Next Article in Journal
Large-Scale Plasma Proteomics and Genetic Integration Uncover Novel Biological Pathways in Male Pattern Baldness
Previous Article in Journal
Takeda G Protein-Coupled Receptor 5 and Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor-Gamma Activation by Pinocembrin and Pinostrobin Isolated from Lindera sericea
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

The Dynamics of Neuroinflammation in Traumatic Brain Injury: Molecular Markers Useful for Establishing the Post-Traumatic Interval in Forensic Practice

by
Sorin Hostiuc
1,* and
Mugurel-Constantin Rusu
2
1
Department of Legal Medicine and Bioethics, Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 042122 Bucharest, Romania
2
Department of Anatomy, Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 020021 Bucharest, Romania
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2026, 27(4), 2049; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms27042049
Submission received: 28 December 2025 / Revised: 14 February 2026 / Accepted: 17 February 2026 / Published: 22 February 2026

Abstract

In forensic pathology, accurately estimating the time since injury is essential. Current histological and imaging approaches commonly miss subtle temporal changes, especially in deaths occurring within hours of injury. This review discusses the timing of neuroinflammation after traumatic brain injury and emphasizes possible markers for estimating the time of injury in forensic cases. Promising markers include microglial activation (allograft inflammatory factor 1 and transmembrane protein 119, detectable within 10 min to 2 h), β-amyloid precursor protein accumulation (20–35 min), high-mobility group box 1 translocation (2–6 h), cytokine fluctuations (IL-1β and TNF-α peak between 4 and 24 h, IL-6 shows delayed, extended elevation), sequential leukocyte infiltration (neutrophils from 2 to 48 h, lymphocytes after 3–5 days), blood–brain barrier breakdown markers such as fibrinogen and IgG leakage, loss of tight junction proteins (2–3 h), matrix metalloproteinase-9 activity (peaking at 24–48 h), and reactive astrocytosis with increased glial fibrillary acidic protein levels (from 12 to 24 h onward). The association between injury severity and inflammation is influenced by factors such as age, genetics (e.g., APOE ε4), coexisting conditions, and preexisting inflammation, which reduce the reliability of individual markers. A multiparametric approach may offer the best prospects to improve the accuracy of post-traumatic and post-mortem interval assessment in medicolegal cases.

1. Introduction

Traumatic brain injuries (TBIs) remain a major cause of death and long-term disability worldwide, with nearly 40 million cases annually [1], with many resulting in sudden or delayed death [1]. While historically caused mostly by high-speed motor vehicle crashes affecting young men, the epidemiology is changing, especially in high-income countries, with a notable rise in older adults. In addition, firearm-related suicides and homicides remain an important factor in certain regions, posing unique forensic challenges [2,3].
In forensic and legal medicine, accurately determining the “age” of a brain injury, especially the post-traumatic interval (PTI), is fundamental for reconstructing crime scenes and establishing legal responsibility. The forensic pathologist’s assessment of wound age can directly influence criminal charges (such as manslaughter versus murder) or civil cases (like wrongful death claims related to medical negligence). Therefore, any marker that objectively enhances PTI precision is extremely important, as it decreases dependence on subjective judgment. In forensic practice, the post-traumatic interval (PTI) refers to the time elapsed between injury and death. It must be distinguished from the post-mortem interval (PMI), the time elapsed between death and examination, as both influence molecular marker stability differently [4].
Classical methods, including histological techniques such as hematoxylin and eosin staining or imaging tests, often fail to detect subtle cellular changes in deaths that occur minutes to hours after injury. They also have difficulties in accurately determining the cause when the victim has experienced more than one traumatic event. Furthermore, distinguishing primary mechanical damage from secondary hypoxic–ischemic injury remains a major challenge, as both processes trigger overlapping necrotic, inflammatory, and apoptotic pathways [5,6]. Despite significant advancements in recent years, current forensic dating techniques remain imprecise. Conventional methods, such as neutrophil migration, have a wide temporal window, making them inadequate for precise dating. Although many immunohistochemical markers have been suggested, their practical usefulness is limited because supporting data are often based on small case numbers, varied methodologies, animal studies, or highly controlled environments [7,8]. Additionally, individual differences such as age, gender, underlying diseases, and post-mortem interval (PMI) may alter protein expression, making some markers unreliable without strict reference standards [5,9]. Critically, these confounding factors, including age, genetic background (e.g., APOE ε4 status), preexisting inflammatory conditions, and comorbidities, must be systematically considered when evaluating each individual marker, as they can significantly alter the kinetics and magnitude of neuroinflammatory responses, thereby affecting PTI estimation accuracy [10,11].
Neuroinflammation is one of the main drivers of secondary TBI. After the initial mechanical injury, a highly active and complex inflammatory cascade is triggered, characterized by activation of resident microglial cells, disruption of the blood–brain barrier (BBB), and infiltration of peripheral immune cells. This response is mediated by a complex network of cytokines, chemokines, and damage-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs) such as HMGB1 [12]. Although the goal of this reaction is to clear debris and promote repair, dysregulated neuroinflammation can cause additional cerebral edema, increased intracranial pressure, and neuronal apoptosis and necrosis, thereby worsening the severity of the initial injury and ultimately deteriorating the patient’s prognosis.
The main aim of this study is to provide a comprehensive review of the temporal dynamics of neuroinflammation following TBI and to evaluate potential markers that could improve the accuracy of post-traumatic interval estimation in fatal cases for forensic purposes. This review uniquely synthesizes current knowledge on the temporal dynamics of neuroinflammatory markers specifically for forensic post-traumatic interval estimation, providing a structured framework for marker selection and interpretation that has not been previously available in the forensic pathology literature. We acknowledge that this review synthesizes existing evidence rather than presenting novel empirical data, and that the proposed multiparametric approach requires prospective validation before clinical implementation. The transition from basic science markers to practical forensic application remains challenging, and we discuss these limitations throughout the manuscript.

2. Pathophysiology of Neuroinflammation in TBI

The pathophysiology of fatal TBI is a complex, evolving process that occurs in two main phases: an immediate, irreversible primary (traumatic) injury, followed by a delayed, potentially modifiable secondary injury cascade. The primary injury may be caused by contact phenomena such as skull fractures, contusions, and lacerations, as well as by indirect injuries like acceleration–deceleration [13]. The severity and distribution of these mechanical forces determine the extent and pattern of initial tissue damage. Various biomechanical studies have demonstrated that strain rate, magnitude, and duration each independently contribute to cellular injury thresholds. High-velocity impacts can generate pressure gradients that travel through brain tissue as stress waves, creating regions of positive and negative pressure that may surpass cellular and biomolecular tolerance limits [14]. The biomechanical deformation of neural tissue causes immediate cytoskeletal disruption, including damage to microtubules and neurofilaments, which occurs within milliseconds of impact [15]. These structural changes disrupt axonal transport and trigger a cascade of cellular and molecular disturbances that extend far beyond the initial mechanical injury [16].
Trauma-related injuries are generally classified as focal or diffuse, though they actually exist on a spectrum rather than as distinct categories [17]. Focal injuries include contusions, hematomas, and lacerations that affect specific brain regions, usually occurring at coup or contrecoup sites where the brain strikes or is struck by the skull. Contusions are commonly found at the frontal and temporal poles because of the irregular contours of the anterior and middle cranial fossae, respectively [18]. Diffuse axonal injury (DAI) is the main feature of diffuse TBI, characterized by widespread damage to axons across the cerebral hemispheres, corpus callosum, brainstem, and cerebellum [19]. It results from rotational acceleration or deceleration forces that produce shear, tensile, and compressive strains within white matter tracts, often at points where tissue properties change suddenly, such as gray-white matter junctions [20]. These mechanical forces cause axonal membrane permeabilization and damage to the cytoskeleton, initiating a process called “traumatic axonal injury,” which involves both immediate mechanical failure and delayed progressive degeneration [16]. Primary axotomy, the complete severing of axons, occurs only in the most severe injuries, whereas most external damage involves mechanoporation of the axolemma and subsequent ionic imbalance [21]. Axonal injury is closely associated with vascular damage; the mechanical forces frequently damage blood vessels, leading to immediate hemorrhage. Vascular damage ranges from small, microscopic petechial hemorrhages seen in mild TBI to large hematomas that require surgery in more severe cases. The cranial blood vessels show regional vulnerability, with bridging veins being especially prone to tearing during acceleration or deceleration injuries [22].
In regions subjected to forces exceeding cellular structural limits, primary mechanical trauma causes immediate necrotic cell death [23]. Necrosis primarily results from catastrophic membrane failure, leading to disruption of ionic homeostasis, cellular edema, and rapid ATP depletion [24]. The distribution of necrotic cell death closely matches the pattern of biomechanical injury, with the most significant tissue damage located at impact sites and along trajectories of maximum strain. Neurons are especially vulnerable to mechanical trauma compared to glial cells, with neuronal death occurring at lower strain thresholds than injuries to astrocytes or oligodendrocytes [25]. Necrotic cells release various intracellular molecules into the extracellular space, including ATP, high-mobility group box 1 (HMGB1), and other DAMPs, which trigger an immediate innate response and initiate the secondary injury cascade.
The secondary injury phase starts within minutes of trauma and can last for days, weeks, or even months. Excitotoxicity is one of the earliest and most severe mechanisms involved. Mechanical damage to neuronal membranes and energy failure lead to the uncontrolled release of excitatory neurotransmitters, such as glutamate, into the extracellular space [26]. Extracellular glutamate overstimulates ionotropic receptors such as N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA), α-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazolepropionic acid (AMPA), and kainate receptors, leading to a large influx of calcium into neurons [27]. The highest glutamate release occurs at contusion margins or areas of secondary ischemia [28]. Intracellular calcium dysregulation contributes to secondary neuronal injury, as mechanical trauma causes immediate calcium influx through damaged membranes and delayed calcium entry via activated receptors and voltage-gated channels [29]. Overactivation of glutamate receptors and impaired calcium buffering result in sustained increases in cytoplasmic calcium, which activate many destructive enzymes like calpains, phospholipases, endonucleases, and nitric oxide synthase [30]. Additionally, mitochondrial calcium overload disrupts oxidative phosphorylation and triggers the mitochondrial permeability transition, initiating both necrotic and apoptotic cell death pathways [31,32].
Mitochondrial impairment is also a crucial aspect of secondary TBI, as mechanical trauma directly damages mitochondrial membranes and causes mitochondrial calcium overload [33]. As Xiong et al. have shown, mitochondrial respiration decreases immediately after TBI, with lasting deficits in oxidative phosphorylation that persist for weeks after the injury [34]. The dysfunction impacts multiple respiratory chain complexes, with Complex I showing particular vulnerability to trauma-induced damage. See Table 1.
The impairment of axonal mitochondria is especially important because they supply the high energy needed for the propagation of the action potential and synaptic transmission. Traumatic axonal injury causes disruptions in mitochondrial transport along axons, leading to the buildup of dysfunctional mitochondria at injury sites and energy failure in distant axonal segments [21]. These processes cause a delayed progression of axonal degeneration, which is typical of DAIs [33].
TBI increases oxidative stress through various mechanisms, including the production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) and reactive nitrogen species (RNS) from damaged mitochondria, the activation of oxidant-generating enzymes, and the depletion of natural antioxidant systems [59,60]. A detailed overview of the main factors driving oxidative stress after TBI is shown in Table 1. Superoxide radical, hydrogen peroxide, hydroxyl radical, and peroxynitrite build up in injured brain tissue, resulting in lipid peroxidation, protein oxidation, and DNA damage.
Lipid peroxidation, in particular, is a highly damaging outcome of oxidative stress because polyunsaturated fatty acids in neuronal membranes are very susceptible to free radical attacks [59]. The rapid spread of lipid peroxidation reactions through the neuronal membrane damages its structure, disrupts ion channels and receptors, and produces toxic aldehydes such as 4-hydroxy-2-nonenal and malondialdehyde. These products further impair cellular function and serve as biomarkers of oxidative injury. Protein carbonylation and nitration can alter key cellular protein functions, including enzymes involved in energy metabolism, cytoskeletal components, or ion channels [61]. Proteomic studies of injured brain tissue have identified hundreds of proteins affected by oxidation, with significant consequences such as impaired glucose metabolism (proteins like pyruvate dehydrogenase, ATP synthase, cytochrome c oxidase Va, enolase 1) [62,63], disrupted protein degradation pathways (ubiquitin carboxy-terminal hydrolase L-1, creatine kinase BB, heat shock cognate 71) [64,65], or disturbed cellular signaling (Synapsin I, SAP-97, PSD-95, α-enolase) [45,50,62]. DNA oxidation can cause mutagenic lesions that, if unrepaired, can lead to cell death; 8-hydroxy-2′-deoxyguanosine is a common marker.
The BBB is a specialized part of the brain’s microvasculature, consisting of several closely connected cell types. The most important (and well known) are brain endothelial cells, which form the inner lining of CNS capillaries. They feature continuous, highly specialized junctional complexes (such as adherens and gap junctions), have low levels of vesicular transport, and contain a rich array of transporters and enzymes that carefully regulate molecular movement between the blood and brain tissue [66,67]. This endothelial layer is surrounded by two other types of perivascular cells—pericytes and astrocytes. Pericytes are embedded in the shared basement membrane and are directly adjacent to endothelial cells. In vivo, loss-of-function studies have shown that a deficiency of pericytes increases BBB permeability to water, small tracers, and large tracers by increasing endothelial transcytosis, altering endothelial BBB-specific gene expression, and shifting the polarization of surrounding astrocyte endfeet. Astrocytes, by extending their endfeet, nearly fully encase CNS microvessels, creating a physical and biochemical interface. They release growth factors that promote and maintain tight junction protein expression in endothelial cells, helping preserve barrier selectivity and water/ion balance via aquaporin-4. TBI damages BBB integrity through multiple mechanisms, including direct mechanical injury to blood vessels, activation of MMPs, oxidative stress, and effects of inflammatory mediators [68].
The disruption generally occurs in three stages: an initial very early opening within 30 min, followed by a partial recovery, and a second, relatively early opening within a few hours after the trauma, leading to another partial recovery and a third opening several days later. Within minutes after trauma, some studies have observed a transient opening. Certain fluid-percussion and closed-head injury studies have shown that BBB breakdown to circulating proteins such as albumin and HRP can happen within 3–13 min after impact and may be widespread across both hemispheres, as a general response to trauma [69,70]. The greatest extravasation occurs within the first hour, followed by partial restoration within 30–60 min in many areas, except at the impact site, which remains permeable for a longer period. In the second phase, which was studied in more detail, it was shown that, around four hours after injury, the BBB is permeable to both large (horseradish peroxidase, around 44 kDa) and small tracers (biotin–dextrin–amine, 3 kDa) [71,72]. Over the next 12–24 h, BBB permeability is partially restored (especially for large molecules), and it increases again (particularly for small solutes) at 2–5 days, being associated with neuroinflammation, endothelial transcytosis, tight junction alterations, and vasogenic edema [71,72].
Disruption of tight junction proteins plays a vital role in the breakdown of the BBB. Many experimental studies show decreased expression and abnormal cellular localization of occludin, claudin-5, or zonula occludens after TBI. For example, Web et al. have demonstrated that in a rat TBI model, mRNA and protein levels of claudin-5, occludin, and zonula occludens-1 in the peri-contusional cortex significantly decrease after injury. These changes are linked to increased BBB permeability, as evidenced by Evans blue, directly connecting tight junction loss to BBB opening [73]. Similarly, Kawoos et al. found, in an experimental blast TBI study in rats, variable reductions in the same proteins at 2–3 h and 1 day post injury, coinciding with increased leakage of a 40 kDa tracer [74]. A more recent study identified claudin-1 induction in brain endothelium as a pathogenic mechanism: increased claudin-1 levels were associated with downregulation of claudin-5, occludin, and zonula occludens-1, leading to decreased transendothelial electrical resistance and increased permeability. Knockdown of claudin-1 preserved junctional proteins and maintained barrier integrity [75]. BBB dysfunction allows the infiltration of the brain by peripheral immune cells, plasma proteins, and potentially neurotoxins [68]. Albumin extravasation activates astrocytes and triggers inflammatory responses via TGF-β signaling pathways [76]. Additionally, infiltration of peripheral macrophages and lymphocytes contributes to neuroinflammation and may influence both injury progression and recovery [77].

2.1. The Neuroinflammatory Continuum

While this section details the mechanotransduction mechanisms linking primary mechanical injury to secondary inflammatory responses, readers primarily interested in forensic marker applications may proceed directly to Section 3. The mechanotransduction pathways described here provide important context for understanding why certain markers appear at specific time points post injury. Still, current technology does not permit post-mortem assessment of mechanotransduction states. The forensic utility of this section lies in understanding the biological rationale for marker temporal profiles rather than direct measurement of these pathways.
The conceptual division between primary and secondary brain injury, while useful for organization, oversimplifies the complex reality of TBI pathophysiology, which actually involves a continuous spectrum of overlapping processes initiated at the moment of impact [78]. The primary mechanical insult triggers an immediate and intense cellular and biomolecular response, blurring the line between direct mechanical damage and secondary effects, with mechanical strain activating signaling pathways, altering gene expression, and initiating inflammatory cascades within minutes [24]. The main link between primary and secondary injury mechanisms is mechanotransduction, the process by which cells convert mechanical stimuli into biochemical signals. Stretch-activated ion channels, integrin-mediated mechanosensing, and deformation of the primary cilium all contribute to cellular responses to mechanical trauma, with activation of mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathways, nuclear factor-κB (NF-κB), and hypoxia-inducible factors occurring rapidly after injury [29]. See Table S1 for the main mechanisms involved in mechanotransduction after TBI.
One of the key components in mechanotransduction-associated neuroinflammation is the Piezo channels. These are a family of large mechanosensitive ion channels embedded in the cell membrane, which open when the membrane is mechanically deformed (stretched, bent, or under pressure). When they open, positively charged ions flow into the cell, transforming mechanical force into electrochemical signals. In microglia, Piezo1 channels are involved in migration and pro-inflammatory cytokine production, acting as gatekeepers of the microglial immune response [79]. In astrocytes, Piezo1 channels play bidirectional roles—inflammation increases their sensitivity, and Piezo1 activity influences astrocyte behavior, reinforcing neuroinflammatory circuits [80].
While these mechanosensitive pathways cannot be directly assessed post mortem, their downstream effects, such as cytokine production patterns and inflammatory cell activation, represent the measurable forensic markers discussed in Section 3. Understanding mechanotransduction helps explain why certain markers appear within minutes (e.g., microglial morphological changes) while others require hours to days (e.g., leukocyte infiltration, astrocytic GFAP upregulation) [81,82,83].
Neuroinflammation after TBI shows complex spatio-temporal dynamics, with both beneficial and harmful effects that evolve over time. It involves many cell types and can both worsen damage and promote repair, sometimes occurring simultaneously in different brain regions [35,82]. In the acute phase, innate immune activation increases edema, oxidative stress, excitotoxicity, and cell death, while also aiding debris clearance, infection containment, angiogenesis, and early tissue repair [84,85,86]. As the response shifts into the chronic phase, ongoing activation of microglia and astrocytes, sustained cytokine and chemokine production, and continued leukocyte infiltration contribute to progressive neurodegeneration, seizures, cognitive decline, and neuropsychiatric syndromes [85,87,88]. The same mediators, such as IL-6, CCL2, and TNFα, can be neuroprotective when transient or low-level, or neurotoxic when excessive or prolonged [84,89].
Microglia act as rapid sentinels after TBI, quickly shifting from a homeostatic to a reactive state within minutes to hours. During this process, they shape much of the downstream cytokine and chemokine environment. In the uninjured brain, they have small bodies and highly branched processes that constantly monitor the parenchyma [90]. After TBI, they quickly undergo morphological changes toward a hypertrophic or amoeboid shape, indicating increased phagocytic activity [90,91]. Studies on human cadavers have shown localized activation and erythrocyte phagocytosis in the contusion zone even with survival times of only a few minutes, suggesting an almost immediate response to injury [92]. Using a rat model, Caplan et al. observed amoeboid microglia in the hippocampus and thalamus within 24 h after TBI, with increased density and an activated phenotype that persisted for weeks [91]. These structural changes are linked to enhanced motility and process reorientation toward injury sites, enabling microglia to contact damaged neurons, myelin, or blood-derived elements [9,90,93]. Their activation leads to increased phagocytosis of cellular debris and synaptic components. Around a week later, microglia show enhanced phagocytic activity and begin to engulf synapses, including the formation of satellite microglia tightly attached to neuronal cell bodies and dendrites. This can contribute to synaptic loss and circuit dysfunction. While this process is essential for clearing debris, excessive or inappropriate engulfment of healthy synapses and neurons has been increasingly associated with cognitive deficits or maladaptive plasticity following TBI.
When triggered by injury-related cues or by early cytokines such as TNFα or IL-1β, microglia release a wide array of secondary cytokines and chemokines in a concentration- and time-dependent manner, far exceeding what neurons or astrocytes release [94]. Transcriptomic profiling of microglia isolated 2–60 days after injury reveals dynamic waves of inflammatory gene expression, with an initial decrease in homeostatic genes and a later development of a specialized inflammatory state that combines both pro- and anti-inflammatory signatures [95] (see Figure 1). These states include upregulation of interferon-related, NF-κB-driven, and neurodegenerative-associated programs, which shape the overall neuroinflammatory cascade and influence neuronal survival, synaptic plasticity, and neurogenesis [88,96,97].
Pro-inflammatory cytokines play multiple roles in injured brain tissue, including exacerbating excitotoxicity by altering glutamate receptor expression, increasing BBB permeability, recruiting peripheral immune cells, and promoting cell death pathways [111]. The inflammatory response begins with an initial innate immune phase, followed by a delayed adaptive immune response involving T and B lymphocytes, which can persist for months after injury [77] and contribute to ongoing neurodegeneration [16]. Post-mortem studies of TBI survivors show microglia activation years after injury, with chronic inflammatory changes observed in both white and grey matter [16]. Positron emission tomography imaging with ligands targeting the translocator protein (TSPO), a marker of microglial activation, has demonstrated chronic neuroinflammation even 17 years post TBI [112].
The mechanisms maintaining chronic neuroinflammation after TBI involve multiple positive feedback loops and the failure of normal resolution pathways [113]. Cellular damage releases DAMPs, such as extracellular DNA/RNA, HMGB1, and heat shock proteins, which bind pattern-recognition receptors, such as Toll-like receptors, on microglia, astrocytes, or endothelial cells. This activates NF-κB/MAPK signaling and drives the production of IL-1β, IL-6, TNF-α, chemokines, ROS, and NO, which further damage neurons and the BBB, creating more DAMPs and sustaining microglial activation. Immediately after TBI, microglia may adopt reparative, M2-like states. Still, over time, there is a shift toward persistent M1-like, pro-inflammatory microglia with decreased phagocytic activity and increased production of TOS, NO, and cytokines [81]. This ongoing bias toward the M1 state prevents the normal resolution of inflammation and promotes continuous neurodegeneration and demyelination. TBI also impairs autophagic flux. Altered autophagy reduces DAMP clearance and prevents degradation of innate components, such as the NLRP3 inflammasome, leading to exaggerated type-1 interferon production and sustained inflammasome signaling, causing sustained cytokine release [114]. Pro-inflammatory microglia also exhibit mitochondrial dysfunction and shift toward glycolysis, which supports increased ROS and cytokine production but hampers homeostatic functions such as surveillance, phagocytosis, and resolution. Overall, these mechanisms promote chronic, non-resolving neuroinflammation.
Senescent cells, which build up in injured brain tissue, represent another mechanism linking acute injury to chronic inflammation and neurodegeneration [115]. Cellular senescence, marked by permanent cell cycle arrest and the release of inflammatory mediators (the senescence-associated secretory phenotype, SASP), increases after TBI and contributes to the ongoing inflammatory state [116].

2.2. The Interaction Between Injury Severity and Inflammatory Response

Both experimental and clinical studies have shown that greater tissue damage from TBI is associated with a larger, longer-lasting inflammatory response. For example, in a rodent study by Lagraoui et al., severe TBI led to an amplified response that persisted for at least 21 days. In contrast, in milder TBI, neuroinflammation nearly returned to baseline within 10 days [117]. Michalovicz et al., also in a rodent study, used a projectile-concussive model to induce mild versus moderate-severe TBI, finding that the latter results in greater neurodegeneration and widespread neuroinflammation across the cortex, hippocampus, thalamus, and cerebellum. In contrast, milder TBI causes more localized and less intense neuroinflammation [118]. Clinically, higher systemic cytokine levels, such as IL-6 or IL-10, have been associated with higher overall Injury Severity Score and increased mortality risk, supporting a link between injury severity and the inflammatory response [119]. Another study by Johnson et al. demonstrated that serum proteins and cytokines, such as ASC, IL-18, TNFα, IL-4, and IL-6, increase after TBI and correlate with GCS scores and overall outcomes [120]. However, this relationship is not always straightforward. For instance, in a large polytrauma cohort, patients with isolated severe TBI had lower IL-6 and IL-10 levels than polytrauma patients without TBI, despite having similar or higher ISS [119]. The same study observed that as head AIS severity increased, overall cytokine expression tended to decrease, and the IL-6/IL-10 ratio suggested a somewhat suppressed pro-inflammatory response, indicating a potential immunomodulatory or immunosuppressive effect of severe TBI on systemic inflammation [119]. Samanta et al. studied immune endotypes in patients with moderate-to-severe TBI and identified “early inflammatory” and “pauci-inflammatory” phenotypes that were not explained by baseline injury severity scores. Patients in the early-inflammatory group had higher levels of IL-6, IL-15, and MCP-1 and worse outcomes, but did not systematically exhibit greater anatomical severity than pauci-inflammatory patients [121].
Numerous studies indicate that the injury–inflammation link is influenced by factors such as age, genetics, prior immune challenges, extracranial injuries, infections, metabolic syndrome, and other comorbidities. These elements can modify the immune response during TBI, influencing the severity and nature of post-traumatic inflammation. Refer to S2 for additional information.

3. Forensically Relevant Markers for PTI Estimation

The earliest detectable changes following TBI occur at the cellular and molecular level, often before conventional histological changes become visible. These hyperacute markers are especially useful in cases where death occurs shortly after injury or when determining whether an individual was alive at the time of the traumatic event.

3.1. Microglial Activation and Morphological Changes

Microglial responses are among the earliest cellular reactions to TBI and can be detected relatively quickly using immunohistochemistry. In human forensic material, Lier et al. examined eight fatal TBI cases with survival times ranging from minutes to 7 days and showed activated, Iba1+ microglia near contusions in a case with a survival time of only 10 min, whereas control samples showed only non-activated microglia [92]. The same study showed progressive changes in microglial morphology and antigen expression (including ferritin and GPX1 upregulation) with increasing time to trauma survival [92]. Another study, done by Bohnert et al., assessed TMEM119, a microglia-specific marker, in 25 lethal TBI cases, and found a significantly increased number of TMEM119+ microglia, even in acute deaths with survival times less than 2 h, compared to cardiovascular controls, with survival-time-dependent changes in TMEM119, CD206, CCR2-positive cells in the cortex, white matter, brainstem, and cerebellum [122]. Flow cytometry studies show that microglia activate within minutes after TBI, with increased cell numbers and altered surface marker profiles and morphologies evident by 24 h, especially in the ipsilateral hemisphere [123]. Although several groups have proposed semi-quantitative scoring systems or morphometric pipelines to classify microglial states (ramified, hypertrophic, amoeboid, rod-like) after TBI, reported temporal thresholds (e.g., exact hour ranges for each morphology) have substantial variability across models, species, brain regions, and injury severity, and therefore are not standardized enough to support precise PTI estimation for routine forensic practice [90,93,124,125]. Advanced age is associated with baseline microglial priming and altered morphology, potentially confounding interpretation. Preexisting neurodegenerative conditions (Alzheimer’s, Parkinson’s) show chronic microglial activation. Systemic infections can induce microglial activation independent of TBI. Post-mortem interval affects immunohistochemical detection sensitivity [98,126].
An important confounding factor, which shoul be explicitly addressed when interpreting microglial markers in the context of TBI is the contribution of hemorrhage-associated infiltrating myeloid cells. Almost always, TBIs cause some degree of vascular damage, ranging from microscopic petechial hemorrhages to large contusional hematomas, which in turn leads to immediate disruption of the blood-brain barrier and rapid invasion of peripheral blood-derived monocytes and macrophages into the brain parenchyma [99,100]. These infiltrating monocyte-derived macrophages share many surface markers with resident microglia, including Iba1, CD68, and CX3CR1, making the two populations largely indistinguishable when using conventional immunohistochemistry [99,101]. Markers previously considered to be specific to microglia, such as TMEM119 and P2RY12,were shown to lose their discriminatory efficacy in the injured brain. For example, TMEM119 protein expression is downregulated in reactive microglia to levels comparable to those of blood-borne macrophages, thereby failing to differentiate the two myeloid populations after TBI [102]. Fate-mapping studies have revealed that infiltrating monocytes can acquire de novo expression of canonical microglial markers, such as TMEM119, P2RY12, and Sall1, and eventually become phenotypically indistinguishable from embryonic microglia using conventional approaches [103,104]. This phenotypic convergence means that studies quantifying “microglial” activation after hemorrhagic TBI using markers such as Iba1 or CD68 inevitably capture a mixed population of resident microglia and infiltrating macrophages, a limitation that affects the interpretation of virtually all immunohistochemical studies discussed in this review.
The functional implications of this microglia-macrophage overlap are directly relevant to forensic PTI estimation. Infiltrating MDMs may actively influence the neuroinflammatory milieu through crosstalk with resident microglia, promoting type I interferon responses and altering microglial activation profiles, as demonstrated by single-cell RNA sequencing studies in CCR2-deficient TBI models [105]. Moreover, MDMs persist in the brain parenchyma for at least 8 months after TBI, retaining phagocytic activity and displaying a distinct transcriptomic signature associated with aging and disease, which may confound the interpretation of chronic neuroinflammatory changes [106]. In the specific context of intracerebral hemorrhage, both microglia and infiltrating macrophages are recruited to the perihematomal region, where they participate in hematoma clearance through erythrophagocytosis, produce pro-inflammatory cytokines (IL-1β, TNF-α, IL-6), matrix metalloproteinases, and reactive oxygen species, and undergo phenotypic polarization that overlaps temporally with the marker dynamics described above [106]. Flow cytometry using CD45 expression levels (CD45lo for microglia versus CD45hi for peripheral macrophages) or advanced techniques such as single-cell transcriptomics and genetic fate-mapping remain the most reliable approaches for discriminating these populations [101], but these methods are largely impractical in routine forensic post-mortem examination. Therefore, until reliable immunohistochemical panels capable of distinguishing microglia from infiltrating macrophages in autopsy tissue become available, the temporal profiles of “microglial” markers reported herein should be interpreted with the caveat that they likely reflect the combined response of both resident and blood-derived myeloid populations, particularly in hemorrhagic TBI cases where vascular disruption facilitates early and significant macrophage infiltration.
Much of the reported temporal kinetics for microglial activation and cytokine responses derives from experimental (mainly rodent) models; rodent-to-human extrapolation requires temporal scaling, and the indicated time windows should be interpreted as approximate forensic ranges rather than exact chronological thresholds.

3.2. Mechanotransduction and Early Axonal Damage

The immediate mechanical response to TBI, involving inertial acceleration–deceleration forces, produces shear, tensile, and compressive strains within the brain, deforming tissue and placing long-tract axons at risk of shear and stretch injury [107]. The distortion of the axonal cytoskeleton disrupts normal axonal transport. It leads to the accumulation of transported proteins in the injured segments, causing axonal swelling and altered neuronal homeostasis [108], with βAPP being the most studied. Human autopsy studies have shown βAPP accumulation within 2–3 h (sometimes even earlier) after TBI. For example, Hortobágyi et al. found that in adults with severe head injury, βAPP+ axons were detected using antigen retrieval techniques in cases surviving for 35–60 min or less.
In contrast, cases with survival of less than 30 min were negative [109]. Nedić et al. observed βAPP+ axons in adult and pediatric cases with a survival time of 20–35 min after acceleration–deceleration head injuries [110]. Al-Sarraj et al., in a larger cohort of subjects, demonstrated βAPP+ axons in 35 of 37 cases of road traffic deaths with survival times of less than 30 min [108]. However, βAPP is a general marker of impaired axonal transport, not specific to traumatic axonal injuries, as it has also been identified in axonal injuries caused by hypoxic–ischemic or other metabolic insults. Studies comparing traumatic with vascular/ischemic axonal injuries have shown, however, that βAPP staining patterns and distributions differ between mechanically sheared axons and ischemic damage, though there is substantial overlap.
Additionally, pattern-based approaches (e.g., axons aligned with fiber tracts versus scattered) may help differentiate between traumatic and hypoxic axonal injuries in some cases, but overall specificity remains low [127,128]. Other axonally transported proteins, such as neurofilament (NF-68), SNAP-25, chromogranin A, or cathepsin D, may also accumulate at sites of axonal injury and can be detected immunohistochemically. Still, they generally have lower sensitivity and specificity than βAPP [129]. From a practical forensic standpoint, βAPP should be interpreted in a pattern-based manner: tract-aligned axonal swellings/varicosities and retraction bulbs favor mechanically induced diffuse axonal injury, whereas more diffuse or watershed/perivascular staining patterns are more compatible with hypoxic–ischemic injury; therefore, βAPP is best interpreted in combination with mechanotransduction readouts and BBB/vascular markers (e.g., IgG/fibrinogen extravasation, tight junction proteins, MMP-9).
From a practical forensic standpoint, βAPP should be interpreted in a pattern-based manner: tract-aligned axonal swellings/varicosities and retraction bulbs favor mechanically induced diffuse axonal injury, whereas more diffuse or watershed/perivascular staining patterns are more compatible with hypoxic–ischemic injury. Therefore, βAPP is best interpreted in combination with mechanotransduction readouts and BBB/vascular markers (e.g., IgG/fibrinogen extravasation, tight junction proteins, MMP-9) [110,130,131].

3.3. Damage-Associated Molecular Patterns

HMGB1 is a nuclear protein that becomes a DAMP when it translocates into the cytoplasm and is released extracellularly, activating TLR4/RAGE and cytokine cascades [132,133,134]. In brain injury models, nuclear-to-cytoplasmic translocation and release occur within minutes to a few hours. Rodent models of TBI have shown nuclear loss and cytoplasmic accumulation beginning at 6 h and persisting for days. The cytosolic fractions are elevated from 2 to 24 h and later [135,136,137,138]. In brains with hypoxic–ischemic injuries, neuronal HMGB1 translocation was seen from 0 to 2 h, and extracellular detection from 2 to 6 h [139,140]. In subarachnoid hemorrhage, neuronal translocation was also observed as early as 2 h after the onset of hemorrhage, with increased mRNA/protein levels and downstream NF-κB/IL-1β activation [141]. Their potential usefulness is relatively limited to PTI, as its pattern varies with injury type, severity, age, and cell death mode (necrosis vs. apoptosis), leading to inconsistent early profiles across studies [132,133,136]. HMGB1 is also affected by systemic trauma, sepsis, and peripheral organ injury, complicating its interpretation [137,142,143]. HMGB1 is a relatively non-specific DAMP: in early post-injury deaths, it may also be increased or translocated in non-traumatic hypoxic–ischemic injury and systemic inflammation, and HMGB1 alone cannot reliably discriminate traumatic from non-traumatic mechanisms. Systemic trauma and sepsis elevate peripheral HMGB1, potentially confounding CNS interpretation. Age affects HMGB1 dynamics. The mode of cell death (necrosis releases HMGB1 rapidly; apoptosis retains it) creates variable profiles. Post-mortem autolysis affects the nuclear–cytoplasmic distribution [134,144,145].

3.4. Temporal Profiles of Key Cytokines

Experimental and clinical TBI data have shown rapid IL-1β upregulation within hours, peaking on the first day and contributing to a narrow treatment window [146,147,148]. In the cortex and hippocampus, IL-1β peaks between 4 and 24 h, with elevations persisting for days. Blood and CSF studies in human TBI show increased IL1β and IL-1ra in the acute (<24 h) and subacute (<7 days) phases, often associated with BBB disruption and worse outcomes [149,150,151]. Similarly, TNFα appears very early after TBI, with cortical mRNA and protein detectable from 1 to 4 h, sometimes peaking before 12 h and declining thereafter, though in other models it remains elevated for a few days [152,153,154,155]. In contrast, human serum TNFα levels rise acutely after TBI and remain chronically elevated, correlating with severity and overall outcomes [120,156]. IL-6 typically shows a slightly delayed (24 h) but more prolonged rise and is considered the most consistently increased acute marker, with elevated blood levels for months [151]. IL-1-dependent chemokines (CCL2, CCL3, CCL4) show strong temporal regulation: in mouse closed-head injury, Ccl3/Ccl4 peak at three h and Ccl2 at nine h, then returning toward baseline by 24–72 h [146]. For forensic purposes, the stereotyped early appearance (2–6 h) and changing cellular/spatial patterns over days mean these markers can support broad PTI binning (e.g., <6 h, 6–24 h, 1–3 days, >3 days). However, expression is influenced by injury severity, systemic inflammation, BBB status, and treatment options [146,149,150,151].
Preexisting systemic inflammation, infection, or sepsis significantly alter cytokine baselines. Medical interventions (such as corticosteroids and hypothermia) can suppress cytokine responses. Age affects cytokine kinetics (the elderly show delayed peaks). Genetic polymorphisms in cytokine genes create inter-individual variability. Post-mortem degradation preferentially affects cytokines compared to structural proteins. Much of the reported temporal kinetics of microglial activation and cytokine responses derives from experimental (mainly rodent) models; rodent-to-human extrapolation requires temporal scaling, and the indicated time windows should be interpreted as approximate forensic ranges rather than exact chronological thresholds [157,158,159].

3.5. Leukocyte Characteristics

The ordered arrival of neutrophils, monocytes/macrophages, and then lymphocytes is one of the best-known and most widely used methods for determining PTI. Neutrophils are the first infiltrating leukocytes, arriving within minutes [160] into the subarachnoid/subdural spaces and peaking approximately 2 h later in animal models. The parenchymal infiltration peaks at around 24–48 h and declines over 7 days [9,161]. MPO activity increased at 6 h, peaked at 24–48 h, and returned to baseline by 72–168 h, depending on the region [161,162,163]. CD45+ and CD11b+ infiltrating myeloid cells in controlled cortical impact peak at around 18–24 h and remain elevated for several days, returning to baseline in about 2 months [9,164]. Regarding lymphocytes, human biopsy/post-mortem samples show no CD3+, CD4+, or CD8+ T cells within 24 h after TBI, but CD3+ and CD4+ T cells are present in essentially all samples at 3–5 days, with CD8+ T cells present in only 75% of cases. CD3+ cells persist for more than 26 days [9]. Systemic infection accelerates leukocyte infiltration. Immunosuppression (medical or age-related) delays infiltration. Preexisting inflammation may show baseline parenchymal leukocytes. Corticosteroid treatment suppresses infiltration.

3.6. BBB Breakdown Markers

Both human and animal studies have shown the presence of serum proteins in the parenchyma within hours after TBI. Swine and rodent contusion models have demonstrated multifocal IgG and fibrinogen leakage from 6 h to approximately 72 h after trauma, even in the absence of overt hemorrhage [74,165]. Human autopsy studies reported perivascular and parenchymal fibrinogen/IgG in 40–50% of acute TBI deaths at 10–13 days, and in nearly half of the patients with survival times over 1 year, suggesting an early onset and also a remarkable chronic persistence of BBB leakage [166,167]. Fibrinogen deposits are larger in acute TBI than in long-term survivors and are correlated with microglial activation and decreased neuronal density [168].
Blast and focal ischemia models show rapid reduction of claudin-5, occludin, and ZO-1 within 2–3 h, paralleling increased permeability to 40 kDa tracers, with near-normalization by 3 days in blast TBI [74], and a biphasic leak (peaks at 3 h and 72 h) in ischemia–reperfusion models [73]. After contusional TBI, TJ downregulation tracks the extravasation of Evans blue/albumin over 24–96 h [73]. Recent studies have also shown maladaptive claudin-1 induction, which suppresses claudin-5/ZO-1 and sustains leakiness in chronic injury [75,169].
MMPs also exhibit distinct temporal patterns. Experimental TBI and stroke models have shown early MMP-9 upregulation (2–6 h), with peak activity around 24–48 h, coinciding with TJ loss, laminin degradation, and vasogenic edema [170,171,172,173]. Human contusional TBI microdialysis studies have detected increased MMP-9 levels before 24–74 h, with the highest concentrations in the pericontusional areas, followed by a substantial decline thereafter, while other MMPs show variable or modest changes [174]. Serum MMP-7 and, to a lesser extent, MMP-1 and MMP-2, are correlated with MRI-quantified BBB permeability, suggesting the potential usefulness of systemic MMPs as peripheral biomarkers for BBB dysfunction [175]. Hypertension and diabetes cause baseline BBB dysfunction. Hypoxic–ischemic injury also disrupts the BBB. Post-mortem autolysis affects tight junction protein immunoreactivity. Systemic inflammation can increase circulating MMPs [176].

3.7. Reactive Astrocytosis and GFAP

Reactive astrocytosis and GFAP (including GBDPs) serve as reliable markers for subacute to chronic PTI, especially if the estimated PTI is longer than 12–24 h. The 12–24 h threshold for GFAP elevation refers specifically to detectable tissue GFAP via immunohistochemistry in autopsy specimens. In contrast, serum GFAP can be detected earlier (within 1–6 h) due to blood–brain barrier disruption, releasing pre-formed protein. Forensic pathologists should note that autopsy-based assessment relies on tissue markers, making the 12–24 h tissue threshold most relevant for post-mortem evaluation (see Table 2 and Figure 2). However, responses differ depending on injury type (focal versus diffuse), severity, age, and sex, and some astrocytes become “atypically” reactive without significant GFAP upregulation [177,178,179]. In focal and stab-wound models, GFAP+ reactive astrocytes appear within 24 h, increase at 3–7 days, and remain elevated for more than 28 days, especially near the core of the injury [180,181,182]. Diffuse or mild TBI shows more modest GFAP increases, with subsets of astrocytes exhibiting only 2–3-fold GFAP elevations compared with higher levels in focal injuries [177,178]. TBI also triggers GFAP breakdown, with the appearance of GFAP breakdown products (GBDPs) via calpains and caspase-6, with fragments 38–46 kDa appearing from day 1, rising through 14–28 days, and marking delayed astrocyte injury [183]. Serum and CSF GFAP levels also rise within hours after TBI, reaching peak values over the first 24–48 h and remaining elevated for several days; there is a positive correlation between serum levels and TBI severity, CT lesions, neurosurgical intervention, and long-term outcome [119,183,184,185].
Preexisting astrogliosis from neurodegenerative disease, prior TBI, or stroke creates elevated baselines. Age affects astrocyte reactivity patterns. Hypoxic–ischemic injury also induces GFAP upregulation, limiting specificity for traumatic injury. Key distinguishing features, differentiating traumatic from hypoxic–ischemic injury include (1) β-APP accumulation pattern: traumatic axonal injury shows characteristic varicose axonal swellings along white matter tracts, while hypoxic–ischemic injury produces more diffuse neuronal β-APP. (2) Microglial activation distribution: TBI shows focal activation at injury sites versus global activation in hypoxia. (3) Temporal sequence: traumatic inflammation follows biomechanical injury distribution, while hypoxic patterns follow vascular territories [200,201,202,203]. Mixed injuries remain challenging and require combined marker assessment with careful correlation to gross pathological findings.

4. Proposed Multiparametric Decision Framework for PTI Estimation

Given the limitations outlined above and the complexity of neuroinflammatory responses following TBI, we propose a structured multiparametric decision framework for forensic PTI estimation. This approach integrates multiple biomarker categories with contextual and clinical information to improve estimation accuracy while accounting for individual variability. The framework follows a hierarchical decision tree structure organized into four sequential evaluation phases: (1) Initial assessment and the identification of confounders; (2) Primar marker panel assessment; (3) Differential diagnosis and (4) Integration and confidence assessment. See Figure 3 for details.

5. Limitations

Biological variability, driven by factors such as advanced age, comorbidities (e.g., diabetes or chronic alcohol use), and genetic predispositions (e.g., APOE ε4), significantly influences the kinetics and magnitude of the neuroinflammatory response. This results in “delayed” or “attenuated” signatures that make post-traumatic interval (PTI) estimation difficult. These challenges are exacerbated by technical issues, including inconsistent antibody standards and the adverse effects of extended post-mortem intervals and tissue autolysis, which tend to reduce sensitive markers such as cytokines while preserving structural proteins. Furthermore, interpreting neuroinflammation is complicated by the difficulty in differentiating trauma from other patterns caused by hypoxic–ischemic events, systemic infections, or preexisting neurodegenerative conditions. The existing literature often suffers from small sample sizes, selection bias, subjective semi-quantitative scoring with inter-observer variability, and a general lack of thorough external validation, emphasizing the importance of a cautious, multi-marker approach in medicolegal contexts.
Important forensic confounders, such as agonal hypoxia/asphyxia, prolonged resuscitation (CPR), mechanical ventilation (including hyperoxia and PEEP-related effects), and catecholamine surges/vasopressor exposure, can modulate cytokine concentrations, BBB permeability readouts, and microglial activation states. These factors may therefore bias PTI estimation if not documented and accounted for, reinforcing the need for multiparametric interpretation and case-specific context.
Much of the existing literature is derived from animal models or clinical TBI cohorts with known injury timing, which may not directly translate to forensic contexts where injury timing is unknown. Prospective validation studies using forensic autopsy cases with documented injury times are essential.
Age-related baseline neuroinflammation, genetic polymorphisms (particularly APOE ε4), preexisting conditions (diabetes, hypertension, neurodegenerative diseases), and chronic medication use can alter marker expression and timing. Preexisting neuroinflammation from conditions such as Alzheimer’s disease, multiple sclerosis, or chronic infections may obscure or accelerate trauma-induced changes.
Cytokines (particularly IL-1β and TNF-α) show significant degradation within 24–48 h post mortem; GFAP and β-APP demonstrate relative stability for 24–72 h under standard autopsy conditions; microglial morphology is preserved for 24–48 h but autolysis limits later assessment. Refrigeration extends marker stability.
Antibody clone selection, tissue fixation protocols, staining variability across laboratories, and inter-observer reliability in morphological assessments require standardization before multi-center validation studies can be meaningful.

6. Conclusions

We have proposed a multiparametric decision framework for PTI estimation which, within the limits that were explicitly mentioned in the manuscript, will significantly aid forensic pathologists in properly assessing PTIs.
This approach includes temporal biomarker profiles with systematic assessment of confounding factors such as age, medical history, and circumstances of death, but also differential diagnosis to distinguish traumatic neuroinflammation from hypoxic–ischemic injury, septic encephalopathy, and preexisting neurodegeneration, requiring spatial correlation between inflammatory patterns and identifiable mechanical injury sites. PTI estimates should be expressed as time ranges rather than point values, accompanied by explicit confidence assessments based on biomarker concordance: high confidence requires convergence of at least three independent markers from different biological categories, moderate confidence with two concordant markers, and low confidence with single or discordant markers. All estimates must transparently acknowledge modifying factors and case-specific limitations. This integrated approach, prioritizing the convergence of multiple biological signals over reliance on isolated markers, may provide a more scientifically robust and forensically defensible methodology for post-traumatic interval estimation, reflecting the biological reality that no single biomarker can capture the temporal complexity of the post-traumatic neuroinflammatory cascade across diverse populations and injury contexts.
Translation into routine medicolegal application will require rigorous forensic validation in large, well-characterized human autopsy cohorts, with standardized sampling and post-mortem protocols and integrative multiparametric statistical models (including external validation) to quantify uncertainty and improve PTI estimation.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/ijms27042049/s1.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, S.H. and M.-C.R.; methodology, S.H. and M.-C.R.; software, S.H.; formal analysis, S.H. and M.-C.R.; writing—original draft preparation, S.H.; writing—review and editing, M.-C.R. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

No new data were created or analyzed in this study.

Acknowledgments

During the preparation of this manuscript/study, the author(s) used Grammarly (version 1.152.2, Grammarly Inc., New York, NY, USA) for the purposes of checking the grammar/spelling, and Consensus.app (https://consensus.app) and Google Scholar Labs (https://scholar.google.com/scholar_labs, launched November 2025, experimental version) for identifying additional, relevant, bibliographic sources. The authors have reviewed and edited the output and take full responsibility for the content of this publication. For graphs/figures, we used Python 3.13.11 (Python Software Foundation, released 5 December 2025) with Matplotlib 3.10.8 (released 10 December 2025).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Abbreviations

AISAbbreviated Injury Scale
AMPAα-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazolepropionic acid
APOEApolipoprotein E
APPAmyloid Precursor Protein
ASCApoptosis-associated Speck-like protein containing a CARD
ATPAdenosine Triphosphate
BBBBlood–Brain Barrier
βAPPBeta-Amyloid Precursor Protein
CCIControlled Cortical Impact
CCL2C-C Motif Chemokine Ligand 2
CCL3C-C Motif Chemokine Ligand 3
CCL4C-C Motif Chemokine Ligand 4
CCR2C-C Chemokine Receptor Type 2
CD3Cluster of Differentiation 3
CD4Cluster of Differentiation 4
CD8Cluster of Differentiation 8
CD11bCluster of Differentiation 11b
CD45Cluster of Differentiation 45
CD206Cluster of Differentiation 206
cGASCyclic GMP-AMP Synthase
CNSCentral Nervous System
CSFCerebrospinal Fluid
CTComputed Tomography
CTEChronic Traumatic Encephalopathy
DAIDiffuse Axonal Injury
DAMPDamage-Associated Molecular Pattern
DNADeoxyribonucleic Acid
eNOSEndothelial Nitric Oxide Synthase
ERKExtracellular Signal-Regulated Kinase
ERK1/2Extracellular Signal-Regulated Kinase 1/2
FAKFocal Adhesion Kinase
FPIFluid Percussion Injury
GBDPsGFAP Breakdown Products
GCSGlasgow Coma Scale
GFAPGlial Fibrillary Acidic Protein
GPX1Glutathione Peroxidase 1
GSK-3βGlycogen Synthase Kinase-3 beta
H2O2Hydrogen Peroxide
HIFHypoxia-Inducible Factor
HMGB1High-Mobility Group Box 1
HRPHorseradish Peroxidase
Iba1Ionized calcium-binding adapter molecule 1
IgGImmunoglobulin G
IL-1βInterleukin-1 beta
IL-1R1Interleukin-1 Receptor Type 1
IL-1raInterleukin-1 Receptor Antagonist
IL-4Interleukin-4
IL-6Interleukin-6
IL-10Interleukin-10
IL-15Interleukin-15
IL-18Interleukin-18
iNOSInducible Nitric Oxide Synthase
ISSInjury Severity Score
JNKc-Jun N-terminal Kinase
MAPKMitogen-Activated Protein Kinase
MCP-1Monocyte Chemoattractant Protein-1
MMPMatrix Metalloproteinase
MMP-1Matrix Metalloproteinase-1
MMP-2Matrix Metalloproteinase-2
MMP-7Matrix Metalloproteinase-7
MMP-9Matrix Metalloproteinase-9
MPOMyeloperoxidase
MRIMagnetic Resonance Imaging
mRNAMessenger RNA
NADHNicotinamide Adenine Dinucleotide (reduced)
NADPHNicotinamide Adenine Dinucleotide Phosphate
NCLXMitochondrial Na+/Ca2+ Exchanger
NF-68Neurofilament-68
NF-κBNuclear Factor-kappa B
NFLNeurofilament Light
NLRP3NLR Family Pyrin Domain Containing 3
NMDAN-methyl-D-aspartate
nNOSNeuronal Nitric Oxide Synthase
NONitric Oxide
NOSNitric Oxide Synthase
NOXNADPH Oxidase
NOX1NADPH Oxidase 1
NOX2NADPH Oxidase 2
NQO1NAD(P)H Quinone Dehydrogenase 1
Nrf2Nuclear Factor Erythroid 2-Related Factor 2
PDE2Phosphodiesterase 2
Piezo1Piezo-type Mechanosensitive Ion Channel Component 1
Piezo2Piezo-type Mechanosensitive Ion Channel Component 2
PMIPost-Mortem Interval
PRX2Peroxiredoxin 2
PSD-95Postsynaptic Density Protein 95
PTIPost-Traumatic Interval
RAGEReceptor for Advanced Glycation End-products
RNARibonucleic Acid
RNSReactive Nitrogen Species
ROCKRho-associated Protein Kinase
ROCK1Rho-associated Protein Kinase 1
ROSReactive Oxygen Species
SAP-97Synapse-Associated Protein 97
SASPSenescence-Associated Secretory Phenotype
SNAP-25Synaptosome-Associated Protein 25
SODSuperoxide Dismutase
SOD2Superoxide Dismutase 2
TBITraumatic Brain Injury
TGF-βTransforming Growth Factor beta
TJTight Junction
TLRToll-Like Receptor
TLR4Toll-Like Receptor 4
TMEM119Transmembrane Protein 119
TNF-αTumor Necrosis Factor alpha
TOSTotal Oxidant Status
TRPTransient Receptor Potential
TRX2Thioredoxin 2
TSPOTranslocator Protein
TUNELTerminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase dUTP nick end labeling
UCH-L1Ubiquitin Carboxy-terminal Hydrolase L-1
VEGFVascular Endothelial Growth Factor
VEGFR-2Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Receptor 2
ZO-1Zonula Occludens-1

References

  1. Maas, A.I.R.; Menon, D.K.; Adelson, P.D.; Andelic, N.; Bell, M.J.; Belli, A.; Bragge, P.; Brazinova, A.; Büki, A.; Chesnut, R.M.; et al. Traumatic Brain Injury: Integrated Approaches to Improve Prevention, Clinical Care, and Research. Lancet Neurol. 2017, 16, 987–1048. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Yan, J.; Wang, C.; Sun, B. Global, Regional, and National Burdens of Traumatic Brain Injury from 1990 to 2021. Front. Public Health 2025, 13, 1556147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Karaboue, M.A.A.; Ministeri, F.; Sessa, F.; Nannola, C.; Chisari, M.G.; Cocimano, G.; Di Mauro, L.; Salerno, M.; Esposito, M. Traumatic Brain Injury as a Public Health Issue: Epidemiology, Prognostic Factors and Useful Data from Forensic Practice. Healthcare 2024, 12, 2266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Thakral, S.; Purohit, P.; Mishra, R.; Gupta, V.; Setia, P. The Impact of RNA Stability and Degradation in Different Tissues to the Determination of Post-Mortem Interval: A Systematic Review. Forensic Sci. Int. 2023, 349, 111772. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Zwirner, J.; Kulakofsky, R.; Fitzek, A.; Schröder, A.S.; Bohnert, S.; Franke, H.; Renné, T.; Tse, R.; Ondruschka, B. Forensic Biomarkers of Lethal Traumatic Brain Injury. Int. J. Leg. Med. 2022, 136, 871–886. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Pinchi, E.; Frati, A.; Cipolloni, L.; Aromatario, M.; Gatto, V.; La Russa, R.; Pesce, A.; Santurro, A.; Fraschetti, F.; Frati, P.; et al. Clinical-Pathological Study on β-APP, IL-1β, GFAP, NFL, Spectrin II, 8OHdG, TUNEL, MiR-21, MiR-16, MiR-92 Expressions to Verify DAI-Diagnosis, Grade and Prognosis. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 2387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Whitwell, H.; Milroy, C.; du Plessis, D. Forensic Neuropathology, 2nd ed.; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2021. [Google Scholar]
  8. Oehmichen, M.; Auer, R.N.; Konig, H.G. Forensic Neuropathology and Associated Neurology; Springer: Berlin, Heidelberg; New York, NY, USA, 2006; ISBN 9783540235002. [Google Scholar]
  9. Alam, A.; Thelin, E.P.; Tajsic, T.; Khan, D.Z.; Khellaf, A.; Patani, R.; Helmy, A. Cellular Infiltration in Traumatic Brain Injury. J. Neuroinflamm. 2020, 17, 328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Cowansage, K.; Nair, R.; Lara-Ruiz, J.M.; Berman, D.E.; Boyd, C.C.; Milligan, T.L.; Kotzab, D.; Bellanti, D.M.; Shank, L.M.; Morgan, M.A.; et al. Genetic and Peripheral Biomarkers of Comorbid Posttraumatic Stress Disorder and Traumatic Brain Injury: A Systematic Review. Front. Neurol. 2025, 16, 1500667. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Lassarén, P.; Lindblad, C.; Frostell, A.; Carpenter, K.L.H.; Guilfoyle, M.R.; Hutchinson, P.J.A.; Helmy, A.; Thelin, E.P. Systemic Inflammation Alters the Neuroinflammatory Response: A Prospective Clinical Trial in Traumatic Brain Injury. J. Neuroinflamm. 2021, 18, 221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Wu, J.; Ren, R.; Chen, T.; Su, L.-D.; Tang, T. Neuroimmune and Neuroinflammation Response for Traumatic Brain Injury. Brain Res. Bull. 2024, 217, 111066. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Andersson, D.; Alkass, K.; Mielcarz, J.A.; Davidsson, J.; Druid, H. Bleeding Pattern in the Early Phase after Experimental Rotational Acceleration Induced Traumatic Brain Injury. Int. J. Leg. Med. 2025, 139, 1609–1621. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Zhang, L.; Yang, K.H.; King, A.I. A Proposed Injury Threshold for Mild Traumatic Brain Injury. J. Biomech. Eng. 2004, 126, 226–236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Smith, D.H.; Wolf, J.A.; Lusardi, T.A.; Lee, V.M.; Meaney, D.F. High Tolerance and Delayed Elastic Response of Cultured Axons to Dynamic Stretch Injury. J. Neurosci. 1999, 19, 4263–4269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Johnson, V.E.; Stewart, J.E.; Begbie, F.D.; Trojanowski, J.Q.; Smith, D.H.; Stewart, W. Inflammation and White Matter Degeneration Persist for Years after a Single Traumatic Brain Injury. Brain 2013, 136, 28–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Adams, J.H.; Doyle, D.; Ford, I.; Gennarelli, T.A.; Graham, D.I.; McLellan, D.R. Diffuse Axonal Injury in Head Injury: Definition, Diagnosis and Grading. Histopathology 1989, 15, 49–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Ommaya, A.K.; Gennarelli, T.A. Cerebral Concussion and Traumatic Unconsciousness. Correlation of Experimental and Clinical Observations of Blunt Head Injuries. Brain 1974, 97, 633–654. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Jang, S.H. Diagnostic Problems in Diffuse Axonal Injury. Diagnostics 2020, 10, 117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Meaney, D.F.; Smith, D.H.; Shreiber, D.I.; Bain, A.C.; Miller, R.T.; Ross, D.T.; Gennarelli, T.A. Biomechanical Analysis of Experimental Diffuse Axonal Injury. J. Neurotrauma 1995, 12, 689–694. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Povlishock, J.T.; Katz, D.I. Update of Neuropathology and Neurological Recovery after Traumatic Brain Injury. J. Head Trauma Rehabil. 2005, 20, 76–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Gennarelli, T.A. Head Injury in Man and Experimental Animals: Clinical Aspects. In Trauma and Regeneration; Acta Neurochirurgica Supplement; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 1983; Volume 32, pp. 1–13. [Google Scholar]
  23. Farkas, O.; Povlishock, J.T. Cellular and Subcellular Change Evoked by Diffuse Traumatic Brain Injury: A Complex Web of Change Extending Far beyond Focal Damage. Prog. Brain Res. 2007, 161, 43–59. [Google Scholar]
  24. Raghupathi, R. Cell Death Mechanisms Following Traumatic Brain Injury. Brain Pathol. 2004, 14, 215–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Morrison, B.; Cater, H.L.; Benham, C.D.; Sundstrom, L.E. An in Vitro Model of Traumatic Brain Injury Utilising Two-Dimensional Stretch of Organotypic Hippocampal Slice Cultures. J. Neurosci. Methods 2006, 150, 192–201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Faden, A.I.; Demediuk, P.; Panter, S.S.; Vink, R. The Role of Excitatory Amino Acids and NMDA Receptors in Traumatic Brain Injury. Science 1989, 244, 798–800. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Choi, D.W. Glutamate Neurotoxicity and Diseases of the Nervous System. Neuron 1988, 1, 623–634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Bullock, R.; Zauner, A.; Woodward, J.J.; Myseros, J.; Choi, S.C.; Ward, J.D.; Marmarou, A.; Young, H.F. Factors Affecting Excitatory Amino Acid Release Following Severe Human Head Injury. Neurosurg. Focus 1998, 5, E1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Weber, J.T. Altered Calcium Signaling Following Traumatic Brain Injury. Front. Pharmacol. 2012, 3, 60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Kampfl, A.; Posmantur, R.; Nixon, R.; Grynspan, F.; Zhao, X.; Liu, S.J.; Newcomb, J.K.; Clifton, G.L.; Hayes, R.L. Μ-calpain Activation and Calpain-mediated Cytoskeletal Proteolysis Following Traumatic Brain Injury. J. Neurochem. 1996, 67, 1575–1583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Rozenfeld, M.; Azoulay, I.S.; Ben Kasus Nissim, T.; Stavsky, A.; Melamed, M.; Stutzmann, G.; Hershfinkel, M.; Kofman, O.; Sekler, I. Essential Role of the Mitochondrial Na+/Ca2+ Exchanger NCLX in Mediating PDE2-Dependent Neuronal Survival and Learning. Cell Rep. 2022, 41, 111772. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Nicholls, D.G.; Budd, S.L. Mitochondria and Neuronal Survival. Physiol. Rev. 2000, 80, 315–360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Lifshitz, J.; Friberg, H.; Neumar, R.W.; Raghupathi, R.; Welsh, F.A.; Janmey, P.; Saatman, K.E.; Wieloch, T.; Grady, M.S.; McIntosh, T.K. Structural and Functional Damage Sustained by Mitochondria after Traumatic Brain Injury in the Rat: Evidence for Differentially Sensitive Populations in the Cortex and Hippocampus. J. Cereb. Blood Flow Metab. 2003, 23, 219–231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Xiong, Y.; Gu, Q.; Peterson, P.L.; Muizelaar, J.P.; Lee, C.P. Mitochondrial Dysfunction and Calcium Perturbation Induced by Traumatic Brain Injury. J. Neurotrauma 1997, 14, 23–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Cornelius, C.; Crupi, R.; Calabrese, V.; Graziano, A.; Milone, P.; Pennisi, G.; Radak, Z.; Calabrese, E.J.; Cuzzocrea, S. Traumatic Brain Injury: Oxidative Stress and Neuroprotection. Antioxid. Redox Signal. 2013, 19, 836–853. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Khatri, N.; Thakur, M.; Pareek, V.; Kumar, S.; Sharma, S.; Datusalia, A.K. Oxidative Stress: Major Threat in Traumatic Brain Injury. CNS Neurol. Disord. Drug Targets 2018, 17, 689–695. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Baracaldo-Santamaría, D.; Ariza-Salamanca, D.F.; Corrales-Hernández, M.G.; Pachón-Londoño, M.J.; Hernandez-Duarte, I.; Calderon-Ospina, C.-A. Revisiting Excitotoxicity in Traumatic Brain Injury: From Bench to Bedside. Pharmaceutics 2022, 14, 152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Kaur, P.; Sharma, S. Recent Advances in Pathophysiology of Traumatic Brain Injury. Curr. Neuropharmacol. 2018, 16, 1224–1238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Hakiminia, B.; Alikiaii, B.; Khorvash, F.; Mousavi, S. Oxidative Stress and Mitochondrial Dysfunction Following Traumatic Brain Injury: From Mechanistic View to Targeted Therapeutic Opportunities. Fundam. Clin. Pharmacol. 2022, 36, 612–662. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Rodriguez-Rodriguez, A.; Egea-Guerrero, J.; Murillo-Cabezas, F.; Carrillo-Vico, A. Oxidative Stress in Traumatic Brain Injury. Curr. Med. Chem. 2014, 21, 1201–1211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Nguyen, A.; Patel, A.B.; Kioutchoukova, I.P.; Diaz, M.J.; Lucke-Wold, B. Mechanisms of Mitochondrial Oxidative Stress in Brain Injury: From Pathophysiology to Therapeutics. Oxygen 2023, 3, 163–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Kumar Sahel, D.; Kaira, M.; Raj, K.; Sharma, S.; Singh, S. Mitochondrial Dysfunctioning and Neuroinflammation: Recent Highlights on the Possible Mechanisms Involved in Traumatic Brain Injury. Neurosci. Lett. 2019, 710, 134347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Bano, N.; Khan, S.; Ahamad, S.; Dar, N.J.; Alanazi, H.H.; Nazir, A.; Bhat, S.A. Microglial NOX2 as a Therapeutic Target in Traumatic Brain Injury: Mechanisms, Consequences, and Potential for Neuroprotection. Ageing Res. Rev. 2025, 108, 102735. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Kuriakose, M.; Younger, D.; Ravula, A.R.; Alay, E.; Rama Rao, K.V.; Chandra, N. Synergistic Role of Oxidative Stress and Blood-Brain Barrier Permeability as Injury Mechanisms in the Acute Pathophysiology of Blast-Induced Neurotrauma. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 7717. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Muneer, P.M.A.; Chandra, N.; Haorah, J. Interactions of Oxidative Stress and Neurovascular Inflammation in the Pathogenesis of Traumatic Brain Injury. Mol. Neurobiol. 2015, 51, 966–979. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Goyal, L.; Singh, S. Neurological Manifestations Following Traumatic Brain Injury: Role of Behavioral, Neuroinflammation, Excitotoxicity, Nrf-2 and Nitric Oxide. CNS Neurol. Disord. Drug Targets 2025, 24, 47–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Musyaju, S.; Modi, H.R.; Shear, D.A.; Scultetus, A.H.; Pandya, J.D. Time Course of Mitochondrial Antioxidant Markers in a Preclinical Model of Severe Penetrating Traumatic Brain Injury. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2025, 26, 906. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Fesharaki-Zadeh, A. Oxidative Stress in Traumatic Brain Injury. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 13000. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Jarrahi, A.; Braun, M.; Ahluwalia, M.; Gupta, R.V.; Wilson, M.; Munie, S.; Ahluwalia, P.; Vender, J.R.; Vale, F.L.; Dhandapani, K.M.; et al. Revisiting Traumatic Brain Injury: From Molecular Mechanisms to Therapeutic Interventions. Biomedicines 2020, 8, 389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Freire, M.A.M.; Rocha, G.S.; Bittencourt, L.O.; Falcao, D.; Lima, R.R.; Cavalcanti, J.R.L.P. Cellular and Molecular Pathophysiology of Traumatic Brain Injury: What Have We Learned so Far? Biology 2023, 12, 1139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Song, K.; Li, Y.; Zhang, H.; An, N.; Wei, Y.; Wang, L.; Tian, C.; Yuan, M.; Sun, Y.; Xing, Y.; et al. Oxidative Stress-Mediated Blood-Brain Barrier (BBB) Disruption in Neurological Diseases. Oxid. Med. Cell. Longev. 2020, 2020, 1–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Kanner, J.; Harel, S.; Salan, A.M. The Generation of Ferryl or Hydroxyl Radicals during Interaction of Hemeproteins with Hydrogen Peroxide. Basic Life Sci. 1988, 49, 145–148. [Google Scholar]
  53. Ren, B.; Liang, J.; Yang, L.; Wei, X.; Guo, M.; Li, H. Bioinformatics-Driven Exploration of Key Genes and Mechanisms Underlying Oxidative Stress in Traumatic Brain Injury. Front. Aging Neurosci. 2025, 17, 1531317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Wu, A.-G.; Yong, Y.-Y.; Pan, Y.-R.; Zhang, L.; Wu, J.-M.; Zhang, Y.; Tang, Y.; Wei, J.; Yu, L.; Law, B.Y.-K.; et al. Targeting Nrf2-Mediated Oxidative Stress Response in Traumatic Brain Injury: Therapeutic Perspectives of Phytochemicals. Oxid. Med. Cell. Longev. 2022, 2022, 1015791. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Hong, Y.; Yan, W.; Chen, S.; Sun, C.-R.; Zhang, J.-M. The Role of Nrf2 Signaling in the Regulation of Antioxidants and Detoxifying Enzymes after Traumatic Brain Injury in Rats and Mice. Acta Pharmacol. Sin. 2010, 31, 1421–1430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Jin, W.; Wang, H.; Yan, W.; Zhu, L.; Hu, Z.; Ding, Y.; Tang, K. Role of Nrf2 in Protection against Traumatic Brain Injury in Mice. J. Neurotrauma 2009, 26, 131–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Bhowmick, S.; D’Mello, V.; Caruso, D.; Muneer, P.M.A. Correction to: Traumatic Brain Injury-Induced Downregulation of Nrf2 Activates Inflammatory Response and Apoptotic Cell Death. J. Mol. Med. 2025, 103, 489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Ismail, H.; Shakkour, Z.; Tabet, M.; Abdelhady, S.; Kobaisi, A.; Abedi, R.; Nasrallah, L.; Pintus, G.; Al-Dhaheri, Y.; Mondello, S.; et al. Traumatic Brain Injury: Oxidative Stress and Novel Anti-Oxidants Such as Mitoquinone and Edaravone. Antioxidants 2020, 9, 943. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Hall, E.D.; Yonkers, P.A.; Andrus, P.K.; Cox, J.W.; Anderson, D.K. Biochemistry and Pharmacology of Lipid Antioxidants in Acute Brain and Spinal Cord Injury. J. Neurotrauma 1992, 9, S425–S442. [Google Scholar]
  60. Salvagno, M.; Sterchele, E.D.; Zaccarelli, M.; Mrakic-Sposta, S.; Welsby, I.J.; Balestra, C.; Taccone, F.S. Oxidative Stress and Cerebral Vascular Tone: The Role of Reactive Oxygen and Nitrogen Species. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25, 3007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Sultana, R.; Perluigi, M.; Butterfield, D.A. Oxidatively Modified Proteins in Alzheimer’s Disease (AD), Mild Cognitive Impairment and Animal Models of AD: Role of Abeta in Pathogenesis. Acta Neuropathol. 2009, 118, 131–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Gowthami, N.; Pursotham, N.; Dey, G.; Ghose, V.; Sathe, G.; Pruthi, N.; Shukla, D.; Gayathri, N.; Santhoshkumar, R.; Padmanabhan, B.; et al. Neuroanatomical Zones of Human Traumatic Brain Injury Reveal Significant Differences in Protein Profile and Protein Oxidation: Implications for Secondary Injury Events. J. Neurochem. 2023, 167, 218–247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Opii, W.O.; Nukala, V.N.; Sultana, R.; Pandya, J.D.; Day, K.M.; Merchant, M.L.; Klein, J.B.; Sullivan, P.G.; Butterfield, D.A. Proteomic Identification of Oxidized Mitochondrial Proteins Following Experimental Traumatic Brain Injury. J. Neurotrauma 2007, 24, 772–789. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Butterfield, D.A.; Sultana, R. Redox Proteomics Identification of Oxidatively Modified Brain Proteins in Alzheimer’s Disease and Mild Cognitive Impairment: Insights into the Progression of This Dementing Disorder. J. Alzheimer’s Dis. 2007, 12, 61–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Castegna, A.; Aksenov, M.; Aksenova, M.; Thongboonkerd, V.; Klein, J.B.; Pierce, W.M.; Booze, R.; Markesbery, W.R.; Butterfield, D.A. Proteomic Identification of Oxidatively Modified Proteins in Alzheimer’s Disease Brain. Part I: Creatine Kinase BB, Glutamine Synthase, and Ubiquitin Carboxy-Terminal Hydrolase L-1. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 2002, 33, 562–571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Stamatovic, S.M.; Johnson, A.M.; Keep, R.F.; Andjelkovic, A.V. Junctional Proteins of the Blood-Brain Barrier: New Insights into Function and Dysfunction. Tissue Barriers 2016, 4, e1154641. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Luissint, A.-C.; Artus, C.; Glacial, F.; Ganeshamoorthy, K.; Couraud, P.-O. Tight Junctions at the Blood Brain Barrier: Physiological Architecture and Disease-Associated Dysregulation. Fluids Barriers CNS 2012, 9, 23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Shlosberg, D.; Benifla, M.; Kaufer, D.; Friedman, A. Blood-Brain Barrier Breakdown as a Therapeutic Target in Traumatic Brain Injury. Nat. Rev. Neurol. 2010, 6, 393–403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Fukuda, K.; Tanno, H.; Okimura, Y.; Nakamura, M.; Yamaura, A. The Blood-Brain Barrier Disruption to Circulating Proteins in the Early Period after Fluid Percussion Brain Injury in Rats. J. Neurotrauma 1995, 12, 315–324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Tanno, H.; Nockels, R.P.; Pitts, L.H.; Noble, L.J. Breakdown of the Blood-Brain Barrier after Fluid Percussive Brain Injury in the Rat. Part 1: Distribution and Time Course of Protein Extravasation. J. Neurotrauma 1992, 9, 21–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Lotocki, G.; de Rivero Vaccari, J.P.; Perez, E.R.; Sanchez-Molano, J.; Furones-Alonso, O.; Bramlett, H.M.; Dietrich, W.D. Alterations in Blood-Brain Barrier Permeability to Large and Small Molecules and Leukocyte Accumulation after Traumatic Brain Injury: Effects of Post-Traumatic Hypothermia. J. Neurotrauma 2009, 26, 1123–1134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Hu, Y.; Seker, B.; Exner, C.; Zhang, J.; Plesnila, N.; Schwarzmaier, S.M. Longitudinal Characterization of Blood-Brain Barrier Permeability after Experimental Traumatic Brain Injury by in Vivo 2-Photon Microscopy. J. Neurotrauma 2021, 38, 399–410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Wen, J.; Qian, S.; Yang, Q.; Deng, L.; Mo, Y.; Yu, Y. Overexpression of Netrin-1 Increases the Expression of Tight Junction-Associated Proteins, Claudin-5, Occludin, and ZO-1, Following Traumatic Brain Injury in Rats. Exp. Ther. Med. 2014, 8, 881–886. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Kawoos, U.; Abutarboush, R.; Gu, M.; Chen, Y.; Statz, J.K.; Goodrich, S.Y.; Ahlers, S.T. Blast-Induced Temporal Alterations in Blood-Brain Barrier Properties in a Rodent Model. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 5906. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Gowrikumar, S.; Tarudji, A.; McDonald, B.Z.; Balusa, S.S.; Kievit, F.M.; Dhawan, P. Claudin-1 Impairs Blood-Brain Barrier by Downregulating Endothelial Junctional Proteins in Traumatic Brain Injury. Tissue Barriers 2025, 13, 2470482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Ivens, S.; Kaufer, D.; Flores, L.P.; Bechmann, I.; Zumsteg, D.; Tomkins, O.; Seiffert, E.; Heinemann, U.; Friedman, A. TGF-Beta Receptor-Mediated Albumin Uptake into Astrocytes Is Involved in Neocortical Epileptogenesis. Brain 2007, 130, 535–547. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Schwartz, M.; Raposo, C. Protective Autoimmunity: A Unifying Model for the Immune Network Involved in CNS Repair. Neuroscientist 2014, 20, 343–358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Maas, A.I.R.; Stocchetti, N.; Bullock, R. Moderate and Severe Traumatic Brain Injury in Adults. Lancet Neurol. 2008, 7, 728–741. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Zhu, T.; Guo, J.; Wu, Y.; Lei, T.; Zhu, J.; Chen, H.; Kala, S.; Wong, K.F.; Cheung, C.P.; Huang, X.; et al. The Mechanosensitive Ion Channel Piezo1 Modulates the Migration and Immune Response of Microglia. iScience 2023, 26, 105993. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Yu, D.; Ahmed, A.; Jayasi, J.; Womac, A.; Sally, O.; Bae, C. Inflammation Condition Sensitizes Piezo1 Mechanosensitive Channel in Mouse Cerebellum Astrocyte. Front. Cell. Neurosci. 2023, 17, 1200946. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Corrigan, F.; Mander, K.A.; Leonard, A.V.; Vink, R. Neurogenic Inflammation after Traumatic Brain Injury and Its Potentiation of Classical Inflammation. J. Neuroinflamm. 2016, 13, 264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Ziebell, J.M.; Morganti-Kossmann, M.C. Involvement of Pro- and Anti-Inflammatory Cytokines and Chemokines in the Pathophysiology of Traumatic Brain Injury. Neurotherapeutics 2010, 7, 22–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Abboud, A.; Mi, Q.; Puccio, A.; Okonkwo, D.; Buliga, M.; Constantine, G.; Vodovotz, Y. Inflammation Following Traumatic Brain Injury in Humans: Insights from Data-Driven and Mechanistic Models into Survival and Death. Front. Pharmacol. 2016, 7, 342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Simon, D.W.; McGeachy, M.J.; Bayır, H.; Clark, R.S.B.; Loane, D.J.; Kochanek, P.M. The Far-Reaching Scope of Neuroinflammation after Traumatic Brain Injury. Nat. Rev. Neurol. 2017, 13, 572. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Morganti-Kossmann, M.C.; Semple, B.D.; Hellewell, S.C.; Bye, N.; Ziebell, J.M. The Complexity of Neuroinflammation Consequent to Traumatic Brain Injury: From Research Evidence to Potential Treatments. Acta Neuropathol. 2019, 137, 731–755. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Thompson, H.J.; Rivara, F.; Becker, K.J.; Maier, R.; Temkin, N. Impact of Aging on the Immune Response to Traumatic Brain Injury (AIm:TBI) Study Protocol. Inj. Prev. 2020, 26, 471–477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  87. Obukohwo, O.M.; Oreoluwa, O.A.; Andrew, U.O.; Williams, U.E. Microglia-Mediated Neuroinflammation in Traumatic Brain Injury: A Review. Mol. Biol. Rep. 2024, 51, 1073. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Witcher, K.G.; Bray, C.E.; Chunchai, T.; Zhao, F.; O’Neil, S.M.; Gordillo, A.J.; Campbell, W.A.; McKim, D.B.; Liu, X.; Dziabis, J.E.; et al. Traumatic Brain Injury Causes Chronic Cortical Inflammation and Neuronal Dysfunction Mediated by Microglia. J. Neurosci. 2021, 41, 1597–1616. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Kumar, M.; Chaudhary, J.; Jain, A. Exploring Potential Biomarkers and Signaling Pathways in Neuroinflammation Post-Traumatic Brain Injury: Insights for Synthetic Compound-Based Interventions. Inflammopharmacology 2025, 33, 3739–3753. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Donat, C.K.; Scott, G.; Gentleman, S.M.; Sastre, M. Microglial Activation in Traumatic Brain Injury. Front. Aging Neurosci. 2017, 9, 208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Caplan, H.W.; Cardenas, F.; Gudenkauf, F.; Zelnick, P.; Xue, H.; Cox, C.S.; Bedi, S.S. Spatiotemporal Distribution of Microglia after Traumatic Brain Injury in Male Mice. ASN Neuro 2020, 12, 1759091420911770. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Lier, J.; Ondruschka, B.; Bechmann, I.; Dreßler, J. Fast Microglial Activation after Severe Traumatic Brain Injuries. Int. J. Leg. Med. 2020, 134, 2187–2193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Grovola, M.R.; von Reyn, C.; Loane, D.J.; Cullen, D.K. Understanding Microglial Responses in Large Animal Models of Traumatic Brain Injury: An Underutilized Resource for Preclinical and Translational Research. J. Neuroinflamm. 2023, 20, 67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Alam, A.; Singh, T.; Kayhanian, S.; Tjerkaski, J.; Garcia, N.M.; Carpenter, K.L.H.; Patani, R.; Lindblad, C.; Thelin, E.P.; Syed, Y.A.; et al. Modeling the Inflammatory Response of Traumatic Brain Injury Using Human Induced Pluripotent Stem Cell Derived Microglia. J. Neurotrauma 2023, 40, 2164–2173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Izzy, S.; Liu, Q.; Fang, Z.; Lule, S.; Wu, L.; Chung, J.Y.; Sarro-Schwartz, A.; Brown-Whalen, A.; Perner, C.; Hickman, S.E.; et al. Time-Dependent Changes in Microglia Transcriptional Networks Following Traumatic Brain Injury. Front. Cell. Neurosci. 2019, 13, 307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  96. Zhao, J.-Y.; Zhou, Y.; Zhou, C.-W.; Zhan, K.-B.; Yang, M.; Wen, M.; Zhu, L.-Q. Revisiting the Critical Roles of Reactive Microglia in Traumatic Brain Injury. Int. J. Surg. 2025, 111, 3942–3978. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  97. Wangler, L.M.; Godbout, J.P. Microglia Moonlighting after Traumatic Brain Injury: Aging and Interferons Influence Chronic Microglia Reactivity. Trends Neurosci. 2023, 46, 926–940. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Subhramanyam, C.S.; Wang, C.; Hu, Q.; Dheen, S.T. Microglia-Mediated Neuroinflammation in Neurodegenerative Diseases. Semin. Cell Dev. Biol. 2019, 94, 112–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  99. Bai, Q.; Xue, M.; Yong, V.W. Microglia and Macrophage Phenotypes in Intracerebral Haemorrhage Injury: Therapeutic Opportunities. Brain 2020, 143, 1297–1314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Strehle, J.; Somnuke, P.; Li, S.; Wang, S.; Hirnet, T.; Wang, Y.; Schäfer, M.K.E. The Border-Associated Macrophage Marker MRC1 Contributes to an Early Neuroprotective Inflammatory Response to Traumatic Brain Injury in Mice. Acta Neuropathol. Commun. 2025, 13, 220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Li, Q.; Lan, X.; Han, X.; Wang, J. Expression of Tmem119/Sall1 and Ccr2/CD69 in FACS-Sorted Microglia- and Monocyte/Macrophage-Enriched Cell Populations after Intracerebral Hemorrhage. Front. Cell. Neurosci. 2018, 12, 520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Ruan, C.; Elyaman, W. A New Understanding of TMEM119 as a Marker of Microglia. Front. Cell. Neurosci. 2022, 16, 902372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Chen, H.-R.; Sun, Y.-Y.; Chen, C.-W.; Kuo, Y.-M.; Kuan, I.S.; Tiger Li, Z.-R.; Short-Miller, J.C.; Smucker, M.R.; Kuan, C.-Y. Fate Mapping via CCR2-CreER Mice Reveals Monocyte-to-Microglia Transition in Development and Neonatal Stroke. Sci. Adv. 2020, 6, eabb2119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Liu, J.; Lei, F.; Yan, B.; Cao, T.; Cui, N.; Sharma, J.; Correa, V.; Roach, L.; Nicolaou, S.; Pitts, K.; et al. Epigenetic Adaptation Drives Monocyte Differentiation into Microglia-like Cells upon Engraftment into the Central Nervous System. eLife 2025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Somebang, K.; Rudolph, J.; Imhof, I.; Li, L.; Niemi, E.C.; Shigenaga, J.; Tran, H.; Gill, T.M.; Lo, I.; Zabel, B.A.; et al. CCR2 Deficiency Alters Activation of Microglia Subsets in Traumatic Brain Injury. Cell Rep. 2021, 36, 109727. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Paladini, M.S.; Yang, B.A.; Torkenczy, K.A.; Frias, E.S.; Feng, X.; Krukowski, K.; Sit, R.; Morri, M.; Lam, W.; Pedoia, V.; et al. Fate Mapping of Peripherally-Derived Macrophages after Traumatic Brain Injury in Mice Reveals a Long-Lasting Population with a Distinct Transcriptomic Signature. Nat. Commun. 2025, 16, 8898. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  107. Hostiuc, S.; Pirici, D.; Negoi, I.; Ion, D.A.; Ceausu, M. Detection of Diffuse Axonal Injury in Forensic Pathology. Rom. J. Leg. Med. 2014, 22, 145–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Al-Sarraj, S.; Troakes, C.; Rutty, G.N. Axonal Injury Is Detected by ΒAPP Immunohistochemistry in Rapid Death from Head Injury Following Road Traffic Collision. Int. J. Leg. Med. 2022, 136, 1321–1339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  109. Hortobágyi, T.; Wise, S.; Hunt, N.; Cary, N.; Djurovic, V.; Fegan-Earl, A.; Shorrock, K.; Rouse, D.; Al-Sarraj, S. Traumatic Axonal Damage in the Brain Can Be Detected Using Beta-APP Immunohistochemistry within 35 Min after Head Injury to Human Adults. Neuropathol. Appl. Neurobiol. 2007, 33, 226–237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Nedic, D.; Pilija, V.; Salihbegovic, A. Expression and Distribution of β Amyloid Precursor Protein Immunomarkers in the Detection of Diffuse Axonal Injury. Srp. Arh. Celok. Lek. 2022, 150, 77–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Allan, S.M.; Rothwell, N.J. Cytokines and Acute Neurodegeneration. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2001, 2, 734–744. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Ramlackhansingh, A.F.; Brooks, D.J.; Greenwood, R.J.; Bose, S.K.; Turkheimer, F.E.; Kinnunen, K.M.; Gentleman, S.; Heckemann, R.A.; Gunanayagam, K.; Gelosa, G.; et al. Inflammation after Trauma: Microglial Activation and Traumatic Brain Injury. Ann. Neurol. 2011, 70, 374–383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Loane, D.J.; Kumar, A. Microglia in the TBI Brain: The Good, the Bad, and the Dysregulated. Exp. Neurol. 2016, 275, 316–327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Hegdekar, N.; Sarkar, C.; Bustos, S.; Ritzel, R.M.; Hanscom, M.; Ravishankar, P.; Philkana, D.; Wu, J.; Loane, D.J.; Lipinski, M.M. Inhibition of Autophagy in Microglia and Macrophages Exacerbates Innate Immune Responses and Worsens Brain Injury Outcomes. Autophagy 2023, 19, 2026–2044. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Bussian, T.J.; Aziz, A.; Meyer, C.F.; Swenson, B.L.; van Deursen, J.M.; Baker, D.J. Clearance of Senescent Glial Cells Prevents Tau-Dependent Pathology and Cognitive Decline. Nature 2018, 562, 578–582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  116. Krukowski, K.; Chou, A.; Feng, X.; Tiret, B.; Paladini, M.-S.; Riparip, L.-K.; Chaumeil, M.M.; Lemere, C.; Rosi, S. Traumatic Brain Injury in Aged Mice Induces Chronic Microglia Activation, Synapse Loss, and Complement-Dependent Memory Deficits. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19, 3753. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  117. Lagraoui, M.; Latoche, J.R.; Cartwright, N.G.; Sukumar, G.; Dalgard, C.L.; Schaefer, B.C. Controlled Cortical Impact and Craniotomy Induce Strikingly Similar Profiles of Inflammatory Gene Expression, but with Distinct Kinetics. Front. Neurol. 2012, 3, 155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  118. Michalovicz, L.T.; Kelly, K.A.; Craddock, T.J.A.; O’Callaghan, J.P. A Projectile Concussive Impact Model Produces Neuroinflammation in Both Mild and Moderate-Severe Traumatic Brain Injury. Brain Sci. 2023, 13, 623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Schindler, C.R.; Lustenberger, T.; Woschek, M.; Störmann, P.; Henrich, D.; Radermacher, P.; Marzi, I. Severe Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI) Modulates the Kinetic Profile of the Inflammatory Response of Markers for Neuronal Damage. J. Clin. Med. 2020, 9, 1667. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Johnson, N.H.; Hadad, R.; Taylor, R.R.; Rodríguez Pilar, J.; Salazar, O.; Llompart-Pou, J.A.; Dietrich, W.D.; Keane, R.W.; Pérez-Bárcena, J.; de Rivero Vaccari, J.P. Inflammatory Biomarkers of Traumatic Brain Injury. Pharmaceuticals 2022, 15, 660. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Samanta, R.J.; Chiollaz, A.-C.; Needham, E.; Yue, J.K.; Helmy, A.; Zanier, E.R.; Wang, K.K.W.; Kobeissy, F.; Posti, J.P.; Summers, C.; et al. Parsimonious Immune-Response Endotypes and Global Outcome in Patients with Traumatic Brain Injury. eBioMedicine 2024, 108, 105310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Bohnert, S.; Seiffert, A.; Trella, S.; Bohnert, M.; Distel, L.; Ondruschka, B.; Monoranu, C.-M. TMEM119 as a Specific Marker of Microglia Reaction in Traumatic Brain Injury in Postmortem Examination. Int. J. Leg. Med. 2020, 134, 2167–2176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Toledano Furman, N.; Gottlieb, A.; Prabhakara, K.S.; Bedi, S.; Caplan, H.W.; Ruppert, K.A.; Srivastava, A.K.; Olson, S.D.; Cox, C.S., Jr. High-Resolution and Differential Analysis of Rat Microglial Markers in Traumatic Brain Injury: Conventional Flow Cytometric and Bioinformatics Analysis. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 11991. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Sumberg, L.; Berman, R.; Pazgier, A.; Torres, J.; Qiu, J.; Tran, B.; Greene, S.; Atwood, R.; Boese, M.; Choi, K. A Semi-Automated and Unbiased Microglia Morphology Analysis Following Mild Traumatic Brain Injury in Rats. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2025, 26, 8149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  125. Velayudhan, P.S.; Schwab, N.; Hazrati, L.-N.; Wheeler, A.L. Temporal Patterns of Microglial Activation in White Matter Following Experimental Mild Traumatic Brain Injury: A Systematic Literature Review. Acta Neuropathol. Commun. 2021, 9, 197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  126. Zhao, W.; Liu, Z.; Wu, J.; Liu, A.; Yan, J. Potential Targets of Microglia in the Treatment of Neurodegenerative Diseases: Mechanism and Therapeutic Implications. Neural Regen. Res. 2026, 21, 1497–1511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  127. Hayashi, T.; Ago, K.; Ago, M.; Ogata, M. Two Patterns of Beta-Amyloid Precursor Protein (APP) Immunoreactivity in Cases of Blunt Head Injury. Leg. Med. 2009, 11, S171–S173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Hayashi, T.; Ago, K.; Nakamae, T.; Higo, E.; Ogata, M. Two Different Immunostaining Patterns of Beta-Amyloid Precursor Protein (APP) May Distinguish Traumatic from Nontraumatic Axonal Injury. Int. J. Leg. Med. 2015, 129, 1085–1090. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Sherriff, F.E.; Bridges, L.R.; Gentleman, S.M.; Sivaloganathan, S.; Wilson, S. Markers of Axonal Injury in Post Mortem Human Brain. Acta Neuropathol. 1994, 88, 433–439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Seki, E.; Komori, T.; Arai, N. Distribution of Amyloid-β Precursor Protein-Immunoreactive Axons Differs According to the Severity of Cerebral Ischemia in Autopsy Brains. Neuropathology 2022, 42, 269–273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Reichard, R.R.; Smith, C.; Graham, D.I. The Significance of Beta-APP Immunoreactivity in Forensic Practice. Neuropathol. Appl. Neurobiol. 2005, 31, 304–313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Paudel, Y.N.; Angelopoulou, E.; Piperi, C.; Othman, I.; Shaikh, M.F. HMGB1-Mediated Neuroinflammatory Responses in Brain Injuries: Potential Mechanisms and Therapeutic Opportunities. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 4609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  133. Manivannan, S.; Marei, O.; Elalfy, O.; Zaben, M. Neurogenesis after Traumatic Brain Injury—The Complex Role of HMGB1 and Neuroinflammation. Neuropharmacology 2021, 183, 108400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  134. Nishibori, M.; Wang, D.; Ousaka, D.; Wake, H. High Mobility Group Box-1 and Blood-Brain Barrier Disruption. Cells 2020, 9, 2650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  135. Siracusa, L.R.; Park, E.; Liu, E.; Baker, A.J. Prolonged Loss of Nuclear HMGB1 in Neurons Following Modeled TBI and Implications for Long-Term Genetic Health. Brain Res. 2025, 1855, 149559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  136. Stahel, P.F. Expression of HMGB1 and RAGE in Rat and Human Brains after Traumatic Brain Injury. J. Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2012, 73, 782; author reply 782–783. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  137. Kawai, C.; Miyao, M.; Kotani, H.; Minami, H.; Abiru, H.; Tamaki, K.; Nishitani, Y. Roles of HMGB1 on Life-Threatening Traumatic Brain Injury and Sequential Peripheral Organ Damage. Sci. Rep. 2024, 14, 21421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  138. Aneja, R.K.; Alcamo, A.M.; Cummings, J.; Vagni, V.; Feldman, K.; Wang, Q.; Dixon, C.E.; Billiar, T.R.; Kochanek, P.M. Lack of Benefit on Brain Edema, Blood-Brain Barrier Permeability, or Cognitive Outcome in Global Inducible High Mobility Group Box 1 Knockout Mice despite Tissue Sparing after Experimental Traumatic Brain Injury. J. Neurotrauma 2019, 36, 360–369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  139. Chen, X.; Zhang, J.; Kim, B.; Jaitpal, S.; Meng, S.S.; Adjepong, K.; Imamura, S.; Wake, H.; Nishibori, M.; Stopa, E.G.; et al. High-Mobility Group Box-1 Translocation and Release after Hypoxic Ischemic Brain Injury in Neonatal Rats. Exp. Neurol. 2019, 311, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  140. Qiu, J.; Nishimura, M.; Wang, Y.; Sims, J.R.; Qiu, S.; Savitz, S.I.; Salomone, S.; Moskowitz, M.A. Early Release of HMGB-1 from Neurons after the Onset of Brain Ischemia. J. Cereb. Blood Flow Metab. 2008, 28, 927–938. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  141. Sun, Q.; Wu, W.; Hu, Y.-C.; Li, H.; Zhang, D.; Li, S.; Li, W.; Li, W.-D.; Ma, B.; Zhu, J.-H.; et al. Early Release of High-Mobility Group Box 1 (HMGB1) from Neurons in Experimental Subarachnoid Hemorrhage in Vivo and in Vitro. J. Neuroinflamm. 2014, 11, 106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  142. Yang, Z.; Simovic, M.O.; Edsall, P.R.; Liu, B.; Cancio, T.S.; Batchinsky, A.I.; Cancio, L.C.; Li, Y. HMGB1 Inhibition to Ameliorate Organ Failure and Increase Survival in Trauma. Biomolecules 2022, 12, 101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  143. Cohen, M.J.; Brohi, K.; Calfee, C.S.; Rahn, P.; Chesebro, B.B.; Christiaans, S.C.; Carles, M.; Howard, M.; Pittet, J.-F. Early Release of High Mobility Group Box Nuclear Protein 1 after Severe Trauma in Humans: Role of Injury Severity and Tissue Hypoperfusion. Crit. Care 2009, 13, R174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  144. Hatayama, K.; Stonestreet, B.S. High Mobility Group Box-1 Protein as a Therapeutic Target in Perinatal Hypoxic-Ischemic Brain Injury. Neural Regen. Res. 2021, 16, 2006–2007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  145. Deng, C.; Zhao, L.; Yang, Z.; Shang, J.-J.; Wang, C.-Y.; Shen, M.-Z.; Jiang, S.; Li, T.; Di, W.-C.; Chen, Y.; et al. Targeting HMGB1 for the Treatment of Sepsis and Sepsis-Induced Organ Injury. Acta Pharmacol. Sin. 2022, 43, 520–528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  146. Vincent, J.C.; Garnett, C.N.; Watson, J.B.; Higgins, E.K.; Macheda, T.; Sanders, L.; Roberts, K.N.; Shahidehpour, R.K.; Blalock, E.M.; Quan, N.; et al. IL-1R1 Signaling in TBI: Assessing Chronic Impacts and Neuroinflammatory Dynamics in a Mouse Model of Mild Closed-Head Injury. J. Neuroinflamm. 2023, 20, 248, Erratum in Neuroinflamm. 2023, 20, 287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  147. Semple, B.D.; O’Brien, T.J.; Gimlin, K.; Wright, D.K.; Kim, S.E.; Casillas-Espinosa, P.M.; Webster, K.M.; Petrou, S.; Noble-Haeusslein, L.J. Interleukin-1 Receptor in Seizure Susceptibility after Traumatic Injury to the Pediatric Brain. J. Neurosci. 2017, 37, 7864–7877. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  148. Luheshi, N.M.; Kovács, K.J.; Lopez-Castejon, G.; Brough, D.; Denes, A. Interleukin-1α Expression Precedes IL-1β after Ischemic Brain Injury and Is Localised to Areas of Focal Neuronal Loss and Penumbral Tissues. J. Neuroinflamm. 2011, 8, 186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  149. Lindblad, C.; Rostami, E.; Helmy, A. Interleukin-1 Receptor Antagonist as Therapy for Traumatic Brain Injury. Neurotherapeutics 2023, 20, 1508–1528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  150. Malik, S.; Alnaji, O.; Malik, M.; Gambale, T.; Farrokhyar, F.; Rathbone, M.P. Inflammatory Cytokines Associated with Mild Traumatic Brain Injury and Clinical Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Front. Neurol. 2023, 14, 1123407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  151. Visser, K.; Koggel, M.; Blaauw, J.; van der Horn, H.J.; Jacobs, B.; van der Naalt, J. Blood-Based Biomarkers of Inflammation in Mild Traumatic Brain Injury: A Systematic Review. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 2022, 132, 154–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  152. Knoblach, S.M.; Fan, L.; Faden, A.I. Early Neuronal Expression of Tumor Necrosis Factor-α after Experimental Brain Injury Contributes to Neurological Impairment. J. Neuroimmunol. 1999, 95, 115–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  153. Fan, L.; Young, P.R.; Barone, F.C.; Feuerstein, G.Z.; Smith, D.H.; McIntosh, T.K. Experimental Brain Injury Induces Differential Expression of Tumor Necrosis Factor-Alpha MRNA in the CNS. Brain Res. Mol. Brain Res. 1996, 36, 287–291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  154. Liu, T.; Clark, R.K.; McDonnell, P.C.; Young, P.R.; White, R.F.; Barone, F.C.; Feuerstein, G.Z. Tumor Necrosis Factor-Alpha Expression in Ischemic Neurons. Stroke 1994, 25, 1481–1488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  155. He, J.; Evans, C.-O.; Hoffman, S.W.; Oyesiku, N.M.; Stein, D.G. Progesterone and Allopregnanolone Reduce Inflammatory Cytokines after Traumatic Brain Injury. Exp. Neurol. 2004, 189, 404–412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  156. Thelin, E.P.; Hall, C.E.; Gupta, K.; Carpenter, K.L.H.; Chandran, S.; Hutchinson, P.J.; Patani, R.; Helmy, A. Elucidating Pro-Inflammatory Cytokine Responses after Traumatic Brain Injury in a Human Stem Cell Model. J. Neurotrauma 2018, 35, 341–352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  157. Chang, J.C. Molecular Pathogenesis of Endotheliopathy and Endotheliopathic Syndromes, Leading to Inflammation and Microthrombosis, and Various Hemostatic Clinical Phenotypes Based on “Two-Activation Theory of the Endothelium” and “Two-Path Unifying Theory” of Hemostasis. Medicina 2022, 58, 1311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  158. Casey, L.C.; Balk, R.A.; Bone, R.C. Plasma Cytokine and Endotoxin Levels Correlate with Survival in Patients with the Sepsis Syndrome. Ann. Intern. Med. 1993, 119, 771–778. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  159. Bakhvalova, V.N.; Panov, V.V.; Potapova, O.F.; Morozova, O.V. Cytokines and antibodies in experimental infection of wild and laboratory rodents (rodentia) with tick-borne encephalitis virus. Vopr. Virusol. 2017, 62, 186–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  160. Siwicka-Gieroba, D.; Dabrowski, W. Credibility of the Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Count Ratio in Severe Traumatic Brain Injury. Life 2021, 11, 1352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  161. Royo, N.C.; Wahl, F.; Stutzmann, J.M. Kinetics of Polymorphonuclear Neutrophil Infiltration after a Traumatic Brain Injury in Rat. Neuroreport 1999, 10, 1363–1367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  162. Clark, R.S.; Schiding, J.K.; Kaczorowski, S.L.; Marion, D.W.; Kochanek, P.M. Neutrophil Accumulation after Traumatic Brain Injury in Rats: Comparison of Weight Drop and Controlled Cortical Impact Models. J. Neurotrauma 1994, 11, 499–506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  163. Matsuo, Y.; Onodera, H.; Shiga, Y.; Nakamura, M.; Ninomiya, M.; Kihara, T.; Kogure, K. Correlation Between Myeloperoxidase-Quantified Neutrophil Accumulation and Ischemic Brain Injury in the Rat: Effects of Neutrophil Depletion. Stroke 1994, 25, 1469–1475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  164. Dwyer, L.J.; Maheshwari, S.; Levy, E.; Poznansky, M.C.; Whalen, M.J.; Sîrbulescu, R.F. B Cell Treatment Promotes a Neuroprotective Microenvironment after Traumatic Brain Injury through Reciprocal Immunomodulation with Infiltrating Peripheral Myeloid Cells. J. Neuroinflamm. 2023, 20, 133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  165. Johnson, V.E.; Weber, M.T.; Xiao, R.; Cullen, D.K.; Meaney, D.F.; Stewart, W.; Smith, D.H. Mechanical Disruption of the Blood–Brain Barrier Following Experimental Concussion. Acta Neuropathol. 2018, 135, 711–726. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  166. Cervós-Navarro, J.; Lafuente, J.V. Traumatic Brain Injuries: Structural Changes. J. Neurol. Sci. 1991, 103, S3–S14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  167. van Vliet, E.A.; Ndode-Ekane, X.E.; Lehto, L.J.; Gorter, J.A.; Andrade, P.; Aronica, E.; Gröhn, O.; Pitkänen, A. Long-Lasting Blood-Brain Barrier Dysfunction and Neuroinflammation after Traumatic Brain Injury. Neurobiol. Dis. 2020, 145, 105080. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  168. Jenkins, D.R.; Craner, M.J.; Esiri, M.M.; DeLuca, G.C. Contribution of Fibrinogen to Inflammation and Neuronal Density in Human Traumatic Brain Injury. J. Neurotrauma 2018, 35, 2259–2271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  169. Sladojevic, N.; Stamatovic, S.M.; Johnson, A.M.; Choi, J.; Hu, A.; Dithmer, S.; Blasig, I.E.; Keep, R.F.; Andjelkovic, A.V. Claudin-1-Dependent Destabilization of the Blood-Brain Barrier in Chronic Stroke. J. Neurosci. 2019, 39, 743–757. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  170. Wu, M.-Y.; Gao, F.; Yang, X.-M.; Qin, X.; Chen, G.-Z.; Li, D.; Dang, B.-Q.; Chen, G. Matrix Metalloproteinase-9 Regulates the Blood Brain Barrier via the Hedgehog Pathway in a Rat Model of Traumatic Brain Injury. Brain Res. 2020, 1727, 146553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  171. Higashida, T.; Kreipke, C.W.; Rafols, J.A.; Peng, C.; Schafer, S.; Schafer, P.; Ding, J.Y.; Dornbos, D.; Li, X.; Guthikonda, M.; et al. The Role of Hypoxia-Inducible Factor-1α, Aquaporin-4, and Matrix Metalloproteinase-9 in Blood-Brain Barrier Disruption and Brain Edema after Traumatic Brain Injury: Laboratory Investigation. J. Neurosurg. 2011, 114, 92–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  172. Egashira, Y.; Zhao, H.; Hua, Y.; Keep, R.F.; Xi, G. White Matter Injury after Subarachnoid Hemorrhage: Role of Blood-Brain Barrier Disruption and Matrix Metalloproteinase-9. Stroke 2015, 46, 2909–2915. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  173. Gasche, Y.; Fujimura, M.; Morita-Fujimura, Y.; Copin, J.C.; Kawase, M.; Massengale, J.; Chan, P.H. Early Appearance of Activated Matrix Metalloproteinase-9 after Focal Cerebral Ischemia in Mice: A Possible Role in Blood-Brain Barrier Dysfunction. J. Cereb. Blood Flow Metab. 1999, 19, 1020–1028. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  174. Guilfoyle, M.R.; Carpenter, K.L.H.; Helmy, A.; Pickard, J.D.; Menon, D.K.; Hutchinson, P.J.A. Matrix Metalloproteinase Expression in Contusional Traumatic Brain Injury: A Paired Microdialysis Study. J. Neurotrauma 2015, 32, 1553–1559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  175. Nichols, P.; Urriola, J.; Miller, S.; Bjorkman, T.; Mahady, K.; Vegh, V.; Nasrallah, F.; Winter, C. Blood-Brain Barrier Dysfunction Significantly Correlates with Serum Matrix Metalloproteinase-7 (MMP-7) Following Traumatic Brain Injury. NeuroImage Clin. 2021, 31, 102741. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  176. Beaman, E.E.; Bonde, A.N.; Larsen, S.M.U.; Ozenne, B.; Lohela, T.J.; Nedergaard, M.; Gíslason, G.H.; Knudsen, G.M.; Holst, S.C. Blood-Brain Barrier Permeable β-Blockers Linked to Lower Risk of Alzheimer’s Disease in Hypertension. Brain 2023, 146, 1141–1151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  177. Muñoz-Ballester, C.; Robel, S. Astrocyte-Mediated Mechanisms Contribute to Traumatic Brain Injury Pathology. WIREs Mech. Dis. 2023, 15, e1622. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  178. Sabetta, Z.; Krishna, G.; Curry-Koski, T.; Lopez, M.; Adelson, P.D.; Thomas, T.C. Sex-Dependent Temporal Changes in Astrocyte-Vessel Interactions Following Diffuse Traumatic Brain Injury in Rats. Front. Physiol. 2024, 15, 1469073. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  179. Sacco, M.A.; Gualtieri, S.; Tarallo, A.P.; Verrina, M.C.; Calafiore, J.; Princi, A.; Lombardo, S.; Ranno, F.; Di Cello, A.; Gratteri, S.; et al. The Role of GFAP in Post-Mortem Analysis of Traumatic Brain Injury: A Systematic Review. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 26, 185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  180. Cieri, M.B.; Villarreal, A.; Gomez-Cuautle, D.D.; Mailing, I.; Ramos, A.J. Progression of Reactive Gliosis and Astroglial Phenotypic Changes Following Stab Wound-Induced Traumatic Brain Injury in Mice. J. Neurochem. 2023, 167, 183–203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  181. Susarla, B.T.S.; Villapol, S.; Yi, J.-H.; Geller, H.M.; Symes, A.J. Temporal Patterns of Cortical Proliferation of Glial Cell Populations after Traumatic Brain Injury in Mice. ASN Neuro 2014, 6, AN20130034. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  182. Thomas, T.C.; Ogle, S.B.; Rumney, B.M.; May, H.G.; Adelson, P.D.; Lifshitz, J. Does Time Heal All Wounds? Experimental Diffuse Traumatic Brain Injury Results in Persisting Histopathology in the Thalamus. Behav. Brain Res. 2018, 340, 137–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  183. Yang, Z.; Arja, R.D.; Zhu, T.; Sarkis, G.A.; Patterson, R.L.; Romo, P.; Rathore, D.S.; Moghieb, A.; Abbatiello, S.; Robertson, C.S.; et al. Characterization of Calpain and Caspase-6-Generated Glial Fibrillary Acidic Protein Breakdown Products Following Traumatic Brain Injury and Astroglial Cell Injury. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 8960. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  184. Murphy, R.A. Time Course and Diagnostic Accuracy of Glial and Neuronal Blood Biomarkers GFAP and UCH-L1 in a Large Cohort of Trauma Patients with and without Mild Traumatic Brain Injury. J. Emerg. Med. 2016, 51, 338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  185. Bogoslovsky, T.; Wilson, D.; Chen, Y.; Hanlon, D.; Gill, J.; Jeromin, A.; Song, L.; Moore, C.; Gong, Y.; Kenney, K.; et al. Increases of Plasma Levels of Glial Fibrillary Acidic Protein, Tau, and Amyloid β up to 90 Days after Traumatic Brain Injury. J. Neurotrauma 2017, 34, 66–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  186. Mercurio, D.; Fumagalli, S.; Schafer, M.K.-H.; Pedragosa, J.; Ngassam, L.D.C.; Wilhelmi, V.; Winterberg, S.; Planas, A.M.; Weihe, E.; De Simoni, M.-G. Protein Expression of the Microglial Marker Tmem119 Decreases in Association with Morphological Changes and Location in a Mouse Model of Traumatic Brain Injury. Front. Cell. Neurosci. 2022, 16, 820127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  187. González Ibanez, F.; Picard, K.; Bordeleau, M.; Sharma, K.; Bisht, K.; Tremblay, M.-È. Immunofluorescence Staining Using IBA1 and TMEM119 for Microglial Density, Morphology and Peripheral Myeloid Cell Infiltration Analysis in Mouse Brain. J. Vis. Exp. 2019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  188. Doust, Y.V.; Rowe, R.K.; Langley, R.C.; Garratt, E.A.; King, A.E.; Ziebell, J.M. Worsened Axonal Injury and Gliosis Following Diffuse Brain Injury in Male and Female Mice with Neurofilament Light Gene Deletion. Exp. Neurol. 2026, 396, 115520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  189. Krieg, J.L.; Leonard, A.V.; Turner, R.J.; Corrigan, F. Identifying the Phenotypes of Diffuse Axonal Injury Following Traumatic Brain Injury. Brain Sci. 2023, 13, 1607. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  190. Shin, S.S.; Hefti, M.M.; Mazandi, V.M.; Issadore, D.A.; Meaney, D.F.; Schneider, A.L.C.; Diaz-Arrastia, R.; Kilbaugh, T.J. Plasma Neurofilament Light and Glial Fibrillary Acidic Protein Levels over Thirty Days in a Porcine Model of Traumatic Brain Injury. J. Neurotrauma 2022, 39, 935–943. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  191. Siedler, D.G.; Chuah, M.I.; Kirkcaldie, M.T.K.; Vickers, J.C.; King, A.E. Diffuse Axonal Injury in Brain Trauma: Insights from Alterations in Neurofilaments. Front. Cell. Neurosci. 2014, 8, 429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  192. Huber, C.M.; Thakore, A.D.; Oeur, A.; Margulies, S.S. Short-Term Cyclosporin A Treatment Reduced Serum Neurofilament-Light Levels in Diffuse but Not Focal Traumatic Brain Injury in a Piglet Model. Biomedicines 2025, 13, 2547. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  193. Weber, D.J.; Allette, Y.M.; Wilkes, D.S.; White, F.A. The HMGB1-RAGE Inflammatory Pathway: Implications for Brain Injury-Induced Pulmonary Dysfunction. Antioxid. Redox Signal. 2015, 23, 1316–1328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  194. Fan, H.; Tang, H.-B.; Chen, Z.; Wang, H.-Q.; Zhang, L.; Jiang, Y.; Li, T.; Yang, C.-F.; Wang, X.-Y.; Li, X.; et al. Inhibiting HMGB1-RAGE Axis Prevents pro-Inflammatory Macrophages/Microglia Polarization and Affords Neuroprotection after Spinal Cord Injury. J. Neuroinflammation 2020, 17, 295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  195. Liesz, A.; Dalpke, A.; Mracsko, E.; Antoine, D.J.; Roth, S.; Zhou, W.; Yang, H.; Na, S.-Y.; Akhisaroglu, M.; Fleming, T.; et al. DAMP Signaling Is a Key Pathway Inducing Immune Modulation after Brain Injury. J. Neurosci. 2015, 35, 583–598, Erratum in J. Neurosci. 2019, 39, 5419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  196. Balança, B.; Desmurs, L.; Grelier, J.; Perret-Liaudet, A.; Lukaszewicz, A.-C. DAMPs and RAGE Pathophysiology at the Acute Phase of Brain Injury: An Overview. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 2439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  197. Murao, A.; Aziz, M.; Wang, H.; Brenner, M.; Wang, P. Release Mechanisms of Major DAMPs. Apoptosis 2021, 26, 152–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  198. Fesharaki-Zadeh, A.; Datta, D. An Overview of Preclinical Models of Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI): Relevance to Pathophysiological Mechanisms. Front. Cell. Neurosci. 2024, 18, 1371213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  199. Pandolfi, F.; Altamura, S.; Frosali, S.; Conti, P. Key Role of DAMP in Inflammation, Cancer, and Tissue Repair. Clin. Ther. 2016, 38, 1017–1028. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  200. Yang, Z.; Wang, K.K.W. Glial Fibrillary Acidic Protein: From Intermediate Filament Assembly and Gliosis to Neurobiomarker. Trends Neurosci. 2015, 38, 364–374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  201. Kanuri, S.H.; Sirrkay, P.J. Deciphering the Structural Biology of GFAP: Connotations of Its Potency in Presaging the Diagnosis for Traumatic Brain Injury and AD. Neurol. Int. 2025, 17, 134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  202. Zheng, X.; Yang, J.; Hou, Y.; Shi, X.; Liu, K. Prediction of Clinical Progression in Nervous System Diseases: Plasma Glial Fibrillary Acidic Protein (GFAP). Eur. J. Med. Res. 2024, 29, 51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  203. Gogishvili, D.; Honey, M.I.J.; Verberk, I.M.W.; Vermunt, L.; Hol, E.M.; Teunissen, C.E.; Abeln, S. The GFAP Proteoform Puzzle: How to Advance GFAP as a Fluid Biomarker in Neurological Diseases. J. Neurochem. 2025, 169, e16226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  204. Mocciaro, E.; Kidd, M.; Johnson, K.; Bishop, E.; Johnson, K.; Zeng, Y.P.; Perrotta, C.; Micci, M.-A. Mechanosensitive Ion Channel Piezo1 Modulates the Response of Rat Hippocampus Neural Stem Cells to Rapid Stretch Injury. PLoS One 2025, 20, e0323191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  205. Beltrán, S.M.; Bobo, J.; Habib, A.; Kodavali, C.V.; Edwards, L.; Mamindla, P.; Taylor, R.E.; LeDuc, P.R.; Zinn, P.O. Author Correction: Characterization of Neural Mechanotransduction Response in Human Traumatic Brain Injury Organoid Model. Sci. Rep. 2024, 14, 2151, Erratum for Sci. Rep. 2023, 13, 13536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  206. Beltrán, S.M.; Bobo, J.; Habib, A.; Kodavali, C.V.; Edwards, L.; Mamindla, P.; Taylor, R.E.; LeDuc, P.R.; Zinn, P.O. Characterization of Neural Mechanotransduction Response in Human Traumatic Brain Injury Organoid Model. Sci. Rep. 2023, 13, 13536, Erratum in Sci. Rep. 2024, 14, 2151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  207. Xiao, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Yuan, W.; Wang, C.; Ge, Y.; Huang, T.; Gao, J. Piezo2 Contributes to Traumatic Brain Injury by Activating the RhoA/ROCK1 Pathways. Mol. Neurobiol. 2024, 61, 7419–7430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  208. Ryu, Y.; Wague, A.; Liu, X.; Feeley, B.T.; Ferguson, A.R.; Morioka, K. Cellular Signaling Pathways in the Nervous System Activated by Various Mechanical and Electromagnetic Stimuli. Front. Mol. Neurosci. 2024, 17, 1427070. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  209. Kim, J.; Adams, A.A.; Gokina, P.; Zambrano, B.; Jayakumaran, J.; Dobrowolski, R.; Maurel, P.; Pfister, B.J.; Kim, H.A. Mechanical Stretch Induces Myelin Protein Loss in Oligodendrocytes by Activating Erk1/2 in a Calcium-Dependent Manner. Glia 2020, 68, 2070–2085. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  210. Keating, C.E.; Cullen, D.K. Mechanosensation in Traumatic Brain Injury. Neurobiol. Dis. 2021, 148, 105210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  211. Yijie, D.; Weisheng, H.; Ji, Z.; Jiao, M.; Yiwu, Z.; Hongmei, D. Role of Integrin and Its Potential as a Novel Postmortem Biomarker in Traumatic Axonal Injury. Int. J. Legal Med. 2023, 137, 843–849. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  212. Stukel, J.M.; Willits, R.K. Mechanotransduction of Neural Cells through Cell-Substrate Interactions. Tissue Eng. Part B Rev. 2016, 22, 173–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  213. Miles, L.; Powell, J.; Kozak, C.; Song, Y. Mechanosensitive Ion Channels, Axonal Growth, and Regeneration. Neuroscientist 2023, 29, 421–444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  214. Nikolaev, Y.; Cox, C.D.; Ridone, P.; Rohde, P.R.; Cordero-Morales, J.F.; Vasquez, V.; Laver, D.R.; Martinac, B. Mammalian TRP Ion Channels Are Insensitive to Membrane Stretch. Biophys. J. 2020, 118, 22a. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  215. 1Cheng, P.-W.; Wu, Y.-C.; Wong, T.-Y.; Sun, G.-C.; Tseng, C.-J. Mechanical Stretching-Induced Traumatic Brain Injury Is Mediated by the Formation of GSK-3β-Tau Complex to Impair Insulin Signaling Transduction. Biomedicines 2021, 9, 1650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  216. Wachtler, N.; O’Brien, R.; Ehrlich, B.E.; McGuone, D. Exploring Calcium Channels as Potential Therapeutic Targets in Blast Traumatic Brain Injury. Pharmaceuticals 2025, 18, 223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  217. Delage, C.; Taib, T.; Mamma, C.; Lerouet, D.; Besson, V.C. Traumatic Brain Injury: An Age-Dependent View of Post-Traumatic Neuroinflammation and Its Treatment. Pharmaceutics 2021, 13, 1624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  218. Ritzel, R.M.; Doran, S.J.; Glaser, E.P.; Meadows, V.E.; Faden, A.I.; Stoica, B.A.; Loane, D.J. Old Age Increases Microglial Senescence, Exacerbates Secondary Neuroinflammation, and Worsens Neurological Outcomes after Acute Traumatic Brain Injury in Mice. Neurobiol. Aging 2019, 77, 194–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  219. Moro, F.; Pischiutta, F.; Portet, A.; Needham, E.J.; Norton, E.J.; Ferdinand, J.R.; Vegliante, G.; Sammali, E.; Pascente, R.; Caruso, E.; et al. Ageing Is Associated with Maladaptive Immune Response and Worse Outcome after Traumatic Brain Injury. Brain Commun. 2022, 4, fcac036. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  220. Kumar, A.; Stoica, B.A.; Sabirzhanov, B.; Burns, M.P.; Faden, A.I.; Loane, D.J. Traumatic Brain Injury in Aged Animals Increases Lesion Size and Chronically Alters Microglial/Macrophage Classical and Alternative Activation States. Neurobiol. Aging 2013, 34, 1397–1411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  221. Green, T.R.F.; Murphy, S.M.; Ortiz, J.B.; Rowe, R.K. Age-at-Injury Influences the Glial Response to Traumatic Brain Injury in the Cortex of Male Juvenile Rats. Front. Neurol. 2022, 12, 804139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  222. Houle, S.; Kokiko-Cochran, O.N. A Levee to the Flood: Pre-Injury Neuroinflammation and Immune Stress Influence Traumatic Brain Injury Outcome. Front. Aging Neurosci. 2022, 13, 788055. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  223. Cheng, W.H.; Stukas, S.; Martens, K.M.; Namjoshi, D.R.; Button, E.B.; Wilkinson, A.; Bashir, A.; Robert, J.; Cripton, P.A.; Wellington, C.L. Age at Injury and Genotype Modify Acute Inflammatory and Neurofilament-Light Responses to Mild CHIMERA Traumatic Brain Injury in Wild-Type and APP/PS1 Mice. Exp. Neurol. 2018, 301, 26–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  224. Kokiko-Cochran, O.N.; Godbout, J.P. The Inflammatory Continuum of Traumatic Brain Injury and Alzheimer’s Disease. Front. Immunol. 2018, 9, 672. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  225. Mahley, R.W.; Huang, Y. Apolipoprotein e Sets the Stage: Response to Injury Triggers Neuropathology. Neuron 2012, 76, 871–885. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  226. Barrett, J.P.; Knoblach, S.M.; Bhattacharya, S.; Gordish-Dressman, H.; Stoica, B.A.; Loane, D.J. Traumatic Brain Injury Induces CGAS Activation and Type I Interferon Signaling in Aged Mice. Front. Immunol. 2021, 12, 710608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  227. Norden, D.M.; Muccigrosso, M.M.; Godbout, J.P. Microglial Priming and Enhanced Reactivity to Secondary Insult in Aging, and Traumatic CNS Injury, and Neurodegenerative Disease. Neuropharmacology 2015, 96, 29–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  228. Bray, C.E.; Witcher, K.G.; Adekunle-Adegbite, D.; Ouvina, M.; Witzel, M.; Hans, E.; Tapp, Z.M.; Packer, J.; Goodman, E.; Zhao, F.; et al. Chronic Cortical Inflammation, Cognitive Impairment, and Immune Reactivity Associated with Diffuse Brain Injury Are Ameliorated by Forced Turnover of Microglia. J. Neurosci. 2022, 42, 4215–4228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Temporal dynamics of key cytokines in neuroinflammation after TBI. Composite representation based on experimental and clinical studies [98,99,100,101,102,103,104,105,106,107,108,109,110], including rodent controlled cortical impact models, human CSF/serum studies, and post-mortem tissue analyses. Individual studies used varying injury models, species, and measurement methods. Axes: X-axis represents time post injury (hours to days); Y-axis represents relative expression level (normalized, arbitrary units). Actual absolute values vary substantially across studies depending on methodology, injury severity, and biological sample (tissue, CSF, serum). Limitations: This figure represents a synthesis of available data and should be interpreted as illustrating general temporal patterns rather than precise quantitative values. Individual patient/case variability is substantial.
Figure 1. Temporal dynamics of key cytokines in neuroinflammation after TBI. Composite representation based on experimental and clinical studies [98,99,100,101,102,103,104,105,106,107,108,109,110], including rodent controlled cortical impact models, human CSF/serum studies, and post-mortem tissue analyses. Individual studies used varying injury models, species, and measurement methods. Axes: X-axis represents time post injury (hours to days); Y-axis represents relative expression level (normalized, arbitrary units). Actual absolute values vary substantially across studies depending on methodology, injury severity, and biological sample (tissue, CSF, serum). Limitations: This figure represents a synthesis of available data and should be interpreted as illustrating general temporal patterns rather than precise quantitative values. Individual patient/case variability is substantial.
Ijms 27 02049 g001
Figure 2. Integrated multimarker timeline for PTI estimation.
Figure 2. Integrated multimarker timeline for PTI estimation.
Ijms 27 02049 g002
Figure 3. A multiparametric approach for PTI Estimation.
Figure 3. A multiparametric approach for PTI Estimation.
Ijms 27 02049 g003
Table 1. Respiratory chain complexes are disrupted after traumatic brain injury.
Table 1. Respiratory chain complexes are disrupted after traumatic brain injury.
Cause/SourceKey Molecular EventsTiming and LocationDownstream Consequences
Glutamate excitotoxicity and calcium overloadMassive glutamate release leads to an overactivation of NDMA/AMPA receptors => excessive Calcium influx => activation of NOS, phospholipases, proteases and increased mitochondrial respiration => oveproduction of ROS/RNS [35,36,37,38]Minutes-hours after injury. Cortex and hippocampus are especially vulnerable.Mitochondrial depolarization, lipid peroxidation, protein and DNA degradation, DNA oxidation, necrosis, apoptosis, long-term cognitive deficits [35,36,37,38].
Mitochondrial electron transport chain dysfunctionMechanical or Calcium-related injury to mitochondria => impaired electron transport chain (complexes I–IV), loss of membrane potential, opening of permeability of transition pores => electron leak to O2 causing the formation of superoxide => increases the production of ROS (positive feedback) [35,36,39,40,41].Starts in minutes-hours and persists days-weeks in the pericontusional tissue and the hippocampusEnergy failure (decreased ATP production), activation of cell death pathways, releases of pro-apoptotic factors, propagation of secondary injury [35,36,39,40,41].
NADPH oxidase (NOX1/2/4)TBI activates (NOX) in neurons, microglia, endothelial cells => transfer of electrons from NADPH to O2 => rapid superoxide generation [42,43,44,45].Before 4 h in blast and impact models, especially in the vascular endothelium and microgliaBBB breakdown via tight junction loss and activation of MMPs; edema; microglial-driven chronic neuroinflammation and neurodegeneration [42,43,44,45].
Nitric oxide synthases (nNOS, iNOS, eNOS)Calcium dependent nNOS/eNOS and iNOS leads to an increased production of NO, which, in combination with superoxide leads to the formation of peroxynitrite => protein nitration (3-NT) and mitochondrial damage [35,37,46].nNOS/eNOS—early (minutes-hours); iNOS—hours-days. Present in neurons, glial cells and vessels.Protein nitration, mitochondrial enzyme inhibition, DNA damage, apoptosis. Was associated with delayed congnitive and behavioral deficits [35,37,46,47].
Neuroinflammation and microglial activationMicroglia and migrated leukocytes release ROS, RNS, citokynes (IL-1β, ΤΝF-α) => positive feedback loop on NOX, NOS and mitochondria [42,46,48,49,50].Hours–weeks; may persist chronically around the injury and in the white matterSustained oxidative stress, synaptic dysfunction, progressive neuronal loss, mood and cognitive disorders [42,46,48,49,50].
BBB disruption and vascular oxidative stressOxidative stress in the endothelium => loss of tight junction proteins (claudin-5, occludin, ZO-1), activation of MMP3 and MMP9, degradation of VEGFR-2 => increased permeability of the BBB [44,45,51].Hours (around 4 h in blast TBI), and may remain abnormal for days.Vasogenic and cellular edema, infiltration of peripheral immune cells, further ROS/RNS production and neuroinflammation [44,45,51].
Iron and hemoglobin breakdown productsMicrohemorrhages and contusion release Fe2+, Fe3+ and heme => generation of hydroxyl radicals [41,52].Subacute/chronic, hear hemorrhagic fociIncreased lipid peroxidation, ferroptosis-like death, increased expansion of the injuries [48,51].
Depletion of mitochondrial antioxidantsDecrease in Reduced Glutathione, NADPH, Superoxide Dismutase 2 (SOD2), Peroxiredoxin 2 (PRX2), Thioredoxin 2 (TRX2) in mitochondria, inconstant compensatory increase in Catalase activity => inability to detoxify superoxide and H2O2 [40,47]From 30 min to >14 days.Persistent redox imbalance, increased window of oxidative damage and potential therapeutic activity for antioxidants [47].
Global failure of cytosolic antioxidant systemsDecreased Reduced Glutathione/Oxidized Glutathione ratio, decreased Glutathione Peroxidase, Glutathione Reductase, Glutathione S-Transferase, Glucose-6-Phosphatase Dehydrogenase, SOD, Catalase in brain tissue. Impaired Nuclear Factor Erythroid 2-Related Factor 2 Dehydrogenase (Nrf2-ARE) activation [36,40,53,54].Duration incompletely mapped in humans.Decreased capacity to neutralize ROS/RNS, greated susceptibility of lipids, proteins, DNA to oxidation, poor recovery [36,40,53]
Nrf2 pathway supression/insufficient activationInjury and inflammation supress or inadequately activate Nrf2, liting the induscion of Heme Oxygenase-1, NADPH Quinone Oxidoreductase 1, Gluthathione Peroxidase 1 and other detoxifying enzymes [46,53,54]Acute and subacute phases. Shown in multiple rodent TBI models [55,56,57]Exaggerated oxidative damage, apoptosis, neuroinflammation. Nrf2 activators and phytochemicals show neuroprotection preclinically [46,53,54,58]
Table 2. Practical summary of key neuroinflammatory biomarkers for approximate post-traumatic interval (PTI) stratification.
Table 2. Practical summary of key neuroinflammatory biomarkers for approximate post-traumatic interval (PTI) stratification.
Marker/ProcessApproximate PTI Bin(s)Specimen/ReadoutMain Limitations/ConfoundersSpecies & Sample Size (Typical)Experimental/Clinical Model (TBI Type)Key References
Microglial activation (Iba1/TMEM119/CD68; morphology)<1 h; 1–6 h; 6–24 hBrain tissue IHC (cortex/white matter adjacent to lesion)Many windows derived from rodent models
Strong effects of region/severity; PMI and agonal hypoxia can alter morphology
Focal CCI and lateral FPI; diffuse/midline FPI; pediatric/closed-head WD; human lethal TBI with survival <2 h to >3 dFocal CCI, lateral/midline FPI, repeated/mild rotational models; diffuse TBI in large animals; fatal human TBI with survival <2 h to months[90,93,102,186,187]
Axonal injury (βAPP; neurofilament changes)<1 h; 1–6 h; 6–24 hBrain tissue IHC (white matter tracts, corpus callosum, brainstem)Overlap with hypoxia/ischemia;
Requires pattern-based interpretation and combination with vascular/mechanotransduction markers
Rodents (CCI, weight-drop, FPI, rTBI; ≈5–12/arm); pig (CCI/diffuse; ≈7–10); clinical NfL cohorts (dozens–hundreds of patients)Diffuse TBI (rotational/weight-drop), focal CCI, rTBI; humans: radiologic DAI, moderate–severe TBI with βAPP post-mortem and blood NfL[17,22,188,189,190,191,192]
DAMPs (HMGB1 translocation; TLR4/RAGE axis)1–6 h; 6–24 hBrain IHC (nuclear → cytoplasmic shift); serum/CSF (context-dependent)Low specificity (hypoxia-ischemia/systemic inflammation);
Influenced by agonal course, resuscitation, sepsis
Mouse/rat ischemia/TBI/SCI (≈6–12/arm); human stroke/TBI cohorts (≈20–100); experimental SCI (≈8–15/arm)Cerebral ischemia (MCAO), CCI/FPI TBI, SAH, SCI; humans: acute stroke/TBI with plasma/CSF HMGB1, S100B, RAGE[9,193,194,195,196,197]
Early cytokines (IL-1β, TNF-α)1–6 h; 6–24 hBrain tissue, CSF/serum (ELISA/multiplex/IHC)High inter-individual variability; strongly affected by ventilation/CPR, infection, medications;
Temporal windows often preclinical
Rodent CCI/FPI/rTBI (≈6–10/arm, 1–24 h); large mammals (mild diffuse TBI; ≈6–8/arm); human CSF/serum studies (≈20–80)Focal and diffuse TBI (CCI, FPI, rTBI); ischemia/stroke as analog; ICU TBI patients with serial cytokine monitoring[90,188,189,198]
Delayed cytokine (IL-6)/chemokine signaling6–24 h; 1–3 daysCSF/serum and brain tissue (variable)Non-specific; sustained elevation with systemic inflammation and ICU courseRodents (CCI/FPI, 6 h–7 d; ≈6–10/arm); clinical stroke/TBI/SAH cohorts (≈30–200)Acute–subacute focal/diffuse TBI, stroke/hemorrhage; critically ill patients with plasma/CSF IL-6 and chemokines[83,90,195,198]
Leukocyte infiltration (neutrophils, lymphocytes)Neutrophils: 1–6 h to 6–24 h; lymphocytes: 1–3 days to >3 daysBrain histology/IHC (perivascular and parenchymal)Depends on BBB integrity and immune status; altered by hemorrhage, shock, and therapeutic interventionsMouse/rat CCI/FPI/ischemia/SAH (≈6–12/arm); SCI models (≈8–15/arm); human biopsy/autopsy series (tens of cases)Sterile acute injuries (focal/diffuse TBI, ischemia, SCI); perivascular/parenchymal histology; linked to HMGB1/RAGE and DAMPs[194,195,196,199]
BBB disruption (IgG/fibrinogen leakage; TJ proteins; MMP-9)1–6 h; 6–24 h; 1–3 daysBrain IHC (IgG/fibrinogen; claudin-5/occludin/ZO-1); MMP activityPMI sensitive; influenced by agonal hypoxia/hypercapnia, ventilation settings, catecholaminesRodent CCI/FPI/ischemia (≈6–12/arm); pig TBI (≈7–10); stroke/TBI cohorts with plasma MMP-9 (≈30–150)Focal CCI, FPI/diffuse, ischemia-reperfusion; humans: acute stroke/TBI with imaging plus blood BBB/MMP-9 markers[193,195,196,198]
Astrocytosis/GFAP6–24 h; 1–3 days; >3 daysBrain IHC; GFAP in CSF/serum (supportive)Delayed marker; GFAP also increases in non-traumatic CNS injury; affected by age/comorbiditiesRodent CCI/FPI/rTBI (≈6–12/arm, hours–weeks); pig CCI/diffuse (≈7–10); clinical TBI GFAP cohorts (dozens–hundreds)Focal CCI, diffuse rotational/rTBI, pediatric/adult TBI; humans: mild–severe TBI with serum/CSF GFAP and imaging correlations[6,119,179,180]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Hostiuc, S.; Rusu, M.-C. The Dynamics of Neuroinflammation in Traumatic Brain Injury: Molecular Markers Useful for Establishing the Post-Traumatic Interval in Forensic Practice. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2026, 27, 2049. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms27042049

AMA Style

Hostiuc S, Rusu M-C. The Dynamics of Neuroinflammation in Traumatic Brain Injury: Molecular Markers Useful for Establishing the Post-Traumatic Interval in Forensic Practice. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2026; 27(4):2049. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms27042049

Chicago/Turabian Style

Hostiuc, Sorin, and Mugurel-Constantin Rusu. 2026. "The Dynamics of Neuroinflammation in Traumatic Brain Injury: Molecular Markers Useful for Establishing the Post-Traumatic Interval in Forensic Practice" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 27, no. 4: 2049. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms27042049

APA Style

Hostiuc, S., & Rusu, M.-C. (2026). The Dynamics of Neuroinflammation in Traumatic Brain Injury: Molecular Markers Useful for Establishing the Post-Traumatic Interval in Forensic Practice. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 27(4), 2049. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms27042049

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop