Next Article in Journal
Genome-Wide Identification and Functional Analysis of the Norcoclaurine Synthase Gene Family in Aristolochia contorta
Previous Article in Journal
Assessment of Plasma and Cerebrospinal Fluid Biomarkers in Patients with Alzheimer’s Disease and Other Dementias: A Center-Based Study
Previous Article in Special Issue
Supramolecular Nanoparticles of Histone and Hyaluronic Acid for Co-Delivery of siRNA and Photosensitizer In Vitro
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Amine-Functionalized Mesoporous Silica for Efficient CO2 Capture: Stability, Performance, and Industrial Feasibility

1
Department of Chemistry, Keimyung University, Daegu 42601, Republic of Korea
2
Division of Nanotechnology, Daegu Gyeongbuk Institute of Science and Technology (DGIST), Daegu 42988, Republic of Korea
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2025, 26(9), 4313; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms26094313
Submission received: 31 March 2025 / Revised: 26 April 2025 / Accepted: 30 April 2025 / Published: 1 May 2025

Abstract

Amine-functionalized mesoporous silica nanoparticles (MSNs) have emerged as promising materials for efficient CO2 capture, offering high adsorption capacities, reusability, and environmental benefits. These materials exhibit significant potential in addressing global challenges related to sustainable energy transitions and carbon management. However, their widespread industrial application is hindered by challenges such as amine leaching, thermal degradation, and scalability. To enhance the stability and efficiency of amine-functionalized MSNs, strategies such as chemical grafting, polymer hybridization, and pore structure optimization have been explored. Additionally, efforts to improve thermal stability through the development of thermally stable amines, protective coatings, and stabilizing additives have shown promise in mitigating degradation during regeneration cycles. Future research must focus on the development of cost-effective, scalable, and environmentally sustainable synthesis methods, as well as strategies for enhancing adsorption efficiency and selectivity. Furthermore, the integration of CO2 conversion technologies, such as catalytic transformation into value-added chemicals, represents a crucial advancement toward holistic carbon management. This review highlights the recent progress in amine-functionalized MSNs for CO2 capture, discusses key challenges, and outlines future research directions to facilitate their large-scale industrial implementation.

1. Introduction

Porous silica nanoparticles have attracted significant attention for over two decades due to their unique physical and chemical properties, including high surface area, tunable pore sizes, and chemical modifiability [1]. These features make them essential materials for advanced applications in diverse fields such as environmental remediation, energy storage, drug delivery, and catalytic supports. In particular, porous silica has emerged as a highly promising candidate for sustainable technologies, including carbon dioxide (CO2) capture and separation, hazardous gas removal, and water purification. These materials demonstrate excellent performance in such applications due to their highly ordered pore structures and superior thermal stability. Extensive research has been dedicated to the synthesis and functionalization of porous silica nanoparticles, aiming to refine their pore shapes, structures and develop scalable methods that are both efficient and environmentally sustainable. Researchers have explored a variety of approaches to control the size, shape, and arrangement of pores while simultaneously addressing the need for production techniques that minimize environmental impact and enable large-scale manufacturing. Techniques such as template-assisted synthesis, template-free methods, and calcination-free processes have shown considerable potential for tailoring pore structures while improving the sustainability of the production process. Additionally, the functionalization of silica surfaces with specific chemical groups, such as amines, has been shown to enhance the selectivity and efficiency of applications like CO2 capture, enabling more precise and effective material performance.
Among various types of porous silica, mesoporous silica nanoparticles (MSNs) exhibit a wide range of structural morphologies depending on the arrangement and shape of their internal pore systems, which directly influence their performance in specific applications. Representative structures include hexagonally ordered cylindrical pores as seen in MCM-41, thick-walled large pores in SBA-15, hollow morphologies, hierarchical pore systems combining micro- and mesopores, three-dimensionally interconnected cubic frameworks, and lamellar (layered) structures. Each of these architectures offers distinct advantages in terms of surface area, pore volume, diffusivity, structural stability, and functionalization space. In particular, for gas adsorption applications such as CO2 capture, the morphology of MSNs plays a critical role in determining diffusion pathways and accessible surface area. For instance, MCM-41 provides high surface area and ordered mesochannels suitable for fast diffusion and surface modification [2,3,4,5,6]; SBA-15, with its wider pores and robust thermal stability [7,8,9,10,11], is ideal for the incorporation of amine or polymeric functionalities. Hollow silica nanoparticles offer high pore volumes and low density, which facilitate interior functionalization, while cubic structures enhance molecular transport due to their three-dimensional connectivity. Lamellar structures, on the other hand, allow for tunable interlayer spacing, which can be advantageous for selective adsorption. Understanding and rationally selecting these structural features is therefore crucial for the design of MSN-based materials tailored to specific environmental or industrial requirements.
In this study, we comprehensively examine the structural characteristics, synthesis methodologies, and CO2 adsorption performance of porous silica nanoparticles. By addressing their potential for sustainable material development and practical applications, this work aims to contribute to advancing their role in sustainable and environmentally friendly technologies.

2. Characteristics and Classification of Porous Silica Nanoparticles

2.1. Structural Characteristics of Porous Materials and CO2 Adsorption

2.1.1. Differences Between Macroporocity, Mesoporosity, and Microporosity

Porous materials are classified into macro-porous, meso-porous, and micro-porous materials based on pore size, and these categories exhibit distinct structural, physical, and application-specific characteristics [12]. These properties play a crucial role in determining the design and applicability of the materials.
Mesoporous materials, with pore sizes ranging from 2 to 50 nm, allow for rapid diffusion of gases and liquids due to their relatively large pores. These materials are highly suitable for applications such as catalyst supports, drug delivery systems, and CO2 capture [13]. Additionally, mesoporous materials have the advantage of structural tunability. For instance, the pore size and the shape can be tailored to optimize the diffusion rate of specific substances. As a result, mesoporous materials are widely utilized in various industrial fields, particularly as efficient catalysts in processes requiring high material transfer rates. Notable examples include mesoporous silica materials like MCM-41 and SBA-15, which provide high thermal stability and surface area, enabling efficient catalytic performance.
Microporous materials, characterized by pore diameter sizes smaller than 2 nm, exhibit and strong interactions with gas molecules and enable high-density adsorption. This is due to their small pore size and large surface areas. Consequently, microporous materials are predominantly employed in CO2 separation, storage, and precision filtration systems [14]. Notably, microporous materials provide high adsorption energy, enabling selective adsorption of specific gas molecules such as CO2. This property is particularly critical in environmental protection and energy storage applications. For example, zeolites play a pivotal role in gas separation technologies, efficiently separating and storing gases like methane (CH4), hydrogen (H2), and carbon dioxide (CO2). Furthermore, microporous materials like activated carbon are widely used in water purification and air filtration systems.
Macroporous materials, with pore sizes exceeding 50 nm, are primarily utilized for facilitating the movement and storage of substances due to their large pore structures. These materials are advantageous for controlling the flow of gases and liquids, making them suitable for high-speed filtration and biological applications. Macroporous materials are integral to fields such as cell culture scaffolds [15], tissue engineering [16], and fluid flow control systems [17]. Specifically, macroporous structures are beneficial for applications requiring large-scale material transfer and, when combined with mesoporous and microporous materials, contribute to the design of hybrid porous systems. Typical examples include macroporous hydrogels and porous polymers [18].
These three categories of porous materials can be complementarily utilized in various applications. For instance, mesoporous materials facilitate gas diffusion and material transport due to their large pore sizes [19], while microporous materials enable strong adsorption of specific gases through their small pore structures [20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27]. Macroporous materials, on the other hand, support bulk movement and storage of substances. By integrating these characteristics, hybrid porous materials can be designed. For example, mesoporous structures aid in the rapid transport of gases within the material, microporous structures handle selective adsorption and storage, and macroporous structures ensure smooth flow of gases and liquids, enhancing overall system efficiency [28]. Such designs are particularly effective for CO2 capture and separation [29,30].

2.1.2. Influence of Meso/Micro-Pore Size on the Diffusion and Adsorption Rates of CO2 Molecules

The pore size of porous materials plays a critical role in determining the diffusion and adsorption rates of CO2 molecules. Since the efficiency of CO2 molecules migrating into the material and reaching adsorption sites depends on the pore size, the pore size of the porous materials is a crucial factor in the design and application. Mesoporous materials, due to their larger pores compared to microporous materials, facilitate the diffusion of CO2 molecules into the internal structure more easily [31]. Larger pore sizes effectively reduce diffusion resistance, allowing gas molecules to reach adsorption sites more quickly [32]. Consequently, mesoporous materials exhibit faster adsorption rates and are particularly advantageous for applications that require processing of large volumes of gas. For instance, SBA-15 silica, which features a mesoporous structure, has been reported to accelerate the diffusion of CO2, reducing the time to reach adsorption equilibrium by approximately 40% compared to microporous zeolites [33]. These features highlight why mesoporous materials are suitable for gas diffusion and large-scale processes. In contrast, microporous materials possess narrow pores smaller than 2 nm, which induce strong interactions with CO2 molecules. These interactions result in high adsorption energies, making microporous materials advantageous for the selective adsorption of CO2 molecules. However, their narrow pore structure can increase the likelihood of restricted gas diffusion, potentially prolonging the time required for gas molecules to reach the adsorption sites [7]. As a result, while microporous materials offer strong adsorption performance, they may exhibit limitations in adsorption speed. Therefore, as mentioned above, strategically combining the properties of mesoporous and microporous materials can effectively maximize performance in CO2 capture, storage, and separation [18,19]. While microporous materials offer strong adsorption affinity due to their narrow pore sizes and high surface areas, their limited diffusion rates and functionalization capacity can present challenges in dynamic or large-scale systems. In contrast, mesoporous materials offer distinct advantages such as larger pore volumes, enhanced molecular transport, and greater accessibility for chemical modification. These characteristics make mesoporous structures particularly suitable for rapid adsorption processes and scalable functionalization with amine groups or polymeric modifiers. To clearly delineate the comparative strengths of mesoporous and microporous materials in the context of CO2 capture, a summary Table 1 is provided below. This comparative analysis highlights key differences in adsorption performance, diffusion behavior, structural adaptability, and regeneration potential. Such insights reinforce the rationale for continued development of mesoporous silica-based adsorbents as practical, high-performance platforms for industrial carbon management.

2.1.3. Pore Volume and the Feasibility of Amine Functionalization

Mesoporous materials, characterized by their large pore volumes, provide an ideal structure for the incorporation of chemical functionalities such as amine groups [41]. This structural feature forms the basis for their effective utilization as adsorbents in CO2 capture or separation systems. Amines, as key active functional groups, enhance adsorption capacity through chemical interactions with CO2 and are indispensable in CO2 capture and separation applications [42]. A representative example is mesoporous silica, such as MCM-41, which exhibits a high pore volume exceeding 0.8 cm3/g, offering ample space for the introduction of various chemical functionalities. For instance, the incorporation of amine groups such as 3-aminopropyltriethoxysilane (APTES) can maximize adsorption efficiency through chemical bonding with CO2 molecules. Studies have shown that mesoporous materials functionalized with amine groups exhibit a nearly 200% increase in CO2 adsorption capacity compared to their unmodified counterparts. This improvement is attributed to the increased amine saturation and strengthened interactions with CO2 molecules [2,20,21,23,42]. Moreover, the structural flexibility of mesoporous materials plays a crucial role in uniformly dispersing amine groups and maximizing the active sites available for chemical reactions [20,21,22,23,24,25,26]. In addition to mesoporous silica, various microporous and mesoporous materials have been investigated as solid adsorbents for CO2 capture. For instance, nitrogen-doped porous carbons synthesized via chelating zinc precursors demonstrated remarkable micropore development (0.7–1.0 nm) and high CO2 adsorption capacity of 3.8 mmol g−1 at 298 K and 1 bar, along with excellent CO2/N2 selectivity (S > 100) and moisture stability [43]. Hyper-crosslinked resins (HCLRs) have also emerged as promising candidates; amino-functionalized HCLRs, in particular, combine enhanced polar affinity with tailored microporosity, achieving up to a three-fold increase in CO2 uptake and significantly improved CO2/N2 selectivity compared to their unmodified counterparts [44,45]. Furthermore, 3D surface-microporous graphene derived directly from CO2 exhibits rapid adsorption kinetics and a CO2 capacity of 3.13 mmol g−1 after KOH activation, owing to its hierarchical porous structure and oxygen-containing functional groups [46].
These examples highlight the broad landscape of porous materials suitable for CO2 capture and reinforce the significance of structural tunability and chemical functionalization—key attributes that also underpin the advantages of mesoporous silica-based adsorbents explored in this study. Compared to non-porous silica nanoparticles, by the way, mesoporous silica materials provide a significantly larger internal surface area and well-ordered pore structures that allow for the uniform dispersion and stabilization of amine functionalities throughout the framework [10]. This high surface accessibility not only increases the total loading of active groups but also facilitates faster CO2 diffusion and more efficient adsorption–desorption cycling [47,48]. The mesoporosity, therefore, is not merely a passive scaffold but an active design parameter that directly influences the adsorption performance, especially under dynamic or humid conditions.
The large pore volume not only facilitates the incorporation of amine molecules but also accelerates the diffusion of CO2 molecules to the adsorption sites. As a result, both the adsorption rate and capacity are significantly enhanced [8,49]. Mesoporous materials functionalized with amines offer several advantages over conventional physical adsorbents. While typical physical adsorbents rely on weak interactions for CO2 capture, amine-functionalized mesoporous materials chemically bind with CO2 molecules, achieving high selectivity and maximizing adsorption capacity. These properties highlight the potential of mesoporous materials as essential materials in CO2 capture and separation, air purification, and sustainable energy technologies.
In conclusion, the large pore volume of mesoporous materials provides an optimized platform for the introduction of chemical functionalities such as amines, leading to a breakthrough improvement in CO2 adsorption efficiency. This positions mesoporous materials as critical components in environmental protection and energy transition technologies.

2.1.4. Specific Surface Area, Pore Volume, and the Feasibility of Amine Functionalization

The specific surface area of porous materials is a critical parameter for evaluating their adsorption performance. Defined as the surface area per unit mass of a material, a high specific surface area provides more active sites, thereby maximizing interactions with gases or liquids [50]. This property is particularly significant in gas (such as carbon dioxide) adsorption applications. A high specific surface area increases the contact area with gas molecules, substantially enhancing adsorption capacity and capture efficiency. For instance, silica-based mesoporous materials with a specific surface area exceeding 500 m2/g have demonstrated over 30% higher CO2 adsorption efficiency compared to conventional adsorbents [51]. The Brunauer–Emmett–Teller (BET) method is a widely used technique for measuring specific surface area. BET analysis employs adsorption isotherms of specific gases to quantify surface area, pore volume, and pore size distribution [52]. For porous silica materials, BET analysis has confirmed that an increase in specific surface area directly correlates with improved CO2 capture performance. This highlights the vital role of high specific surface area in the physical processes of gas diffusion and adsorption [3]. Consequently, increasing the specific surface area is a key strategy in the design of adsorbents. This approach enables the optimization of porous material performance in various applications, including CO2 capture, water purification, and catalysis.

2.2. Types and Applications of Silica Nanoparticles

Porous silica nanoparticles are multifunctional materials widely applicable in nanotechnology and materials engineering. Based on their structural characteristics, they are categorized into spherical silica nanoparticles, hollow silica nanoparticles, and hierarchical porous silica. Each type is utilized in specific applications, leveraging its unique physical and chemical properties.

2.2.1. Porous Spherical Silica Nanoparticles

Spherical silica nanoparticles are extensively employed in applications where uniform size and shape are critical. Their consistent morphology enhances material flowability and optimizes surface reactivity, making them suitable for applications such as drug delivery and surface modification [53,54]. In drug delivery systems, porous spherical silica nanoparticles are highly valued for their biocompatibility and tunable size. For example, silica nanoparticles with an average particle size of 100 nm have been successfully utilized to deliver anticancer agents specifically to tumor sites [55]. These nanoparticles enable controlled drug release, minimizing side effects while maximizing therapeutic efficacy. In a study by Li et al. (2015), peptide-functionalized spherical silica nanoparticles were shown to effectively target cancer cells for treatment [56]. Additionally, the ability to tailor the size of spherical silica nanoparticles enhances their potential to deliver drugs to specific tissues or cells [57,58]. Another significant application of spherical silica nanoparticle is surface modification. Introducing amino functional groups onto the silica surface has been shown to significantly improve CO2 capture efficiency [2,4,20,42,59,60,61,62,63]. Functionalized silica serves not only as an adsorbent but also as a catalyst in chemical reactions or as an interface for interactions with biomolecules. For instance, amine-functionalized silica nanoparticles enhance CO2 adsorption capacity and selectivity through strong chemical bonding with CO2 molecules compared to conventional physical adsorbents. Figure 1 presents a schematic representation of mesoporous silica nanoparticles and their TEM images. Dr. Bae’s group has published several papers on utilizing of these nanoparticles for gas adsorption [20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,64].

2.2.2. Hollow Silica Nanoparticles

Hollow silica nanoparticles, characterized by their empty core structure, offer unique physical properties and chemical versatility. These particles possess low density, high pore volume, and large surface area, enabling their use in thermal insulation, catalytic supports, drug delivery, and more [65,66,67,68,69,70,71]. Firstly, the hollow structure of silica nanoparticles provides excellent thermal insulation properties due to their low thermal conductivity. This feature demonstrates potential for next-generation insulation materials in aerospace and construction industries. Studies have shown that hollow structures effectively block heat transfer, and their lightweight nature makes them ideal for high-performance insulation. Multi-layered hollow silica has demonstrated superior insulation performance compared to conventional materials, with added environmental benefits [22,67]. Moreover, hollow silica nanoparticles excel as catalytic supports due to their high surface area and porosity as shown in Figure 2. For instance, Pd-catalyst-loaded hollow silica nanoparticles exhibit high activity and stability in chemical reactions, maintaining structural integrity after catalysis [68,69,70]. A study by Chen et al. (2014) demonstrated that incorporating gold nanoparticles into hollow silica structures enhanced catalytic reactivity, showcasing the ability of hollow structures to protect catalyst particles while maintaining high reactivity [70].

2.2.3. Hierarchical Porous Silica

Hierarchical porous silica is characterized by a multi-level pore structure that integrates micropores and mesopores, effectively enhancing diffusion and adsorption efficiency. As illustrated in Figure 3a, such structures are typically formed through surfactant-assisted self-assembly processes. Initially, cationic and nonionic surfactants form spherical micelles at the first critical micelle concentration (CMC 1). As the surfactant concentration increases, cylindrical micelles are generated at the second critical micelle concentration (CMC 2). The size and arrangement of these micelles are influenced by factors such as the type of surfactant, solvent polarity, pH, temperature, and the ratio of silica precursor to surfactant. During synthesis in a polar solvent, the hydrophilic segments of the micelles’ orient outward, allowing hydrolyzed silica precursors to condense around them and form a Si–O–Si network. Subsequent removal of the micelles, either through high-temperature calcination or solvent extraction, results in the creation of internal pore structures. Depending on the synthesis conditions, the final pore architecture can adopt cubic, hexagonal, or lamellar arrangements shown in Figure 3b [72]. The resulting hierarchical structure optimizes gas and liquid transport pathways, thereby improving the performance of catalytic and adsorption systems. In CO2 adsorption systems, mesopores facilitate gas diffusion, while micropores provide high adsorption energy, increasing overall adsorption capacity [73]. A study by Shen et al. (2020) reported that hierarchical porous silica-based CO2 capture systems exhibited approximately 40% higher efficiency than single-porosity structures [61]. Additionally, introducing amine functional groups into hierarchical porous silica significantly enhances CO2 adsorption capacity. For example, Xu et al. (2003) demonstrated that amine-functionalized hierarchical porous MCM-41 silica (MCM-41-PEI) achieved a CO2 adsorption capacity of 246 mg/g-PEI, which is 30 times higher than that of MCM-41 alone and 2.3 times higher than PEI alone [3]. Hierarchical porous silica is also effective for heavy metal removal, water purification, and elimination of harmful airborne substances. Its multi-level pore structure provides a large surface area for effective adsorption of organic and inorganic pollutants, maximizing environmental remediation efficiency through selective adsorption [74,75].

2.3. Synthesis Techniques of Porous Silica Nanoparticles

Numerous studies have addressed the synthesis and functionalization of mesoporous silica nanoparticles (MSNs), utilizing a range of methods such as sol–gel, hydrothermal, and templating approaches. Functionalization strategies, including post-grafting with organosilanes and co-condensation with amine-bearing precursors, have been widely explored to introduce active groups like amines, thiols, and carboxyls [76,77,78]. In a recent study, Usgodaarachchi et al. synthesized MSNs using rice husk ash via a green sol–gel process and demonstrated controlled amine functionalization using various co-condensation and post-grafting methods [79]. These MSNs exhibited significant differences in textural properties and adsorption performance depending on the functionalization route, highlighting the critical role of synthesis parameters. The study also showed that the pristine MSN exhibited superior methylene blue adsorption compared to its amine-functionalized counterparts, due to its higher surface area and favorable electrostatic interactions. Recent works by Olivieri et al. demonstrated successful surface engineering of MSNs for corrosion protection using benzoyl chloride [39] or silver-capped benzotriazole [80], supported by detailed characterization including TEM, BET, FT-IR, and TGA. Siddiqui et al. (2022) also highlighted extensive advances in MSN synthesis and surface modification techniques for biomedical delivery systems, emphasizing structural tunability and chemical versatility [78]. These findings confirm that the synthesis and structure–function relationships of MSNs have been extensively investigated and optimized across multiple application fields. These comprehensive advancements have laid a strong foundation for categorizing the synthetic approaches for porous silica nanoparticles. Among them, hard-template-based methods have emerged as a powerful strategy to precisely control pore morphology, volume, and particle architecture, which will be discussed in the following section.

2.3.1. Hard Template-Based Silica Nanoparticles

Hard-template-based silica refers to a synthesis method in which a solid template (e.g., polystyrene, carbon, Al2O3) is used to create porous structures, followed by the removal of the template to obtain silica with precise pore architectures [81,82,83]. In the case of hard templates, materials with smooth and rigid surfaces—such as inorganic substances, high-strength polymers, or carbon frameworks—are employed. As a result, the inner surfaces of the resulting pores exhibit a highly uniform and well-defined morphology. However, the removal of such templates poses certain challenges: polymeric and carbon-based templates typically require high-temperature calcination, while inorganic templates must be eliminated using strong acids, which can introduce additional complexity to the synthesis process. This technique is suitable for forming uniform and complex pore structures and is widely utilized in various applications. The synthesis of hard-template-based silica involves three main steps [20,21,22,30,64,84,85,86]:
  • Template Preparation:
A solid template with the desired pore structure (e.g., spherical or hollow) is prepared. Commonly used templates include polystyrene nanoparticles [22,84,85], carbon nanotubes, or metal oxides [30]. The size and shape of the template are crucial factors determining the structural characteristics of the resulting silica. For example, carbon nanotubes are widely used to form hollow structures.
2.
Silica Precursor Coating:
A silica precursor, such as tetraethyl orthosilicate (TEOS) or tetramethyl orthosilicate (TMOS), is coated onto the template surface to form a silica layer. The addition of surfactants (such as CTACl or P123) during this process enhances the uniformity of the silica coating. Uniform coating ensures the precision of the pore structures and broadens the applicability of the final material.
3.
Template Removal:
The template is removed via calcination or chemical dissolution (e.g., using strong acids or bases). This step eliminates the solid template, yielding silica with uniform pore structures. For example, studies using carbon nanospheres as templates successfully synthesized hollow silica structures that demonstrated high efficiency when applied as catalyst supports [86].
Figure 4 schematically illustrates the aforementioned three-step process using polystyrene (PS) as a template, TEOS as the silica precursor, and CTACl as the surfactant. The final calcination step removes the PS template to yield a hollow silica structure.
The primary advantage of hard-template-based silica is the precise control over pore size, volume, and morphology, which is highly beneficial for high-performance applications requiring meticulous structural tuning [30,85]. Additionally, this method allows for the design and synthesis of complex architectures (e.g., hollow or hierarchical porous structures), offering unique functionalities that distinguish it from conventional porous silica [22,86]. However, the disadvantages of this approach include the complexity and high cost associated with template preparation and removal processes. Residual template materials may remain after removal, necessitating additional cleaning or post-treatment steps [73,85]. As a result, this method may not be suitable for large-scale industrial applications [20,21,22,64,84]. Despite these limitations, the advantages associated with precisely controlled pore structures have enabled hard-template-based silica to find applications across a wide range of fields [55,60,61,74,86,87,88,89]: In catalysis, the coexistence of macropores and mesopores facilitates efficient diffusion of reactants and improves accessibility to active sites. For instance, Ni/SiO2 catalysts exhibit excellent stability even at high temperatures and are widely employed in chemical synthesis and fuel reforming processes [87]. In drug delivery systems, the compartmentalized pore architecture, which allows for precise control over pore size and shell thickness, supports enhanced drug loading capacity and enables tunable release profiles [71]. For CO2 capture and storage (CCS), hierarchical porosity promotes faster gas transport and improved regenerability of sorbents, making these materials particularly attractive for cyclic adsorption processes. Owing to these multifunctional advantages, the structural versatility achieved through hard-templating plays a critical role in tailoring silica materials to meet specific application-driven requirements [20,21,61,89]. For example, Huang et al. (2012) reported the synthesis of hierarchical porous silica using polystyrene nanoparticles as templates, which exhibited exceptional performance as a methanol synthesis catalyst [89].

2.3.2. Soft-Template-Based Silica

Soft-template-based silica refers to a method of forming regular mesoporous structures using surfactants and micelle systems. Since non-polymerized surfactants are typically employed as templates, the resulting silica generally exhibits a relatively uniform pore size. However, the internal pore surfaces may occasionally lack smoothness due to the nature of the soft templates. A key advantage of this technique lies in the ease of template removal, as the organic components can be eliminated under mild conditions such as low temperatures or weakly acidic environments. This technique is commonly employed to produce silica materials with uniform pore architectures, such as SBA-15 and KIT-6 [5,13,90,91,92]. The synthesis of soft-template-based silica involves the following steps [5,26,92]:
  • Preparation of Surfactant and Cosolvent as illustrated in Figure 5a–c:
Surfactants (e.g., CTAB) and cosolvents (e.g., ethanol) are mixed with water to form micelle structures. These micelles serve as the core structures onto which the silica precursor is coated.
2.
Addition of Silica Precursors as depicted in Figure 5d–f:
Silica precursors such as tetraethyl orthosilicate (TEOS) or tetramethyl orthosilicate (TMOS) are added to induce hydrolysis and condensation reactions. During this process, silica is uniformly coated onto the surface of the micelles [61].
3.
Removal of Surfactants as shown in Figure 5g:
Finally, the surfactants are removed through calcination (e.g., at 550 °C) or solvent extraction (e.g., using ethanol) to obtain mesoporous silica [23,24,25,26].
A widely studied example, SBA-15, is a mesoporous silica synthesized using P123 surfactant. It exhibits a 2D hexagonal pore structure with large pore sizes (6–10 nm) and high specific surface areas (600–800 m2/g). These properties make it suitable for CO2 adsorption and catalytic support applications [73]. The soft-template approach is favored due to its relatively simple process for synthesizing regular mesoporous structures. Mesoporous silica structures like SBA-15 and KIT-6 are versatile materials that find applications in catalysts, adsorbents, and drug delivery systems [29,91]. However, the soft-template method has limitations, including challenges in controlling pore size and difficulties in optimizing mesoporous structures for specific applications. Additionally, the removal of surfactants requires extra steps such as calcination or solvent extraction [93,94]. SBA-15, a representative material produced via the soft-template approach, demonstrates high thermal stability and mesoporous structures, making it widely used as a catalyst support and adsorbent. For example, its CO2 adsorption capacity has been reported to reach 4.53 mmol per gram of absorbent [8]. Another notable material, KIT-6, features a 3D cubic mesoporous structure, offering high efficiency in gas dispersion and diffusion [95,96]. In 2018, Wu’s group synthesized a micro-mesoporous composite (referred to as the ZK complex) using KIT-6 as a template. This material was applied as a catalyst for the hydrodesulfurization (HDS) of dibenzothiophene (DBT) and diesel oil. By adjusting the molar ratio of n-butanol (BuOH) to P123, the pore structure of the ZK complex was tuned. The ZK-3 variant (BuOH/P123 = 100) exhibited optimal physicochemical properties, including a high surface area (858 m2/g), pore volume (0.90 cm3/g), and pore diameter (4.6 nm). The NiMo/ZK-3 catalyst achieved a high selectivity of 72.1% and efficiency in the HDS of DBT and also demonstrated superior performance in sulfur removal from diesel. These results were attributed to the excellent pore structure, appropriate metal-support interactions (MSI), high Brønsted/Lewis acidity (B/L ratio), and uniformly dispersed active metal (MoS2). This study suggests that the ZK-3 composite has the potential to replace conventional ZSM-5 and KIT-6 supports in HDS reactions [97].

2.3.3. Template-Free Silica

Template-free silica refers to a method of forming porous structures without using a template by directly hydrolyzing or condensing silica precursors. This technique is recognized for its eco-friendliness, simplicity, and suitability for large-scale production [98]. The synthesis of template-free silica involves the following steps [99,100,101]:
  • Mixing of Precursors and Catalysts:
Silica precursors such as tetraethyl orthosilicate (TEOS) or tetramethyl orthosilicate (TMOS) are mixed with alkaline (e.g., NaOH) or acidic catalysts (e.g., HCl) (Figure 6a).
2.
Spontaneous Pore Formation:
Silica particles aggregate spontaneously under controlled reaction conditions to form irregular porous structures. The pore formation process can be tuned by adjusting temperature or pH [101].
Yan’s group introduced an efficient template-free method to synthesize mesoporous silica from coal fly ash (CFA). In this approach, sodium silicate precursors were prepared from the de-silication liquor and acid-leached residue generated during the alumina extraction process from CFA. The effects of sodium silicate characteristics (modulus and silica concentration) and synthesis conditions (pH and temperature) on the pore structures of mesoporous silica were evaluated. Silica synthesized under optimal conditions (pH 8, 40 °C) exhibited a high specific surface area (690 m2/g) and pore volume (1.28 cm3/g). After amination, the silica was used as an adsorbent for lead ions (Pb2+) removal, achieving an adsorption capacity of 303 mg/g. This method improved the silica utilization efficiency of CFA to 93%, addressing environmental issues while demonstrating the potential for large-scale production of mesoporous silica as represented in Figure 6b [101]. As shown in the above example, template-free synthesis offers a low-cost, environmentally friendly, and simple process suitable for mass production [64,101]. However, this approach may result in less uniform pore sizes and structures, which can limit performance in certain applications [83,102,103]. Template-free silica particles are widely used as simple adsorbents for environmental applications such as heavy metal removal and wastewater treatment [6,104]. Furthermore, the irregular porous structures present opportunities to replace expensive catalyst supports [68,70]. According to Merky et al., nano-silica oxides (nano-SiO2) synthesized via the sol-gel process were applied as adsorbents for removing heavy metals such as lead (Pb2+) and chromium (Cr6+) from aqueous solutions. The optimal adsorption conditions were identified as an initial pH of 5 for Pb2+ and pH 2 for Cr6+, using 0.5 g/L and 1 g/L of nano-silica, respectively. After 60 min and 90 min of contact time, removal efficiencies of 82.3% and 78.5% were achieved. Furthermore, the study demonstrated practical reusability with high adsorption efficiency maintained over six cycles of regeneration [105].

2.3.4. Only-Room-Temperature Synthesized Mesoporous Silica Nanoparticles

As mentioned earlier, uniform mesoporous silica nanoparticles (MSNs) are widely used across various fields due to their uniform pore structure, high surface area, and tunable functionalities. However, the calcination process required for surfactant removal poses significant economic and environmental challenges, especially for large-scale industrial synthesis. Recently, Bae’s group reported the synthesis of various MSN morphologies using a calcination-free method at room temperature, and their studies included a comparative analysis with traditionally calcined samples and applications such as toxic gas adsorption [23,24,25,26,27]. As shown in Figure 7, the arrangement of mesoporous structures varies depending on the two different synthesis methods. The traditional calcination method results in mesoporous silica nanoparticles (MSNs) with a well-ordered pore arrangement, whereas the calcination-free synthesis method produces MSNs with irregular pore structures. Interestingly, the MSNs synthesized via the calcination-free method exhibit a larger pore volume due to their irregular pore size and arrangement, which enhances gas adsorption efficiency [23]. This section focuses on the synthesis, advantages, and applications of mesoporous silica nanoparticles via calcination-free synthesis. Calcination-free synthesis of MSNs typically involves mild chemical treatments to extract the surfactant template while maintaining structural integrity. A representative process includes the following steps:
  • Selection of Template and Mixing with precursors:
Cationic surfactants such as CTAC are suitable as templates for generating mesopores within silica. These surfactants exhibit micelle-forming behavior under basic conditions, which necessitates the use of amine-based catalysts to facilitate the reaction environment. Alkoxysilanes, commonly used as silica precursors, undergo condensation polymerization in alkaline media; thus, the simultaneous formation of micelles and the polymerization of silica precursors can be effectively achieved. When trifunctional alkoxysilanes are employed instead of TEOS, the synthesis strategy may vary depending on the functional groups attached to the silane. For example, basic silanes such as APTES (3-aminopropyltriethoxysilane) allow direct mixing with the surfactant due to their ability to maintain a basic pH during synthesis [39]. In contrast, in the case of VTES (vinyltriethoxysilane), pre-hydrolysis is required prior to mixing with the surfactant to prevent premature gelation during the reaction process [27].
2.
Template Removal:
Before template removal, it is essential to ensure that the polymerization between the silane precursors is sufficiently complete. Incomplete polymerization may lead to the collapse of the mesoporous structure upon template removal, resulting in the collapse of the framework or the formation of irregular and poorly defined pores. Depending on the specific application, such structural deviations may be either advantageous or detrimental. Cationic surfactant templates can generally be removed through relatively mild procedures. First, the pH of the system should be adjusted to neutral or mildly acidic conditions. This is because cationic surfactants, which form micelles under basic conditions, lose their micellar structure in neutral or acidic environments. At this stage, the selection of an appropriate solvent is critical. Solvents with high surfactant solubility, such as tetrahydrofuran (THF) or ethanol (EtOH), facilitate the diffusion of disassembled surfactants out of the silica framework. Applying moderate heating (50–80 °C) can accelerate this diffusion process and enhance the efficiency of template removal. However, surfactants deeply embedded within the silica framework may not be easily removed, often requiring multiple cycles of the extraction process.
3.
Drying:
The silica material is washed with ethanol and water to ensure complete removal of residual surfactants, followed by drying at ambient or low temperatures (60–100 °C). This calcination-free method offers several advantages, with energy efficiency being the most prominent. Traditional methods requiring calcination involve temperatures exceeding 600 °C, whereas solvent-based template removal can be conducted at room temperature or under mild heating. Additionally, the absence of high-temperature restructuring preserves the large pore volumes and high surface areas generated during synthesis. These mild conditions also help retain labile functional groups, such as amines or other organic functionalities, enhancing surface reactivity for applications like CO2 capture. Furthermore, compared to silica synthesized through calcination, non-calcined mesoporous silica exhibits higher surface activity, facilitating the introduction of additional functional groups via trifunctional alkoxysilanes. The synthesis of mesoporous silica without a calcination step represents a significant advancement in environmentally friendly approaches. According to the study by Dr. Candela-Noguera and colleagues, silica synthesized via template removal without calcination demonstrated superior biodegradability compared to its calcined counterpart. This characteristic may serve as a key advantage in the development of green synthesis strategies, which are increasingly prioritized in current research trends [106]. However, the absence of calcination may leave behind residual surfactants or templates, potentially reducing pore uniformity. Furthermore, the increased solvent usage poses challenges for large-scale production.
The following are key applications of calcination-free silica nanoparticles synthesized using methods reported by Bae’s group:
  • CO2 Adsorption:
Calcination-free MSNs demonstrate superior CO2 adsorption capacity due to their higher pore volumes and increased availability of amine functionalization sites. Studies have shown that non-calcined MSNs outperform calcined counterparts in CO2 capture, achieving over twofold higher performance under similar conditions [23,24].
2.
Formaldehyde Removal:
Non-calcined hollow MSNs exhibit enhanced formaldehyde adsorption owing to their larger internal surface area and functional group availability [24]. Recent work demonstrated the synthesis of MSNs with a pore volume of 0.845 cm3/g and a BET surface area of 1072 m2/g without calcination. Functionalization with tetraethylene pentamine (TEPA) resulted in materials capable of adsorbing 11.3 mmol/g of CO2, significantly higher than calcined samples [23]. This breakthrough highlights the potential of non-calcined MSNs as next-generation adsorbents for environmental applications. Calcination-free synthesis of mesoporous silica nanoparticles represents a significant advancement in materials science, combining environmental benefits with enhanced functional performance. This approach is particularly promising for applications in gas adsorption, drug delivery, and catalysis. Future efforts should focus on optimizing the scalability and uniformity of these materials to expand their industrial applicability.

3. CO2 Adsorption Mechanisms

3.1. Introduction of Amine Functional Groups

3.1.1. Physical (Wet) Impregnation Approach

The physical impregnation method involves mixing a silica support with a desired amount of amine to form an amine-silica composite [20,21,22,23,24,25]. The amount of amine incorporated into the silica support is determined by the initial quantity of amine added, while the retention of amine within the silica pores is limited by the pore volume and the density of the amine. This approach offers notable advantages, including simplicity, mild synthesis conditions, and the potential for high amine loading due to the substantial pore volume of silica. However, the lack of chemical bonding between the amine and silica support may reduce the composite’s stability, which can limit its practical usability.

3.1.2. Chemical Functionalization Method

To significantly enhance CO2 capture efficiency, amine functional groups are covalently attached to the silica support [64,107,108]. Typically, this involves condensation reactions between amino-silane and the hydroxyl groups present on the surface of silica nanoparticles. Consequently, the quantity of introduced amines depends on the number of hydroxyl groups available on the silica surface. Harlick et al. demonstrated an alternative approach to increase the number of attached amine functional groups by linking amino-silane to the surface through Si–O–Si bridges using a controlled amount of water, thereby enhancing amine content [107]. Additionally, various studies have explored the use of polymers and other methods to induce chemical bonding, further increasing amine content [109,110,111,112]. Amine groups attached through these chemical methods exhibit high stability, making them highly efficient for reuse [113].

3.1.3. One-Pot Synthesis

Unlike methods that involve attaching amine functional groups after synthesizing mesoporous silica nanoparticles (MSNs), the one-pot synthesis approach integrates amine functional groups directly during MSN synthesis. Specifically, this process involves hydrolysis and co-condensation of organosilane and aminosilane in the presence of an acid or base catalyst and organic template to produce amine-functionalized mesoporous silica materials [114,115,116,117,118,119]. This method simplifies the process, reduces overall reaction time, and facilitates large-scale production, making it possible to obtain uniform particles in bulk. However, the integration of multiple steps into a single process presents challenges in identifying optimal reaction conditions and increases the likelihood of reaction byproducts, which can be a significant drawback.

3.2. CO2 Adsorption on Amine-Functionalized MSNs via Physical Impregnation or Chemical Grafting Methods

Physical adsorption occurs when CO2 molecules adhere to the surface of mesoporous silica nanoparticles (MSNs) through weak van der Waals forces without forming chemical bonds. This mechanism is particularly effective at low temperatures, typically ranging from 0 to 50 °C, as it requires minimal energy input. The process is reversible, allowing for rapid adsorption and desorption while consuming relatively low amounts of energy for adsorbent regeneration. However, due to the weak interactions between CO2 molecules and the adsorbent surface, the overall adsorption capacity remains lower than that of chemical adsorption. Additionally, physical adsorption lacks selectivity, which means other gases may co-adsorb alongside CO2, reducing its effectiveness. Despite these limitations, physical adsorption is suitable for capturing CO2 from low-concentration environments, such as direct air capture. The mesoporous silica-based materials utilized in this process enable rapid adsorption and desorption cycles, making them highly energy-efficient and practical for industrial applications [4,78].

Chemical Adsorption

Chemical adsorption, in contrast to physical adsorption, involves the formation of chemical bonds between CO2 molecules and functional groups such as amines or metal oxides on the surface of MSNs. This process results in the formation of carbamate or bicarbonate species, which significantly enhance selectivity and adsorption capacity [120]. One of the key advantages of chemical adsorption is its stability at relatively high temperatures, typically ranging from 50 to 120 °C, making it suitable for various industrial applications. However, breaking these chemical bonds requires high temperatures or chemical treatments, which increases the energy demand for adsorbent regeneration. Due to its superior selectivity and adsorption efficiency, chemical adsorption is particularly effective for capturing CO2 in high-concentration environments, such as industrial flue gases. Amine-functionalized mesoporous silica has emerged as a promising material for carbon capture and storage (CCS) technologies due to its strong affinity for CO2 molecules [63].
  • Chemical Adsorption of CO2 by MSNs with Physically Impregnated Amine Groups
Several studies have systematically analyzed the effects of combining SBA-15 mesoporous silica with polyethyleneimine (PEI) to improve CO2 adsorption performance. Yan et al. (2011) investigated how variations in SBA-15 pore size and volume influence PEI loading and CO2 adsorption capacity. The study revealed that larger pores allow for better PEI distribution, thereby enhancing adsorption efficiency. However, excessive PEI loading can lead to pore blockage, which increases diffusion resistance and ultimately reduces adsorption performance [10]. Similarly, Sanz et al. (2010) examined the impact of different PEI impregnation ratios, ranging from 10% to 70%, on CO2 adsorption. Their findings indicated that a 50% PEI loading was optimal, as it maintained sufficient pore volume while maximizing adsorption capacity. In contrast, a 70% PEI loading led to inefficient accumulation of PEI on the external surface, reducing overall adsorption efficiency [121]. Heydari-Gorji et al. (2011) demonstrated that plate-shaped SBA-15 silica (SBA-15PLT), which features shorter pore lengths, exhibited lower diffusion resistance and higher CO2 adsorption rates compared to SBA-15 and MCM-41, which have longer pores. The improved diffusion and accessibility of amine groups in the shorter pore structures contributed significantly to the enhanced CO2 capture rates [47]. Ma et al. (2009) introduced the concept of “Molecular Basket Sorbents (MBS),” which combines SBA-15’s large pore volume with PEI’s high chemical affinity for CO2 and H2S. Their study demonstrated that MBS exhibited an exceptional CO2 adsorption capacity of 140 mg/g, along with high selectivity and excellent regenerability. Moreover, they found that humidity increased CO2 adsorption capacity by approximately 35%, highlighting the role of PEI-water interactions in enhancing CO2 binding [48]. Gargiulo et al. (2014) analyzed the thermodynamics of CO2 adsorption and found that increasing temperature enhanced PEI flexibility, activating additional adsorption sites. Their study reported peak adsorption performance at approximately 75 °C [11]. These findings collectively underscore the importance of optimizing pore structure, volume, and PEI loading to enhance CO2 capture efficiency, providing valuable insights for industrial applications in carbon capture, utilization, and storage (CCUS). A comparative summary of pore characteristics and CO₂ adsorption capacities of PEI-functionalized SBA-15 reported in these studies is provided in Table 2.
2.
Chemical Adsorption of CO2 by MSNs with Chemically Grafted Amine Groups
An alternative approach to improving CO2 adsorption efficiency involves chemically grafting amine functional groups onto silica particles. This method provides enhanced stability and efficiency, even after multiple regeneration cycles. Linneen et al. (2014) examined CO2 adsorption performance using mono-amine silane, di-amine silane, and tri-amine silane grafted onto silica aerogels. Their results indicated that tri-amine silane exhibited the highest nitrogen content, measuring 4.13 mmol N/g, and achieved a CO2 adsorption capacity of 2.61 mmol/g under optimal conditions. Notably, this adsorbent maintained a high adsorption capacity of 2.30 mmol/g over 100 cycles, demonstrating excellent regeneration stability [122]. Park et al. (2016) investigated the advantages of in-situ polymerization of amine silanes within silica, which led to significantly higher amine content and improved CO2 adsorption compared to conventional surface grafting. Their findings revealed that in-situ polymerization increased amine-silane content by four to seven times, with a maximum CO2 adsorption capacity of 5.7 wt%, whereas conventional grafting achieved only 0.8 wt% [123]. Ko et al. (2013) studied CO2 adsorption in double-walled silica nanotubes (DWSN) functionalized with various amine types. Their study ranked adsorption performance in the following order: tri-amine > di-amine > primary amine > secondary amine > tertiary amine. Among these, DWSN functionalized with tri-amine (AEAEAPTMS) achieved the highest CO2 adsorption capacity of 2.23 mmol/g. The comparative performance of various amine-functionalized silica materials discussed above is illustrated in Figure 8 and Table 3. These studies consistently highlight that increasing the complexity of amine structures enhances adsorption capacity by providing more binding sites for CO2 molecules. However, steric hindrance in tertiary-amine structures can slightly reduce adsorption efficiency [124]. Thus, optimizing amine structures and synthesis conditions is crucial for developing high-performance CO2 adsorbents, providing valuable insights for future advancements in carbon capture technologies.

4. Challenges and Future Directions

The continuous increase in CO2 concentration has been identified as a major cause of climate change and global warming, leading to a surge in global interest in carbon capture, utilization, and storage (CCUS) technologies [125]. Among these, CO2 capture technology using solid adsorbents has garnered significant attention in both industry and academia due to its high adsorption capacity and energy efficiency. In particular, silica-based adsorbents are considered highly suitable materials for CO2 capture because of their excellent thermal and chemical stability, high specific surface area, and tunable pore structure. Therefore, future research should focus not only on optimizing the performance of these adsorbents but also on developing synthesis methods suitable for large-scale production. This review aims to discuss the characteristics of various silica-based CO2 adsorption materials, as well as the challenges and future research directions for their commercialization.

4.1. Enhancement of Adsorption Capacity and Selectivity

To maximize CO2 capture efficiency, it is essential to expand the specific surface area of adsorbents and to optimize their pore structures. High-surface-area materials, such as mesoporous silica, can optimize the adsorption pathways of CO2 molecules by controlling the size and morphology of internal pores, which plays a crucial role in significantly increasing adsorption capacity. Materials capable of forming pore structures that provide excellent accessibility to CO2 molecules can particularly maximize contact opportunities with CO2 and allow for the regulation of adsorption selectivity depending on pore size. For instance, dendritic mesoporous silica nanoparticles (DMSNs), which possesses three-dimensional center radial channels with hierarchical pores, serves as an excellent platform for CO2 adsorption by offering a high specific surface area and hierarchical pore volume [126,127]. Controlling pore size of mesoporous silica nanoparticles is critical in optimizing the diffusion rate of CO2 molecules and the available adsorption surface area. Amine-functionalized MSNs have been reported to be effective for CO2 adsorption, especially when they possess a hierarchical pore structure or large pore sizes [128]. In addition to, shorter pore lengths enhance the accessibility of amine groups inside the pores, reducing diffusion resistance and thereby improving CO2 adsorption efficiency [47]. Therefore, precise control of the pore structure in silica-based adsorbents is a key factor to maximize CO2 adsorption performance, and practical synthesis research on this aspect is required for industrial applications.

4.2. Ensuring Durability and Stability

Ensuring long-term durability and stability is essential for the commercialization of CO2 adsorption materials. In particular, amine-impregnated MSNs face reduced adsorption a significant challenge related to amine leaching during adsorption-desorption cycles. To address this issue, researches have been conducted on chemically grafting amines onto the silica particles’ surface via covalent bonding to prevent leaching. However, these approaches generally result in lower adsorption capacity compared to impregnation methods. Consequently, alternative strategies, such as embedding amines in polymer matrices or forming protective coatings on the silica particles’ surface, have been proposed to prevent physical damage and enhance durability [129,130]. Furthermore, thermal stability is a crucial performance indicator for evaluating amine-functionalized silica particles. High temperatures during the regeneration process can cause thermal decomposition and volatilization of amines on silica particles, leading to reduce adsorption performance. To mitigate this problem, it has been proposed to introduce thermally stable amine derivatives [127] or apply silicone or ceramic coatings on the surface of silica particles to suppress thermal degradation [131]. The use of oxidation inhibitors or thermal-stabilizing catalysts can also prevent amine oxidation, ensuring long-term stability.

4.3. Environmental Friendliness and Cost Reduction (Low-Cost Raw Materials, Waste Heat Utilization, and Energy-Efficient Regeneration Processes)

For the successful commercialization of CO2 capture technologies, the development of cost-effective and environmentally sustainable materials is crucial. Utilizing low-cost raw materials and eco-friendly synthesis approaches can substantially lower production costs while minimizing the overall carbon footprint [132]. In particular, research efforts have focused on leveraging biomass-derived silica and industrial byproducts as feedstocks, while employing water-based synthesis methods in place of organic solvents to reduce environmental impact [133]. Moreover, enhancing the energy efficiency of CO2 capture and regeneration processes remains an important challenge. Considerable attention has been given to strategies that utilizing waste heat from industrial processes as a renewable energy source for regeneration. These approaches offer significant potential to lower overall energy consumption and operational costs, thereby improving the economic viability of CO2 capture technologies [134].

4.4. Future Research Directions

Ensuring the sustainability of CO2 capture technologies requires continuous research efforts focused on optimizing adsorbent performance, enhancing durability, reducing costs, and developing environmentally friendly processes. Specifically, the development of novel amine compounds and composite materials with low toxicity and minimal environmental impact, the design of energy-efficient regeneration processes, and the implementation of strategies to maintain long-term stability and performance of adsorbents are of paramount importance.
Beyond conventional CO2 capture, the conversion of captured CO2 into value-added chemicals represents a crucial research direction. Recent studies have demonstrated the potential of catalytic functional materials for transforming captured CO2 into methanol, carbonates, and other valuable products. For example, the incorporation of metal nanoparticles into mesoporous silica has been explored for applications in CO2 methanation reactions and carbonate synthesis, thereby maximizing the utilization of captured CO2 [135]. Furthermore, the development of multifunctional adsorbents capable of simultaneously capturing multiple hazardous gases alongside CO2 is necessary. Adsorbents designed to remove not only CO2 but also H2S, NOₓ, and SOₓ could offer significant benefits, particularly for industries with high emissions of hazardous gases, such as steel mills, refineries, and cement plants. For example, in the power generation industry, extensive research has been conducted to reduce CO2 emissions resulting from combustion processes. Recently, Zhang and colleagues reported a study utilizing polymer-amine-functionalized silica adsorbents for post-combustion CO2 capture [136]. Similarly, in the cement industry—which accounts for approximately 7% of global CO2 emissions—CO2 is generated not only from the thermal decomposition of CaCO3 into CaO and CO2 but also from the combustion of fuels, making CO2 capture an essential area of research. In 2023, Jaffar et al. demonstrated the effective capture of CO2 using a combination of monoethanolamine (MEA) and silica-alkoxylated polyethyleneimine (SPEI) [137]. Building upon such studies, the continuous development of amine-based adsorbents is being actively pursued for high-emission industries, as these materials hold strong potential for broad application. Advancing this research is critical to mitigating global warming. Moving forward, it will be necessary to enhance not only the performance, scalability, and industrial applicability of silica-based adsorbents but also to develop greener synthesis routes. Such progress will be key to achieving sustainable, efficient, and economically viable CO2 capture technologies.

5. Conclusions

Amine-functionalized mesoporous silica nanoparticles (MSNs) have demonstrated significant potential as efficient solid adsorbents for CO2 capture due to their high surface area, tunable pore structures, and chemical modifiability. Despite these advantages, several challenges remain, including amine leaching, thermal degradation, and limitations in large-scale production. Recent advancements in amine stabilization strategies, such as covalent grafting, polymer integration, and tailored pore architectures, have contributed to improving the durability and adsorption efficiency of these materials. Moreover, the design of thermally stable amine compounds, protective coatings, and oxidation-resistant additives has helped to address issues related to thermal degradation, thereby enhancing the long-term applicability of amine-functionalized MSNs in industrial settings. Future research must prioritize the development of cost-effective and environmentally friendly synthesis methods to facilitate large-scale production while minimizing the carbon footprint. Additionally, efforts to improve energy-efficient regeneration processes, particularly by utilizing waste heat from industrial operations, are essential to enhance the economic viability of CO2 capture technologies. Beyond adsorption, the potential of MSNs in catalytic CO2 conversion into value-added chemicals, such as methanol and carbonates, represents a promising avenue for further exploration.
In summary, while amine-functionalized MSNs offer a promising solution for CO2 capture, their full industrial adoption requires continued interdisciplinary research and technological innovation. Addressing the existing challenges through scalable synthesis, performance optimization, and integration with CO2 utilization strategies will be key to advancing sustainable carbon management and mitigating climate change impacts.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.K., S.G.J. and J.Y.B.; methodology, M.K. and S.G.J.; validation, M.K., S.G.J. and J.Y.B.; formal analysis, M.K. and S.G.J.; investigation, M.K., J.C. and S.G.J.; resources, M.K., J.C., S.G.J. and J.Y.B.; data curation, M.K., J.C. and S.G.J.; writing—original draft preparation, M.K., S.G.J. and J.Y.B. writing—review and editing, M.K., J.C., S.G.J. and J.Y.B.; visualization, M.K. and S.G.J.; supervision, J.Y.B., J.C. and M.K.; project administration, J.Y.B.; funding acquisition, J.Y.B. and J.C. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was supported by the Technology Innovation Program (RS-2024-00431493, Development of EV tires with 20% improvement in wear performance based on eco-friendly nanocomposite) funded by the Ministry of Trade Industry & Energy (MOTIE, Korea).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data is contained within the article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Mehmood, A.; Ghafar, H.; Yaqoob, S.; Gohar, U.F.; Ahmad, B. Mesoporous Silica Nanoparticles: A Review. J. Dev. Drugs 2017, 6, 2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Wang, X.; Chen, L.; Guo, Q. Development of hybrid amine-functionalized MCM-41 sorbents for CO2 capture. Chem. Eng. J. 2015, 260, 573–581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Xu, X.; Song, C.; Andrésen, J.M.; Miller, B.G.; Scaroni, A.W. Preparation and characterization of novel CO2 “molecular basket’’ adsorbents based on polymer-modified mesoporous molecular sieve MCM-41. Micropor. Mesopor. Mat. 2003, 62, 29–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Ahmed, S.; Ramli, A.; Yusup, S.; Farooq, M. Adsorption behavior of tetraethylenepentamine-functionalized Si-MCM-41 for CO2 adsorption. Chem. Eng. Res. Des. 2017, 122, 33–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Widenmeyer, M.; Anwander, R. Pore Size Control of Highly Ordered Mesoporous Silica MCM-48. Chem. Mater. 2002, 14, 1827–1831. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Anbia, M.; Kargosha, K.; Khoshbooei, S. Heavy metal ions removal from aqueous media by modified magnetic mesoporous silica MCM-48. Chem. Eng. Res. Des. 2015, 93, 779–788. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Stuckert, A.N.; Yang, R.T. CO2 Capture from the Atmosphere and Simultaneous Concentration Using Zeolites and Amine-Grafted SBA-15. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2011, 45, 10257–10264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Ferreira, M.L.; Pedernera, M.; Adrover, M.E. Enhanced CO2 capture by functionalization of SBA-15 with APTES and L-lysine. Chem. Eng. J. 2024, 498, 155431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Wang, X.; Lin, K.S.K.; Chan, J.C.C.; Cheng, S. Direct Synthesis and Catalytic Applications of Ordered Large Pore Aminopropyl-Functionalized SBA-15 Mesoporous Materials. J. Phys. Chem. B 2005, 109, 1763–1769. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Yan, X.; Zhang, L.; Zhang, Y.; Yang, G.; Yan, Z. Amine-Modified SBA-15: Effect of Pore Structure on the Performance for CO2 Capture. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2011, 50, 3220–3226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Gargiulo, N.; Peluso, A.; Aprea, P.; Pepe, F.; Caputo, D. CO2 Adsorption on Polyethylenimine-Functionalized SBA-15 Mesoporous Silica: Isotherms and Modeling. J. Chem. Eng. Data 2014, 59, 896–902. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Thommes, M.; Kaneko, K.; Neimark, A.V.; Olivier, J.P.; Rodriguez-Reinoso, F.; Rouquerol, J.; Sing, K.S.W. Physisorption of gases, with special reference to the evaluation of surface area and pore size distribution (IUPAC Technical Report). Pure Appl. Chem. 2015, 87, 1051–1069. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Zhao, D.; Feng, J.; Huo, Q.; Melosh, N.; Fedrickson, G.H.; Chmelka, B.F.; Stucky, G.D. Triblock Copolymer Syntheses of Mesoporous Silica with Periodic 50 to 300 Angstrom Pores. Science 1998, 279, 548–552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Xiang, S.; He, Y.; Zhang, Z.; Wu, H.; Zhou, W.; Krishna, R.; Chen, B. Microporous metal-organic framework with potential for carbon dioxide capture at ambient conditions. Nat. Commun. 2012, 3, 954. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Heras, K.L.; Garcia-Orue, I.; Aguirre, J.J.; La Caba, K.d.; Guerrero, P.; Igartua, M.; Santos-Vizcaino, E.; Hernandez, R.M. Soy protein/β-chitin sponge-like scaffolds laden with human mesenchymal stromal cells from hair follicle or adipose tissue promote diabetic chronic wound healing. Biomater. Adv. 2023, 155, 213682. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Shang, L.; Wang, S.; Mao, Y. Recent advances in plant-derived polysaccharide scaffolds in tissue engineering: A review. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2024, 277, 133830. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Azmand, H.R.; Enemuo, A.N.; Seo, S.-W. Active liquid flow control through a polypyrrole-coated macroporous silicon membrane toward chemical stimulation applications. Sens. Actuators A 2021, 318, 112512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Valencia, L.; Rosas, W.; Aguilar-Sanchez, A.; Mathew, A.P.; Palmqvist, A.E.C. Bio-based Micro-/Meso-/Macroporous Hybrid Foams with Ultrahigh Zeolite Loadings for Selective Capture of Carbon Dioxide. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces Adv. 2019, 11, 40424–40431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Wang, B.; Prinsen, P.; Wang, H.; Bai, Z.; Wang, H.; Luque, R.; Xuan, J. Macroporous materials: Microfluidic fabrication, functionalization and applications. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2017, 46, 855–914. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Bae, J.Y.; Jang, S.G. Characteristics of CO2 Capture by Tetraethylenepentamine Modified Mesoporous Silica Morphology. J. Nanosci. Nanotechnol. 2019, 19, 6291–9296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Bae, J.Y.; Jang, S.G. Preparation and Characterization of Amine-Functionalized Mesoporous Hollow Silica for CO2 Capture. J. Nanosci. Nanotechnol. 2020, 20, 7070–7074. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Lee, J.-T.; Bae, J.Y. Synthesis and Characteristics of Double-Shell Mesoporous Hollow Silica Nanomaterials to Improve CO2 Adsorption Performance. Micromachines 2021, 12, 1424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Kang, M.; Lee, J.-T.; Bae, J.-Y. Facile Synthesis of Mesoporous Silica at Room Temperature for CO2 Adsorption. Micromachines 2022, 13, 926. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Kang, M.; Lee, J.-T.; Kim, M.-K.; Byun, M.; Bae, J.-Y. Facile Mesoporous Hollow Silica Synthesis for Formaldehyde Adsorption. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 4208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Lee, J.M.; Kang, M.; Kim, J.-S.; Bae, J.-Y. Amine-Impregnated Dendritic Mesoporous Silica for the Adsorption of Formaldehyde. Micromachines 2024, 15, 30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Ko, H.-S.; Kang, M.; Lee, J.-T.; Bae, J.-Y. Synthesis of Mesoporous Silica Sol with Low Refractive Properties for Increasing Transmittance. Micromachines 2024, 15, 892. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Lee, J.-T.; Kang, M.; Bae, J.-Y. The Facile Synthesis and Application of Mesoporous Silica Nanoparticles with a Vinyl Functional Group for Plastic Recycling. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25, 2295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Jayaramulu, K.; Devi, B. Hybrid Two-Dimensional Porous Materials. Chem. Mater. 2023, 35, 9473–9492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Corma, A. From Microporous to Mesoporous Molecular Sieve Materials and Their Use in Catalysis. Chem. Rev. 1997, 97, 2373–2419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Ye, Y.; Jo, C.; Jeong, I.; Lee, J. Functional mesoporous materials for energy applications: Solar cells, fuel cells, and batteries. Nanoscale 2013, 5, 4584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Li, Y.; Liu, X.; Guo, Q. Adsorption Mechanisms of CO2 on Macroporous Ion-Exchange Resin Organic Amine Composite Materials by the Density Functional Theory. ACS Omega 2024, 9, 17541–17550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Kresge, C.T.; Leonowicz, M.E.; Roth, W.J.; Vartuli, J.C.; Beck, J.S. Ordered mesoporous molecular sieves synthesized by a liquid-crystal template mechanism. Nature 1992, 359, 710–712. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Jaroniec, M.; Solovyov, L.A. Improvement of the Kruk-Jaroniec-Sayari Method for Pore Size Analysis of Ordered Silicas with Cylindrical Mesopores. Langmuir 2006, 22, 6757–6760. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Faisal, M.; Pamungkas, A.Z.; Krisnandi, Y.K. Study of Amine Functionalized Mesoporous Carbon as CO2 Storage Materials. Processes 2021, 9, 456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Dwiningtyas, G.S.; Abdullah, I.; Doi, R.; Krisnandi, Y.K. Bimetallic NiSn supported on mesoporous carbon as an efficient catalyst for selective methanol synthesis from CO2. CRC, 2024; in press. [Google Scholar]
  36. Duan, L.; Wang, C.; Zhang, W.; Ma, B.; Deng, Y.; Li, W.; Zhao, D. Interfacial Assembly and Applications of Functional Mesoporous Materials. Chem. Rev. 2021, 121, 14349–14429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Wang, J.; Fan, X.; Han, X.; Lv, K.; Zhao, Y.; Zhao, Z.; Zhao, D. Ultrasmall Inorganic Mesoporous Nanoparticles: Preparation, Functionalization, and Application. Adv. Mater. 2024, 36, 2312374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Guerritore, M.; Olivieri, F.; Avolio, R.; Castaldo, R.; Cocca, M.; Errico, M.E.; Lavorgna, M.; Silvestri, B.; Ambrogi, V.; Gentile, G. Hierarchical micro-to-macroporous silica nanoparticles obtained by their grafting with hyper-crosslinked resin. Micropor. Mesopor. Mat. 2022, 335, 111864. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Olivieri, F.; Scherillo, F.; Castaldo, R.; Cocca, M.; Squillace, A.; Gentile, G.; Lavorgna, M. Effectiveness of Mesoporous Silica Nanoparticles Functionalized with Benzoyl Chloride in pH-Responsive Anticorrosion Polymer Coatings. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. 2023, 5, 5917–5925. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Kovach, N.C.; Russell-Parks, G.A.; Trewyn, B.G. Strategies for post-synthetic functionalization of mesoporous carbon nanomaterial surfaces. Micropor. Mesopor. Mat. 2022, 329, 111453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Sayari, A.; Belmabkhouta, Y.; Serna-Guerrero, R. Flue gas treatment via CO2 adsorption. Chem. Eng. J. 2011, 171, 760–774. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Qi, G.; Wang, Y.; Estevez, L.; Duan, X.; Anako, N.; Park, A.H.A.; Li, W.; Jones, C.W.; Giannelis, E.P. High efficiency nanocomposite sorbents for CO2 capture based on amine-functionalized mesoporous capsules. Energy Environ. Sci. 2011, 4, 444–452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Castaldo, R.; Ambrogi, V.; Avolio, R.; Cocca, M.; Gentile, G.; Errico, M.E.; Avella, M. Functional hyper-crosslinked resins with tailored adsorption properties for environmental applications. Chem. Eng. J. 2019, 362, 497–503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Castaldo, R.; Avolio, R.; Cocca, M.; Errico, M.E.; Avella, M.; Gentile, G. Amino-functionalized hyper-crosslinked resins for enhanced adsorption of carbon dioxide and polar dyes. Chem. Eng. J. 2021, 418, 129463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Tian, Y.; Lin, Y.; Hagio, T.; Hu, Y.H. Surface-microporous graphene for CO2 adsorption. Catal. Today 2020, 356, 514–518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Qian, D.; Lei, C.; Wang, E.-M.; Li, W.-C.; Lu, A.-H. A Method for Creating Microporous Carbon Materials with Excellent CO2-Adsorption Capacity and Selectivity. ChemSusChem 2014, 7, 291–298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Heydari-Gorji, A.; Yang, Y.; Sayari, A. Effect of the Pore Length on CO2 Adsorption over Amine-Modified Mesoporous Silicas. Energy Fuels 2011, 25, 4206–4210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Ma, X.; Wang, X.; Song, C. “Molecular Basket” Sorbents for Separation of CO2 and H2S from Various Gas Streams. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131, 5777–5783. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Leal, O.; Bolivar, C.; Ovalles, C.; Garcia, J.J.; Espidel, Y. Reversible adsorption of carbon dioxide on amine surface-bonded silica gel. Inorg. Chim. Acta 1995, 240, 183–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Brunauer, S.; Emmett, P.H.; Teller, E. Adsorption of Gases in Multimolecular Layers. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1938, 60, 300–319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Choi, S.; Drese, J.H.; Jones, C.W. Adsorbent Materials for Carbon Dioxide Capture from Large Anthropogenic Point Sources. ChemSusChem 2009, 2, 796–854. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Sing, K.S.W.; Everett, D.H.; Haul, R.A.W.; Moscou, L.; Pierotti, R.A.; Rouquerol, J.; Siemieniewska, T. Reporting Physisorption Data For Gas/Solid Systems with Special Reference to the Determination of Surface Area and Porosity. Pure Appl. Chem. 1985, 57, 603–619. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Bruckmann, F.d.S.; Nunes, F.B.; Salles, T.d.R.; Franco, C.; Cadoná, F.C.; Bohn Rhoden, C.R. Biological Applications of Silica-Based Nanoparticles. Magnetochemistry 2022, 8, 131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Slowing, I.I.; Vivero-Escoto, J.L.; Wu, C.-W.; Lin, V.S.-Y. Mesoporous silica nanoparticles as controlled release drug delivery and gene transfection carriers. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 2008, 60, 1278–1288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Li, L.; Guan, Y.; Liu, H.; Hao, N.; Liu, T.; Meng, X.; Fu, C.; Li, Y.; Qu, Q.; Zhang, Y.; et al. Silica NanorattleDoxorubicin-Anchored Mesenchymal Stem Cells for Tumor-Tropic Therapy. ACS Nano 2011, 5, 7462–7470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Li, Z.-Y.; Hu, J.-J.; Xu, Q.; Chen, S.; Jia, H.-Z.; Sun, Y.-X.; Zhuo, R.-X.; Zhang, X.-Z. A redox-responsive drug delivery system based on RGD containing peptide-capped mesoporous silica nanoparticles. J. Mater. Chem. B 2015, 3, 39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Lin, W.; Huang, Y.-w.; Zhou, X.-D.; Ma, Y. In vitro toxicity of silica nanoparticles in human lung cancer cells. Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 2006, 217, 252–259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Saorin, A.; Martinez-Serra, A.; Paparoni-Bruzual, G.J.; Crozzolin, M.; Lombardi, V.; Back, M.; Riello, P.; Monopoli, M.P.; Rizzolio, F. Understanding the impact of silica nanoparticles in cancer cells through physicochemical and biomolecular characterizations. Mater. Adv. 2024, 5, 5106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Serna-Guerreroa, R.; Belmabkhout, Y.; Sayari, A. Modeling CO2 adsorption on amine-functionalized mesoporous silica: 1. A semi-empirical equilibrium model. Chem. Eng. J. 2010, 161, 173–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Yan, H.; Zhang, G.; Xu, Y.; Zhang, Q.; Liu, J.; Li, G.; Zhao, Y.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, Y. High CO2 adsorption on amine-functionalized improved macro-/mesoporous multimodal pore silica. Fuel 2022, 315, 123195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Shen, Z.; Cai, Q.; Yin, C.; Xia, Q.; Cheng, J.; Li, X.; Wang, Y. Facile synthesis of silica nanosheets with hierarchical pore structure and their amine-functionalized composite for enhanced CO2 capture. Chem. Eng. Sci. 2020, 217, 115528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Zeng, W.; Bai, H. High-performance CO2 capture on amine-functionalized hierarchically porous silica nanoparticles prepared by a simple template-free method. Adsorption 2016, 22, 117–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Henao, W.; Jaramillo, L.Y.; López, D.; Romero-Sáez, M.; Buitrago-Sierra, R. Insights into the CO2 capture over amine-functionalized mesoporous silica adsorbents derived from rice husk ash. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2020, 8, 104362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Bae, J.-Y. CO2 Capture by Amine-Functionalized Mesoporous Hollow Silica. J. Nanosci. Nanotechnol. 2017, 17, 7418–7422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Sasidharan, M.; Zenibana, H.; Nandi, M.; Bhaumik, A.; Nakashima, K. Synthesis of mesoporous hollow silica nanospheres using polymeric micelles as template and their application as a drug-delivery carrier. Dalton Trans. 2013, 42, 13381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Phan, M.V.; Tran, T.K.T.; Pham, Q.N.; Do, M.H.; Nguyen, T.H.N.; Nguyen, M.T.; Phan, T.T.; To, T.X.H. Controllable Synthesis of Hollow Silica Nanoparticles Using Layered Double Hydroxide Templates and Application for Thermal Insulation Coating. ACS Omega 2023, 8, 31399–31409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Gao, T.; Jelle, B.P.; Sandberg, L.I.C.; Gustavsen, A. Monodisperse Hollow Silica Nanospheres for Nano Insulation Materials: Synthesis, Characterization, and Life Cycle Assessment. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2013, 5, 761–767. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Hu, R.; Wang, L.; Xu, S.; Lu, Y.; Zhou, S. Silica nanospheres-encapsulated polymer ligands-bound Pd nanoparticles as highly efficient and selective catalysts for semi-hydrogenations of alkynes. Micropor. Mesopor. Mat. 2024, 377, 113213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Du, G.; Song, Y.; Li, N.; Xu, L.; Tong, C.; Feng, Y.; Chen, T.; Xu, J. Cage-like hierarchically mesoporous hollow silica microspheres templated by mesomorphous polyelectrolyte-surfactant complexes for noble metal nanoparticles immobilization. Coll. Surf. A 2019, 575, 129–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Chen, J.; Xue, Z.; Feng, S.; Tu, B.; Zhao, D. Facile Mesoporous Hollow Silica Synthesis for Formaldehyde Adsorption. J. Colloid. Interface Sci. 2014, 429, 62–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Li, Y.; Li, N.; Pan, W.; Yu, Z.; Yang, L.; Tang, B. Hollow Mesoporous Silica Nanoparticles with Tunable Structures for Controlled Drug Delivery. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2017, 9, 2123–2129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Yang, H.; Zhang, G.; Liu, J.; Li, G.; Zhao, Y.; Wang, Y.; Wu, C.; Wu, W. Amine-functionalized disordered hierarchical porous silica derived from blast furnace slag with high adsorption capability and cyclic stability for CO2 adsorption. Chem. Eng. J. 2023, 478, 147480. [Google Scholar]
  73. Na, K.; Jo, C.; Kim, J.; Cho, K.; Jung, J.; Seo, Y.; Messinger, R.J.; Chmelka, B.F.; Ryoo, R. Directing Zeolite Structures into Hierarchically Nanoporous Architectures. Science 2011, 333, 328–332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Shi, W.; Tao, S.; Yu, Y.; Wang, Y.; Ma, W. High performance adsorbents based on hierarchically porous silica for purifying multicomponent wastewater. J. Mater. Chem. 2011, 21, 15567–15574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Fuentes, K.M.; Onna, D.; Rioual, T.; Huvelle, M.A.L.; Britto, F.; Simian, M.; Sánchez-Domínguez, M.; Soler-Illia, G.J.A.A.; Bilmes, S.A. Copper upcycling by hierarchical porous silica spheres functionalized with branched polyethylenimine: Antimicrobial and catalytic applications. Micropor. Mesopor. Mat. 2021, 327, 111391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Li, H.; Chen, X.; Shen, D.; Wu, F.; Pleixats, R.; Pan, J. Functionalized silica nanoparticles: Classification, synthetic approaches and recent advances in adsorption applications. Nanoscale 2021, 13, 15998. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Li, H.; Wu, F.; Pan, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Pleixats, R.; Pan, J. Selective capture of palladium(II) from highly acidic solution by proline-valinol amide functionalized silica nanoparticles. Colloids Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 2022, 648, 129374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Siddiqui, B.; Rehman, A.U.; Haq, I.-u.; Al-Dossary, A.A.; Elaissari, A.; Ahmed, N. Exploiting recent trends for the synthesis and surface functionalization of mesoporous silica nanoparticles towards biomedical applications. Int. J. Pharm.-X 2022, 4, 100116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Usgodaarachchi, L.; Thambiliyagodage, C.; Wijesekera, R.; Bakker, M.G. Synthesis of mesoporous silica nanoparticles derived from rice husk and surface-controlled amine functionalization for efficient adsorption of methylene blue from aqueous solution. Curr. Res. Green. Sustain. Chem. 2021, 4, 100116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Olivieri, F.; Castaldo, R.; Cocca, M.; Gentile, G.; Lavorgna, M. Innovative Silver-Based Capping System for Mesoporous Silica Nanocarriers Able to Exploit a Twofold Anticorrosive Mechanism in Composite Polymer Coatings: Tailoring Benzotriazole Release and Capturing Chloride Ions. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2021, 13, 48141–48152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Zhao, W.; Lang, M.; Li, Y.; Lia, L.; Shi, J. Fabrication of uniform hollow mesoporous silica spheres and ellipsoids of tunable size through a facile hard-templating route. J. Mater. Chem. 2009, 19, 2778–2783. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Khanal, A.; Inoue, Y.; Yada, M.; Nakashima, K. Synthesis of Silica Hollow Nanoparticles Templated by Polymeric Micelle with Core-Shell-Corona Structure. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007, 129, 1534–1535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Zhang, Y.; Hsu, B.Y.W.; Ren, C.; Li, X.; Wang, J. Silica-based nanocapsules: Synthesis, structure control and biomedical applications. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2015, 44, 315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Yin, Y.; Lu, Y.; Gates, B.; Xia, Y. Template-Assisted Self-Assembly: A Practical Route to Complex Aggregates of Monodispersed Colloids with Well-Defined Sizes, Shapes, and Structures. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 8718–8729. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Robertson, M.; Guillen-Obando, A.; Barbour, A.; Smith, P.; Griffin, A.; Qiang, Z. Direct synthesis of ordered mesoporous materials from thermoplastic elastomers. Nat. Commun. 2023, 14, 639. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Lu, A.-H.; Schüth, F. Nanocasting: AVersatile Strategy for Creating Nanostructured Porous Materials. Adv. Mater. 2006, 18, 1793–1805. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Gac, W.; Zawadzki, W.; Słowik, G.; Sienkiewicz, A.; Kierys, A. Nickel catalysts supported on silica microspheres for CO2 methanation. Micropor. Mesopor. Mat. 2018, 272, 79–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Qi, G.; Wang, Y.; Estevez, L.; Switzer, A.K.; Duan, X.; Yang, X.; Giannelis, E.P. Facile and Scalable Synthesis of Monodispersed Spherical Capsules with a Mesoporous Shell. Chem. Mater. 2010, 22, 2693–2695. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Huang, Y.; Deng, W.; Guo, E.; Chung, P.-W.; Chen, S.; Trewyn, B.G.; Brown, R.C.; Lin, V.S.-Y. Mesoporous Silica Nanoparticle-Stabilized and Manganese-Modified Rhodium Nanoparticles as Catalysts for Highly Selective Synthesis of Ethanol and Acetaldehyde from Syngas. ChemCatChem 2012, 4, 674–680. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Slowing, I.I.; Trewyn, B.G.; Lin, V.S.-Y. Mesoporous Silica Nanoparticles for Intracellular Delivery of Membrane-Impermeable Proteins. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007, 129, 8845–8849. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Xu, B.; Li, S.; Shi, R.; Liu, H. Multifunctional mesoporous silica nanoparticles for biomedical applications. Signal Transduct. Target. Ther. 2023, 8, 435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Beck, J.S.; Vartuli, J.C.; Roth, W.J.; Leonowicz, M.E.; Kresge, C.T.; Schmitt, K.D.; Chu, C.T.-W.; Olson, D.H.; Sheppard, E.W.; McCullen, S.B.; et al. A New Family of Mesoporous Molecular Sieves Prepared with Liquid Crystal Templates. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1992, 114, 10834–10843. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Nicolae, S.A.; Szilágyi, P.Á.; Titirici, M.M. Soft templating production of porous carbon adsorbents for CO2 and H2S capture. Carbon 2020, 169, 193–204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Azhagapillai, P.; Reddy, K.S.K.; Pena, G.D.J.G.; Bojesomo, R.S.; Raj, A.; Anjum, D.H.; Elkadi, M.; Karanikolos, G.N.; Ali, M.I. Synthesis of Mesoporous Carbon Adsorbents Using Biowaste Crude Glycerol as a Carbon Source via a Hard Template Method for Efficient CO2 Capture. ACS Omega 2023, 8, 21664–21676. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Feng, Z.; Bai, X. 3D-mesoporous KIT-6 supported highly dispersed Pd nanocatalyst for dodecahydro-N-ethylcarbazole dehydrogenation. Micropor. Mesopor. Mat. 2022, 335, 111789. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Huang, X.; Yang, W.; Li, Z.; Lou, Q.; Tian, Y.; Li, J. Nickel Oxide Nanoparticles on KIT-6: An Efficient Catalyst in Methane Combustion. Processes 2023, 11, 1004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Gao, Q.; Zhang, Y.; Zhou, K.; Wu, H.; Guo, J.; Zhang, L.; Duan, A.; Zhao, Z.; Zhang, F.; Zhou, Y. Synthesis of ZSM-5/KIT-6 with a tunable pore structure and its catalytic application in the hydrodesulfurization of dibenzothiophene and diesel oil. RSC Adv. 2018, 8, 28879. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  98. Prieto, G.; Tüysüz, H.; Duyckaerts, N.; Knossalla, J.; Wang, G.-H.; Schüth, F. Hollow Nano- and Microstructures as Catalysts. Chem. Rev. 2016, 116, 14056–14119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Ye, L.; Li, L.; Wang, X.; Zhang, Y.; Yan, L. Template-free synthesis of uniform hollow silica nanoparticles for controllable antireflection coatings. Ceram. Int. 2020, 46, 7453–7458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Brinker, C.J.; Scherer, G.W. The Physics and Chemistry of Sol-Gel Processing; Academic Press: San Diego, CA, USA, 1990; pp. 97–234. [Google Scholar]
  101. Liu, D.; Qiao, H.; Qin, S.; Xing, X.; Yan, K. An efficient and template-free synthesis of mesoporous silica from coal fly ash. Asia-Pac. J. Chem. Eng. 2024, 19, e3023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Léonard, A.; Vantomme, A.; Bouvy, C.; Moniotte, N.; Mariaulle, P.; Su, B.-L. Highly Ordered Mesoporous and Hierarchically Nanostructured Mesomacroporous Materials for Nanotechnology, Biotechnology, Information Technology and Medical Applications. Nanopages 2006, 1, 1–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Saravanan, M.; Sudalai, S.; Dharaneesh, A.B.; Prahaaladhan, V.; Srinivasan, G.; Arumugam, A. An Extensive Review on Mesoporous Silica from Inexpensive Resources: Properties, Synthesis, and Application toward Modern Technologies. J. Sol-Gel Sci. Technol. 2023, 10, 1–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Li, G.; Zhao, Z.; Liu, J.; Jiang, G. Effective heavy metal removal from aqueous systems by thiol functionalized magnetic mesoporous silica. J. Hazard. Mater. 2011, 192, 277–283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  105. Meky, N.; Salama, E.; Soliman, M.F.; Naeem, S.G.; Ossman, M.; Elsayed, M. Synthesis of Nano-silica Oxide for Heavy Metal Decontamination from Aqueous Solutions. Water Air Soil Poll. 2024, 235, 154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Candela-Noguera, V.; Amorós, P.; Aznar, E.; Marcos, M.D.; Martínez-Máñez, R. Systematic study of the implications of calcination and solvent extraction of the surfactant in MCM-41-type mesoporous silica nanoparticles. Micropor. Mesopor. Mat. 2024, 373, 113119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Harlick, P.J.E.; Sayari, A. Applications of Pore-Expanded Mesoporous Silica. 5. Triamine Grafted Material with Exceptional CO2 Dynamic and Equilibrium Adsorption Performance. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2007, 46, 446–458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Kim, S.-N.; Son, W.-J.; Choi, J.-S.; Ahn, W.-S. CO2 adsorption using amine-functionalized mesoporous silica prepared via anionic surfactant-mediated synthesis. Micropor. Mesopor. Mat. 2008, 115, 497–503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Hicks, J.C.; Drese, J.H.; Fauth, D.J.; Gray, M.L.; Qi, G.; Jones, C.W. Designing Adsorbents for CO2 Capture from Flue Gas-Hyperbranched Aminosilicas Capable of Capturing CO2 Reversibly. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 2902–2903. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. López-Aranguren, P.; Fraile, J.; Vega, L.F.; Domingo, C. Regenerable solid CO2 sorbents prepared by supercritical grafting of aminoalkoxysilane into low-cost mesoporous silica. J. Supercrit. Fluids 2014, 85, 68–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Moschetta, E.G.; Sakwa-Novak, M.A.; Greenfield, J.L.; Jones, C.W. Post-Grafting Amination of Alkyl Halide-Functionalized Silica for Applications in Catalysis, Adsorption, and 15N NMR Spectroscopy. Langmuir 2015, 31, 2218–2227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. López-Aranguren, P.; Builes, S.; Fraile, J.; López-Periago, A.; Vega, L.F.; Domingo, C. Hybrid aminopolymer–silica materials for efficient CO2 adsorption. RSC Adv. 2015, 5, 104943. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Sanz-Pérez, E.S.; Dantas, T.C.M.; Arencibia, A.; Calleja, G.; Guedes, A.P.M.A.; Araujo, A.S.; Sanz, R. Reuse and recycling of amine-functionalized silica materials for CO2 adsorption. Chem. Eng. J. 2017, 308, 1021–1033. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Tang, Y.; Landskron, K. CO2-Sorption Properties of Organosilicas with Bridging Amine Functionalities Inside the Framework. J. Phys. Chem. C 2010, 114, 2494–2498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Gunathilake, C.; Jaroniec, M. Mesoporous Organosilica with Amidoxime Groups for CO2 Sorption. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2014, 6, 13069–13078. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Wen, J.J.; Gu, F.N.; Wei, F.; Zhou, Y.; Lin, W.G.; Yang, J.; Yang, J.Y.; Wang, Y.; Zou, Z.G.; Zhu, J.H. One-pot synthesis of the amine-modified meso-structured monolith CO2 adsorbent. J. Mater. Chem. 2010, 20, 2840–2846. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Klinthong, W.; Huang, C.-H.; Tan, C.-S. One-Pot Synthesis and Pelletizing of Polyethylenimine-Containing Mesoporous Silica Powders for CO2 Capture. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2016, 55, 6481–6491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Cui, S.; Cheng, W.; Shen, X.; Fan, M.; Russell, A.; Wu, Z.; Yi, X. Mesoporous amine-modified SiO2 aerogel: A potential CO2 sorbent. Energy Environ. Sci. 2011, 4, 2070. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Kong, Y.; Jiang, G.; Fan, M.; Shen, X.; Cui, S.; Russell, A.G. A new aerogel based CO2 adsorbent developed using a simple sol–gel method along with supercritical drying. Chem. Commun. 2014, 50, 12158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  120. Hahn, M.W.; Steib, M.; Jentys, A.; Lercher, J.A. Mechanism and Kinetics of CO2 Adsorption on Surface Bonded Amines. J. Phys. Chem. C 2015, 119, 4126–4135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Sanz, R.; Calleja, G.; Arencibia, A.; Sanz-Pérez, E.S. CO2 adsorption on branched polyethyleneimine-impregnated mesoporous silica SBA-15. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2010, 256, 5323–5328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Linneen, N.N.; Pfeffer, R.; Lin, Y.S. CO2 adsorption performance for amine grafted particulate silica aerogels. Chem. Eng. J. 2014, 254, 190–197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Park, J.H.; Celedonio, J.M.; Seo, H.; Park, Y.K.; Ko, Y.S. A study on the effect of the amine structure in CO2 dry sorbents on CO2 capture. Catal. Today 2016, 265, 68–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Ko, Y.G.; Lee, H.J.; Oh, H.C.; Choi, U.S. Amines immobilized double-walled silica nanotubes for CO2 capture. J. Hazard. Mater. 2013, 250–251, 53–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  125. Hasan, M.M.F.; First, E.L.; Boukouvala, F.; Floudas, C.A. A multi-scale framework for CO2 capture, utilization, and sequestration: CCUS and CCU. Comput. Chem. Eng. 2015, 81, 2–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Maity, A.; Belgamwar, R.; Polshettiwar, V. Facile synthesis to tune size, textural properties and fiber density of dendritic fibrous nanosilica for applications in catalysis and CO2 capture. Nat. Protoc. 2019, 14, 2177–2204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Kole, K.; Das, S.; Samanta, A.; Jana, S. Parametric Study and Detailed Kinetic Understanding of CO2 Adsorption over High-Surface-Area Flowery Silica Nanomaterials. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2020, 59, 21393–21402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Anyanwu, J.-T.; Wang, Y.; Yang, R.T. CO2 capture (including direct air capture) and natural gas desulfurization of amine-grafted hierarchical bimodal silica. Chem. Eng. J. 2022, 427, 131561. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Chen, C.; Zhang, S.; Row, K.H.; Ahn, W.-S. Amine–silica composites for CO2 capture: A short review. J. Energy Chem. 2017, 26, 868–880. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Olivieri, F.; Castaldo, R.; Cocca, M.; Gentile, G.; Lavorgna, M. Mesoporous silica nanoparticles as carriers of active agents for smart anticorrosive organic coatings: A critical review. Nanoscale 2021, 13, 9091. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Kuwahara, Y.; Kang, D.-Y.; Copeland, J.R.; Brunelli, N.A.; Didas, S.A.; Bollini, P.; Sievers, C.; Kamegawa, T.; Yamashita, H.; Jones, C.W. Dramatic Enhancement of CO2 Uptake by Poly(ethyleneimine) Using Zirconosilicate Supports. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012, 134, 10757–10760. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Leonzio, G.; Mwabonje, O.; Fennell, P.S.; Shah, N. Environmental performance of different sorbents used for direct air capture. Sustain. Prod. Consum. 2022, 32, 101–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  133. Singh, B.; Gorji, Z.E.; Singh, R.; Sharma, V.; Repo, T. Silica Gel Supported Solid Amine Sorbents for CO2 Capture. Energy Environ. Mater. 2025, 8, e12832. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  134. Cui, Z.; Du, Q.; Gao, J.; Bie, R. Waste heat recovery and cascade utilization of CO2 chemical absorption system based on organic amine method in heating season. Appl. Therm. Eng. 2023, 230, 120834. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  135. Wang, F.; Tian, X.; Shi, Y.; Fan, W.; Liu, Q. Photocatalytic CO2 methanation over the Ni/SiO2 catalysts for performance enhancement. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 2024, 68, 1382–1392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  136. Zhang, W.; Sun, C.; Snape, C.E.; Irons, R.; Stebbing, S.; Alderson, T.; Fitzgerald, D.; Liu, H. Process simulations of post-combustion CO2 capture for coal andnatural gas-fired power plants using a polyethyleneimine/silicaadsorbent. Int. J. Greenh. Gas. Control 2017, 58, 276–289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  137. Jaffar, M.M.; Brandoni, C.; Martinez, J.; Snape, C.; Kaldis, S.; Rolfe, A.; Santos, A.; Lysiak, B.; Lappas, A.; Hewitt, N.; et al. Comparative techno-economic analysis of the integration of MEA-based scrubbing and silica PEI adsorbent-based CO2 capture processes into cement plants. J. Clean. Prod. 2023, 414, 137666. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Schematic Representation of Mesoporous Silica Nanoparticle (a) and TEM Image (b) [10].
Figure 1. Schematic Representation of Mesoporous Silica Nanoparticle (a) and TEM Image (b) [10].
Ijms 26 04313 g001
Figure 2. Schematic representation of mesoporous hollow silica nanoparticles (a), TEM image (b), and it’s enlarged image (c) [20,21,64].
Figure 2. Schematic representation of mesoporous hollow silica nanoparticles (a), TEM image (b), and it’s enlarged image (c) [20,21,64].
Ijms 26 04313 g002
Figure 3. (a) A common approach to synthesizing hierarchical mesoporous silica involves using a surfactant-templated method, (b) Graphical depiction of hierarchical mesoporous silica [72].
Figure 3. (a) A common approach to synthesizing hierarchical mesoporous silica involves using a surfactant-templated method, (b) Graphical depiction of hierarchical mesoporous silica [72].
Ijms 26 04313 g003
Figure 4. (a) Schematic illustration of the synthesis of mesoporous hollow nanoparticles using PS particles: (i) synthesis pathway employing cetyltrimethylammonium chloride (CTACl) or (ii) poly(ethylene glycol)-block-poly(propylene glycol)-block-poly(ethylene glycol) (P123) as a surfactant. TEM images of the particles at different stages: (b) polystyrene (PS), (c) MHS synthesized using CTACl, and (d) MHS synthesized using P123. All scale bars in (bd) are 100 nm [22].
Figure 4. (a) Schematic illustration of the synthesis of mesoporous hollow nanoparticles using PS particles: (i) synthesis pathway employing cetyltrimethylammonium chloride (CTACl) or (ii) poly(ethylene glycol)-block-poly(propylene glycol)-block-poly(ethylene glycol) (P123) as a surfactant. TEM images of the particles at different stages: (b) polystyrene (PS), (c) MHS synthesized using CTACl, and (d) MHS synthesized using P123. All scale bars in (bd) are 100 nm [22].
Ijms 26 04313 g004
Figure 5. Synthetic process of mesoporous silica sol in the presence of CTAC surfactant. (Reproduced from Ref. [26] with permission from MDPI journal).
Figure 5. Synthetic process of mesoporous silica sol in the presence of CTAC surfactant. (Reproduced from Ref. [26] with permission from MDPI journal).
Ijms 26 04313 g005
Figure 6. Schematic flow chart of template-free silica examples: (a) hollow silica nanoparticles [99], and (b) disordered mesoporous silica (DMS) synthesized from CFA through (i) pre-desilication, Na2CO3 activation, and acid leaching, (ii) sodium silicate synthesis, and (iii) sol-gel process with low-temperature aging [101].
Figure 6. Schematic flow chart of template-free silica examples: (a) hollow silica nanoparticles [99], and (b) disordered mesoporous silica (DMS) synthesized from CFA through (i) pre-desilication, Na2CO3 activation, and acid leaching, (ii) sodium silicate synthesis, and (iii) sol-gel process with low-temperature aging [101].
Ijms 26 04313 g006
Figure 7. TEM images of mesoporous silica synthesized using different methods. (a,b) Mesoporous nanoparticles, synthesized via the traditional calcination method, exhibits uniformly arranged and well-ordered pores due to the thermal energy facilitating structural organization. (c,d) Mesoporous nanoparticles, synthesized using the room-temperature method, displays irregular and disordered pore structures (Reproduced from Ref. [23] with permission from MDPI journal).
Figure 7. TEM images of mesoporous silica synthesized using different methods. (a,b) Mesoporous nanoparticles, synthesized via the traditional calcination method, exhibits uniformly arranged and well-ordered pores due to the thermal energy facilitating structural organization. (c,d) Mesoporous nanoparticles, synthesized using the room-temperature method, displays irregular and disordered pore structures (Reproduced from Ref. [23] with permission from MDPI journal).
Ijms 26 04313 g007
Figure 8. Illustration of the molecular structures grafted onto the support according to the type and number of amine functional groups: Depending on the type of amine, they are classified as primary- (a), secondary- [124] (b), and tertiary-amino silane [124] (c), while based on the number of amine groups, they are referred to as mono- (a) [122], di- (d) [122], and tri-amino silane (e) [122].
Figure 8. Illustration of the molecular structures grafted onto the support according to the type and number of amine functional groups: Depending on the type of amine, they are classified as primary- (a), secondary- [124] (b), and tertiary-amino silane [124] (c), while based on the number of amine groups, they are referred to as mono- (a) [122], di- (d) [122], and tri-amino silane (e) [122].
Ijms 26 04313 g008
Table 1. Comparison Between Microporous and Mesoporous Materials for CO2 Capture.
Table 1. Comparison Between Microporous and Mesoporous Materials for CO2 Capture.
PropertyMicroporous MaterialsMesoporous MaterialsRef.
Pore Size<2 nm2–50 nmIUPAC standard [12]
Adsorption EnergyHigh (strong CO2 interactions)Moderate (weaker than micropores)[14]
Diffusion RateSlower due to narrow poresFaster due to larger pores[13]
Adsorption RateSlow equilibrium; high selectivityFast equilibrium; lower intrinsic selectivity[29,33]
Functionalization VersatilityLimited space for large functional groupsAmple space for grafting and loading amine or polymer layers[34,35,36,37,38,39,40]
Structural TunabilityLimited (framework rigidity)Highly tunable pore size, shape, and wall thickness[37]
Regeneration StabilityOften stable but can be moisture sensitiveHigher tolerance after hybridization/coating[37,38]
Industrial ScalabilityLimited by synthesis complexityEasier scaling with surfactant-templated routes[13,36]
Table 2. Pore Characteristics and CO2 Adsorption Capacity of PEI-Functionalized SBA-15 at 75 °C (Collection of Studies Using SBA-15 as a Support and PEI as a Functional Group).
Table 2. Pore Characteristics and CO2 Adsorption Capacity of PEI-Functionalized SBA-15 at 75 °C (Collection of Studies Using SBA-15 as a Support and PEI as a Functional Group).
PEI Content (%)CO2 Partial Pressure (atm)CO2 Adsorpt. (mg/g)BET Surface Area (m2/g)Total Pore V (cm3/g)Ref.
SBA-15PEI Functionalized SBA-15SBA-15PEI Functionalized SBA-15
500.15105803461.140.11[10]
50190775491.10.09[121]
551173590~01.14~0[47]
00.15140950801.310.2[48]
43170752~00.7~0[11]
Table 3. CO2 Adsorption Capacity and Pore Characteristics Before and After Amine Functionalization at 25 °C, Based on Functionalization Methods and Types.
Table 3. CO2 Adsorption Capacity and Pore Characteristics Before and After Amine Functionalization at 25 °C, Based on Functionalization Methods and Types.
SupportAmine TypeCO2 Partial Pressure (atm)CO2 Adsorpt. (mg/g)BET Surface Area (m2/g)Total Pore V (cm3/g)A Method and Types of Amine Functionalized GroupsRef.
W/O PEIW/PEIW/O PEIW/PEI
Amorphous SiO2[3-(methylamino)propyl]trimethoxysilane0.17572652061.31.1polymerization < grafting[123]
Particulate silica aerogelN1-(3-trimethoxysilyl)propyl diethylenetriamine11157674174.21.1mono-amine silane < di-amine silane < tri-amine silane [122]
Double-walled silica nanotube3-[2-(2-aminoethylamino) ethylamino] propyl-trimethoxysilane19834860.91.110.45tertiary amine < secondary amine < primary amine < di-amine < tri-amines[124]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Bae, J.Y.; Jang, S.G.; Cho, J.; Kang, M. Amine-Functionalized Mesoporous Silica for Efficient CO2 Capture: Stability, Performance, and Industrial Feasibility. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2025, 26, 4313. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms26094313

AMA Style

Bae JY, Jang SG, Cho J, Kang M. Amine-Functionalized Mesoporous Silica for Efficient CO2 Capture: Stability, Performance, and Industrial Feasibility. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2025; 26(9):4313. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms26094313

Chicago/Turabian Style

Bae, Jae Young, Su Guan Jang, Jaehun Cho, and Misun Kang. 2025. "Amine-Functionalized Mesoporous Silica for Efficient CO2 Capture: Stability, Performance, and Industrial Feasibility" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 26, no. 9: 4313. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms26094313

APA Style

Bae, J. Y., Jang, S. G., Cho, J., & Kang, M. (2025). Amine-Functionalized Mesoporous Silica for Efficient CO2 Capture: Stability, Performance, and Industrial Feasibility. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 26(9), 4313. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms26094313

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop