A Study on the Stability and Carbohydrate Metabolic Traits of Starter Cultures in Response to Continuous Subculturing
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Results and Discussion
2.1. Morphological Changes in Fermentation Strains During Continuous Subculture
2.2. Assessment of Growth Characteristics and Fermentation Activity After Continuous Subculture
2.3. Carbohydrate Metabolic Profiling
2.4. Analysis of Microbial Growth Kinetics
2.5. S. thermophilus and L. bulgaricus Genome Sequences
2.6. Differences in Carbon Source Metabolism Between S. thermophilus and L. bulgaricus
2.7. Genetic Stability After Continuous Subculture
3. Materials and Methods
3.1. Continuous Subculturing of S. thermophilus and L. bulgaricus
3.2. Measurement of pH, TA, and Viable Counts
3.3. Fermentation Vitality
3.4. Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) Analysis
3.5. Growth Kinetics Modeling
3.6. Whole-Genome Sequencing and Comparative Genome Analysis
3.7. Phenotypic Analyses
3.8. Statistical Analysis and Genome Submission
4. Conclusions
Supplementary Materials
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Aslam, H.; Marx, W.; Rocks, T.; Loughman, A.; Chandrasekaran, V.; Ruusunen, A.; Dawson, S.L.; West, M.; Mullarkey, E.; Pasco, J.A.; et al. The effects of dairy and dairy derivatives on the gut microbiota: A systematic literature review. Gut Microbes 2020, 12, 1799533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nestel, P.J.; Mori, T.A. Dairy foods: Beneficial effects of fermented products on cardiometabolic health. Curr. Nutr. Rep. 2023, 12, 478–485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Savaiano, D.A.; Hutkins, R.W. Yogurt, cultured fermented milk, and health: A systematic review. Nutr. Rev. 2021, 79, 599–614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cataldo, P.G.; Klemm, P.; Thüring, M.; Saavedra, L.; Hebert, E.M.; Hartmann, R.K.; Lechner, M. Insights into 6S RNA in lactic acid bacteria (LAB). BMC Genom. Data 2021, 22, 29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Baig, M.A.; Turner, M.S.; Liu, S.Q.; Shah, N.N.; Ayyash, M.M. Heat, cold, acid, and bile salt induced differential proteomic responses of a novel potential probiotic Lactococcus garvieae C47 isolated from camel milk. Food Chem. 2022, 397, 133774. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- He, X.A.; Cui, Y.; Jia, Q.Y.; Zhuang, Y.L.; Gu, Y.; Fan, X.J.; Ding, Y.Y. Response mechanisms of lactic acid bacteria under environmental stress and their application in the food industry. Food Biosci. 2025, 64, 105938. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, X.X.; Yang, J.J.; Shi, S.Q.; Lan, H.L.; Zhao, W.; Hung, W.L.; He, J.; Wang, R. The genome of Bifidobacterium longum subsp. infantis YLGB-1496 provides insights into its carbohydrate utilization and genetic stability. Genes 2024, 15, 466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhu, X.M.; Jiang, D.D.; Yuan, B.J.; Ni, K.K. Effect of low-temperature-tolerant lactic acid bacteria on the fermentation quality and bacterial community of oat silage at 5 °C vs. 15 °C. Fermentation 2022, 8, 158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hernández, A.; Larsson, C.U.; Sawicki, R.; van Niel, E.W.J.; Roos, S.; Håkansson, S. Impact of the fermentation parameters pH and temperature on stress resilience of Lactobacillus reuteri DSM 17938. AMB Express 2019, 9, 66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Derunets, A.S.; Selimzyanova, A.I.; Rykov, S.V.; Kuznetsov, A.E.; Berezina, O.V. Strategies to enhance stress tolerance in lactic acid bacteria across diverse stress conditions. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2024, 40, 126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Brunelli, L.; Perotti, S.; Gargari, G.; De Vitis, V.; Mantegazza, G.; Ferrari, R.; Minuzzo, M.; Pierallini, E.; Ricci, G.; Fiore, W.; et al. Genetic and phenotypic stability of Lacticaseibacillus paracasei DG (DSM 34154) over 10 years of industrial production. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2025, 91, e02394-24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Valenzuela-Miranda, D.; Valenzuela-Muñoz, V.; Nuñez-Acuña, G.; Gallardo-Escárate, C. Long-term serial culture of Piscirickettsia salmonis leads to a genomic and transcriptomic reorganization affecting bacterial virulence. Aquaculture 2020, 529, 735634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ratib, N.R.; Seidl, F.; Ehrenreich, I.M.; Finkel, S.E. Evolution in long-term stationary-phase batch culture: Emergence of divergent Escherichia coli lineages over 1200 days. mBio 2021, 12, 10-1128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Schröder, N.C.H.; Korsa, A.; Wami, H.; Mantel, O.; Dobrindt, U.; Kurtz, J. Serial passage in an insect host indicates genetic stability of the human probiotic Escherichia coli Nissle 1917. Evol. Med. Public Health 2022, 10, 71–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Shibata, Y.; Kawada, M.; Nakano, Y.; Toyoshima, K.; Yamashita, Y. Identification and characterization of an autolysin-encoding gene of Streptococcus mutans. Infect. Immun. 2005, 73, 3512–3520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Liu, S.L.; Ma, Y.M.; Zheng, Y.; Zhao, W.; Zhao, X.; Luo, T.Q.; Zhang, J.; Yang, Z.N. Cold-stress response of probiotic Lactobacillus plantarum K25 by iTRAQ proteomic analysis. J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2020, 30, 187–195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Du, Y.; Li, H.; Shao, J.C.; Wu, T.; Xu, W.L.; Hu, X.M.; Chen, J. Adhesion and colonization of the probiotic Lactobacillus plantarum HC-2 in the intestine of Litopenaeus Vannamei are associated with bacterial surface proteins. Front. Microbiol. 2022, 13, 878874. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yu, P.; Li, N.; Geng, M.X.; Liu, Z.M.; Liu, X.M.; Zhang, H.P.; Zhao, J.X.; Zhang, H.; Chen, W. Lactose utilization of Streptococcus thermophilus and correlations with β-galactosidase and urease. J. Dairy Sci. 2020, 103, 166–171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Peiro, C.; Millard, P.; de Simone, A.; Cahoreau, E.; Peyriga, L.; Enjalbert, B.; Heux, S. Chemical and metabolic controls on dihydroxyacetone metabolism lead to suboptimal growth of Escherichia coli. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2019, 85, e00768-19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Collins, H.M.; Betts, N.S.; Dockter, C.; Berkowitz, O.; Braumann, I.; Cuesta-Seijo, J.A.; Skadhauge, B.; Whelan, J.; Bulone, V.; Fincher, G.B. Genes that mediate starch metabolism in developing and germinated barley grain. Front. Plant Sci. 2021, 12, 641325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Andersen, S.; Moller, M.S.; Poulsen, J.C.N.; Pichler, M.J.; Svensson, B.; Lo Leggio, L.; Goh, Y.J.; Abou Hachem, M. An 1,4-α-glucosyltransferase defines a new maltodextrin catabolism scheme in Lactobacillus acidophilus. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2020, 86, e00661-20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, Y.X.; Yang, Y.J.; Fan, Q.; Huang, Z.X.; Li, J.J.; Wu, Q.; Tang, X.H.; Ding, J.M.; Han, N.Y.; Xu, B. Molecular and biochemical characterization of salt-tolerant trehalose-6-phosphate hydrolases identified by screening and sequencing salt-tolerant clones from the metagenomic library of the gastrointestinal tract. Front. Microbiol. 2020, 11, 1466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, X.F.; Wang, M.H.; Ding, M.; Pang, X.Y.; Sun, J.; Lu, Y.J. Effects of complex cryoprotectant on the freeze-drying survival of Lactobacillus acidophilus FMNS-10 and its protective mechanisms. J. Stored Prod. Res. 2025, 112, 102646. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xiong, F.K.; Liu, Z.B.; Hu, G.Z.; Zhao, D.; Qu, D.Q. Optimisation of the protection process in baijiu yeast spray drying and investigation of its micro-nano protection mechanism. LWT-Food Sci. Technol. 2025, 227, 118000. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tan, H.H.; Hou, J.; Ouyang, J.; Zheng, Z.J. Development of a sustainable approach to produce galactaric acid from sunflower heads by engineered Pseudomonas putida KT2440. Bioresour. Technol. 2025, 437, 133115, Corrigendum in Bioresour. Technol. 2025, 437, 133179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2025.133179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Avci, F.G.; Prasun, T.; Wendisch, V.F. Metabolic engineering for microbial production of sugar acids. BMC Biotechnol. 2025, 25, 36, Correction in BMC Biotechnol. 2025, 25, 50. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12896-025-00996-0. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kapse, N.; Pisu, V.; Dhakephalkar, T.; Margale, P.; Shetty, D.; Wagh, S.; Dagar, S.; Dhakephalkar, P.K. Unveiling the probiotic potential of Streptococcus thermophilus MCC0200: Insights from in vitro studies corroborated with genome analysis. Microorganisms 2024, 12, 347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Alexandraki, V.; Kazou, M.; Blom, J.; Pot, B.; Papadimitriou, K.; Tsakalidou, E. Comparative genomics of Streptococcus thermophilus support important traits concerning the evolution, biology and technological properties of the species. Front. Microbiol. 2019, 10, 2916. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shehata, H.R.; Chandler, R.A.; Newmaster, S.G. Draft genome sequences of Lactobacillus delbrueckii subsp. bulgaricus strains CBC-LB69 and CBC-LB8, isolated from homemade dairy foods in bulgaria. Microbiol. Resour. Announc. 2020, 9, 10-1128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hao, P.; Zheng, H.J.; Yu, Y.; Ding, G.H.; Gu, W.Y.; Chen, S.T.; Yu, Z.H.; Ren, S.X.; Oda, M.; Konno, T.; et al. Complete sequencing and pan-Genomic analysis of Lactobacillus delbrueckii subsp bulgaricus reveal its genetic basis for industrial yogurt production. PLoS ONE 2011, 6, e15964. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dinarieva, T.Y.; Klimko, A.I.; Kahnt, J.; Cherdyntseva, T.A.; Netrusov, A.I. Adaptation of lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus CM MSU 529 to aerobic growth: A proteomic approach. Microorganisms 2023, 11, 313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Onwe, R.O.; Onwosi, C.O.; Ezugworie, F.N.; Ekwealor, C.C.; Okonkwo, C.C. Microbial trehalose boosts the ecological fitness of biocontrol agents, the viability of probiotics during long-term storage and plants tolerance to environmental-driven abiotic stress. Sci. Total Environ. 2022, 806, 150432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Guo, Z.P.; Li, M.Y.; Guo, Z.T.; Zhu, R.; Xin, Y.; Gu, Z.H.; Zhang, L. Trehalose metabolism targeting as a novel strategy to modulate acid tolerance of yeasts and its application in food industry. Food Microbiol. 2023, 114, 104300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pightling, A.W.; Pettengill, J.B.; Luo, Y.; Baugher, J.D.; Rand, H.; Strain, E. Interpreting whole-genome sequence analyses of foodborne bacteria for regulatory applications and outbreak investigations. Front. Microbiol. 2018, 9, 1482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- An, M.L.; Zhao, Z.; Zhao, L.; Yang, J.J.; Gao, H.N.; Zhang, L.L.; Zhao, G.P.; Hou, B.C.; He, J.; Hung, W.L.; et al. Metabolic modulation of yogurt fermentation kinetics and storage stability by Lactobacillus-starter culture interactions. Foods 2025, 14, 2935. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Filannino, P.; Di Cagno, R.; Crecchio, C.; De Virgilio, C.; De Angelis, M.; Gobbetti, M. Transcriptional reprogramming and phenotypic switching associated with the adaptation of Lactobacillus plantarum C2 to plant niches. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 27392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]





| Generation Time (n) | pH Values | OD600 | Fermentation Activity (U) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 2000 | 0 | 2000 | 0 | 2000 | |
| A1 | 4.73 ± 0.03 a | 4.69 ± 0.01 a | 1.37 ± 0.02 a | 1.49 ± 0.01 b | 45.33 ± 1.02 a | 51.37 ± 0.80 b |
| A4 | 4.81 ± 0.01 a | 4.74 ± 0.01 a | 1.49 ± 0.01 a | 1.52 ± 0.01 b | 57.41 ± 0.98 a | 64.10 ± 2.06 b |
| A31 | 4.75 ± 0.00 a | 4.66 ± 0.02 b | 1.39 ± 0.01 a | 1.39 ± 0.02 a | 50.27 ± 1.56 a | 56.29 ± 1.14 b |
| A37 | 4.81 ± 0.00 a | 4.64 ± 0.01 b | 1.48 ± 0.02 a | 1.53 ± 0.01 b | 50.86 ± 0.91 a | 58.95 ± 1.64 b |
| A72 | 4.71 ± 0.00 a | 4.66 ± 0.01 b | 1.50 ± 0.00 a | 1.55 ± 0.02 a | 52.10 ± 1.28 a | 55.65 ± 0.51 b |
| B29 | 4.30 ± 0.00 a | 4.07 ± 0.01 b | 2.10 ± 0.01 a | 2.19 ± 0.01 b | 57.01 ± 0.42 a | 62.41 ± 0.67 b |
| B39 | 4.32 ± 0.01 a | 4.31 ± 0.01 a | 2.00 ± 0.01 a | 2.06 ± 0.01 b | 33.10 ± 0.78 a | 41.69 ± 1.55 b |
| B43 | 4.48 ± 0.01 a | 4.33 ± 0.01 b | 1.99 ± 0.01 a | 2.08 ± 0.01 b | 56.38 ± 2.01 a | 61.90 ± 1.72 b |
| Gompertz | A37-0 | A37-2000 | B29-0 | B29-2000 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nmax | 1.089 | 1.203 | 1.837 | 1.998 |
| Rm | 0.536 | 0.691 | 0.634 | 0.887 |
| λ (h) | 5.323 | 4.688 | 5.043 | 4.427 |
| N0 | 0.026 | 0.050 | 0.061 | 0.087 |
| SSE | 0.005 | 0.007 | 0.013 | 0.015 |
| Adjusted R2 | 0.996 | 0.996 | 0.997 | 0.997 |
| RMSE | 0.025 | 0.031 | 0.043 | 0.047 |
| 0 h (log10 CFU/mL) | 6.77 ± 0.01 a | 6.80 ± 0.02 a | 5.43 ± 0.01 a | 5.51 ± 0.02 a |
| 2 h (log10 CFU/mL) | 6.71 ± 0.05 a | 6.89 ± 0.02 b | 5.75 ± 0.03 a | 6.15 ± 0.01 b |
| 3 h (log10 CFU/mL) | 7.20 ± 0.05 a | 7.32 ± 0.02 b | 6.24 ± 0.04 a | 6.78 ± 0.02 b |
| 5 h (log10 CFU/mL) | 7.90 ± 0.05 a | 8.38 ± 0.05 b | 7.15 ± 0.06 a | 7.64 ± 0.04 b |
| 8 h (log10 CFU/mL) | 8.50 ± 0.02 a | 8.70 ± 0.07 b | 7.75 ± 0.05 a | 7.89 ± 0.03 b |
| A1 | A4 | A31 | A37 | A72 | B29 | B39 | B43 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| General genome feature | ||||||||
| Size | 1,784,905 | 1,785,671 | 1,789,462 | 1,769,967 | 1,781,421 | 1,818,337 | 1,812,629 | 1,776,843 |
| GC content | 38.95 | 38.95 | 38.94 | 38.93 | 38.99 | 49.84 | 49.85 | 49.81 |
| CDS No. | 1889 | 1890 | 1890 | 1882 | 1900 | 1877 | 1869 | 1843 |
| Number of RNAs | 41 | 31 | 37 | 43 | 43 | 90 | 86 | 81 |
| Subsystem features | ||||||||
| COG gene No. | 1574 | 1572 | 1567 | 1552 | 1595 | 1486 | 1485 | 1489 |
| Percent of All Genes (%) | 83.32 | 83.17 | 82.91 | 82.47 | 83.95 | 79.17 | 79.45 | 80.79 |
| KEGG Pathway Enrichment | ||||||||
| Carbohydrate metabolism | 109 | 111 | 110 | 106 | 105 | 139 | 123 | 127 |
| Amino acid metabolism | 124 | 128 | 124 | 122 | 118 | 142 | 102 | 95 |
| Metabolism of other amino acids | 25 | 26 | 25 | 26 | 25 | 35 | 31 | 32 |
| Energy metabolism | 46 | 46 | 49 | 46 | 47 | 53 | 65 | 62 |
| Lipid metabolism | 32 | 33 | 32 | 31 | 30 | 37 | 44 | 44 |
| Nucleotide metabolism | 67 | 67 | 67 | 66 | 68 | 75 | 78 | 79 |
| Gene Mutation Type | Strains | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A1 | A4 | A31 | A37 | A72 | B29 | B39 | B43 | |
| Single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) | 6 | 10 | 5 | 6 | 4 | 10 | 15 | 12 |
| Multiple nucleotide polymorphism (MNP) | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 0 |
| Insertion mutation (INS) | 2 | 1 | 4 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Deletion mutation (DEL) | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 4 |
| Inversion mutation (INV) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Duplicate mutation (DUP) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Balanced chromosomal translocation (BED) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Intergenic genomic variation | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2026 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license.
Share and Cite
Yu, Y.; Yang, J.; Wang, R.; Zhang, L.; Zhou, K.; Li, B.; Hou, B.; Sang, Y.; Feng, H.; Zhang, Y.; et al. A Study on the Stability and Carbohydrate Metabolic Traits of Starter Cultures in Response to Continuous Subculturing. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2026, 27, 2906. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms27062906
Yu Y, Yang J, Wang R, Zhang L, Zhou K, Li B, Hou B, Sang Y, Feng H, Zhang Y, et al. A Study on the Stability and Carbohydrate Metabolic Traits of Starter Cultures in Response to Continuous Subculturing. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2026; 27(6):2906. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms27062906
Chicago/Turabian StyleYu, Yangyang, Jianjun Yang, Ran Wang, Lele Zhang, Kai Zhou, Baolei Li, Baochao Hou, Yue Sang, Haihong Feng, Yan Zhang, and et al. 2026. "A Study on the Stability and Carbohydrate Metabolic Traits of Starter Cultures in Response to Continuous Subculturing" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 27, no. 6: 2906. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms27062906
APA StyleYu, Y., Yang, J., Wang, R., Zhang, L., Zhou, K., Li, B., Hou, B., Sang, Y., Feng, H., Zhang, Y., He, J., & Li, X. (2026). A Study on the Stability and Carbohydrate Metabolic Traits of Starter Cultures in Response to Continuous Subculturing. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 27(6), 2906. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms27062906

