Next Article in Journal
Habitat Provision and Erosion Are Influenced by Seagrass Meadow Complexity: A Seascape Perspective
Previous Article in Journal
Possible Population Growth of Astrospartus mediterraneus (Risso, 1826) (Ophiuroidea, Gorgonocephalidae) in the Mediterranean Sea
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

The ‘Edge Effect’ Phenomenon in Plants: Morphological, Biochemical and Mineral Characteristics of Border Tissues

1
Federal Scientific Vegetable Center, 143072 Moscow, Russia
2
Institute of Living Systems, Immanuel Kant Baltic Federal University, 236040 Kaliningrad, Russia
3
Nikitsky Botanic Gardens, National Scientific Center of RAS, 298648 Yalta, Russia
4
Medical Faculty, Department of General and Clinical Pharmacology, Penza State University, 440026 Penza, Russia
5
Department of Horticulture, Faculty of Biotechnology and Horticulture, University of Agriculture, 31-120 Krakow, Poland
6
Department of Agricultural Sciences, University of Naples Federico II, Portici, 80055 Naples, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Diversity 2023, 15(1), 123; https://doi.org/10.3390/d15010123
Submission received: 26 November 2022 / Revised: 10 January 2023 / Accepted: 11 January 2023 / Published: 16 January 2023
(This article belongs to the Section Biodiversity Conservation)

Abstract

:
The ‘edge’ effect is considered one of the fundamental ecological phenomena essential for maintaining ecosystem integrity. The properties of plant outer tissues (root, tuber, bulb and fruit peel, tree and shrub bark, leaf and stem trichomes) mimic to a great extent the ‘edge’ effect properties of different ecosystems, which suggests the possibility of the ‘edge’ effect being applicable to individual plant organisms. The most important characteristics of plant border tissues are intensive oxidant stress, high variability and biodiversity of protection mechanisms and high adsorption capacity. Wide variations in morphological, biochemical and mineral components of border tissues play an important role in the characteristics of plant adaptability values, storage duration of roots, fruit, tubers and bulbs, and the diversity of outer tissue practical application. The significance of outer tissue antioxidant status and the accumulation of polyphenols, essential oil, lipids and minerals, and the artificial improvement of such accumulation is described in connection with plant tolerance to unfavorable environmental conditions. Methods of plant ‘edge’ effect utilization in agricultural crop breeding, production of specific preparations with powerful antioxidant value and green nanoparticle synthesis of different elements have been developed. Extending the ‘edge’ effect phenomenon from ecosystems to individual organisms is of fundamental importance in agriculture, pharmacology, food industry and wastewater treatment processes.

1. Introduction

From the viewpoint of classical ecology, the ‘edge’ effect extends to the border areas between two or more habitats and is characterized by significant changes in populations or communities [1,2]. Such areas show increased biodiversity and high oxidant stress connected with changes in insolation, imbalance of light cycles, great fluctuations in temperature and water access, and complex interactions between the different components [3]. The relationship between the environment and an individual organism, particularly a plant, has not been previously considered as an example of the ‘edge’ effect. Nevertheless, the universality of the ‘edge’ effect phenomenon is clearly reflected at both the macro- and micro-ecosystem (individual organisms, including plants) levels. In fact, it is known that plant organism preservation is determined to a large extent by the formation of symbiotic communities with soil rhizobacteria, fungi and microbes [4], and allelopathic interactions with other plants [5,6,7] and insects [8]. For instance, plant–fungi–bacteria symbiosis is shown to promote plant biodiversity, nutrition and seedling recruitment [9].
The mentioned processes largely mimic the classical ‘edge’ effect, providing the integrity of plant organism and its development.
On the other hand, attention should be paid to the existence of a secondary defense level in plants against unfavorable environmental factors: the development of morphologically distinct external tissues (Figure 1). To date, how clearly the ‘edge’ effect manifests itself at this level of morphological and biochemical changes in plant tissues remains unexplored.
The comparison between macro-ecosystems and micro-systems of individual plant organisms enables the distinction of several resembling properties of the ‘edge effect’ in ecosystems and plants, including:
(1)
intensive oxidant stress;
(2)
high biodiversity of organisms in bordering areas and of biologically active compounds in plant border tissues;
(3)
damper effect of bordering areas/tissues necessary to withstand the unfavorable environmental conditions;
(4)
high adsorption capacity of plant bordering tissues and intensive energy accumulation in ecosystem bordering areas.
At present, many investigations address the bordering communities of ecosystems: bacteria, fungi, microorganisms and algae [10,11,12,13]. External plant parts have been discussed previously only in connection with the necessity of agricultural waste management [14,15], which hinders the identification of the general patterns of plant ‘edge’ effect and the successive development of their utilization.
The present review aims to reveal the peculiarities of plant bordering tissues as an example of the ‘edge’ effect and indicates new opportunities for its utilization. Among the external parts of plants, tree bark, leaf and stem trichomes, seed skin, tuber, bulb and fruit peel provide the most interesting objects of the plant ‘edge’ effect investigation. These parts differ greatly in biochemical composition, metabolism intensity and longevity value, with the highest longevity associated with tree bark [16]. Great variations in metabolism intensity have been recorded in onion outer scales [17] and seed shell [18] compared to beetroot [19] and young potato peel [20]. A decreased metabolism has been shown in pumpkin, squash [21] and tomato fruit [19] outer tissues. Leaf and stem trichomes have large surface areas and show intensive production of volatile derivatives [22].
This review combines both literature data of recent years and our own previously unpublished data.

2. Trichomes

Among the bordering plant parts that protect the integrity of an organism and enable tolerance to environmental stress factors, some of them should be mentioned. Multi- and mono-cellular trichomes (the so-called glandular and non-glandular forms) are situated at the surfaces of leaves, stems and buds and their formation and development are regulated predominantly via phytohormones [23]. Trichomes usually originate from epidermal cells and are typical in many plant species, showing significant diversity in morphology, cellular structure and function. While glandular trichomes provide mainly chemical protection for plants, non-glandular trichomes induce mostly physical protection (Figure 2), though these definitions are rather flexible [24,25,26].
A great diversity of biologically active compounds is synthesized in trichomes: polyphenols, terpenoids, alkaloids and polyketides [26]. Among the different compounds of high medicinal value, it is worth mentioning the production of artemisinin by Artemisia annua L. trichomes, an antimalarial sesquiterpene [24], of essential oils [27,28] and of methylated forms of selenium (Se) containing amino acids (selenomethyl selenocysteine and gamma glutamyl selenomethyl selenocysteine) in the trichomes of Se hyperaccumulators (Stanleya pinnata (Pursh) Britton and Astragalus bisulcatus (Hook.) A. Gray), with powerful anti-carcinogen activity [29]. Essential oils may serve as a defense against arthropods [30] or as pollinator attractants [31]. Volatile Se derivatives of Stanleya pinnata (Pursh) Britton and Astragalus bisulcatus (Hook.) A. Gray along with high concentrations of toxic Se in trichomes protect plants against herbivory, providing additional advantages compared to non-Se accumulator plants. Flavonoids of non-glandular trichomes repel herbivory and protect against different pathogens [32]. The well-known halophyte tamarisk uses trichomes to secrete salt excess from tissues [33].
Furthermore, both glandular and non-glandular trichomes provide valuable defenses against different forms of abiotic stresses, including atmospheric oxidants, such as ozone [34], and increase plant resistance to UV radiation [35], high temperature and water loss [32]. Notably, phenolics in the trichome cell walls act as optical filters, excluding light waves harmful to sensitive plant tissues.
One of the resistance mechanisms that develop in response to environmental stress in aromatic plants is an increase in essential oil component diversity, which was recorded in Artemisia annua L. grown in Nikitsky Botanic Gardens during 2016–2022 [36]. The results demonstrated a positive correlation between the number of essential oil components and of solar flares (r = +0.996, p < 0.0001). The investigated period was characterized by a 2 to 1530 solar flare range and 46 to 72 essential oil components. Furthermore, the essential oil yield negatively correlated with the number of spotless days (r = −0.829; p < 0.01). These results indicate that plant adaptability and the variation in the number of chemical compounds participating in plant defense is closely connected with solar activity. It seems doubtless that the diversity of trichome protection mechanisms stimulates the formation of ecological niches for different plant species and suggests multiple relationships between different organisms.

3. Seed Epidermis

One of the most evident examples of the ‘edge effect’ in plants is represented by the seed epidermis, which provides mechanical, antioxidant and anti-viral protection of the embryo, prevents water losses during dormancy, promotes active accumulation of nutrients during seed germination [37] and induces seed distribution along significant territories. These properties are determined by both the biochemical and mineral composition of the seed epidermis and by the peculiarities of its morphological structure. The great diversity of seed coat morphology [38] indicates the importance of the ‘edge’ effect in plant development.
The main components of the seed epidermis are soluble and insoluble fiber [18], polyphenols, [37], terpenoids [17] and wax. The biochemical protection of the embryo is achieved via the predominant accumulation of antioxidants in the seed coat [39]. These compounds provide a valuable defense against pathogens and an improvement in the nutritional quality of the seeds, which is highly valuable in the food industry and pharmaceuticals [40,41].
A seed epidermis predominately accumulates Zn, Se, K, Ca and S [42]. Se accumulation particularly in the aleurone layer of cereal grains was indicated by Moore et al. [43]. Selenium, a well-known natural antioxidant, was shown to be accumulated almost exclusively 1–2 mm below the surface of Bertholletia excelsa Humb. & Bonpl. (selenium_hyperaccumulator), while Zn and Ca provide the enrichment of the outer layer [44]. It is well known that the aleurone layer actively participates in seed development via the maintenance of low pH and the release of nitrites, α-amylase necessary for starch hydrolysis, proteases and storage proteins in endosperm [45]. The germination is accompanied by a significant increase in biologically active water-soluble compound content, able to stimulate seedling development and photosynthetic pigments accumulation [46]. The importance of seed epidermis Se content in seed germination is proved by the existence of a positive correlation between this parameter and seedling length [46]. In this respect, investigations of the seed collection of Brassica chinensis Jusl. and perennial onion at the Federal Scientific Vegetable Center revealed positive correlations between seedling length and seed epidermis Se content both in Brassica chinensis Jusl. and Allium species (r = +0.722, n = 12; p < 0.01 r = +0.895; n = 10; p < 0.01, respectively).
Compared to the embryo, the grain coat of wheat contains significantly higher levels of Se, and seed polishing during flour production promotes a decreased level of this essential microelement for humans in the resulting product [47].
Notably, the phenomenon of embryo protection and improvement of seed germination by the seed epidermis may be enhanced artificially via seed priming alone or in combination with low dosages of fungicides [48], nano-Si coating [49] and Se biofortification. Indeed, according to our data, the foliar application to bean plants of sodium selenate or selenocystin at the dose of 0.265 mM resulted in a significant increase in the seed wax hexane extract absorption of mature plants (Figure 3). The waxy layer of the seed epidermis is known to increase seed viability and improve resistance to reactive oxygen species, and contributes to maintaining their dormant state [50,51]. Epicuticular wax is characterized by the ability to decrease surface wetting and moisture loss, the reflection of harmful UV light waves and the formation of a self-cleaning surface. On the other hand, the beginning of germination is accompanied by a decrease in wax biosynthesis [40].
In practice, both whole seed and seed epidermis proved to be adsorbent and highly valuable as important sources of natural antioxidants [41,52,53,54,55,56]. In this respect, seed epidermis may act as a powerful water purification agent against organic dyes, antibiotics and heavy metals (Table 1).

4. Tree Bark

Tree bark is one of the most typical examples of the ‘edge’ effect in plants. The outer tissues of bark are characterized by great morphological diversity, thickness [68,69,70] and biochemical peculiarities [71], which are directly connected with the different strategies of plant adaptation to the environment (for instance, protection against herbivory attack, drought, forest fires, etc.) [72]. Nevertheless, to date, the reasons for such diversities have been poorly understood [73]. According to the intensity of metabolic processes, the inner bark tissues (living phloem) and outer tissues (dead phloem and periderm) determine their main physiological functions. Inner tissues participate in the transport and storage of photosynthesis products and in carbon fixation, while the outer tissues (periderm) protect trees from water loss and provide a protection against pathogens and herbivory attack, mechanical injuries and anomalously high and low temperatures, providing a valuable insulation [74].
The values of bark tissue antioxidant activity are in accordance with the intensity of metabolic processes increasing from the periderm to phloem and to immature phloem and vascular cambium. Indeed, outer bark (periderm) and cork cambium (inner bark; phellem) are composed of nonliving cells and provide a mechanical protection for trees, demonstrating relatively low levels of antioxidants, while the middle phloem part and especially the vascular cambium actively metabolize tissues which show levels of total antioxidant activity 1.4–2 times higher, than the periderm [75]. It is also worth mentioning that the levels of total AOA and total polyphenol content in tree bark, though they show a wide range of values, are often equal to or even higher, than the levels recorded for most agricultural crops.
Similarly to other bordering tissues, tree bark periderm is characterized by a high capacity for environmental pollutant absorption, absorbing heavy metals, dyes and pesticides [76,77,78]. Bark is known to accumulate Na [79], Ca, Zn, Fe, Al, Pb and Sr, and the amount of accumulation correlates with the level of environmental pollution [80]. Relatively high levels of Ca and Zn were also recorded in poplar bark [81]. Species differences in adsorption capacity and total antioxidant activity have been recorded [75,76].
Tree adaptability to environmental factors reflects the effects of genetic peculiarities, place of growth, temperature, seashore vicinity, altitude and age [75,82,83]. Investigations relevant to the quantitative and qualitative composition of Abies alba Mill. bark extracts revealed an increase in the total polyphenol extract yield and a significant decrease in phenolics diversity from the base to the top of the tree [83]. The relationship between tree age and bark antioxidant status was also reported for Acacia confuse Merr. [84] and Cinnamomum loureirii Nees [85]. The differences in the bark and wood extractive levels vary between different species from 1.5 to 16. The extractives content increases with increasing age [86]. According to Dogan et al. [86], tannin content in the tree bark of different species varied from 2% to 54%.
ICP-MS analysis of elements in periderm, phloem and cambium of white willow (Salix alba L.) bark, gathered in Moscow region (55°39.51′ N, 37°12.23′ E), showed the highest macro-element concentrations in metabolically active tissue cambium (Figure 4) and the highest levels of toxic elements in periderm (Figure 5).
Among the micro-elements, the highest concentrations in periderm were recorded for B, Co, Cu, Fe, I, Mn, Mo and Zn, while no differences were detected for Se accumulation among the tissues tested, which may be connected with the low levels of this element (Figure 6). These results are in accordance with the work of Aoyama et al. [87], who demonstrated a higher Fe, Mn and Zn adsorption capacity in periderm compared to phloem in Cryptomeria japonica (L.f.) D. Don bark.
Furthermore, bark is rich in polysaccharides and polyphenols, including tannins and lignin. A high polyphenol content suggests a potential for bark utilization in the food industry, cosmetics and herbal medicine [88,89]. In this respect, there is a group of trees/shrubs with unusually high bark antioxidant activity, such as willow Salix alba L. (134 mg GAE g−1 d.w.), deren shrubs Cornus sanguinea L. and Cornus alba L. (165–170 mg GAE g−1 d.w.), and Calligonum polygonoides L. shrub of semi-desert (172 mg GAE g−1 d.w.) [75].
The medicinal importance of tree bark is documented for many tree species, revealing its anti-inflammatory, chemo-preventive, neuro-protective, cardio-protective, anti-carcinogenic, antiviral, antibacterial and antidiabetic effects connected predominantly with its high antioxidant properties [90,91,92,93].
The high adsorption levels of bark periderm make it valuable for use in wastewater purification, and especially effective against Cr, Ni [94,95] and organic pollutants [96] (Table 2).

5. Vegetable Root Periderm

The peel of fruit and vegetable roots is characterized by relatively high humidity, and as a result, by rather active metabolic processes. In this respect, changes in its biochemical characteristics as a consequence of oxidative stress during vegetation or storage may become highly valuable both for the evaluation of plant adaptability degree and plant breeding.

5.1. Potato (Solanum tuberosum L.)

Potato periderm is considered one of the most important waste products in the food industry, with an annual volume of 70–140 thousand tons [20,102,103]. It is rich in phenolics, with a predominance of chlorogenic acid [102], and demonstrates high biological activity [20,103,104,105]. Potato periderm is known to protect tubers against bacteria, fungi, viruses, insects [106] and phytopathogens [107]. Almost 50% of the phenolics in potato are located in the peel and adjoining tissues [108,109].
The protective effect of potato periderm has been recorded in peel morphology and the differences in the total antioxidant activity of the peel and pulp of tubers before and after 6 months of storage (Figure 7). Indeed, a significant decrease in AOA value occurred in potato peel after storage, which resulted in a simultaneous increase in pulp AOA. Similar changes were recorded in total phenolic content (TP) in potato peel and pulp. Notably, the peel/pulp AOA and TP values after storage became similar to each other. The rather large sample (18 cultivars) indicated the significance of such changes, valuable both for plants and humans. The results were consistent with the investigation of Külen et al. [110] who demonstrated that the total phenolic content (TP) of potato tubers was high at harvest, declined after two months of cold storage, increased after four months of cold storage, and finally returned to values similar to harvest levels after seven months of cold storage.
The powerful antioxidant status of potato periderm, which contains phenolics [111], anthocyanins, glycoalkaloids and polysaccharides [112] indicates the great potential for potato peel utilization.
The presented examples of potato periderm utilization combine cases based on its high antioxidant activity [113]; antibacterial properties; anti-inflammatory and anti-cancer properties; protection against pests; preservation of oil [114], fish [115,116] and meat [117]; wound healing [118] properties; high adsorption capacity (biosorbent, wound healing); high nutritional value (food additive, animal feed) [20]; biofertilizer [119] and mechanical protection of tubers. Table 3 also demonstrates several examples of potato periderm utilization for water purification, which is in accordance with the high adsorption capacity of the outer tissues [120].

5.2. Beta vulgaris L.

Beetroot periderm is another example of the ‘edge’ effect. Beta vulgaris L. is a popular plant food with high nutritional benefits. The high biological activity of beetroot is directly connected to its significant fiber content, both soluble and insoluble, which is highly important for the food industry, with uses such as the enrichment of pasta, cakes and cookies. Another beetroot attribute is its betalain content, which is a natural water-soluble pigment of the class of nitrogen compounds that consists of betacyanins, which are responsible for red–violet color, and betaxanthins, accounting for yellow–orange color [130]. Furthermore, the antioxidant activity of betalains, which is associated with protection against degenerative diseases [131], has been demonstrated [132].
The significance of biochemical changes in beetroot periderm during storage reflects cultivar adaptability. Indeed, the data in Figure 8 indicate that such changes are species-dependent and are accompanied by significant decreases in peel AOA.
As far as pulp is concerned, the stability of its AOA is a good characteristic of plant adaptability. Among the cultivars tested, the highest adaptability was recorded in Bordo and to a lesser extent in the cultivars Dobrynya and Marusya. The significant decrease in the antioxidant defense of both peel and pulp during storage indicates the lower tolerance of the cultivars Gaspadynya, Lubava and Nezhnost to environmental factors. The main natural antioxidants of beetroot are phenolic acids (ferulic, vanillic, caffeic, protocatechuic, p-hydroxypbenzoic), flavonoids (catechin, epicatechin, rutin) and betalain pigments (betacyanin, betaxanthin). The latter are of special importance as a unique natural pigment with high antioxidant activity and powerful biological effect, including hepatoprotective [133], anti-inflammatory, anti-aging, antidiabetic, cardioprotective and anti-cancer activity [134]. In this respect, the importance of root periderm is due to the 3–4 times higher levels of betalain pigment content compared to those of beetroot pulp. The utilization of beetroot betalains, as a natural colorant, stable at pH 3–7 [134], for the production of tomato paste, sauces, desserts, soups, jams, jellies, ice cream, sweets and snacks, as a food preservative due to its high antioxidant activity and as a supplement in the treatment of various diseases has been widely reported in literature (Table 4). The high adsorption capacity of beetroot periderm should also be highlighted, as it provides a great opportunity to extract uranium from wastewater [135]. Most of the biologically active compounds of beetroot (phenols, betalain pigments, organic acids, bioflavonoids) contain polar chemical groups (hydroxyl, carboxylic, carbonyl and amino), which form potential binding sites for uranium (VI).
Furthermore, geosmin from beetroot periderm was shown to be an excellent mosquito attractant. All the mentioned properties clearly reflect the exclusive properties of bordering tissues as examples of the ‘edge’ effect.

5.3. Raphanus sativus L.

In contrast to beetroot, radish roots accumulate pigments (anthocyanins) exclusively in the periderm, providing a powerful antioxidant defense via water-soluble antioxidants. This defense is enhanced by fat-soluble polyphenols, whose concentrations in radish periderm are almost three times higher than the corresponding concentrations in the pulp (Figure 9).
The statistically significant correlation between radish peel and pulp antioxidant activity presented in Figure 9 is a good example of the universal character of this phenomenon. Indeed, similar relationships were recorded for peel/pulp AOA of A. cepa L. and shallot bulbs, tomato fruit and beet (Table 5).
The general character of this phenomenon is proved by numerous examples of peel/pulp AOA relationship presented in Table 5.

5.4. Daucus carota subsp. sativus

Carrot periderm is only 11% of the total carrot root weight, but is known to contain the highest levels of total polyphenols (54.1%) compared to the phloem (39.5%) and especially to the xylem (6.4%) [140]. Furthermore, carrot periderm accumulates significantly higher amounts of biologically active compounds, including carotenoids (+42%), organic acids (+103%), cations (+92%) and phenolic acids (seven times) than the root flesh [141]. However, a similar antioxidant distribution (periderm > phloem > xylem) has been recorded in other root vegetables [141].
The investigations of Hellström et al. [142] showed that mechanically stressed carrot roots (caused by washing, peeling, polishing or grating) may increase phenolic content, turning the inner tissues into the bordering ones. Nevertheless, the phenomenon of carrot root storage at reduced temperature may be applied to other vegetables. The efficiency of the antioxidant content increase depends greatly on the plant’s genetic peculiarities. Great differences in the antioxidant status changes have been demonstrated in potatoes, broccoli, onion, celery and lettuce, and the effect is positively connected with the surface area of slices [143]. Lower levels of dry matter in root pulp compared to peel promote a more intensive increase in the total antioxidant activity (AOA) and polyphenol content (TP) in root pulp compared to peel as a consequence of root crushing and storage (Figure 10). Indeed, while a 1.5-fold increase in the AOA of celery root pulp was registered a week after root crushing, changes in periderm AOA and TP were not significant.
A similar mechanism of secondary metabolite synthesis intensification due to oxidant stress takes place as a response to plant damage by herbivores and harmful insects [144].

5.5. Allium Species

Onion outer scales are among the most important agricultural by-products in the world, being highly valuable in medicine due to their antimicrobial, cardioprotective, antidiabetic, anticancer, neuroprotective and anti-obesity properties [145]. The outer scales have a physiological role in onion bulb growth, development and storage, because they provide mechanical, pathogen and antioxidant defense and water loss prevention during storage [146]. They are composed of dead cells, lacking active metabolism. The phenolic content of outer scales from different colored onions (pearl, red, yellow and white) was approximately six times higher than that of their fleshy edible parts [108]. Extracts from edible onion parts showed lower activity in all antioxidant tests carried out. Onion outer scales are known to predominantly accumulate quercetin aglucone, which is more bioavailable to the human organism than the quercetin glucosides present in the inner scales [147]. In this respect, the maximum plasma quercetin concentration of 1.02 μmol L−1 was reached 2.33 h after shallot flesh consumption, compared with 3.95 μmol L−1 recorded 2.78 h after dry outer scale consumption [147].
Data presented in Figure 11 a and b indicate species differences in AOA and TP content in the inner and outer scales of Allium plants, demonstrating the highest occurrence of polyphenols with reference to inner scale AOA and the absolute predominance of TP within the total antioxidant activity of A. sativum outer scales and bulb.
The comparison of lipid accumulation in the inner and outer scales of A. cepa in conditions of water stress against that occurring with adequate water supply indicates the high stability of this parameter in the outer scales under different vegetation conditions (Figure 12). However, a significant increase in the ratio between the outer and inner scale lipids was recorded as a consequence of a stress in cultivars with relatively low adaptability, compared to those tolerant to environmental stress (Figure 13). On the other hand, it may be supposed that the high adaptability of A. cepa cultivars is associated with the lower level of lipid outer/inner scale ratio, compared to cultivars with lower adaptability. Further investigations are necessary to disclose the significance of lipid accumulation for A. cepa breeding.
A. cepa outer scale utilization is closely connected with its high antioxidant activity, adsorption capacity and nutritional value [149] (Table 6).

5.6. Cucurbita Species

Great species and varietal differences in antioxidant status of Cucurbita moschata Lindl., C. maxima Lindl., C. pepo L. and C. ficifolia Bouché (18 cultivars) were reported by Kostecka-Gugala et al. [153], although no data about exocarp/mesocarp differences have been presented. Investigations of C. maxima and C. moschata cvs. demonstrated small exocarp/mesocarp differences in total antioxidant activity and polyphenol accumulation [154]. By contrast, exocarp and mesocarp of Cucurbita plants were characterized by significant variations in macro- and micro-element distribution, suggesting the importance of mineral distribution in the ‘edge’ phenomenon (Figure 14).
Notably, the biodiversity effect in the ‘bordering tissues’ has been clearly shown in the exocarp/mesocarp mineral distribution of Cucurbita maxima Lindl. and Cucurbita moschata Lindl. fruit (Figure 14) [154]. Only K, Li and Si predominate in fruit mesocarp, while other element concentrations were significantly higher in exocarp, especially Mn. The analysis of the relationship between elements in Cucurbita fruit revealed the highest correlations (r = 0.85–0.98) between Ca, Sr, Cr and Ni [154]. The variations in pumpkin exocarp utilization are closely connected with the main characteristics of the bordering plant parts, combining high antioxidant and adsorption activity (Table 7).

6. Other Agricultural Crops and Nanoparticle Production

The utilization of the peel of different vegetables proves the exclusive character of the outer tissues. In this respect, tomato fruit periderm is a good source of pectin, polyphenols and fatty acids and a tin corrosion inhibitor [163,164]. Fruit peel is also used to produce biodegradable packaging material [165].
Recent investigations show the interesting utilization prospects of plant outer tissues in the green synthesis of nanoparticles (Table 8), due to their powerful antioxidant properties and the high diversity of their biologically active compounds [166,167]. In this respect, periderm extracts provide not only chemically active reductants, but also a broad number of nanoparticle stabilizers, such as polysaccharides, proteins, etc. Furthermore, the high diversity of biologically active compounds in plant outer tissues raises the opportunity to valorize the effect of their synergism to enhance the benefits from single compounds to human organism.

7. Conclusions

The presented data indicate important peculiarities of the ‘edge’ effect in plant outer tissues: (i) high diversity in the morphological, biochemical and mineral characteristics of bordering tissues, which improve plant adaptability to different environmental factors; (ii) great possibilities for plant outer tissue utilization based on its enhanced antioxidant status and high adsorption abilities; (iii) the opportunity to improve plant defenses via mechanical or biochemical changes to plant outer tissues and (iv) the importance of outer tissue biochemical characteristics in plant breeding. The revealed patterns are important for the implementation of the plant ‘edge’ effect in agricultural crop production, food and pharmaceutical industries and non-waste production. Further investigations are needed to elicit new prospects for the use of the ‘edge’ effect in agricultural crop breeding and protection methods against environmental stresses.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/d15010123/s1, Supplement S1: Effect of foliar sodium selenate and selenocystin supply on wax accumulation at the surface of bean seeds, Uliasha cv (0.26 mM solution); Supplement S2: Determination of potato peel, pulp antioxidant status; Supplement S3. Determination of betalain pigments in beet peel and pulp; Supplement S4. Radish antioxidant activity; Supplement S5 Effect of water stress on lipids accumulation in inner and outer scales of A. cepa. References [185,186] are cited in the supplementary materials.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, N.G., L.S. and G.C.; formal analysis, L.L. and A.S. (Agnieszka Sekara); investigation, V.Z., L.K., V.R., P.P. and V.K.; methodology, A.S. (Agnieszka Sekara), A.T., N.G. and L.S.; supervision, V.Z., V.K. and A.S. (Anna Smirnova); validation, G.C.; draft manuscript writing, N.G., L.S. and P.P.; manuscript revision and final editing, N.G., L.S., L.L., A.T. and G.C. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Levin, S.A. The Princeton Guide to Ecology; Princeton University Press: Princeton, NJ, USA, 2009; p. 780. [Google Scholar]
  2. Fonseca, M.S. Edge effect. In Encyclopedia of Ecology; Jørgensen, S.E., Fath, B.D., Eds.; Academic Press: London, UK, 2008; pp. 1207–1211. [Google Scholar]
  3. Porensky, L.M.; Young, T.P. Edge-effect interactions in fragmented and patchy landscapes. Conserv. Biol. 2013, 27, 509–519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Harman, G.E.; Uphoff, N. Symbiotic root-endophytic soil microbes improve crop productivity and provide environmental benefits. Hindawi Scientifica 2019, 2019, 9106395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  5. Cheng, F.; Cheng, Z. Research progress on the use of plant allelopathy in agriculture and the physiological and ecological mechanisms of allelopathy. Front. Plant Sci. 2015, 6, 1020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  6. Aziz, M.M.; Ahmad, A.; Ullah, E.; Kamal, A.; Nawaz, M.Y.; Ali, H.H. Plant allelopathy in agriculture and Its environmental and functional mechanisms: A review. Int. J. Food Sci. Agr. 2021, 5, 623–626. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Xie, Y.; Tian, L.; Han, X.; Yang, Y. Research advances in allelopathy of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) of plants. Horticulturae 2021, 7, 278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Ashra, H.; Nair, S. Review: Trait plasticity during plant-insect interactions: From molecular mechanisms to impact on community dynamics. Plant Sci. 2022, 317, 111188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Van der Heijden, M.; Bruin, S.; Luckerhoff, L.; van Lontestijn, R.S.P.; Schlaeppi, K. A widespread plant-fungal-bacterial symbiosis promotes plant biodiversity, plant nutrition and seedling recruitment. ISME J. 2016, 10, 389–399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Fall, A.F.; Nakabonge, G.; Ssekandi, J.; Founoune-Mboup, H.; Apori, S.O.; Ndiaye, A.; Badji, A.; Ngom, K. Roles of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi on soil fertility: Contribution in the improvement of physical, chemical, and biological properties of the soil. Front. Fungal Biol. 2022, 3, 723892. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Geisen, S.; Heinen, R.; Andreou, E.; van Lent, T.; ten Hooven, F.C.; Thakur, M.P. Contrasting effects of soil microbial interactions on growth–defense relationships between early- and mid-successional plant communities. New Phytol. 2022, 233, 1345–1357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Golubkina, N.; Krivenkov, L.; Sekara, A.; Vasileva, V.; Tallarita, A.; Caruso, G. Prospects of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi utilization in production of Allium plants. Plants 2020, 9, 279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Dyer, L.A.; Philbin, C.S.; Ochsenrider, K.M.; Richards, L.A.; Massad, T.J.; Smilanich, A.M.; Forister, M.L.; Parchman, T.L.; Galland, L.M.; Hurtado, P.J.; et al. Modern approaches to study plant–insect interactions in chemical ecology. Nat. Rev. Chem. 2018, 2, 50–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Annegowda, H.V.; Majumder, P. Chapter 5—Valuable bioactives from vegetable wastes. In Valorization of Agri-Food Wastes and By-Products; Bhat, R., Ed.; Academic Press: London, UK, 2021; pp. 83–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Ben-Othman, S.; Jõudu, I.; Bhat, R. Bioactives from agri-food wastes: Present insights and future challenges. Molecules 2020, 25, 510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  16. Hamad, A.M.A. Some natural antioxidants sources from foods and tree barks. Int. J. Sci. Technol. Res. 2019, 8, 93–98. [Google Scholar]
  17. Celano, R.; Docimo, T.; Piccinelli, A.L.; Gazzerro, P.; Tucci, M.; Sanzo, R.D.; Carabetta, S.; Campone, L.; Russo, M.; Rastrelli, L. Onion peel: Turning a food waste into a resource. Antioxidants 2021, 10, 304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Prasadi, N.V.P.; Joye, I.J. Dietary fibre from whole grains and their benefits on metabolic health. Nutrients 2020, 12, 3045. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Yucetepe, A.; Altin, G.; Ozcelik, B. A novel antioxidant source: Evaluation of in vitro bioaccessibility, antioxidant activity and polyphenol profile of phenolic extract from black radish peel wastes (Raphanus sativus L. var. niger) during simulated gastrointestinal digestion. Int. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2021, 56, 1376–1384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Gebrechristos, H.Y.; Chen, W. Utilization of potato peel as eco-friendly products: A review. Food Science and Nutrition. Food Sci. Nutr. 2018, 6, 1352–1356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Staichok, A.C.B.; Mendonça, K.R.B.; dos Santos, P.G.A.; Garcia, L.G.C.; Damiani, C. Pumpkin peel flour (Cucurbita máxima L.)—Characterization and technological applicability. J. Food Nutr. Res. 2016, 4, 327–333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Aschenbrenner, A.-K.; Horakh, S.; Spring, O. Linear glandular trichomes of Helianthus (Asteraceae): Morphology, localization, metabolite activity and occurrence. AoB Plants 2013, 5, plt028. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Li, J.; Wang, X.; Jiang, R.; Dong, B.; Fang, S.; Li, Q.; Lv, Z.; Chen, W. Phytohormone-based regulation of trichome development. Front. Plant Sci. 2021, 12, 734776. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Judd, R.; Bagley, M.C.; Li, M.L.; Zhu, Y.; Lei, C.; Yuzuak, S.; Ekelöf, M.; Pu, G.; Zhao, X.; Muddiman, D.C.; et al. Artemisinin biosynthesis in non-glandular trichome cells of Artemisia Annua. Mol. Plant. 2019, 12, 704–714. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Schilmiller, A.L.; Last, R.L.; Pichersky, E. Harnessing plant trichome biochemistry for the production of useful compounds. Plant J. 2008, 54, 702–711. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  26. Huchelmann, A.; Boutry, M.; Hachez, C. Plant glandular trichomes: Natural cell factories of high biotechnological interest. Plant Physiol. 2017, 175, 6–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  27. Biswas, K.K.; Foster, A.J.; Aung, T.; Mahmoud, S.S. Essential oil production: Relationship with abundance of glandular trichomes in aerial surface of plants. Acta Physiol. Plant 2009, 31, 13–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Fernandes, Y.S.; Trindade, L.M.P.; Rezende, H.; Paula, J.R.; Gonçalves, L.A. Trichomes and chemical composition of the volatile oil of Trichogonia cinerea (Gardner) R.M.King; H.Rob (Eupatorieae, Asteraceae). Annals Braz. Acad. Sci. 2016, 88, 309–322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Freeman, J.L.; Zhang, L.H.; Marcus, M.A.; Fakra, S.; McGrath, S.P.; Pilon-Smits, E.A. Spatial imaging, speciation, and quantification of selenium in the hyperaccumulator plants Astragalus bisulcatus and Stanleya pinnata. Plant Physiol. 2006, 142, 124–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Hare, J.D.; Elle, E. Variable impact of diverse insect herbivores on dimorphic Datura wrightil. Ecology 2002, 83, 2711–2720. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Lehnebach, C.A.; Robertson, A.W. Pollination ecology of four epiphytic orchids of New Zealand. Ann. Bot. 2004, 93, 773–781. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Karabourniotis, G.; Liakopoulos, G.; Nikolopoulos, D. Protective and defensive roles of non-glandular trichomes against multiple stresses: Structure–function coordination. J. For. Res. 2020, 31, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Duan, Q.; Zhu, Z.; Wang, B.; Chen, M. Recent progress on the salt tolerance mechanisms and application of tamarisk. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 3325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Li, S.; Tosens, T.; Harley, P.C.; Jiang, Y.; Kanagendran, A.; Grosberg, M.; Jaamets, K.; Niinemets, Ü. Glandular trichomes as a barrier against atmospheric oxidative stress: Relationships with ozone uptake, leaf damage, and emission of LOX products across a diverse set of species. Plant Cell Environ. 2018, 41, 1263–1277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Yan, A.; Pan, J.; An, L.; Gan, Y.; Feng, H. The responses of trichome mutants to enhanced ultraviolet-B radiation in Arabidopsis thaliana. J. Photochem. Photobiol. B Biol. 2012, 113, 29–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Logvinenko, L.; Golubkina, N.; Fedotova, I.; Bogachuk, M.; Fedotov, M.; Kataev, V.; Alpatov, A.; Shevchuck, O.; Caruso, G. Effect of foliar sodium selenate and nano selenium supply on biochemical characteristics, essential oil accumulation and mineral composition of Artemisia annua L. Plants 2022, 27, 8246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Smýkal, P.; Vernoud, V.; Blair, M.W.; Soukup, A.; Thompson, R.D. The role of the testa during development and in establishment of dormancy of the legume seed. Front. Plant Sci. 2014, 5, 351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Dardick, C.; Callahan, A.M. Evolution of the fruit endocarp: Molecular mechanisms underlying adaptations in seed protection and dispersal strategies. Front. Plant Sci. 2014, 5, 284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Okafor, J.N.C.; Meyer, M.; Le Roes-Hill, M.; Jideani, V.A. Flavonoid and phenolic acid profiles of dehulled and whole Vigna subterranea (L.) Verdc seeds commonly consumed in South Africa. Molecules 2022, 27, 5265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Sun, J.; Wang, P.; Zhou, T.; Rong, J.; Jia, H.; Liu, Z. Transcriptome analysis of the effects of shell removal and exogenous gibberellin on germination of Zanthoxylum seeds. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 8521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Golubkina, N.; Kharchenko, V.; Moldovan, A.; Zayachkovsky, V.; Stepanov, V.; Pivovarov, V.; Sekara, A.; Tallarita, A.; Caruso, G. Nutritional value of Apiaceae veeds as affected by 11 species and 43 sultivars. Horticulturae 2021, 7, 57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Mangueze, A.V.J.; Pessoa, M.F.G.; Silva, M.J.; Ndayiragije, A.; Magaia, H.E.; Cossa, V.S.I.; Reboredo, F.H.; Carvalho, M.L.; Santos, J.P.; Guerra, M.; et al. Simultaneous zinc and selenium biofortification in rice. Accumulation, localization and implications on the overall mineral content of the flour. J. Cereal Sci. 2018, 82, 34–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Moore, K.L.; Schröder, M.; Lombi, E.; Zhao, F.-J.; McGrath, S.P.; Hawkesford, M.J.; Shewry, P.R.; Grovenor, C.R.M. Nano SIMS analysis of arsenic and selenium in cereal grain. New Phytol. 2010, 185, 434–445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Lima, L.W.; Stonehouse, G.C.; Walters, C.; El Mehdawi, A.F.; Fakra, S.C.; Pilon-Smits, E.A.H. Selenium accumulation, speciation and localization in Brazil nuts (Bertholletia excelsa H.B.K.). Plants 2019, 8, 289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  45. Bradford, K.; Nonogaki, H. (Eds.) Seed development, dormancy and germination. Ann. Plant Rev. 2007, 27, 164. [Google Scholar]
  46. Golubkina, N.A.; Papazyan, T.T. Selenium in Nutrition. Plants, Animals, Human Beings; Moscow Pechatny Gorod: Moscow, Russia, 2006. (In Russian) [Google Scholar]
  47. Lyons, G.H.; Genc, Y.; Stangoulis, J.C.R.; Palmer, L.T.; Graham, R.D. Selenium distribution in wheat grain, and the effect of postharvest processing on wheat selenium content. Biol. Trace Elem. Res. 2005, 103, 155–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Adhikari, B.; Olorunwa, O.J.; Barickman, T.C. Seed priming enhances seed germination and morphological traits of Lactuca sativa L. under salt stress. Seeds 2022, 1, 74–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Hussain, A.; Rizwan, M.; Ali, Q.; Ali, S. Seed priming with silicon nanoparticles improved the biomass and yield while reduced the oxidative stress and cadmium concentration in wheat grains. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2019, 26, 7579–7588. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. De Giorgi, J.; Piskurewicz, U.; Loubery, S.; Utz-Pugin, A.; Bailly, C.; Mène-Saffrané, L.; Lopez-Molina, L. An endosperm-associated cuticle ss required for Arabidopsis seed viability, dormancy and early control of germination. PLoS Genet. 2015, 11, e1005708. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Szakiel, A.; Pączkowski, C.; Pensec, F.; Bertsch, C. Fruit cuticular waxes as a source of biologically active triterpenoids. Phytochem. Rev. 2012, 11, 263–284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  52. Azabou, S.; Sebii, H.; Taheur, F.B.; Abid, Y.; Iridi, M.; Nasri, M. Phytochemical profile and antioxidant properties of tomato by-products as affected by extraction colvents abnd potential application in refined olive oils. Food Biosci. 2020, 36, 100664. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Shao, D.; Venkitasamy, C.; Li, X.; Pan, Z.; Shi, J.; Wang, B.; The, H.E.; McHugh, T.H. Thermal and storage characteristics of tomato seed oil. LWT Food Sci. Technol. 2015, 63, 191–197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Taveira, M.; Silva, L.R.; Vale-Silva, L.A.; Pinto, E.; Valentầo, P.; Ferreres, F.; de Pinho, P.G.; Andrade, P.B. Lycopersicom esculentum seeds: An industrial byproduct as an antimicrobial agent. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2010, 58, 9529–9536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Allaqaband, S.; Dar, A.H.; Patel, U.; Kumar, N.; Nayik, G.A.; Khan, S.A.; Ansari, M.J.; Alabdallah, N.M.; Kumar, P.; Pandey, V.K.; et al. Utilization of fruit seed-based bioactive compounds for formulating the nutraceuticals and functional food: A review. Front. Nutr. 2022, 9, 902554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Giannelos, P.N.; Sxizas, S.; Lois, E.; Zannikos, F.; Anastopoulos, G. Physical, chemical and fuel related properties of tomato seeds oil for evaluating its direct use in diesel engines. Ind. Crop Prod. 2005, 22, 193–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Alene, A.N.; Abate, G.Y.; Habte, A.T.; Getahun, D.M. Utilization of a novel low-cost gibto (Lupinus Albus) seed peel waste for the removal of malachite green dye: Equilibrium, kinetic, and thermodynamic studies. J. Chem. 2021, 2021, 6618510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Obi, A.; Ejikeme, P.M.; Onukwuli, O.D. Lead removal from waste water by fluted pumpkin seed shell activated carbon: Adsorption modeling and kinetics. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2010, 7, 793–800. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  59. Kowalkowska, A.; Jóźwiak, T. Utilization of pumpkin (Cucurbita pepo) seed husks as a low-cost sorbent for removing anionic and cationic dyes from aqueous solutions. Desalin. Water Treat. 2019, 171, 397–407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Alakabei, I. Antibiotic removal from the aquatic environment with activated carbon produced from pumpkin seeds. Molecules 2022, 27, 1380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Bulut, Y.; Baysal, Z. Removal of Pb(II) from wastewater using wheat bran. J. Environ. Manag. 2006, 78, 107–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Chung, W.J.; Shim, J.; Ravindran, B. Application of wheat bran based biomaterials and nano-catalyst in textile wastewater. J. King Saud Univ. Sci. 2022, 34, 101775. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Reddy, M.C.S.; Ashwini, V.N.C. Bengal gram seed husk as an adsorbent for the removal of dye from aqueous solutions—Batch studies. Arab. J. Chem. 2017, 10, S2554–S2566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  64. Edokpayi, J.N.; Ndlovu, S.S.; Odiyo, J.O. Characterization of pulverized marula seed husk and its potential for the sequestration of methylene blue from aqueous solution. BMC Chem. 2019, 13, 10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Rahimdokht, M.; Pajootan, E.; Arami, M. Application of melon seed shell as a natural low-cost adsorbent for the removal pf methylene blue from dye-bearing wastewaters: Optimization, isothem, kinetic, and thermodynamic. Desalination Water Treat. 2016, 57, 18049–18061. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. De Oliveira Brito, S.M.; Andrade, H.M.C.; Soares, L.F.; de Azevedo, R.P. Brazil nut shells as a new biosorbent to remove methylene blue and indigo carmine from aqueous solutions. J. Hazard. Mater. 2010, 174, 84–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Ong, S.T.; Keng, P.S.; Lee, S.L.; Leong, M.H.; Hung, Y.T. Equilibrium studies for the removal of basic dye by sunflower seed husk (Helianthus annuus). Int. J. Phys. Sci. 2010, 5, 1270–1276. [Google Scholar]
  68. Jackson, J.F.; Adams, D.C.; Jackson, U.B. Allometry of constitutive defense: A model and a comparative test with tree bark and fire regime. Am. Nat. 1999, 153, 614–632. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Rosell, J.A. Bark thickness across the angiosperms: More than just fire. New Phytol. 2016, 211, 90–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  70. Rosell, J.A. Bark in woody plants: Understanding the diversity of a multifunctional structure. Integr. Comp. Biol. 2019, 59, 535–547. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Biswas, S.; Gupta, K.; Talapatra, S.N. A digitized database of bark morphology for identification of common tree species and literature study of bark phytochemicals and therapeutic usage. WSN 2016, 42, 143–155. [Google Scholar]
  72. Sakai, K. Chemistry of bark. In Wood and Cellulosic Chemistry, 2nd ed.; Hon, D.N.S., Shiraishi, N., Dekker, M., Eds.; American Chemical Society: New York, NY, USA, 2001. [Google Scholar]
  73. Paine, C.E.T.; Stahl, C.; Courtois, E.A.; Patiño, S.; Sarmiento, C.; Baraloto, C. Functional explanations for variation in bark thickness in tropical rain forest trees. Funct. Ecol. 2010, 24, 1202–1210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Romero, C. Bark: Structure and functional ecology. Adv. Econ. Bot. 2014, 17, 5–25. Available online: http://www.jstor.org/stable/43932771 (accessed on 24 November 2022).
  75. Golubkina, N.; Plotnikova, U.; Lapchenko, V.; Lapchenko, H.; Sheshnitsan, S.; Amagova, Z.; Matsadze, V.; Naumenko, T.; Bagrikova, N.; Logvinenko, L. Evaluation of factors affecting tree and shrub bark’s antioxidant status. Plants 2022, 11, 2609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Ighalo, J.O.; Adeniyi, A.G. Adsorption of pollutants by plant bark derived adsorbents: An empirical review. J. Water Process. Eng. 2020, 35, 101228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Parvina, S.; Rahmana, W.; Sahaa, I.; Alama, J.; Khan, M.R. Coconut tree bark as a potential low-cost adsorbent for the removal of methylene blue from wastewater. Desalin. Water Treat. 2019, 146, 385–392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. şen, A.; Pereira, H.; Olivella, M.A. Heavy metals removal in aqueous environments using bark as a biosorbent. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2015, 12, 391–404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  79. Au, J.; Youngentob, K.N.; Clark, R.G.; Phillips, R.; Foley, W.J. Bark chewing reveals a nutrient limitation of leaves for a specialist folivore. J. Mammal. 2017, 98, 1185–1192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Krutul, D.; Zielenkiewicz, T.; Radomski, A.; Zawadzki, J.; Antczak, A.; Drożdżek, M.; Makowski, T. Metals accumulation on Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) wood and bark affectes with environmental pollution. Wood Res. 2017, 62, 353–364. [Google Scholar]
  81. Enzmann, J.W.; Goodrich, R.D.; Meiske, J.C. Chemical composition and nutritive value of poplar bark. J. Anim. Sci. 1969, 29, 653–660. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  82. Skrypnik, L.; Grigorev, N.; Michailov, D.; Antipina, M.; Danilova, M.; Pungin, A. Comparative study on radical scavenging activity and phenolic compounds content in water bark extracts of alder (Alnus glutinosa (L.) Gaertn.), oak (Quercus robur L.) and pine (Pinus sylvestris L.). Eur. J. Wood Wood Prod. 2019, 77, 879–890. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Brennan, M.; Fritsch, C.; Cosgun, S.; Dumarcay, S.; Colin, F.; Gérardin, P. Quantitative and qualitative composition of bark polyphenols changes longitudinally with bark maturity in Abies alba Mill. Ann. For. Sci. 2020, 77, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Tung, Y.-T.; Chang, S.-T. Variation in antioxidant activity of extracts of Acacia confusa of different ages. Nat. Prod. Commun. 2010, 5, 73–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  85. Li, Y.; Tan, B.; Cen, Z.; Fu, Y.; Zhu, X.; He, H.; Kong, D.; Wu, H. The variation in essential oils composition, phenolic acids and flavonoids is correlated with changes in antioxidant activity during Cinnamomum loureirii bark growth. Arab. J. Chem. 2021, 14, 1032149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Dogan, K.; Akman, P.K.; Tornuk, F. Tree barks as potential sources of value-added components for the food industry. Int. J. Food Technol. Nutr. 2019, 2, 25–35. [Google Scholar]
  87. Aoyama, M.; Kishino, M.; Jo, T.S. Biosorption of Cr(VI) on Japanese cedar bark. Sep. Sci. Technol. 2005, 39, 1149–1162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Tanase, C.; Coșarcă, S.; Muntean, D.-L. A critical review of phenolic compounds extracted from the bark of woody vascular plants and their potential biological activity. Molecules 2019, 24, 1182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  89. Ciesla, W.M. Non-Wood Forest Products from Temperate-Leved Trees; Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations: Rome, Italy, 2002; 125p. [Google Scholar]
  90. Salih, E.; Kanninen, M.; Sipi, M.; Luukkanen, O.; Hiltunen, R.; Vuorela, H.; Julkunen-Tiitto, R.; Fyhrquist, P. Tannins, flavonoids and stilbenes in extracts of african savanna woodland trees Terminalia brownii, Terminalia laxiflora and Anogeissus leiocarpus showing promising antibacterial potential. South Afr. J. Bot. 2017, 108, 370–386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Deng, Y.; Zhao, Y.; Padilla-Zakour, O.; Yang, G. Polyphenols, antioxidant and antimicrobial activities of leaf and bark extracts of Solidago canadensis L. Ind. Crops Prod. 2015, 74, 803–809. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Enkhtaivan, G.; John, K.M.; Ayyanar, M.; Sekar, T.; Jin, K.-J.; Kim, D.H. Anti-influenza (H1N1) potential of leaf and stem bark extracts of selected medicinal plants of south India. Saudi J. Biol. Sci. 2015, 22, 532–538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Kadir, A.A. Drugs from plants. In Forest Products Biotechnology; Taylor & Francis: London, UK, 1998; pp. 209–234. [Google Scholar]
  94. Martini, S.; Afroze, S.; Roni, K.A. Modified eucalyptus bark as a sorbent for simultaneous removal of COD, oil, and Cr(III) from industrial wastewater. Alex. Eng. J. 2020, 59, 1637–1648. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Akar, S.; Lorestani, B.; Sobhanardakani, S.; Cheraghi, M.; Moradi, O. Surveying the efficiency of Platanus orientalis bark as biosorbent for Ni and Cr(VI) removal from plating wastewater as a real sample. Environ. Monit. Assess. 2019, 191, 373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Brás, I.; Lemos, L.T.; Alves, A.; Pereira, M.F.R. Application of pine bark as a sorbent for organic pollutants in effluents management of environmental quality. Manag. Environ. Qual. 2004, 15, 491–501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  97. Salazar-Rabago., J.; Leyva-Ramos., R.; Rivera-Utrilla, J.; Ocampo-Perez, R.; Cerino-Cordova, F.J. Biosorption mechanism of methylene blue from aqueous solution onto white pine (Pinus durangensis) sawdust: Effect of operating conditions. Sustain. Environ. Res. 2017, 27, 32–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Ansari, R.; Mosayebzade, Z. Removal of basic dye methylene blue from aqueous solutions using sawdust and sawdust coated with polypyrrole. J. Iran Chem. Soc. 2010, 7, 339–350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Jauberty, L.; Gloaguen, V.; Astier, C.; Krausz, P.; Delpechi, V.; Berland, A.; Granger, V.; Niort, I.; Royer, A.; Decossas, J.-L. Bark, a suitable biosorbent for the removal of uranium from wastewater—From laboratory to industry. Radioprotection 2011, 46, 443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  100. Haussard, M.; Gaballah, I.; de Donato, P.; Barrès, O.; Mourey, A. Removal of hydrocarbons from wastewater using treated bark. J. Air Waste Manag. Assoc. 2001, 51, 1351–1358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  101. Şen, A.; Olivella, M.A.; Fiol, N.; Miranda, I.; Villaescusa, I.; Pereira, H. Removal of chromium (VI) in aqueous environments using cork and heat treated cork samples from Quercus cerris and Quercus suber. BioResources 2012, 7, 4843–4857. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  102. Di Wu Recycle technology for potato peel waste processing: A review. Procedia Environ. Sci. 2016, 31, 103–107. [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  103. Kot, A.M.; Pobiega, K.; Piwowarek, K.; Kieliszek, M.; Błażejak, S.; Gniewosz, M.; Lipińska, E. Biotechnological methods of management and utilization of potato industry waste—A review. Potato Res. 2020, 63, 431–447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Wu, Z.G.; Xu, H.Y.; Ma, Q.; Cao, Y.; Ma, J.N.; Ma, C.M. Isolation, identification and quantification of unsaturated fatty acids, amides, phenolic compounds and glycoalkaloids from potato peel. Food Chem. 2012, 135, 2425–2429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Friedman, M.; Kozukue, N.; Kim, H.J.; Choi, S.H.; Mizuno, M. Glycoalkaloid, phenolic, and flavonoid content and antioxidative activities of conventional nonorganic and organic potato peel powders from commercial gold, red, and Russet potatoes. J. Food Comp. Anal. 2017, 62, 69–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Akyol, H.; Riciputi, Y.; Capanoglu, E.; Caboni, M.F.; Verardo, V. Phenolic compounds in the potato and its byproducts: An overview. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2016, 17, 835. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Askari, S.; Siddiqui, A.; Kaleem, M. Potato peel mediated improvement in organic substances of vigna mungo growing under copper stress. J. Pharmacogn. Phytochem. 2017, 6, 1373–1378. [Google Scholar]
  108. Albishi, T.; John, J.; Al-Khalifa, A.; Shahidi, F. Phenolic content and antioxidant activities of selected potato varieties and their processing by-products. J. Funct. Foods 2013, 5, 590–600. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Al-Weshahy, A.; Venket Rao, A. Isolation and characterization of functional components from peel samples of six potatoes varieties growing in Ontario. Food Res. Int. 2009, 42, 1062–1066. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Külen, O.; Stushnoff, C.; Holm, D. Effect of cold storage on total phenolics content, antioxidant activity and vitamin c level of selected potato clones. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2013, 93, 2437–2444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Ezekiel, R.; Singh, N.; Sharma, S.; Kaur, A. Beneficial phytochemicals in potato—A review. Food Res. Int. 2013, 50, 487–496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Rodríguez-Martínez, B.; Gullón, B.; Yáñez, R. Identification and recovery of valuable bioactive compounds from potato peels: A comprehensive review. Antioxidants 2021, 10, 1630. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  113. Lopes, J.; Gonçalves, I.; Nunes, C.; Teixeira, B.; Mendes, R.; Ferreira, P.; Coimbra, M.A. Potato peel phenolics as additives for developing active starch-based films with potential to pack smoked fish fillets. Food Packag. Shelf Life 2021, 28, 100644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Mohdaly, A.; Sarhan, M.; Smetanska, I.; Mahmoud, A. Antioxidant properties of various solvent extracts of potato peel, sugar beet pulp and sesame cake. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2010, 90, 218–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Albishi, T.; John, J.A.; Al-Khalifa, A.S.; Shahidi, F. Antioxidative phenolic constituents of skins of onion varieties and their activities. J. Funct. Foods 2013, 5, 1191–1203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Habeebullah, S.F.K.; Grejsen, H.D.; Jacobsen, C. Potato peel extract as a natural antioxidant in chilled storage of minced horse mackerel (Trachurus trachurus): Effect on lipid and protein oxidation. Food Chem. 2012, 131, 843–851. [Google Scholar]
  117. Kanatt, S.; Chander, R.; Radhakrishna, P.; Sharma, A. Potato peel extracta natural antioxidant for retarding lipid peroxidation in radiation processed lamb meat. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2005, 53, 1499–1500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Manjunath, K.S.; Bhandage, S.; Kamat, S. Potato peel dressing: A novel adjunctive in the management of necrotizing fasciitis. J. Maxillofac Oral. Surg. 2015, 14, 352–354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  119. Mamoini, F.Z.; Eazouk, R.; Kajji, A.; Daoui, K.; El Ouali, A.; Boukhlifi, F. Characterization of organic waste used as biofertilizers: Case of potato peelings, almond hulls and shrimp shells. Int. J. Agric. Innov. Res. 2016, 4, 993–997. [Google Scholar]
  120. Javed, A.; Ahmad, A.; Tahir, A.; Shabbir, U.; Nouman, M.; Hameed, A. Potato peel waste—Its nutraceutical, industrial and biotechnological applacations. AIMS Agric. Food 2019, 4, 807–823. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Mohammed, N.M.S.; Salim, H.A.M. Adsorption of Cr (V) ion from aqueous solutions by solid waste of potato peels. Sci. J. Uni Zakho 2017, 5, 254–258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  122. Mutongo, F.; Kuipa, O.; Kuipa, P.K. Removal of Cr (VI) from aqueous solutions using powder of potato peelings as a low cost sorbent. Bioinorg. Chem. Appl. 2014, 2014, 973153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  123. Bibi, S.; Farooqi, A.; Yasmin, A.; Kamran, M.A.; Niazi, N.K. Arsenic and fluoride removal by potato peel and rice husk (PPRH) ash in aqueous environments. Int. J. Phytoremediat. 2017, 19, 1029–1036. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Guechi, E.K.; Hamdaoui, O. Evaluation of potato peel as a novel adsorbent for the removal of Cu (II) from aqueous solutions: Equilibrium, kinetic, and thermodynamic studies. Desalin Water Treat 2016, 57, 10677–10688. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Mahale, K.K.; Mokhasi, H.R.; Ashoka, H. Biosorption of nickel (II) from aqueous solutions using potato peel. Res. J. Chem. Environ. Sci. 2016, 4, 96–101. [Google Scholar]
  126. Gupta, N.; Kushwaha, A.K.; Chattopadhyaya, M. Application of potato (Solanum tuberosum) plant wastes for the removal of methylene blue and malachite green dye from aqueous solution. Arab. J. Chem. 2016, 9, S707–S716. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  127. Nathan, R.J.; Martin, C.E.; Barr, D.; Rosengren, R.J. Simultaneous removal of heavy metals from drinking water by banana, orange and potato peel beads: A study of biosorption kinetics. Appl. Water Sci. 2021, 11, 116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. El-Azazy, M.; El-Shafie, A.S.; Issa, A.A.; Al-Sulaiti, M.; Al-Yafie, J.; Shomar, B.; Al-Saad, K. Potato peels as an adsorbent for heavy metals from aqueous solutions: Eco-structuring of a green adsorbent operating plackett–burman design. J. Chem. 2019, 2019, 4926240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  129. Feizi, M.; Jalali, M. Removal of heavy metals from aqueous solutions using sunflower, potato, canola and walnut shell residues. J. Taiwan Inst. Chem. Eng. 2015, 54, 125–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Kaur, D.; Wani, A.A.; Singh, D.P.; Sogi, D.S. Shelf life enhancement of butter, ice-cream, and mayonnaise by addition of lycopene. Int. J. Food Prop. 2011, 14, 1217–1231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Imamura, T.; Isozumi, N.; Higashimura, Y.; Koga, H.; Segawa, T.; Desaka, N.; Takagi, H.; Matsumoto, K.; Ohki, S.; Mori, M. Red-beet betalain pigments inhibit amyloid-β aggregation and toxicity in amyloid-β expressing caenorhabditis elegans. Plant Foods Human Nutr. 2022, 77, 90–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  132. Costa, C.; Tsatsakis, A.; Mamoulakis, C.; Teodoro, M.; Briguglio, G.; Caruso, E.; Tsoukalas, D.; Margina, D.; Dardiotis, E.; Kouretas, D.; et al. Current evidence on the effect of dietary polyphenols intake on chronic diseases. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2017, 110, 286–299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  133. Vulić, J.J.; Cebović, T.N.; Canadanović-Brunet, J.M.; Cetković, G.S.; Canadanović, V.M.; Djilas, S.M.; Tumbas Šaponjac, V.T. In vivo and in vitro antioxidant effects of beetroot pomace extracts. J. Funct. Foods 2014, 6, 168–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  134. Sadowska-Bartosz, I.; Bartosz, G. Biological properties and applications of betalains. Molecules 2021, 26, 2520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  135. Smječanin, N.; Nuhanović, M.; Sulejmanović, J.; Grahet, Ž.; Odobašić, A.; Grahet, Ž.; Odobašić, A. Study of uranium biosorption process in aqueous solution by red beet peel. J. Radioanal. Nucl. Chem. 2022, 331, 1459–1471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  136. El-Beltagi, H.S.; El-Mogy, M.M.; Parmar, A.; Mansour, A.T.; Shalaby, T.A.; Ali, M.R. Phytochemical characterization and utilization of dried red beetroot (Beta vulgaris) peel extract in maintaining the quality of Nile Tilapia fish fillet. Antioxidants 2022, 11, 906. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  137. Maqbool, H.; Safeena, M.P.; Abubacker, Z.; Azhar, M.; Kumar, S. Effect of beetroot peel dip treatment on the quality preservation of Deccan mahseer (Tor khudree) steaks during frozen storage (−18 °C). LWT 2021, 151, 112222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  138. Lazăr, S.; Constantin, O.E.; Horincar, G.; Andronoiu, D.G.; Stănciuc, N.; Muresan, C.; Râpeanu, G. Beetroot by-product as a functional ingredient for obtaining value-added mayonnaise. Processes 2022, 10, 227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  139. Melo, N.; Wolff, G.H.; Costa-da-Silva, A.L.; Arribas, R.; Triana, M.F.; Gugger, M.; Riffell, J.A.; DeGennaro, M.; Stensmyr, M.C. Geosmin attracts Aedes aegypti mosquitoes to oviposition sites. Current Biol. 2020, 30, 127–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  140. Zhang, D.; Hamauzu, Y. Phenolic compounds and their antioxidant properties in different tissues of carrots (Daucus carota L.). J. Food Agr. Environ. 2004, 2, 95–100. [Google Scholar]
  141. Leja, M.; Kamińska, I.; Kramer, M.; Maksylewicz-Kaul, A.; Kammerer, D.; Carle, R.; Baranski, R. The content of phenolic compounds and radical scavenging activity varies with carrot origin and root color. Plant Foods Hum. Nutr. 2013, 68, 163–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  142. Hellström, J.; Granato, D.; Mattila, P.H. Accumulation of phenolic acids during storage over differently handled fresh carrots. Foods 2020, 9, 1515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  143. Hu, W.; Sarengaowa, G.Y.; Feng, K. Biosynthesis of phenolic compounds and antioxidant activity in fresh-cut fruits and vegetables. Front. Microbiol. 2022, 13, 906069. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  144. War, A.R.; Paulraj, M.G.; Ahmad, T.; Buhroo, A.A.; Hussain, B.; Ignacimuthu, S.; Sharma, H.C. Mechanisms of plant defense against insect herbivores. Plant Signal. Behav. 2012, 7, 1306–1320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  145. Kumar, M.; Barbhai, M.; Hasan, M.; Punia, S.; Dhumal, S.; Radha; Rais, N.; Chandran, D.; Pandiselvam, R.; Kothakota, A.; et al. Onion (Allium cepa L.) peels: A review on bioactive compounds and biomedical activities. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2022, 146, 112498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  146. Chope, G.A.; Cools, K.; Hammond, J.P.; Thompson, A.J.; Terry, L.A. Physiological, biochemical and transcriptional analysis of onion bulbs during storage. Ann. Bot. 2012, 109, 819–831. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  147. Wiczkowski, W.; Romaszko, J.; Bucinski, A.; Szawara- Nowak, D.; Honke, J.; Zielinski, H.; Piskula, M.K. Quercetin from shallots (Allium cepa L. var. aggregatum) is more bioavailable than its glucosides. J. Nutr. 2008, 138, 885–888. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  148. Nemtinov, V.I.; Golubkina, N.; Koshevarov, A.; Konstanchuk, Y.; Molchanova, A.; Nadezhkin, S.; Sellito, V.M.; Caruso, G. Health–beneficial compounds from edible and waste bulb components of sweet onion genotypes organically grown in northern Europe. Banat’s J. Biotechnol. 2019, 10, 58–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  149. Shabir, I.; Pandey, V.K.; Dar, A.H.; Pandiselvam, R.; Manzoor, S.; Mir, S.A.; Shams, R.; Dash, K.K.; Fayaz, U.; Khan, S.A. Nutritional profile, phytochemical compounds, biological activities, and utilization of onion peel for food applications: A review. Sustainability 2022, 14, 11958. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  150. Phanthuwongpakdee, J.; Babel, S.; Laohhasurayotin, K.; Sattayaporn, S.; Kaneko, T. Anthocyanin based agricultural wastes as bio-adsorbents for scavenging radioactive iodide from aqueous environment. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2020, 8, 104147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  151. Lee, S.Y.; Kim, H.W.; Hwang, K.E.; Song, D.H.; Choi, M.S.; Ham, Y.K.; Choi, Y.S.; Lee, J.W.; Lee, S.K.; Kim, C.J. Combined effect of kimchi powder and onion peel extract on quality characteristics of emulsion sausages prepared with irradiated pork. Korean J. Food Sci. Animal Res. 2015, 35, 277–285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  152. Cebin, A.V.; Šeremet, D.; Mandura, A.; Martinić, A.; Komes, D. Onion solid waste as a potential source of functional food ingredients. Power Eng. 2020, 15, 7–13. [Google Scholar]
  153. Kostecka-Gugala, A.; Kruczek, M.; Ledwożyw-Smoleń, I.; Kaszycki, P. Antioxidants and health-beneficial nutrients in fruits of eighteen Cucurbita cultivars: Analysis of diversity and dietary implications. Molecules 2020, 25, 1792. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  154. Goncharov, A.; Golubkina, N.; Pivovarov, V.; Gasparian, I.; Caruso, G. Comparative evaluation of biochemical parameters and mineral composition of Cucurbita ficifolia, C.maxima and C.maschata fruit, grown in the northern hemisphere. Veg. Crops Russ. 2022, 4, 46–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  155. Šehović, E.; Memić, M.; Sulejmanović, J.; Huremovic, J. Sorption of metals on pulverized pumpkin (Cucurbita pepo L.) peels. Anal. Lett. 2016, 49, 2446–2460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  156. Bal, D.; Özer, Ç.; İmamoğlu, M. Green and ecofriendly biochar preparation from pumpkin peel and its usage as an adsorbent for methylene blue removal from aqueous solutions. Water Air Soil Pollut. 2021, 232, 457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  157. Rashid, J.; Tehreem, F.; Rehman, A.; Kumar, R. Synthesis using natural functionalization of activated carbon from pumpkin peels for decolourization of aqueous methylene blue. Sci. Tot. Environ. 2019, 671, 369–376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  158. Salami, A.; Asefi, N.; Kenari, R.E.; Garekhani, M. Extraction of pumpkin peel extract, using supercritical CO2 and subcritical water technology: Enhancing oxidative stability of canola oil. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2021, 58, 1101–1109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  159. Jarungjitaree, P.; Naradisorn, M. Evaluation of antioxidant and antifungal activities of pumpkin by-product and its application in banana. J. Food Sci. Agr. Technol. 2018, 4, 129–133. Available online: http://rs.mfu.ac.th/ojs.index.php/jfat (accessed on 24 November 2022).
  160. Gungor, K.K.; Torun, M. Pumpkin peel valorization using green extraction technology to obtain β-carotene fortified mayonnaise. Waste Biomass Valor. 2022, 13, 4375–4388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  161. Hussain, A.; Kausar, T.; Sehar, S.; Sarwar, A.; Ashraf, A.H.; Jamil, M.A.; Noreen, S.; Rafique, A.; Iftikhar, K.; Quddoos, M.Y.; et al. A comprehensive review of functional ingredients, especially bioactive compounds present in pumpkin peel, flesh and seeds, and their health benefits. Food Chem. Adv. 2022, 1, 100067. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  162. Sharma, M.; Bhat, R. Extraction of carotenoids from pumpkin peel and pulp: Comparison between innovative green extraction technologies (ultrasonic and microwave-assisted extractions using corn oil. Foods 2021, 10, 787. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  163. Grassino, A.N.; Halambek, S.; Djaković, S.; Rimac, M.; Grabarić, Z.D. Utilization of tomato peel waste from canning factory as a potential source for pectin production and application as tin corrosion inhibitor. Food Hydrocoll. 2016, 52, 265–274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  164. Grassino, A.N.; Djaković, S.; Bosiljkov, T.; Halambek, J.; Zorić, Z.; Dragović-Uzelac, V.; Petrović, M.; Brnčić, S.R. Valorisation of tomato peel waste as a sustainable source for pectin, polyphenols and fatty acids recovery using sequential extraction. Waste Biomass Valor. 2020, 11, 4593–4611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  165. Shinde, M.; Sonawane, S.K.; Patil, S. Fruit peel utilization in food packaging. IFI Mag. 2019, 1, 19–24. [Google Scholar]
  166. Elkodous, M.A.; El-Husseiny, H.M.; El-Sayyad, G.S.; Hashem, A.H.; Doghish, A.S.; Elfadil, D.; Radwan, Y.; El-Zeiny, H.M.; Bedair, H.; Ikhdair, O.A.; et al. Recent advances in waste-recycled nanomaterials for biomedical applications:waste-to-wealth. Nanotechnol. Rev. 2021, 10, 1662–1739. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  167. Omar, R.A.; Chauhan, D.; Talreja, N.; Mangalaraja, R.V.; Ashfaq, M. Nano Particles Reducing and Stabilizing Agents Chapter 12—Vegetables Waste for Biosynthesis of Various Nanoparticles. In Nanobiotechnology for Plant Protection, Agri-Waste and Microbes for Production of Sustainable Nanomaterials; Abd-Elsalam, K.A., Periakaruppan, S.R.R., Eds.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2022; pp. 281–298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  168. Deokar, G.K.; Ingale, A.G. Unveiling an unexpected potential of beetroot waste in green synthesis of single crystalline gold nanoplates: A mechanistic study. Arab. J. Chem. 2018, 11, 950–958. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  169. Bahram, M.; Mohammadzadeh, E. Green synthesis of gold nanoparticles with willow tree bark extract: A sensitive colourimetric sensor for cysteine detection. Anal. Methods 2014, 6, 6916–6924. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  170. Phukan, K.; Devi, R.; Chowdhury, D. Green synthesis of gold nano-bioconjugates from onion peel extract and evaluation of their antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, and cytotoxic studies. ACS Omega 2021, 6, 17811–17823. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  171. Babu, S.; Devadiga, A.; Shetty, K.V.; Saidutta, M.B. Synthesis of silver nanoparticles using medicinal Zizyphus xylopyrus bark extract. Appl. Nanosci. 2014, 5, 755–762. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  172. Erdem, İ.; Çakır, Ş. Green synthesis of silver nanoparticles using walnut shell powder and Cynara sp. and their antibacterial activities. Hacettepe J. Biol. Chem. 2022, 50, 335–347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  173. Nandhini, S.; Sheeba, D. Vegetable peel extract mediated synthesis of silver nanoparticles and its antimicrobial activities. Res. J. Chem. Environ. 2020, 24, 39–44. [Google Scholar]
  174. Sharma, K.; Kaushik, S.; Jyoti, A. Green synthesis of silver nanoparticles by using waste vegetable peel and its antibacterial activities. J. Pharm. Sci. Res. 2016, 8, 313–316. [Google Scholar]
  175. Deepa, A.F.; Amirul Islam, M.; Dhanker, R. Green synthesis of silver nanoparticles from vegetable waste of pea Pisum sativum and bottle gourd Lagenaria siceraria: Characterization and antibacterial properties. Front. Environ. Sci. 2022, 10, 941554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  176. Iravani, S.; Zolfaghari, B. Green synthesis of silver nanoparticles using Pinus eldarica bark extract. Biomed. Res. Int. 2013, 2013, 639725. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  177. Santhosh, A.; Theertha, V.; Prakash, P.; Chandran, S.S. From waste to a value added product: Green synthesis of silver nanoparticles from onion peels together with its diverse applications. Mater. Today Proc. 2021, 46, 4460–4463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  178. Puri, A.; Patil, S. Biogenic synthesis of selenium nanoparticles using Diospyros montana bark extract: Characterization, antioxidant, antibacterial, and antiproliferative activity. Biosci. Biotechnol. Res. Asia 2022, 19, 423–441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  179. Pattanayak, S.; Masud, M.; Mollick, R.; Maity, D.; Chakraborty, S.; Dash, S.K.; Chattopadhyay, S.; Roy, S.; Chattopadhyay, D.; Chakraborty, M. Butea monosperma bark extract mediated green synthesis of silver nanoparticles: Characterization and biomedical applications. J. Saudi Chem. Soc. 2017, 21, 673–684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  180. Ullah, H.; Ullah, Z.; Fazal, A.; Irfan, M. Use of vegetable waste extracts for controlling microstructure of CuO nanoparticles: Green synthesis, characterization, and photocatalytic applications. J. Chem. 2017, 2017, 2721798. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  181. Surendra, T.V.; Roopan, S.M.; Al-Dhabi, N.A.; Arasu, M.V.; Sarkar, G.; Suthindhiran, K. Vegetable peel waste for the production of ZnO nanoparticles and its toxicological efficiency, antifungal, hemolytic, and antibacterial activities. Nanoscale Res. Lett. 2016, 11, 546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  182. Modi, S.; Yadav, V.K.; Choudhary, N.; Alswieleh, A.M.; Sharma, A.K.; Bhardwaj, A.K.; Khan, S.H.; Yadav, K.K.; Cheon, J.K.; Jeon, B.H. Onion peel waste mediated-green synthesis of sinc oxide nanoparticles and their phytotoxicity on mung bean and wheat plant growth. Materials 2022, 15, 2393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  183. Akintelu, S.A.; Oyebamiji, A.K.; Olugbeko, S.C.; Folorunso, A.S. Green synthesis of iron oxide nanoparticles for biomedical application and environmental remediation: A review. Eclética Química 2021, 46, 17–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  184. Miri, A.; Khatami, M.; Sarani, M. Biosynthesis, magnetic and cytotoxic studies of hematite nanoparticles. J. Inorg. Organomet. Polym. 2020, 30, 767–774. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  185. Iqbal, S.; Younas, U.; Chan, K.W.; Zia-Ul-Haq, M.; Ismail, M. Chemical composition of Artemisia annua L. leaves and antioxidant potential of extracts as a function of extraction solvents. Molecules 2012, 17, 6020–6032. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  186. Golubkina, N.A.; Kekina, H.G.; Molchanova, A.V.; Antoshkina, M.S.; Nadezhkin, S.M.; Soldatenko, A.V. Plants Antioxidants and Methods of Their Determination; Infra-M: Moscow, Russia, 2020; pp. 155–164. (In Russian) [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. ‘Edge effect’ related to the interaction between plants and environment.
Figure 1. ‘Edge effect’ related to the interaction between plants and environment.
Diversity 15 00123 g001
Figure 2. The role of trichomes in plant protection.
Figure 2. The role of trichomes in plant protection.
Diversity 15 00123 g002
Figure 3. Effect of foliar sodium selenate and SeCys supply on wax accumulation on the surface of bean seeds, cv Uliasha (0.26 mM solution) (Supplement S1).
Figure 3. Effect of foliar sodium selenate and SeCys supply on wax accumulation on the surface of bean seeds, cv Uliasha (0.26 mM solution) (Supplement S1).
Diversity 15 00123 g003
Figure 4. Distribution of macro-elements between periderm, phloem and cambium of white willow. For each element, values with the same letters do not differ statistically according to Duncan test at p < 0.05.
Figure 4. Distribution of macro-elements between periderm, phloem and cambium of white willow. For each element, values with the same letters do not differ statistically according to Duncan test at p < 0.05.
Diversity 15 00123 g004
Figure 5. Distribution of Al, As and heavy metals between periderm, phloem and cambium of white willow. For each element, values with the same letters do not differ statistically according to Duncan test at p < 0.05.
Figure 5. Distribution of Al, As and heavy metals between periderm, phloem and cambium of white willow. For each element, values with the same letters do not differ statistically according to Duncan test at p < 0.05.
Diversity 15 00123 g005
Figure 6. Distribution of micro-elements between periderm, phloem and cambium of white willow. For each element, values with the same letters do not differ statistically according to Duncan test at p < 0.05.
Figure 6. Distribution of micro-elements between periderm, phloem and cambium of white willow. For each element, values with the same letters do not differ statistically according to Duncan test at p < 0.05.
Diversity 15 00123 g006
Figure 7. Changes in potato tuber total antioxidant activity (AOA) and total polyphenol content (TP) during storage (18 cultivars, Supplement S2). Values with the same letters do not differ statistically according to Duncan test at p < 0.05.
Figure 7. Changes in potato tuber total antioxidant activity (AOA) and total polyphenol content (TP) during storage (18 cultivars, Supplement S2). Values with the same letters do not differ statistically according to Duncan test at p < 0.05.
Diversity 15 00123 g007
Figure 8. Effect of storage on peel/pulp betalain pigment levels of 6 cultivars with high (cvs. Bordo, Dobrynya and Marusya) and moderate adaptability (Gaspadynya, Lybava, Nezhnost). For each cultivar, values with the same letters do not differ statistically according to Duncan test at p < 0.05. (Supplement S3).
Figure 8. Effect of storage on peel/pulp betalain pigment levels of 6 cultivars with high (cvs. Bordo, Dobrynya and Marusya) and moderate adaptability (Gaspadynya, Lybava, Nezhnost). For each cultivar, values with the same letters do not differ statistically according to Duncan test at p < 0.05. (Supplement S3).
Diversity 15 00123 g008
Figure 9. Relationship between peel/pulp AOA of radish roots (18 cultivars) (Supplement S4).
Figure 9. Relationship between peel/pulp AOA of radish roots (18 cultivars) (Supplement S4).
Diversity 15 00123 g009
Figure 10. Changes in AOA and TP in crushed celery peel and pulp before and after storage at +4 °C during a week. Values with the same letters do not differ statistically according to Duncan test at p < 0.05.
Figure 10. Changes in AOA and TP in crushed celery peel and pulp before and after storage at +4 °C during a week. Values with the same letters do not differ statistically according to Duncan test at p < 0.05.
Diversity 15 00123 g010
Figure 11. AOA and TP accumulation in outer and inner scales of A. cepa L., A. cepa gr. aggregatum and A. sativum L. [148]. Values with the same letters do not differ statistically according to Duncan test at p < 0.05.
Figure 11. AOA and TP accumulation in outer and inner scales of A. cepa L., A. cepa gr. aggregatum and A. sativum L. [148]. Values with the same letters do not differ statistically according to Duncan test at p < 0.05.
Diversity 15 00123 g011
Figure 12. Lipid accumulation in outer and inner scales of A. cepa bulbs in conditions of water stress and adequate water supply (1-Zolotnichok, 2-Zolotie cupola, 3-Globus, 4-Myachkovski cvs.) (2021: high precipitation in the Amur region and adequate water supply in Moscow region). Values with the same letters do not differ statistically according to Duncan test at p < 0.05 (Supplement S5).
Figure 12. Lipid accumulation in outer and inner scales of A. cepa bulbs in conditions of water stress and adequate water supply (1-Zolotnichok, 2-Zolotie cupola, 3-Globus, 4-Myachkovski cvs.) (2021: high precipitation in the Amur region and adequate water supply in Moscow region). Values with the same letters do not differ statistically according to Duncan test at p < 0.05 (Supplement S5).
Diversity 15 00123 g012
Figure 13. Effect of high humidity on lipid outer/inner scale ratio in A. cepa cultivars with high (Zolotie cupola and Zolotnichok) and moderate (Globus, Myachkovski) levels of adaptability. Values with the same letters do not differ statistically according to Duncan test at p < 0.05. (Supplement S5).
Figure 13. Effect of high humidity on lipid outer/inner scale ratio in A. cepa cultivars with high (Zolotie cupola and Zolotnichok) and moderate (Globus, Myachkovski) levels of adaptability. Values with the same letters do not differ statistically according to Duncan test at p < 0.05. (Supplement S5).
Diversity 15 00123 g013
Figure 14. Exocarp/mesocarp differences in minerals accumulation. (* values are halved).
Figure 14. Exocarp/mesocarp differences in minerals accumulation. (* values are halved).
Diversity 15 00123 g014
Table 1. Several examples of seed coat absorption capacity.
Table 1. Several examples of seed coat absorption capacity.
SpeciesPollutantReferences
Lupinus albus L.Malachite green dye[57]
Cucurbita sp.Pb[58]
Dyes[59]
Antibiotics[60]
Triticum L. grain branPb[61]
Dye from textile wastewater[62]
Cicer arietinum L.Dyes[63]
Sclerocarya birrea (A.Rich.) Hochst.Methylene blue[64]
Cucumis melo L.Methylene blue[65]
Bertholletia excelsa Humb. & Bonpl. shellsMethylene blue, indigo carmine[66]
Helianthus L.Dyes[67]
Table 2. Examples of bark utilization for water purification.
Table 2. Examples of bark utilization for water purification.
Active IngredientPollutantReference
Eucalyptus L’Hér. barkCr, oil[94]
Platanus orientalis L. barkCr, Ni[95]
Pinus L. barkPentachlorophenol[96]
Pinus durangensis Martínez sawdustMethylene blue[97]
Juglans regia L. sawdustMethylene blue[98]
Pseudotsuga menziesii (Mirb.) Franco barkUranium[99]
Pinophyta Cronquist, Takht. & Zimmerm. ex Reveal barkHydrocarbons, Al, Ca, Fe, Mg, S[100]
Quercus cerris L. corkCr6+[101]
Table 3. Prospects for potato peel utilization.
Table 3. Prospects for potato peel utilization.
Active IngredientUtilization EfficiencyReferences
Antioxidant and antiviral properties
Peel powderPreservative in fish processing[115,116]
Preservative in meat storage and processing[117]
Oil preservation[114]
Wound healing[118]
Food additive and animal feed[20]
Peel extractsAnti-cancer, anti-inflammatory[113]
Adsorption capacity for water purification
Potato peel + HClCr6+[121,122]
Potato peel ashAs-, F[123]
Potato peel dry powder; pH 5Cu2+[124]
Potato peelNi2+[125]
Potato peelMethylene blue, malachite green[126]
Banana, orange, potato peelHeavy metals[127]
Potato raw and burned peelCd2+, Co2+, Cu2+, Fe2+, Ni2+, Pb2+[128]
Potato peelMn2+, Fe3+, Zn2+, Ni2+, Cu2+, Cd2+[129]
Others
Potato peelbiofertilizer[119]
Table 4. Utilization of beetroot periderm.
Table 4. Utilization of beetroot periderm.
Active IngredientPropertiesRef.
Adsorption capacity0.125 mm fraction of peel powderU6+[135]
Antioxidant and antiviral effectPeel powderImprovement of Nile Tilapia storage[136]
Peel extractImprovement of Deccan mahseer (Tor khudree) steaks storage[137]
MedicineBetalain pigments, fiber, polyphenolsDegenerative diseases, anti-inflammatory, anti-aging, cancer prevention[131,132]
Hepatoprotective[133]
Functional food, food additive and colorantPeel powderFood colorant, functional bread[134]
Mayonnaise[138]
OthersFresh peelMosquito attractant[139]
Table 5. Correlation between peel and pulp antioxidant activity in different agricultural crops and betalain pigments in beetroot.
Table 5. Correlation between peel and pulp antioxidant activity in different agricultural crops and betalain pigments in beetroot.
SpeciesN **Mean Peel AOA ***ParameterRegression Equation ****r
A. cepa L. red bulbs *10128AOAY= −0.009X2 + 0.3756X+0.960
Allium cepa gr. aggregatum8123.4AOAY= −0.0012X2 + 0.3548X+0.994
Raphanus sativus L.1850AOAY= −0.004X2 + 0.5929X + 0.0395+0.939
Solanum tuberosum L.815AOAY= −0.0127X2 + 1.0921X−0.0064+0.996
Beta vulgaris L.630BetacyaninsY= −0.0128X2 + 0.5894X+0.968
6BetaxanthinsY= −0.02581X2 + 0.5961X+0.991
* Nemtinov et al., 2019; ** number of varieties; *** in mg GAE g−1 d.w.; **** Y: pulp AOA; X: peel AOA.
Table 6. Utilization of onion outer scales.
Table 6. Utilization of onion outer scales.
Active IngredientUtilization EfficiencyRef.
Adsorption capacity
Anthocyanin containing onion peelRemoval of radioactive iodine[150]
Antioxidant effect
Peel extractsCardioprotective, antidiabetic, anticancer, immunomodulatory, neuroprotective properties[17,145]
Peel powder extractFood preservative, pork sausages[151]
Food additive and colorant
Peel powderFood colorant, functional bread[152]
Table 7. Utilization of pumpkin exocarp.
Table 7. Utilization of pumpkin exocarp.
Active IngredientUtilization EfficiencyReferences
Absorption capacity
pulverized C. pepo L. peelCd, Co, Cr, Fe, Mn, Ni, and Pb removal[155]
Cucurbita sp. BiocarMethylene blue removal[156]
activated carbonMethylene blue removal[157]
Antioxidant effect
Peel extractOxidative stability of canola oil[158]
Antifungal activity against anthracnose in banana[159]
Food additive and colorant
Helianthus annuus L. oil extractβ-carotene enriched mayonnaise production[160]
C. maxima Lindl., peelPectin, polysaccharides and fiber production[161]
C. maxima Lindl., peelBread baking[21]
C. maxima Lindl.Carotenoids extraction[162]
Table 8. Examples of periderm extract utilization for production of nanoparticles.
Table 8. Examples of periderm extract utilization for production of nanoparticles.
NanoparticlesSpecies WasteSize, nmRef.
AuBeta vulgaris L. waste50–65[168]
Salix alba L. bark15[169]
Allium cepa L. peel ethyl acetate extracts<20 nm[170]
AgZiziphus xylopyrus B.Heyne ex Roth (Rhamnaceae)60–70[171]
Juglans regia L. shell [172]
Cucurbita pepo L. and Trichosanthes cucumerina L. [173]
Lagenaria siceraria (Molina) Standl., Luffa cylindrica (L.), Solanum lycopersicum L., Solanum melongena L. and Cucumis sativus L.20[174]
Pinus sativum L. and Lagenaria siceraria (Molina) Standl. [175]
Pinus eldarica (Medw.) Silba (Pinaceae)—Eldarica pine10–40[176]
Allium cepa L. peel [177]
SeDiospyros montana Roxb.120–200[178]
Butea monosperma (Lam.) Taub.35[179]
CuOBrassica oleracea var. botrytis L. waste, Solanum tuberosum L. and Pisum sativum L. peel [180]
ZnOMoringa oleifera Lam. peel40–45[181]
Allium cepa L. peel20–80[182]
Fe2O3Salvadora persica L. bark [183,184]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Golubkina, N.; Skrypnik, L.; Logvinenko, L.; Zayachkovsky, V.; Smirnova, A.; Krivenkov, L.; Romanov, V.; Kharchenko, V.; Poluboyarinov, P.; Sekara, A.; et al. The ‘Edge Effect’ Phenomenon in Plants: Morphological, Biochemical and Mineral Characteristics of Border Tissues. Diversity 2023, 15, 123. https://doi.org/10.3390/d15010123

AMA Style

Golubkina N, Skrypnik L, Logvinenko L, Zayachkovsky V, Smirnova A, Krivenkov L, Romanov V, Kharchenko V, Poluboyarinov P, Sekara A, et al. The ‘Edge Effect’ Phenomenon in Plants: Morphological, Biochemical and Mineral Characteristics of Border Tissues. Diversity. 2023; 15(1):123. https://doi.org/10.3390/d15010123

Chicago/Turabian Style

Golubkina, Nadezhda, Liubov Skrypnik, Lidia Logvinenko, Vladimir Zayachkovsky, Anna Smirnova, Leonid Krivenkov, Valery Romanov, Viktor Kharchenko, Pavel Poluboyarinov, Agnieszka Sekara, and et al. 2023. "The ‘Edge Effect’ Phenomenon in Plants: Morphological, Biochemical and Mineral Characteristics of Border Tissues" Diversity 15, no. 1: 123. https://doi.org/10.3390/d15010123

APA Style

Golubkina, N., Skrypnik, L., Logvinenko, L., Zayachkovsky, V., Smirnova, A., Krivenkov, L., Romanov, V., Kharchenko, V., Poluboyarinov, P., Sekara, A., Tallarita, A., & Caruso, G. (2023). The ‘Edge Effect’ Phenomenon in Plants: Morphological, Biochemical and Mineral Characteristics of Border Tissues. Diversity, 15(1), 123. https://doi.org/10.3390/d15010123

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop