Next Article in Journal
Metabolic Regulation in the Maintenance of Drosophila Testis Stem Cells
Next Article in Special Issue
Impact of the Combination of Epigallocatechin Gallate and Ellagic Acid Supplemented with Ketone Bodies on Energetic Restoration of Mitochondrial Dysfunction and Metabolic Inefficiencies in Patients with Multiple Sclerosis: A Review
Previous Article in Journal
RAGE Axis in the Pathogenesis and Treatment of CNS Neurodegeneration in Long-Term Hyperglycemia
Previous Article in Special Issue
Nrf2-Activating Natural Compounds in Neurodegenerative Diseases: Targeting Oxidative Stress and Protein Aggregation
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Immunomodulatory Effects of Flavonoids in Colitis-Associated Colorectal Cancer

1
Laboratory of Innate Immunity, Research Unit in Biomedicine (UBIMED), Facultad de Estudios Superiores Iztacala, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Av. De los Bariios 1, Los Reyes Iztacala, Tlalnepantla 54090, Mexico
2
Department of Toxicology, Centro de Investigación y de Estudios Avanzados del Instituto Politécnico Nacional, Av. IPN 2508, Zacatenco, Ciudad de México 07360, Mexico
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2026, 27(4), 1883; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms27041883
Submission received: 21 January 2026 / Revised: 6 February 2026 / Accepted: 10 February 2026 / Published: 15 February 2026
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Natural-Derived Bioactive Compounds in Disease Treatment)

Abstract

Flavonoids present in plants and fruits have been used in traditional medicine to reduce inflammation under various inflammatory conditions, including colitis. The pharmacological mechanisms that regulate intestinal inflammation are associated with the colonic microbiota, protection against oxidative stress, preservation of epithelial barrier function, and immune homeostasis. This review describes the main flavonoids present in the diet and examines their role in mitigating colon inflammation, as well as their impact when chronic inflammation progresses to colitis-associated colorectal cancer (CAC), in which flavonoids may promote immune evasion and tumor growth. Understanding the effects of flavonoids on colon physiology offers an opportunity to use these compounds rationally in the treatment of colitis and prevention of the development of colorectal cancer (CRC).

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Colitis is a chronic inflammatory condition of the colon characterized by a dysregulated immune response against the intestinal microbiota, leading to persistent mucosal inflammation, epithelial damage, and compromised barrier function. In addition to the clinical burden of symptoms such as abdominal pain, diarrhea, and rectal bleeding, which severely compromise patient quality of life, the real danger lies in its long-term progression. A sustained inflammatory environment substantially elevates the risk of developing colorectal cancer over time [1,2]. Flavonoid consumption has been linked to health benefits, including protective effects against diseases associated with intestinal inflammation, alleviation of colitis symptoms, and reduction in CAC progression through anti-inflammatory actions [3]. However, suppressing inflammation could interfere with antitumor immunity, depending on the CRC stage and phenotype. Therefore, the use of flavonoids in the treatment of CAC must be carefully considered.
This review analyzes the role of flavonoids in the regulation of intestinal inflammation and explores how flavonoids regulate intestinal inflammation, modulate immune responses, and influence CAC. In addition, the duality of the effects of flavonoids is discussed, highlighting the need for a balanced approach that considers both their benefits and their possible risks at different stages of the disease. This analysis provides a comprehensive overview that can guide future research and therapeutic strategies for the management of flavonoids as treatments.
This study evaluated the complex interplay between dietary flavonoids and CRC, focusing on their anti-inflammatory properties and their implications across various stages of CRC development. We synthesized established data from databases, including Google Scholar, PubMed, and Scopus, covering the period from January 2000 to June 2025. Our goal is to bridge existing knowledge gaps by examining the cellular and molecular facets of inflammatory processes within the flavonoid-CRC relationship. The search was guided by specific descriptors such as “inflammation,” “flavonoids,” “immune evasion” and “immunological escape” in the context of CRC progression. Our selection process prioritized studies detailing anti-inflammatory mechanisms of action that also function as key immune pathways during different phases of tumor growth. To maintain this thematic focus, we applied strict exclusion criteria, discarding any literature involving research unrelated to the colorectal region or studies on flavonoid anticancer properties not directly linked to inflammatory processes. Following this rigorous screening process, 164 out of the 233 articles consulted were selected for inclusion in this review.

2. Chemical Structure of Flavonoids

Flavonoids present in a wide range of sources, such as fruits, vegetables, herbs, spices, legumes, nuts, mushrooms and even plant derivatives, like tea, wine and honey [4], interact with multiple molecular targets due to their chemical diversity. Their biological activity is determined by their bioavailability, absorption, and metabolism, which are affected by their structure and degree of polymerization. Flavonoids are metabolized into an absorbable aglycone form in the small intestine. However, certain flavonoids resist hydrolytic enzyme activity, which permits their transit to the colon, where they can interact with intestinal cells and the gut microbiota and impact intestinal physiology [5]. Microbial enzymes metabolize flavonoids through glycoside removal, demethylation, and dihydroxylation, generating bioactive low-molecular-weight compounds that possess notable anti-inflammatory and antioxidant properties [6].
Structurally, flavonoids share a flavylium backbone composed of two aromatic rings, A and B, and an aromatic heterocyclic ring, C, collectively identified as the flavylium ion [7] (Figure 1). Flavonoids are classified as anthocyanins, flavonols, flavones, flavanones, isoflavones, or flavan-3-ols on the basis of the number of hydroxyl groups attached to rings A, B, and C (Table 1) [8].

3. Colitis, Progression to Colorectal Cancer and Immune Evasion

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), including both Crohn’s disease and ulcerative colitis (UC), is characterized by chronic inflammation that affects human health. These conditions are recognized as significant risk factors for developing CAC, with a two- to threefold increased risk compared with that of the general population due to characteristic dysplastic changes [9].
Crohn’s disease can affect any part of the gastrointestinal tract but usually affects the small intestine and/or the colon, with inflammation present across all layers of the bowel wall [3]. In contrast, UC involves nontransmural inflammation confined to the large intestine and rectum. Active UC leads to proinflammatory immune cell infiltration and severe tissue damage, including edema, loss of goblet cells, fibrosis, erosion, and ulcers. Symptoms include diarrhea, abdominal pain, fever, intestinal obstruction, and the passage of blood or mucus [2].
Chronic inflammation is associated with the activation of inflammatory signaling pathways, including the nuclear factor kappa B (NF-κB), IL-6/STAT3, COX-2/PGE2, and IL-23/Th17 pathways [10]. Persistent inflammation in the colon can lead to anatomical changes such as polyps, which may progress from benign lesions to indefinite dysplasia, subsequently to low-grade dysplasia, and eventually to high-grade dysplasia. High-grade dysplasia frequently develops into malignant tumors characterized by uncontrolled cell proliferation, angiogenesis, and immune evasion [11].
Immune cells, including neutrophils, macrophages (Mφs), natural killer (NK) cells, proinflammatory Th1 cells, CD8+ lymphocytes, and monocytes, play crucial roles in eliminating transformed cells and reducing the tumor burden at early stages. Nevertheless, if transformed cells escape immune detection, they can progress to later phases of tumor development [12].
During the second phase, immunogenicly transformed cells are eliminated, while those not recognized by the immune system persist and promote tumor growth, leading to immunoselection [13]. In the third phase, there is a shift toward an anti-inflammatory immune response mediated by Th2 cells, regulatory T cells (Tregs), and tumor-associated immune cells with permissive profiles, such as tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs) and myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs), which facilitate tumor progression and angiogenesis necessary for metastasis [14]. Tregs promote an anti-inflammatory environment by secreting IL-10 and TGF-β, both of which are linked to poor CRC prognosis [15] (Figure 2).
The mechanisms described are dynamic, shifting from an inflammation-associated environment during CRC initiation to a predominantly anti-inflammatory context that supports tumor growth and metastasis. Flavonoids with anti-inflammatory properties may mitigate colitis and play protective roles against CAC progression. However, once CAC is established, their effects require careful evaluation, as outcomes may depend on the balance of signaling cues in the tumor microenvironment and the specific stage of CRC development.

4. Mechanisms of Action of Flavonoids

Both in vivo and in vitro studies have demonstrated that flavonoids effectively reduce inflammation in the digestive tract at doses ranging from 10 to 200 mg/kg body weight. These effects are mediated via various mechanisms, including the following:

4.1. Modulation of the Microbiota by Flavonoids

Intestinal dysbiosis is strongly linked to gastrointestinal tract inflammation and plays a significant role in the development of CAC [16]. Pathobionts have also been shown to promote an immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment that favors the growth of CRC. In addition, both clinical and preclinical evidence indicate that bacteria can colonize tumors [17,18,19]. For example, F. nucleatum is consistently enriched in the intratumoral microbiome of patients with CRC and can persist in metastatic lesions [20,21].
The microbial shifts observed during the transition from inflammation to malignancy are detailed in Table 2. These specific taxonomic changes represent targets for intervention with flavonoids.
Flavonoids contribute to the enhancement of the composition and functionality of the intestinal microbiota by promoting beneficial bacteria, although the effects of these compounds vary. For example, hesperetin and myricetin have been shown to increase the abundance of beneficial genera such as Bifidobacterium and A. muciniphila while reducing potentially pathogenic groups such as Enterobacteriaceae, all of which are linked to maintaining intestinal barrier integrity and mitigating inflammation [22], a key mechanism in their protective role against CAC progression. Additionally, flavonoids like quercetin and luteolin help reduce the production of procarcinogenic metabolites by pathogenic bacteria such as F. nucleatum, P. anaerobius, E. coli, and C. difficile in patients with colitis [23,24] (see Table 3 for details).
However, studies are needed to confirm whether in advanced stages of CAC, flavonoids can decrease the intratumoral microbiome and the degree of immunosuppression in the tumor microenvironment by regulating these pathogenic bacteria.
Table 2. Microbiota shifts and dysbiosis during colorectal inflammation and cancer progression. ↑ = increase.
Table 2. Microbiota shifts and dysbiosis during colorectal inflammation and cancer progression. ↑ = increase.
ConditionMicrobial Changes (Key Taxa)FunctionRef.
Healthy gut microbiota Roseburia hominis, Dorea formicigenerans, and Ruminococcus obeumSymbiotic and anti-inflammatory species.[23,25]
Colon
inflammation
(Ulcerative
colitis)
Bifidobacterium breve and Clostridium
symbiosum.
Inflammatory dysbiosis.
↑ Hydrogen sulfide (H2S), Ammonia (NH3)Genotoxic and proinflammatory.
(Crohn’s
disease)
Ruminococcus gnavus, Escherichia coli,
Clostridium clostridioforme
Inflammatory dysbiosis
Colorectal
adenoma
Fusobacterium nucleatum, Bacteroides fragilis (ETBF), Solobacterium moorei, Escherichia coli, Lachnoclostridium spp., Peptostreptococcus anaerobius, E. faecalis, Parvimonas micraTumor-promoting bacteria enriched in
adenomas.
[26,27,28]
Colorectal
cancer
Morganella morganii, Clostridium butyricum, (ETBF), S. thermophilus, S. gallolyticus, S. salivarius, L. gallinarum, S. moorei, P. stomatis, P. asaccharolytica, P. intermedia, Carnobacterium maltaromaticum, pks + E. coliStrong immunosuppressive/
procarcinogenic signals.
[29,30,31,32,33,34,35]
B. fragilis (enterotoxogenic)Disrupts intestinal barrier, activates Th17, STAT3, NF-κB, suppresses exosomal
miR-149-3p, promotes Th17 differentiation.
[33,36,37]
P. micraStimulates Th17 cell responses,
proinflammatory cytokines
[38]
F. nucleatum, P. anaerobius, E. faecalisActivate TLR2/4 signaling via MYD88,
trigger NF-κB, promote cytokines, tumor progression and metastasis.
[39,40,41]
F. nucleatumLocal enrichment in intratumoral
microbiome, in metastatic lesions.
[20,21]
P. anaerobiusPromote MDSC infiltration by inducing CXCL1 (intratumoral).[40,42]
Klebsiella pneumoniaeRegulate tumor cytokines, attract M2 Mφs, suppress T-cell functions
(intratumoral).
[43]

4.2. Flavonoids Regulate the Expression of Tight Junction Proteins in the Gut Epithelial Barrier

Individuals genetically predisposed to UC exhibit a compromised epithelial barrier, characterized by structural abnormalities in tight junctions [44]. This barrier dysfunction permits luminal antigens to penetrate the intestinal mucosa, promoting the infiltration of Mφs, dendritic cells (DCs), neutrophils, and other immune cells [24]. The resulting chronic inflammatory environment causes tissue damage and contributes to UC pathogenesis [3]. Notably, flavonoids such as quercetin, rutin and hesperetin, among others, enhance the expression of the key membrane-associated proteins Zonula occludens-1 (ZO-1), occludin, and claudin-1, reinforcing epithelial integrity within the colon (see Table 3 for details; Figure 3A).
Table 3. Flavonoid immunomodulatory effects. ↑ indicates positive and ↓ negative regulation of flavonoids on the mentioned effect.
Table 3. Flavonoid immunomodulatory effects. ↑ indicates positive and ↓ negative regulation of flavonoids on the mentioned effect.
FlavonoidModelDoseImmunomodulatory EffectsRef.
AcacetinRAW264.7 cells45 μmol/L 24 h↓ TNF-α, IL-1β, IL-6, IL-23, IFN-γ, IL-12, IL-8, IL-17, IL-18 and IL-33, ↓ iNOS, ↓ COX-2 and PGE2[45]
C57BL/6 mouse model of dextran sulfate sodium (DSS)-induced colitis50 mg/kg by oral gavage (p.o.) from day 1 to day 9
AnthocyaninsCaco-2, HT-29, HCT-116 cells200 μmol/L, 400 μg/mL, 154.3 μg/mL for 48 h↓ MIP-1, ↓ MAPK (p38, ERK1/2, JNK), ↓ COX-2 and PGE2. Useful in the treatment of cancer[46,47,48]
ApigeninC57BL/6 mouse model of DSS-induced colitis25 and 50 mg/kg p.o. for 3 days↑ Beneficial bacteria, ↑ ZO-1, occludin and claudin-1, ↓ TNF-α, IL-1β, IL-6, IL-23, IFN-γ, IL-12, IL-8, IL-17, IL-18 and IL-33, ↑ IL-10 and TGF, ↓ MAPK (p38, ERK1/2, JNK), ↓ MPO, ↓ iNOS, ↓ COX-2 and PGE2[49,50,51]
Caco-2 cells
C57BL/6 mouse model of oxazolone-induced colitis
50 μM 1, 12 and 24 h
0.8 mg/day from day 0 to day 35
BaicaleinBALBc mouse model of DSS-induced colitis40 mg/kg p.o. daily for 10 days beginning with the start of DSS exposure↓ STAT3 and/or STAT6[52]
BaicalinSprague–Dawley (SD) rat model of 2,4,6-trinitrobenzenesulfonic acid (TNBS)-induced colitis,
HT-29 cells
100 mg/kg p.o. once a day for 14 days,
316 µg/mL for 24 h
↓ TNF-α, IL-1β, IL-6, IL-23, IFN-γ, IL-12, IL-8, IL-17, IL-18 and IL-33, ↓ NF-κB, ↓ MIP-3, ↑ Tregs, ↓ MDA, ↑ GPx and CAT. Useful in the treatment of cancer[53,54,55,56,57]
Peripheral blood mononuclear cells from patients with UC40 μmol/L for 24 h
SD rat model of TNBS-induced colitis,
RAW264.7 cells
5 mg/mL p.o. per day,
5.0 × 10−5 μM + 1 μg/mL LPS for 48 h
SD rat model of TNBS-induced colitisIntragastrically (i.g.) 1% (w/v) once every 2 days for 14 days
SD rat model of TNBS-induced colitisi.g. 90 mg/kg daily through the model
ChrysinBALBc mouse model of DSS-induced colitis10 mg/kg p.o. for 7 days, beginning with the start of DSS exposure.↓ TNF-α, IL-1β, IL-6, IL-23, IFN-γ, IL-12, IL-8, IL-17, IL-18 and IL-33, ↓ MIP-1, ↓ MPO[58]
DaidzeinMesenteric lymph node cells from DSS-induced C57BL/6 mouse model of DSS-induced colitis100 mg/kg daily from day −7 to 6 of DSS model↓ TNF-α, IL-1β, IL-6, IL-23, IFN-γ, IL-12, IL-8, IL-17, IL-18 and IL-33, ↓ NF-κB, ↓ TLR4, ↑ IL-10 and TGF, ↓ MPO, useful in the treatment of cancer[59,60]
BALBc mouse model of DSS-induced colitis,
RAW 264.7 cells
10 mg/kg p.o. for seven days,
200 μM/mL for 24 h
EGCGCaco-2 cells5 μM for 6 h↑ Beneficial bacteria, ↑ ZO-1, occludin and claudin-1, ↓ TNF-α, IL-1β, IL-6, IL-23, IFN-γ, IL-12, IL-8, IL-17, IL-18 and IL-33, ↓ NF-κB, ↓ TLR4, ↓ MIP-3, ↓ MIP-1, ↑ Tregs, ↑ IL-10 and TGF, ↓ STAT3 and/or STAT6, ↓ MPO, useful in the treatment of cancer[61,62,63,64,65,66,67]
HT29 and T84 cells25 μM for 24 h
C57BL/6 mouse model of DSS-induced colitis100 mg/kg p.o. through DSS model
EpicatechinC57BL/6 mouse model of DSS-induced colitis,
Caco-2 cells
300 mg/kg p.o. from the beginning to the end of the model,
5 μM incubated for 6 h
↑ ZO-1, occludin and claudin-1, ↓ TNF-α, IL-1β, IL-6, IL-23, IFN-γ, IL-12, IL-8, IL-17, IL-18 and IL-33, ↓ NF-κB, ↓ TLR4, ↓ MIP-3, ↓ MIP-1, ↑ Tregs, ↑ IL-10 and TGF, ↓ STAT3 and/or STAT6, ↓ MPO, ↓ GSH and SOD, ↑ GPx and CAT. Useful in the treatment of cancer[62,68]
BALBc mouse model of DSS-induced colitis100 mg/kg/day p.o. on day 8 of the experiment
C57BL/6 mouse model of DSS-induced colitis50 mg/kg from day 5 to day 12
Specific-pathogen-free SD rat model of TNBS-induced colitis50 mg/kg/d i.p. for 10 consecutive days after model establishment
C57BL/6 model of TNBS-induced colitis10 mg/kg i.p. twice a day after the induction of colitis
EriocitrinC57BL/6J mouse model of DSS-induced colitis30 mg/kg/d p.o. followed by DSS administration↓ TNF-α, IL-1β, IL-6, IL-23, IFN-γ, IL-12, IL-8, IL-17, IL-18 and IL-33, ↓ MPO[69]
FisetinBALBc mouse model of DSS-induced colitis,
BALBc peritoneal Mφs
10 mg/kg p.o. once a day from one day before of DSS administration and followed until the 8th day,
50 μM for 24 h
↓ TNF-α, IL-1β, IL-6, IL-23, IFN-γ, IL-12, IL-8, IL-17, IL-18 and IL-33, ↓ NF-κB, ↓ MAPK (p38, ERK1/2, JNK), ↓ MPO, ↓ iNOS, ↓ GSH and SOD, ↓ MDA, ↓ COX-2 and PGE2. Useful in the treatment of cancer[70]
GalanginSwiss albino mouse model of DSS-induced colitis40 mg/kg/d p.o. from day 8 to day 28↓ TNF-α, IL-1β, IL-6, IL-23, IFN-γ, IL-12, IL-8, IL-17, IL-18 and IL-33, ↓ NF-κB, ↓ TLR4, ↑ IL-10 and TGF, ↓ MPO, ↓ iNOS, ↓ GSH and SOD, ↓ COX-2 and PGE2. Useful in the treatment of cancer[71,72,73,74]
RAW 264.7 cellsPretreated with 0.78 μg/mL for 1 h
BALBc mouse model of DSS-induced colitis40 mg/kg p.o. from day 0 to 12
ICR mouse model of DSS-induced colitis15 mg/kg p.o. from 1 week prior to the DSS challenge, up to the end of study
GenisteinWister rat model of acetic acid (AA)-induced colitis100 mg/kg/d equivalent to a human dose of 16.13 mg/kg↑ Beneficial bacteria, ↑ ZO-1, occludin and claudin-1, ↓ TNF-α, IL-1β, IL-6, IL-23, IFN-γ, IL-12, IL-8, IL-17, IL-18 and IL-33, ↓ MIP-1, ↓ STAT3 and/or STAT6, ↓ MPO, ↓ iNOS, ↓ COX-2 and PGE2. Useful in the treatment of cancer[75,76,77,78,79]
C57BL/6 mouse model of DSS-induced colitis10 mg/kg/d p.o. till day 14th
C57BL/6 mouse model of DSS-induced colitis,
THP-1 cells and U937 cells
45 mg/kg from day 1 to day 10,
20 μM for 4 h
Wistar rat model of TNBS-induced colitis100 mg/kg p.o. 24 h after TNBS administration for 14 days
C57BL/6 mouse model of DSS-induced colitis40 mg/kg/d i.g. for 10 days
HesperetinC57BL/6 mouse model of DSS-induced colitis,
Caco-2 cells
40 mg/kg/d p.o. from day 0 to day 13,
40 µg/mL for 48 h
↑ ZO-1, occludin and claudin-1, ↓ TNF-α, IL-1β, IL-6, IL-23, IFN-γ, IL-12, IL-8, IL-17, IL-18 and IL-33, ↓ MIP-1, ↑ Tregs, ↑ IL-10 and TGF, ↓ MPO, ↓ GSH and SOD, ↓ MDA[76,80,81,82,83]
C57BL/6 mouse model of DSS-induced colitis,
Caco-2 and RAW264.7 cells
20 mg/kg/d i.p.,
100 μM for 24 h
Wistar rat model of DSS-induced colitis50 mg/kg/d p.o. for 14 days
BALB/c mouse model of DSS-induced colitis80 mg/kg/d p.o. at the same time as DSS
KaempferolC57BL/6J mouse model of DSS-induced colitis0.3% diets for 3 weeks after the start of DSS exposure↑ Beneficial bacteria, ↓ TNF-α, IL-1β, IL-6, IL-23, IFN-γ, IL-12, IL-8, IL-17, IL-18 and IL-33, ↓ MPO, ↓ iNOS, ↓ COX-2 and PGE2[61,84]
LinarinC57BL/6J mouse model of DSS-induced colitis50 mg/kg/d p.o. beginning with the start of DSS exposure↑ Beneficial bacteria, ↓ TNF-α, IL-1β, IL-6, IL-23, IFN-γ, IL-12, IL-8, IL-17, IL-18 and IL-33, ↓ MPO[85]
LuteolinCaco-2 cells150 μM for 24 h↑ Beneficial bacteria, ↓ TNF-α, IL-1β, IL-6, IL-23, IFN-γ, IL-12, IL-8, IL-17, IL-18 and IL-33, ↓ NF-κB, ↓ MAPK (p38, ERK1/2, JNK), ↓ STAT3 and/or STAT6, ↓ MPO, ↓ iNOS, ↓ GSH and SOD, ↓ MDA, ↓ COX-2 and PGE2. Useful in the treatment of cancer[73,86,87,88,89,90]
C57BL/6CrSlc mouse model of DSS-induced colitis,
Caco-2, L929, and RAW 264.7
50 mg/kg/d p.o. starting 7 days before DSS treatment and continuing until sacrifice,
100 μM after 6 h
C57BL/6 mouse model of DSS-induced colitis100 mg/kg/d p.o. after DSS administration from days 3–7
C57BL/6 mouse model of DSS-induced colitis50 mg/kg/d p.o. 7 days prior to DSS exposure and were then maintained until sacrifice
SPF grade C57BL 6 mouse model of DSS-induced colitis 20 mg/kg i.p. after DSS administration
MyricetinC57BL/6 mouse model of DSS-induced colitis80 mg/kg p.o. at the same time as DSS↓ TNF-α, IL-1β, IL-6, IL-23, IFN-γ, IL-12, IL-8, IL-17, IL-18 and IL-33, ↓ NF-κB, ↑ Tregs, ↑ IL-10 and TGF, ↓ MPO, ↓ GSH and SOD, ↓ MDA, ↑ GPx and CAT[91,92,93]
pathogen-free BALB/c mouse model of DSS-induced colitis200 mg/kg/d p.o. beginning on the day on which oral DSS water was given
CD1 mouse model of DSS-induced colitis10 mg/kg/d p.o.; the treatment started 1 h before administration of DSS and followed until the seventh day
MyricitrinCD1 mouse model of DSS-induced colitis10 mg/kg/d p.o. for 7 days beginning with the start of DSS exposure↓ TNF-α, IL-1β, IL-6, IL-23, IFN-γ, IL-12, IL-8, IL-17, IL-18 and IL-33, ↓ MAPK (p38, ERK1/2, JNK), ↓ NF-κB, ↓ COX-2 and PGE2. Useful in the treatment of cancer[93]
NaringeninRAW264.7 cells and HT-29 cells,
C57BL/6 mouse model of DSS-induced colitis
25 µmol/L for 2 h,
50 mg/kg p.o. prior to DSS treatment and continued till the end of DSS treatment
↑ Beneficial bacteria, ↑ ZO-1, occludin and claudin-1, ↓ TNF-α, IL-1β, IL-6, IL-23, IFN-γ, IL-12, IL-8, IL-17, IL-18 and IL-33, ↓ NF-κB, ↓ TLR4, ↓ MIP-1, ↓ iNOS, ↓ GSH and SOD, ↑ GPx and CAT, ↓ COX-2 and PGE2. Useful in the treatment of cancer[94,95,96,97,98]
BALB/c mouse model of DSS-induced colitisDiet containing 0.3% (w/w) during the recovery period (11 days)
Wistar rat model of AA-induced colitis100 mg/kg/d p.o. for 7 consecutive days pre colitis induction
BALB/c mouse model of DSS-induced colitisdiet containing 0.3% (wt:wt) till the end of DSS treatment
NaringinC57BL/6 mouse model of DSS-induced colitis100 mg/kg p.o. the same days as DSS treatment↑ Beneficial bacteria, ↑ ZO-1, occludin and claudin-1, ↓ NF-κB, ↓ MAPK (p38, ERK1/2, JNK), ↓ MPO, ↓ iNOS, ↓ GSH and SOD, ↓ MDA, ↓ COX-2 and PGE2. Useful in the treatment of cancer[99,100,101]
Wistar rat model of AA-induced colitis80 mg/kg p.o. for 12 days
C57BL/6 mouse model of AA-induced colitis,
RAW264.7 cells and rat intestinal IEC-6 epithelial cells
40 mg/kg/d p.o. for seven successive days, 1 day after colitis induction,
20 μM in vitro for 12 h
PinocembrinRAW264.7 and Caco-2 cells, C57BL/6 mouse model of DSS-induced colitis150 μM for 24 h,
100 mg/kg/d p.o. 2 days prior to DSS treatment and continued to the end of the DSS treatment
↑ ZO-1, occludin and claudin-1, ↓ TNF-α, IL-1β, IL-6, IL-23, IFN-γ, IL-12, IL-8, IL-17, IL-18 and IL-33, ↓ NF-κB, ↓ TLR4, ↓ iNOS, ↓ COX-2 and PGE2. Useful in the treatment of cancer[102,103]
SD rat model of DSS-induced colitis50 mg/kg p.o. for 7 days, prior to the DSS treatment and treated until the last day of the experiment
QuercetinFischer rat model of DSS/azoximetane (AOM)-induced CAC 25 mg/kg injected 3 days a week during the 18 weeks of the experiment↑ Beneficial bacteria, ↑ ZO-1, occludin and claudin-1, ↓ TNF-α, IL-1β, IL-6, IL-23, IFN-γ, IL-12, IL-8, IL-17, IL-18 and IL-33, ↓ NF-κB, ↓ TLR4, ↑ Tregs, ↑ IL-10 and TGF, ↓ MAPK (p38, ERK1/2, JNK), ↓ STAT3 and/or STAT6, ↓ MPO, ↓ iNOS, ↓ GSH and SOD, ↑ GPx and CAT, ↓ COX-2 and PGE2. Useful in the treatment of cancer[104,105,106,107,108,109,110]
C57BL/6 mouse model of DSS-induced colitis and Ahr/ mouse model50 mg/kg p.o. from days 1–10 and 18–22
RAW264.7 cell10 μM for 24 h
Swiss rat model of AA-induced colitis100 mg/kg p.o.; the animals were treated 2 h before and 10 h after colitis induction, and they were euthanized at the 18th hour
Rat intestinal microvascular endothelial cells80 μM for 12 h
Wistar rat model of TNBS-induced colitis,
Caco-2 cells,
25 mg/kg/d, p.o. for 11 days,
493 μM for 2 h
C57BL/6 mouse model of DSS-induced colitisMice chow pellets supplemented with 100, 500, 1000, and 1500 ppm quercetin. After one week, mice quercetin with 3% (m/v) DSS added for 6 days
RutinBALBc mouse model of DSS-induced colitis50 mg/kg/d for 48 days beginning with the start of DSS exposure,↑ ZO-1, occludin and claudin-1, ↓ TNF-α, IL-1β, IL-6, IL-23, IFN-γ, IL-12, IL-8, IL-17, IL-18 and IL-33, ↓ NF-κB, ↓ MAPK (p38, ERK1/2, JNK), ↓ MPO, ↓ iNOS[111,112]
pathogen-free ICR mouse model of DSS-induced colitis,
peritoneal Mφs
6 mg/kg/d, p.o. for 2 weeks 1-week DSS exposure,
200 μM for 30 min
TangeretinC57BL/6 mouse model of TNBS-induced colitis20 mg/kg/d p.o. for 3 days after treatment with TNBS↑ ZO-1, occludin and claudin-1, ↓ TNF-α, IL-1β, IL-6, IL-23, IFN-γ, IL-12, IL-8, IL-17, IL-18 and IL-33, ↓ NF-κB, ↑ Tregs, ↑ IL-10 and TGF, ↓ MAPK (p38, ERK1/2, JNK), ↓ MPO. Useful in the treatment of cancer[50,113,114]

4.3. Negative Regulation of Proinflammatory Cytokines and Chemokines by Flavonoids

Mφs and DCs infiltrating the colonic tissue recognize microbiota-associated molecular patterns and sample luminal antigens via their Toll-like receptors (TLRs) and C-type lectin receptors (CLRs) [115]. Throughout the progression of UC, the immune response promotes persistent inflammation, characterized by elevated levels of reactive oxygen species (ROS), proinflammatory cytokines, and chemokines. These factors collectively induce DNA damage and trigger oncogenic signaling pathways [116].
Antigen recognition by Mφs and their subsequent interaction with T lymphocytes drive the maturation of T cells into effector cells. The production of proinflammatory cytokines, such as TNF-α, IL-1β, IL-6, IL-23, and IL-17a, amplifies inflammation by recruiting and activating additional mediators such as IFN-γ and IL-22 [117]. Chemokines, including MCP-1, IL-8, and MIP-2, facilitate the recruitment and infiltration of leukocyte populations that contribute to tissue damage [118].
Flavonoids have been shown to inhibit the secretion of TNF-α, IL-1β, IL-6, IL-23, IFN-γ and IL-12 and, to a lesser extent, of IL-8, IL-17, IL-18 and IL-33 [24] and decrease the expression of TLR4, MIP-3 and MCP-1, helping reduce chronic intestinal inflammation. For example, luteolin has been shown to inhibit TLR4 and downstream NF-κB activation, thereby reducing the secretion of TNF-α, IL-6, and IL-1β in murine models of colitis. Similarly, baicalein attenuates intestinal inflammation by suppressing TLR4-mediated pathways and decreasing the levels of chemokines such as CCL2 and CXCL1. These actions contribute to the resolution of chronic inflammation and the restoration of intestinal homeostasis, underscoring their therapeutic potential during the early stages of CAC. The detailed molecular targets and immune effects of several dietary polyphenols are summarized in Table 3 (Figure 3A).
In oncological contexts, when Mφs are stimulated with IFN-γ and TLR ligands, they can mediate tumor cell lysis [119]. Therefore, flavonoids that decrease IFN-γ or downregulate TLR expression while broadly suppressing proinflammatory cytokines and chemokines may, under certain conditions, impair tumor cell elimination. For example, luteolin is a well-characterized NF-κB inhibitor that decreases TNF-α, IL-6, and IL-1β expression, which are key for driving effector T-cell recruitment and macrophage activation [120]. Persistent suppression of these inflammatory signals, especially in advanced CAC, may limit antitumor immunity and contribute to immune evasion.
This effect is not generalizable to all contexts but rather depends strongly on the chemical structure of flavonoids, their concentration, and the stage of disease. For instance, structurally, planar flavonoids such as baicalein bind to the aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AhR), influencing transcriptional programs that include immunoregulatory cytokines and Treg-related genes [121]. At high doses, some AhR ligands have been linked to increased Treg expansion and IL-10 production, both of which are associated with the suppression of effector T-cell function in tumors [122].
Thus, while the anti-inflammatory activity of flavonoids is clearly beneficial during early colitis, in more advanced stages of CAC, when a type 1 immune response is required for tumor control, their prolonged or high-dose use may shift the balance toward immunosuppression. This observation is further supported by reports that some flavonoids increase the proportion of Tregs, which suppress CD8+ T-cell activity and facilitate tumor escape during the immune equilibrium and escape phases of CAC [123] (Figure 3B).
In the third phase of immune evasion, tumor cells, along with Tregs, contribute to an anti-inflammatory profile by secreting increased amounts of IL-10 and TGF-β. This environment supports additional IL-10 secretion by monocytes and Mφs and suppresses NK cell-mediated cytotoxicity within the tumor microenvironment. Elevated serum IL-10 levels are associated with a poorer prognosis regarding treatment response and disease-free survival in patients with CRC [15], whereas TGF-β is involved in cancer cell growth, invasion, and metastasis and reduces antitumor immune responses by inhibiting the differentiation, maturation, and proliferation of CD8+ T lymphocytes, as well as the maturation and presentation of tumor antigens by DCs [124] (Figure 3C). Flavonoids such as apigenin, luteolin or naringenin have been shown to induce the secretion of IL-10, TGF-β, or both, as well as promote Treg differentiation (Table 3). The mechanisms underlying the effects of flavonoids on cytokine production are still being studied; however, flavonoid-mediated effects on cytokine secretion and Treg populations contribute to the resolution of chronic inflammation and may play a role in modulating immune responses during colitis-associated with colorectal cancer progression; detailed targets and immune effects are summarized in Table 3.

4.3.1. Flavonoid Inhibition of the NF-κB Signaling Pathway

NF-κB is a family of transcription factors that controls inflammatory responses through the regulation of chemokines and proinflammatory cytokine gene expression. These factors are involved in cell proliferation and death processes, which are related to oncogenesis by regulating the expression of various cell cycle controllers, such as cyclin A, cyclin D1, and cyclin-dependent kinase 6 (CDK6) [125]. In some instances, cancer cells display concurrent NF-κB activation and unregulated proliferation or reduced sensitivity to cell death [126]. Notably, NF-κB also plays a key role in antitumor immunity by activating antigen-presenting cells and promoting the proinflammatory cytokines essential for defense. Therefore, total and systemic inhibition of NF-κB can be detrimental, as this transcription factor is essential for immune activation and the maturation of antigen-presenting cells, and it controls the expression of numerous proinflammatory cytokines and chemokines that are key for recruiting and activating effector immune cells such as Mφs and T cells [127]. Solely focusing on broad NF-κB suppression may unintentionally dampen these critical signals, which could hinder immune surveillance and facilitate tumor evasion. In contrast, context-dependent modulation that limits protumorigenic NF-κB signaling in cancer cells while maintaining its activity in effector immune cells may provide therapeutic benefit.
Flavonoids regulate NF-κB signaling at multiple levels of the cascade. For example, baicalein and quercetin, among other dietary flavonoids, have been shown to directly inhibit key steps of NF-κB activation, including the phosphorylation and degradation of IκBα and the nuclear translocation of the p65 subunit, leading to reduced expression of proinflammatory mediators in experimental models of inflammation [128,129] (Table 3; Figure 4). However, such multilevel modulation must be interpreted with care, as the impacts on immune cells and cancer cells may differ. In immune effector cells like CD8+ T lymphocytes and NK cells, excessive inhibition of NF-κB signaling can reduce the production of IFN-γ and other effector cytokines that support antitumor immunity, which in turn may favor a microenvironment permissive to tumor growth [130].
These observations emphasize that the effect of NF-κB modulation by flavonoids is not uniform across all cell types or disease stages. A fine-tuned approach that preserves NF-κB activity, where it supports protective inflammation and immune activation while selectively attenuating its protumorigenic signaling in transformed or stromal cells, is essential.

4.3.2. Flavonoids Inhibit the Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase (MAPK) Pathway

The MAPK pathway, which involves the ERK1/2, JNK, and p38 kinases, is a key regulator of various cellular processes, including proliferation, differentiation, migration, and apoptosis [131].
The pivotal ERK1/2 signaling axis controls cell growth, proliferation, differentiation, and apoptosis. Furthermore, it has roles in inflammation and CAC, promoting tumor cell survival and proliferation while also contributing to antitumor inflammatory responses. Early activation of ERK1/2 can restrict initial tumor development but may facilitate metastasis during advanced disease stages [132]. This complexity underscores the necessity of considering the disease stage prior to the use of flavonoids, which downregulate this pathway, and the stage of development of this disease should be considered (Table 3).
The JNK pathway modulates cellular responses to stress, inflammation, and apoptosis and can be activated by irradiation, environmental stressors, and growth factors. In contrast, p38 MAPKs are notably involved in autoimmune mechanisms, regulating the production of TNF-α, IL-1β, and IL-6. Stimulation of the p38 pathway by IL-1β, TNF-α, TGF-β or oxidative stress [133] can establish a feedback loop amplifying inflammation and potentially suppressing tumorigenesis via transcriptional and posttranscriptional regulation at early transformation stages. However, following the acquisition of a malignant phenotype, p38 activation may enhance tumor cell growth [134]. Given the dual role of this pathway, careful assessment of disease progression is needed before flavonoids that attenuate its activation, such as apigenin and luteolin, can be used. The detailed effects of several dietary polyphenols on the MAPK pathway are summarized in Table 3 (Figure 4). For individuals with UC without neoplastic transformation, p38 inhibition may help prevent chronic inflammation. Conversely, in those with precancerous lesions, reduced p38 activity could hinder the elimination of transformed cells. In advanced cancer stages, targeted modulation of the p38 pathway may be advantageous for controlling malignant tumor progression.

4.3.3. Flavonoids Inhibit the Signal Transducer and Activator of Transcription (STAT) Activation

STAT proteins are a family of transcription factors that regulate gene expression, influencing cell differentiation, proliferation, survival, and inflammation in response to cytokines and growth factors via JAK-mediated tyrosine phosphorylation [135].
The relationship between STATs and cytokines involves a complex and dynamic feedback system. Cytokines activate these pathways and promote the expression of more cytokines, which are influenced by cell type, stimulus and the cellular microenvironment [136]. For example, STAT3 and STAT6 play crucial roles in the connection between inflammation and the development of CAC. In contrast, STAT1 may function as a tumor suppressor in inflammation-linked carcinogenesis [137].
STAT3 is predominantly activated by IL-6, IL-10, IL-35, and epidermal growth factor (EGF) [138]. In particular, IL-6 signaling drives proinflammatory gene expression and fosters carcinogenesis by inducing genes involved in angiogenesis, invasion, and metastasis [139].
STAT6 activation occurs primarily through IL-4 and IL-13, facilitating Mφ differentiation toward the M2 phenotype, modulating T-cell proliferation and survival, suppressing CD8+ T-cell effector functions, promoting Th2 differentiation, and regulating Treg activity [140].
STAT1 is mainly activated via IFN-γ, leading to the expression of crucial genes for immune defense against pathogens and tumors, including CXC motif chemokine ligands (CXCLs) and microRNAs [141]. Furthermore, STAT1 upregulates proapoptotic genes essential for TNF-mediated apoptosis [142].
Chronic activation of the STAT3 and STAT6 pathways is correlated with persistent inflammation and oncogenesis. Flavonoids have been investigated as potential STAT inhibitors; however, owing to the intricate regulation of STAT proteins and their interactions within the cellular microenvironment, nonselective inhibition could lead to unfavorable outcomes. Specifically, flavonoids that inhibit STAT3 and/or STAT6 signaling might attenuate inflammatory processes and block tumor-promoting pathways. Among these, luteolin stands out as a well-characterized compound capable of inhibiting STAT3 and, in certain inflammatory contexts, STAT6 activation, thereby limiting protumorigenic and Th2 immune responses. Similar inhibitory effects on STAT3 have been described for baicalein and EGCG, although their mechanisms and specificity vary depending on the cellular context and disease stage (Table 3; Figure 4). While the desired therapeutic goal is the inhibition of protumorigenic and proinflammatory signaling mediated by STAT3 and STAT6, genistein can paradoxically interfere with the activation of STAT1, which is essential for the induction of IFN-γ-dependent genes and facilitates tumor surveillance and the cytotoxic activity of immune cells. The mechanism behind this opposite effect involves the ability of the genistein molecule to compete for the ATP-binding site of Janus kinases (JAKs), where at certain concentrations, it may have a greater affinity for the pathways that lead to STAT1 phosphorylation than for those that lead to STAT3 phosphorylation [143]. Consequently, the use of genistein might impair the primary defense mechanisms against malignancy by dampening STAT1-mediated antitumor immunity, even while attempting to reduce chronic inflammation.

4.4. Flavonoid Protection Against Oxidative Stress

Nitric oxide (NO), a gaseous free radical produced by activated Mφs, can destroy bacteria, viruses, protozoa, and tumor cells. However, excessive NO production may cause tissue damage and inflammation [144]. In the context of CAC, during phase I, Mφs and neutrophils produce ROS to target cancer cells by inducing lethal DNA mutations, initiating cell death pathways such as caspase-mediated apoptosis, and inhibiting the activity of immunosuppressive cells [145] (Figure 5).
Dietary flavonoids such as quercetin and baicalin reduce oxidative stress by inhibiting iNOS expression and myeloperoxidase (MPO) activity and by scavenging peroxynitrite radicals [146] (Table 3). In UC inflammation, these actions may limit cell damage and restore tissue homeostasis. This antioxidant property is also relevant in early CAC, where ROS trigger pathways such as the NF-κB and STAT3 pathways [147], which influence cell transformation and survival.
In advanced stages of CRC, ROS contribute to the formation of a tumor microenvironment characterized by the presence of Tregs, M2 Mφs, and anti-inflammatory cytokines. Increased levels of ROS in cancer cells can influence the initiation and progression of cancer; however, excessive concentrations of ROS can also be harmful to cells [148]. In this stage, cancer cells develop mechanisms of resistance to oxidative stress that involve multiple pathways to activate the redox-sensitive transcription factors NF-κB, Nrf2, c-jun and HIF-1, resulting in increased expression of molecular antioxidants such as superoxide dismutase (SOD), catalase, thioredoxin and the antioxidant system γ-glutamylcysteinyl glycine (GSH). This redox adaptation can increase tolerance to stress and exogenous insults, decrease apoptotic performance, and improve DNA repair [149]. In addition, alterations in the elimination of ROS enzymes, such as GSH, significantly affect the metabolism of alkylating agents [150].
Quercetin and EGCG, among other flavonoids, can increase the activity of glutathione peroxidase (GPx) and catalase (CAT) and stimulate the production of reduced GSH and SOD in cells, which help reduce the levels of malondialdehyde (MDA) (Table 3) [151]. This increase in antioxidant activity could be counterproductive in the advanced stages of CRC, promoting mechanisms of resistance to oxidative stress and reducing the effectiveness of chemotherapy and radiotherapy treatments. Thus, flavonoid administration at this stage should be approached cautiously [145].

4.5. Flavonoids Negatively Regulate Eicosanoids

Eicosanoids derived from arachidonic acid via cyclooxygenase (COX) and lipoxygenase (LOX) enzymes play crucial roles in colon inflammation, influencing the activity of immune cells such as Mφs, neutrophils, T cells and DCs [152].
Sustained COX-2 production in UC promotes CAC by inhibiting apoptosis, increasing angiogenesis and invasiveness, and converting procarcinogens into carcinogens [153]. Throughout CRC progression, eicosanoids fuel inflammation, ROS generation, and DNA mutation in colonic cells. In established CAC, PGE2 promotes cancer growth, survival, invasion, and therapy resistance through the activation of PI3K/AKT and Wnt/β-catenin signaling, as well as through the inhibition of apoptosis [154]. The COX-2/PGE2/EP2–EP4 axis is also associated with increased Treg-mediated suppression of CD8+ and Th1 responses [155] (Figure 6).
Flavonoids like apigenin and quercetin counteract this axis by inhibiting COX-2 and reducing PGE2 levels, making them promising agents for both prevention and adjunctive therapy in CAC, although their dual effects on other pathways must be carefully considered (Table 3).

5. Discussion

CAC is the third leading cause of cancer death worldwide and the main cause of death in Mexico [156]. Although the mortality rate from colon cancer is gradually decreasing in Western countries, the incidence and mortality rates are increasing in Latin America [157]. In these regions, CAC could be prevented if accessible therapeutic strategies could be established.
Flavonoids regulate intestinal inflammation; therefore, a comprehensive understanding of their effects is essential for the development of possible therapeutic strategies against IBD and CAC development.
Our analysis underscores that flavonoids effects are complex, and often bidirectional, suggesting that inappropriate use could lead to adverse rather than clinical benefits. Importantly, the heterogeneity of the available literature does not merely reflect experimental variability but rather highlights that flavonoids represent a structurally and functionally diverse group of compounds whose biological effects cannot be interpreted as uniform or interchangeable. While preclinical evidence suggests that flavonoids may mitigate UC and CAC, many of these data stem from in vitro systems or animal models that use specific doses and protocols that do not necessarily mirror human exposure or clinical practice [158]. This gap is particularly evident in large-scale epidemiological studies, which often report inconsistent or even null associations between total dietary flavonoid intake and CRC risk, reporting that the effect depends strictly on the type of polyphenol administered [159,160].
This discrepancy can be attributed to several factors, most notably the relevance of dosage and treatment duration [161]. Many preclinical studies utilize high concentrations that are difficult to achieve through a standard human diet or even oral supplementation, given the low bioavailability and rapid metabolism of these compounds in the gastrointestinal tract [162]. Moreover, the administration route, often through intraperitoneal injection or gavage in murine models, does not always reflect a realistic clinical approach for human prevention, where oral intake and interaction with the colonic microbiota are determinants. Consequently, while in vivo evidence is robust, there remains a notable lack of large-scale clinical trials confirming these effects in humans, with most clinical data limited to small-scale safety pilots rather than long-term efficacy against CAC progression.
A critical comparison of the literature further revealed that not all flavonoids exert comparable immunological effects across disease stages. For example, compounds such as quercetin and luteolin consistently demonstrate anti-inflammatory activity during the early phases of colitis by limiting NF-κB activation and proinflammatory cytokine production [163]. In contrast, other flavonoids, such as genistein or even the same compounds administered at higher doses or during later stages, have been reported to attenuate antitumor immune mechanisms. By hindering IFN-γ–dependent responses or STAT1 signaling, these interventions may inadvertently favor immune evasion once a malignancy is established. Furthermore, recent evidence suggests that flavonoids can act as potent adjuvants in tumor immunotherapy by reversing the immunosuppressive microenvironment in several types of cancer, including CRC [164].
The divergent outcomes reported across studies are not necessarily contradictory; instead, they reflect the intricate interplay between flavonoid structure, molecular targets, dosing regimens, and, crucially, the timing of intervention. These findings emphasize that future research must account for the specific stage of CAC development to scientifically justify the use of flavonoids. By providing a rigorous bibliographic foundation, this review supports the move toward a more rational and chronological clinical application of flavonoids in treating colon-associated inflammatory processes.

6. Conclusions and Future Directions

The dual role of flavonoids does not reflect contradictory biological actions but rather distinct immunological requirements across disease stages. During active colitis and early inflammation-driven tumorigenesis, flavonoids may reduce mucosal damage and chronic inflammation, thereby lowering the risk of CAC development. However, once malignant transformation has occurred, particularly in established or advanced tumors (stages II and III), excessive attenuation of inflammatory signaling may impair immune surveillance, facilitate immune escape, and potentially interfere with the efficacy of anticancer therapies.
On the basis of the evidence discussed, flavonoids may be considered complementary agents for the management of inflammatory colitis and UC to reduce the risk of CAC. Conversely, their use in patients with established CAC should be approached with caution and cannot be recommended without stage-specific evaluation. These findings highlight the need for future studies that are explicitly designed to address disease stage, immune context, and treatment timing to define rational and safe therapeutic strategies involving flavonoids.

Author Contributions

S.H.N.: conceptualization, investigation, visualization, writing—original draft, writing—review and editing. L.V.: funding acquisition, resources, writing—review and editing. T.R.: visualization. M.R.-S.: funding acquisition, project administration, resources, supervision, visualization, writing—original draft, writing—review and editing. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

Funded by the National Council for Humanities, Sciences and Technologies (CONAHCyT)—Mexico, grant 21067 to L. Vega and M. Rodriguez-Sosa and by Programa Académico de Investigación e Innovación Tecnológica (PAPIIT)-UNAM, grant number IV200425 to M. Rodríguez-Sosa.

Data Availability Statement

No datasets were generated or analyzed during the current study.

Acknowledgments

Sonia H. Navia received a scholarship from Estancias Posdoctorales por México EPM (1) 2024, SECIHTI, CVU 537911. Figures were adapted from Servier Medical Art (https://smart.servier.com/, accessed on 20 January 2026), licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported License, and OpenClipart (https://openclipart.org, accessed on 20 January 2026).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Abbreviations

AKTProtein Kinase B
AhrAryl hydrocarbon receptor
BCl2B-cell lymphoma 2
CRCcolorectal cancer
CACcolitis-associated cancer
CATCatalase
CDKcyclin-dependent kinase
CLRC-type lectin receptor
COXcyclooxygenase
CXCLchemokine ligand with CXC motif
DCsdendritic cells
EGCGepigallocatechin gallate
EPE-prostanoid receptor
ERKextracellular signal-regulated kinase
GPxglutathione peroxidase
GSHγ-glutamylcysteinyl glycine
HClO2chlorous acid
HIF-1hypoxia-inducible factor 1
IBDinflammatory bowel disease
ILinterleukin
INFinterferon
iNOSinducible nitric oxide synthase
JAKjanus kinase
JNKJun N-terminal kinase
KCkeratinocytes
LOXlipoxygenase
MAPKmitogen-activated protein kinase
Mφsmacrophages
MDAmalondialdehyde
MDSCsmyeloid-derived suppressor cells
MIPinflammatory protein of Mφ
MPOmyeloperoxidase
NF-κBnuclear factor kappa B
NKsnatural killer cells
Nrf2nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor 2
NOnitric oxide
PGE2prostaglandin E2
PI3Kphosphoinositide 3-kinase
PD-L1programmed cell death 1 ligand 1
ROSreactive oxygen species
SODsuperoxide dismutase
STATsignal transducer activation and activator of transcription
TAMsMφ associated with tumors
TGFtransforming growth factor
Th1T helper 1 cells
Th2T helper 2 cells
Th17T helper 17 cells
TLRToll-like receptor
TNFtumor necrosis factor
Tregsregulatory T cells
UCulcerative colitis
ZO-1Zonula occludens-1

References

  1. Fantini, M.C.; Guadagni, I. From inflammation to colitis-associated colorectal cancer in inflammatory bowel disease: Pathogenesis and impact of current therapies. Dig. Liver Dis. 2021, 53, 558–565. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Gros, B.; Kaplan, G.G. Ulcerative Colitis in Adults: A Review. JAMA 2023, 330, 951–965. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Vezza, T.; Rodriguez-Nogales, A.; Algieri, F.; Utrilla, M.P.; Rodriguez-Cabezas, M.E.; Galvez, J. Flavonoids in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Review. Nutrients 2016, 8, 211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Marzocchella, L.; Fantini, M.; Benvenuto, M.; Masuelli, L.; Tresoldi, I.; Modesti, A.; Bei, R. Dietary flavonoids: Molecular mechanisms of action as anti-inflammatory agents. Recent. Pat. Inflamm. Allergy Drug Discov. 2011, 5, 200–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Gil-Cardoso, K.; Ginés, I.; Pinent, M.; Ardévol, A.; Blay, M.; Terra, X. Effects of flavonoids on intestinal inflammation, barrier integrity and changes in gut microbiota during diet-induced obesity. Nutr. Res. Rev. 2016, 29, 234–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Catalán, M.; Ferreira, J.; Carrasco-Pozo, C. The Microbiota-Derived Metabolite of Quercetin, 3,4-Dihydroxyphenylacetic Acid Prevents Malignant Transformation and Mitochondrial Dysfunction Induced by Hemin in Colon Cancer and Normal Colon Epithelia Cell Lines. Molecules 2020, 25, 4138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Weng, C.J.; Yen, G.C. Flavonoids, a ubiquitous dietary phenolic subclass, exert extensive in vitro anti-invasive and in vivo anti-metastatic activities. Cancer Metastasis Rev. 2012, 31, 323–351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Shen, N.; Wang, T.; Gan, Q.; Liu, S.; Wang, L.; Jin, B. Plant flavonoids: Classification, distribution, biosynthesis, and antioxidant activity. Food Chem. 2022, 383, 132531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Shah, S.C.; Itzkowitz, S.H. Colorectal Cancer in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: Mechanisms and Management. Gastroenterology 2022, 162, 715–730.e3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Fernandez-Munoz, K.V.; Sanchez-Barrera, C.A.; Meraz-Rios, M.; Reyes, J.L.; Perez-Yepez, E.A.; Ortiz-Melo, M.T.; Terrazas, L.I.; Mendoza-Rodriguez, M.G. Natural Alternatives in the Treatment of Colorectal Cancer: A Mechanisms Perspective. Biomolecules 2025, 15, 326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Zhou, R.W.; Harpaz, N.; Itzkowitz, S.H.; Parsons, R.E. Molecular mechanisms in colitis-associated colorectal cancer. Oncogenesis 2023, 12, 48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Terabe, M.; Park, J.M.; Berzofsky, J.A. Role of IL-13 in regulation of anti-tumor immunity and tumor growth. Cancer Immunol. Immunother. 2004, 53, 79–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Pena-Romero, A.C.; Orenes-Pinero, E. Dual Effect of Immune Cells within Tumour Microenvironment: Pro- and Anti-Tumour Effects and Their Triggers. Cancers 2022, 14, 1681. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Wang, J.; Li, D.; Cang, H.; Guo, B. Crosstalk between cancer and immune cells: Role of tumor-associated macrophages in the tumor microenvironment. Cancer Med. 2019, 8, 4709–4721. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Evans, C.; Dalgleish, A.G.; Kumar, D. Review article: Immune suppression and colorectal cancer. Aliment. Pharmacol. Ther. 2006, 24, 1163–1177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Glassner, K.L.; Abraham, B.P.; Quigley, E.M.M. The microbiome and inflammatory bowel disease. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2020, 145, 16–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Flemer, B.; Lynch, D.; Brown, J.; Jeffery, I.; Ryan, F.; Claesson, M.; O’Riordain, M.; Shanahan, F.; O’Toole, P. Tumour-associated and non-tumour-associated microbiota in colorectal cancer. Gut 2017, 66, 633–643. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Liu, W.; Zhang, X.; Xu, H.; Li, S.; Lau, H.C.-H.; Chen, Q.; Zhang, B.; Zhao, L.; Chen, H.; Sung, J.J.-Y.; et al. Microbial Community Heterogeneity Within Colorectal Neoplasia and its Correlation With Colorectal Carcinogenesis. Gastroenterology 2021, 160, 2395–2408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Okuda, S.; Shimada, Y.; Tajima, Y.; Yuza, K.; Hirose, Y.; Ichikawa, H.; Nagahashi, M.; Sakata, J.; Ling, Y.; Miura, N.; et al. Profiling of host genetic alterations and intra-tumor microbiomes in colorectal cancer. Comput. Struct. Biotechnol. J. 2021, 19, 3330–3338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Yamamoto, S.; Kinugasa, H.; Hirai, M.; Terasawa, H.; Yasutomi, E.; Oka, S.; Ohmori, M.; Yamasaki, Y.; Inokuchi, T.; Harada, K.; et al. Heterogeneous distribution of Fusobacterium nucleatum in the progression of colorectal cancer. J. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2021, 36, 1869–1876. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Bullman, S.; Pedamallu, C.; Sicinska, E.; Clancy, T.; Zhang, X.; Cai, D.; Neuberg, D.; Huang, K.; Guevara, F.; Nelson, T.; et al. Analysis of Fusobacterium persistence and antibiotic response in colorectal cancer. Science 2017, 358, 1443–1448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Cardona, F.; Andrés-Lacueva, C.; Tulipani, S.; Tinahones, F.J.; Queipo-Ortuño, M.I. Benefits of polyphenols on gut microbiota and implications in human health. J. Nutr. Biochem. 2013, 24, 1415–1422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Louis, P.; Hold, G.; Flint, H. The gut microbiota, bacterial metabolites and colorectal cancer. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2014, 12, 66–1672. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Wang, L.; Li, M.; Gu, Y.; Shi, J.; Yan, J.; Wang, X.; Li, B.; Wang, B.; Zhong, W.; Cao, H. Dietary flavonoids-microbiota crosstalk in intestinal inflammation and carcinogenesis. J. Nutr. Biochem. 2024, 125, 109494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Franzosa, E.A.; Sirota-Madi, A.; Avila-Pacheco, J.; Fornelos, N.; Haiser, H.J.; Reinker, S.; Vatanen, T.; Hall, A.B.; Mallick, H.; McIver, L.J.; et al. Gut microbiome structure and metabolic activity in inflammatory bowel disease. Nat. Microbiol. 2019, 4, 293–305, Correction in Nat. Microbiol. 2019, 4, 898. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41564-019-0442-5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Yachida, S.; Mizutani, S.; Shiroma, H.; Shiba, S.; Nakajima, T.; Sakamoto, T.; Watanabe, H.; Masuda, K.; Nishimoto, Y.; Kubo, M.; et al. Metagenomic and metabolomic analyses reveal distinct stage-specific phenotypes of the gut microbiota in colorectal cancer. Nat. Med. 2019, 25, 968–976. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Liang, J.; Li, T.; Nakatsu, G.; Chen, Y.; Yau, T.; Chu, E.; Wong, S.; Szeto, C.; Ng, S.; Chan, F.; et al. A novel faecal Lachnoclostridium marker for the non-invasive diagnosis of colorectal adenoma and cancer. Gut 2020, 69, 1248–1257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Ruiz, P.; Shkoda, A.; Kim, S.; Sartor, R.; Haller, D. IL-10 gene-deficient mice lack TGF-beta/Smad signaling and fail to inhibit proinflammatory gene expression in intestinal epithelial cells after the colonization with colitogenic Enterococcus faecalis. J. Immunol. 2005, 174, 2990–2999. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Thomas, A.M.; Manghi, P.; Asnicar, F.; Pasolli, E.; Armanini, F.; Zolfo, M.; Beghini, F.; Manara, S.; Karcher, N.; Pozzi, C.; et al. Metagenomic analysis of colorectal cancer datasets identifies cross-cohort microbial diagnostic signatures and a link with choline degradation. Nat. Med. 2019, 25, 667–678, Correction in Nat. Med. 2019, 25, 1948. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-019-0663-4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Wirbel, J.; Pyl, P.T.; Kartal, E.; Zych, K.; Kashani, A.; Milanese, A.; Fleck, J.S.; Voigt, A.Y.; Palleja, A.; Ponnudurai, R.; et al. Meta-analysis of fecal metagenomes reveals global microbial signatures that are specific for colorectal cancer. Nat. Med. 2019, 25, 679–689. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Cao, Y.; Oh, J.; Xue, M.; Huh, W.J.; Wang, J.; Gonzalez-Hernandez, J.A.; Rice, T.A.; Martin, A.L.; Song, D.; Crawford, J.M.; et al. Commensal microbiota from patients with inflammatory bowel disease produce genotoxic metabolites. Science 2022, 378, abm3233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Han, Z.Q.; Wen, L.N. Microbiota geography in the colorectal carcinoma microenvironment: A spatiotemporal atlas of colonic mucosal microbial niche reconstruction. World J. Gastroenterol. 2025, 31, 106057. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Wu, S.; Rhee, K.; Albesiano, E.; Rabizadeh, S.; Wu, X.; Yen, H.; Huso, D.; Brancati, F.; Wick, E.; McAllister, F.; et al. A human colonic commensal promotes colon tumorigenesis via activation of T helper type 17 T cell responses. Nat. Med. 2009, 15, 1016–1022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Boleij, A.; Tjalsma, H. The itinerary of Streptococcus gallolyticus infection in patients with colonic malignant disease. Lancet Infect. Dis. 2013, 13, 719–724. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Arthur, J.C.; Perez-Chanona, E.; Mühlbauer, M.; Tomkovich, S.; Uronis, J.M.; Fan, T.-J.; Campbell, B.J.; Abujamel, T.; Dogan, B.; Rogers, A.B.; et al. Intestinal Inflammation Targets Cancer-Inducing Activity of the Microbiota. Science 2012, 338, 120–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Chung, L.; Orberg, E.T.; Geis, A.; Chan, J.; Fu, K.; Shields, C.D.; Dejea, C.; Fathi, P.; Chen, J.; Finard, B.; et al. Bacteroides fragilis Toxin Coordinates a Pro-carcinogenic Inflammatory Cascade via Targeting of Colonic Epithelial Cells. Cell Host Microbe 2018, 23, 203–214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Cao, Y.; Wang, Z.; Yan, Y.; Ji, L.; He, J.; Xuan, B.; Shen, C.; Ma, Y.; Jiang, S.; Ma, D.; et al. Enterotoxigenic Bacteroidesfragilis Promotes Intestinal Inflammation and Malignancy by Inhibiting Exosome-Packaged miR-149-3p. Gastroenterology 2021, 161, 1552–1566.e12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Zhao, L.; Zhang, X.; Zhou, Y.; Fu, K.; Lau, H.C.-H.; Chun, T.W.-Y.; Cheung, A.H.-K.; Coker, O.O.; Wei, H.; Wu, W.K.-K.; et al. Parvimonas micra promotes colorectal tumorigenesis and is associated with prognosis of colorectal cancer patients. Oncogene 2022, 41, 4200–4210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Kostic, A.; Chun, E.; Robertson, L.; Glickman, J.; Gallini, C.; Michaud, M.; Clancy, T.; Chung, D.; Lochhead, P.; Hold, G.; et al. Fusobacterium nucleatum potentiates intestinal tumorigenesis and modulates the tumor-immune microenvironment. Cell Host Microbe 2013, 14, 207–215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Long, X.; Wong, C.C.; Tong, L.; Chu, E.S.H.; Ho Szeto, C.; Go, M.Y.Y.; Coker, O.O.; Chan, A.W.H.; Chan, F.K.L.; Sung, J.J.Y.; et al. Peptostreptococcus anaerobius promotes colorectal carcinogenesis and modulates tumour immunity. Nat. Microbiol. 2019, 4, 2319–2330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Zou, J.; Shankar, N. Roles of TLR/MyD88/MAPK/NF-κB Signaling Pathways in the Regulation of Phagocytosis and Proinflammatory Cytokine Expression in Response to E. faecalis Infection. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0136947. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Zhang, Q.; Ma, C.; Duan, Y.; Heinrich, B.; Rosato, U.; Diggs, L.; Ma, L.; Roy, S.; Fu, Q.; Brown, Z.; et al. Gut Microbiome Directs Hepatocytes to Recruit MDSCs and Promote Cholangiocarcinoma. Cancer Discov. 2021, 11, 1248–1267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Chiang, M.; Hsiao, P.; Liu, Y.; Tang, H.; Chiou, C.; Lu, M.; Lai, Y. Two ST11 Klebsiella pneumoniae strains exacerbate colorectal tumorigenesis in a colitis-associated mouse model. Gut Microbes 2021, 13, 1980348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Poritz, L.S.; Harris, L.R., 3rd; Kelly, A.A.; Koltun, W.A. Increase in the tight junction protein claudin-1 in intestinal inflammation. Dig. Dis. Sci. 2011, 56, 2802–2809. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Ren, J.; Yue, B.; Wang, H.; Zhang, B.; Luo, X.; Yu, Z.; Zhang, J.; Ren, Y.; Mani, S.; Wang, Z.; et al. Acacetin Ameliorates Experimental Colitis in Mice via Inhibiting Macrophage Inflammatory Response and Regulating the Composition of Gut Microbiota. Front. Physiol. 2020, 11, 577237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Shi, N.; Chen, X.; Chen, T.; Shi, N.; Chen, X.; Chen, T. Anthocyanins in Colorectal Cancer Prevention Review. Antioxidants 2021, 10, 1600. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Yun, J.W.; Lee, W.S.; Kim, M.J.; Lu, J.N.; Kang, M.H.; Kim, H.G.; Kim, D.C.; Choi, E.J.; Choi, J.Y.; Kim, H.G.; et al. Characterization of a profile of the anthocyanins isolated from Vitis coignetiae Pulliat and their anti-invasive activity on HT-29 human colon cancer cells. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2010, 48, 903–909. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Sood, R.; Choi, H.-K.; Lee, H.-J. Potential anti-cancer properties of malvidin and its glycosides: Evidence from in vitro and in vivo studies. J. Funct. Foods 2024, 116, 106191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Wang, H.; Huang, X.; Xia, S.; Chen, C.; Chen, X.; Zhang, Y.; Farag, M.A.; Xiao, J.; Nie, S. Celery soluble dietary fiber antagonizes flavonoids ameliorative effect on dextran-sodium-sulfate-induced colitis in mice. J. Adv. Res. 2023, 52, 73–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Hu, Y.; Guan, X.; He, Z.; Xie, Y.; Niu, Z.; Zhang, W.; Wang, A.; Zhang, J.; Si, C.; Li, F.; et al. Apigenin-7-O-glucoside alleviates DSS-induced colitis by improving intestinal barrier function and modulating gut microbiota. J. Funct. Foods 2023, 104, 105499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Li, M.; Weigmann, B. Effect of a Flavonoid Combination of Apigenin and Epigallocatechin-3-Gallate on Alleviating Intestinal Inflammation in Experimental Colitis Models. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 16031. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Yao, J.; Liu, T.; Chen, R.J.; Liang, J.; Li, J.; Wang, C.G. Sphingosine-1-phosphate signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 signaling pathway contributes to baicalein-mediated inhibition of dextran sulfate sodium-induced experimental colitis in mice. Chin. Med. J. 2020, 133, 292–300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Zhu, L.; Shen, H.; Gu, P.Q.; Liu, Y.J.; Zhang, L.; Cheng, J.F. Baicalin alleviates TNBS-induced colitis by inhibiting PI3K/AKT pathway activation. Exp. Ther. Med. 2020, 20, 581–590. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Yu, F.Y.; Huang, S.G.; Zhang, H.Y.; Ye, H.; Chi, H.G.; Zou, Y.; Lv, R.X.; Zheng, X.B. Effects of baicalin in CD4 + CD29 + T cell subsets of ulcerative colitis patients. World J. Gastroenterol. 2014, 20, 15299–15309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Cui, L.; Feng, L.; Zhang, Z.H.; Jia, X.B. The anti-inflammation effect of baicalin on experimental colitis through inhibiting TLR4/NF-kappaB pathway activation. Int. Immunopharmacol. 2014, 23, 294–303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Zhu, L.; Xu, L.Z.; Zhao, S.; Shen, Z.F.; Shen, H.; Zhan, L.B. Protective effect of baicalin on the regulation of Treg/Th17 balance, gut microbiota and short-chain fatty acids in rats with ulcerative colitis. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2020, 104, 5449–5460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Shen, J.; Cheng, J.; Zhu, S.; Zhao, J.; Ye, Q.; Xu, Y.; Dong, H.; Zheng, X. Regulating effect of baicalin on IKK/IKB/NF-kB signaling pathway and apoptosis-related proteins in rats with ulcerative colitis. Int. Immunopharmacol. 2019, 73, 193–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Shin, E.K.; Kwon, H.S.; Kim, Y.H.; Shin, H.K.; Kim, J.K. Chrysin, a natural flavone, improves murine inflammatory bowel diseases. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2009, 381, 502–507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Shen, J.; Li, N.; Zhang, X. Daidzein Ameliorates Dextran Sulfate Sodium-Induced Experimental Colitis in Mice by Regulating NF-kappaB Signaling. J. Environ. Pathol. Toxicol. Oncol. 2019, 38, 29–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Morimoto, M.; Watanabe, T.; Yamori, M.; Takebe, M.; Wakatsuki, Y. Isoflavones regulate innate immunity and inhibit experimental colitis. J. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2009, 24, 1123–1129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Ge, J.; Li, M.; Yao, J.; Guo, J.; Li, X.; Li, G.; Han, X.; Li, Z.; Liu, M.; Zhao, J. The potential of EGCG in modulating the oral-gut axis microbiota for treating inflammatory bowel disease. Phytomedicine 2024, 130, 155643. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Contreras, T.C.; Ricciardi, E.; Cremonini, E.; Oteiza, P.I. (-)-Epicatechin in the prevention of tumor necrosis alpha-induced loss of Caco-2 cell barrier integrity. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 2015, 573, 84–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Porath, D.; Riegger, C.; Drewe, J.; Schwager, J. Epigallocatechin-3-gallate impairs chemokine production in human colon epithelial cell lines. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 2005, 315, 1172–1180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Xu, Z.; Wei, C.; Zhang, R.U.; Yao, J.; Zhang, D.; Wang, L. Epigallocatechin-3-gallate-induced inhibition of interleukin-6 release and adjustment of the regulatory T/T helper 17 cell balance in the treatment of colitis in mice. Exp. Ther. Med. 2015, 10, 2231–2238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Du, Y.; Ding, H.; Vanarsa, K.; Soomro, S.; Baig, S.; Hicks, J.; Mohan, C. Low dose Epigallocatechin Gallate Alleviates Experimental Colitis by Subduing Inflammatory Cells and Cytokines, and Improving Intestinal Permeability. Nutrients 2019, 11, 1743. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Bing, X.; Xuelei, L.; Wanwei, D.; Linlang, L.; Keyan, C. EGCG Maintains Th1/Th2 Balance and Mitigates Ulcerative Colitis Induced by Dextran Sulfate Sodium through TLR4/MyD88/NF-kappaB Signaling Pathway in Rats. Can. J. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2017, 2017, 3057268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Abboud, P.A.; Hake, P.W.; Burroughs, T.J.; Odoms, K.; O’Connor, M.; Mangeshkar, P.; Wong, H.R.; Zingarelli, B. Therapeutic effect of epigallocatechin-3-gallate in a mouse model of colitis. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 2008, 579, 411–417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Zhang, H.; Deng, A.; Zhang, Z.; Yu, Z.; Liu, Y.; Peng, S.; Wu, L.; Qin, H.; Wang, W. The protective effect of epicatechin on experimental ulcerative colitis in mice is mediated by increasing antioxidation and by the inhibition of NF-kappaB pathway. Pharmacol. Rep. 2016, 68, 514–520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Guo, G.; Shi, W.; Shi, F.; Gong, W.; Li, F.; Zhou, G.; She, J. Anti-inflammatory effects of eriocitrin against the dextran sulfate sodium-induced experimental colitis in murine model. J. Biochem. Mol. Toxicol. 2019, 33, e22400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Sahu, B.D.; Kumar, J.M.; Sistla, R. Fisetin, a dietary flavonoid, ameliorates experimental colitis in mice: Relevance of NF-kappaB signaling. J. Nutr. Biochem. 2016, 28, 171–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Gerges, S.H.; Tolba, M.F.; Elsherbiny, D.A.; El-Demerdash, E. The natural flavonoid galangin ameliorates dextran sulphate sodium-induced ulcerative colitis in mice: Effect on Toll-like receptor 4, inflammation and oxidative stress. Basic Clin. Pharmacol. Toxicol. 2020, 127, 10–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Sangaraju, R.; Nalban, N.; Alavala, S.; Rajendran, V.; Jerald, M.K.; Sistla, R. Protective effect of galangin against dextran sulfate sodium (DSS)-induced ulcerative colitis in Balb/c mice. Inflamm. Res. 2019, 68, 691–704. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Franza, L.; Carusi, V.; Nucera, E.; Pandolfi, F. Luteolin, inflammation and cancer: Special emphasis on gut microbiota. Biofactors 2021, 47, 181–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Xuan, H.; Ou, A.; Hao, S.; Shi, J.; Jin, X. Galangin Protects against Symptoms of Dextran Sodium Sulfate-induced Acute Colitis by Activating Autophagy and Modulating the Gut Microbiota. Nutrients 2020, 12, 347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Jia, Q.; Fang, S.; Yang, R.; Ling, Y.; Mehmood, S.; Ni, H.; Gao, Q. Genistein alleviates dextran sulfate sodium-induced colitis in mice through modulation of intestinal microbiota and macrophage polarization. Eur. J. Nutr. 2024, 63, 1877–1888. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Elhefnawy, E.A.; Zaki, H.F.; El Maraghy, N.N.; Ahmed, K.A.; Abd El-Haleim, E.A. Genistein and/or sulfasalazine ameliorate acetic acid-induced ulcerative colitis in rats via modulating INF-gamma/JAK1/STAT1/IRF-1, TLR-4/NF-kappaB/IL-6, and JAK2/STAT3/COX-2 crosstalk. Biochem. Pharmacol. 2023, 214, 115673. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Abron, J.D.; Singh, N.P.; Price, R.L.; Nagarkatti, M.; Nagarkatti, P.S.; Singh, U.P. Genistein induces macrophage polarization and systemic cytokine to ameliorate experimental colitis. PLoS ONE 2018, 13, e0199631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. Chen, Y.; Le, T.H.; Du, Q.; Zhao, Z.; Liu, Y.; Zou, J.; Hua, W.; Liu, C.; Zhu, Y. Genistein protects against DSS-induced colitis by inhibiting NLRP3 inflammasome via TGR5-cAMP signaling. Int. Immunopharmacol. 2019, 71, 144–154, Erratum in Int. Immunopharmacol. 2024, 142, 113057. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intimp.2024.113057. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Seibel, J.; Molzberger, A.F.; Hertrampf, T.; Laudenbach-Leschowski, U.; Diel, P. Oral treatment with genistein reduces the expression of molecular and biochemical markers of inflammation in a rat model of chronic TNBS-induced colitis. Eur. J. Nutr. 2009, 48, 213–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Guo, K.; Ren, J.; Gu, G.; Wang, G.; Gong, W.; Wu, X.; Ren, H.; Hong, Z.; Li, J. Hesperidin Protects Against Intestinal Inflammation by Restoring Intestinal Barrier Function and Up-Regulating Treg Cells. Mol. Nutr. Food Res. 2020, 64, e1970058. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Zhang, J.; Lei, H.; Hu, X.; Dong, W. Hesperetin ameliorates DSS-induced colitis by maintaining the epithelial barrier via blocking RIPK3/MLKL necroptosis signaling. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 2020, 873, 172992. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  82. Shafik, N.M.; Gaber, R.A.; Mohamed, D.A.; Ebeid, A.M. Hesperidin modulates dextran sulfate sodium-induced ulcerative colitis in rats: Targeting sphingosine kinase-1- sphingosine 1 phosphate signaling pathway, mitochondrial biogenesis, inflammation, and apoptosis. J. Biochem. Mol. Toxicol. 2019, 33, e22312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Xu, L.; Yang, Z.L.; Li, P.; Zhou, Y.Q. Modulating effect of Hesperidin on experimental murine colitis induced by dextran sulfate sodium. Phytomedicine 2009, 16, 989–995. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Park, M.Y.; Ji, G.E.; Sung, M.K. Dietary kaempferol suppresses inflammation of dextran sulfate sodium-induced colitis in mice. Dig. Dis. Sci. 2012, 57, 355–363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Jin, C.; Liu, J.; Jin, R.; Yao, Y.; He, S.; Lei, M.; Peng, X. Linarin ameliorates dextran sulfate sodium-induced colitis in C57BL/6J mice via the improvement of intestinal barrier, suppression of inflammatory responses and modulation of gut microbiota. Food Funct. 2022, 13, 10574–10586. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Li, B.L.; Zhao, D.Y.; Du, P.L.; Wang, X.T.; Yang, Q.; Cai, Y.R. Luteolin alleviates ulcerative colitis through SHP-1/STAT3 pathway. Inflamm. Res. 2021, 70, 705–717. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Nishitani, Y.; Yamamoto, K.; Yoshida, M.; Azuma, T.; Kanazawa, K.; Hashimoto, T.; Mizuno, M. Intestinal anti-inflammatory activity of luteolin: Role of the aglycone in NF-kappaB inactivation in macrophages co-cultured with intestinal epithelial cells. Biofactors 2013, 39, 522–533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Vukelic, I.; Detel, D.; Baticic, L.; Potocnjak, I.; Domitrovic, R. Luteolin ameliorates experimental colitis in mice through ERK-mediated suppression of inflammation, apoptosis and autophagy. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2020, 145, 111680. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Li, Y.; Shen, L.; Luo, H. Luteolin ameliorates dextran sulfate sodium-induced colitis in mice possibly through activation of the Nrf2 signaling pathway. Int. Immunopharmacol. 2016, 40, 24–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Zuo, T.; Yue, Y.; Wang, X.; Li, H.; Yan, S. Luteolin Relieved DSS-Induced Colitis in Mice via HMGB1-TLR-NF-kappaB Signaling Pathway. Inflammation 2021, 44, 570–579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Qu, X.; Li, Q.; Song, Y.; Xue, A.; Liu, Y.; Qi, D.; Dong, H. Potential of myricetin to restore the immune balance in dextran sulfate sodium-induced acute murine ulcerative colitis. J. Pharm. Pharmacol. 2020, 72, 92–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Zhao, J.; Hong, T.; Dong, M.; Meng, Y.; Mu, J. Protective effect of myricetin in dextran sulphate sodium-induced murine ulcerative colitis. Mol. Med. Rep. 2013, 7, 565–570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Schwanke, R.C.; Marcon, R.; Meotti, F.C.; Bento, A.F.; Dutra, R.C.; Pizzollatti, M.G.; Calixto, J.B. Oral administration of the flavonoid myricitrin prevents dextran sulfate sodium-induced experimental colitis in mice through modulation of PI3K/Akt signaling pathway. Mol. Nutr. Food Res. 2013, 57, 1938–1949. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Zamanian, M.Y.; Golmohammadi, M.; Abdullaev, B.; García, M.O.; Alazbjee, A.A.A.; Kumar, A.; Mohaamed, S.S.; Hussien, B.M.; Khalaj, F.; Hodaei, S.M.; et al. A narrative review on therapeutic potential of naringenin in colorectal cancer: Focusing on molecular and biochemical processes. Cell Biochem. Funct. 2024, 42, e4011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  95. Dou, W.; Zhang, J.; Sun, A.; Zhang, E.; Ding, L.; Mukherjee, S.; Wei, X.; Chou, G.; Wang, Z.T.; Mani, S. Protective effect of naringenin against experimental colitis via suppression of Toll-like receptor 4/NF-kappaB signalling. Br. J. Nutr. 2013, 110, 599–608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Chaen, Y.; Yamamoto, Y.; Suzuki, T. Naringenin promotes recovery from colonic damage through suppression of epithelial tumor necrosis factor-alpha production and induction of M2-type macrophages in colitic mice. Nutr. Res. 2019, 64, 82–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Al-Rejaie, S.S.; Abuohashish, H.M.; Al-Enazi, M.M.; Al-Assaf, A.H.; Parmar, M.Y.; Ahmed, M.M. Protective effect of naringenin on acetic acid-induced ulcerative colitis in rats. World J. Gastroenterol. 2013, 19, 5633–5644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  98. Azuma, T.; Shigeshiro, M.; Kodama, M.; Tanabe, S.; Suzuki, T. Supplemental naringenin prevents intestinal barrier defects and inflammation in colitic mice. J. Nutr. 2013, 143, 827–834. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Cao, R.; Wu, X.; Guo, H.; Pan, X.; Huang, R.; Wang, G.; Liu, J. Naringin Exhibited Therapeutic Effects against DSS-Induced Mice Ulcerative Colitis in Intestinal Barrier-Dependent Manner. Molecules 2021, 26, 6604. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  100. Kumar, V.S.; Rajmane, A.R.; Adil, M.; Kandhare, A.D.; Ghosh, P.; Bodhankar, S.L. Naringin ameliorates acetic acid induced colitis through modulation of endogenous oxido-nitrosative balance and DNA damage in rats. J. Biomed. Res. 2014, 28, 132–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Dong, J.; Chen, Y.; Yang, F.; Zhang, W.; Wei, K.; Xiong, Y.; Wang, L.; Zhou, Z.; Li, C.; Wang, J.; et al. Naringin Exerts Therapeutic Effects on Mice Colitis: A Study Based on Transcriptomics Combined With Functional Experiments. Front. Pharmacol. 2021, 12, 729414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  102. Yue, B.; Ren, J.; Yu, Z.; Luo, X.; Ren, Y.; Zhang, J.; Mani, S.; Wang, Z.; Dou, W. Pinocembrin alleviates ulcerative colitis in mice via regulating gut microbiota, suppressing TLR4/MD2/NF-kappaB pathway and promoting intestinal barrier. Biosci. Rep. 2020, 40, BSR20200986. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  103. Hu, L.; Wu, C.; Zhang, Z.; Liu, M.; Maruthi Prasad, E.; Chen, Y.; Wang, K. Pinocembrin Protects Against Dextran Sulfate Sodium-Induced Rats Colitis by Ameliorating Inflammation, Improving Barrier Function and Modulating Gut Microbiota. Front. Physiol. 2019, 10, 908. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Pérez-Valero, Á.; Magadán-Corpas, P.; Ye, S.; Serna-Diestro, J.; Sordon, S.; Huszcza, E.; Popłoński, J.; Villar, C.J.; Lombó, F. Antitumor Effect and Gut Microbiota Modulation by Quercetin, Luteolin, and Xanthohumol in a Rat Model for Colorectal Cancer Prevention. Nutrients 2024, 16, 1161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Riemschneider, S.; Hoffmann, M.; Slanina, U.; Weber, K.; Hauschildt, S.; Lehmann, J. Indol-3-Carbinol and Quercetin Ameliorate Chronic DSS-Induced Colitis in C57BL/6 Mice by AhR-Mediated Anti-Inflammatory Mechanisms. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18, 2262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Liu, S.H.; Lu, T.H.; Su, C.C.; Lay, I.S.; Lin, H.Y.; Fang, K.M.; Ho, T.J.; Chen, K.L.; Su, Y.C.; Chiang, W.C.; et al. Lotus leaf (Nelumbo nucifera) and its active constituents prevent inflammatory responses in macrophages via JNK/NF-kappaB signaling pathway. Am. J. Chin. Med. 2014, 42, 869–889. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Guazelli, C.F.; Fattori, V.; Colombo, B.B.; Georgetti, S.R.; Vicentini, F.T.; Casagrande, R.; Baracat, M.M.; Verri, W.A., Jr. Quercetin-loaded microcapsules ameliorate experimental colitis in mice by anti-inflammatory and antioxidant mechanisms. J. Nat. Prod. 2013, 76, 200–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Bian, Y.; Liu, P.; Zhong, J.; Hu, Y.; Zhuang, S.; Fan, K.; Liu, Z. Quercetin Attenuates Adhesion Molecule Expression in Intestinal Microvascular Endothelial Cells by Modulating Multiple Pathways. Dig. Dis. Sci. 2018, 63, 3297–3304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Dodda, D.; Chhajed, R.; Mishra, J.; Padhy, M. Targeting oxidative stress attenuates trinitrobenzene sulphonic acid induced inflammatory bowel disease like symptoms in rats: Role of quercetin. Indian J. Pharmacol. 2014, 46, 286–291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Dong, Y.; Hou, Q.; Lei, J.; Wolf, P.G.; Ayansola, H.; Zhang, B. Quercetin Alleviates Intestinal Oxidative Damage Induced by H2O2 via Modulation of GSH: In Vitro Screening and In Vivo Evaluation in a Colitis Model of Mice. ACS Omega 2020, 5, 8334–8346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  111. Sharma, A.; Tirpude, N.V.; Kumari, M.; Padwad, Y. Rutin prevents inflammation-associated colon damage via inhibiting the p38/MAPKAPK2 and PI3K/Akt/GSK3beta/NF-kappaB signalling axes and enhancing splenic Tregs in DSS-induced murine chronic colitis. Food Funct. 2021, 12, 8492–8506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Kwon, K.; Murakami, A.; Tanaka, T.; Ohigashi, H. Dietary rutin, but not its aglycone quercetin, ameliorates dextran sulfate sodium-induced experimental colitis in mice: Attenuation of pro-inflammatory gene expression. Biochem. Pharmacol. 2005, 69, 395–406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Eun, S.H.; Woo, J.T.; Kim, D.H. Tangeretin Inhibits IL-12 Expression and NF-kappaB Activation in Dendritic Cells and Attenuates Colitis in Mice. Planta Med. 2017, 83, 527–533. [Google Scholar]
  114. Chen, B.; Yang, X.; Zhan, M.; Chen, Y.; Xu, J.; Xiao, J.; Xiao, H.; Song, M. Dietary tangeretin improved antibiotic-associated diarrhea in mice by enhancing the intestinal barrier function, regulating the gut microbiota, and metabolic homeostasis. Food Funct. 2023, 14, 10731–10746. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Lu, Y.; Li, X.; Liu, S.; Zhang, Y.; Zhang, D. Toll-like Receptors and Inflammatory Bowel Disease. Front. Immunol. 2018, 9, 72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  116. Bardelčíková, A.; Šoltys, J.; Mojžiš, J. Oxidative Stress, Inflammation and Colorectal Cancer: An Overview. Antioxidants 2023, 12, 901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Sanchez-Munoz, F.; Dominguez-Lopez, A.; Yamamoto-Furusho, J.K. Role of cytokines in inflammatory bowel disease. World J. Gastroenterol. 2008, 14, 4280–4288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Nakase, H.; Sato, N.; Mizuno, N.; Ikawa, Y. The influence of cytokines on the complex pathology of ulcerative colitis. Autoimmun. Rev. 2022, 21, 103017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  119. Sun, L.; Kees, T.; Almeida, A.; Liu, B.; He, X.; Ng, D.; Han, X.; Spector, D.; McNeish, I.; Gimotty, P.; et al. Activating a collaborative innate-adaptive immune response to control metastasis. Cancer Cell 2021, 39, 1361–1374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Hasibuan, P.A.Z.; Simanjuntak, Y.; Hey-Hawkins, E.; Lubis, M.F.; Rohani, A.S.; Park, M.N.; Kim, B.; Syahputra, R.A. Unlocking the potential of flavonoids: Natural solutions in the fight against colon cancer. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2024, 176, 116827. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  121. Xu, T.; Liu, Y.; Han, F.; Xie, H.Q.; Yang, G.; Wang, R.; Xu, L. Ligand- and tissue-specific differences in the activation of the aryl hydrocarbon receptor by flavonoids: A focus on baicalein and scutellarein. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2025, 205, 115713. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Griffith, B.D.; Frankel, T.L. The Aryl Hydrocarbon Receptor: Impact on the Tumor Immune Microenvironment and Modulation as a Potential Therapy. Cancers 2024, 16, 472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Olguin, J.E.; Medina-Andrade, I.; Molina, E.; Vazquez, A.; Pacheco-Fernandez, T.; Saavedra, R.; Perez-Plasencia, C.; Chirino, Y.I.; Vaca-Paniagua, F.; Arias-Romero, L.E.; et al. Early and Partial Reduction in CD4+ Foxp3+ Regulatory T Cells during Colitis-Associated Colon Cancer Induces CD4+ and CD8+ T Cell Activation Inhibiting Tumorigenesis. J. Cancer 2018, 9, 239–249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  124. Drabsch, Y.; ten Dijke, P. TGF-beta signalling and its role in cancer progression and metastasis. Cancer Metastasis Rev. 2012, 31, 553–568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  125. Zinatizadeh, M.R.; Schock, B.; Chalbatani, G.M.; Zarandi, P.K.; Jalali, S.A.; Miri, S.R. The Nuclear Factor Kappa B (NF-kB) signaling in cancer development and immune diseases. Genes Dis. 2021, 8, 287–297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Karin, M. Nuclear factor-κB in cancer development and progression. Nature 2006, 441, 431–436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Zhang, T.; Ma, C.; Zhang, Z.; Zhang, H.; Hu, H. NF-kappaB signaling in inflammation and cancer. MedComm (2020) 2021, 2, 618–653. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Aggarwal, D.; Chaudhary, M.; Mandotra, S.K.; Tuli, H.S.; Chauhan, R.; Joshi, N.C.; Kaur, D.; Dufosse, L.; Chauhan, A. Anti-inflammatory potential of quercetin: From chemistry and mechanistic insight to nanoformulations. Curr. Res. Pharmacol. Drug Discov. 2025, 8, 100217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  129. Alharbi, H.O.A.; Alshebremi, M.; Babiker, A.Y.; Rahmani, A.H. The Role of Quercetin, a Flavonoid in the Management of Pathogenesis Through Regulation of Oxidative Stress, Inflammation, and Biological Activities. Biomolecules 2025, 15, 151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Kee, B.L. Transcriptional control of natural killer cell antitumor activity. Trends Immunol. 2025, 46, 779–790. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Qi, M.; Elion, E.A. MAP kinase pathways. J. Cell Sci. 2005, 118, 3569–3572. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  132. Shahgoli, V.K.; Noorolyai, S.; Ahmadpour Youshanlui, M.; Saeidi, H.; Nasiri, H.; Mansoori, B.; Holmskov, U.; Baradaran, B. Inflammatory bowel disease, colitis, and cancer: Unmasking the chronic inflammation link. Int. J. Colorectal. Dis. 2024, 39, 173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  133. Edlund, S.; Bu, S.; Schuster, N.; Aspenström, P.; Heuchel, R.; Heldin, N.; Dijke, P.t.; Heldin, C.; Landström, M. Transforming growth factor-beta1 (TGF-beta)-induced apoptosis of prostate cancer cells involves Smad7-dependent activation of p38 by TGF-beta-activated kinase 1 and mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase 3. Mol. Biol. Cell 2003, 14, 529–544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  134. Grossi, V.; Peserico, A.; Tezil, T.; Simone, C. p38α MAPK pathway: A key factor in colorectal cancer therapy and chemoresistance. World J. Gastroenterol. 2014, 20, 9744–9758. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  135. Wesoly, J.; Szweykowska-Kulinska, Z.; Bluyssen, H.A. STAT activation and differential complex formation dictate selectivity of interferon responses. Acta Biochim. Pol. 2007, 54, 27–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  136. Awasthi, N.; Liongue, C.; Ward, A.C.; Awasthi, N.; Liongue, C.; Ward, A.C. STAT proteins: A kaleidoscope of canonical and non-canonical functions in immunity and cancer. J. Hematol. Oncol. 2021, 14, 198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  137. León-Cabrera, S.; Vázquez-Sandoval, A.; Molina-Guzman, E.; Delgado-Ramirez, Y.; Delgado-Buenrostro, N.; Callejas, B.; Chirino, Y.; Pérez-Plasencia, C.; Rodríguez-Sosa, M.; Olguín, J.; et al. Deficiency in STAT1 Signaling Predisposes Gut Inflammation and Prompts Colorectal Cancer Development. Cancers 2018, 10, 341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  138. Grivennikov, S. Inflammation and colorectal cancer: Colitis-associated neoplasia. Semin. Immunopathol. 2013, 35, 229–244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  139. Waldner, M.; Neurath, M. Master regulator of intestinal disease: IL-6 in chronic inflammation and cancer development. Semin. Immunol. 2014, 26, 75–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  140. Zhu, M.; Li, S.; Cao, X.; Rashid, K.; Liu, T. The STAT family: Key transcription factors mediating crosstalk between cancer stem cells and tumor immune microenvironment. Semin. Cancer Biol. 2023, 88, 18–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  141. Schmitt, M.J.; Philippidou, D.; Reinsbach, S.E.; Margue, C.; Wienecke-Baldacchino, A.; Nashan, D.; Behrmann, I.; Kreis, S. Interferon-γ-induced activation of Signal Transducer and Activator of Transcription 1 (STAT1) up-regulates the tumor suppressing microRNA-29 family in melanoma cells. Cell Commun. Signal. 2012, 10, 41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  142. Kumar, A.; Commane, M.; Flickinger, T.W.; Horvath, C.M.; Stark, G.R. Defective TNF-α-Induced Apoptosis in STAT1-Null Cells Due to Low Constitutive Levels of Caspases. Science 1997, 278, 1630–1632. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  143. Baier, A.; Szyszka, R. Compounds from Natural Sources as Protein Kinase Inhibitors. Biomolecules 2020, 10, 1546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  144. Andrabi, S.M.; Sharma, N.S.; Karan, A.; Shahriar, S.M.S.; Cordon, B.; Ma, B.; Xie, J. Nitric Oxide: Physiological Functions, Delivery, and Biomedical Applications. Adv. Sci. 2023, 10, e2303259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  145. Trachootham, D.; Alexandre, J.; Huang, P.; Trachootham, D.; Alexandre, J.; Huang, P. Targeting cancer cells by ROS-mediated mechanisms: A radical therapeutic approach? Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 2009, 8, 579–591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  146. Achitei, D.; Ciobica, A.; Balan, G.; Gologan, E.; Stanciu, C.; Stefanescu, G. Different profile of peripheral antioxidant enzymes and lipid peroxidation in active and non-active inflammatory bowel disease patients. Dig. Dis. Sci. 2013, 58, 1244–1249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  147. Lingappan, K. NF-kappaB in Oxidative Stress. Curr. Opin. Toxicol. 2018, 7, 81–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  148. Wu, W.-S. The signaling mechanism of ROS in tumor progression. Cancer Metastasis Rev. 2006, 25, 695–705. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  149. Yadav, S.; Zajac, E.; Singhal, S.S.; Awasthi, S.; Yadav, S.; Zajac, E.; Singhal, S.S.; Awasthi, S. Linking stress-signaling, glutathione metabolism, signaling pathways and xenobiotic transporters. Cancer Metastasis Rev. 2007, 26, 59–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  150. Townsend, D.M.; Tew, K.D.; Townsend, D.M.; Tew, K.D. The role of glutathione-S-transferase in anti-cancer drug resistance. Oncogene 2003, 22, 7369–7375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  151. Piechota-Polanczyk, A.; Fichna, J. Review article: The role of oxidative stress in pathogenesis and treatment of inflammatory bowel diseases. Naunyn. Schmiedebergs Arch. Pharmacol. 2014, 387, 605–620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  152. Wang, D.; DuBois, R. Role of prostanoids in gastrointestinal cancer. J. Clin. Investig. 2018, 128, 2732–2742. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  153. Dempke, W.; Rie, C.; Grothey, A.; Schmoll, H.J. Cyclooxygenase-2: A novel target for cancer chemotherapy? J. Cancer Res. Clin. Oncol. 2001, 127, 411–417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  154. Greenhough, A.; Smartt, H.; Moore, A.; Roberts, H.; Williams, A.; Paraskeva, C.; Kaidi, A. The COX-2/PGE2 pathway: Key roles in the hallmarks of cancer and adaptation to the tumour microenvironment. Carcinogenesis 2009, 30, 377–386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  155. Jin, K.; Qian, C.; Lin, J.; Liu, B. Cyclooxygenase-2-Prostaglandin E2 pathway: A key player in tumor-associated immune cells. Front. Oncol. 2023, 13, 1099811. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  156. International Agency for Research on Cancer. Cancer Over Time. Available online: https://gco.iarc.fr/overtime/en (accessed on 1 February 2025).
  157. Andrade-Meza, A.; Arias-Romero, L.E.; Armas-Lopez, L.; Avila-Moreno, F.; Chirino, Y.I.; Delgado-Buenrostro, N.L.; Garcia-Castillo, V.; Gutierrez-Cirlos, E.B.; Juarez-Avelar, I.; Leon-Cabrera, S.; et al. Mexican Colorectal Cancer Research Consortium (MEX-CCRC): Etiology, Diagnosis/Prognosis, and Innovative Therapies. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 2115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  158. Hoensch, H.; Groh, B.; Edler, L.; Kirch, W. Prospective cohort comparison of flavonoid treatment in patients with resected colorectal cancer to prevent recurrence. World J. Gastroenterol. 2008, 14, 2187–2193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  159. Chang, H.; Lei, L.; Zhou, Y.; Ye, F.; Zhao, G. Dietary Flavonoids and the Risk of Colorectal Cancer: An Updated Meta-Analysis of Epidemiological Studies. Nutrients 2018, 10, 950. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  160. Zamora-Ros, R.; Barupal, D.K.; Rothwell, J.A.; Jenab, M.; Fedirko, V.; Romieu, I.; Aleksandrova, K.; Overvad, K.; Kyro, C.; Tjonneland, A.; et al. Dietary flavonoid intake and colorectal cancer risk in the European prospective investigation into cancer and nutrition (EPIC) cohort. Int. J. Cancer 2017, 140, 1836–1844. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  161. Cassidy, A.; Minihane, A.M. The role of metabolism (and the microbiome) in defining the clinical efficacy of dietary flavonoids. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2017, 105, 10–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  162. Bohn, T. Dietary factors affecting polyphenol bioavailability. Nutr. Rev. 2014, 72, 429–452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  163. Pandey, P.; Lakhanpal, S.; Mahmood, D.; Kang, H.N.; Kim, B.; Kang, S.; Choi, J.; Choi, M.; Pandey, S.; Bhat, M.; et al. An updated review summarizing the anticancer potential of flavonoids via targeting NF-kB pathway. Front. Pharmacol. 2024, 15, 1513422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  164. Yan, C.; Wang, G. Advances in research on flavonoids in tumor immunotherapy (Review). Mol. Med. Rep. 2025, 31, 150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Flavylium cation representing the fundamental structural framework of flavonoids composed of aromatic rings A and B connected by a central oxygen-containing heterocyclic ring C.
Figure 1. Flavylium cation representing the fundamental structural framework of flavonoids composed of aromatic rings A and B connected by a central oxygen-containing heterocyclic ring C.
Ijms 27 01883 g001
Figure 2. Immunoediting in CAC: Phase I (elimination) immune cells recognize and destroy tumor cells (immunosurveillance). In phase II (equilibrium), tumor cell death matches their generation, promoting immunoselection of poorly immunogenic clones. In phase III (escape), tumor cells evade the immune response and proliferate, establishing an immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment dominated by regulatory T cells (Tregs), tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs), myeloid suppressor cells (MDSCs), macrophages (Mφs) and type 2 helper T (Th2) cells. The orange arrows illustrate the cellular transitions through immune evasion.
Figure 2. Immunoediting in CAC: Phase I (elimination) immune cells recognize and destroy tumor cells (immunosurveillance). In phase II (equilibrium), tumor cell death matches their generation, promoting immunoselection of poorly immunogenic clones. In phase III (escape), tumor cells evade the immune response and proliferate, establishing an immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment dominated by regulatory T cells (Tregs), tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs), myeloid suppressor cells (MDSCs), macrophages (Mφs) and type 2 helper T (Th2) cells. The orange arrows illustrate the cellular transitions through immune evasion.
Ijms 27 01883 g002
Figure 3. Immunomodulatory effects of flavonoids during colitis and tumorigenesis. (A) Regulation of tight junctions, cytokines, reactive oxygen species (ROS) and cells during colitis. (B) Flavonoid effects on cytokines, ROS and cells involved in antitumor immunity. (C) Influence on cytokines and cells involved in immune evasion of colon cancer cells. ↑ indicates upregulation, and ↓ indicates downregulation by flavonoids on the indicated biomolecule or cell. The green arrows indicate the activation or induction of biomolecules or cells by flavonoids, whereas the red lines denote flavonoid-mediated inhibition of specific interactions or cellular functions. The black arrows illustrate the endogenous biological pathways, cellular transitions, and signaling cascades within the colonic and tumor microenvironments.
Figure 3. Immunomodulatory effects of flavonoids during colitis and tumorigenesis. (A) Regulation of tight junctions, cytokines, reactive oxygen species (ROS) and cells during colitis. (B) Flavonoid effects on cytokines, ROS and cells involved in antitumor immunity. (C) Influence on cytokines and cells involved in immune evasion of colon cancer cells. ↑ indicates upregulation, and ↓ indicates downregulation by flavonoids on the indicated biomolecule or cell. The green arrows indicate the activation or induction of biomolecules or cells by flavonoids, whereas the red lines denote flavonoid-mediated inhibition of specific interactions or cellular functions. The black arrows illustrate the endogenous biological pathways, cellular transitions, and signaling cascades within the colonic and tumor microenvironments.
Ijms 27 01883 g003
Figure 4. Flavonoid-mediated inhibition of the JAK/STAT, MAPK and NF-κB signaling pathways. The blue arrows illustrate the signaling cascades while red lines denote flavonoid-mediated inhibition of specific interactions.
Figure 4. Flavonoid-mediated inhibition of the JAK/STAT, MAPK and NF-κB signaling pathways. The blue arrows illustrate the signaling cascades while red lines denote flavonoid-mediated inhibition of specific interactions.
Ijms 27 01883 g004
Figure 5. Modulation of oxidative stress by flavonoids and the role of ROS and NO in different stages of colitis and cancer development. Reduction in the level of ROS/RNS by direct antioxidant activity via the inhibition of iNOS and MPO. ↑ indicates upregulation, and ↓ indicates downregulation by flavonoids on the indicated cell or biological process. The grey arrows illustrate the endogenous biological pathways, cellular transitions and signaling cascades. The red lines denote flavonoid-mediated inhibition of specific biomolecules.
Figure 5. Modulation of oxidative stress by flavonoids and the role of ROS and NO in different stages of colitis and cancer development. Reduction in the level of ROS/RNS by direct antioxidant activity via the inhibition of iNOS and MPO. ↑ indicates upregulation, and ↓ indicates downregulation by flavonoids on the indicated cell or biological process. The grey arrows illustrate the endogenous biological pathways, cellular transitions and signaling cascades. The red lines denote flavonoid-mediated inhibition of specific biomolecules.
Ijms 27 01883 g005
Figure 6. Action of flavonoids on the COX-2/PGE2 axis and the effect of prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) on immunological tumor evasion and immunosurveillance. ↑ indicates upregulation, and ↓ indicates downregulation by flavonoids on the indicated cell or biological process. The black arrows illustrate the endogenous biological pathways and signaling cascades of Cox-1 and Cox-2 in physiological or inflammation conditions respectively. The red lines denote flavonoid-mediated inhibition of specific biomolecules.
Figure 6. Action of flavonoids on the COX-2/PGE2 axis and the effect of prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) on immunological tumor evasion and immunosurveillance. ↑ indicates upregulation, and ↓ indicates downregulation by flavonoids on the indicated cell or biological process. The black arrows illustrate the endogenous biological pathways and signaling cascades of Cox-1 and Cox-2 in physiological or inflammation conditions respectively. The red lines denote flavonoid-mediated inhibition of specific biomolecules.
Ijms 27 01883 g006
Table 1. Flavonoid classification and chemical structure [4].
Table 1. Flavonoid classification and chemical structure [4].
Compound ClassKey Structural FeaturesChemical Structure
AnthocyaninsGlycosides derived from polyhydroxy and polymethoxy substituents within the flavylium coreIjms 27 01883 i001
FlavonolsSpecific substitutions on rings A and B, hydroxyl groups at positions 5 and 7 on ring A linked to a three-carbon chainIjms 27 01883 i002
Flavones4H-chromen-4-one backbone with a phenyl group at position 2; commonly 7-O-glucosidesIjms 27 01883 i003
FlavanonesFully saturated C ring, lacking a double bond between C2 and C3 positionsIjms 27 01883 i004
Isoflavones3-phenylchromen-4-one structure, structural isomers of flavones, phenyl group at position 4Ijms 27 01883 i005
Flavan-3-olsHydroxyl group at position 3 on the C ring, absence of a double bond between positions 2 and 3Ijms 27 01883 i006
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Navia, S.H.; Vega, L.; Rodríguez, T.; Rodríguez-Sosa, M. Immunomodulatory Effects of Flavonoids in Colitis-Associated Colorectal Cancer. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2026, 27, 1883. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms27041883

AMA Style

Navia SH, Vega L, Rodríguez T, Rodríguez-Sosa M. Immunomodulatory Effects of Flavonoids in Colitis-Associated Colorectal Cancer. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2026; 27(4):1883. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms27041883

Chicago/Turabian Style

Navia, Sonia H., Libia Vega, Tonathiu Rodríguez, and Miriam Rodríguez-Sosa. 2026. "Immunomodulatory Effects of Flavonoids in Colitis-Associated Colorectal Cancer" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 27, no. 4: 1883. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms27041883

APA Style

Navia, S. H., Vega, L., Rodríguez, T., & Rodríguez-Sosa, M. (2026). Immunomodulatory Effects of Flavonoids in Colitis-Associated Colorectal Cancer. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 27(4), 1883. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms27041883

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop