Next Article in Journal
Special Issue “Influenza Viruses: Infection and Genomics”
Previous Article in Journal
Candida albicans Extracellular Vesicles Upregulate Nrg1 Transcription Repressor to Inhibit Self-Hyphal Development and Candidemia
Previous Article in Special Issue
From Chromosomal Aberrations to Transcriptome Analysis: Four Decades of Research in Bivalve Genotoxicity
error_outline You can access the new MDPI.com website here. Explore and share your feedback with us.
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

Special Issue “Responses of Organisms to Environmental Chemical Stressors: Molecular and Cellular Insights”

by
Maria Giulia Lionetto
1,2
1
Department of Biological and Environmental Sciences and Technologies (DiSTeBA), University of Salento, 73100 Lecce, Italy
2
National Biodiversity Future Center (NBFC), 90133 Palermo, Italy
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2026, 27(1), 505; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms27010505
Submission received: 18 December 2025 / Accepted: 1 January 2026 / Published: 3 January 2026
In recent decades, anthropogenic activities have substantially increased the release of chemical contaminants in the environment and continuous exposure to chemical stressors has become a pervasive condition for living organisms [1,2]. Chemical stressors include a broad spectrum of substances such as trace metals, pesticides, persistent organic pollutants, industrial chemicals, micro and nanoplastics, and pharmaceuticals released into the environment. These contaminants originate from agricultural runoff, industrial discharge, urban waste, and atmospheric deposition [2,3], leading to their widespread distribution in both terrestrial and aquatic environments [4,5]. To cope with these threats, living organisms activate a complex network of molecular and cellular responses such as detoxification pathways, DNA repair systems, metabolic adjustments, modulation of enzymatic activities, and changes in gene expression [6,7,8]. Investigating these responses at the molecular and cellular level provides critical insights into the mechanisms by which organisms detect, respond to, and cope with environmental contaminants, as well as the early cellular damage that can occur [9]. This knowledge is essential for identifying sensitive biomarkers of exposure, effect, and susceptibility, which can serve as early-warning tools for environmental risk assessment [10,11,12].
The Special Issue of International Journal of Molecular Science, entitled ‘Responses of Organisms to Environmental Chemical Stressors: Molecular and Cellular Insights,’ was aimed to highlight the latest research on these molecular and cellular responses, with particular attention given to innovative experimental approaches and methodologies. The contributions collected herein offer an overview of cutting-edge studies addressing diverse organisms, from invertebrates and algae to mammalian cells, and a range of stressors, including metals, microplastics, and endocrine-disrupting compounds. By integrating multi-omics, proteomics, transcriptomics, and microbiome profiling, these studies provide mechanistic insights into how organisms perceive and respond to chemical stressors, and contribute to a deeper understanding of environmental toxicology at the cellular level.
Among traditional environmental contaminants, heavy metals remain of major concern [13,14,15]. Environmental exposure to heavy metals such as cadmium is known to induce oxidative stress and disrupt key physiological processes [16,17,18,19]; however, the molecular mechanisms underlying cadmium toxicity in specialized tissues of non-model organisms are still poorly understood. In this context, Song et al. [20] performed an integrated molecular and proteomic analysis to characterize the effects of cadmium exposure on silk glands. They reported significant oxidative stress, modulation of key antioxidant enzymes, and differential expression of hundreds of proteins involved in amino acid metabolism, glutathione pathways, and redox regulation. These findings provide strong evidence that cadmium compromises physiological processes essential for silk production at multiple molecular levels and enhance understanding of heavy metal-induced stress in spiders. This work paves the way for future studies on the ecological consequences of Cd pollution.
Microplastic pollution represents an emerging and globally distributed environmental stressor [21,22,23,24,25,26]. Aquatic environments are especially exposed and vulnerable to microplastic pollution [27], whose interaction with biological systems have been widely investigated [28,29], although the molecular mechanisms and long-term effects remain incompletely understood. Yet its effects on primary producers at the cellular and molecular level are still poorly characterized. Addressing this knowledge gap, Li et al. [30] investigated how amino-modified polystyrene microplastics (PS-NH2) affect the diatom Navicula sp., revealing marked growth inhibition, chloroplast ultrastructural damage, and activation of antioxidant defenses. Transcriptomic profiling demonstrated disruptions in pathways related to porphyrin and chlorophyll metabolism, carbon fixation, glycolysis/gluconeogenesis, and endocytosis. This study provides a mechanistic link between microplastic exposure and impaired photosynthetic performance in primary producers.
The impact of microplastic exposure on host-associated microbial communities remains largely unexplored, despite their critical role in host health [31,32]. To address this issue, Auguste et al. [33] demonstrated that exposure to polyester microfibers altered the hemolymph microbiome of the mussel Mytilus galloprovincialis. Even short-term exposure (96 h) induced significant shifts in microbial community composition, with more pronounced changes at lower concentrations. This study highlights the sensitivity of host-associated microbiomes to textile-derived microfibers and expands the ecotoxicological paradigm to include host–microbiota interactions. The modulation of the hemolymph microbiome in Mytilus galloprovincialis underscores the importance of considering symbiotic microbial communities in ecotoxicology. Microbiome composition and functionality may amplify or mitigate the effects of chemical stressors on the host, suggesting a new layer of complexity in environmental risk assessment.
While many studies focus on individual contaminants, organisms in natural environments are typically exposed to complex mixtures of chemicals. The combined effects of such mixtures, particularly on reproductive cells, remain poorly understood [34,35]. The work by Mastrorocco et al. [36] examined the combined toxicity of di-(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate (DEHP) and cadmium on ovine cumulus–oocyte complexes cultured in vitro. While nuclear maturation was largely unaffected, the authors observed altered mitochondrial distribution within oocytes and increased oxidative stress in cumulus cells when both contaminants were present together, emphasizing the importance of studying environmentally relevant mixtures rather than single compounds. This study underlines the necessity of moving beyond single-compound toxicity assessments toward more realistic scenarios, where organisms are exposed to complex pollutant mixtures that may interact synergistically or antagonistically.
This Special Issue also includes comprehensive review articles that place experimental findings within broader conceptual frameworks. Khatir and Leitão [37] trace the evolution of genotoxicity studies in bivalves, from traditional cytogenetic assays to recent transcriptomic approaches. Their work underscores the central role of bivalves as sentinel species and stresses the value of multi-endpoint and multi-omics strategies in detecting early biological responses to genotoxic pollutants.
The review by Lința et al. [38] synthesizes evidence on how endocrine-disrupting chemicals (EDCs) contribute to hepatic and pancreatic toxicity. The authors emphasize mitochondrial damage, oxidative stress, and metabolic disruption as key mechanistic drivers linking EDC exposure to pathologies such as metabolic dysfunction and fatty liver disease. This review effectively bridges mechanistic toxicology with human health implications.
The six contributions in this Special Issue, although diverse in species, chemical stressors, and experimental approaches, reveal several key unifying themes that enhance our understanding of organismal responses to environmental chemical stressors. A key observation across the studies is that the integration of multi-omics and systems-level approaches emerges as a powerful strategy to unravel the complex responses of the organisms to environmental pollutants. Proteomics, transcriptomics, and microbiome profiling allow the identification of interconnected molecular pathways, reveal novel biomarkers, and provide mechanistic understanding at both cellular and subcellular levels [39,40]. Such findings highlight an additional layer of complexity that should be considered in modern ecotoxicology. The contributions also demonstrate that responses are often species- or taxon-specific, reflecting differences in physiology, metabolism, and ecological niche. This emphasizes the importance of considering a variety of organisms, including non-model species, to obtain a comprehensive understanding of environmental impacts. Moreover, the reviews highlight how molecular and cellular endpoints can bridge mechanistic toxicology with ecological and human health outcomes, linking early biochemical perturbations to broader biological consequences in a One Health framework. Collectively, these studies reinforce the concept that molecular and cellular responses can act as predictive, early-warning indicators, offering valuable tools for environmental risk assessment and informing conservation and management strategies before population-level or ecosystem-level effects occur. Overall, this Special Issue advances the field toward more integrative, realistic, and mechanistic approaches to ecotoxicology.

Funding

This study was partially funded by the NBFC (National Biodiversity Future Center) funded by European Union NextGenerationEU, PNRR, project n. CN00000033, CUP: F87G22000290001.

Conflicts of Interest

The author declares no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Carlin, D.J.; Rider, C.V.; Woychik, R.; Birnbaum, L.S. Unraveling the Health Effects of Environmental Mixtures: An NIEHS Priority. Environ. Health Perspect. 2013, 121, a6–a8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Singh, P.K.; Kumar, U.; Kumar, I.; Dwivedi, A.; Singh, P.; Mishra, S.; Seth, C.S.; Sharma, R.K. Critical Review on Toxic Contaminants in Surface Water Ecosystem: Sources, Monitoring, and Its Impact on Human Health. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2024, 31, 56428–56462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Morin-Crini, N.; Lichtfouse, E.; Liu, G.; Balaram, V.; Ribeiro, A.R.L.; Lu, Z.; Stock, F.; Carmona, E.; Teixeira, M.R.; Picos-Corrales, L.A.; et al. Worldwide Cases of Water Pollution by Emerging Contaminants: A Review. Environ. Chem. Lett. 2022, 20, 2311–2338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Petrie, B.; Barden, R.; Kasprzyk-Hordern, B. A Review on Emerging Contaminants in Wastewaters and the Environment: Current Knowledge, Understudied Areas and Recommendations for Future Monitoring. Water Res. 2015, 72, 3–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Rasheed, T.; Bilal, M.; Nabeel, F.; Adeel, M.; Iqbal, H.M.N. Environmentally-Related Contaminants of High Concern: Potential Sources and Analytical Modalities for Detection, Quantification, and Treatment. Environ. Int. 2019, 122, 52–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Eide, M.; Zhang, X.; Karlsen, O.A.; Goldstone, J.V.; Stegeman, J.; Jonassen, I.; Goksøyr, A. The Chemical Defensome of Five Model Teleost Fish. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 10546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Regoli, F.; Giuliani, M.E. Oxidative Pathways of Chemical Toxicity and Oxidative Stress Biomarkers in Marine Organisms. Mar. Environ. Res. 2014, 93, 106–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Gandar, A.; Laffaille, P.; Canlet, C.; Tremblay-Franco, M.; Gautier, R.; Perrault, A.; Gress, L.; Mormède, P.; Tapie, N.; Budzinski, H.; et al. Adaptive Response under Multiple Stress Exposure in Fish: From the Molecular to Individual Level. Chemosphere 2017, 188, 60–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Dreier, D.A.; Mello, D.F.; Meyer, J.N.; Martyniuk, C.J. Linking Mitochondrial Dysfunction to Organismal and Population Health in the Context of Environmental Pollutants: Progress and Considerations for Mitochondrial Adverse Outcome Pathways. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 2019, 38, 1625–1634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Lionetto, M.G.; Caricato, R.; Giordano, M.E. Pollution Biomarkers in Environmental and Human Biomonitoring. Open Biomark. J. 2019, 9, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Rosner, A.; Ballarin, L.; Barnay-Verdier, S.; Borisenko, I.; Drago, L.; Drobne, D.; Concetta Eliso, M.; Harbuzov, Z.; Grimaldi, A.; Guy-Haim, T.; et al. A Broad-taxa Approach as an Important Concept in Ecotoxicological Studies and Pollution Monitoring. Biol. Rev. 2024, 99, 131–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Lionetto, M.G.; Caricato, R.; Giordano, M.E. Pollution Biomarkers in the Framework of Marine Biodiversity Conservation: State of Art and Perspectives. Water 2021, 13, 1847. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Mohammad Ali, M.; Hossain, D.; Al-Imran; Suzan Khan, M.; Begum, M.; Hasan Osman, M. Environmental Pollution with Heavy Metals: A Public Health Concern. In Heavy Metals—Their Environmental Impacts and Mitigation; Khaled Nazal, M., Zhao, H., Eds.; IntechOpen: London, UK, 2021; ISBN 978-1-83968-121-9. [Google Scholar]
  14. Ali, H.; Khan, E.; Ilahi, I. Environmental Chemistry and Ecotoxicology of Hazardous Heavy Metals: Environmental Persistence, Toxicity, and Bioaccumulation. J. Chem. 2019, 2019, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Donald, A.N.; Donald, A.N.; Raphael, P.B.; Raphael, P.B.; Olumide, O.J.; Amarachukwu, O.F. The Synopsis of Environmental Heavy Metal Pollution. Am. J. Environ. Sci. 2022, 18, 125–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Qu, F.; Zheng, W. Cadmium Exposure: Mechanisms and Pathways of Toxicity and Implications for Human Health. Toxics 2024, 12, 388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Lionetto, M. Inhibition of Eel Enzymatic Activities by Cadmium. Aquat. Toxicol. 2000, 48, 561–571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Peana, M.; Pelucelli, A.; Chasapis, C.T.; Perlepes, S.P.; Bekiari, V.; Medici, S.; Zoroddu, M.A. Biological Effects of Human Exposure to Environmental Cadmium. Biomolecules 2022, 13, 36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Matović, V.; Buha, A.; Ðukić-Ćosić, D.; Bulat, Z. Insight into the Oxidative Stress Induced by Lead and/or Cadmium in Blood, Liver and Kidneys. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2015, 78, 130–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Song, Z.; Song, Z.; Liu, W.; Lyu, B. Molecular and Proteomic Analyses of Effects of Cadmium Exposure on the Silk Glands of Trichonephila Clavata. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2025, 26, 754. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Zeb, A.; Liu, W.; Ali, N.; Shi, R.; Wang, Q.; Wang, J.; Li, J.; Yin, C.; Liu, J.; Yu, M.; et al. Microplastic Pollution in Terrestrial Ecosystems: Global Implications and Sustainable Solutions. J. Hazard. Mater. 2024, 461, 132636. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Thompson, R.C.; Courtene-Jones, W.; Boucher, J.; Pahl, S.; Raubenheimer, K.; Koelmans, A.A. Twenty Years of Microplastic Pollution Research—What Have We Learned? Science 2024, 386, eadl2746. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Ziani, K.; Ioniță-Mîndrican, C.-B.; Mititelu, M.; Neacșu, S.M.; Negrei, C.; Moroșan, E.; Drăgănescu, D.; Preda, O.-T. Microplastics: A Real Global Threat for Environment and Food Safety: A State of the Art Review. Nutrients 2023, 15, 617. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Giordano, M.E.; Lionetto, F.; Lionetto, M.G. Impact of Polyethylene Terephthalate Nanoplastics (PET) on Fibroblasts: A Study on NIH-3T3 Cells. Front. Physiol. 2025, 16, 1580682. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Geremia, E.; Muscari Tomajoli, M.T.; Murano, C.; Petito, A.; Fasciolo, G. The Impact of Micro- and Nanoplastics on Aquatic Organisms: Mechanisms of Oxidative Stress and Implications for Human Health—A Review. Environments 2023, 10, 161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Jewett, E.; Arnott, G.; Connolly, L.; Vasudevan, N.; Kevei, E. Microplastics and Their Impact on Reproduction—Can We Learn From the C. Elegans Model? Front. Toxicol. 2022, 4, 748912. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Sunny, A.R.; Sazzad, S.A.; Islam, M.A.; Mithun, M.H.; Hussain, M.; Raposo, A.; Bhuiyan, M.K.A. Microplastics in Aquatic Ecosystems: A Global Review of Distribution, Ecotoxicological Impacts, and Human Health Risks. Water 2025, 17, 1741. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Xu, S.; Ma, J.; Ji, R.; Pan, K.; Miao, A.-J. Microplastics in Aquatic Environments: Occurrence, Accumulation, and Biological Effects. Sci. Total Environ. 2020, 703, 134699. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Lionetto, F.; Lionetto, M.G.; Mele, C.; Corcione, C.E.; Bagheri, S.; Udayan, G.; Maffezzoli, A. Autofluorescence of Model Polyethylene Terephthalate Nanoplastics for Cell Interaction Studies. Nanomaterials 2022, 12, 1560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Li, X.; Wang, Z.; Chen, Y.; Li, Q. Polystyrene Microplastics Induce Photosynthetic Impairment in Navicula Sp. at Physiological and Transcriptomic Levels. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 26, 148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Evariste, L.; Barret, M.; Mottier, A.; Mouchet, F.; Gauthier, L.; Pinelli, E. Gut Microbiota of Aquatic Organisms: A Key Endpoint for Ecotoxicological Studies. Environ. Pollut. 2019, 248, 989–999. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Wilkins, L.G.E.; Leray, M.; O’Dea, A.; Yuen, B.; Peixoto, R.S.; Pereira, T.J.; Bik, H.M.; Coil, D.A.; Duffy, J.E.; Herre, E.A.; et al. Host-Associated Microbiomes Drive Structure and Function of Marine Ecosystems. PLoS Biol. 2019, 17, e3000533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Auguste, M.; Leonessi, M.; Doni, L.; Oliveri, C.; Jemec Kokalj, A.; Drobne, D.; Vezzulli, L.; Canesi, L. Polyester Microfibers Exposure Modulates Mytilus galloprovincialis Hemolymph Microbiome. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25, 8049. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Hamid, N.; Junaid, M.; Pei, D.-S. Combined Toxicity of Endocrine-Disrupting Chemicals: A Review. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2021, 215, 112136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Dutta, S.; Sengupta, P.; Bagchi, S.; Chhikara, B.S.; Pavlík, A.; Sláma, P.; Roychoudhury, S. Reproductive Toxicity of Combined Effects of Endocrine Disruptors on Human Reproduction. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 2023, 11, 1162015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Mastrorocco, A.; Temerario, L.; Vurchio, V.; Cotecchia, S.; Martino, N.A.; Dell’Aquila, M.E. In Vitro Toxicity of a DEHP and Cadmium Mixture on Sheep Cumulus–Oocyte Complexes. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 26, 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Khatir, Z.; Leitão, A. From Chromosomal Aberrations to Transcriptome Analysis: Four Decades of Research in Bivalve Genotoxicity. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2025, 26, 5389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Lința, A.V.; Lolescu, B.M.; Ilie, C.A.; Vlad, M.; Blidișel, A.; Sturza, A.; Borza, C.; Muntean, D.M.; Crețu, O.M. Liver and Pancreatic Toxicity of Endocrine-Disruptive Chemicals: Focus on Mitochondrial Dysfunction and Oxidative Stress. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25, 7420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Zhang, X.; Xia, P.; Wang, P.; Yang, J.; Baird, D.J. Omics Advances in Ecotoxicology. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2018, 52, 3842–3851. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Canzler, S.; Schor, J.; Busch, W.; Schubert, K.; Rolle-Kampczyk, U.E.; Seitz, H.; Kamp, H.; Von Bergen, M.; Buesen, R.; Hackermüller, J. Prospects and Challenges of Multi-Omics Data Integration in Toxicology. Arch. Toxicol. 2020, 94, 371–388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Lionetto, M.G. Special Issue “Responses of Organisms to Environmental Chemical Stressors: Molecular and Cellular Insights”. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2026, 27, 505. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms27010505

AMA Style

Lionetto MG. Special Issue “Responses of Organisms to Environmental Chemical Stressors: Molecular and Cellular Insights”. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2026; 27(1):505. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms27010505

Chicago/Turabian Style

Lionetto, Maria Giulia. 2026. "Special Issue “Responses of Organisms to Environmental Chemical Stressors: Molecular and Cellular Insights”" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 27, no. 1: 505. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms27010505

APA Style

Lionetto, M. G. (2026). Special Issue “Responses of Organisms to Environmental Chemical Stressors: Molecular and Cellular Insights”. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 27(1), 505. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms27010505

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop