Next Article in Journal
Latest News from the “Guardian”: p53 Directly Activates Asymmetric Stem Cell Division Regulators
Previous Article in Journal
Salivary Interleukin-6 and Interleukin-18 Levels and Their Association with Dental Health in Children with Idiopathic Nephrotic Syndrome
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Protective Vaccination of Mice Against Blood-Stage Malaria Impacts Hepatic Expression of Genes Encoding Acute-Phase Proteins and IL-6 Family Members

by
Frank Wunderlich
1,†,
Daniela Gerovska
2,†,
Denis Delic
3,* and
Marcos J. Araúzo-Bravo
2,4,5,*
1
Department of Biology, Heinrich-Heine-University, 40225 Düsseldorf, Germany
2
Computational Biology and Systems Biomedicine, Biogipuzkoa Health Research Institute, 20014 San Sebastian, Spain
3
Boehringer Ingelheim Pharma & Co., KG, 88400 Biberach, Germany
4
IKERBASQUE, Basque Foundation for Science, 48009 Bilbao, Spain
5
Department of Cell Biology and Histology, Faculty of Medicine and Nursing, University of Basque Country (UPV/EHU), 48940 Leioa, Spain
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2025, 26(7), 3173; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms26073173
Submission received: 17 February 2025 / Revised: 25 March 2025 / Accepted: 26 March 2025 / Published: 29 March 2025
(This article belongs to the Section Molecular Biology)

Abstract

In response to vaccination and/or infectious agents, the liver produces acute-phase proteins (APPs) driven by IL-6, which circulate in blood plasma as components of the humoral innate defense. This study investigates the liver of mice for possible effects of protective vaccination against primary blood-stage infections of Plasmodium chabaudi malaria on the expression of genes encoding APPs and IL-6 family members. Female Balb/c mice were vaccinated with a non-infectious vaccine prior to challenge with 106 P. chabaudi-infected erythrocytes, resulting in about 80% survival of otherwise lethal infections. Gene expression microarrays were used to determine the relative transcript levels of genes in the livers of vaccinated and unvaccinated mice on days 0, 1, 4, 8, and 11 p.i. (post infectionem). Vaccination induced significant (p-value < 0.05) differences in the expression of malaria-responsive genes toward the end of crisis on day 11 p.i., when mice recovered from infections. These genes include Saa4, Apcs, Cp, and Crp, encoding APPs described to inhibitorily interact with parasitic blood stages; the genes F2, F7, F8, F9, F10, and F13b, and Plg, Plat, and Serpina5, encoding proteins balancing coagulation vs. fibrinolysis dysregulated by malaria, respectively; the genes Hc, C8a, C8b, C8g, and C9, encoding components of lytic complement membrane attack complex (MAC); and Cfh, Cfi, and C4bp, encoding complement-regulatory proteins. Vaccination accelerated, albeit differently, the malaria-induced activation of all three complement pathways, evidenced as higher transcript levels of C1qa, C1qb, C1qc, Fcna, Cfp, C3, Cfh, C8a, and C9 on day 4 p.i., C1ra, C1s, and C2 on day 1 p.i., and Serping1, encoding the multifunctional protease inhibitor C1INH, on day 0 p.i. Protective vaccination may also accelerate downregulation of the malaria-promoting lethality of IL-6 trans-signaling, which may contribute to an overall accelerated recovery of mice from otherwise lethal blood-stage malaria.

1. Introduction

Morbidity and mortality from malaria are caused by the blood stages of parasitic protozoans of the genus Plasmodium, which develop and multiply within host red blood cells. Worldwide, malaria was estimated to be responsible for 247 million cases and 619,000 deaths in 2021, with most deaths occurring in children under 5 years of age in Sub-Saharan African countries [1]. A commercial vaccine against malaria is not yet available, but promising progress has been made towards an effective anti-malaria vaccine [2,3]. Recently, the WHO recommended the RTS,S/AS01 vaccine, also known as Mosquirix, to be offered to young children aged 6 weeks to 17 months in African regions with moderate or high malaria transmission, but its efficacy in terms of reducing hospitalization is only about 30%, and wanes over time [1,4]. More recently, the presumably more effective R21/Matrix-M vaccine has been approved by the WHO for trials in young-aged children in four African countries [5,6,7].
More basic research is desirable to improve our understanding of the host defense mechanisms that need to be activated by vaccination to provide effective protection against blood-stage malaria. Such host mechanisms can be conveniently studied in animal models. One such experimental model is P. chabaudi in mice [8,9], which shares several characteristics with P. falciparum, the deadliest human malaria species, causing about 99% of malaria-related deaths worldwide. In P. chabaudi infections, an experimental non-infectious vaccine was shown to enable the curing of otherwise non-healing lethal blood-stage malaria [10,11]. This cure is associated with a reduced peak parasitaemia by about 30%, and changed responses of the liver to malaria. Thus, the liver of vaccinated mice responds to malaria with increased IFNγ production, attenuated inflammation, augmented uptake of injected particles [11], and changed expression of genes encoding not only mRNAs, but also miRNAs [12]. Importantly, protective vaccination accelerates malaria-induced liver-intrinsic extramedullary erythroblastosis [13], megakaryo-/thrombopoiesis [14], and NK cell generation [15]. These effects of vaccination support the view that the liver plays a potential role in the survival of otherwise lethal infections of blood-stage malaria [16].
The liver is also known for its ability to rapidly produce acute-phase proteins (APPs) in response to vaccinations and/or infectious agents, which play an effective role in the humoral innate host defense [17,18,19]. APPs circulate and patrol in the blood plasma, but are mainly produced by hepatocytes, which are the most abundant cell type in the liver and are immunological agents in their own right [20], and, to a lesser extent, by Kupffer cells, the resident macrophages of the liver. APPs exert manifold functions, and a given APP can even exert opposing functions [18]. There are positive and negative APPs, which are either up- or downregulated in response to infection. Negative APPs include albumin and transferrin, whereas most APPs are positive, such as C-reactive protein, serum amyloid A, caeruloplasmin, and haptoglobulin [18]. APP signatures are also used as diagnostic markers for diseases in human and veterinary medicine, and increasingly also for testing vaccine efficacy [17,21]. APPs are also critical for determining the course and outcome of blood-stage malaria. The quantity and quality of circulating APPs vary in patients infected with different Plasmodium species [22,23,24] and in different experimental blood-stage infections [16,25,26]. A recent meta-analysis even proposed the C-reactive protein as an early biomarker for malaria and for monitoring malaria severity [27]. Particularly critical in the context of outcomes of blood-stage malaria may also be those APPs that play central roles in blood coagulation and fibrinolysis, as well as in the complement (C) system.
The C system is a highly effective first line of the host humoral innate immunity against infectious diseases, including blood-stage malaria [28,29]. More than 60 fluid-phase and membrane-bound proteins act together against pathogens in tight, mainly proteolytically controlled sequential cleavage cascades and amplifications of different components [30]. There are three activation pathways: the classical pathway (CP), the lectin pathway (LP), and the alternative pathway (AP), which converge upon activation by pathogens at the level of C3 convertases, cleaving the APP C3—a key C component that promotes chemotaxis/vasodilatation, including attraction of macrophages and neutrophils and, in particular, opsonization of microbes as C3b. The C5b component initiates the formation of the membrane attack complex (MAC) with the final lytic C9 component [30]. However, there is also evidence that not only do malaria-infected hosts benefit from complement activation, but also, its dysregulation is increasingly being considered as causing pathogenesis in severe malaria [31]. Such dysregulations in complement activation may also critically affect blood coagulation and fibrinolysis, which are tightly intertwined with the C system [32,33]. For instance, fibrinogen as a central APP in blood coagulation is cleaved by thrombin to form fibrin and fibrin clots, respectively. The latter, in turn, can be dissolved with the participation of numerous protein factors, initiated by plasmin cleaved from the APP plasminogen. A well-regulated balance of coagulation and fibrinolysis appears to be required for a cure [34]. However, it remains poorly understood whether protective vaccination affects this regulation at all.
The main driver of APP production is the pleiotropic cytokine interleukin 6 (IL-6). IL-6 is produced, other than by immune cells, by hepatocytes in particular, which also express the specificity-defining membrane IL-6 receptor α (IL6Rα). Signal transduction occurs through the ubiquitously expressed IL-6 signal-transducing membrane receptor GP130 [35,36]. IL-6 is also known to play a critical role in the course and outcome of blood-stage malaria. Previously, malaria-induced lethality in mice infected with P. chabaudi has been shown to be overcome by interrupting the alternative IL-6 trans-signaling pathway mediated by IL-6 bound to the soluble (s)IL-6Rα [37]. The IL-6 family includes other members, such as IL-11, IL-27, IL-31, oncostatin M (OSM), leukemia inhibitory factor (LIF), ciliary neurotrophic factor (CTNF), cardiotrophin 1 (CTF-1), and cardiotrophin-like cytokine factor 1 (CLCF1) [35,36], which also use GP130 as a signal-transducing receptor, in part in combination with other receptors, such as LIF receptor (LIFR) and OSM receptor (OSMR). However, only a paucity of data are available on the impact of protective vaccination on the expression of the different IL-6 family members and their specificity-defining and signal-transducing receptors in the liver in response to blood-stage malaria.
The present study is a continuation of our previous studies on the role of the liver in vaccination-induced survival of blood-stage malaria: it aims to identify genes encoding blood plasma proteins and IL-6 family members, whose expression in the liver of mice is changed by protective vaccination against P. chabaudi blood-stage malaria. For this purpose, whole-genome oligo gene expression microarrays are a very appropriate tool to concomitantly compare the relative expression levels of many different genes at given times. Specifically, the same gene expression microarrays as used in our previous studies [13,14,15] will be used here for analysis of selected genes, whose expression in the liver responds to vaccination and to malaria in both vaccination-protected mice undergoing progressive blood-stage infection, and in unvaccinated mice suffering a lethal outcome. Vaccination-responsive genes in the liver may be of potential importance for vaccination-protected survival from the otherwise lethal outcome of primary blood-stage infections of P. chabaudi in unvaccinated mice.

2. Results

2.1. Responsiveness to Malaria and Vaccination of Hepatic Expression of Genes Encoding APPs

Figure 1 shows the expression patterns of malaria-responsive genes encoding APPs in the liver of female Balb/c mice, and their responsiveness to vaccination. The genes Azgp1, encoding α-2-glycoprotein1, and Saa2, encoding serum amyloid A2, were not responsive to vaccination, whereas the genes Saa1, Saa3, Saa4, Apcs, Cp, Crp, and B2m, encoding SAA1, SAA3, SAA4, serum amyloid P, Caeruloplasmin, C-reactive protein, and β-2 microglobulin, respectively, significantly responded to vaccination.
Azgp1, with a constitutive expression of about 240 above the normalization level, continuously decreased its expression to about 210 at the peak of parasitaemia on day 8 p.i., and this level remained towards the end of the crisis phase of infection on day 11 p.i. (Figure 1A). Similarly, to unvaccinated mice, the hepatic expression of Azgp1 in vaccinated mice took a decreasing course, with a minimum on day 8 p.i., before displaying an insignificant increase towards the end of the crisis, on day 11 p.i. (Figure 1A). The expression of Saa1 increased from about 263 to about 308 above normalization level in unvaccinated mice at early prepatency on day 1 p.i., and this level of expression was maintained at early patency on day 4 p.i. and at peak parasitaemia on day 8 p.i., before decreasing to about 263 towards the end of the crisis phase on day 11 p.i. (Figure 1B). Saa2 showed a very similar expression profile to Saa1, though at slightly lower levels (Figure 1B,C). In contrast to Saa1 and Saa2, the genes Saa3 and Saa4 displayed significantly lower constitutive expressions of about 90 and 178, respectively, and their malaria-responsive expression profiles responded to vaccination, though differently (Figure 1D,E). Upon infection, Saa3 increased its initial expression to about 215 in the liver of unvaccinated mice and to 275 in vaccinated mice on day 1 p.i., before both decreased to about 155 on day 4 p.i., followed by identical expression towards the end of the crisis phase on day 11 p.i. Saa4 also increased its initial expression from 178 to about 214 on day 1 p.i., followed by a decrease in expression which reached a minimum on day 11 p.i. in unvaccinated mice, whereas this decrease reached its minimum on day 8 p.i. in vaccination-protected mice, before turning to a significant increase in expression on day 11 p.i. (Figure 1E). Similar expression patterns as seen for Saa4, i.e., a significant increase in expression towards the end of the crisis after a period of decrease in vaccinated mice compared to a further ongoing decrease in unvaccinated mice, were also observed for the genes Apcs, encoding the serum amyloid P (SAP) component, Cp, encoding caeruloplasmin, Crp, encoding C-reactive protein, and B2m, encoding β-2 microglobulin (Figure 1F–I).
Figure S1A–G shows the genes whose expression was responsive to malaria, but not to vaccination, which included Hp, coding for haptoglobin, Orm1-3, coding for the orosomucoids1-3, Apoe, coding for apolipoproteinE, A2m, encoding α-2-macroglobulin, and Fn1, encoding fibronectin1. These genes were constitutively expressed on day 0 p.i. at levels between 318 and 133 above normalization. Only A2m exhibited a very low constitutive level of expression (Figure S1F). The expression of these genes varied during the course of primary blood-stage infection. Hp and Orm1-3 showed an increase in expression at early prepatency on day 1 p.i. (Figure S1A–D). The expression of Apoe and A2m remained largely unchanged until early patency on day 4 p.i., before they began to respond significantly to malaria: Apoe with a decrease and A2m with an increase reaching a minimum and a maximum, respectively, at peak parasitaemia on day 8 p.i. (Figure S1E,F). In addition, Fn1, with a constitutive expression of about 254 above normalization, decreased its expression, upon malaria infection, to about 245 on day 4 p.i., before increasing slightly again at peak parasitaemia (Figure S1G). Numerical p-values of Figure S1 are provided in Table S9.
The two genes—Alb, encoding the abundant APP albumin, and Trf, encoding transferrin—did not respond, neither to malaria nor to vaccination (Figure S1H,I). Albumin is critical for the regulation of oncotic pressure, acts as a carrier for various molecules, particularly fat-soluble molecules, and its concentration in the blood plasma is known to decrease in response to various infectious agents [17,18].

2.2. Vaccination Affects Expression of Genes Involved in Blood Coagulation and Fibrinolysis

The soluble APP fibrinogen consists of the three subunits, α, β, and γ, which are encoded by the genes Fga, Fgb, and Fgg, whose expression was differentially responsive to malaria, but largely unresponsive to vaccination (Figure 2A–C). The fibrinogens FGA, FGB, and FGG are known to be cleaved by the serine protease thrombin, which is derived by proteolytic cleavage from the precursor prothrombin, to form the insoluble fibrin [38]. Expression of the prothrombin-encoding gene F2 was responsive to malaria and vaccination (Figure 2D). This responsiveness was evidenced during crisis between days 8 and 11 p.i., when F2 expression in unvaccinated mice was further decreased towards the end of the crisis on day 11 p.i. Concomitantly, however, the decreasing F2 expression in vaccination-protected mice at the peak of parasitaemia on day 8 p.i. was significantly reversed to increased expression (Figure 2D). Remarkably, such a significant turnaround in expression during crisis in vaccinated mice compared to unvaccinated mice could also be observed for the malaria-sensitive expression of the genes F7, F8, F9, F10, and F13b, which also encode proteins involved in the coagulation cascade (Figure 2E–I).
Fibrinolysis, the disintegration of the insoluble fibrin clot, is then achieved mainly by the serine protease plasmin, which is proteolytically derived from the precursor plasminogen encoded by Plg [38]. The constitutive expression of Plg is slightly lower than that of F2, but the course of Plg expression in response to malaria and vaccination is very similar to that of F2 (Figure 3A). In unvaccinated and vaccinated mice, there is a decrease in Plg expression until the peak of parasitaemia on day 8 p.i. A further decrease is followed in unvaccinated mice towards the end of the crisis at day 11 p.i., whereas Plg expression is significantly increased during crisis in vaccinated mice (Figure 3A). A key enzyme in fibrinolysis is the serine protease PLAT (plasminogen activator, tissue type), which cleaves the proenzyme PLG to plasmin, which is thought to play a central role in orchestrating fibrinolysis, coagulation, and the complement system [32]. The gene Plat, encoding the plasminogen activator, which is tissue-type, showed a very low constitutive expression in both unvaccinated and vaccinated mice, and responded almost identically to malaria, with a relatively slow increase in expression, until peak parasitaemia was reached at day 8 p.i. During the crisis phase, however, Plat expression continued to increase in unvaccinated mice, reaching a maximum towards the end of the crisis at day 11 p.i., whereas it decreased significantly at the same time in vaccinated mice (Figure 3B). Unlike Plat, the malaria-responsive expression of Plau, encoding the urokinase type plasminogen activator, was not vaccination-responsive (Figure 3C).
There exist three plasminogen activator inhibitors (PAIs): PAI-1, encoded by the gene Serpine1, PAI-2, encoded by Serpinb2, and PAI-3 (serine protease inhibitor, clade A, member 5), encoded by Serpina5. Protective vaccination induced a significant increase in the constitutive expression of Serpine1 and Serpina5 (Figure 3D,E). Serpina5 displayed a significant response to vaccination, evidenced as decreasing expression during crisis in vaccinated mice when compared with more rapidly increasing expression in unvaccinated mice. The malaria-induced expression of Serpinb2 showed a significantly faster increase in transcript levels between day 4 p.i. and day 8 p.i. in the liver of unvaccinated mice than in vaccinated mice, resulting in lower transcript levels at peak parasitaemia in vaccinated mice (Figure 3F).

2.3. Vaccination Impacts Malaria-Responsive Expression of Genes Encoding C Components

Central to the C system is the APP C3, which is activated by all three activation pathways [30]. The first component of the CP, the C1 complex, circulates in the plasma and is composed of C1qr2s2 [39]. C1q consists of two A chains, two B chains, and two C chains, which are encoded by C1qa, C1qb, and C1qc, localized in a cluster on chromosome 4 [39]. In the liver of female Balb/c mice, these three genes were constitutively expressed at levels between about 120 and about 140 above the normalization level (Figure 4A–C). The courses of expression of these three C1q genes in response to malaria and vaccination were almost identical. Upon infection, there was a strong response of these transcript levels, characterized by a transient decrease on day 1 p.i., which was followed by a massive increase on day 4 p.i., reaching its maximum at the peak of parasitaemia on day 8 p.i. (Figure 4A–C). Remarkably, the transient decrease on day 1 p.i., and especially the re-increase in expression on day 4 p.i., were lower and higher, respectively, in vaccinated mice than in unvaccinated mice (Figure 4A–C). The expression of C1ra and C1s took a completely different pattern as compared with the C1q genes (Figure 4D,E). Indeed, infection of unvaccinated and vaccinated mice did not lead to transiently decreased mRNA levels of C1ra and C1s initially on day 1 p.i., but instead, the levels increased. In vaccinated mice, this initial increase in C1ra and C1s mRNA levels was significantly accelerated, as well as there being a subsequent decline towards day 4 p.i., before the decrease returned to elevated levels during the crisis phase (Figure 4D,E). An accelerated increase in expression on day 1 p.i. was also found for the C2 gene in vaccinated mice, which was followed by an accelerated decreasing expression until peak parasitaemia on day 8 p.i., as compared with unvaccinated mice. Towards the end of crisis on day 11 p.i., the decreasing expression continued in unvaccinated mice, whereas expression in vaccinated mice increased (Figure 4F).
The LP is activated when pattern recognition molecules, such as mannose-binding lectin (MBL), other collectins, or ficolins bind to carbohydrates on the surface of pathogens [30]. However, the response of their encoding genes to malaria or vaccination is dramatically different. The expression of the genes Mbl1, encoding MBL1, Masp1, encoding the precursor MBL-associated serine protease1 (MASP1), Fcna, encoding ficulin A, and Colec11, encoding collectin 11, is shown in Figure 5A–D. Upon infection of unvaccinated mice, there was only a slight increase in Mbl1 expression on day 1 p.i., which was followed by an accelerating decrease in expression, reaching its lowest level towards the end of the crisis on day 11 p.i. Protective vaccination significantly changed the response to malaria of Mbl expression in the liver. There was no increase in expression on day 1 p.i., and only a slightly slower decrease in expression until day 4 p.i. in vaccinated mice than in unvaccinated mice. After day 4 p.i., Mbl1 expression declined in both vaccinated and unvaccinated mice, but only until the peak of parasitaemia on day 8 p.i., when the decline stopped and turned into an increased expression towards the end of the crisis on day 11 p.i. Unlike Mbl1, however, the expression of Masp1 followed a different time course after infection, particularly in vaccinated mice, resembling more that of C1qa, C1qb, and C1qc (Figure 5B). There was initially a significantly transient decrease in its expression on day 1 p.i., before the expression increased on day 4 p.i. and reached a maximum on day 8 p.i., which was higher than the corresponding expression level in unvaccinated mice (Figure 5B).
Remarkably, the expression trajectories of Fcna and Colec11 in the liver of vaccinated mice infected with P. chabaudi took a similar course to that of Masp1, with an initial strong transient decrease on day 1 p.i., followed by a faster increase at day 4 p.i., peaking on day 8 p.i. (Figure 5C,D). It is also notable that the vaccination response of Colec11 differed from that of both Fcna and Masp1, insofar as vaccination per se increased the constitutive expression of Colec11, and the initial transient decrease in the malaria-responsive expression was much lower in the liver of vaccinated mice than in unvaccinated mice (Figure 5B–D).
The constitutively active AP also appeared to respond to malaria and vaccination, as evidenced by the expression profiles of complement factors B and P (properdin) [30]. The gene Cfb, encoding factor B, had a much higher constitutive expression than Cfp, encoding properdin. Upon infection, there was an initial increase in expression that peaked at early prepatency on day 1 p.i., followed by a decline in expression that was faster in vaccinated mice than in unvaccinated mice, i.e., Cfb transcript levels were lower in vaccinated mice than in unvaccinated mice on day 4 p.i. (Figure 5E). At the peak of parasitaemia on day 8 p.i., expression continued to decrease in unvaccinated mice during crisis, whereas Cfb transcript levels in vaccinated mice increased significantly at the same time (Figure 5E). The gene Cfp displayed a very similar expression pattern as C1qa, C1qb, and C1qc in response to blood-stage malaria, with a faster increase towards day 4 p.i. after an initial faster decrease on day 1 p.i. in vaccinated mice than in unvaccinated mice (Figure 5F). The same maximum expression was reached in both vaccinated and unvaccinated mice at peak parasitaemia on day 8 p.i.
All three complement pathways converge at the level of C3 convertases, incidentally via C4 and C2 in the CP and LP pathways [30]. The gene encoding C3 showed a relatively high constitutive expression of about 318 above normalization level in both vaccinated and unvaccinated mice (Figure 6A). Upon infection of unvaccinated mice, the C3 expression levels remained largely unaffected, whereas an increase in expression occurred in vaccinated mice, with a maximum at early patency on day 4 p.i. (Figure 6A).
The final membrane attack complex (MAC) is initiated by activation of C5, encoded by Hc, which binds C6, C7, C8, and the highly lytic C9 [30,40,41]. Figure 6B–F show the expression of the Hc, C8a, C8b, and C9 genes. Conspicuously, the expression of these genes was similar in response to blood-stage malaria, but with significant differences between vaccination-protected and unvaccinated mice. In unvaccinated mice, there was occasionally a slight increase in expression on day 1 p.i., before it began to decrease to its lowest level towards the end of the crisis on day 11 p.i. (Figure 6B–F). However, the expression of C8a and C9 in vaccinated mice was significantly higher on day 4 p.i. than in unvaccinated mice. Thereafter, expression declined towards day 8 p.i., but became reversed significantly during crisis (Figure 6C–F).

2.4. Vaccination Impacts Expression of Genes Encoding Complement Regulatory Proteins

The liver is also known to express specific C regulatory proteins to prevent overactivation of various C components [42]. For instance, the C inhibitor (C1INH), encoded by Serping1 (serine or cysteine peptidase inhibitor, clade G, member 1), is known to inactivate the C1 complex in the CP and the MASP-1 and MASP-2 in the LP. The Cfh-encoded Factor H, the Cfi-encoded Factor I, the C4bp-encoded C4BP, and the Cd55-encoded CD55 are known to be negative regulators of AP, and the membrane-localized CD59 encoded by Cd59 inhibits the MAC [30,38,42]. Notably, the expression of these genes was both malaria- and vaccination-responsive, but in different ways (Figure 7A–F). For instance, vaccination per se significantly increased the constitutive expression of Serping1 and Cfh. Furthermore, the initial increase in Serping1 expression in the liver of vaccinated mice on day 1 p.i. correlated with the initially transient decrease in expression of C1q genes (Figure 4A–C) and Masp1 (Figure 5B), as well as with that of Cd55 and Cd59a (Figure 7E,F). The expression of Serping1, Cfh, Cfi, C4bp, and CD55 at day 11 p.i. was significantly greater in vaccinated mice than in unvaccinated mice (Figure 7A–E).

2.5. Vaccination Affects Hepatic Gene Expression of IL-6 Family Members in Response to Blood-Stage Malaria

Figure 8 shows the time course of expression of Il6, Il6ra, and Il6st in the liver of unvaccinated and vaccinated mice in response to primary blood-stage infection with P. chabaudi malaria. All three genes were constitutively expressed on day 0 p.i., but at different levels. Il6 was expressed at a very low level of about 4 above normalization level, Il6ra at the highest level of about 149, and Il6st at about 113, in unvaccinated mice. All three genes were responsive to blood-stage malaria (Figure 8A–C). Upon infection of unvaccinated mice, the initial expression of Il6 on day 1 p.i. was upregulated, like that of Il6st, whereas that of Il6ra was significantly downregulated. The expression of Il6 in the liver of unvaccinated mice was significantly downregulated on day 4 p.i., before being upregulated again on day 8 p.i., and then declining on day 11 p.i. to approximately the level observed on day 1 p.i. IL6ra expression on day 4 p.i. remained at about the same reduced level observed on day 1 p.i., but then increased, reaching its maximum at peak of parasitaemia on day 8 p.i., which was maintained towards the end of the crisis phase on day 11 p.i. (Figure 8B). Protective vaccination did not affect the low constitutive expression level of Il6, but significantly affected that of Il6st and that of Il6ra. Protective vaccination also affected the course of the malaria-responsive expression of these genes. The initial increase in IL6 expression during early prepatency was faster, the decreased expression on day 4 p.i. was higher, the increase between day 4 and 8 p.i. was slower, and the second peak of expression was lower in vaccinated mice than in unvaccinated mice (Figure 8A). The course of Il6ra expression in vaccinated mice was similar to that in unvaccinated mice, but the relative transcript levels were significantly greater in vaccinated mice on days 1, 4, and 8 p.i., possibly due to the increased constitutive expression induced by vaccination (Figure 8B). Also, the constitutive expression of Il6st was significantly greater in the liver of vaccinated mice than in unvaccinated mice (Figure 8C). Upon infection, the Il6st expression in unvaccinated mice was highly elevated, peaking at day 4 p.i., before decreasing steadily towards the end of the crisis phase at day 11 p.i. In contrast to unvaccinated mice, the Il6st expression in vaccination-protected mice was delayed on day 1 p.i., before reaching its maximum on day 4 p.i., and then remained at this high level until day 11 p.i., i.e., the Il6st expression was significantly greater in vaccination-protected mice than in unvaccinated mice during crisis (Figure 8C).
Besides IL-6, IL-11 is the only member of the IL6 family which uses two recruited GP130 signal transducers [36]. In response to blood-stage malaria, Il11 expression took a two-peak course that was not significantly different between unvaccinated and vaccinated mice. The first peak at day 1 p.i. was much lower than the second peak at day 8 p.i. (Figure 8D). By contrast, the expression of Il11ra1 encoding the IL-11 specificity-defining receptor was highly responsive to vaccination. Its constitutive expression was reduced on day 0 p.i., and this reduced expression level remained reduced on day 4 p.i. in the liver of vaccinated mice compared to unvaccinated mice (Figure 8E).
Il27 signals through the membrane receptor IL27Rα, in association with one GP130 [43]. The genes Il27 and Il27ra were constitutively expressed in the liver, and their expressions were malaria-responsive, but only Il27ra was also significantly responsive to vaccination (Figure S2A,B). The malaria-responsive expression of Il27ra was initially decreased on day 1 p.i., then increased on day 4 p.i., and this expression level was maintained until day 11 p.i. in vaccination-protected mice compared to unvaccinated mice (Figure S2B). Numerical p-values of Figure S2 are provided in Table S10.
OSM also uses a single GP130 in combination with either OSMR or LIFR. The GP130/LIFR heterodimer is also used by LIF and CTF1 [36]. The expression of Osm, Lif, Ctf1, and Lifr were sensitive to both malaria and vaccination. In particular, vaccination per se decreased the constitutive expression of Ctf1, while the expression of Osm and Lif was initially increased on day 1 p.i., and the expression of Lifr was increased towards the end of the crisis (Figure S3A–E). Numerical p-values of Figure S3 are provided in Table S11. LIFR/GP130 can also be used by CRLF1, CLCF1, and CNTF, with CNTFR as the specificity-defining membrane receptor [36]. The expression of Ctnfr was decreased on day 4 p.i., and that of Ctnf on day 11 p.i., in the liver of vaccinated mice compared to unvaccinated mice (Figure S4A–D). Numerical p-values of Figure S4 are provided in Table S12.

3. Discussion

Our data reveal significant differences in the expression of genes in the liver of vaccination-protected vs. unvaccinated mice during primary blood-stage infection with P. chabaudi malaria. Such differences were most evident late in infection, i.e., during the crisis phase between peak parasitaemia on day 8 p.i. and dramatically falling parasitaemias towards the end of the crisis on day 11 p.i. Higher expression levels were identified in vaccination-protected mice for the genes Cp, Saa4, Apcs, B2m, and Crp; for the genes F2, F7, F8, F9, F10, and F13b, encoding proteins involved in the coagulation cascade; for the gene Plg, encoding the zymogen of plasmin involved in fibrinolysis; and mostly for those genes encoding various complement components involved in the activation and regulation of complements such as C1ra, C1s, Mbl1, Masp1, Colec11, Fcna, Cfb, C2, Hc, C8a, C8b, C8g, C9, Serping1, Cfh, Cfi, C4bp, and Cd55. Conspicuously, these increased transcript levels occur during crisis, i.e., the infection phase when the liver has resumed increased activity, which was previously evidenced as an increased uptake by the liver of fluorescent particles injected into vaccination-protected infected mice [11]. It is therefore reasonable to assume that these genes encode APPs, which may necessarily contribute to processes required for the overall recovery of the mice from infection during the crisis phase.
This assumption is more plausible for genes encoding those APPs known to inhibitorily interact with Plasmodium-infected erythrocytes and/or merozoites. For example, our data are consistent with previous results showing that the serum of mice at the beginning of the crisis phase of self-healing P. chabaudi malaria infections contained elevated levels of the Cp-encoded caeruloplasmin, which binds copper known for its contact killing properties [25]. The short pentameric pentraxin SAP encoded by Apcs is able to inhibit the growth of the intraerythrocytic malaria parasites [44]. Another member of the pentraxin family, namely CRP, is also known to bind to Plasmodium-infected erythrocytes, presumably via host Fcγ receptors [45,46]. CRP is a planar ring-shaped molecule consisting of five non-covalently linked protomers with an A- and a B-face [47]. It is the ligand-binding B-face that is capable of opsonizing microbial pathogens, including Plasmodium-infected erythrocytes and presumably merozoites. Such binding may explain why ascending parasitaemia in P. chabaudi infections, from early patency on day 4 p.i. to peak parasitaemia on day 8 p.i., is associated with decreasing levels of Crp transcripts. The A-face of CRP is known to interact with C1q through its globular head region [48]. Binding of CRP to Plasmodium-infected erythrocytes activates complement, leading to hemolysis and erythrocyte clearance [45]. Consistent with this, the increased Crp mRNA production in the liver of vaccination-protected mice during crisis runs in parallel with concomitantly increased hepatic mRNA production of the genes Hc, C8a, C8c, and C9, encoding components of the terminal C cascade. This suggests concomitant actions of CRP and the lytic MAC on the parasite blood stages, i.e., P. chabaudi-parasitized erythrocytes and free merozoites, during the crisis phase of infection. Concomitantly with increased MAC formation during crisis, the liver produces increasing mRNA levels of Cfh, Cfi, C4bp, and Cd55, encoding complement regulatory proteins protecting host cells from lysis, e.g., non-infected erythrocytes and thrombocytes [33]. It is attractive to speculate that particularly reticulocytes, which may make up about 90% of all red blood cells during crisis [11], may benefit from these complement regulatory proteins, since reticulocytes are not the favorite host cells of P. chabaudi merozoites [13].
Moreover, a late response to malaria in the liver of vaccinated mice was also found for the expression of genes encoding plasma proteins involved in coagulation and fibrinolysis. Although the malaria-responsive expression of the genes Fga, Fgb, and Fgg, encoding the subunits of the APP fibrinogen, was not vaccination-responsive, the transcript levels of genes involved in the coagulation cascade, such as F2, encoding the zymogen prothrombin, F7, F8, F9, F10, and F13b, were highly significantly increased in the liver of vaccinated mice during the crisis, whereas, concomitantly, the expression of these genes continued to decrease in unvaccinated mice. Moreover, the hepatic expression of genes involved in fibrinolysis also showed a late vaccination response. The expression of Plg, encoding the APP plasminogen, was increased during the crisis only in vaccinated mice, even at slightly higher levels than the vaccination-responsive F genes (Figure 3A). A key enzyme in fibrinolysis is the serine protease PLAT (plasminogen activator, tissue type), which cleaves the proenzyme PLG to plasmin, which, in turn, plays a central role in orchestrating fibrinolysis, coagulation, and the contact and complement system [32,49]. Consistently with this, Plat expression was also found to respond to vaccination late in the crisis phase. Unlike Plg, however, Plat mRNA levels did not further increase, but decreased during crisis. In addition, the decreasing Plat mRNA levels during crisis were found to run in parallel with decreased expression of Serpina5, encoding the plasminogen activator inhibitor PAI-3, in the liver of vaccinated mice during the crisis. This suggests a delicately balanced regulation, not only at the mRNA level, between PLG, on the one hand, and PLAT and PAI-3, on the other hand, during the crisis phase of infections: decreasing levels of PAI-3 and PLAT during crisis in vaccination-protected mice could explain the re-increase in PLG levels. Reversely, increased expression of Plat and Serpina5 and, concomitantly, decreased expression of Plg during crisis, as observed in unvaccinated mice, may have resulted in an increased dysregulation of the ‘fibrinolytic activity’ in unvaccinated mice. Possibly, this may have ultimately led to their death, due to increased formation of thrombi, which may have still been promoted by the increased generation of platelets in the liver, as previously found during crisis [14]. Evidence that PAIs may be critical for regulating blood-stage malaria was previously found in P. chabaudi-selfhealer C57BL/6 mice: these mice, when depleted of Serpine1 encoding PAI-1, partially lost their ability to control the course of infection of P. chabaudi malaria [50].
Furthermore, our data indicate that protective vaccination impacts, albeit differently, the activation of the three malaria-responsive complement pathways AP, LP, and CP. Even within a given pathway, vaccination differently impacts the individual complement factors. For instance, the constitutively active AP is characterized by spontaneously hydrolysing C3 and its initial association with Factor B, which is cleaved by Factor D, generating the alternative C3 convertase, which, in turn, is stabilized by the positive AP regulator properdin and is negatively regulated by Factor H [30]. Consistently with this, our data show, at the mRNA level, that protective vaccination accelerates the downregulation of initially upregulated Cfb transcripts in the liver on day 4 p.i., but, concomitantly, accelerates an upregulation Cfh and Cfp transcripts (Figure 5E,F and Figure 7B). Furthermore, our data show the responses to malaria of both the CP and the LP to be also accelerated by vaccination. The genes C1qa, C1qb, and C1qc, encoding the subunits of the circulating C1q complex in the CP, had significantly higher expression at early patency on day 4 p.i. (Figure 4A–C), just as the genes encoding Mbl1, Masp1, and Fcna in the LP (Figure 5A–C). However, the accelerated LP response to vaccination on day 4 p.i. is complex, as the MBL1-mediated pathway appears to be sequentially implemented by an accelerated ficolin-mediated pathway and by a collectin11-mediated pathway, evidenced by the accelerated increase in mRNA levels of Fcna at day 4 p.i. and Colec11 at peak parasitaemia on day 8 p.i. The surface binding activity of ficolin and collectin11 appears to be associated with increasing parasitaemias in the peripheral blood [11]. Both the LP and CP, as well as the AP, eventually converged at the level of C3-convertase, and the C3 mRNA level also increased more rapidly in the liver of vaccinated mice on day 4 p.i. than in unvaccinated mice, i.e., vaccination accelerated the formation of C3, induced by primary infection with P. chabaudi blood-stage malaria, and its cleavage product C3b is known to opsonize malaria-infected erythrocytes and merozoites, respectively [51].
The view that vaccination accelerates activation of the CP and LP is further substantiated with the higher levels of C1ra, C1s, C2, and Serping1 in vaccination-protected mice than in unvaccinated mice at early prepatency on day 1 p.i. (Figure 4D–F and Figure 7A). Even the transiently decreased levels of C1qa, C1qb, C1qc, Masp1, Fcna, and Colec11 on day 1 p.i. in the liver of vaccinated mice appeared to be more lowered than in unvaccinated mice. These transiently decreased levels may reflect an apparent rapid consumption of these transcripts in the early activation patterns of both the CP and the LP. For example, the initiation complex of the CP is an assembly of the recognition protein C1q with two proteases C1r and two proteases C1s, the latter being responsible for the activation and proteolytic activity of the C1 complex [30,39]. Conspicuously, our data show that the mRNA level of C1ra, which encodes the subcomponent A of C1r, is highly significantly increased by vaccination at early prepatency on day 1 p.i., in contrast to its impaired increase in unvaccinated mice (cf. Figure 4). Furthermore, active C1r, in turn, is known to cleave, and, thus, to activate C1s, which then splits C4 and C2 to produce C4a, C4b, C2a, and C2b, and C4b combines with C2a to generate C3- or C5-convertase [30]. In accordance, this may also explain why an accelerated increase in the expression of C1s and C2 was found in vaccinated mice on day 1 p.i., in contrast to the impaired lower increases in C1s and C2 mRNAs in unvaccinated mice (cf. Figure 4). The initially increased mRNA expression of C1ra, C1s, and C2 in the liver of vaccinated mice suggests that protective vaccination accelerates the complex malaria-induced initial activation patterns of CP and LP.
A dominant regulatory role in the complex control of complement activation, but also in other non-complement-mediated actions, may be ascribed to the C1INH encoded by Serping1, a fluid-phase multifunctional serine protease inhibitor [30,52,53]. The C1INH is known to limit overactivation of the complement system, thereby protecting host tissues from aberrant C activation. C1INH negatively regulates the CP by binding to the C1q-complex, and the LP by inhibiting MASP1 and MASP2 [52,54]. C1INH also interacts with coagulation and fibrinolysis by binding to and inhibiting the serine proteases FXIIa, plasmin, and PLAT [52]. In addition, C1INH was described to suppress malaria parasite invasion of host erythrocytes and cytoadhesion by binding to parasite glycosylphosphatidylinositol and the host cell receptors CD36 and chondroitin sulfate A [55]. Recruitment of C1INH to P. falciparum malaria merozoites, in turn, controls complement activation [54]. Our data show that transcript levels of Serping1 respond directly to vaccination: (i) vaccination per se increased the constitutive transcript levels of Serping1; (ii) upon infection with P. chabaudi malaria, Serping1 mRNA increased more rapidly, with an early peak on day 1 p.i., in vaccinated mice, whereas the peak in unvaccinated mice was delayed on day 4 p.i.; (iii) the decline in Serping1 mRNA levels after the peak on day 1 p.i. towards day 8 p.i. was accelerated in vaccinated mice, before increasing again towards the end of the crisis, due to overall recovery from infection. The early increase in Serping1 mRNA levels, and the subsequent accelerated decline, may have helped to limit the initial overactivation of the CP and LP by transiently impairing the initial activation components of the LP and CP on day 1 p.i., characterized by the transient decrease in mRNA levels of Masp1 and C1q, respectively. The ensuing accelerated downregulation of Serping1 may, in turn, reflect that less C1INH is required, or may even be a hindrance, during this period of infection, whereas C1INH is required again for the final recovery from infection. Our data support the view that protective vaccination presumably accelerates activation and production of complement components in the liver, but concomitantly prevents overactivation of the complement system in response to malaria blood stages. It is tempting to speculate that such an accelerated production may facilitate a somewhat earlier formation of protective anti-malaria antibodies during the crisis phase, ultimately favoring survival from otherwise lethal P. chabaudi blood-stage infections.
Furthermore, our data show that protective vaccination also affects, albeit differently, the hepatic mRNA levels of some members of the IL-6 family, in particular, those of their specificity-defining and signal-transducing receptors. Among the IL-6 family members, significant changes (p-value < 0.05) were found for Ctf1, whose constitutive mRNA level was reduced by vaccination per se, and remained lower upon malaria infection compared to in unvaccinated mice, but only for the first 4 days of infection (cf. Figure S3). This downregulation might be not explainable by previous findings showing that CTF1 can induce an acute-phase response in rat hepatocytes [56], but may possibly be related to the pro- and/or anti-inflammatory properties of CTF1 [57,58]. Moreover, vaccination highly significantly increased Lif mRNA levels, but only at early prepatency on day 1 p.i. (cf. Figure S3). This appears to be consistent with previous data showing that LIF is able to induce an acute-phase response [56,59,60,61] and cachexia [62]. In contrast to Lif and Ctf1, vaccination had only a moderate effect (p-value < 0.05) on the malaria-induced IL-6 mRNA levels in the liver on day 1 p.i. Surprisingly, however, vaccination induced a significant increase in the constitutive mRNA level of Il6ra, encoding the membrane-bound IL6Rα, which remained elevated until the peak of parasitaemia on day 8 p.i. (cf. Figure 8). Vaccination did not affect IL-11 mRNA levels, but downregulated the constitutive mRNA levels of Il11ra1, which remained downregulated during the first 4 days of infection. This may be explained by limiting hepatoxic effects of IL-11 [63].
Abundant information, allowing a more reasonable interpretation, is only available for IL-6 and its receptors. Indeed, the mRNA levels of Il6st, encoding the IL-6 signal-transducing receptor GP130, were found to be upregulated by vaccination: at the constitutive level and during recovery from infection towards the end of the crisis at day 11 p.i. (cf. Figure 8). This suggests a critical role for GP130 in the recovery of vaccination-protected mice from P. chabaudi infections. Notably, the shed, soluble (s)GP130 has previously been described to function as a natural inhibitor of IL-6 trans-signaling [64], i.e., the sGP130 is able to bind and inactivate the soluble complex of IL-6/sIL6Rα, responsible for IL-6 trans-signaling [65]. In accordance, our previous study demonstrated that inhibition of IL-6 trans-signaling protects against malaria-induced lethality in mice [37]. The present results can therefore be interpreted as suggesting that protective vaccination may promote an accelerated downregulation of IL-6 trans-signaling, thereby favoring the resumption of processes in the liver required for accelerated recovery from infection during the crisis phase and, thus, for the survival of mice from otherwise lethal P. chabaudi blood-stage malaria.
Collectively, our data further substantiate the view that the liver plays an important role in the host defense against blood-stage malaria, and that protective vaccination may even enhance the liver’s responsiveness to experimental blood-stage infections of P. chabaudi malaria, evidenced as significant effects on constitutive and infection-altered expression of genes encoding various APPs and IL-6 family members.

4. Material and Methods

4.1. Blood-Stage Malaria of P. chabaudi

Infection experiments were previously performed with female Balb/c mice aged 10–12 weeks, bred under specified pathogen-free conditions, using a non-clonal line of P. chabaudi with similar features to P. chabaudi chabaudi AS [11,12,13]. The outcome of these blood-stage infections of malaria was previously shown to be controlled by genes of the H-2-complex and the non-H-2 background, and by sex and testosterone [66].

4.2. Protective Vaccination

Vaccination experiments were previously performed using a non-infectious vaccine consisting of erythrocyte membranes isolated as ghosts from P. chabaudi-parasitized erythrocytes by a glycerol-enhanced hypotonic shock, as detailed previously [11,13]. These membrane ghosts were previously shown to contain parasite-synthesized proteins, and presumably autoantigens [67,68]. Approximately 106 ghosts suspended in 100 µL Freund’s complete adjuvant (FCA) were subcutaneously injected at weeks 3 and 1 a.i. (ante infectionem), before challenging with 106 P. chabaudi-parasitized erythrocytes. These infections in vaccinated mice (V) took a similar course in terms of parasitaemia as those in non-vaccinated mice (N). In both V and N, the patent period began at about 4 p.i. with about 1–5% P. chabaudi-parasitized erythrocytes. Then, parasitaemia increased and culminated at peak parasitaemia on day 8 p.i., with about 60% in V and about 40% in N [12]. The following crisis phase lasted for about 3–5 days, with parasitaemia descending to 5–2% at day 11 p.i., and there was death of all N and survival of about 75% V [12], which corresponds with our previous results [11]. The efficacy of vaccination depends on sex and testosterone, respectively, and genes of the H-2 complex and non-H-2 background, as briefly summarized elsewhere [14,69].

4.3. Collection of Livers and RNA Preparation

Three V mice and three N mice were sacrificed at different time points during infections, i.e., on day 0 p.i., at early prepatency on day 1 p.i., at early patency on day 4 p.i., at peak parasitaemia on day 8 p.i., and towards the end of the crisis phase on day 11 p.i. Livers were excised from the 30 sacrificed mice, rapidly frozen in liquid nitrogen, and stored at -80o C until use. Total RNA was isolated from individual livers using the standard Trizol protocol (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) followed by purification with the miRNeasy Kit (Qiagen) [13]. The integrity and quality of RNA was checked by the Agilent 2100 bioanalyzer platform (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA), with RIN values of all 30 RNA samples being in the range between 8.7 and 9.1 [13].

4.4. Hybridization and Analyses of Mouse Whole-Genome Oligo Microarrays

These experiments have also previously been performed [13]. Cy3-labeled cRNA from 100 ng RNA equivalents of the 30 individual livers were generated using the Agilent Low Input Quick Amp Labeling Kit (Agilent Technologies). The incorporations ranged between 18 and 23 fmol Cy3/ng cRNA, as determined with an ND-spectrophotometer (NanoDrop Technologies, Wilmington, DE, USA). The Agilent Gene Expression Hybridization Kit was used to hybridize the Cy3-labeled cRNA to the Agilent’s 8x60K oligo microarrays (design number 028005), displaying 39,430 Entrez Gene RNAs. The Agilent’s Microarray Scanner System (Agilent Technologies) with the Agilent Feature Extraction Software (FES) 11.0 were used to read out and process the microarray image files. FES determines feature intensities including background subtraction, rejects outliers, and calculates the statistical confidence of the array spots. Using the quantile method, the microarrays were normalized across all 30 samples. Both raw and normalized data were made accessible in both the EMBL-EBI Array Express repository (array accession number: E-MTAB-4791) and the NCBI’s Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database with accession number GSE129133. All 30 normalized microarrays were previously subjected to global transcriptomic analyses, i.e., principal component analysis, a heat map of the most highly variable transcripts, and hierarchical clustering dendrograms calculated using the unweighted pair group method with arithmetic mean and Euclidean distance measure [13]. The study here analyzes the normalized microarrays with respect to the expression of selected genes encoding acute-phase proteins, including proteins involved in coagulation, fibrinolysis, and complement activation, as well as proteins encoding IL-6 family members and their receptors, respectively. The light intensities of single spots above the normalization level defined the relative levels of gene expression, which were represented as the mean ± SD as a dispersion metric in all figures.

4.5. Statistical Analysis

The non-parametric Krustall–Wallis test [70], conducted with the kruskalwallis function of Matlab (R2020b) (MathWorks, Inc. Natick, MA, USA), was used to determine the statistical significance of differences in the expression levels of a given gene between vaccinated mice (V) and non-vaccinated (N) mice on a given sampling day (0, 1, 4, 8, and 11 p.i), i.e., the means obtained from the three microarrays prepared from three individual livers of V (nV = 3) and from the three corresponding N microarrays (nV = 3) were compared. This test was also used to compare the statistical differences between the means for V and those for N over the intervals between different consecutive sampling days p.i. In all figures, statistical significance for a given sampling time or corresponding intervals between sampling times for vaccinated and non-vaccinated mice, with a p-value below the significance level α = 0.05, is indicated by an asterisk (*). The exact numerical p-values are provided in the Supplementary Tables corresponding to the figures. In these tables, the ’T’ columns show the p-values from the Kruskal–Wallis test for statistical significance of the difference at a given time point between the two groups, while the ‘Δ’ columns show the p-values from the Kruskal–Wallis test for the difference between two time points.

5. Limitations

Future studies are needed to confirm the findings regarding the protein level at selected time points in a larger number of animals. Freund’s adjuvant is considered highly immunostimulatory, and adding an adjuvant-only group would further enhance the vaccination-specific effects. Functional studies, such as targeting the complement pathway, are needed to uncover causative effects derived from the vaccination-induced protective effects.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/ijms26073173/s1.

Author Contributions

Conception and writing of draft manuscript: F.W.; biocomputing: D.G. and M.J.A.-B.; infections, RNA, microarrays: D.D.; analyses and interpretation of data: all authors. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

D.G. and M.J.A.-B. have been supported by the IPerGlio project. This project has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation program under Grant Agreement ERAPERMED2022-245, by Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación, Spain, Grant No. PID2023-152752OB-I00/AEI/10.13039/501100011033, and by Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Infrastructure of Precision Medicine associated with Science and Technology (IMPaCT) of the Strategic Action in Health (iDATA-MP).

Institutional Review Board Statement

The animal study protocol was approved (2008) by Treiber, the former animal welfare officer and head of the animal facilities of the Heinrich Heine University, Düsseldorf (Germany), before final approval by the State-controlled Committee, as described below under the Statement of Ethics.

Informed Consent Statement

Experiments with mice were previously conducted in strict accordance with the German law on animal protection. The keeping of mice, as well as the experimental protocol of the study, were officially approved by the State-controlled Committee on the Ethics of Animal Experiments of the State Nordrhein-Westfalen, Germany, and were regularly controlled, without previous announcement, by the local authorities. All efforts were made to minimize suffering.

Data Availability Statement

Microarray data are available at the NCBI’s GEO database with accession number GSE129133.

Conflicts of Interest

Author Denis Delic was employed by the company Boehringer Ingelheim Pharma & Co. KG. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest”.

References

  1. WHO. World Malaria Report 2022; World Health Organization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2022. [Google Scholar]
  2. Datoo, M.S. Immunogenicity of R21/Matrix-M vaccine against clinical malaria after 2 years’ follow-up in children in Burkina Faso: A phase 1/2b randomized clinical trial. Lancet Infect Dis. 2022, 22, 1728–1736. [Google Scholar]
  3. Ganley, M.; Holz, L.E.; Minnell, J.J.; deMenezes, M.N.; Burn, O.K.; Poa, K.C.Y.; Draper, S.L.; English, K.; Chan, S.T.S.; Anderson, R.J.; et al. mRNA vaccines against malaria tailored for liver-resident memory T cells. Nature Immunol. 2023, 24, 1487–1498. [Google Scholar]
  4. Wadman, M. First malaria vaccine slashes childhood deaths. Science 2023, 382, 357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Vogel, G. New hope against malaria. Science 2023, 382, 1232. [Google Scholar]
  6. Ogieuhi, I.J.; Ajekliigbe, V.O.; Kolo-Manna, K.; Akingbola, A.; Odeniyi, T.A.; Soyemi, T.S.; Ayomide, J.H.; Thiyagarajan, B.; Awolola, B.D. A narrative review of the RTS S AS01 malaria vaccine and its implementation in Africa to reduce the global malaria burden. Discover Public Health 2024, 21, 152. [Google Scholar]
  7. WHO. World Malaria Report 2024; World Health Organization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2024. [Google Scholar]
  8. Longley, R.; Smith, C.; Fortin, A.; Berghout, J.; McMorran, B.; Burgio, G.; Foote, S.; Gros, P. Host resistance to malaria: Using mouse models to explore the host response. Mamm. Genome 2011, 22, 32–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Stephens, R.; Culleton, R.I.; Lamb, T.J. The contribution of Plasmodium chabaudi to our understanding of malaria. Trends Parasitol. 2012, 28, 73–82. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  10. Wunderlich, F.; Brenner, H.; Helwig, M. Plasmodium chabaudi malaria: Protective immunization with surface membranes of erythrocytes infected with Plasmodium chabaudi. Infect. Immun. 1988, 56, 3326–3328. [Google Scholar]
  11. Krücken, J.; Delic, D.; Pauen, H.; Wojtalla, A.; El-Khadragy, M.; Dkhil, M.A. Augmented particle trapping and attenuated inflammation in the liver by protective vaccination against Plasmodium chabaudi malaria. Malar. J. 2009, 8, 54–64. [Google Scholar]
  12. Dkhil, M.A.; Al-Quraishy, S.A.; Abdel-Baki, A.S.; Delic, D.; Wunderlich, F. Differential miRNA expression in the liver of Balb/c protected by vaccination during crisis of Plasmodium chabaudi blood-stage malaria. Front. Microbiol. 2017, 7, 2155. [Google Scholar]
  13. Delic, D.; Wunderlich, F.; Al-Quraishy, A.; Abdel-Baki, A.-A.; Dkhil, M.; Araúzo-Bravo, M.J. Vaccination accelerates hepatic erythroblastosis induced by blood-stage malaria. Malar. J. 2020, 19, 49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Wunderlich, F.; Delic, D.; Gerovska, D.; Arauzo-Bravo, M.J. Vaccination accelerates liver-intrinsic expression of megakaryote-related genes in response to blood-stage malaria. Vaccines 2022, 10, 287. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  15. Arauzo-Bravo, M.J.; Delic, D.; Gerovska, D.; Wunderlich, F. Protective vaccination reshapes hepatic response to blood-stage malaria of genes preferentially expressed by NK cells. Vaccines 2020, 8, 677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Wunderlich, F.; Al-Quraishy, S.; Dkhil, M. Liver-inherent immune system: Its role in blood-stage malaria. Front. Microbiol. 2014, 5, 559. [Google Scholar]
  17. Khalil, R.H.; Al-Humadi, N. Types of acute phase reactants and their importance in vaccination. Biomed. Rep. 2020, 12, 143–152. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  18. Ehlting, C.; Wolf, S.D.; Bode, J.G. Acute-phase protein synthesis: A key feature of innate immune functions of the liver. Biol. Chem. 2021, 402, 1129–1145. [Google Scholar]
  19. Mantovani, A.; Garlanda, C. Humoral innate immunity and acute phase proteins. N. Engl. J. Med. 2023, 388, 439–452. [Google Scholar]
  20. Crispe, I.N. Hepatocytes as immunological agents. J. Immunol. 2016, 196, 17–21. [Google Scholar]
  21. Perez, L. Acute phase protein response to viral infection and vaccination. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 2019, 671, 196–202. [Google Scholar]
  22. O’Donnell, A.; Fowkes, F.J.I.; Allen, S.J.; Imre, H.; Alpers, M.P.; Weatherall, D.J.; Day, K.P. The acute phase response in children with mild and severe malaria in Papua New Guinea. Trans. Roy. Soc. Trop. Med. Hyg. 2009, 103, 679–686. [Google Scholar]
  23. Gillespie, S.H.; Dow, C.; Raynes, J.G.; Behrens, R.H.; Chiodini, P.L.; McAdam, K.P.W.J. Measurement of acute phase proteins for assessing severity of Plasmodium falciparum malaria. J. Clin. Pathol. 1991, 44, 228–231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Reuterswärd, P.; Bergström, S.; Okikiiriza, E.; Lindquist, E.; Bergström, S.; Svahn, H.A.; Ayoglu, B.; Uhlen, M.; Wahlgren, M.; Normark, J.; et al. Levels of human proteins in plasma associated with acute paediatric malaria. Malar. J. 2018, 17, 426. [Google Scholar]
  25. Taylor-Robinson, A.W. Increased production of acute-phase proteins corresponds to the peak parasitaemia of primary malaria infection. Parasitol. Intern. 2000, 48, 297–301. [Google Scholar]
  26. Aggrey, A.A.; Srivastava, K.; Ture, S.; Field, D.J.; Morrell, C.N. Platelet induction of the acute-phase response is protective in murine experimental cerebral malaria. J. Immunol. 2013, 190, 4685–4691. [Google Scholar]
  27. Wilairatana, P.; Mahannop, P.; Tussato, T.; Hayeedoloh, I.; Boonhok, R.; Klangbud, W.K.; Mala, W.; Kotepui, K.U.; Kotepui, M. C-reactive protein as an early biomarker for malaria infection and monitoring of malaria severity: A meta-analysis. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 22033. [Google Scholar]
  28. Silver, K.L.; Higgins, S.J.; McDonald, C.R.; Kain, K.C. Complement driven innate immune response to malaria: Fuelling severe malaria diseases. Cell. Microbiol. 2010, 12, 1036–1045. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  29. Kurtovic, L.; Boyle, M.J.; Opi, D.H.; Kennedy, A.T.; Tham, W.-H.; Reiling, L.; Chan, J.-A.; Beeson, J.G. Complement in malaria immunity and vaccines. Immunol. Rev. 2020, 293, 38–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Sahu, S.K.; Kulkarni, D.H.; Ozanturk, A.N.; Ma, L.; Kulkarni, H.S. Emerging roles of the complement system in host-pathogen interactions. Trends Microbiol. 2022, 30, 390–402. [Google Scholar]
  31. Biryukov, S.; Stoute, J.A. Complement activation in malaria: Friend or foe? Trends Mol. Med. 2014, 20, 293–301. [Google Scholar]
  32. Heissig, B.; Salama, Y.; Takahashi, S.; Osada, T.; Hattori, K. The multifaceted role of plasminogen in inflammation. Cell. Signal. 2020, 75, 109761. [Google Scholar]
  33. Luo, S.; Hu, D.; Wang, M.; Zipfel, P.F.; Hu, Y. Complement in hemolysis- and thrombosis-related diseases. Front. Immunol. 2020, 11, 1212. [Google Scholar]
  34. Deroost, K.; Pham, T.-T.; Opdenakker, G.; Van den Steen, P.E. The immunological balance between host and parasite in malaria. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 2016, 40, 208–257. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  35. Heinrich, P.C.; Behrmann, I.; Hermanns, H.M.; Müller-Neven, G.; Schaper, F. Principles of interleukin (IL)-6-typew cytokine signalling and its regulation. Biochem. J. 2003, 374, 1–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Murakami, M.; Kamimura, D.; Hirano, T. Pleiotropy and specificity: Insights from the interleukin 6 family of cytokines. Immunity 2019, 50, 812–831. [Google Scholar]
  37. Wunderlich, C.M.; Delic, D.; Behnke, K.; Meryk, A.; Ströhle, P.; Chaurasia, B.; Al-Quraishy, S.; Wunderlich, F.; Brüning, J.C.; Wunderlich, F.T. Cutting edge: Inhibition of IL6 trans-signaling protects from malaria-induced lethality in mice. J. Immunol. 2012, 188, 4141–4144. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  38. Pryzdial, E.L.G.; Leatherdale, A.; Conway, E.M. Coagulation and complement: Key innate defense participants in a seamless web. Front. Immunol. 2022, 13, 918775. [Google Scholar]
  39. Petry, F.; McClive, P.J.; Botto, M.; Morley, B.J.; Morahan, G.; Loos, M. The mouse C1q genes are clustered on chromosome 4 and show conservation of gene organization. Immunogen. 1996, 43, 370–376. [Google Scholar]
  40. Kiyuka, P.K.; Meri, S.; Khattab, A. Complement in malaria: Immune evasion strategies and role in protective immunity. FEBS Letters 2020, 594, 2502–2517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Santiago, V.F.; Dombrowski, J.G.; Kawahara, R.; Rosa-Fernandes, L.; Mule, S.N.; Murillo, O.; Santana, T.V.; Paccini Coutinho, J.V.; Macedo-da-Silva, J.; Cardoso Lazari, L.; et al. Complement system activation is a plasma biomarker signature during malaria in pregnancy. Genes 2023, 14, 1624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Liszewski, M.K.; Java, A.; Schramm, E.C.; Atkinson, J.P. Complement dysregulation and disease: Insights from contemporary genetics. Ann. Rev. Pathol. 2017, 12, 25–52. [Google Scholar]
  43. Han, L.; Chen, Z.; Yu, K.; Yan, J.; Li, T.; Ba, X.; Lin, W.; Huang, Y.; Shen, P.; Huang, Y.; et al. Interleukin 27 signaling in rheumatoid arthritis patients: Good or evil? Front. Immunol. 2022, 12, 787252. [Google Scholar]
  44. Balmer, P.; McMonagle, F.A.; Alexander, J.; Phillips, R.S. Experimental erythrocytic malaria infection induces elevated serum amyloid P production in mice. Immunol. Lett. 2000, 72, 147–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Ansar, W.; Bandyopadhyay, S.M.; Chowdhury, S.; Habib, S.H.; Mandal, C. Role of C-reactive protein in complement-mediated hemolysis in malaria. Glycoconj. J. 2006, 23, 233–240. [Google Scholar]
  46. Lu, J.; Mold, C.; DuClos, T.W.; Sun, P.D. Pentraxins and Fc receptor-mediated immune responses. Front. Immunol. 2018, 9, 2607. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Temming, A.R.; Buirs, M.T.; Bentlage, A.E.H.; Treffers, L.W.; Feringa, H.; de Taeye, S.W.; Kuijpers, T.W.; Nagelkerke, S.Q.; Brasser, G.; Mok, J.Y.; et al. C-reactive protein enhances cellular destruction through IgG-Fc receptors in vitro. Front. Immunol. 2021, 12, 594773. [Google Scholar]
  48. McGrath, F.D.G.; Brouwer, M.C.; Arlaud, G.J.; Daha, M.R.; Hack, C.E.; Roos, A. Evidence that complement protein C1q with C-reactive protein through its globular head region. J. Immunol. 2006, 176, 46974–46982. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Weidmann, H.; Heikaus, L.; Long, A.T.; Naudin, C.; Sclüter, H.; Renne, T. The plasma contact system, a protease cascade at the nexus of inflammation, coagulation and immunity. BBA-Mol. Cell Res. 2017, 1864, 2118–2127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Krücken, J.; Dkhil, M.A.; Braun, J.V.; Schroetel, R.M.U.; El-Khadragy, M.; Carmeliet, P.; Mossmann, H.; Wunderlich, F. Testosterone suppresses protective responses of the liver to blood-stage malaria. Infect. Immun. 2005, 73, 436–443. [Google Scholar]
  51. Reiss, T.; Müller, F.; Pradel, G. The impact of human complement on the clinical outcome of malaria infection. Mol. Immunol. 2022, 151, 19–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Davis III, A.E.; Lu, F.; Mejia, P. C1 Inhibitor, a multifunctional serine protease inhibitor. Thromb. Haemost. 2010, 104, 886–893. [Google Scholar]
  53. Hausburg, M.A.; Williams, J.S.; Banton, K.L.; Mains, C.W.; Roshon, M.; Bar-Or, D. C1 esterase inhibitor-mediated immunosuppression in Covid-19: Friend or foe? Clin. Immun. Comm. 2022, 2, 83–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Kennedy, A.T.; Wijeyewickrema, L.C.; Huglo, A.; Lin, C.; Pike, R.; Cowman, A.F.; Tham, W.H. Recruitment of human C1 esterase inhibitor controls complement activation on blood stage Plasmodium falciparum merozoites. J. Immunol. 2017, 198, 4728–4737. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  55. Mejia, P.; Diez-Silva, M.; Kamena, F.; Lu, F.; Fernandes, S.M.; Seeberger, P.H.; Davis, A.E., III; Mitchell, J.R. Human C1-inhibitor suppresses malaria parasite invasion and cytoadhesion via binding to parasite glycophosphatidylinositol and host cell receptors. J. Infect. Dis. 2016, 213, 80–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Richards, C.D.; Langdon, C.; Pennica, D.; Gauldie, J. Murine cardiotrophin-1 stimulates the acute phase response in rat hepatocytes and H35 hepatoma cells. J. Interferon Cytokine Res. 1996, 16, 69–75. [Google Scholar]
  57. Lopez-Yolgi, M.; Moreno-Aliaga, M.J.; Bustos, M. Cardiotrophin-1: A multifaceted cytokine. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev. 2015, 26, 523–532. [Google Scholar]
  58. Carneros, D.; Santamaria, E.M.; Larequi, E.; Velez-Ortiz, J.M.; Reboredo, M.; Mancheño, U.; Perugorria, M.J.; Navas, P.; Romero-Gómez, M.; Prieto, J.; et al. Cardiotrophin-1 is an anti-inflammatory cytokine and promotes IL-4-induced M2 macrophage polarization. Faseb J. 2019, 33, 7578–7587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Kordula, T.; Rokita, H.; Koj, A.; Fiers, W.; Gauldie, J.; Baumann, H. Effects of interleukin-6 and leukemia inhibitory factor on the acute phase response and DNA synthesis in cultured rat hepatocytes. Lymphokine Cytokine Res. 1991, 10, 23–26. [Google Scholar]
  60. Brown, M.A.; Metcalf, D.; Gough, N.M. Leukemia inhibitory factor and interleukin 6 are expressed at very low levels in the normal adult mouse and are induced by inflammation. Cytokine 1994, 6, 300–309. [Google Scholar]
  61. Metcalf, D. The unsolved enigmas of leukemia inhibitory factor. Stem Cells 2003, 21, 5–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Yang, X.; Wang, J.; Chang, C.-Y.; Zhou, F.; Liu, J.; Xu, H.; Ibrahim, M.; Gomez, M.; Guo, G.L.; Liu, H.; et al. Leukemia inhibitory factor suppresses hepatic de novo lipogenesis and induces cachexia in mice. Nature Comm. 2024, 15, 627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Widjaja, A.A.; Chothani, S.P.; Cook, S.A. Different roles of interleukin 6 and interleukin 11 in the liver: Implications for therapy. Hum. Vacc. Immunotherap. 2020, 16, 2357–2362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Jostock, T.; Müllberg, J.; Özbek, S.; Atreya, R.; Blinn, G.; Voltz, N.; Fischer, M.; Neurath, M.F.; Rose-John, S. Soluble gp130 is the natural inhibitor of soluble interleukin-6 receptor transsignalling responses. Eur. J. Biochem. 2001, 268, 160–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Rose-John, S.; Jenkins, B.J.; Garbers, C.; Moll, J.M.; Scheller, J. Targeting IL-6 transsignalling: Past, present and future. Nature Rev. Immunol. 2023, 23, 666–681. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Wunderlich, F.; Mossmann, H.; Helwig, M.; Schillinger, G. Resistance to Plasmodium chabaudi in B10 mice: Influence of the H2-complex and testosterone. Infect. Immun. 1988, 56, 2400–2406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Wunderlich, F.; Helwig, M.; Schillinger, G.; Speth, V.; Wiser, M.F. Expression of the parasite protein Pc90 in plasma membranes of erythrocytes infected with Plasmodium chabaudi. Eur. J. Cell. Biol. 1988, 47, 157–164. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  68. Wunderlich, F.; Helwig, M.; Schillinger, G.; Speth, V. Cryptic disposition of antigenic parasite proteins in plasma membranes of erythrocytes infected with Plasmodium chabaudi. Mol. Biochem. Parasitol. 1988, 30, 55–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Wunderlich, F.; Maurin, W.; Benten, W.P.M.; Schmitt-Wrede, H.-P. Testosterone impairs efficacy of protective vaccination against P. chabaudi malaria. Vaccine 1993, 11, 1097–1099. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Kruskal, W.H.; Wallis, W.A. Use of ranks in one-criterion variance analysis. J. Amer. Statistic. Assoc. 1952, 47, 583–621. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Expression trajectories of genes encoding different APPs in the liver in response to blood-stage malaria and vaccination. (A) Azgp1. (B) Saa1. (C) Saa2. (D) Saa3. (E) Saa4. (F) Apcs. (G) Cp. (H) Crp. (I) B2m. RNA was isolated from single livers of vaccination-protected (V, red) and non-vaccinated (N, blue) mice on days 0, 1, 4, 8, and 11 p.i. during primary infection with P. chabaudi blood-stage malaria. Gene expression levels are plotted on a linear scale as the mean of three microarrays +/− SD. The ‘*’ symbol over the sampling points or interval lines between two sampling points indicate a statistically significant difference, with a p-value < 0.05, at a given sampling point or two corresponding intervals between vaccinated and non-vaccinated mice. Numerical p-values are provided in Table S1. nN = 3 and nV = 3 are the total number of non-vaccinated and vaccinated mice, respectively, at each time point.
Figure 1. Expression trajectories of genes encoding different APPs in the liver in response to blood-stage malaria and vaccination. (A) Azgp1. (B) Saa1. (C) Saa2. (D) Saa3. (E) Saa4. (F) Apcs. (G) Cp. (H) Crp. (I) B2m. RNA was isolated from single livers of vaccination-protected (V, red) and non-vaccinated (N, blue) mice on days 0, 1, 4, 8, and 11 p.i. during primary infection with P. chabaudi blood-stage malaria. Gene expression levels are plotted on a linear scale as the mean of three microarrays +/− SD. The ‘*’ symbol over the sampling points or interval lines between two sampling points indicate a statistically significant difference, with a p-value < 0.05, at a given sampling point or two corresponding intervals between vaccinated and non-vaccinated mice. Numerical p-values are provided in Table S1. nN = 3 and nV = 3 are the total number of non-vaccinated and vaccinated mice, respectively, at each time point.
Ijms 26 03173 g001
Figure 2. Time courses of genes encoding proteins involved in blood coagulation, expressed in the liver in response to malaria and vaccination. (A) Fga. (B) Fgb. (C) Fgg. (D) F2. (E) F7. (F) F8. (G) F9. (H) F10. (I) F13b. RNA was isolated from single livers of vaccination-protected (V, red) and non-vaccinated (N, blue) mice on days 0, 1, 4, 8, and 11 p.i. during primary infection with P. chabaudi blood-stage malaria. Gene expression levels are plotted on a linear scale as the mean of three microarrays +/− SD. The ‘*’ symbol over the sampling points or interval lines between two sampling points indicate a statistically significant difference, with a p-value < 0.05, at a given sampling point or two corresponding intervals between vaccinated and non-vaccinated mice. Numerical p-values are provided in Table S2. nN = 3 and nV = 3 are the total number of non-vaccinated and vaccinated mice, respectively, at each time point.
Figure 2. Time courses of genes encoding proteins involved in blood coagulation, expressed in the liver in response to malaria and vaccination. (A) Fga. (B) Fgb. (C) Fgg. (D) F2. (E) F7. (F) F8. (G) F9. (H) F10. (I) F13b. RNA was isolated from single livers of vaccination-protected (V, red) and non-vaccinated (N, blue) mice on days 0, 1, 4, 8, and 11 p.i. during primary infection with P. chabaudi blood-stage malaria. Gene expression levels are plotted on a linear scale as the mean of three microarrays +/− SD. The ‘*’ symbol over the sampling points or interval lines between two sampling points indicate a statistically significant difference, with a p-value < 0.05, at a given sampling point or two corresponding intervals between vaccinated and non-vaccinated mice. Numerical p-values are provided in Table S2. nN = 3 and nV = 3 are the total number of non-vaccinated and vaccinated mice, respectively, at each time point.
Ijms 26 03173 g002
Figure 3. Hepatic expression of genes, encoding proteins involved in fibrinolysis, in response to malaria and vaccination. (A) Plg. (B) Plat. (C) Plau. (D) Serpine1. (E) Serpina5. (F) Serpinb2. RNA was isolated from single livers of vaccination-protected (V, red) and non-vaccinated (N, blue) mice on days 0, 1, 4, 8, and 11 p.i. during primary infection with P. chabaudi blood-stage malaria. Gene expression levels are plotted on a linear scale as the mean of three microarrays +/− SD. The ‘*’ symbol over the sampling points or interval lines between two sampling points indicate a statistically significant difference, with a p-value < 0.05, at a given sampling point or two corresponding intervals between vaccinated and non-vaccinated mice. Numerical p-values are provided in Table S3. nN = 3 and nV = 3 are the total number of non-vaccinated and vaccinated mice, respectively, at each time point.
Figure 3. Hepatic expression of genes, encoding proteins involved in fibrinolysis, in response to malaria and vaccination. (A) Plg. (B) Plat. (C) Plau. (D) Serpine1. (E) Serpina5. (F) Serpinb2. RNA was isolated from single livers of vaccination-protected (V, red) and non-vaccinated (N, blue) mice on days 0, 1, 4, 8, and 11 p.i. during primary infection with P. chabaudi blood-stage malaria. Gene expression levels are plotted on a linear scale as the mean of three microarrays +/− SD. The ‘*’ symbol over the sampling points or interval lines between two sampling points indicate a statistically significant difference, with a p-value < 0.05, at a given sampling point or two corresponding intervals between vaccinated and non-vaccinated mice. Numerical p-values are provided in Table S3. nN = 3 and nV = 3 are the total number of non-vaccinated and vaccinated mice, respectively, at each time point.
Ijms 26 03173 g003
Figure 4. Expression of genes encoding early complement components of the CP in response to malaria and vaccination. (A) C1qa. (B) C1qb. (C) C1qc. (D) C1ra. (E) C1s. (F) C2. RNA was isolated from single livers of vaccination-protected (V, red) and non-vaccinated (N, blue) mice on days 0, 1, 4, 8, and 11 p.i. during primary infection with P. chabaudi blood-stage malaria. Gene expression levels are plotted on a linear scale as the mean of three microarrays +/− SD. The ‘*’ symbol over the sampling points or interval lines between two sampling points indicates a p-value < 0.05 statistically significant difference at a given sampling point or two corresponding intervals between vaccinated and non-vaccinated mice. Numerical p-values are provided in Table S4. nN = 3 and nV = 3 are the total number of non-vaccinated and vaccinated mice, respectively, at each time point.
Figure 4. Expression of genes encoding early complement components of the CP in response to malaria and vaccination. (A) C1qa. (B) C1qb. (C) C1qc. (D) C1ra. (E) C1s. (F) C2. RNA was isolated from single livers of vaccination-protected (V, red) and non-vaccinated (N, blue) mice on days 0, 1, 4, 8, and 11 p.i. during primary infection with P. chabaudi blood-stage malaria. Gene expression levels are plotted on a linear scale as the mean of three microarrays +/− SD. The ‘*’ symbol over the sampling points or interval lines between two sampling points indicates a p-value < 0.05 statistically significant difference at a given sampling point or two corresponding intervals between vaccinated and non-vaccinated mice. Numerical p-values are provided in Table S4. nN = 3 and nV = 3 are the total number of non-vaccinated and vaccinated mice, respectively, at each time point.
Ijms 26 03173 g004
Figure 5. Expression trajectories of genes encoding components of the LP and AP in the liver of vaccinated and unvaccinated mice. (A) Mbl1. (B) Masp1. (C) Fcna. (D) Colec11. (E) Cfb. (F) Cfp. RNA was isolated from single livers of vaccination-protected (V, red) and non-vaccinated (N, blue) mice on days 0, 1, 4, 8, and 11 p.i. during primary infection with P. chabaudi blood-stage malaria. Gene expression levels are plotted on a linear scale as the mean of three microarrays +/− SD. The ‘*’ symbol over the sampling points or interval lines between two sampling points indicates a statistically significant difference, with a p-value < 0.05, at a given sampling point or two corresponding intervals between vaccinated and non-vaccinated mice. Numerical p-values are provided in Table S5. nN = 3 and nV = 3 are the total number of non-vaccinated and vaccinated mice, respectively, at each time point.
Figure 5. Expression trajectories of genes encoding components of the LP and AP in the liver of vaccinated and unvaccinated mice. (A) Mbl1. (B) Masp1. (C) Fcna. (D) Colec11. (E) Cfb. (F) Cfp. RNA was isolated from single livers of vaccination-protected (V, red) and non-vaccinated (N, blue) mice on days 0, 1, 4, 8, and 11 p.i. during primary infection with P. chabaudi blood-stage malaria. Gene expression levels are plotted on a linear scale as the mean of three microarrays +/− SD. The ‘*’ symbol over the sampling points or interval lines between two sampling points indicates a statistically significant difference, with a p-value < 0.05, at a given sampling point or two corresponding intervals between vaccinated and non-vaccinated mice. Numerical p-values are provided in Table S5. nN = 3 and nV = 3 are the total number of non-vaccinated and vaccinated mice, respectively, at each time point.
Ijms 26 03173 g005
Figure 6. Time courses of hepatic expression of genes encoding C3, C5, and final components of the membrane attack complex (MAC). (A) C3. (B) Hc. (C) C8a. (D) C8b. (E) C8g. (F) C9. RNA was isolated from single livers of vaccination-protected (V, red) and non-vaccinated (N, blue) mice on days 0, 1, 4, 8, and 11 p.i. during primary infection with P. chabaudi blood-stage malaria. Gene expression levels are plotted on a linear scale as the mean of three microarrays +/− SD. The ‘*’ symbol over the sampling points or interval lines between two sampling points indicates a statistically significant difference, with a p-value < 0.05, at a given sampling point or two corresponding intervals between vaccinated and non-vaccinated mice. Numerical p-values are provided in Table S6. nN = 3 and nV = 3 are the total number of non-vaccinated and vaccinated mice, respectively, at each time point.
Figure 6. Time courses of hepatic expression of genes encoding C3, C5, and final components of the membrane attack complex (MAC). (A) C3. (B) Hc. (C) C8a. (D) C8b. (E) C8g. (F) C9. RNA was isolated from single livers of vaccination-protected (V, red) and non-vaccinated (N, blue) mice on days 0, 1, 4, 8, and 11 p.i. during primary infection with P. chabaudi blood-stage malaria. Gene expression levels are plotted on a linear scale as the mean of three microarrays +/− SD. The ‘*’ symbol over the sampling points or interval lines between two sampling points indicates a statistically significant difference, with a p-value < 0.05, at a given sampling point or two corresponding intervals between vaccinated and non-vaccinated mice. Numerical p-values are provided in Table S6. nN = 3 and nV = 3 are the total number of non-vaccinated and vaccinated mice, respectively, at each time point.
Ijms 26 03173 g006
Figure 7. Expression of genes encoding different complement regulatory proteins in vaccination-protected and unvaccinated mice infected with P. chabaudi malaria. (A) Serping1. (B) Cfh. (C) Cfi. (D) C4bp. (E) Cd55. (F) Cd59a. RNA was isolated from individual livers taken from vaccination-protected (V, red) and non-vaccinated (N, blue) mice on days 0, 1, 4, 8, and 11 p.i. during primary infections with P. chabaudi blood-stage malaria. Gene expression levels are plotted on a linear scale as the mean of three microarrays +/− SD. The ‘*’ symbol over the sampling points or interval lines between two sampling points indicate a statistically significant difference, with a p-value < 0.05, at a given sampling point or two corresponding intervals between vaccinated and non-vaccinated mice. Numerical p-values are provided in Table S7. nN = 3 and nV = 3 are the total number of non-vaccinated and vaccinated mice, respectively, at each time point.
Figure 7. Expression of genes encoding different complement regulatory proteins in vaccination-protected and unvaccinated mice infected with P. chabaudi malaria. (A) Serping1. (B) Cfh. (C) Cfi. (D) C4bp. (E) Cd55. (F) Cd59a. RNA was isolated from individual livers taken from vaccination-protected (V, red) and non-vaccinated (N, blue) mice on days 0, 1, 4, 8, and 11 p.i. during primary infections with P. chabaudi blood-stage malaria. Gene expression levels are plotted on a linear scale as the mean of three microarrays +/− SD. The ‘*’ symbol over the sampling points or interval lines between two sampling points indicate a statistically significant difference, with a p-value < 0.05, at a given sampling point or two corresponding intervals between vaccinated and non-vaccinated mice. Numerical p-values are provided in Table S7. nN = 3 and nV = 3 are the total number of non-vaccinated and vaccinated mice, respectively, at each time point.
Ijms 26 03173 g007
Figure 8. Expression trajectories of Il6, Il11, and corresponding receptors in the liver of vaccination-protected and unvaccinated mice during primary infection with P. chabaudi blood-stage malaria. (A) Il6. (B) Il11. (C) Il6ra. (D) Il11ra1. (E) Il6st. RNA was isolated from individual livers of vaccination-protected (V, red) and non-vaccinated (N, blue) mice on days 0, 1, 4, 8, and 11 p.i. during primary infection with P. chabaudi blood-stage malaria. Gene expression levels are plotted on a linear scale as the mean of three microarrays +/− SD. The ‘*’ symbol over the sampling points or interval lines between two sampling points indicates a statistically significant difference, with a p-value < 0.05, at a given sampling point or two corresponding intervals between vaccinated and non-vaccinated mice. Numerical p-values are provided in Table S8. nN = 3 and nV = 3 are the total number of non-vaccinated and vaccinated mice, respectively, at each time point.
Figure 8. Expression trajectories of Il6, Il11, and corresponding receptors in the liver of vaccination-protected and unvaccinated mice during primary infection with P. chabaudi blood-stage malaria. (A) Il6. (B) Il11. (C) Il6ra. (D) Il11ra1. (E) Il6st. RNA was isolated from individual livers of vaccination-protected (V, red) and non-vaccinated (N, blue) mice on days 0, 1, 4, 8, and 11 p.i. during primary infection with P. chabaudi blood-stage malaria. Gene expression levels are plotted on a linear scale as the mean of three microarrays +/− SD. The ‘*’ symbol over the sampling points or interval lines between two sampling points indicates a statistically significant difference, with a p-value < 0.05, at a given sampling point or two corresponding intervals between vaccinated and non-vaccinated mice. Numerical p-values are provided in Table S8. nN = 3 and nV = 3 are the total number of non-vaccinated and vaccinated mice, respectively, at each time point.
Ijms 26 03173 g008
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Wunderlich, F.; Gerovska, D.; Delic, D.; Araúzo-Bravo, M.J. Protective Vaccination of Mice Against Blood-Stage Malaria Impacts Hepatic Expression of Genes Encoding Acute-Phase Proteins and IL-6 Family Members. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2025, 26, 3173. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms26073173

AMA Style

Wunderlich F, Gerovska D, Delic D, Araúzo-Bravo MJ. Protective Vaccination of Mice Against Blood-Stage Malaria Impacts Hepatic Expression of Genes Encoding Acute-Phase Proteins and IL-6 Family Members. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2025; 26(7):3173. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms26073173

Chicago/Turabian Style

Wunderlich, Frank, Daniela Gerovska, Denis Delic, and Marcos J. Araúzo-Bravo. 2025. "Protective Vaccination of Mice Against Blood-Stage Malaria Impacts Hepatic Expression of Genes Encoding Acute-Phase Proteins and IL-6 Family Members" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 26, no. 7: 3173. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms26073173

APA Style

Wunderlich, F., Gerovska, D., Delic, D., & Araúzo-Bravo, M. J. (2025). Protective Vaccination of Mice Against Blood-Stage Malaria Impacts Hepatic Expression of Genes Encoding Acute-Phase Proteins and IL-6 Family Members. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 26(7), 3173. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms26073173

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop