Next Article in Journal
Cannabinoid Signaling and Autophagy in Oral Disease: Molecular Mechanisms and Therapeutic Implications
Previous Article in Journal
CXCL9 and CXCL10 Induce Expression of Nociceptive Ion Channels in Primary Sensory Neurons in Models of HIV-Associated Distal Sensory Polyneuropathy
error_outline You can access the new MDPI.com website here. Explore and share your feedback with us.
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Genotypic Diversity and Antimicrobial Resistance Profiles of Multidrug-Resistant Escherichia coli in Porcine Populations from Hubei, China

Key Laboratory of Prevention and Control Agents for Animal Bacteriosis (Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs), Hubei Provincial Key Laboratory of Animal Pathogenic Microbiology, Institute of Animal Husbandry and Veterinary, Hubei Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Wuhan 430064, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2026, 27(1), 524; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms27010524
Submission received: 24 November 2025 / Revised: 26 December 2025 / Accepted: 28 December 2025 / Published: 4 January 2026
(This article belongs to the Section Molecular Microbiology)

Abstract

The indiscriminate and excessive use of antimicrobial agents in livestock production is a major driver of antimicrobial resistance (AMR), thereby posing a grave threat to global public health. Although several surveillance studies have documented antimicrobial resistance patterns of swine-derived E. coli in different regions of China, comprehensive investigations integrating multilocus sequence typing (MLST), resistance determinants, and virulence gene profiles have remained scarce for central China, particularly Hubei province, since 2018. This study investigated the prevalence of antibiotic resistance, and molecular epidemiology of E. coli isolated from swine farms in Hubei province, China, while simultaneously analyzing their clonal and genetic diversity. A total of 148 E. coli isolates were collected from porcine sources in central China, revealing distinct regional variations in genetic diversity. Multilocus sequence typing (MLST) analysis identified 38 sequence types (STs) distributed across 7 clonal complexes (CCs) and several unassigned clones. ST46 emerged as the predominant sequence type (19.6% prevalence), followed by ST23 and ST10. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing demonstrated 100% resistance to lincosamides and sulfonamides, with all isolates exhibiting multidrug resistance (MDR) to antimicrobial classes. Genetic characterization detected 16 resistance determinants, with individual isolates carrying 5–7 resistance genes on average. The resistance profile included seven β-lactamase genes: blaTEM (61.5%), blaCTX-M-1G (57.4%), blaDHA (46.6%), blaSHV (39.2%), blaCTX-M-9G (24.3%), blaOXA (13.5%), and blaCMY-2 (1.4%); and eight aminoglycoside-modifying enzyme genes, including polymyxin resistance gene mcr-1 (7.4%). Virulence factor screening through PCR detected nine associated genes, with EAST1, fyuA, STa, K88, STb, Irp2, and LT-1 present in 95.3% of isolates, while K99 and 987P were absent in all specimens. This investigation documents alarmingly high antimicrobial resistance rates in swine-derived E. coli populations while elucidating their genetic diversity. The findings suggest that intensive antibiotic use in porcine production systems has driven the evolution of extensively drug-resistant bacterial isolates. These results emphasize the urgent need to implement antimicrobial stewardship programs in livestock management to mitigate AMR proliferation.

1. Introduction

Escherichia coli is a predominant commensal bacterium residing as part of the natural gut microbiota in humans and warm-blooded animals [1,2,3,4]. However, pathogenic isolates of E. coli are a major cause of intestinal infections in neonatal piglets aged 1–10 days, primarily causing diarrhea and edema in this vulnerable population [5]. The lack of effective vaccines to prevent E. coli outbreaks attributable to its diverse serotypes and region-specific epidemiological variations has led to a heavy reliance on antimicrobial agents for disease management in most agricultural settings. The escalating use of antimicrobials in livestock production has precipitated the emergence of multidrug-resistant (MDR), extensively drug-resistant (XDR), and even pandrug-resistant (PDR) bacterial isolates, raising significant global health concerns. Of particular urgency is the rapid dissemination of antimicrobial resistance (AMR), a critical public health crisis that now permeates multiple sectors of society and imposes substantial economic burdens worldwide [6].
Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) has evolved into one of the most critical global health threats of the past three decades [7]. Of particular concern is the rising prevalence of drug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria in livestock populations, which can transmit to humans through environmental pathways and food chain contamination [8]. The intensive use of antibiotics in swine production has exacerbated this trend, with resistance profiles in pig-derived pathogens showing accelerated development when compared with other livestock sectors. Notably, surveillance data from Great Britain revealed higher AMR prevalence in porcine-derived E. coli isolates than those from cattle and sheep [9], underscoring the urgency to systematically characterize antibiotic resistance profiles of pathogenic E. coli in Chinese swine operations. Surveillance data from 2011–2012 revealed high resistance rates in swine E. coli isolates to tetracycline (79.57%), trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (73.12%), and kanamycin (55.91%) [10]. Subsequent monitoring in Guangdong province (2013–2016) detected multidrug resistance (MDR) in 100% of 333 E. coli isolates from commercial pig operations [11]. A surveillance of E. coli in Chinese pig farms from 2018 to 2019 indicated that 90.54% were multidrug-resistant (MDR) or had common resistance to tetracycline (96.26%) etc., and occasional resistance to last-resort drugs. Among 515 sequenced MDR isolates were 101 O-serogroups, 118 sequence types, 109 AMR genes, and 53 plasmid groups [12]. The results revealed that sequence types (ST88, ST100) and serotypes (O9:H19, O116:H11, O149:H10) of E. coli isolates exhibited enhanced virulence, while F18ab-fimbriated isolates carrying stx2A genes showed higher cytotoxicity, 95.8% were multidrug resistant, and 79% harbored oqxB-aac(3) gene clusters [13].
These findings reflect global concerns where MDR Gram-negative pathogens contribute to 60–70% of antimicrobial treatment failures in veterinary practice, highlighting critical challenges for animal health management [14].
Extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL)-producing-E. coli is spreading worldwide and poses a public health issue [15]. Escherichia coli has evolved multiple β-lactamase-mediated resistance mechanisms, including extended-spectrum β-lactamases (ESBLs; SHV, TEM, OXA, and CTX-M types), plasmid-mediated AmpC β-lactamases (CMY-2, a plasmid-mediated AmpC-like gene) and carbapenemases (MBL, KPC, and class D oxacillinases) [16]. CTX-Ms formed the largest group of ESBLs, and they have become globally disseminated. Currently, CTX-M-15 (a part of the CTX-M-1 group) is the most frequent CTX-M worldwide. This is closely followed by CTX-M-14 (a member of the CTX-M-9 group) [17]. Given the limited data on the epidemiology of MDR E. coli from pigs in Hubei province in China, it is interesting to investigate the spread of these resistant bacteria, particularly the ESBL types, which may be the cause of the spread of resistance genes from pork to human.
Several epidemiological studies on E. coli have been initiated in parts of China. In northeastern China, a survey showed that the separation rate of E. coli isolated from pig fecal samples reached 88% [18]. An investigation on pig farms in Henan province found that the positive rate of E. coli was 70.74%, of which the commonly sequenced types (STs) 10 and 101 were identified [19]. However, data on the genetic diversity and antimicrobial resistance of E. coli is still restricted in the Hubei province of central China.
E. coli can induce porcine postweaning diarrhea (PWD) [20], and it may be associated with the expression of fimbriae to mediate adhesion and colonization of porcine enterocytes [21,22]. Most adhesins are related with fimbriae F18 and F4 (K88), F5 (K99), F6 (987P) and F41, with F18 and F4 (K88) being leading causes of PWD in piglets [23,24,25]. The predominant toxins of pathogenic E. coli include those that are heat-labile (LT-I and LT-II) [26,27] and heat-stable (STa and STb) [28], as well as enteroaggregative E. coli heat-stable enterotoxin 1 (EAST1) [29], and these produce other virulence factors, such as pathogenicity islands (PAI). The locus of enterocyte effacement (LEE) and high-pathogenicity islands (HPIs) are particularly significant PAIs. Irp2 and fyuA genes, located in high-pathogenicity islands (HPIs), encode a yesiniabactin-like iron-scavenging system [30]. However, E. coli isolated from pigs with diarrhea carry different types of virulence genes, which can enhance the pathogenicity of E. coli through synergistic effects. However, data on characteristics of virulence genes of E. coli is still restricted in the Hubei province of central China.
Multilocus sequence typing (MLST) has been used to study the evolution and epidemiology of a number of bacterial pathogens. It has become the method of choice for typing epidemiologically important isolates. MLST is a widely used and standardized molecular typing method that enables comparison of E. coli lineages across studies and geographic regions, and is particularly suitable for population structure and epidemiological investigations [31]. Investigating the trend characterization of epidemic isolates will help us to better understand epidemiology.
This present study was carried out to investigate the prevalence and characteristics of E. coli. The MLST genotypes, antibiotic resistance and virulence genes of E. coli isolates were examined, having been collected from 2019 to 2022 in Hubei province of China. These findings provide information and implications for safeguarding and commanding the occurrence of diseases in future studies.

2. Results

2.1. Isolation of E. coli Isolates and Antimicrobial Susceptibility Profile

E. coli isolates were obtained from the fecal matter of weaned piglets from Hubei province. A total of 148 isolates of E. coli were separated from samples and further identified by PCR tests as E. coli. There are 15 isolates of E. coli isolated from Suizhou city, 37 isolates of E. coli isolated from Xiangyang city, 82 isolates of E. coli isolated from Wuhan city and 14 isolates of E. coli isolated from Yichang city (Figure 1).

2.2. Antimicrobial Susceptibility Profile of E. coli Isolates

Antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) results showed that all of the E. coli isolates showed resistance to lincosamides and sulfonamide (Figure 2A). A high rate of resistance to sulfaisoxazole, tetracycline, lomefloxacin, enoxacin, ampicillin, amoxicillin, azithromycin, and gentamicin has also been observed for the isolates, among which 100% of the E. coli was resistant to sulfaisoxazole; 97.97% of the E. coli was resistant to tetracycline; 95.95% of the E. coli was resistant to lomefloxacin; 93.24% of the E. coli was resistant to enoxacin; 91.89% of the E. coli was resistant to ampicillin; 91.89% of the E. coli was resistant to amoxicillin; 89.19% of the E. coli was resistant to azithromycin; and 82.43% of the E. coli was resistant to gentamicin. The isolates demonstrated a relatively low rate of resistance to cephalothin (77.7%) cefuroxime (68.92%), doxycycline (68.92%), cefotaxime (68.24%), ceftriaxone (62.84%), ciprofloxacin (61.49%), amikacin (52.7%) and kanamycin (51.35%) (Figure 2A and Figure 3).
As shown in Figure 2B, all of the isolates were multidrug-resistant (MDR) isolates, and most of the isolates were resistant to more than three drug classes. AST revealed that the 20 isolates showed severe resistance profiles that were resistant to the seventeen antimicrobial agents tested. Overall, most of the isolates were conferring resistance to 12–14 of the antimicrobial agents tested. Among the antibiotics tested, high resistance rates were observed for sulfaisoxazole, azithromycin, lomefloxacin, enoxacin, amikacin, tetracycline, doxycycline, lincomycin, cefuroxime, ceftriaxone, cephalothin, and cefotaxime.
E. coli in different regions has separate antibiotic resistance. The AST results revealed that resistance to lincomycin, and sulfaisoxazole was a common phenotype of the isolates from the pig farms in four cities, including Xiangyang, Yichang, Suizhou, and Wuhan in Hubei province (Figure 3). E. coli isolates resistant to doxycycline and amikacin were isolated, including in Yichang, Suizhou, and Wuhan in Hubei province; Xiangyang was the only region from which no isolates from pig farms with the abovementioned resistant phenotypes were detected (Figure 3). Notably, MDR isolates were identified on pig farms in Hubei province, but a relatively high proportion of the MDR isolates were identified on farms in Wuhan and Yichang relative to those from the other city.

2.3. Detection of Antimicrobial Resistance Genes

16 antibiotic resistance genes (ARGs) in 148 isolates of E. coli were detected (Figure 4A) using PCR-based assays. Of these, aac(6′)-Ib (71.6%, 106/148), blaTEM (61.5%, 91/148), aadA1 (60.1%, 89/148), blaCTX-M-1G (57.4%, 85/148), aac(3′)-Iv (55.4%, 82/148), aac(3′)-IIc (54.1%, 80/148), aadA2 (52.7%, 78/148), and blaDHA (46.9%, 69/148) were prevalent with higher detection rates (Figure 4B). Among the 148 E. coli isolates, 147 isolates carried β-lactamase genes with a detection rate of 99.3%, of which, the detection rates of blaSHV, blaTEM, blaOXA, blaCMY-2 and blaDHA were 39.2% (58/148), 61.5% (91/148), 13.5% (20/148),1.4% (2/148) and 46.6% (69/148), respectively. The detection rate of blaCTX-M-1G in CTX-M was 57.4% (highest) and the detection rate of blaCTX-M-9G was 24.3%.
Among the 148 E. coli isolates, 144 isolates carried aminoglycoside-modifying enzyme genes with a detection rate of 97.3%, of which the detection rates of rmtB (8.1%) and aac(3′)-Ia (33.8%) were prevalent with lower detection rates. Amongst the isolates positive for aminoglycoside-modifying enzyme genes, only one strain was positive for rmtA. In addition, the detection rate of the mobilized colistin resistance gene mcr-1 was 7.4%.
Antibiotic resistance genes were detected in all 147 isolates, with only one strain having no detected antibiotic genes. Of the 147 isolates, 91 (61.5%) had more than 6 ARGs, 4 (2.7%) isolates had more than 10 ARGs, and 2 isolates had 11 ARGs (Supplementary Table S1).

2.4. Various Extended-Spectrum β-Lactamase Genes Were Present in the Isolates

Among all of the isolates tested, 147 (99.3%) carried ESBLs and 130 of them harbored various number of ESBLs. The most frequent was blaTEM + blaSHV + blaCTX-M-1G (13.5%, 20/148); 64 isolates were found to have two different ESBLs genes; 52 isolates were found to have three different ESBLs genes; 11 isolates were found to have four different ESBLs genes; and 3 isolates were found to have five ESBLs genes—blaTEM, blaCTX-M-1G, blaCTX-M-9G, blaDHA and blaOXA (Figure 4C, Supplementary Table S1).

2.5. Various Extended-Spectrum Aminoglycoside-Modifying Enzyme Genes Were Present in the Isolates

Amongst the 148 isolates tested, 144 (97.3%) isolates carried aminoglycoside-modifying enzyme genes and 133 of them harbored various numbers of aminoglycoside-modifying enzyme genes. The most frequent were aadA1 + aadA2 + aac(3′)-Iv + aac(6′)-Ib and aac(3′)-IIc + aadA1 + aadA2 + aac(3′)-Iv + aac(6′)-Ib (15.5%, 23/148); 34 isolates were found to have two different ESBLs genes; 22 isolates were found to have three different ESBLs genes; 41 isolates were found to have four different ESBLs genes; 27 isolates were found to have five different ESBLs genes; and 9 isolates were found to have six different ESBLs genes (Figure 4D, Supplementary Table S1).

2.6. Prevalence of Virulence Genes in E. coli Isolates from Pigs

The distribution of eight virulence genes in 148 isolates of E. coli has been examined in this study. As shown in Figure 5A,B, the virulence gene EASTI (80.4%, 119/148) was found in most of the E. coli isolates, followed by fyuA (55.4%, 82/148), STa (52%, 77/148), K88 (38.5%, 57/148) and irp2 (3.1%, 49/148). While K99 and 987P were not detected in all isolates.
Among the 148 isolates tested, 141 (95.3%) carried virulence genes and 123 of these harbored a various number of virulence genes. The most frequent were EASTI+ and EASTI + fyuA+ (9.9%, 14/141), followed by irp2 + fyuA+ (9.2%, 13/141), STa + EASTI (7.1%, 10/141), STa + EASTI + irp2 + fyuA + K88+ (6.4%, 9/141), STa + EASTI + fyuA + K88+ (5.7%, 8/141), EASTI + EASTI + irp2+ (5.0%, 7/141), LT-1 + STa + STb + EASTI + irp2 + fyuA + K88+ (4.3%, 6/141), LT-1 + STa + STb + EASTI + K88+ (4.3%, 6/141), and STa + EASTI + K88+ (4.3%, 6/141) (Figure 5C, Supplementary Table S1).

2.7. Multi-Locus Sequence Typing (MLST)

The genetic diversity of these E. coli isolates was analyzed with MLST. A total of 148 isolates were analyzed utilizing MLST, the identification of 38 sequence types (STs). Among these isolates, 101 out of the 148 isolates possessed 14 different STs which belonged to 7 CCs. The remaining 46 isolates belonged to 23 different unassigned STs. The presence of new STs was due to new combinations of previously known alleles in adk (allele 7), fumC (allele 7), gyrB (allele 193), icd (allele 1), mdh (allele 986), purA (allele 159) and recA (allele 139). The predominant STs were ST46, ST23 and ST10 containing 29 (19.59%), 20 (13.51%), 12 (8.11%) isolates respectively. Ten STs contained three or more isolates with ST602, ST165, ST100, ST744, ST7452, ST1642, ST1081, ST515, ST48 and ST101 comprising nine (6.08%), eight (5.41%), eight (5,41%), seven (4.73%), five (3.38%), four (2.70%), four (2.70%), four (2.70%), three (2.03%) and three (2.03%) isolates, respectively. Seven STs (ST410, ST650, ST764, ST1147, ST1518, ST2739 and ST5229) contained two isolates each. Eight STs (ST77, ST88, ST457, ST542, ST617, ST710, ST746, ST1112, ST1585, ST1716, ST1990, ST3744, ST5334, ST7601, ST9607, ST11019 and ST11284) had only one isolate each (Figure 6).
Minimum-spanning trees showed that the tested E. coli were mainly classed into seven clonal complexes and other unassigned clone complexes. CC-46 was the most frequently isolated clonal complex, containing 29 isolates belonging to one ST, and accounted for 19.59% (29/148) of all the isolates. The major clonal complexes also included CC-23 (25/148, 16.89%), CC-10 (16/148, 10.81%) and CC-165 (16/148, 10.81%). The other isolates covered 28 STs belonging to three CCs and were unassigned.
To further analyze sequence types (STs), a neighbor-joining phylogenetic analysis was performed based on concatenated MLST sequences (Figure 6). The NJ phylogram classified the identified STs into four major phylogenetic groups. Group 4 comprised a single isolate belonging to an unassigned ST, whereas Group 3 included six isolates representing two different unassigned STs. In contrast, Groups 1 and 2 encompassed the majority of isolates (n = 140) and contained most of the dominant clonal complexes, including CC-10, CC-23, CC-46, CC-101, CC-165, CC-206, CC-446, as well as several unassigned STs. Specifically, CC-10 included ST10, ST48, and ST617; CC-23 included ST23, ST88, ST410, and ST650; CC-101 included ST101 and ST5229; and CC-165 included ST100 and ST165 (Figure 6).

3. Discussion

E. coli is one of the main pathogenic bacteria that impact the production and growth of pigs on pig farms. It is associated with gastrointestinal diseases such as diarrhea, edema disease, and systemic infections such as septicemia and polyserositis [2]. These diseases caused by E. coli can increase mortality, morbidity and growth delays of piglets, which are responsible for economic losses. This study analyzed the prevalence, genetic diversity and antibiotic resistance of disease, which may help us to improve methods of prevention and treatment.
E. coli isolates exhibit high AMR with widespread multidrug resistance and extensive carriage of resistance genes, showing regional differences in resistance phenotypes.
From 2002 to 2008, the prevalence of E. coli isolated from pork chop samples was 44% in the United States [32]. However, various incidence rates have also been reported in different regions of China. From 2003 to 2009, the prevalence of E. coli isolates from pig farms was 77.78% in China [33]. From 2013 to 2016, the positive rates of E. coli between farm 1 and farm 2 were 40.25% and 59.75%. respectively, in Guangdong province [11]. Between 2016 and 2017, a survey indicated that the separation rate of E. coli isolated from pig fecal swabs reached 88% in northeastern China, including Heilongjiang, Jilin and Liaoning [18].
Diarrhea in weaned piglets driven by E. coli remains a principal cause of economic losses for the pig industry. This commonly requires antimicrobial drug treatment, which is of considerable expense when used to cure piglets infected with this pathogen. In 2011, the study of Agersө et al. found that 32% of isolates have multi-drug resistance, mainly concentrated on ampicillin (27%) and tetracycline (29%) [34]. In 2012, Tadesse et al. tested 1729 isolates of E. coli antibiotic susceptibility varied from different sources, the resistance rate of E. coli increased from 7.2% to 63.6% but the most common resistance was to tetracycline, streptomycin and sulfonamides [35]. A total of 131 E. coli isolates were obtained from the pigs presenting from diarrhea in Switzerland from 2014 to 2015, the isolates exhibited resistance to tetracycline (50%), sulfamethoxazole (49%), ampicillin (26%), gentamicin (17%), and ciprofloxacin (8%) [36]. However, this caused a rise in the employment of various antimicrobial agents, such as lincosamides, tetracyclines and sulfonamides, which may expand antimicrobial resistance.
In this study, antimicrobial susceptibility testing of the E. coli isolates revealed the highest prevalence of resistance to three classes of antimicrobials: lincosamides, tetracyclines, and sulfonamides. This observation is likely associated with the long-term irrational use of these three antibiotics for controlling bacterial diarrhea in piglets within Hubei province.
Notably, over 80% of the E. coli isolates exhibited high resistance rates to seven antimicrobials, specifically tetracycline, lomefloxacin, enoxacin, ampicillin, amoxicillin, azithromycin, and gentamicin. Resistance was also detected against β-lactam drugs: the resistance rate to cephalothin (a first-generation cephalosporin) reached 77.7%, which was higher than that to cefuroxime (a second-generation cephalosporin, 68.9%), the third-generation cephalosporins cefotaxime (68.2%) and ceftriaxone (62.8%).
All isolates displayed varying degrees of resistance to the tested antimicrobials, and most E. coli isolates exhibited a high prevalence of multidrug resistance. Among them, 20 isolates were resistant to all 17 tested antimicrobials. Overall, more than half of the isolates showed resistance to 9–17 antimicrobial agents. The most common MDR pattern was resistance to 12 antimicrobials (cefuroxime, amikacin, ampicillin, amoxicillin, lincomycin, doxycycline, tetracycline, gentamicin, enoxacin, lomefloxacin, azithromycin, and sulfaisoxazole), which was observed in 30 isolates.
For context, relevant studies conducted in other regions of China have reported comparable trends. Jiang et al. found that E. coli isolates had high resistance rates to ampicillin (99.5%), tetracycline (93.4%), and amoxicillin (65.1%), with prevalent resistance also detected against cephalosporins, quinolones, and aminoglycosides [37]. Meng et al. similarly noted that the majority of E. coli isolates were resistant to tetracycline (79.57%), trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (73.12%), and kanamycin (55.91%) [10]. In contrast, a study in Sichuan province (2012–2013) reported that E. coli isolates had the highest resistance to sulfamethoxazole (61.6%), followed by tetracycline (61.2%), ampicillin (48.2%), and kanamycin (22.4%) [38]. Additionally, a multi-provincial survey (covering seven provinces) showed that E. coli isolates from pig farms had resistance rates of 81.44% to ampicillin, 94.37% to tetracycline, and 88.36% to sulfaisoxazole [39]. Collectively, these findings provide critical insights and implications for guiding the rational application of antibiotics in swine production in future research and practice.
It has been documented that E. coli has a great ability to accumulate ARGs, mainly through horizontal gene transfer [40]. In this study, a large number of ARGs are detected in various isolates and it was found that a higher proportion contained six or more resistance genes. One of the most common antibiotic resistance mechanisms in E. coli is mediated by the production of β-lactamase, ESBLs are an increasing cause of resistance to third-generation cephalosporins, including the fourth-generation cephalosporins in Enterobacteriaceae [41,42]. The blaTEM, blaCTX-M and blaSHV types have been recognized as the most prevalent ESBL genes that confer antibiotic resistance among pathogens [43,44]. In this study, five ESBL genes and two AmpC enzyme genes (blaDHA, blaCMY-2) were detected. Among the five ESBL genes, blaTEM (61.5%) was the most prevalent gene, similar to the ESBL epidemic in Guizhou in 2021 [45]; followed by blaCTX-M-1 at 57.4%, blaSHV at 39.2%, blaCTX-M-9G at 24.3% and blaOXA at 13.5%. ESBLs are paradigmatic of resistance, are usually encoded on mobile genetic elements that accelerate their dissemination, and have become another challenge for drug resistance control in pig farms [46].
It is inevitable for bacteria to develop resistance to aminoglycosides due to their widespread use. There have been reports of aminoglycoside resistance in both Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacteria [47]. In this study, the detection rate of five aminoglycoside-modifying enzyme genes (aac(6′)-Ib, aac(3′)-IV, aac(3′)-IIc, aadA1, aadA2) exceeds 50%, and it is possible to carry multiple aminoglycoside modifying enzyme genes in a single strain, leading to high levels of resistance to aminoglycosides. In 2015, the plasmid-mediated colistin resistance gene, mcr-1, was reported for the first time in E. coli isolate from the animals and their food in China [48], it has quickly spread to human pathogens [49]. The transfer of colistin resistance by plasmid has been ascribed to the mcr-1 gene, which is the most predominant type of mcr gene [50]. The low detection rate (7.4%) of mcr-1 in this study likely results from the low use of polymyxins in pig feed in Hubei. It is important to monitor such isolates closely to prevent their spread. The concern of antibiotic resistance in these categories is serious and needs urgent attention. Additionally, it demands urgent attention in terms of the regularization monitoring of antimicrobial susceptibilities and the efficient administration of bacterial infections to restrict the further spread of multidrug resistance in Hubei province.
In past decades, the occurrence and spread of PWD in piglets has caused massive economic losses to the development of the pig farming industry in China [51]. The highest detection rate of virulence factor has been found for EAST1 (80.4%), followed by fyuA (55.4%). Fimbriae adhesins are necessary in the pathogenetic mechanism, the most common adhesins on E. coli from PWD in pigs are fimbriae F4 and F18 [52]. F4 (K88) (38.5%) was identified in this study, which indicates that it is closely related with pathogenic E. coli. For enterotoxins detected in this study, the gene encoding the heat-stable enterotoxin STa was frequently detected (52.0%), which is similar to findings reported in Korea and other countries [53,54], followed by the heat-stable enterotoxin STb (25.7%). The detection of heat-labile enterotoxin (LT-1) (10.1%) was less than that of the STa and STb in this study. It is possible that the comparative identification of enterotoxins seems to vary from one geographic area to another. This study finds the distribution and characteristics of virulence factors in E. coli in Hubei province, and the data may be useful for establishing preventive measures for PWD.
The application of MLST in E. coli isolates facilitates a better understanding of the genetic diversity of these E. coli isolates. In this study, a total of 148 isolates were analyzed utilizing MLST, leading to the identification of 38 sequence types (STs), the most frequent ST was ST46, followed by ST23, ST10, ST602, ST165, ST100 and ST744. These isolates belonged to seven CCs and other unassigned clone complexes, including CC46, CC23, CC10 and so on. This reveals that there is abundant diversity in ST types among porcine E. coli isolates in Hubei province. Notably, the ST distribution profile in our study exhibits distinct discrepancies compared with previously reported data, both from the same region (Hubei province) and other regions of China. First, from the city-level perspective, no city-exclusive STs were identified in this study: dominant sequence types (e.g., ST46, ST23, ST10) were detected across multiple cities in Hubei province, indicating regional circulation of these lineages rather than strict geographic restriction. This pattern may reflect potential dissemination via animal movement, shared farming practices, or environmental transmission routes between farms in different cities. Second, our study identified ST46 as the most prevalent sequence type, which differs from findings reported in other regions of China. For instance, Yang et al. [55] found that ST10 was the most common sequence type (22/171, 12.9%), followed by ST48 (16/171, 9.4%) and ST744 (8/171, 4.7%). Additionally, the prevalence of ST10 in our study (12/148, 8.11%) was lower than that documented in previous research. Zhang et al. [11] have reported that the proportion of ST10 reached 50% (16/32). The potential reasons are the limitation of the data size, regional epidemiological characteristics of E. coli clones, and differences in sample collection strategies (e.g., variations in farm scale, feeding patterns, and disease prevalence periods between studies). Recently, E. coli ST10 has not only been detected in animals in China but also isolated from human infections in China [56], indicating the potential zoonotic risk of this ST clone, which warrants further surveillance. These findings highlight the necessity of the continuous regional epidemiological surveillance of E. coli ST types, as the distribution of dominant clones may vary geographically, which is crucial for guiding local disease prevention and control strategies.
Based on the detected virulence gene combinations, most isolates could be classified as enterotoxigenic E. coli (ETEC), which is consistent with their isolation from diarrheic piglets. Several dominant STs, including ST46, ST23, and ST10, were detected across multiple cities, suggesting regional dissemination rather than city-specific circulation. Notably, some of these STs have also been reported in human infections, indicating potential zoonotic relevance. Although this study was not designed to establish causal relationships between virulence and antimicrobial resistance, an isolate-level integrative analysis revealed that several multidrug-resistant isolates simultaneously harbored multiple virulence-associated genes. However, no clear linear correlation was observed between the number of resistance genes and virulence genes across isolates. This finding suggests that antimicrobial resistance and virulence traits are not directly proportional but may be co-selected under similar selective pressures in intensive swine production systems.
Dominant STs exhibited heterogeneous resistance and virulence profiles, indicating that clonal background alone does not determine pathogenic potential. The coexistence of multidrug resistance and enterotoxigenic virulence factors in several isolates underscores their epidemiological relevance. The detection of similar STs across multiple cities supports the hypothesis of regional dissemination and highlights the importance of continuous surveillance to monitor the spread of multidrug-resistant E. coli within and beyond swine populations.
Several limitations should be acknowledged in this study. First, although phenotypic resistance to sulfonamides was universally observed, sulfonamide resistance genes were not investigated, which limits mechanistic interpretation and warrants further molecular characterization in future studies. Second, while multiple antimicrobial resistance genes and virulence-associated genes were detected, a systematic one-to-one correlation between resistance genotype and phenotypic susceptibility, as well as between virulence gene content and clinical severity, could not be established. This was partly due to the absence of detailed clinical outcome data and individual antimicrobial treatment histories for the sampled piglets. Third, although transmission patterns and horizontal gene transfer were discussed, the lack of whole-genome sequencing data constrained comprehensive analyses of mobile genetic elements and resistance gene dissemination. Future studies integrating genomic, clinical, and antimicrobial usage data will be essential to identify high-risk lineages and better understand the evolution and spread of multidrug-resistant E. coli.
In this study, a high antimicrobial resistance and the genotypic diversity of E. coli were isolated from swine in Hubei province and observed. From the results obtained it can be concluded that these isolates present highly prevalent multi-drug resistance. These data provide a greater understanding of the genetic diversity and antimicrobial resistance of E. coli. From a One Health perspective, the “risk” associated with individual isolates should be interpreted as a composite characteristic arising from the combined presence of multidrug resistance and key virulence determinants rather than from sequence type alone. The presence of multidrug-resistant diarrheagenic E. coli in swine populations represents a potential reservoir for resistance determinants that may disseminate across animals, humans, and the environment, emphasizing the need for integrated antimicrobial stewardship strategies.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Bacterial Isolates and Identification

From 2019 to 2022, a total of 148 fecal swab samples were collected from pig farms in 4 cities: Xiangyang, Yichang, Suizhou, and Wuhan in Hubei province. The samples were taken from diseased piglets with diarrhea symptoms. These isolates were obtained using MacConkey agar, which was incubated at 37 °C for 24 h. Pink colonies were picked and purified again, then bacterial isolates cultured in Luria–Bertani (LB) broth at 37 °C for 24 h. And further confirmed by the PCR amplification of the 16S rRNA gene with primers (16S-F: 5′-AGAGTTTGATCATGGCTCAG-3′; 16S-R: 5′-TAGGGTTACCTTGTTACGACTT-3′) as previously described [55]. PCR amplification was performed as previously described, with minor modifications to the annealing temperature and extension time to optimize amplification efficiency. Primer sequences remained unchanged.

4.2. Antibiotic Resistance Profiles

According to the guidelines of the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute [57], the confirmed E. coli were assayed for antimicrobial susceptibility testing. E. coli isolates were examined for susceptibility to antimicrobial drugs utilizing a disk diffusion assay. All samples were analyzed for the presence of resistant bacteria. A total of 17 antimicrobials were tested, comprising cefuroxime (CXM), ceftriaxone (CRO), cephalothin (CEP), cefotaxime (CTX), ampicillin (AMP), amoxicillin (AMX), lincomycin (MY), doxycycline (DOC), tetracycline (TET), kanamycin (KMC), gentamicin (GEN), amikacin (AMK), ciprofloxacin (CIP), enoxacin (ENO), lomefloxacin (LOM), azithromycin (AZM), and sulfaisoxazole (SFN). Inoculated plates were incubated at 37 °C for 24 h and the diameters of the inhibition zone were subsequently measured (in mm). Antimicrobial susceptibility testing was performed using the disk diffusion method. Isolates were categorized as susceptible, intermediate, or resistant according to the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) M100 guidelines based on inhibition zone diameters. The E. coli strain ATCC 25922 was utilized for quality control. Multidrug resistance (MDR) was defined as resistance to at least one antimicrobial agent in three or more different antimicrobial classes, in accordance with established criteria [58]. The antimicrobial agents tested in this study represented eight antimicrobial classes, including cephalosporins, penicillins, lincosamides, tetracyclines, aminoglycosides, fluoroquinolones, macrolides, and sulfonamides.

4.3. Detection of Antibiotic Resistance Genes

To extract the total DNA of each E. coli strain, we boiled the lysis of the isolated colonies. PCR was used to identify genes responsible for resistance to β-lactamase genes (blaDHA, blaCMY-2, blaTEM, blaSHV, blaCTX-M-1G, blaCTX-M-9G, blaOXA), aminoglycoside-modifying enzyme genes (aac(3′)-Ia, aac(3′)-IIc, aac(3′)-IV, aac(6′)-Ib, aadA1, aadA2, rmtA, rmtB), and polypeptide resistance gene mcr-1. The primers for PCR are listed in Table 1 and were synthesized at Sangon Biotech, Shanghai, China.

4.4. Detection of Virulence-Associated Genes

Considering the contribution of virulence genes to the invasiveness and pathogenicity of E. coli, DNA was isolated and we identified nine virulence-associated genes of each strain, including LT-1, STa, STb, EAST1, irp2, fyuA, K88, K99, and 987P, which were amplified by PCR, as previously described [51,68,69,70]. These virulence genes were selected because they represent major adhesins, enterotoxins, and pathogenicity island-associated factors commonly implicated in porcine enterotoxigenic E. coli (ETEC) infections. The primer sequences of virulence genes are shown in Table 2. PCR reactions were carried out in a final volume of 25 μL containing 12.5 μL mix (Vazyme Biotech, Nanjing, China), 1 μL each of primers, and 2 μL bacterial DNA. PCR was performed in a GeneAmp PCR System 9700 (Applied Bio-systems, Darmstadt, Germany), under the following conditions: initial denaturation at 95 °C for 5 min; cycling consisted of 35 cycles of 30 s at 94 °C, 30 s at 58 °C, and 1 min at 72 °C, with a final extension at 72 °C for 10 min. The resulting amplification products were separated by electrophoresis in 1% agarose gel, stained with ethidium bromide and visualized using a GelDoc XR system (Bio-Rad, Shanghai, China).

4.5. MLST and Phylogenetic Tree

The multilocus sequence typing (MLST) was executed on E. coli isolates according to the E. coli MLST database guidelines (https://enterobase.warwick.ac.uk/species/ecoli/allele_st_search, accessed on 9 January 2023), according to the protocols published on the web site. Briefly, the seven house-keeping genes adk, fumC, gyrB, icd, mdh, purA and recA were amplified employing a PCR protocol, and the amplicons sequenced utilizing the amplification primers. We investigated individual gene sequences and allocated an allelic profile number in line with the MLST database. Sequence type (ST) and clone complex (CC) designations of each strain were composed of seven alleles. Multilocus sequence typing (MLST)-based phylogenetic analysis was performed using concatenated sequences of seven housekeeping genes. Sequence alignment was conducted in MEGA version 11.0, and a neighbor-joining (NJ) phylogenetic tree was constructed using the Kimura 2-parameter (K2P) substitution model. The robustness of the tree topology was assessed by 1000 bootstrap replicates.

4.6. Statistical Analysis

The Student’s t-test was employed to analyze the data. When p < 0.05, difference was considered statistically significant. The analysis was performed using GraphPad Prism version 8 (GraphPad Software, Inc., San Diego, CA, USA).

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/ijms27010524/s1.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, R.G.; Methodology, X.L. and Z.L.; Software, W.L.; Validation, N.W.; Formal analysis, N.W.; Investigation, X.L.; Resources, W.C.; Data curation, Z.L.; Writing—original draft, X.L.; Writing—review & editing, F.Y.; Visualization, T.G.; Supervision, K.Y.; Project administration, Y.T.; Funding acquisition, F.Y. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the Technical Innovation Project of Hubei Province (2024CSA070); the Hubei Provincial Major Science and Technology Innovation Plan (2023BBB069), and the Hubei Province Innovation Center of Agricultural Sciences and Technology (2021-620-000-001-017). The funders had no role in the study design, data collection, and analysis; the decision to publish; or the preparation of the manuscript.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors report no declarations of interest.

References

  1. Marques, C.; Belas, A.; Franco, A.; Aboim, C.; Gama, L.T.; Pomba, C. Increase in antimicrobial resistance and emergence of major international high-risk clonal lineages in dogs and cats with urinary tract infection: 16 year retrospective study. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2018, 73, 377–384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Fairbrother, J.M.; Nadeau, É.; Gyles, C.L. Escherichia coli in postweaning diarrhea in pigs: An update on bacterial types, pathogenesis, and prevention strategies. Anim. Health Res. Rev. 2005, 6, 17–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Suryadevara, M.; Clark, A.E.; Wolk, D.M.; Carman, A.; Rosenbaum, P.F.; Shaw, J. Molecular Characterization of Invasive Staphylococcus aureus Infection in Central New York Children: Importance of Two Clonal Groups and Inconsistent Presence of Selected Virulence Determinants. J. Pediatr. Infect. Dis. Soc. 2013, 2, 30–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Moore, J.E.; Watabe, M.; Millar, B.C.; Rooney, P.J.; Loughrey, A.; Goldsmith, C.E. Direct molecular (PCR) detection of verocytotoxigenic and related virulence determinants (eae, hyl, stx) in E. coli O157:H7 from fresh faecal material. Br. J. Biomed. Sci. 2008, 65, 163–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Casey, W.T.; McClean, S. Exploiting molecular virulence determinants in Burkholderia to develop vaccine antigens. Curr. Med. Chem. 2015, 22, 1719–1733. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Yang, S.C.; Lin, C.H.; Aljuffali, I.A.; Fang, J.Y. Current pathogenic Escherichia coli foodborne outbreak cases and therapy development. Arch. Microbiol. 2017, 199, 811–825. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Beasley, D.W.; Davis, C.T.; Whiteman, M.; Granwehr, B.; Kinney, R.M.; Barrett, A.D. Molecular determinants of virulence of West Nile virus in North America. Arch. Virol. Suppl. 2004, 18, 35–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Umpierrez, A.; Bado, I.; Oliver, M.; Acquistapace, S.; Etcheverría, A.; Padola, N.L.; Vignoli, R.; Zunino, P. Zoonotic Potential and Antibiotic Resistance of Escherichia coli in Neonatal Calves in Uruguay. Microbes Environ. 2017, 32, 275–282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Enne, V.I.; Cassar, C.; Sprigings, K.; Woodward, M.J.; Bennett, P.M. A high prevalence of antimicrobial resistant Escherichia coli isolated from pigs and a low prevalence of antimicrobial resistant E. coli from cattle and sheep in Great Britain at slaughter. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 2008, 278, 193–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Tauch, A.; Burkovski, A. Molecular armory or niche factors: Virulence determinants of Corynebacterium species. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 2015, 362, fnv185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Zhang, Y.; Sun, Y.H.; Wang, J.Y.; Chang, M.X.; Zhao, Q.Y.; Jiang, H.X. A Novel Structure Harboring blaCTX-M-27 on IncF Plasmids in Escherichia coli Isolated from Swine in China. Antibiotics 2021, 10, 387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Peng, Z.; Hu, Z.; Li, Z.; Zhang, X.; Jia, C.; Li, T.; Dai, M.; Tan, C.; Xu, Z.; Wu, B.; et al. Antimicrobial resistance and population genomics of multidrug-resistant Escherichia coli in pig farms in mainland China. Nat. Commun. 2022, 13, 1116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Zhu, J.; Liu, Z.; Wang, S.; Gao, T.; Liu, W.; Yang, K.; Yuan, F.; Wu, Q.; Li, C.; Guo, R.; et al. Prevalence, Molecular Characterization, and Antimicrobial Resistance Profile of Enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli Isolates from Pig Farms in China. Foods 2025, 14, 1188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. De Waele, J.J.; Boelens, J.; Leroux-Roels, I. Multidrug-resistant bacteria in ICU: Fact or myth. Curr. Opin. Anaesthesiol. 2020, 33, 156–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Carvalho, I.; Tejedor-Junco, M.T.; González-Martín, M.; Corbera, J.A.; Suárez-Pérez, A.; Silva, V.; Igrejas, G.; Torres, C.; Poeta, P. Molecular diversity of Extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing Escherichia coli from vultures in Canary Islands. Environ. Microbiol. Rep. 2020, 12, 540–547. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Ghafourian, S.; Sadeghifard, N.; Soheili, S.; Sekawi, Z. Extended Spectrum Beta-lactamases: Definition, Classification and Epidemiology. Curr. Issues Mol. Biol. 2015, 17, 11–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Peirano, G.; Pitout, J.D.D. Extended-Spectrum beta-Lactamase-Producing Enterobacteriaceae: Update on Molecular Epidemiology and Treatment Options. Drugs 2019, 79, 1529–1541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Cheng, P.; Yang, Y.; Cao, S.; Liu, H.; Li, X.; Sun, J.; Li, F.; Ishfaq, M.; Zhang, X. Prevalence and Characteristic of Swine-Origin mcr-1-Positive Escherichia coli in Northeastern China. Front. Microbiol. 2021, 12, 712707. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Hu, Z.; Peng, Z.; Zhang, X.; Li, Z.; Jia, C.; Li, X.; Lv, Y.; Tan, C.; Chen, H.; Wang, X. Prevalence and Molecular Characterization of Antimicrobial-Resistant Escherichia coli in Pig Farms, Slaughterhouses, and Terminal Markets in Henan Province of China. Foodborne Pathog. Dis. 2021, 18, 733–743. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Barros, M.M.; Castro, J.; Araújo, D.; Campos, A.M.; Oliveira, R.; Silva, S.; Outor-Monteiro, D.; Almeida, C. Swine Colibacillosis: Global Epidemiologic and Antimicrobial Scenario. Antibiotics 2023, 12, 682. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Tran-Mai, A.P.; Tran, H.T.; Mai, Q.G.; Huynh, K.Q.; Tran, T.L.; Tran-Van, H. Flagellin from Salmonella enteritidis Enhances the Immune Response of Fused F18 from Enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli. Trop. Life Sci. Res. 2022, 33, 19–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Luo, X.; Wu, S.; Jia, H.; Si, X.; Song, Z.; Zhai, Z.; Bai, J.; Li, J.; Yang, Y.; Wu, Z. Resveratrol alleviates enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli K88-induced damage by regulating SIRT-1 signaling in intestinal porcine epithelial cells. Food Funct. 2022, 13, 7346–7360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Jerez-Bogota, K.; Jensen, M.; Højberg, O.; Cormican, P.; Lawlor, P.G.; Gardiner, G.E.; Canibe, N. Antibacterial plant combinations prevent postweaning diarrhea in organically raised piglets challenged with enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli F18. Front. Vet. Sci. 2023, 10, 1095160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Fiil, B.K.; Thrane, S.W.; Pichler, M.; Kittilä, T.; Ledsgaard, L.; Ahmadi, S.; Hermansen, G.M.M.; Jelsbak, L.; Lauridsen, C.; Brix, S.; et al. Orally active bivalent V(H)H construct prevents proliferation of F4(+) enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli in weaned piglets. iScience 2022, 25, 104003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Duan, Q.; Wu, W.; Pang, S.; Pan, Z.; Zhang, W.; Zhu, G. Coimmunization with Two Enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli (ETEC) Fimbrial Multiepitope Fusion Antigens Induces the Production of Neutralizing Antibodies against Five ETEC Fimbriae (F4, F5, F6, F18, and F41). Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2020, 86, e00217-20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Huang, J.; Duan, Q.; Zhang, W. Significance of Enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli (ETEC) Heat-Labile Toxin (LT) Enzymatic Subunit Epitopes in LT Enterotoxicity and Immunogenicity. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2018, 84, e00849-18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Joffre, E.; Sjöling, A. The LT1 and LT2 variants of the enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli (ETEC) heat-labile toxin (LT) are associated with major ETEC lineages. Gut Microbes 2016, 7, 75–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Tobias, J.; Von Mentzer, A.; Loayza Frykberg, P.; Aslett, M.; Page, A.J.; Sjöling, A.; Svennerholm, A.M. Stability of the Encoding Plasmids and Surface Expression of CS6 Differs in Enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli (ETEC) Encoding Different Heat-Stable (ST) Enterotoxins (STh and STp). PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0152899. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Vereecke, N.; Van Hoorde, S.; Sperling, D.; Theuns, S.; Devriendt, B.; Cox, E. Virotyping and genetic antimicrobial susceptibility testing of porcine ETEC/STEC strains and associated plasmid types. Front. Microbiol. 2023, 14, 1139312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Guerra, J.A.; Romero-Herazo, Y.C.; Arzuza, O.; Gómez-Duarte, O.G. Phenotypic and genotypic characterization of enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli clinical isolates from northern Colombia, South America. BioMed Res. Int. 2014, 2014, 236260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Yun, K.W.; Kim, D.S.; Kim, W.; Lim, I.S. Molecular typing of uropathogenic Escherichia coli isolated from Korean children with urinary tract infection. Korean J. Pediatr. 2015, 58, 20–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Zhao, S.; Blickenstaff, K.; Bodeis-Jones, S.; Gaines, S.A.; Tong, E.; McDermott, P.F. Comparison of the prevalences and antimicrobial resistances of Escherichia coli isolates from different retail meats in the United States, 2002 to 2008. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2012, 78, 1701–1707. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Zhao, Q.Y.; Li, W.; Cai, R.M.; Lu, Y.W.; Zhang, Y.; Cai, P.; Webber, M.A.; Jiang, H.X. Mobilization of Tn1721-like structure harboring blaCTX-M-27 between P1-like bacteriophage in Salmonella and plasmids in Escherichia coli in China. Vet. Microbiol. 2021, 253, 108944. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Hatta, M.; Kawaoka, Y. [Molecular determinants associated with high virulence of influenza A virus]. Tanpakushitsu Kakusan Koso 2007, 52, 1237–1241. [Google Scholar]
  35. Tadesse, D.A.; Zhao, S.; Tong, E.; Ayers, S.; Singh, A.; Bartholomew, M.J.; McDermott, P.F. Antimicrobial drug resistance in Escherichia coli from humans and food animals, United States, 1950–2002. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2012, 18, 741–749. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Brand, P.; Gobeli, S.; Perreten, V. Pathotyping and antibiotic resistance of porcine enterovirulent Escherichia coli strains from Switzerland (2014–2015). Schweiz Arch. Tierheilkd. 2017, 159, 373–380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Jiang, H.-X.; Lü, D.-H.; Chen, Z.-L.; Wang, X.-M.; Chen, J.-R.; Liu, Y.-H.; Liao, X.-P.; Liu, J.-H.; Zeng, Z.-L. High prevalence and widespread distribution of multi-resistant Escherichia coli isolates in pigs and poultry in China. Vet. J. 2011, 187, 99–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Zhang, A.; He, X.; Meng, Y.; Guo, L.; Long, M.; Yu, H.; Li, B.; Fan, L.; Liu, S.; Wang, H.; et al. Antibiotic and Disinfectant Resistance of Escherichia coli Isolated from Retail Meats in Sichuan, China. Microb. Drug Resist. 2016, 22, 80–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Zhang, P.; Shen, Z.; Zhang, C.; Song, L.; Wang, B.; Shang, J.; Yue, X.; Qu, Z.; Li, X.; Wu, L.; et al. Surveillance of antimicrobial resistance among Escherichia coli from chicken and swine, China, 2008–2015. Vet. Microbiol. 2017, 203, 49–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Poirel, L.; Madec, J.-Y.; Lupo, A.; Schink, A.-K.; Kieffer, N.; Nordmann, P.; Schwarz, S. Antimicrobial Resistance in Escherichia coli. Microbiol. Spectr. 2018, 6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Gelalcha, B.D.; Kerro Dego, O. Extended-Spectrum Beta-Lactamases Producing Enterobacteriaceae in the USA Dairy Cattle Farms and Implications for Public Health. Antibiotics 2022, 11, 1313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Saravanan, M.; Ramachandran, B.; Barabadi, H. The prevalence and drug resistance pattern of extended spectrum beta-lactamases (ESBLs) producing Enterobacteriaceae in Africa. Microb. Pathog. 2018, 114, 180–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Tawfik, A.F.; Alswailem, A.M.; Shibl, A.M.; Al-Agamy, M.H. Prevalence and genetic characteristics of TEM, SHV, and CTX-M in clinical Klebsiella pneumoniae isolates from Saudi Arabia. Microb. Drug Resist. 2011, 17, 383–388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Dirar, M.H.; Bilal, N.E.; Ibrahim, M.E.; Hamid, M.E. Prevalence of extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL) and molecular detection of blaTEM, blaSHV and blaCTX-M genotypes among Enterobacteriaceae isolates from patients in Khartoum, Sudan. Pan Afr. Med. J. 2020, 37, 213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Yu, B.; Zhang, Y.; Yang, L.; Xu, J.; Bu, S. Analysis of antibiotic resistance phenotypes and genes of Escherichia coli from healthy swine in Guizhou, China. Onderstepoort J. Vet. Res. 2021, 88, e1–e8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Perez, F.; Endimiani, A.; Hujer, K.M.; Bonomo, R.A. The continuing challenge of ESBLs. Curr. Opin. Pharmacol. 2007, 7, 459–469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Gad, G.F.; Mohamed, H.A.; Ashour, H.M. Aminoglycoside resistance rates, phenotypes, and mechanisms of Gram-negative bacteria from infected patients in upper Egypt. PLoS ONE 2011, 6, e17224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Liu, Y.-Y.; Wang, Y.; Walsh, T.R.; Yi, L.-X.; Zhang, R.; Spencer, J.; Doi, Y.; Tian, G.; Dong, B.; Huang, X.; et al. Emergence of plasmid-mediated colistin resistance mechanism MCR-1 in animals and human beings in China: A microbiological and molecular biological study. Lancet Infect. Dis. 2016, 16, 161–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Hussein, N.H.; Al-Kadmy, I.M.S.; Taha, B.M.; Hussein, J.D. Mobilized colistin resistance (mcr) genes from 1 to 10: A comprehensive review. Mol. Biol. Rep. 2021, 48, 2897–2907. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Moosavian, M.; Emam, N. The first report of emerging mobilized colistin-resistance (mcr) genes and ERIC-PCR typing in Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae clinical isolates in southwest Iran. Infect. Drug Resist. 2019, 12, 1001–1010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Liu, W.; Yuan, C.; Meng, X.; Du, Y.; Gao, R.; Tang, J.; Shi, D. Frequency of virulence factors in Escherichia coli isolated from suckling pigs with diarrhoea in China. Vet. J. 2014, 199, 286–289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Luppi, A. Swine enteric colibacillosis: Diagnosis, therapy and antimicrobial resistance. Porc. Health Manag. 2017, 3, 16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Kwon, D.; Choi, C.; Jung, T.; Chung, H.K.; Kim, J.; Bae, S.; Cho, W.; Kim, J.; Chae, C. Genotypic prevalence of the fimbrial adhesins (F4, F5, F6, F41 and F18) and toxins (LT, STa, STb and STx2e) in Escherichia coli isolated from postweaning pigs with diarrhoea or oedema disease in Korea. Vet. Rec. 2002, 150, 35–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Do, T.N.; Cu, P.H.; Nguyen, H.X.; Au, T.X.; Vu, Q.N.; Driesen, S.J.; Townsend, K.M.; Chin, J.J.C.; Trott, D.J. Pathotypes and serogroups of enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli isolated from pre-weaning pigs in north Vietnam. Med. Microbiol. 2006, 55, 93–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Yang, G.Y.; Guo, L.; Su, J.H.; Zhu, Y.H.; Jiao, L.G.; Wang, J.F. Frequency of Diarrheagenic Virulence Genes and Characteristics in Escherichia coli Isolates from Pigs with Diarrhea in China. Microorganisms 2019, 7, 308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Yu, T.; He, T.; Yao, H.; Zhang, J.B.; Li, X.N.; Zhang, R.M.; Wang, G.Q. Prevalence of 16S rRNA Methylase Gene rmtB Among Escherichia coli Isolated from Bovine Mastitis in Ningxia, China. Foodborne Pathog. Dis. 2015, 12, 770–777. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Noah, D.L.; Krug, R.M. Influenza virus virulence and its molecular determinants. Adv. Virus Res. 2005, 65, 121–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Song, H.; Santi, N.; Evensen, Ø.; Vakharia, V.N. Molecular determinants of infectious pancreatic necrosis virus virulence and cell culture adaptation. J. Virol. 2005, 79, 10289–10299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Pai, H.; Seo, M.-R.; Choi, T.Y. Association of QnrB determinants and production of extended-spectrum beta-lactamases or plasmid-mediated AmpC beta-lactamases in clinical isolates of Klebsiella pneumoniae. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2007, 51, 366–368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Yan, J.J.; Hong, C.Y.; Ko, W.C.; Chen, Y.J.; Tsai, S.H.; Chuang, C.L.; Wu, J.J. Dissemination of blaCMY-2 among Escherichia coli isolates from food animals, retail ground meats, and humans in southern Taiwan. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2004, 48, 1353–1356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  61. Weill, F.X.; Demartin, M.; Tandé, D.; Espié, E.; Rakotoarivony, I.; Grimont, P.A. SHV-12-like extended-spectrum-beta-lactamase-producing strains of Salmonella enterica serotypes Babelsberg and Enteritidis isolated in France among infants adopted from Mali. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2004, 42, 2432–2437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Briñas, L.; Moreno, M.A.; Teshager, T.; Sáenz, Y.; Porrero, M.C.; Domínguez, L.; Torres, C. Monitoring and characterization of extended-spectrum beta-lactamases in Escherichia coli strains from healthy and sick animals in Spain in 2003. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2005, 49, 1262–1264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Liu, J.H.; Wei, S.Y.; Ma, J.Y.; Zeng, Z.L.; Lü, D.H.; Yang, G.X.; Chen, Z.L. Detection and characterisation of CTX-M and CMY-2 beta-lactamases among Escherichia coli isolates from farm animals in Guangdong Province of China. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents 2007, 29, 576–581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Colom, K.; PéRez, J.; Alonso, R.; Ferná¡ndez-Aranguiz, A.; Lariño, E.; Cisterna, R. Simple and reliable multiplex PCR assay for detection of blaTEM, blaSHV and blaOXA-1 genes in Enterobacteriaceae. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 2003, 223, 147–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Sun, N.; Liu, J.H.; Yang, F.; Lin, D.C.; Li, G.H.; Chen, Z.L.; Zeng, Z.L. Molecular characterization of the antimicrobial resistance of Riemerella anatipestifer isolated from ducks. Vet. Microbiol. 2012, 158, 376–383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Park, C.H.; Robicsek, A.; Jacoby, G.A.; Sahm, D.; Hooper, D.C. Prevalence in the United States of aac(6′)-Ib-cr encoding a ciprofloxacin-modifying enzyme. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2006, 50, 3953–3955. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Chen, S.; Zhao, S.; White, D.G.; Schroeder, C.M.; Lu, R.; Yang, H.; McDermott, P.F.; Ayers, S.; Meng, J. Characterization of multiple-antimicrobial-resistant salmonella serovars isolated from retail meats. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2004, 70, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Li, S.; Wang, L.; Zhou, Y.; Miao, Z. Prevalence and characterization of virulence genes in Escherichia coli isolated from piglets suffering post-weaning diarrhoea in Shandong Province, China. Vet Med. Sci. 2020, 6, 69–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Osman, K.M.; Mustafa, A.M.; Aly, M.A.; AbdElhamed, G.S. Serotypes, virulence genes, and intimin types of shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli and enteropathogenic Escherichia coli isolated from mastitic milk relevant to human health in Egypt. Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis. 2012, 12, 297–305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Cheng, D.; Sun, H.; Xu, J.; Gao, S. PCR detection of virulence factor genes in Escherichia coli isolates from weaned piglets with edema disease and/or diarrhea in China. Vet. Microbiol. 2006, 115, 320–328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Geographical distribution of the farms where the experimental samples were collected. Farms represent the different farms where samples were collected and the number of samples; Wuhan (82), Xiangyang (37), Yichang (14), Suizhou (15).
Figure 1. Geographical distribution of the farms where the experimental samples were collected. Farms represent the different farms where samples were collected and the number of samples; Wuhan (82), Xiangyang (37), Yichang (14), Suizhou (15).
Ijms 27 00524 g001
Figure 2. Antimicrobial susceptibility results of E. coli (n = 148) isolates. (A) Antimicrobial resistance profiles of E. coli isolates to 17 agents. (B) Analysis of multidrug resistance. X-axis indicates multidrug resistance of the isolates to 17 agents. (Ijms 27 00524 i001 drug resistance rate; Ijms 27 00524 i002 drug intermediation rate; Ijms 27 00524 i003 drug sensitivity rate).
Figure 2. Antimicrobial susceptibility results of E. coli (n = 148) isolates. (A) Antimicrobial resistance profiles of E. coli isolates to 17 agents. (B) Analysis of multidrug resistance. X-axis indicates multidrug resistance of the isolates to 17 agents. (Ijms 27 00524 i001 drug resistance rate; Ijms 27 00524 i002 drug intermediation rate; Ijms 27 00524 i003 drug sensitivity rate).
Ijms 27 00524 g002
Figure 3. Heatmap showing the percentage of pig farm E. coli isolates resistant to each of the antibiotics tested. The resistance rate of E. coli isolates to 17 agents. CXM, cefuroxime; CRO, ceftriaxone; CEP, cephalothin; CTX, cefotaxime; AMP, ampicillin; AMX, amoxicillin; MY, lincomycin; DOC, doxycycline; TET, tetracycline; KMC, kanamycin; GEN, gentamicin; AMK, amikacin; CIP, ciprofloxacin; ENO, enoxacin; LOM, lomefloxacin; AZM, azithromycin; SFN, sulfaisoxazole.
Figure 3. Heatmap showing the percentage of pig farm E. coli isolates resistant to each of the antibiotics tested. The resistance rate of E. coli isolates to 17 agents. CXM, cefuroxime; CRO, ceftriaxone; CEP, cephalothin; CTX, cefotaxime; AMP, ampicillin; AMX, amoxicillin; MY, lincomycin; DOC, doxycycline; TET, tetracycline; KMC, kanamycin; GEN, gentamicin; AMK, amikacin; CIP, ciprofloxacin; ENO, enoxacin; LOM, lomefloxacin; AZM, azithromycin; SFN, sulfaisoxazole.
Ijms 27 00524 g003
Figure 4. Detection rate of antibiotic resistance genes in E. coli isolates. (A) Heat map showing detected antimicrobial resistance genes carried by the isolates. Small rectangles marked in red and green represent positive and negative. (B) The bar graph shows the numbers of positive isolates for different detected antibiotic resistance genes. Antimicrobial resistance genes accounting for resistance to the same class of antibiotics are marked with bars in the same color. (C) Genetic compositions of extended-spectrum β-lactamase isolates. Left column: multiple gene isolates, right column: single gene isolates. (D) Genetic compositions of aminoglycoside-modifying enzyme isolates. Left column: multiple gene isolates, right column: single gene isolates.
Figure 4. Detection rate of antibiotic resistance genes in E. coli isolates. (A) Heat map showing detected antimicrobial resistance genes carried by the isolates. Small rectangles marked in red and green represent positive and negative. (B) The bar graph shows the numbers of positive isolates for different detected antibiotic resistance genes. Antimicrobial resistance genes accounting for resistance to the same class of antibiotics are marked with bars in the same color. (C) Genetic compositions of extended-spectrum β-lactamase isolates. Left column: multiple gene isolates, right column: single gene isolates. (D) Genetic compositions of aminoglycoside-modifying enzyme isolates. Left column: multiple gene isolates, right column: single gene isolates.
Ijms 27 00524 g004
Figure 5. Distribution and category of E. coli isolates positive for virulence-associated genes. (A) Heat map showing detected virulence genes carried by the isolates. Small rectangles marked in red and green represent positive and negative. (B) The bar graph showing numbers of positive isolates for different detected virulence genes. (C) Genetic compositions of virulence-associated isolates. Left column: multiple gene isolates, right column: single gene isolates.
Figure 5. Distribution and category of E. coli isolates positive for virulence-associated genes. (A) Heat map showing detected virulence genes carried by the isolates. Small rectangles marked in red and green represent positive and negative. (B) The bar graph showing numbers of positive isolates for different detected virulence genes. (C) Genetic compositions of virulence-associated isolates. Left column: multiple gene isolates, right column: single gene isolates.
Ijms 27 00524 g005
Figure 6. Neighbor-joining phylogenetic tree of E. coli isolates based on concatenated MLST sequences of seven housekeeping genes. Branch lengths represent genetic distances calculated using the Kimura two-parameter model. [color code (isolate origin city): green = Wuhan; red = Yichang; brown = Xiangyang; and yellow = Suizhou. Abbreviations: ST = sequence type; CC = clone complex; UA = unassigned clone complex. The dendrogram is clustered into four groups (Group 1–4) based on MLST profile similarity].
Figure 6. Neighbor-joining phylogenetic tree of E. coli isolates based on concatenated MLST sequences of seven housekeeping genes. Branch lengths represent genetic distances calculated using the Kimura two-parameter model. [color code (isolate origin city): green = Wuhan; red = Yichang; brown = Xiangyang; and yellow = Suizhou. Abbreviations: ST = sequence type; CC = clone complex; UA = unassigned clone complex. The dendrogram is clustered into four groups (Group 1–4) based on MLST profile similarity].
Ijms 27 00524 g006
Table 1. Primers used in this study to amplify E. coli drug resistance genes.
Table 1. Primers used in this study to amplify E. coli drug resistance genes.
GenesPrimer Sequence (5′-3′)Size of Product (Base Pairs)Reference
blaDHAF: AACTTTCACAGGTGTGCTGT
R: CCGTACGCATACTGGCTTTC
387Pai, Seo and Choi, 2007 [59]
blaCMY-2F: ATGATGAAAAAATCGTTATGC
R: TTGCAGCTTTTCAAGAATGCG
1143Yan et al. 2004 [60]
blaTEMF: ATAAAATTCTTGAAGACGAAA
R: GACAGTTACCAATGCTTAATC
1080Weill et al. 2004 [61]
blaSHVF: CACTCAAGGATGTATTGTG
R: TTAGCGTTGCCAGTGCTCG
885Brinas et al. 2005 [62]
blaCTX-M-1GF: CTTCCAGAATAAGGAATCCC
R: CGTCTAAGGCGATAAACAAA
949Liu et al. 2007 [63]
blaCTX-M-9GF: TGACCGTATTGGGAGTTTG
R: ACCAGTTACAGCCCTTCG
902Liu et al. 2007 [63]
blaOXAF: ATATCTCTACTGTTGCATCTCC
R: AAACCCTTCAAACCATCC
619Colom et al. 2003 [64]
aac(3′)-IaF: TTACGCAGCAGCAACGATGT
R: GTTGGCCTCATGCTTGAGGA
402Sun et al. 2012 [65]
aac(3′)-IIcF: AACCGGTGACCTATTGATGG
R: TGTGCTGGCACGATCGGAGT
774Sun et al. 2012 [65]
aac(3′)-IVF: GGCCACTTGGACTGATCGAG
R: GCGGATGCAGGAAGATCAAC
609Sun et al. 2012 [65]
aac(6′)-IbF: TTGCGATGCTCTATGAGTGGCTA
R: CTCGAATGCCTGGCGTGTTT
482Park et al. 2006 [66]
aadA1F: AGGTAGTTGGCGTCATCGAG
R: CAGTCGGCAGCGACATCCTT
589Sun et al. 2012 [65]
aadA2F: GGTGCTAAGCGTCATTGAGC
R: GCTTCAAGGTTTCCCTCAGC
470Sun et al. 2012 [65]
rmtAF: CTAGCGTCCATCCTTTCCTC
R: TTGCTTCCATGCCCTTGCC
635Chen et al. 2004 [67]
rmtBF: ACATCAACGATGCCCTCAC
R: AAGTTCTGTTCCGATGGTC
724Chen et al. 2004 [67]
mcr-1F: CGGTCAGTCCGTTTGTTC
R: CTTGGTCGGTCTGTAGGG
309Liu et al. 2016 [48]
Table 2. Primers used in this study to amplify E. coli virulence-associated genes.
Table 2. Primers used in this study to amplify E. coli virulence-associated genes.
Virulence FactorsPrimer Sequence (5′-3′)Size of Product (Base Pairs)
LT-1F: TAGAGACCGGTATTACAGAAATCTGA282
R: TCATCCCGAATTCTGTTATATATGTC
STaF: GGGTTGGCAATTTTTATTTCTGTA183
R: ATTACAACAAAGTTCACAGCAGTA
STbF: ATGTAAATACCTACAACGGGTGAT300
R: TATTTGGGCGCCAAAGCATGCTCC
EAST1F: ATGCCATCAACACAGTATATC117
R: TCAGGTCGCGAGTGACGG
irp2F: AAGGATTCGCTGTTACCGGAC301
R: TCGTCGGGCA GCGTTTCTTCT
fyuAF: TGATTAACCCCGCGACGGGAA787
R: CGCAGTAGGCACGATGTTGTA
K88F: GATGAAAAAGACTCTGATTGCA841
R: GATTGCTACGTTCAGCGGAGCG
K99F: CTGAAAAAAACACTGCTAGCTATT543
R: CATATAAGTGACTAAGAAGGATGC
987PF: GTTACTGCCAGTCTATGCCAAGTG463
R: TCGGTGTACCTGCTGAACGAATAG
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Li, X.; Liu, Z.; Wang, N.; Guo, R.; Chen, W.; Liu, W.; Gao, T.; Yang, K.; Tian, Y.; Yuan, F. Genotypic Diversity and Antimicrobial Resistance Profiles of Multidrug-Resistant Escherichia coli in Porcine Populations from Hubei, China. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2026, 27, 524. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms27010524

AMA Style

Li X, Liu Z, Wang N, Guo R, Chen W, Liu W, Gao T, Yang K, Tian Y, Yuan F. Genotypic Diversity and Antimicrobial Resistance Profiles of Multidrug-Resistant Escherichia coli in Porcine Populations from Hubei, China. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2026; 27(1):524. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms27010524

Chicago/Turabian Style

Li, Xiaoyue, Zewen Liu, Ningning Wang, Rui Guo, Wenjie Chen, Wei Liu, Ting Gao, Keli Yang, Yongxiang Tian, and Fangyan Yuan. 2026. "Genotypic Diversity and Antimicrobial Resistance Profiles of Multidrug-Resistant Escherichia coli in Porcine Populations from Hubei, China" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 27, no. 1: 524. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms27010524

APA Style

Li, X., Liu, Z., Wang, N., Guo, R., Chen, W., Liu, W., Gao, T., Yang, K., Tian, Y., & Yuan, F. (2026). Genotypic Diversity and Antimicrobial Resistance Profiles of Multidrug-Resistant Escherichia coli in Porcine Populations from Hubei, China. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 27(1), 524. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms27010524

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop