Diplostomum cf. vanelli Yamaguti, 1935 (Trematoda: Diplostomidae Poirier, 1886): Morpho-Molecular Data and Life Cycle

Abstract

Furcocercariae, of the trematodes from the family Diplostomidae, were found in freshwater snails—Radix auricularia, which were collected in a reservoir located on Popov Island (Peter the Great Bay, Sea of Japan). The life cycle was experimentally reproduced for the first time, while morphometric data for the development stages were studied and described for the newly discovered trematode. Moreover, molecular data for nuclear and mitochondrial markers were also obtained. It was determined that the morphometric characteristics of the trematode coincided with the species Diplostomum cf. vanelli, the molecular data analysis validates the species independence. Furthermore, the study highlights the issue of species identification in the Diplostomum genus.

1. Introduction

Trematodes of the genus Diplostomum Nordmann, 1832 are a cosmopolitan group of parasites. According to the World Register of Marine Species (WoRMS) (https://www.marinespecies.org/index.php (accessed on 10 April 2024)), this group includes 27 species of fish ocular parasites. A significant number of publications have been devoted to the study of representatives of this genus, concerning both the morphology of developmental stages and issues of taxonomy and systematics [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10]. Interest in this group of trematodes is determined not only by the solution of taxonomic problems, but also by its high ecological significance. A major feature of the life cycles of species of Diplostomum is the metacercarial stage infecting the eyes of fish, often causing blindness and sometimes death. Fry are most susceptible to infection. The extensiveness and intensity of the invasion quickly increases, which leads to the death of the fish if it is not eaten by the final host. Infection can lead to large-scale epizootics among fish, both on natural conditions and in fish farms. In the south of the Russian Far East, six species of Diplostomum are currently recorded: D. kronschnepi Bychowskaja-Pawlowskaja, 1953, D. mergi Dubois, 1932, D. commutatum (Diesing, 1850) Dubois, 1937, D. spathaceum (Rudolphi, 1819) Olsson, 1876, D. helveticum (Dubois, 1929), and D. vanelli Yamaguti, 1935 [11,12,13]. For two of the listed species (D. spathaceum and D. mergi), molecular data were obtained for samples collected in Ukraine and China, respectively.

During our examination of freshwater malacofauna in a reservoir on the territory of Popov Island, the pulmonated snails Radix auricularia (Linnaeus, 1758) (Lymnaeidae Rafinesque, 1815) were found, releasing furcocercariae morphologically similar to Diplostomidae Poirier, 1886. The life cycle was experimentally studied, and morphometric data on development stages and molecular characteristics were obtained to clarify the taxonomic affiliation of the discovered trematodes.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Life Cycle and Morphology of Worms

The snails R. auricularia, releasing morphologically identical furcocercariae, were collected manually and using a hydrobiological sieve in a reservoir located on Popov Island in the Peter the Great Bay of the Sea of Japan. Among the 100 collected snails, 10 were infected by Diplostomidae. To determine a second intermediate host, water containing cercariae obtained from one individual of R. auricularia was poured into two containers with a volume of 1 L each, of which the first contained 10 tadpoles of Dybowski’s frog Rana dybowskii Günther, 1876, and the second seven fish, Lake minnow Phoxinus percnurus (Pallas, 1814). Tadpoles and fish were caught in a reservoir that did not contain a source of trematode infestation. Before starting experimental infection, 20 tadpoles and 10 fish were dissected from this reservoir for control, with no trematode metacercariae found. Infection of animals was repeated twice, after the fish and tadpoles were kept in separate aquariums with volumes of 10 and 1.5 L, respectively. On the third- and forty-third-day post exposure (PE), metacercariae morphologically similar to those of Diplostomum were found in the vitreous body of the eyes of the infected fish using a light microscope. The fish (n = 5) were cut into pieces and fed to a two-week-old duckling Anas platyrhynchos Linnaeus, 1758 (n = 1) along with a portion of food. Nine days PE, the bird was euthanized and necropsied. Six worms were removed from the duckling’s intestines.

All procedures contributing to this work comply with the ethical standards of the relevant national and institutional guides on the care and use of laboratory animals including fish, tadpoles, and birds. Euthanasia of all the animals was carried out in accordance with the decision of the Committee on the Ethics of Animal Experiments, Federal Scientific Center of the East Asia Terrestrial Biodiversity (FSCEATB), Far Eastern Branch, Russian Academy of Sciences (FEB RAS) (Permit No. 1 of 25 April 2022) and was done in accordance with ethical standards of the relevant national and institutional guides.

The morphology of live cercariae and metacercariae was examined using light microscopy. Cercariae were fixed in a hot 4% formalin solution before measurements; the metacercariae were measured live. Adult trematodes were fixed in 70% ethanol and then transferred to 96% ethanol for storage. Whole mounts of adult specimens were prepared by staining with alum carmine, dehydration in a graded ethanol series, clearing in clove oil, and mounting in Canada balsam. Measurements of cercariae, metacercariae, and adult stages were made using an ocular micrometer and light microscopy. All measurements were in micrometers (μm). Morphological drawings were made using a drawing tube.

2.2. Molecular Data

2.2.1. DNA Extraction, Amplification, and Sequencing

Genomic DNA was extracted from one adult worm using HotSHOT [14]. Partial sequences of the 28S rRNA gene (28S) of nuclear DNA and partial sequences of the COX1 gene of mitochondrial DNA were amplified by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) using specific primers (

Table 1. PCR primers used in amplification and sequencing partial 28S and COX1 gene sequences from adult Diplostomum specimen collected from duckling.

DNA Region	Primer	Sequence 5′→3′	Direction	Reference
28S	digl2	AAGCATATCACTAAGCGG	forward, external	[15]
	1500R	GCTATCCTGAGGGAAACTTCG	reverse, external	[15]
	900F	CCGTCTTGAAACACGGACCAAG	forward, internal	[15]
	1200R	CTTGGTCCGTGTTTCAAGACGGG	reverse, internal	[15]
COX1	MplatCOX1dF	TGTAAAACGACGGCCAGTTTWCITTRGATCATAAG	forward, external	[16]
	MplatCOX1dR	CAGGAAACAGCTATGACTGAAAYAAYAIIGGATCICCACC	reverse, external	[16]

). Annealing temperatures were 55 and 47 °C for 28S and COX1, respectively. The efficiency and contamination of PCR were tested by setting positive and negative controls, respectively. The PCR products were sequenced via the Sanger method using a BigDye Terminator Cycle Sequencing Kit (Applied Biosystems, Waltham, MA, USA). Nucleotide sequences were determined on an ABI 3500 Genetic Analyzer (Applied Biosystems, USA) at the FSCEATB FEB RAS, Russia. Both external and internal primers were used for sequencing (Table 1).

2.2.2. Analysis of Genetic Data

Processing and alignment of consensus sequences were carried out using the FinchTV 1.4 and MEGA 5.0 programs [17]. Phylogenetic relationships within the family Diplostomidae were assessed independently for both markers using newly obtained sequences and data for all species of Diplostomum available in GenBank. Sequences less than 1000 bp in length were removed from the analysis. The p-distances between and within the species were analyzed using the MEGA software without including indels. Members of the trematode family Diplostomidae, Postharmostomum commutatum (Diesing, 1858) (Brachylaimoidea (Joyeux & Foley, 1930)), located left (basal) in the phylogenetic tree based on lsrDNA- and ssrDNA-combined sequences inferred by [18], were selected as outgroups in our study to take root of the reconstructions. The list of samples used in the study is provided in Table 2 and Table 3.

Phylogenetic relationships were reconstructed using the Bayesian algorithm in the MrBayes 3.1.2. program [19] by applying a model selected as optimal on the basis of the Akaike information criterion (AIC) in the jModeltest 2.1.7 program [20]: TPM3uf+I+G for 28S, and TIM3+I+G for COX1. The method of a posteriori probabilities was used for the trees constructed by the Bayesian algorithm. In the Bayesian analysis, 600,000 and 31,300,000 generations of the Markov chain Monte Carlo posterior part third (MCMC) were simulated for 28S and COX1, respectively. The number of generations was determined to be sufficient since the SD value calculated was <0.01. The selection was performed with a frequency of every 100 and 1000 generations for 28S and COX1 markers, respectively. Of the samples assessed, 25% were excluded to permit the construction of consensus trees.

Table 2. Sequences for the 28S gene for species of Diplostomum used for the phylogenetic analysis of D. cf. vanelli.

Species	Sources	Genbank Accession Number
Diplostomum cf. vanelli	this study	PP002326
Diplostomum alascense	[21]	MZ314153
Diplostomum phoxini	[18]	AY222173
Diplostomum alarioides	[21]	MZ314152
Diplostomum scudderi	[21]	MZ314170
Diplostomum marshalli	[21]	MZ314167
Diplostomum gavium	[21]	MZ314154-55 MZ314157
Diplostomum pseudospathaceum	[22]	KR269766
Diplostomum rauschi	[21]	MZ314169
Diplostomum indistinctum	[21]	MZ314161-65
Diplostomum spathaceum	[22]	KR269765
	[21]	MZ314171
Diplostomum huronense	[21]	MZ314160
Diplostomum baeri	[23]	OK631869
Diplostomum ardeae	[24]	MT259036
Postharmostomum commutatum *	[25]	MH915390

* Outgroup.

Table 2. Sequences for the 28S gene for species of Diplostomum used for the phylogenetic analysis of D. cf. vanelli.

Species	Sources	Genbank Accession Number
Diplostomum cf. vanelli	this study	PP002326
Diplostomum alascense	[21]	MZ314153
Diplostomum phoxini	[18]	AY222173
Diplostomum alarioides	[21]	MZ314152
Diplostomum scudderi	[21]	MZ314170
Diplostomum marshalli	[21]	MZ314167
Diplostomum gavium	[21]	MZ314154-55 MZ314157
Diplostomum pseudospathaceum	[22]	KR269766
Diplostomum rauschi	[21]	MZ314169
Diplostomum indistinctum	[21]	MZ314161-65
Diplostomum spathaceum	[22]	KR269765
	[21]	MZ314171
Diplostomum huronense	[21]	MZ314160
Diplostomum baeri	[23]	OK631869
Diplostomum ardeae	[24]	MT259036
Postharmostomum commutatum *	[25]	MH915390

* Outgroup.

Table 3. Sequences for the COX1 gene for species of Diplostomum used for the phylogenetic analysis of D. cf. vanelli.

Species	Sources	Genbank Accession Number
Diplostomum cf. vanelli	this study	PP002346
Diplostomum huronense	[21] [26] [8] [27]	MZ323257-61 GQ292488-90 KR271069; KR271071-74 HM064667-68; HM064672
Diplostomum rauschi	[21]	MZ323270
Diplostomum indistinctum	[21] [26] [27] [28]	MZ323262-63; MZ323265 GQ292482 HM064673 KT831379
Diplostomum baeri	Unpublished [29] [8] [30] [23]	MF142161; MF142171-73; MF142176; MF142178; MF142184; MF142186-89; MF142191; MF142196; MF142198; MF142209; MF142211-12; MF142214; MF142216; MF142222-24 MH368850-53 KR271040; KR271042-47; KR271050-60; KR271062; KR271064-67 KM212030-KM212031 OK632471-74; OK632476-77
Diplostomum spathaceum	[21] [8] [22]	MZ323274; MZ323276; MZ323278-81 KR271414-16; KR271419-24; KR271427-28; KR271431-45; KR271449; KR271451; KR271454-62; KR271465; KR271467-69 KR269763
Diplostomum alascense	[21]	MZ323250
Diplostomum scudderi	[21]	MZ323273
Diplostomum alarioides	[21]	MZ323249
Diplostomum pseudospathaceum	[22] [8]	KR269764 KR271083-89; KR271091-92
Diplostomum gavium	[21]	MZ323251; MZ323255
Diplostomum marshalli	[21]	MZ323268
Diplostomum lunaschiae	[24]	MT324602; MT324607-08; MT324612-14; MT324617; MT324621-22; MT324595-96; MT324599
Diplostomum ardeae	[24] [8]	MT324592-93 KR271033
Diplostomum mergi	[8] Unpublished	KR271082 KY271543
Postharmostomum commutatum *	[31]	MN200359

* Outgroup.

Table 3. Sequences for the COX1 gene for species of Diplostomum used for the phylogenetic analysis of D. cf. vanelli.

Species	Sources	Genbank Accession Number
Diplostomum cf. vanelli	this study	PP002346
Diplostomum huronense	[21] [26] [8] [27]	MZ323257-61 GQ292488-90 KR271069; KR271071-74 HM064667-68; HM064672
Diplostomum rauschi	[21]	MZ323270
Diplostomum indistinctum	[21] [26] [27] [28]	MZ323262-63; MZ323265 GQ292482 HM064673 KT831379
Diplostomum baeri	Unpublished [29] [8] [30] [23]	MF142161; MF142171-73; MF142176; MF142178; MF142184; MF142186-89; MF142191; MF142196; MF142198; MF142209; MF142211-12; MF142214; MF142216; MF142222-24 MH368850-53 KR271040; KR271042-47; KR271050-60; KR271062; KR271064-67 KM212030-KM212031 OK632471-74; OK632476-77
Diplostomum spathaceum	[21] [8] [22]	MZ323274; MZ323276; MZ323278-81 KR271414-16; KR271419-24; KR271427-28; KR271431-45; KR271449; KR271451; KR271454-62; KR271465; KR271467-69 KR269763
Diplostomum alascense	[21]	MZ323250
Diplostomum scudderi	[21]	MZ323273
Diplostomum alarioides	[21]	MZ323249
Diplostomum pseudospathaceum	[22] [8]	KR269764 KR271083-89; KR271091-92
Diplostomum gavium	[21]	MZ323251; MZ323255
Diplostomum marshalli	[21]	MZ323268
Diplostomum lunaschiae	[24]	MT324602; MT324607-08; MT324612-14; MT324617; MT324621-22; MT324595-96; MT324599
Diplostomum ardeae	[24] [8]	MT324592-93 KR271033
Diplostomum mergi	[8] Unpublished	KR271082 KY271543
Postharmostomum commutatum *	[31]	MN200359

* Outgroup.

3. Results

3.1. Morphology Data

Diplostomum cf. vanelli

A total of six worms, with a well-developed reproductive system but without eggs in the uterus, were found from the duckling’s intestines.

Definitive host: Anas platyrhynchos (experimentally).

Site: small intestine.

First intermediate host: Radix auricularia.

Second intermediate host: Phoxinus percnurus (experimentally).

Site: Eye vitreous humor.

Locality: Lake on Popov Island (Vladivostok city), Primorsky Region, the Russian southern Far East, 42°57′ N, 131°43′ E.

Type-deposition: Paratype No. 251-255-Tr. This material is held in the parasitological collection of the Zoological Museum (Federal Scientific Center of the East Asia Terrestrial Biodiversity, Far East Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Vladivostok, Russia); e-mail: petrova@biosoil.ru. Deposited: 22 September 2023.

Adult worm (five experimentally-derived specimens) (Figure 1A,B,

Table 4. Measurements of adult Diplostomum vanelli of study by Yamaguti, 1935 cit. [32], Dubois, 1938 cit. [32], and Diplostomum cf. vanelli of present study (μm).

	Diplostomum vanelli
Source	Present Study	Yamaguti 1935 cit. [32]	Dubois 1938 cit. [32]
Body length	785–1145	1210–1600	1200–1500
Prosoma length	410–595	680–800	670–750
Prosoma width	250–370	450–650	480–520
Opisthosoma length	375–550	530–800	580–750
Opisthosoma width	175–245	320–470	400–470
Oral sucker length	50–80	48–75	55–62
Oral sucker width	45–100	38–84	62–79
Lateral pseudosucker length	55	90–102 diameter	72–100 diameter
Lateral pseudosucker width	30–80
Pharynx length	50–70 diameter	54–66	53–65
Pharynx width		42–54	45–50
Ventral sucker length	55–85	72–108 diameter	74–82
Ventral sucker width	70–105		86–90
Holdfast organ length	80–95	150–208 diameter	220–280 diameter
Holdfast organ width	100–125
Anterior testis length	100–220	110–180	140–160
Anterior testis width	70–130	200–330	270–305
Posterior testis length	175–220	140–200	150–205
Posterior testis width	60–115	280–360	315–360
Ovary length	50–60	50–110	105
Ovary width	55–75	75–160	125–140
Eggs length	-	93–108	96–104
Eggs width	-	54–60	54–63
Prosoma/opisthosoma length ratio	1.0	-	0.83–1.0
Oral/ventral sucker length ratio	0.9	-	-

). Body, distinctly bipartite. Prosoma spatulates, without ventral concavity. Opisthosoma elongates. Oral sucker subterminal, round or transversely oval, equal to or slightly less than ventral sucker. Pseudosuckers two, well-developed, lateral, on either side of oral sucker. Pharynx well-developed, round, adjacent to oral sucker. Intestinal bifurcation in middle third of forebody. Oesophagus short. Caeca short, terminates before reaching posterior end of body. Ventral sucker round, located just anterior to holdfast organ or partially covered by its front edge. Holdfast organ large, circular, with median longitudinal slit. Testes tandem, located in middle part of opisthosoma. Anterior testis asymmetrical. Posterior testis symmetrical, dumbbell-shaped. Seminal vesicle curved, posterior to testes. Ovary round or oval, situated in front of the anterior testis, dextral to midline. Vitelline fields contain small irregular follicles. In prosoma, vitelline follicles surround holdfast organ, then aggregate into six longitudinal ribbon fields (three on each side of median line), which extend to level of posterior end of pharynx. In opisthosoma, vitelline follicles occupy ventral side of body, and terminate before reaching end of opisthosoma. Copulatory bursa opened dorsally, located near posterior end of body. Eggs undetected in uterus.

Cercaria (based on 15 specimens) (Figure 1C,D). Body, 212–300 × 62–87, elongated oval, filled with numerous granular formations. Anterior end of body armed by three to four rows of transverse spines surrounding oral organ. At level of middle part of oral organ, five to six rows of spines, close in proximity to each other. Posterior to these rows of spines, seven rows of transverse spines reaching level of posterior end of ventral sucker or slightly posterior to ventral sucker. Oral organ elongated oval, 55–67 × 25–47. Prepharynx short, 4–5. Pharynx small oval, 12 × 10. Caeca reach excretory bladder. Ventral sucker round, 30–42 × 30–45, with spines arranged in two rows. Glands present in two pairs of cells located posterior to ventral sucker. Ducts of glands open at anterior end of body. Excretory system includes small excretory bladder, first-order ducts, second-order ducts, and caudal duct. Caudal duct, splits anterior to furcae into two canals reaching middle part of furcae, where it opens with pores. Flame cell formula 2[(1 + 1 + 1) + (1 + 1 + 1 + [2])] = 16. Tail stem, 225–282 × 42–50. Length of furcae equal to length of tail stem, 207–287 × 12–22.

Metacercaria (based on 15 specimens) (Figure 1E,F). Body consists of large prosoma (390–450 × 210–280) and small opisthosoma. Prosoma is leaf-shaped, gray due to pigmentation. Oral sucker, 70–90 × 50–90, round, subterminal. Pseudosuckers two, well-developed, lateral, on either side of oral sucker, 40–60 × 30–40. Prepharynx absent. Pharynx, 50–60 × 30–50, round or oval. Oesophagus long. Intestinal bifurcation on the border of anterior and middle thirds of body. Caeca reach anterior edge of excretory bladder. Ventral sucker, 30–60 × 30–90, round, or transversely oval, anterior to holdfast organ. Holdfast organ oval, 100–120 × 110–120. Four ducts diverge from excretory bladder, two of them blind and reach holdfast organ, and the other two form longitudinal channels connected transverse commissures forming network of channels. Number of excretory bodies from 150 to 180 calcareous bodies.

3.2. Molecular Data

For trematodes in this study, after alignment, the lengths of the obtained nucleotide sequences were as follows: 1115 bp for 28S and 405 bp for COX1.

In the phylogenetic reconstruction based on the nuclear marker (Figure 2), the D. cf. vanelli specimens obtained in the present study clustered with the specimens designated as D. spathaceum, Diplostomum huronense (La Rue, 1927) Hughes, 1929, Diplostomum baeri Dubois, 1937, and Diplostomum ardeae Dubois, 1969. In the phylogenetic reconstruction based on the mitochondrial marker (Figure 3), the D. cf. vanelli specimens obtained in the present study clustered with the specimens designated as Diplostomum indistinctum (Guberlet, 1923) (Branch 4). Genetic distances between the discovered trematode and species from the same clade and within clade are presented in

Table 5. Genetic distances between Diplostomum spathaceum, D. cf. vanelli, D. huronense, D. baeri, and D. ardea based on 28S sequences. The interspecific distances 0.1–3.6% were obtained in the present study. Standard error in bold.

	Species	Distances between Species					Distances within Species
		1	2	3	4	5
1	Diplostomum spathaceum		0.0000	0.0008	0.0044	0.0039	0.0000	0.0000
2	Diplostomum cf. vanelli	0.0000		0.0008	0.0044	0.0039	-	-
3	Diplostomum huronense	0.0009	0.0009		0.0042	0.0038	-	-
4	Diplostomum baeri	0.0188	0.0188	0.0179		0.0049	-	-
5	Diplostomum ardea	0.0224	0.0224	0.0215	0.0323		-	-

and

Table 6. Genetic distances between Diplostomum cf. vanelli, D. indistinctum (Branch 4), and D. spathaceum, based on COX1 sequences. The interspecific distances 3.2–15.9% were obtained in the present study. Standard error in bold.

	Species	Distances between Species			Distances within Species
		1	2	3
1	Diplostomum cf. vanelli		0.0126	0.0132	-	-
2	Diplostomum spathaceum	0.0963		0.0126	0.0094	0.0021
3	Diplostomum indistinctum	0.0849	0.0910		0.0082	0.0035

.

4. Discussion

Adult specimens of Diplostomum sp. from the experimental infections in this study are most morphologically similar to D. kronschnepi, D. helveticum, D. mergi, D. spathaceum, and D. vanelli in the structure of the prosoma and opisthosoma. However, specimens of the first four species differ from the worms in our material in the extent of the vitelline fields in the prosoma: in these four species the vitelline fields reach the level of the anterior end of the holdfast organ or ventral sucker, or extend slightly in front of the ventral sucker, as compared to the vitelline fields reaching the level of the posterior end of the pharynx of the specimens in our study. Moreover, D. mergi has a prosoma that is significantly longer than the opisthosoma, in contrast to the trematode we obtained, in which the prosoma and opisthosoma are equal or similar in length. In addition, the testes of D. spathaceum occupy the second half of the opisthosoma, whereas the testes of the fluke from the present study are located in the middle part of the opisthosoma.

The trematodes we obtained experimentally are most similar in morphometry to those of D. vanelli, which were first discovered in the lapwing Vanellus vanellus (Linnaeus, 1758) in Japan [32]. Our trematodes and those of D. vanelli have the following similar morphological characteristics: the ratio of the oral and ventral suckers; the ratio of the sizes of the prosoma and opisthosoma. In contrast, in the description of adult worms of D. vanelli given in the works of Yamaguti (1935) and Dubois (1938) (citing [32]), the vitelline fields in the prosoma reach the ventral sucker or, less often, the middle of the prosoma. At the same time, in the figure from Yamaguti (1935) (citing [32]), the vitelline fields reach the lower edge of the pharynx. The same length and localization of vitelline fields were obtained for the worm we studied. In addition, there are some metric differences between the individuals presented in the publications of Yamaguti (1935) (citing [32]) and Dubois (1938) (citing [32]) and in our material, which we attribute to the juvenile stage of the worms (as evidenced by their non-ovigerous state) in the current study (Table 4).

In the phylogenetic reconstruction based on the 28S nuclear marker (Figure 2), the genetic distances between our sample and D. huronense, D. baeri, and D. ardeae varied from 0.1 to 3.2%, which corresponds to the interspecific distances in the obtained reconstruction (0.1–3.6%). At the same time, the nucleotide sequence of trematode from this study was identical to samples KR269765 and MZ314171, designated as D. spathaceum. However, data on morphology are presented only for D. baeri [23]. Faltynkova and co-authors [23] have noted that due to weak morphological differences between Diplostomum species, erroneous species identification is possible. For correct species determination, an integrated approach is required, namely, the combination of both nucleotide sequences and the morphology of the worm from which these sequences were obtained. Thus, the species identity of the samples designated as D. huronense, D. spathaceum, and D. ardeae may be mistaken. Moreover, it is possible that trematode and D. spathaceum (KR269765, MZ314171), which are not different in nuclear marker, are cryptic species. This assumption is confirmed by data on mitochondrial marker. In phylogenetic reconstruction based on COX1 (Figure 3), our sample and D. spathaceum clustered into separate branches, and the genetic distance between them was 9.6%, which is in the range of interspecific differences (3.2–15.9%), while differences within the D. spathaceum cluster do not exceed 1.9%. Since both nuclear and mitochondrial marker data were obtained from the same samples of these two species (Table 2 and Table 3), we can confidently state that they are separate species. The worms in our material also significantly differ from other representatives of the genus-based mitochondrial marker (Figure 3). Thus, based on the combination of morphological characteristics and the similarity of a number of metric indicators (oral sucker, pharynx, ventral sucker, length of testes (Table 4)), and despite minor differences in metric indicators, we suggest that the trematode obtained as a result of the experimental study may belong to species D. cf. vanelli, the validity of which assertion is confirmed by a set of data on nuclear and mitochondrial markers. However, to finally resolve the issue, it is necessary to obtain genetic data for this species from the type localization, since previously, for morphologically similar trematodes from Russia and Japan circulating with the participation of birds and designated as one species, differences were identified at the molecular level [33]. Thus, until molecular data for samples D. vanelli are obtained from the type localization, the worm we study will be designated as D. cf. vanelli.

In addition to the species affilation of D. cf. vanelli, we identified paraphyly for three species of Diplostomum (D. huronense, D. indistinctum, and D. baeri) when analyzing the phylogenetic reconstruction for the mitochondrial marker (Figure 3). It was established that Branches 1, 2, and 5 included adult worms of D. huronense, D. indistinctum, and D. baeri, respectively, while Branches 3, 6, and 7 combined the cercarial and metacercarial stages of the same species, D. huronense, D. indistinctum, and D. baeri. Genetic distances between samples designated as D. huronense from Branches 1 and 3 were 10.8%, D. indistinctum from Branches 2 and 4 differed by 12.1%, and differences between specimens from Branches 2, 5, 6, and 7 designated as D. baeri ranged from 10.8 to 12.6%. The listed distances correspond to the interspecific level. Separating the specimens of the same species into different groups was previously mentioned in the work of [21]. In our opinion, it is most likely due to incorrect species identification of trematodes, primarily at the cercariae and metacercarial stages. Taking into account the above, we reiterate the conclusion of Faltynkova et al. 2022 [23] about the need to use a set of morphological and molecular data obtained from the same individuals. All this indicates the need for a significant revision of the data on Diplostomum deposited in the NCBI database.