Next Article in Journal
PFOS Induces Lipometabolism Change, Immune Defense, and Endocrine Disorders in Black-Spotted Frogs: Application of Transcriptome Profiling
Next Article in Special Issue
Forest Disturbances Threatening Cypripedium calceolus Populations Can Improve Its Habitat Conditions
Previous Article in Journal
The Facet of Human Impact: Solenopsis invicta Buren, 1972 Spreading around the Atlantic Forest
Previous Article in Special Issue
Monitoring of Dactylorhiza sambucina (L.) Soó (Orchidaceae)—Variation in Flowering, Flower Colour Morph Frequencies, and Erratic Population Census Trends
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Seed Morphology, Life Form and Distribution in Three Bromheadia Species (Epidendroideae, Orchidaceae)

by
Emma Ortúñez
1,2,*,† and
Roberto Gamarra
1,2,†
1
Departamento de Biología, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, 28049 Madrid, Spain
2
Centro de Investigación en Biodiversidad y Cambio Global (CIBC-UAM), Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, 28049 Madrid, Spain
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Diversity 2023, 15(2), 195; https://doi.org/10.3390/d15020195
Submission received: 23 December 2022 / Revised: 23 January 2023 / Accepted: 24 January 2023 / Published: 1 February 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Distribution and Diversity of Orchids)

Abstract

:
The seed morphology of three species belonging to the genus Bromheadia was analyzed under light and scanning electron microscopy. The seeds of B. cecieliae and B. truncata were studied for the first time. Differences in the qualitative and quantitative characteristics between the terrestrial B. finlaysoniana and the epiphytes B. cecieliae and B. truncata were observed, which were in concordance with the life form. Due to the variability of the seed shapes, a new methodology is proposed to analyze the distance between the embryo and the testa cells, with the aim of demonstrating the presence of air space within the seed. The method is compared to previous formulae used to measure free air space. Furthermore, a new measurement, the angle in twisted testa cells of epiphytic orchids, is proposed, to evaluate the degree of torsion in medial cells. Although the wide distribution of B. finlaysoniana could be related to the great buoyancy of their seeds in contrast to the limited distribution of B. cecieliae, we consider that environmental factors are more influential than the buoyancy of seeds when understanding the distribution of these taxa. Future studies on seeds morphology in orchid genera with terrestrial and epiphytic taxa will provide new insights into this research.

1. Introduction

Orchid seeds are tiny, comprising a pluricellular embryo enclosed in a thin layer of dead cells, which make up the testa [1]. Testa cells show a set of characteristics that have been observed under light and scanning electron microscopes, providing qualitative and quantitative data used to describe the seeds’ morphology [2,3,4,5,6]. Previous studies on seed micromorphology have demonstrated the taxonomic value of several traits [7,8,9], and emphasize its strong correlation with molecular phylogenies [4,10,11,12]. In Orchidaceae, seed traits are more conservative than other characteristics [4,5].
Two life forms are dominant in the family Orchidaceae: terrestrial and epiphytic. According to Vij et al. [1], terrestrial taxa are primitive. Seed traits have evolved from terrestrial to epiphytic orchids concerning the cell shape, the seed size, the arrangement of the testa cells, or the internal air space between the embryo and testa. Testa cells have evolved from polygonal (quadrangular to rectangular) in terrestrial orchids to elongated in the epiphytic ones. Seed size has been indicated as being larger in terrestrial species [2,13]; however, Arditti and Ghani [3] rejected this assertion. Parallel testa cells along the longitudinal axis are common in terrestrial orchids and twisted ones have only been observed in epiphytic orchids [1,14]. Free air space is variable amongst orchid seeds [3], even though several studies have suggested that air space is larger in terrestrial species [1,15,16].
Arditti et al. [2] proposed the use of two mathematical formulae to estimate the volume of the seed and embryo, by simulating two cones fused at the base in the case of the seed, and using a prolate spheroid in the embryo. With these data, a formula to estimate the percentage of free air space was also proposed. Seed and embryo volumes and the percentage of free air space, have been calculated in several orchids [7,12,15,17]. However, Zotz et al. [18] obtained negative results with the use of these formulae due to the variability of the seeds’ shape, so they proposed a modification for the embryo volume by simulating two cones fused at the base, as proposed for the seed volume.
Arditti and Ghani [3] suggested that bigger aerial spaces in terrestrial species gives the seeds an advantage by enabling them to be dispersed over long distance due to their buoyancy, thus, epiphytic species with lower percentages of free air space have a smaller capacity for dispersal, as was corroborated in later publications [15,16,19]. Investigations into seed morphology and free air space are related to the habitat; it being important to understand the ecology of taxa and its conservation [20]. Differences among qualitative and quantitative features of the seeds in terrestrial and epiphytic orchids have been reported [1,10,14], even in the same genus.
The genus Bromheadia Lindl. belongs to the tribe Vandeae and the subfamily Epidendroideae. It comprises 29 species, distributed from Sri Lanka to Papua New Guinea and Queensland in northern Australia [21]. According to Kruizinga et al. [22], most of the species are epiphytic (rarely terrestrial or lithophytic), but B. borneensis J.J.Sm., B. finlaysoniana (Lindl.) Miq. and B. pendek de Vogel are exclusively terrestrial. In the cladogram of the genus based on the morphological traits of the species, the epiphyte B. alticola Ridl. appeared as the oldest taxon, the terrestrial species clumped in the same clade, and the rest of the species, all of them epiphytic, are grouped into a third polytomy [23].
Three species are analyzed in this study: B. cecieliae Kruiz., B. finlaysoniana and B. truncata Seidenf.
B. cecieliae is an epiphyte only known from Borneo, and it was indicated with a question mark for the Malay Peninsula [22]. It grows on trunks in lower montane to montane mixed or Dipterocarp forests, at 1200–1700 m [22].
B. finlaysoniana is distributed from Southeast Asia to northern Australia. It grows as terrestrial in open habitats, more or less disturbed, on loamy to sandy soils, generally at 0–200 m but can be found up to 1100 m [22,24,25]. Chong et al. [26] considered it an extinct species in Singapore. Brummitt [27] assessed that there were no particular threats associated with this taxon, which is categorized as LC (Least concern).
B. truncata is distributed from Thailand to Borneo. It grows as epiphyte in lowland to montane Dipterocarp primary forests, up to 1830 m [22,25]. No information about conservation status has been found in the literature for B. truncata and B. cecieliae.
Although some traits of the seeds in B. finlaysoniana have been described [5,28], there is a lack of information about the seeds in the rest of the genus.
The aim of this study is to compare the seeds of the three Bromheadia species mentioned above, and to test if the seed characteristics are in concordance with the life form and the distribution range of each species.

2. Materials and Methods

The seeds were carefully removed from mature capsules of specimens housed in the herbarium of the Royal Botanic Gardens at Kew (K). The species studied with the localities, collector and vouchers are given in Table 1. The scientific names and authorities are according to POWO [29]. An average of 30 mature seeds from each sample were analyzed under a light microscope (LM), and 10 mature seeds using scanning electron microscopy (SEM).
For light microscopy observations, the seeds were pre-mounted with PVA (polyvinyl alcohol). The samples for the SEM observations were mounted on SEM stubs and coated with gold in a sputter-coater (SEM Coating System, Bio-Rad SC 502, Contra Costa County, CA, USA). They were examined with a Philips XL30, with a filament voltage of 20 kV at SIDI-UAM (Interdepartmental Service of Investigation, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid).
Quantitative data, such as seed size (length and width), embryo size (length and width), the number of cells along the longitudinal axis, the distances between testa and embryo, the torsion angle of the medial cells with respect to the longitudinal axis, and the seed mass were recorded. In addition, the seed and embryo volume and the percentage of free air space were calculated with the mathematical formulae proposed by Arditti et al. [2].
The distance between both ends of the embryo and the apical and basal poles of the seeds, and between the lateral sides of the embryo and the testa, were measured to verify the presence of air space within the seed (Figure 1a). Furthermore, during our study, we observed variability in the arrangement of the medial cells along the longitudinal axis; measuring the torsion angle of these cells to obtain quantitative data suitable for comparison among the taxa (Figure 1b).
Seed and embryo dimensions were measured under a stereomicroscope Olympus SZ61 using cellSens version 1.4 software (Olympus, Tokyo, Japan).
A sample of 100 seeds for each species were weighted with an analytical balance Mettler Toledo X96 (precision: 0.000001 g) at Chemical Analyses Laboratory (SIDI-UAM); later, the mass of one seed was estimated.
Qualitative data, such as seed shape, morphology and the orientation of medial testa cells, morphology of longitudinal anticlinal walls, periclinal walls (visibility, ornamentation), and the presence of intercellular gaps and waxes were analyzed under SEM, and selected images were recorded.
The terminology and micromorphological methods were adopted from Arditti et al. [2] and Gamarra et al. [14].
Ward’s method with Euclidean distances was conducted to obtain a cluster analysis of the quantitative data using PAST software [30].
Distribution maps of each species were created from herbaria collections and bibliographic resources (Table A1) and produced using Map Maker Pro v.3.5 software (Map Maker Limited, 2019) from georeferenced specimens.
The preliminary conservation status was estimated according to the criteria and categories recommended by the IUCN Red List [31], based on the distribution of each taxon.

3. Results

3.1. Seed Morphology

Seeds of the studied species show differences in the qualitative micromorphological characteristics regarding seed shape, morphology and orientation of medial testa cells, morphology of the longitudinal anticlinal walls, visibility of periclinal walls, and the presence of intercellular gaps and waxes (Table 2). Two different patterns were observed, one in B. finlaysoniana, and the other in B. cecieliae and B. truncata.
B. finlaysoniana (Figure 2A) has fusiform to clavate seeds, polygonal and isodiametric cells in the apical pole, rectangular medial and basal cells, medial cells arranged at the same orientation of the longitudinal axis, thin and straight longitudinal anticlinal walls, visible periclinal walls without ornamentation, intercellular gaps at the cell corners (Figure 2B) and a lack of waxes.
B. cecieliae and B. truncata share the following traits (Figure 2C,D): fusiform seed shape, quadrangular to rectangular cells in both poles, elongated and twisted medial cells along the longitudinal axis, thickened longitudinal anticlinal walls with prominent ridges on both sides of the adhesion zone (anticlinal zone), narrow-to-not visible periclinal walls, cell corners without intercellular gaps, and the presence of waxes in the testa.
The means and standard deviation of length, width and volume of the seed and embryo, percentage of free air space, distance of apical and basal poles between the seed and embryo, distance of the lateral sides between the testa seed and embryo, cell number along the longitudinal axis, the torsion angle of the medial cells with respect to the longitudinal axis, and the estimated mass of one seed for each species are summarized in Table 3.
The data reflect differences mainly in the length and width of the seed, in the distances between the embryo and the seed poles and between the embryo and the lateral sides of the testa in B. finlaysoniana with the other taxa (Figure 3).
Seeds in B. finlaysoniana are longer and wider than those of B. cecieliae and B. truncata, and the distances from the seed poles to the embryo and the lateral sides of the testa to the embryo are also larger (Table 3, Figure 3 and Figure 4). The measurements of embryo length and width are similar in the three species (Table 3, Figure 3). The data of the percentage of free air space show negative values for the epiphytic species (Table 3). The number of testa cells along the longitudinal axis is higher in B. finlaysoniana. Testa cells are parallelly arranged to the longitudinal axis in B. finlaysoniana but are twisted, in a 17–22° angle in B. cecieliae and a 25–29° angle in B. truncata. The estimated mass of one seed is higher in B. finlaysoniana (Table 3).
The seed size, the distances from the seed poles to the embryo and the lateral sides of the testa to the embryo, the number of testa cells along the longitudinal axis, the angle of the medial cells with respect to the longitudinal axis, and the seed mass, are more similar in B. cecieliae and B. truncata compared to B. finlaysoniana (Table 3).
Using Ward’s method with Euclidean distance, two large clusters were produced by the dendrogram (Figure 5), one including the two epiphytic species, and the other with the terrestrial ones.

3.2. Distribution of the Species

B. finlaysoniana is the most widely distributed species within the genus; from Vietnam, Cambodia and Thailand to northern Australia, though mainly in Peninsular Malaysia, Sumatra and Borneo (Sabah, Brunei, Sarawak, Kalimantan) (Figure 6A). It grows preferably in sunny places (rarely semi-shade) as terrestrial in primary and secondary forests (in Melaleuca forests with Pandanus and Lophostemon, Dipterocarp forests, Kerangas forests rich in bryophytes, swamp forests with Gonystylus, Calophyllum and Shorea), heath woodlands, forest edges, scrubby vegetation, natural and artificial grasslands, logging roads, weedy roadside banks, and rocky seashore, in an altitudinal range from 0 to 1100 m, from plains to steep hillsides, in dry soils to waterlogged places, peat swamps, along riversides and streams with Gramineae and Juncaceae, on sandy soils, clay soils, granites or ultramafic substrates, with thick leaf litter (rich in hummus) or on almost bare bedrock.
B. cecieliae is endemic from Borneo (Sabah, Sarawak, Kalimantan) (Figure 6B). It grows as epiphyte on tree trunks and twigs, in mossy montane Dipterocarp forests with climbing bamboos and rattans, from 600 to 1900 m. The number of locations is less than 10 in Borneo. Due to its restricted geographic range, a preliminary conservation status of Vulnerable (VU) has been assigned.
B. truncata is widespread through Thailand, Peninsular Malaysia, Singapore, Sumatra and Borneo (Sabah), being more abundant in Peninsular Malaysia and Sumatra (Figure 6C). It grows as epiphyte in forests, from 300 to 1370 m. Although the number of locations is low, this species is widely distributed, so its preliminary conservation status as LC (Least concern) is assigned.

4. Discussion

Orchid seeds are extremely small and numerous, and generally dispersed by the air [1,3,5]; however, there is variability between the seeds of different species, even within the same genus [4,5,10,14].
Our results support the data of previous studies acquired by other researchers regarding the qualitative characteristics observed in seeds of terrestrial and epiphytic orchids. In B. finlaysoniana, we have observed a set of common traits in the seeds of terrestrial species, such as quadrangular to rectangular testa cells arranged parallel to the longitudinal axis, thin anticlinal walls, straight transversal anticlinal walls, and wide and visible periclinal walls [2,4,5,12,14]. Besides, the presence of intercellular gaps was only found in terrestrial orchids, such as in the tribes Cranichideae and Nervilieae [5,14,32,33]. These results agree with those found in Ziegler [28] and Barthlott et al. [5]. However, in B. cecieliae and B. truncata, the seeds have long-elongated and twisted testa cells, an anticlinal zone, narrow-to-not visible periclinal walls, and the presence of waxes, a set of common traits in seeds of epiphytic orchids [1,5,14]. These traits have been observed for the first time in the genus Bromheadia. Our results verify the presence of qualitative traits regarding the life form, such as in the genus Liparis [10,14].
The quantitative data are also in concordance with the life form. Seeds of B. finlaysoniana are longer and wider, and the distance from the embryos to both poles and to the lateral sides of the seeds are higher, demonstrating the presence of high internal air space, in concordance with seeds of many terrestrial species [16,17]. In B. cecieliae and B. truncata, the seeds are shorter and narrower, with the embryos encased in the testa, so the air space is reduced, such as in many epiphytic species [1,10]. The embryo length and width are similar among the three species, only slightly longer in B. finlaysoniana. Tsutsumi et al. [10] asserted that embryo sizes were higher in epiphytic than in terrestrial taxa, but it is necessary to increase the number of samples to corroborate this assertion. Seeds are heavier in B. finlaysoniana than in the two epiphytic species. Arditti and Ghani [3] suggested that weight is probably less important than the air space during floatation time.
According to different reports [3,16,19], a higher percentage of free air space in the seed contributes to a higher buoyancy, and the species with this type of seed show wider distributions. In our study, B. finlaysoniana is the most widely distributed species within the genus extending from Thailand to northern Australia. It has also been cited from Myanmar [22,34] based on specimens collected by William Griffith. In the label found in the sheet of the New York Botanical Garden (NY02650868), the location is vague (“Birma and Malay Peninsula”). The sheet from the herbarium AMES in Harvard University (HUH023450925) contains two specimens collected in Assam (India) without leaves or flowers, under the name B. pulchra Schltr., later revised by H.J. van Scheindelen as B. finlaysoniana. Besides, the sheet in the Muséum National d’Histoire Naturelle de Paris (P00436672) contains a label with the vague locality “Indes Orientales”, attributed to India in another handwritten label. Kruizinga et al. [22] did not mention this species for India, so its presence in Myanmar and India needs to be confirmed. The wide distribution could be in concordance with the air space in the seed and the terrestrial life form. However, other terrestrial species of the genus show more restricted distributions: B. borneensis from Peninsular Malaysia, Lingga Archipelago to Borneo, and B. pendek only from Borneo [22]. If the seeds of these species are like those of B. finlaysoniana, it would support that the distribution of taxa could be more influenced by abiotic and biotic factors than the buoyancy of seeds.
The vast number of epiphytic species of Bromheadia are endemics from Borneo, Papua New Guinea, Peninsular Malaysia, or Sri Lanka [22]. Their distributions would support the lower buoyancy of seeds, such as in B. cecieliae, which is native from Borneo. However, B. truncata has an extensive distribution with a long distance between the northern locality in Thailand and the central core in the Malay Peninsula and northeastern Borneo (Figure 6C). In this case, the influence of environmental factors would also be more pronounced than the buoyancy of seeds.
The family Orchidaceae developed in their origins as a terrestrial clade, shifted to epiphytic and, later, some lineages returned to the ground [12]. Within the tribe Vandeae, the vast number of species are epiphytic or lithophytic, and fewer than 10 species are exclusively terrestrial [35]. The life form “epiphyte” may be regarded as ancestral in Vandeae, also in the genus Bromheadia [23], and the presence of endocarpic trichomes in all the tribe, independently of the life form, supports this assertion [35]. In the case of B. finlaysoniana, a regression in the life form to terrestrial has been probably followed with the modification of seed traits such as polygonal cells, thin anticlinal walls, visible periclinal walls, or intercellular gaps, common features in orchid seeds that are more adapted to grow on soil [1,5,14].
The mathematical formulae proposed by Arditti et al. [2] to calculate the seed and embryo volume and the percentage of free air space, and the later modification for the embryo volume by Zotz et al. [18] are not in concordance with the morphological variability of seeds observed in Orchidaceae [1,5,12,14,36]. In our study, the seed shape varies between B. finlaysoniana and the two epiphytic species (Figure 2), even if the embryo morphology remains morphologically constant. Using the formulae proposed by Arditti et al. [2], we have obtained negative values for the percentage of free air space. So, we have proposed to measure the distance of the apical and basal poles between the seed and the embryo, and the distances of the lateral sides between the testa and the embryo to check the presence of internal air space. The results of these measurements show that the embryos in the two epiphytic species of Bromheadia are encased in the testa because the distances are extremely short; however, in B. finlaysoniana, a space is clearly observed between the testa and the embryo.
The reduction in free air space in seeds of epiphytic orchids could be related to less buoyancy [20], a strategy in species that grow on trunks and branches in tropical forests where the wind speed is lower than in pastures or at the edges of forests. In seeds of terrestrial orchids, a higher buoyancy would contribute to a long-distance dispersal [37]. Kiyohara et al. [38] and Shimizu et al. [39] related buoyancy to a greater length and width of the seeds. In our study, the seeds of the terrestrial B. finlaysoniana are longer and wider than those of B. cecieliae and B. truncata, and the space between the testa and the surface of the embryo is bigger, so a greater buoyancy would contribute to a major distribution [16,19], as shown in Figure 6A. However, the long-distance dispersal of seeds in orchids does not assure germination due to the absence of mycorrhiza or the influence of several abiotic factors [40]. Distribution of orchid taxa is independent of the life form and the seed’s buoyancy, as shown by the pantropical distribution of the epiphytic Polystachya concreta (Jacq.) Garay and H.R.Sweet [41] or the limited area of the terrestrial Gymnadenia runei (Teppner and E.Klein) Ericsson [42].
The conservation status is confirmed for B. finlaysoniana [27], due to its widespread distribution and the great variability of habitats and soils in which it grows. For B. cecieliae and B. truncata, a preliminary conservation status is proposed, although this proposal is limited by the lack of information concerning the ecology of these taxa. Data on characteristics of the phorophytes such as the identification of trees, types of branches, and the height at which the epiphytes grow, are required to assess its conservation status.
Our results have demonstrated that seed morphology differs between epiphytic and terrestrial taxa, indicating that species from the same genus may have different morphologies associated with its life form. In future research, seeds of more Bromheadia species will provide new insights. More studies on seed morphology in orchid genera with terrestrial and epiphytic representatives must be encouraged to better understand their ecological processes, orchid evolution, and their adaptations.

Author Contributions

Both authors have fully contributed to all stages of the preparation of the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was partially funded by the Departamento de Biología (Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Spain) under Grant BIOUAM 06-2019.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

All data generated or analyzed in this study are included in this published article.

Acknowledgments

We are much indebted to the curators of the herbarium K for their permission to examine the specimens of the studied genus. The technical assistance of Esperanza Salvador and Isidoro Poveda at the SEM laboratory, and Luis Larumbe at the Chemical Analysis laboratory (SIDI-UAM), is gratefully acknowledged. In addition, we thank Pablo de la Fuente and Guillermo Valdelvira for their comments.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Appendix A

Table A1. List of collections and bibliographic resources of the three studied species with countries, localities, collector (including collector number) and voucher. Acronyms of herbaria: BM (The Natural History Museum, London, UK); C (University of Copenhagen, Denmark); CANB (Australian National Herbarium, Canberra, Australia); G (Conservatoire et Jardin Botaniques de la Ville de Genève, Switzerland); HUH (Harvard University, Cambridge, USA); K (Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, UK); L (Naturalis Biodiversity Center, Leiden, The Netherlands); MO (Missouri Botanical Garden, Saint-Louis, USA); NY (New York Botanical Garden, USA); P (Muséum National d’Histoire Naturelle, Paris, France); PH (Academy of Natural Sciences, Philadelphia, USA).
Table A1. List of collections and bibliographic resources of the three studied species with countries, localities, collector (including collector number) and voucher. Acronyms of herbaria: BM (The Natural History Museum, London, UK); C (University of Copenhagen, Denmark); CANB (Australian National Herbarium, Canberra, Australia); G (Conservatoire et Jardin Botaniques de la Ville de Genève, Switzerland); HUH (Harvard University, Cambridge, USA); K (Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, UK); L (Naturalis Biodiversity Center, Leiden, The Netherlands); MO (Missouri Botanical Garden, Saint-Louis, USA); NY (New York Botanical Garden, USA); P (Muséum National d’Histoire Naturelle, Paris, France); PH (Academy of Natural Sciences, Philadelphia, USA).
SpeciesCountryLocalityCollector and NumberVoucher
B. cecieliaeIndonesiaBorneo, W Kalimantan, Serawai, Sungai MerahA.C. Church 2114 et al.NY03998648
MalaysiaBorneo, Mount Kinabalu, Gurulau SpurJ. and M.S. Clemens 50541NY03998647
MalaysiaTambunan District, Crocker RangeJ.H. Beaman 10414 et al.L0283052
MalaysiaSabah, S. Rurun headwatersJ.J. Vermeulen and H. Duistermaet 1067L1488365
MalaysiaSabah, Long Pa Sia to Long SamadohE.F. de Vogel 8524 et al.L1488364
Malaysia Sarawak, Hose MountainsE.F. de Vogel 1174L1488361
MalaysiaSarawak, Batu LawiY. Mahmud et al. S.88176K000718611
MalaysiaSarawak, Kelabit Highlands, Bukit Batu BuliA. Vogel et al.L1488362
B. finlaysonianaAustraliaQueensland, Brown Creek, Iron range Sine coll.CANB
AustraliaQueensland, Cape YorkSine coll.CANB
BruneiBelait BukitM.J.S. Sands 5477K
CambodiaNord Kampot, KnaiM. Poilane 14685P00460027
CambodiaMulu PreyDr. NormandNY03998645
IndonesiaLampung, Bangka Island, G. MarasA.J. Kostermans 1328 and AntaK000482120
IndonesiaSumatra, Barat Kota, Siberut IslandJ.J. SmithK000482123
IndonesiaJambi province, Batanghari Kabupaten Harapan RainforestWardi et al.K000734779
IndonesiaSumatra, Langga Pajoeng, Soengei KananR. Si Toroes 3844NY03998654
IndonesiaSumatra, Tigapulu Mts, Talang Lakat, Bukit Karampal areaJ.S. Burley 1475a et al.MO
IndonesiaRiau Rengat, Tigapulu Mts., Karampal areaJ.S. Burley and Tukirin 1475K000482121
IndonesiaBlitoengTeysmannL1488250
IndonesiaBorneo, Kalimantan, BanjarmasinJ. Motley 809K000482115
IndonesiaBorneo, Kalimantan, MaruwaiP.J.A. Kessler 2707K000482114
IndonesiaBorneo, Kalimantan, HaruwuJ.S. Burley and Tukirin 602K000482116
IndonesiaBorneo, Kalimantan, S. Kahayan, HaruwuJ.S. Burley 602 et al.NY00009461
IndonesiaMoluccas, Aroe Island, SiaP. Buwalda 5508K000482118
IndonesiaIrian Jaya, Wasabori, SeroeiL.J. van Dijk 473K000482104
IndonesiaIrian Jaya, Barat BaboLundquist 648K000482102
IndonesiaIrian Jaya, Barat Fak, Mimika TimurE.A. Widjaja 2177K000482107
IndonesiaIrian Jaya, Samberbaba, SeroeiL.J. van Dijk 829K000482106
IndonesiaIrian Jaya, Cyclops mountains above HollandiaC. Koster 4303K000482098
IndonesiaIrian Jaya, Biak Island, PaieriA.J. Kostermans 936 and SoegengK000482110
IndonesiaIrian Jaya, TablasoefoeP. van Royen and H. Sleumer 6446K000482095
IndonesiaIrian Jaya, Barat Fak Fak, Borowai districtC.J. Stefels 3157K000482097
LaosSé-mounF.J. Harmand 314P00436675
MalaysiaSabah, Leila Forest Reserve, Distr. SandakanK. Murch s.n.K
MalaysiaKepongSine coll.C
MalaysiaSarawak, Bako National ParkJ.W. Purseglove 4899K000482133
MalaysiaSarawak, Sungai Likau, Similajau National ParkA.B.G. Mohtar and H.J. Othman 59456K000482139
MalaysiaSarawak, Kuching District, Mount SerapiJ.H. Beaman 11540 et al.K000482136
MalaysiaSarawak, SerianH.J. Othman and A. Munting 61607K000482135
MalaysiaSarawak, Lundu Kampung BiawakA. Munting 56380K000482138
MalaysiaSarawak, BarioP. Sie 35387K000482132
MalaysiaSarawak, between Bario and Pa UmorJ.H. Beaman and G. Ismail 11234K000482137
MalaysiaSarawak, Kelabit Highlands, KalimantanH. Christiansen and F.L. Apu 8K000482134
MalaysiaPerak Larut, KampongKiah 299K000482088
MalaysiaJohor, Bukit TinggiSine coll.K000482094
MalaysiaSabah, Long PasiaA. Hoare and L. Beliau 36K000482130
MalaysiaSabah, KeningauS. Sazana et al.K000342079
MalaysiaAnambas Islands, Telok Padang, JemajaM.R. Henderson 20439K000482092
MalaysiaPenang HillA.F.G. KerrK000597047
MalaysiaPerak Kampong Pokok AssamL. Wray 3121K000482090
MalaysiaPahang Rompin Leban ChondongJ.H.R. EvansK000492089
MalaysiaSabah, SandakanKeith 6717K000482127
MalaysiaSabah, Keningau Nabawan SyarikatK. Fidilis 128074K000482129
MalaysiaJohor Kampong, Hubong, EndauKadim bin Tassim and Noor 372K000482093
MalaysiaSabah, Lahad DAtu, Mount SilamJ.H. Beaman 11621K000482131
MalaysiaNegeri Sembilan, Pulau Rumbia, Sembilan IslandsC. Boden-KlossK000482086
MalaysiaSabah, SipitangA. Cuadra 4063K000482128
MalaysiaKeningau Distr.J.J. Wood 753K
MalaysiaPerak Larut and Matang Larut HaoSine coll.K000482087
MalaysiaSabah Beluran, Sg. TungudSine coll.K000482126
MalaysiaJohore BahruC.W. Franck 284P00436678
MalaysiaKampong Pulau DomarJ. SinclairP00436679
MalaysiaSabah, Leila Forest Reserve, Distr. SandakanK. MurchK
MalaysiaSarawak, Bako National Park, Telok PandanB.C. Stone 684PH00594440
MalaysiaSarawak, Marudi District, BarioT.E. Beaman 184 and R. RepinNY03998652
MalaysiaSarawak, KuchingM. and J. Clemens 6678NY03998655
MalaysiaSarawak, SengghaiSine coll.NY03998659
MalaysiaSarawak, Bako National Park, Telok AsamJ.W. Purseglove 4899NY03998660
MalaysiaSarawak, Kuching District, Mount SerapiJ.H. Beaman 11540 et al.NY03998653
MalaysiaMount MatangJ. and M. Clemens 22401MO
MalaysiaMalacca, Pulau BesarB.C. Stone 11494PH00594439
MalaysiaKedah, G. JeraiB.C. Stone 12701aPH00594441
MalaysiaTerengganu, P. RedangK.C. Liew 172PH00594442
MalaysiaSabah, Kota Kinabalu District, Bukit PadangJ.H. and R.S. Beaman 6836MO
Papua New GuineaKaiser-Wilhelmsland, JadunaR. Schlechter 19288G00165063
Papua New GuineaKiunga subdistrict, IngembitRidsdale 33240 et al.K000482100
Papua New GuineaWestern Amanab, W. SepikR. Brown 1882K000482101
PhilippinesTagalinog Island, PalawanD.R. Mendoza and R. Espiritu 91317K000482124
SingaporePasir PanjangM. TogasiK000482091
ThailandRanong prov., Muang LanG. Seidenfaden and Smitinand GT6137C
ThailandBan Na, SuratA.F.G. Kerr 0427K000597044
ThailandTako, LangsuanA.F.G. Kerr 0380K000597039
ThailandBangsak, TrangA.F.G. Kerr 0831K000597043
ThailandSatulA.F.G. Kerr 0467K000597042
ThailandSaba Yoi, SongklaA.F.G. KerrK000597045
ThailandKampengpet, SongklaA.F.G. KerrK000597048
ThailandSangka, SurinA.F.G. Kerr 0129K000597049
VietnamLang-ThanThorelP00436677
VietnamQuang Nam Prov., Dai Loc Distr., Dai HongL. Averyanov et al.P01019665
B. truncataIndonesiaSumatra: Sicikeh-Cikeh Forest Hartini [43]
IndonesiaSumatra, Jambi Hartini [43]
MalaysiaJohor, Gunung Panti areaSine coll.L1488171
MalaysiaTerengganuG.P. Lewis 100K
MalaysiaSelangorSegerbäck 2128C
MalaysiaPenangA.C. Maingay 1680K
MalaysiaBorneo, Kinabalu, Gurulau spurC.E. CarrHUH02341030
MalaysiaSabah, Ulu KalangA. Lamb 2004/1116L1488170
SingaporeChawchu KangH.N. RidleyBM000629516
ThailandDoi SuthepG. Seidenfaden and Smitinand GT2691C
ThailandWaeng Forest StationG. Seidenfaden and Smitinand GT7535C

References

  1. Vij, S.P.; Kaur, P.; Kaur, S.; Kaushal, P.S. The orchid seeds: Taxonomic, evolutionary and functional aspects. J. Orchid Soc. India 1992, 6, 91–107. [Google Scholar]
  2. Arditti, J.; Michaud, J.D.; Healey, P.L. Morphometry of orchid seeds. I. Paphiopedilum and native California and related species of Cypripedium. Am. J. Bot. 1979, 66, 1128–1137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Arditti, J.; Ghani, A.K.A. Tansley Review No. 110. Numerical and physical properties of orchid seeds and their biological implications. New Phytol. 2000, 145, 367–421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Gamarra, R.; Ortúñez, E.; Galán Cela, P.; Guadaño, V. Anacamptis versus Orchis (Orchidaceae): Seed micromorphology and its taxonomic significance. Plant Syst. Evol. 2012, 298, 597–607. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Barthlott, W.; Große-Veldmann, B.; Korotkova, N. Orchid Seed Diversity: A Scanning Electron Microscopy Survey. Englera 2014, 32, 3–245. [Google Scholar]
  6. Vafaee, Y.; Mohammadi, G.; Nazari, F.; Fatahi, M.; Kaki, A.; Gholami, S.; Ghorbani, A.; Khadivi, A. Phenotypic characterization and seed-micromorphology diversity of the threatened terrestrial orchids: Implications for conservation. S. Afr. J. Bot. 2021, 137, 386–398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Healey, P.L.; Michaud, J.D.; Arditti, J. Morphometry of orchid seeds. III. Native California and related species of Goodyera, Piperia, Platanthera and Spiranthes. Am. J. Bot. 1980, 67, 508–518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Chase, M.W.; Pippen, J.S. Seed morphology in the Oncidiinae and related subtribes (Orchidaceae). Syst. Bot. 1988, 13, 313–323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Kurzweil, H. Seed morphology in Southern African Orchidoideae (Orchidaceae). Plant Syst. Evol. 1993, 185, 229–247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Tsutsumi, C.; Yukawa, T.; Lee, N.S.; Lee, C.S.; Kato, M. Phylogeny and comparative seed morphology of epiphytic and terrestrial species of Liparis (Orchidaceae) in Japan. J. Plant Res. 2007, 120, 405–412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Gamarra, R.; Galán, P.; Pedersen, H.A.; Ortúñez, E.; Sanz, E. Seed micromorphology in Dactylorhiza Necker ex Nevski (Orchidaceae) and allied genera. Turk. J. Bot. 2015, 39, 298–309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Fan, X.-L.; Chomicki, G.; Hao, K.; Liu, Q.; Xiong, Y.-Z.; Renner, S.S.; Gao, J.-Y.; Huang, S.-Q. Transitions between the terrestrial and epiphytic habit drove the evolution of seed-aerodynamic traits in orchids. Am. Nat. 2020, 195, 275–283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Rasmussen, H.N. Terrestrial Orchids: From Seed to Mycotrophic Plant; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 1995. [Google Scholar]
  14. Gamarra, R.; Ortúñez, E.; Galán Cela, P.; Merencio, Á. Seed micromorphology of Orchidaceae in the Gulf of Guinea (West Tropical Africa). Plant Syst. Evol. 2018, 304, 665–677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Swamy, K.K.; Kumar, H.N.K.; Ramakrishna, T.M.; Ramaswamy, S.N. Studies on seed morphometry of epiphytic orchids from Western Ghats of Karnataka. Taiwania 2004, 49, 124–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Verma, J.; Kusum; Thakur, K.; Sembi, J.K.; Vij, S.P. Study on seed morphometry of seven threatened Himalayan orchids exhibiting varied life modes. Acta Bot. Gall. 2012, 159, 443–449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Galán Cela, P.; Seligrat, I.; Ortúñez, E.; Gamarra, R.; Vivar, A.; Scrugli, A. A study of seed micromorphology in the genus Ophrys (Orchidaceae). An. Jard. Bot. Madrid 2014, 71, e008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Zotz, G.; Weichgrebe, T.; Happatz, H.; Einzmann, H.J.R. Measuring the terminal velocity of tiny diaspores. Seed Sci. Res. 2016, 26, 222–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Chaudhary, B.; Chattopadhyay, P.; Banerjee, N. Modulations in seed micromorphology reveal signature of adaptive species-diversification in Dendrobium (Orchidaceae). Open J. Ecol. 2014, 4, 33–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Diantina, S.; McGill, C.; Millner, J.; Nadarajan, J.; Pritchard, H.W.; Clavijo McCormick, A. Comparative seed ecology of tropical and temperate orchid species with different growth habits. Plants 2020, 9, 161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Pridgeon, A.M.; Cribb, P.J.; Chase, M.W.; Rasmussen, F.N. Genera Orchidacearum—Volume 6: Epidendroideae (Part Three); Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  22. Kruizinga, J.; Van Scheindelen, H.J.; De Vogel, E.F. Revision of the genus Bromheadia (Orchidaceae). Orchid. Monogr. 1997, 8, 79–118. [Google Scholar]
  23. Repetur, C.P.; Van Welzen, P.C.; De Vogel, E.F. Phylogeny and historical biogeography of the genus Bromheadia (Orchidaceae). Syst. Bot. 1997, 22, 465–477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Puspitaningtyas, D.M. Orchid exploration in Mount Bintan Besar protected forest, Bintan Island, Riau Islands Province, Sumatra, Indonesia. Biodiversitas 2018, 19, 1081–1088. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Nordin, F.A.; Othman, A.S.; Zainudin, N.A.; Khalil, N.; Asi, N.; Azmi, A.; Mangsor, K.N.; Harun, M.S.; Zin, K.F. The Orchid Flora of Gunung Ledang (Mount Ophir), Malaysia—120 years after Ridley. Pertanika J. Trop. Agric. Sci. 2021, 44, 369–387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Chong, K.Y.; Tan, H.T.W.; Corlett, R.T. A Checklist of the Total Vascular Plant Flora of Singapore. Native, Naturalized and Cultivated Species; National University of Singapore: Singapore, 2009. [Google Scholar]
  27. Brummitt, N. Bromheadia finlaysoniana. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2013, e.T44393543A44410760. Available online: https://doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.UK.2013-1.RLTS.T44393543A44410760.en (accessed on 16 January 2023).
  28. Ziegler, B. Mikromorphologie der Orchideensamen unter Berücksichtigung Taxomonischer Aspekte. Ph.D. Thesis, Ruprecht-Karl Universität, Heidelberg, Germany, 1981. [Google Scholar]
  29. POWO. Plants of the World Online. Facilitated by the Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew. 2022. Available online: http://www.plantsoftheworldonline.org/ (accessed on 19 December 2022).
  30. Hammer, Ø.; Harper, D.A.T.; Ryan, P.D. Paleontological statistics software package for education and data analysis. Palaeontol. Electron. 2001, 4, 1–9. [Google Scholar]
  31. IUCN. Guidelines for Using the IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria. Version 14. Prepared by the Standards and Petitions Committee. Available online: http://www.iucnredlist.org/documents/RedListGuidelines.pdf (accessed on 18 September 2019).
  32. Tohda, H. Seed morphology in Orchidaceae II. Tribe Cranichidae. Sci. Rep. Tohoku Univ. 4th Ser. Biol. 1985, 39, 21–43. [Google Scholar]
  33. Molvray, M.; Kores, P.J. Character analysis of the seed coat in Spiranthoideae and Orchidoideae, with special reference to the Diurideae (Orchidaceae). Am. J. Bot. 1995, 82, 1443–1454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Ormerod, P.; Kurzweil, H.; Watthana, S. Annotated list of Orchidaceae from Myanmar. Phytotaxa 2021, 481, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Gamarra, R.; Ortúñez, E. Endocarpic trichomes in Vandeae (Orchidaceae). Flora 2021, 280, 151844. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Tongbram, J.; Rao, A.N.; Vij, S.P. Seed morphometric studies in some orchids from Manipur. J. Orchid Soc. India 2012, 26, 25–29. [Google Scholar]
  37. Davies-Colley, R.; Payne, G.W.; Elswijk, M. Microclimate gradients across a forest edge. N. Z. J. Ecol. 2000, 24, 111–121. [Google Scholar]
  38. Kiyohara, S.; Fukunaga, H.; Sawa, S. Characteristics of the falling speed of Japanese orchid seeds. Int. J. Biol. 2012, 4, 10–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Shimizu, N.; Sawa, Y.; Sawa, S. Adaptation and evolution of seed shape on breeding area in Japanese orchids. Int. J. Biol. 2012, 4, 47–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Thakur, K.K.; Verma, J. Study on distribution, habitat characteristics and seed morphometry of a medicinal orchid, Eulophia herbacea Lindl. Vegetos 2013, 26, 121–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Mytnik-Ejsmont, J. A Monograph of the Subtribe Polystachyinae Schltr. (Orchidaceae); University of Gdansk: Gdansk, Poland, 2011. [Google Scholar]
  42. Delforge, P. Orchids of Europe, North Africa and the Middle East, 3rd ed.; A&C Black: London, UK, 2006. [Google Scholar]
  43. Hartini, S. Orchids diversity in the Sicikeh-Cikeh Forest, North Sumatra, Indonesia. Biodiversitas 2019, 20, 1087–1096. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Schemes of the methodology followed under light microscopy to measure the values of (a) seed of B. finlaysoniana, distances between seed and embryo (distance to the apical pole, DAP; distance to the basal pole, DBP; lateral distances, LD; embryo length, EL; embryo width, EW); (b) seed of B. cecieliae, angle of the medial cells with respect to the longitudinal axis, α.
Figure 1. Schemes of the methodology followed under light microscopy to measure the values of (a) seed of B. finlaysoniana, distances between seed and embryo (distance to the apical pole, DAP; distance to the basal pole, DBP; lateral distances, LD; embryo length, EL; embryo width, EW); (b) seed of B. cecieliae, angle of the medial cells with respect to the longitudinal axis, α.
Diversity 15 00195 g001
Figure 2. Seed morphology under SEM: (A) seed and cell shapes in B. finlaysoniana; (B) intercellular gaps in B. finlaysoniana; (C) seed and cell shapes in B. cecieliae; (D) medial cells and anticlinal zone in B. truncata.
Figure 2. Seed morphology under SEM: (A) seed and cell shapes in B. finlaysoniana; (B) intercellular gaps in B. finlaysoniana; (C) seed and cell shapes in B. cecieliae; (D) medial cells and anticlinal zone in B. truncata.
Diversity 15 00195 g002
Figure 3. Box plots of measured values of the seeds of the three Bromheadia species: seed length (SL), seed width (SW), embryo length (EL), embryo width (EW), distance to the apical pole (DAP), distance to the basal pole (DBP), lateral distance (LD).
Figure 3. Box plots of measured values of the seeds of the three Bromheadia species: seed length (SL), seed width (SW), embryo length (EL), embryo width (EW), distance to the apical pole (DAP), distance to the basal pole (DBP), lateral distance (LD).
Diversity 15 00195 g003
Figure 4. Comparison between the seed and embryo (arrow) under LM for (A) Bromheadia finlaysoniana and (B) B. cecieliae.
Figure 4. Comparison between the seed and embryo (arrow) under LM for (A) Bromheadia finlaysoniana and (B) B. cecieliae.
Diversity 15 00195 g004
Figure 5. Dendrogram showing the clustering of the studied species of Bromheadia.
Figure 5. Dendrogram showing the clustering of the studied species of Bromheadia.
Diversity 15 00195 g005
Figure 6. Distribution maps: (A) Bromheadia finlaysoniana; (B) B. cecieliae; (C) B. truncata. Red stars represent localities provided in Table A1.
Figure 6. Distribution maps: (A) Bromheadia finlaysoniana; (B) B. cecieliae; (C) B. truncata. Red stars represent localities provided in Table A1.
Diversity 15 00195 g006
Table 1. List of species studied with life form (E: epiphyte; T: terrestrial), localities, collector (including collector number) and voucher.
Table 1. List of species studied with life form (E: epiphyte; T: terrestrial), localities, collector (including collector number) and voucher.
SpeciesLife FormLocalityCollector and NumberVoucher
B. finlaysonianaTMalaysia, Sabah: Distr. Sandakan, Leila Forest Reserve, 17-VIII-1971K. Murch s.n.K
Papua New Guinea: Amanab, W Sepita, disturbed growth near road, semi-shade terrestrial, 3-IV-1928R. Brown 1882K000482101
Thailand: Sangka, Surin, 300 m, by a stream in open evergreen forest, 15-I-1924A.F.G. Kerr 0129K000594041
B. cecieliaeEMalaysia, Sarawak: Batu Lawi, 1050 m, near the river, hill slope, 6-V-2002Y. Mahmud et al. S.88176K000718611
B. truncataEMalaysia: Penang, s.f.A.C. Maingay 1680K
Table 2. Main micromorphological traits of the seeds in the studied species of Bromheadia.
Table 2. Main micromorphological traits of the seeds in the studied species of Bromheadia.
TaxaSeed ShapeMedial Cell ShapeOrient. Testa CellsLong. Anticl. WallsPericl. WallsIntercellular GapsWaxes
B. finlaysonianaFusiform to clavateRectangularParallelThinVisiblePresentAbsent
B. cecieliaeFusiformElongatedTwistedThickened Narrow-to-not visibleAbsentPresent
B. truncataFusiformElongatedTwistedThickened Narrow-to-not visibleAbsentPresent
Table 3. Average values and standard deviation of quantitative data in the seeds of the studied species of Bromheadia: seed length (SL), seed width (SW), number of cells (NC), medial cell angle (MCA), embryo length (EL), embryo width (EW), seed volume (SV), embryo volume (EV), percentage of free air space, distance to the apical pole (DAP), distance to the basal pole (DBP), lateral distance (LD), seed mass (SM). The seed and embryo volumes, and the percentage of free air space were calculated following the described method [2,3].
Table 3. Average values and standard deviation of quantitative data in the seeds of the studied species of Bromheadia: seed length (SL), seed width (SW), number of cells (NC), medial cell angle (MCA), embryo length (EL), embryo width (EW), seed volume (SV), embryo volume (EV), percentage of free air space, distance to the apical pole (DAP), distance to the basal pole (DBP), lateral distance (LD), seed mass (SM). The seed and embryo volumes, and the percentage of free air space were calculated following the described method [2,3].
TaxaSL (µm) ± SD SW (µm) ± SD NCMCAEL (µm) ± SDEW (µm) ± SDSV (mm3 × 10−3) ± SD EV (mm3 × 10−3) ± SDAir Space (%)DAP (µm) ± SDDBP (µm) ± SDLD * (µm) ± SDSM (µg)
B. finlaysoniana504.41 ± 24.71144.41 ± 9.187–9129.70 ± 14.7752.60 ± 4.282.78 ± 3.941.56 ± 3.8394.35 ± 1.11175.35 ± 7.26201.14 ± 21.8632.19 ± 6.220.379
B. cecieliae148.76 ± 10.3656.25 ± 4.582–317–22°100.07 ± 9.3048.58 ± 4.311.24 ± 2.51.25 ± 2.82−0.75 ± 12.2121.43 ± 5.0126.62 ± 8.243.88 ± 1.310.120
B. truncata160.35 ± 13.2751.58 ± 6.302–325–29°109.32 ± 9.0745.32 ± 6.111.14 ± 3.151.14 ± 3.16−5.24 ± 8.2620.86 ± 3.0030.16 ± 6.583.12 ± 0.270.186
* The lateral distance is the result of the mean of the two values obtained for each measured seed.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ortúñez, E.; Gamarra, R. Seed Morphology, Life Form and Distribution in Three Bromheadia Species (Epidendroideae, Orchidaceae). Diversity 2023, 15, 195. https://doi.org/10.3390/d15020195

AMA Style

Ortúñez E, Gamarra R. Seed Morphology, Life Form and Distribution in Three Bromheadia Species (Epidendroideae, Orchidaceae). Diversity. 2023; 15(2):195. https://doi.org/10.3390/d15020195

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ortúñez, Emma, and Roberto Gamarra. 2023. "Seed Morphology, Life Form and Distribution in Three Bromheadia Species (Epidendroideae, Orchidaceae)" Diversity 15, no. 2: 195. https://doi.org/10.3390/d15020195

APA Style

Ortúñez, E., & Gamarra, R. (2023). Seed Morphology, Life Form and Distribution in Three Bromheadia Species (Epidendroideae, Orchidaceae). Diversity, 15(2), 195. https://doi.org/10.3390/d15020195

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop