Next Article in Journal
Cervicovaginal Mycobiome Restructuring by HPV and Bacterial Community State Types in a Kazakhstani Shotgun Metagenomic Cohort: Lactobacillus iners as a Candida-Permissive Niche Associated with α-9 HPV in Cytologically Normal Women
Previous Article in Journal
SGLT2 Inhibitors in Alzheimer’s Disease: Biochemical Insights and Therapeutic Potential
Previous Article in Special Issue
Extracellular Vesicle and Plasma miRNAs as Candidate Biomarkers of Traumatic Brain Injury in the Context of Polytrauma
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Integration of Transcriptional Signatures from Brain Tissue and Plasma Extracellular Vesicles of a Preclinical Tauopathy Mouse Model

by
Tanzima Tarannum Lucy
†,
A. N. M. Mamun-Or-Rashid
†,
Daniel C. Lee
,
Iliya Lefterov
,
Radosveta Koldamova
* and
Nicholas Francis Fitz
*
Department of Environmental and Occupational Health, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15261, USA
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2026, 27(11), 5050; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms27115050
Submission received: 8 May 2026 / Revised: 29 May 2026 / Accepted: 1 June 2026 / Published: 3 June 2026

Abstract

Tauopathies, including Alzheimer’s disease, involve progressive neurodegeneration and sustained neuroinflammation. We present a multi-compartment transcriptomic atlas of 9.6-month-old PS19 tauopathy mice compared with wild-type (WT) controls (n = 8/group), profiling cortical mRNA, cortical non-coding RNA (ncRNA), and plasma small extracellular vesicle (pEV) ncRNA. In the PS19 cortex, mRNA sequencing identified 917 differentially expressed genes (DEGs), with microglial deconvolution revealing an association toward disease-associated microglia (DAM) gene signature and downregulation of genes involved in oxidative phosphorylation and cholesterol biosynthesis relative to WT. Cortical ncRNA profiling identified 466 differentially expressed ncRNAs, primarily circular RNAs (circRNAs; n = 331). In pEVs, 822 ncRNAs were differentially abundant, of which 657 circRNAs were identified in PS19 compared to WT mice. Cross-compartment integration suggest that pEV miRNA gene targets functionally mirrored genes involved in the brain’s inflammatory and metabolic failure. We identified a preliminary candidate signature of 33 ncRNAs, including miR-5114 (up in brain, down in pEV), circ_0008242 and circ_0002153 (up in brain and pEV), and circ_0007688 (down in brain and pEV), differentially enriched across both brain and periphery in PS19 compared to WT mice. These results suggest that the pEV non-coding landscape may partially reflect central tau-mediated changes in the brain transcriptional response. This study identifies circRNAs as the most numerically perturbed ncRNA class and provides a foundation for potential peripheral indicators of central brain tau pathology.

1. Introduction

Alzheimer’s disease (AD) and related tauopathies affect more than 55 million people worldwide, with projections estimating 150 million cases by 2050 [1]. These conditions are defined by the intraneuronal accumulation of hyperphosphorylated tau forming neurofibrillary tangles (NFTs), deposition of amyloid-beta (Aβ) plaques, progressive synaptic loss, and sustained neuroinflammation. The revised 2024 Alzheimer’s Association diagnostic criteria now define AD biologically as a continuum—moving from initial molecular changes to overt clinical dementia—which highlights the urgent need for early, accessible indicators that can track disease progression across this spectrum [2,3,4].
Tauopathies represent a heterogeneous group of neurodegenerative disorders characterized by the pathological aggregation of the microtubule-associated protein tau (MAPT) into NFTs [5,6]. Under physiological conditions, tau promotes microtubule assembly and axonal transport [7]. However, in diseases like AD and frontotemporal dementia (FTD), tau undergoes aberrant post-translational modifications, most notably hyperphosphorylation and acetylation—leading to its detachment from microtubules, loss of function, and subsequent neurotoxicity [6,8].
The P301S transgenic mouse (PS19 line) is a widely used model of primary tauopathy that expresses human tau with the P301S MAPT mutation under the murine prion protein promoter, as it recapitulates the spatiotemporal progression of tauopathy, including early synaptic loss, microgliosis, and late-stage neuronal death in their hippocampus, neocortex and entorhinal cortex [9,10,11]. By 6 months of age, these mice develop NFTs, followed by progressive neuronal loss by 9–12 months and a pronounced neuroinflammatory profile characterized by microgliosis and astrogliosis [11,12,13,14]. Transcriptomic studies using bulk RNA-seq and Weighted Gene Co-expression Network Analysis (WGCNA) have shown that the gene expression in the cortex of PS19 mice overlaps with evolutionarily conserved disease modules identified in postmortem human FTD and AD brains, reinforcing the translational relevance of this model [15,16,17].
A growing body of research has established that the transcriptomic landscape of tauopathy extends beyond protein-coding mRNAs. Non-coding RNA (ncRNA) species—including microRNAs (miRNAs), circular RNAs (circRNAs), small nucleolar RNAs (snoRNAs), small nuclear RNAs (snRNAs), and transfer RNAs (tRNAs)—are emerging as significant post-transcriptional regulators that are extensively perturbed in AD and related dementias [18,19,20]. circRNAs are abundantly expressed in the brain and enriched at synapses; their covalently closed loop structure makes them uniquely resistant to exonucleases, suggesting they may serve as stable markers of neuronal state. Recent studies using m6A-seq and circRNA-seq in Drosophila tauopathy models and induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs)-derived neurons have shown that tau pathology is associated with N6-methyladenosine (m6A) RNA methylation, which, in turn, regulates circRNA biogenesis and promotes neurodegeneration [21,22].
Extracellular vesicles (EVs) are lipid bilayer-enclosed nanoparticles released by CNS cells that can traverse the blood–brain barrier bidirectionally [23,24,25,26,27]. These EVs carry functional cargo, including proteins and ncRNAs, which reflect the molecular state of their cell of origin. Furthermore, the discovery of a “molecular bridge” between the brain and periphery via EVs offers a unique opportunity for non-invasive monitoring [3,23,24]. Previous work by our group has highlighted the diagnostic potential of plasma EV non-coding RNA cargos, identifying snoRNAs as potential plasma EV biomarkers for AD and demonstrating that circulating EVs are essential mediators of neuroprotective signaling and cognitive resilience [28,29,30,31]. Human clinical studies using immuno-affinity enrichment to isolate neuron-derived EVs (targeting markers like L1CAM) from the plasma samples have shown that these vesicles carry tau species and miRNAs that can discriminate between AD and controls with high accuracy [32]. Furthermore, miRNA enrichment profiles in EVs have been shown to correlate with temporal cortical thickness on MRI in patients with AD [32].
Despite these advances, several knowledge gaps persist. Most studies have focused on single compartments, and no study has simultaneously profiled the brain mRNA, brain ncRNA, and plasma EV ncRNA landscapes in the PS19 model. This hinders our understanding of how central molecular changes are reflected in peripheral biofluids. We hypothesize that tau pathology in the PS19 brain induces a coordinated ncRNA response that may be reflected in plasma EV cargo. By integrating transcriptomic data across central and peripheral compartments, we aimed to identify a convergent candidate molecular signature as peripheral indicators of tau-mediated neurodegeneration.

2. Results

We conducted a multi-compartment transcriptomic study using cortical brain tissue and plasma small extracellular vesicles (pEVs) from eight PS19 and eight wild-type (WT) mice (equal number of males and females, ~9.6 months old). The study design integrated protein-coding mRNA and non-coding RNA (ncRNA) sequencing data from the brain cortex, as it is already reported to show tau pathologies, i.e., NFTs, neuronal loss and brain atrophy, microgliosis and astrogliosis [2,5,6,7,11,14,33], and pEV ncRNA sequencing data to map the molecular landscape of tauopathy across central and peripheral compartments (Figure 1).

2.1. Cortical mRNA Differential Expression and Microglial Transcriptional Response in PS19 Mice

To investigate the primary transcriptomic alterations associated with neurodegeneration in PS19, we first profiled the cortical mRNA landscape, hypothesizing that tau accumulation triggers cell-type-specific inflammatory and metabolic shifts. Transcriptomic profiling of the prefrontal cortex identified 917 differentially expressed genes (DEGs) in PS19 mice compared to WT (568 upregulated and 349 downregulated in PS19 compared to WT; p < 0.05; Figure 2A and Supplementary Table S1). To determine the cellular contributions to this signature, we performed cell-type deconvolution based on our previous studies [34,35,36,37,38,39,40], which revealed that the highest number of microglia-specific genes were the most significantly affected in PS19 mice compared to WT (Figure 2B). Further analysis of microglial-specific DEGs showed an associated induction of disease-associated microglial (DAM) gene markers—including Trem2, Gns, and Man2b1—and a corresponding downregulation of homeostatic gene markers such as C1qa, C1qc, Tgfbr1 and Csf1r in PS19 mice compared to WT (Figure 2C). This homeostatic-to-DAM transcriptional transition reflects a conserved response to neurodegeneration documented in several models, such as 5xFAD and APP/PS1 mice, using single-cell RNA sequencing and immunohistochemistry to track microglial polarization [41,42,43].
Gene Ontology (GO) enrichment analysis indicated that total genes significantly upregulated in PS19 mice compared to WT were predominantly involved in ‘Inflammatory response’, ‘Antigen presentation’, ‘Cytokine signaling pathway’ and ‘phagocytosis’, and these upregulated pathways are closely associated with each other (Figure 2D). Furthermore, Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) analysis also showed similar inflammatory and phagocytosis pathways (Supplementary Table S1). The upregulation of genes in these pathways is consistent with the NF-κB-associated microglial signature typically identified in tau-laden cortices of PS19 mice [44]. These modules share substantial overlaps with conserved neurodegenerative disease modules identified through WGCNA co-expression analysis in PS19 and rTg4510 mice and integrated with human postmortem FTD/AD data [15,16]. Conversely, genes significantly downregulated in PS19 mice compared to WT were associated with ‘Oxidative phosphorylation’, ‘Cholesterol biosynthesis’, ‘Response to insulin’ and ‘Long-term memory’; unlike pathways associated with upregulated genes, only some of these pathways were closely associated with each other (Figure 2E). The suppression of oxidative phosphorylation represents a critical metabolic failure in PS19 compared to WT mice, likely associated with hyperphosphorylated tau-mediated impairment of mitochondrial transport as observed in various tauopathy models [4,45,46].
To validate the neuroinflammatory state, we performed immunohistochemistry (IHC) for ionized calcium-binding adapter molecule 1 (IBA1)-positive microglia in the cortex of younger mice (~6 months old, n = 6 per group). We observed a significant increase in the density of IBA1-positive microglia in PS19 cortex compared to WT (p < 0.0001; Figure 2F), providing biological confirmation of the DAM-associated transcriptomic profiles. Together, these data indicate that cortical tauopathy in the PS19 model is defined by a robust transition from homeostatic to disease-associated microglia alongside widespread downregulation of genes associated with metabolic functions compared to WT controls.

2.2. Characterization of the Brain Non-Coding RNA Landscape in the PS19 Mouse Model

Given the substantial alterations in mRNA expression, we next analyzed the cortical ncRNA differential abundance to assess whether they act as key post-transcriptional regulators of the observed transcriptional changes and to what extent they reflect the mRNA expression patterns presented in Figure 2. We characterized the distribution and differential expression of five major ncRNA subtypes (circRNA, snoRNA, snRNA, miRNA, tRNA) in the cortex. Annotated counts across the classes revealed the broad diversity of the detected brain ncRNA landscape (Figure 3A and Supplementary Table S2). We identified 466 differentially expressed ncRNAs in PS19 mice compared to WT (219 downregulated and 247 upregulated in the cortex of PS19 mice compared to WT; Figure 3B). circRNAs constituted most of the differentially expressed fraction (n = 331; 71% of total significant differentially expressed ncRNAs), highlighting them as the most numerically perturbed ncRNA class in the tauopathic brain of PS19 mice compared to WT (Figure 3C,D). We also observed significant perturbations in miRNAs (n = 57; Figure 3G), tRNAs (n = 30; Figure 3J), snoRNAs (n = 46; Figure 3K), and snRNAs (n = 2; Figure 3L) in PS19 mice compared to WT. This massive circRNA differential expression is a recently recognized feature of tauopathy, mechanistically linked to tau-induced N6-methyladenosine (m6A) RNA methylation-dependent biogenesis, a process validated using m6A-seq and circRNA-seq in Drosophila tauopathy models and human AD/FTD brain samples [21,22].
Figure 2. Cortical brain mRNA differential expression analysis shows upregulation of genes associated with inflammation and downregulation of genes associated with metabolism in PS19 mice compared to WT mice. Gene expression profiling was performed by RNA-seq followed by edgeR for identifying differentially expressed genes (DEGs) between cortical tissue from PS19 and WT mice. (A) Volcano plot showing differentially expressed cortical brain mRNAs defined by Wald test p < 0.05 in PS19 mice compared to WT (~9.6 months old, n = 8 per group); p < 0.05. Red, blue and gray denote significantly upregulated (n = 568) and downregulated (n = 349) DEGs and non-significant (n = 13,400) genes, respectively. DEG defined by raw Wald test p < 0.05. (B) Cell type-specific significant DEG distribution shows microglia-specific genes are the most significantly affected in PS19 mice compared to WT. (C) Bar chart showing microglial state of DEGs; both DAM and homeostatic genes were affected in PS19 mice compared to WT. (D,E) GO terms were analyzed using the Metascape [47] for the total upregulated and downregulated genes in PS19 mice compared to WT shown in (A). Bubble plots show GO terms for upregulated and downregulated mRNAs (left panels) in PS19 mice compared to WT. Bubble size represents gene count and color represents −log10(p-value). Enriched GO terms derived from DEGs were identified using Metascape and organized into functional modules. The resulting GO network was visualized in Cytoscape, where nodes represent enriched biological terms and node size reflects the number of associated input genes. Edges denote similarity between GO terms based on shared gene membership (kappa score > 0.3). Distinct node colors indicate separate functional clusters, highlighting modular organization within the gene set. ((D,E)-right panels). Immunohistochemistry data shows a significant increase in the number of ionized calcium-binding adaptor molecule 1 (IBA1)-positive microglia in the cortex of PS19 mice compared to WT. (F) Representative images of immunohistochemistry of IBA1 of the cortex of WT and PS19 brain sections (left) and violin plot showing the number of microglia per field. (~6 months old, n = 6 per group, equal number of male and female, four fields per section, six sections per mouse); statistical analysis was performed with unpaired t-test. Plots are means ± SEM. **** p < 0.0001.
Figure 2. Cortical brain mRNA differential expression analysis shows upregulation of genes associated with inflammation and downregulation of genes associated with metabolism in PS19 mice compared to WT mice. Gene expression profiling was performed by RNA-seq followed by edgeR for identifying differentially expressed genes (DEGs) between cortical tissue from PS19 and WT mice. (A) Volcano plot showing differentially expressed cortical brain mRNAs defined by Wald test p < 0.05 in PS19 mice compared to WT (~9.6 months old, n = 8 per group); p < 0.05. Red, blue and gray denote significantly upregulated (n = 568) and downregulated (n = 349) DEGs and non-significant (n = 13,400) genes, respectively. DEG defined by raw Wald test p < 0.05. (B) Cell type-specific significant DEG distribution shows microglia-specific genes are the most significantly affected in PS19 mice compared to WT. (C) Bar chart showing microglial state of DEGs; both DAM and homeostatic genes were affected in PS19 mice compared to WT. (D,E) GO terms were analyzed using the Metascape [47] for the total upregulated and downregulated genes in PS19 mice compared to WT shown in (A). Bubble plots show GO terms for upregulated and downregulated mRNAs (left panels) in PS19 mice compared to WT. Bubble size represents gene count and color represents −log10(p-value). Enriched GO terms derived from DEGs were identified using Metascape and organized into functional modules. The resulting GO network was visualized in Cytoscape, where nodes represent enriched biological terms and node size reflects the number of associated input genes. Edges denote similarity between GO terms based on shared gene membership (kappa score > 0.3). Distinct node colors indicate separate functional clusters, highlighting modular organization within the gene set. ((D,E)-right panels). Immunohistochemistry data shows a significant increase in the number of ionized calcium-binding adaptor molecule 1 (IBA1)-positive microglia in the cortex of PS19 mice compared to WT. (F) Representative images of immunohistochemistry of IBA1 of the cortex of WT and PS19 brain sections (left) and violin plot showing the number of microglia per field. (~6 months old, n = 6 per group, equal number of male and female, four fields per section, six sections per mouse); statistical analysis was performed with unpaired t-test. Plots are means ± SEM. **** p < 0.0001.
Ijms 27 05050 g002
Figure 3. Differences in expression of cortical non-coding RNAs in PS19 mice and associated biological pathways of their host genes or predicted targets. (A) Bar graph shows the distribution of five ncRNA types (circRNA, snoRNA, snRNA, miRNA, and tRNA) from the cortex based on annotated counts identified with COMPSRA. (B) Volcano plot of differentially expressed total brain ncRNAs comparing PS19 and WT mice (247 up and 219 down in PS19 mice), (D) circRNAs (178 up, 153 down), (G) miRNAs (12 up, 45 down), (J) tRNAs (27 up, 3 down), (K) snoRNAs (28 up, 18 down), and (L) snRNAs (2 up) in PS19 mice compared to WT. Red, blue and gray denote significantly upregulated and downregulated differentially expressed ncRNAs and non-significant ncRNAs defined by Wald test p < 0.05 in PS19 mice compared to WT, respectively. The results were considered significant with p < 0.05. (C) Donut chart summarizing significantly enriched [up + down; shown in (D,G,J–L)] ncRNA subtypes detected in brain tissue shown in (A). (E,F) DAVID was used to generate the bubble plots of GO enrichment analysis of the host genes (obtained from circBase) of upregulated (E) and downregulated (F) circRNAs. (H,I) Integration of significantly downregulated and upregulated brain miRNA targets (obtained using TargetScan mouse) with their corresponding brain mRNA data identified in Figure 2 and Supplementary Table S1 (DEGs, up and down, respectively). Venn diagrams show common mRNAs between miRNA targets and their corresponding brain DEG lists. Bubble plots display GO terms for these common genes. Bubble size represents gene count; color represents −log10(p-value). Data shown upregulated or downregulated in PS19 mice compared to WT (~9.6 months old, n = 8 per group, equal number of male and female). Non-coding RNAs (ncRNAs), microRNAs (miRNAs), circular RNAs (circRNAs), small nucleolar RNAs (snoRNAs), small nuclear RNAs (snRNAs), and transfer RNAs (tRNAs).
Figure 3. Differences in expression of cortical non-coding RNAs in PS19 mice and associated biological pathways of their host genes or predicted targets. (A) Bar graph shows the distribution of five ncRNA types (circRNA, snoRNA, snRNA, miRNA, and tRNA) from the cortex based on annotated counts identified with COMPSRA. (B) Volcano plot of differentially expressed total brain ncRNAs comparing PS19 and WT mice (247 up and 219 down in PS19 mice), (D) circRNAs (178 up, 153 down), (G) miRNAs (12 up, 45 down), (J) tRNAs (27 up, 3 down), (K) snoRNAs (28 up, 18 down), and (L) snRNAs (2 up) in PS19 mice compared to WT. Red, blue and gray denote significantly upregulated and downregulated differentially expressed ncRNAs and non-significant ncRNAs defined by Wald test p < 0.05 in PS19 mice compared to WT, respectively. The results were considered significant with p < 0.05. (C) Donut chart summarizing significantly enriched [up + down; shown in (D,G,J–L)] ncRNA subtypes detected in brain tissue shown in (A). (E,F) DAVID was used to generate the bubble plots of GO enrichment analysis of the host genes (obtained from circBase) of upregulated (E) and downregulated (F) circRNAs. (H,I) Integration of significantly downregulated and upregulated brain miRNA targets (obtained using TargetScan mouse) with their corresponding brain mRNA data identified in Figure 2 and Supplementary Table S1 (DEGs, up and down, respectively). Venn diagrams show common mRNAs between miRNA targets and their corresponding brain DEG lists. Bubble plots display GO terms for these common genes. Bubble size represents gene count; color represents −log10(p-value). Data shown upregulated or downregulated in PS19 mice compared to WT (~9.6 months old, n = 8 per group, equal number of male and female). Non-coding RNAs (ncRNAs), microRNAs (miRNAs), circular RNAs (circRNAs), small nucleolar RNAs (snoRNAs), small nuclear RNAs (snRNAs), and transfer RNAs (tRNAs).
Ijms 27 05050 g003
GO and KEGG analysis of host genes associated with the 178 upregulated circRNAs in the PS19 cortex revealed enrichment in processes related to chromatin remodeling and transcriptional regulation, as well as neurodevelopmental programs, including nervous system development, axonogenesis, axon guidance and neuron migration (Figure 3E). These pathways are typically engaged during neuronal differentiation and synapse formation, suggesting reactivation of developmental and epigenetic programs that may reflect an attempt to maintain or reorganize neuronal identity in the context of ongoing synaptic stress. In contrast, host genes associated with the 153 downregulated circRNAs were predominantly enriched for processes directly linked to synaptic structure and function, including chemical synaptic transmission, neuron projection development, glutamatergic synapse, cerebral cortex development, chromatin remodeling, and pathways of neurodegeneration (Figure 3F). The loss of circRNAs associated with these categories points more directly to impaired synaptic signaling and neuronal connectivity in the PS19 brain cortex. Taken together, although the upregulated and downregulated circRNA-associated gene sets initially appear to highlight distinct biological themes, both converge on pathways intimately linked to synaptic integrity and neuronal plasticity, consistent with progressive synaptic dysfunction in tauopathy. To evaluate miRNA-mediated regulatory effects, we integrated predicted mRNA targets of 45 downregulated miRNAs in the PS19 cortex (n = 16,611) with upregulated mRNAs (n = 568), identifying 478 shared genes associated with immune- and inflammation-related processes, including immune system response, inflammatory response, positive regulation of phagocytosis, and cytokine signaling pathways (Figure 3H). These pathways are hallmarks of genes related to microglial activation and innate immune signaling, indicating that loss of specific miRNAs may release repression on inflammatory gene networks in the PS19 cortex. Conversely, integration of mRNA targets of 12 upregulated miRNAs (n = 12,619) with downregulated mRNAs (n = 349) revealed 192 common genes enriched for metabolic and neuronal plasticity-related processes, including cholesterol and sterol biosynthesis, isoprenoid biosynthesis, long-term memory, and regulation of transcription by RNA polymerase II (Figure 3I). These pathways are essential for membrane homeostasis, synaptic function, and transcriptional control, suggesting that increased miRNA expression contributes to the suppression of genes related to core metabolic and cognitive-supporting programs in the PS19 cortex. Together, this integrated miRNA–mRNA regulatory landscape indicates a coordinated shift toward upregulation of genes related to neuroinflammatory signaling alongside repression of genes associated with metabolic and neuronal maintenance pathways, consistent with the transcriptomic alterations observed in Figure 2D,E and Supplementary Table S1. Thus, the cortical miRNA profile may contribute to regulation of genes involved in inflammatory activation and metabolic failure in the PS19 brain. In contrast to the circRNA expression signature, which primarily reflects genes associated with synaptic dysfunction and adaptive responses to synaptic loss, miRNA-mediated regulation appears to operate upstream by reshaping immune and metabolic gene networks that potentially could exacerbate neuronal vulnerability during tauopathy progression.
To investigate the regulatory landscape of circRNA-mediated gene expression, a comprehensive competing endogenous RNA (ceRNA) network was constructed based on brain circRNA–miRNA–mRNA interactions. Within this network, 341 differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were identified as participating in significant ceRNA regulatory triads, defined as more than 20 interaction connections, indicating high regulatory centrality (and Supplementary Table S3 and Supplementary Figure S1).
To further characterize the biological relevance of these genes, GO and KEGG pathway enrichment analyses were performed separately for upregulated and downregulated mRNAs derived from brain tissue (and Supplementary Table S3 and Supplementary Figure S1). The enriched GO terms and pathways displayed substantial overlap with those identified in the previous analyses of brain mRNA expression, miRNA targets, and circRNA-associated regulatory modules shown in Figure 2 and Figure 3. Importantly, the convergence of functional enrichment results across these independent datasets suggests a coordinated regulatory mechanism, whereby circRNAs influence gene expression through miRNA sponging effects within the ceRNA network. These findings provide additional evidence supporting the functional significance of circRNA–miRNA interactions in modulating key biological pathways in the brain. Lastly, the ceRNA network situates several miRNAs (miR-3059-3p, mir-5114, mir-5126, mir-155-5p) as potenital regulators of genes important in inflammatory response and metabolic activity.

2.3. Physical and Molecular Characterization of EVs Isolated from Plasma of PS19 and WT Mice

To assess whether central molecular perturbations are reflected in peripheral biofluids via ncRNAs, we performed physical and molecular characterization of pEVs, hypothesizing that their cargo may reflect aspects of the brain’s transcriptomic state. We isolated EVs from 200 μL of mouse plasma from both PS19 and WT mice using Total Exosome Isolation (TEI) workflow precipitation method described. Microfluidic Resistive Pulse Sensing (MRPS) analysis using the Spectradyne nCS2 confirmed a characteristic size distribution with a peak between 65 and 200 nm, with no significant difference between WT and PS19 groups, aligning with MISEV2023 guidelines for defining small EV fractions [27] (Figure 4A). Total particle concentration was not different between groups with approximately 1 × 1012 particles/mL, and no significant differences were observed in distribution metrics D10, D50, or D90 (indicate the size below which 10%, the median particle size, and the size below which 90% of the particles fall, respectively) between WT and PS19 groups (p > 0.05; Figure 4B,C). This consistency aligns with clinical findings where pEV concentration remains stable while molecular cargo could change significantly in neurodegenerative diseases [48,49].
Western blot analysis (n = 4 per group) confirmed the presence of canonical tetraspanin markers CD63 and CD81, with intensity quantification showing no significant difference in abundance between WT and PS19 pEV lysates, consistent with findings in other tau-transgenic mouse models [50,51]. The absence of Calnexin confirmed the purity of the preparations and the exclusion of intracellular contaminants (Figure 4D). The stable physical characteristics of these pEVs across groups established a reliable baseline for the subsequent analysis of changes in their disease-associated molecular cargos.
We should note that while the precipitation-based isolation method provided a high particle yield comparable with ultracentrifugation, contamination with plasma albumin or lipoproteins was unavoidable but this did not interfere with the downstream analysis.

2.4. Detailed Profiling of ncRNA Cargo from EVs Isolated from Plasma of PS19 and WT Mice

Following physical and molecular validation of pEVs, we next profiled their ncRNA cargo to assess whether circulating EVs reflect molecular alterations observed in the PS19 cortex when compared to WT. Annotation of pEV ncRNA subclasses detected total 15,157 ncRNAs (Figure 5A and Supplementary Table S4), and among them, 822 were differentially enriched ncRNAs in PS19 mice compared to WT (581 upregulated and 241 downregulated; Figure 5B). As in the cortex, circRNAs represented the dominant differentially abundant species (n = 657; ~80%), with a bias toward upregulation (518 circRNAs) in PS19 pEVs compared to WT (Figure 5C,D). Significant alterations were also observed in other ncRNA classes, including miRNAs (10 upregulated, 28 downregulated; Figure 5G), snoRNAs (6 upregulated, 74 downregulated; Figure 5J), and tRNAs (47 upregulated; Figure 5K), indicating broad but class-specific remodeling of the pEV ncRNA landscape in PS19 mice compared to WT.
Functional enrichment analysis of host genes associated with upregulated circRNAs in PS19 pEVs highlighted pathways related to chromatin remodeling and transcriptional regulation, as well as neuronal and synaptic processes, including learning, axon guidance, axonogenesis, postsynaptic receptor localization, and neuron projection development (Figure 5E). These terms are central to synaptic organization and plasticity, suggesting that circRNA cargo within pEVs captures neuronal responses to synaptic stress. Notably, this signature closely mirrors the enrichment profile of upregulated circRNAs in the PS19 cortex (Figure 3E and Supplementary Table S2), supporting the idea that circulating pEV circRNAs reflect central synaptic remodeling and degeneration-associated responses in tauopathy. GO analysis of host genes associated with downregulated circRNAs in PS19 pEVs revealed enrichment for pathways involved in synaptic organization and maintenance, including synaptic transmission, synapse assembly, and regulation of axonogenesis, alongside chromatin remodeling (Figure 5F). The coordinated loss of circRNAs linked to these processes is consistent with impaired synaptic integrity and mirrors the functional signature observed for downregulated circRNAs in the PS19 cortex compared to WT (Figure 3F and Supplementary Table S2).
Notably, downregulated circRNAs host genes were associated with protein K48-linked ubiquitination, highlighting disruption of genes important in the proteostatic machinery of PS19 mice. K48-linked ubiquitin chains serve as the canonical signal for proteasomal degradation, a pathway that is perturbed by toxic tau species, leading to impaired protein clearance. This finding aligns with evidence from Drosophila tauopathy models and Alzheimer’s disease postmortem brain tissue, where tau-associated proteasome dysfunction contributes to synaptic and neuronal degeneration [52,53,54,55]. Together, these data suggest that pEV circRNAs serve as an indicator of not only synaptic decline but also proteostasis defects that are central to tau-mediated neurodegeneration.
Integration of pEV miRNA gene targets with cortical mRNA expression revealed a functional and statistical concordance between circulating pEV-associated ncRNAs and brain mRNA transcriptome. Predicted mRNA targets of 28 downregulated miRNAs from PS19 pEVs compared to WT (n = 16,270) overlapped with 454 upregulated mRNAs in the PS19 cortex and were enriched for genes associated with immune-related pathways, including immune system response, inflammatory response, regulation of phagocytosis, and cytokine signaling (Figure 5H). This pathway enrichment closely mirrors the regulatory signature observed for downregulated cortical miRNAs intersecting with upregulated mRNAs in PS19 mice (Figure 3H and Supplementary Table S2). Conversely, predicted mRNA targets of 10 upregulated miRNAs from PS19 pEVs (n = 10,436) intersected with 165 downregulated cortical mRNAs, revealing enrichment for genes associated with metabolic and transcriptional pathways such as cholesterol and steroid biosynthesis, isoprenoid biosynthesis, and regulation of transcription by RNA polymerase II (Figure 5I and Supplementary Table S4). These functional categories directly recapitulate the GO terms identified for upregulated cortical miRNAs and downregulated mRNAs in the PS19 cortex (Figure 3I and Supplementary Table S2). Collectively, these data indicate that the ncRNA cargo of circulating pEVs—particularly miRNAs—serves as a potential peripheral marker of the metabolic suppression and inflammatory activation occurring in the tauopathic brain [56,57,58,59,60,61,62]. Together with the circRNA findings, these results suggest that pEV ncRNA profiles encode a functional candidate signature that may reflect brain inflammatory and metabolic landscape of PS19 mice compared to WT mice, supporting their potential utility as potential peripheral indicators of central tau neurodegeneration.

2.5. Integration of Functional Analysis of ncRNAs in Brain and EVs from PS19 Compared to WT Mice

Network-based analysis of significantly differentially changed ncRNAs (excluding the uncharacterized GM subtypes) revealed a highly coordinated relationship between ncRNAs from cortical brain tissue (green nodes) and circulating pEVs (blue nodes) across groups (Figure 6A and Supplementary Table S5). The resulting correlation network was dominated by negative correlations (blue edges), indicating that changes in cortical ncRNA expression levels were inversely related in pEV ncRNA cargos, while positive correlations (red edges) were less frequent. Within this network, miR-203 and miR-487b emerged as central hub nodes, positioning them as key mediators of brain–periphery communication. The strong negative correlation of these miRNAs between cortex and pEVs suggests that their peripheral abundance may serve as a surrogate biomarker of ncRNAs that regulate genes important in the brain inflammatory state, highlighting specific ncRNA clusters as potential non-invasive ‘liquid biopsy’ candidates for neurodegenerative conditions.
To further assess brain contributions of pEV miRNA cargos, we compared highly expressed cortical miRNAs (average expression > 500 CPM; n = 185) with 38 significantly differentially abundant pEV miRNAs, identifying 11 miRNAs that are highly expressed in brain and differentially abundant in pEVs of PS19 mice compared to WT (Figure 6B and Supplementary Table S6). Notably, this group included miR-203-3p, reinforcing its role as a brain-derived mediator of peripheral signaling, consistent with its central hub node in Figure 6A and Supplementary Table S5.
Functional annotation of 437 shared target mRNAs derived from downregulated miRNAs in the cortex (n = 16,611) and pEVs (n = 16,270), intersected with 568 upregulated cortical mRNAs, revealed consistent enrichment of genes associated with immune-related processes, including immune system response, inflammatory response, cytokine signaling pathways, and regulation of phagocytosis across both compartments (Figure 6C and Supplementary Table S6). In contrast, 133 shared target mRNAs associated with upregulated miRNAs in the cortex (n = 12,619) and pEVs (n = 10,436), intersecting with 349 downregulated cortical mRNAs, were enriched with genes associated with pathways related to cholesterol and sterol biosynthesis, positive regulation of transcription by RNA polymerase II, and long-term memory (Figure 6D). Together, these analyses suggests that ncRNA abundance patterns in circulating pEVs may partially reflect the transcriptional responses associated with inflammatory activation and metabolic repression observed in the PS19 brain compared to WT. This convergence across compartments further supports the concept that pEV ncRNA profiles—particularly miRNA networks—serve as peripheral indicators of brain pathological processes during tauopathy.

2.6. Shared ncRNA Signatures Between the Brain and pEV of PS19 Mice Compared to WT

Finally, we integrated transcriptomic datasets across cortical tissue and circulating pEVs to identify convergent molecular signatures and assess the capacity of pEV-derived ncRNAs to reflect central tauopathy-associated changes. This analysis revealed a discrete shared signature of 33 ncRNAs that showed significant differential expression in the brain and differential abundance in pEVs of PS19 mice compared with WT (Figure 7). This overlapping signature was overwhelmingly dominated by circRNAs (32 of 33), most of which exhibited concordant differentially enrichment in both brain and pEVs. Notably, circRNAs such as circ_0008242 and circ_0002153 were consistently upregulated in both brain and pEVs, whereas circ_0007688 was significantly reduced in both compartments (Figure 7(1i–ii)).
In addition to concordant regulation, several circRNAs displayed inverse expression–enrichment patterns between brain and pEVs. Specifically, six circRNAs were upregulated in the brain but downregulated in pEVs (Figure 7(1iii)), while twenty-three circRNAs were downregulated in the brain yet upregulated in pEVs of PS19 mice compared to WT (Figure 7(1iv)), consistent with selective ncRNA export into the peripheral circulation during disease progression.
Among miRNAs, miR-5114 emerged as the sole differentially abundant species shared between brain and pEVs, exhibiting increased levels in the PS19 cortex and reduced abundance in pEVs isolated from PS19 mice relative to WT (Figure 7(2) and Supplementary Table S7). Comparison shown 193 mRNAs were common between predicted miR-5114 gene targets (n = 6282) and upregulated cortical mRNAs revealed association of genes important in innate immune and inflammatory pathways (Figure 7(2a)). In contrast, analysis of 100 shared mRNAs intersecting with downregulated cortical mRNAs identified genes related to neuronal function and adaptation, including long-term memory, response to hypoxia, and positive regulation of transcription by RNA polymerase II (Figure 7(2b)).
Together, these findings identify miR-5114 as miRNA altered in both brain and pEVs of PS19 mice compared to WT and has common gene targets with cortical DEGs associated with inflammatory activation, with repression of neuronal maintenance processes. More broadly, the convergence of circRNA- and miRNA-based candidate signatures across brain and pEVs highlights a compact, disease-relevant ncRNA network warranting further investigation as a potential non-invasive indicator for brain tauopathy.

3. Discussion

The simultaneous profiling of cortical mRNA, ncRNA, and pEV ncRNA in PS19 mice was used to test the hypothesis that the central molecular landscape of tauopathy is reflected in peripheral biofluids through EV-mediated transport. Our findings reveal that tau pathology in the PS19 cortex is associated with a pronounced transcriptional response associated with neuroinflammation dominated by genes associated with microglial activation and DAM gene induction. Furthermore, the transcriptional response was associated with a metabolic alteration characterized by suppression of oxidative phosphorylation and cholesterol biosynthesis, and a remarkably broad ncRNA differentially enriched landscape in which circRNAs emerge as the most perturbed class in both brain tissue and circulating pEVs. These results suggest a conserved neurodegenerative transcriptional response and the potential of ncRNAs as both mechanistic partial regulators of gene expression and peripheral indicators of tauopathy.

3.1. Conservation of Neuroinflammatory and Metabolic Transcriptomic Signature Across Neurodegenerative Models and Human Disease

The dominant transcriptomic features identified in the PS19 cortex—specifically microglial DAM induction, inflammatory pathway upregulation, and metabolic gene suppression in PS19 compared to WT mice—are conserved across various models of neurodegeneration and human disease. The enrichment of upregulated brain DEGs in antigen processing and presentation, myeloid leukocyte activation, and positive regulation of phagocytosis is also consistent with tau fibril-induced microglial activation via TLR2/MyD88/NF-κB signaling [33] and supports the concept that tau aggregates are recognized as damage-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs) by innate immune receptors. While DAM activation is considered partially protective—enhancing phagocytic clearance of toxic tau species—chronic activation of these pathways facilitates tau spreading through small EV release of seeding-competent tau fragments [63,64,65], creating a vicious cycle of inflammation and progressive tauopathy.
Santos et al. used WGCNA co-expression analysis in PS19, rTg4510, and GRN-haplo-insufficient mice to identify co-expression modules that were highly preserved in human postmortem FTD and AD brains, demonstrating conservation of the microglial/inflammatory and neuronal/synaptic gene modules [15,16,66]. We also observed transcriptomic patterns in the PS19 cortex consistent with conserved responses to neurodegeneration reported in other models. The downregulation of genes associated with oxidative phosphorylation in PS19 mice compared to WT reflects a metabolic failure common to human AD, often attributed to hyperphosphorylated tau-mediated disruption of the electron transport chain and mitochondrial transport impairment as shown in transgenic mouse models using proteomics and functional assays [33,41,42,43,45,67]. Furthermore, the suppression of cholesterol biosynthesis in PS19 cortex compared to WT is significant, as cholesterol homeostasis is essential for synaptic integrity and its disruption is linked to accelerated tau phosphorylation in human-derived iPSC models [68,69,70,71]. The co-suppression of long-term memory-related gene programs alongside metabolic failure suggests that bioenergetic insufficiency may underlie early cognitive deficits in PS19 mice, a hypothesis supported by spatial transcriptomic data showing early downregulation of genes associated with ATP metabolic process in vulnerable hippocampal subfields [72]. These findings confirm that the PS19 model recapitulates the fundamental transcriptomic shifts observed in human tauopathy, providing a valid framework for biomarker discovery.

3.2. CircRNA Differential Expression as a Significant Feature of Tauopathy ncRNA Biology

The increased differential enrichment of circRNAs in both the brain cortex (71%) and pEVs (80%) of PS19 mice compared to WT is the most striking finding of this study and confirms the importance of this subtype in the tauopathy landscape. circRNAs are stabilized by their covalently closed structure and are enriched at synapses where they regulate neuronal plasticity; their perturbation in the PS19 brain suggests a fundamental shift in synaptic regulatory architecture [73,74,75,76,77,78,79]. A mechanistic link between tau pathology and circRNA biogenesis was established by Atrian et al. [21], who used m6A-seq and circRNA-seq in Drosophila tauopathy models and iPSC-derived neurons to demonstrate that tau-induced N6-methyladenosine (m6A) RNA methylation is associated with circRNA biogenesis, leading to neurotoxic circRNA elevation. Our data extend these findings to the PS19 mammalian model and in both brain and pEVs, showing that hundreds of circRNAs are altered in PS19 mice compared to WT, with a notable preference toward upregulation in pEVs (518 species upregulated in PS19 pEVs compared to WT). This m6A-circRNA axis may explain why circRNA differential expression is so extensive in our PS19 dataset: widespread tau-induced m6A modifications could trigger global alterations in back-splicing rates across hundreds of loci [21,22]. circRNAs can sponge miRNAs and thereby inhibit them from downregulating the translation of their target mRNAs. Upregulated brain circRNAs may sponge miRNAs that would eventually suppress synaptic transmission genes, while downregulated circRNAs may release suppression of chromatin remodeling and neuronal structural genes—resulting in a bidirectional disruption of neural circuitry maintenance. The enrichment of downregulated pEV circRNA host genes associated with ‘Protein K48-linked ubiquitination’ is of biological significance, as the proteasomal degradation pathway is a primary target of tau-mediated toxicity across models [19,80,81,82]. Selective loading of circRNAs into EVs is a regulated process involving EV biogenesis machinery and altered circRNA packaging may also reflect tau neurodegenerative changes in multivesicular body biology or altered expression in source cells (neurons, microglia, endothelial cells) contributing to the circulating pEV pool. Studies profiling circRNAs in plasma of patients with AD have identified differential circRNA signatures that could discriminate AD from MCI and healthy controls [20], supporting the translational relevance of our findings. The GO pathway convergence between brain and pEV circRNA host gene networks—particularly for synaptic transmission and neurodevelopmental pathways—are consistent with the possibility that pEV circRNA cargo may partially reflects genuine brain transcriptional changes rather than peripheral systemic responses.

3.3. miRNA Regulatory Networks Linking Brain and Plasma EVs in PS19 Mice

Our miRNA integration analyses reveal a coherent picture in which both brain-derived and pEV-derived miRNAs have target genes which converge on the suppression of genes associated with cholesterol/sterol biosynthesis and amplification of immune and inflammatory responses in PS19 mice compared to WT. This convergence raises the possibility that miRNA profiles in plasma EVs may not solely represent a random sampling of circulating RNA, though selective export mechanisms require direct experimental validation.
The identification of miR-126a-3p, miR-335-3p, and miR-300-3p, among the most differentially abundant miRNAs in pEVs that are also highly expressed in the brain, is of particular interest. miR-126-3p is a well-established regulator of vascular integrity and angiogenesis, predominantly expressed by endothelial cells, and has been reported to be significantly downregulated in plasma-derived EVs of patients with AD [56,57,58,59,60,61,62]. Its shared differentially enrichment across brain tissue and circulating pEVs in PS19 mice raises the possibility that endothelial cell-derived EVs carrying miR-126 reflect tau-associated vascular compromise, consistent with evidence of blood–brain barrier disruption in PS19 mice and in human tauopathy. miR-335-3p has been shown to regulate cellular stress responses and has been identified in panels of AD-responsive peripheral miRNAs with reported roles in regulating synaptic plasticity genes relevant to memory consolidation [83]. The co-regulation of genes important in cholesterol biosynthetic pathway by both brain miRNAs and pEV miRNAs—where upregulated miRNAs target cholesterol biosynthesis genes whose mRNAs are simultaneously downregulated in the brain transcriptome—suggests an integrated multi-level suppression of lipid metabolism in tauopathy. This pattern is consistent with the broader recognition that disrupted brain cholesterol homeostasis is an early and pathogenically important event in AD, and that miRNA-mediated post-transcriptional suppression of genes may compound the transcriptional downregulation of biosynthetic enzymes identified in our mRNA data.

3.4. Preliminary Evidence for Brain–Plasma EV Correlation and Its Mechanistic Basis in Tauopathy

A central translational goal of this study was to determine the extent to which plasma EV ncRNA cargo correlates with the central brain transcriptome in tauopathy. Our integration analyses demonstrate that the GO pathway enrichments for pEV miRNA target genes and brain circRNA regulatory networks converge on identical biological themes—specifically genes associated with cholesterol biosynthesis suppression and immune activation in PS19 compared to WT—suggesting a high degree of functional alignment between the brain and peripheral compartments. This brain-to-plasma EV alignment is mechanistically supported by the findings of Ruan et al. [84,85], who demonstrated that EVs isolated from human AD brains and injected into wild-type mouse hippocampi could initiate tauopathy, establishing that EVs could be functional carriers of tau-related molecular information. The candidate ncRNA signatures, including miR-126a-3p and miR-335-3p, which were significantly downregulated in PS19 pEVs compared to WT, further support this link. miR-126-3p is a critical regulator of vascular integrity, and its differential abundance in PS19 compared to WT mice mirrors observations in plasma-derived EVs of a patient with AD, where levels correlate with disease severity [3,56,57,58,59,83]. These cross-compartment correlations provide preliminary evidence consistent with the hypothesis that the ncRNA cargos of circulating plasma EVs may partially track the transcriptional state of the brain in tauopathy.

3.5. Potential of Plasma EV ncRNA Cargos as Peripheral Indicators of Tau Pathology

The degree of statistical and functional compartmental convergence and the identification of shared ncRNA species suggest that plasma EV transcriptomics warrant further investigation as potential indicators of AD pathogenesis and tracking disease progression. miRNAs such as miR-126a-3p and miR-335-3p, which we found significantly downregulated in PS19 pEVs compared to WT, have been validated in human clinical studies as biomarkers that discriminate between AD and healthy controls with high sensitivity and specificity [3,84,85,86]. For instance, clinical studies using small RNA sequencing of neuron-derived EVs from human plasma identified miR-126-3p as part of a panel that correlates with temporal cortical thickness on MRI [32,87] and reflects underlying vascular-to-neuronal signaling deficits. The unique shared candidate signature of brain and pEVS, including miR-5114 and the 32 circRNAs we identified in PS19 compared to WT, provides a specific potential peripheral indicator that may reflect early central changes prior to overt dementia. Recent evidence suggests that circRNAs function as molecular sponges for microRNAs involved in synaptic plasticity and memory, positioning them not just as markers, but as active participants in the regulation of cognition and cognitive diseases [88]. The identified shared ncRNAs, including miR-5114 and circRNA species like circ_0008242, circ_0002153, circ_0007688 present several advantages as non-invasive peripheral indicators. Their presence in EVs ensures protection from systemic RNases, granting them superior stability compared to free-floating transcripts, while their compartmental origin allows them to directly reflect the biochemical status of the CNS in a peripheral biofluid [89,90,91,92,93,94]. Their compartmental origin—specifically if enriched for brain-specific markers like L1CAM or NCAM or APLP1+ -allows them to better reflect the biochemical status of the CNS in a peripheral biofluid, bypassing the dilution effects of general plasma RNA [95,96,97,98,99,100,101]. Because these molecules are associated with neuroinflammatory and metabolic transcriptional shifts that preceded neuronal loss, they may represent candidates for tracking the transition from pre-symptomatic tau accumulation to overt neurodegeneration. In summary, these preliminary brain–plasma EV ncRNA candidate signatures identified in this study provide foundation for further developing studies explore their potential as non-invasive molecular tools to monitor the progression of tauopathy.

3.6. Limitations

While this study provides a comprehensive multi-compartment atlas of tauopathy, several limitations must be acknowledged. First, the PS19 model is a model of primary tauopathy and does not capture the complex amyloid-tau synergy present in sporadic human AD. Second, this study utilized a single time point (~9.6 months), capturing a stage of advanced tauopathy. Longitudinal studies across multiple ages would be necessary to determine the temporal dynamics of these ncRNA candidate signatures and identify the earliest detectable peripheral markers of central pathology in PS19 mice compared to WT. Third, our analysis used raw Wald test threshold of p < 0.05 to capture a broad, discovery-oriented view of transcriptional alterations across cortical mRNA, cortical ncRNA, and pEV ncRNA datasets. This approach was intended to maximize sensitivity for identifying coordinated cross-compartment patterns and shared candidate molecular signatures that might not remain detectable under stringent multiple-testing correction. Fourth, our analysis of pEVs focused on the total circulating pool. While EVs are known to cross the blood-brain barrier, the plasma compartment contains a highly heterogeneous mixture of vesicles derived from various tissues, which may dilute CNS-specific signals. Future studies employing immuno-affinity enrichment for CNS-specific markers (e.g., L1CAM) would likely enhance the sensitivity of detecting brain-derived signatures. The current study is based on a preclinical PS19 mouse model, a single disease stage, total pEVs, and a limited sample size, where pEV ncRNA profiles show functional and statistical concordance with brain transcriptomic changes. This establishes a hypothesis and foundational data that requires further confirmation in independent preclinical models, longitudinal studies, and ultimately human samples.
Finally, while we have identified shared candidate signatures and convergent pathways, functional validation of the identified circRNAs and miR-5114 in primary cell systems is required to elucidate their exact mechanistic roles in tau-mediated neurodegeneration.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Animals

The PS19 mouse strain (B6;C3-Tg(Prnp-MAPT*P301S)PS19Vle/J; (C57BL/6xC3H)F1) was purchased from The Jackson Laboratory (Bar Harbor, ME, USA) and was used experimentally as heterozygous. Wild-type (WT) littermates were internally bred. All animal studies were approved by the University of Pittsburgh Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) and conducted in accordance with the guidelines of the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals. Mice were housed in a 12:12 h light–dark cycle with unrestricted access to food and water. Eight mice per group (equal number of male and female per group) were used for all experiments.

4.2. Tissue and Plasma Processing

Mice were anesthetized with Avertin (1.25% tribromoethanol, 2.5% 2-methyl-2-butanol; 250 mg/kg, intraperitoneally). Blood was collected intracardially using an EDTA-treated syringe, followed by transcardial perfusion with chilled 20 mL of 0.1 M PBS (pH 7.4). Plasma was obtained by centrifugation at 13,000× g for 5 min. For brain tissue RNA isolation, one hemisphere was dissected to use ~10 mg of cortex after removing the cerebellum, olfactory bulb, and subcortex. The other hemisphere was fixed in 4% phosphate-buffered paraformaldehyde at 4 °C for 48 h before being transferred to 30% sucrose for storage at 4 °C. Fixed hemibrains were embedded in O.C.T., sectioned coronally at 30 µm using CryoStar NX50 cryostat (Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA), and stored in a glycol-based cryoprotectant at −20 °C until histological staining. All other samples were snap-frozen in dry ice before long-term storage at −80 °C.

4.3. RNA Isolation

Brain mRNA and ncRNA were isolated from 10 mg of prefrontal cortex using the Norgen MicroRNA Isolation Kit (#21300, Thorold, ON, Canada). Tissue was dissociated in RLT buffer (#74106, Qiagen RNeasy Mini Kit, Hilden, Germany) with 10% beta-mercaptoethanol, homogenized through a 25G needle, and passed through a QIAshredder (#79656, Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) prior to RNA isolation per manufacturer’s protocol. pEVs were isolated from 200 µL plasma using the Total Exosome Isolation Kit (#4484450, Invitrogen, Vilnius, Lithuania) following the manufacturer’s protocol. EV RNA was extracted using the ExoQuick Exosome RNA Purification Column Kit (EQ808A, SBI, Palo Alto, CA, USA). RNA quality and quantity were assessed using the RNA Pico 6000 Kit for the Agilent 2100 Bioanalyzer (part ID: 5067-1513, Waldbronn, Germany).

4.4. EV Characterization

EVs were analyzed by MRPS using the nCS2 instrument (Spectradyne LLC, Signal Hill, CA, USA) with C-400 microfluidic cartridges. Samples were diluted in 0.02 µm-filtered (Whatman Anotop 25/0.025, #6809-2102, Cytiva, Dassel, Germany) 1% Tween-20 in PBS and analyzed for a minimum of 30 runs with default settings. Western blotting was performed using EV lysates with cOmplete, EDTA-free Protease Inhibitor Cocktail (#11873580001) and Roche PhosSTOP (#4906837001) in 4–12% Bis-Tris WedgeWell gels (#NW04125BOX, Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) transferred to nitrocellulose membranes (iblot 3 transfer stack, #IB33001, Invitrogen, Israel) using iblot3 transfer system (#IB31001, Invitrogen, Singapore). These membranes were washed and blocked in TBS Blocking buffer (#37579, Thermoscientific, IL), and then probed with EV-specific antibodies, including anti-CD63 (#PA5-92370, Rockford, IL, USA, 1:500 dilution o/n at 4 °C), followed by goat anti-rabbit HRP (#A27036, Invitrogen, India, 1:10,000 dilution for 1 h at RT), and anti-CD81 (sc-7637, 1:200 o/n at 4 °C), followed by goat anti-Mouse HRP (A28177, Invitrogen, Bengaluru, India; 1:3000 dilution for 1 h at RT). Also, we probed for endoplasmic reticulum (ER)-specific Calnexin (ab22595, abcam, UK, 1:1000 dilution o/n at 4 °C), followed by goat anti-rabbit HRP (A27036, 1:10,000 for 1 h at RT). Immunoreactive signals were visualized using enhanced chemiluminescence (TMA-6, Lumigen ECL Ultra, MI, USA) with the Amersham Imager 600 (GE Lifescience, Uppsala, Sweden).

4.5. Library Preparation and Sequencing

mRNA libraries were generated using the SMART-Seq mRNA Kit (#634773, Takara Bio, San Jose, CA) combined with the Nextera XT DNA Library Preparation Kit (#FC-131-1096, Illumina Inc., San Diego, CA, USA) and Illumina DNA/RNA UD Indexes Set A (#20091654, Illumina, CA). Small ncRNA libraries were prepared using the NEBNext Multiplex Small RNA Library Prep Set (#E7560S, New England Biolabs, Inc., Ipswich, MA, USA). All libraries were sequenced on the NextSeq 2000 (Illumina, CA), generating paired-end reads for mRNA and single-end reads for small RNA at the Health Sciences Sequencing Core, University of Pittsburgh Children’s Hospital.

4.6. Bioinformatics Analysis

Brain mRNA data were aligned to the mouse reference genome (mm10) using Rsubread (v2.16.1) [102] and annotated with org.Mm.eg.db (v3.19.1). Differential expression was analyzed with edgeR (v4.0.16) [103]. ncRNA libraries were aligned and quality-checked using STAR (v2.5.3a) with COMPSRA (v1.0.3) [104] and differential abundance was determined by DESeq2 (v1.42.1) [105]. Genes and ncRNAs with raw Wald test p < 0.05 were considered differentially expressed. For ncRNA, GO enrichment analyses were performed using DAVID 2025 web-tool [106,107] with a p-value cut-off of <0.05. For mRNA analyses, functional relationships among differentially expressed genes were assessed using enrichment analysis performed with Metascape (v3.5) [47]. Significantly enriched Gene Ontology (GO) terms were subsequently visualized as a network in Cytoscape (v3.10.4) [108], where each node represents an individual GO term and edges indicate shared gene membership. Functional clusters within the network were identified using the MCODE plugin [104]. To enhance network clarity and visual interpretability, edge bundling and manual layout adjustments were applied in Cytoscape (v3.x) [108]. In the final network representation, nodes are color-coded according to their assigned functional clusters, and node size is scaled to reflect enrichment significance (p-value). circRNA-associated genes were predicted using circbase (v1.0) [109]. miRNA target predictions were performed using TargetScanMouse Release 8.0 [110].
To investigate cross-tissue relationships between brain and extracellular vesicle (EV) ncRNA profiles, a correlation network was constructed in R (v4.x) [111]. Expression values for brain- and EV-derived ncRNAs were treated as separate feature matrices and all pairwise Spearman correlations between brain and EV ncRNA pairs were computed using cor.test(1.0.7) [112] (two-sided, continuity-corrected). Edges were retained if they met the following criteria: raw p < 0.05, |ρ| ≥ 0.75. Nodes with fewer than 10 cross-tissue interactions in the initial filtered edge set (p < 0.05, |ρ| ≥ 0.75) were excluded; a small number of retained nodes may fall below this threshold in the final network due to the single-pass application of the degree filter (For example: Node A had 10 brain interactions initially. Node B (one of its EV partners) had only 8 and was dropped. Now, Node A has 9 but it already passed the filter). Within-tissue pairs (brain–brain and EV–EV) were excluded from analysis. The resulting network was constructed using igraph (v1.x) and visualized using ggraph (v2.x), with node color encoding tissue of origin (brain: green; EV: blue), node size scaled to the number of interactions, and edge color and width reflecting correlation direction and magnitude, respectively. The network was additionally exported in GraphML format for interactive exploration in Cytoscape (v3.10.4) [108], where node shape and fill color were mapped to tissue source and edge width to |ρ|.
CeRNA networks were analyzed utilizing a correlation matrix approach. Spearman correlations were performed on all significantly affected brain miRNAs, circRNAs, and mRNA, with significant interactions defined as p < 0.05. CeRNA miRNAs–circRNAs–mRNA interaction triplets were defined by significant correlation with further filtering of circRNA–mRNA r > 0.4; circRNA–miRNA r < −0.3; miRNA–mRNA r < −0.3 and at least 20 connections. The network was additionally exported in GraphML format for interactive exploration in Cytoscape (v3.10.4), showing the top 5% of ceRNA interaction triplets.

4.7. Immunohistochemistry

To characterize changes in activated microglia in the vicinity of the infusion site, a series of six brain sections from each animal was immunostained with anti-IBA1 antibody. Six coronal sections per mouse (3 male, 3 female) were immunostained using Alexa Fluor 594-conjugated anti-IBA1 antibody (48934, Cell Signaling Technology Inc., Danvers, MA, USA). Free-floating sections were washed in PBS, subjected to antigen retrieval (50 mM sodium citrate, 0.05% Tween-20, pH 9, 80 °C, 30 min), blocked in 5% normal rabbit serum (0.2% Triton X-100/PBS, 1 h), and incubated with primary antibody (1:500) overnight at 4 °C, followed by 1 h incubation at RT. Slides were mounted and imaged at 20× magnification on a Nikon Eclipse 90i microscope (Nikon Instruments, Inc., Melville, NY, USA) equipped with pco.panda 4.2M camera (Excelitas PCO GmbH, Kelheim, Germany). The number of IBA1-positive microglia was quantified per field (four fields per section, six sections per mouse) using Nikon NIS Elements software.

4.8. Statistical Analysis

Statistical analyses and visualizations were performed using GraphPad Prism (v10.0.3) and a p-value of <0.05 was considered significant.

5. Conclusions

In summary, this study provides the first integrated multi-compartment transcriptomic atlas of the PS19 tauopathy model, demonstrating that cortical tau accumulation is associated with a coordinated molecular response across brain and peripheral plasma EV compartments. Our analysis revealed evidence of transition from homeostatic to DAM gene signature and downregulation of cholesterol biosynthesis transcriptional response in PS19 mice compared to WT. We established that the circular RNA landscape is the most numerically perturbed non-coding RNA biotype in both the cortical tissue and pEVs, identifying a candidate signature of 33 shared differentially enriched ncRNAs in PS19 mice compared to WT controls—including miR-5114 and circ_0008242, circ_0002153, circ_0007688 —that is associated with central pathology. These findings suggest that the non-coding cargo of circulating plasma EVs in PS19 mice may partially reflect central neuroinflammatory and metabolic gene expression profile, providing a preliminary, exploratory foundation for the development of non-invasive molecular indicators to monitor AD progression and evaluate therapeutic interventions.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/ijms27115050/s1.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, R.K. and I.L.; methodology, T.T.L. and A.N.M.M.-O.-R.; software, T.T.L., A.N.M.M.-O.-R., D.C.L. and N.F.F.; validation, T.T.L. and A.N.M.M.-O.-R.; formal analysis, T.T.L., A.N.M.M.-O.-R. and D.C.L.; investigation, T.T.L. and A.N.M.M.-O.-R.; resources, N.F.F., R.K. and I.L.; data curation, T.T.L. and A.N.M.M.-O.-R.; writing—original draft preparation, T.T.L. and A.N.M.M.-O.-R.; writing—review and editing, D.C.L., N.F.F., R.K. and I.L.; visualization, T.T.L., A.N.M.M.-O.-R. and D.C.L.; supervision, N.F.F., R.K. and I.L.; project administration, N.F.F., R.K. and I.L.; funding acquisition, N.F.F., R.K. and I.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the grants provided to Radosveta Koldamova and Iliya Lefterov, grant number R01 AG077636, R01 AG075992, and Nicholas Francis Fitz, grant number R01 AG075069.

Institutional Review Board Statement

All animal studies were approved by the University of Pittsburgh Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (Protocol # 24024421, Approved 29 February 2024) and conducted in accordance with the guidelines of the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data that support the findings of this study were deposited to NCBI Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database and are publicly available. GEO submission numbers for pEV ncRNA, brain ncRNA and brain mRNA are GSE333357, GSE333358 and GSE333191, respectively.

Acknowledgments

We would like to acknowledge Amanda E. Moore for helping with the pEV and RNA isolation, and library generation.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Abbreviations

The following abbreviations are used in this manuscript:
WTWild-Type
mRNAMessenger Ribonucleic Acid
ncRNANon-coding RNA
pEVPlasma Small Extracellular Vesicle
DEGsDifferentially Expressed Genes
DAMDisease-Associated Microglia
circRNAsCircular RNAs
miRNAMicro-RNA
ADAlzheimer’s Disease
NFTsNeurofibrillary Tangles
AβAmyloid-Beta
MAPTMicrotubule-Associated Protein Tau
FTDFrontotemporal Dementia
PS19 lineP301S Transgenic Mouse
WGCNAWeighted Gene Co-expression Network Analysis
snoRNAsSmall Nucleolar RNAs
tRNAsTransfer RNAs
iPSCsInduced Pluripotent Stem Cells
m6AN6-methyladenosine
L1CAML1 Cell Adhesion Molecule
GOGene Ontology
KEGGKyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes
IHCImmunohistochemistry
snRNASmall Nuclear RNA
MRPSMicrofluidic Resistive Pulse Sensing
DAMPsDamage-Associated Molecular Patterns
NCAMNeural Cell Adhesion Molecule
APLP1+Amyloid Beta Precursor Like Protein 1
IACUCInstitutional Animal Care and Use Committee
EREndoplasmic Reticulum
HRPHorseradish Peroxidase

References

  1. Gonzalez, A.; Geywitz, S.; Maccioni, R.B. Alzheimer’s disease: Where do we stand now and what are the strategic interventions? Front. Cell Neurosci. 2025, 19, 1655342. [Google Scholar]
  2. Jack, C.R., Jr.; Andrews, J.S.; Beach, T.G.; Buracchio, T.; Dunn, B.; Graf, A.; Hansson, O.; Ho, C.; Jagust, W.; McDade, E.; et al. Revised criteria for diagnosis and staging of Alzheimer’s disease: Alzheimer’s Association Workgroup. Alzheimer’s Dement. 2024, 20, 5143–5169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  3. Aharon, A.; Spector, P.; Ahmad, R.S.; Horrany, N.; Sabbach, A.; Brenner, B.; Aharon-Peretz, J. Extracellular Vesicles of Alzheimer’s Disease Patients as a Biomarker for Disease Progression. Mol. Neurobiol. 2020, 57, 4156–4169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  4. Alavi Naini, S.M.; Soussi-Yanicostas, N. Tau Hyperphosphorylation and Oxidative Stress, a Critical Vicious Circle in Neurodegenerative Tauopathies? Oxid. Med. Cell Longev. 2015, 2015, 151979. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  5. Medeiros, R.; Baglietto-Vargas, D.; LaFerla, F.M. The role of tau in Alzheimer’s disease and related disorders. CNS Neurosci. Ther. 2011, 17, 514–524. [Google Scholar]
  6. Creekmore, B.C.; Watanabe, R.; Lee, E.B. Neurodegenerative Disease Tauopathies. Annu. Rev. Pathol. 2024, 19, 345–370. [Google Scholar]
  7. Cario, A.; Berger, C.L. Tau, microtubule dynamics, and axonal transport: New paradigms for neurodegenerative disease. Bioessays 2023, 45, e2200138. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  8. Chiodini, I.; Liuzzi, A. PRL-secreting pituitary adenomas in pregnancy. J. Endocrinol. Investig. 2003, 26, 96–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  9. Takeuchi, H.; Iba, M.; Inoue, H.; Higuchi, M.; Takao, K.; Tsukita, K.; Karatsu, Y.; Iwamoto, Y.; Miyakawa, T.; Suhara, T.; et al. P301S mutant human tau transgenic mice manifest early symptoms of human tauopathies with dementia and altered sensorimotor gating. PLoS ONE 2011, 6, e21050. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  10. Woerman, A.L.; Patel, S.; Kazmi, S.A.; Oehler, A.; Freyman, Y.; Espiritu, L.; Cotter, R.; Castaneda, J.A.; Olson, S.H.; Prusiner, S.B. Kinetics of Human Mutant Tau Prion Formation in the Brains of 2 Transgenic Mouse Lines. JAMA Neurol. 2017, 74, 1464–1472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  11. Yoshiyama, Y.; Higuchi, M.; Zhang, B.; Huang, S.M.; Iwata, N.; Saido, T.C.; Maeda, J.; Suhara, T.; Trojanowski, J.Q.; Lee, V.M. Synapse loss and microglial activation precede tangles in a P301S tauopathy mouse model. Neuron 2007, 53, 337–351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  12. Patel, H.; Martinez, P.; Perkins, A.; Taylor, X.; Jury, N.; McKinzie, D.; Lasagna-Reeves, C.A. Pathological tau and reactive astrogliosis are associated with distinct functional deficits in a mouse model of tauopathy. Neurobiol. Aging 2022, 109, 52–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  13. Xia, Y.; Prokop, S.; Bell, B.M.; Gorion, K.M.; Croft, C.L.; Nasif, L.; Xu, G.; Riffe, C.J.; Manaois, A.N.; Strang, K.H.; et al. Pathogenic tau recruits wild-type tau into brain inclusions and induces gut degeneration in transgenic SPAM mice. Commun. Biol. 2022, 5, 446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  14. Alves, R.L.; Goncalves, A.; Voytyuk, I.; Harrison, D.C. Behaviour profile characterization of PS19 and rTg4510 tauopathy mouse models: A systematic review and a meta-analysis. Exp. Neurol. 2025, 389, 115234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  15. Kim, H.; Kim, Y.; Lee, C.Y.; Kim, D.G.; Cheon, M. Investigation of early molecular alterations in tauopathy with generative adversarial networks. Sci. Rep. 2023, 13, 732. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  16. Swarup, V.; Hinz, F.I.; Rexach, J.E.; Noguchi, K.I.; Toyoshiba, H.; Oda, A.; Hirai, K.; Sarkar, A.; Seyfried, N.T.; Cheng, C.; et al. Identification of evolutionarily conserved gene networks mediating neurodegenerative dementia. Nat. Med. 2019, 25, 152–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  17. Hong, J.; Ge, C.; Jothikumar, P.; Yuan, Z.; Liu, B.; Bai, K.; Li, K.; Rittase, W.; Shinzawa, M.; Zhang, Y.; et al. A TCR mechanotransduction signaling loop induces negative selection in the thymus. Nat. Immunol. 2018, 19, 1379–1390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  18. Wu, D.P.; Zhao, Y.D.; Yan, Q.Q.; Liu, L.L.; Wei, Y.S.; Huang, J.L. Circular RNAs: Emerging players in brain aging and neurodegenerative diseases. J. Pathol. 2023, 259, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  19. Gokool, A.; Loy, C.T.; Halliday, G.M.; Voineagu, I. Circular RNAs: The Brain Transcriptome Comes Full Circle. Trends Neurosci. 2020, 43, 752–766. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  20. Li, Y.; Lv, Z.; Zhang, J.; Ma, Q.; Li, Q.; Song, L.; Gong, L.; Zhu, Y.; Li, X.; Hao, Y.; et al. Profiling of differentially expressed circular RNAs in peripheral blood mononuclear cells from Alzheimer’s disease patients. Metab. Brain Dis. 2020, 35, 201–213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  21. Atrian, F.; Ramirez, P.; De Mange, J.; Marquez, M.; Gonzalez, E.M.; Minaya, M.; Karch, C.M.; Frost, B. m6A-dependent circular RNA formation mediates tau-induced neurotoxicity. bioRxiv 2024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  22. Baumann, K. Tau oligomers are linked to m(6)A-RNA. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2021, 22, 650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  23. Pan, R.; Chen, D.; Hou, L.; Hu, R.; Jiao, Z. Small extracellular vesicles: A novel drug delivery system for neurodegenerative disorders. Front. Aging Neurosci. 2023, 15, 1184435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  24. Wang, K.; He, S.; Wang, Y.; Guo, S.; Zhang, F.; Wang, Y.; Dong, W.; Zhang, L.; Wang, X.; Li, Y. Extracellular vesicles: A new frontier in deciphering the mechanisms of traditional Chinese medicine. Pharmacol. Res. 2025, 219, 107890. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  25. Salim, M.W.; Zhang, W.; Collins-Praino, L.; Wang, Y.; Care, A. Small Extracellular Vesicles from Neural Cells: Physiological and Pathological Roles, and Potential in Neurodegenerative Therapy. Adv. Healthc. Mater. 2026, e04608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  26. Pascual, M.; Ibanez, F.; Guerri, C. Exosomes as mediators of neuron-glia communication in neuroinflammation. Neural Regen. Res. 2020, 15, 796–801. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  27. Welsh, J.A.; Goberdhan, D.C.I.; O’Driscoll, L.; Buzas, E.I.; Blenkiron, C.; Bussolati, B.; Cai, H.; Di Vizio, D.; Driedonks, T.A.P.; Erdbrugger, U.; et al. Minimal information for studies of extracellular vesicles (MISEV2023): From basic to advanced approaches. J. Extracell. Vesicles 2024, 13, e12404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  28. Fitz, N.F.; Kumar, A.; Su, Y.; Sharma, M.; Singh, S.; Koldamova, R.; Lefterov, I.; Sahu, A.; Ambrosio, F.; Rosano, C.; et al. Serum-Derived Extracellular Vesicles as Biological Indicator of Mobility Resilience in Older Adults. Aging Cell 2026, 25, e70470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  29. Fitz, N.F.; Alam, M.S.; Ostach, M.A.; Garg, S.; Lefterov, I.; Koldamova, R. A novel technique for monitoring Alzheimer’s disease associated changes in brain-derived extracellular vesicle cargos in mouse models. bioRxiv 2026. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  30. Cavanaugh, C.A.; Moore, A.E.; Fitz, N.F.; Lefterov, I.; Koldamova, R. Transcriptomic Response to Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation in Muscle, Brain, and Plasma EVs in WT and Klotho-Deficient Mice. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2025, 26, 7849. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  31. Fitz, N.F.; Wang, J.; Kamboh, M.I.; Koldamova, R.; Lefterov, I. Small nucleolar RNAs in plasma extracellular vesicles and their discriminatory power as diagnostic biomarkers of Alzheimer’s disease. Neurobiol. Dis. 2021, 159, 105481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  32. Kumar, A.; Su, Y.; Sharma, M.; Singh, S.; Kim, S.; Peavey, J.J.; Suerken, C.K.; Lockhart, S.N.; Whitlow, C.T.; Craft, S.; et al. MicroRNA expression in extracellular vesicles as a novel blood-based biomarker for Alzheimer’s disease. Alzheimer’s Dement. 2023, 19, 4952–4966. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  33. Dutta, D.; Jana, M.; Paidi, R.K.; Majumder, M.; Raha, S.; Dasarathy, S.; Pahan, K. Tau fibrils induce glial inflammation and neuropathology via TLR2 in Alzheimer’s disease-related mouse models. J. Clin. Investig. 2023, 133, e161987. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  34. Lu, Y.; Saibro-Girardi, C.; Fitz, N.F.; McGuire, M.R.; Ostach, M.A.; Mamun-Or-Rashid, A.N.M.; Lefterov, I.; Koldamova, R. Multi-transcriptomics reveals brain cellular responses to peripheral infection in Alzheimer’s disease model mice. Cell Rep. 2023, 42, 112785. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  35. Fitz, N.F.; Nam, K.N.; Wolfe, C.M.; Letronne, F.; Playso, B.E.; Iordanova, B.E.; Kozai, T.D.Y.; Biedrzycki, R.J.; Kagan, V.E.; Tyurina, Y.Y.; et al. Phospholipids of APOE lipoproteins activate microglia in an isoform-specific manner in preclinical models of Alzheimer’s disease. Nat. Commun. 2021, 12, 3416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  36. McKenzie, A.T.; Wang, M.; Hauberg, M.E.; Fullard, J.F.; Kozlenkov, A.; Keenan, A.; Hurd, Y.L.; Dracheva, S.; Casaccia, P.; Roussos, P.; et al. Brain Cell Type Specific Gene Expression and Co-expression Network Architectures. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 8868, Correction in Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 19430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  37. Ximerakis, M.; Lipnick, S.L.; Innes, B.T.; Simmons, S.K.; Adiconis, X.; Dionne, D.; Mayweather, B.A.; Nguyen, L.; Niziolek, Z.; Ozek, C.; et al. Single-cell transcriptomic profiling of the aging mouse brain. Nat. Neurosci. 2019, 22, 1696–1708. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  38. Zeisel, A.; Hochgerner, H.; Lonnerberg, P.; Johnsson, A.; Memic, F.; van der Zwan, J.; Haring, M.; Braun, E.; Borm, L.E.; La Manno, G.; et al. Molecular Architecture of the Mouse Nervous System. Cell 2018, 174, 999–1014.e22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  39. Zeisel, A.; Munoz-Manchado, A.B.; Codeluppi, S.; Lonnerberg, P.; La Manno, G.; Jureus, A.; Marques, S.; Munguba, H.; He, L.; Betsholtz, C.; et al. Brain structure. Cell types in the mouse cortex and hippocampus revealed by single-cell RNA-seq. Science 2015, 347, 1138–1142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  40. Zhang, Y.; Chen, K.; Sloan, S.A.; Bennett, M.L.; Scholze, A.R.; O’Keeffe, S.; Phatnani, H.P.; Guarnieri, P.; Caneda, C.; Ruderisch, N.; et al. An RNA-sequencing transcriptome and splicing database of glia, neurons, and vascular cells of the cerebral cortex. J. Neurosci. 2014, 34, 11929–11947, Erratum in J. Neurosci. 2015, 35, 864–866. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  41. Gao, T.; Jernigan, J.; Raza, S.A.; Dammer, E.B.; Xiao, H.; Seyfried, N.T.; Levey, A.I.; Rangaraju, S. Transcriptional regulation of homeostatic and disease-associated-microglial genes by IRF1, LXRbeta, and CEBPalpha. Glia 2019, 67, 1958–1975. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  42. Sobue, A.; Komine, O.; Hara, Y.; Endo, F.; Mizoguchi, H.; Watanabe, S.; Murayama, S.; Saito, T.; Saido, T.C.; Sahara, N.; et al. Microglial gene signature reveals loss of homeostatic microglia associated with neurodegeneration of Alzheimer’s disease. Acta Neuropathol. Commun. 2021, 9, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  43. Chen, Y.; Colonna, M. Microglia in Alzheimer’s disease at single-cell level. Are there common patterns in humans and mice? J. Exp. Med. 2021, 218, e20202717. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  44. Wang, C.; Fan, L.; Khawaja, R.R.; Liu, B.; Zhan, L.; Kodama, L.; Chin, M.; Li, Y.; Le, D.; Zhou, Y.; et al. Microglial NF-kappaB drives tau spreading and toxicity in a mouse model of tauopathy. Nat. Commun. 2022, 13, 1969. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  45. Mondragon-Rodriguez, S.; Perry, G.; Zhu, X.; Moreira, P.I.; Acevedo-Aquino, M.C.; Williams, S. Phosphorylation of tau protein as the link between oxidative stress, mitochondrial dysfunction, and connectivity failure: Implications for Alzheimer’s disease. Oxid. Med. Cell Longev. 2013, 2013, 940603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  46. Quntanilla, R.A.; Tapia-Monsalves, C. The Role of Mitochondrial Impairment in Alzheimer s Disease Neurodegeneration: The Tau Connection. Curr. Neuropharmacol. 2020, 18, 1076–1091. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  47. Zhou, Y.; Zhou, B.; Pache, L.; Chang, M.; Khodabakhshi, A.H.; Tanaseichuk, O.; Benner, C.; Chanda, S.K. Metascape provides a biologist-oriented resource for the analysis of systems-level datasets. Nat. Commun. 2019, 10, 1523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  48. Dixson, A.C.; Dawson, T.R.; Di Vizio, D.; Weaver, A.M. Context-specific regulation of extracellular vesicle biogenesis and cargo selection. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2023, 24, 454–476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  49. Zhao, Z.; Wijerathne, H.; Godwin, A.K.; Soper, S.A. Isolation and analysis methods of extracellular vesicles (EVs). Extracell. Vesicles Circ. Nucl. Acids 2021, 2, 80–103, Correction in Extracell. Vesicles Circ. Nucl. Acids 2021, 2, 222. [Google Scholar]
  50. Fan, Y.; Pionneau, C.; Cocozza, F.; Boelle, P.Y.; Chardonnet, S.; Charrin, S.; Thery, C.; Zimmermann, P.; Rubinstein, E. Differential proteomics argues against a general role for CD9, CD81 or CD63 in the sorting of proteins into extracellular vesicles. J. Extracell. Vesicles 2023, 12, e12352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  51. Simon, M.; Fan, Y.; Acloque, H.; Rubinstein, E.; Burtey, A. The intercellular transfer of extracellular vesicles markers CD63, CD9 and CD81 is spatially polarized and restricted to cell vicinity. bioRxiv 2026. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  52. Li, L.; Jiang, Y.; Wang, J.Z.; Liu, R.; Wang, X. Tau Ubiquitination in Alzheimer’s Disease. Front. Neurol. 2021, 12, 786353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  53. Cao, Q.; Kumar, M.; Frazier, A.; Williams, J.B.; Zhao, S.; Yan, Z. Longitudinal characterization of behavioral, morphological and transcriptomic changes in a tauopathy mouse model. Aging 2023, 15, 11697–11719. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  54. You, X.; Vlatkovic, I.; Babic, A.; Will, T.; Epstein, I.; Tushev, G.; Akbalik, G.; Wang, M.; Glock, C.; Quedenau, C.; et al. Neural circular RNAs are derived from synaptic genes and regulated by development and plasticity. Nat. Neurosci. 2015, 18, 603–610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  55. Sun, T.; Zeng, L.; Cai, Z.; Liu, Q.; Li, Z.; Liu, R. Comprehensive analysis of dysregulated circular RNAs and construction of a ceRNA network involved in the pathology of Alzheimer’s disease in a 5 x FAD mouse model. Front. Aging Neurosci. 2022, 14, 1020699. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  56. Gonullu, S.; Aydin, S.; Celik, H.; Celik, O.; Kucukler, S.; Topal, A.; Akay, R.; Yildiz, M.O.; Alim, B.; Ozdemir, S. Milk-derived miR-126-3p-loaded small extracellular vesicles attenuate amyloid-beta-induced cellular stress in a neuroblastoma cell model. BMC Neurosci. 2026, 27, 17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  57. Xue, B.; Qu, Y.; Zhang, X.; Xu, X.F. miRNA-126a-3p participates in hippocampal memory via alzheimer’s disease-related proteins. Cereb. Cortex 2022, 32, 4763–4781. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  58. Giudici, G.; Fenoglio, C.; Serpente, M.; Arighi, A.; Arcaro, M.; Delvecchio, G.; Brambilla, P.; Sacchi, L.; Pintus, M.; Borracci, V.; et al. Comparison of neuron-derived extracellular vesicles miRNA profile between patients with behavioural variant frontotemporal dementia and primary psychiatric disorders. Neurobiol. Dis. 2025, 216, 107132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  59. Chum, P.P.; Hakim, M.A.; Behringer, E.J. Cerebrovascular microRNA Expression Profile During Early Development of Alzheimer’s Disease in a Mouse Model. J. Alzheimers Dis. 2022, 85, 91–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  60. Wang, S.; Aurora, A.B.; Johnson, B.A.; Qi, X.; McAnally, J.; Hill, J.A.; Richardson, J.A.; Bassel-Duby, R.; Olson, E.N. The endothelial-specific microRNA miR-126 governs vascular integrity and angiogenesis. Dev. Cell 2008, 15, 261–271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  61. Yu, B.; Jiang, Y.; Wang, X.; Wang, S. An integrated hypothesis for miR-126 in vascular disease. Med. Res. Arch. 2020, 8, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  62. Liao, L.; Tang, Y.; Zhou, Y.; Meng, X.; Li, B.; Zhang, X. MicroRNA-126 (MiR-126): Key roles in related diseases. J. Physiol. Biochem. 2024, 80, 277–286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  63. Odfalk, K.F.; Bieniek, K.F.; Hopp, S.C. Microglia: Friend and foe in tauopathy. Prog. Neurobiol. 2022, 216, 102306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  64. Wang, Y.; Martinez-Vicente, M.; Kruger, U.; Kaushik, S.; Wong, E.; Mandelkow, E.M.; Cuervo, A.M.; Mandelkow, E. Tau fragmentation, aggregation and clearance: The dual role of lysosomal processing. Hum. Mol. Genet. 2009, 18, 4153–4170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  65. Guo, M.; Hao, Y.; Feng, Y.; Li, H.; Mao, Y.; Dong, Q.; Cui, M. Microglial Exosomes in Neurodegenerative Disease. Front. Mol. Neurosci. 2021, 14, 630808. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  66. Santos, V.B.; Abdullah, M.; Ellison, J.; Ravula, A.R.; Radhakishun, S.; You, Y.; Liang, Z.; Ikezu, S.; Ikezu, T. P2RX7 deficiency prevents tau-mediated neurodegeneration via regulation of microglial response and suppression of extracellular vesicles containing tau and toxic mitochondrial content. Alzheimer’s Dement. 2025, 21, e103649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  67. Maeda, J.; Minamihisamatsu, T.; Shimojo, M.; Zhou, X.; Ono, M.; Matsuba, Y.; Ji, B.; Ishii, H.; Ogawa, M.; Akatsu, H.; et al. Distinct microglial response against Alzheimer’s amyloid and tau pathologies characterized by P2Y12 receptor. Brain Commun. 2021, 3, fcab011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  68. Lam, M.; Kuo, S.Y.; Reis, S.; Gestwicki, J.E.; Silva, M.C.; Haggarty, S.J. Cholesterol Dysregulation Drives Seed-Dependent Tau Aggregation in Patient Stem Cell-Derived Models of Tauopathy. bioRxiv 2023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  69. Shin, K.C.; Ali Moussa, H.Y.; Park, Y. Cholesterol imbalance and neurotransmission defects in neurodegeneration. Exp. Mol. Med. 2024, 56, 1685–1690. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  70. Arenas, F.; Garcia-Ruiz, C.; Fernandez-Checa, J.C. Intracellular Cholesterol Trafficking and Impact in Neurodegeneration. Front. Mol. Neurosci. 2017, 10, 382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  71. Raut, S.; Bhalerao, A.; Powers, M.; Gonzalez, M.; Mancuso, S.; Cucullo, L. Hypometabolism, Alzheimer’s Disease, and Possible Therapeutic Targets: An Overview. Cells 2023, 12, 2019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  72. Wang, S.; Ponnusamy, M.; Patel, O.; Hansen, M.; Collier, L.; Collier, S.; Thinakaran, G. Spatiotemporal transcriptomic profiling reveals metabolic dysfunction prior to overt tauopathy in the PS19 mouse model. Res. Sq. 2025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  73. Huang, S.; Song, Z.; Pan, J.; Luo, Y.; Chen, Y. The emerging role of circular RNAs in neuropsychiatric disorders. Transl. Psychiatry 2025, 16, 45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  74. Olcay, A. Circular RNAs as a novel player in synaptic transmission and neuropsychiatric disorders. Neuropsychopharmacology 2025, 50, 1195–1196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  75. Hatzimanolis, O.; Sykes, A.M.; Cristino, A.S. Circular RNAs in neurological conditions—Computational identification, functional validation, and potential clinical applications. Mol. Psychiatry 2025, 30, 1652–1675. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  76. Zimmerman, A.J.; Hafez, A.K.; Amoah, S.K.; Rodriguez, B.A.; Dell’Orco, M.; Lozano, E.; Hartley, B.J.; Alural, B.; Lalonde, J.; Chander, P.; et al. A psychiatric disease-related circular RNA controls synaptic gene expression and cognition. Mol. Psychiatry 2020, 25, 2712–2727. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  77. Pala, M.; Yilmaz, S.G. Circular RNAs, miRNAs, and Exosomes: Their Roles and Importance in Amyloid-Beta and Tau Pathologies in Alzheimer’s Disease. Neural Plast. 2025, 2025, 9581369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  78. Sekar, S.; Cuyugan, L.; Adkins, J.; Geiger, P.; Liang, W.S. Circular RNA expression and regulatory network prediction in posterior cingulate astrocytes in elderly subjects. BMC Genom. 2018, 19, 340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  79. Shen, X.; He, Y.; Ge, C. Role of circRNA in pathogenesis of Alzheimer’s disease. Zhong Nan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban 2022, 47, 960–966. [Google Scholar]
  80. Kim, Y.; Kim, E.K.; Chey, Y.; Song, M.J.; Jang, H.H. Targeted Protein Degradation: Principles and Applications of the Proteasome. Cells 2023, 12, 1846. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  81. Kiss, L.; James, L.C.; Schulman, B.A. UbiREAD deciphers proteasomal degradation code of homotypic and branched K48 and K63 ubiquitin chains. Mol. Cell 2025, 85, 1467–1476.e6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  82. Manohar, S.; Jacob, S.; Wang, J.; Wiechecki, K.A.; Koh, H.W.L.; Simoes, V.; Choi, H.; Vogel, C.; Silva, G.M. Polyubiquitin Chains Linked by Lysine Residue 48 (K48) Selectively Target Oxidized Proteins In Vivo. Antioxid. Redox Signal 2019, 31, 1133–1149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  83. Raihan, O.; Brishti, A.; Molla, M.R.; Li, W.; Zhang, Q.; Xu, P.; Khan, M.I.; Zhang, J.; Liu, Q. The Age-dependent Elevation of miR-335-3p Leads to Reduced Cholesterol and Impaired Memory in Brain. Neuroscience 2018, 390, 160–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  84. Ruan, Z. Extracellular vesicles drive tau spreading in Alzheimer’s disease. Neural Regen. Res. 2022, 17, 328–329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  85. Ruan, Z.; Pathak, D.; Venkatesan Kalavai, S.; Yoshii-Kitahara, A.; Muraoka, S.; Bhatt, N.; Takamatsu-Yukawa, K.; Hu, J.; Wang, Y.; Hersh, S.; et al. Alzheimer’s disease brain-derived extracellular vesicles spread tau pathology in interneurons. Brain 2021, 144, 288–309, Erratum in Brain 2021, 144, e42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  86. Lo Curto, A.; Taverna, S.; Costa, M.A.; Passantino, R.; Augello, G.; Adamo, G.; Aiello, A.; Colomba, P.; Zizzo, C.; Zora, M.; et al. Can Be miR-126-3p a Biomarker of Premature Aging? An Ex Vivo and In Vitro Study in Fabry Disease. Cells 2021, 10, 356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  87. Petracci, I.; Bellini, S.; Goljanek-Whysall, K.; Quinlan, L.R.; Fiszer, A.; Cakmak, A.; Njume, C.M.; Borroni, B.; Ghidoni, R. Exploring the Role of microRNAs as Blood Biomarkers in Alzheimer’s Disease and Frontotemporal Dementia. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2025, 26, 3399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  88. Yu, X.; Liu, H.; Chang, N.; Fu, W.; Guo, Z.; Wang, Y. Circular RNAs: New players involved in the regulation of cognition and cognitive diseases. Front. Neurosci. 2023, 17, 1097878. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  89. Ziaei, A.; Kargar, M.; Shirvani-Farsani, Z.; MehrabMohseni, M. Emerging roles of circular RNAs and enhancer RNAs: New insights into the development and management of neurodegenerative disorders. Biomark. Res. 2026, 14, 25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  90. Zhou, J.; Qiu, C.; Fan, Z.; Liu, T.; Liu, T. Circular RNAs in stem cell differentiation: A sponge-like role for miRNAs. Int. J. Med. Sci. 2021, 18, 2438–2448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  91. Abuduwaili, Z.; Fan, Y.; Tao, W.; Chen, Y.; Xu, Y.; Zhu, X. The Role of circRNAs in the Pathological Mechanisms of Alzheimer’s Disease: Potential Biomarkers for Diagnosis. Curr. Neuropharmacol. 2025, 23, 635–649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  92. Ren, S.; Lin, P.; Wang, J.; Yu, H.; Lv, T.; Sun, L.; Du, G. Circular RNAs: Promising Molecular Biomarkers of Human Aging-Related Diseases via Functioning as an miRNA Sponge. Mol. Ther. Methods Clin. Dev. 2020, 18, 215–229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  93. Hoffmann, M.; Schwartz, L.; Ciora, O.A.; Trummer, N.; Willruth, L.L.; Jankowski, J.; Lee, H.K.; Baumbach, J.; Furth, P.A.; Hennighausen, L.; et al. circRNA-sponging: A pipeline for extensive analysis of circRNA expression and their role in miRNA sponging. Bioinform. Adv. 2023, 3, vbad093. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  94. Kulcheski, F.R.; Christoff, A.P.; Margis, R. Circular RNAs are miRNA sponges and can be used as a new class of biomarker. J. Biotechnol. 2016, 238, 42–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  95. Gomes, D.E.; Witwer, K.W. L1CAM-associated extracellular vesicles: A systematic review of nomenclature, sources, separation, and characterization. J. Extracell. Biol. 2022, 1, e35, Correction in J. Extracell. Biol. 2025, 4, e70070. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  96. Karnati, H.K.; Garcia, J.H.; Tweedie, D.; Becker, R.E.; Kapogiannis, D.; Greig, N.H. Neuronal Enriched Extracellular Vesicle Proteins as Biomarkers for Traumatic Brain Injury. J. Neurotrauma 2019, 36, 975–987. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  97. Choi, Y.; Park, J.H.; Jo, A.; Lim, C.W.; Park, J.M.; Hwang, J.W.; Lee, K.S.; Kim, Y.S.; Lee, H.; Moon, J. Blood-derived APLP1(+) extracellular vesicles are potential biomarkers for the early diagnosis of brain diseases. Sci. Adv. 2025, 11, eado6894. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  98. Nogueras-Ortiz, C.J.; Eren, E.; Yao, P.; Calzada, E.; Dunn, C.; Volpert, O.; Delgado-Peraza, F.; Mustapic, M.; Lyashkov, A.; Rubio, F.J.; et al. Single-extracellular vesicle (EV) analyses validate the use of L1 Cell Adhesion Molecule (L1CAM) as a reliable biomarker of neuron-derived EVs. J. Extracell. Vesicles 2024, 13, e12459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  99. Mustapic, M.; Eitan, E.; Werner, J.K., Jr.; Berkowitz, S.T.; Lazaropoulos, M.P.; Tran, J.; Goetzl, E.J.; Kapogiannis, D. Plasma Extracellular Vesicles Enriched for Neuronal Origin: A Potential Window into Brain Pathologic Processes. Front. Neurosci. 2017, 11, 278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  100. Wang, L.; Zhang, X.; Yang, Z.; Wang, B.; Gong, H.; Zhang, K.; Lin, Y.; Sun, M. Extracellular vesicles: Biological mechanisms and emerging therapeutic opportunities in neurodegenerative diseases. Transl. Neurodegener. 2024, 13, 60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  101. Yu, Y.; Wang, Z.; Chai, Z.; Ma, S.; Li, A.; Li, Y. Central Nervous System-Derived Extracellular Vesicles as Biomarkers in Alzheimer’s Disease. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2025, 26, 8272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  102. Liao, Y.; Smyth, G.K.; Shi, W. The R package Rsubread is easier, faster, cheaper and better for alignment and quantification of RNA sequencing reads. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019, 47, e47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  103. Chen, Y.; Chen, L.; Lun, A.T.L.; Baldoni, P.L.; Smyth, G.K. edgeR v4: Powerful differential analysis of sequencing data with expanded functionality and improved support for small counts and larger datasets. Nucleic Acids Res. 2025, 53, gkaf018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  104. Bader, G.D.; Hogue, C.W. An automated method for finding molecular complexes in large protein interaction networks. BMC Bioinform. 2003, 4, 2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  105. Torres-Oliva, M.; Almudi, I.; McGregor, A.P.; Posnien, N. A robust (re-)annotation approach to generate unbiased mapping references for RNA-seq-based analyses of differential expression across closely related species. BMC Genom. 2016, 17, 392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  106. Sherman, B.T.; Hao, M.; Qiu, J.; Jiao, X.; Baseler, M.W.; Lane, H.C.; Imamichi, T.; Chang, W. DAVID: A web server for functional enrichment analysis and functional annotation of gene lists (2021 update). Nucleic Acids Res. 2022, 50, W216–W221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  107. Huang, D.W.; Sherman, B.T.; Lempicki, R.A. Systematic and integrative analysis of large gene lists using DAVID bioinformatics resources. Nat. Protoc. 2009, 4, 44–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  108. Shannon, P.; Markiel, A.; Ozier, O.; Baliga, N.S.; Wang, J.T.; Ramage, D.; Amin, N.; Schwikowski, B.; Ideker, T. Cytoscape: A software environment for integrated models of biomolecular interaction networks. Genome Res. 2003, 13, 2498–2504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  109. Glazar, P.; Papavasileiou, P.; Rajewsky, N. circBase: A database for circular RNAs. RNA 2014, 20, 1666–1670. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  110. McGeary, S.E.; Lin, K.S.; Shi, C.Y.; Pham, T.M.; Bisaria, N.; Kelley, G.M.; Bartel, D.P. The biochemical basis of microRNA targeting efficacy. Science 2019, 366, eaav1741. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  111. The R Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Available online: https://cran.r-project.org/doc/manuals/r-release/fullrefman.pdf (accessed on 26 April 2026).
  112. Yu, D.; Zhang, Z.; Glass, K.; Su, J.; DeMeo, D.L.; Tantisira, K.; Weiss, S.T.; Qiu, W. New Statistical Methods for Constructing Robust Differential Correlation Networks to characterize the interactions among microRNAs. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 3499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Schematic diagram of the study design. Brain cortex and plasma were collected from 8 WT and 8 PS19 mice (equal distribution of males and females, ~9.6 months old). Cortical tissue (~10 mg) was processed for parallel mRNA and small non-coding RNA (ncRNA) isolation. Plasma (~200 μL) was used for EV isolation via precipitation-based methods, followed by ncRNA extraction. Following library generation and sequencing, data integration was performed to identify convergent candidate molecular signatures across compartments. The figure was created using BioRender.com. (web-based; accessed on 2 April 2026).
Figure 1. Schematic diagram of the study design. Brain cortex and plasma were collected from 8 WT and 8 PS19 mice (equal distribution of males and females, ~9.6 months old). Cortical tissue (~10 mg) was processed for parallel mRNA and small non-coding RNA (ncRNA) isolation. Plasma (~200 μL) was used for EV isolation via precipitation-based methods, followed by ncRNA extraction. Following library generation and sequencing, data integration was performed to identify convergent candidate molecular signatures across compartments. The figure was created using BioRender.com. (web-based; accessed on 2 April 2026).
Ijms 27 05050 g001
Figure 4. No difference in the characterization of EVs isolated from the plasma of PS19 and WT mice. (A) Representative Spectradyne particle analysis plots showing EV concentration and diameter in WT (top) and PS19 (bottom) mice. Quantification of Spectradyne particle analysis with bar graphs showing no significant (ns) difference in EV concentration (B) and EV size (C) between WT and PS19 mice. D10, D50 and D90 indicate the size below which 10%, the median particle size, and the size below which 90% of the particles fall, respectively. (D) Western blot of EV lysates showing EV tetraspanin markers, CD63 and CD81, and negative control marker, calnexin (left) and band intensity analysis for CD63 (center) and CD81 (right) showing no difference between the experimental groups (~9.7 months old, n = 4, equal number of male and female per group). t-test was done for statistical analysis; ‘ns’ denotes ‘not significant’.
Figure 4. No difference in the characterization of EVs isolated from the plasma of PS19 and WT mice. (A) Representative Spectradyne particle analysis plots showing EV concentration and diameter in WT (top) and PS19 (bottom) mice. Quantification of Spectradyne particle analysis with bar graphs showing no significant (ns) difference in EV concentration (B) and EV size (C) between WT and PS19 mice. D10, D50 and D90 indicate the size below which 10%, the median particle size, and the size below which 90% of the particles fall, respectively. (D) Western blot of EV lysates showing EV tetraspanin markers, CD63 and CD81, and negative control marker, calnexin (left) and band intensity analysis for CD63 (center) and CD81 (right) showing no difference between the experimental groups (~9.7 months old, n = 4, equal number of male and female per group). t-test was done for statistical analysis; ‘ns’ denotes ‘not significant’.
Ijms 27 05050 g004
Figure 5. Differential abundance and functional analysis of ncRNAs cargos from plasma EVs of PS19 and WT mice. (A) Bar graph shows the distribution of five ncRNA types (circRNA, snoRNA, snRNA, miRNA, and tRNA) in pEVs, based on annotated counts by COMPSRA. (B) Volcano plot of all differentially enriched ncRNA in pEVs of PS19 mice compared to WT mice (581 up, 241 down in pEVs of PS19 mice), (D) circRNA (518 up, 139 down), (G) miRNAs (10 up, 28 down), (J) snoRNAs (6 up, 74 down), and (K) tRNAs (47 up). Red, blue and gray denote significantly upregulated and downregulated differentially enriched ncRNAs and non-significant ncRNAs defined as raw Wald test p < 0.05 when comparing PS19 to WT groups, respectively. The results were considered significant when p < 0.05. (C) Donut chart summarizing significantly enriched ncRNA subtypes [up + down; shown in (D,G,J,K)] in pEV shown in (B). (E,F) DAVID was used to generate the bubble plots of GO enrichment analysis of the host genes (obtained from circBase) of upregulated (E) and downregulated (F) circRNAs. (H,I) Integration of significantly downregulated and upregulated pEV miRNA targets (obtained using TargetScan mouse) with their corresponding brain mRNA data from Figure 2 (DEGs, up and downregulated, respectively). Venn diagrams show common mRNAs between miRNA targets and their corresponding brain DEG lists. Bubble plots display GO terms for these common targets. Bubble size represents gene count; color represents −log10(p-value). Data shown upregulated or downregulated in PS19 mice compared to WT (~9.6 months old, n = 8 per group, equal number of male and female). Non-coding RNAs (ncRNAs), microRNAs (miRNAs), circular RNAs (circRNAs), small nucleolar RNAs (snoRNAs), small nuclear RNAs (snRNAs), and transfer RNAs (tRNAs).
Figure 5. Differential abundance and functional analysis of ncRNAs cargos from plasma EVs of PS19 and WT mice. (A) Bar graph shows the distribution of five ncRNA types (circRNA, snoRNA, snRNA, miRNA, and tRNA) in pEVs, based on annotated counts by COMPSRA. (B) Volcano plot of all differentially enriched ncRNA in pEVs of PS19 mice compared to WT mice (581 up, 241 down in pEVs of PS19 mice), (D) circRNA (518 up, 139 down), (G) miRNAs (10 up, 28 down), (J) snoRNAs (6 up, 74 down), and (K) tRNAs (47 up). Red, blue and gray denote significantly upregulated and downregulated differentially enriched ncRNAs and non-significant ncRNAs defined as raw Wald test p < 0.05 when comparing PS19 to WT groups, respectively. The results were considered significant when p < 0.05. (C) Donut chart summarizing significantly enriched ncRNA subtypes [up + down; shown in (D,G,J,K)] in pEV shown in (B). (E,F) DAVID was used to generate the bubble plots of GO enrichment analysis of the host genes (obtained from circBase) of upregulated (E) and downregulated (F) circRNAs. (H,I) Integration of significantly downregulated and upregulated pEV miRNA targets (obtained using TargetScan mouse) with their corresponding brain mRNA data from Figure 2 (DEGs, up and downregulated, respectively). Venn diagrams show common mRNAs between miRNA targets and their corresponding brain DEG lists. Bubble plots display GO terms for these common targets. Bubble size represents gene count; color represents −log10(p-value). Data shown upregulated or downregulated in PS19 mice compared to WT (~9.6 months old, n = 8 per group, equal number of male and female). Non-coding RNAs (ncRNAs), microRNAs (miRNAs), circular RNAs (circRNAs), small nucleolar RNAs (snoRNAs), small nuclear RNAs (snRNAs), and transfer RNAs (tRNAs).
Ijms 27 05050 g005
Figure 6. Comparative pathway analysis and integration of brain and pEV ncRNA candidate signatures associated with tau pathology. (A) The correlation network diagram visualizes the complex interaction between significantly differentially enriched ncRNAs in cortical brain tissue and pEVs of PS19 versus WT mice. A total of 38,140 significant correlations were observed among them, with 24,237 positive correlations and 13,903 negative correlations observed; within-compartment pairs were excluded. Correlation pairs were then filtered by p-value, correlation strength, and minimum node degree to retain the most robust cross-tissue associations. Edges represent significant pairwise Spearman correlations (p < 0.05, |ρ| ≥ 0.75) between brain and pEV ncRNA pairs. The nodes are color-coded by compartment: green circles represent brain-derived ncRNAs, while blue circles represent pEV-derived ncRNAs. The size of each node reflects its number of interactions in the network, with larger circles indicating molecules that share numerous significant correlations with other transcripts across both compartments. Connections signify statistically significant correlations between pairs of ncRNAs. Red lines indicate a positive correlation, where higher expressions in the brain correspond to higher abundance in pEVs. Blue lines indicate a negative correlation, where higher expressions in the brain correspond to lower abundance in pEVs. The thickness of the lines represents the strength of the correlation; light thin lines indicate lower correlation, and dark thick lines indicate higher correlation. Key transcripts, including specific circRNAs, microRNAs, and tRNA fragments. (B) Venn diagram showing the overlap of brain miRNA with expression level > 500, considered brain-enriched miRNAs, and significantly differentially abundant (p < 0.05) miRNA species in pEVs, identifying 11 common miRNAs. Bottom panel shows enrichment profile of those 11 shared miRNAs in pEVs of PS19 compared to WT. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01. (C,D) Cross-compartment integration analysis. Venn diagrams illustrate the common miRNA gene targets (identified via TargetScan mouse) that are shared between significantly differentially expressed brain miRNAs and differentially abundant pEV miRNAs. These shared gene targets were then overlapped with the cortical brain mRNA dataset. (C) Integration with upregulated brain mRNAs highlights shared genes associated with regulatory control of immune system response and cytokine-mediated signaling. (D) Integration of miRNA targets with downregulated brain mRNAs reveals highly convergent enrichment of genes associated with cholesterol and sterol biosynthetic processes, as shown in the accompanying bubble plot. Data shown upregulated or downregulated in PS19 mice compared to WT (~9.6 months old, n = 8 per group, equal number of male and female). Non-coding RNAs (ncRNAs), microRNAs (miRNAs), circular RNAs (circRNAs), and transfer RNAs (tRNAs).
Figure 6. Comparative pathway analysis and integration of brain and pEV ncRNA candidate signatures associated with tau pathology. (A) The correlation network diagram visualizes the complex interaction between significantly differentially enriched ncRNAs in cortical brain tissue and pEVs of PS19 versus WT mice. A total of 38,140 significant correlations were observed among them, with 24,237 positive correlations and 13,903 negative correlations observed; within-compartment pairs were excluded. Correlation pairs were then filtered by p-value, correlation strength, and minimum node degree to retain the most robust cross-tissue associations. Edges represent significant pairwise Spearman correlations (p < 0.05, |ρ| ≥ 0.75) between brain and pEV ncRNA pairs. The nodes are color-coded by compartment: green circles represent brain-derived ncRNAs, while blue circles represent pEV-derived ncRNAs. The size of each node reflects its number of interactions in the network, with larger circles indicating molecules that share numerous significant correlations with other transcripts across both compartments. Connections signify statistically significant correlations between pairs of ncRNAs. Red lines indicate a positive correlation, where higher expressions in the brain correspond to higher abundance in pEVs. Blue lines indicate a negative correlation, where higher expressions in the brain correspond to lower abundance in pEVs. The thickness of the lines represents the strength of the correlation; light thin lines indicate lower correlation, and dark thick lines indicate higher correlation. Key transcripts, including specific circRNAs, microRNAs, and tRNA fragments. (B) Venn diagram showing the overlap of brain miRNA with expression level > 500, considered brain-enriched miRNAs, and significantly differentially abundant (p < 0.05) miRNA species in pEVs, identifying 11 common miRNAs. Bottom panel shows enrichment profile of those 11 shared miRNAs in pEVs of PS19 compared to WT. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01. (C,D) Cross-compartment integration analysis. Venn diagrams illustrate the common miRNA gene targets (identified via TargetScan mouse) that are shared between significantly differentially expressed brain miRNAs and differentially abundant pEV miRNAs. These shared gene targets were then overlapped with the cortical brain mRNA dataset. (C) Integration with upregulated brain mRNAs highlights shared genes associated with regulatory control of immune system response and cytokine-mediated signaling. (D) Integration of miRNA targets with downregulated brain mRNAs reveals highly convergent enrichment of genes associated with cholesterol and sterol biosynthetic processes, as shown in the accompanying bubble plot. Data shown upregulated or downregulated in PS19 mice compared to WT (~9.6 months old, n = 8 per group, equal number of male and female). Non-coding RNAs (ncRNAs), microRNAs (miRNAs), circular RNAs (circRNAs), and transfer RNAs (tRNAs).
Ijms 27 05050 g006
Figure 7. Common differentially enriched ncRNA species in both brain and pEVs of PS19 mice. (Top) Venn diagram illustrates 33 ncRNAs are both significantly differentially expressed in the cortex and differentially abundant in pEVs of PS19 mice compared to WT (p < 0.05). (1) Detailed breakdown of the 32 common significantly altered circRNAs from brain and pEVs of PS19 mice compared to WT. (i,ii) Bar graphs showing the mean expression of circRNAs that are significantly upregulated (i) or downregulated (ii) in both the brain and pEVs of PS19 mice compared to WT. (iii,iv) Comparative bubble plots for the remaining shared circRNAs, where bubble size reflects mean expression and color reflects the log2 fold-change (log2FC) directionality. Panel (iii) shows 6 circRNAs that were significantly upregulated in the cortex but downregulated in pEVs of PS19 mice compared to WT. Panel (iv) shows 23 circRNAs that were downregulated in the cortex but upregulated in pEVs of PS19 mice compared to WT. (2) Functional mapping of miR-5114, the only shared differentially enriched miRNA in both brain and pEVs of PS19 mice. (a,b) Venn diagrams showing the overlap of predicted miR-5114 gene targets with cortical mRNAs that are upregulated (a) or downregulated (b) in PS19 mice compared to WT. GO term bubble plots reveal that miR-5114 targets are genes involved in innate immune responses and long-term memory/hypoxia response pathways, suggesting miR-5114 may represent a candidate molecular link between central pathology and peripheral EV cargo. Data shown upregulated or downregulated in PS19 mice compared to WT (~9.6 months old, n = 8 per group, equal number of male and female). Non-coding RNAs (ncRNAs), microRNAs (miRNAs), and circular RNAs (circRNAs).
Figure 7. Common differentially enriched ncRNA species in both brain and pEVs of PS19 mice. (Top) Venn diagram illustrates 33 ncRNAs are both significantly differentially expressed in the cortex and differentially abundant in pEVs of PS19 mice compared to WT (p < 0.05). (1) Detailed breakdown of the 32 common significantly altered circRNAs from brain and pEVs of PS19 mice compared to WT. (i,ii) Bar graphs showing the mean expression of circRNAs that are significantly upregulated (i) or downregulated (ii) in both the brain and pEVs of PS19 mice compared to WT. (iii,iv) Comparative bubble plots for the remaining shared circRNAs, where bubble size reflects mean expression and color reflects the log2 fold-change (log2FC) directionality. Panel (iii) shows 6 circRNAs that were significantly upregulated in the cortex but downregulated in pEVs of PS19 mice compared to WT. Panel (iv) shows 23 circRNAs that were downregulated in the cortex but upregulated in pEVs of PS19 mice compared to WT. (2) Functional mapping of miR-5114, the only shared differentially enriched miRNA in both brain and pEVs of PS19 mice. (a,b) Venn diagrams showing the overlap of predicted miR-5114 gene targets with cortical mRNAs that are upregulated (a) or downregulated (b) in PS19 mice compared to WT. GO term bubble plots reveal that miR-5114 targets are genes involved in innate immune responses and long-term memory/hypoxia response pathways, suggesting miR-5114 may represent a candidate molecular link between central pathology and peripheral EV cargo. Data shown upregulated or downregulated in PS19 mice compared to WT (~9.6 months old, n = 8 per group, equal number of male and female). Non-coding RNAs (ncRNAs), microRNAs (miRNAs), and circular RNAs (circRNAs).
Ijms 27 05050 g007
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Lucy, T.T.; Mamun-Or-Rashid, A.N.M.; Lee, D.C.; Lefterov, I.; Koldamova, R.; Fitz, N.F. Integration of Transcriptional Signatures from Brain Tissue and Plasma Extracellular Vesicles of a Preclinical Tauopathy Mouse Model. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2026, 27, 5050. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms27115050

AMA Style

Lucy TT, Mamun-Or-Rashid ANM, Lee DC, Lefterov I, Koldamova R, Fitz NF. Integration of Transcriptional Signatures from Brain Tissue and Plasma Extracellular Vesicles of a Preclinical Tauopathy Mouse Model. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2026; 27(11):5050. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms27115050

Chicago/Turabian Style

Lucy, Tanzima Tarannum, A. N. M. Mamun-Or-Rashid, Daniel C. Lee, Iliya Lefterov, Radosveta Koldamova, and Nicholas Francis Fitz. 2026. "Integration of Transcriptional Signatures from Brain Tissue and Plasma Extracellular Vesicles of a Preclinical Tauopathy Mouse Model" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 27, no. 11: 5050. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms27115050

APA Style

Lucy, T. T., Mamun-Or-Rashid, A. N. M., Lee, D. C., Lefterov, I., Koldamova, R., & Fitz, N. F. (2026). Integration of Transcriptional Signatures from Brain Tissue and Plasma Extracellular Vesicles of a Preclinical Tauopathy Mouse Model. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 27(11), 5050. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms27115050

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop