Next Article in Journal
Mechanisms Generating Dichotomies in the Life Strategies of Heterotrophic Marine Prokaryotes
Next Article in Special Issue
Diversity and Distribution of the Inland Water Decapods of Sicily (Crustacea, Malacostraca)
Previous Article in Journal
Molecular Phylogenetics and Comparative Examination of Voucher Museums Reveal Two New Species of Gymnophthalmid Lizards (Squamata, Gymnophthalmidae) from the Peruvian Andes, with Comments on Proctoporus guentheri (Boettger, 1891)
Previous Article in Special Issue
Photobacterium halophilum sp. nov. and a Salt-Loving Bacterium Isolated from Marine Sediment
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Red-Backed Shrike Lanius collurio Whole-Genome Sequencing Reveals Population Genetic Admixture

Institute of Pharmacy and Molecular Biotechnology, Department Biology, Heidelberg University, Im Neuenheimer Feld 364, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Diversity 2022, 14(3), 216; https://doi.org/10.3390/d14030216
Submission received: 24 February 2022 / Revised: 12 March 2022 / Accepted: 13 March 2022 / Published: 16 March 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Diversity in 2022)

Abstract

:
The Red-backed Shrike (Lanius collurio) is a medium-sized, carnivorous passerine, occurring throughout the western Palearctic. As with numerous other bird species, its numbers are declining, mainly due to anthropogenic factors. Therefore, revealing the population structure and genetic diversity is paramount in ensuring the survival of the species. However, until present, only mitochondrial DNA has been targeted to reveal the genetic structure of the species. These studies suggested a panmictic population structure. In this study, we employed next-generation sequencing of 88 Red-backed Shrikes from 11 countries and used single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs)) to investigate the population structure. Even with such high-resolution DNA data, we found considerable genetic variability, but our results indicate no genetic structure in the Red-backed Shrike, suggesting a panmictic population. Migrant birds from Israel and Kuwait could not be attributed to breeding populations. Panmixia is the genetic legacy of the widespread and continuous distribution of the species, high locomotion capacities, and, most importantly, the numerous ice ages from the past few million years, which forced various populations to retract to refugia and expand their ranges several times, and to interbreed both in the glacial refugia and during warm periods in Eurasia.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

DNA sequencing began a new era in population genetics in the late 1970s with the arrival of the Sanger sequencing technique [1]. This technique endowed researchers with the ability to assess population differentiation at the molecular level. At its core, the study of population genetics was a combination of Darwin’s natural selection theory and Mendel’s genetic principles, as emphasised by the early researchers in the field [2,3,4]. This indicates that, previously, population genetic research was performed while considering morphological and behavioural aspects coupled with theoretical features [5]. Current DNA high-throughput sequencers [6] generate an outstanding amount of genomic data, allowing for unprecedented views on variation patterns among individuals and species alike [7]. Once the technological capabilities of sequencing became so efficient, their running costs subsequently decreased, making them accessible to a wider range of research groups. Following this, it became possible to expand focus beyond model organisms, e.g., Drosophila melanogaster and Mus musculus, and to study species whose genetic backgrounds were unknown. In the past decade, the number of genomes from non-model organisms has grown at an astonishing rate [8], which broadened our understanding of population history in terms of genetic drift, rate of mutation occurrence, gene flow, and even natural selection [9].
Avian genomics has played a crucial role in the development of non-model organism genomics, mainly through the efforts of the Birds 10K Avian Phylogenomics Consortium [10]. This international initiative aims to obtain genomes from all extant bird species (around 11,000), with circa 450 genomes already assembled [11]. The history of avian genomics unfolded relatively slowly in the beginning of the omics era [12,13,14], with most sequencing aimed at resolving avian phylogenies [15,16,17] or targeting species with high economic importance such as the chicken (Gallus gallus) [18] and the turkey (Meleagris gallopavo) [19]. However, in the past few years, increasing numbers of studies have employed high-throughput sequencing to decode the population genetic background, evolutionary history, and speciation of various other bird species [20,21,22,23,24].
The shrike family (Aves, Laniidae) currently comprises a total of 34 species, divided into four genera: Corvinella, Urosteles, Eurocephalus, and Lanius [25], the last one being considered true shrikes. Until present, apart from sequencing the genome of the Loggerhead Shrike (Lanius ludovicianus) by the B10K consortium, no next-generation sequencing (NGS) research has targeted the shrike family. Nonetheless, a number of genetic studies have focused on shrike species, notably to elucidate phylogeographical [26,27,28,29,30,31] and speciation patterns [26,32,33,34]. In the western Palearctic, the most abundant shrike species is the Red-backed Shrike Lanius collurio (RBS), with more than 6 million breeding pairs [35,36]. Previous mitochondrial DNA research on the RBS has revealed population genetic variability, but admixture across the birds from western Palearctic, although two haploclades without geographic separation, are obvious [37].
Mitochondrial DNA can reveal the phylogeographic details of recent evolutionary history, but nuclear DNA should be more informative regarding the distant past and offer data on separation events going back many thousands of years. In this study, we used next-generation DNA sequencing and SNPs to elucidate the population genetic structure of the breeding RBS in the western Palearctic from nuclear DNA. We also explored if SNPs could help identify the breeding site of migrant birds captured in Israel and Kuwait.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Sampling, DNA Extraction, and Sequencing

We obtained blood and tissue samples from 88 Red-backed Shrikes in 11 countries: Bulgaria, Czech Republic, Germany, Israel, Kuwait, Latvia, Norway, Poland, Romania, Russia, and Sweden (see Figure 1). Birds were captured and sampled by experienced bird ringers, following national regulations. All samples were from breeding birds, except the birds from Israel and Kuwait, which are migratory individuals. Complete details of the samples used are found in Table S1. We extracted genomic DNA following a classic phenol-chloroform protocol [38]. After isolation, we quantified DNA quality with a WPA Biowave II spectrophotometer (Biochrom Ltd, Cambridge, UK).
Whole-genome sequencing was performed by Berry Genomics (Beijing, China) at 15× coverage, with paired ends, on an Illumina Novaseq 6000 machine. Sequencing was completed in two batches: the first in January 2018 (n = 56) and the second in December 2018 (n = 32).

2.2. NGS Data Analysis

We assembled the raw sequences (fastq files) and mapped them using the Burrows–Wheeler Aligner [39]. We employed the complete genome of the Loggerhead Shrike (Lanius ludovicianus) as a reference. Currently, this is the only complete genome available for the shrike family. It split from the RBS circa 8 Mya [26]. In the new alignments, we removed the clonal reads via SAMtools [40], with the rmdup command. Using the same software, we created a multiple VCF file containing the genomic variation from all 88 alignments. We then filtered the VCF file by (i) removing the indels and (ii) setting a minor allele frequency (MAF) of 0.1. We added this filtering step as some software requires the indels to be removed, while the second procedure helped to exclude errors in sequencing. Until this stage, our methodology closely resembles the technique employed by the Genome Analysis Toolkit (GATK) pipeline as best practice for variant discovery [41].
For the first analysis step, we performed a principal component analysis (PCA) via PLINK [42] and used R [43] to visualise the results. We further investigated population membership of our individuals using Admixture software [44], and for visualising the runs, we uploaded the output files in the online POPHELPER Structure Web App v1.0.10 (https://roymf.shinyapps.io/structure/, accessed on 14 January 2020). Third, we constructed a tree based on single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) from the sex chromosome Z. To do so, we initially downloaded the chromosome Z from a Collared Flycatcher (Ficedula albicollis) (NC_021700) from GenBank and then compared it to our Loggerhead Shrike genome reference, from which we then extracted the same scaffolds. Finally, with the list of scaffolds belonging to the chromosome Z, we were able to extract the respective scaffolds from our multiple VCF file. Via the vcf2phylo pipeline [45], we extracted the chromosome SNPs and built an IQ-TREE [46]. We visualised the results in FigTree 1.4.4 [47].
A schematic representation of our NGS data analysis workflow is available in Figure 2.

3. Results

We obtained short-read (i.e., 150 base pairs) whole-genome sequences for 88 individuals. On average, each sequence had 63,883,753 clean reads and 19,165,126,023 clean bases (Table 1, and full details in Table S1). Our PCA did not reveal any group structure among the 11 populations in our dataset (Figure 3). Although with minimal variation, it appears that several of the German birds are different, but this aspect was not confirmed by our other analyses.
For the Admixture software analysis, our assumptions that the birds are subclustered were also proven incorrect (Figure 4). From K = 2 until K = 7, there is no stand-alone population. All individuals from the 11 countries share genetic elements. For example, breeding shrikes from Germany do not show a singular population structure; the corresponding genetic elements also occur in other countries. Furthermore, the FST values for the admixture analysis (Table 2) offer additional support for almost complete panmixia, with the overwhelming majority of values between 0.051 and 0.097. The only three values that do not fit in this range are from the Czech Republic: the first, compared with the Bulgarian population, at 0.102; the second, compared with Israel, at 0.113; and the third, compared with Latvia, at 0.103. Overall, the population from the Czech Republic has the highest FST variation (average = 0.094) compared to the other groups. However, in terms of FST theoretical values, this is still considered almost complete panmixia.
In several taxa, the DNA from Z sex chromosome was highly informative [48,49]. Our last tool in elucidating the population structure of the RBS, the chromosome Z SNPs tree, also indicates panmixia. Birds from the same country do not cluster together. Instead, there is a general admixture, with individuals occupying random positions on the tree branches, regardless of their natal origin. Migrating birds captured in Israel and Kuwait could not be attributed to a breeding population (Figure 5 and Figure 6).

4. Discussion

Our insight into the population genetic structure of the Red-backed Shrike, provided by next-generation sequencing of 88 individuals from 11 countries, revealed complete admixture, also known as panmixia. These findings confirm the results from our previous study, based only on mitochondrial DNA [37]. Across the western Palearctic, genomic studies have indicated population differentiation in a number of species. For the Saker Falcon (Falco cherrug), SNP sets differentiated between birds of central Europe, eastern Europe, and central Asia, with the westernmost populations showing demographic isolation [20]. For the Great Tit (Parus major), all continental European populations share a common genetic background, except the birds from Spain, Corsica, and Sardinia; similarly, birds from the UK also exist within their own cluster [21]. For Barn Swallows (Hirundo rustica) breeding in Sweden, Germany, and Switzerland, an assessment based on ddRAD, mtDNA sequencing, and microsatellites did not detect any unique genetic elements between the populations [23]. However, the European Turtle Dove (Streptopelia turtur) is characterised by population genetic admixture, according to a study that employed both RAD and mtDNA sequencing [22].
Unfortunately, we could not assess the natal origin of the RBSs sampled along the migratory flyways in Israel and Kuwait, which represented a special point of interest for us. For a number of species, previous studies were successful in tracking population membership of migrating birds. Using stable isotopes, Kloskowski et al. [50] were able to connect wintering areas with breeding areas for the Red-necked Grebe (Podiceps grisegena). Employing the same technique, Guillemain et al. retraced the natal origin of Greylag Geese (Anser anser) wintering in Camargue, France [51]. European breeding Ortolan Buntings (Emberiza hortulana) were also assigned to their east African wintering grounds based on stable isotopes extracted from tail feathers [52]. Last, migrating Pied Flycatchers (Ficedula hypoleuca) and European Robins (Erithacus rubecula) over the Italian Alps were connected to their breeding areas via stable isotopes as well as bird ringing data [53]. The isotope analysis, however, offers only limited information, as it reflects the recent situation, whereas DNA data go back thousands and even millions of years.
Our panmixia results for the RBS are in concordance with the general situation of bird species inhabiting the western Palearctic. Out of 145 species that have been the focus of population genetic studies, the majority of them show genetic admixture, as indicated by a recent literature review [54]. Only species on the Atlantic islands or on separated mountain ranges show a higher degree of genetic isolation and speciation. Extended gene flow among populations on the landmass of the western Palearctic leads to homogenisation of mutations and contributes to general admixture, as shown in the Northern Wheatear (Oenanthe oenanthe) [55]. Furthermore, as in the case of the Red-backed Shrike, low philopatry rates [56] also significantly reduce population differentiation. Overall, for avian species, their high locomotion capacity also acts as a catalyst for gene flow, dispersal, and admixture [57].
Although the phylogeography and population history of other highly mobile vertebrates, e.g., Killer Whales [58] and saltwater fishes [59], have been resolved via high-throughput sequencing, we think the flying ability of many bird species represents a strong underlying factor for their general genetic admixture. This is particularly evident in comparison to several tropical passerines, which have reduced flying capabilities and show a thoroughly differentiated genetic structure. Furthermore, the numerous ice ages in the past few million years had a crucial influence on the panmixia of the majority of bird species in the northern hemisphere. These glaciations and the harsh conditions they imposed forced bird populations to retreat into southern refugia, where different lineages mixed. During the interglacial periods, when the ice pack melted and the majority of the hemisphere was once again hospitable, these bird populations expanded and lineages from different refugia came into contact. These consistent and consecutive admixtures of lineages in the past millennia were a decisive cause in the panmixia of modern bird species in the northern hemisphere.
In theory, population membership can be linked to certain genetic variation, but in practice, population differentiation ranges from complete isolation to full panmixia [60]. There are still limitations in understanding population histories from large, whole-genome datasets, especially regarding the number of samples, magnitude of sequencing depth, and complexity of computational analyses, among others [61]. Although an array of performant analysis software [62] has helped elucidate the history and dynamics of many species, the current bioinformatic pipelines still show limitations for selecting population specific genetic elements [63]. Today, we are witnessing the generation of datasets containing thousands of genomes; the main challenge derived from the ever-increasing size of these datasets is building software capable of processing the amount of data. However, as more efficient software and scanning algorithms emerge, coupled with the constantly improving sequencing techniques [6], future research on population genomics will greatly improve and further shed light on evolutionary aspects of the natural world.

5. Conclusions

High-throughput sequencing of 88 RBSs from 11 countries and subsequent data analysis could neither detect an unambiguous population genetic substructure nor could it allocate migrating RBS from Israel and Kuwait to their natal populations. Although genetic variation is evident, neither PCA, admixture analysis, nor SNP tree investigation could provide us with differentiating elements between the 88 samples used in the current study. Our results are in concordance with mtDNA studies of RBS and previous research on western Palearctic bird species, of which the majority are characterised by population genetic admixture. This is the legacy of multiple ice ages, which forced a back-and-forth population expansion process, in which different subpopulations mixed. Although our bioinformatic approach was performed with the most up-to-date and recommended software, we think that there are limitations in the amount of data that current software can process. Finally, we emphasise the need for additional population sampling and deeper sequencing to challenge our current results.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/d14030216/s1, Table S1: Complete details of samples used.

Author Contributions

L.G.P. and M.W. conceived the study. L.G.P. and E.W. analysed the data. L.G.P. wrote the manuscript. E.W. and M.W. provided regular intellectual input, reviewed drafts of the paper, and approved the final manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

L.G.P. received financial support from the Deutsche Ornithologen-Gessellschaft (DO-G)—Abs-Halbstipendium, the Erwin-Stresemann Förderung, the Irmgard und Michael Abs Stiftung, DAAD, STIBET, and Graduate Academy Heidelberg. The funding agencies had no role in the collection, analysis, or interpretation of the data, nor in the writing of the manuscript and decision to publish the results.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

We would like to express our sincere appreciation to Roberto Carlos Frias-Soler for burgeoning discussions on interpreting population genomics from next-generation sequencing data. We acknowledge Petra Fellhauer for technical support. We are grateful to Rien van Wijk (Bulgaria), Sharina van Boheemen (Czech Republic), Markus Santhosh Braun, Jan Engler, Christoph Unger, Jens Hering, Fabian Schrauth, Silke Fregin, and the Zoological Institute and Museum at the Ernst-Moritz-Arndt University of Greifswald, Simon Bruslund and Heidelberg Zoo (Germany), Yariv Malihi, Yoav Motro, Noam Weiss, Kylynn Clare, Jasper Liamm, and the International Birding and Research Center Eilat (Israel), Donna L. Dittmann, J. V. Remsen, Frederick Sheldon, and the Museum of Natural Sciences at Louisiana State University (Kuwait), Oskars Keišs and Valts Jaunzemis (Latvia), Arild Johnsen, Lars Erik Johannessen and the Natural History Museum at University of Oslo (Norway), Marcin Tobółka and Piotr Tryjanowski (Poland), Peter Pap Laszlo, and Csongor Istvan Vágási (Romania), Tatiana Makarova, Ivan Starikov and the Zoological Museum of Moscow University (Russia), and Ulf Johansson and the Swedish National History Museum (Sweden) for providing the samples used in this study. We thank the Carl Zeiss Sports Optics GmbH for offering L.G.P. Victory SF 10 × 42 binoculars, and Petzl Deutschland GmbH for the Reactik + headlamp, used for fieldwork in Germany and Israel. We are also indebted to Lykke Pedersen for providing useful advice on how to trap wild Red-backed Shrikes. We thank Mark Miller from the San Diego Supercomputer Center for helping us with the CIPRES platform analysis. Agnes Hotz-Wagenblatt from the German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) provided crucial support with running analyses on a local cluster. We are indebted to Amir Bahmani (Islamic Azad University), Vandhana Krishnan, Ramesh V. Nair, Amir Bahmani, and Michael P. Snyder (Stanford Center for Genomics and Personalized Medicine) for sharing their state-of-the-art knowledge and offering outstanding technical support for the bioinformatic analyses. Edgardo Ortiz Valencia (Technical University of Munich) offered immediate help with running the vcf2phylip software. We are grateful to Josefin Stiller and the B10K project for allowing us to use the Loggerhead Shrike Lanius ludovicianus complete genome as a reference for our analyses. Mare Haider, Pelin and Irmgard Yildiz, Philipp Scheffzek, Dietlinde Schiebel, and Markus Schirmer provided logistical support at the initial stage of the study. Miguel Ferrer, the academic editor of the journal, along with Antoine Louchart and one anonymous reviewer, provided valuable comments and helped us to improve the first version of the manuscript. Finally, L.G.P. would like to dedicate this article to his long-time friend and Erasmus comrade, Ștefan-Adrian Strungaru, who passed away in April 2021 after a tragic diving accident in the Black Sea.

Conflicts of Interest

Michael Wink is Editor-in-Chief of Diversity. The funding agencies had no role in the collection, analysis, or interpretation of the data, nor in the writing of the manuscript and decision to publish the results.

References

  1. Sanger, F.; Nicklen, S.; Coulson, A.R. DNA Sequencing with Chain-Terminating Inhibitors. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1977, 74, 5463–5467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Fisher, R.A. The Correlation between Relatives on the Supposition of Mendelian Inheritance, Trans. R. Soc. Edinb. 1919, 52, 399–433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. Haldane, J.B.S. A Mathematical Theory of Natural and Artificial Selection. Parts I—IX. Math. Proc. Camb. Philos. Soc. 1932, 23, 26–28. [Google Scholar]
  4. Wright, S. Evolution in Mendelian Populations. Genetics 1931, 16, 97–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Charlesworth, B.; Charlesworth, D. Population Genetics from 1966 to 2016. Heredity 2017, 118, 2–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  6. Heather, J.M.; Chain, B. The Sequence of Sequencers: The History of Sequencing DNA. Genomics 2016, 107, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  7. Rajora, O.P. (Ed.) Population Genomics; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  8. Ellegren, H. Genome Sequencing and Population Genomics in Non-Model Organisms. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2014, 29, 51–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Hartl, D.L.; Clark, A.G. Principles of Population Genetics, 3rd ed.; Sinauer Associates, Inc.: Sunderland, MA, USA, 1997. [Google Scholar]
  10. Zhang, G. Bird Sequencing Project Takes Off. Nature 2015, 522, 34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Stiller, J.; Zhang, G. Comparative Phylogenomics, a Stepping Stone for Bird Biodiversity Studies. Diversity 2019, 11, 115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Wink, M. A Historical Perspective of Avian Genomics. In Avian Genomics in Ecology and Evolution; Kraus, R.H., Ed.; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2019; pp. 7–19. [Google Scholar]
  13. Kraus, R.H.S.; Wink, M. Avian Genomics: Fledging into the Wild! J. Ornithol. 2015, 156, 851–865. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Wink, M. DNA Analyses Have Revolutionized Studies on the Taxonomy and Evolution in Birds. In Birds—Challenges and Opportunities for Business, Conservation and Research; Mikkola, H., Ed.; IntechOpen: London, UK, 2021. [Google Scholar]
  15. Kimball, R.T.; Oliveros, C.H.; Wang, N.; White, N.D.; Barker, F.K.; Field, D.J.; Ksepka, D.T.; Chesser, R.T.; Moyle, R.G.; Braun, M.J.; et al. A Phylogenomic Supertree of Birds. Diversity 2019, 11, 109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Jarvis, E.D.; Mirarab, S.; Aberer, A.J.; Li, B.; Houde, P.; Li, C.; Ho, S.Y.W.; Faircloth, B.C.; Nabholz, B.; Howard, J.T. Whole-Genome Analyses Resolve Early Branches in the Tree of Life of Modern Birds. Science 2014, 346, 1320–1331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  17. Prum, R.O.; Berv, J.S.; Dornburg, A.; Field, D.J.; Townsend, J.P.; Lemmon, E.M.; Lemmon, A.R. A Comprehensive Phylogeny of Birds (Aves) Using Targeted Next-Generation DNA Sequencing. Nature 2015, 526, 569–573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Hillier, L.W.; Miller, W.; Birney, E.; Warren, W.; Hardison, R.C.; Ponting, C.P.; Bork, P.; Burt, D.W.; Groenen, M.A.M.; Delany, M.E.; et al. Sequence and Comparative Analysis of the Chicken Genome Provide Unique Perspectives on Vertebrate Evolution. Nature 2004, 432, 695–716. [Google Scholar]
  19. Dalloul, R.A.; Long, J.A.; Zimin, A.V.; Aslam, L.; Beal, K.; Blomberg, L.A.; Bouffard, P.; Burt, D.W.; Crasta, O.; Crooijmans, R.P.M.A.; et al. Multi-Platform Next-Generation Sequencing of the Domestic Turkey (Meleagris Gallopavo): Genome Assembly and Analysis. PLoS Biol. 2010, 8, e1000475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Zhan, X.; Dixon, A.; Batbayar, N.; Bragin, E.; Ayas, Z.; Deutschova, L.; Chavko, J.; Domashevsky, S.; Dorosencu, A.; Bagyura, J.; et al. Exonic versus Intronic SNPs: Contrasting Roles in Revealing the Population Genetic Differentiation of a Widespread Bird Species. Heredity 2015, 114, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Spurgin, L.G.; Bosse, M.; Adriaensen, F.; Albayrak, T.; Barboutis, C.; Belda, E.; Bushuev, A.; Cecere, J.G.; Charmantier, A.; Cichon, M.; et al. The Great Tit HapMap Project: A Continental-Scale Analysis of Genomic Variation in a Songbird. BioRxiv 2019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Calderón, L.; Campagna, L.; Wilke, T.; Lormee, H.; Eraud, C.; Dunn, J.C.; Rocha, G.; Zehtindjiev, P.; Bakaloudis, D.E.; Metzger, B.; et al. Genomic Evidence of Demographic Fluctuations and Lack of Genetic Structure across Flyways in a Long Distance Migrant, the European Turtle Dove. BMC Evol. Biol. 2016, 16, 237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. von Rönn, J.A.C.; Shafer, A.B.A.; Wolf, J.B.W. Disruptive Selection without Genome-Wide Evolution across a Migratory Divide. Mol. Ecol. 2016, 25, 2529–2541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Vijay, N.; Bossu, C.M.; Poelstra, J.W.; Weissensteiner, M.H.; Suh, A.; Kryukov, A.P.; Wolf, J.B.W. Evolution of Heterogeneous Genome Differentiation across Multiple Contact Zones in a Crow Species Complex. Nat. Commun. 2016, 7, 13195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Gill, F.; Donsker, D.; Rasmussen, P. IOC World Bird List V12.1. Available online: https://www.worldbirdnames.org/ioc-lists/crossref/ (accessed on 4 February 2022).
  26. Fuchs, J.; Alström, P.; Yosef, R.; Olsson, U. Miocene Diversification of an Open-habitat Predatorial Passerine Radiation, the Shrikes (Aves: Passeriformes: Laniidae). Zool. Scr. 2019, 48, 571–588. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Kvist, L.; Giralt, D.; Valera, F.; Hoi, H.; Kristin, A.; Darchiashvili, G.; Lovaszi, P. Population Decline Is Accompanied by Loss of Genetic Diversity in the Lesser Grey Shrike Lanius Minor. Ibis 2011, 153, 98–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Gonzalez, J.; Wink, M.; Garcia-del-Rey, E.; Castro, G.D. Evidence from DNA Nucleotide Sequences and ISSR Profiles Indicates Paraphyly in Subspecies of the Southern Grey Shrike (Lanius meridionalis). J. Ornithol. 2008, 149, 495–506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Padilla, D.P.; Spurgin, L.G.; Fairfield, E.A.; Illera, J.C.; Richardson, D.S. Population History, Gene Flow, and Bottlenecks in Island Populations of a Secondary Seed Disperser, the Southern Grey Shrike (Lanius meridionalis koenigi). Ecol. Evol. 2015, 5, 36–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  30. Mundy, N.I.; Winchell, C.S.; Woodruff, D.S. Genetic Differences between the Endangered San Clemente Island Loggerhead Shrike Lanius ludovicianus mearnsi and Two Neighbouring Subspecies Demonstrated by MtDNA Control Region and Cytochrome b Sequence Variation. Mol. Ecol. 1997, 6, 29–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  31. Caballero, I.C.; Ashley, M.V. Genetic Analysis of the Endemic Island Loggerhead Shrike, Lanius ludovicianus anthonyi. Conserv. Genet. 2011, 12, 1485–1493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Panov, E.N. The True Shrikes (Laniidae) of the World: Ecology, Behavior and Evolution; Pensoft: Sofia, Bulgaria; Moscow, Russia, 2011. [Google Scholar]
  33. Harris, T.; Franklin, K. Shrikes and Bush-Shrikes: Including Wood-Shrikes, Helmet-Shrikes, Flycatcher-Shrikes, Philentomas, Batises and Wattle-Eyes; Helm: London, UK, 2000. [Google Scholar]
  34. Olsson, U.; Alström, P.; Svensson, L.; Aliabadian, M.; Sundberg, P. The Lanius excubitor (Aves, Passeriformes) Conundrum-Taxonomic Dilemma When Molecular and Non-Molecular Data Tell Different Stories. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 2010, 55, 347–357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. del Hoyo, J.; Elliott, A.; Christie, D.A. (Eds.) Handbook of the Birds of the World. Vol. 13. Penduline-Tits to Shrikes; Lynx Edicions: Barcelona, Spain, 2008. [Google Scholar]
  36. Cramp, S.; Perrins, C.M. (Eds.) The Birds of the Western Palearctic; Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK, 1993; Volume 7. [Google Scholar]
  37. Pârâu, L.G.; Frias-Soler, R.C.; Wink, M. High Genetic Diversity among Breeding Red-Backed Shrikes Lanius collurio in the Western Palearctic. Diversity 2019, 11, 31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Green, M.R.; Sambrook, J. Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual, 4th ed.; Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press: New York, NY, USA, 2012; Volume 1. [Google Scholar]
  39. Li, H.; Durbin, R. Fast and Accurate Short Read Alignment with Burrows-Wheeler Transform. Bioinformatics 2009, 25, 1754–1760. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Li, H.; Handsaker, B.; Wysoker, A.; Fennell, T.; Ruan, J.; Homer, N.; Marth, G.; Abecasis, G.; Durbin, R. The Sequence Alignment/Map Format and SAMtools. Bioinformatics 2009, 25, 2078–2079. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Depristo, M.A.; Banks, E.; Poplin, R.; Garimella, K.V.; Maguire, J.R.; Hartl, C.; Philippakis, A.A.; del Angel, G.; Rivas, M.A.; Hanna, M.; et al. A Framework for Variation Discovery and Genotyping Using Next-Generation DNA Sequencing Data. Nat. Genet. 2011, 43, 491–501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Purcell, S.; Neale, B.; Todd-Brown, K.; Thomas, L.; Ferreira, M.A.R.; Bender, D.; Maller, J.; Sklar, P.; de Bakker, P.I.W.; Daly, M.J.; et al. PLINK: A Tool Set for Whole-Genome Association and Population-Based Linkage Analyses. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 2007, 81, 559–575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  43. R Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Computing 2021, 1, 12–21. [Google Scholar]
  44. Alexander, D.H.; Novembre, J.; Lange, K. Fast Model-Based Estimation of Ancestry in Unrelated Individuals. Genome Res. 2009, 19, 1655–1664. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  45. Ortiz, E.M. Vcf2phylip v2.0: Convert a VCF Matrix into Several Matrix Formats for Phylogenetic Analysis. Available online: https://zenodo.org/record/2540861 (accessed on 21 January 2020).
  46. Nguyen, L.-T.; Schmidt, H.A.; von Haeseler, A.; Minh, B.Q. IQ-TREE: A Fast and Effective Stochastic Algorithm for Estimating Maximum-Likelihood Phylogenies. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2015, 32, 268–274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Rambaut, A.; Drummond, A. FigTree v1. 3.1. Available online: http://tree.bio.ed.ac.uk/software/figtree (accessed on 13 December 2019).
  48. Oyler-McCance, S.J.; Cornman, R.S.; Jones, K.L.; Fike, J.A. Z Chromosome Divergence, Polymorphism and Relative Effective Population Size in a Genus of Lekking Birds. Heredity 2015, 115, 452–459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Ellegren, H.; Smeds, L.; Burri, R.; Olason, P.I.; Backström, N.; Kawakami, T.; Künstner, A.; Mäkinen, H.; Nadachowska-Brzyska, K.; Qvarnström, A.; et al. The Genomic Landscape of Species Divergence in Ficedula Flycatchers. Nature 2012, 491, 756–760. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Kloskowski, J.; Trembaczowski, A.; Filipiuk, M. Stable Isotope Tracing of Links between Marine Wintering and Freshwater Breeding Habitats of Red-Necked Grebes. J. Ornithol. 2019, 160, 593–605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Guillemain, M.; Bacon, L.; Kardynal, K.J.; Olivier, A.; Podhrazsky, M.; Musil, P.; Hobson, K.A. Geographic Origin of Migratory Birds Based on Stable Isotope Analysis: The Case of the Greylag Goose (Anser snser) Wintering in Camargue, Southern France. Eur. J. Wildl. Res. 2019, 65, 67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  52. Jiguet, F.; Kardynal, K.J.; Piha, M.; Seimola, T.; Copete, J.L.; Czajkowski, M.A.; Dombrovski, V.; Efrat, R.; Minkevicius, S.; Raković, M.; et al. Stable Isotopes Reveal the Common Winter Moult of Central Rectrices in a Long-Distance Migrant Songbird. J. Ornithol. 2019, 160, 1077–1085. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Franzoi, A.; Bontempo, L.; Kardynal, K.J.; Camin, F.; Pedrini, P.; Hobson, K.A. Natal Origins and Timing of Migration of Two Passerine Species through the Southern Alps: Inferences from Multiple Stable Isotopes (δ 2 H, δ 13 C, δ 15 N, δ 34 S) and Ringing Data. Ibis 2020, 162, 293–306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Pârâu, L.G.; Wink, M. Common Patterns in the Molecular Phylogeography of Western Palearctic Birds: A Comprehensive Review. J. Ornithol. 2021, 162, 937–959. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Wang, E.; Zhang, D.; Braun, M.S.; Hotz-Wagenblatt, A.; Pärt, T.; Arlt, D.; Schmaljohann, H.; Bairlein, F.; Lei, F.; Wink, M. Can Mitogenomes of the Northern Wheatear (Oenanthe oenanthe) Reconstruct Its Phylogeography and Reveal the Origin of Migrant Birds? Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 9290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Tryjanowski, P.; Goławski, A.; Kuźniak, S.; Mokwa, T.; Antczak, M. Disperse or Stay? Exceptionally High Breeding-Site Infidelity in the Red-Backed Shrike Lanius collurio. Ardea 2007, 95, 316–320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  57. Ottenburghs, J.; Lavretsky, P.; Peters, J.L.; Kawakami, T.; Kraus, R.H.S. Population Genomics and Phylogeography. In Avian Genomics in Ecology and Evolution; Kraus, R.H.S., Ed.; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2019; pp. 237–265. [Google Scholar]
  58. Foote, A.D.; Martin, M.D.; Louis, M.; Pacheco, G.; Robertson, K.M.; Sinding, M.-H.S.; Amaral, A.R.; Baird, R.W.; Baker, C.S.; Ballance, L.; et al. Killer Whale Genomes Reveal a Complex History of Recurrent Admixture and Vicariance. Mol. Ecol. 2019, 28, 3427–3444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Skovrind, M.; Olsen, M.T.; Vieira, F.G.; Pacheco, G.; Carl, H.; Gilbert, M.T.P.; Møller, P.R. Genomic Population Structure of Freshwater-Resident and Anadromous Ide (Leuciscus idus) in North-Western Europe. Ecol. Evol. 2016, 6, 1064–1074. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Krebs, J.E.; Goldstein, E.S.; Kilpatrick, S.T. Lewin’s Genes XII; Jones & Bartlett Learning: Burlington, MA, USA, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  61. Kelleher, J.; Wong, Y.; Wohns, A.W.; Fadil, C.; Albers, P.K.; McVean, G. Inferring Whole-Genome Histories in Large Population Datasets. Nat. Genet. 2019, 51, 1330–1338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Excoffier, L.; Heckel, G. Computer Programs for Population Genetics Data Analysis: A Survival Guide. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2006, 7, 745–758. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Stamatakis, A. Population and Evolutionary Genetic Inferences in the Whole-Genome Era: Software Challenges. In Population Genomics; Rajora, O.P., Ed.; Springer Nature: Cham, Switzerland, 2019; pp. 161–175. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. Map with countries from which we obtained samples, as well as the total number of samples per country.
Figure 1. Map with countries from which we obtained samples, as well as the total number of samples per country.
Diversity 14 00216 g001
Figure 2. Schematic representation of our complete NGS data analysis workflow.
Figure 2. Schematic representation of our complete NGS data analysis workflow.
Diversity 14 00216 g002
Figure 3. PCA containing both breeding and migratory individuals included in our dataset. Breeding birds are represented by circles, while migratory individuals are distinguished by triangles (Israel) and squares (Kuwait).
Figure 3. PCA containing both breeding and migratory individuals included in our dataset. Breeding birds are represented by circles, while migratory individuals are distinguished by triangles (Israel) and squares (Kuwait).
Diversity 14 00216 g003
Figure 4. Admixture analysis (K = 7), containing the 11 populations in our dataset. In each row, the number of colours indicates the possible number of subgroups in the dataset (as indicated on the y axis).
Figure 4. Admixture analysis (K = 7), containing the 11 populations in our dataset. In each row, the number of colours indicates the possible number of subgroups in the dataset (as indicated on the y axis).
Diversity 14 00216 g004
Figure 5. Maximum likelihood phylogenetic tree based on the chromosome Z SNPs from both breeding and migrant individuals. Migrant individuals from Israel and Kuwait are highlighted with a red rectangle.
Figure 5. Maximum likelihood phylogenetic tree based on the chromosome Z SNPs from both breeding and migrant individuals. Migrant individuals from Israel and Kuwait are highlighted with a red rectangle.
Diversity 14 00216 g005
Figure 6. Maximum likelihood phylogenetic tree based on the chromosome Z SNPs, only from breeding individuals.
Figure 6. Maximum likelihood phylogenetic tree based on the chromosome Z SNPs, only from breeding individuals.
Diversity 14 00216 g006
Table 1. Average quality values of the 88 whole-genome sequences.
Table 1. Average quality values of the 88 whole-genome sequences.
Raw ReadsRaw BasesClean ReadsClean BasesRead LengthQ30 Percent
Average64,015,48119,204,644,28663,883,75319,165,126,023150;15094.00;91.22
Table 2. Fst values for Admixture analysis, considering each of the 11 countries as possible populations.
Table 2. Fst values for Admixture analysis, considering each of the 11 countries as possible populations.
BulgariaCzechRepGermanyIsraelKuwaitLatviaNorwayPolandRomaniaRussiaSweden
Bulgaria
CzechRep0.102
Germany0.0740.095
Israel0.0930.1130.085
Kuwait0.0720.0930.0640.083
Latvia0.0820.1030.0740.0930.072
Norway0.0640.0850.0560.0750.0540.064
Poland0.0670.0870.0590.0780.0570.0670.049
Romania0.0670.0870.0590.0770.0570.0670.0480.052
Russia0.0770.0970.0690.0870.0670.0770.0590.0620.061
Sweden0.0690.0900.0610.0800.0590.0690.0510.0540.0530.063
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Pârâu, L.G.; Wang, E.; Wink, M. Red-Backed Shrike Lanius collurio Whole-Genome Sequencing Reveals Population Genetic Admixture. Diversity 2022, 14, 216. https://doi.org/10.3390/d14030216

AMA Style

Pârâu LG, Wang E, Wink M. Red-Backed Shrike Lanius collurio Whole-Genome Sequencing Reveals Population Genetic Admixture. Diversity. 2022; 14(3):216. https://doi.org/10.3390/d14030216

Chicago/Turabian Style

Pârâu, Liviu G., Erjia Wang, and Michael Wink. 2022. "Red-Backed Shrike Lanius collurio Whole-Genome Sequencing Reveals Population Genetic Admixture" Diversity 14, no. 3: 216. https://doi.org/10.3390/d14030216

APA Style

Pârâu, L. G., Wang, E., & Wink, M. (2022). Red-Backed Shrike Lanius collurio Whole-Genome Sequencing Reveals Population Genetic Admixture. Diversity, 14(3), 216. https://doi.org/10.3390/d14030216

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop