Next Article in Journal
The Arg108Cys Variant of Methylmalonyl-CoA Mutase: Clinical Implications for the Mexican Population Based on Molecular Dynamics and Docking
Next Article in Special Issue
Breeding D1-Type Hybrid Japonica Rice in Diverse Upland Rainfed Environments
Previous Article in Journal
Synthesis, Characterization, and Preliminary Analysis of Squid Pen Trypsin Hydrolysates and Chitosan Microcapsules
Previous Article in Special Issue
Integrated Transcriptome and Metabolome Analyses Reveal Candidate Genes Associate with Phenolic Compound Biosynthesis in Different Varieties of Perilla frutescens
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Fine Mapping of the QTL qRLP12 That Controls Root Length Under Polyethylene glycol-Induced Drought Stress During the Early Seedling Stage of Sesame

1
Crop Research Institute, Jiangxi Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Jiangxi Province Key Laboratory for Genetic Improvement of Oilcrops, Nanchang 330200, China
2
College of Agriculture, Yangtze University, Jingzhou 434025, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2025, 26(7), 2886; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms26072886
Submission received: 4 March 2025 / Revised: 17 March 2025 / Accepted: 20 March 2025 / Published: 22 March 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Research on Plant Genomics and Breeding: 2nd Edition)

Abstract

A deeper root system can improve the efficiency of water and nutrient absorption from soil; therefore, genetic improvements to the root length of crops are essential for yield stability under drought stress. We previously identified a stable quantitative trait locus (QTL) qRLP12 for root length under polyethylene glycol (PEG)-induced drought stress in a Jinhuangma (JHM, sensitive)/Zhushanbai (ZSB, tolerant) recombinant inbred line (RIL) population. To validate and fine map this QTL, in this study, a secondary F2 population was constructed, and the genetic effect of the target QTL was validated by comparing the phenotype data of different genotypes. Using newly developed markers, 14 genotypes of recombinant F2 individuals were obtained. A phenotypic analysis of homozygous recombinant progeny lines narrowed qRLP12 to a 91 kb region. Seven putative predicted genes were identified in the target region, among which LOC105165547, a callose synthase gene, was the only one containing nonsynonymous variations in the coding region between two parents. Quantitative real-time PCR analysis revealed that LOC105165547 was significantly induced by PEG stress in the qRLP12+ line. These indicated that LOC105165547 might be the candidate gene for qRLP12, which is responsible for root length subjected to PEG stress. Our results provide a favored gene resource for improving root length under drought stress in sesame.

1. Introduction

Drought is recognized as one of the most challenging abiotic stresses affecting crop productivity worldwide. The percentage of the planet affected by drought has more than doubled in the last 40 years, and during the same period, droughts have impacted more people worldwide than any other natural hazard [1]. This alarming trend underscores the urgent need for effective strategies to enhance drought tolerance in crops. Deep root systems in terrestrial crops allow them to avoid drought stress by absorbing water from subsoil. Improving the root length under water shortage conditions is therefore a critical strategy to enhance drought tolerance in crops [2]. Research has shown that deeper rooting can enhance grain yield under drought conditions in crops such as maize [3], sorghum [4], wheat [5], and rice [6]. Therefore, understanding the genetic and molecular mechanisms underlying root development is essential for improving agricultural sustainability and addressing food security challenges.
Sesame (Sesamum indicum L., 2n = 26) is one of the world’s most important oilseed crops, often referred to as the “queen of oilseeds” due to its rich nutrient profile, including tocopherols, lignans, proteins, and plenty of various mineral elements [7,8]. Although sesame is considered a typical “survivor crop” since it has relatively strong tolerance to water deficits, it is particularly vulnerable to drought stress at the germination and flowering stages, primarily due to its shallow root characterization [9,10]. Moreover, the increasing frequency and intensity of drought events, exacerbated by climate change, have further heightened the risk to sesame production over recent decades [11,12]. Major sesame-producing areas worldwide, such as West and Central Africa [13], India [14], and China, frequently experience drought stress during sesame growth season. In China, flash droughts and seasonal droughts frequently coincide with the sesame sowing period in most parts of the main sesame-producing areas, especially in southern China; this significantly hampers sesame seedling growth and production potential [11,15,16]. This highlights the pressing need to enhance the drought tolerance of sesame to ensure yield stability.
Despite the existing knowledge surrounding drought tolerance, significant gaps remain in our understanding of the genetic mechanisms regulating root growth under drought stress in sesame. So far, several studies using transcriptome analysis have revealed multiple transcription factors (TFs), such as ERF [17], MYB [18], bZIP [19], NAC [20], and HD-ZIP [21], participating in the response to drought stress in sesame. Some of these TFs, including SiERF5 [22], SiNAC104 [22], SiMYB75 [23], and SiMYB77 [24], have been found to improve root elongation and enhance tolerance to drought stress in transgenic Arabidopsis thaliana and tobacco plants. Besides these, some other genes, such as the osmotin-like proteins gene (SindOLP) and S-adenosylmethionine synthetase gene (SiSAM), regulate drought tolerance through various pathways [25,26]. Overexpression of SindOLP in sesame could provide longer roots and enhanced tolerance against drought, salinity, and the charcoal rot pathogen [25], while SiSAM was found to be related to capsule number and stem length under drought stress in a genome-wide association (GWAS) study examining drought tolerance-related traits at the flowering stage [26]. The latter gene may improve drought tolerance by modulating the polyamine level and ROS homeostasis [26]. Another sesame orphan gene, ‘Big Root biomass’, improved yield parameters under normal growth conditions and increased drought stress sensitivity when overexpressed in Arabidopsis thaliana plants [27]. In addition, transcriptome profiling of root and leaf samples has revealed hundreds of genes and microRNAs participating in drought response in sesame [28,29,30,31,32]. However, while some of these identified TFs or genes were found to be able to improve root growth under drought stress in transgenic Arabidopsis thaliana and tobacco experiments, major QTLs or candidate genes for root growth under drought stress remain largely unexplored in sesame. To our knowledge, only three stable major QTLs for root length under drought stress were identified by far, which was performed by our lab [33]. The genetic mechanism and underlying functional genes that govern root growth under drought stress in sesame are still unknown, representing a critical knowledge gap in the field. Validation, fine mapping, and cloning of major QTLs are essential for understanding their function and applying them in sesame improvement.
We previously identified a major QTL for the main root length under polyethylene glycol (PEG)-induced drought stress (RLP) at the early seedling stage using an RIL population derived from Jinhuangma (JHM, sensitive) and Zhushanbai (ZSB, tolerant) [33]. This QTL explained 11.85–14.46% of the root length under PEG stress variations across different experiments, with the landrace ZSB conferring the favorable allele for longer roots [33]. Here, the drought-tolerant line RA11 and drought-sensitive line RA171 selected from the JHM/ZSB RIL population were used to construct a large F2 mapping population to fine map qRLP12, develop robust markers for breeding, and identify the underlying gene for root length under drought stress in sesame.

2. Results

2.1. Validation of qRLP12 for Root Length Under PEG Stress

qRLP12 was initially mapped to a 4.2 cM genetic interval in the RIL population derived from JHM and ZSB [33]. To further verify the genetic effect of qRLP12, we constructed a secondary F2 population by using two RILs: RA11 and RA171. RA11 harbored only one QTL (qRLP12) for root length under PEG stress, while RA171 contained no such QTL. All the F2 plants were planted in nylon net houses to obtain F2:3 lines. Under PEG stress, RA11 had a significantly longer root length than RA171, while the root length under water control conditions showed no difference between these two lines (Figure 1, Table S1). Two flanking markers, Z9 and Z10, were developed based on variations from our previous whole-genome resequencing data. After genotyping with Z9 and Z10, one hundred and six F2:3 lines showing no cross-over between these two markers were used for phenotyping. According to the marker genotypes of Z9 and Z10, the F2:3 lines could be divided into three groups, including Jinhuangma type (JJ), Zhushanbai type (ZZ), and heterozygous type (ZJ). Analysis of variance components for the phenotypic data revealed that the RLP mean of the ZZ group was significantly larger than that of the JJ group (p < 0.01) (Figure 2, Table 1 and Table S2). No significant variation was detected among different replicates (Table S3). The distribution of RLP in the heterozygous group overlapped with those of both the JJ and the ZZ groups. These results suggest that qRLP12 was segregated in this F2 population with the enhancing allele derived from ZSB. Therefore, qRLP12 was identified as a stable locus and suitable for further fine mapping and cloning.

2.2. Fine Mapping of qRLP12

To refine the position of qRLP12, we screened 1025 F2 plants derived from RA11 and RA171 for recombinants between markers Z9 and Z10. This led to the identification of 27 plants with cross-over events between these two markers. To saturate this target region, seven additional markers, Z65, Z61, Z66, Z63, Z67, Z62, and Z64, were developed based on variations between JHM and ZSB according to previous resequencing data (Table S4, Figure 2). Among the 27 recombinants, we identified 14 genotypes by surveying with these markers in the target interval. No cross-over event was observed between the two markers Z66 and Z63 in our mapping population. By means of linkage analysis using the genotype data of recombinants, a high-resolution map was constructed (Figure 3). These markers were mapped to a 1.32 cM interval. Homozygous F3 progenies of recombinants were singled out by using these markers and planted in a net house to obtain two groups of homozygous F3:4 lines (including recombinant and non-recombinant types) for phenotyping.
After comparisons and a two-way ANOVA of the phenotype data among different homozygous progeny F3:4 lines of recombinants, significant differences (p < 0.01) in RLP were detected only between different groups of progeny lines of seven recombinants (R3, R6, R7, R8, R9, R10, and R13) that had heterozygous regions delimited by the markers Z61 and Z67. The effect of different replications on phenotype was not significant (Table S5). Among these progenies, the lines harboring homozygous ZSB alleles in the Z61Z67 interval exhibited longer RLP. On the other hand, the remaining recombinant genotypes (R1, R2, R4, R5, R11, and R14) carried homozygous segments in the same interval, and no significant differences in RLP were detected between their progeny groups (Figure 4). Consequently, qRLP12 was finally mapped to a 91 kb region between markers Z61 and Z67 based on the location of critical recombination events (Figure 4).

2.3. Candidate Genes in qRLP12 Region

By using the sesame reference genome v1.0 database, a total of seven predicted genes were identified in the targeted 91 kb [34] (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/datasets/genome/GCF_000512975.1/, accessed on 5 March 2024). These genes were annotated to encode callose synthase 7 (LOC105165547), conserved oligomeric Golgi complex subunit 5 (LOC105165546), GDSL esterase/lipase (LOC105165545), protein VACUOLELESS1 (LOC105165544), 3-hydroxyisobutyryl-CoA hydrolase-like protein 5 (LOC105165543), heavy metal-associated isoprenylated plant protein (LOC105165542) and subtilisin-like protease (LOC105165541). Based on the previous whole-genome resequencing data for the two parents, we discovered 14 SNPs and four insertions and deletions (InDels) in the 91 kb candidate region. Among these seven genes, only the callose synthase 7 (LOC105165547) contained nonsynonymous variations between the two parents. The subtilisin-like protease gene (LOC105165541) harbored one SNP in its fifth intron. The flanking marker Z67 was developed based on the corresponding SNP in LOC105165541, while LOC105165547 had 10 variations, including two InDels and eight SNPs (Tables S6 and S7). Two nonsynonymous substitutions (A to G and T to C) in LOC105165547 resulted in amino acid changes (Thr to Ala and Val to Ala) between ZSB and JHM. Two insertions of 35 bp and 37 bp were detected in the last exon of LOC105165547 in JHM, leading to a premature stop codon (Table 2, Figure S1). The insertion sites of these two fragments were only 5 bp apart. Notably, the cleaved amplified polymorphic sequences (CAPS) marker Z66 and InDel marker Z63 in the qRLP12 co-segregation region were designed based on the missense SNP (A to G) and the two insertions in LOC105165547. These suggested that the callose synthase-encoding LOC105165547 was the most likely causal locus for qRLP12.

2.4. Expression Analysis of Candidate Genes

To further identify the candidate gene for qRLP12, quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR) was used to detect the expression levels of all seven predicted genes of the target region in RA11 and RA171 subjected to PEG stress (Figure 5). Comparison with water control treatment, LOC105165546 was significantly induced in the roots of both RA11 and RA171 under PEG stress by similar degrees (p < 0.01). Two genes, LOC105165544 and LOC105165547, were significantly up-regulated only in RA11 (p < 0.01). LOC105165541 was significantly down-regulated in both RA11 and RA171 (p < 0.01 for RA11, p < 0.05 for RA171). The expression level of LOC105165547 was significantly suppressed in RA171 (p < 0.05). There was no difference in the expression of the other three genes (LOC105165545, LOC105165543, and LOC 105165542) between PEG stress and water conditions in the root of both RA11 and RA171. These results further supported our conclusion that LOC105165547 might be a good candidate gene for PEG-induced drought stress tolerance at the qRLP12 locus.

3. Discussion

Deep roots are often favored for plant seedling establishment and growth, especially during periods of water scarcity [35,36,37,38]. As roots are the hidden part of plants, their traits are relatively more difficult to investigate than those of above-ground parts. To date, few genes are associated with root development and root-related traits for drought tolerance in sesame. Phenotypic investigations using hydroponic systems and field experiments have revealed that sesame roots have great morphological and anatomical diversity [39,40]. This allows the identification of major loci/genes for root traits through genetic analysis approaches, such as linkage mapping and GWAS. By using GWAS, an orphan gene, BRB, associated with root number and root dry weight, was identified on LG15 [27]. BRB-overexpressing Arabidopsis lines displayed reduced total lateral root length and fresh root weight [27]. Besides this gene, six QTLs associated with root length in hydroponic growth conditions were also detected on LG1, LG4, LG5, LG7, and LG10 using the same diversity panel [27]. However, no major genes for root traits under drought stress were cloned in sesame so far, and the genetic mechanism of root growth under water deficits in sesame remained unclear.
In our previous study, we identified three stable QTLs associated with root length under PEG stress in a JHM × ZSB recombinant inbred lines population [33]. Among them, qRLP12 located on LG6 had the highest LOD value and strongest effect, meaning that it could be an important gene for better drought tolerance at the early seedling stage in sesame. The ZSB allele of qRLP12 conferred a longer root length. Here in this study, using 27 recombinants from the secondary F2 population, we fine mapped the qRLP12 locus to an interval between the markers Z61 and Z67, spanning a 91 kb region on LG6 according to the sesame reference genome sequence v1.0. To our knowledge, this is the first fine map of a root length QTL under drought conditions in sesame. Our results provide the first understanding of the genetic control of root length response to drought stress in sesame. The genome location of the qRLP12 interval is different from that of any other reported root trait QTL or drought tolerance-related QTL in sesame [26,27,41], suggesting a potential unique genetic pathway influencing root development and drought response in sesame. Further studies on the interaction of qRLP12 with other drought tolerance QTLs may reveal the genetic mechanism of water deprivation response in sesame.
There are seven annotated genes in the target region of qRLP12 according to the sesame reference genome database v1.0. Three of them have been highlighted in association with root development or growth. In particular, LOC105165545 encodes GDSL esterase/lipase (GELP), which have been linked to root development through hormone-mediated signaling pathways in rice [42], soybean [43], and Arabidopsis [44]. LOC105165541 encodes subtilisin-like protease potentially involved in regulating root growth or drought tolerance [45,46]. However, our genomic resequencing data revealed no functional polymorphism in LOC105165545 between the two parent lines used in this study. Although LOC105165541 harbors one missense mutation, this SNP was converted into the flanking marker Z67 and mapped at the boundary of the qRLP12 interval (Figure 3 and Figure 4). The key recombinant, R8, carrying a homozygous ZSB type in the marker Z67 locus, showed segregating phenotypes among the progeny lines (Figure 4). These results indicated that LOC105165545 and LOC105165541 could be excluded as the qRLP12 candidate. The other gene, LOC105165547 encoding callose synthase 7 gene (here designated as SiCalS7), contains two InDels and two nonsynonymous substitutions in its open reading frame (Tables S6 and S7). The 35 bp insertion of SiCalS7 in JHM caused a premature termination. Moreover, a gene expression analysis revealed that SiCalS7 was significantly induced under PEG treatment in the qRLP12+ line RA11 but down- regulated in the qRLP12- line RA171 (Figure 5). A comparison of the 2 kb promoter region of SiCalS7 revealed an SNP and a 2-bp InDel between two parents (Table S6), leading to a change in the CCAAT-box element, which is a typical stress-responsive element [47], indicating that these variations may be the cause of the differential expression of SiCalS7. Therefore, SiCalS7 is strongly suggested as the candidate gene for qPLP12.
SiCalS7 is homologous to Arabidopsis CALLOSE SYNTHASE 7/GLUCAN SYNTHASE-LIKE7 (CALS7/GSL7, At1g06490), which belongs to glycosyltransferase family 48 (GT48) [48]. This enzyme is required for callose biosynthesis during phloem development [49]. It has been proposed that callose may serve as an induced defense mechanism in response to both biotic and abiotic stresses [50]. Callose deposition and trafficking in the cell wall play a crucial role in tissue development and responses to environmental stresses, while callose synthase genes regulate the level of callose in plants [51,52]. During root development, CALS7 is reported to be highly and specifically enriched in phloem sieve elements, which possess numerous symplastic connections to adjacent cells [53,54]. Loss-of-function mutations in CALS7 result in complete loss of the callose lining of sieve plate pores between phloem sieve elements in roots [55]. Callose synthase genes can be activated by various biotic and abiotic stresses, and the accumulation of callose has been found to contribute to enhanced root cell walls and offer a physical barrier against drought stress [51]. For example, in soybean, callose accumulation in seedlings was a response to water deficit in roots [55]; in barley, PEG treatment could lead to drought-resistant genotypes accumulating higher levels of callose in their root systems compared to drought-sensitive genotypes [56], and high tolerance to drought and salt stress in Tibetan wild barley is closely related to enhanced callose [57]. Elevated callose content may impede the plant’s defense mechanisms against drought by enhancing its water retention capabilities, which could be associated with improved water use efficiency. Further mutagenesis studies or complementation experiments are needed to examine the function of SiCalS7 and how it regulates root growth under drought stress. Recently, the clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR)/CRISPR-associated protein 9 (Cas9) system had been successfully applied in sesame through hairy root transformation [58]. The biological functions of SiCalS7 and its associated genomic variations could be confirmed using gene editing or high-efficiency overexpression transformation systems in future studies.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Plant Materials

RA11 is a recombinant inbred line (RIL) that carries qRLP12, and RA171 is a PEG stress-sensitive RIL containing no QTL for root length under drought stress. RA11 and RA171 were selected from an RIL population developed in our previous study from two parents, Jinghuangma (JHM) and Zhushanbai (ZSB), with contrasting drought tolerance [33]. An F2 population was developed by crossing the PEG-induced drought stress-resistant RIL RA11 and the susceptible RIL RA171 to fine map qRLP12. To verify the initial qRLP12 mapping results, a total of 106 F2:3 lines were phenotyped and genotyped. All the plants were propagated in a nylon net house to prevent cross-pollination caused by insects.

4.2. Marker Development and Recombinant Screening

A total of 1025 F2 plants from the crossing of RA11 and RA171 were screened to identify recombinants in the qRLP12 interval. Nine markers, including one SSR marker, four InDel (insertion and deletion) markers, one derived cleaved amplified polymorphic sequences (dCAPS) marker, and three CAPS markers, within the physical region delimiting qRLP12 were developed based on a comparison of re-sequencing data for JHM and ZSB. All primers were designed with Primer Premier 6 (https://www.premierbiosoft.com/). The polymorphic primer pair sequences are shown in Table S4. Total genomic DNA was extracted from young, fresh leaves based on the CTAB method [59]. PCR was run on a Bio-Rad T100 thermal cycler (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA, USA) using the following protocol: 94 °C for 3 min, followed by 35 cycles of 94 °C for 30 s, 50–60 °C (depending on the specific primers) for 40 s, and 72 °C for 50 s, and a final extension at 72 °C for 5 min. PCR products were digested with corresponding restriction enzymes when needed, separated on agarose gel or 8% non-denaturing polyacrylamide gels (acrylamide/bis-acrylamide = 19:1 or 39:1) with 1 × TBE buffer, and visualized by means of silver staining. Recombinants were identified via genotyping with two flanking markers, Z9 and Z10. The identified recombinants were then genotyped with seven additional markers to further differentiate recombinant event types. A linkage analysis was carried out with JoinMap® v4 [60], and the genetic map was displayed with MapChart v2.32 [61]. The F3:4 lines of recombinants were also genotyped with newly developed markers to single out the homozygous ones for phenotyping. At least two homozygous lines for each genotype were used for phenotyping.

4.3. Phenotype Evaluation

The root length under polyethylene glycol (PEG)-simulated drought stress (RLP) was evaluated according to the methods used in our previous study [33]. Thirty-five mature seeds of each line were surface sterilized with 75% ethanol for 5 min, rinsed five times with sterile water, and dried at 25 °C. Sterilized seeds were first germinated on two layers of filter paper in a plastic container (10 cm × 10 cm × 5 cm) with a lid. Thirty hours after germination in darkness at 28 °C, when the roots of the seedling had reached 1–2 cm, twelve similar seedlings from each line were transferred to new containers with 30 mL of 15% w/v PEG6000/water solution or ddH2O. For the F2:3 population and the recombinants’ progenies, three replicates were performed for each line, and three replications were performed for each F3:4 line under PEG stress. After four days of incubation in darkness at 28 °C (five days after germination), the root length of the twelve seedlings for each line was measured with a ruler. Root samples of RA11 and RA171 after five days of PEG treatment or water treatment were collected for gene expression analysis.

4.4. Statistical Analysis

An analysis of variance (ANOVA) and multiple comparisons (Fisher’s unprotected LSD) were carried out based on a general linear model to test for phenotypic differences between the different genotypes. Statistical analyses were performed, and graphs were drawn using GraphPad Prism 9 (GraphPad Software, LLC, Boston, MA, USA).

4.5. RNA Extraction and Quantitative PCR with Reverse Transcription

Total RNA was isolated using a FastPure Universal Plant Total RNA Isolation Kit (RC411, Vazyme, Nanjing, China) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. cDNA was synthesized using a HiScript III All-in-one RT SuperMix Perfect kit for qPCR (RC333, Vazyme, Nanjing, China). Quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR) was conducted on a Roche Lightcycler® 96 (Roche Molecular Systems, Mannheim, Germany) instrument using ChamQ Universal SYBR qPCR Master Mix (Q711, Vazyme). The qRT-PCR volume was 20 μL, consisting of 10 μL of 2×ChamQ Universal SYBR qPCR Master Mix, 0.4 μL of each primer (10 μM), 2 μL of cDNA, and 7.2 μL of ddH2O. The amplification conditions were as follows: 95 °C for 30 s, followed by 40 cycles of 95 °C for 10 s and 60 °C for 30 s. Three biological replicates of each sample were tested for all tested genes. The raw qPCR data was processed using LightCycler® 96 software v1.1 (Roche Molecular Systems, Mannheim, Germany). The relative gene expression levels were calculated using the 2-∆∆CT method using SiUBQ6 as an internal control [62]. The primer pairs used for quantitative PCR experiments are listed in Table S4.

5. Conclusions

In this study, we fine mapped the novel QTL qRLP12 for root length under drought stress to a physical distance of 91 kb in sesame, establishing it as a key locus for root length enhancement under drought conditions. Among the annotated genes within the target region, LOC105165547 encoding a callose synthase 7 protein is the most likely candidate gene of qRLP12 based on their putative functions and sequence variations between two parents and expression analysis. To our knowledge, this qRLP12 locus is the first report to refine a QTL associated with root length under drought stress in sesame. Our study paves the way for future investigations into the molecular mechanisms governing root growth under drought stress in sesame, while the linked markers developed herein can facilitate marker-assisted selection for root improvement under water deficits in sesame breeding efforts.

Supplementary Materials

Supporting information can be downloaded at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/ijms26072886/s1.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, J.L. and J.S.; methodology, J.L. and M.L.; validation, J.L., Y.D. and X.Y.; investigation, J.L., Y.D., Z.W., H.Z., P.Z. and X.Y.; resources, J.L., J.S., H.Z., Z.W., P.Z. and X.Y.; writing—original draft preparation, J.L.; writing—review and editing, J.S. and M.L.; supervision, J.S. and M.L.; funding acquisition, J.L. and J.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (32160482) and the China Agriculture Research System (CARS-14).

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data used in this study are available within the article and its accompanying Supplementary Materials.

Acknowledgments

We thank Chunhua Hu and Yunyan Zhao for their support on data processing.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Abbreviations

The following abbreviations are used in this manuscript:
QTLquantitative trait locus
JHMjinhuangma
ZSBzhushanbai
RILrecombinant inbred line
PEGpolyethylene glycol
RLProot length under PEG-induced drought stress
TFstranscription factors
qRT-PCRquantitative real-time PCR
GWASgenome-wide association
GELPGDSL esterase/lipase
InDelsinsertions and deletions
dCAPSderived cleaved amplified polymorphic sequences
CAPScleaved amplified polymorphic sequences
CALS7CALLOSE SYNTHASE 7

References

  1. Orimoloye, I.R.; Belle, J.A.; Orimoloye, Y.M.; Olusola, A.O.; Ololade, O.O. Drought: A Common Environmental Disaster. Atmosphere 2022, 13, 111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Frolov, A.; Bilova, T.; Paudel, G.; Berger, R.; Balcke, G.U.; Birkemeyer, C.; Wessjohann, L.A. Early responses of mature Arabidopsis thaliana plants to reduced water potential in the agar-based polyethylene glycol infusion drought model. J. Plant Physiol. 2017, 208, 70–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Feng, X.; Jia, L.; Cai, Y.; Guan, H.; Zheng, D.; Zhang, W.; Xiong, H.; Zhou, H.; Wen, Y.; Hu, Y. ABA-inducible DEEPER ROOTING 1 improves adaptation of maize to water deficiency. Plant Biotechnol. J. 2022, 20, 2077–2088. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  4. Chen, X.; Wu, Q.; Gao, Y.; Zhang, J.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, R.; Zhou, Y.; Xiao, M.; Xu, W.; Huang, R. The role of deep roots in sorghum yield production under drought conditions. Agronomy 2020, 10, 611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Bacher, H.; Montagu, A.; Herrmann, I.; Walia, H.; Schwartz, N.; Peleg, Z. Stress-induced deeper rooting introgression enhances wheat yield under terminal drought. J. Exp. Bot. 2023, 74, 4862–4874. [Google Scholar]
  6. Uga, Y.; Sugimoto, K.; Ogawa, S.; Rane, J.; Ishitani, M.; Hara, N.; Kitomi, Y.; Inukai, Y.; Ono, K.; Kanno, N. Control of root system architecture by DEEPER ROOTING 1 increases rice yield under drought conditions. Nat. Genet. 2013, 45, 1097–1102. [Google Scholar]
  7. Yadav, R.; Kalia, S.; Rangan, P.; Pradheep, K.; Rao, G.P.; Kaur, V.; Pandey, R.; Rai, V.; Vasimalla, C.C.; Langyan, S.; et al. Current Research Trends and Prospects for Yield and Quality Improvement in Sesame, an Important Oilseed Crop. Front. Plant Sci. 2022, 13, 863521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Teboul, N.; Gadri, Y.; Berkovich, Z.; Reifen, R.; Peleg, Z. Genetic Architecture Underpinning Yield Components and Seed Mineral–Nutrients in Sesame. Genes 2020, 11, 1221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Jeyaraj, S.; Beevy, S.S. Insights into the Drought Stress Tolerance Mechanisms of Sesame: The Queen of Oilseeds. J. Plant Growth Regul. 2024, 43, 3370–3391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Dossa, K.; Wei, X.; Li, D.; Fonceka, D.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, L.; Yu, J.; Boshou, L.; Diouf, D.; Cissé, N.; et al. Insight into the AP2/ERF transcription factor superfamily in sesame and expression profiling of DREB subfamily under drought stress. BMC Plant Biol. 2016, 16, 171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Chen, S.; Gong, B. Response and adaptation of agriculture to climate change: Evidence from China. J. Dev. Econ. 2021, 148, 102557. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Hermans, K.; McLeman, R. Climate change, drought, land degradation and migration: Exploring the linkages. Curr. Opin. Environ. Sustain. 2021, 50, 236–244. [Google Scholar]
  13. Boureima, S.; Diouf, S.; Amoukou, M.; Van Damme, P. Screening for sources of tolerance to drought in sesame induced mutants: Assessment of indirect selection criteria for seed yield. Int. J. Pure Appl. Biosci. 2016, 4, 45–60. [Google Scholar]
  14. Pandey, B.B.; Ratnakumar, P.; Usha Kiran, B.; Dudhe, M.Y.; Lakshmi, G.S.; Ramesh, K.; Guhey, A. Identifying traits associated with terminal drought tolerance in sesame (Sesamum indicum L.) genotypes. Front. Plant Sci. 2021, 12, 739896. [Google Scholar]
  15. Wang, L.; Yuan, X. Two types of flash drought and their connections with seasonal drought. Adv. Atmos. Sci. 2018, 35, 1478–1490. [Google Scholar]
  16. Deng, Y.; Wang, X.; Lu, T.; Du, H.; Ciais, P.; Lin, X. Divergent seasonal responses of carbon fluxes to extreme droughts over China. Agric. For. Meteorol. 2023, 328, 109253. [Google Scholar]
  17. Su, R.; Dossou, S.S.K.; Dossa, K.; Zhou, R.; Liu, A.; Zhong, Y.; Fang, S.; Zhang, X.; Wu, Z.; You, J. Genome-wide characterization and identification of candidate ERF genes involved in various abiotic stress responses in sesame (Sesamum indicum L.). BMC Plant Biol. 2022, 22, 256. [Google Scholar]
  18. Mmadi, M.A.; Dossa, K.; Wang, L.; Zhou, R.; Wang, Y.; Cisse, N.; Sy, M.O.; Zhang, X. Functional characterization of the versatile MYB gene family uncovered their important roles in plant development and responses to drought and waterlogging in sesame. Genes 2017, 8, 362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Wang, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Zhou, R.; Dossa, K.; Yu, J.; Li, D.; Liu, A.; Mmadi, M.A.; Zhang, X.; You, J. Identification and characterization of the bZIP transcription factor family and its expression in response to abiotic stresses in sesame. PLoS ONE 2018, 13, e0200850. [Google Scholar]
  20. Zhang, Y.; Li, D.; Wang, Y.; Zhou, R.; Wang, L.; Zhang, Y.; Yu, J.; Gong, H.; You, J.; Zhang, X. Genome-wide identification and comprehensive analysis of the NAC transcription factor family in Sesamum indicum. PLoS ONE 2018, 13, e0199262. [Google Scholar]
  21. Wei, M.; Liu, A.; Zhang, Y.; Zhou, Y.; Li, D.; Dossa, K.; Zhou, R.; Zhang, X.; You, J. Genome-wide characterization and expression analysis of the HD-Zip gene family in response to drought and salinity stresses in sesame. BMC Genom. 2019, 20, 748. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Dossa, K.; Mmadi, M.A.; Zhou, R.; Zhang, T.; Su, R.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, L.; You, J.; Zhang, X. Depicting the core transcriptome modulating multiple abiotic stresses responses in sesame (Sesamum indicum L.). Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 3930. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Dossa, K.; Mmadi, M.A.; Zhou, R.; Liu, A.; Yang, Y.; Diouf, D.; You, J.; Zhang, X. Ectopic expression of the sesame MYB transcription factor SiMYB305 promotes root growth and modulates ABA-mediated tolerance to drought and salt stresses in Arabidopsis. AoB Plants 2020, 12, plz081. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Rajput, P.; Agarwal, P.; Agarwal, P.K. A Sesamum indicum SiMYB77 Transcription Factor, Enhances Drought and Salt Tolerance in Transgenic Tobacco Via Maintaining Higher Osmolytes and ROS Homeostasis. J. Plant Growth Regul. 2024, in press. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Chowdhury, S.; Basu, A.; Kundu, S. Overexpression of a new osmotin-like protein gene (SindOLP) confers tolerance against biotic and abiotic stresses in sesame. Front. Plant Sci. 2017, 8, 410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Dossa, K.; Li, D.; Zhou, R.; Yu, J.; Wang, L.; Zhang, Y.; You, J.; Liu, A.; Mmadi, M.A.; Fonceka, D. The genetic basis of drought tolerance in the high oil crop Sesamum indicum. Plant Biotechnol. J. 2019, 17, 1788–1803. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Dossa, K.; Zhou, R.; Li, D.; Liu, A.; Qin, L.; Mmadi, M.A.; Su, R.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, J.; Gao, Y. A novel motif in the 5’-UTR of an orphan gene ‘Big Root Biomass’ modulates root biomass in sesame. Plant Biotechnol. J. 2021, 19, 1065–1079. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Baghery, M.A.; Kazemitabar, S.K.; Dehestani, A.; Mehrabanjoubani, P.; Naghizadeh, M.M.; Masoudi-Nejad, A. Transcription Factors and microRNA Genes Regulatory Network Construction Under Drought Stress in Sesame (Sesamum indicum L.). Res. Sq. 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Baghery, M.A.; Kazemitabar, S.K.; Dehestani, A.; Mehrabanjoubani, P.; Naghizadeh, M.M.; Masoudi-Nejad, A. Insight into gene regulatory networks involved in sesame (Sesamum indicum L.) drought response. Biologia 2022, 77, 1181–1196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Song, Q.; Joshi, M.; Wang, S.; Johnson, C.D.; Joshi, V. Comparative analysis of root transcriptome profiles of sesame (Sesamum indicum L.) in response to osmotic stress. J. Plant Growth Regul. 2021, 40, 1787–1801. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Dossa, K.; Li, D.; Wang, L.; Zheng, X.; Liu, A.; Yu, J.; Wei, X.; Zhou, R.; Fonceka, D.; Diouf, D. Transcriptomic, biochemical and physio-anatomical investigations shed more light on responses to drought stress in two contrasting sesame genotypes. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 8755. [Google Scholar]
  32. You, J.; Zhang, Y.; Liu, A.; Li, D.; Wang, X.; Dossa, K.; Zhou, R.; Yu, J.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, L. Transcriptomic and metabolomic profiling of drought-tolerant and susceptible sesame genotypes in response to drought stress. BMC Plant Biol. 2019, 19, 267. [Google Scholar]
  33. Liang, J.; Sun, J.; Ye, Y.; Yan, X.; Yan, T.; Rao, Y.; Zhou, H.; Le, M. QTL mapping of PEG-induced drought tolerance at the early seedling stage in sesame using whole genome re-sequencing. PLoS ONE 2021, 16, e0247681. [Google Scholar]
  34. Wang, L.; Yu, S.; Tong, C.; Zhao, Y.; Liu, Y.; Song, C.; Zhang, Y.; Zhang, X.; Wang, Y.; Hua, W. Genome sequencing of the high oil crop sesame provides insight into oil biosynthesis. Genome Biol. 2014, 15, R39. [Google Scholar]
  35. Siddiqui, M.N.; Léon, J.; Naz, A.A.; Ballvora, A. Genetics and genomics of root system variation in adaptation to drought stress in cereal crops. J. Exp. Bot. 2021, 72, 1007–1019. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  36. Courtois, B.; Ahmadi, N.; Khowaja, F.; Price, A.H.; Rami, J.-F.; Frouin, J.; Hamelin, C.; Ruiz, M. Rice root genetic architecture: Meta-analysis from a drought QTL database. Rice 2009, 2, 115–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Comas, L.H.; Becker, S.R.; Cruz, V.M.V.; Byrne, P.F.; Dierig, D.A. Root traits contributing to plant productivity under drought. Front. Plant Sci. 2013, 4, 442. [Google Scholar]
  38. Meister, R.; Rajani, M.; Ruzicka, D.; Schachtman, D.P. Challenges of modifying root traits in crops for agriculture. Trends Plant Sci. 2014, 19, 779–788. [Google Scholar]
  39. Su, R.; Zhou, R.; Mmadi, M.A.; Li, D.; Qin, L.; Liu, A.; Wang, J.; Gao, Y.; Wei, M.; Shi, L. Root diversity in sesame (Sesamum indicum L.): Insights into the morphological, anatomical and gene expression profiles. Planta 2019, 250, 1461–1474. [Google Scholar]
  40. Hamedani, N.G.; Gholamhoseini, M.; Bazrafshan, F.; Amiri, B.; Habibzadeh, F. Variability of root traits in sesame genotypes under different irrigation regimes. Rhizosphere 2020, 13, 100190. [Google Scholar]
  41. Li, D.; Dossa, K.; Zhang, Y.; Wei, X.; Wang, L.; Zhang, Y.; Liu, A.; Zhou, R.; Zhang, X. GWAS uncovers differential genetic bases for drought and salt tolerances in sesame at the germination stage. Genes 2018, 9, 87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Zhao, H.; Ma, B.; Duan, K.-X.; Li, X.-K.; Lu, X.; Yin, C.-C.; Tao, J.-J.; Wei, W.; Zhang, W.-K.; Xin, P.-Y. The GDSL lipase MHZ11 modulates ethylene signaling in rice roots. Plant Cell 2020, 32, 1626–1643. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Su, H.-G.; Zhang, X.-H.; Wang, T.-T.; Wei, W.-L.; Wang, Y.-X.; Chen, J.; Zhou, Y.-B.; Chen, M.; Ma, Y.-Z.; Xu, Z.-S. Genome-wide identification, evolution, and expression of GDSL-type esterase/lipase gene family in soybean. Front. Plant Sci. 2020, 11, 726. [Google Scholar]
  44. Liu, D.; Zhao, X.; Liu, Y.; Tian, M.; Zhao, J.; Bai, N.; Huang, R.; Li, M.; Sui, S. The GDSL lipase CpGLIP1 from Chimonanthus praecox improves drought and cold tolerance in Arabidopsis and poplar. Ind. Crop. Prod. 2024, 215, 118636. [Google Scholar]
  45. Stührwohldt, N.; Bühler, E.; Sauter, M.; Schaller, A. Phytosulfokine (PSK) precursor processing by subtilase SBT3. 8 and PSK signaling improve drought stress tolerance in Arabidopsis. J. Exp. Bot. 2021, 72, 3427–3440. [Google Scholar]
  46. Zhao, X.; Goher, F.; Chen, L.; Song, J.; Zhao, J. Genome-wide identification, phylogeny and expression analysis of subtilisin (SBT) gene family under wheat biotic and abiotic stress. Plants 2023, 12, 3065. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Laloum, T.; De Mita, S.; Gamas, P.; Baudin, M.; Niebel, A. CCAAT-box binding transcription factors in plants: Y so many? Trends Plant Sci. 2013, 18, 157–166. [Google Scholar]
  48. Shi, X.; Han, X.; Lu, T.-g. Callose synthesis during reproductive development in monocotyledonous and dicotyledonous plants. Plant Signal. Behav. 2016, 11, e1062196. [Google Scholar]
  49. Ušák, D.; Haluška, S.; Pleskot, R. Callose synthesis at the center point of plant development—An evolutionary insight. Plant Physiol. 2023, 193, 54–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Nishimura, M.T.; Stein, M.; Hou, B.-H.; Vogel, J.P.; Edwards, H.; Somerville, S.C. Loss of a callose synthase results in salicylic acid-dependent disease resistance. Science 2003, 301, 969–972. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Li, N.; Lin, Z.; Yu, P.; Zeng, Y.; Du, S.; Huang, L.-J. The multifarious role of callose and callose synthase in plant development and environment interactions. Front. Plant Sci. 2023, 14, 1183402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Diana, S.-G.; Kamila, G.-J.; Ewa, K.; Małgorzata, K.-K.; Monika, T.; Emilia, G.; Kaja, S.; Magdalena, R.; Karolina, U.; Monika, K. The effect of silicon supplementation and drought stress on the deposition of callose and chemical components in the cell walls of the Brassica napus roots. BMC Plant Biol. 2024, 24, 1249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Vatén, A.; Dettmer, J.; Wu, S.; Stierhof, Y.-D.; Miyashima, S.; Yadav, S.R.; Roberts, C.J.; Campilho, A.; Bulone, V.; Lichtenberger, R. Callose biosynthesis regulates symplastic trafficking during root development. Dev. cell 2011, 21, 1144–1155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Kalmbach, L.; Bourdon, M.; Belevich, I.; Safran, J.; Lemaire, A.; Heo, J.-o.; Otero, S.; Blob, B.; Pelloux, J.; Jokitalo, E. Putative pectate lyase PLL12 and callose deposition through polar CALS7 are necessary for long-distance phloem transport in Arabidopsis. Curr. Biol. 2023, 33, 926–939.e9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Ehrhardt-Brocardo, N.C.M.; Coelho, C.M.M.; Souza, C.A.; Mathias, V. Callose accumulation in roots of soybean seedlings under water deficit. Theor. Exp. Plant Physiol. 2019, 31, 475–481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Ahmed, I.M.; Nadira, U.A.; Cao, F.; He, X.; Zhang, G.; Wu, F. Physiological and molecular analysis on root growth associated with the tolerance to aluminum and drought individual and combined in Tibetan wild and cultivated barley. Planta 2016, 243, 973–985. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Ahmed, I.M.; Nadira, U.A.; Bibi, N.; Cao, F.; He, X.; Zhang, G.; Wu, F. Secondary metabolism and antioxidants are involved in the tolerance to drought and salinity, separately and combined, in Tibetan wild barley. Environ. Exp. Bot. 2015, 111, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. You, J.; Li, D.; Yang, L.; Dossou, S.S.K.; Zhou, R.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, L. CRISPR/Cas9-mediated efficient targeted mutagenesis in sesame (Sesamum indicum L.). Front. Plant Sci. 2022, 13, 935825. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Porebski, S.; Bailey, L.G.; Baum, B.R. Modification of a CTAB DNA extraction protocol for plants containing high polysaccharide and polyphenol components. Plant Mol. Biol. Report. 1997, 15, 8–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Van Ooijen, J. JoinMap 4 ® Software for the Calculation of Genetic Linkage Maps in Experimental Populations; Kyazma B.V.: Wageningen, The Netherlands, 2006. [Google Scholar]
  61. Voorrips, R. MapChart: Software for the graphical presentation of linkage maps and QTLs. J. Hered. 2002, 93, 77–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Wei, L.; Miao, H.; Zhao, R.; Han, X.; Zhang, T.; Zhang, H. Identification and testing of reference genes for Sesame gene expression analysis by quantitative real-time PCR. Planta 2013, 237, 873–889. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Root phenotypes of the mapping parents RA11 and RA171. (a): water condition; (b): 15% PEG treatment. Scale bars represent 1 cm.
Figure 1. Root phenotypes of the mapping parents RA11 and RA171. (a): water condition; (b): 15% PEG treatment. Scale bars represent 1 cm.
Ijms 26 02886 g001
Figure 2. Root length under PEG-stress of F2:3 lines grouped according to their genotypes of flanking markers Z9 and Z10. ZZ: homozygous ZSB genotype; JJ: homozygous JHM genotype; ZJ: heterozygous genotype. Different letters above indicate significant differences at p = 0.01 between genotypes.
Figure 2. Root length under PEG-stress of F2:3 lines grouped according to their genotypes of flanking markers Z9 and Z10. ZZ: homozygous ZSB genotype; JJ: homozygous JHM genotype; ZJ: heterozygous genotype. Different letters above indicate significant differences at p = 0.01 between genotypes.
Ijms 26 02886 g002
Figure 3. High-resolution linkage map of the qRLP12 interval. The QTL interval shown to the left of the map was excerpted from Liang et al. (2021) [33]. The red rectangle shown in the map represents the co-segregation region of qRLP12.
Figure 3. High-resolution linkage map of the qRLP12 interval. The QTL interval shown to the left of the map was excerpted from Liang et al. (2021) [33]. The red rectangle shown in the map represents the co-segregation region of qRLP12.
Ijms 26 02886 g003
Figure 4. Genotypes (left panel) and the corresponding phenotypic assays (right panel) of qRLP12 recombinants. Dark, open, and gray rectangles represent the ZSB genotypes, JHM genotypes, and heterozygotes, respectively. The vertical dashed lines define the interval harboring qRLP12. Statistical analyses of phenotypes between different genotypes from self-pollinated progenies of each recombinant are shown with **, ***, and ns, significant at p  <  0.01 and p  <  0.001, and non-significant, respectively.
Figure 4. Genotypes (left panel) and the corresponding phenotypic assays (right panel) of qRLP12 recombinants. Dark, open, and gray rectangles represent the ZSB genotypes, JHM genotypes, and heterozygotes, respectively. The vertical dashed lines define the interval harboring qRLP12. Statistical analyses of phenotypes between different genotypes from self-pollinated progenies of each recombinant are shown with **, ***, and ns, significant at p  <  0.01 and p  <  0.001, and non-significant, respectively.
Ijms 26 02886 g004
Figure 5. Expression levels of the seven candidate genes in the roots of RA11 (qRLP12+) and RA171 (qRLP12-) subjected to PEG-stress or water control. SiUBQ6 was used as an internal control.
Figure 5. Expression levels of the seven candidate genes in the roots of RA11 (qRLP12+) and RA171 (qRLP12-) subjected to PEG-stress or water control. SiUBQ6 was used as an internal control.
Ijms 26 02886 g005
Table 1. Statistical analysis for root length under PEG stress (RLP) of F2:3 population.
Table 1. Statistical analysis for root length under PEG stress (RLP) of F2:3 population.
Genotype 1No. 2RLP 3 (cm)
JJ233.80 ± 0.68 a
ZJ565.26 ± 1.05 b
ZZ276.05 ± 0.87 c
1 Genotypes identified using flanking markers Z9 and Z10; ZZ, JJ and ZJ represent ZSB type, JHM type and heterozygous type. 2 Number of lines. 3 Data for RLP are shown as mean ± standard deviation. Letters represent significant differences at p = 0.01.
Table 2. Predicted candidate genes in the 91 kb target region of qRLP12.
Table 2. Predicted candidate genes in the 91 kb target region of qRLP12.
Gene ID 1AnnotationVariation 2
LOC105165541subtilisin-like protease SBT5.3NA
LOC105165542heavy metal-associated isoprenylated plant protein 16-likeNA
LOC1051655433-hydroxyisobutyryl-CoA hydrolase-like protein 5NA
LOC105165544protein VACUOLELESS1NA
LOC105165545GDSL esterase/lipase NA
LOC105165546conserved oligomeric Golgi complex subunit 5NA
LOC105165547callose synthase 7Exon14: A1558G (Thr520Ala); Exon42: 5679indel35bp, 5684indel37bp; Exon42: T5696C (Val1910Ala)
1 Gene accession numbers were retrieved from the annotation of sesame reference genome (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/datasets/gene/GCF_000512975.1/, accessed on 5 March 2024). 2 Numbers represent the positions of polymorphic sites in the coding region of candidate genes between JHM and ZSB, the location of start codon was set as 1, “NA” indicates no sequence variation in the coding region of annotated genes.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Liang, J.; Deng, Y.; Yan, X.; Wang, Z.; Zeng, P.; Le, M.; Zhou, H.; Sun, J. Fine Mapping of the QTL qRLP12 That Controls Root Length Under Polyethylene glycol-Induced Drought Stress During the Early Seedling Stage of Sesame. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2025, 26, 2886. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms26072886

AMA Style

Liang J, Deng Y, Yan X, Wang Z, Zeng P, Le M, Zhou H, Sun J. Fine Mapping of the QTL qRLP12 That Controls Root Length Under Polyethylene glycol-Induced Drought Stress During the Early Seedling Stage of Sesame. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2025; 26(7):2886. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms26072886

Chicago/Turabian Style

Liang, Junchao, Yanxin Deng, Xiaowen Yan, Zhiqi Wang, Pan Zeng, Meiwang Le, Hongying Zhou, and Jian Sun. 2025. "Fine Mapping of the QTL qRLP12 That Controls Root Length Under Polyethylene glycol-Induced Drought Stress During the Early Seedling Stage of Sesame" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 26, no. 7: 2886. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms26072886

APA Style

Liang, J., Deng, Y., Yan, X., Wang, Z., Zeng, P., Le, M., Zhou, H., & Sun, J. (2025). Fine Mapping of the QTL qRLP12 That Controls Root Length Under Polyethylene glycol-Induced Drought Stress During the Early Seedling Stage of Sesame. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 26(7), 2886. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms26072886

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop