Next Article in Journal
Environmental DNA in a Biofilm Can Be Used to Assess Diatom Ecological Health in Stream Water Ecology
Previous Article in Journal
A Subsurface Stepping Stone Hypothesis for the Conquest of Land by Arthropods
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Diversity
Volume 16
Issue 1
10.3390/d16010007
diversity-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

A New Species and Four New Recorded Species of Naididae (Annelida: Oligochaeta) from Korea †

by
Jeounghee Lee
1 and
Taekjun Lee
1,2,*
1
Marine Biological Resources Institute, Sahmyook University, Seoul 01795, Republic of Korea
2
Department of Animal Resources Science, Sahmyook University, Seoul 01795, Republic of Korea
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:440BD1DF-C1B9-4540-B470-75A336208E26.
Diversity 2024, 16(1), 7; https://doi.org/10.3390/d16010007
Submission received: 9 November 2023 / Revised: 29 November 2023 / Accepted: 12 December 2023 / Published: 22 December 2023
(This article belongs to the Section Marine Diversity)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
This taxonomic study investigates marine tubificids, with a focus on the genera Smithsonidrilus, Heterodrilus, Limnodriloides, and Tubificoides and presenting a new species, Heterodrilus koreanus n. sp., discovered in the around Ulleungdo and Dokdo Islands in the East Sea of the Republic of Korea. The new species, Heterodrilus koreanus n. sp., is characterized by a very long and slender atrium with prostate glands attached to the ventral side, with indistinct ducts and large round ampullae in the spermathecae. The four recorded species are: H. pentcheffi Erséus, 1981, Limnodriloides anxius Erséus, 1990, Smithsonidrilus exspectatus Erséus, 1993, and Tubificoides heterochaetus Michaelsen, 1926. This study not only enhances our comprehension of the intricate morphology within these genera but also contributes to the broader understanding of marine oligochaetes, particularly in the Korean marine ecosystem.

1. Introduction

Marine oligochaetes are found worldwide, with approximately 800 identified species inhabiting a variety of environments, including saline pools, rejectamenta, intertidal and subtidal sands, filamentous or macroalgal anchorages, and brackish water and deep-sea sediments [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9]. Most marine species belong to the Naididae family. They are known to be particularly diverse and abundant in shallow subtropical and tropical waters [1,3,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44,45,46]. Marine oligochaetes from Asia have been recorded in several studies, with approximately 100 species recorded in China over the past 30 years [3,20,37,40,47,48,49,50,51,52]. During the same period, 16 species (including brackish species) have been identified in Japan [53,54,55,56,57,58]. In comparison, taxonomic research on marine annelids in Korea has been focused on uncharacterized polychaetes [59,60,61,62,63,64,65,66,67]. There is no research on marine oligochaetes. Only two species, Marionina coatesae Erséus, 1990 and Pontodrilus litoralis (Grube, 1855), of marine oligochaetes have been recorded to date [68,69].
The present study considered the naidid fauna around the Ulleungdo and Dokdo Islands in the East Sea of Republic of Korea. Ulleungdo and Dokdo in the East Sea are located on the eastern side of the Korean Peninsula. They are part of an archipelago consisting of two large volcanic and 89 small islands. This location serves as a water mass where the East Korean Warm Current and the North Korean Warm Current intersect and mix [70,71,72]. The seafloor in this area is devoid of terrestrial sediments. It is characterized by a heterogeneous benthic zone with rocky areas and sediments composed of gravel, sand, and biogenic material. It is 217 km from the mainland of the Korean Peninsula. It is accessible, depending on the weather, from the nearest island, Ulleungdo. Only some areas of the island are accessible to the public. The investigation of the island and nearby waters is permitted only for research purposes. Research on the biodiversity of Ulleungdo and Dokdo Island and nearby waters has been conducted continuously since 1960. It has been confirmed that invertebrates living in waters of this area reveal a specialized species composition and regional distribution depending on the topography and habitat. To date, studies of marine invertebrate diversity have been conducted in relatively shallow water depths (<20 m). This study confirmed the biodiversity of benthic animals through scuba diving in waters of 20–50 m in depth, which had been little studied until now. Through this research, the habitat of marine oligochaetes was identified on a bottom of coarse sand and a medium to coarse bottom of gravel and rubble.
This study provides descriptions and photographs of one new species and four recorded species. Our findings contribute to the understanding of marine oligochaete diversity in Korean waters, highlighting the need for continued exploration and research in this region.

2. Materials and Methods

Specimen Sampling and Collection of New Species

Marine oligochaetes were collected from sediment samples obtained through scuba diving in subtidal zones (>20 m) east of Ulleungdo Island and Dokdo Island (Figure 1).
-
Neunggol is a huge underwater rock located in the south of Ulleungdo Island. It is famous for its strong currents. The bottom is coarse and made of sand and gravel.
-
Independence gate-bawi is a sea arch located in the easternmost part of Dongdo. It is home to a large amount of seaweed, Undaria, and Saccharina, and Eisenia. The bottom is medium to coarse and made of gravel and rubble.
-
Gajae Rock is located in the north of Seodo Island. It has good currents with many rocks and valleys. The large Crayfish Rock in the northernmost part has two valleys. The northern valley is made up of torn vertical walls. The bottom is coarse and made of sand. Specimens were kept alive and transported to the laboratory. Anesthesia and washing were carried out as previously described [73]. Specimens were sorted from sieved mixtures using a stereomicroscope (SMZ-168, Motic, Hong Kong). They were then fixed in an 8% formalin solution or 80% ethanol. Fixed worms were mounted on microscope slides with Canada balsam following the protocol of Erséus, 1994 [74]. Taxonomic identifications were carried out using a BX41 research microscope fitted with an Olympus DP22 camera system (Olympus, Tokyo, Japan). InnerViewTM-i series software (Innerview Co. Ltd., Seongnam, Republic of Korea) was used to measure and edit photographs. Voucher specimens of species described here have been deposited in the Marine Biological Resource Institute, Sahmyook University, Seoul, Republic of Korea, and the National Institute of Biological Resources in Korea.

3. Molecular Analysis

3.1. Extraction, PCR Amplification, and Sequencing

DNA was extracted using a DNeasy Blood and Tissue Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. All PCR primers are described in Table 1. All have been used previously [46]. For 18S rDNA, about 1800 bp were amplified as two overlapping segments, ca 1000 bp each. The entire fragment was first amplified with primer set 1 (Tim A and Tim B). Two fragments were subsequently amplified using primer set 2 (Tim A and 110R) and primer set 3 (660F and Tim B). PCRs were performed in a total volume of 25 μL, containing 0.5 Units of Taq polymerase (KAPA HiFi PCR Kit, Kapa Biosystems, Wilmington, DE, USA), 5 μL of the 10× buffer, 1.8 μL of 20 mM of MgCl2, 1 μL of each primer (10 mM each), 1 μL of a mix containing 10 mM of each dNTP, and 4 μL of template DNA. All PCRs for 16S and 18S were performed with an initial denaturation step at 95 °C for 5 min, followed by 30 cycles of denaturation at 95 °C for 1 min, annealing at 48–52 °C for 1 min, and elongation at 72 °C for 1 min 30 s, with a final elongation step at 72 °C for 7 min. To amplify the COI, the thermal profile was as follows: 95 °C for 5 min, 30 cycles of 95 °C for 1 min, 44 °C for 1 min, 72 °C for 1 min 30 s, and 72 °C for 7 min. PCR products were verified using a 2% agarose gel electrophoresis. They were sequenced by Cosmo Genetech (Seoul, Republic of Korea). Sequences were deposited in GenBank.

3.2. GenBank Data

We obtained sequence datasets for three locations (16S, 18S, and COI) from the new Heterodrilus species, 15 other Heterodrilus species, 9 related oligochaetes species, and a polychaete species. Sequences of 30 species of ingroup and out-group taxa were accessed from GenBank (Table 2). New DNA sequences were deposited into GenBank (Accession no. 16S: MW794267–MW794271, 18S: MW795716–MW795720, COI: MT250545–MT250549).

4. Phylogenetic Analysis

For sequence alignment, MAFFT ver. 7.450 [80] within Geneious Prime (Biomatters Ltd., Auckland, New Zealand) was used, applying the L-INS-I setting (Scoring matrix: 200PAM/k = 2) for the three loci (16S rDNA, 18S rDNA, and COI of 623 bp, 1830 bp, and 658 bp, respectively). Furthermore, we individually concentrated on consensus sequences (2961 bp) in the three loci of the datasets. All parameters except topology were unlinked between partitions. An additional matrix was also created by concentrating on mitochondrial data, with data obtained from the nuclear 18S locus and partitioning alignments both by locus and by codon position.
Evolution models of best fit were chosen using the Akaike information criterion (AIC) implemented by ModelFinder (Kalyaanamoorthy et al., 2017) [81] within MEGA X [82]. Pairwise sequence distances were calculated using MEGA X [82]. The tree was inferred by using the Maximum Likelihood (ML) method and General Time Reversible (GTR) model. The GTR + G + I model was identified as the best-fit model for all loci (16S, 18S, and COI) using ModelFinder with 1000 bootstrap replicates [81]. Initial trees for the heuristic search were obtained automatically by applying Neighbor-Joining (NJ) algorithms to a matrix of pairwise distances estimated using the Maximum Composite Likelihood (MCL) method. Trees were drawn to scale, with branch lengths measured in terms of the number of substitutions per site.
Bayesian inference (BI) analyses were performed for mtDNA (two regions), ntDNA (one locus), and consensus sequence data (mtDNA and three loci) separately (16S: 450 bp, 18S: 1613 bp, COI: 442 bp, mtDNA: 1838 bp, and consensus: 2925 bp). Bayesian analyses were carried out in Geneious using MrBayes 3.2 and the GTR substitution model [83,84]. Analyses of alignments were carried out in two independent parallel runs of four Metropolis-coupled Monte Carlo Markov Chains (MCMCs) implemented in MrBayes. Four chains were run twice in parallel for 2.1 × 106 generations, and trees were sampled every 1000 generations. Stationarity of the analyses was inferred when the average standard deviation of split frequencies was less than 0.01. All trees were rooted with Ophelina acuminata.

5. Results

  • Taxonomy account
  • Phylum Annelida
  • Class Clitellata
  • Subclass Oligochaeta
  • Order Tubificida
  • Family Naididae Ehrenberg, 1831
  • Subfamily Limnodriloidinae Erséus, 1982
  • Genus Limnodriloides Pierantoni, 1903
Hair chaetae absent. Chaetae all bifid, generally more than two per bundle anteriorly. Modified spermathecal chaetae in X. Clitellum extending over XI–XII. Body wall without papillae and adherent foreign particles. Male and spermathecal pores paired or unpaired in XI and X, respectively. Esophagus in IX modified, ether dilated and glandular or with a pair of anteriorly directed diverticular. Male genitalia paired. Pseudopenes or true penes present, lacking cuticular sheaths. Spermathecae paired or unpaired, dorsal or ventral-lateral. Sperm arranged in loose bundles or as slender spermatozeugmata.
  • Type species. Limnodriloides appendiculatus Pierantoni, 1903.
  • Limnodriloides anxius Erséus, 1990 [27] (Figure 2A–E)
  • Limnodriloides monothecus (partim); Erséus 1982 [17] (pp. 250–253) (nec figs. 28–29): 1986 [23] (p. 309); nec sensu Cook, 1974 [85].
  • Limnodriloides monothecus: Erséus 1987: 274.
  • Limnodriloides anxius: Erséus, 1990 [3] (pp. 243–303), Figs. 26I–O, 27A–D.
  • Material examined. NIBRIV0000901382, NIBRIV0000901503, NIBRIV0000901504. Independence gate-bawi at Dokdo-ri, Ulleung-eup, Ulleung-gun, Gyeongsangbuk-do, Republic of Korea, (37.239363° N 131.871777° E), 1 May 2022, in medium-coarse sediment of 20 m in depth at 14 °C through scuba diving.
  • Description. Length 4.7–6.9 mm long (three complete specimens)
  • Prostomium small conical shape (Figure 2A). Clitellum poorly developed. Chaetae bifid, upper tooth thinner and shorter than lower (Figure 2B,C). Chaetae 30–64 μm long, 2(1)–4 per bundle anteriorly, absent from (X)XI. Pharyngeal glands in IV–V. Esophageal diverticula present in IX. Male genitalia paired, vas deferens shorter than atrium, entering atrium subapically. Atrial ampulla oblong, prostatic pad elongate, ventral in ampulla (Figure 2E). Prostate gland lobed, large. Atrial duct slender, 56–71 μm long, convoluted. Ental part atrial duct thick inner epithelium. Duct terminating in pseudopenial papilla inside copulatory sac; sac 20–38 μm long (Figure 2E). Spermathecal pore unpaired, mid-dorsal in middle of X (Figure 2D). Spermatheca elongate pear-shaped, 95–150 μm long, inner epithelium thicker in ectal than in ental part. Sperm arranged as 1–2 spindle-shaped spermatozeugmata in spermatheca. Spermatozeugmata 80–95 μm long; length about 6–8 × width (Figure 2D).
Diversity 16 00007 g002
Figure 2. Limnodriloides anxius. (A) Total body, (B) anterior chaetae, (C) posterior chaeta, (D) spermatheca with spermatozoa, (E) lateral view of male genitalia in segment of XI. Scale bars: 400 μm in (A), 20 μm in (B,C), 40 μm in (D,E). aa: atrial ampulla, ad: atrial duct, pp: pseudopenis, ppa: prostatic pad, sf: sperm fennel, s: spermathecae, sz: spermatozoa, vd: vas deferens.
Figure 2. Limnodriloides anxius. (A) Total body, (B) anterior chaetae, (C) posterior chaeta, (D) spermatheca with spermatozoa, (E) lateral view of male genitalia in segment of XI. Scale bars: 400 μm in (A), 20 μm in (B,C), 40 μm in (D,E). aa: atrial ampulla, ad: atrial duct, pp: pseudopenis, ppa: prostatic pad, sf: sperm fennel, s: spermathecae, sz: spermatozoa, vd: vas deferens.
Diversity 16 00007 g002
  • Distribution. West Atlantic (Belize, Bonaire, Venezuela, Bravados, Florida through Virginia) and Korea.
  • Habitat. Lower intertidal and subtidal, generally muddy sand to at least 20 m in depth.
  • Remarks. According to Erséus (1990) [27], both the chaetal arrangement and male genitalia exhibit significant variability in Limnodriloides monothecus and L. anxius. As a result, previous literature often reported this species as L. monothecus. However, a key distinguishing feature between these two species is the shape of the spermatozeugmata within sperm, with L. monothecus having cylindrical sperm, setting it apart from L. anxius. This character offers reliable means for accurate distinguishing the two species. Our specimens (4.7–6.9 mm) were smaller than the those in the original description (7.8–8.8 mm). Despite the size difference, the atrial ampullae in our specimens closely resembled those of the type series. Additionally, while the shape of the spermatheca was not precisely an enlarged pear-shape, it bore a strong resemblance. Furthermore, the sperm within the spermatheca was organized as 1–2 spindle-shaped spermatozeugmata. Therefore, our samples were confirmed to share key characteristics with type species. This species was reported for the first time in Korea key characteristics with type species.
  • Genus Smithsonidrilus Brinkhurst, 1966
Body wall smooth without papillae or adherent foreign particles. Chaetae all bifid. Hair chaetae and modified genital chaetae absent. Pharyngeal glands generally well developed in IV or V. A pair of esophageal diverticula present anteriorly in IX. Coelomocytes, small and sparse, not of the ‘Rhyacodriline-type’. Male and spermathecal pores unpaired, midventral in XI. Male ducts complex, filling most of coelom in XI. A pair of ciliated vasa deferentia sub-apically joining paired, slender atria. Each atrium consisting of (1) an ental ampulla, which is partly ciliated, (2) an ectal duct, which is not ciliated but granulated, and (3) a heavily granulated, elongate diverticulum attached at junction between ampulla and duct, and which ventrally bears a very large, lobed, and broadly attached prostate gland. Pseudopenes present, paired or unpaired. Spermatheca paired or unpaired, ampulla with sperm arranged as loose s, ring, bundles, or slender spermatozeugmata in X. Sperm as longitudinal bundles in spermatheca.
  • Type species. Smithsonidrilus marinus Brinkhurst, 1966.
  • Smithsonidrilus exspectatus Erséus, 1993 (Figure 3A–D)
  • Smithsonidrilus exspectatus Erséus, 1993 [31] (pp. 587–590), Figure 1.
  • Material examined. MABIKNA00157827, Neunggeol at Ulleung-eup, Ulleung-gun, Gyeongsangbuk-do, Republic of Korea, (37.26586° N, 130.52299° E), 5 June 2022, in medium-coarse sediment from 52 m in depth at 11 °C, obtained through scuba diving. Specimens were deposited at the National Marine Biodiversity Institute of Korea (MABIK).
  • Description. Prostomium pointed triangular (Figure 3A). Clitellum extending over 2/3X–2/3XII. All chaetae bifid, upper tooth thinner and shorter than lower (Figure 3B). Chaetae 42–86 μm long, 2–3 per bundle anteriorly, 1(2) per bundle posteriorly, absent from XI, two per bundle thereafter. Male pore unpaired, located mid-ventrally, posterior to middle of XI. Spermathecal pore unpaired, mid-ventral, near middle of X. Male genitalia complex, with ejaculatory duct and pseudopenis unpaired. Spermathecal ampulla unpaired with oval-shape (Figure 3C), Male and spermathecal pores unpaired, located mid-ventrally posterior of XI and middle of X, respectively. Sperm funnel conspicuous and deep (Figure 3D). Vas deferens thin-walled, ciliated, as long as atrial ampulla, not clearly set off from latter. Atrial ampulla 100–170 μm long, ectally dilated, without cilia inside. Ectal part of atrial ampulla narrow. Prostate gland large and lobed, attached to diverticulum of atrial duct (Figure 3D). Atrial ampulla ectally terminating and slender, with non-granulated atrial duct. Atrial ducts ectally transiting into conspicuous, unpaired ejaculatory duct. Ejaculatory duct heavily muscular, often folded. Spermatheca unpaired with inconspicuous vestibula, a large, thin-walled, oval ampulla, and a filiform diverticulum attached to inner end of ampulla (Figure 3C). Sperm in random mass, denser in diverticulum than in ampulla throughout spermatheca.
Diversity 16 00007 g003
Figure 3. Smithsonidrilus exspectatus. (A) Total body, (B) chaeta, (C) spermatheca with spermatozoa, (D) lateral view of male genitalia. Scale bars: 400 μm in (A), 20 μm in (B,C), 100 μm in (D), aa: atrial ampulla, ad: atrial duct, d: duct, ed: ejaculatory duct, pp: pseudopenis, pr: prostate glands, sf: sperm fennel, sa: spermathecal ampulla, sd: spermathecal duct, sdi: spermathecal diverticulum, sp: spermatheca, sz: spermatozoa, sf, sperm funnel, vd: vas deferens.
Figure 3. Smithsonidrilus exspectatus. (A) Total body, (B) chaeta, (C) spermatheca with spermatozoa, (D) lateral view of male genitalia. Scale bars: 400 μm in (A), 20 μm in (B,C), 100 μm in (D), aa: atrial ampulla, ad: atrial duct, d: duct, ed: ejaculatory duct, pp: pseudopenis, pr: prostate glands, sf: sperm fennel, sa: spermathecal ampulla, sd: spermathecal duct, sdi: spermathecal diverticulum, sp: spermatheca, sz: spermatozoa, sf, sperm funnel, vd: vas deferens.
Diversity 16 00007 g003
  • Distribution. Florida Keys (Atlantic coast of southern Florida), and the East Sea of Korea
  • Habitat. Barely subtidal (known from 0.1–0.6 m in depth), medium to coarse sand.
  • Remarks. According to the original description [31], Smithsonidrilus exspectatus, belonging to the S. marinus complex, is characterized by unpaired male and spermathecal pores. However, it distinguishes itself from other species within this group in terms of spermathecal structure and copulatory apparatus. In contrast to other members of the complex, this species lacks a distinct filiform diverticulum at the inner end of the spermathecal ampulla. While maintaining a complex copulatory apparatus, it possesses a much simpler configuration than other species in the S. marinus complex. These differences in spermathecal structure and copulatory apparatus provide clear distinctions between this species and its counterparts within the S. marinus complex.
  • Subfamily Tubificidae d’Udekem, 1855
  • Genus Tubificoides Lastočkin, 1937
Body wall naked or with fine particle adhering to cuticle, often forming distinct papillae. Prostomium retractable or not. Hair chaetae absent or present in dorsal bundles; dorsal chaetae simple-pointed, bifid, or pectinated. Ventral chaetae all bifid and modified genital chaetae absent. Male and spermathecal pores paired in posterior of XI and middle of X, respectively. Male genitalia paired in XI. Vas deferens ciliated, thin-walled, entering atrium subapically, generally opposite to large stalked prostate gland. Main body of atria somewhat cylindrical, terminal section again histologically distinct, ending in penial structure bearing a penis sheath of varying form.
  • Type species. Tubificoides heterochaetus Lastočkin, 1937 = T. swirencowi Jaroschenko, 1948 (non T. heterochaetus (Michaelsen, 1926)).
  • Tubificoides pollex Milligan, 1991 (Figure 4A–D)
  • Tubificoides pollex Milligan, 1991 [86] (pp. 340–341), Figure 1A–E.
  • Material examined. 1 May 2022 NIBRIV0000901383, NIBRIV0000901505, NIBRIV0000901506. Independence gate-bawi at Dokdo-ri, Ulleung-eup, Ulleung-gun, Gyeongsangbuk-do, Republic of Korea, (37.239363° N, 131.871777° E), 1 May 2022, in medium-coarse sediment of 20 m in depth at 14 °C through scuba diving. Specimen has been deposited at the National Institute of Biological Resources (NIBR).
  • Description. Prostomium not retractable, short, bluntly triangular. Anterior segments distinctly wider than postclitellar segments (Figure 4A). Body wall slightly papillate posteriorly with foreign material adhering. Clitellum weak, extending over X–XII. Ventral chaetae bifid, upper tooth slightly thinner than lower, 3–4 per bundle (Figure 4B). Ventral chaetae absent in XI; thereafter, two per bundle, upper tooth shorter and much thinner than lower. Posterior segments with one chaeta in both dorsal and ventral bundles. Anterior dorsal bundles of II–VIII with 1–2 bifid needle, upper thinner and shorter than lower, and 1(2) hair chaetae, short, 1(2) per bundle (Figure 4C). Pharyngeal glands in IV and V. Esophagus appearing slightly enlarged in IX. Male genitalia paired. Sperm funnel large. Vas deferens thin-walled, about twice as long as atrium, internal ciliation fine and dense. Prostate gland large, attached to atrium opposite entrance of vas deferens. Penis cuticularized, thumb-shaped, a large, oval lateral opening bearing a flap-like projection (Figure 4D). Spermathecae with narrow, elongate, and large oval ampullae. Sperm traps not well developed.
Diversity 16 00007 g004
Figure 4. Tubificoides pollex. (A) Total body, (B) ventral chaeta, (C) dorsal bundle, (D) lateral view of male genitalia in segment of XI. Scale bars: 800 μm in (A), 20 μm in (B,C), 200 μm in (D), a: atrium, p: prostate gland, ps: penis sheath, vd: vas deferens.
Figure 4. Tubificoides pollex. (A) Total body, (B) ventral chaeta, (C) dorsal bundle, (D) lateral view of male genitalia in segment of XI. Scale bars: 800 μm in (A), 20 μm in (B,C), 200 μm in (D), a: atrium, p: prostate gland, ps: penis sheath, vd: vas deferens.
Diversity 16 00007 g004
  • Distribution. Europe (North Sea, Danube estuary), North America (Virginia, North Carolina, Louisiana, Florida), Northern Gulf of Mexico, and the East Sea of Korea.
  • Habitat. Silt mixed with calcareous sand, subtidal to 25 m in depth.
  • Remarks. Tubificoides pollex exhibits several distinctive morphological features that set it apart from other species within the genus Tubificoides. The most prominent feature is the conical shape of the cuticularized penis sheath, a characteristic not observed in any other Tubificoides species. Additionally, T. pollex features a lateral opening on the penis sheath, which is marked by a distinctive flap-like projection along its proximal margin. This unique combination of morphological characteristics distinguishes T. pollex from its closest relatives within the genus Tubificoides, including T. diazi Brinkhurst & Baker, 1979, T. crenicoleus Baker, 1983, T. longipenis (Brinkhurst, 1965), T. uncinatus Helgason & Erskus, 1987, and T. lunatus Milligan, 1991. Furthermore, none of the other species in the Tubificoides genus exhibit both a conical shape of the penis sheath and the presence of lateral openings with flap-like projections. These distinctive characteristics make T. pollex a unique and easily identifiable member of the Tubificoides genus.
  • Subfamily Rhyancodrilinae Hrabe, 1963
  • Genus Heterodrilus, 1902
Body wall naked. Hair chaetae absent. Anterior chaetae trifid. Posterior chaetae bifid or simple-pointed. Chaetae two per bundle anterior to clitellum, only one chaeta each bundle posterior to clitellum. Penial chaetae generally present in XI, Spermathecal chaetae absent. Male pores paired, located in line with ventral chaetae in posterior pair on XI. Spermathecal pores paired in line with ventral chaetae in posterior part of XI. Granulated coelomocytes generally abundant. Male efferent ducts paired in XI. Protrusible pseudopenes, without cuticularized lining. Prostate glands lobed, not pedunculate, broadly attached to walls of atria.
  • Type species. Heterodrilus arenicolus Pierantoni, 1902.
  • Heterodrilus pentcheffi Erséus, 1981 [16], (Figure 5A–D)
  • Clitellio arenicolus (partim) Giere, 1979 [12] (p. 304).
  • Heterodrilus pentcheffi Erséus, 1981 [16] (pp. 121–123), Figure 1 and Figure 2, Table 1; 1984 [87] (p. 196); 1986 [23] (p. 289–290), Figure 1.
  • Heterodrilus sp. Erséus, 1981 [16] (pp. 123–124), Figure 1, Figure 2, Figure 3 and Figure 4.
  • Material examined. NIBRIV0000910381, Gajae-bawi at Dokdo-ri, Ulleung-eup, Ulleung-gun, Gyeongsangbuk-do, Republic of Korea, (37.247542° N 131.862955° E), 21 June 2022, in medium-coarse sediment from 24.1 m in depth at 16 °C, obtained through scuba diving. Specimens were deposited at the National Institute of Biological Resources (NIBR).
  • Description. Prostomium round (Figure 5A). Clitellum extending over 1/2X–XII. Chaetae trifid, two per bundle, with upper tooth thin and short, middle tooth long and basally wide, 40–110 μm long, two per bundle, one per bundle thereafter. Posterior chaetae lower tooth generally becomes reduced and straight, single-pointed (Figure 5C). Penial chaetae simple-pointed, erect expanded, with two per bundle (Figure 5D). Male pore paired in posterior of XI. Spermathecal pore paired in anterior of X, with small epidermal pad located mid-ventrally between spermathecal pores. Coelomocytes granulated, very abundant. Male genitalia paired, vas deferens very long and tightly coiled in a spiral, narrowing entally. Atrium very long and slender, M-shaped, with slender outer muscular layer and densely granulated inner epithelium, bulbous pseudopenis. Prostate gland with large lobes broadly attached to most of the length of the atrium. Spermathecae paired, each with a narrow distinct duct and voluminous sacciform ampulla with an irregular thick wall containing large granules of secretion. Sperm arranged as large bundles.
Diversity 16 00007 g005
Figure 5. Heterodrilus pentcheffi. (A) Total body, (B) anterior chaetae, (C) posterior chaeta, (D) penial chaetae. Scale bar: 1 mm in (A), 40 μm in (B–D).
Figure 5. Heterodrilus pentcheffi. (A) Total body, (B) anterior chaetae, (C) posterior chaeta, (D) penial chaetae. Scale bar: 1 mm in (A), 40 μm in (B–D).
Diversity 16 00007 g005
  • Distribution. Caribbean (Belize, Panama), East coast of North America (Florida, North Carolina, New Jersey), Bermuda, Galapagos Islands, and the East Sea of Korea.
  • Habitat. Coarse sand, subtidal from 0.5 m to 39 m in depth.
  • Remarks. Heterodrilus pentcheffi has chaetae similar to H. minisetosus, H. bulbiporus, H. perkinsi, and H. koreanus n. sp. Among these, H. minisetosus, H. bulbiporus, H. perkinsi are common in Florida waters [32]. Most H. minisetosus do not have penial chaetae. If they do, they are very small. This worm has distinctly bifid chaetae in posterior segments and vas deferens that are uncoiled. Other species, such as H. bulbiporus and H. perkinsi, have distinctly bifid posterior chaeta, two per bundle. H. pentcheffi differs from H. koreanus n. sp. in terms of the shape of spermathecae and prostate gland attachment part of atrium.
  • Heterodrilus koreanus n. sp. (Figure 6A–G, Table 3)
  • Holotype. NIBRIV0000901381. Mature, complete individual, stained in alcoholic paracarmine and whole-mounted in Canada Balsam. This specimen has been deposited at the National Institute of Biological Resources (NIBR)
  • Paratype. NIBRIV0000901501, NIBRIV00009015012. Mature, complete individuals, stained in alcoholic paracarmine and whole-mounted in Canada Balsam. Specimens have been deposited at the National Institute of Biological Resources (NIBR).
  • Other Material. Collected from the type locality. Ten specimens were fixed on 80% ethanol. Specimens have been deposited in the Marine Biological Resource Institute, Sahmyook University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
  • Type Locality. Independence gate-bawi at Dokdo-ri, Ulleung-eup, Ulleung-gun, Gyeongsangbuk-do, Republic of Korea (37.239363° N 131.871777° E), 1 May 2022, in medium-coarse sediment from 20 m in depth at 14 °C, obtained through scuba diving.
Table 3. Morphological comparison of Heterodrilus koreanus n. sp. with allied species.
Table 3. Morphological comparison of Heterodrilus koreanus n. sp. with allied species.
SpeciesH. keenaniH. chenianusH. koreanus n. sp.H. claviatriatusH. mediopapillosus
ChaetaeAnterior chaeta (with subdental liganment)trifidtrifidtrifidtrifidtrifid
Diversity 16 00007 i001Diversity 16 00007 i002Diversity 16 00007 i003Diversity 16 00007 i004Diversity 16 00007 i005
Posterior chaetabifid with subdental liganmentbifid without subdental liganmentbifid with subdental liganmentbifid with subdental liganmentbifid with subdental liganment
Diversity 16 00007 i006Diversity 16 00007 i007Diversity 16 00007 i008Diversity 16 00007 i009Diversity 16 00007 i010
Penial chaetarelatively small, straight,
single-point,
ectal tips slightly curved,
inconspicuous ectal node,
ectal tips slightly curved		abesntstout, simple-pointed,
relatively straight with blunt tip,
slightly curved at the end		straight, single-point,
ectal node followed by tapered, slightly curved tip		straight, single-pointed
Spermathecaeoblong ampulla with distinct narrow ductabsentlarge oval ampulla with indistinct ductvery large, sacciform ampulla with distinct narrow ductlarge ampullae of varying shape with narrow lumen
Diversity 16 00007 i011Diversity 16 00007 i012Diversity 16 00007 i013Diversity 16 00007 i014Diversity 16 00007 i015
Male genitaliaAtriumC-shaped with slenderClub-shaped with more or less curvedM-shaped with cylindrical, slender,
very long		Club-shaped with slenderM-shaped with tubular
Diversity 16 00007 i016Diversity 16 00007 i017Diversity 16 00007 i018Diversity 16 00007 i019Diversity 16 00007 i020
Prostate glandsventral surface of atriumbroadly attached ventral surface
of ental part of atrium		ventral surface of atriumventral surface of atriumventral surface of atrium
Pseudopenisvery in inconspicuousnot mentionsmallSmall,
sometimes protruded		pear-shaped
Vas deferensvery long, coiledlonger than atrium
with irregularly coiled		long and tightly coiled,
not spiral		some tight coiled,
not spiral		long and irregularly coiled
localityHeron Island in Great Barrier Reef of S. AustraliaWuzhi Island in South Hainan
of China		Dokdo in the East Sea of KoreaHeron Island in Great Barrier, Reef of S. AustraliaWakayama Prefecture
in S. Japan
referenceErséus, 1981 [16]Wang and Erséus, 2003 [43]This studyErséus, 1981 [16]Takashima & Mawatari, 1997 [88]
  • Description. Length 1.3–1.9 mm (holotype 1.3 mm), width at X 4.33–4.85 μm (holotype 4.85 μm). Hair chaetae absent. Prostomium short, conical shape (Figure 1A). Chaetae with thin subdental liganment, 53.98–97.56 μm long, two per bundles in segments anterior to clitellum, only one chaeta representing each bundle posterior to clitellum, reversed, large, and stout. Anterior chaetae trifid with upper and middle teeth same length, pointed and lower tooth shaft present, posterior chaetae bifid with wide diverging broad teeth, upper tooth longer and thicker than lower (Figure 6B,C). Clitellum extending over 1/2X–1/2XII, without ventral chaetae in XI. Pharyngeal glands present in IV–V. Coelomocyte abundant with granulated round shape (Figure 6E). Penial chaetae, two per bundle, 269.31–321.32 μm, stout, simple-pointed, relatively straight with blunt tip and slightly curved at the end in XI (Figure 6D). Atrium cylindrical, slender, very long, 636–721 μm long, 34–63 μm wide, M-shaped with thick muscular outer layer and granulated inner epithelium in XI, sometimes extending posterior to X or anterior to XII. Prostate glands multi-lobed, attached along most of the ventral surface of the atrium (Figure 6F). Male pores paired, located slightly ventral to line of ventral somatic chaetae, posteriorly in XI. Unpaired epidermal papilla present ventrally to line in X (Figure 6G). Pseudopenis small. Vas deferens long and tightly coiled, not forming a proper spiral in anterior part of XI. Sperm funnel small in X. Spermathecae paired in X, indistinct duct and large oval ampulla with thick wall containing large granules of secretion. Spermathecal chaetae absent. Sperm in spermathecal ampulla as thimble-shaped spermatozoa (Figure 6G).
  • Etymology. The specific epithet ‘koreanus’ refers to ‘Korea’, the type locality.
  • Remarks. The genus Heterodrilus is large and exclusively marine. It is distributed globally in tropical and subtropical zones [16,33,46,84]. Its species are common in sandy sediments. The morphology of Heterodrilus koreanus n. sp. appears similar to that of H. claviatriatus (Erséus 1981) or H. mediopapillosus (Takashima & Mawatari, 1997) (Table 1).
  • The atrium of the latter two species is very long and slender, with prostate glands attached to the ventral surface of the atrium and the vas deferens being long and irregularly coiled. Anterior chaetae are trifid, with the middle tooth being larger than the other two, containing a thin subdental ligament. The new species differs from H. claviatriatus in having spermathecae with distinct narrow ducts. The penial chaetae and atrium are shorter in our specimens. H. koreanus n. sp. more closely resembles the Japanese species H. mediopapillosus in that they share an M-shaped atrium and unpaired epidermal papilla (Table 1). However, the spermathecal ampulla of H. mediopapillosus is oval-shaped, with a faint outline of the duct (Figure 6F), while the penial chaetae of our species are shorter and slightly curved at the end (Figure 6E).
Diversity 16 00007 g006
Figure 6. Heterodrilus koreanus n. sp. (A) total body, (B) anterior chaetae, (C) posterior chaetae, (D) penial chaetae, (E) coelomocytes, (F) segment of X, (G) spermathecae. Scale bars. (A) = 400 μm, (B–D) = 60 μm, (E) = 100 μm, (F,G) = 80 μm. a: atrium, ce: coelomocytes, ep: epidermal papilla, pg: prostate glands, sf: sperm funnel, spa: spermathecal ampulla, spp: spermathecal pore, spz: spermatozoa.
Figure 6. Heterodrilus koreanus n. sp. (A) total body, (B) anterior chaetae, (C) posterior chaetae, (D) penial chaetae, (E) coelomocytes, (F) segment of X, (G) spermathecae. Scale bars. (A) = 400 μm, (B–D) = 60 μm, (E) = 100 μm, (F,G) = 80 μm. a: atrium, ce: coelomocytes, ep: epidermal papilla, pg: prostate glands, sf: sperm funnel, spa: spermathecal ampulla, spp: spermathecal pore, spz: spermatozoa.
Diversity 16 00007 g006
H. koreanus n. sp. has not only morphological but also ecological differences. Heterodrilus species have been found in tropical or subtropical seas in previous studies [2,16,43,84,87]. The Great Barrier Reef Sea is a tropical part of the ocean. The Sea of Wakayama is also subtropical. However, the East Sea of Korea is cooler since it lies in a more northern region. Considering that this species shows several differences compared to other species in the genus Heterodrilus, it appears to be a new species.

6. Molecular Analysis

Phylogenetic trees based on two loci (16S and COI) provided statistical support at different values, showing no topological conflicts. Most specimens of Heterodrilus koreanus n. sp. showed monophyly of Heterodrilus in Phallodrilinae. The 18S ML showed unsettled positions of H. koreanus n. sp. 4. In all trees, H. ersei was a sister group of all other Heterodrilus species except for H. koreanus n. sp. The bootstrap analysis also supported H. koreanus n. sp. and some relationships within this genus, although it could not resolve relationships with Heterodrilus (pp = 0.93).
H. ersei was identified as a sister group to all other Heterodrilus species, with the exception of H. koreanus n. sp. This makes it clear that H. ersei was identified as a sister group to all other Heterodrilus species, except for H. koreanus n. sp. found in three separate instances: H. koreanus n. sp. 5 in the 16S tree, H. koreanus n. sp. 1 in the COI tree, and H. koreanus n. sp. 4 in the 18S tree (Figure 7).
Consensus trees (mt DNA and all loci) from the Bayesian inference (BI) analysis are shown in Figure 8. These trees showed that H. koreanus n. sp. was a distinct lineage within Heterodrilus. The monophyly of H. koreanus n. sp. was strongly supported (pp = 1). It had a close relationship with H. chenianus (patristic distances: 0.44–0.84) (Figure 8). Monophyly of heterodrilus (pp = 0.93) was corroborated. This monophyly contained all Phallodrilinae.
Within the Heterodrilus clade, the H. ersei is the sister group of all remaining species ((pp = 0.96 (mtDNA) and 0.74 (all loci)). The latter formed four clades (see Figure 8): Clade 1, Clade 2, H. cf. virilis, and H. paucifascis. Clade 1+2 and H. cf. virilis were suggested as a sister group of H. paucifascis. Within Clade 1, three species (H. koreanus, H. chenianus, and H. minisetosus) were strongly supported (pp = 1). H. koreanus and H. chenianus + H. minisetosus were also supported by having posterior probabilities of 1. Otherwise, H. chenianus + H. minisetosus were resolved with low support (pp = 0.84). Clade 2 contained a strongly supported group (pp = 1) of four species (H. bulbiporus, H. minisetosus, H. perkinsi and H. pentcheffi), in which H. bulbiporus + H. minisetosus were proposed as closely related sister species, with pp = 1. H. ersei.

7. Discussion

This study identified a new species of marine oligochaete and provided their descriptions. Our data represent the first record of marine oligochaetes in Korea. One new species and four recorded species belong to genera Heterodrilus, Tubificoides, and Smithsonidrilus, based on morphological analysis. The new species, Heterodrilus koreanus n. sp., and four recorded species, H. pentcheffi Erséus, 1981, Limnodriloides anxius Erséus, 1990, Smithsonidrilus exspectatus Erséus, 1993, Tubificoides heterochaetus Michaelsen, 1926, could be distinguished from other similar species by comparing their morphological characteristics. For more accurate identification of the new species, molecular analysis was also performed.
Heterodrilus koreanus n. sp. has several morphological features that can distinguish it from its close relatives H. claviatriatus (Erséus 1981) and H. mediopapillosus (Takashima & Mawatari 1997). Phylogenetic analysis also showed that it was a close relative of H. keenani Erséus, 1981 and H. chenianus Wang & Erséus, 2003. The atrium of H. koreanus n. sp. is a long cylindrical tube. It has an M shape. In comparison, H. claviatriatus, H. keenani, and H. chenianus have a shorter atrium and are club-shaped or C-shaped. Although H. mediopapillosus is very similar, the shape of its spermathecae is different. These species also have two large penial chaetae per bundle. However, H. chenianus, which is closely related phylogenetically, does not have spermathecae or penial chaetae (see Table 3).
According to previous studies, the genus Heterodrilus is a group of largely tropical and subtropical marine tubificids [16,23,27,43,84,89]. These four species have been collected in warm seas. Notably, two morphologically similar species, H. chenianus in southern China and H. mediopapillosus in Japan, have been found in warmer areas than the survey region of this study. Since the habitats are very different, it is difficult to say whether they are the same species, even if some similar traits are shared. Regrettably, this phylogenetic analysis could not include the most similar species, H. claviatriatus or H. mediopapillosus, because sequences of these species are not yet available from the NCBI database. This analysis, however, contained some morphologically similar species available in NCBI, making it possible to compare sequences obtained from the new species and other related species within the corresponding genus. Thus, the results of this study are not fully comparable.
Our molecular analysis, based on three loci (16S, COI, and 18S), revealed a complex phylogenetic relationship within the genus Heterodrilus. The phylogenetic trees provided statistical support at different values, indicating no topological conflicts. Most specimens of Heterodrilus koreanus n. sp. showed monophyly within Phallodrilinae, but this clade did not encompass all Phallodrilinae members. Instead, it represented a distinct lineage within the broader taxonomic group. The 18S ML showed unsettled positions of H. koreanus n. sp., emphasizing the challenges of resolving relationships with this species using this particular locus. Remarkably, the sequences of separate individuals of H. koreanus (1, 4, and 5) appeared in different clades when considering individual genes (16S, COI, and 18S). Only in the combined tree (Figure 8) did all five specimens of H. koreanus form a single, compact clade. This observation underscores the imperfectness of relying on a single gene, such as COI, for species identification. The incongruence in individual gene trees highlights the need for a more holistic approach in molecular taxonomy, especially when dealing with closely related spe cies. The position of H. ersei in our phylogenetic analysis is noteworthy. It appears as a sister group to all other Heterodrilus species except for H. koreanus n. sp. This suggests a closer evolutionary relationship with the broader diversity within Heterodrilus, and its exclusion from the monophyletic group including H. koreanus n. sp. prompts further investigation into its evolutionary history and ecological significance.
To summarize, our study reveals two main groups within the genus Heterodrilus, characterized by distinct morphological features and geographical distributions [16]. This work significantly contributes to the knowledge of marine oligochaete diversity in Korea. Additionally, it highlights the challenges of molecular taxonomy within Heterodrilus, showcasing the imperfectness of relying on single-gene identification, particularly illustrated by the varied placement of H. koreanus n. sp. within Phallodrilinae in individual gene trees. The study underscores the necessity for comprehensive analyses involving multiple genes to unravel the intricate evolutionary relationships within this taxonomic group. Further investigations, incorporating additional species and molecular markers, are crucial to refine the phylogenetic framework and deepen our understanding of oligochaete evolution in marine environments.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, J.L.; methodology, J.L.; software, J.L.; validation, J.L.; formal analysis, J.L.; investigation, T.L.; resources, J.L.; data curation, J.L.; writing—original draft preparation, J.L.; writing—review and editing, J.L. and T.L.; visualization, J.L.; supervision, T.L.; project administration, T.L.; funding acquisition, T.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was supported by a grant (NIBR2023331202) from the National Institute of Biological Resources (NIBR), funded by the Ministry of Environment (MOE), and a grant (2023M00100) from the National Marine Biodiversity Institute of Korea (MABIK) Research Program. It was also supported by grants (NRF-2021R1A6A3A01088490; 2021R1I1A2058017) from the Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation (NRF), funded by the Ministry of Education, Republic of Korea.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available in this published article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Brinkhurst, R.O. British and other marine and estuarine oligochaetes. In Synopses of the British Fauna (New Series); Kermack, D.M., Barnes, R.S.K., Eds.; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 1982; Volume 21, p. 127. [Google Scholar]
  2. Diaz, R.J.; Erséus, C. Habitat preferences and species associations of shallow-water marine Tubificidae (Oligochaeta) from the barrier reef ecosystems off Belize, Central America. Hydrobiologia 1994, 278, 93–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Erséus, C. Marine Oligochaeta of Hong Kong. In Proceedings of the Second International Marine Biological Workshop, The Marine Flora and Fauna of Hong Kong and Southern China, Hong Kong, China, 2–24 April 1986; Morton, B., Ed.; Hong Kong University Press: Hong Kong, China, 1990; pp. 259–335. [Google Scholar]
  4. Erséus, C. Phylogeny of oligochaetous Clitellata. Hydrobiologia 2005, 535, 357–372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Finogenova, N.P. New species of Oligochaeta from Dnieper and Bug Firth and Black Sea and revision of some species. Nauka Leningr. Tr. Zool. Instituta 1972, 52, 65–74. (In Russian) [Google Scholar]
  6. Hartzell, P.L.; Nghiem, J.V.; Richio, K.J.; Shain, D.H. Distribution and phylogeny of glacier ice worms (Mesenchytraeus solifugus and Mesenchytraeus solifugus rainierensis). Can. J. Zool. 2005, 83, 1206–1213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Healy, B.; Coates, K.A. Finding enchytraeid oligochaetes (Clitellata) in hot climates: Species occurence on the shores of Bermuda. Hydrobiologia 1999, 406, 111–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Prantoni, A.L.; Di Domênico, M.; da Cunha Lana, P. A taxonomic overview of marine and estuarine oligochaetes from Brazil. Mar. Biodivers. 2014, 44, 275–278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Wang, H.; Erséus, C. Marine Phallodrilinae (Oligochaeta, Tubificidae) of Hainan Island in southern China. Hydrobiologia 2001, 462, 199–204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Lee, J.H. Taxonomic Study on the Aquatic Oligochaetes (Annelida: Clitellata) from Korea. Ph.D. Thesis, Ewha Womans University, Seoul, Republic of Korea, 2021; pp. 1–322. [Google Scholar]
  11. Righi, G.; Kanner, E. Marine Oligochaeta (Tubificidae and Enchytraeidae) from the Caribbean Sea. Stud. Fauna Curaçao Other Caribb. Isl. 1979, 58, 44–68. [Google Scholar]
  12. Giere, O. Studies on marine Oligochaeta from Bermuda, with emphasis on new Phallodrilus species (Tubificidae). Cah. Biol. Mar. 1979, 3, 301–314. [Google Scholar]
  13. Erséus, C. Taxonomic revision of the Marine Genus Phallodrilus Pierantoni (Oligochaeta, Tubificidae), with description of thirteen new species. Zool. Scr. 1979, 8, 187–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Brinkhurst, R.O.; Baker, H.R. A review of the marine Tubificidae (Oligochaeta) of North America. Can. J. Zool. 1979, 57, 1553–1569. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Erséus, C. Taxonomic Studies on the Marine Genera Aktedrilus Knöllner and Bacescuella Hrabě (Oligochaeta, Tubificidae), with with descriptions of seven new species. Zool. Scr. 1980, 9, 97–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Erséus, C. Taxonomic Revision of the marine genus Heterodrilus Pierantoni (Oligochaeta, Tubificidae). Zool. Scr. 1981, 10, 111–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Erséus, C. Taxonomic Revision of the marine genus Limnodriloides (Oligochaeta: Tubificidae). Verhandlungen Des Naturwissenschaftlichen Ver. Hambg. 1982, 25, 207–277. [Google Scholar]
  18. Erséus, C. Duridrilus tardus gen. et sp.n., a marine tubificid (Oligochaeta) from Bermuda and Barbados. Sarsia 1983, 68, 29–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Erséus, C. The marine Tubificidae (Oligochaeta) of Hong Kong and southern China. Asian Mar. Biol. 1984, 1, 135–175. [Google Scholar]
  20. Erséus, C. Aspects of the phylogeny of the marine Tubificidae. Hydrobiologia 1984, 115, 37–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Bonomi, G.; Erséus, C. A taxonomic and faunistic survey of the marine Tubificidae and Enchytraeidae (Oligochaeta) of Italy. Introduction and preliminary results. Hydrobiologia 1984, 115, 207–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Erséus, C. Annelida of Saudi Arabia. Marine Tubificidae (Oligochaeta) of the Arabian Gulf coast of Saudi Arabia. Fauna Saudi Arab. 1985, 6, 130–154. [Google Scholar]
  23. Erséus, C. Marine tubificidae (Oligochaeta) at Hutchinson Island, Florida. Proc. Biol. Soc. Wash. 1986, 99, 286–315. [Google Scholar]
  24. Erséus, C. A new species of Phallodrilus (Oligochaeta, Tubificidae) from a limestone cave on Bermuda. Sarsia 1986, 71, 7–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Milligan, M.R. Marine Tubificidae (Oligochaeta) from Puerto Rico with descriptions of two new species, Tubificoides aguadillensis and Heterodrilus paucifascis. Proc. Biol. Soc. Wash. 1987, 100, 480–489. [Google Scholar]
  26. Erséus, C. Two new species of the marine genus Limnodriloides and a record of Tubificoides fraseri Brinkhurst (Oligochaeta: Tubificidae) from New Zealand. N. Z. J. Mar. Freshw. Res. 1989, 23, 557–561. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Erséus, C. The marine Tubificidae (Oligochaeta) of the barrier reef ecosystems at Carrie Bow Cay, Belize, and other parts of the Caribbean Sea, with descriptions of twenty-seven new species and revision of Heterodrilus, Thalassodrilides and Smithsonidrilus. Zool. Scr. 1990, 19, 243–303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Erséus, C. Records of the marine genus Bathydrilus (Oligochaeta: Tubificidae) from California, with descriptions of two new species. Proc. Biol. Soc. Wash. 1991, 104, 622–626. [Google Scholar]
  29. Erséus, C. Groundwater and marine intertidal Tubificidae (Oligochaeta) from the Canary and Cabo Verde Islands, with descriptions of two new species. Bijdr. Tot Dierkd. 1992, 62, 63–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Erséus, C. The marine Tubificidae (Oligochaeta) of Rottnest Island, Western Australia. In Proceedings of the Fifth International Marine Biological Workshop: The Marine Flora and Fauna of Rottnest Island, Western Australia, Rottnest Island, Australia, 5 January 1991; Wells, F.E., Walker, D.I., Kirkman, H., Lethbridge, R., Eds.; Western Australian Museum: Perth, Australia, 1993; pp. 331–390. [Google Scholar]
  31. Erséus, C. A new marine species of Smithsonidrilus (Oligochaeta: Tubificidae) from the Florida Keys. Proc. Biol. Soc. Wash. 1993, 106, 587–590. [Google Scholar]
  32. Milligan, M.R. Identification Manual for the Aquatic Oligochaeta of Florida. Volume II. Estuarine and Nearshore Marine Oligochaetes; Center for Systematics and Taxonomy: Sarasota, FL, USA, 1996; pp. 239+214. [Google Scholar]
  33. Morton, B. The Marine Flora and Fauna of Hong Kong and Southern China IV; Hong Kong University Press: Hong Kong, China, 1997; Volume 4. [Google Scholar]
  34. Erséus, C. The marine tubificidae (Oligochaeta) of Darwin Harbour, Northern Territory, Australia, with descriptions of fifteen new species. In The Marine Flora and Fauna of Darwin Harbour, Northern Territory, Australia; Hamley, R.H., Caswell, G., Megirian, D., Larson, H.K., Eds.; Museums and Art Galleries of the Northern Territory and the Australian Marine Sciences Association: Darwin, Australia, 1997; pp. 99–132. [Google Scholar]
  35. Erséus, C. Marine Tubificidae (Oligochaeta) from the Montebello and Houtman Abrolhos Islands, Western Australia, with descriptions of twenty-three new species. In The Marine Flora and Fauna of the Houtman Abrolhos Islands, Western Australia; Wells, F.E., Ed.; Western Australian Museum: Perth, Australia, 1997; pp. 389–458. [Google Scholar]
  36. Erséus, C. Additional notes on the taxonomy of the marine Oligochaeta of Hong Kong, with a description of a new species of Tubificidae. In The Marine Flora and Fauna of Hong Kong and Southern China; Morton, B., Ed.; Hong Kong University Press: Hong Kong, China, 1997; pp. 37–52. [Google Scholar]
  37. Erséus, C. A record of Randiella from New Caledonia, the first known occurrence of the marine interstitial family Randiellidae (Annelida; Oligochaeta) in the South Pacific Ocean. J. Nat. Hist. 1997, 31, 1745–1750. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Erséus, C. Marine Tubificidae (Oligochaeta) from a mangrove habitat in Kenya. Trop. Zool. 1999, 12, 137–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Huang, Z. Marine Species and Their Distribution in China’s Seas; Krieger Pub Co.: Malabar, FL, USA, 2001. [Google Scholar]
  40. Giere, O. Taxonomy and new bacterial symbioses of gutless marine Tubificidae (Annelida, Oligochaeta) from the Island of Elba (Italy). Org. Divers. Evol. 2002, 2, 289–297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Erséus, C. Mangroves and marine oligochaete diversity. Wetl. Ecol. Manag. 2002, 10, 197–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Wang, H.; Erséus, C. Marine species of Ainudrilus and Heterodrilus (Oligochaeta: Tubificidae: Rhyacodrilinae) from Hainan Island in southern China. N. Z. J. Mar. Freshw. Res. 2003, 37, 205–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Erséus, C.; Wang, H. Marine Tubificidae (Oligochaeta) of the Dampier area, Western Australia. In The Marine Flora and Fauna of Dampier, Western Australia; Wells, F.E., Walker, D.I., Jones, D.S., Eds.; Western Australian Museum: Perth, Australia, 2003; pp. 362–393. [Google Scholar]
  44. Erséus, C.; Giere, O.; Dreyer, J.; Bailey-Brock, J.H. A new marine species of Tubificoides (Annelida: Oligochaeta: Tubificidae) from Hawaii, U.S.A. Proc. Biol. Soc. Wash. 2005, 118, 264–269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Mejlon, E.; De Wit, P.; Matamoros, L.; Erséus, C. DNA-based phylogeny of the marine genus Heterodrilus (Annelida, Clitellata, Naididae). J. Zool. Syst. Evol. Res. 2015, 53, 194–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Cai, L.; Lin, X. Quantitative distribution of marine and brackish-water Oligochaeta on the intertidal zone in Deep Bay, China. In Proceedings of the 10th International Symposium on Aquatic Oligochaeta, Wuhan, China, 16–21 October 2006; Wang, H.Z., Wetzel, M.J., Pinder, A.M., Verdonschot, P.F.M., Arslan, N., Eds.; State Key Laboratory of Freshwater Ecology and Biotechnology, Institute of Hydrobiology, Chinese Academy of Sciences: Wuhan, China, 2006; pp. 1–21. [Google Scholar]
  47. Chen, X.; Cai, L.; Zhou, X.; Rao, Y. Geographical variation in oligochaete density and biomass in subtropical mangrove wetlands of China. J. Ocean Univ. China 2017, 16, 925–931. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Erséus, C.; Daoyuan, S.; Yanling, L.; Bin, S. Marine Oligochaeta of Jiaozhou Bay, Yellow Sea coast of China. Hydrobiologia 1990, 202, 107–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Erséus, C.; Diaz, R.J. The Oligochaeta of the Cape d’Aguilar Marine Reserve, Hong Kong. In The Marine Flora and Fauna of Hong Kong and Southern China IV; Morton, B., Ed.; Hong Kong University Press: Hong Kong, China, 1997; pp. 189–204. [Google Scholar]
  50. Erséus, C.; Qi, S. Two aberrant Tubificidae (Oligochaeta) from Pearl River in the People’s Republic of China. Hydrobiologia 1985, 127, 193–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Hallett, S.; Erséus, C.; Lester, R. Actinosporea from Hong Kong marine Oligochaeta. In The Marine Flora and Fauna of Hong Kong and Southern China IV; Morton, B., Ed.; Hong Kong University Press: Hong Kong, China, 1997; pp. 1–7. [Google Scholar]
  52. Ohtaka, A. New record of Tubificoide brevicoleus Baker (Oligochaeta, Tubificidae) from the Pacific coasts of Hokkaido, Northern Japan. J. Fac. Sci. Hokkaido Univ. Ser. VI Zool. 1987, 25, 1–8. Available online: http://hdl.handle.net/2115/27700 (accessed on 8 November 2023).
  53. Takashima, Y.; Mawatari, S.F. Marine Tubificidae (Oligochaeta) from Hokkaido, northern Japan, with descriptions of two new species. Species Divers. 1996, 1, 55–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Takashima, Y.; Mawatari, S.F. Mitinokuidrilus excavatus n. sp., a marine tubificid (Oligochaeta) with a unique mode of reproduction. Zool. Sci. 1998, 15, 593–597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Torii, T.; Erséus, C.; Martinsson, S.; Ito, M. Morphological and genetic characterization of the first species of Thalassodrilides (Annelida: Clitellata: Naididae: Limnodriloidinae) from Japan. Species Divers. 2016, 21, 117–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Takashima, Y. Taxonomy of marine Tubificidae of Japan (6) Subfamily Limnodriloidinae. Aquabiology 2000, 22, 398–402. [Google Scholar]
  57. Takashima, Y. Taxonomy of the marine Tubificidae of Japan (8) Subfamily Phallodrilinae. Aquabiology 2001, 23, 70–76. [Google Scholar]
  58. Choi, H.K.; Jung, T.W.; Yoon, S.M. A new species of Lagis (Annelida: Polychaeta: Pectinariidae) from Korean waters. Zootaxa 2017, 4227, 279–286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Jeong, M.-K.; Wi, J.H.; Suh, H.-L. A reassessment of Capitella species (Polychaeta: Capitellidae) from Korean coastal waters, with morphological and molecular evidence. Mar. Biodivers. 2018, 48, 1969–1978. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Jong, W.L. Systematic studies on Syllidae (Annelida, Polychaeta) from the South Sea and the East Sea in Korea. Anim. Syst. Evol. Divers. 1994, 10, 131–144. [Google Scholar]
  61. Lee, J.H.; Je, J.G.; Choi, J.W. Taxonomical review of Perinereis aibuhitensis Grube, 1878 (Nereidae: Polychaeta) in Korea. Korean J. Syst. Zool. 1992, 8, 1–10. [Google Scholar]
  62. Park, T.-S.; Kim, W. A taxonomic study on Perinereis nuntia species group (Polychaeta: Nereididae) of Korea. Anim. Syst. Evol. Divers. 2007, 23, 75–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Rho, B.J.; Lee, J.W. A systematic study on the errantiate Polychaeta in Korea. Anim. Syst. Evol. Divers. 1987, 3, 74–90. [Google Scholar]
  64. Rho, B.J.; Song, K.H. A study on the classification of the Korean Polychaeta (I). Jous. Kor. Res. Inst. Bet 1974, 54, 73–85. [Google Scholar]
  65. Lee, J.H.; Jae, J.G. Polychaetous annelids from the Yellow Sea. Ocean Polar Res. 1983, 5, 19–27. [Google Scholar]
  66. Paik, E.-I. New records of five polychaetous Annelida species in Korea. Korean J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 1979, 12, 35–39. [Google Scholar]
  67. Lee, J.H.; Jung, J.W. The First Record of Marine Oligochaete, Marionina coatesae (Annelida; Oligochaeta; Enchytraeidae) from Korean Waters. Anim. Syst. Evol. Divers. 2021, 37, 171–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Dózsa-Farkas, K.; Ortmann-Ajkai, A.; Horváth, F. New enchytraeid species (Oligochaeta: Enchytraeidae) from the Danube–Dráva National Park. Acta Zool. Acad. Sci. Hung. 2015, 61, 305–327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Cho, J.-S.R.; Kim, Y.-M.; Sagong, J.; Lee, J.-H.; Yeo, M.-Y.; Bahn, S.-Y.; Kim, H.-M.; Lee, G.-S.; Lee, D.-H.; Choo, Y.-S. Biodiversity of marine invertebrates on rocky shores of Dokdo, Korea. Zool. Stud. 2012, 51, 710–726. [Google Scholar]
  70. Lee, S.H.; Kang, C.-K.; Lee, C.I.; Kwak, J.H. Current status of the East Sea ecosystem in a changing world. Deep Sea Res. Part II Top. Stud. Oceanogr. 2017, 146, 101–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Jo, Y.-H.; Choi, J.-G.; Park, J. Physical boundaries of intrathermocline Ulleung eddies in the East/Japan Sea. Deep Sea Res. Part II Top. Stud. Oceanogr. 2017, 143, 15–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Higgins, R.P.; Thiel, H. Introduction to the Study of Meiofauna; Smithsonian Institution Press: Washington, DC, USA, 1988. [Google Scholar]
  73. Erseus, C.; Healy, B. Oligochaeta. In Taxonomic Atlas of the Benthic Fauna of the Santa Maria Basin and Western Santa Barbara Channel; US Department of the Interior, Minerals Management Service, Pacific OCS Region: Camarillo, CA, USA, 1994; Volume 4, pp. 5–38. [Google Scholar]
  74. Norén, M.; Jondelius, U. Phylogeny of the Prolecithophora (Platyhelminthes) inferred from 18S rDNA sequences. Willi Hennig Soc. Cladistics 1999, 15, 103–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Erséus, C.; Kallersjö, M.; Ekman, M.; Hovmöller, R. 18S rDNA phylogeny of the Tubificidae (Clitellata) and its constituent taxa: Dismissal of the Naididae. Mol. Phylogenetics Evol. 2002, 22, 414–422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Palumbi, S.R.; Martin, A.; Romano, S.; McMillan, W.O.; Stice, L.; Grabowski, G. The Simple Fool’s Guide to PCR, Version 2.0; University of Hawaii: Honolulu, HI, USA, 1991; pp. 1–48. [Google Scholar]
  77. Folmer, O.; Black, M.; Hoeh, W.; Lutz, R.; Vrijenhoek, R. DNA primers for amplification of mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase subunit 1 from diverse metazoan invertebrates. Mol. Mar. Biol. Biotechnol. 1994, 3, 294–299. [Google Scholar]
  78. Katoh, K.; Standley, D.M. MAFFT multiple sequence alignment software version 7: Improvements in performance and usability. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2013, 30, 772–780. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  79. Kalyaanamoorthy, S.; Minh, B.Q.; Wong, T.K.F.; von Haeseler, A.; Jermiin, L.S. ModelFinder: Fast model selection for accurate phylogenetic estimates. Nat. Methods 2017, 14, 587–589. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  80. Kumar, S.; Stecher, G.; Li, M.; Knyaz, C.; Tamura, K. MEGA X: Molecular evolutionary genetics analysis across computing platforms. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2018, 35, 1547–1549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Huelsenbeck, J.P.; Ronquist, F. MRBAYES: Bayesian inference of phylogenetic trees. Bioinformatics 2001, 17, 754–755. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  82. Ronquist, F.; Teslenko, M.; Van Der Mark, P.; Ayres, D.L.; Darling, A.; Höhna, S.; Larget, B.; Liu, L.; Suchard, M.A.; Huelsenbeck, J.P. MrBayes 3.2: Efficient Bayesian phylogenetic inference and model choice across a large model space. Syst. Biol. 2012, 61, 539–542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Pierantoni, U. Due nuovi generi di Oligocheti marini rinvenuti nel Golfo di Napoli. Boll. Soc. Nat. Napoli 1902, 16, 113–117. [Google Scholar]
  84. Sjölin, E.; Erséus, C. New species of Heterodrilus (Oligochaeta, Tubificidae) and records of H. maiusculus from the Mediterranean Sea. Ital. J. Zool. 2001, 68, 223–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Cook, D.G. The systematics and distribution of marine Tubificidae (Annelida: Oligochaeta) in the Bahia de San Quintin, Baja California, with descriptions of five new species. Bull. South. Calif. Acad. Sci. 1974, 73, 126–140. [Google Scholar]
  86. Milligan, M.R. Two new species of Tubificoides (Oligochaeta, Tubificidae) and new records of T. brownae and T. imajimai from the Gulf of Mexico and Caribbean, with a redescription of T. bakeri. Zool. Scr. 1991, 20, 339–345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Erséus, C. Interstitial fauna of Galapagos XXXIII. Tubificidae (Annelida, Oligochaeta). Microfauna Mar. 1984, 1, 191–198. [Google Scholar]
  88. Takashima, Y.; Mawatari, S.F. Marine Tubificidae (Oligochaeta, Annelida) from Shirahama, Western Japan, with a description of a new species. Publ. Seto Mar. Biol. Lab. 1997, 38, 29–36. Available online: http://hdl.handle.net/2433/176274 (accessed on 8 November 2023). [CrossRef]
  89. Erséus, C. Oligochaeta from Hoi Ha Wan. In The Marine Flora and Fauna of Hong Kong and Southern China III, Proceedings of the Fourth International Marine Biological Workshop: Hong Kong and South China, Hong Kong, China, 11–29 April 1989; Morton, B., Ed.; Hong Kong University Press: Hong Kong, China, 1992; pp. 909–917. [Google Scholar]
Diversity 16 00007 g001
Figure 1. Collection Sites and Scuba Diving in Progress. Geographic locations of collection sites (red dot) and a visual representation of the scuba diving process during sample collection in the study. The scuba diving image provides insight into the fieldwork conducted to obtain specimens for taxonomic analysis.
Figure 1. Collection Sites and Scuba Diving in Progress. Geographic locations of collection sites (red dot) and a visual representation of the scuba diving process during sample collection in the study. The scuba diving image provides insight into the fieldwork conducted to obtain specimens for taxonomic analysis.
Diversity 16 00007 g001
Diversity 16 00007 g007
Figure 7. Phylogenetic trees of Heterodrilus based on 16S, 18S, and COI sequences. Branches corresponding to partitions reproduced in less than 50% of bootstrap replicates were collapsed. Percentages of replicate trees in which associated taxa were clustered together in the bootstrap test (1000 replicates) are shown next to branches, with branch lengths measured in terms of the number of bootstrap values.
Figure 7. Phylogenetic trees of Heterodrilus based on 16S, 18S, and COI sequences. Branches corresponding to partitions reproduced in less than 50% of bootstrap replicates were collapsed. Percentages of replicate trees in which associated taxa were clustered together in the bootstrap test (1000 replicates) are shown next to branches, with branch lengths measured in terms of the number of bootstrap values.
Diversity 16 00007 g007
Diversity 16 00007 g008
Figure 8. Consensus trees obtained from the Bayesian MCMC analysis of combined (16S rDNA + COI, 16S rDNA +18S rDNA and COI) datasets. Posterior probabilities >0.50 are indicated. Inset images depict that branches corresponding to partitions reproduced in less than 50% of bootstrap replicates were collapsed. Percentages of replicate trees in which associated taxa were clustered together in the bootstrap test (1000 replicates) are shown next to branches, with branch lengths measured in terms of number of substitutions per site.
Figure 8. Consensus trees obtained from the Bayesian MCMC analysis of combined (16S rDNA + COI, 16S rDNA +18S rDNA and COI) datasets. Posterior probabilities >0.50 are indicated. Inset images depict that branches corresponding to partitions reproduced in less than 50% of bootstrap replicates were collapsed. Percentages of replicate trees in which associated taxa were clustered together in the bootstrap test (1000 replicates) are shown next to branches, with branch lengths measured in terms of number of substitutions per site.
Diversity 16 00007 g008
Table 1. Primers used for PCR and sequencing in this study.
Table 1. Primers used for PCR and sequencing in this study.
Primer NamePrimer SequenceReference
18S Primer
TimA5′-AMCTGGTTGATCCTGCCAG-3′ Tim Littlewood (pers. comm. Norén and Jondelius 1999) [75]
TimB 5′-TGATCCATCTGCAGGTTCACCT-3′
660F5′-GATCTCGGGTCCAGGCT-3′Erséus et al., 2002 [76]
1100R 5′-GATCGTCTTCGAACCTCTG-3′ Norén and Jondelius, 1999 [77]
16S Primer
16S ar-L5′-CGC CTG TTT ATC AAA AAC AT-3′Palumbi et al., 1999 [78]
16S br-H5′-CGC CTG TTT ATC AAA AAC AT-3′
COI Primer
LCO14905′-GGTCAACAAATCATAAAGATATTGG-3′Folmer et al., 1994 [79]
HCO2198yy5′-TAAACTTCAGGGTGACCAAAAAATCA-3′
Table 2. Species used, places of origin, and GenBank accession numbers for 16S, 18S, and COI sequences (new sequences are indicated by bold lettering).
Table 2. Species used, places of origin, and GenBank accession numbers for 16S, 18S, and COI sequences (new sequences are indicated by bold lettering).
SpeciesLocality16S18SCOI
INGROUP: Clitellata, Naididae
Heterodrilus bulbiporus Erséus 1981Fort Pierce, Florida, USAKJ753872KJ753886KJ753850
Heterodrilus cf. virilis Erséus 1992aLizard Island,
Australia		KJ753880KJ753892KJ753853
Heterodrilus chenianus Wang and Erséus 2003Hainan, ChinaAY885601AY885574KJ753856
Heterodrilus decipiens Erséus 1997aRottnest Island,
W. Australia		AY885603AF209455-
Heterodrilus devexus Erséus 1997aDampier,
W. Australia		AY885602AY885575-
Heterodrilus ersei (Giere 1979)Lee Stocking Island,
Bahamas		AY885606AY885576KJ753857
Heterodrilus flexuosus Erséus 1990Carrie Bow Cay,
Belize		AY885600AY885573-
Heterodrilus keenani Erséus, 1981Heron Island,
Australia		-AY040688AY040703
Heterodrilus minisetosus Erséus 1981Lee Stocking Island,
Bahamas		AY885599AF411885KJ753859
Heterodrilus modestus Erséus 1990Lee Stocking Island,
Bahamas		KJ753876KJ753888KJ753855
Heterodrilus koreanus n. sp.1Dokdo, the East Sea,
Korea		MW795716MW794267MT250545
Heterodrilus koreanus n. sp.2Dokdo, the East Sea,
Korea		MW795717MW794268MT250546
Heterodrilus koreanus n. sp.3Dokdo, the East Sea,
Korea		MW795718MW794269MT250547
Heterodrilus koreanus n. sp.4Dokdo, the East Sea,
Korea		MW795719MW794270MT250548
Heterodrilus koreanus n. sp.5Dokdo, the East Sea,
Korea		MW795720MW794271MT250549
Heterodrilus occidentalis Erseus 1981Fort Pierce, Florida,
USA		KJ753877KJ753889-
Heterodrilus paucifascis Milligan 1987Carrie Bow Cay,
Belize		AY885605AF411865KJ753858
Heterodrilus pentcheffi Erséus 1981Lee Stocking Island,
Bahamas		KJ753878KJ753890KJ753854
Heterodrilus perkinsi Erséus 1986Fort Pierce, Florida,
USA		KJ753879KJ753891KJ753849
Heterodrilus queenslandicus (Jamieson, 1977)Heron Island, AustraliaAY885604AF411881-
OUTGROUPS: Clitellata, Naididae
Heronidrilus heronae (Erséus and Jamieson, 1981)Heron Island,
Australia		AY885616AF209454KJ753861
Adelodrilus pusillus Erséus, 1978Koster area,
SW Sweden		KJ753881KJ753894KJ753867
Aktedrilus arcticus (Erséus, 1978)Koster area,
SW Sweden		AY885591AF209451AF064042
Pectinodrilus molestus (Erséus, 1988)Carrie Bow Cay, BelizeAY885598AF209462KJ753864
Thalassodrilus prostatus (Knöllner, 1935)Göteborg,
SW Sweden		KJ753883KJ753896KJ753871
Tubificoides pseudogaster (Dahl, 1960)Kysing Fjord, DenmarkAY885609AF411873HM460209
Heronidrilus gravidus Erséus, 1990Carrie Bow Cay, BelizeAY885617AF411887-
Clitellata, Phreodrilidae
Insulodrilus bifidus Pinder and Brinkhurst, 1997Bow River,
W. Australia		AY885593AF411906KJ753862
Clitellata, Enchytraeidae
Buchholzia fallax Michaelsen, 1887Toscana (soil), ItalyAY885581AF411895KJ753848
Polychaeta
Ophelina acuminata Örsted, 1843Øresund Strait, DenmarkHM746716AY340439MN138411
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Lee, J.; Lee, T. A New Species and Four New Recorded Species of Naididae (Annelida: Oligochaeta) from Korea. Diversity 2024, 16, 7. https://doi.org/10.3390/d16010007

AMA Style

Lee J, Lee T. A New Species and Four New Recorded Species of Naididae (Annelida: Oligochaeta) from Korea. Diversity. 2024; 16(1):7. https://doi.org/10.3390/d16010007

Chicago/Turabian Style

Lee, Jeounghee, and Taekjun Lee. 2024. "A New Species and Four New Recorded Species of Naididae (Annelida: Oligochaeta) from Korea" Diversity 16, no. 1: 7. https://doi.org/10.3390/d16010007

APA Style

Lee, J., & Lee, T. (2024). A New Species and Four New Recorded Species of Naididae (Annelida: Oligochaeta) from Korea. Diversity, 16(1), 7. https://doi.org/10.3390/d16010007

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop