Real-Life Metal Cocktail Induced Pancreatic Alterations in Rats: Influence of Sex and Exposure Duration
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Results
2.1. Toxic Metals
2.2. Histological Analyses Results
2.3. Glucose Levels
2.4. MDH-1 Activity
2.5. Amylase Activity
2.6. Oxidative Stress/Antioxidant Protection Parameters
2.7. Bioelements
2.8. Correlation Matrix
3. Discussion
3.1. Study Rationale and Key Findings
3.2. Pancreatic Accumulation of Toxic Metals
3.3. Histopathological Alterations, and Metabolic and Functional Pancreatic Impairment
3.4. Oxidative Stress, Antioxidant Response, and Mineral Homeostasis Disruption
3.5. Metal Co-Accumulation and Disruption of Pancreatic Homeostasis
3.6. Sex- and Exposure-Duration-Dependent Susceptibility to Metal Mixture Toxicity
3.7. Limitations and Further Directions
4. Materials and Methods
4.1. Experimental Animals
4.2. Experimental Protocol
4.3. Toxic Metal and Bioelement Measurements
4.4. Histological Analyses
4.5. Glucose Level and Amylase Activity Determination
4.6. MDH-1 Determination
4.7. Parameters of Oxidative Stress and Antioxidant Defence
4.8. Statistical Analysis
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Peña-Fernández, A.; González-Muñoz, M.J.; Lobo-Bedmar, M.C. Establishing the Importance of Human Health Risk Assessment for Metals and Metalloids in Urban Environments. Environ. Int. 2014, 72, 176–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sparks, D.L. Toxic Metals in the Environment: The Role of Surfaces. Elements 2005, 1, 193–197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vimercati, L.; Baldassarre, A.; Gatti, M.F.; Gagliardi, T.; Serinelli, M.; De Maria, L.; Caputi, A.; Dirodi, A.A.; Galise, I.; Cuccaro, F.; et al. Non-Occupational Exposure to Heavy Metals of the Residents of an Industrial Area and Biomonitoring. Environ. Monit. Assess. 2016, 188, 673. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Armah, F.A.; Quansah, R.; Luginaah, I. A Systematic Review of Heavy Metals of Anthropogenic Origin in Environmental Media and Biota in the Context of Gold Mining in Ghana. Int. Sch. Res. Not. 2014, 2014, 252148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kienzler, A.; Bopp, S.K.; Van Der Linden, S.; Berggren, E.; Worth, A. Regulatory Assessment of Chemical Mixtures: Requirements, Current Approaches and Future Perspectives. Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 2016, 80, 321–334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Heys, K.A.; Shore, R.F.; Pereira, M.G.; Jones, K.C.; Martin, F.L. Risk Assessment of Environmental Mixture Effects. RSC Adv. 2016, 6, 47844–47857. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tchounwou, P.B.; Yedjou, C.G.; Patlolla, A.K.; Sutton, D.J. Heavy Metal Toxicity and the Environment. In Molecular, Clinical and Environmental Toxicology; Luch, A., Ed.; Experientia Supplementum; Springer: Basel, Switzerland, 2012; Volume 101, pp. 133–164. [Google Scholar]
- Wang, S.; Shi, X. Molecular Mechanisms of Metal Toxicity and Carcinogenesis. Mol. Cell. Biochem. 2001, 222, 3–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Georgescu, B.; Georgescu, C.; Dărăban, S.; Bouaru, A.; Pașcalău, S. Heavy Metals Acting as Endocrine Disrupters. Sci. Pap. Anim. Sci. Biotechnol. 2011, 44, 89. [Google Scholar]
- Goumenou, M.; Djordjevic, A.B.; Vassilopoulou, L.; Tsatsakis, A.M. Endocrine Disruption and Human Health Risk Assessment in the Light of Real-Life Risk Simulation. In Toxicological Risk Assessment and Multi-System Health Impacts from Exposure; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2021; pp. 147–162. [Google Scholar]
- WHO. Global Assessment on the State of the Science of Endocrine Disruptors; WHO: Geneva, Switzerland, 2002. [Google Scholar]
- NIH. Endocrine Disruptors; NIH: Bethesda, MD, USA, 2025.
- European Commission. Adoption of a Strategy on Endocrine Disruptors; European Commission: Brussels, Belgium, 2018. [Google Scholar]
- Lagarde, F.; Beausoleil, C.; Belcher, S.M.; Belzunces, L.P.; Emond, C.; Guerbet, M.; Rousselle, C. Non-Monotonic Dose-Response Relationships and Endocrine Disruptors: A Qualitative Method of Assessment. Environ. Health 2015, 14, 13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Renieri, E.A.; Sfakianakis, D.G.; Alegakis, A.A.; Safenkova, I.V.; Buha, A.; Matović, V.; Tzardi, M.; Dzantiev, B.B.; Divanach, P.; Kentouri, M.; et al. Nonlinear Responses to Waterborne Cadmium Exposure in Zebrafish. An in Vivo Study. Environ. Res. 2017, 157, 173–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Escher, B.I.; Stapleton, H.M.; Schymanski, E.L. Tracking Complex Mixtures of Chemicals in Our Changing Environment. Science 2020, 367, 388–392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Papalou, O.; Kandaraki, E.A.; Papadakis, G.; Diamanti-Kandarakis, E. Endocrine Disrupting Chemicals: An Occult Mediator of Metabolic Disease. Front. Endocrinol. 2019, 10, 112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ding, Y.; Xu, T.; Mao, G.; Chen, Y.; Qiu, X.; Yang, L.; Zhao, T.; Xu, X.; Feng, W.; Wu, X. Di-(2-Ethylhexyl) Phthalate-Induced Hepatotoxicity Exacerbated Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM) in Female Pubertal T2DM Mice. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2021, 149, 112003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Murea, M.; Ma, L.; Freedman, B.I. Genetic and Environmental Factors Associated with Type 2 Diabetes and Diabetic Vascular Complications. Rev. Diabet. Stud. 2012, 9, 6–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Sargis, R.M.; Simmons, R.A. Environmental Neglect: Endocrine Disruptors as Underappreciated but Potentially Modifiable Diabetes Risk Factors. Diabetologia 2019, 62, 1811–1822. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Stojanoska, M.M.; Milosevic, N.; Milic, N.; Abenavoli, L. The Influence of Phthalates and Bisphenol A on the Obesity Development and Glucose Metabolism Disorders. Endocrine 2017, 55, 666–681. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Elmorsy, E.; Al-Ghafari, A.; Al Doghaither, H.; Ghulam, J. Effects of Environmental Metals on Mitochondrial Bioenergetics of the CD-1 Mice Pancreatic Beta-Cells. Toxicol. Vitr. 2021, 70, 105015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Bersényi, A.; Fekete, S.G.; Szőcs, Z.; Berta, E. Effect of Ingested Heavy Metals (Cd, Pb and Hg) on Haematology and Serum Biochemistry in Rabbits. Acta Vet. Hung. 2003, 51, 297–304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Naujokas, M.F.; Anderson, B.; Ahsan, H.; Aposhian, H.V.; Graziano, J.H.; Thompson, C.; Suk, W.A. The Broad Scope of Health Effects from Chronic Arsenic Exposure: Update on a Worldwide Public Health Problem. Environ. Health Perspect. 2013, 121, 295–302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, X.; Mukherjee, B.; Karvonen-Gutierrez, C.A.; Herman, W.H.; Batterman, S.; Harlow, S.D.; Park, S.K. Urinary Metal Mixtures and Longitudinal Changes in Glucose Homeostasis: The Study of Women’s Health Across the Nation (SWAN). Environ. Int. 2020, 145, 106109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Baralić, K.; Javorac, D.; Marić, Đ.; Đukić-Ćosić, D.; Bulat, Z.; Antonijević Miljaković, E.; Anđelković, M.; Antonijević, B.; Aschner, M.; Buha Djordjevic, A. Benchmark Dose Approach in Investigating the Relationship between Blood Metal Levels and Reproductive Hormones: Data Set from Human Study. Environ. Int. 2022, 165, 107313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Javorac, D.; Baralić, K.; Marić, Đ.; Mandić-Rajčević, S.; Đukić-Ćosić, D.; Bulat, Z.; Djordjevic, A.B. Exploring the Endocrine Disrupting Potential of Lead through Benchmark Modelling—Study in Humans. Environ. Pollut. 2023, 316, 120428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Marić, Đ.; Baralić, K.; Javorac, D.; Mandić Rajčević, S.; Đukić-Ćosić, D.; Antonijević Miljaković, E.; Aćimović, M.; Bulat, Z.; Aschner, M.; Buha Djordjevic, A. Puzzling Relationship between Levels of Toxic Metals in Blood and Serum Levels of Reproductive Hormones: Benchmark Dose Approach in Cross-Sectional Study. All Life 2022, 15, 1052–1064. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Đukić-Ćosić, D.; Baralić, K.; Javorac, D.; Bulat, Z.; Ćurčić, M.; Antonijević, B.; Đorđević, V.; Repić, A.; Buha Djordjevic, A. Exploring the Relationship Between Blood Toxic Metal(Oid)s and Serum Insulin Levels through Benchmark Modelling of Human Data: Possible Role of Arsenic as a Metabolic Disruptor. Environ. Res. 2022, 215, 114283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Hernández, A.F.; Tsatsakis, A.M. Human Exposure to Chemical Mixtures: Challenges for the Integration of Toxicology with Epidemiology Data in Risk Assessment. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2017, 103, 188–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tsatsakis, A.; Kouretas, D.; Tzatzarakis, M.; Stivaktakis, P.; Tsarouhas, K.; Golokhvast, K.; Rakitskii, V.; Tutelyan, V.; Hernandez, A.; Rezaee, R.; et al. Simulating Real-Life Exposures to Uncover Possible Risks to Human Health: A Proposed Consensus for a Novel Methodological Approach. Hum. Exp. Toxicol. 2017, 36, 554–564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Marić, Đ.; Baralić, K.; Vukelić, D.; Milošević, I.; Nikolić, A.; Antonijević, B.; Đukić-Ćosić, D.; Bulat, Z.; Aschner, M.; Djordjevic, A.B. Thyroid under Siege: Unravelling the Toxic Impact of Real-Life Metal Mixture Exposures in Wistar Rats. Chemosphere 2024, 360, 142441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Baralić, K.; Marić, Đ.; Vukelić, D.; Antonijević Miljaković, E.; Anđelković, M.; Antonijević, B.; Đukić-Ćosić, D.; Bulat, Z.; Buha Djordjevic, A. Effects of the Real-Life Metal(Oid)s Mixture on Female Reproductive Function: Less Is Different. Sci. Total Environ. 2023, 895, 165181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dover, E.N.; Patel, N.Y.; Stýblo, M. Impact of in Vitro Heavy Metal Exposure on Pancreatic β-Cell Function. Toxicol. Lett. 2018, 299, 137–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Patel, H.V.; Kalia, K. Role of Hepatic and Pancreatic Oxidative Stress in Arsenic Induced Diabetic Condition in Wistar Rats. J. Environ. Biol. 2013, 34, 231–236. [Google Scholar]
- Zhu, H.; Jia, Y.; Cao, H.; Meng, F.; Liu, X. Biochemical and Histopathological Effects of Subchronic Oral Exposure of Rats to a Mixture of Five Toxic Elements. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2014, 71, 166–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sun, T.; Zheng, Z.; Ma, Y.; Pan, M.; Zhou, Y.; Wei, J.; Yuan, X.; Wan, J.; Li, Y.; Sun, Y. Mixed Heavy Metal Exposure During Pregnancy Induces GDM-like Metabolic Dysfunction Associated with Glycer-Ophospholipid Metabolic Reprogramming and Altered Insig1 Expression: A Multi-Omics Study in Rats. Toxics 2026, 14, 351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fiati Kenston, S.S.; Su, H.; Li, Z.; Kong, L.; Wang, Y.; Song, X.; Gu, Y.; Barber, T.; Aldinger, J.; Hua, Q.; et al. The Systemic Toxicity of Heavy Metal Mixtures in Rats. Toxicol. Res. 2018, 7, 396–407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Riaz, M.A.; Nisa, Z.U.; Anjum, M.S.; Butt, H.; Mehmood, A.; Riaz, A.; Akhtar, A.B.T. Assessment of Metals Induced Histopathological and Gene Expression Changes in Different Organs of Non-Diabetic and Diabetic Rats. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 5897. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Orji, U.O.; Ibiam, U.A.; Awoke, J.N.; Atoki, A.V.; Eze, E.D.; Obasi, O.D.; Ogbu, C.; Ezeani, N.N.; Alum, E.U.; Aloke, C.; et al. Ethanolic Extract of Cnidoscolus Aconitifolius Leaves Alleviates Insulin Resistance by Modulating Oxidative Stress and Inflammation in Albino Rats Exposed to Heavy Metal Mixture. Nat. Prod. Res. 2025. ahead of print. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rajsekhar, S.; Singh, T.A.; Deep, K.C. Cadmium and Arsenic: A Deadly Duo for Diabetic Rats. J. Chem. Health Risks 2024, 14, 685. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Buha, A.; Wallace, D.; Matovic, V.; Schweitzer, A.; Oluic, B.; Micic, D.; Djordjevic, V. Cadmium Exposure as a Putative Risk Factor for the Development of Pancreatic Cancer: Three Different Lines of Evidence. BioMed Res. Int. 2017, 2017, 1981837. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lei, L.-J.; Jin, T.-Y.; Zhou, Y.-F. Insulin Expression in Rats Exposed to Cadmium. Biomed. Environ. Sci. 2007, 20, 295. [Google Scholar]
- Andrzejewska, A.; Szynaka, B.; Stokowska, W.; Szynaka, P. Does Lead Acetate Intoxication Damage Acinar Cell Nuclei in the Rat Pancreas? Ultrastructural Observations. Mater. Med. Pol. 1995, 27, 43–46. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- Arkuszewska, E. The Chromium Concentration in Organs and Tissuesof Rats Fed a Diet Enriched in Chromium. J. Anim. Feed. Sci. 2005, 14, 525–528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
- Hantzidiamantis, P.J.; Awosika, A.O.; Lappin, S.L. Physiology, Glucose; StatPearls Publishing: Treasure Island, FL, USA, 2024. [Google Scholar]
- Röder, P.V.; Wu, B.; Liu, Y.; Han, W. Pancreatic Regulation of Glucose Homeostasis. Exp. Mol. Med. 2016, 48, e219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Akinfemiwa, O.; Zubair, M.; Muniraj, T. Amylase; StatPearls Publishing: Treasure Island, FL, USA, 2024. [Google Scholar]
- Ježek, P.; Holendová, B.; Jabůrek, M.; Tauber, J.; Dlasková, A.; Plecitá-Hlavatá, L. The Pancreatic β-Cell: The Perfect Redox System. Antioxidants 2021, 10, 197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- MacDonald, M.J. Evidence for the Malate Aspartate Shuttle in Pancreatic Islets. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 1982, 213, 643–649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Paithankar, J.G.; Saini, S.; Dwivedi, S.; Sharma, A.; Chowdhuri, D.K. Heavy Metal Associated Health Hazards: An Interplay of Oxidative Stress and Signal Transduction. Chemosphere 2021, 262, 128350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Caturano, A.; D’Angelo, M.; Mormone, A.; Russo, V.; Mollica, M.P.; Salvatore, T.; Galiero, R.; Rinaldi, L.; Vetrano, E.; Marfella, R.; et al. Oxidative Stress in Type 2 Diabetes: Impacts from Pathogenesis to Lifestyle Modifications. Curr. Issues Mol. Biol. 2023, 45, 6651–6666. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Goyer, R.A. Toxic and Essential Metal Interactions. Annu. Rev. Nutr. 1997, 17, 37–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vukelić, D.; Baralić, K.; Marić, Đ.; Đukic-Ćosić, D.; Bulat, Z.; Panieri, E.; Saso, L.; Djordjevic, A.B. Hepato-Renal Toxicity of Low Dose Metal(Oid)s Mixture in Real-Life Risk Simulation in Rats: Effects on Nrf2/HO-1 Signalling and Redox Status. Sci. Total Environ. 2024, 908, 168352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Gómez-Pérez, Y.; Gianotti, M.; Lladó, I.; Proenza, A.M. Sex-Dependent Effects of High-Fat-Diet Feeding on Rat Pancreas Oxidative Stress. Pancreas 2011, 40, 682–688. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kubat, E.; Mahajan, S.; Liao, M.; Ackerman, L.; Ohara, P.T.; Grady, E.F.; Bhargava, A. Corticotropin-Releasing Factor Receptor 2 Mediates Sex-Specific Cellular Stress Responses. Mol. Med. 2013, 19, 212–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Diakopoulos, K.N.; Lesina, M.; Wörmann, S.; Song, L.; Aichler, M.; Schild, L.; Artati, A.; Römisch-Margl, W.; Wartmann, T.; Fischer, R.; et al. Impaired Autophagy Induces Chronic Atrophic Pancreatitis in Mice via Sex- and Nutrition-Dependent Processes. Gastroenterology 2015, 148, 626–638.e17, Erratum in Gastroenterology 2021, 160, 2230. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2021.04.018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rorsman, P.; Ashcroft, F.M. Pancreatic β-Cell Electrical Activity and Insulin Secretion: Of Mice and Men. Physiol. Rev. 2018, 98, 117–214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Percie Du Sert, N.; Hurst, V.; Ahluwalia, A.; Alam, S.; Avey, M.T.; Baker, M.; Browne, W.J.; Clark, A.; Cuthill, I.C.; Dirnagl, U.; et al. The ARRIVE Guidelines 2.0: Updated Guidelines for Reporting Animal Research. PLoS Biol. 2020, 18, e3000410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hyun, J.J.; Lee, H.S. Experimental Models of Pancreatitis. Clin. Endosc. 2014, 47, 212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- ATSDR. Toxicological Profile for Cadmium; U.S Public Health Service, Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry: Atlanta, GA, USA, 2012; pp. 1–487.
- ATSDR. Toxicological Profile for Nickel; U.S Public Health Service, Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry: Atlanta, GA, USA, 2005. Available online: https://wwwn.cdc.gov/Tsp/ToxProfiles/ToxProfiles.aspx?id=245&tid=44 (accessed on 2 April 2023).
- INCHEM. Lead (Evaluation of Health Risk to Infants and Children); INCHEM: Geneva, Switzerland, 2023; Available online: https://www.inchem.org/documents/jecfa/jecmono/v21je16.htm (accessed on 2 April 2023).
- Lee, M.-Y.; Bae, O.-N.; Chung, S.-M.; Kang, K.-T.; Lee, J.-Y.; Chung, J.-H. Enhancement of Platelet Aggregation and Thrombus Formation by Arsenic in Drinking Water: A Contributing Factor to Cardiovascular Disease. Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 2002, 179, 83–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- EPA. Exposure Assessment Tools by Approaches—Exposure Reconstruction (Biomonitoring and Reverse Dosimetry); EPA: Washington, DC, USA, 2025.
- Food and Drug Administration. Guidance for Industry on Estimating the Maximum Safe Starting Dose in Initial Clinical Trials for Therapeutics in Adult Healthy Volunteers; Food and Drug Administration: Silver Spring, MD, USA, 2005. Available online: https://www.fda.gov/regulatory-information/search-fda-guidance-documents/estimating-maximum-safe-starting-dose-initial-clinical-trials-therapeutics-adult-healthy-volunteers (accessed on 3 April 2026).
- Girotti, M.J.; Khan, N.; Mclellan, B.A. Early Measurement of Systemic Lipid Peroxidation Products in the Plasma of Major Blunt Trauma Patients. J. Trauma Inj. Infect. Crit. Care 1991, 31, 32–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gidenne, S.; Ceppa, F.; Fontan, E.; Perrier, F.; Burnat, P. Analytical Performance of the Albumin Cobalt Binding (ACB®) Test on the Cobas MIRA® Plus Analyzer. Clin. Chem. Lab. Med. (CCLM) 2004, 42, 455–461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ellman, G.L. Tissue Sulfhydryl Groups. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 1959, 82, 70–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Misra, H.; Fridovich, I. The Role of Superoxide Anion in the Autoxidation of Epinephrine and a Simple Assay for Superoxide Dismutase. J. Biol. Chem. 1972, 247, 3170–3175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Bradford, M.M. A Rapid and Sensitive Method for the Quantitation of Microgram Quantities of Protein Utilizing the Principle of Protein-Dye Binding. Anal. Biochem. 1976, 72, 248–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Schober, P.; Boer, C.; Schwarte, L.A. Correlation Coefficients: Appropriate Use and Interpretation. Anesth. Analg. 2018, 126, 1763–1768. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]









| Control | M1/F1 | M2/F2 | M3/F3 | M4/F4 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Male rats: 28 days of exposure | Pb (ng/kg) | Average | 16 | 36 ** | 56 *** | 43 *** | 45 *** |
| SD | 3.3 | 13 | 2.8 | 14 | 11 | ||
| Cd (ng/kg) | Average | 6.3 | 7.3 | 16 ** | 14 ** | 20 *** | |
| SD | 1.8 | 2.4 | 8.5 | 2.2 | 3.4 | ||
| As (ng/kg) | 25% Percentile | 20 | 42 | 23 | 316 * | 435 *** | |
| Median | 24 | 66 | 27 | 372 | 447 | ||
| 75% Percentile | 27 | 72 | 39 | 415 | 467 | ||
| Hg (ng/kg) | Average | 2.7 | 14 | 41 *** | 49 *** | 51 *** | |
| SD | 0.34 | 1.5 | 9.3 | 7.4 | 17 | ||
| Cr (ng/kg) | 25% Percentile | 13 | 40 | 33 | 29 | 105 | |
| Median | 16 | 49 | 43 | 48 | 169 * | ||
| 75% Percentile | 17 | 59 | 74 | 59 | 182 | ||
| Ni (ng/kg) | 25% Percentile | 102 | 165 | 182 | 155 | 228 | |
| Median | 112 | 254 | 290 * | 178 | 263 | ||
| 75% Percentile | 116 | 411 | 314 | 245 | 285 | ||
| Control | F1 | F2 | F3 | F4 | |||
| Female rats: 28 days of exposure | Pb (ng/kg) | Average | 29 | 37 | 40 | 41 * | 25 |
| SD | 10 | 8.5 | 9.2 | 12 | 4.7 | ||
| Cd (ng/kg) | Average | 5.6 | 7.5 | 11 *** | 11 *** | 17 *** | |
| SD | 0.70 | 1.3 | 1.2 | 2.7 | 1.4 | ||
| As (ng/kg) | 25% Percentile | 13 | 24 | 30 | 22 | 254 | |
| Median | 15 | 32 | 39 | 26 | 286 *** | ||
| 75% Percentile | 18 | 53 | 42 | 31 | 458 | ||
| Hg (ng/kg) | 25% Percentile | 2.7 | 3.1 | 18 | 36 | 33 | |
| Median | 3.3 | 4.7 | 22 | 45 ** | 44 ** | ||
| 75% Percentile | 3.4 | 7.4 | 31 | 48 | 48 | ||
| Cr (ng/kg) | 25% Percentile | 25 | 42 | 35 | 41 | 134 | |
| Median | 27 | 52 | 51 | 42 | 139 ** | ||
| 75% Percentile | 29 | 65 | 87 | 72 | 143 | ||
| Ni (ng/kg) | 25% Percentile | 121 | 227 | 235 | 148 | 377 | |
| Median | 148 | 236 | 276 | 337 | 691 ** | ||
| 75% Percentile | 262 | 243 | 454 | 446 | 848 | ||
| Control | M1 | M2 | M3 | M4 | |||
| Male rats: 90 days of exposure | Pb (ng/kg) | Average | 11 | 23 *** | 19 ** | 25 *** | NA |
| SD | 1.3 | 5.3 | 2.2 | 3.9 | NA | ||
| Cd (ng/kg) | Average | 2.4 | 3.3 | 3.4 * | 3.7 ** | NA | |
| SD | 0.55 | 0.85 | 0.40 | 0.70 | NA | ||
| As (ng/kg) | 25% Percentile | 12 | 26 | 32 | 1006 | NA | |
| Median | 13 | 39 | 49 | 1274 *** | NA | ||
| 75% Percentile | 16 | 53 | 69 | 1611 | NA | ||
| Hg (ng/kg) | Average | 3.1 | 5.0 | 7.6 *** | 13 *** | NA | |
| SD | 0.76 | 1.9 | 1.7 | 2.1 | NA | ||
| NA | |||||||
| Cr (ng/kg) | 25% Percentile | 20 | 23 | 23 | 23 | NA | |
| Median | 23 | 35 | 27 | 28 | NA | ||
| 75% Percentile | 25 | 45 | 43 | 31 | NA | ||
| Ni (ng/kg) | 25% Percentile | 55 | 144 | 126 | 142 | NA | |
| Median | 59 | 188 | 150 | 354 ** | NA | ||
| 75% Percentile | 65 | 235 | 313 | 495 | NA | ||
| Control | F1 | F2 | F3 | F4 | |||
| Female rats: 90 days of exposure | Pb (ng/kg) | Average | 13 | 24 * | 31 ** | 26 * | NA |
| SD | 3.7 | 11 | 9.2 | 3.8 | NA | ||
| Cd (ng/kg) | Average | 2.8 | 4.7 | 6.3 ** | 7.0 *** | NA | |
| SD | 0.30 | 2.0 | 1.4 | 2.1 | NA | ||
| As (ng/kg) | Average | 17 | 55 *** | 52 ** | 64 *** | NA | |
| SD | 2.8 | 16 | 18 | 14 | NA | ||
| Hg (ng/kg) | 25% Percentile | 1.0 | 4.1 | 26 | 24 | NA | |
| Median | 3.0 | 4.2 | 30 * | 45 ** | NA | ||
| 75% Percentile | 4.3 | 5.7 | 32 | 54 | NA | ||
| Cr (ng/kg) | Average | 15 | 22 ** | 32 *** | 33 *** | NA | |
| SD | 2.5 | 2.7 | 5.3 | 2.8 | NA | ||
| Ni (ng/kg) | 25% Percentile | 76 | 147 | 160 | 143 | NA | |
| Median | 87 | 167 | 188 * | 216 * | NA | ||
| 75% Percentile | 94 | 209 | 225 | 315 | NA | ||
| Control | M1 | M2 | M3 | M4 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Male rats: 28 days of exposure | IMA (pg/g) | Average | 31.31 | 25.46 | 33.90 * | 24.73 | 45.33 *** |
| SD | 6.036 | 4.067 | 4.330 | 1.844 | 7.209 | ||
| MDA (μmol/g) | Average | 40.32 | 25.95 * | 36.28 | 37.30 | 36.82 | |
| SD | 7.443 | 7.663 | 9.134 | 9.779 | 6.864 | ||
| SH groups (mmol/g) | Average | 0.088 | 0.422 *** | 0.197 | 0.187 | 0.1714 | |
| SD | 0.0752 | 0.106 | 0.0450 | 0.0395 | 0.1403 | ||
| GSH (μmol/g) | Average | 27.57 | 21.22 | 20.03 | 22.39 | 20.39 | |
| SD | 7.615 | 9.295 | 7.385 | 4.484 | 4.150 | ||
| SOD (IU/g) | 25% Percentile | 1.200 | 0.550 | 1.150 | 0.850 | 0.3500 | |
| Median | 1.700 | 1.050 | 1.300 | 1.500 | 0.7000 | ||
| 75% Percentile | 5.150 | 2.150 | 2.400 | 3.600 | 3.900 | ||
| Control | F1 | F2 | F3 | F4 | |||
| Female rats: 28 days of exposure | IMA (pg/g) | 25% Percentile | 24.24 | 22.02 | 24.96 | 27.13 | 30.26 |
| Median | 28.32 | 28.30 | 29.81 | 29.20 | 34.83 * | ||
| 75% Percentile | 30.23 | 34.47 | 34.54 | 31.83 | 48.72 | ||
| MDA (μmol/g) | Average | 50.52 | 56.02 | 63.26 *** | 58.04 | 41.54 | |
| SD | 11.05 | 6.176 | 4.274 | 13.03 | 5.160 | ||
| SH groups (mmol/g) | Average | 0.138 | 0.119 | 0.0564 *** | 0.153 | 0.1240 | |
| SD | 0.0225 | 0.0194 | 0.0145 | 0.00879 | 0.01281 | ||
| GSH (μmol/g) | Average | 21.81 | 28.27 | 12.88 * | 21.39 | 22.40 | |
| SD | 6.529 | 7.502 | 0.953 | 2.079 | 5.039 | ||
| SOD (IU/g) | 25% Percentile | 0.800 | 1.000 | 0.550 | 0.700 | 0.7000 | |
| Median | 1.200 | 1.200 | 1.200 | 1.000 | 1.000 | ||
| 75% Percentile | 1.400 | 1.600 | 2.200 | 3.700 | 2.000 | ||
| Control | M1 | M2 | M3 | M4 | |||
| Male rats: 90 days of exposure | IMA (pg/g) | 25% Percentile | 34.33 | 32.86 | 37.13 | 29.88 | NA |
| Median | 35.08 | 38.85 | 41.69 | 36.04 | NA | ||
| 75% Percentile | 36.78 | 61.63 | 61.70 | 49.82 | NA | ||
| MDA (μmol/g) | Average | 26.52 | 18.34 | 28.60 | 33.84 | NA | |
| SD | 9.941 | 5.699 | 10.86 | 6.146 | NA | ||
| SH groups (mmol/g) | 25% Percentile | 0.0680 | 0.107 | 0.0775 | 0.182 | NA | |
| Median | 0.107 | 0.193 | 0.195 | 0.234 | NA | ||
| 75% Percentile | 0.359 | 0.333 | 0.501 | 0.534 | NA | ||
| GSH (μmol/g) | 25% Percentile | 13.20 | 13.24 | 16.24 | 16.70 | NA | |
| Median | 25.68 | 14.11 | 23.45 | 29.17 | NA | ||
| 75% Percentile | 27.61 | 18.61 | 36.86 | 37.44 | NA | ||
| SOD (IU/g) | 25% Percentile | 1.400 | 1.550 | 1.500 | 2.500 | NA | |
| Median | 1.900 | 1.700 | 2.300 | 3.200 | NA | ||
| 75% Percentile | 3.050 | 2.700 | 3.550 | 4.100 | NA | ||
| Control | F1 | F2 | F3 | F4 | |||
| Female rats: 90 days of exposure | IMA (pg/g) | 25% Percentile | 31.85 | 37.18 | 32.47 | 34.03 | NA |
| Median | 35.36 | 41.84 * | 41.09 | 40.92 | NA | ||
| 75% Percentile | 37.43 | 48.61 | 41.61 | 56.08 | NA | ||
| MDA (μmol/g) | Average | 19.84 | 23.82 | 24.94 | 26.56 | NA | |
| SD | 6.379 | 7.340 | 7.538 | 6.977 | NA | ||
| SH groups (mmol/g) | Average | 0.0700 | 0.370 * | 0.170 | 0.176 | NA | |
| SD | 0.0619 | 0.384 | 0.177 | 0.112 | NA | ||
| GSH (μmol/g) | Average | 15.42 | 19.60 | 24.29 * | 22.56 | NA | |
| SD | 4.468 | 6.999 | 8.404 | 5.256 | NA | ||
| SOD (IU/g) | 25% Percentile | 0.300 | 0.750 | 0.650 | 0.600 | NA | |
| Median | 0.500 | 0.900 | 1.400 * | 1.600 * | NA | ||
| 75% Percentile | 0.750 | 2.050 | 2.900 | 2.950 | NA | ||
| Control | M1 | M2 | M3 | M4 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Male rats: 28 days of exposure | Fe (μg/kg) | Average | 31 | 27 | 21 ** | 16 *** | 22 ** |
| SD | 5.5 | 6.0 | 5.1 | 5.3 | 2.8 | ||
| Cu (μg/kg) | Average | 1.6 | 1.0 *** | 0.64 *** | 0.75 *** | 1.2 ** | |
| SD | 0.14 | 0.23 | 0.19 | 0.35 | 0.18 | ||
| Zn (μg/kg) | Average | 20 | 13 *** | 11 *** | 12 *** | 14 *** | |
| SD | 2.2 | 2.9 | 2.3 | 3.2 | 2.0 | ||
| Mn (μg/kg) | Average | 2.6 | 1.8 * | 1.8 * | 1.5 *** | 2.1 | |
| SD | 0.084 | 0.42 | 0.77 | 0.56 | 0.22 | ||
| Ca (μg/kg) | 25% Percentile | 29 | 14 | 12 | 7.9 | 18 | |
| Median | 30 | 17 * | 18 * | 12 * | 26 | ||
| 75% Percentile | 32 | 18 | 19 | 22 | 27 | ||
| Mg (μg/kg) | Average | 222 | 269 | 239 | 197 | 391 * | |
| SD | 66 | 68 | 160 | 105 | 34 | ||
| Control | F1 | F2 | F3 | F4 | |||
| Female rats: 28 days of exposure | Fe (μg/kg) | Average | 23 | 29 | 31 | 25 | 28 |
| SD | 8.4 | 12 | 12 | 8.4 | 9.2 | ||
| Cu (μg/kg) | Average | 0.82 | 0.66 | 0.90 | 0.91 | 0.93 | |
| SD | 0.31 | 0.29 | 0.39 | 0.29 | 0.27 | ||
| Zn (μg/kg) | Average | 15 | 15 | 18 | 19 | 17 | |
| SD | 2.1 | 3.7 | 5.1 | 5.3 | 3.1 | ||
| Mn (μg/kg) | Average | 1.8 | 0.76 ** | 1.3 | 1.7 | 1.6 | |
| SD | 0.43 | 0.46 | 0.40 | 0.61 | 0.50 | ||
| Ca (μg/kg) | Average | 20 | 15 * | 16 | 17 | 17 | |
| SD | 0.79 | 2.3 | 4.2 | 5.0 | 5.1 | ||
| Mg (μg/kg) | Average | 201 | 131 | 208 | 203 | 254 | |
| SD | 7.9 | 81 | 71 | 16 | 62 | ||
| Control | M1 | M2 | M3 | M4 | |||
| Male rats: 90 days of exposure | Fe (μg/kg) | 25% Percentile | 23 | 17 | 15 | 23 | NA |
| Median | 30 | 21 | 16 * | 25 | NA | ||
| 75% Percentile | 32 | 28 | 18 | 29 | NA | ||
| Cu (μg/kg) | Average | 0.91 | 0.71 * | 0.49 *** | 0.75 | NA | |
| SD | 0.075 | 0.19 | 0.073 | 0.16 | NA | ||
| Zn (μg/kg) | Average | 22 | 17 * | 12 *** | 17 * | NA | |
| SD | 1.9 | 3.9 | 4.4 | 3.2 | NA | ||
| Mn (μg/kg) | Average | 1.7 | 1.7 | 1.4 | 2.1 | NA | |
| SD | 0.61 | 0.55 | 0.36 | 0.31 | NA | ||
| NA | |||||||
| Ca (μg/kg) | Average | 23 | 22 | 14 *** | 17 *** | NA | |
| SD | 1.3 | 3.0 | 3.0 | 2.8 | NA | ||
| Mg (μg/kg) | Average | 212 | 151 ** | 110 *** | 117 *** | NA | |
| SD | 9.0 | 24 | 4.1 | 4.8 | NA | ||
| Control | F1 | F2 | F3 | F4 | |||
| Female rats: 90 days of exposure | Fe (μg/kg) | Average | 19 | 23 | 25 | 19 | NA |
| SD | 3.0 | 9.7 | 13 | 5.7 | NA | ||
| Cu (μg/kg) | Average | 0.97 | 0.69 | 0.90 | 0.66 | NA | |
| SD | 0.15 | 0.30 | 0.41 | 0.34 | NA | ||
| Zn (μg/kg) | Average | 16 | 16 | 15 | 12 * | NA | |
| SD | 1.7 | 3.1 | 3.0 | 5.0 | NA | ||
| Mn (μg/kg) | Average | 1.6 | 1.5 | 1.7 | 1.5 | NA | |
| SD | 0.40 | 0.28 | 0.47 | 0.34 | NA | ||
| Ca (μg/kg) | Average | 19 | 8.9 *** | 9.2 *** | 10 *** | NA | |
| SD | 0.84 | 3.6 | 3.5 | 1.9 | NA | ||
| Mg (μg/kg) | Average | 214 | 174 ** | 92 *** | 73 *** | NA | |
| SD | 6.1 | 23 | 23 | 16 | NA | ||
| Cd (mg/kg b.w./day) | Pb (mg/kg b.w./day) | As (mg/kg b.w./day) | Hg (mg/kg b.w./day) | Cr (mg/kg b.w./day) | Ni (mg/kg b.w./day) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Male animals | M1(28)/M1(90) | 2.333 × 10−5 | 2.120 × 10−5 | 0.006255316 | 8.085 × 10−5 | 1.264 × 10−5 | 0.0039306 |
| M2(28)/M2(90) | 0.000126 | 0.000186666 | 0.004978616 | 0.004777846 | 0.000385713 | 0.0299077 | |
| M3(28)/M3(90) | 0.000366 | 0.00531664 | 0.089681714 | 0.0447651 | 0.003356639 | 0.1888047 | |
| M4(28) | 0.05 | 0.05 | 0.038 | 0.23 | 0.52 | 5 | |
| Female animals | F1(28)/F1(90) | 3.50 × 10−7 | 0.000042971 | 0.005771 | 0.000579 | 4.5089 × 10−6 | 0.000161 |
| F2(28)/F2(90) | 0.000214 | 0.00153903 | 0.068489 | 0.004033 | 0.00039499 | 0.041618 | |
| F3(28)/F3(90) | 0.000705 | 0.0095243 | 0.193642 | 0.036029 | 0.01673275 | 0.438417 | |
| F4(28) | 0.05 | 0.05 | 0.038 | 0.23 | 0.52 | 5 | |
| Parameter | Method Principle | Units | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Malondialdehyde (MDA) | MDA levels are measured with thiobarbituric acid via absorbance after heating (100 °C, 5 min), cooling on ice (10 min), and centrifugation (10,000× g, at 4 °C, for 10 min). | µmol/mg protein | [67] |
| Ischemia-modified albumin (IMA) | Ischemia reduces albumin’s cobalt-binding ability at its amino terminal, measured colorimetrically with absorbance at 470 nm. | Absorbance units (ABSUs) | [68] |
| Total thiol group level (SH groups) | Absorbance of the yellow product from the reaction with 5,5′-dithiobis-(2-nitrobenzoic acid) (DTNB) in alkaline conditions (pH 9.0) is measured. | mmol/mg protein | [69] |
| Glutathione (GSH) | GSH is measured by reacting with DTNB in alkaline conditions (pH 9.0) after protein precipitation with 5% sulfosalicylic acid. | µmol/mg protein | [69] |
| Superoxide dismutase activity (SOD) | SOD activity is determined by its ability to inhibit adrenaline auto-oxidation at pH 10.2. | Percentage of the inhibition of adrenaline auto-oxidation (IU/mg protein) | [70] |
| Protein concentration | Coomassie Brilliant Blue G-250 reagent shifts absorbance from 465 to 595 nm upon binding to proteins, with bovine serum albumin as the standard. | mg | [71] |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2026 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license.
Share and Cite
Baralić, K.; Marić, Đ.; Bulat, Z.; Đukić-Ćosić, D.; Milošević, I.; Radovanović, A.; Lužajić Božinovski, T.; Lukić, V.; Repić, A.; Antonijević, B.; et al. Real-Life Metal Cocktail Induced Pancreatic Alterations in Rats: Influence of Sex and Exposure Duration. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2026, 27, 4624. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms27104624
Baralić K, Marić Đ, Bulat Z, Đukić-Ćosić D, Milošević I, Radovanović A, Lužajić Božinovski T, Lukić V, Repić A, Antonijević B, et al. Real-Life Metal Cocktail Induced Pancreatic Alterations in Rats: Influence of Sex and Exposure Duration. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2026; 27(10):4624. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms27104624
Chicago/Turabian StyleBaralić, Katarina, Đurđica Marić, Zorica Bulat, Danijela Đukić-Ćosić, Ivan Milošević, Anita Radovanović, Tijana Lužajić Božinovski, Vera Lukić, Aleksandra Repić, Biljana Antonijević, and et al. 2026. "Real-Life Metal Cocktail Induced Pancreatic Alterations in Rats: Influence of Sex and Exposure Duration" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 27, no. 10: 4624. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms27104624
APA StyleBaralić, K., Marić, Đ., Bulat, Z., Đukić-Ćosić, D., Milošević, I., Radovanović, A., Lužajić Božinovski, T., Lukić, V., Repić, A., Antonijević, B., & Buha Djordjevic, A. (2026). Real-Life Metal Cocktail Induced Pancreatic Alterations in Rats: Influence of Sex and Exposure Duration. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 27(10), 4624. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms27104624

