Next Article in Journal
N-(3-Cyano-4,5,6,7-tetrahydrobenzothiophen-2-yl)-2-[[5-[(1,5-dimethyl-3-oxo-2-phenylpyrazol-4-yl)amino]-1,3,4-thiadiazol-2-yl]sulfanyl]acetamide
Previous Article in Journal
4-[(4-Chlorophenyl)carbamoyl]butanoic Acid
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Communication

Palladium-Catalyzed Direct Mono- and Diarylation of Diphenydithienylethenes: A Useful Method for Enhancing Fluorescence Intensity and Aggregation-Induced Emission

1
Faculty of Petroleum, PetroVietnam University, Ba Ria City 78109, Vietnam
2
Department of Organic Chemistry, Faculty of Chemistry, Ho Chi Minh City University of Education, Ho Chi Minh City 72711, Vietnam
3
Faculty of Chemistry, Ha Noi National University of Education, Ha Noi 123106, Vietnam
4
Laboratoire de Physicochimie des Polymères et des Interfaces, Universités de CY Cergy Paris, Université 5 mail Gay-Lussac, CEDEX, 95031 Cergy-Pontoise, France
5
Faculty of Chemistry, Ha Noi University of Science and Technology, 1 Dai Co Viet, Ha Noi 112452, Vietnam
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Molbank 2021, 2021(2), M1210; https://doi.org/10.3390/M1210
Submission received: 15 April 2021 / Revised: 3 May 2021 / Accepted: 7 May 2021 / Published: 10 May 2021
(This article belongs to the Section Organic Synthesis and Biosynthesis)

Abstract

:
In this study we report efficient method for the syntheses of mono- and diarylated diphenyldithienylethene (DPDTE) via a palladium-catalyzed C–H arylation reaction. These new derivatives showed amplified luminescent properties thanks to a change in polarity, particularly in the presence of an electron-withdrawing groups (EWG). Moreover, the arylated DPDTEs showed dual-emissive phenomena, including fluorescence in organic solvents and aggregation-induced emission.

1. Introduction

Tetraarylethene (TAE) has become a well-known building block for luminescent organic material for its aggregation-induced emission (AIE) behavior [1,2]. The functionalization of TAE changed its physical properties, leading to its extensive applications in material science, synthetic and biological fields, supramolecular frameworks, and self-assemblies. For example, tetrafunctionalization at the para position of the phenyl ring of tetraphenylethene (TPE) provided interesting organic linkers for a metal–organic framework (MOF) involving platinum [3], mercury [4], silver [5], and palladium [6] and a covalent–organic framework (COF) via imine formation. TAEs showed weak emission at the aggregation state, but their emissive intensity could be amplified via MOF and COF formation. Diarylation of TPE can fine tune its physical properties to adapt to proposed applications. Diarylated TPEs possess not only AIE but also other interesting physical properties. In particular, TPE-f [7], in which TPE is combined with highly luminous fluorene groups, is an undoped organic light-emitting diode that exhibits deep-blue emissions, low turn-on voltage (3V), and high electroluminescence efficiency. TPE-g [8,9,10] with a triphenylamine moiety was fabricated as emissive layers in OLEDs because of its deep-blue emitter. TPE-h [11], which bears a pyridinyl group, exhibited an enhanced hole-transporting ability, blue emission, and excellent reversible mechanochromism. TPE-i [12,13,14] (Scheme 1), synthesized in high yields via the Suzuki–Miyaura reaction, showed different fluorescent colors and reversible mechanochromic luminescence with good reproducibility in a solid state. When R=CF3, the compound was a self-recovering mechanochromic luminogen. When R=CHO, this group was functionalized after three steps to triethylmethylammonium bromide, which can be used as an ultrasensitive fluorescence biosensor.
Monoarylated TPEs have been commonly synthesized by the Suzuki–Miyaura cross-coupling reaction. 1,8-Naphthalimide-based TPEs (TPE-a) are highly emissive luminophors having various mechanofluorochromic and aggregation-induced characteristics. Phenothiazine-substituted TPE (TPE-b) [15] showed strong emissions, strong AIE characteristics, and mechanofluorochromism in a solid state because its conformation was twisted by monoarylation. TPE has also been incorporated with heptamethine cyanine IR-780 in order to enhance its photosensitivity, photothermal response, and photostability in the near infrared region. TPE-c proved to be superior in rapid cell uptake and exhibited strong cytotoxicity to HeLa cells (IC50 = 3.3 µM). TPE-c [16] was an illustrative example of the relationship between an aggregation state and photophysical properties. It can be also applied in cell imaging and image-guided theranostics. A donor-accepter system could be designed by introducing an electron-withdrawing group (EWG) into TPE. For example, TPE-d [17] has a high polarity because its molecules consist of TPE as a donor group and an accepter group such as pyridyl or cyano. Their multistimulus-responsive fluorescent characteristics have been investigated and proven to have a relationship with AIE, mechanofluorescence, and acidochromism. These TPE derivatives are suitable for application in mechanosensors, acid or alkali fluorescence sensors, or in other opto-electronic applications. TPE-substituted benzothiadiazoles (TPE-e) [18] showed AIE and solvatochromic effects and have been applied to monitoring trace water fractions in organic solvents. The bond between TPE and the introduced aryl groups is commonly formed by the classical Suzuki–Miyaura cross-coupling reaction. The AIE effects of TPE, tetrathienylethene, and diphenyldithienylethene (DPDTE) have been thoroughly investigated. DPDTE is a good candidate for preparing new AIE luminogens because of the feasible arylation, via direct palladium-catalyzed C–H functionalization, of its thiophene moieties.

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. Synthesis

The starting material (DPDTE) was synthesized as described in the literature [19]. The reported procedure has been modified for gem-1,1-dibromo-2,2-dithienylethene and phenylboronic acid to give DPDTE with a 55% isolated yield. The palladium-catalyzed C–H functionalization of the thiophene and thienothiophene have been optimized by Doucet [20] and our group [21]. This ligand-free catalytic system consisted of only two components Pd(OAc)2 and KOAc with DMAc as solvent, can be applied to various thiophene derivatives with good functional group tolerance. We have further optimized this condition by changing the ratio of 1 and p-BrC6H4COOCH3 to obtain the monoarylated DPDTE (2c) and diarylated DPDTE (3c). A short screening of the reaction conditions is summarized in Table 1. The optimized conditions for the monoarylation of DPDTE were established with the ratio of 1 and aryl bromide as 1:0.5. With this optimized condition in hand, we successfully synthesized a number of monoarylated DPDTEs with moderate isolated yields (from 41 to 50%). The synthesized monoarylated DPDTEs are listed in the Scheme 2. The isolated yields of monoarylated DPDTEs were moderate. These conditions are suitable for a wide range of functional groups such as nitro, nitrile, aldehyde, acetyl, ester, and pyridine.
The diarylation could be obtained by increasing aryl bromides to 5 equivalents. Nine prepared compounds were synthesized and are showed in Scheme 3. The isolated yields varied from 31 to 66%, of which 3f was obtained with the highest yield, while 3i was isolated with the lowest yield. This result can be explained by the fact that electron-withdrawing substituents in aryl bromides led to easier oxidative additions of the palladium catalyst to the C–Br bond. The structures of all these compounds were confirmed by 1H-NMR, 13C-NMR and HRMS (see Supplementary Materials).

2.2. Photophysical Properties

Finally, in order to evaluate the photophysical properties of the mono- and diarylated DPDTEs, their UV-visible absorption and emission spectra were recorded in a chloroform solution at room temperature (Figure 1). The characteristic values, including λabs and λem, are listed in Table 2. The emission spectra of all these arylated DPDTE were characterized and shown in Figure 2, in which 2f showed the highest intensive emission among all the synthesized compounds. These results suggested that the monoarylated products (2af) are more strongly emissive than the diarylated products (3ai). This behavior could be explained by the fact that polarity of dissymmetric monoarylated DPDTEs is higher than that of the symmetric diarylated DPDTEs.
The aggregation-induced emissions of 2b and 2e are shown in Figure 3 and Figure 4, respectively. A common feature of the electronic absorption spectra of the monoarylated DPDTEs is a set of three absorption bands characteristic of aromatic rings with intense and well-resolved absorption bands in the UV region (250–450 nm). However, spectrum 2c has only two absorption bands in the spectrum cut-off. The ester is the weakest electron-withdrawing-group of the considered substituents, and 2c’s three absorption bands do not shift to the longer wavelength as much as some other monoarylated DPDTEs do. Therefore, the band with the shortest wavelength falls outside the range of the screenshot diagram. Diarylated DPDTEs showed only two bands from 250 to 450 nm. This difference is due to the more symmetric structure of the diarylated derivatives in comparison to the monoarylated ones. Among those monoarylated DPDTEs, those with strong EWGs, such as 2b, 2d, 2e, and 2f showed increase in absorption intensity as well as in absorption wavelength due to the reduced-energy band gap between HOMO and LUMO of the molecules. Compound 2e showed amazing fluorescence with increasing emission intensity: about 16-fold, from zero to about 17,500 a.u., while the percentage of water reached 90%. The emission color of 2e changed from blue to yellow and could be easily observed under UV light. In addition, its wavelength shifted from 450 to 545 nm, while for compound 2b, when the H2O ratio was increased, there was a gradual shift in emission wavelength. Interestingly, the color intensity increased from 2000 to 9000 a.u and was then reduced to 8200 a.u due to the quenching (ACQ) effect of aggregation. This aggregation may have been assisted by the hydrogen bonding of the gem-diol, which resulted from adding a water molecule to the aldehyde functional group.

3. Materials and Methods

3.1. Materials

Reagents and solvents were obtained from commercial suppliers and used without further purification. Column chromatography was carried out using Merck Kieselgel 60 silica gel (particle size: 32–63 Å). Analytical TLC was performed using Merck precoated silica gel 60 F-254 sheets. All the C–H activation reactions were carried out under a nitrogen atmosphere. NMR spectroscopic data were acquired on Bruker Avance III spectrometer at 500 MHz for 1H–NMR and 125 MHz for 13C–NMR. HR–MS spectra were recorded on a 6500 series Q-TOF (Agilent) spectrometer. UV-Vis absorption spectra was measured on the UV-Vis Cary 60-Agilent spectrometer. Fluorescence spectra were recorded on Perkin Elmer FL 8500 spectrometer.

3.2. General Procedure for the CH Arylated Reaction

A suspension of DPDTE (69 mg, 0.2 mmol, 1.0 eq), Pd(OAc)2 (1.0 mg, 0.006 mmol, 0.03 eq), KOAc (58 mg, 0.6 mmol, 3.0 eq), and 4-arylbromide (0.5 eq for monoarylation and 5.0 eq for diarylation) in degassed DMAc (5.0 mL) was stirred at 120 °C for 14 h under a nitrogen atmosphere. The insoluble impurities were filtered, and the combined filtrates were washed with water (3 × 30 mL) and dried over anhydrous Na2SO4. The solvent was evaporated in vacuo to give a crude residue which was purified by column chromatography on silica gel (n-hexane) to give pure monoarylated (2a–f) and diarylated products (3a–i).
1-(2-(pyridine-4-yl)thien-5-yl)-1-thien-5-yl-2,2-diphenylethene2a: 40 mg (48%), yellow solid. 1H-NMR δH (500 MHz, CDCl3, δ ppm): δ 8.50 (2H, d, J = 6.5 Hz), δ 7.38 (2H, d, J = 6.0 Hz), δ 7.25–7.18 (10H, m), δ 7.15–7.13 (2H, m), δ 6.84–6.82 (2H, m), δ 6.76 (1H, d, J = 4.0 Hz); 13C-NMR δC (125 MHz, CDCl3, δ ppm): δ 148.7, 144.8, 143.9, 143.3, 142.8, 142.7, 142.6, 140.4, 131.2, 131.1, 130.5, 129.9, 128.3, 128.0, 127.5, 127.3, 126.9, 126.7, 126.3, 125.9, 125.5, 119.7. HR-MS calcd for C27H20NS2 ([M+H]+): 422.1037, found: 422.1039.
1-(2-(4-formylphenyl)thien-5-yl)-1-thien-5-yl-2,2-diphenylethene2b: 44 mg (49%), yellow solid. 1H-NMR δH (500 MHz, CDCl3, δ ppm): δ 9.96 (1H, s), δ 7.81 (2H, d, J = 8.5 Hz), δ 7.60 (2H, d, J = 8.0 Hz), δ 7.26–7.14 (12H, m), δ 6.84 (2H, d, J = 3.0 Hz), δ 6.74 (1H, d, J = 3.5 Hz); 13C-NMR δC (125 MHz, CDCl3, δ ppm): δ 191.4, 147.7, 145.0, 143.3, 143.0, 142.9, 142.8, 140.0, 134.9, 131.2, 130.6, 130.4, 129.9, 128.3, 128.0, 127.4, 127.2, 126.6, 126.3, 126.2, 125.7, 124.4. HR-MS calcd for C29H21OS2 ([M+H]+): 449.1034, found: 449.1064.
1-(2-(methyl 4-benzoate)thien-5-yl)-1-thien-5-yl-2,2-diphenylethene2c: 42 mg (44%), yellow solid. 1H-NMR δH (500 MHz, CDCl3, δ ppm): δ 7.96 (2H, d, J = 8.5 Hz), δ 7.52 (2H, d, J = 8.5 Hz), δ 7.21–7.12 (12H, m), δ 6.83 (2H, d, J = 3.5 Hz), δ 6.72 (1H, d, J = 4.0 Hz), δ 3.91 (3H, s); 13C-NMR δC (125 MHz, CDCl3, δ ppm): δ 166.8, 147.0, 145.1, 143.2, 143.0, 131.0, 130.7, 130.6, 130.2, 129.9, 128.6, 128.2, 128.0, 127.3, 127.1, 126.6, 126.3, 125.1, 123.8, 52.1. HR-MS calcd for C30H23O2S2 ([M+H]+): 479.1139, found: 479.1136.
1-(2-(4-nitrophenyl)thien-5-yl)-1-thien-5-yl-2,2-diphenylethene2d: 44 mg (47%), orange solid. 1H-NMR δH (500 MHz, CDCl3, δ ppm): δ 8.16 (2H, d, J = 9.0 Hz), δ 7.57 (2H, d, J = 9.0 Hz), δ 7.22–7.17 (10H, m), δ 7.14 (2H, m), δ 6.85–6.84 (2H, m), δ 6.75 (1H, d, J = 3.5 Hz); 13C-NMR δC (125 MHz, CDCl3, δ ppm): δ 148.6, 146.4, 144.9, 143.7, 142.9, 142.8, 141.6, 140.5, 139.6, 131.3, 130.6, 129.9, 128.3, 128.0, 127.5, 127.3, 126.7, 126.3, 126.0, 125.6, 125.0, 124.3. HR-MS calcd for C28H19NO2S2 ([M]+): 465.0857, found: 465.0822.
1-(2-(4-acetylphenyl)thien-5-yl)-1-thien-5-yl-2,2-diphenylethene2e: 38 mg (41%), yellow solid. 1H-NMR δH (500 MHz, CDCl3, δ ppm): δ 7.89 (2H, d, J = 8.5 Hz), δ 7.54 (2H, d, J = 8.5 Hz), δ 7.22–7.13 (12H, m), δ 6.84–6.83 (2H, m), δ 6.73 (2H, d, J = 4.0 Hz), δ 2.58 (3H, s, -CH3); 13C-NMR δC (125 MHz, CDCl3, δ ppm): δ 197.3, 147.2, 145.1, 143.1, 143.0, 142.9, 138.7, 135.6, 131.1, 130.6, 129.9, 129.0, 128.2, 127.9, 127.8, 127.3, 127.1, 126.6, 126.3, 125.2, 123.9, 26.5. HR-MS calcd for C30H23OS2 ([M+H]+): 463.1190, found: 463.1165.
1-(2-(4-nitrilphenyl)thien-5-yl)-1-thien-5-yl-2,2-diphenylethene2f: 45 mg (50%), orange solid. 1H-NMR δH (500 MHz, CDCl3, δ ppm): δ 7.57 (2H, d, J = 8.5 Hz), δ 7.53 (2H, d, J = 8.5 Hz), δ 7.22–7.12 (12H, m), δ 6.85–6.83 (2H, m), δ 6.74 (1H, d, J = 4.0 Hz); 13C-NMR δC (125 MHz, CDCl3, δ ppm): δ 147.9, 144.9, 143.4, 142.9, 142.8, 142.1, 138.5, 132.6, 131.1, 130.8, 130.6, 129.9, 129.8, 128.3, 128.0, 127.4, 127.2, 126.7, 126.3, 126.0, 125.6, 124.4, 118.9, 110.3. HR-MS calcd for C29H20NS2 ([M+H]+): 446.1037, found: 446.1021.
1,1-Di(2-(pyridine-4-yl)thien-5-yl)-2,2-diphenylethene3a: 49 mg (49%), yellow solid. 1H-NMR δH (500 MHz, CDCl3, δ ppm): δ 8.53 (4H, brs), δ 7.39 (4H, d, J = 4.5 Hz), δ 7.28 (2H, d, J = 4.0 Hz), δ 7.23–7.19 (10H, m), δ 6.83 (2H, d, J = 4.0 Hz); 13C-NMR δC (125 MHz, CDCl3, δ ppm): δ 149.0, 148.0, 145.3, 142.4, 141.0, 131.5, 130.5, 128.3, 128.2, 127.8, 125.5, 125.3, 119.7. HR-MS calcd for C32H23N2S2 ([M+H]+): 499.1303, found: 499.1291.
1,1-Di(2-(4-formylphenyl)thien-5-yl)-2,2-diphenylethene3b: 72 mg (65%), yellow solid. 1H-NMR δH (500 MHz, CDCl3, δ ppm): δ 9.96 (2H, s), δ 7.82 (4H, d, J = 8.5 Hz), δ 7.62 (4H, d, J = 8.0 Hz), δ 7.22–7.21 (12H, m), δ 6.82 (2H, d, J = 4.0 Hz); 13C-NMR δC (125 MHz, CDCl3, δ ppm): δ 191.4, 147.0, 144.2, 143.2, 142.7, 139.9, 135.1, 131.4, 130.6, 130.4, 128.3, 128.1, 127.6, 125.7, 124.5. HR-MS calcd for C36H25O2S2 ([M+H]+): 553.1296, found: 553.1309.
1,1-Di(2-(methyl 4-benzoate)thien-5-yl)-2,2-diphenylethene3c: 74 mg (61%), yellow solid. 1H-NMR δH (500 MHz, CDCl3, δ ppm): δ 7.97 (4H, d, J = 9.0 Hz), δ 7.53 (4H, d, J = 9.0 Hz), δ 7.21–7.19 (10H, m), δ 7.15 (2H, d, J = 4.0 Hz), δ 6.79 (2H, d, J = 4.0 Hz), δ 3.91 (6H, s); 13C-NMR δC (125 MHz, CDCl3, δ ppm): δ 166.7, 146.4, 143.6, 143.5, 142.9, 138.5, 131.3, 130.6, 130.2, 128.7, 128.2, 127.4, 126.6, 125.1, 123.9, 52.1. HR-MS calcd for C38H28O4S2 ([M]+): 612.1429, found: 612.1421.
1,1-Di(2-(4-nitrophenyl)thien-5-yl)-2,2-diphenylethene3d: 73 mg (62%), orange solid. 1H-NMR δH (500 MHz, CDCl3, δ ppm): δ 8.18 (4H, d, J = 9.0 Hz), δ 7.59 (4H, d, J = 8.0 Hz), δ 7.24–7.19 (12H, m), δ 6.83 (2H, d, J = 3.5 Hz); 13C-NMR δC (125 MHz, CDCl3, δ ppm): δ 147.7, 147.6, 146.6, 144.9, 142.5, 142.1, 140.3, 131.5, 130.5, 128.3, 127.8, 125.7, 125.6, 125.1, 124.4. HR-MS calcd for C34H23N2O4S2 ([M+H]+): 587.1099, found: 587.1078.
1,1-Di(2-(4-acetylphenyl)thien-5-yl)-2,2-diphenylethene3e: 68 mg (59%), yellow solid. 1H-NMR δH (500 MHz, CDCl3, δ ppm): δ 7.91 (4H, d, J = 8.5 Hz), δ 7.56 (4H, d, J = 8.5 Hz), δ 7.17 (2H, d, J = 4.0 Hz), δ 7.23–7.19 (10H, m), δ 6.80 (2H, d, J = 4.0 Hz), δ 2.58 (6H, s); 13C-NMR δC (125 MHz, CDCl3, δ ppm): δ 197.2, 146.6, 143.8, 143.4, 142.8, 138.6, 135.7, 131.3, 130.6, 129.0, 128.2, 127.5, 125.3, 124.0, 26.5. HR-MS calcd for C38H28O2S2 ([M]+): 580.1531, found: 580.1506.
1,1-Di(2-(4-cyanophenyl)thien-5-yl)-2,2-diphenylethene3f: 72 mg (66%), yellow solid. 1H-NMR δH (500 MHz, CDCl3, δ ppm): δ 7.59 (4H, d, J = 8.5 Hz), δ 7.54 (4H, d, J = 8.5 Hz), δ 7.23–7.19 (10H, m), δ 7.16 (2H, d, J = 4.0 Hz), δ 6.80 (2H, d, J = 4.0 Hz); 13C-NMR δC (125 MHz, CDCl3, δ ppm): δ 147.1, 144.4, 142.6, 142.5, 138.4, 132.6, 131.4, 130.5, 128.3, 127.7, 125.7, 125.5, 124.5, 118.8, 110.5. HR-MS calcd for C36H22N2S2 ([M]+): 546.1224, found: 546.1218.
1,1-Di(2-(4-trifluoromethylphenyl)thien-5-yl)-2,2-diphenyl ethene3g: 70 mg (55%), yellow solid. 1H-NMR δH (500 MHz, CDCl3, δ ppm): δ 7.56 (8H, s), δ 7.22–7.19 (10H, m), δ 7.13 (2H, d, J = 4.0 Hz), 6.80 (2H, d, J = 4.0 Hz); 13C-NMR δC (125 MHz, CDCl3, δ ppm): δ 146.3, 143.7, 143.0, 142.8, 137.6, 131.2, 130.6, 129.3, 129.2, 129.0, 128.2, 127.5, 125.9, 125.8, 125.5, 123.8, 29.3. HR-MS calcd for C36H22F6S2 ([M]+): 632.1067, found: 632.1065.
1,1-Di(2-(3-formylphenyl)thien-5-yl)-2,2-diphenyl ethene3h: 67 mg, 61%), yellow solid. 1H-NMR δH (500 MHz, CDCl3, δ ppm): δ 10.01 (2H, s), δ 7.98 (2H, t), δ 7.74–7.72 (4H, m), δ 7.49 (2H, t, J = 7.5 Hz), δ 7.22–7.20 (10H, m), δ 7.14 (2H, d, J = 4.0 Hz), δ 6.80 (2H, d, J = 4.0 Hz); 13C-NMR δC (125 MHz, CDCl3, δ ppm): δ 192.0, 146.0, 143.5, 143.1, 142.9, 136.9, 135.3, 131.2, 131.1, 130.6, 129.5, 128.5, 128.2, 127.4, 126.4, 125.9, 123.4. HR-MS calcd for C36H24O2S2 ([M]+): 552.1218, found: 552.1181.
1,1-Di(2-(4-methoxyphenyl)thien-5-yl)-2,2-diphenyl ethene3i: 34 mg, 31%), yellow solid. 1H-NMR δH (500 MHz, CDCl3, δ ppm): δ 7.41 (4H, d, J = 9.0 Hz), δ 6.85 (4H, d, J = 8.5 Hz), δ 6.92 (2H, d, J = 4.0 Hz), δ 7.23–7.16 (10H, m), δ 6.73 (2H, d, J = 3.5 Hz), δ 3.81 (6H, s); 13C-NMR δC (125 MHz, CDCl3, δ ppm): δ 159.2, 144.8, 144.0, 143.4, 131.0, 130.7, 128.2, 128.1, 127.5, 127.3, 127.0, 126.8, 125.8, 121.3, 114.2, 55.4. HR-MS calcd for C36H28O2S2 ([M]+): 556.1531, found: 556.1507.

4. Conclusions

In conclusion, we developed an efficient palladium-catalyzed direct arylation of DPDTE with various aryl bromides. This efficient ligand-free reaction conditions can tolerate various functional groups. Therefore, our methodology is a useful tool for adjusting the polarity of DPDTE and to improve its fluorescent intensity. The photophysical property of the two monoarylated DPDTEs 2b and 2e were also characterized. In addition, the two diarylated DPDTEs 3a and 3f are undergoing further self-assembly study with metal ions that enhance their fluorescence since these DPDTEs contain potential coordination sites.

Supplementary Materials

The following is available online: supporting information with NMR spectra of compounds 2a–f, 3a–i.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, T.T.D., T.T.L. (Thanh Tin Le); conducting experiments, S.T.P., T.T.L. (Thanh Tin Le); acquisition of data, H.T.H.L., T.T.L. (Thanh Thanh Le); interpretation of data, T.T.L. (Thanh Tin Le), T.T.D., H.N.; writing—original draft preparation, T.T.L. (Thanh Tin Le), T.T.D., H.N.; writing—review and editing, T.T.L. (Thanh Tin Le), T.T.D.; supervision, T.T.L. (Thanh Tin Le), T.T.D.; project administration, T.T.L. (Thanh Tin Le); funding acquisition, T.T.L. (Thanh Tin Le). All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Ministry of Education and Training under the grant number B2018-SPS-22.

Data Availability Statement

We are pleased to provide additional data as wanted.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Hong, Y.; Lam, J.W.Y.; Tang, B.Z. Aggregation-induced emission. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2011, 40, 5361–5388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Mei, J.; Leung, N.L.C.; Kwok, R.T.K.; Lam, J.W.Y.; Tang, B.Z. Aggregation-Induced Emission: Together We Shine, United We Soar! Chem. Rev. 2015, 115, 11718–11940. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Zhang, M.; Saha, M.L.; Wang, M.; Zhou, Z.; Song, B.; Lu, C.; Yan, X.; Li, X.; Huang, F.; Yin, S.; et al. Multicomponent Platinum(II) Cages with Tunable Emission and Amino Acid Sensing. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2017, 139, 5067–5074. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Yuan, B.; Wang, D.X.; Zhu, L.N.; Lan, Y.L.; Cheng, M.; Zhang, L.M.; Chu, J.Q.; Li, X.Z.; Kong, D.M. Dinuclear HgII tetracarbene complex-triggered aggregation-induced emission for rapid and selective sensing of Hg2+ and organomercury species. Chem. Sci. 2019, 10, 4220–4226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  5. Sinha, N.; Stegemann, L.; Tan, T.T.Y.; Doltsinis, N.L.; Strassert, C.A.; Hahn, F.E. Turn-On Fluorescence in Tetra-NHC Ligands by Rigidification through Metal Complexation: An Alternative to Aggregation-Induced Emission. Angew. Chemie Int. Ed. 2017, 56, 2785–2789. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Das, P.; Kumar, A.; Howlader, P.; Mukherjee, P.S. A Self-Assembled Trigonal Prismatic Molecular Vessel for Catalytic Dehydration Reactions in Water. Chem. A Eur. J. 2017, 23, 12565–12574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Huang, J.; Tang, R.; Zhang, T.; Li, Q.; Yu, G.; Xie, S.; Liu, Y.; Ye, S.; Qin, J.; Li, Z. A New Approach to Prepare Efficient Blue AIE Emitters for Undoped OLEDs. Chem. A Eur. J. 2014, 20, 5317–5326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Huang, J.; Jiang, Y.; Yang, J.; Tang, R.; Xie, N.; Li, Q.; Kwok, H.S.; Tang, B.Z.; Li, Z. A tetraphenylethene-substituted pyridinium salt with multiple functionalities: Synthesis, stimuli-responsive emission, optical waveguide and specific mitochondrion imaging. J. Mater. Chem. C 2014, 2, 2028–2036. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Zhou, X.; Li, H.; Chi, Z.; Zhang, X.; Zhang, J.; Xu, B.; Zhang, Y.; Liu, S.; Xu, J. Piezofluorochromism and morphology of a new aggregation-induced emission compound derived from tetraphenylethylene and carbazole. New J. Chem. 2012, 36, 685–693. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Zhou, X.; Li, H.Y.; Chi, Z.G.; Xu, B.J.; Zhang, X.Q.; Zhang, Y.; Liu, S.W.; Xu, J.R. A new piezochromic fluorescence and aggregation-induced emission compound containing tetraphenylethylene and triphenylamine moieties with morphology-alterable property. J. Fluoresc. 2012, 22, 565–572. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Yang, J.; Guo, Q.; Wen, X.; Gao, X.; Peng, Q.; Li, Q.; Ma, D.; Li, Z. Pyrene-based blue AIEgens: Tunable intramolecular conjugation, good hole mobility and reversible mechanochromism. J. Mater. Chem. C 2016, 4, 8506–8513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Liu, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Lan, Q.; Qin, Z.; Liu, S.; Zhao, C.; Chi, Z.; Xu, J. Synthesis and properties of high-performance functional polyimides containing rigid nonplanar conjugated tetraphenylethylene moieties. J. Polym. Sci. Part A Polym. Chem. 2013, 51, 1302–1314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Zhao, F.; Chen, Z.; Liu, G.; Fan, C.; Pu, S. Tetraphenylethene-based highly emissive fluorescent molecules with aggregation-induced emission (AIE) and various mechanofluorochromic characteristics. Tetrahedron Lett. 2018, 59, 836–840. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Li, H.; Wang, C.; Hou, T.; Li, F. Amphiphile-Mediated Ultrasmall Aggregation Induced Emission Dots for Ultrasensitive Fluorescence Biosensing. Anal. Chem. 2017, 89, 9100–9107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Khan, F.; Ekbote, A.; Misra, R. Reversible mechanochromism and aggregation induced enhanced emission in phenothiazine substituted tetraphenylethylene. New J. Chem. 2019, 43, 16156–16163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Zhao, X.; Fan, Z.; Qiao, Y.; Chen, Y.; Wang, S.; Yue, X.; Shen, T.; Liu, W.; Yang, J.; Gao, H.; et al. AIEgens Conjugation Improves the Photothermal Efficacy and Near-Infrared Imaging of Heptamethine Cyanine IR-780. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2020, 12, 16114–16124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Jia, J.; Wen, J. Multi-stimuli responsive fluorescence switching of D-A tetraphenylethylene functionalized cyanopyridine isomers. Tetrahedron Lett. 2020, 61, 151577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Sun, H.; Tang, X.X.; Zhang, R.; Sun, W.H.; Miao, B.X.; Zhao, Y.; Ni, Z.H. Tetraphenylethene-substituted benzothiadiazoles: AIE and TICT properties, tunable intramolecular conjugation and application in detecting trace water in organic solvents. Dye. Pigment. 2020, 174, 108051. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Mlostoń, G.; Urbaniak, K.; Pawlak, A.; Heimgartner, H. New Applications of Hetaryl Thioketones for the Synthesis of Hetaryl-Substituted Ethenes via ‘Two-Fold Extrusion Reaction’. Heterocycles 2016, 93, 127–139. [Google Scholar]
  20. Belkessam, F.; Mohand, A.; Soulé, J.-F.; Elias, A.; Doucet, H. Palladium-catalyzed 2,5-diheteroarylation of 2,5-dibromothiophene derivatives. Beilstein J. Org. Chem. 2014, 10, 2912–2919. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Ha Vuong, T.M.; Villemin, D.; Nguyen, H.-H.; Le, T.T.; Dang, T.T.; Nguyen, H. Programmed Site-Selective Palladium-Catalyzed Arylation of Thieno[3,2-b]thiophene. Chem. An Asian J. 2017, 12, 2819–2826. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Scheme 1. Monoarylation and diarylation of tetraphenylethene.
Scheme 1. Monoarylation and diarylation of tetraphenylethene.
Molbank 2021 m1210 sch001
Scheme 2. Synthesis of monoarylated diphenyldithienylethenes 2a–f.
Scheme 2. Synthesis of monoarylated diphenyldithienylethenes 2a–f.
Molbank 2021 m1210 sch002
Scheme 3. Synthesis of diarylated diphenyldithienylethenes 3a–i.
Scheme 3. Synthesis of diarylated diphenyldithienylethenes 3a–i.
Molbank 2021 m1210 sch003
Figure 1. Absorption spectra of the monoarylated DPDTEs (2af) (a) and diarylated DPDTEs (3ai) (b) at 298 K in CHCl3 solution (C = 10−5 M).
Figure 1. Absorption spectra of the monoarylated DPDTEs (2af) (a) and diarylated DPDTEs (3ai) (b) at 298 K in CHCl3 solution (C = 10−5 M).
Molbank 2021 m1210 g001
Figure 2. Emission spectra of the monoarylated DPDTEs (2af) (a) and diarylated DPDTEs (3ai) (b) in CHCl3 at 298 K (C = 10−5 M) with λex = 360 nm.
Figure 2. Emission spectra of the monoarylated DPDTEs (2af) (a) and diarylated DPDTEs (3ai) (b) in CHCl3 at 298 K (C = 10−5 M) with λex = 360 nm.
Molbank 2021 m1210 g002
Figure 3. (a) The AIE spectra of 2b in THF/H2O mixture, with λex = 360 nm; (b) Photograph of 2b in THF/H2O mixture, under UV lamp (λex = 365 nm).
Figure 3. (a) The AIE spectra of 2b in THF/H2O mixture, with λex = 360 nm; (b) Photograph of 2b in THF/H2O mixture, under UV lamp (λex = 365 nm).
Molbank 2021 m1210 g003
Figure 4. (a) The AIE spectra of 2e in THF/H2O mixture, with λex = 360 nm; (b) Photograph of 2e in THF/H2O mixture, under UV lamp (λex = 365 nm).
Figure 4. (a) The AIE spectra of 2e in THF/H2O mixture, with λex = 360 nm; (b) Photograph of 2e in THF/H2O mixture, under UV lamp (λex = 365 nm).
Molbank 2021 m1210 g004
Table 1. Optimization of the arylation of DPDTE.
Table 1. Optimization of the arylation of DPDTE.
Molbank 2021 m1210 i001
EntryRatio
1:ArBr
Yield (%) *
2c3c
11:0.5430
21:1319
31:21229
41:31838
51:4747
61:5060
Reaction conditions: Pd(OAc)2 3 mol%, KOAc 3 eq., ratio (1:ArBr) listed in Table 1, 120 °C, 14 h. (ArBr = p-BrC6H4CO2CH3), *: isolated yield.
Table 2. Photophysical data of the arylated DPDTE (2af, 3a–i).
Table 2. Photophysical data of the arylated DPDTE (2af, 3a–i).
AbsorptionEmission at 298 K a
λabs a/nm (ε 103/M−1cm−1)λem a/nmIntensity(a.u)
2a256(73.5), 316(60.8), 363(70.4)475 982.0
2b334(18.1), 389(24.0)476 1026.9
2c277(21.4), 327(26.9) <100
2d337(25.0), 413(33.3) <100
2e253(25.0), 332(19.4), 385(24.4)4672536.7
2f261(23.3), 323(16.2), 376(19.9)4465733.3
3a263(21.8), 370(40.0)495284.8
3b260(59.2), 344(72.5) <100
3c263(44.2), 362(62.9) <100
3d264(29.3), 357(31.9) <100
3e268(32.3), 384(52.7) <100
3f269(34.0), 306(36.6), 409(49.2) <100
3g263(29.0), 355(33.0)452621.7
3h336(48.5) <100
3i253(36.2), 344(54.6), 385(36.5) <100
a Measured in CHCl3 solution at 298 K (C = 10−5 M), with 360 nm excitation.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Le, T.T.; Phan, S.T.; Le, H.T.H.; Nguyen, H.; Dang, T.T.; Le, T.T. Palladium-Catalyzed Direct Mono- and Diarylation of Diphenydithienylethenes: A Useful Method for Enhancing Fluorescence Intensity and Aggregation-Induced Emission. Molbank 2021, 2021, M1210. https://doi.org/10.3390/M1210

AMA Style

Le TT, Phan ST, Le HTH, Nguyen H, Dang TT, Le TT. Palladium-Catalyzed Direct Mono- and Diarylation of Diphenydithienylethenes: A Useful Method for Enhancing Fluorescence Intensity and Aggregation-Induced Emission. Molbank. 2021; 2021(2):M1210. https://doi.org/10.3390/M1210

Chicago/Turabian Style

Le, Thanh Thanh, Son Thai Phan, Hai Thi Hong Le, Hien Nguyen, Tung Thanh Dang, and Thanh Tin Le. 2021. "Palladium-Catalyzed Direct Mono- and Diarylation of Diphenydithienylethenes: A Useful Method for Enhancing Fluorescence Intensity and Aggregation-Induced Emission" Molbank 2021, no. 2: M1210. https://doi.org/10.3390/M1210

APA Style

Le, T. T., Phan, S. T., Le, H. T. H., Nguyen, H., Dang, T. T., & Le, T. T. (2021). Palladium-Catalyzed Direct Mono- and Diarylation of Diphenydithienylethenes: A Useful Method for Enhancing Fluorescence Intensity and Aggregation-Induced Emission. Molbank, 2021(2), M1210. https://doi.org/10.3390/M1210

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop