A and B in Figure 6).
In Enthemonae, as indicated in Rodríguez et al. (2014), there are three clades that correspond to the superfamilies Actinostoloidea Carlgren, 1932 [10], Actinioidea Rafinesque, 1815 [39], and Metridioidea Carlgren, 1893 [40]. Discoactis tritentaculata fam. gen. and sp. nov. (indicated by red box in Figure 6) is included in the clade of Actinostoloidea (indicated by the pale red box) and becomes a sister group with the genus Capnea Forbes, 1841 [15], with almost sufficient phylogenetic support late (nodes C and D).
Internal phylogeny in the superfamily. Discoactis tritentaculata sp. nov. (blue box in Figure 7) is the derived lineage of the superfamily Actinostoloidea and is most related to Capneidae: forming a clade with Capneidae with support of 88% and a posterior probability of 0.99 (Figure 7).
Concerning the other families, Actinostolidae (at least Actinostola Verrill, 1879 and Stomphia Gosse, 1859) is monophyletic (100/1) and Exocoelactinidae is the sister group of Actinostolidae (87/1). Halcampulactidae is the sister of these two families, but the node is not supported well. Those five families become monophyletic (66/1). Anthosactinidae (Anthosactis Danielssen, 1890, Hormosoma Stephenson, 1918, and Antholoba Hertwig, 1882) becomes polyphyletic in this analysis.
The clade of Discoactis tritentaculata is shown by the blue box, and the families are indicated nearby the OTUs. Numbers connected with slash characters above the branches indicate the ML bootstrap support values followed by the BI posterior probabilities of nodes A and B. Numbers without slash characters indicate the ML bootstrap support values of the nodes (bootstrap values ≥ 50% and posterior probabilities ≥ 0.50 are shown).
The two clades of suborders are indicated by bars. Numbers connected with slash characters above the branches indicate the ML bootstrap support values followed by the BI posterior probabilities. Numbers without slash characters indicate the ML bootstrap support values of the nodes (bootstrap values ≥50% are shown). Nodes A and B indicate the bases of the clades of suborders Anenthemonae and Enthemonae, respectively; node C is the base of the superfamily Actinostoloidea; and node D is the node of Discoactis tritentaculata and the family Capneidae.

4. Discussion

Recent transition of families belonging to Actinostoloidea.
After establishing Actinostoloidea Carlgren, 1932, the anemones in this group had been accommodated in the previous tribe Mesomyaria (Carlgren, 1949) because all previous families, Actinostolidae Carlgren, 1932 and Exocoelactinidae Carlgren, 1925, of Actinostoloidea have mesogleal sphincters [10,11,41]. However, recently, Rodríguez et al. (2014) [8] re-established this taxon as one of the members of Enthemonae, obeying their phylogenetic tree. According to the definition of Rodríguez et al. [8], the marginal sphincter muscles of the species of Actinostoloidea are all mesogleal (same as the characters of Mesomyaria) and the mesenterial pairs of this taxon are unequally developed in this suborder.
However, our previous research [16] suggested that there is a clade of sea anemones that have strange features (for Actinostoloidea) in the superfamily clade: Capneidae species form an internal clade of Actinostoloidea with high support. Despite Capnea geogiana, a species of Capneidae, already being included in the analysis by Rodríguez et al. [8] and the fact that this species is in the Actinostoloidea clade, they completely ignored this result and put Capnea into superfamily Actinioidea. However, the results of phylogenetic trees of the previous studies [8,12,14,42] and the present study show Capnea to be certainly in the superfamily of Actinostoloidea, and this result should not be neglected. This family, however, has peculiar morphological features that do not completely correspond to the main features of this superfamily: Capnea does not have a mesogleal sphincter but instead has an endodermal sphincter [15,16]. On the other hand, it was not certain whether Capneidae possessed unequally developed mesenterial pairs, an important feature of this superfamily in the study by Rodriguez et al. [8], or not.
Two more families of Actinostoloidea have been described after the re-establishment of this superfamily in 2024: one is Halcampulactidae Gusmão, Berniler, Deusen, Harris, and Rodríguez, 2019. According to Gusmão et al. (2019) [12], Halcampulactis solimar Gusmão, Berniler, Deusen, Harris, and Rodríguez, 2019, the only species of this family, has peculiar features: it has an elongated body, develops only eight macrocnemes like Edwardsiidae, lacks marginal sphincter muscles and basal discs, and lives in sand by burrowing [12]. Though these morphological features and ecologies are quite peculiar and completely different from the other families of Actinostoloidea, it was confirmed that Halcampuractidae certainly belongs to this superfamily (Figure 6 and Figure 7; [12]). The other recently described family within Actinostoloidea is Tetracoelactinidae Sanamyan Sanamyan, Sanamyan, Galkin, Ivin, and Bocharova, 2021 [14] with the genus Tetracoelactis Sanamyan and Sanamyan, 2019, originally established as one genus of Exocoelactinidae [37] from this family.
Moreover, Sanamyan et al. (2021) [14] established one more family, Anthosactinidae Sanamyan, Sanamyan, Galkin, Ivin and Bocharova, 2021 and reinstated the family Sicyonidae Hertwig, 1882 by splitting Actinostolidae based on the phylogenetic analysis of this superfamily. Though Actinostolidae had been a huge family with containing many genera (around 20), this family was divided by moving some genera to Anthosactinidae and Sicyonidae (see Table 4).
Therefore, Discoactinidae becomes the eighth family in the present study. (Though WoRMS [43] also contains Halcampoididae Appellöf, 1896 in this superfamily, the taxonomic position is doubted [14]).
Reconsidering of the diagnosis of superfamily Actinostoloidea.
As mentioned above, the number of families in Actinostoloidea has rapidly increased. As to the taxonomic change, discussing the diagnostic features of this superfamily is necessary.
Now, among Actinostoloidea, there is only one characteristic feature that diagnoses this superfamily: “generally having unequally developed mesenterial pairs”. This feature apparently characterizes the “Actinostola rule” in Actinostolidae and Anthosactinidae and “Exocoelactis rule” in Exocoelactinidae, which also have rarely been observed in the other families in Actinostoloidea: first cycle of Halcampulactis [12], one pair of perfect mesenteries in Sicyonidae, and one of the second pair of Tetracoelactinidae [14]. In the present study, the ventrolateral pairs of Discoactis also follow this diagnosis (Figure 3). However, based on our observations, Capneidae anemones never have this character at all, at least in the adult phase (Figure 5).
Then, it is also possible that Actinostoloidea is characterized by bilateral symmetry, as Sanamyan et al. (2021) [14] discussed. According to them, biradial symmetry may be the plesiomorphy of sea anemones and bilateral symmetry might be derived in sea anemones. The unequal mesenterial pairs which represent this superfamily can frequently clarify dorsal–ventral (D-V) axis: for example, the lateral first cycle mesenterial pairs of Discoactis tritentaculata and Halcampulactis solimar [12], which do not develop equally, can help us to distinguish the dorsal and ventral sides. In addition, anemones of Exocoelactinidae [4,41], Sicyonidae, and Tetracoelactinidae [14] can be distinguished the D-V axis. However, we cannot ensure that Capneidae, in which unequal mesenterial pairs are absent, shows bilateral symmetry or not, at least based on our materials. Moreover, there are species in which the mesenterial arrangement represents not bilateral but biradial symmetry in Actinostolidae, at least in the genus Stomphia [5]. Therefore, it is not favorable to define this superfamily by a bilateral symmetric mesenterial arrangement as the diagnostic character.
In conclusion, we can conclude that there is an exceptional group even the most prominent character that generally represents this superfamily. In other words, the last character by which superfamily Actinostoloidea was characterized has now disappeared. Based on those results, we now have revised the diagnosis again to accommodate those families and Discoactinidae fam. nov., as described below.
Superfamily Actinostoloidea Carlgren, 1932 [10]
Diagnosis (after Gusmão and Rodríguez (2021) [42] with editions in bold). Enthemonae with or sometimes without basilar muscles, a mesogleal or endodermal marginal sphincter and no acontia or acontioids; rarely lacking basilar muscles and marginal sphincter muscle. Aboral end mostly flat and adherent; sometimes with physa. Column usually smooth; rarely with cuticles and rows of tubercles. Mesenteries often differentiated but sometimes not differentiated into macro- and microcnemes. Mesenteries of same pair often unequally developed: sometimes they only existing in juvenile stage or completely absent, depending on the families. Retractors usually diffuse weak or strong, sometimes circumscribed, pinnate. Cnidom: gracile spirocysts, basitrichs, holotrichs, b-mastigophores, and p-mastigophores A.
Included families. Actinostolidae; Exocoelactinidae; Halcampulactidae; Anthosactinidae; Tetracoelactinidae; Sicyonidae; Capneidae; Discoactinidae fam. nov.
See Table 4 for a comparison of all current families included in the suborder Actinostoloidea.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, T.I. and K.Y.; methodology, T.I. and K.Y.; software, T.I.; validation, T.I.; formal analysis, T.I.; investigation, T.I. and K.Y.; resources, H.K.; data curation, T.I. and K.Y.; writing—original draft preparation, T.I.; writing—review and editing, K.Y. and H.K.; visualization, T.I.; supervision, K.Y.; project administration, T.I. and K.Y.; funding acquisition, T.I., K.Y. and H.K. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was financially aided by the following budgets: Sasakawa Scientific Research Grant from the Japan Science Society (No. 27-528) and JSPS KAKENHI (JP 17J03267 to T.I. and JP25440211 to K.Y.). This research was also aided by JAMBIO, Japanese Association for Marine Biology.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in this study are included in the article. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

We acknowledge the vessels by which Discoactis tritentaculata sp. nov. were collected, their crew, and co-collectors, as well as the crews of R/V Natsushima (JAMSTEC) and participants of the cruise NT 03-05; R/V Rinkai-Maru, Mamoru Sekifuji, Michiyo Kawabata (MMBS of UT-Tokyo), and the participants of the 12th JAMBIO Coastal Organism Joint Survey; crews of R/V Toyoshio-Maru, Susumu Otsuka and Kaori Wakabayashi (Hiroshima University) and participants of research cruises on May 2014 and October 2023; crews of R/V Yayoi, Masato Hirose (AORI of UT-Tokyo), and participants of the sampling of Otsuchi in 2017. Concerning the collection of Capnea japonica, the Marine Science Museum, Fukushima Prefecture, Aquamarine Fukushima, and Takashi Iwasaki, Masato Ikegawa, and the captain and crews of R/V Iwaki-Maru(Fukushima Prefectural Fisheries and Marine Science Research Centre) helped us, and we acknowledge them. We also acknowledge Takuma Haga and Shimpei Hiruta (NSMT) for teaching us about phylogenetic analyses.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Hertwig, R. Die Actinien der Challenger Expedition. Gustav Fisch 1882, 119, 14. [Google Scholar]
  2. Fautin, D.G. Catalog to families, genera, and species of orders Actiniaria and Corallimorpharia (Cnidaria: Anthozoa). Zootaxa 2016, 4145, 1–449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Titus, B.M.; Benedict, C.; Laroche, R.; Gusmão, L.C.; Van Deusen, V.; Chiodo, T.; Meyer, C.P.; Berumen, M.L.; Bartholomew, A.; Yanagi, K.; et al. Phylogenetic relationships among the clownfish-hosting sea anemones. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 2019, 139, 106526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Yanagi, K. Chapter 4, Actiniaria. In How to Study Sessile Organisms: Revised; The Sessile Organisms Society of Japan, Ed.; Kouseisha Kouseikaku: Tokyo, Japan, 2017; pp. 53–87. (In Japanese) [Google Scholar]
  5. Carlgren, O. A Survey of the Ptychodactiaria, Corallimorpharia and Actiniaria; Kungliga Svenska Vetenskapsakademiens Handlingar: Stockholm, Sweden, 1949; Volume 1, pp. 1–121. [Google Scholar]
  6. Shick, J.M. A Functional Biology of Sea Anemones; Chapman & Hall: London, UK, 1991; 395p. [Google Scholar]
  7. Izumi, T.; Fujii, T.; Yanagi, K.; Fujita, T. Fluorescent Anemones in Japan—Comprehensive Revision of Japanese Actinernoidea (Cnidaria: Anthozoa: Actiniaria: Anenthemonae) with Rearrangements of the Classification. Diversity 2023, 15, 773. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Rodríguez, E.; Barbeitos, M.S.; Brugler, M.R.; Crowley, L.M.; Grajales, A.; Gusmão, L.; Häussermann, V.; Reft, A.; Daly, M. Hidden among sea anemones: The first comprehensive phylogenetic reconstruction of the Order Actiniaria (Cnidaria, Anthozoa, Hexacorallia) reveals a novel group of hexacorals. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e96998. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Izumi, T.; Fujii, T.; Yanagi, K. Introduction to the latest classification system of Actiniaria and proposals for Japanese names of higher taxa. TAXA 2019, 46, 54–63. (In Japanese) [Google Scholar]
  10. Carlgren, O. Die Ceriantharien, Zoantharien und Actiniarien des arktischen Gebietes. In Eine Zusammenstellung der Arktischen Tierformen mit Besonderer Berücksichtigung des Spitzbergen-Gebietes auf Grund der Ergebnisse der Deutschen Expedition in das Nördliche Eismeer im Jahre 1898; Römer, F., Schaudinn, F., Brauer, A., Arndt, W., Eds.; Gustav Fischer: Jena, Germany, 1932; pp. 255–266. [Google Scholar]
  11. Carlgren, O. Zur Kenntnis der Hexacorallen. Zool. Anz. 1925, 65, 87–99. [Google Scholar]
  12. Gusmão, L.C.; Berniker, K.; Van Deusen, V.; Rodríguez, E. Halcampulactidae (Actiniaria, Actinostoloidea), a new family of burrowing sea anemones with external brooding from Antarctica. Polar Biol. 2019, 42, 1271–1286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Andres, A. Prodromus neapolitanae actiniarum faunae addito generalis actiniarum bibliographiae catalogo. Mitth. Zool. Stn. Neapal 1881, 2, 305–371. [Google Scholar]
  14. Sanamyan, N.P.; Sanamyan, K.E.; Galkin, S.V.; Ivin, V.V.; Bocharova, E.S. Deep water Actiniaria (Cnidaria: Anthozoa) Sicyonis, Ophiodiscus and Tealidium: Re-evaluation of Actinostolidae and related families. Invertebr. Zool. 2021, 18, 385–449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Forbes, E. Contributions to British actinology. I. On Kapnea, a new helianthoid polype. Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist. 1841, 7, 81–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Yanagi, K.; Izumi, T. Redescription of the sea anemone Capnea japonica (Cnidaria: Anthozoa: Actiniaria). Species Divers. 2021, 26, 153–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Momma, H.; Hotta, H. Deep Tow Dredge and Shovel Sampler. Jpn. Agency Mar.-Earth Sci. Technol. 1989, 21, 251–257. [Google Scholar]
  18. Carlgren, O. A contribution to the knowledge of the structure and distribution of the cnidae in the Anthozoa. Lunds Univ. Årsskrift 1940, 36, 1–62. [Google Scholar]
  19. Presnell, J.K.; Schreibman, M.P. Humason’s Animal Tissue Techniques, 5th ed.; Johns Hopkins University Press: Baltimore, MD, USA, 1997. [Google Scholar]
  20. Rasband, W.S. (1997–2012) ImageJ, U.S. National Institutes of Health: Bethesda, Maryland, USA. Available online: http://imagej.nih.gov/ij/ (accessed on 17 October 2020).
  21. Mariscal, R.N. Nematocysts. In Coelenterate Biology: Reviews and New Perspectives; Muscatine, L., Lenhoff, H.M., Eds.; Academic Press: New York, NY, USA, 1974; pp. 129–178. [Google Scholar]
  22. Sinniger, F.; Montoya-Burgos, J.I.; Chevaldonné, P.; Pawlowski, J. Phylogeny of the order Zoantharia (Anthozoa, Hexacorallia) based on the mitochondrial ribosomal genes. Mar. Biol. 2005, 147, 1121–1128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Geller, J.B.; Walton, E.D. Breaking up and getting together: Evolution of symbiosis and cloning by fission in sea anemones (genus Anthopleura). Evolution 2001, 55, 1781–1794. [Google Scholar]
  24. Medlin, L.; Elwood, H.J.; Stickel, S.; Sogin, M.L. The characterization of enzymatically amplified eukaryotic 16S-like rRNA-coding regions. Gene 1988, 71, 491–499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Apakupakul, K.; Siddall, M.E.; Burreson, E.M. Higher level relationships of leeches (Annelida: Clitellata: Euhirudinea) based on morphology and gene sequences. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 1999, 12, 350–359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Medina, M.; Collins, A.G.; Silberman, J.D.; Sogin, M.L. Evaluating hypotheses of basal animal phylogeny using complete sequences of large and small subunit rRNA. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2001, 98, 9707–9712. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Littlewood, D.T.J.; Curini-Galletti, M.; Herniou, E.A. The interrelationships of Proseriata (Platyhelminthes: Seriata) tested with molecules and morphology. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 2000, 16, 449–466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Williams, S.T.; Reid, D.G.; Littlewood, D.T.J. A molecular phylogeny of the Littorininae (Gastropoda: Littorinidae): Unequal evolutionary rates, morphological parallelism and biogeography of the Southern Ocean. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 2003, 28, 60–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Williams, S.T.; Ozawa, T. Molecular phylogeny suggests polyphyly of both the turban shells (family Turbinidae) and the superfamily Trochoidea (Mollusca: Vetigastropoda). Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 2006, 39, 33–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Katoh, K.; Standley, D.M. MAFFT multiple sequence alignment software version 7: Improvements in performance and usability. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 2013, 30, 772–780. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Castresana, J. Gblocks Server. 2002. Available online: http://molevol.cmima.csic.es/castresana/Gblocks_server.html (accessed on 20 January 2022).
  32. Tanabe, A.S. Kakusan4 and Aminosan: Two programs for comparing nonpartitioned, proportional and separate models for combined molecular phylogenetic analyses of multilocus sequence data. Mol. Ecol. Resour. 2011, 11, 914–921. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Stamatakis, A. RAxML-VI-HPC: Maximum likelihood-based phylogenetic analyses with thousands of taxa and mixed models. Bioinformatics 2006, 22, 2688–2690. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Ronquist, F.; Huelsenbeck, J.P. MrBayes 3: Bayesian phylogenetic inference under mixed models. Bioinformatics 2003, 19, 1572–1574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Carlgren, O. Actiniaria Part, I. In Danish Ingolf-Expedition; Hagerup: Copenhagen, Denmark, 1921; Volume 5, pp. 1–241. [Google Scholar]
  36. Bourne, G.C. On some new Phelliinae from New Guinea. Q. J. Microsc. Sci. 1918, 63, 31–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Sanamyan, N.P.; Sanamyan, K.E. Tetracoelactis ioran, a new genus and species of deep-sea anemones of the family Exocoelactinidae (Cnidaria: Anthozoa: Actiniaria) from the Northwestern Pacific Ocean. Zoosystematica Ross. 2019, 28, 238–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Gosse, P.H. A History of the British Sea-Anemones and Corals; Van Voorst: London, UK, 1860; 362p. [Google Scholar]
  39. Rafinesque, C.S. Analyse de la Nature ou Tableau de l’Univers et des Corps Organisés; Rafinesque, C.S., Ed.; Gallia: Palerme, Italy, 1815; 224p. [Google Scholar]
  40. Carlgren, O. Studien über nordische Actinien. K. Sven. Vetenskapsakademiens Handl. 1893, 25, 1–148. [Google Scholar]
  41. Yanagi, K.; Fujii, T.; Hirose, M. Redescription of the sea anemone Exocoelactis actinostoloides (Cnidaria: Anthozoa: Actiniaria) based on a topotypic specimen collected from Tokyo Bay, Japan. Species Divers. 2015, 20, 199–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Gusmão, L.C.; Rodríguez, E. Two sea anemones (Cnidaria: Anthozoa: Actiniaria) from the Southern Ocean with evidence of a deep-sea, polar lineage of burrowing sea anemones. Zool. J. Linn. Soc. 2021, 193, 1–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Rodríguez, E.; Fautin, D.; Daly, M. World List of Actiniaria. Actinostolidae Carlgren, 1932. World Register of Marine Species. Available online: https://www.marinespecies.org/aphia.php?p=taxdetails&id=100655 (accessed on 7 January 2025).
  44. Verrill, A.E. Notice of recent additions to the marine fauna of the eastern coast of North America, No. 5. Am. J. Sci. Arts 1879, 17, 472–474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Sampling localities of Discoactis tritentaculata fam. gen. and sp. nov. in this study. A: Kanagawa and Shizuoka Prefs. A1: Senoumi Bank, Suruga Bay; A2: Misaki, Sagami Bay. B: Otsuchi, Iwate Pref. C: Iki, Nagasaki Pref. D; Sukumo, Kochi Pref.
Figure 1. Sampling localities of Discoactis tritentaculata fam. gen. and sp. nov. in this study. A: Kanagawa and Shizuoka Prefs. A1: Senoumi Bank, Suruga Bay; A2: Misaki, Sagami Bay. B: Otsuchi, Iwate Pref. C: Iki, Nagasaki Pref. D; Sukumo, Kochi Pref.
Diversity 17 00430 g001
Figure 2. External morphology of Discoactis tritentaculata. (A,B,D,E) Views of a preserved specimen, and (C) view of living specimen. (A) Tentacles elongated (CMNH-ZG 10795). (B) Tentacles contracted (CMNH-ZG 10796). (C) Oral view of the oral disc of NSMT-Co 1908. (D) Proximal view of the basal disc (CMNH-ZG 10796). (E) Enlarged view of D (CMNH-ZG 10796). I–V indicates the number of the mesenterial cycle. Abbreviations: bd, basal disc; cap, capitulum; scs, scapus; te, tentacle. Scale bars indicate 5 mm in (AD), 1 mm in E, 100 µm.
Figure 2. External morphology of Discoactis tritentaculata. (A,B,D,E) Views of a preserved specimen, and (C) view of living specimen. (A) Tentacles elongated (CMNH-ZG 10795). (B) Tentacles contracted (CMNH-ZG 10796). (C) Oral view of the oral disc of NSMT-Co 1908. (D) Proximal view of the basal disc (CMNH-ZG 10796). (E) Enlarged view of D (CMNH-ZG 10796). I–V indicates the number of the mesenterial cycle. Abbreviations: bd, basal disc; cap, capitulum; scs, scapus; te, tentacle. Scale bars indicate 5 mm in (AD), 1 mm in E, 100 µm.
Diversity 17 00430 g002
Figure 3. Internal morphology of Discoactis tritentaculata. (A,CG) CMNH-ZG 10795, (B) CMNH-ZG 10796. (A,B) Longitudinal section of the distal end; (C) transverse section of the upper column; (D) longitudinal section of a tentacle; (E) transverse section of a tentacle; (F) transverse section of the proximal end (basal disc); (G) enlarged view of the transverse section of the column. I–V indicates the number of the mesenterial cycle. Abbreviations: a, actinopharynx; cap, capitulum; fi, filament; ima, imperfect macrocneme; me, mesoglea; mi, microcneme; ov, ovary; pa, parietal muscle; pma, perfect macrocneme; rm, retractor muscle; sp, sphincter muscle (mesogleal); tcm, tentacle circular muscle; tlm, tentacle longitudinal muscle. Scale bars indicate 1 mm in (AC,F) and 100 µm in (D,E,G).
Figure 3. Internal morphology of Discoactis tritentaculata. (A,CG) CMNH-ZG 10795, (B) CMNH-ZG 10796. (A,B) Longitudinal section of the distal end; (C) transverse section of the upper column; (D) longitudinal section of a tentacle; (E) transverse section of a tentacle; (F) transverse section of the proximal end (basal disc); (G) enlarged view of the transverse section of the column. I–V indicates the number of the mesenterial cycle. Abbreviations: a, actinopharynx; cap, capitulum; fi, filament; ima, imperfect macrocneme; me, mesoglea; mi, microcneme; ov, ovary; pa, parietal muscle; pma, perfect macrocneme; rm, retractor muscle; sp, sphincter muscle (mesogleal); tcm, tentacle circular muscle; tlm, tentacle longitudinal muscle. Scale bars indicate 1 mm in (AC,F) and 100 µm in (D,E,G).
Diversity 17 00430 g003
Figure 4. Cnidae of Discoactis tritentaculata (CMNH-ZG10795). (A) Spirocyst of the tentacle; (B) basitrichs of the tentacle; (C) basitrich of the actinopharynx; (D) gracile microbasic p-mastigophore in the actinopharynx; (E) robust microbasic p-mastigophore in the actinopharynx; (F) basitrich of the column; (G) small microbasic p-mastigophore in the actinopharynx; (H) large microbasic p-mastigophore in the actinopharynx.
Figure 4. Cnidae of Discoactis tritentaculata (CMNH-ZG10795). (A) Spirocyst of the tentacle; (B) basitrichs of the tentacle; (C) basitrich of the actinopharynx; (D) gracile microbasic p-mastigophore in the actinopharynx; (E) robust microbasic p-mastigophore in the actinopharynx; (F) basitrich of the column; (G) small microbasic p-mastigophore in the actinopharynx; (H) large microbasic p-mastigophore in the actinopharynx.
Diversity 17 00430 g004
Figure 5. SEM image of a cross section of the mesenteries of Capnea japonica (CMNH-ZG 10798). (A) Directive mesenteries with outer side retractor muscles. (B) Three pairs of equally developed mesenteries with pinnate, circumscribed retractor muscles. Abbreviations: d, directive mesentery; r, retractor muscle; s, siphonoglyph. Left and right arrows indicate each pair of mesenteries. Scale bars indicate 500 μm.
Figure 5. SEM image of a cross section of the mesenteries of Capnea japonica (CMNH-ZG 10798). (A) Directive mesenteries with outer side retractor muscles. (B) Three pairs of equally developed mesenteries with pinnate, circumscribed retractor muscles. Abbreviations: d, directive mesentery; r, retractor muscle; s, siphonoglyph. Left and right arrows indicate each pair of mesenteries. Scale bars indicate 500 μm.
Diversity 17 00430 g005
Figure 6. Maximum-likelihood tree of the order Actiniaria based on the combined dataset of mitochondrial 12S and 16S rDNA, cytochrome oxidase III (COXIII) DNA, and nuclear 18S and 28S rDNA (total 6943 bp). Two clades of suborders are indicated by bars. Numbers connected with slash characters above branches indicate ML bootstrap support values followed by BI posterior probabilities. Numbers without slash characters indicate ML bootstrap support values of the nodes (bootstrap values of ≥50% are shown). Nodes in A and B indicate the bases of the clades of suborder Anenthemonae and Enthemonae, respectively; node C is the base of the superfamily Actinostoloidea; and node D is the node of Discoactis tritentaculata and the family Capneidae.
Figure 6. Maximum-likelihood tree of the order Actiniaria based on the combined dataset of mitochondrial 12S and 16S rDNA, cytochrome oxidase III (COXIII) DNA, and nuclear 18S and 28S rDNA (total 6943 bp). Two clades of suborders are indicated by bars. Numbers connected with slash characters above branches indicate ML bootstrap support values followed by BI posterior probabilities. Numbers without slash characters indicate ML bootstrap support values of the nodes (bootstrap values of ≥50% are shown). Nodes in A and B indicate the bases of the clades of suborder Anenthemonae and Enthemonae, respectively; node C is the base of the superfamily Actinostoloidea; and node D is the node of Discoactis tritentaculata and the family Capneidae.
Diversity 17 00430 g006
Figure 7. Maximum-likelihood tree of the order Actiniaria based on the combined dataset of mitochondrial 12S and 16S rDNA, cytochrome oxidase III (COXIII) DNA, and nuclear 18S and 28S rDNA (total 4043 bp). The clade of Discoactis tritentaculata is showed by the blue box, and the families are indicated nearby the OTU. Numbers connected with slash characters above branches indicate ML bootstrap support values followed by BI posterior probabilities of nodes A and B. Numbers without slash characters indicate ML bootstrap support values of the nodes (bootstrap values of ≥50% and posterior probabilities of ≥0.50 are shown).
Figure 7. Maximum-likelihood tree of the order Actiniaria based on the combined dataset of mitochondrial 12S and 16S rDNA, cytochrome oxidase III (COXIII) DNA, and nuclear 18S and 28S rDNA (total 4043 bp). The clade of Discoactis tritentaculata is showed by the blue box, and the families are indicated nearby the OTU. Numbers connected with slash characters above branches indicate ML bootstrap support values followed by BI posterior probabilities of nodes A and B. Numbers without slash characters indicate ML bootstrap support values of the nodes (bootstrap values of ≥50% and posterior probabilities of ≥0.50 are shown).
Diversity 17 00430 g007
Table 3. Cnidom of Discoactis tritentaculata fam. gen. and sp. nov.
Table 3. Cnidom of Discoactis tritentaculata fam. gen. and sp. nov.
Discoactis tritentaculata Izumi, Yanagi, and Kohtsuka, 202x
CMNH-ZG 10795 (Suruga Bay)NSMT-Co 1908 (Sagami Bay)
Length × Width (µm)MeanSDNFrequencyLength × Width (µm)MeanSDNFrequency
Tentacle
basitrichs 13.6–21.9 × 2.0–3.318.6 × 2.61.71 × 0.3227numerous13.4–20.5 × 1.7–3.117.0 × 2.51.95 × 0.3529numerous
spirocysts 17.5–52.0 × 2.4–4.532.4 × 3.38.28 × 0.4688numerous15.3–41.4 × 2.1–4.625.6 × 3.36.99 × 0.6648numerous
Actinopharynx
basitrichs 11.7–15.4 × 1.9–2.913.3 × 2.41.07 × 0.2813few11.8–14.1 × 1.8–2.613.4 × 2.10.82 × 0.285rare
microbasic p-mastigophoresgracile19.5–26.9 × 3.4–4.823.6 × 4.01.44 × 0.3636numerous20.8–25.5 × 3.3–5.122.8 × 4.21.24 × 0.3926numerous
robust20.9–25.6 × 5.4–7.423.6 × 6.41.15 × 0.4734numerous20.0–25.3 × 5.3–6.722.3 × 5.81.62 × 0.4111few
Column
basitrichs 11.2–15.9 × 2.0–2.413.2 × 2.21.71 × 0.154rare10.0–16.2 × 1.7–2.813.1 × 2.31.88 × 0.304rare
Filament
spirocysts ----none21.3–26.6 × 2.5–3.024.6 × 2.82.39 × 0.253rare
holotrichs ----none23.1–23.7 × 6.3–6.623.5 × 6.50.35 × 0.172rare
microbasic p-mastigophoressmall18.8–21.7 × 4.1–6.220.6 × 4.90.82 × 0.5110few16.2–20.8 × 3.3–5.118.2 × 4.21.50 × 0.509few
large28.2–36.1 × 4.8–7.632.2 × 6.51.71 × 0.5975numerous22.5–28.6 × 4.7–6.225.2 × 5.51.49 × 0.3833numerous
Discoactis tritentaculata Izumi, Yanagi, and Kohtsuka, 202x
CMNH-ZG 10797 (Otsuchi)NSMT-Co 1908 (Sea of Japan)
Length × Width (µm)MeanSDNFrequencyLength × Width (µm)MeanSDNFrequency
Tentacle
basitrichs 14.2–18.9 × 2.0–3.716.5 × 2.50.99 × 0.2529numerous13.9–18.3 × 2.1–2.916.3 × 2.51.20 × 0.2215numerous
spirocysts 15.2–30.1 × 2.1–3.822.6 × 3.24.57 × 0.4620numerous14.2–42.4 × 2.1–4.124.8 × 2.96.77 × 0.5149numerous
Actinopharynx Damaged
basitrichs 14.5–20.6 × 2.3–3.018.3 × 2.62.05 × 0.257few
microbasic p-mastigophores 16.6–26.3 × 3.5–6.723.7 × 4.82.04 × 0.9824numerous
Column
basitrichs 10.2–15.5 × 1.9–3.313.1 × 2.51.34 × 0.3517numerous10.6–20.1 × 1.9–3.313.2 × 2.53.08 × 0.457few
Filament No cnidae observed in the specimen
basitrichs 17.2–21.1 × 1.7–3.019.4 × 2.51.17 × 0.2822numerous
spirocysts 27.1–31.2 × 2.5–3.029.1 × 2.72.02 × 0.252rare
microbasic p-mastigophoressmall17.2–26.8 × 3.5–6.622.0 × 5.12.50 × 0.7258numerous
large
Table 4. Comparison of Discoactinidae fam. nov., Capneidae, and the other six families of superfamily Actinostoloidea.
Table 4. Comparison of Discoactinidae fam. nov., Capneidae, and the other six families of superfamily Actinostoloidea.
Discoactinidae fam. nov.Capneidae Gosse, 1860Actinostolidae Carlgren, 1932Anthosactinidae Sanamyan, Sanamyan, Galkin, Ivin, and Bocharova, 2021
Type genusDiscoactis gen. nov.Capnea Forbes, 1841Actinostola Verrill, 1879Anthosactis Danielssen, 1890
The other generaNoneActinoporus Duchassaing, 1850Antholoba Hertwig, 1882
Antiparactis Verrill, 1899
Bathydactylus Carlgren, 1928
Cnidanthus Carlgren, 1927
Glandulactis Riemann-Zürneck, 1978
Hadalanthus Carlgren, 1956
Ophiodiscus Hertwig, 1882
Paranthus Andres, 1883
Parasicyonis Carlgren, 1921
Pseudoparactis Stephenson, 1920
Pycnanthus McMurrich, 1893
Stomphia Gosse, 1859
Synsicyonis Carlgren, 1921
Hormosoma Stephenson, 1918
Tealidium Hertwig, 1882
Characters
Number of macrocnemes
in the first cycle
10121212
Marginal sphincter musclePresent but weakPresent, strongPresentPresent
(origin)(mesogleal)(endodermal)(mesogleal)(mesogleal)
Location of unequal mesenterial pairsVentrolateral mesenteries in first cycleNoneThird cycle or fourth cycleFourth cycle
Remarks on a mesenterial developing ruleOriginal developmentFollowing the general rule of ActiniariaGenerally following the “Actinostola rule”
ReferencesThe present study[5,15,16,38][4,5,10,14,43,44][14]
Sicyonidae Hertwig, 1882Exocoelactinidae Carlgren, 1925Tetracoelactinidae Sanamyan, Sanamyan, Galkin, Ivin, and Bocharova, 2021Halcampulactidae Gusmão, Berniker, Deusen, Harris, and Rodriguez, 2019
Type genusSicyonis Hertwig, 1882 Exocoelactis Carlgren, 1925Tetracoelactis Sanamyan and Sanamyan, 2019Halcampulactis Gusmão, Berniker, Deusen, Harris, and Rodríguez, 2019
The other generaNoneNoneNoneNone
Characters
Number of macrocnemes
in the first cycle
1212128
Marginal sphincter muscleAbsentPresentPresentAbsent
(Origin)-(mesogleal)(mesogleal)-
Location of unequal mesenterial pairsEqualAfter the third cycleSecond and third cyclesLateral mesenteries in the first cycle
Remarks of mesenterial developing rule Following to “Exocoelactis rule” (same as Edwardsiidae)
References[14][4,41][14,37][12]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Izumi, T.; Yanagi, K.; Kohtsuka, H. Mt. Fuji in the Ocean–Description of a Strange New Species of Sea Anemone, Discoactis tritentaculata fam., gen., and sp. nov. (Cnidaria; Anthozoa; Actiniaria; Actinostoloidea) from Japan, with the Foundation of a New Family and Genus. Diversity 2025, 17, 430. https://doi.org/10.3390/d17060430

AMA Style

Izumi T, Yanagi K, Kohtsuka H. Mt. Fuji in the Ocean–Description of a Strange New Species of Sea Anemone, Discoactis tritentaculata fam., gen., and sp. nov. (Cnidaria; Anthozoa; Actiniaria; Actinostoloidea) from Japan, with the Foundation of a New Family and Genus. Diversity. 2025; 17(6):430. https://doi.org/10.3390/d17060430

Chicago/Turabian Style

Izumi, Takato, Kensuke Yanagi, and Hisanori Kohtsuka. 2025. "Mt. Fuji in the Ocean–Description of a Strange New Species of Sea Anemone, Discoactis tritentaculata fam., gen., and sp. nov. (Cnidaria; Anthozoa; Actiniaria; Actinostoloidea) from Japan, with the Foundation of a New Family and Genus" Diversity 17, no. 6: 430. https://doi.org/10.3390/d17060430

APA Style

Izumi, T., Yanagi, K., & Kohtsuka, H. (2025). Mt. Fuji in the Ocean–Description of a Strange New Species of Sea Anemone, Discoactis tritentaculata fam., gen., and sp. nov. (Cnidaria; Anthozoa; Actiniaria; Actinostoloidea) from Japan, with the Foundation of a New Family and Genus. Diversity, 17(6), 430. https://doi.org/10.3390/d17060430

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop