Next Article in Journal
Statistical Assessment of Phenol Biodegradation by a Metal-Tolerant Binary Consortium of Indigenous Antarctic Bacteria
Next Article in Special Issue
Comparative Analysis of Apopellia endiviifolia Plastomes Reveals a Strikingly High Level of Differentiation between Its Terrestrial and Water Form
Previous Article in Journal
Zooshikella harenae sp. nov., Isolated from Pacific Oyster Crassostrea gigas, and Establishment of Zooshikella ganghwensis subsp. marina subsp. nov. and Zooshikella ganghwensis subsp. ganghwensis subsp. nov.
Previous Article in Special Issue
The Placenta of Physcomitrium patens: Transfer Cell Wall Polymers Compared across the Three Bryophyte Groups
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Diversity
Volume 13
Issue 12
10.3390/d13120642
diversity-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Seasonal Changes in the Photosynthetic Activity of Terrestrial Lichens and Mosses in the Lichen Scots Pine Forest Habitat

by
Michał H. Węgrzyn
*,
Patrycja Fałowska
,
Karima Alzayany
,
Karolina Waszkiewicz
,
Patrycja Dziurowicz
and
Paulina Wietrzyk-Pełka
Laboratory of Polar Research, Institute of Botany, Faculty of Biology, Jagiellonian University, Gronostajowa 3, 30-387 Kraków, Poland
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Diversity 2021, 13(12), 642; https://doi.org/10.3390/d13120642
Submission received: 2 September 2021 / Revised: 29 November 2021 / Accepted: 1 December 2021 / Published: 3 December 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Taxonomy, Diversity and Evolution of Bryophytes)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Photosynthetic activity is one of the most important metabolic processes that can be quickly and easily studied in the field. It can be used for identifying the environmental factors affecting ecosystem balance, as any stressor influencing metabolic and physiological processes will have a measurable effect on photosynthesis. The aim of this study was to measure the photosynthetic activity of selected lichens and mosses and investigate its changes resulted from diurnal and seasonal variability. We studied two lichens (Cladonia mitis Sandst and Cladonia uncialis (L.) Weber ex F.H. Wigg.) and two mosses (Pleurozium schreberi (Willd. ex Brid.) Mitt. and Dicranum scoparium (L.) Hedw.). Samples were collected in the area of lichen Scots pine forest of the “Bory Tucholskie” National Park. Our study revealed that the photosynthetic activity of cryptogams depended on species, season, time of the day, and water availability. Cladonia species, which are the main component of lichen Scots pine forests, have higher photosynthetic activity than Pleurozium schreberi, which represents species of fresh coniferous forests. Photosynthetic activity increased from spring through summer and reached the highest values in autumn. It was also higher in soaked samples collected in the morning and afternoon compared to noon. Despite the water access, noon samples still showed the lowest activity. This can result from natural changes in humidity during the day to which cryptogams are well-adapted.

1. Introduction

For many years, science has been searching for tools to assess the conservation status of habitats and identify the main environmental factors stabilizing or disturbing the balance of the ecosystems, so-called ecosystems’ health, or ecosystems’ function [1,2,3]. In relation to plants, the influence of various unfavorable environmental conditions (stressors) on their physiological condition and development in the forest habitat was previously investigated [4,5,6,7,8]. Plants possess many complex mechanisms that help them to adapt to environmental conditions and survive despite the impacts of various stressors [9,10,11,12,13]. Photosynthetic activity, as one of the most important metabolic processes, is a good indicator for the assessment of the influence of environmental factors, because it can be very quickly examined in the field [14]. Its measurements are based on recordings of chlorophyll a fluorescence, i.e., the re-emission of light energy absorbed by the energy antennas of the photosynthetic apparatus [15,16,17,18].
Solar radiation in the range of 400–700 nm is defined as photosynthetically active radiation (PAR) [19,20,21,22]. The photosynthetic pigments, chlorophylls, and carotenoids (localized in light-harvesting complexes (LHCs)) are responsible for the absorption of radiation. Only part of the energy captured by them is used up [23,24]. Some of it is lost as heat or emitted as chlorophyll fluorescence [25]. The chlorophyll fluorescence induction is termed as the Kautsky kinetics [26]. The emission of fluorescence takes place in chloroplasts and is related to all other metabolic and physiological processes within the plant cell. Hence, any change in the environment that impacts these processes will also affect the photosynthesis [25,26,27].
As a result of the chlorophyll fluorescence signal measurement, the FV/FM value is obtained—the maximum photochemical efficiency of photosystem II [27]. This parameter is considered as a reliable measure of the photochemical activity of the photosynthetic apparatus.
Research on the mechanisms of chlorophyll fluorescence activation in lichens and mosses and the influence of factors causing stress on cryptogam photosynthesis have been previously carried out in laboratory conditions on various species belonging to different ecological groups [28]. They are theoretically based on the assumptions of photosynthetic activity of vascular plants [29]. However, the CO2 exchange patterns of lichens and mosses differ from those of vascular plants [30]. Lichens and mosses have simple thallus structures and little control over water loss. This has a strong impact on the biochemical metabolic processes which are only active when cryptogams are wet [31].
Apart from access to water, seasonal variation of climate may also cause significant changes in photosynthetic functioning [32,33]. However, only a few studies were devoted to this issue and considered the variability of photosynthetic activity over a longer period. Regarding terrestrial lichens, only Veres et al. [33] indicated such changes. In the case of mosses, such studies are also scarce [34]. In majority, they focus on the phenomenon of high resistance of mosses to long periods of dehydration, which is related to the theory that mosses as first land plants faced extremely dry conditions when moving to the terrestrial habitat [34]. In many of these studies, samples of mosses and lichens have been collected and soaked before measurement photosynthetic activity e.g., [28].
Such research never has not been carried out in the protected lichen Scots pine forests habitat, even though its favorable conservation status depends on habitat factors (such as temperature, humidity and solar energy which shapes the forest) [35].
The lichen Scots pine forests are semi-natural-type communities with a lichen-rich field layer. They occur in the places with extremely poor and dry conditions associated with a specific substrate formation in the last glacial age [36,37]. It is also believed that anthropogenic factors, such as cattle grazing, litter raking (pine needles, pinecones, and small branches), deforestation, and clear felling (removal of all wood from the forest), had a crucial influence on the development of these habitats. Unfortunately, a rapid disappearance of lichen Scots pine forests resulted from strong eutrophication processes of forest substrate has been observed for several years. Preventing the loss of these habitats is an important issue, as Scots pine forests are protected by EU legislation as the Natura 2000 habitat (No. 91T0) [38,39]. We conducted research in the area of Bory Tucholskie (N Poland), which is currently a large forest complex covering the post-glacial sandy areas of the sanders of the Brda and Wda rivers, where Scots pine forests are still present [40]. One of its aims, to which this paper is dedicated, was to determine the photosynthetic activity of selected species of lichens (Cladonia mitis Sandst and Cladonia uncialis (L.) Weber ex F.H. Wigg.) and mosses (Pleurozium schreberi (Willd. ex Brid.) Mitt. and Dicranum scoparium (L.) Hedw.) in the field condition, as well as to investigate impact of seasonal and diurnal variability on this parameter. C. mitis, C. uncialis, and D. scoparium are characteristic species for lichen Scots pine forest habitat [35]. They are heliophytes that prefer forest habitats with a low tree cover. This results in greater amounts of solar light and heat energy reaching the substrate, and, in turn, this lowers the humidity conditions of the air and substrate [40]. On the other hand, P. schreberi is characteristic for the fresh form of pine forest [35] and prefers more shaded and moister habitats [41]. These species have been very common in all 20 study plots.
As our study area in previous years was subjected to active protection activities in order to provide habitat conditions favorable for terricolous lichens’ development, we assumed that present conditions are not optimal for mosses [35,40]. Existing findings indicate that the photosynthetic activity of both groups depends on water availability, which changes during the day [40]. To test this, we divided our samples into two groups: soaked and non-soaked (measured directly in field conditions). Species might uptake water first from a morning dew [33,41]. During the day, air humidity gradually decreases; thus, we assume that the studied species present the highest photosynthetic activity in the morning [35,40]. Since the air temperatures differ from highest in summer, lower in autumn, and the lowest in spring [35,40], we expected them to affect the photosynthetic activity of lichens and mosses. We set the following hypotheses: (1) the soaked thalli of selected lichens and mosses show higher photosynthetic activity compared to non-soaked thalli, (2) the photosynthetic activity of species differs between the seasons and is the highest in autumn, (3) the photosynthetic activity of lichens is higher than it is for mosses in all of the studied seasons, and (4) photosynthetic activity of all species is higher in the morning and afternoon than at noon.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Fieldwork with Measurement of the Maximum Quantum Efficiency of PSII Photochemistry in Lichens and Mosses

In 2020, during spring, summer, and autumn, measurements of photosynthetic activity in selected two lichens (Cladonia mitis Sandst. and Cladonia uncialis (L.) Weber ex F.H. Wigg.) and two mosses (Pleurozium schreberi (Willd. ex Brid.) Mitt. and Dicranum scoparium (L.) Hedw.) were conducted in the field. The winter period was not included in the research, due to the snow cover. The research was carried out in the experimental area of lichen Scots pine forest of “Bory Tucholskie” National Park (stand No. 18 and 19) established in 2017 (Figure 1). In this area, 25 plots were randomly marked in the field by a benchmark. From among 25 plots, 20 plots containing all 4 selected species of lichens and mosses were randomly chosen (Figure 1). In the designated periods (spring = June, summer = July, and autumn = September) and time (at 9:00 a.m., 12:00 a.m., and 3:00 p.m.), two samples of each lichen and moss species were randomly taken from each plot: (A) The first sample (ca. 2 g) was placed in conical tubes (5 mL) filled with rainwater for a period of 2 h, and after this, time measurements were taken. Thallus watering aimed to uniformly hydrate samples for measurements. This provided a similar level of thallus hydration. (B) The second sample was measured directly after harvesting without treatment. All measurements were carried out on samples collected after 2 days without rain to ensure a similar dryness of the non-soaked samples. Altogether, 40 samples of each selected species were collected once on a given day and at a given time (20 of them were soaked and 20 non-soaked). The measurements were performed with the use of Handy PEA+ fluorometer of (Handy PEA, Hansatech Instrument Ltd., King’s Lynn, Norfolk, UK). We used the prompt fluorescence (PF) method [42]. The measurements were performed after adapting the sample in the dark for approximately 15 min [43]. This was performed to extinguish the reaction of the light phase of photosynthesis. After adaptation, each sample was irradiated with continuous light with a wavelength shorter than 670 nm. During the irradiation, the photodetector registered the chlorophyll fluorescence in the range of 680–760 nm. After the measurement, the FV/FM ratio was recorded, namely the maximum photochemical efficiency of photosystem II, which is considered as the most reliable measure of the photochemical activity of the photosynthetic apparatus [29].

2.2. Statistical Analysis

Two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), followed by Tukey’s HSD (Honestly Significant Difference) test for equal sample size (p < 0.05), was performed to reveal significant differences in FV/FM between the following pairs of variables: (a) species (C. mitis, C. uncialis, D. scoparium, and P. schreberi) and sample type (soaked or non-soaked) (including soaked and non-soaked samples, N = 4320); (b) species and season (spring, summer, and autumn) (including only soaked samples N = 2160); and (c) species and daytime (9:00 a.m., 12:00 a.m., 3:00 p.m.) (including only soaked samples, N = 2160). Prior to the analysis, the normality of the distribution was verified by using the Kolmogorov–Smirnov test (p > 0.05), and Levene’s test (p > 0.05) was performed to assess the equality of variances.

3. Results

Species and sample type, as well as the interaction between these factors, significantly affected FV/FM (Table 1 and Figure 2). All soaked samples showed higher values of FV/FM compared to non-soaked samples; however, these differences were not always significant (Figure 2). The FV/FM of soaked C. mitis, C. uncialis, D. scoparium, and P. schreberi reached a significantly higher value than the FV/FM of non-soaked P. schreberi. Within same species, soaked and non-soaked samples significantly differed only in the case of C. mitis and P. schreberi (Figure 2).
Species and season as well as interaction between these factors significantly affected FV/FM (Table 1; Figure 3). In case of all analysed species, FV/FM was lowest in spring, increased in summer and reached higher values in autumn (Figure 3). FV/FM of C. mitis and P. schreberi significantly differed between spring, summer, and autumn (Figure 3). For C. uncialis and D. scoparium, there was no significant difference between summer and autumn FV/FM values, however the spring FV/FM values significantly differed from summer and autumn (Figure 3). FV/FM of P. schreberi collected in spring showed the lowest FV/FM, which significantly differed from FV/FM of other species collected in all seasons (Figure 3).
Concerning the effect of species and daytime, both of these variables influenced FV/FM; however, the interaction between them was not significant (Table 1 and Figure 4). Only FV/FM of P. schreberi was significantly lower compared to the FV/FM of C. mitis, C. uncialis, and D. scoparium (Figure 4). In the case of daytime, the FV/FM significantly differed between 12:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. (Figure 4). For all species FV/FM decreased from 9:00 a.m. to 12:00 a.m. and then increased at 3:00 p.m. (Figure 4).

4. Discussion

Under optimal vascular plant-growth conditions, the FV/FM value is ca. 0.85 relative units [44], but for lichens, it always shows maximal values of ca. 0.6–0.7 FV/FM [45]. Recent studies have shown that environmental stress caused by, for example, increased content of heavy metals, can cause FV/FM values to reach even 0.77 [28]. Our study showed similar results for lichens species (0.79 in autumn season). A lower value of this parameter indicates the occurrence of stress, manifested in the form of photo-inhibition [44,46]. Very low values of this parameter (0.2–0.3) indicate irreversible changes in the PSII structure [44,46]. However, it was noticed that FV/FM is not proportional to the intensity of photosynthesis (expressed by CO2 assimilation or O2 release) [47]. It has also been proven that FV/FM is not sensitive to certain stresses, such as drought [27]. Lichens and mosses occur in all the plant zones of the Earth. They can live in habitats characterized by extreme conditions. Lichens are known to be extremely tolerant to drought stress and low and high temperatures [48,49,50]. Due to their features, they are considered pioneer species having important roles in the process of primary succession where habitat conditions are especially severe [51,52,53].
Cryptogams, especially lichens and mosses, are important organisms in the structure and function of the plant habitats because they are a form of ecotone that divides the aboveground and belowground as insulator and filter [31,35]. This is crucial for lichen Scots pine forests, where the appropriate development of the lichen-rich baseground together with healthy functioning of cryptogams allows for the maintenance of the ecosystem’s balance and, thus, the proper state of habitat preservation. We found that species and sample type, as well as the interaction between these factors, significantly affected FV/FM. The rehydrated specimens had a higher FV/FM, but differences were statistically significant only between Cl. mitis and P. schreberi. Thus, our hypothesis on difference in photosynthetic activity between soaked and non-soaked samples was only partly confirmed. Nevertheless, our results showed the importance of the hydration of the tested samples before measurement of physiological parameters and drawing conclusions on condition and functioning.
In the case of lichens, thallus hydration is especially important, because the spaces between the hyphae in core layer are filled with water and the not-scattered light can reach the photobionts layer. The type of green algae photobiont clearly determines lichen reactions to air humidity; for example, lichens with Trentepohlia-type photobionts showed higher FV/FM in lower hydration condition than those with Trebouxia-type photobionts [54]. The effect of the relative humidity (RH) factors on the trebouxioid lichens varied among species, yet they generally attained the highest FV/FM when RH reaches 95% [54]. The coccomyxoid lichens (like those used in our study) had the weakest overall response to steam reactivation and may be better adapted to exploiting liquid water sources [54]. Previous research showed that, regardless of the photobiont type, the highest FV/FM values were reached at an RH above 95% [54].
Compared to lichens, mosses have been mainly studied in terms of desiccation tolerance [55,56,57]. Mosses showed varying levels of desiccation tolerance, allowing them to occur in more extreme and unstable habitats; however, there are also species that are moderately dry-tolerant and those which poorly tolerate dry periods [56]. It was previously shown that P. schreberi and D. scoparium are presenting the variability of drying tolerance with seasonal patterns of tolerance to desiccation, which decreases in spring and fall and increases in mid-summer and winter. Our results did not fully support these findings. They showed an increase in FV/FM activity in all species from low in spring to medium in summer and high in autumn. However, a decrease in this activity in the autumn may only take place after a drastic drop in temperature and first frosts, which appear in the study area only in November. Our high FV/FM values for the autumn also did not agree with the results of seasonal activity of Syntrichia ruralis Hedw. [58]. In the autumn, the FV/FM of this species was also slightly lower than the values for the summer period, but the measurements were made in October, while ours we made at the turn of September/October, and this might be a reason for the differences. In general, the photosynthetic activity in the studied species of lichens and mosses changed with the seasons. However, we found the highest photosynthetic activity to be in the fall, at the end of September; and this was agreed with our assumptions and other studies, such as References [33,59].
Kinetic activation is an important property of the photosynthetic apparatus and photosynthetic (PSII) activity response to environmental conditions, such as water availability [60]. Distinguishing between the reactions of lichens to rain and humidity revealed that their ability to utilize each of these water sources strongly influenced both their total wetting time and the activity performed [60]. In our opinion, kinetic activation is directly related to desiccation tolerance, as only those species with rapid activation can retain high photosynthetic activity in dry areas, where rain falls sporadically and for a very short time [61]. The lichen Scots pine forest belongs to a dry habitat, not because of rarely falling rains, but because of the type of well-drained sandy soils. Due to this type of substrate, water escapes very quickly, causing rapid drying of the surface. Both the lichens and mosses growing in this habitat must have fast kinetic activation. The lichen species taken for our study are the most characteristic species for lichen Scots pine forest habitat, in contrast to P. schreberi, which represents the species of the coniferous forests (Vaccinio-Piceetea Br.-Bl. 1939), where the substrate temperatures are lower, and the humidity is higher compared to lichen Scots pine forests. D. scoparium prefers drier habitats, e.g., dry heaths (Pohlio-Callunion Shimwell 1973 em. Brzeg 1981), and therefore it tolerates very well extreme temperature and humidity changes of lichen Scots pine forest. It is worth noting that studied species represent different growth forms; that is, lichens belong to fruticulose species, while D. scoparium and P. schreberi represent short turf and weft, respectively [30,62]. Probably, this factor might also influence kinetic activity of species; however, this issue requires further study.
Our results for soaked samples clearly showed that lichens had higher photosynthetic activity through all studied seasons than mosses. Only D. scoparium showed higher photosynthetic activity in the summer and autumn, as compared to lichens. Thus, our fourth hypothesis on higher photosynthetic activity of lichens than mosses through all seasons was partially confirmed. Nevertheless, our results confirmed the different habitat preferences of individual species.
Interestingly, all studied species showed the highest photosynthetic activity at 9:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Photosynthetic activity at noon in relation to data from all three seasons showed the lowest values. This confirmed our last hypothesis on highest photosynthetic activity of all species in the mornings and afternoons. It should be emphasized that these results were obtained for soaked samples. This might indicate that cryptogams are coded for a decrease in photosynthetic activity at noon. Even in a situation where the availability of water appears at noon (simulated as a two-hour soaking period), they do not react anyway. In the morning and afternoon, the air humidity is the highest [35], while at noon, when the air temperature is the highest, the humidity drops rapidly. The scale of this phenomenon in the lichen Scots pine forest habitat changes over the seasons, from low differences in spring to high differences in summer and autumn [35]. Probably, this pattern is preserved in the photosynthetic activity of the studied species and showed. It is also worth to noting that lichens with green algae photobiont are dependent on air humidity/water vapour [49], and those with cyanobacteria needs liquid water [63]. Faster activation of photosynthesis in lichens with eukaryotic algae may result from easier penetration of water into the photosynthetic system. In the case of cyanobacteria, more water is necessary because of the rehydration period, which is required to imbibe polysaccharides sheaths of cyanobacterial cells with water [64]. Species selected for this study are the trebouxioid lichens, and they have Asterochloris sp. green algae photobiont [65].
We are aware that other factors that are not included in these studies may affect the variability of photosynthetic activity during the year. However, we conducted research directly in the field, and this allowed us to measure the response of species in their natural environment. Our study revealed the existence of differences in photosynthetic activity of selected cryptogams of lichen Scots pine forest. We can conclude that, as a part of the active protection of this habitat, the availability of water expected by diagnostic species can be regulated by the alternation of basic factors, such as light and temperature. This, in turn, affects the photosynthetic activity and the viability of cryptogams that are dominant components of protected lichen Scots pine forests.

5. Conclusions

Our study provides insight into the photosynthetic activity (FV/FM) of selected cryptogam species. The obtained results showed that it is closely correlated and dependent on both the time of the day and the season. Cladonia species and D. scoparium (which are main component of lichen-rich Scots pine forests) tended to have higher photosynthetic activity values than P. schreberi. This moss represents species of coniferous forests, but at the same time, it successively displaces Cladonia species in the field layer of lichen Scots pine forests.
During the day, photosynthesis of all studied species was the lowest at noon, while its highest values were recorded in the afternoon. Throughout the year, FV/FM reached the lowest values in spring, intermediate values in summer, and the highest values in autumn.
For both moss and lichen species, higher FV/FM values were shown for soaked samples than non-soaked, and this outcome is directly linked with water availability. It is worth noticing that, despite the presence of water, samples collected at noon still exhibited the lowest FV/FM when compared to samples collected in the morning and afternoon. This is most likely connected with cryptogam adaptations to humidity fluctuations during the day; they are high in the morning and afternoons, but then they decrease at noon.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.H.W. and P.W.-P.; methodology, M.H.W. and P.W.-P.; formal analysis, M.H.W., P.F., K.A., K.W, P.D. and P.W.-P.; investigation, M.H.W., P.F., K.A., K.W. and P.D.; writing—original draft preparation, M.H.W., P.F., K.A., K.W., P.D. and P.W.-P.; writing—review and editing, M.H.W. and P.W.-P.; visualization, M.H.W. and P.W.-P.; supervision, M.H.W.; project administration, M.H.W.; funding acquisition, M.H.W. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Forest Fund of the State Forests, grant number EZ.0290.1.13.2020.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to Janusz Kochanowski Director of “Bory Tucholskie” National Park for agreeing to conduct research in the national park; to Agnieszka Turowska from “Bory Tucholskie” National Park for all assistance during the implementation of the project and assistance in conducting field research; and to anonymous reviewers for their very valuable suggestions and remarks on manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript; or in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. Noss, R.F. Assessing and monitoring forest biodiversity: A suggested framework and indicators. For. Ecol. Manag. 1999, 115, 135–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. McCune, B. Lichen communities as indicators of forest health. Bryologist 2000, 103, 353–356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Will-Wolf, S.; Esseen, P.A.; Neitlich, P. Monitoring biodiversity and ecosystem function: Forests. In Monitoring with Lichens–Monitoring Lichens; Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2002; pp. 203–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Aber, J.; Neilson, R.P.; McNulty, S.; Lenihan, J.M.; Bachelet, D.; Drapek, R.J. Forest processes and global environmental change: Predicting the effects of individual and multiple stressors: We review the effects of several rapidly changing environmental drivers on ecosystem function, discuss interactions among them, and summarize predicted changes in productivity, carbon storage, and water balance. BioScience 2001, 51, 735–751. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Lowman, M.D.; Schowalter, T.D. Plant science in forest canopies–the first 30 years of advances and challenges (1980–2010). New Phytol. 2012, 194, 12–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Russell, B.D.; Connell, S.D. Origins and consequences of global and local stressors: Incorporating climatic and non-climatic phenomena that buffer or accelerate ecological change. Mar. Biol. 2012, 159, 2633–2639. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Valladares, F.; Laanisto, L.; Niinemets, Ü.; Zavala, M.A. Shedding light on shade: Ecological perspectives of understory plant life. Plant Ecol. Divers. 2016, 9, 237–251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Alba, C.; Fahey, C.; Flory, S.L. Global change stressors alter resources and shift plant interactions from facilitation to competition over time. Ecology 2019, 100, e02859. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Lichtenthaler, H.K. Vegetation stress: An introduction to the stress concept in plants. J. Plant Physiol. 1996, 148, 4–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Hofmann, G.E.; Todgham, A.E. Living in the now: Physiological mechanisms to tolerate a rapidly changing environment. Annu. Rev. Genet. 2010, 72, 127–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  11. Rejeb, I.B.; Pastor, V.; Mauch-Mani, B. Plant responses to simultaneous biotic and abiotic stress: Molecular mechanisms. Plants 2014, 3, 458–475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Pereira, A. Plant abiotic stress challenges from the changing environment. Front. Plant Sci. 2016, 7, 1123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  13. Raza, A.; Ashraf, F.; Zou, X.; Zhang, X.; Tosif, H. Plant adaptation and tolerance to environmental stresses: Mechanisms and perspectives. In Plant Ecophysiology and Adaptation under Climate Change: Mechanisms and Perspectives I; Springer: Singapore, 2020; pp. 117–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. William, W.A., III; Deming-Adams, B. Chlorophyll Fluorescence as a Tool to Monitor Plant Response to the Environment. In Chlorophyll a Fluorescence; Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2004; pp. 583–604. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Bolhàr-Nordenkampf, H.R.; Öquist, G. Chlorophyll fluorescence as a tool in photosynthesis research. In Photosynthesis and Production in a Changing Environment; Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 1993; pp. 193–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Cosgrove, J.; Borowitzka, M.A. Chlorophyll fluorescence terminology: An introduction. In Chlorophyll a Fluorescence in Aquatic Sciences: Methods and Applications; Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2010; pp. 1–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Nikolić, B.R.; Pavlović, D.M.; Đurović, S.; Waisi, H.; Marisavljević, D.; Anđelković, A. Chlorophyll as a measure of plant health: Agroecological aspects. Pestic. Fitomed. 2014, 29, 21–34. [Google Scholar]
  18. Adak, M.K. Analysis of chlorophyll fluorescence: A reliable technique in determination of stress on plants. In Eco-friendly Agro-biological Techniques for Enhancing Crop Productivity; Springer: Singapore, 2018; pp. 63–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. McCree, K.J. The measurement of photosynthetically active radiation. Solar Energy 1973, 15, 83–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. McCree, K.J. Photosynthetically active radiation. In Physiological Plant Ecology I; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 1981; pp. 4–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Wandji Nyamsi, W.; Espinar, B.; Blanc, P.; Wald, L. Estimating the photosynthetically active radiation under clear skies by means of a new approach. Adv. Sci. Res. 2015, 12, 5–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Zhen, S.; Bugbee, B. Far-red photons have equivalent efficiency to traditional photosynthetic photons: Implications for redefining photosynthetically active radiation. Plant Cell Environ. 2020, 43, 1259–1272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Grossman, A.R.; Bhaya, D.; Apt, K.E.; Kehoe, D.M. Light-harvesting complexes in oxygenic photosynthesis: Diversity, control, and evolution. Annu. Rev. Genet. 1995, 29, 231–288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Schmid, V.H. Light-harvesting complexes of vascular plants. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 2008, 65, 361–3639. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Kalaji, H.M.; Schansker, G.; Ladle, R.J.; Goltsev, V.; Bosa, K.; Allakhverdiev, S.; Brestic, M.; Bussotti, F.; Calatayud, A.; Dąbrowski, P.; et al. Frequently asked questions about in vivo chlorophyll fluorescence: Practical issues. Photosynth. Res. 2014, 122, 121–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Kautsky, H.; Hirsch, A. Neue versuche zur kohlensäureassimilation. Naturwissenschaften 1931, 19, 964. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Chukhutsina, V.U.; Holzwarth, A.R.; Croce, R. Time-resolved fluorescence measurements on leaves: Principles and recent developments. Photosynth. Res. 2019, 140, 355–369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Rola, K.; Latkowska, E.; Myśliwa-Kurdziel, B.; Osyczka, P. Heavy-metal tolerance of photobiont in pioneer lichens inhabiting heavily polluted sites. Sci. Total Environ. 2019, 679, 260–269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Coe, R.A.; Lin, H.C. Light-Response Curves in Land Plants. Photosynthesis 2018, 1770, 83–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Longton, R.E. The role of bryophyte and lichens in terrestrial ecosystems. In Bryophyte and Lichens in a Changing Environment Oxford; Bates, J.W., Farmer, A.M., Eds.; Clarendon Press: Oxford, UK, 1992; pp. 32–76. [Google Scholar]
  31. Sveinbjörnsson, B.; Sonesson, M. Photosynthesis and respiration in mosses and lichens. Glob. Change Arctic Terrest. Ecosyst. 1997, 124, 113–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Lange, O.; Green, T.G. Photosynthetic performance of a foliose lichen of biological soil-crust communities: Long-term monitoring of the CO2 exchange of Cladonia convoluta under temperate habitat conditions. Bibl. Lichenol. 2003, 86, 257–280. [Google Scholar]
  33. Veres, K.; Farkas, E.; Csintalan, Z. The bright and shaded side of duneland life: The photosynthetic response of lichens to seasonal changes is species-specific. Mycol. Prog. 2020, 19, 629–641. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Tuba, Z.; Csintalan, Z.; Proctor, M.C. Photosynthetic responses of a moss Tortula ruralis ssp. ruralis, and the lichens Cladonia convoluta and C. furcata to water deficit and short periods of desiccation and their ecophysiological significance: A baseline study at present-day concentration. New Phytol. 1996, 133, 353–361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Węgrzyn, M.H.; Fałowska, P.; Kołodziejczyk, J.; Alzayany, K.; Wężyk, P.; Zięba-Kulawik, K.; Hawryło, P.; Turowska, A.; Grzesiak, B.; Lipnicki, L.; et al. Tree height as the main factor causing disappearance of the terricolous lichens in the lichen Scots pine forests. Sci. Total Environ. 2021, 771, 144834. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Mangerud, J.; Jakobsson, M.; Alexanderson, H.; Astakhov, V.; Clarke, G.K.; Henriksen, H.C.; Krinner, G.; Lunkka, J.P.; Möller, P.; Murray, A.; et al. Ice-dammed lakes and rerouting of the drainage of northern Eurasia during the Last Glaciation. Quat. Sci. Rev. 2004, 23, 1313–1332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Słowiński, M.; Błaszkiewicz, M.; Brauer, A.; Noryśkiewicz, B.; Ott, F.; Tyszkowski, S. The role of melting dead ice on landscape transformation in the early Holocene in Tuchola Pinewoods, North Poland. Quat. Int. 2015, 388, 64–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Directive, H. Council Directive 92/43/EEC of 21 May 1992 on the conservation of natural habitats and of wild fauna and flora. Off. J. Europ Commun. 1992, 206, 7–50. [Google Scholar]
  39. Kolbek, J.; Chytrý, M.; Kučera, T.; Kočí, M.; Grulich, V.; Lustyk, P. Suché Bory—dry pine forests. In Katalog Biotopu Cēské Republiky, 2nd ed.; Agentura Ochrany Přírody a Krajiny ČR: Prague, Czech Republic, 2010; pp. 331–334. [Google Scholar]
  40. Węgrzyn, M.H.; Kołodziejczyk, J.; Fałowska, P.; Wężyk, P.; Zięba-Kulawik, K.; Szostak, M.; Turowska, A.; Grzesiak, B.; Wietrzyk-Pełka, P. Influence of the environmental factors on the species composition of lichen Scots pine forests as a guide to maintain the community (Bory Tucholskie National Park, Poland). Glob. Ecol. Conserv. 2020, 22C, e01017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Tobias, M.; Niinemets, Ü. Acclimation of photosynthetic characteristics of the moss Pleurozium schreberi to among-habitat and within-canopy light gradients. Plant Biol. 2010, 12, 743–754. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Kalaji, H.M.; Rastogi, A.; Živčák, M.; Brestic, M.; Daszkowska-Golec, A.; Sitko, K.; Alsharafa, K.Y.; Lotfi, R.; Stypiński, P.; Samborska, I.A.; et al. Prompt chlorophyll fluorescence as a tool for crop phenotyping: An example of barley landraces exposed to various abiotic stress factors. Photosynthetica 2018, 56, 953–961. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  43. Schansker, G.; Tóth, S.Z.; Strasser, R.J. Dark-recovery of the Chl a fluorescence transient (OJIP) after light adaptation: The qT- component of non-photochemical quenching is related to an activated photosystem I acceptor side. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2006, 1757, 787–797. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  44. Angelini, G.; Ragni, P.; Esposito, D.; Giardi, P.; Pompili, M.L.; Moscardelli, R.; Giardi, M.T. A device to study the effect of space radiation on photosynthetic organisms. Physica Med. 2001, 17, 267–268. [Google Scholar]
  45. Garty, J. Biomonitoring atmospheric heavy metals with lichens: Theory and application. Crit. Rev. Plant Sci. 2001, 20, 309–371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Dzubaj, A.; Bačkor, M.; Tomko, J.; Peli, E.; Tuba, Z. Tolerance of the lichen Xanthoria parietina (L.) Th. Fr. to metal stress. Ecotox. Environ. Saf. 2008, 70, 319–326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Maxwell, K.; Johnson, G.N. Chlorophyll fluorescence—A practical guide. J. Exp. Bot. 2000, 51, 659–668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Gauslaa, Y.; Solhaug, K.A. High-light damage in air-dry thalli of the old forest lichen Lobaria pulmonaria—interactions of irradiance, exposure duration and high temperature. J. Exper. Bot. 1999, 50, 697–705. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Palmqvist, K.; Sundberg, B. Light use efficiency of dry matter gain in five macro-lichens: Relative impact of microclimate conditions and species-specific traits. Plant Cell Environ. 2000, 23, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Singh, R.; Ranjan, S.; Nayaka, S.; Pathre, U.V.; Shirke, P.A. Functional characteristics of a fruticose type of lichen, Stereocaulon foliolosum Nyl. in response to light and water stress. Act. Physiol. Plant. 2013, 35, 1605–1615. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Wietrzyk-Pełka, P.; Rola, K.; Patchett, A.; Szymański, W.; Węgrzyn, M.H.; Björk, R.G. Patterns and drivers of cryptogam and vascular plant diversity in glacier forelands. Sci. Total Environ. 2021, 770, 144793. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Wietrzyk-Pełka, P.; Cykowska-Marzencka, B.; Maruo, F.; Szymański, W.; Węgrzyn, M.H. Mosses and liverworts in the glacier forelands and mature tundra of Svalbard (High Arctic): Diversity, ecology, and community composition. Pol. Polar Res. 2020, 41, 37–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Wietrzyk-Pełka, P.; Rola, K.; Szymański, W.; Węgrzyn, M.H. Organic carbon accumulation in the glacier forelands with regard to variability of environmental conditions in different ecogenesis stages of High Arctic ecosystems. Sci. Total Environ. 2020, 717, 135151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Phinney, N.H.; Solhaug, K.A.; Gauslaa, Y. Photobiont-dependent humidity threshold for chlorolichen photosystem II activation. Planta 2019, 250, 2023–2031. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Dilks, T.J.; Proctor, M.C. Seasonal variation in desiccation tolerance in some British bryophyte. J. Bryol. 1976, 9, 239–247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Proctor, M.C. Experiments on the effect of different intensities of desiccation on bryophyte survival, using chlorophyll fluo- rescence as an index of recovery. J. Bryol. 2003, 25, 201–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Green, T.A.; Sancho, L.G.; Pintado, A. Ecophysiology of desiccation/rehydration cycles in mosses and lichens. Plant Desiccation Toler. 2011, 215, 89–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Csintalan, Z.; Péli, E.R. Seasonality and Small Spatial-Scale Variation of Chlorophyll a Fluorescence in Bryophyte Syntrichia ruralis [Hedw.] in Semi-Arid Sandy Grassland, Hungary. Plants 2020, 9, 92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  59. Baruffo, L.; Tretiach, M. Seasonal variations of Fo, Fm and Fv/Fm in an epiphytic population of the lichen Punctelia subrudecta (Nyl.) Krog. Lichenologist 2007, 39, 555–565. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Čabrajic, A.V.; Liden, M.; Lundmark, T.; Palmqvist, K. Modelling hydration and photosystem II activation in relation to in situ rain and humidity patterns: A tool to compare performance of rare and generalist epi- phytic lichens. Plant Cell Environ. 2010, 33, 840–850. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Moser, T.J.; Nash, T.H., III; Link, S.O. Diurnal gross photosynthetic patterns and potential seasonal CO2 assimilation in Cladonia stellaris and Cladonia rangiferina. Canad. J. Bot. 1983, 61, 642–655. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Glime, J.M. (Ed.) Adaptive Strategies: Growth and Life Forms. In Bryophyte Ecology; Michigan Technological University: Houghton, MI, USA, 2017; Volume 1: Physiological Ecology, Chapters 4–5. [Google Scholar]
  63. Lange, O.L.; Kilian, E.; Ziegler, H. Water vapour uptake and photosynthesis of lichens: Performance differences in species with green and blue-green algae as phycobionts. Oecologia 1986, 71, 104–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Lange, O.L.; Bilger, W.; Rimke, S.; Schreiber, U. Chlorophyll fluorescence of lichens containing green and blue-green algae during hydration by water vapor uptake and by addition of liquid water. Bot. Acta 1989, 102, 306–313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Smith, C.W. Lichens of Great Britain and Ireland; British Lichen Society: London, UK, 2009. [Google Scholar]
Diversity 13 00642 g001 550
Figure 1. Study area: (A) locality of the “Bory Tucholskie” National Park in Poland; (B) twenty sampling plots in experimental area of the lichen Scots pine forest habitat in “Bory Tucholskie” National Park. Blue line indicates forest stands (© The Head Office of Geodesy and Cartography, www.geoportal.gov.pl).
Figure 1. Study area: (A) locality of the “Bory Tucholskie” National Park in Poland; (B) twenty sampling plots in experimental area of the lichen Scots pine forest habitat in “Bory Tucholskie” National Park. Blue line indicates forest stands (© The Head Office of Geodesy and Cartography, www.geoportal.gov.pl).
Diversity 13 00642 g001
Diversity 13 00642 g002 550
Figure 2. Mean ± SE and SD of FV/FM, including division into species (C. mitis, C. uncialis, D. scoparium, and P. schreberi) and sample type (soaked or non-soaked). The results of ANOVA (p < 0.05) are presented graphically (N = 4320). The lowercase letters indicate the statistically significant interaction between habitat type and location (see Table 1 for details on the main effects and interactions).
Figure 2. Mean ± SE and SD of FV/FM, including division into species (C. mitis, C. uncialis, D. scoparium, and P. schreberi) and sample type (soaked or non-soaked). The results of ANOVA (p < 0.05) are presented graphically (N = 4320). The lowercase letters indicate the statistically significant interaction between habitat type and location (see Table 1 for details on the main effects and interactions).
Diversity 13 00642 g002
Diversity 13 00642 g003 550
Figure 3. Mean ± SE and SD of FV/FM, including division into species (C. mitis, C. uncialis, and D. scoparium, P. schreberi) and season (spring, summer, and autumn). The results of ANOVA (p < 0.05) are presented graphically (N = 2160). The lowercase letters indicate the statistically significant interaction between species and season (see Table 1 for details on the main effects and interactions).
Figure 3. Mean ± SE and SD of FV/FM, including division into species (C. mitis, C. uncialis, and D. scoparium, P. schreberi) and season (spring, summer, and autumn). The results of ANOVA (p < 0.05) are presented graphically (N = 2160). The lowercase letters indicate the statistically significant interaction between species and season (see Table 1 for details on the main effects and interactions).
Diversity 13 00642 g003
Diversity 13 00642 g004 550
Figure 4. Mean ± SE and SD of FV/FM, including division into species (C. mitis, C. uncialis, D. scoparium, and P. schreberi) and daytime (8:00 a.m., 12:00 a.m., and 3:00 p.m.). The results of ANOVA (p < 0.05) are presented graphically (N = 2160). The capital letters show the significant main effect of the species; the asterisk (*) indicates the significant main effect of daytime (see Table 1 for details on the main effects and interactions).
Figure 4. Mean ± SE and SD of FV/FM, including division into species (C. mitis, C. uncialis, D. scoparium, and P. schreberi) and daytime (8:00 a.m., 12:00 a.m., and 3:00 p.m.). The results of ANOVA (p < 0.05) are presented graphically (N = 2160). The capital letters show the significant main effect of the species; the asterisk (*) indicates the significant main effect of daytime (see Table 1 for details on the main effects and interactions).
Diversity 13 00642 g004
Table
Table 1. Results of the two-way ANOVA for the effects of the following variables on cryptogam FV/FM: (a) species (C. mitis, C. uncialis, D. scoparium, and P. schreberi) and sample type (soaked or non-soaked); (b) species and season (spring, summer, and autumn); and (c) species and daytime (8:00 a.m., 12:00 a.m., and 3:00 p.m.). Significant effects (p < 0.05) are shown in bold.
Table 1. Results of the two-way ANOVA for the effects of the following variables on cryptogam FV/FM: (a) species (C. mitis, C. uncialis, D. scoparium, and P. schreberi) and sample type (soaked or non-soaked); (b) species and season (spring, summer, and autumn); and (c) species and daytime (8:00 a.m., 12:00 a.m., and 3:00 p.m.). Significant effects (p < 0.05) are shown in bold.
VariablesFp
(a)Species16.238<0.001
Sample type37.091<0.001
Species × sample type2.7290.043
(b)Species55.393<0.001
Season543.092<0.001
Species × season5.626<0.001
(c)Species28.891<0.001
Daytime7.416<0.001
Species × daytime1.2470.281
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Węgrzyn, M.H.; Fałowska, P.; Alzayany, K.; Waszkiewicz, K.; Dziurowicz, P.; Wietrzyk-Pełka, P. Seasonal Changes in the Photosynthetic Activity of Terrestrial Lichens and Mosses in the Lichen Scots Pine Forest Habitat. Diversity 2021, 13, 642. https://doi.org/10.3390/d13120642

AMA Style

Węgrzyn MH, Fałowska P, Alzayany K, Waszkiewicz K, Dziurowicz P, Wietrzyk-Pełka P. Seasonal Changes in the Photosynthetic Activity of Terrestrial Lichens and Mosses in the Lichen Scots Pine Forest Habitat. Diversity. 2021; 13(12):642. https://doi.org/10.3390/d13120642

Chicago/Turabian Style

Węgrzyn, Michał H., Patrycja Fałowska, Karima Alzayany, Karolina Waszkiewicz, Patrycja Dziurowicz, and Paulina Wietrzyk-Pełka. 2021. "Seasonal Changes in the Photosynthetic Activity of Terrestrial Lichens and Mosses in the Lichen Scots Pine Forest Habitat" Diversity 13, no. 12: 642. https://doi.org/10.3390/d13120642

APA Style

Węgrzyn, M. H., Fałowska, P., Alzayany, K., Waszkiewicz, K., Dziurowicz, P., & Wietrzyk-Pełka, P. (2021). Seasonal Changes in the Photosynthetic Activity of Terrestrial Lichens and Mosses in the Lichen Scots Pine Forest Habitat. Diversity, 13(12), 642. https://doi.org/10.3390/d13120642

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop