Next Article in Journal
Changes in the Species Composition and Structure of Large-Diameter Trees Along a Narrow Latitudinal Gradient in Subtropical China
Previous Article in Journal
Assessing Local Distribution of Alien Ponto-Caspian Mysids in Lithuanian Waters, the Baltic Sea Basin: Do Sampling Method and Time Matter?
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Testing a Hump-Shaped Pattern with Increasing Elevation for Ant Species Richness in Daliang Mountain, Sichuan, China

Key Laboratory of Forest Disaster Warning and Control in Yunnan Province, College of Forestry, Southwest Forestry University, Kunming 650224, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Diversity 2025, 17(5), 308; https://doi.org/10.3390/d17050308
Submission received: 4 February 2025 / Revised: 19 April 2025 / Accepted: 21 April 2025 / Published: 24 April 2025

Abstract

:
Ants have long been regarded as ubiquitous insects that are indicators of environmental change and ecosystems. Understanding the patterns of ant species richness along elevational gradients is crucial for elucidating their ecological functions within ecosystems. However, there is currently no comprehensive consensus on the pattern. In this study, we explored the pattern of ant species richness along an elevational gradient in the Mt. Daliang region (Sichuan, China), a biodiversity conservation hotspot in China. The ant species richness was investigated using 115 plots 50 × 50 m in size, distributed across 12 elevation bands of 250 m interval between 750 to 3500 m a.s.l. We identified 157 ant species from 51 genera and seven subfamilies. Myrmicinae was the most diverse subfamily, consisting of 20 genera and 84 species, followed by Formicinae, Dolichoderinae, Ponerinae, Dorylinae, Amblyoponinae, and Proceratiinae. We found a unimodal distribution pattern of ant species richness along the elevational gradient, with the highest ant species richness occurring at mid-elevations. This hump-shaped pattern of ant species richness was presented alongside the temperature variation. Furthermore, our results indicated that ground-foraging ant species were the most abundant in this region and that ants prefer to nest in the soil. Our findings highlight the importance of elevation in influencing ant species richness in Daliang Mountain, Sichuan, China, and provide novel insights into the potential drivers of elevational gradients in ant species communities.

1. Introduction

Ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) are ubiquitous social insects, which inhabit nearly all terrestrial ecosystems except the polar regions and extremely cold areas above the snow line in high mountains [1]. They play multiple roles ecologically, including serving as seed dispersers for plants [2], engaging in mutualistic relationships with sap-sucking insects [3], and acting as hosts for a variety of associated organisms [4]. However, certain ant species can adversely impact human life, damage crops, and spread diseases [5,6,7,8,9]. Ants exhibit remarkable diversity, with 14,312 species across 343 genera and 16 subfamilies [10]. In China, 1113 ant species from 119 genera and 12 subfamilies have been documented [11]. Elevational gradients are recognized as crucial determinants of ant species richness [12]. Ant richness is often regarded as an indicator of forest health and overall biodiversity [13,14,15]. Their ecological significance and high diversity make ants an ideal model system for studying species richness distribution patterns [16,17,18,19,20,21,22]. Previous studies at multiple scales showed that ant species richness does not follow a single pattern along elevational gradients [12,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37]. Generally, there are three main trends, as follows: (1) a monotonous decrease with increasing elevation [12,35,36]; (2) low-elevation plateaus [37]; and (3) a hump-shaped pattern, where richness peaks at middle elevation [34,38]. Among these, the hump-shaped pattern of ant species richness has been the most frequently reported [37]. Despite many studies investigating the patterns of ant species along elevational gradients [12,35,36,37,38], a consensus on these patterns remains elusive [37]. Therefore, further work is needed in different mountainous regions, particularly those that have not been previously studied. Given the unparalleled significance of montane ecosystems, exploring the distribution pattern of ant species could provide crucial insights for the conservation of species diversity.
Mountains are recognized as biodiversity hotspots [39]. Their intricate topography and diverse climatic conditions have given rise to a unique and diverse fauna [40]. They provide an ideal natural location for testing ecological hypotheses [41,42,43]. In fact, mountains present compressed versions of regional and elevational gradients in the distribution patterns of species richness [32,44,45,46]. Such patterns are frequently linked to environmental variables [23,47]. A recent study suggested that elevation’s impacts on the species diversity of plants and soil microbes are strongly mediated by thermal variation. This finding emphasizes the importance of elevation and temperature in driving the diversity of plants, bacteria, and fungi in Qinghai–Tibetan alpine wetlands [48]. Temperature has been shown to play a crucial role in shaping ant species richness in relation to elevation [23,37]. A global analysis of the elevational patterns in ant richness indicates that these patterns are driven by a complex interaction of multiple factors, such as temperature and area distribution [12,23,37,49]. The importance of temperature as an explanatory variable for the distribution of ant richness distribution across the mountain could predict species changes under climate change [32,50]. Furthermore, microhabitats can have a significant impact on ant species richness [34,51,52,53]. Many ant species are functionally associated with their specific microhabitats [32,51,52]. Understanding how ant species richness responds to these environmental factors can, thus, assist in exploring the mechanisms underlying richness patterns. This, in turn, can enhance our comprehension of both the ecological and evolutionary impacts of the elevational gradient on the ant community within a particular mountain [32,50].
The Daliang Mountain is located in the transition zone between the Tibetan Plateau, the Yunnan–Guizhou Plateau, and the Sichuan Basin, which is made up of the Sichuan–Yunnan Plate and the South China Plate, and has a subtropical semi-humid climate [34,54,55,56]. Despite the remarkable geographical and ecological diversity of Mt. Daliang, there is currently still very little information available on the richness of ant species in this region. Moreover, a thorough examination of the ant richness distribution pattern and its driving factors in Mt. Daliang has not yet been conducted. Therefore, the aim of this study was to comprehensively investigate the number of ant species, and to determine the ant species richness pattern by testing the following hypothesis: ants exhibit a hump-shaped pattern with maximum species richness at the middle elevation along an elevation gradient of Daliang Mountain, Sichuan, China.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Sampling Design

The Daliang Mountain is located in Liangshan Yi Autonomous Prefecture, Sichuan Province, China. It lies at the junction of Sichuan and Yunnan provinces and on the southeastern edge of the Qinghai–Tibet Plateau, serving as the watershed of Jinshakou and Mabian River. The terrain in this region is intricate, characterized by significant elevation variations, and a highly diverse climate, which has led to rich biodiversity [57]. Elevational gradients are considered an important factor for understanding ant species richness because of the extensive variations in climate and habitat [8,12]. Our study was conducted along an elevation gradient in Daliang Mountain (Figure 1). In this study, a total of 115 sample plots (50 m × 50 m) were established along the elevational gradient. We examined elevational gradients between 750 m a.s.l. to 3500 m a.s.l. with 250 m elevation intervals in Mt. Daliang. The elevation ranges of species was divided into 12 elevational bands. In each sample plot, five independent squares (1 m × 1 m) were established. Due to the complexity of the field environment, there may be some deviation when choosing specific sample plots. However, the error range was maintained within ±50 m a.s.l. The sample sites and vegetation types of this study are presented in Figure 2 and Table S1.

2.2. Survey Method

In this study, ant species were collected using a standardized plot-based sampling methodology to maximize the number of ant species [58]. Firstly, five 1 × 1 m quadrats were systematically established within each 50 m × 50 m plot using the diagonal sampling method, maintaining the 10 m intervals between sampling points. All visible ant species within each quadrat were counted and collected. Subsequently, soil cores (20 cm depth) were excavated using a shovel, and sieved through handheld mesh pans to collect and record subterranean ants. Secondly, a 2 m × 2 m white sheet was deployed beneath target vegetation. One researcher vigorously shook the vegetation over the sheet for 60 s to dislodge arboreal species. Displaced species were immediately examined, collected, and labeled. Thirdly, comprehensive habitat surveys were conducted for 60 min across seven microhabitats, namely ground surface, under stone, tree canopy, rotten wood, moss, trunk, and litter. Ants were collected using aspirators and soft forceps and counted. Meanwhile, the air temperature was recorded for each plot using a mini temperature humidity meter (UNI-T, UT333). Finally, after finishing the above investigation, the information of sample plot location, geographical location, elevation, vegetation type, microhabitats, and investigated time and collector were recorded, and then photos of the sample plots were taken. These specimens were preserved in 2 mL cryopreservation tubes containing 100% ethanol, and then subsequently transported to the laboratory for taxonomic identification and analysis.

2.3. Ant Specimen Processing and Identification

For each species we mounted a minimum of 9 ant individuals on triangular paper points. Ant specimens were identified based on the external morphological traits of workers of ants, such as the head, antennae, eye, mesosoma, mandible, pronotum, etc. [11]. Moreover, these ant specimens were carefully verified by an ant taxonomist, Professor Zheng-Hui Xu (Southwest Forestry University). Voucher specimens were deposited in the Southwest Forestry University Herbarium, Yunnan, China.

2.4. Statistical Analysis

The relationships of ant species richness with elevation and temperature were analyzed using logistic regressions. To conduct this analysis, the regression analyses were performed with the average of ant species richness across all plots for each elevation band as the response variable and elevation and temperature as explanatory variables. Differences in ant species number in different microhabitats were analyzed by an independent samples t-test. All statistical analyses were performed in R v.4.2.2 [59].

3. Results

In total, 112,328 individual ants were collected across 115 sampling plots in the Daliang Mountain, Scichuan Province, China. A total of 157 ant species belonging to 51 genera and 7 subfamilies (Amblyoponinae, Proceratiinae, Ponerinae, Dorylinae, Myrmicinae, Dolichoderinae, and Formicinae) were identified (Figure 3 and Table S2). Within the Daling Mountain region, Myrmicinae was the most diverse subfamily, comprising 20 genera and 84 species. It was followed by Formicinae (12 genera and 39 species), Dolichoderinae (7 genera and 14 species), Ponerinae (7 genera and 13 species), Dorylinae (3 genus and 4 species), Amblyoponinae (1 genus and 2 species), and Proceratiinae (1 genus and 1 species). Among these genera, Pheidole and Tetramorium were the most species-rich, with each containing 12 species. Among 112,328 individuals, the 2 ant species with the highest number of individuals in this area were Paraparatrechina aseta (Forel) and Pheidole nietneri Emery. Furthermore, we found a hump-shaped distribution of ant species richness along the elevational gradient in the Daliang Mountain region, with the peak richness occurring at mid-elevation (Figure 4a, Table S3). Similar to the relationship between the elevational gradient and ant species richness, the mean temperature also exhibited a unimodal association with ant species richness (Figure 4b).
A total of eight types of ant foraging sites (with the tree crown not depicted in Figure 5) were observed, as shown in Figure 5 and Table S4. The number of ant species engaged in foraging on the ground surface was significantly greater than that of ant species in the soil, beneath stone, within the tree crown, on rotten wood, in moss, on the trunk and in the littler, respectively (Figure 6a). However, no significant differences were found among the number of foraging ant species from beneath stone, within the tree crown, on rotten wood, in moss, on the trunk, and in the litter (p > 0.05). Moreover, five types of ant nesting sites were detected (Figure 6b). The number of ant species nesting in the soil was significantly higher than that of the number of ant species from the ground surface, under stones, on rotten wood, and in the littler, respectively (Figure 6b).

4. Discussion

Ants are critical components of terrestrial food webs, serving as a keystone taxa in ecological interactions and mediating multiple ecosystem processes. Their remarkable sensitivity to environmental changes makes them an ideal indicator for monitoring abiotic, biotic, and functional changes [15]. This study represents the comprehensive ant inventory in the Mt. Daliang region of China. Such inventories are fundamental to biodiversity conservation for formulating and implementing conservation strategies [60]. Among the identified genera, Pheidole, consisting of 23,721 individuals across 12 species, and Tetramorium, with 5325 individuals and 12 species, emerged as the most diverse. Among all the species surveyed, Paraparatrechina aseta had the highest number of individuals (12190). Additionally, twenty-two genera were represented by only a single species within our collection. In the Mt. Daliang region, similar to the Western Sichuan Plateau in China [34,35], the richness of Palaearctic genera, like Myrmica and Lasius, surpassed that of the Oriental genera, such as Prenolepis and Leptogenys. However, this richness pattern differed from Yunnan, China [61], and Nepal [36]. These disparities might be attributed to such factors as research objectives, sampling methods, and the surveyed area. Our findings are in line with ant species lists from China’s neighboring regions and countries. This similarity is particularly evident in terms of the dominant subfamilies and commonly occurring genera, as seen in southern China [62], southwest China [34,35,63], Yunnan, China [61], northwestern Siwalik, India [64], Jammu and Kashmir, India [65], and in Nepal [36]. Moreover, our results align with earlier research that has recognized Pheidole as one of the three most species-rich genera globally (Camponotus, Crematogaster, and Pheidole) [36,66].
Ant species richness patterns typically show three distinct trends along elevational gradients. The most frequently observed is a hump-shaped pattern with maximum species richness at the middle elevation, followed by a richness plateau at low elevation and a monotonous decrease with elevation in the number of ant species [12,28,35,36,37,67,68,69,70,71,72]. The Mt. Daliang region is a subtropical semi-humid climate zone, with a section of the Jinsha River’s dry and hot valley [73]. In the present study, we found that ant species richness peaks at the middle elevation, exhibiting a hump-shaped pattern with increasing elevation in the Daliang Mountain region. The spatial distribution of the variation of ant species was consistent with a recent study conducted in the Central and Northern Parts of the Western Sichuan Plateau, China [34]. This study confirms that the unimodal pattern of species richness along the elevation gradient would be typical in lower latitude and dry mountain systems [37,74,75,76,77,78,79]. It is noteworthy that the ant species richness gradient also displayed a unimodal pattern with increasing temperature. Given that temperature decreases by an average 6 °C for each 1000 m increased in elevation [80], temperature could regulate local species richness, with a threshold occurring at specific elevations. However, when this threshold is surpassed, ant species richness becomes constrained by either low or high temperature, thereby leading to reduced ant species richness [37,50]. As a consequence, the highest species richness is likely to be found in middle elevation bands with a moderate temperature [15].
Ant species richness may be further modulated by microhabitat heterogeneity [81,82,83]. In our study, it was found that ant species foraging on the ground surface and within the soil were relatively the most abundant, and the number of ant species building nests in soil was the highest. This finding is in line with previous investigations [34,53,56,84,85,86,87,88,89,90]. As an open area with rich food resources, ample sunlight, relatively high temperatures, and comparatively low humidity, the ground surface was a favored foraging site for ant species [53]. The majority of ant species choose to nest in soil. This is because temperatures and humidity in the soil are more stable compared to exposed above-ground locations [91]. In mountainous environments, nests beneath stones are common microhabitats. Stones provide stability and strength and are able to absorb sufficient sunshine to maintain a warm nest environment [92,93,94]. The regulation of temperature in brood chambers is facilitated by building chambers in the soil nest [90]. Moreover, numerous other factors, such as food availability, evolutionary history, biogeography, competition, dispersal ability, have the potential to impact the selection of nesting sites [22,91,92,95,96,97].

5. Conclusions

Our results support the hypothesis that the pattern of ant species richness along the elevational gradients in the Mt. Daliang region is hump-shaped, with peak richness observed at mid-elevations. Furthermore, the distribution pattern of ant species richness is also influenced by temperature and microhabitats. Additionally, this investigation recorded 157 ant species belonging to 51 genera and 7 subfamilies, highlighting the remarkable richness of ant fauna in Mt. Daliang. Our findings suggests that future research should consider more factors to determine the key mechanisms underlying the elevational pattern of ant species richness.

Supplementary Materials

The supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/d17050308/s1, Table S1: Sample plot location in Daliang Mountain, Sichuan, China; Table S2: The occurrence of ant species in each band of elevation; Table S3: The mean of ant species richness were from every 250 m increase in elevation across 115 sampled plots; Table S4: Ant community composition and microhabitats in the Daliang Mountain, Sichuan, China.

Author Contributions

X.-M.Z. and Z.-H.X. conceived the ideas for the study; S.-J.Y. and X.-M.Z. collected the data; S.-J.Y. and X.-M.Z. analyzed the data and wrote the paper. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 31760633, 32060122), and Yunnan Provincial Science and Technology Department-Applied Basic Research Joint Special Funds of Agriculture (202301BD070001-151, 202101BD070001-057).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data in this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Guénard, B. An overview of the species and ecological diversity of ants. In eLS; John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.: Chichester, UK, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  2. Beattie, A.J.; Hughes, L. Ant-plant interactions. In Plant-Animal Interactions: An Evolutionary Approach; Herrera, C.M., Pellmyr, O., Eds.; Blackwell Science: Oxford, UK, 2002; p. 334. [Google Scholar]
  3. Way, M.J. Mutualism between ants and honeydew-producing Homoptera. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 1963, 8, 307–344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Kronauer, D.J.; Pierce, N.E. Myrmecophiles. Curr. Biol. 2011, 21, R208–R209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Tschinkel, W.R. The fire ant (Solenopsis invicta): Still unvanquished. In Biological Pollution: The Control and Impact of Invasive Exotic Species; McKnight, B.N., Ed.; Indiana Academy of Science: Indianapolis, IN, USA, 1993; pp. 121–136. [Google Scholar]
  6. Stafford, C.T. Hypersensitivity to fire ant venom. Ann. Allergy Asthma Immunol. 1996, 77, 87–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Walker, D.H.; Barbour, A.G.; Oliver, J.H.; Lane, R.S.; Dumler, J.S.; Dennis, D.T.; Persing, D.H.; Azad, A.F.; McSweegan, E. Emerging Bacterial Zoonotic and Vector-Borne Diseases: Ecological and Epidemiological Factors. JAMA 1996, 275, 463–469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Xu, Z.H. Study on the Biodiversity of Formicidae in Xishuangbanna Nature Reserve; Yunnan Science and Technology Press: Kunming, China, 2002. [Google Scholar]
  9. Kim, C.W.; Choi, S.Y.; Park, J.W.; Hong, C.S. Respiratory allergy to the indoor ant (Monomorium pharaonis) not related to sting allergy. Ann. Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2005, 94, 301–306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Bolton, B. An Online Catalog of the Ants of the World. Available online: http://www.antcat.org/ (accessed on 22 June 2024).
  11. AntWiki. 2024. Available online: https://www.antwiki.org/ (accessed on 9 December 2024).
  12. Marathe, A.; Priyadarsanan, D.R.; Krishnaswamy, J.; Shanker, K. Spatial and climatic variables independently drive elevational gradients in ant species richness in the Eastern Himalaya. PLoS ONE 2020, 15, e0227628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Stephens, S.S.; Wagner, M.R. Using ground foraging ant (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) functional groups as bioindicators of forest health in northern Arizona ponderosa pine forests. Environ. Entomol. 2006, 35, 937–949. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Majer, J.D.; Orabi, G.; Bisevac, L. Ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) pass the bioindicator scorecard. Myrmecol. News 2007, 10, 69–76. [Google Scholar]
  15. Tiede, Y.; Schlautmann, J.; Donoso, D.A.; Wallis, C.I.B.; Bendix, J.; Brandl, R.; Farwig, N. Ants as indicators of environmental change and ecosystem processes. Ecol. Indic. 2017, 83, 527–537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Dunn, R.R.; Sanders, N.J.; Fitzpatrick, M.C.; Laurent, E.; Lessard, J.P.; Agosti, D.; Andersen, A.N.; Bruhl, C.; Cerda, X.; Ellison, A.M.; et al. Global ant (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) biodiversity and biogeography-a new database and its possibilities. Myrmecol. News 2007, 10, 77–83. [Google Scholar]
  17. Guénard, B.; Weiser, M.D.; Dunn, R.R. Global models of ant diversity suggest regions where new discoveries are most likely are under disproportionate deforestation threat. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2012, 109, 7368–7373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Guénard, B.; Weiser, M.D.; Gómez, K.; Narula, N.; Economo, E.P. The Global Ant Biodiversity Informatics (GABI) database: Synthesizing data on the geographic distribution of ant species (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Myrmecol. News 2017, 24, 83–89. [Google Scholar]
  19. Gibb, H.; Dunn, R.R.; Sanders, N.J.; Grossman, B.F.; Photakis, M.; Abril, S.; Agosti, D.; Andersen, A.N.; Angulo, E.; Armbrecht, I.; et al. A global database of ant species abundances. Ecology 2017, 98, 883–884. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Economo, E.P.; Narula, N.; Friedman, N.R.; Weiser, M.D.; Guénard, B. Macroecology and macroevolution of the latitudinal diversity gradient in ants. Nat. Commun. 2018, 9, 1778. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Kass, J.M.; Guénard, B.; Dudley, K.L.; Jenkins, C.N.; Azuma, F.; Fisher, B.L.; Parr, C.L.; Gibb, H.; Longino, J.T.; Ward, P.S.; et al. The global distribution of known and undiscovered ant biodiversity. Sci. Adv. 2022, 8, eabp9908. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Schultheiss, P.; Nooten, S.S.; Wang, R.; Wong, M.K.L.; Brassard, F.; Guénard, B. The abundance, biomass, and distribution of ants on Earth. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2022, 119, e2201550119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Sanders, N.J.; Lessard, J.; Fitzpatrick, M.C.; Dunn, R.R. Temperature, but not productivity or geometry, predicts elevational diversity gradients in ants across spatial grains. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 2007, 16, 640–649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Sabu, T.K.; Vineesh, P.J.; Vinod, K.V. Diversity of forest litter-inhabiting ants along elevations in the Wayanad region of the Western Ghats. J. Insect Sci. 2008, 8, 69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Olson, D.M. The distribution of leaf litter invertebrates along a Neotropical altitudinal gradient. J. Trop. Ecol. 1994, 10, 129–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Fisher, B.L. Ant diversity patterns along an elevational gradient in the Reserve Naturelle Integrale d’s Andringitra, Madagascar. Fieldiana Zool. 1996, 85, 93–108. [Google Scholar]
  27. Samson, D.A.; Rickart, E.A.; Gonzales, P.C. Ant Diversity and Abundance along an Elevational Gradient in the Philippines. Biotropica 1997, 29, 349–363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Brühl, C.A.; Mohamed, M.; Linsenmair, K.E. Altitudinal distribution of leaf litter ants along a transect in primary forests on Mount Kinabalu, Sabah, Malaysia. J. Trop. Ecol. 1999, 15, 265–277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Majer, J.; Kitching, R.; Heterick, B.; Hurley, K.; Brennan, K. North-South Patterns within Arboreal Ant Assemblages from Rain Forests in Eastern Australia. Biotropica 2001, 33, 643–661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Araújo, L.M.; Fernandes, G.W. Altitudinal patterns in a tropical ant assemblage and variation in species richness between habitats. Lundiana 2003, 4, 103–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Longino, J.T.; Colwell, R.K. Density compensation, species composition, and richness of ants on a neotropical elevational gradient. Ecosphere 2011, 2, 1–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Munyai, T.; Foord, S. Ants on a mountain: Spatial, environmental and habitat associations along an altitudinal transect in a centre of endemism. J. Insect Conserv. 2012, 16, 677–695. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Sanders, N.J.; Rahbek, C. The patterns and causes of elevational diversity gradients. Ecography 2012, 35, 1–3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Li, Z.Y.; Xu, Z.H.; Zhang, X.M.; Li, T.; Yin, X.D.; Duan, J.H. Ant Species Diversity in the Central and Northern Parts of the Western Sichuan Plateau in China. Diversity 2023, 15, 935. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Yin, X.D.; Xu, Z.H.; Zhang, X.M.; Li, T.; Han, X. Ant diversity and distribution patterns along an elevational gradient in the northern part of western Sichuan Plateau, China. Orient. Insects 2023, 58, 278–292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Subedi, I.P.; Budha, P.B.; Kunwar, R.M.; Charmakar, S.; Ulak, S.; Pradhan, D.K.; Pokharel, Y.P.; Velayudhan, S.T.; Sathyapala, S.; Animon, I. Diversity and Distribution of Forest Ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) in Nepal: Implications for Sustainable Forest Management. Insects 2021, 12, 1128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Szewczyk, T.; McCain, C.M. A Systematic Review of Global Drivers of Ant Elevational Diversity. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0155404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Bharti, H.; Sharma, Y.P.; Bharti, M.; Pfeiffer, M. Ant species richness, endemicity and functional groups, along an elevational gradient in the Himalayas. Asian Myrmecol. 2013, 5, 79–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Myers, N.; Mittermeier, R.A.; Mittermeier, C.G.; da Fonseca, G.A.; Kent, J. Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities. Nature 2000, 403, 853–858. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Lomolino, M.V. Elevation gradients of species-density: Historical and prospective views. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 2001, 10, 3–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Korner, C. Why are there global gradients in species richness? Mountains might hold the answer. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2000, 15, 513–514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Carina, H.; Allison, P.; Alexandre, A. Mountains, Climate and Biodiversity; John Wiley and Sons: New York, NY, USA, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  43. Rahbek, C.; Borregaard, M.K.; Colwell, R.K.; Dalsgaard, B.; Holt, B.G.; Morueta-Holme, N.; Nogues-Bravo, D.; Whittaker, R.J.; Fjeldså, J. Humboldt’s enigma: What causes global patterns of mountain biodiversity? Science 2019, 365, 1108–1113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Jankowski, J.E.; Ciecka, A.L.; Meyer, N.Y.; Rabenold, K.N. Beta diversity along environmental gradients: Implications of habitat specialization in tropical montane landscapes. J. Anim. Ecol. 2009, 78, 315–327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Pryke, J.; Samways, M. Significant variables for the conservation of mountain invertebrates. J. Insect Conserv. 2010, 14, 247–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Wu, F.; Yang, X.J.; Yang, J.X. Additive diversity partitioning as a guide to regional montane reserve design in Asia: An example from Yunnan Province, China. Divers. Distrib. 2010, 16, 1022–1033. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Ruggiero, A.; Hawkins, B.A. Why do mountains support so many species of birds? Ecography 2008, 31, 306–315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Ding, B.; Feng, L.; Ba, S.; Jiang, X.; Liu, G.; Liu, W. Temperature drives elevational diversity patterns of different types of organisms in Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau wetlands. iScience 2023, 26, 107252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Sanders, N.J. Elevational gradients in ant species richness: Area, geometry, and Rapoport’s rule. Ecography 2002, 25, 25–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Paraskevopoulos, A.W.; Sanders, N.J.; Resasco, J. Temperature-driven homogenization of an ant community over 60 years in a montane ecosystem. Ecology 2024, 05, e4302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Brassard, F.; Leong, C.M.; Chan, H.H.; Guénard, B. High Diversity in Urban Areas: How Comprehensive Sampling Reveals High Ant Species Richness within One of the Most Urbanized Regions of the World. Diversity 2021, 13, 358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Brassard, F.; Murphy, B.P.; Andersen, A.N. The Impacts of Fire Vary among Vertical Strata: Responses of Ant Communities to Long-Term Experimental Burning. Ecol. Appl. 2024, 34, e3025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Qian, Y.S.; Chen, C.; Qi, B.; Guo, N.Y.; Xu, Z.H.; Zhang, X.M. Distribution patterns of formicidae insects from middle Daliangshan of Sichuan province. J. Yangzhou Univ. 2022, 43, 111–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Zhu, S.Z. Forest changes of Liangshan Moutain areas in Sichuan Province in history. J. Chin. Hist. Geogr. 2007, 22, 43–52. [Google Scholar]
  55. Luo, C.L.; Xu, Z.H.; Xiong, Z.P.; Qi, B.; Yuan, D.Y.; Ran, M.J. Distribution patterns of ant species from Wanglang Nature Reserve and adjacent areas of Sichuan Province. J. Zhejiang AF Univ. 2019, 36, 638–645. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Ouyang, Y.; Zhang, J.H.; Liu, H.; Huang, H.X.; Zhang, T.J.; Huang, Y. Classification of soil parent materials in mountain areas of Southwest China based on geological formations: A case study of Daliangshan region. Geol. Surv. China 2021, 8, 51–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Wang, W.X.; Wang, J.Y.; Chen, W.D. Diversity and Flora Analysis of Spermatophyte in Liangshan Mountains, Sichuan Province. J. Lishui Univ. 2024, 46, 20–30. [Google Scholar]
  58. Agosti, D.; Majer, J.; Alonso, L.E.; Schultz, T.R. (Eds.) Ants: Standard Methods for Measuring and Monitoring Biodiversity; Biological Diversity Handbook Series; Smithsonian Institution Press: Washington, DC, USA, 2000; p. 280. [Google Scholar]
  59. R Core. Team R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing; R Foundation for Statistical Computing: Vienna, Austria, 2022; Available online: http://www.r-project.org/index.html (accessed on 10 October 2022).
  60. Pfeiffer, M.; Mezger, D.; Hosoishi, S.; Bakhtiar, E.; Kohout, R.J. The Formicidae of Borneo (Insecta: Hymenoptera): A preliminary species list. Asian Myrmecol. 2011, 4, 9–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Liu, C.; Guénard, B.; Hita Garcia, F.; Yamane, S.; Blanchard, B.; Yang, D.; Economo, E. New records of ant species from Yunnan, China. ZooKeys 2015, 477, 17–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Fellowes, J.R. Ant (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) genera in southern China: Observations on the Oriental-Palaearctic boundary. Myrmecol. Nachrichten 2006, 8, 239–249. [Google Scholar]
  63. Fontanilla, A.M.; Nakamura, A.; Xu, Z.; Cao, M.; Kitching, R.L.; Tang, Y.; Burwell, C.J. Taxonomic and functional ant diversity along tropical, subtropical, and subalpine elevational transects in Southwest China. Insects 2019, 10, 128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Bharti, H.; Wachkoo, A.A.; Kumar, R. First inventory of ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) in northwestern Shivalik, India. Halteres 2017, 8, 33–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Wachkoo, A.A.; Akbar, S.A.; Jan, U.; Shah, G.M. Taxonomic inventory of ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) in Jammu and Kashmir state. In Biodiversity of the Himalaya: Jammu and Kashmir State; Springer Nature: Basingstoke, UK, 2020; pp. 733–747. [Google Scholar]
  66. Wilson, E.O. Which are the most prevalent ant genera. Stud. Entomol. 1976, 19, 187–200. [Google Scholar]
  67. Karaman, M.G. Zoogeography, diversity and altitudinal distribution of ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) in the Mediterranean and the oro-Mediterranean parts of Montenegro. North West. J. Zool. 2011, 7, 26–34. [Google Scholar]
  68. Burwell, C.J.; Nakamura, A. Distribution of ant species along an altitudinal transect in continuous rainforest in subtropical Queensland, Australia. Mem. Qld. Mus. 2011, 55, 391–411. [Google Scholar]
  69. Longino, J.T.; Branstetter, M.G.; Colwell, R.K. How ants drop out: Ant abundance on tropical mountains. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e104030. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Yusah, K.M.; Turner, E.C.; Yahya, B.E.; Fayle, T.M. An elevational gradient in litter-dwelling ant communities in Imbak Canyon, Sabah, Malaysia. J. Trop. Biol. Conserv. JTBC 2012, 9, 192–199. [Google Scholar]
  71. Liu, C.; Dudley, K.L.; Xu, Z.H.; Economo, E.P. Mountain meta communities: Climate and spatial connectivity shape ant diversity in a complex landscape. Ecography 2018, 41, 101–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Subedi, I.P.; Budha, P.B. Diversity and distribution patterns of ants along elevational gradients. Nepal. J. Zool. 2020, 4, 44–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Cao, K. Analysis and Prediction of Climate and Water Resources Changes in Sichuan Region. Water Resour. Hydropower Northeast China 2018, 4, 28–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Vetaas, O.R.; Grytnes, J.A. Distribution of vascular plant species richness and endemic richness along the Himalayan elevation gradient in Nepal. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 2002, 11, 291–301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Rahbek, C. The role of spatial scale and the perception of large-scale species-richness patterns. Ecol. Lett. 2005, 8, 224–239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Bhattarai, K.R.; Vetaas, O.R. Can Rapoport’s rule explain tree species richness along the Himalayan elevation gradient, Nepal? Divers. Distrib. 2006, 12, 373–378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Acharya, K.P.; Vetaas, O.R.; Birks, H. Orchid species richness along Himalayan elevational gradients. J. Biogeogr. 2011, 38, 1821–1833. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Manish, K.; Pandit, M.K. Phylogenetic diversity, structure and diversification patterns of endemic plants along the elevational gradient in the Eastern Himalaya. Plant Ecol. Divers. 2018, 11, 501–513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Sun, L.; Luo, J.; Qian, L.S.; Deng, T.; Sun, H. The relationship between elevation and seed-plant species richness in the Mt. Namjagbarwa region (Eastern Himalayas) and its underlying determinants. Glob. Ecol. Conserv. 2020, 23, e01053. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Barry, R.G. Mountain Weather and Climate; Routledge: London, UK, 1992. [Google Scholar]
  81. Lassau, S.; Hochuli, D. Effects of habitat complexity on ant assemblages. Ecography 2004, 2, 157–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Sarty, M.; Abbott, K.L.; Lester, P.J. Habitat complexity facilitates coexistence in a tropical ant community. Oecologia 2006, 149, 465–473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Pacheco, R.; Vasconcelos, H.L. Habitat diversity enhances ant diversity in a naturally heterogeneous Brazilian landscape. Biodivers. Conserv. 2011, 21, 797–809. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Liu, X.; Xu, Z.H.; Zhang, C.L.; Yu, N.N.; Xu, G.L. Distribution patterns of ants from west slope of Mount Demula and Bomi Valley. J. Northwest For. Univ. 2012, 27, 77–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Zhai, J.; Qian, Y.H.; Xu, Z.H.; Zhang, X.; Li, X.Y.; Huang, X.R. Distribution patterns of ant species in the Anzihe Nature Reserve of Sichuan Province. J. For. Environ. 2020, 40, 612–618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Xu, Z.H.; Chu, J.J.; Zhang, C.L.; Yu, N.N. Ant species and distribution pattern in Gongbo Nature Reserve in Southeastern Tibet. Sichuan J. Zool. 2011, 30, 118–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Yu, N.N.; Xu, Z.H.; Zhang, C.L.; Chu, J.J.; Yang, B.L.; Liu, X. Distribution patterns of ant species from Mount Sejila, southeastern Tibet. J. Beijing For. Univ. 2011, 33, 75–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Zhang, C.L.; Xu, Z.H.; Yu, N.N.; He, Q.J. Distribution patterns of ant species on east slope of Mount Demola and Zayu Valley in Southeastern Tibet. J. Northeast. For. Univ. 2012, 40, 87–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Liu, X.; Xu, Z.H.; Yu, N.N.; Zhang, C.L. Distribution patterns of ant species (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) in Galongla Mountains and Medog Valley of Southestern Tibet. Sci. Silvae Sin. 2016, 52, 88–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Li, W.Q.; Xu, Z.H.; Zhou, X.Y.; Li, A.N.; Xu, G.L. Distribution patterns of ant species from Mount Everest Section of Mt. Himalaya. J. Enivron. Entomol. 2017, 39, 1054–1062. [Google Scholar]
  91. Hölldobler, B.; Wilson, E.O. The Ants; Belknap Press of Harvard University Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 1990. [Google Scholar]
  92. Van Pelt, A. High altitude ants of the Southern Blue Ridge. Am. Midl. Nat. 1963, 69, 205–223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Billick, I. Density dependence and colony growth in the ant species Formica neorufibarbis. J. Anim. Ecol. 2001, 70, 895–905. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. McCaffrey, J.; Galen, C. Between a rock and a hard place: Impact of nest selection behavior on the altitudinal range of an alpine ant, Formica neorufibarbis. Environ. Entomol. 2011, 40, 534–540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  95. Brian, M.V. Production Ecology of Ants and Termites, International Biological Programme; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 1978; p. 409. [Google Scholar]
  96. Blüthgen, N.; Feldhaar, H. Food and Shelter: How Resources Influence Ant Ecology. In Ant Ecology; Lach, L., Parr, C., Abbott, K., Eds.; Oxford Academic: Oxford, UK, 2010; Chapter 7; pp. 115–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Kaspari, M.; Yuan, M.; Alonso, L. Spatial grain and the causes of regional diversity gradients in ants. Am. Nat. 2003, 161, 459–477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Location of the studied plots in Daliang Mountain, Sichan Province, China.
Figure 1. Location of the studied plots in Daliang Mountain, Sichan Province, China.
Diversity 17 00308 g001
Figure 2. The letters (ae) show the vegetation types in the studied plots: (a) broad-leaved forest; (b) coniferous forest; (c) mixed coniferous and broad-leaved forest; (d) shrublands; (e) grasslands.
Figure 2. The letters (ae) show the vegetation types in the studied plots: (a) broad-leaved forest; (b) coniferous forest; (c) mixed coniferous and broad-leaved forest; (d) shrublands; (e) grasslands.
Diversity 17 00308 g002
Figure 3. The members of subfamilies are given as the species number of a total of 157 ant species occurrences in the Daliang Mountain, Sichan Province, China.
Figure 3. The members of subfamilies are given as the species number of a total of 157 ant species occurrences in the Daliang Mountain, Sichan Province, China.
Diversity 17 00308 g003
Figure 4. Relationship of species number with elevation (m) (a) and mean temperature (°C) (b) for every 250 m elevation from 750 m to 3500 m across 115 sampling plots in the Daliang Mountain, Sichan Province, China. The empty circles represent the means after the same elevation was averaged. The graph was visualized according to ant species richness. The fitted lines display the predicted probabilities of ant species as fit by the logistic regression model.
Figure 4. Relationship of species number with elevation (m) (a) and mean temperature (°C) (b) for every 250 m elevation from 750 m to 3500 m across 115 sampling plots in the Daliang Mountain, Sichan Province, China. The empty circles represent the means after the same elevation was averaged. The graph was visualized according to ant species richness. The fitted lines display the predicted probabilities of ant species as fit by the logistic regression model.
Diversity 17 00308 g004
Figure 5. Foraging and nesting sites of ant species. (a) Under stone; (b) litter; (c) inside rotten wood; (d) soil; (e) ground surface; (f) trunk; (g) moss.
Figure 5. Foraging and nesting sites of ant species. (a) Under stone; (b) litter; (c) inside rotten wood; (d) soil; (e) ground surface; (f) trunk; (g) moss.
Diversity 17 00308 g005
Figure 6. The mean value of ant species number for the foraging (a) and nesting ant species number (b). Error bars represent standard error (SE). Different letters indicate statistical significance at p < 0.05.
Figure 6. The mean value of ant species number for the foraging (a) and nesting ant species number (b). Error bars represent standard error (SE). Different letters indicate statistical significance at p < 0.05.
Diversity 17 00308 g006
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

You, S.-J.; Xu, Z.-H.; Zhang, X.-M. Testing a Hump-Shaped Pattern with Increasing Elevation for Ant Species Richness in Daliang Mountain, Sichuan, China. Diversity 2025, 17, 308. https://doi.org/10.3390/d17050308

AMA Style

You S-J, Xu Z-H, Zhang X-M. Testing a Hump-Shaped Pattern with Increasing Elevation for Ant Species Richness in Daliang Mountain, Sichuan, China. Diversity. 2025; 17(5):308. https://doi.org/10.3390/d17050308

Chicago/Turabian Style

You, Shi-Jia, Zheng-Hui Xu, and Xin-Min Zhang. 2025. "Testing a Hump-Shaped Pattern with Increasing Elevation for Ant Species Richness in Daliang Mountain, Sichuan, China" Diversity 17, no. 5: 308. https://doi.org/10.3390/d17050308

APA Style

You, S.-J., Xu, Z.-H., & Zhang, X.-M. (2025). Testing a Hump-Shaped Pattern with Increasing Elevation for Ant Species Richness in Daliang Mountain, Sichuan, China. Diversity, 17(5), 308. https://doi.org/10.3390/d17050308

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop