Next Article in Journal
Interferon Regulatory Factors as a Potential Therapeutic Target for Neuroinflammation: A Focus on Alzheimer’s Disease
Previous Article in Journal
Modulation of Structural and Physical-Chemical Properties of Fish Gelatin Hydrogel by Natural Polysaccharides
Previous Article in Special Issue
Early Cardiac Dysfunction in Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy: A Case Report and Literature Update
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

The Spectrum of Small Heat Shock Protein B8 (HSPB8)-Associated Neuromuscular Disorders

by
Hebatallah R. Rashed
1,2,
Samir R. Nath
1 and
Margherita Milone
1,*
1
Department of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
2
Department of Neurology, Ain Shams University, Cairo 11588, Egypt
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2025, 26(7), 2905; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms26072905
Submission received: 3 March 2025 / Revised: 19 March 2025 / Accepted: 20 March 2025 / Published: 23 March 2025

Abstract

The heat shock protein B8 (HSPB8) is one of the small heat shock proteins (sHSP or HSPB) and is a ubiquitous protein in various organisms, including humans. It is highly expressed in skeletal muscle, heart, and neurons. It plays a crucial role in identifying misfolding proteins and participating in chaperone-assisted selective autophagy (CASA) for the removal of misfolded and damaged, potentially cytotoxic proteins. Mutations in HSPB8 can cause distal hereditary motor neuropathy (dHMN), Charcot–Marie–Tooth (CMT) disease type 2L, or myopathy. The disease can manifest from childhood to mid-adulthood. Most missense mutations in the N-terminal and α-crystallin domains of HSPB8 lead to dHMN or CMT2L. Frameshift mutations in the C-terminal domain (CTD), resulting in elongation of the HSPB8 C-terminal, cause myopathy with myofibrillar pathology and rimmed vacuoles. Myopathy and motor neuropathy can coexist. HSPB8 frameshift mutations in the CTD result in HSPB8 mutant aggregation, which weakens the CASA ability to direct misfolded proteins to autophagic degradation. Cellular and animal models indicate that HSPB8 mutations drive pathogenesis through a toxic gain-of-function mechanism. Currently, no cure is available for HSPB8-associated neuromuscular disorders, but numerous therapeutic strategies are under investigation spanning from small molecules to RNA interference to exogenous HSPB8 delivery.

1. Introduction

The heat shock protein B8 (HSPB8) is one of the ten small heat shock proteins (sHSP or HSPB) present in mammalians, including humans, named HSPB1 through 10. They are a group of highly conserved chaperones with low molecular weight [1,2]. Like other HSPBs, HSPB8 is an ATP-independent holdases that prevents aggregation of misfolded proteins and participates in the refolding process while interacting with ATP-dependent foldases, such as heat shock protein 70 (HSP70 or HSPA). Therefore, HSPB8 plays an essential role in protein quality control. It also participates in chaperone-assisted autophagy, a crucial process for the removal of misfolded and damaged potentially cytotoxic proteins [3]. HSPB8 is a ubiquitous protein, highly expressed in skeletal muscle, heart, neurons, glial cells, and, at a lower level, in other tissues, such as lung and kidney. Therefore, it is not surprising that HSPB8 mutations cause neuromuscular disorders. Following the detection of the first HSPB8 mutations in distal hereditary motor neuropathy (dHMN), discovered simultaneously with HSPB1 mutations as cause on another dHMN [4,5], mutations in HSPB8 have also been linked to Charcot–Marie–Tooth (CMT) disease and muscle disease. Herein, we describe the spectrum of neuromuscular disorders of variable onset and phenotype stemming from mutations in HSPB8.

2. Distal Hereditary Motor Neuropathy (dHMN)

2.1. Clinical Features

dHMN and distal spinal muscular atrophy (distal SMA) are synonyms for a spectrum of clinically and genetically heterogeneous disorders characterized by the degeneration of the motor axons, leading to distal muscle weakness and atrophy in the absence of sensory involvement [6,7,8]. Age of onset is variable and sometimes additional neurological features are present. More than 30 genetically distinct forms of dHMN have been recognized, including HSPB8-dHMN, which is typically due to autosomal dominant mutations, though most patients remain without a genetic diagnosis [8,9,10].
HSPB8 was first identified as causative of autosomal dominant dHMN in 2004, when two different autosomal dominant mutations (c.423G->C, p.Lys141Asn and c.421A->G, p.Lys141Glu) in this gene were detected in a Czech family and a Belgian family after the disease had been mapped to a 5-Mb candidate region at 12q24.3 in the Belgian family [4,7,11,12]. The age of onset was between mid-teens and mid-20s. The weakness was lower limb predominant and initially affected the big toe extensors to later involve tibial and peroneal muscles. Patients developed distal lower limb paralysis within 10 years from onset. Weakness and atrophy progressed to involve thigh muscles and distal upper limb muscles. Some patients experienced muscle cramps and fasciculations in muscles undergoing atrophy. Sensory abnormalities were typically absent, though a subset of older patients showed decreased vibratory sense. Tendon reflexes were reduced or absent in the lower limbs. More recently, four additional HSPB8 mutations were identified in 7 of 510 patients with dHMN [13]. The age of onset spanned from 8 to 60 years. All patients had slowly progressive distal lower limb weakness, and two also had distal upper limb weakness. No patient had proximal weakness. Two patients reported feet paresthesia. Most patients had pes cavus. No patient showed evidence of central nervous system involvement. Table 1 summarizes the clinical findings of HSPB8-associated neuromuscular disorders.
Analysis of the genetic etiology of 112 European index patients with dHMN only detected HSPB8 pathogenic variants in 3 patients [14]. A study on hereditary motor neuropathies in North England estimated that dHMN has a prevalence of 2.14 affected individuals per 100,000 people in that geographic area, but only 1 of the 64 described patients had HSPB8-dHMN, suggesting that this is one of the least frequent dHMNs [15]. In agreement with such finding, an observational study on dHMN, conducted in two tertiary neuromuscular referral centers in Spain, identified no patients with HSPB8-dHMN among 163 affected individuals from 108 different families [8]. A single patient of this cohort carried a variant of unknown significance (c.65G>A, p.Arg22Gln) in HSPB8.

2.2. Serology Studies

The creatinine kinase (CK) level was investigated in one patient who showed mild hyperCKemia (530 U/L; N < 200) [13]. No myopathic electromyographic findings were reported in this patient.

2.3. Electrophysiology Studies

Electrophysiological studies typically show predominantly distal and symmetric chronic neurogenic findings with minimal or no fibrillation potentials, suggestive of a motor axonal neuropathy [12,13,16]. A mild axonal sensory involvement can occur in some patients [13], demonstrating an overlap between dHMN and CMT2L.

2.4. Radiology Studies

Brain and spinal cord MRI examination performed in very few patients with HSPB8-dHMN was normal [13].

2.5. Pathology Findings

A nerve biopsy of the superficial peroneal sensory nerve in one patient with dHMN showed no remarkable abnormalities under light and electron microscopy; exceedingly rare onion bulbs were detected after extensive search [11,16]. This patient’s peroneus brevis biopsy demonstrated fatty replacement of muscle and a few atrophic fibers.

3. Charcot–Marie–Tooth Disease Type 2L (CMT2L)

3.1. Clinical Features

CMT or hereditary motor and sensory neuropathy (HSMN) is the most common inherited peripheral nerve disorder [17]. CMT is traditionally classified based on nerve conduction velocity in demyelinating (CMT1), axonal (CMT2), and dominant intermediate. CMT2 is further categorized into various subtypes with respect to the genotype [17].
In 2004, one of two HSPB8 mutations (c.423G->T. p.Lys141Asn) previously discovered in HSPB8-dHMN was identified as causative of CMT2L in a large Chinese family previously mapped to a 6.8-cM candidate region at 12q24 [18,19]. The age of onset of the neuropathy varied from mid-teens to early 30s and presented with a slowly progressive lower limb predominant distal muscle weakness and atrophy. Two patients also had proximal weakness. Patients had associated sensory loss and hypo- or areflexia. Most patients demonstrated pes cavus, and a few had scoliosis (Table 1). In 2013, a novel HSPB8 mutations was discovered in a 27-year-old Korean patient with CMT2 who presented with a similar phenotype [20]. These patients did not have painless ulcerations or injuries.
HSPB8-CMT2L remains very rare. No patients with HSPB8 mutations were identified in a cohort of 61 patients from 18 families with CMT2 [21]. In general, HSPB8 mutations account for 1% of patients with CMT2/dHMN [13].

3.2. Electrophysiology Studies

Electrophysiological studies show normal nerve conduction velocities but reduced or absent compound muscle action potentials (CMAPs) and sensory nerve action potentials (SNAPs). Electromyography reveals neurogenic motor unit potentials, fibrillation potentials, and positive sharp waves. The electrophysiological findings are consistent with a chronic axonal sensorimotor polyneuropathy [18,19,20].

3.3. Radiology Studies

Muscle MRI in one patient revealed signal abnormality in the lower limb muscles. T1-weighted images demonstrated severe muscle atrophy and fatty replacement in the leg muscles, compared to the thigh muscles. There was, however, also fatty involvement of the anterior and posterior thigh muscles, especially of the vastus muscle group. Gracilis, rectus femoris, and medial compartment muscles were relatively spared [20].

3.4. Nerve Pathology Findings

Nerve biopsies show features of axonal degeneration, loss of large, myelinated fibers, and occasional clusters of thinly myelinated axons [18,19,20]. Electron microscopy studies reveal vacuolization, focal granular material aggregation, and organelles loss within the axons of myelinated fibers. Schwann cells with features of degeneration and vacuolated unmyelinated axons can also be observed.

4. HSPB8-Myopathy

4.1. Clinical Features

More recently, mutations in HSPB8 were recognized as the cause of an autosomal dominant myopathy with myofibrillar pathology and rimmed vacuoles. HSPB8 myopathy was first described in 2016 in two families presenting with a distal neuromyopathy phenotype [22]. Since then, only a few additional patients with HSPB8-myopathy have been reported [23,24,25,26,27,28,29]. Since the initial submission of this review, HSPB8-myopathy has been referenced in the Online Mendelian Inheritance in Man (OMIM) as myofibrillar myopathy type 13 (MFM13) with rimmed vacuoles.
The myopathy usually manifests from adolescence to mid-adulthood, but childhood onset can occur with the youngest reported patient developing weakness at age 6 (Table 1) [29]. Lower limbs are often more affected than upper limbs muscles. At onset, there is typically distal lower limb weakness with involvement of the ankle dorsiflexors, later extending to proximal lower and upper limb muscles as well as axial muscle. Weakness can also manifest in proximal lower limb muscles (Figure 1). The gastrocnemius is relatively spared. Axial weakness resulting in camptocormia can also be the initial manifestation of the myopathy, followed by limb girdle weakness. The weakness, which is accompanied by development of muscle atrophy, can be asymmetric. The abdominal muscles weakness can lead to detection of Beevor sign. Facial weakness has not been observed. Tendon reflexes may be normal, diminished, or absent. Patients may show skeletal abnormalities, such as lumbar lordosis, scoliosis, or pes cavus with hammertoes.
Muscle cramps and fasciculations can occur early in the disease course, especially in patients with associated neurogenic changes. Coexisting motor neuropathy has been observed in several patients [22,23,25].
Patients may develop respiratory dysfunction ranging from asymptomatic to severe respiratory failure. Some patients may require non-invasive ventilatory support or even mechanical ventilation [25,27,28]. In affected individuals of a family, respiratory failure requiring mechanical ventilation, manifested after a disease duration spanning from approximatively a decade to 40 years [27].
Cardiac symptoms are uncommon, and cardiomyopathy has been reported in a single family [28]. A patient had asymptomatic right bundle branch block on electrocardiogram [25].
HSPB8 myopathy is very rare. Its prevalence is unknown as very few families and sporadic cases have been reported so far.

4.2. Serology Studies

CK levels are normal or elevated up to approximately 2000 IU/L [22,23,25,26,28].

4.3. Electrophysiology Studies

Needle electromyography shows myopathic changes with rapid recruitment of short-duration motor unit potentials with or without fibrillation potentials [23,25,26,28]. Intermixed long-duration motor unit potentials are often detected in proximal and more frequently in distal muscles [22,24,26]. Nerve conduction studies are either normal or show an associated motor neuropathy with axonal features [22,23,24,25,26,28].

4.4. Radiology Studies

Muscle MRI demonstrates muscle signal changes early in the disease stage later progressing to fatty replacement [22,24,25,26]. Fatty changes of paraspinal muscles [23,25,26], and symmetric or asymmetric multifocal fatty degenerative changes of the lower limb muscles have been described [22,23,24,25,28]. In the thighs, the most affected muscles include the vastus muscles, especially vastus medialis and intermedius, adductor magnus, hamstrings, sartorius, and gracilis [22,23,24,25,28]. Some patients have shown a selective pattern of fatty degeneration of the adductor magnus and adductor longus and less involvement of adductor brevis, sartorius, gracilis, and hamstrings [24]. In the leg, tibialis anterior, extensor digitorum longus, gastrocnemius, and peroneus muscles are affected [22,23,24]. Some patients show predominant fatty replacement of the anterior and lateral compartment muscles and relatively spared soleus and gastrocnemius [22,25,28]. However, fatty degeneration and volume loss of tibialis posterior, both heads of gastrocnemius, and peroneus longus with sparing of other muscles can also occur [24].

4.5. Muscle Pathology Findings

Muscle pathology often shows dystrophic changes with features of myofibrillar pathology and rimmed vacuoles of various degree (Figure 2), depending on the underlying genetic defect [22,23,24,25,26,28,29]. Structural abnormalities can be patchy and the distribution of rimmed vacuoles or myofibrillar pathology may vary even within the same muscle biopsy. Myopathological findings include muscle fiber size variation, fiber atrophy, nuclei internalization, fiber splitting, cytoplasmic bodies, cytoplasmic inclusions, rimmed and non-rimmed vacuoles, sarcoplasmic masses, and increased endomysial fibrous connective tissue. Regenerating and necrotic fibers are either absent or rare. Core-like structures and moth-eaten fibers can be observed on oxidative stains.
By immunohistochemical or immunofluorescent studies, muscle biopsies may show sarcoplasmic protein aggregates immunoreactive for sarcomeric proteins, such as myotilin, desmin, αB-crystallin, but also dystrophin and even punctate T-cell intracellular antigen 1 (TIA1) positivity (Figure 2). Ectopic TAR DNA-binding protein 43 (TDP-43) positivity, SMI-31, sequestosome 1 (SQSTM1)/p62, and microtubule-associated protein 1 light chain 3B (LC3B) positive inclusions can be detected. In some patients, muscle biopsy displayed co-localization of HSPB8, DNAJB6, myotilin, BAG3, and TDP-43 within the myofibrillar aggregates, while rimmed vacuoles were p62-positive, and atrophic fibers were HSPB8 overexpressing [22].
Electron microscopy studies show focal disruption and loss of the myofibrils, accumulation of granulofilamentous or amorphous material, and Z lines streaming [22,23,24,29].
Fibroblasts from a patient with HSPB8-myopathy showed reduced expression of HSPB8 and increased expression of both the autophagosomal marker LC3B and autophagy receptor p62, compared to control fibroblasts [25].

5. Gene and Protein Structure and Function

HSPB8 (also known as HSP22) is located on chromosome 12q24.23 and consists of three exons. The encoded HSPB8 is composed of 196 amino acids. HSPB8 is one of the ten human small heat shock proteins, which are ATP-independent molecular chaperones. They are structurally characterized by the α-crystallin domain (ACD), a highly conserved sequence of about 85 amino acids, which is flanked by the more variable hydrophobic N-terminal domain (NTD) and short C-terminal domains (CTD) (Figure 3) [1]. The ACD, which in HSPB8 consists of beta strands, is responsible for the protein’s core chaperone activity [30,31,32]. The NTD contains the conserved RLFDQxFG motif, which is crucial for the interaction with other heat shock proteins [33]. The CTD interacts with the exposed hydrophobic regions of substrates and inhibits their aggregation. Contrary to several other HSPBs that form oligomers through the I/V-X-I/V motif, HSPB8 lacks this motif and preferentially forms homodimers [34]. A hydrophobic pocket within the ACD of HSPB8 allows its binding to the two isoleucine-proline-valine (IPV) domains of the co-chaperone BAG3. Two HSP8 molecules bind one BAG molecule and form a chaperone complex [34,35,36].
As previously described, HSPB8 is an ATP-independent holdases that prevents aggregation of misfolded proteins. It also participates in the refolding process while interacting with ATP-dependent foldases, such as heat shock protein 70 (HSP70 or HSPA) [1,2,37]. HSPB8, like other HSPBs, has a crucial role in cellular protein quality control. Additional HSPB functions include response to cellular stress and processes favoring apoptosis, facilitation of substrates degradation, and maintenance of cytoskeleton structural integrity. HSPB8, together with BAG3, is a key component of the chaperone-assisted selective autophagy (CASA), a selective autophagic pathway for the disposal of misfolded and damaged proteins (Figure 4) [38,39]. CASA requires the formation of a heteromeric complex consisting of HSPB8, BAG3, the ATP-dependent chaperone HSPA (HSP70), and the E3 ubiquitin ligase STUB1, although other ubiquitin ligases may replace STUB1. BAG3 operates as scaffold for the interaction of the other CASA components; HSPB8 and HSPA recognize the misfolded and damaged proteins, which undergo HSPA-dependent refolding or STUB1-dependent ubiquitination. Ubiquitinated targets are then routed to the autophagosome lysosomal pathway for degradation through the involvement of the selective autophagy receptor SQSTM1/p62 [40]. Failure of this quality control machinery results in the accumulation of damaged and misfolded proteins in cytoplasmic aggregates. The CASA complex has been shown to have a crucial role in the degradation of damaged Z disc constituents in skeletal muscle and removal of mutated or cytotoxic protein aggregates in neurodegenerative diseases [41,42,43]. Regarding neuromuscular diseases, not only mutations in HSPB8, but also mutations in BAG3 can cause myopathy with myofibrillar pathology (like that observed in HSPB8 myopathy) or axonal neuropathy, further supporting the crucial role of the CASA complex in maintaining the functional integrity of the neuromuscular system, including sarcomer [44]. So far, no STUB1 or HSPA mutants have been associated with neuromuscular diseases, but mutations in STUB1 have been recognized as cause of spinocerebellar ataxia [45].
HSPB8 is also involved in the cytosolic unfolded protein response (cUPR), a cellular response to proteotoxic stress and cytosolic protein aggregates driven by the heme-regulated kinase inhibitor [46].
HSPB8 has a role in stress granules dynamics and maintenance [38]. Stress granules are membrane-free ribonucleoprotein aggregates that form in response to proteotoxic stress when translation is inhibited. HSPB8 prevents irreversible aggregation of misfolded proteins in the stress granules and recruits BAG3 and HSPA to degrade the misfolded protein. HSPB8, in concert with BAG3 and HSPA, plays a role in stress granule surveillance. Considering this HSPB8 role, it is not surprising to also see small TIA1 positive inclusions in HSPB8 myopathy [26].
Of interest, mutations in other HSPBs, in addition of HSPB8, cause neuromuscular diseases. For example, HSPB1 mutations are a common cause of dHMN and CMT2 and can cause neuromyopathy and distal myopathy featured by rimmed vacuoles [5,47,48,49,50]. HSPB3 mutations have been linked to dHMN and CMT2 [51,52]. HSPB5 (alpha-B crystallin, CRYAB) mutations can cause myopathy with myofibrillar pathology or CMT2 [53,54].

6. Genetic Aspects and Pathomechanisms

The inheritance pattern of HSPB8 mutations leading to neuromuscular disorders is autosomal dominant [4,11,12,13,16,22,23,25,27,28]. De novo mutations can occur [13,20,26].
The HSPB8 mutations reported so far and the associated phenotypes are summarized in Figure 3. Most mutations occur in the ACD and CTD of the protein. A single mutation (p.Pro90Leu) causing dHMN has been described in the NTD [4,11,13]. Lysine141 in ACD is a hot spot and mutations affecting this residue can lead to dHMN, CMT2L, or neuromyopathy [4,13,19,20]. p.Lys141Asn causes either dHMN or CMT2L [4,11,13], underscoring the value of the rigorous clinical and electrophysiological characterization of patient’s phenotype for the interpretation of the genetic findings. Only two mutations have been associated with CMT2L and affect the Lys141 residue (p.Lys141Asn and p.Lys141Thr) [18,19,20]. Mutations causing myopathy mainly reside in the CTD and result in extension of the C-terminal of the protein [23,25,26,29]. Two of these mutations were associated with proximal weakness at disease onset, with one patient manifesting at age 19 (p.Thr194Serfs∗23) [26], and the other at age 6 (p.G192Afs*55) [29]. A third mutation (p.Gln170Glyfs*45) was linked with axial weakness at onset [23]. The remaining variants occurred in patients with distal onset of the weakness. The only mutation associated with myopathy, in the setting of neuromyopathy, and not located in CTD, is p.Lys141Glu within the ACD [4,22,24].
HSPB8 missense mutations involving Lys.141 were shown to reduce HSPB8 chaperone activity [3]. Comparison of the structural properties of the mutant HSPB8 (p.Lys141Glu), which cause dHMN or neuromyopathy, with the wild-type HSPB8 suggested that the mutation may result in destabilization of the HSPB8 structure and reduction of its chaperone function [3,55,56].
Regarding the HSPB8 frameshift mutations, initial studies had suggested the possibility that the myopathy may be caused by HSPB8 haploinsufficiency by induction of nonsense-mediated mRNA decay or protein degradation [23]. More recently, elegant studies have demonstrated that HSPB8 frameshift mutants lead to a toxic gain-of-function [23,57]. They are insoluble and form cytoplasmic aggregates while continuing to retain their property to interact with the CASA components. This results in sequestration of the CASA components, as well as the autophagy receptors SQSTM1/p62, into the HSPB8 mutant aggregates, reduced CASA efficiency and proteostasis response failure. Additionally, HSPB8 frameshift mutants impair myoblast differentiation and fusion into myotubes, and compromise sarcomeric protein homeostasis.

7. Animal and In Vitro Models

The role of HSPB8 in promoting chaperone activity and chaperone mediated selective autophagy is well established across several experimental models. Functional analyses of HSPB8 mutations in vitro have showed a loss of chaperone activity and pro-degradative function of HSPB8 [3,55,58]. Carra et al. investigated the capacity of HSPB8 to prevent protein aggregation in the cells using the polyglutamine protein Htt43Q as a model. In most cellular models, HSPB8 blocked inclusion formation and maintained Htt43Q in a soluble state competent for rapid degradation [3]. More recently, Crippa et al. reported that HSPB8 suppresses the accumulation of aberrantly localized misfolded forms of TDP-43 and its 25 kDa C-terminal fragment (TDP-25), enhancing their clearance via autophagy [58].
Mutations of the HSPB8K141 residue cause multiple defects in HSPB8 function, including abnormal interactions of HSPB8 with other HSPB, including HSPB1, and impairment of chaperone activity and autophagosomes-lysosome delivery, leading to accumulation of misfolded proteins [59,60]. In primary rat motor neuron culture, expression of HSPB8 K141E as well as K141N resulted in both neurite degeneration and formation of spheroids within neurites [61]. Kim et al. demonstrated that HSPB8K141E induces destabilization of the HSPB8 structure, which may diminish its chaperone-like activity with certain substrates [55]. More recently, Sisto et al. showed that mouse embryonic fibroblasts isolated from a HSPB8K141N green fluorescent protein (GFP)-LC3 model have diminished autophagosome production when the mechanistic target of rapamycin kinase (MTOR) pathway is inhibited [56]. Notably, HSPB8 knock-out mice show locomotor performance comparable to wild-type mice, along with normal sciatic nerve morphology and preserved myofiber and Z-line organization, suggesting that a toxic gain-of-function of mutant HSPB8, rather than loss-of-function, drives the neuromuscular phenotype [60]. However, muscle pathology showed accumulation of abnormal mitochondria, which is in line with the functional alterations in cardiac mitochondria previously reported by Qiu et al. [62].
Various mouse models have been generated to study the effects of HSPB8 mutations in vivo [60,62,63,64]. Of note, the HSPB8K141N knock-in (KI) mouse model recapitulates the human disease phenotype, with homozygous KI mice developing a motor neuronopathy with progressive axonal degeneration [60]. The sciatic nerve of these mice was characterized by low autophagy potential in pre-symptomatic mice and HSPB8 aggregates in symptomatic mice. Functionally, these mice display declining strength and locomotor performance from about 9 months of age onward [60]. Similar electrophysiological, neuropathological, and locomotor deficits were seen in a transgenic mouse model ubiquitously overexpressing human HSPB8K141N [64]. Alongside neuropathy, homozygous HSPB8K141N KI mice developed a myopathy phenotype independent of the motor neuron pathology [60]. In line with human patients with HSPB8-myopathy, this myopathy resembles human myofibrillar myopathy with Z-disc disorganization, rimmed vacuoles, protein aggregates containing HSPB8, αB-crystallin, and desmin, as well as accumulation of LC3 and SQSTM1/p62 suggestive of possible impairment in the autophagic flux [60]. Although heterozygous HSPB8K141N KI mice appear physiologically normal in functional tests, ultrastructural analysis of nerve and muscle revealed similar pathological changes as those seen in homozygotes.
The Drosophila Hsp67Bc gene encodes a protein belonging to the HSPB family localized at the Z- and A-bands and neuromuscular junctions. It is the nearest functional ortholog of the human HSPB8 [65,66]. Using this Drosophila model, the effects of muscle-specific overexpression of Drosophila Hsp67Bc hot-spot variants Hsp67Bc R126E and Hsp67Bc R126N (corresponding to HSPB8 p.K141E and p.K141N, respectively) yielded distinct phenotypic outcomes [66]. The p.R126E mutant flies exhibited impaired motility, which may result from myofibrillar disorganization, altered neuromuscular junctions (decreased number of synaptic boutons), mitochondrial disruption and depolarization. In contrast, the p.R126N mutation led to excessive aggregation of the mutant protein but less severe sarcomeric alterations without mitochondrial abnormalities. In functional assays, these flies showed functional performance like wild-type flies [66].
Taken together, studies of animal and cellular models indicate that HSPB8 mutations drive pathogenesis through a toxic gain-of-function mechanism involving disrupted chaperone function and impaired autophagic clearance of misfolded proteins.

8. Therapeutic Strategies

Given its key role in preventing aggregation and favoring misfolded protein degradation, modulation, or induction, HSPB8 may represent a promising therapeutic approach in proteinopathies and protein-folding disease.
Enhancing autophagy to increase misfolded protein degradation is an area of active research in chaperonopathies, proteinopathies, and other neurodegenerative diseases [67,68]. Studies have been conducted to identify small molecules able to induce, stabilize, or inhibit HSPB8 to potentiate the clearance of mutated proteins in neurodegenerative disorders, such as amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, Parkinson’s disease, and Alzheimer’s disease. When neuronal cells expressing the HSPB8 promotor upstream of a luciferase enzyme were used for high-throughput screening, doxorubicin and colchicine were identified as dose-dependent inducers of HSPB8 [36,58]. Trehalose, an inducer of autophagy, has also been shown to increase HSPB8 expression. This induction of autophagy is mediated through transcription factor EB (TFEB), though induction of HSPB8 by trehalose was TFEB independent in cellular models [69,70,71] Recently, piplartine was shown to enhance autophagy in cellular HSPB1 and HSPB8 mutant models [56]. Geranylgeranylacetone, also known as teprenone, broadly induces heat shock protein expression and increases HSPB8 expression exhibiting a protective effect on the vascular endothelium of mice.
Recently, RNA interference targeting HSPB8 has been investigated to ameliorate the neuronal and muscle phenotype in a mouse model of HSPB8-dHMN but failed to show improvement of function and neuropathological findings [72]. The study led to the conclusion that the RNA interference induced HSPB8 reduction may not be an ideal therapeutic option, unless one would introduce a higher viral load and early treatment.
Another promising therapeutic strategy is the delivery of exogenous HSPB8 into target cells and tissues using viral vectors and HSPB8-loaded extracellular vesicles. Oligodendrocyte derived vesicles loaded with HSPB8 were recently shown to reduce ubiquitinated proteins and ROS in microglia and primary mixed neural cultures [73].
The growing evidence supporting both pharmacological induction and exogenous delivery of HSPB8 underscores its potential as a therapeutic target in diverse proteinopathies and neurodegenerative disorders and remains an important future direction for the field.

9. Potential Limitations of Current Studies

Due to the rarity of HSPB8-associated neuromuscular disorders, it is possible that the full spectrum of clinical and pathological manifestations has not yet fully emerged. Additionally, being HSPB8 ubiquitously expressed, one cannot exclude that mutations in the encoding gene could affect other organs and tissues, resulting in additional diseases or contributing to the clinical phenotype associated with primary mutations in other genes. Currently available animal models and in vitro models do not express the patient’s whole genetic make-up. Gene-by-gene interactions, genetic modifiers, and gene–environment interaction can impact disease manifestation and its variability even within the same family regarding phenotype, age of disease onset, or severity. Although tremendous progress has been made to understand HSPB8 disease mechanisms and creating disease models, current studies may have revealed only part of the underlying processes leading to disease. Further investigations are needed to unravel what causes muscle and nerve degeneration and muscle weakness. These are crucial steps for the development of specific therapies that could halt disease progression, reverse motor deficits, and prevent disease development. Similarly, results from studies investigating various therapeutic options must take into account the limitations of the current disease models, in addition to potential side effects and drug toxicity in humans. Additionally, one should also consider that the rarity of HSPB8-associated neuromuscular disorders and their clinical heterogeneity will limit the ability to assess clinical response to future treatment.

10. Conclusions

The spectrum of neurological disorders associated with HSPB8 is in continuous expansion and can involve motor axons, peripheral nerves, and muscles, in isolation or in combination. The clinical phenotype of the myopathy is variable with distal, proximal, or axial weakness. Patients may develop respiratory muscle weakness and, therefore, require periodic monitoring of their respiratory status. Although cardiomyopathy has been reported only in a family, considering that HSPB8 is expressed in cardiac muscle and that cardiomyopathy occurs in a mouse model of HSPB8 disease, screening for underlying cardiac involvement should be part of patient care. Apart from rare exceptions, missense mutations tend to be associated with dHMN or CMT2L while frameshift mutations in the C-terminal domain of HSPB8, leading to C-terminal elongation, result in myopathy with myofibrillar pathology and rimmed vacuoles. In such cases, the mutant HSPB8 aggregates, impairs CASA and downstream events leading to compromised proteostasis, and alters the sarcomere organization. Currently no treatment is available for HSPB8-related neuromuscular disorders to ameliorate patients’ motor deficit or halt disease progression, though multiple therapeutic strategies are under investigation.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.M. Original draft preparation, H.R.R., S.R.N., and M.M. Review and editing, H.R.R., S.R.N., and M.M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by a grant from Regenerative Medicine Minnesota (RMM 091620 DS 003) to M.M.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

List of Abbreviations

ACDα-crystallin domain
CASAChaperone-assisted selective autophagy
CMTCharcot–Marie–Tooth
CRYABAlpha-B crystallin
CTDC-terminal domain
CKCreatinine kinase
dHMNDistal hereditary motor neuropathy
GFPGreen fluorescent protein
HSPHeat shock protein
HSPBSmall heat shock protein
KIKnock-in
KOKnock-out
LC3BMicrotubule-associated protein 1 light chain 3B
MFMMyofibrillar myopathy
MTORMechanistic target of rapamycin kinase
NADHNicotinamide adenine dinucleotide tetrazolium reductase
SQSTM1Sequestosome 1
TDP-43TAR DNA-binding protein 43
TFEBTranscription factor EB
TIA1T-cell intracellular antigen 1

References

  1. Benndorf, R.; Velazquez, R.; Zehr, J.D.; Pond, S.L.K.; Martin, J.L.; Lucaci, A.G. Human HspB1, HspB3, HspB5 and HspB8: Shaping these disease factors during vertebrate evolution. Cell Stress Chaperones 2022, 27, 309–323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Makhoba, X.H. Two sides of the same coin: Heat shock proteins as biomarkers and therapeutic targets for some complex diseases. Front. Mol. Biosci. 2025, 12, 1491227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Carra, S.; Sivilotti, M.; Chavez Zobel, A.T.; Lambert, H.; Landry, J. HspB8, a small heat shock protein mutated in human neuromuscular disorders, has in vivo chaperone activity in cultured cells. Hum. Mol. Genet. 2005, 14, 1659–1669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Irobi, J.; Van Impe, K.; Seeman, P.; Jordanova, A.; Dierick, I.; Verpoorten, N.; Michalik, A.; De Vriendt, E.; Jacobs, A.; Van Gerwen, V.; et al. Hot-spot residue in small heat-shock protein 22 causes distal motor neuropathy. Nat. Genet. 2004, 36, 597–601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Evgrafov, O.V.; Mersiyanova, I.; Irobi, J.; Van Den Bosch, L.; Dierick, I.; Leung, C.L.; Schagina, O.; Verpoorten, N.; Van Impe, K.; Fedotov, V.; et al. Mutant small heat-shock protein 27 causes axonal Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease and distal hereditary motor neuropathy. Nat. Genet. 2004, 36, 602–606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Harding, A.E.; Thomas, P.K. Hereditary distal spinal muscular atrophy. A report on 34 cases and a review of the literature. J. Neurol. Sci. 1980, 45, 337–348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Irobi, J.; Tissir, F.; De Jonghe, P.; De Vriendt, E.; Van Broeckhoven, C.; Timmerman, V.; Beuten, J. A clone contig of 12q24.3 encompassing the distal hereditary motor neuropathy type II gene. Genomics 2000, 65, 34–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Frasquet, M.; Rojas-Garcia, R.; Argente-Escrig, H.; Vazquez-Costa, J.F.; Muelas, N.; Vilchez, J.J.; Sivera, R.; Millet, E.; Barreiro, M.; Diaz-Manera, J.; et al. Distal hereditary motor neuropathies: Mutation spectrum and genotype-phenotype correlation. Eur. J. Neurol. 2021, 28, 1334–1343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Irobi, J.; Dierick, I.; Jordanova, A.; Claeys, K.G.; De Jonghe, P.; Timmerman, V. Unraveling the genetics of distal hereditary motor neuronopathies. Neuromol. Med. 2006, 8, 131–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Tazir, M.; Nouioua, S. Distal hereditary motor neuropathies. Rev. Neurol. 2024, 180, 1031–1036. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Timmerman, V.; Raeymaekers, P.; Nelis, E.; De Jonghe, P.; Muylle, L.; Ceuterick, C.; Martin, J.J.; Van Broeckhoven, C. Linkage analysis of distal hereditary motor neuropathy type II (distal HMN II) in a single pedigree. J. Neurol. Sci. 1992, 109, 41–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Timmerman, V.; De Jonghe, P.; Simokovic, S.; Lofgren, A.; Beuten, J.; Nelis, E.; Ceuterick, C.; Martin, J.J.; Van Broeckhoven, C. Distal hereditary motor neuropathy type II (distal HMN II): Mapping of a locus to chromosome 12q24. Hum. Mol. Genet. 1996, 5, 1065–1069. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Echaniz-Laguna, A.; Geuens, T.; Petiot, P.; Pereon, Y.; Adriaenssens, E.; Haidar, M.; Capponi, S.; Maisonobe, T.; Fournier, E.; Dubourg, O.; et al. Axonal Neuropathies due to Mutations in Small Heat Shock Proteins: Clinical, Genetic, and Functional Insights into Novel Mutations. Hum. Mutat. 2017, 38, 556–568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Dierick, I.; Baets, J.; Irobi, J.; Jacobs, A.; De Vriendt, E.; Deconinck, T.; Merlini, L.; Van den Bergh, P.; Rasic, V.M.; Robberecht, W.; et al. Relative contribution of mutations in genes for autosomal dominant distal hereditary motor neuropathies: A genotype-phenotype correlation study. Brain 2008, 131, 1217–1227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Bansagi, B.; Griffin, H.; Whittaker, R.G.; Antoniadi, T.; Evangelista, T.; Miller, J.; Greenslade, M.; Forester, N.; Duff, J.; Bradshaw, A.; et al. Genetic heterogeneity of motor neuropathies. Neurology 2017, 88, 1226–1234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Timmerman, V.; Beuten, J.; Irobi, J.; De Jonghe, P.; Martin, J.J.; Van Broeckhoven, C. Distal hereditary motor neuropathy type II (distal HMN type II): Phenotype and molecular genetics. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 1999, 883, 60–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Bird, T.D. Charcot-Marie-Tooth Hereditary Neuropathy Overview. In GeneReviews((R)); Adam, M.P., Feldman, J., Mirzaa, G.M., Pagon, R.A., Wallace, S.E., Amemiya, A., Eds.; University of Washington: Seattle, WA, USA, 1993–2025; (last revision 01-23-2025). [Google Scholar]
  18. Tang, B.S.; Luo, W.; Xia, K.; Xiao, J.F.; Jiang, H.; Shen, L.; Tang, J.G.; Zhao, G.H.; Cai, F.; Pan, Q.; et al. A new locus for autosomal dominant Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease type 2 (CMT2L) maps to chromosome 12q24. Hum. Genet. 2004, 114, 527–533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Tang, B.S.; Zhao, G.H.; Luo, W.; Xia, K.; Cai, F.; Pan, Q.; Zhang, R.X.; Zhang, F.F.; Liu, X.M.; Chen, B.; et al. Small heat-shock protein 22 mutated in autosomal dominant Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease type 2L. Hum. Genet. 2005, 116, 222–224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Nakhro, K.; Park, J.M.; Kim, Y.J.; Yoon, B.R.; Yoo, J.H.; Koo, H.; Choi, B.O.; Chung, K.W. A novel Lys141Thr mutation in small heat shock protein 22 (HSPB8) gene in Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease type 2L. Neuromuscul. Disord. 2013, 23, 656–663. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Bienfait, H.M.; Baas, F.; Koelman, J.H.; de Haan, R.J.; van Engelen, B.G.; Gabreels-Festen, A.A.; Ongerboer de Visser, B.W.; Meggouh, F.; Weterman, M.A.; De Jonghe, P.; et al. Phenotype of Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease Type 2. Neurology 2007, 68, 1658–1667. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Ghaoui, R.; Palmio, J.; Brewer, J.; Lek, M.; Needham, M.; Evila, A.; Hackman, P.; Jonson, P.H.; Penttila, S.; Vihola, A.; et al. Mutations in HSPB8 causing a new phenotype of distal myopathy and motor neuropathy. Neurology 2016, 86, 391–398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Echaniz-Laguna, A.; Lornage, X.; Lannes, B.; Schneider, R.; Bierry, G.; Dondaine, N.; Boland, A.; Deleuze, J.F.; Bohm, J.; Thompson, J.; et al. HSPB8 haploinsufficiency causes dominant adult-onset axial and distal myopathy. Acta Neuropathol. 2017, 134, 163–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Cortese, A.; Laura, M.; Casali, C.; Nishino, I.; Hayashi, Y.K.; Magri, S.; Taroni, F.; Stuani, C.; Saveri, P.; Moggio, M.; et al. Altered TDP-43-dependent splicing in HSPB8-related distal hereditary motor neuropathy and myofibrillar myopathy. Eur. J. Neurol. 2018, 25, 154–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Al-Tahan, S.; Weiss, L.; Yu, H.; Tang, S.; Saporta, M.; Vihola, A.; Mozaffar, T.; Udd, B.; Kimonis, V. New family with HSPB8-associated autosomal dominant rimmed vacuolar myopathy. Neurol. Genet. 2019, 5, e349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Nicolau, S.; Liewluck, T.; Elliott, J.L.; Engel, A.G.; Milone, M. A novel heterozygous mutation in the C-terminal region of HSPB8 leads to limb-girdle rimmed vacuolar myopathy. Neuromuscul. Disord. 2020, 30, 236–240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Inoue-Shibui, A.; Niihori, T.; Kobayashi, M.; Suzuki, N.; Izumi, R.; Warita, H.; Hara, K.; Shirota, M.; Funayama, R.; Nakayama, K.; et al. A novel deletion in the C-terminal region of HSPB8 in a family with rimmed vacuolar myopathy. J. Hum. Genet. 2021, 66, 965–972. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Tan, J.; Duong, H.; Milone, M.; Gibbs, L.; Tedesco, B.; Poletti, A.; Kimonis, V. A novel c.515delC HSPB8-multisystem proteinopathy associated with inclusion body myopathy with cardiomyopathy. medRxiv 2024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Yang, G.; Lv, X.; Yang, M.; Feng, Y.; Wang, G.; Yan, C.; Lin, P. Expanding the spectrum of HSPB8-related myopathy: A novel mutation causing atypical pediatric-onset axial and limb-girdle involvement with autophagy abnormalities and molecular dynamics studies. J. Hum. Genet. 2024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Kim, K.K.; Kim, R.; Kim, S.H. Crystal structure of a small heat-shock protein. Nature 1998, 394, 595–599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Van Montfort, R.; Slingsby, C.; Vierling, E. Structure and function of the small heat shock protein/alpha-crystallin family of molecular chaperones. Adv. Protein Chem. 2001, 59, 105–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Shemetov, A.A.; Seit-Nebi, A.S.; Gusev, N.B. Structure, properties, and functions of the human small heat-shock protein HSP22 (HspB8, H11, E2IG1): A critical review. J. Neurosci. Res. 2008, 86, 264–269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Sudnitsyna, M.V.; Mymrikov, E.V.; Seit-Nebi, A.S.; Gusev, N.B. The role of intrinsically disordered regions in the structure and functioning of small heat shock proteins. Curr. Protein Pept. Sci. 2012, 13, 76–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Cristofani, R.; Piccolella, M.; Crippa, V.; Tedesco, B.; Montagnani Marelli, M.; Poletti, A.; Moretti, R.M. The Role of HSPB8, a Component of the Chaperone-Assisted Selective Autophagy Machinery, in Cancer. Cells 2021, 10, 335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Carra, S.; Seguin, S.J.; Landry, J. HspB8 and Bag3: A new chaperone complex targeting misfolded proteins to macroautophagy. Autophagy 2008, 4, 237–239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Mandrioli, J.; Crippa, V.; Cereda, C.; Bonetto, V.; Zucchi, E.; Gessani, A.; Ceroni, M.; Chio, A.; D’Amico, R.; Monsurro, M.R.; et al. Proteostasis and ALS: Protocol for a phase II, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicentre clinical trial for colchicine in ALS (Co-ALS). BMJ Open 2019, 9, e028486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Tedesco, B.; Cristofani, R.; Ferrari, V.; Cozzi, M.; Rusmini, P.; Casarotto, E.; Chierichetti, M.; Mina, F.; Galbiati, M.; Piccolella, M.; et al. Insights on Human Small Heat Shock Proteins and Their Alterations in Diseases. Front. Mol. Biosci. 2022, 9, 842149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Ganassi, M.; Mateju, D.; Bigi, I.; Mediani, L.; Poser, I.; Lee, H.O.; Seguin, S.J.; Morelli, F.F.; Vinet, J.; Leo, G.; et al. A Surveillance Function of the HSPB8-BAG3-HSP70 Chaperone Complex Ensures Stress Granule Integrity and Dynamism. Mol. Cell 2016, 63, 796–810. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Tedesco, B.; Vendredy, L.; Timmerman, V.; Poletti, A. The chaperone-assisted selective autophagy complex dynamics and dysfunctions. Autophagy 2023, 19, 1619–1641. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Gamerdinger, M.; Hajieva, P.; Kaya, A.M.; Wolfrum, U.; Hartl, F.U.; Behl, C. Protein quality control during aging involves recruitment of the macroautophagy pathway by BAG3. EMBO J. 2009, 28, 889–901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Ulbricht, A.; Eppler, F.J.; Tapia, V.E.; van der Ven, P.F.; Hampe, N.; Hersch, N.; Vakeel, P.; Stadel, D.; Haas, A.; Saftig, P.; et al. Cellular mechanotransduction relies on tension-induced and chaperone-assisted autophagy. Curr. Biol. 2013, 23, 430–435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Cicardi, M.E.; Cristofani, R.; Rusmini, P.; Meroni, M.; Ferrari, V.; Vezzoli, G.; Tedesco, B.; Piccolella, M.; Messi, E.; Galbiati, M.; et al. Tdp-25 Routing to Autophagy and Proteasome Ameliorates its Aggregation in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Target Cells. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 12390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Cicardi, M.E.; Cristofani, R.; Crippa, V.; Ferrari, V.; Tedesco, B.; Casarotto, E.; Chierichetti, M.; Galbiati, M.; Piccolella, M.; Messi, E.; et al. Autophagic and Proteasomal Mediated Removal of Mutant Androgen Receptor in Muscle Models of Spinal and Bulbar Muscular Atrophy. Front. Endocrinol. 2019, 10, 569. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Adriaenssens, E.; Tedesco, B.; Mediani, L.; Asselbergh, B.; Crippa, V.; Antoniani, F.; Carra, S.; Poletti, A.; Timmerman, V. BAG3 Pro209 mutants associated with myopathy and neuropathy relocate chaperones of the CASA-complex to aggresomes. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 8755. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Heimdal, K.; Sanchez-Guixe, M.; Aukrust, I.; Bollerslev, J.; Bruland, O.; Jablonski, G.E.; Erichsen, A.K.; Gude, E.; Koht, J.A.; Erdal, S.; et al. STUB1 mutations in autosomal recessive ataxias-evidence for mutation-specific clinical heterogeneity. Orphanet J. Rare Dis. 2014, 9, 146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Mukherjee, T.; Ramaglia, V.; Abdel-Nour, M.; Bianchi, A.A.; Tsalikis, J.; Chau, H.N.; Kalia, S.K.; Kalia, L.V.; Chen, J.J.; Arnoult, D.; et al. The eIF2alpha kinase HRI triggers the autophagic clearance of cytosolic protein aggregates. J. Biol. Chem. 2021, 296, 100050. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Tang, B.; Liu, X.; Zhao, G.; Luo, W.; Xia, K.; Pan, Q.; Cai, F.; Hu, Z.; Zhang, C.; Chen, B.; et al. Mutation analysis of the small heat shock protein 27 gene in chinese patients with Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease. Arch. Neurol. 2005, 62, 1201–1207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Houlden, H.; Laura, M.; Wavrant-De Vrieze, F.; Blake, J.; Wood, N.; Reilly, M.M. Mutations in the HSP27 (HSPB1) gene cause dominant, recessive, and sporadic distal HMN/CMT type 2. Neurology 2008, 71, 1660–1668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Bugiardini, E.; Khan, A.M.; Phadke, R.; Lynch, D.S.; Cortese, A.; Feng, L.; Gang, Q.; Pittman, A.M.; Morrow, J.M.; Turner, C.; et al. Genetic and phenotypic characterisation of inherited myopathies in a tertiary neuromuscular centre. Neuromuscul. Disord. 2019, 29, 747–757. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Muelas, N.; Carretero-Vilarroig, L.; Marti, P.; Azorin, I.; Frasquet, M.; Poyatos-Garcia, J.; Portela, S.; Martinez-Vicente, L.; Argente-Escrig, H.; Sivera, R.; et al. Clinical features, mutation spectrum and factors related to reaching molecular diagnosis in a cohort of patients with distal myopathies. J. Neurol. 2025, 272, 97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Kolb, S.J.; Snyder, P.J.; Poi, E.J.; Renard, E.A.; Bartlett, A.; Gu, S.; Sutton, S.; Arnold, W.D.; Freimer, M.L.; Lawson, V.H.; et al. Mutant small heat shock protein B3 causes motor neuropathy: Utility of a candidate gene approach. Neurology 2010, 74, 502–506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Nam, D.E.; Nam, S.H.; Lee, A.J.; Hong, Y.B.; Choi, B.O.; Chung, K.W. Small heat shock protein B3 (HSPB3) mutation in an axonal Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease family. J. Peripher. Nerv. Syst. 2018, 23, 60–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Carvalho, A.A.S.; Lacene, E.; Brochier, G.; Labasse, C.; Madelaine, A.; Silva, V.G.D.; Corazzini, R.; Papadopoulos, K.; Behin, A.; Laforet, P.; et al. Genetic Mutations and Demographic, Clinical, and Morphological Aspects of Myofibrillar Myopathy in a French Cohort. Genet. Test. Mol. Biomark. 2018, 22, 374–383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Cortese, A.; Curro, R.; Ronco, R.; Blake, J.; Rossor, A.M.; Bugiardini, E.; Laura, M.; Warner, T.; Yousry, T.; Poh, R.; et al. Mutations in alpha-B-crystallin cause autosomal dominant axonal Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease with congenital cataracts. Eur. J. Neurol. 2024, 31, e16063. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Kim, M.V.; Kasakov, A.S.; Seit-Nebi, A.S.; Marston, S.B.; Gusev, N.B. Structure and properties of K141E mutant of small heat shock protein HSP22 (HspB8, H11) that is expressed in human neuromuscular disorders. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 2006, 454, 32–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Sisto, A.; van Wermeskerken, T.; Pancher, M.; Gatto, P.; Asselbergh, B.; Assuncao Carreira, A.S.; De Winter, V.; Adami, V.; Provenzani, A.; Timmerman, V. Autophagy induction by piplartine ameliorates axonal degeneration caused by mutant HSPB1 and HSPB8 in Charcot-Marie-Tooth type 2 neuropathies. Autophagy 2024, 1–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Tedesco, B.; Vendredy, L.; Adriaenssens, E.; Cozzi, M.; Asselbergh, B.; Crippa, V.; Cristofani, R.; Rusmini, P.; Ferrari, V.; Casarotto, E.; et al. HSPB8 frameshift mutant aggregates weaken chaperone-assisted selective autophagy in neuromyopathies. Autophagy 2023, 19, 2217–2239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Crippa, V.; D’Agostino, V.G.; Cristofani, R.; Rusmini, P.; Cicardi, M.E.; Messi, E.; Loffredo, R.; Pancher, M.; Piccolella, M.; Galbiati, M.; et al. Transcriptional induction of the heat shock protein B8 mediates the clearance of misfolded proteins responsible for motor neuron diseases. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 22827. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Fontaine, J.M.; Sun, X.; Hoppe, A.D.; Simon, S.; Vicart, P.; Welsh, M.J.; Benndorf, R. Abnormal small heat shock protein interactions involving neuropathy-associated HSP22 (HSPB8) mutants. FASEB J. 2006, 20, 2168–2170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Bouhy, D.; Juneja, M.; Katona, I.; Holmgren, A.; Asselbergh, B.; De Winter, V.; Hochepied, T.; Goossens, S.; Haigh, J.J.; Libert, C.; et al. A knock-in/knock-out mouse model of HSPB8-associated distal hereditary motor neuropathy and myopathy reveals toxic gain-of-function of mutant Hspb8. Acta Neuropathol. 2018, 135, 131–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Irobi, J.; Almeida-Souza, L.; Asselbergh, B.; De Winter, V.; Goethals, S.; Dierick, I.; Krishnan, J.; Timmermans, J.P.; Robberecht, W.; De Jonghe, P.; et al. Mutant HSPB8 causes motor neuron-specific neurite degeneration. Hum. Mol. Genet. 2010, 19, 3254–3265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Qiu, H.; Lizano, P.; Laure, L.; Sui, X.; Rashed, E.; Park, J.Y.; Hong, C.; Gao, S.; Holle, E.; Morin, D.; et al. H11 kinase/heat shock protein 22 deletion impairs both nuclear and mitochondrial functions of STAT3 and accelerates the transition into heart failure on cardiac overload. Circulation 2011, 124, 406–415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Sanbe, A.; Marunouchi, T.; Abe, T.; Tezuka, Y.; Okada, M.; Aoki, S.; Tsumura, H.; Yamauchi, J.; Tanonaka, K.; Nishigori, H.; et al. Phenotype of cardiomyopathy in cardiac-specific heat shock protein B8 K141N transgenic mouse. J. Biol. Chem. 2013, 288, 8910–8921. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Zhang, R.; Zhang, F.; Li, X.; Huang, S.; Zi, X.; Liu, T.; Liu, S.; Li, X.; Xia, K.; Pan, Q.; et al. A novel transgenic mouse model of Chinese Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease type 2L. Neural Regen. Res. 2014, 9, 413–419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Carra, S.; Boncoraglio, A.; Kanon, B.; Brunsting, J.F.; Minoia, M.; Rana, A.; Vos, M.J.; Seidel, K.; Sibon, O.C.; Kampinga, H.H. Identification of the Drosophila ortholog of HSPB8: Implication of HSPB8 loss of function in protein folding diseases. J. Biol. Chem. 2010, 285, 37811–37822. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Jablonska, J.; Dubinska-Magiera, M.; Jagla, T.; Jagla, K.; Daczewska, M. Drosophila Hsp67Bc hot-spot variants alter muscle structure and function. Cell Mol. Life Sci. 2018, 75, 4341–4356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Silva, M.C.; Nandi, G.A.; Tentarelli, S.; Gurrell, I.K.; Jamier, T.; Lucente, D.; Dickerson, B.C.; Brown, D.G.; Brandon, N.J.; Haggarty, S.J. Prolonged tau clearance and stress vulnerability rescue by pharmacological activation of autophagy in tauopathy neurons. Nat. Commun. 2020, 11, 3258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Vantaggiato, C.; Orso, G.; Guarato, G.; Brivio, F.; Napoli, B.; Panzeri, E.; Masotti, S.; Santorelli, F.M.; Lamprou, M.; Gumeni, S.; et al. Rescue of lysosomal function as therapeutic strategy for SPG15 hereditary spastic paraplegia. Brain 2023, 146, 1103–1120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Rusmini, P.; Cortese, K.; Crippa, V.; Cristofani, R.; Cicardi, M.E.; Ferrari, V.; Vezzoli, G.; Tedesco, B.; Meroni, M.; Messi, E.; et al. Trehalose induces autophagy via lysosomal-mediated TFEB activation in models of motoneuron degeneration. Autophagy 2019, 15, 631–651. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  70. Pupyshev, A.B.; Belichenko, V.M.; Tenditnik, M.V.; Bashirzade, A.A.; Dubrovina, N.I.; Ovsyukova, M.V.; Akopyan, A.A.; Fedoseeva, L.A.; Korolenko, T.A.; Amstislavskaya, T.G.; et al. Combined induction of mTOR-dependent and mTOR-independent pathways of autophagy activation as an experimental therapy for Alzheimer’s disease-like pathology in a mouse model. Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav. 2022, 217, 173406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Pupyshev, A.B.; Klyushnik, T.P.; Akopyan, A.A.; Singh, S.K.; Tikhonova, M.A. Disaccharide trehalose in experimental therapies for neurodegenerative disorders: Molecular targets and translational potential. Pharmacol. Res. 2022, 183, 106373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Vendredy, L.; De Winter, V.; Van Lent, J.; Orije, J.; Authier, T.D.S.; Katona, I.; Asselbergh, B.; Adriaenssens, E.; Weis, J.; Verhoye, M.; et al. RNA Interference Targeting Small Heat Shock Protein B8 Failed to Improve Distal Hereditary Motor Neuropathy in the Mouse Model. J. Gene Med. 2025, 27, e70013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Chierichetti, M.; Cristofani, R.; Crippa, V.; Ferrari, V.; Cozzi, M.; Casarotto, E.; Pramaggiore, P.; Cornaggia, L.; Patelli, G.; Mohamed, A.; et al. Small heat shock protein B8: From cell functions to its involvement in diseases and potential therapeutic applications. Neural Regen. Res. 2025, 20, 2872–2886. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Patient with HSPB8-myopathy. Patient manifested with proximal lower limb muscle weakness that later extended to upper limb and axial muscles. (A) He had difficulty elevating the arms and scoliosis. (B) Quadriceps is atrophic and weak as suggested by his difficulty extending the knees. (C) Calf muscles, although atrophic, had preserved strength, and he was able to stand on toes. (This patient was previously reported: Nicolau et al. [24]).
Figure 1. Patient with HSPB8-myopathy. Patient manifested with proximal lower limb muscle weakness that later extended to upper limb and axial muscles. (A) He had difficulty elevating the arms and scoliosis. (B) Quadriceps is atrophic and weak as suggested by his difficulty extending the knees. (C) Calf muscles, although atrophic, had preserved strength, and he was able to stand on toes. (This patient was previously reported: Nicolau et al. [24]).
Ijms 26 02905 g001
Figure 2. Quadriceps biopsy from patient with HSBP8-myopathy (p.Thr194Serfs∗23). (A) Many fibers harboring rimmed vacuoles (arrows) unevenly distributed across the muscle section and a regenerating fiber (arrowhead) (hematoxylin-eosin). (B) A necrotic fiber invaded by macrophages (arrow; trichrome). (C) In a region of the specimen, a few fibers showing a focal loss (arrow) or focal increase of nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide tetrazolium reductase (NADH) enzyme reactivity. (D) One (arrow) of the rare fibers containing two small congophilic inclusions (bright red; Congo red). A few fibers with myotilin aggregates (E), punctuate desmin ((F), arrow) or TIA1 ((G), arrow) positivity. (H) A fiber with dystrophin aggregates. (I) Lack of fiber type grouping pointing away from coexisting reinnervation (ATPase pH 4.3, type 1 fibers stain brown). (This patient was previously reported: Nicolau et al. [24]). Magnification: 40× (AH); 10× (I).
Figure 2. Quadriceps biopsy from patient with HSBP8-myopathy (p.Thr194Serfs∗23). (A) Many fibers harboring rimmed vacuoles (arrows) unevenly distributed across the muscle section and a regenerating fiber (arrowhead) (hematoxylin-eosin). (B) A necrotic fiber invaded by macrophages (arrow; trichrome). (C) In a region of the specimen, a few fibers showing a focal loss (arrow) or focal increase of nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide tetrazolium reductase (NADH) enzyme reactivity. (D) One (arrow) of the rare fibers containing two small congophilic inclusions (bright red; Congo red). A few fibers with myotilin aggregates (E), punctuate desmin ((F), arrow) or TIA1 ((G), arrow) positivity. (H) A fiber with dystrophin aggregates. (I) Lack of fiber type grouping pointing away from coexisting reinnervation (ATPase pH 4.3, type 1 fibers stain brown). (This patient was previously reported: Nicolau et al. [24]). Magnification: 40× (AH); 10× (I).
Ijms 26 02905 g002
Figure 3. Schematic representation of HSPB8, protein domains, and mutations causing neuromuscular diseases. p.P90L, p.N138T, and p.K141M have been associated with dHMN; p.K141T has been associated with CMT2L; p.K141N has been associated with dHMN and CMT2L; p.K141E has been reported in neuromyopathy. p.Q170Gfs*45, p.P173Sfs*43, p.T176Wfs*38, p.T194Sfs*23, and p.G192Afs*55 in CTD have been associated with myopathy; p.P173Sfs*43 has been associated with neuromyopathy.
Figure 3. Schematic representation of HSPB8, protein domains, and mutations causing neuromuscular diseases. p.P90L, p.N138T, and p.K141M have been associated with dHMN; p.K141T has been associated with CMT2L; p.K141N has been associated with dHMN and CMT2L; p.K141E has been reported in neuromyopathy. p.Q170Gfs*45, p.P173Sfs*43, p.T176Wfs*38, p.T194Sfs*23, and p.G192Afs*55 in CTD have been associated with myopathy; p.P173Sfs*43 has been associated with neuromyopathy.
Ijms 26 02905 g003
Figure 4. Schematic representation of HSPB8’s structural and functional role in chaperone-assisted selective autophagy (CASA). Hydrophobic (HP) residues are exposed on a misfolded protein and recognized by the alpha-crystallin domain of HSPB8, which is modulated by phosphorylation of key residues T87, S27, S24, and S57. HSPB8 recruits BAG3 through interaction with its IV-X-IV (IPV) motif. HSPA (HSP70) binds the BAG domain of BAG3 and recognizes the KFERQ motif on the misfolded substrate, allowing for further stabilization of the misfolded protein. STUB1 is recruited to the complex, interacting with HSPA through its tetratricopeptide repeat (TPR) domain, and polyubiquitinates the misfolded protein. SQSTM1 recognizes the ubiquitinated substrate and serves as an adaptor protein linking the misfolded protein to the autophagic membrane through interaction with LC3. The misfolded protein subsequently undergoes autophagic degradation.
Figure 4. Schematic representation of HSPB8’s structural and functional role in chaperone-assisted selective autophagy (CASA). Hydrophobic (HP) residues are exposed on a misfolded protein and recognized by the alpha-crystallin domain of HSPB8, which is modulated by phosphorylation of key residues T87, S27, S24, and S57. HSPB8 recruits BAG3 through interaction with its IV-X-IV (IPV) motif. HSPA (HSP70) binds the BAG domain of BAG3 and recognizes the KFERQ motif on the misfolded substrate, allowing for further stabilization of the misfolded protein. STUB1 is recruited to the complex, interacting with HSPA through its tetratricopeptide repeat (TPR) domain, and polyubiquitinates the misfolded protein. SQSTM1 recognizes the ubiquitinated substrate and serves as an adaptor protein linking the misfolded protein to the autophagic membrane through interaction with LC3. The misfolded protein subsequently undergoes autophagic degradation.
Ijms 26 02905 g004
Table 1. Clinical features of HSPB8-associated neuromuscular disorders.
Table 1. Clinical features of HSPB8-associated neuromuscular disorders.
Characteristics dHMNCMT2LMyopathy
Age of onset Childhood to adulthoodAdolescence to adulthood Childhood to adulthood
WeaknessDistal predominantDistal predominantDistal, proximal, or axial predominant
Tendon reflexesDiminished or absentDiminished or absentNormal, diminished, or absent
Muscle atrophyPresent Present Present
CrampsCan be presentAbsent Can be present
Fasciculations Can be present AbsentCan be present in neuromyopathy
Skeletal abnormalitiesPes cavusPes cavus and scoliosisPes cavus, scoliosis, lumbar lordosis
dHMN: distal hereditary motor neuropathy; CMT2L: Charcot–Marie–Tooth type 2L.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Rashed, H.R.; Nath, S.R.; Milone, M. The Spectrum of Small Heat Shock Protein B8 (HSPB8)-Associated Neuromuscular Disorders. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2025, 26, 2905. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms26072905

AMA Style

Rashed HR, Nath SR, Milone M. The Spectrum of Small Heat Shock Protein B8 (HSPB8)-Associated Neuromuscular Disorders. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2025; 26(7):2905. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms26072905

Chicago/Turabian Style

Rashed, Hebatallah R., Samir R. Nath, and Margherita Milone. 2025. "The Spectrum of Small Heat Shock Protein B8 (HSPB8)-Associated Neuromuscular Disorders" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 26, no. 7: 2905. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms26072905

APA Style

Rashed, H. R., Nath, S. R., & Milone, M. (2025). The Spectrum of Small Heat Shock Protein B8 (HSPB8)-Associated Neuromuscular Disorders. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 26(7), 2905. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms26072905

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop