Next Article in Journal
Sample Preparation Protocol for Laboratory Cryo-Soft X-Ray Microscopy for Studying Cellular Nanoparticle Uptake
Previous Article in Journal
Augmented Bone Morphogenetic Protein Signaling During TMJ Development Alters Morphology in a Timepoint-Dependent Manner
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJMS
Volume 26
Issue 4
10.3390/ijms26041656
ijms-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Association of Basal Serum Androgen Concentration with Follicles Number on the Day of Triggering Final Oocyte Maturation in Low Responders According to the Bologna Criteria: A Prospective Cohort Study

by
Julia K. Bosdou
1,
Christos A. Venetis
1,
Panagiotis Anagnostis
2,*,
Despoina Savvaidou
1,
Katerina Chatzimeletiou
1,
Leonidas Zepiridis
1,
Dimitrios G. Goulis
2,
Grigoris Grimbizis
1,2 and
Efstratios M. Kolibianakis
1
1
Unit for Human Reproduction, 1st Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medical School, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 56429 Thessaloniki, Greece
2
Unit of Reproductive Endocrinology, 1st Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medical School, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 56429 Thessaloniki, Greece
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2025, 26(4), 1656; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms26041656
Submission received: 18 January 2025 / Revised: 10 February 2025 / Accepted: 13 February 2025 / Published: 15 February 2025
(This article belongs to the Section Molecular Endocrinology and Metabolism)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

Studies in animals have shown that androgens promote early follicular development and granulosa cell proliferation by augmenting follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) receptor expression in granulosa cells. Inconsistency exists regarding the association between basal serum androgen levels and follicular development in low responders undergoing in vitro fertilization (IVF), although the number of studies is limited. The aim of the current study was to assess the association between basal serum androgen concentrations and the number of follicles ≥ 11 mm on the day of triggering final oocyte maturation in low responders undergoing IVF. This prospective study was performed from June 2020 to September 2024 in 96 low responders, categorized according to the Bologna criteria. Total testosterone, dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate (DHEAS), 17-OH progesterone (17-OH-P), Δ4-androstenedione (Δ4-A), and sex hormone-binding globulin (SHBG) were measured on the day of initiation of ovarian stimulation. No association was found between basal serum testosterone (coef.: −0.002, p = 0.98), DHEAS (coef.: −0.096, p = 0.35), 17-OH-P (coef.: +0.086, p = 0.40), Δ4-A (coef.: −0.028, p = 0.79), and SHBG (coef.: +0.160, p = 0.12) concentrations and the number of follicles ≥ 11 mm on the day of triggering final oocyte maturation. The results of the current study challenge the usefulness of basal serum androgen measurements prior to ovarian stimulation in low responders as predictors of ovarian response.

1. Introduction

Retrieval of multiple oocytes is a key factor for optimizing success rates in assisted reproductive technologies (ARTs) [1,2,3]. This is mainly achieved by the exogenous administration of gonadotropins. Unfortunately, in a significant proportion of women undergoing ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization (IVF), the number of oocytes retrieved is low, which, in turn, leads to a suboptimal probability of pregnancy [4].
Numerous strategies have been proposed for the management of this particularly challenging group of patients, known as low responders, aiming to increase the number of recruitable antral follicles, as well as their response to gonadotropin administration [5]. Designing interventions that could achieve these goals, however, necessitates an understanding of the mechanisms that regulate follicular recruitment and growth.
Androgens play a crucial role in folliculogenesis through their interactions with androgen receptors (ARs), which are expressed on the ovarian granulosa cells of pre-antral and antral follicles [6]. In the early stages of follicular development, androgens stimulate primordial follicle activation, granulosa cell proliferation, and follicular recruitment by stimulating insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-1) signaling, which synergizes with follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) to support follicular growth and reduce atresia [7,8]. Moreover, androgens contribute to the recruitment and growth of antral follicles by enhancing FSH receptor expression in the granulosa cells of pre-antral and antral follicles and improving follicular sensitivity to FSH [9,10,11].
However, androgens decline with age [12], reflecting the diminishing ability of the aging ovary to respond to gonadotrophin stimulation during IVF. It has been demonstrated that low basal serum androgen concentrations are a significant risk factor for poor oocyte yield and a decreased probability of pregnancy [13,14]. Moreover, it has been suggested that low responders more frequently show hypoandrogenemia compared to normal responders undergoing ovarian stimulation for IVF [15,16].
Considering the above, it has also been proposed that the decreased androgen concentrations observed with advancing female age [12,17] contribute to the frequent occurrence of a low ovarian response [18]. In fact, high androgen concentrations in the ovarian microenvironment have been shown to promote early follicular development and granulosa cell proliferation [9,19]. A limited number of studies have evaluated the association between basal serum androgen concentrations and follicular development in low responders treated with exogenous gonadotropins for IVF, with conflicting results [20,21,22].
The aim of the current study was to assess the association between basal serum androgen concentration and the number of follicles on the day of triggering final oocyte maturation in low responders undergoing IVF.

2. Results

2.1. Patient Population and Cycle Characteristics

Ninety-six low responders fulfilling the Bologna criteria were recruited in this study (Figure 1). The demographic characteristics, basal hormone profile, and cycle characteristics are presented in Table 1.
Seven patients did not reach oocyte retrieval due to having no response to ovarian stimulation (7.3% 95% CI: 3.5–14.7% cancellation rate). In ten patients, no oocytes were retrieved (10.4%, 95% CI: 5.6–18.5%), while in six patients no fertilization was achieved (5.2%, 95% CI: 2.1–12.1%), and in twenty-three patients, embryo development failed (25.0%, 95% CI: 17.2–34.8%) (Table 1).

2.2. Primary Outcome Measure

No association was found between basal serum testosterone (coef.: −0.002, p = 0.98), DHEAS (coef.: −0.096, p = 0.35), 17-OH-P (coef.: +0.086, p = 0.40), Δ4-androstenedione (coef.: −0.028, p = 0.79), and SHBG (coef.: +0.160, p = 0.12) concentrations and the number of follicles ≥ 11 mm on the day of triggering final oocyte maturation (Figure 2). Moreover, no association was found in the multivariable regression analysis between basal androgen concentrations and the number of follicles ≥ 11 mm on the day of triggering final oocyte maturation, controlling for age, BMI, AFC, and AMH (Table 2).

2.3. Secondary Outcome Measures

No association was observed between basal serum testosterone (coef.: +0.024, p = 0.82), DHEAS (coef.: +0.017, p = 0.87), 17-OH-P (coef.: +0.191, p = 0.06), Δ4-androstenedione (coef.: +0.049, p = 0.64), and SHBG (coef.: +0.151, p = 0.14) concentrations and the number of follicles ≥ 17 mm on the day of triggering final oocyte maturation.
Furthermore, no association was observed between basal serum androgen concentrations and the number of COCs retrieved, the number of MII oocytes, and the number of 2pn oocytes (Table 3) by performing Spearman’s correlation analysis.

2.4. ROC Analyses

Basal serum androgen concentrations were not significant predictors of reaching oocyte retrieval (AUC 0.65, 95% CI: 0.49–0.81 for testosterone; AUC 0.60, 95% CI: 0.43–0.77 for DHEAS; AUC 0.76, 95% CI: 0.57–0.95 for 17-OH-P; AUC 0.58, 95% CI: 0.42–0.75 for Δ4-androstenedione; and AUC 0.66, 95% CI: 0.40–0.91 for SHBG).
Similarly, basal serum androgen concentrations were not significant predictors for the retrieval of ≤3 oocytes (AUC 0.55, 95% CI: 0.43–0.68 for testosterone; AUC 0.48, 95% CI: 0.35–0.60 for DHEAS; AUC 0.52, 95% CI: 0.40–0.63 for 17-OH-P; AUC 0.45, 95% CI: 0.33–0.58 for Δ4-androstenedione; and AUC 0.57, 95% CI: 0.46–0.69 for SHBG) or a live birth (AUC 0.42, 95% CI: 0.14–0.69 for testosterone; AUC 0.39, 95% CI: 0.15–0.64 for DHEAS; AUC 0.60, 95% CI: 0.38–0.82 for Δ4-androstenedione; AUC 0.58, 95% CI: 0.24–0.93 for 17-OH-P; and AUC 0.48, 95% CI: 0.25–0.71 for SHBG) (Figure 3).

3. Discussion

This prospective cohort study showed that basal serum androgen concentrations were not associated with follicular development on the day of triggering final oocyte maturation in low responders, as defined by the Bologna criteria, undergoing ovarian stimulation for IVF. Moreover, basal serum androgen concentrations were not able to discriminate between patients who had ≤3 oocytes retrieved or not and those who achieved a live birth or not.
To the best of our knowledge, this is the first prospective study including only low responders fulfilling the Bologna criteria and evaluating the association between basal serum androgen concentrations and the number of follicles on the day of triggering final oocyte maturation. However, the current study was not powered to assess the association of basal serum androgen concentrations with pregnancy outcomes.
Three previous studies have evaluated the association between basal serum androgen concentrations and follicular development in low responders undergoing ovarian stimulation for IVF, with conflicting results [20,21,22]. Two of these studies, retrospective in their design, showed that serum testosterone levels were positively associated with the number of follicles with a mean diameter >14 mm developed on the day of triggering final oocyte maturation, alongside pregnancy achievement [20,21]. On the other hand, the remaining prospective study showed that testosterone and DHEAS levels were not predictive of the implantation rate [22].
It should be noted that the above studies used different definitions of low ovarian response, which unfortunately leads to challenges in data synthesis and interpretation. To address this problem, the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology introduced the Bologna criteria [23], aiming to promote research on a more homogeneous population. Although the Bologna criteria have also been criticized in terms of the heterogeneity of the subpopulations they include [24], they still represent a significant step in the right direction [25].
Furthermore, relevant studies have focused only on the association of basal serum testosterone and DHEAS concentrations with the number of follicles on the day of triggering final oocyte maturation, while the concentrations of other androgens, such as 17-OH-P, Δ4-A, and SHBG have so far not been assessed. In the current study, a complete androgen panel was studied, allowing for a more holistic evaluation of the predictive value of androgens during gonadotrophin administration for follicular development.
The decline in androgen bioavailability with age significantly impacts ovarian function, contributing to follicular atresia and reduced fertility [8,26]. The loss of androgen action leads to the decreased expression of receptors such as FSH and the insulin growth factor-1 (IGF-1) receptor, along with increased apoptosis in granulosa cells. At the molecular level, AR signaling impacts multiple aspects of folliculogenesis and its activation plays a critical role in regulating follicular growth. In AR knockout models, where androgen signaling is disrupted, there is an increase in follicular atresia, as shown by the presence of pyknotic granulosa cells, indicating the loss of follicular survival signals [26]. Moreover, androgens act by enhancing the responsiveness of the FSH receptor, a key receptor involved in follicular growth and maturation. The interplay between androgen and FSH receptor expression suggests that androgens not only support early folliculogenesis but also prime follicles for later stages of development [7,27]. The fact that AR expression in pre-antral follicles precedes FSH receptor expression supports the hypothesis that androgens potentially influence primordial follicle activation and survival. In addition, androgens influence the expression of growth factors such as IGF-1 and regulate the apoptotic pathways by modulating pro-apoptotic and anti-apoptotic genes, such as the expression of the anti-apoptotic microRNA (miR) miR-125b [26]. Therefore, this complicated molecular cross-talk between androgens, FSHR, and IGF-1 highlights the essential contribution of androgens to follicular growth, development, and maturation [28]. These molecular mechanisms between androgens, the FSH receptor, and IGF-1 highlight the essential contribution of androgens to follicular growth and maturation and their enhancement of ovarian responsiveness by improving reproductive outcomes in assisted reproductive technologies (Figure 4).
However, the results of the current study challenge the usefulness of basal serum androgen evaluation at the initiation of gonadotrophin administration in low responders as a predictor of multifollicular development. For this reason, the rationale of administering androgens during ovarian stimulation [29,30] based on the assessment of basal serum androgens should be revisited. Whether androgen administration might increase the probability of live birth independently of serum androgen levels upon the initiation of ovarian stimulation needs to be assessed in future prospective studies.
In conclusion, the current prospective cohort study did not show any association between basal serum androgen concentrations and follicular development on the day of triggering final oocyte maturation in low responders, categorized as such by the Bologna criteria, undergoing ovarian stimulation for IVF. Understanding the mechanisms of how androgens contribute to follicular growth provides valuable insights into tailoring treatment protocols to optimize the reproductive outcomes of poor responders. Future research should focus on improving androgen modulation strategies to enhance follicular growth and improve the probability of pregnancy in this challenging patient population.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Study Population

Low responders fulfilling at least two of the following three criteria (Bologna, 2010) [23] were included in this prospective cohort study: (i) advanced maternal age (≥40 years) or any other risk factor for poor ovarian response, (ii) a previous poor ovarian response (≤3 oocytes with a conventional stimulation protocol), and (iii) an abnormal ovarian reserve test, i.e., antral follicle count (AFC) < 5–7 follicles or anti-Mullerian hormone (AMH) < 0.5–1.1 ng/mL]. The exclusion criteria were endometriosis stage III–IV [31], a history of previous ovarian surgery, and endocrine or metabolic disorders.
This study was conducted in the Unit for Human Reproduction, in the 1st Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology at the Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, from June 2020 to September 2024. This study was approved by the Ethics Committee Review Board of Papageorgiou General Hospital. Written consent was obtained from all the patients. Patients could participate in this study only once.

4.2. Hormonal Measurements and Ovarian Stimulation

Total testosterone, dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate (DHEAS), Δ4-androstenedione (Δ4-A) 17-OH progesterone (17-OH-P), and sex hormone-binding globulin (SHBG) were measured in the morning on the day of initiation of ovarian stimulation for each patient. Testosterone, DHEAS, and SHBG levels were measured by means of the Atellica® IM Analyzer (Siemens Healthineers, Erlangen, Germany), whereas the 7-OH-P and Δ4-A levels were measured by means of the Active® RIA (Beckman Coulter, Brea, CA, USA). The intra-assay and inter-assay coefficients of variation were <10% and <20% for testosterone, <10% and <13% for DHEAS, <7% and <20% for SHBG, <10.5% and <12.8% for 17-OH-P, and <7.5% and <11.3% for Δ4-A, respectively.
On day 2 of the menstrual cycle (stimulation day 1), patients were administered gonadotrophins at a fixed daily dose of 300 IU [32]. These included follitropin alfa (Gonal-F®; Merck Serono Europe Ltd., London, UK or Bemfola®; Gedeon Richter Plc, Budapest, Hungary), follitropin beta (Puregon®; NV Organon, Oss, The Netherlands), and menotropin (Menopur®; FERRING Pharmaceuticals S.A., St-Prex, Switzerland).
Starting on day 5 of stimulation, patients underwent monitoring with two-dimensional transvaginal ultrasound (2D TVS) and assessment of estradiol and luteinizing hormone (LH) every 2–3 days as required. The gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist ganirelix (Orgalutran®; NV Organon, Oss, The Netherlands) or cetrorelix (Cetrotide®; Merck Serono Europe Ltd., London, UK) was used to inhibit a premature LH surge, according to a fixed 5-day protocol. The “5-day protocol” referred to the initiation of GnRH antagonist on day 5 of ovarian stimulation with gonadotrophins, introduced in a fixed manner (regardless of follicle size) at a dose of 0.25 mg/0.5mL of cetrorelix or ganirelix, aiming to inhibit a premature LH surge. Follicular development was assessed by measuring the mean diameter of each follicle ≥11 mm by two-dimensional transvaginal ultrasound evaluation at each visit.

4.3. ART Procedure

Final oocyte maturation was triggered using 250 μg of recombinant human chorionic gonadotrophin (hCG) (Ovitrelle®, Merck Serono Europe Ltd., London, UK) as soon as at least three follicles ≥ 17 mm in diameter were present, or, if this was not possible, when one or two leading follicles were present that were between 17 mm and 24 mm in size, while optimizing the size of the remaining follicles with diameters between 11 mm and 17 mm.
Oocyte retrieval was performed transvaginally 36 h following the triggering of final oocyte maturation by puncturing all follicles ≥ 11 mm in size. Follicular flushing was not performed. Fertilization was performed either with conventional IVF or intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI).

4.4. Outcome Measures

The primary outcome measure was the association between testosterone, DHEAS, Δ4-A, 17-OH-P, and SHBG concentration with the number of follicles ≥ 11 mm in diameter on the day of triggering final oocyte maturation. The secondary outcome measures included the association between androgen concentration and the number of follicles ≥ 17 mm on the day of triggering final oocyte maturation, the number of cumulus–oocyte complexes (COCs) retrieved, metaphase II (MII) oocytes, 2-pronuclei (2pn) oocytes, and the association between androgen concentration and the probability of reaching oocyte retrieval, the retrieval of ≤3 oocytes [23], and the achievement of a live birth.

4.5. Statistical Analysis

Variables were tested for normality with the Shapiro–Wilk test. Spearman correlation coefficient [coef. with 95% confidence interval (CI)], linear regression, and generalized linear model (GLM) analyses were used to investigate the association between androgen concentrations and the number of follicles on the day of triggering final oocyte maturation. Dichotomous variables were expressed as proportions (95% CI), whereas continuous variables were expressed as mean or median (95% CI), depending on the normality or not of the distribution. Statistical analyses were performed using STATA v14.0 (StataCorp., 2015, Stata Statistical Software: Release 14, College Station, TX, USA, StataCorp LP). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analyses were performed, aiming to evaluate the discriminatory value of serum androgen concentrations and binary outcomes, such as reaching oocyte retrieval, the retrieval of ≤3 oocytes, or the achievement of a live birth. A p-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

4.6. Sample Size

Sample size estimation showed that 84 patients needed to be enrolled in this study in order to detect a correlation of at least 0.30, considering that values less than 0.30 indicated a weak correlation [33,34], using a two-sided hypothesis test with 80% power and a significance level of 0.05 [35]. To account for a potential 15% dropout rate, 96 patients were recruited in the current study.

Author Contributions

J.K.B. conceived the idea of this study, contributed toward the analysis and interpretation of the data, and drafted the manuscript. C.A.V. and E.M.K. contributed to the analysis and interpretation of the data and revised the manuscript for important intellectual content. P.A., D.S., K.C., L.Z., D.G.G. and G.G. revised the manuscript for important intellectual content. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was co-financed by Greece and the European Union (European Social Fund- ESF) through the Operational Programme “Human Resources Development, Education and Lifelong Learning” in the context of the project “Reinforcement of Postdoctoral Researchers—2nd Cycle” (MIS-5033021), implemented by the State Scholarships Foundation (ΙΚΥ).

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was approved by the Ethics Committee Review Board of Papageorgiou General Hospital (protocol code D3b/30443, Thessaloniki, 19 June 2020).

Informed Consent Statement

Written consent was obtained from all patients.

Data Availability Statement

Data available upon request.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Anna Mitsoli, Katerina Mouza, and Natalia Michaleli for their help in this project.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Venetis, C.A.; Tilia, L.; Panlilio, E.; Kan, A. Is more better? A higher oocyte yield is independently associated with more day-3 euploid embryos after ICSI. Hum. Reprod. 2019, 34, 79–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Law, Y.J.; Zhang, N.; Kolibianakis, E.M.; Costello, M.F.; Keller, E.; Chambers, G.M.; Venetis, C.A. Is there an optimal number of oocytes retrieved at which live birth rates or cumulative live birth rates per aspiration are maximized after ART? A systematic review. Reprod. Biomed. Online 2021, 42, 83–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Sunkara, S.K.; Rittenberg, V.; Raine-Fenning, N.; Bhattacharya, S.; Zamora, J.; Coomarasamy, A. Association between the number of eggs and live birth in IVF treatment: An analysis of 400,135 treatment cycles. Hum. Reprod. 2011, 26, 1768–1774. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Venetis, C.A.; Kolibianakis, E.M.; Tarlatzi, T.B.; Tarlatzis, B.C. Evidence-based management of poor ovarian response. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 2010, 1205, 199–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Kyrou, D.; Kolibianakis, E.M.; Venetis, C.A.; Papanikolaou, E.G.; Bontis, J.; Tarlatzis, B.C. How to improve the probability of pregnancy in poor responders undergoing in vitro fertilization: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Fertil. Steril. 2009, 91, 749–766. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Franks, S.; Hardy, K. Androgen Action in the Ovary. Front Endocrinol. 2018, 9, 452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Neves, A.R.; Montoya-Botero, P.; Polyzos, N.P. Androgens and diminished ovarian reserve: The long road from basic science to clinical implementation. A comprehensive and systematic review with meta-analysis. Am. J. Obs. Gynecol. 2022, 227, 401–413.e18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Walters, K.A.; Rodriguez Paris, V.; Aflatounian, A.; Handelsman, D.J. Androgens and ovarian function: Translation from basic discovery research to clinical impact. J. Endocrinol. 2019, 242, R23–R50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Vendola, K.; Zhou, J.; Wang, J.; Bondy, C.A. Androgens promote insulin-like growth factor-I and insulin-like growth factor-I receptor gene expression in the primate ovary. Hum. Reprod. 1999, 14, 2328–2332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Bonser, J.; Walker, J.; Purohit, A.; Reed, M.J.; Potter, B.V.; Willis, D.S.; Franks, S.; Mason, H.D. Human granulosa cells are a site of sulphatase activity and are able to utilize dehydroepiandrosterone sulphate as a precursor for oestradiol production. J. Endocrinol. 2000, 167, 465–471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Astapova, O.; Minor, B.M.N.; Hammes, S.R. Physiological and Pathological Androgen Actions in the Ovary. Endocrinology 2019, 160, 1166–1174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Davison, S.L.; Bell, R.; Donath, S.; Montalto, J.G.; Davis, S.R. Androgen levels in adult females: Changes with age, menopause, and oophorectomy. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2005, 90, 3847–3853. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Guo, J.; Zhang, Q.; Li, Y.; Wang, W.; Yang, D. Low level of basal testosterone: A significant risk factor for poor oocyte yield after ovulation induction. Reprod. Fertil. Dev. 2016, 28, 286–292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Xiao, S.; Li, Y.; Long, L.; Luo, C.; Mai, Q. Basal serum testosterone levels correlate with ovarian reserve and ovarian response in cycling women undergoing in vitro fertilization. Gynecol. Endocrinol. 2016, 32, 51–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Fuentes, A.; Sequeira, K.; Tapia-Pizarro, A.; Munoz, A.; Salinas, A.; Cespedes, P.; Escalona, J.; Godoy, A. Androgens Profile in Blood Serum and Follicular Fluid of Women With Poor Ovarian Response During Controlled Ovarian Stimulation Reveals Differences Amongst POSEIDON Stratification Groups: A Pilot Study. Front. Endocrinol. 2019, 10, 458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Guo, J.; Zhang, Q.; Li, Y.; Huang, J.; Wang, W.; Huang, L.; Zhao, X.; Yang, D. Predictive value of androgens and multivariate model for poor ovarian response. Reprod. Biomed. Online 2014, 28, 723–732. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Meldrum, D.R.; de Ziegler, D. Introduction: Risk and safety management in infertility and assisted reproductive technology. Fertil. Steril. 2013, 100, 1497–1498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Gleicher, N.; Weghofer, A.; Kushnir, V.A.; Shohat-Tal, A.; Lazzaroni, E.; Lee, H.J.; Barad, D.H. Is androgen production in association with immune system activation potential evidence for existence of a functional adrenal/ovarian autoimmune system in women? Reprod. Biol. Endocrinol. 2013, 11, 58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Weil, S.; Vendola, K.; Zhou, J.; Bondy, C.A. Androgen and follicle-stimulating hormone interactions in primate ovarian follicle development. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 1999, 84, 2951–2956. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Qin, Y.; Zhao, Z.; Sun, M.; Geng, L.; Che, L.; Chen, Z.J. Association of basal serum testosterone levels with ovarian response and in vitro fertilization outcome. Reprod. Biol. Endocrinol. 2011, 9, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Lu, Q.; Shen, H.; Li, Y.; Zhang, C.; Wang, C.; Chen, X.; Liang, R.; Wei, L. Low testosterone levels in women with diminished ovarian reserve impair embryo implantation rate: A retrospective case-control study. J. Assist. Reprod. Genet. 2014, 31, 485–491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Abide Yayla, C.; Ozkaya, E.; Kayatas Eser, S.; Sanverdi, I.; Devranoglu, B.; Kutlu, T. Association of basal serum androgen levels with ovarian response and ICSI cycle outcome. Ir. J. Med. Sci. 2018, 187, 409–415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Ferraretti, A.P.; La Marca, A.; Fauser, B.C.; Tarlatzis, B.; Nargund, G.; Gianaroli, L. ESHRE consensus on the definition of ‘poor response’ to ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization: The Bologna criteria. Hum. Reprod. 2011, 26, 1616–1624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Papathanasiou, A. Implementing the ESHRE ‘poor responder’ criteria in research studies: Methodological implications. Hum. Reprod. 2014, 29, 1835–1838. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Venetis, C.A. The Bologna criteria for poor ovarian response: The good, the bad and the way forward. Hum. Reprod. 2014, 29, 1839–1841. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Sen, A.; Prizant, H.; Light, A.; Biswas, A.; Hayes, E.; Lee, H.J.; Barad, D.; Gleicher, N.; Hammes, S.R. Androgens regulate ovarian follicular development by increasing follicle stimulating hormone receptor and microRNA-125b expression. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2014, 111, 3008–3013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Liao, B.; Qi, X.; Yun, C.; Qiao, J.; Pang, Y. Effects of Androgen Excess-Related Metabolic Disturbances on Granulosa Cell Function and Follicular Development. Front. Endocrinol. 2022, 13, 815968. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Gervasio, C.G.; Bernuci, M.P.; Silva-de-Sa, M.F.; Rosa, E.S.A.C. The role of androgen hormones in early follicular development. ISRN Obs. Gynecol. 2014, 2014, 818010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Katsika, E.T.; Bosdou, J.K.; Goulis, D.G.; Grimbizis, G.F.; Kolibianakis, E.M. Higher live birth rate following transdermal testosterone pretreatment in poor responders: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Reprod. Biomed. Online 2023, 46, 81–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Bosdou, J.K.; Venetis, C.A.; Kolibianakis, E.M.; Toulis, K.A.; Goulis, D.G.; Zepiridis, L.; Tarlatzis, B.C. The use of androgens or androgen-modulating agents in poor responders undergoing in vitro fertilization: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum. Reprod. Update 2012, 18, 127–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Becker, C.M.; Bokor, A.; Heikinheimo, O.; Horne, A.; Jansen, F.; Kiesel, L.; King, K.; Kvaskoff, M.; Nap, A.; Petersen, K.; et al. ESHRE guideline: Endometriosis. Hum. Reprod. Open 2022, 2022, hoac009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Bosch, E.; Broer, S.; Griesinger, G.; Grynberg, M.; Humaidan, P.; Kolibianakis, E.; Kunicki, M.; La Marca, A.; Lainas, G.; Le Clef, N.; et al. ESHRE guideline: Ovarian stimulation for IVF/ICSI. Hum. Reprod. Open 2020, 2020, hoaa009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Mukaka, M.M. Statistics corner: A guide to appropriate use of correlation coefficient in medical research. Malawi Med. J. 2012, 24, 69–71. [Google Scholar]
  34. Chan, Y.H. Biostatistics 104: Correlational analysis. Singap. Med. J. 2003, 44, 614–619. [Google Scholar]
  35. Guenther, W.C. Desk Calculation of Probabilities for the Distribution of the Sample Correlation Coefficient. Am. Stat. 1977, 31, 45–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Ijms 26 01656 g001
Figure 1. Flow diagram.
Figure 1. Flow diagram.
Ijms 26 01656 g001
Ijms 26 01656 g002
Figure 2. Linear regression between serum androgen (testosterone, DHEAS, Δ4-A, and 17-OH-P) and SHBG concentrations and the number of follicles ≥ 11 mm on the day of triggering final oocyte maturation.
Figure 2. Linear regression between serum androgen (testosterone, DHEAS, Δ4-A, and 17-OH-P) and SHBG concentrations and the number of follicles ≥ 11 mm on the day of triggering final oocyte maturation.
Ijms 26 01656 g002
Ijms 26 01656 g003
Figure 3. ROC curve analysis evaluating the discriminatory value of serum androgen concentrations for the achievement of a live birth.
Figure 3. ROC curve analysis evaluating the discriminatory value of serum androgen concentrations for the achievement of a live birth.
Ijms 26 01656 g003
Ijms 26 01656 g004
Figure 4. Androgen effects on follicular growth and development.
Figure 4. Androgen effects on follicular growth and development.
Ijms 26 01656 g004
Table 1. Demographic and cycle characteristics.
Table 1. Demographic and cycle characteristics.
Patient Characteristics (n = 96)Median95% CI
Age (years)42.041.5–42.9
BMI (kg/m2)24.122.5–25.7
AFC6.05.0–7.0
AMH (ng/mL)0.80.6–1.0
Serum androgen concentration
Testosterone (ng/dL)20.418.3–24.0
DHEAS (μg/dL)170.1148.0–180.0
17-OH-P (ng/mL)0.60.5–0.6
Δ4-A (ng/mL)1.00.9–1.2
SHBG (nmol/L)55.747.0–64.6
Ovarian stimulation characteristics
Duration of stimulation (days)10.09.0–10.0
Total dose of FSH (IU)30002700–3000
Day of triggering final oocyte maturation
Number of follicles ≥ 11 mm5.04.0–5.1
Number of follicles ≥ 17 mm2.02.0–3.0
Estradiol (pg/mL)1154921–1285
IVF outcome
COCs retrieved3.02.0–4.0
MII oocytes3.02.0–3.0
2pn oocytes2.02.0–2.0
% (n)95% CI
IVF
ICSI		20.8 (16)
79.2 (61)		13.0–31.5
68.5–87.0
Patients reaching ET52.1 (50)42.0–62.0
Positive hCG test9.4 (9)4.9–17.2
Ongoing pregnancy5.2 (5)2.1–12.1
Live birth5.2 (5)2.1–12.1
BMI: body mass index; FSH: follicle-stimulating hormone; AFC: antral follicle count; AMH: anti-Mullerian hormone; DHEAS: dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate; Δ4-A: Δ4-androstenedione; 17-OH-P: 17-OH progesterone; SHBG: sex hormone-binding globulin; IVF: in vitro fertilization; ICSI: intracytoplasmic sperm injection; COCs: cumulus–oocyte complexes; MII: metaphase II oocyte; 2pn: 2-pronuclei oocyte; hCG: human chorionic gonadotrophin and ET: embryo transfer.
Table 2. Multivariable analysis with the number of follicles ≥ 11 mm on the day of triggering final oocyte maturation as the dependent variable and basal serum androgen concentration, controlling for age, BMI, AFC, and AMH, as the independent variable.
Table 2. Multivariable analysis with the number of follicles ≥ 11 mm on the day of triggering final oocyte maturation as the dependent variable and basal serum androgen concentration, controlling for age, BMI, AFC, and AMH, as the independent variable.
Androgen and SHBGCoef.p-Value95% Confidence Interval
Testosterone+0.0030.60−0.007 to +0.013
DHEAS−0.0010.30−0.002 to +0.001
17-OH-P+0.0150.89−0.197 to +0.227
Δ4-A−0.0170.91−0.300 to +0.267
SHBG+0.0020.24−0.001 to +0.005
Coef.: coefficient; DHEAS: dehydroepiandrosterone sulphate; SHBG: sex hormone-binding globulin; Δ4-A: Δ4-androstenedione; 17-OH-P: 17-OH progesterone; AFC: antral follicle count; AMH: anti-Mullerian hormone; and BMI: body mass index.
Table 3. Spearman’s correlation analysis for the association between basal androgen concentrations and the number of COCs retrieved, as well as MII and 2pn oocytes.
Table 3. Spearman’s correlation analysis for the association between basal androgen concentrations and the number of COCs retrieved, as well as MII and 2pn oocytes.
COCsMII2pn
Coefficient
p-Value
Testosterone−0.118
0.30		−0.176
0.12		−0.129
0.26
DHEAS−0.041
0.72		−0.039
0.73		+0.060
0.60
17-OH-P−0.008
0.95		−0.039
0.73		−0.103
0.37
Δ4-A−0.036
0.75		−0.070
0.54		−0.045
0.69
SHBG+0.143
0.21		+0.091
0.42		+0.010
0.93
DHEAS: dehydroepiandrosterone sulphate; SHBG: sex hormone-binding globulin; Δ4-A: Δ4-androstenedione; 17-OH-P: 17-OH progesterone; COCs: cumulus–oocyte complexes; MII: metaphase II oocyte; and 2pn: 2-pronuclei oocyte.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Bosdou, J.K.; Venetis, C.A.; Anagnostis, P.; Savvaidou, D.; Chatzimeletiou, K.; Zepiridis, L.; Goulis, D.G.; Grimbizis, G.; Kolibianakis, E.M. Association of Basal Serum Androgen Concentration with Follicles Number on the Day of Triggering Final Oocyte Maturation in Low Responders According to the Bologna Criteria: A Prospective Cohort Study. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2025, 26, 1656. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms26041656

AMA Style

Bosdou JK, Venetis CA, Anagnostis P, Savvaidou D, Chatzimeletiou K, Zepiridis L, Goulis DG, Grimbizis G, Kolibianakis EM. Association of Basal Serum Androgen Concentration with Follicles Number on the Day of Triggering Final Oocyte Maturation in Low Responders According to the Bologna Criteria: A Prospective Cohort Study. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2025; 26(4):1656. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms26041656

Chicago/Turabian Style

Bosdou, Julia K., Christos A. Venetis, Panagiotis Anagnostis, Despoina Savvaidou, Katerina Chatzimeletiou, Leonidas Zepiridis, Dimitrios G. Goulis, Grigoris Grimbizis, and Efstratios M. Kolibianakis. 2025. "Association of Basal Serum Androgen Concentration with Follicles Number on the Day of Triggering Final Oocyte Maturation in Low Responders According to the Bologna Criteria: A Prospective Cohort Study" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 26, no. 4: 1656. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms26041656

APA Style

Bosdou, J. K., Venetis, C. A., Anagnostis, P., Savvaidou, D., Chatzimeletiou, K., Zepiridis, L., Goulis, D. G., Grimbizis, G., & Kolibianakis, E. M. (2025). Association of Basal Serum Androgen Concentration with Follicles Number on the Day of Triggering Final Oocyte Maturation in Low Responders According to the Bologna Criteria: A Prospective Cohort Study. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 26(4), 1656. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms26041656

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop