1. Introduction
Myocardial infarction (MI) remains a leading cause of mortality worldwide, with malignant ventricular arrhythmias representing the predominant mechanism of sudden cardiac death in the acute phase [
1]. Clinical studies have consistently demonstrated that patients with early-stage MI are particularly vulnerable to life-threatening arrhythmias [
1]. Up to 90% of patients with acute MI develop some form of arrhythmia during or immediately after the event, with the majority occurring within the first 24 to 48 h [
2]. The initial 5 days post-MI are recognized as the early phase of infarction, during which the risk of arrhythmias remains elevated [
3]. Ventricular fibrillation may occur without prior warning arrhythmias, especially during the first day of infarction [
4]. Collectively, these observations underscore that the early post-infarction period represents a critical window of arrhythmia susceptibility [
5,
6,
7]. Despite advances in reperfusion therapy, malignant ventricular arrhythmias remain a major early complication after ST-segment elevation MI [
8], underscoring an unmet need for mechanism-based preventive strategies.
At the cellular and molecular levels, post-infarction arrhythmogenesis has been associated with several discrete pathological processes. These include ion channel remodeling, such as dysregulation of
CACNA1C,
SCN5A, and
KCNQ1, gap junction dysfunction mediated by connexin 43 (Cx43) post-translational modifications [
9], aberrant calcium handling involving CaMKII activation [
10], and myofibroblast accumulation within the infarct border zone, which creates a substrate for slow conduction and re-entry [
11,
12]. However, these mechanisms have largely been investigated in isolation and at the bulk-tissue level, leaving the cell-type-specific molecular landscape that governs arrhythmia susceptibility in early-stage MI incompletely characterized.
Recent advances in single-cell and spatial transcriptomics have enabled unbiased, high-resolution dissection of cellular heterogeneity in the diseased heart. Single-nucleus RNA sequencing (snRNA-seq) has been successfully applied to delineate the cellular dynamics of post-MI repair and remodeling [
13,
14], and spatial transcriptomic analyses have begun to map the molecular architecture of the infarct border zone [
14,
15]. However, these approaches have yet to be systematically leveraged to investigate the molecular basis of arrhythmia susceptibility in the early post-MI period.
In this study, by integrating single-cell and spatial transcriptomic analyses of post-infarction human hearts, we identify a border-zone-localized cardiomyocyte subpopulation characterized by pronounced ion channel remodeling. Integrative network analyses and functional validation further pinpoint the long non-coding RNA NEAT1 as a key regulator of calcium homeostasis within this subpopulation, suggesting NEAT1 as a potential target for post-infarction arrhythmias.
3. Discussion
Ion channel remodeling is recognized as a central substrate for post-infarction arrhythmogenesis [
20]; however, the cell-type-specific transcriptional programs driving this process remain poorly defined, particularly at the resolution of discrete cardiomyocyte subpopulations. Here, we analyzed single-nucleus and spatial transcriptomic data from human hearts following MI, and defined a distinct cardiomyocyte subpopulation, arrhythmia-potential cardiomyocytes (aCMs), localized to the infarct border zone. These aCMs exhibit pronounced ion channel remodeling with relatively preserved metabolic activity, and pseudotime and RNA velocity analyses revealed their unique trajectory intermediate between healthy and damaged CMs. Co-expression network analysis prioritized
NEAT1 as a hub gene strongly correlated with the L-type calcium channel gene
CACNA1C and the L-type calcium channel regulator
PDLIM5. Functional validation demonstrated that
NEAT1 positively regulates both targets likely through a microRNA-mediated ceRNA network. These findings identify
NEAT1 as a previously unrecognized regulator of ion channel gene expression in aCMs and suggest that targeting the
NEAT1–
hsa-miR-204-5p/211-5p–
CACNA1C/
PDLIM5 axis may represent a candidate therapeutic target for arrhythmia prevention in early-stage MI.
By performing further clustering and subpopulation analysis, we defined a distinct subpopulation within hCMs, which we designated as aCMs. We defined early MI as occurring within five days of infarction onset. This definition is consistent with the well-established temporal phases of post-infarction cardiac repair, in which the acute inflammatory phase predominates during the first 4–5 days after MI before transitioning to the proliferative and maturation phases [
21,
22]. Cell proportion analysis revealed that aCMs were almost exclusively detected in the hearts of patients with early MI. GO enrichment analyses demonstrated that aCM marker genes were prominently clustered in pathways such as “response to hypoxia,” distinguishing them clearly from healthy hCMs. GSVA analysis found that aCMs retained a certain level of fatty acid β-oxidation activity, whereas pathways related to ion channel function were markedly altered. Notably, the pathway “negative regulation of calcium ion transmembrane transport via high voltage-gated calcium channel” was significantly upregulated, despite a concurrent increase in
CACNA1C expression. This apparent paradox, in which enhanced channel transcription coincided with activated inhibitory regulation, may suggest a potential compensatory feedback mechanism that possibly reflect a transitional state of ion channel remodeling [
23,
24]. Gene-level analysis revealed that
PPARGC1A was markedly downregulated in aCMs, whereas
PPARGC1B was notably upregulated, a reciprocal pattern that may explain the preserved fatty acid metabolic capacity. In contrast, violin plots showed that both
PPARGC1A and
PPARGC1B expression were dysregulated in dCMs. Furthermore, aCMs highly expressed the potassium channel gene
KCNQ1, the calcium channel gene
CACNA1C, and the sodium channel gene
SCN5A, collectively indicating a transcriptional signature consistent with electrical remodeling. This transcriptional program was further recapitulated in an independent single-cell dataset, in which aCM-like subclusters displayed high aCM signature scores, supporting the generalizability of the aCM phenotype beyond the discovery cohort.
To delineate the temporal trajectory of aCMs during post-MI cardiac remodeling, we performed pseudotime analysis and RNA velocity analysis. Notably, aCMs appeared to diverge from the canonical hCM–ICM–dCM disease progression axis. By examining marker genes along the trajectory from hCMs to aCMs, we found that
FN1,
NEAT1,
PDLIM5, and
NPPB were significantly upregulated during this transition.
FN1 encodes fibronectin, a key mediator of cell adhesion, and is closely associated with fibrotic processes [
25,
26]. We therefore interrogated our spatial transcriptomics data. Based on an aCM gene signature score, we found that aCMs were predominantly localized to the border zone of hearts from patients with early MI, whereas they were rarely detected in hearts from patients with late MI. Additionally, aCMs exhibited partial spatial colocalization with fibroblasts. Finally, to characterize the communication features of aCMs, we performed CellChat analysis. Chord diagram analysis revealed that both outgoing and incoming signaling of aCMs were slightly reduced compared with hCMs; in particular, the PTPRM signaling pathway was markedly attenuated, which may represent an important contributor to the impaired contractile function of aCMs [
27]. Consistent with the spatial transcriptomics findings, the NRXN and FN1 signaling pathways were enhanced in aCMs, suggesting intensified crosstalk with fibroblasts. Notably, NRXN has also been implicated in calcium signaling [
28].
Gene co-expression networks in biological systems typically follow a scale-free topology, endowing them with both resilience to random perturbations and vulnerability to targeted disruption of hub nodes [
29]. We therefore applied hdWGCNA to identify the regulatory networks underlying aCMs. Among the 11 identified co-expression modules, module 5 and module 10 accounted for relatively high expression proportions. Notably, module 5 exhibited the highest average expression level among all modules, whereas module 10 exhibited the lowest, yet the two modules were closely adjacent in UMAP space. They were therefore selected as the two primary modules for downstream analysis. To identify the core regulatory network, we merged genes from modules 5 and 10, performed correlation analysis, and retained edges with a correlation coefficient greater than 0.75. We found that
KCNQ1 and
DIP2C may form a regulatory module. Although
DIP2C has been implicated in diverse molecular pathways, its regulatory relationship with MI and
KCNQ1 remains poorly characterized [
30]. In addition, a larger regulatory network centered on
CACNA1C was identified, encompassing
NEAT1,
PDLIM5,
TTN, and
LARGE1, among others.
NEAT1 has been reported to be upregulated after MI and to impair cardiac function [
31]. Moreover,
NEAT1 has recently been shown to promote pathological cardiac remodeling and heart failure by driving paraspeckle formation through liquid–liquid phase separation, which sequesters Fth1 mRNA and triggers cardiomyocyte ferroptosis [
32], further supporting a pathogenic role of
NEAT1 in the stressed myocardium.
PDLIM5 has been shown to regulate L-type calcium channel (Cav1.2) activity by forming a complex with protein kinase D1 (PKD1) [
33]. We validated these transcriptional changes using an NRVM model exposed to 6 h of hypoxia. At the transcriptional level, 6 h of hypoxia significantly upregulated the expression of
Neat1,
Cacna1c, and
Pdlim5. At the protein level, however, only PDLIM5 showed a significant increase.
Although the dynamics of
CACNA1C in the border zone during early MI have not been definitively established, Wang et al. reported Cav1.2 protein downregulation at 12 h post-MI in mice [
34], whereas Perrier E et al. [
23] showed Cav1.2 mRNA upregulation at 1 week post-MI via mineralocorticoid receptor activation in rats. Beyond these model- and species-specific differences, the dissociation between
CACNA1C mRNA and protein levels merits a more direct mechanistic consideration. First, the α1C subunit is a large multi-pass membrane protein (approximately 220 kDa, 24 transmembrane segments), and the synthesis, folding, membrane trafficking, and degradation of such multi-pass channel proteins occur over relatively long timescales [
35]; within the acute 6 h window of our experiment, hypoxia-induced transcriptional upregulation may therefore not yet be translated into a measurable increase in Cav1.2 protein, whereas the smaller
PDLIM5 protein may respond within this period. Second, steady-state channel abundance is buffered at the post-transcriptional level, including microRNA-mediated translational repression and ubiquitin-proteasome-mediated degradation, which can maintain Cav1.2 protein despite elevated mRNA [
36,
37]. Notably, the
NEAT1-
hsa-miR-204-5p/211-5p-
CACNA1C/
PDLIM5 ceRNA axis identified in this study operates precisely at this post-transcriptional layer. Third, the combined hypoxia and knockdown data suggest a necessary-but-not-sufficient relationship:
NEAT1 silencing was sufficient to reduce both
CACNA1C mRNA and protein, whereas
NEAT1 upregulation alone may be insufficient to drive an increase in steady-state Cav1.2 protein within the experimental window. Finally, the lack of CACNA1C protein change in our hypoxia model may also reflect the acute in vitro conditions and the border-zone-specific aCM microenvironment, which a cell-based model cannot fully replicate.
We then employed two virtual knockout approaches, scTenifoldNet [
38] and GeneKI [
39], as internal robustness checks on the
NEAT1–
CACNA1C/
PDLIM5 regulatory relationship identified by hdWGCNA. Both approaches predicted that
NEAT1 knockout would perturb ion channel and contractile apparatus genes, including
CACNA1C,
PDLIM5, and
ACTA1. To provide independent causal evidence, we performed siRNA-mediated knockdown of
Neat1 in NRVMs, which significantly downregulated
Pdlim5 and
Cacna1c at both transcriptional and translational levels. Analysis of the GSE110209 dataset further revealed strong transcriptional correlations between
Neat1 and both
Cacna1c and
Pdlim5 in the infarct border zone of rat hearts post-MI [
40], supporting cross-species conservation of this regulatory network. Notably, this correlation was absent in sham-operated animals, indicating that the
NEAT1–
CACNA1C regulatory relationship is a specific consequence of the pathological MI microenvironment rather than a constitutive transcriptional program.
NEAT1 has been reported to function as a microRNA sponge in some contexts [
41]. Using Starbase and ENCORI, we identified
hsa-miR-204-5p/211-5p as a shared candidate targeting
NEAT1,
CACNA1C, and
PDLIM5 [
42,
43], In AC16 cells,
NEAT1 knockdown significantly upregulated
hsa-miR-204-5p/211-5p while downregulating both targets, a reciprocal pattern consistent with a ceRNA-mediated regulatory mechanism. Finally, to evaluate the therapeutic potential of
NEAT1 as a target, we performed Fluo-4 calcium imaging. Consistent with previous reports, 6 h of hypoxia markedly increased the Fluo-4 fluorescence intensity in NRVMs [
44], indicative of an elevation in intracellular Ca
2+ levels. siRNA-mediated knockdown of
NEAT1 effectively attenuated this elevation.
NEAT1 has been proposed as a potential therapeutic target in MI; previous in vivo studies have demonstrated that
NEAT1 silencing reduces infarct size, preserves cardiac function, and suppresses inflammatory and apoptotic signaling in mouse models of MI [
45,
46]. However, the relationship between
NEAT1 and
CACNA1C is complex, although
NEAT1 knockdown downregulated
CACNA1C transcription in vitro,
CACNA1C regulation in vivo varies across species, time points, and molecular layers. Given this complexity, whether
NEAT1 knockdown exerts any net effect on Cav1.2 protein in the post-infarction border zone remains unclear. Meanwhile, genetic ablation of
NEAT1 has been reported to impair post-MI cardiac function in some settings, suggesting that the therapeutic outcome of
NEAT1 targeting may be context-dependent.
This study has several limitations that should be acknowledged. First, not all co-expression modules identified by hdWGCNA were subjected to in-depth investigation; and the border-zone-specific origin and electrophysiological properties of the aCM phenotype, which was defined primarily on a transcriptomic basis, still require further exploration. In addition, the aCM phenotype was defined primarily on the basis of transcriptomic data and has not been validated electrophysiologically. Second, owing to constraints inherent to the rodent model system [
47], our functional studies focused primarily on the calcium channel gene
CACNA1C, whereas the potassium channel gene
KCNQ1 was not experimentally pursued. Moreover, because the aCM phenotype derives from adult human border-zone myocardium, validation in NRVMs and AC16 cells may not fully recapitulate the adult ischemic context, which may limit translation to the human heart. Direct validation of the predicted miRNA–mRNA interactions, such as by dual-luciferase reporter assays, would further strengthen this mechanism. Third, although previous studies have reported beneficial effects of
NEAT1 knockdown in mouse models of MI, its electrophysiological consequences remain to be characterized. We focused on the susceptibility of individual cardiomyocytes as potential triggers of arrhythmia, but MEA recordings predominantly assess the tissue-level arrhythmic substrate rather than single-cell excitability, and patch-clamp recording was not feasible in our laboratory. Meanwhile, our Fluo-4 imaging captured static endpoint fluorescence intensity rather than dynamic Ca
2+ transients, and stable in vitro recapitulation of the aCM phenotype remains challenging. Consequently, direct evidence from an in vivo arrhythmia model demonstrating the therapeutic efficacy of
NEAT1 inhibition is still lacking. In future work, we plan to establish a cardiac-specific
NEAT1 knockout mouse model using viral delivery of Cre recombinase to determine whether targeting
NEAT1 can reduce the incidence of malignant arrhythmias during the early phase of MI.
4. Materials and Methods
4.1. Single-Nucleus RNA Sequencing Data Collection and Processing
Single-nucleus RNA-seq (snRNA-seq) data were obtained from the previously published spatial multi-omic map of human myocardial infarction (Kuppe, Ramirez Flores, Li et al., 2022 [
15]; Zenodo accession no. 6578047). The dataset comprises myocardial tissue specimens from patients with myocardial infarction and controls, profiled by snRNA-seq, snATAC-seq, and spatial transcriptomics (Visium). For the present study, we focused on the snRNA-seq component (snRNA-seq-submission.h5ad) and subset the cardiomyocyte (CM) nuclei for subpopulation-level re-analysis. Specifically, CM nuclei were re-embedded using uniform manifold approximation and projection (UMAP) with the first 30 harmony-corrected principal components. A shared nearest neighbour (SNN) graph was built using Seurat’s FindNeighbors, and nuclei were clustered with the Louvain algorithm (FindClusters) across multiple resolutions (0.1–1.5), with optimal resolution selection guided by cluster stability metrics visualized via clustree. Cluster-defining marker genes were identified by Wilcoxon rank-sum tests as implemented in Seurat’s FindAllMarkers. Based on the re-clustering results, we designated a distinct subpopulation (cluster 20) characterized by combined electrophysiological dysregulation and preserved metabolic activity signatures, which we designated arrhythmia-potential CM (aCM). The remaining CM nuclei retained their original annotation labels from the reference atlas, yielding four final CM subpopulations for downstream analyses: healthy CM (hCM), intermediate CM, damaged CM, and aCM.
4.2. Differential Expression and Gene Ontology Analysis
To characterize transcriptional differences between aCM and hCM, we performed differential expression analysis using Seurat’s FindMarkers function with the Wilcoxon rank-sum test. Differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were filtered by adjusted
p < 0.05 and |log
2 fold change| > 0.25. Gene Ontology (GO) enrichment analysis was performed using the DAVID Bioinformatics Resources (
https://david.ncifcrf.gov/,
https://davidbioinformatics.nih.gov/ (accessed on 12 June 2026)) on the filtered DEG list, with GO Biological Process (GO-BP) terms reported.
4.3. Gene Set Variation Analysis (GSVA) and Ucell
To evaluate pathway-level activity differences across CM subpopulations, we performed gene set variation analysis using the GSVA package (v1.50.0) with a Gaussian kernel. Pathway gene sets were compiled from three resources: (1) KEGG categories, (2) GO Biological Process terms from the Molecular Signatures Database (MSigDB, c5.go. bp v2025.1), and (3) Hallmark gene sets from MSigDB. GSVA enrichment scores were calculated on per-subpopulation pseudo-bulk expression profiles generated by AverageExpression. The resulting pathway activity matrix was visualized using pheatmap with row-wise z-score normalization and hierarchical clustering.
To test whether each CM cluster in a new, independent single-cell dataset of myocardial infarction recapitulates the four defined human CM subtypes (healthy, intermediate, damaged, arrhythmia-potential), we built four gene signatures and scored each cluster with UCell (AddModuleScore_UCell, an AUC-like enrichment score in [0, 1]; per-cell scores averaged per cluster). Markers per subtype came from differential expression, filtered at adjusted p < 0.05, |log2 fold change| > 0.25, and expression in >10% of CM cells. Signature genes were selected by a dominance criterion (higher mean expression in the target cluster(s) than in all others, ranked by dominance), each targeting the healthy, damaged, arrhythmia-susceptible, or transitional clusters, respectively. Score differences across clusters were tested by Kruskal–Wallis plus pairwise Wilcoxon (BH corrected) and visualized as zero-centered diverging heatmaps and dot plots combining relative point size with absolute score color.
4.4. Pseudotime Trajectory Analysis
To reconstruct the transcriptional trajectory of CM subclusters, we performed pseudotime analysis using Monocle 3. The Seurat object containing four CM subclusters (healthy, intermediate, damaged, and Arrhythmia_Susceptible_CM) was converted to a cell_data_set, preserving the pre-computed UMAP embedding. Cells were clustered at low resolution (1 × 10−5) and a principal graph was learned to capture the global differentiation topology. The trajectory was rooted at the healthy_CM population by selecting the most frequent graph node among healthy_CM cells. Branch-dependent genes were identified via the Moran’s I-based graph test (q < 0.05), and the top 500 most significant genes were hierarchically clustered (Ward’s D2) into four co-varying modules and visualized as a pseudotime-ordered heatmap after z-score normalization. To focus on the healthy_CM-to-Arrhythmia_Susceptible_CM transition, the shortest path between their representative graph nodes was extracted, and gene expression dynamics along this path were modeled by LOESS regression. Pseudotime-associated genes were identified by Spearman correlation (|ρ| > 0.3, adjusted *p* < 0.05) and LOESS goodness-of-fit (R2 > 0.05) along the path.
4.5. RNA Velocity and Pseudotime Analysis with scTour
To infer the transcriptional dynamics of CM subclusters, we performed RNA velocity-like analysis using scTour, a deep learning framework that simultaneously estimates pseudotime and a latent vector field without requiring spliced/unspliced count matrices. Raw UMI counts from the Arrhythmia_Susceptible_CM reference dataset were exported to AnnData format, preserving the pre-computed UMAP embedding from the Seurat workflow. Genes were filtered to the top 2000 highly variable genes (Seurat v3). The scTour model was trained for 400 epochs using a negative binomial loss, with reconstruction loss weights for the local and global components set to α_recon_lec = 0.5 and α_recon_lode = 0.5, respectively, and GPU acceleration was applied. Pseudotime was inferred using the get_time() function, and the latent transcriptional space (X_TNODE) was obtained by mixing the posterior and prior latent representations with mixing coefficients α_z = 0.5 and α_predz = 0.5. The vector field was computed from the latent space and then projected onto the pre-computed UMAP for visualization, which revealed the directionality and magnitude of transcriptional transitions across CM subclusters.
4.6. Spatial Transcriptomic Analysis
To determine the spatial distribution of aCMs in the post-MI heart, we analyzed Visium spatial transcriptomic data from four samples: one control (P1) and three MI samples spanning early (P2 IZ-BZ, ~5 days; P3 RZ-BZ, ~2 days) to late (P12 RZ-BZ, ~30 days) stages. Each spot was pre-annotated with cell-type proportions for 11 major cardiac cell types (RCTD deconvolution). Tissue zones were assigned based on cell-type composition: the infarct zone (IZ; cardiomyocyte < 15%, fibroblast + myeloid > 25%), remote zone (RZ; cardiomyocyte > 35%), and border zone (BZ; intermediate). To estimate CM subcluster proportions within each spot, we employed a gene signature scoring approach. Subcluster-specific marker genes were identified from the scRNA-seq CM reference using Wilcoxon rank-sum tests with Bonferroni correction (adjusted *p* < 0.01, log$_2$ fold change > 1.0), retaining the top 50 genes per subcluster that were also detected in Visium data. For each spot, a per-subcluster signature score was calculated as the mean expression of its marker genes across the four CM subclusters (healthy, intermediate, damaged, and Arrhythmia_Susceptible_CM), and scores were normalized to proportions via softmax transformation. Cell-type composition pie charts were overlaid onto H&E-stained tissue images at spot coordinates, and CM subcluster proportions were visualized as scatter plots with zone-level background shading. Log2 fold change relative to the control mean was computed to highlight regions of aCM enrichment or depletion.
4.7. Cell–Cell Communication Analysis
To characterize the intercellular signaling landscape involving aCMs, we performed ligand–receptor interaction analysis using CellChat (v2) with the full CellChatDB.human database. The scRNA-seq dataset was downsampled to a maximum of 1500 cells per cell type to balance computational efficiency and subtype representation. Communication probabilities were computed using the trimean method and filtered to retain interactions supported by at least 10 cells. To reduce dropout effects in shallowly sequenced single-cell data, expression values were smoothed via diffusion on the human protein–protein interaction network (projectData). Network centrality scores were calculated to identify major signal senders and receivers. To focus on aCM-specific signaling alterations, communication probabilities were aggregated at the pathway level separately by direction (sender/receiver) for each of the four CM subclusters (healthy, intermediate, damaged, and Arrhythmia_Susceptible_CM). Pathways were ranked by their total dispersion across CM subtypes (range of summed probability), and the top 12 most variable pathways were selected for visualization. Chord diagrams were used to display the global signaling architecture among all cell types, and dot plots were generated to compare pathway-level communication activity across the four CM subtypes.
4.8. hdWGCNA Analysis
To characterize the gene co-expression landscape of aCMs, we applied high-dimensional weighted gene co-expression network analysis (hdWGCNA) to aCM cells. Genes expressed in less than 5% of cells were excluded, retaining 11,724 genes. To mitigate sparsity, metacells were constructed by K-nearest neighbor aggregation (k = 25, max shared = 10) within each cell type–donor combination, using the harmony reduction. An unsigned co-expression network was then built with a soft-thresholding power of 3, yielding 11 modules (67–667 genes each; 3359 genes assigned in total). Module eigengenes were computed and harmonized to remove donor effects. Module eigengene activity was profiled across CM subclusters via DotPlot, in which M5 showed notably elevated expression and M10 showed depleted expression in aCMs compared to other CM subclusters, prompting their selection for downstream analysis. Module hub genes (top 10 by kME) were identified, and the transcriptional proximity of module gene sets was visualized by UMAP embedding (n_neighbors = 15, min_dist = 0.1). Genes from M5 and M10 were merged, and pairwise Pearson correlations were computed across metacells; edges with |r| > 0.75 were retained and used to construct a co-expression network via igraph, which was subsequently exported to Cytoscape (Version 3.9.1) for visualization and network analysis.
4.9. In Silico Knockout
For scTenifoldNet, we simulated NEAT1 perturbation using the single-cell Tensor-based Network Knockout framework. Co-expression networks were constructed from bootstrap samples (10 sub-networks, 500 cells each) of the Arrhythmia_Susceptible_CM expression matrix, with genes filtered at the 90th percentile of expression variance. Network topology was decomposed into 10 core regulatory patterns via tensor CP factorization (1000 iterations), and wild-type versus knockout networks were aligned in a 10-dimensional manifold space. For each gene, differential regulation was quantified by the Z-score of its inter-network distance, with significance assessed by adjusted p value derived from the tensor decomposition. For GenKI, we adopted a variational graph auto-encoder (VGAE)-based framework to infer the downstream transcriptional consequences of NEAT1 depletion. A gene co-expression network was first constructed from scRNA-seq data of Arrhythmia_Susceptible_CM cells (n = 1264) using pcNet. The VGAE was subsequently trained on wild-type data to learn graph-structured latent representations, and NEAT1 knockout was simulated by zeroing its expression and removing all associated edges from the network. For each gene, the KL divergence between wild-type and knockout latent distributions was calculated, with significance assessed via permutation testing (100 iterations).
4.10. Neonatal Rat Ventricular Myocytes Isolation and Culture
Neonatal rat ventricular myocytes (NRVMs) were isolated using the Worthington Neonatal Cardiomyocyte Isolation System (WBC-LK003300) (Hangzhou Ziyuan Experimental Animals Technology Co., Ltd.). Briefly, hearts from anesthetized rat pups were excised, rinsed in ice-cold Sterile calcium- and magnesium-free Hank’s Balanced Salt Solution, and minced to <1 mm3 fragments. Tissue was digested overnight at 4 °C with 50 µg/mL trypsin, followed by 30–45 min collagenase treatment at 37 °C with intermittent trituration. Cell suspensions were sequentially filtered, centrifuged (1200× g, 5 min), and subjected to RBC lysis. Cardiomyocytes were enriched via 1.5 h differential adhesion, then cultured in 10% FBS/DMEM with antibiotics on gelatin-coated plates (37 °C, 5% CO2). To induce hypoxia, NRVMs were placed in a hypoxia chamber (1% O2, 5% CO2, 94% N2) for 6 h. The human cardiomyocyte cell line AC16 was cultured under identical conditions.
4.11. Cell Culture and siRNA Transfection
AC16 human cardiomyocytes and NRVMs were cultured under standard conditions. For NEAT1 knockdown, cells were transfected with specific siRNAs targeting
NEAT1 (sequences listed in
Table S2) using Lipofectamine™ RNAiMAX Transfection Reagent (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Cells were harvested 24 h post-transfection for subsequent analyses.
4.12. Western Blot
Western blot was used for immunoblotting analysis. The extracted proteins were separated by SDS-PAGE and transferred to a 0.22 μm PVDF membrane. The membrane was sequentially probed with primary antibodies and HRP-conjugated secondary antibodies, followed by detection using enhanced chemiluminescent substrate. For CACNA1C, a multi-pass transmembrane protein, protein samples were not boiled prior to loading.
4.13. RT-qPCR
Real-time quantitative PCR was performed using SYBR Master Mix (Vazyme, Nanjing, China) on a BIO-RAD CFX96 Real-Time System (Bio-Rad Laboratories; Hercules, CA, USA). Each reaction was run in triplicate, and relative gene expression was calculated by the 2
−ΔΔCt method with β-tubulin as the endogenous control. Primer sequences for rat (NRVM) and human (AC16) genes are listed in
Table S2. For miRNA quantification, total RNA was reverse-transcribed using the miRcute Enhanced miRNA cDNA First Strand Synthesis Kit (KR211, Tiangen, Beijing, China), and qPCR was performed with the miRcute Enhanced miRNA qPCR Detection Kit (SYBR Green, FP411, Tiangen) on the same instrument.
4.14. Fluo-4 Calcium Imaging
After 6 h of hypoxia, NRVMs were incubated with 5 µM Fluo-4 AM (Yeasen, China) in HBSS at 37 °C for 30 min in the dark, followed by three washes with HBSS and an additional 20 min incubation at 37 °C to allow for complete de-esterification. Fluorescence images were captured under an inverted fluorescence microscope (Olympus IX83, Japan) with excitation at 488 nm and emission at 516 nm. One field per well was recorded from five independent wells of a 24-well plate, and mean fluorescence intensity was quantified using ImageJ (1.54p) after background subtraction. Relative intracellular calcium levels were normalized to the normoxia control group. Data are presented as mean ± SD.
4.15. Statistical Analysis
Statistical analyses were performed using GraphPad Prism 8 (GraphPad Software, La Jolla, CA, USA). Each data point represents an independent biological replicate. Comparisons between two groups were performed using an unpaired two-tailed Student’s
t-test. Comparisons among multiple groups (e.g.,
Figure 1F and
Figure 5E) were performed using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Bonferroni’s post hoc test for multiple comparisons. Statistical significance was defined as
p < 0.05.