Next Article in Journal
Genome Skimming of Thysanoptera (Arthropoda, Insecta) and Its Taxonomic and Systematic Applications
Previous Article in Journal
Sand Prawns Mitigate the Impact of Prolonged Drought on the Biology of a Temporary Open/Closed Estuary
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Aromatic Profiling and Bioactive Potentials of Thai Edible Flowers from the Curcuma spp. (Zingiberaceae)

by
Sarana Rose Sommano
1,2,*,
Sureerat Thomya
1,
Pasin Norkum Ai
1,
Julaluk Khemacheewakul
2,3,
R. Sindhu
4,
Shashanka K. Prasad
5,
Pawenud Thongdang
6,
Apinya Rachkeeree
6,
Methee Wongnak
6,
Prateep Panyadee
6,
Ratchadawan Puangpradab
6 and
Ratchuporn Suksathan
6,*
1
Faculty of Agriculture, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai 50200, Thailand
2
Center of Excellence in Agro Bio-Circular-Green Industry (Agro BCG), Faculty of Agro-Industry, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai 50100, Thailand
3
Faculty of Agro-Industry, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai 50100, Thailand
4
Department of Microbiology, JSS Academy of Higher Education and Research, Mysuru 570 015, Karnataka, India
5
Department of Biotechnology and Bioinformatics, JSS Academy of Higher Education and Research, Mysuru 570 015, Karnataka, India
6
Queen Sirikit Botanic Garden, the Botanical Garden Organisation, Chiang Mai 50180, Thailand
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Diversity 2025, 17(4), 224; https://doi.org/10.3390/d17040224
Submission received: 27 February 2025 / Revised: 18 March 2025 / Accepted: 20 March 2025 / Published: 24 March 2025

Abstract

:
This study investigated the aroma profiles, nutritional composition, and bioactive potential of three edible Curcuma species, namely Curcuma candida, C. singularis, and C. petiolata, traditionally consumed in Northern Thailand. An aroma analysis revealed distinct volatile profiles for each species. C. petiolata was qualitatively characterized by high sabinene levels, while β-pinene, limonene, caryophyllene, and humulene were prominent markers for C. candida, and C. singularis exhibited the highest abundance of camphor. A nutritional analysis showed the edible floral tissue of C. petiolata to possess the highest carbohydrate (83.47 g/100 g DW), protein (18.04 g/100 g DW), and energy content (342.83 g/100 g DW). The mineral composition of the edible flowers revealed high levels of macronutrients, including phosphorus (0.36 g/100 g DW), potassium (1.82 g/100 g DW), sodium (0.33 g/100 g DW), and calcium (1.30 g/100 g DW). Palmitic acid (31,098 mg/100 g DW) was the predominant saturated fatty acid, while linoleic acid (45,356 mg/100 g DW) was the most abundant unsaturated fatty acid from these edible flora species. The ethanolic extracts of floral tissues of C. singularis exhibited the highest total phenolic content (0.26 mg GAE/g DW), followed by C. petiolata. Conversely, C. petiolata demonstrated the highest total flavonoid content (0.20 mg QE/g sample), followed by C. singularis (0.11 mg QE/g sample). Antioxidant potential exhibited a significant positive correlation with the quantified total flavonoid content. This research contributes to a deeper understanding of the nutritional and bioactive properties of edible Curcuma flowers, providing valuable information for the development of novel functional foods with unique flavor profiles and potential health benefits.

1. Introduction

Neglected or underutilized edible flowers, despite their potential to bolster food security and sustainability, remain marginalized in contemporary agricultural systems. These species often exhibit inherent resilience and elevated nutritional profiles, rendering them critical resources for mitigating food insecurity, especially within vulnerable populations [1]. Furthermore, their distinct organoleptic properties contribute to culinary diversification, satisfying consumer demand for novel food experiences. The revitalization of these species supports biodiversity preservation and can generate economic benefits for rural communities [2]. As scientific investigation into their nutritional and medicinal properties advances and innovative food product development accelerates, the integration of these underutilized species into contemporary diets is anticipated to exhibit sustained growth, presenting a promising avenue for sustainable and nutritionally rich food systems. The genus Curcuma, belonging to the Zingiberaceae family, comprises a diverse array of species with significant cultural and culinary importance in Thailand [3,4,5]. The rhizomes of C. aeruginosa, C. amada, C. aromatica, C. longa, C. pierreana, C. pseudomontana, C. purpurascens, C. xanthorrhiza, and C. zedoaria are widely employed in culinary applications, contributing distinctive aromas, flavors, and colors to various dishes, and are also utilized as sources for dyes and spices. Specifically, Rajkumari and Sanatombi [4] reported that C. angustifolia, C. caulina, C. leucorrhiza, and C. xanthorrhiza are known for their substantial starch content and utilized as nutritional supplements and arrowroot powder substitutes. Apart from the rhizomes, other plant parts, including inflorescences, tuberous roots, and shoots, have been documented as valuable sources for nutritional and medicinal compositions [6,7,8]. These species, and many others within the genus, have been deeply integrated into Thai cuisine and cultural practices, reflecting the nation’s rich botanical heritage and its longstanding relationship with the natural world. Curcuma flowers often hold profound cultural significance, functioning as symbolic decorative elements in traditional ceremonies and celebrations. Within the diverse genus Curcuma, certain species produce edible flowers that offer unique culinary and cultural value [7]. Notably, the vibrant blooms of Ao (C. plicata) are frequently incorporated into salads or side dishes, imparting a distinctive bitter–peppery flavor and adding a striking visual element. The flowers of C. longa are generally also consumed as vegetables in many Asian cultures [9]. Beyond their culinary applications, these flowers possess significant ornamental value, serving as visual embellishments for dishes and enhancing the overall aesthetic appeal of culinary presentations.
The characterization of bioactive aromatic compounds from indigenous edible plants is crucial for developing functional foods and beverages that enhance consumer well-being. The unique aromatic profile of a species serves as a chemical fingerprint, enabling authentication and quality control [3,10,11]. Furthermore, numerous aromatic compounds, including terpenes, exhibit documented bioactivity, such as antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, and anticarcinogenic effects [12,13,14]. Therefore, a comprehensive analysis of these plants’ aromatic profiles is essential for the food industry. Building upon the established importance of aromatic compound characterization in developing functional foods, this research aims to comprehensively analyze the aroma profiles, nutritional composition, and bioactive potential of inflorescences from three underutilized Curcuma species (C. candida, C. singularis, and C. petiolata). By elucidating these properties, we seek to expand the inventory of edible Curcuma flowers, identify novel food sources with enhanced flavor and health benefits, and contribute to food security and dietary diversification. Furthermore, this study will support the preservation of the cultural heritage through the revitalization of traditional culinary practices and foster sustainable economic opportunities via the cultivation and commercialization of these valuable botanical resources.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Plant Material and Sample Preparation

The flowers of the three Curcuma species, namely C. candida (Wall.) Techapr. and Škorničk., C. singularis Gagnep. and C. petiolata Roxb., were either from the living collections at Queen Sirikit Botanic Garden (QSBG) or collected locally by our botanists in Chiang Mai, Thailand. Voucher specimens were taxonomically identified by QSBG botanists and verified using the relevant literature [3,15] (Figure 1). These plant specimens were then deposited in the Queen Sirikit Botanic Garden (QBG) herbarium with the following voucher specimen numbers: QBG 89559 for C. candida, QBG 93482 for C. singularis, and QBG 66915 for C. petiolata. For volatile compound analysis, fresh samples were either processed immediately or stored at 4 °C and analyzed within 24 h. A separate petal of the flowers was dried to a constant moisture content (3–5%) using a hot air oven (Memmert, UF 705, Schwabach, Germany) set at 45 °C.

2.2. Analysis of the Chemical Composition of Aroma Compounds

Fresh flowers at different young inflorescences were analyzed to determine their volatile compounds using Solid-Phase Microextraction (SPME) with Restek PAL SPME Polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) Fibers (Restek, Böckten, Switzerland), similar to a previously published method with some adjustments [16]. Briefly, a small amount of fresh flowers (600 mg) was placed in SPME screw cap vials (1.5 mL). A fiber was inserted to capture the volatile compounds, and the vial was heated in an oven at 40 °C for 10 min. The fiber was then removed and inserted into a gas chromatography–mass spectrometer (GC-MS) (Restek, Bad Homburg, Germany) equipped with an Rtx-5MS capillary column (diphenyl dimethyl polysiloxane, 30 m × 0.25 mm, fused silica 0.25 µm) and (Scion 456-GC, Stanleyweg 4, Rotterdam, The Netherlands) mass spectrometer. The temperatures of the interface, injector, and oven accordingly used a gradient temperature program. Helium (99.999%) was utilized as the carrier gas at a total flow rate of 1 mL/min, using the spitless injection mode. The quadruple mass spectrometer was operated in electron impact ionization (EI) mode at 70 eV, and the scan range was set at 30–550 m/z. The identification of volatile compositions was conducted through comparison with mass spectra available in the NIST 2017 library.

2.3. Nutritional Composition

2.3.1. Proximate Composition

The analysis included measurements of key components like moisture, protein, fat, fiber, and ash [7,17].
The amount of protein in the dried samples was determined using the Kjeldahl method. This method measures the nitrogen content in the sample, which is then converted to protein content using a standard conversion factor of 6.25, following this equation:
Protein% = [(A − B) × N × 1.4 × 6.25]/W
where A = volume of HCl (0.01 N) used in sample titration;
B = volume of HCl (0.01 N) used in blank titration;
N = normality of HCl;
W = weight of sample (g).
Ash content was specifically determined by incinerating dried samples (1.0 g) at 550 °C for 16 h, dissolving the remaining ash in nitric acid, and filtering the solution through an ash-free, acid-washed filter paper (Albet No. 242, 9 cm diameter). Once cooled, the crucible and ash were weighed to determine the total weight. The ash content was calculated as a percentage of the original sample weight. Total lipid content was determined using the Soxhlet extraction method. Approximately 2 g of the sample was weighed and placed in a thimble. The sample was then defatted with petroleum ether in a Soxhlet apparatus for at least 4 h at high heat, seeing the solvent vaporized, condensed, and dripped back into the sample chamber at the rate 5 drops per second. The remaining ether was evaporated by drying at 80–90 °C for 2 h. The sample was then cooled in a desiccator and weighed. The fat content was calculated using the following formula:
Fat Content (%) = [Weight of fat (g)/Weight of sample (g)] × 100
Moisture content was determined by drying the sample in an oven at 105 °C until a constant weight was achieved and then reweighing the sample. The difference in weight represented the moisture content. The total carbohydrate content was calculated using the following formula:
Carbohydrate Content (%) = 100 − [Moisture Content (%) + Protein Content (%) + Ash Content (%) + Fat Content (%))
The total energy per 100 g of fresh weight was calculated according to the following formula:
Total Energy (kcal) = (Protein Content (%) × 4 kcal/g) + (Fat Content (%) × 9 kcal/g) + (Carbohydrate Content (%) × 4 kcal/g)

2.3.2. Crude Fiber

Crude fiber content was determined according to the method of the Association of Official Analytical Chemists International (AOAC) [18]. A 2 g sample, free of moisture and fat, was treated with boiling dilute sulfuric acid (0.1275 M) for 30 min. This step removes sugars, starches, and some proteins. Then sodium hydroxide (NaOH) (200 mL, 0.313 M) was added and boiled for 30 min, and then the residue was filtered and washed with hot distilled water, 1% HCl, and 95% ethanol, respectively. This removed the additional proteins and some hemicellulose. The residue remaining was filtered, washed, and dried. The dried residue was ashed in a muffle furnace at a high temperature (around 550–600 °C) to remove any remaining organic matter. The weight of the ash-free residue was determined, and the crude fiber content was calculated as a percentage of the original sample weight.

2.3.3. Elements

Concentrated hydrochloric acid (HCl) (2 mL) was added to bring the sample into a solution. The final dilution with deionized water was adjusted based on the predicted concentration of the target element, ensuring it fell within the optimal range of the analytical method. For potassium (K), calcium (Ca), magnesium (Mg), and sodium (Na) determinations [19], a 100 mL final volume generally provided sufficient concentrations above the detection limit for most plant tissues. For iron (Fe) analysis, final volumes between 10 and 50 mL were typically required. The elements were determined with an Atomic Absorption Spectrophotometer (AAS) [20]. The digestion of the dried samples was performed with HNO3:HClO3 (1:6). Standard preparations for the elements investigation were Na (0.3–3–ppm), K (0–10.0 ppm), Ca (1–10 ppm), Mg (0.1–0.2), and Fe (2–20 ppm).

2.3.4. Free Fatty Acid Compositions

A sample (0.5 g) was weighed into a 250 mL round-bottom flask and 5 mL of 0.5 M sodium hydroxide (NaOH) solution added in methanol. Then, the mixture was refluxed at 110–120 °C for 5 min, followed by the addition of 5 mL of 20% (w/v) boron trifluoride in methanol. The mixture was refluxed again for 5 min. After cooling, the mixture was transferred to a 50 mL test tube, and 5 mL of hexane and 10 mL of saturated salt solution was added. The mixture was shaken vigorously. Finally, the upper hexane layer was collected, filtered through a 0.45 m nylon membrane filter, and injected into the gas chromatography system coupled with an FID detector (436-GC, Bruker-SCION, Stanleyweg 4, Rotterdam, The Netherlands). Chromatograms separation was performed on the SLB®-IL60 (30 m, 0.25 mmID, 0.2 μm diameters, Sigma-Aldrich, Bellefonte, PA, USA). The column temperature was programmed to increase from 100 °C to 240 °C, initially holding at 100 °C for 0–4 min, then increasing by 1.5 °C/min to 240 °C and remaining so for 30 min. Nitrogen gas was used as the carrier gas, with a flow rate at 1 mL/min. The injector and detector temperature were set at 225 °C and 250 °C, respectively. Samples were injected using the split injection mode (1 µL) [21,22].

2.4. Phytochemical Analyses

2.4.1. Total Phenolic, Flavonoid Content

The extraction method was adapted from previous studies [7,17]. Dried plant samples were powdered and extracted using an ethanol maceration method to obtain the phytochemical extract. Total phenolic content was determined using the Folin–Ciocalteu method, expressed as gallic acid equivalents (mg GAE/g sample), and measured at 765 nm using a microplate spectrophotometer. A gallic acid standard curve (0–120 ppm) was used for quantification [23]. Total flavonoid content was measured and expressed as rutin equivalents (mg RE/g extract) using a quercetin standard curve (0–2000 ppm). Flavonoid content was determined spectrophotometrically at 595 nm using a microplate reader and reported as milligrams of Quercetin equivalents per gram of extracted sample (mg QE/g sample) [24].

2.4.2. Antioxidant Activities

The DPPH (2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl) radical-scavenging activity of the extracts was determined using a microplate assay. Briefly, diluted plant extracts (67 μL) were mixed with 133 μL of a methanolic solution of DPPH (Sigma-Aldrich, Saint Louis, MO, USA). The mixture was incubated in the dark for 30 min at room temperature. Absorbance was measured at 517 nm using a microplate spectrophotometer. The percentage inhibition of DPPH radical was calculated. The IC50 value, representing the extract concentration required to inhibit the DPPH radical by 50%, was determined [25]. The ABTS radical-scavenging activity was assessed using the ABTS+ assay. An ABTS+ working solution was prepared by reacting ABTS+ (2,2′-azino-bis (3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulphonic acid)) with potassium persulfate. Plant extracts (1.9 μL) were mixed with the ABTS+ working solution, and the mixture was incubated in the dark for 5 min. Absorbance was measured at 734 nm using a microplate spectrophotometer. The results were expressed as the Trolox Equivalent Antioxidant Capacity (TEAC) in mg Trolox equivalents per gram of extract (mg TEAC/g sample), determined by comparison with a Trolox standard curve (0–5.0 mM) [26].

2.5. Statistical Analysis

Each experiment was repeated three times, and the results are illustrated as the average value and the standard deviation. In addition, Duncan’s multiple-range test was performed using SPSS statistical software version 17. A p-value of 0.05 was used to determine statistical significance, indicating a 95% confidence level. A principal component analysis was conducted using XLSTAT software version 2018.1 to comprehend the relationships between the volatile compounds and plant species.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Plant Utilization

Table 1 illustrates the utilization summary of C. candida, C. singularis, and C. petiolata. While primarily recognized for their ornamental and medicinal properties, these plants also serve as valuable food sources within specific regional contexts. This study investigates the traditional culinary uses of these species, focusing on their consumption patterns, preparation methods, and cultural significance among local communities in Thailand.
C. candida is a regionally significant economic plant, particularly valued during its blooming season. Its distribution is limited to Thailand and Myanmar [27]. Locally, young inflorescences are prepared as steamed vegetables paired with Nam Prik (chili dip), stir-fried, or added to soups, especially among the Karen and Shan communities in Mae Hong Son province, Northern Thailand [28,29].
The young inflorescence of C. singularis is consumed as a vegetable, commonly served as a side dish with chili paste, particularly in Northeastern Thailand [30,31,32]. This species, a culturally significant terrestrial herb, is predominantly collected from woody areas during the rainy season [33]. It has also been observed to occasionally appear in local markets during this period.
C. petiolata is one of the Curcuma species widely cultivated as an ornamental plant and has long been used as a folk botanical in Asia [34]. Young inflorescences of C. petiolata, similar to other Curcuma species, are consumed as a seasonal food source by local people in the Lom Sak district, Phetchabun province, Thailand (based on field observations con-ducted by the authors in 2022). Harvesting occurs from natural habitats during the early flowering stage, when the inflorescences are tender. Preparation typically involves steaming or boiling, and they are often served as a side dish with condiments. This aligns with traditional consumption patterns within the Curcuma genus.

3.2. Aroma Composition and Profiling

The volatile composition of the edible flowers from the three Curcuma species was investigated. The identified volatile compounds included aldehydes, alcohols, alkanes, terpenes, ketones, and esters, which are presented in Supplementary Table S1. A cluster analysis revealed four distinct groups among the volatile profiles (Figure 2a). The first cluster encompassed the majority of the volatile components. The remaining clusters were differentiated by the presence of specific compounds: sabinene in cluster 2 and camphor in cluster 4. The third cluster was enriched with terpenes, including β-pinene, limonene, humulene, and caryophyllene. A biplot analysis (Figure 2b) explained over 80% of the total variance, with principal components 1 (PC1) and 2 (PC2) contributing 55% and 27%, respectively.
The analysis indicated that C. petiolata was distinct due to its high concentration of sabinene, while β-pinene, limonene, caryophyllene, and humulene were markers for C. candida. C. singularis was characterized by the highest abundance of camphor. The aromatic profiles of the volatile compounds were compared to a commercial aroma database (https://foreverest.net/, accessed on 15 January 2025). β-pinene has a pine-like woody scent, limonene has an orange smell, humulene is associated with basil and spice notes, camphor is commonly found in camphor oil and ginger oil, and caryophyllene has a warm, woody, mossy, spicy, and earthy aroma, characteristic of basil and oregano. Sabinene contributes woody, spicy, citrus, and terpene notes with green, oily, and camphoraceous nuances, typically found in carrot seed oil and black pepper. As illustrated in Figure 2c, C. petiolata exhibited a distinct black pepper aroma, whereas the other Curcuma spp. shared similar characteristics with basil and citrusy notes. Dok din displayed a noticeable camphor scent, while C. singularis was marked by an even stronger camphor aroma.
While research on the volatile composition of Curcuma floral tissues has primarily focused on ornamental and medicinal species such as C. alismatifolia, C. rubescens, C. attenuate, and C. aeruginosa, terpenoids consistently emerge as the dominant volatile organic compound (VOC) group across rhizomes, leaves, and inflorescences within the genus [3,35,36]. In C. alismatifolia, a diverse array of 906 floral VOCs was identified, with caryophyllene, β-pinene, and α-pinene as the most abundant compounds. These volatiles contribute to the perceived sensory characteristics of the flowers, including woody (Wo), sweet (Sw), green (Gr), and fresh (Fr) notes [35,37]. C. longa floral oil exhibits a distinct profile, characterized by significant amounts of 1,8-cineole, α-terpinene, aphellandrene, myrcene, and zingiberene [38,39].
Other Curcuma species display a range of terpenoid constituents, including α-pinene, L-β-pinene, limonene, β-ocimene, eucalyptol, cyclofenchene, β-ionone, and (E)-labda-8(17),12-diene-15,16-dial. Additionally, significant amounts of 4-methoxy-6-phenethyl-2H-pyran-2-on and 5,6-dehydrokavain (19.34%) have been reported [35,36,37]. Given the high abundance of volatiles in the Curcuma floral tissues, essential oil extraction through distillation is feasible, typically yielding around 1% [40]. These findings suggest that floral structures may play a crucial role in the dispersal of botanical fragrances within the Curcuma genus. Furthermore, a degree of similarity has been observed between the volatile profiles of floral tissues and those of the corresponding leafy parts [38]. Previous investigations [39] have identified the essential oil constituents of the C. petiolata rhizome as camphene, (E)-β-elemenone, (E)-β-farnesene, germacrone, 1,8-cineole, and camphor. Notably, sabinene, a prominent aroma compound in the floral tissues, was absent from the rhizome. In contrast, the C. singularis rhizome [40] exhibited a distinct chemical profile, comprising camphor, germacrone, caryophyllene oxide, terpinen-4-ol, and germacrone-4,5-epoxide. This composition demonstrates a degree of similarity to the volatile compounds identified in the floral material examined in our present study.

3.3. Nutritional Composition

3.3.1. Proximate and Mineral Composition

The nutritional composition of the edible flowers from Curcuma spp. is displayed in Table 2. C. petiolata was the species with the highest carbohydrate, protein, and energy content at 83.47 g/100 g DW, 18.04 g/100 g DW, and 342.83 kcal/100 g DW, respectively. C. candida had the highest fat and fiber content at 6.80 g/100 g and 19.64 g/100 g, respectively. Generally, carbohydrates proved to be the most abundant macronutrients in floral parts, followed by proteins, with lipids exhibiting the lowest content. Furthermore, the fat content of the edible flowers fell within the typical range, aligning well with the existing literature (0.1 g/100 g to 8 g/100 g) [41,42]. In our previous work, the flower of C. plicata was considerably high in carbohydrate (ca. 30 g/100 g DW) and low in fat (ca. 5 g/100 g DW) as compared to other species of edible flowers within the Zingiberaceae family [7].
C. longa contains 11.80% moisture content, 8.30% ash, 9.40% crude protein, 2.50% crude fibre, 11.00% fat, and 68.80% Nitrogen free extract [43].
The mineral composition of the edible flowers revealed a high amount of macro-elements, including phosphorus, potassium, sodium, and calcium (Table 2). C. candida exhibited the highest content of phosphorus (0.40 g/100 g DW), potassium (3.06 g/100 g DW), and calcium (2.09 g/100 g DW). C. singularis had the highest sodium (0.48 g/100 g DW). The levels of these elements were slightly different to those detected from ornamental edible flowers, including Begonia × tuberhybrida, Tropaeolum majus, Calendula officinalis, Rosa sp., Hemerocallis sp., and Tagetes patula, as reported previously [44]. Their phosphorus and potassium content were in the ranges of 0.2 g/100 g DW and 3.0 g/100 g DW, with a substantial lower content of calcium at 0.3 g/100 g DW. Potassium and sodium help control cell volume, nerve and muscle function, and pH balance [35]. These elements are abundant in edible plants, including their edible floral parts [45]. Calcium, primarily obtained from food sources, including plant-based options, is the fundamental component of bones and teeth. It also plays a vital role in regulating muscle contractions and nerve impulses. Phosphorus, working in tandem with calcium, contributes to a strong bone structure and is essential for the production of ATP, the body’s primary energy source [46,47].
In terms of micro-elements, iron and magnesium were also the highest in C. candida at 0.47 g/100 g DW and 0.59 g/100 g DW, respectively. The levels seem to be a lot higher than those found in Mediterranean edible flowers, including Dianthus chinensis, Fuchsia regia, and Viola cornuta, which reported around 0.0005 g/100 g DW and 0.0006 g/100 g DW of these two elements, respectively. Iron plays an important role in oxygen transport and supporting the immune system, while magnesium supports the muscle and nerves system, bone health, and blood sugar levels [48]. The mineral content of floral herbs is influenced by several factors, including their origin, cultivation conditions, exposure to environmental pollution, and the specific plant parts used. These factors also impact the levels of other plant compounds such as tannins, phytates, oxalates, and dietary fiber. These compounds can form stable, insoluble bonds with minerals, potentially reducing their bioavailability [49].

3.3.2. Free Fatty Acids

The comprehensive fatty acid profile of the edible flowers from the three Curcuma species are presented in Table 3. The three species included a total of three unsaturated fatty acids (UFAs) and three saturated fatty acids (SFAs). Linoleic acid was the predominant UFA present in these species, exhibiting the highest content in C. petiolata (45,356.00 mg/100 g DW), followed by C. singularis (34,953.50 mg/100 g DW) and C. candida (30,323.50 mg/100 g DW). Moreover, α-linolenic acid was present in its highest concentration in Krachiao khao (C. singularis) (14,404.00 mg/100 g), following by C. petiolata (12,770.50 mg/100 g DW), and Dok din (C. candida) (8669.00 mg/100 g DW). Oleic acid was predominantly found in C. singularis (13,217.50 mg/100 g), followed by C. candida (10,266.50 mg/100 g DW), and C. petiolata (6851.50 mg/100 g DW). The predominant SFA observed was palmitic acid, which was found in the highest concentration in C. candida (42,943.00 mg/100 g DW), followed by C. singularis (32,978.50 mg/100 g) and C. petiolata (31,097.50 mg/100 g DW). Stearic acid was particularly abundant in C. candida (6151.00 mg/100 g DW), followed by C. singularis (4446.50 mg/100 g DW) and C. petiolata (12,770.50 mg/100 g DW). Nevertheless, C. candida alone exhibited behenic acid at a concentration of 1647.00 mg/100 g DW. Edible flowers generally contain varying amounts of lipids, ranging from low to high, with some reaching up to 30 g/100 g of dried weight. These lipids are notably rich in linoleic (C18:2) and α-linolenic (C18:3) acids, which are essential fatty acids [43]. In line with this, a study has shown that the floral structures of Zingiber mioga Roscoe have been found to be rich in these fatty acids, and the levels also increase through the developmental stages [50]. Linoleic and alpha-linolenic acids are crucial for human health. They play vital roles in growth, development, and the prevention of various diseases, including heart disease, high blood pressure, diabetes, arthritis, and certain cancers [51,52]. Palmitic acid can be obtained from our diet and produced within our bodies. While often linked to chronic diseases in adults, it is essential for forming cell membranes and other vital structures. It also plays a crucial role in protein modification and cell signaling [53].

3.4. Phytochemical Analyses

As reported in Table 4, the inflorescences of C. singularis showed the highest total phenolic value (0.26 mg GAE/g DW), followed by C. petiolate, while the total flavonoid content in the inflorescences of C. petiolata also exhibited the highest value (0.20 mg QE/g sample), followed by C. singularis (0.11 mg QE/g sample). In our previous work, C. plicata illustrated the content of total phenolics at 0.16 mg GAE/g extract and total flavonoids at 15.50 mg Rutin Equivalent (RE)/g extract, which were lower than those found in other species of the Zingiberaceae such as those from Zingiber spp. (ca. 0.2 mg GAE/g extract and ca. 20 mg RE/g extract [8]. Meanwhile, the rhizomes of C. aeruginosa, C. amada, C. aromatica, C. candida, C. latifolia, C. longa, and C. mangga exhibited total phenol levels ranging from 0.94 to 587.15 mg GAE/g extract. Notably, the ethanol extract of C. longa demonstrated the highest levels of total phenols [54]. Phenolic compounds, including flavonoids, are naturally occurring plant constituents. Flavonoids are a subclass of polyphenols known for their health-promoting properties, particularly their ability to counteract free radicals and reactive oxygen species (ROS). This antioxidant activity contributes to various biological effects, such as anti-inflammatory, anti-aging, anti-atherosclerotic, and anticancer properties [55,56]. Moreover, flavonoids help reduce the risk of neurodegenerative disorder and heart diseases and possess antioxidant and anti-cancer properties [57,58].
It is important to acknowledge that the phytochemical profiles observed in this study may exhibit variability due to factors such as a limited population size and inherent intraspecific diversity. The phytochemical properties of Curcuma species are intricately influenced by a complex interplay of genetic and environmental factors [59,60,61]. Genetic variations within and between species govern the enzymes involved in secondary metabolite biosynthesis, ultimately determining the types and quantities of phytochemicals produced [62,63]. Environmental factors, such as light intensity, temperature, and soil composition, can significantly influence gene expression and metabolic pathways, thereby impacting the accumulation of phytochemicals [64,65]. This is supported by the findings from a previous study on turmeric cultivars, where significant genotypic variations were observed for various morpho-physiological traits, highlighting the role of genetic inheritance [64]. Furthermore, studies have demonstrated that genotypes collected from the same source can exhibit significant variability, suggesting that geographical distribution alone may not accurately predict homogeneity within a species [66,67]. Considering these factors, our findings provide a valuable baseline for future investigations. Future research incorporating a broader sampling of diverse populations within each Curcuma species is crucial to comprehensively investigate the extent of intraspecific variation in aromatic profiles, nutritional composition, and phytochemical properties. Moreover, due to the phenolics, flavonoids, antioxidants, and other beneficial properties of edible flowers, there have been numerous efforts to utilize them for purposes beyond their traditional use as vegetables or side dishes, such as in cakes, teas, jams, salads, and beverages [17,41].

4. Conclusions

This study comprehensively characterized the aroma profiles, nutritional composition, and bioactive potential of three underutilized edible Curcuma species, namely C. candida, C. singularis, and C. petiolata. Our findings reveal distinct chemical profiles for each species, with C. petiolata notable for its high sabinene content and C. singularis characterized by a prominent camphor aroma. Furthermore, the nutritional analysis demonstrated that C. petiolata is a rich source of carbohydrates, protein, and energy, while all three species exhibited significant levels of essential minerals. The presence of diverse bioactive compounds, particularly high levels of phenolics in C. singularis and flavonoids in C. petiolata, coupled with strong antioxidant activity, suggests that these Curcuma species possess considerable health-promoting potential. These findings contribute valuable knowledge to the scientific understanding of edible Curcuma species and highlight their potential as promising sources of natural bioactive compounds for the development of novel functional foods and nutraceuticals. Future research should investigate the underlying mechanisms of action of these bioactive compounds and explore their potential applications in various health contexts.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/d17040224/s1, Table S1: The volatile composition of the edible flowers from three Curcuma species.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, S.R.S. and R.S. (Ratchuporn Suksathan); methodology, P.T., A.R. and R.P.; software, P.N.A.; validation, S.R.S., R.S. (Ratchuporn Suksathan) and P.P.; formal analysis, P.T., A.R. and R.P.; investigation, S.T., P.T. and A.R.; resources, M.W. and P.P.; data curation, R.S. (Ratchuporn Suksathan); writing—original draft preparation, S.R.S., S.T., P.T., A.R., P.P. and R.S. (Ratchuporn Suksathan); writing—review and editing, S.R.S., J.K., R.S. (R. Sindhu) and S.K.P.; visualization, P.N.A.; supervision, S.R.S. and R.S. (Ratchuporn Suksathan); project administration, S.R.S.; funding acquisition, S.R.S. and J.K. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The Lancang-Mekong Cooperation Special Fund (LMCSF, 2022) under the project “Sustainable conservation and value adding locally edible floral species in the Mekong regions”.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding authors.

Acknowledgments

This research is partially supported by Chiang Mai University.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Knez, M.; Ranić, M.; Gurinović, M. Underutilized plants increase biodiversity, improve food and nutrition security, reduce malnutrition, and enhance human health and well-being. Let’s put them back on the plate! Nutr. Rev. 2024, 82, 1111–1124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Peduruhewa, P.; Jayathunge, K.; Liyanage, R. Potential of underutilized wild edible plants as the food for the future—A review. J. Food Secur. 2021, 9, 136–147. [Google Scholar]
  3. Sommano, S.R.; Tangpao, T. Chapter 4—Aromatic profile of rhizomes from the ginger family used in food. In Aromatic Herbs in Food; Galanakis, C.M., Ed.; Elsevier Inc.: London, UK, 2021; pp. 123–165. [Google Scholar]
  4. Rajkumari, S.; Sanatombi, K. Nutritional value, phytochemical composition, and biological activities of edible Curcuma species: A review. Int. J. Food Prop. 2017, 20, S2668–S2687. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Sirirugsa, P.; Larsen, K.; Maknoi, C. The genus Curcuma L. (Zingiberaceae): Distribution and classification with reference to species diversity in Thailand. Gard. Bull. Singap. 2007, 59, 203–220. [Google Scholar]
  6. Dutta, B. Study of secondary metabolite constituents and curcumin contents of six different species of genus Curcuma. J. Med. Plants Stud. 2015, 3, 116–119. [Google Scholar]
  7. Rachkeeree, A.; Kantadoung, K.; Suksathan, R.; Puangpradab, R.; Page, P.A.; Sommano, S.R. Nutritional compositions and phytochemical properties of the edible flowers from selected Zingiberaceae found in Thailand. Front. Nutr. 2018, 5, 3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Sommano, S.R.; Suksathan, R.; Wongnak, M.; Chatkaewnapanon, Y. Edible Flowers in Thailand Rainy Season; RPP ALL Co., Ltd.: Chiang Mai, Thailand, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  9. Abdullah, A.T.M.; Rahman, M.M.; Sharif, M.; Khan, T.A.; Islam, S.N.; Karim, K.M.R. Edible flowers efficiency to boost the thermal oxidation stability of soybean oil: Polyphenolic and antioxidant insights. Future Foods 2024, 9, 100338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Tangpao, T.; Chung, H.H.; Sommano, S.R. Aromatic profiles of essential oils from five commonly used Thai basils. Foods 2018, 7, 175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Wongkaew, M.; Sangta, J.; Chansakaow, S.; Jantanasakulwong, K.; Rachtanapun, P.; Sommano, S.R. Volatile profiles from over-ripe purée of Thai mango varieties and their physiochemical properties during heat processing. PLoS ONE 2021, 16, e0248657. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Pinto, T.; Aires, A.; Cosme, F.; Bacelar, E.; Morais, M.C.; Oliveira, I.; Ferreira-Cardoso, J.; Anjos, R.; Vilela, A.; Gonçalves, B. Bioactive (poly) phenols, volatile compounds from vegetables, medicinal and aromatic plants. Foods 2021, 10, 106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Cox-Georgian, D.; Ramadoss, N.; Dona, C.; Basu, C. Chapter 15 Therapeutic and medicinal uses of terpenes. In Medicinal Plants: From Farm to Pharmacy, 1st ed.; Joshee, N., Dhekney, S.A., Parajuli, P., Eds.; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2019; pp. 333–359. [Google Scholar]
  14. Sommano, S.R.; Chittasupho, C.; Ruksiriwanich, W.; Jantrawut, P. The cannabis terpenes. Molecules 2020, 25, 5792. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Larsen, K.; Lock, J.M.; Maas, H.; Maas, P.J.M. Zingiberaceae. In Flowering Plants Monocotyledons: Alismatanae and Commelinanae (except Gramineae); Kubitzki, K., Ed.; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 1998; pp. 474–495. [Google Scholar]
  16. Charoimek, N.; Sunanta, P.; Tangpao, T.; Suksathan, R.; Chanmahasathien, W.; Sirilun, S.; Hua, K.-F.; Chung, H.H.; Sommano, S.R.; Junmahasathien, T. Pharmaceutical potential evaluation of Damask rose by-products from volatile oil extraction. Plants 2024, 13, 1605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Suksathan, R.; Rachkeeree, A.; Puangpradab, R.; Kantadoung, K.; Sommano, S.R. Phytochemical and nutritional compositions and antioxidants properties of wild edible flowers as sources of new tea formulations. NFS J. 2021, 24, 15–25. [Google Scholar]
  18. Thiex, N. Evaluation of analytical methods for the determination of moisture, crude protein, crude fat, and crude fiber in distillers dried grains with solubles. J. AOAC Int. 2019, 92, 61–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. The Food Drug Administration (FDA). Food labeling: Revision of the nutrition and supplement facts label. Fed. Regist. 2016, 81, 33742–33999. [Google Scholar]
  20. Xiao, J.H.; Xiao, D.M.; Sun, Z.H.; Xiong, Q.; Liang, Z.Q.; Zhong, J.J. Chemical compositions and antimicrobial property of three edible and medicinal Cordyceps Species. J. Food Agric. Environ. 2009, 7, 91–100. [Google Scholar]
  21. Folch, J.; Lee, M.; Stanley, G.H.S. A simple method for the isolation and purification of total lipids from animal tissue. J. Biol. Chem. 1975, 226, 497–509. [Google Scholar]
  22. Morrison, W.R.; Smith, L.M. Preparation of fatty acid methyl esters and dimethylacetals from lipids with boron fluoride-methanol. J. Lipid Res. 1964, 5, 600–608. [Google Scholar]
  23. Ao, C.; Deba, F.; Tako, M.; Tawata, S. Biological activity and composition of extract from aerial root of Ficus microcarpa L. fil. Int. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2009, 44, 349–358. [Google Scholar]
  24. Settharaksa, S.; Madaka, F.; Sueree, L.; Kittiwisut, S.; Sakunpak, A.; Moton, C.; Charoenchai, L. Effect of solvent types on phenolic, flavonoid contents and antioxidant activities of Syzygium gratum (Wight) SN. Int. J. Pharm. Pharm. Sci. 2014, 6, 114–116. [Google Scholar]
  25. Yen, G.C.; Hsieh, C.L. Antioxidant effects of dopamine and related compounds. Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem. 1997, 61, 1646–1649. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  26. Re, R.; Pellegrini, N.; Proteggente, A.; Pannala, A.; Yang, M.; Rice-Evans, C. Antioxidant activity applying an improved ABTS radical cation decolorization assay. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 1999, 26, 1231–1237. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  27. Nopporncharoenkul, N.; Jenjittikul, T.; Chuenboonngarm, N.; Anamthawat-Jónsson, K.; Umpunjun, P. Cytogenetic verification of Curcuma candida (Zingiberaceae) from Thailand and Myanmar. Thai For. Bull. (Bot.) 2020, 48, 7–17. [Google Scholar]
  28. Jenjittikul, T.; Larsen, K. Kaempferia candida Wall.(Zingiberaceae), a new record for Thailand. Thai For. Bull. (Bot.) 2000, 28, 45–49. [Google Scholar]
  29. Inta, A.; Trisonthi, C.; Pongamornkul, W.; Panyadee, P. Ethnobotany of Zingiberaceae in Mae Hong Son, Northern Thailand. Biodiversitas J. Biol. Divers. 2023, 24, 2114–2124. [Google Scholar]
  30. Saisor, N.; Prathepha, P.; Saensouk, S. Ethnobotanical study and utilization of plants in Khok Nhong Phok forest, Kosum Phisai district, northeastern Thailand. Biodiversitas J. Biol. Divers. 2021, 22, 4336–4348. [Google Scholar]
  31. Ragsasilp, A.; Saensouk, P.; Saensouk, S. Ginger family from Bueng Kan Province, Thailand: Diversity, conservation status, and traditional uses. Biodiversitas J. Biol. Divers. 2022, 23, 2739–2752. [Google Scholar]
  32. Saensouk, S.; Saensouk, P.; Pasorn, P.; Chantaranothai, P. Diversity and uses of Zingiberaceae in Nam Nao National Park, Chaiyaphum and Phetchabun provinces, Thailand, with a new record for Thailand. Agric. Nat. Resour. 2016, 50, 445–453. [Google Scholar]
  33. Cruz-Garcia, G.S.; Price, L.L. Ethnobotanical investigation of ‘wild’ food plants used by rice farmers in Kalasin, Northeast Thailand. J. Ethnobiol. Ethnomed. 2011, 7, 33. [Google Scholar]
  34. Perry, L.M.; Methzger, J. Medicinal Plants of East and Southeast Asia: Attributed Properties and Uses; MIT Press: London, UK, 1980; pp. 1–632. [Google Scholar]
  35. Song, C.; Tian, J.; Xie, D.; Lin, S.; Yang, Y.; Zhang, X.; Liao, X.; Wu, Z. Metabolomic and transcriptomic analyses provide insight into the variation of floral scent and molecular regulation in different cultivars and flower development of Curcuma alismatifolia. Hortic. Res. 2025, 12, uhae348. [Google Scholar]
  36. Peng, W.; Li, P.; Ling, R.; Wang, Z.; Feng, X.; Liu, J.; Yang, Q.; Yan, J. Diversity of Volatile Compounds in Ten Varieties of Zingiberaceae. Molecules 2022, 27, 565. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Cao, Z.; Wang, L.; Huang, D.; Wu, G.; Li, X.; Yue, Y.; Yu, Y.; Yu, R.; Fan, Y. Identification and functional analysis of floral terpene synthase genes in Curcuma alismatifolia. Planta 2024, 260, 26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Chane-Ming, J.; Vera, R.; Chalchat, J.-C.; Cabassu, P. Chemical Composition of Essential Oils from Rhizomes, Leaves and Flowers of Curcuma longa L. from Reunion Island. J. Essent. Oil Res. 2002, 14, 249–251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Tran-Trung, H.; Dau, X.D.; Nguyen, T.C.; Nguyen-Thi-Thu, H.; Nguyen-Ngoc, H.; Nguyen, T.G.A.; Hoang, V.T.; Nguyen, D.K.; Nguyen, D.D.; Tran Van, C. Phytochemical analysis of the essential oils from the rhizomes of three Vietnamese Curcuma species and their antimicrobial activity. Nat. Prod. Commun. 2023, 18, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Cuong, N.M.; Ha, V.T.; Khanh, P.N.; Van, D.T.; Cuong, T.D.; Huong, T.T.; Thuy, D.T.T.; Nhan, N.T.; Hanh, N.P.; Toan, T.Q. Chemical compositions and antimicrobial activity of essential oil from the rhizomes of Curcuma singularis growing in Vietnam. Am. J. Essent. Oils Nat. Prod. 2017, 5, 20–25. [Google Scholar]
  41. Kumari, P.; Bhargava, B. Phytochemicals from edible flowers: Opening a new arena for healthy lifestyle. J. Funct. Foods 2021, 78, 104375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Fernandes, L.; Ramalhosa, E.; Pereira, J.A.; Saraiva, J.A.; Casal, S. The Unexplored Potential of Edible Flowers Lipids. Agriculture 2018, 8, 146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Choudhury, D. Study on the nutrient composition of local variety of turmeric (Curcuma longa). J. Pharm. Innov. 2019, 8, 205–207. [Google Scholar]
  44. Mlcek, J.; Plaskova, A.; Jurikova, T.; Sochor, J.; Baron, M.; Ercisli, S. Chemical, nutritional and sensory characteristics of six ornamental edible flowers species. Foods 2021, 10, 2053. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Grzeszczuk, M.; Stefaniak, A.; Meller, E.; Wysocka, G. Mineral composition of some edible flowers. J. Elem. 2018, 23, 151–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Dowhan Hoag, L.; Dharmarajan, T. Calcium and phosphorus. In Geriatric Gastroenterology; Pitchumoni, C.S., Dharmarajan, T.S., Eds.; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2020; pp. 1–29. [Google Scholar]
  47. Prasad, R.; Prasad, S.; Lal, R. Phosphorus in soil and plants in relation to human nutrition and health. In Soil Phosphorus, 1st ed.; Lal, R., Stewart, B.A., Eds.; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2016; pp. 65–80. [Google Scholar]
  48. Si, M.K.; Ali, A.; Vaidya, A.; Singh, S.; Deshmukh, K.; Bhagat, N.; Hanwat, P.; Sahu, N.; Bhagat, P.; Tilase, S. Quantitative analysis of essential metals (magnesium, calcium and iron) in various Indian vegetables and fruits. Int. J. Eng. Res. Technol. 2021, 10, 266–269. [Google Scholar]
  49. Suliburska, J.; Kaczmarek, K. Herbal infusions as a source of calcium, magnesium, iron, zinc and copper in human nutrition. Int. J. Food Sci. Nutr. 2012, 63, 194–198. [Google Scholar]
  50. Wei, S.; Liu, H.; Li, J.; Ren, T.; Xie, J. Metabolite variations of sugars, organic acids, fatty acids and amino acids in flower buds of Zingiber mioga Roscoe at different developmental stages. J. Food Compos. Anal. 2023, 116, 105050. [Google Scholar]
  51. Connor, W.E. α-Linolenic acid in health and disease. Am. J. Clin. 1999, 69, 827–828. [Google Scholar]
  52. Rajaram, S. Health benefits of plant-derived α-linolenic acid. Am. J. Clin. 2014, 100, 443S–448S. [Google Scholar]
  53. Innis, S.M. Palmitic acid in early human development. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2016, 56, 1952–1959. [Google Scholar]
  54. Rachkeeree, A.; Kantadoung, K.; Puangpradub, R.; Suksathan, R. Phytochemicals, Antioxidants and Anti-Tyrosinase Analyses of Selected Ginger Plants. Pharmacogn. J. 2020, 12, 872–883. [Google Scholar]
  55. Xu, D.P.; Li, Y.; Meng, X.; Zhou, T.; Zhou, Y.; Zheng, J.; Zhang, J.J.; Li, H.B. Natural antioxidants in foods and medicinal plants: Extraction, assessment and resources. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2017, 18, 96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Karak, P. Biological activities of flavonoids: An overview. Int. J. Pharm. Sci. Rs. 2019, 10, 1567–1574. [Google Scholar]
  57. Panche, A.N.; Diwan, A.; Chandra, S. Flavonoids: An overview. J. Nutr. Sci. 2016, 5, e47. [Google Scholar]
  58. Petrova, I.; Petkova, N.; Ivanov, I. Five edible flowers–valuable source of antioxidants in human nutrition. Int. J. Pharmacogn. Pharm. Res. 2016, 8, 604–610. [Google Scholar]
  59. Sandeep, I.S.; Kuanar, A.; Akbar, A.; Kar, B.; Das, S.; Mishra, A.; Sial, P.; Naik, P.K.; Nayak, S.; Mohanty, S. Agroclimatic zone based metabolic profiling of turmeric (Curcuma Longa L.) for phytochemical yield optimization. Ind. Crops Prod. 2016, 85, 229–240. [Google Scholar]
  60. Albaqami, J.J.; Hamdi, H.; Narayanankutty, A.; Visakh, N.U.; Sasidharan, A.; Kuttithodi, A.M.; Famurewa, A.C.; Pathrose, B. Chemical composition and biological activities of the leaf essential oils of Curcuma longa, Curcuma aromatica and Curcuma angustifolia. Antibiotics 2022, 11, 1547. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  61. Sandeep, I.S.; Das, S.; Nasim, N.; Mishra, A.; Acharya, L.; Joshi, R.K.; Nayak, S.; Mohanty, S. Differential expression of CURS gene during various growth stages, climatic condition and soil nutrients in turmeric (Curcuma longa): Towards site specific cultivation for high curcumin yield. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2017, 118, 348–355. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  62. Sasikumar, B. Genetic resources of Curcuma: Diversity, characterization and utilization. Plant Genet. Resour. 2005, 3, 230–251. [Google Scholar]
  63. Guerriero, G.; Berni, R.; Muñoz-Sanchez, J.A.; Apone, F.; Abdel-Salam, E.M.; Qahtan, A.A.; Alatar, A.A.; Cantini, C.; Cai, G.; Hausman, J.-F.; et al. Production of plant secondary metabolites: Examples, tips and suggestions for biotechnologists. Genes 2018, 9, 309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Alam, M.A.; Roy, S.; Rahman, M.A.; Islam, M.R.; Rahman, M.M.; Obaidullah, A.J.; Farid, M.N.; Rahman, M.M.; Islam, M.R.; Mozumder, S.N. Study on the genetic variability and adaptability of turmeric (Curcuma longa L.) genotypes for development of desirable cultivars. PLoS ONE 2024, 19, e0297202. [Google Scholar]
  65. Anandaraj, M.; Prasath, D.; Kandiannan, K.; Zachariah, T.J.; Srinivasan, V.; Jha, A.; Singh, B.; Singh, A.; Pandey, V.; Singh, S. Genotype by environment interaction effects on yield and curcumin in turmeric (Curcuma longa L.). Ind. Crops Prod. 2014, 53, 358–364. [Google Scholar]
  66. Dudekula, M.V.; Kandasamy, V.; Balaraman, S.S.; Selvamani, S.B.; Muthurajan, R.; Adhimoolam, K.; Manoharan, B.; Natesan, S. Unlocking the genetic diversity of Indian turmeric (Curcuma longa L.) germplasm based on rhizome yield traits and curcuminoids. Front. Plant Sci. 2022, 13, 1036592. [Google Scholar]
  67. Alam, M.A.; Rahman, M.; Ahmed, S.; Jahan, N.; Khan, M.A.-A.; Islam, M.R.; Alsuhaibani, A.M.; Gaber, A.; Hossain, A. Genetic variation and genotype by environment interaction for agronomic traits in maize (Zea mays L.) hybrids. Plants 2022, 11, 1522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Edible flowers of three Curcuma spp. (a) C. candida (Wall.) Techapr. and Škorničk., (b) C. singularis Gagnep., and (c) C. petiolata Roxb. Scale bar = 10 cm and Royal Horticultural Society (RHS) color chart.
Figure 1. Edible flowers of three Curcuma spp. (a) C. candida (Wall.) Techapr. and Škorničk., (b) C. singularis Gagnep., and (c) C. petiolata Roxb. Scale bar = 10 cm and Royal Horticultural Society (RHS) color chart.
Diversity 17 00224 g001
Figure 2. Cluster analysis of volatile compounds in three edible Curcuma spp. flowers (a), principal component analysis (PCA) biplot illustrating relationships between compounds and species (b), and their descriptive aromatic profile mapping (c).
Figure 2. Cluster analysis of volatile compounds in three edible Curcuma spp. flowers (a), principal component analysis (PCA) biplot illustrating relationships between compounds and species (b), and their descriptive aromatic profile mapping (c).
Diversity 17 00224 g002
Table 1. Utilization of wild edible Curcuma spp. in Thailand.
Table 1. Utilization of wild edible Curcuma spp. in Thailand.
NoCollection NumbersLocal Name; Scientific NamePlant Parts UsedUtilization
1LC014Dok din,
Curcuma candida
InflorescencesYoung inflorescences are steamed and consumed as a vegetable, commonly paired with chili, stir-fried, or incorporated into spicy soups.
2LC012Krachiao khao,
Curcuma singularis
InflorescencesYoung inflorescences are steamed and consumed as a vegetable
3LC017Queen lily ginger,
Curcuma petiolata
InflorescencesYoung inflorescences are occasionally steamed, consumed as a vegetable and seasonal food source
Table 2. Nutrition composition of edible flowers from the Curcuma spp.
Table 2. Nutrition composition of edible flowers from the Curcuma spp.
Nutritional ParametersCurcuma candidaCurcuma singularisCurcuma petiolata
Proximate composition (g/100 g DW)
Moisture content14.62 ± 0.69 b17.81 ± 0.88 a12.83 ± 0.66 c
Ash17.04 ± 0.12 b14.68 ± 0.16 c18.27 ± 0.19 a
Fat5.60 ± 0.07 b5.36 ± 0.39 c6.72 ± 0.01 a
Carbohydrate81.68 ± 0.61 b77.23 ± 0.06 c83.47 ± 0.33 a
Fiber19.64 ± 0.2619.19 ± 1.1419.49 ± 0.23
Protein10.71 ± 0.30 c12.74 ± 0.19 b18.04 ± 1.18 a
Total energy333.26 ± 0.04 b318.40 ± 1.93 c342.83 ± 3.66 a
Macro-elements (g/100 g DW)
Phosphorus0.40 ± 0.00 a0.28 ± 0.04 c0.36 ± 0.01 b
Potassium3.06 ± 0.01 a2.60 ± 0.03 b1.82 ± 0.01 c
Sodium0.46 ± 0.01 b0.48 ± 0.01 a0.33 ± 0.00 c
Calcium2.49 ± 0.00 a1.01 ± 0.01 c1.30 ± 0.01 b
Micro-elements (g/100 g DW)
Iron0.47 ± 0.02 a0.29 ± 0.00 b0.22 ± 0.00 c
Magnesium0.59 ± 0.01 a0.36 ± 0.00 c0.41 ± 0.00 b
Values are the mean of the triplicates + SD. Values of each parameter with different superscript letters within the same row are significantly different at p < 0.05.
Table 3. Free fatty acid composition of edible flowers from the Curcuma spp.
Table 3. Free fatty acid composition of edible flowers from the Curcuma spp.
Free fatty Acid Composition
(mg/100 g DW)
Curcuma candidaCurcuma petiolataCurcuma singularis
Behenic acid1647.00 ± 106.07Nd.Nd.
Linoleic acid30,323.50 ± 433.46 b45,356.00 ± 181.02 a34,953.50 ± 142.13 b
Oleic acid10,266.50 ± 258.09 a6851.50 ± 33.23 b13,217.50 ± 190.21 a
Palmitic acid42,943.00 ± 219.20 a31,097.50 ± 96.87 b32,978.50 ± 54.45 b
Stearic acid6151.00 ± 8.49 a3924.00 ± 2.83 c4446.50 ± 116.67 b
α-Linolenic acid8669.00 ± 55.15 c12,770.50 ± 248.19 b14,404.00 ± 15.56 a
Values are the mean of the triplicates ± SD. Values of each parameter with different superscript letters within the same row are significantly different at p < 0.05. Nd.: Not detected.
Table 4. Phytochemicals of edible flowers from Curcuma spp.
Table 4. Phytochemicals of edible flowers from Curcuma spp.
PhytochemicalsCurcuma candidaCurcuma singularisCurcuma petiolata
Total phenolics
(mg GAE/g DW)
0.06 ± 0.00 c0.26 ± 0.01 a0.23 ± 0.02 b
Total flavonoids
(mg QE/g DW)
0.09 ± 0.01 c0.11 ± 0.01 b0.20 ± 0.03 a
DPPH
(mg TEAC/g DW)
3.06 ± 0.01 c3.34 ± 0.08 b4.98 ± 0.02 a
DPPH (IC50 mg/g DW)10.01 ± 0.01 b10.32 ± 0.09 c8.80 ± 0.07 a
ABTS+
(mg TEAC/g DW)
0.70 ± 0.02 c1.47 ± 0.03 b2.57 ± 0.01 a
Values are the mean of the triplicates ± SD. Values of each parameter with different superscript letters within the same row are significantly different at p < 0.05.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Sommano, S.R.; Thomya, S.; Ai, P.N.; Khemacheewakul, J.; Sindhu, R.; Prasad, S.K.; Thongdang, P.; Rachkeeree, A.; Wongnak, M.; Panyadee, P.; et al. Aromatic Profiling and Bioactive Potentials of Thai Edible Flowers from the Curcuma spp. (Zingiberaceae). Diversity 2025, 17, 224. https://doi.org/10.3390/d17040224

AMA Style

Sommano SR, Thomya S, Ai PN, Khemacheewakul J, Sindhu R, Prasad SK, Thongdang P, Rachkeeree A, Wongnak M, Panyadee P, et al. Aromatic Profiling and Bioactive Potentials of Thai Edible Flowers from the Curcuma spp. (Zingiberaceae). Diversity. 2025; 17(4):224. https://doi.org/10.3390/d17040224

Chicago/Turabian Style

Sommano, Sarana Rose, Sureerat Thomya, Pasin Norkum Ai, Julaluk Khemacheewakul, R. Sindhu, Shashanka K. Prasad, Pawenud Thongdang, Apinya Rachkeeree, Methee Wongnak, Prateep Panyadee, and et al. 2025. "Aromatic Profiling and Bioactive Potentials of Thai Edible Flowers from the Curcuma spp. (Zingiberaceae)" Diversity 17, no. 4: 224. https://doi.org/10.3390/d17040224

APA Style

Sommano, S. R., Thomya, S., Ai, P. N., Khemacheewakul, J., Sindhu, R., Prasad, S. K., Thongdang, P., Rachkeeree, A., Wongnak, M., Panyadee, P., Puangpradab, R., & Suksathan, R. (2025). Aromatic Profiling and Bioactive Potentials of Thai Edible Flowers from the Curcuma spp. (Zingiberaceae). Diversity, 17(4), 224. https://doi.org/10.3390/d17040224

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop